Gun Violence Against Sexual and Gender Minorities in the United States | 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gun Violence Against Sexual and Gender Minorities in the United States | 1 Gun Violence Against Sexual and Gender Minorities in the United States | 1 RESEARCH THAT MATTERS GUN VIOLENCE AGAINST SEXUAL AND GENDER MINORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES: A Review of Research Findings and Needs April 2019 Adam P. Romero Ari M. Shaw Kerith J. Conron Gun Violence Against Sexual and Gender Minorities in the United States | 1 CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................................................................3 PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................................15 A. GUN VIOLENCE IN THE UNITED STATES ........................................................................................................................................... 15 B. GUN VIOLENCE AGAINST SEXUAL AND GENDER MINORITIES: THE PRESENT REPORT .............................................................. 18 C. ORGANIZATION OF THIS REPORT ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 D. FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 E. METHOD ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 SUICIDE DEATH, ATTEMPT, AND IDEATION .......................................................................................................................23 A. SUICIDE DEATH .................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 i. Suicide death in the general population ....................................................................................................................................... 23 ii. Suicide in the LGBT population ...................................................................................................................................................... 24 iii. Gun use in suicide .......................................................................................................................................................................... 25 B. SUICIDE ATTEMPT AND IDEATION .................................................................................................................................................... 27 i. Suicide attempt and ideation in the general population ............................................................................................................. 27 ii. Suicide attempt and ideation in the LGBT population ................................................................................................................ 28 iii. Gun use in suicide attempt and ideation .................................................................................................................................... 31 C. INTERVENTIONS TO REDUCE FIREARM SUICIDE DEATH, ATTEMPT, AND IDEATION IN THE LGBT POPULATION ................... 31 D. RESEARCH AND DATA NEEDS REGARDING FIREARM SUICIDALITY IN THE LGBT POPULATION ............................................... 34 INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE ............................................................................................................................................36 A. INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE IN THE GENERAL POPULATION .................................................................................................... 36 B. INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE IN THE LGBT POPULATION ........................................................................................................... 37 C. GUN USE IN INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE .................................................................................................................................... 40 D. INTERVENTIONS TO REDUCE FIREARM INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE AGAINST LGBT PEOPLE ............................................. 42 E. RESEARCH AND DATA NEEDS REGARDING FIREARM INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE AGAINST LGBT PEOPLE ....................... 43 COMMUNITY VIOLENCE .......................................................................................................................................................45 A. HATE CRIMES ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 i. Hate crimes in the United States and California .......................................................................................................................... 45 ii. Anti-LGBT hate crimes in the United States and California ........................................................................................................ 46 B. SCHOOL VIOLENCE ............................................................................................................................................................................. 48 i. School violence in the United States .............................................................................................................................................. 48 ii. Anti-LGBT school violence .............................................................................................................................................................. 48 iii. Gun use in school violence ............................................................................................................................................................ 49 C. NON-BIAS CRIMES AND STREET VIOLENCE AGAINST LGBT PEOPLE ............................................................................................. 50 D. SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST LGBT PEOPLE ..................................................................................................................................... 51 E. MASS SHOOTINGS AND SERIAL KILLINGS OF LGBT PEOPLE .......................................................................................................... 52 F. LAW ENFORCEMENT ............................................................................................................................................................................ 52 G. INTERVENTIONS TO REDUCE FIREARM COMMUNITY VIOLENCE AGAINST LGBT PEOPLE ......................................................... 54 H. RESEARCH AND DATA NEEDS REGARDING FIREARM COMMUNITY VIOLENCE AGAINST LGBT PEOPLE .................................. 56 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................................................58 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................................................................................59 Gun Violence Against Sexual and Gender Minorities in the United States | 2 About the Authors Adam P. Romero, J.D., is Arnold D. Kassoy Scholar of Law and Director of Legal Scholarship and Federal Policy at the Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law, where he is also a Lecturer-in-Law. Ari M. Shaw, Ph.D., is a political scientist focusing on international human rights and LGBT politics. Kerith J. Conron, Sc.D., M.P.H., is Blachford-Cooper Distinguished Scholar and Research Director at the Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law. About the Williams Institute The Williams Institute is dedicated to conducting rigorous, independent research on sexual orientation and gender identity law and public policy. A think tank at UCLA School of Law, the Williams Institute produces high-quality research with real-world relevance and disseminates it to judges, legislators, policymakers, media, and the public. These studies can be accessed at the Williams Institute website. Statement of Independence The Williams Institute is committed to the highest standard of independent inquiry, academic excellence, and rigor. Research findings and conclusions are never altered to accommodate other interests, including those of funders, other organizations, or government bodies and officials. Suggested Citations Romero, A. P., Shaw, A. M., & Conron, K. J. (2019). Gun Violence Involving Sexual and Gender Minorities in the United States: A Review of Research Findings and Needs. Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute. ADAM P. ROMERO, ARI M. SHAW, KERITH J. CONRON, THE WILLIAMS INST., GUN VIOLENCE INVOLVING SEXUAL AND GENDER MINORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES: A REVIEW OF RESEARCH FINDINGS AND NEEDS (2019). Acknowledgements The authors thank Akiesha Anderson for her substantial work on an early draft of this report, Adam Frankel who provided research assistance, and John Blosnich, Tisha Boyd, David Divita, Ann Haas, Sawyeh Maghsoodloo, Brian Malte, Ilan H. Meyer, Jocelyn Samuels, Alex Sheldon, and Bianca Wilson for their generous
Recommended publications
  • Business Meeting
    . PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Business Meeting . — November 19, 2020 — Please print double-sided in support of Board Policy B707 – Sustainable Use of Resources Portland Community College Board of Directors Vision Building futures for our Students and Communities . Mission Portland Community College supports student success by delivering access to quality education while advancing economic development and promoting sustainability in a collaborative culture of diversity, equity and inclusion. Core Themes • Access and Student Success • Quality Education • Economic Development and • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Sustainability . Who We Are Portland Community College is a public, multi-campus, comprehensive community college serving the lifelong learning needs of our students. We offer college transfer programs; career and technical education programs; adult basic skills; opportunities to develop English as a second language; high school completion and dual credit; community and continuing education programs; and service-learning opportunities that foster the development of civic responsibility and engagement. Through extensive partnerships with business, industry, labor, educational institutions and the public sector, we provide training and learning opportunities for the local and state workforce and promote economic and community development. We Value • Effective teaching and student development programs that prepare students for their roles as citizens in a democratic society in a rapidly changing global economy • An
    [Show full text]
  • Ongoing & Upcoming Events
    Country Pond Fish & Game Club - Newton, NH Established 1903 April 2021 www.cpfgc.com Volume 21-04 Ongoing & Upcoming Events APRIL CALENDAR (Unless otherwise indicated, all events and activities are Open to the Public) Indoor Work Parties Granite State Bowhunters Mondays, 18:00 - 20:00 Tournament Sunday, 11 April, 07:00 Indoor Archery League (CPF&G Club Members Only) New Member Orientation Tuesdays thru 13 April, 18:00 Sunday, 11 April, 10:00 (This Class is Full) Centerfire Pistol League Centerfire Pistol “Practice Plates” (CPF&G Club Members Only) Wednesdays, 3 February thru March, 17:00 (CPF&G Club Members Only) Tuesday, 13 April, 17:00 Trap Shooting Monthly Members Meeting Saturdays @ 13:00 & Sundays @ 09:00 Thursday, 15 April, 19:00 Your attendance would be appreciated. “Ladies Only” NRA Basic Pistol Shooting Course Centerfire Pistol Plate Shoot Saturday, 20 March, 08:00 Sunday, 18 April, 09:00 Centerfire Pistol Plate Shoot Sunday, 21 March, 09:00 Centerfire Pin Shoot Thursday, 22 April, 19:00 Centerfire Pin Shoot 3-Gun Thursday, 25 March, 19:00 Action Shooting Match Sunday, 25 April, 09:00 Centerfire Pistol “Practice Plates” Saturday, 27 March, 09:00 (CPF&G Club Members Only) Tuesday, 27 April, 17:00 Board of Directors Meeting Board of Directors Meeting Thursday, 1 April, 19:00 Thursday, 6 May, 19:00 Centerfire Pin Shoot NRA Basic Pistol Shooting Course Thursday, 8 April, 19:00 Saturday, 8 May, 08:00 April 2021 Trigger Times page 2 RANGE CLOSURES thru April (Hours shown are ACTUAL TIMES CLOSED) OUTDOOR RANGE INDOOR PISTOL RANGE Sunday, 21 MAR ....................
    [Show full text]
  • PERUTA; MICHELLE No
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD PERUTA; MICHELLE No. 10-56971 LAXSON; JAMES DODD; LESLIE BUNCHER, DR.; MARK CLEARY; D.C. No. CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL 3:09-cv-02371- ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, IEG-BGS Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; WILLIAM D. GORE, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Intervenor. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Irma E. Gonzalez, Senior District Judge, Presiding 2 PERUTA V. CTY. OF SAN DIEGO ADAM RICHARDS; SECOND No. 11-16255 AMENDMENT FOUNDATION; CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC.; BRETT D.C. No. STEWART, 2:09-cv-01235- Plaintiffs-Appellants, MCE-DAD v. OPINION ED PRIETO; COUNTY OF YOLO, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted En Banc June 16, 2015 San Francisco, California Filed June 9, 2016 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge and Harry Pregerson, Barry G. Silverman, Susan P. Graber, M. Margaret McKeown, William A. Fletcher, Richard A. Paez, Consuelo M. Callahan, Carlos T. Bea, N. Randy Smith and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge W. Fletcher; Concurrence by Judge Graber; Dissent by Judge Callahan; Dissent by Judge Silverman; Dissent by Judge N.R. Smith PERUTA V. CTY. OF SAN DIEGO 3 SUMMARY* Civil Rights The en banc court affirmed the district courts’ judgments and held that there is no Second Amendment right for members of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deadliest School Shooting in American History: a Dramatistic Analysis of the Virginia Tech Massacre
    Zafis 1 The Deadliest School Shooting in American History: A Dramatistic Analysis of the Virginia Tech Massacre A Senior Project presented to the Faculty of the Communication Studies Department California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts by Natalie Susanne Zafis June, 2013 © 2013 Natalie Susanne Zafis Zafis 2 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….3 Kenneth Burke and the Dramatistic Pentad…………………………………………………6 Context of the Shooting……………………………………………………………………..11 Analysis of Media Coverage………………………………………………………………..16 Initial Perceptions of an Imperfect Gun Rights Dominated Scene………………….17 The Shift in Focus from a Gun Rights Scene to a Flawed Agent…………………...19 The Development of a Counter-Scene: Gun Rights vs. Mental Illness……………..21 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………..24 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………...27 Zafis 3 Introduction April 16, 2007, marks the day of the deadliest school shooting in American history. Seung-Hui Cho murdered 32 people, wounded 17 others, and took his life at Virginia Polytechnic Institute that day. Although many critical details surrounding the event were unknown or unclear immediately after it took place, local and national media outlets published as much information as possible, even at the risk of inaccurate reporting. For example, one of the first reports published by the media after the rampage described “unimaginable horror as some students were lined up against a wall and shot” by the gunman, who was supposedly not a student and was looking for his girlfriend (Hauser & O’Connor). It was later confirmed that the shooter was 23-year-old Virginia Tech student Seung-Hui Cho, who was not only classified as mentally ill, but was also deemed “an imminent danger to self and others” by a district court in Montgomery County, Virginia, in December of 2005 (Effron).
    [Show full text]
  • The Different Components of Active Shooter Incidents: Examining the Co-Occurrence of Offender and Incident Characteristics
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects CUNY Graduate Center 2-2021 The Different Components of Active Shooter Incidents: Examining the Co-occurrence of Offender and Incident Characteristics Jeffery R. Osborne The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4168 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Running head: ACTIVE SHOOTER INCIDENTS THE DIFFERENT COMPONENTS OF ACTIVE SHOOTER INCIDENTS: EXAMINING THE CO-OCCURRENCE OF OFFENDER & INCIDENT CHARACTERISTICS by JEFFERY R. OSBORNE A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Criminal Justice in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2021 ACTIVE SHOOTER INCIDENTS ii © 2021 JEFFERY R. OSBORNE All Rights Reserved ACTIVE SHOOTER INCIDENTS iii The Different Components of Active Shooter Incidents: Examining the Co-occurrence of Offender & Incident Characteristics by Jeffery R. Osborne This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Criminal Justice in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ___________________ ____________________________________ Date C. Gabrielle Salfati Chair of Examining Committee ___________________ ____________________________________ Date Valli Rajah Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Maria R, Haberfeld Michael M. Maxfield Steven M, Gorelick John P. Jarvis THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK ACTIVE SHOOTER INCIDENTS iv ABSTRACT The Different Components of Active Shooter Incidents: Examining the Co-occurrence of Offender & Incident Characteristics by Jeffery R.
    [Show full text]
  • Backgrounder on Pistols Used in Virginia Tech Shooting
    Backgrounder on Pistols Used in Virginia Tech Shooting “[C]omparable in size and weight to the small .38 revolvers it has replaced, the…Glock 19 is significantly more powerful with greater firepower, and is much easier to shoot fast and true.” - Glock Catalog April 2007 Table of Contents Introduction...................................................................................................1 Attachment One: Catalog Copy for the Glock 19 and Walther P22 Pistols............5 Attachment Two: Background on Glock’s History from the book Making a Killing: The Business of Guns in America............................................9 Introduction The two handguns used in the Virginia Tech shooting—a 9mm Glock 19 pistol, and a 22 caliber Walther P22 pistol—stand as stark examples of the trend toward increased lethality that defines today’s gun industry. Since the mid-1980s, the gun industry has embraced increased firepower and capacity to resell the shrinking base of gun buyers in America.1 In the 1980s, a very significant shift in gun design and marketing occurred: high-capacity semiautomatic pistols became the dominant product line. Formerly, the most popular handgun design was the revolver, most often containing six shots. In 1980, semiautomatic pistols accounted for only 32 percent of the 2.3 million handguns produced in America. The majority were revolvers. By 1991 this number had reversed itself with semiautomatic pistols accounting for 74 percent of the 1.8 million handguns produced that year. Domestic Pistol and Revolver Production
    [Show full text]
  • The Guardian's Coverage of the Virginia Tech Massacre
    Through "Foreign" Eyes: The Guardian's Coverage of the Virginia Tech Massacre A thesis presented to the faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Jared D. Hargis June 2009 © 2009 Jared D. Hargis. All Rights Reserved This thesis titled Through "Foreign" Eyes: The Guardian's Coverage of the Virginia Tech Massacre by JARED D. HARGIS has been approved for the E. W. Scripps School of Journalism and the Scripps College of Communication by Bill Reader Assistant Professor of Journalism Gregory J. Shepherd Dean, Scripps College of Communication ii ABSTRACT HARGIS, JARED D., M.S., June 2009, Journalism Through "Foreign" Eyes: The Guardian's Coverage of the Virginia Tech Massacre (125 pp.) Director of Thesis: Bill Reader This thesis presents a textual analysis and a descriptive content analysis of how the British newspaper The Guardian covered the Virginia Tech school shootings that took place on 16 April 2007. Analysis of the first eight days of coverage, totaling 61 articles, added to the existing research on media coverage of school shootings by understanding how the media lens of an influential British newspaper viewed the “gun culture” of the United States. The results of this study indicate that The Guardian’s coverage suggests that the “gun culture” of the United States may be directly responsible for the Virginia Tech school shootings, and that the newspaper and its readers (via their feedback) have constructed a collective argument that such events are inevitable when guns are so readily accessible as they are in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Kamini Doobay, MD Demetre Daskalakis, MD, MPH Abdul El
    KEYNOTE SPEAKERS: KEYNOTEKamini SPEAKERS: Doobay, MD Kamini Doobay,Demetre MD Daskalakis, MD, MPH Demetre Daskalakis,Abdul El-Sayed, MD, MPH MD, PhD Abdul El-Sayed, MD, PhD Event Summary With nearly 200 attendees, we are thrilled with how the AIM Conference came together. It was empowering, engaging, and beyond what we expected. Watching so many students from various medical schools come together around one shared interest —Advocacy in Medicine— was incredibly rewarding and inspiring. Students had the opportunity to hear from leaders in the field of activism ranging from residents, nurses, and attendings, to public health officials. In the afternoon, we hosted workshops to teach tangible skills and address common areas of physician advocacy. Take a look at this short video that highlights the day we had! Our event was also covered by Vice so check out this article. Thanks again for all everyone to attended and supported this event. We look forward to hosting a conference next year and hope to see you there! Thank You to Our Funding Partners NYC Department of Health Center for Health Equity SUNY Downstate College of Medicine NYU School of Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College CUNY School of Medicine Department of Health Equity Special thank you to The New York Academy of Medicine and the NY Docs Coalition for their generous donation of expertise, time and resources. Table of Contents SKILL-BASED WORKSHOPS • Civil Disobedience • Curriculum Reform • Lobbying • Media Communications • Organizing an Action ISSUE-BASED WORKSHOPS • Abortion Access • Criminal Justice Reform • Gun Violence • Immigration & Refugee Health • LGBTQ+ Health • Opioid Epidemic • Segregated Care • Single-Payer Healthcare Thank You to Our Funding Partners NYC Department of Health Center for Health Equity SUNY Downstate College of Medicine NYU School of Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College CUNY School of Medicine Department of Health Equity Special thank you to The New York Academy of Medicine and the NY Docs Coalition for their generous donation of expertise, time and resources.
    [Show full text]
  • An Oral History Exploration of Change at the University of Kentucky Following the Virginia Tech Shooting
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Educational Policy Studies and Evaluation Educational Policy Studies and Evaluation 2019 AN ORAL HISTORY EXPLORATION OF CHANGE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY FOLLOWING THE VIRGINIA TECH SHOOTING Marianne R. L. Young University of Kentucky, [email protected] Author ORCID Identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6323-9703 Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2019.007 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Young, Marianne R. L., "AN ORAL HISTORY EXPLORATION OF CHANGE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY FOLLOWING THE VIRGINIA TECH SHOOTING" (2019). Theses and Dissertations--Educational Policy Studies and Evaluation. 62. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/epe_etds/62 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Educational Policy Studies and Evaluation at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Educational Policy Studies and Evaluation by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File.
    [Show full text]
  • I Do’ Our Pets with Their Fur Babies MARCH 22, 2018 | VOL
    Joy Geng Reflects on Decades of LGBTQ Activism Trey Pearson Finds Community Through Queer-Affirming Music March for Our Lives: Local Events Spring Pet Guide For the Love of Couples Say ‘I Do’ Our Pets With Their Fur Babies WWW.PRIDESOURCE.COM MARCH 22, 2018 | VOL. 2612 | FREE SPRING PET GUIDE ENTERTAINMENT 16 Couples Say ‘I Do’ With Their Fur Karola Wollstein (left) and Diane Stead (right) with Babies Hansi and Sylvie, their Wheaton Terriers. The couple 20 Pets and the LGBTQ Owners Who was married in June 2017. Photo courtesy of Milhem Images, Inc. Love Them COVER 22 Five Ways to Cope with the Death 24 From Christian Rock 16 For the Love of Our Pets of a Pet to Pops’s ‘Silver Horizon’ 23 May 12: Strutting Mutts Help Local Trey Pearson Finds Community NEWS Animal Shelter 16 Couples Say ‘I Do’ Through Queer-Affirming Music 4 U.S. Rep. Debbie Dingell, Vegas mass Shooting 23 Bloomfield Hills Woman Offered Survivor and Others to Attend March for Our Lives in $500K for Pet Speaker on ‘Shark Tank’ Ann Arbor with Furry Friends 4 LGBT Advocates Joining March For Our Lives in D.C. 6 Dr. Abdul El-Sayed Challenges Tradition as Gubernatorial Candidate 8 Longtime LGBTQ Activist Joy Geng Reitres, Reflects on COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS NEWS HAPPENINGS Decades of Engagement 12 Pence Criticized for Excluding Media from Breakfast with Gay Irish PM 13 Bisexual Rio Councilwoman, Human Rights Activist Killed 14 Study Examines U.S. Views on Polarizing Issues OPINION 12 Pence Criticized for Excluding Media 30 Best of LGBT Events 10 Parting Glances from Breakfast with Gay Irish PM 10 Viewpoint 11 Creep of the Week INTERVIEW LIFE 32 Statewide Events to Celebrate 24 From Christian Rock to Pop’s ‘Silver Horizon’ International Transgender Day of Visbility 26 From Film to the Stage: Melissa McKamie Refreshes 32 Joe Kort Teams Up with Modern Sex Baronness Elsa Schraeder in ‘The Sound of Music’ Therapy Institutes to Offer LGBTQ-Affirmative Therapy Certification Program 28 Worship Guide 26 Out Actress in 30 Happenings 34 Black and Pink Picks New Executive 6 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • State RKBA Websites. Last Updated: 3/23/2020 These Sites Are Listed Here As a Convenience to Our Readers
    State RKBA Websites. Last Updated: 3/23/2020 These sites are listed here as a convenience to our readers. Handgunlaw.us in no way endorses Connecticut Indiana any websites or is responsible for their content. Indiana St Rifle & Pistol Association We will not list just chat forums on this page CT Citizens Defense League The 2nd Amendment Patriots Connecticut Carry Alabama Iowa Bama Carry Delaware Iowa Firearms Coalition DE State Sportsmen's Association Iowa Gun Owners Alaska Delaware Open Carry Alaska Outdoor Council Kansas Florida Kansas State Rifle Association Am. Samoa Floridacarry.org 2nd Amendment Coalition of Florida Kentucky Arizona KY Coalition to Carry Concealed Arizona Citizens Defense League Georgia Arizona State Rifle & Pistol Assn. GeorgiaCarry.org Louisiana GeorgiaPacking.org Arkansas Georgia Gun Owners Maine California Guam Maine Gun Owners Association California Rifle & Pistol Association Gun Owners of Maine Golden State 2nd Amendment Council Hawaii Gun Owners of California Hawaii Firearms Coalition Maryland California Gun Rights Foundation Hawaii Rifle Association Maryland Shall Issue CAL-FFL Firearms Policy Coalition Idaho Massachusetts Idaho 2nd Amendment Alliance Gun Owners Action League Lawful & Responsible Gun Owners Colorado Illinois Commonwealth 2A Colorado State Shooting Association Illinois State Rifle Association Pikes Peak Firearms Coalition Illinois Carry Michigan Rocky Mountain Gun Owners Guns Save Life MCRGO Michigan Rifle & Pistol Association Michigan Open Carry Michigan Gun Owners www.handgunlaw.us 1 Minnesota New Mexico Puerto Rico Gun Owners Civil Rights Alliance New Mexico Shooting Sports Assoc. Gun Rights & Safety Association MN Gun Owners Caucus New York Rhode Island Mississippi SAFE RI Firearms Owner's League MS St Firearm Owners Association SCOPE RI 2nd Amendment Coalition NY State Rifle & Pistol Association Missouri South Carolina MO Sport Shooting Assn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trump Resistance's
    THE TRUMP RESISTANCE’S REPERTOIRE OF CONTENTION The Trump Resistance’s Rep- ertoire of Contention and its Practice of Civil Disobedience (2016-2018) Charlotte Thomas-Hébert Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne European Center for Sociology and Political Science (CESSP) France Abstract: The Resistance, formed in opposition to Donald Trump, has seen progressive groups ally in marches and ral- lies all over the United States. Yet one of its most striking fea- tures is that there have been few acts of civil disobedience. Using the tools of social movement studies and political soci- ology as well as ethnographic data, this paper investigates why breaking the law has not been a more popular form of nonvio- lent direct action, and why activists seemed to favor permitted marches at a time when civil disobedience had become if not le- gitimate, at least increasingly accepted as a democratic practice. 1 SOCIETY OF AMERICANISTS REVIEW he election of Barack Obama as well as the Great Reces- sion of 2008 marked a subsequent revival of protest poli- Ttics in the United States, with movements ranging from campaigns for better living wages such as Fight for $15, Black Lives Matter actions against police brutality and institutional racism and strikes in the public sector (Wisconsin in 2011, the Chicago teach- ers’ strike of 2012). Additional protest politics movements include the “Nonviolent Moral Fusion Direct Actions” of the Moral Mon- days in the South in 2013 and Occupy in 2011, that held public space in opposition to “corporate greed” and the financialization of the economy. If these movements have adopted different strategies and repertoires of contention, they have stayed clear of electoral politics and have criticized the legitimacy of the American political system.
    [Show full text]