One-Dimensional Fluid–Structure Interaction Models in Pressurized Fluid-Filled Pipes: a Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

One-Dimensional Fluid–Structure Interaction Models in Pressurized Fluid-Filled Pipes: a Review Review One-Dimensional Fluid–Structure Interaction Models in Pressurized Fluid-Filled Pipes: A Review David Ferras 1,* , Pedro A. Manso 2, , Anton J. Schleiss 2 and Dídia I. C. Covas 3, 1 Department of Environmental Engineering and Water Technology, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, 2611AX Delft, The Netherlands 2 Laboratory of Hydraulic Constructions (LCH), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; pedro.manso@epfl.ch (P.A.M.); anton.schleiss@epfl.ch (A.J.S.) 3 CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected] (D.F.); [email protected] (D.I.C.C.); Tel.: +31-152-151-121 (D.F.) Received: 3 September 2018; Accepted: 28 September 2018; Published: 8 October 2018 Featured Application: This research aims at providing an extensive literature review on the state-of-the-art numerical models in 1D Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI). Readers will find especially useful the novel classification of FSI models, their governing equations and associated citations supporting further reading. Abstract: The present review paper aims at collecting and discussing the research work, numerical and experimental, carried out in the field of Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI) in one-dimensional (1D) pressurized transient flow in the time-domain approach. Background theory and basic definitions are provided for the proper understanding of the assessed literature. A novel frame of reference is proposed for the classification of FSI models based on pipe degrees-of-freedom. Numerical research is organized according to this classification, while an extensive review on experimental research is presented by institution. Engineering applications of FSI models are described and historical accidents and post-accident analyses are documented. Keywords: hydraulic transients; water–hammer; fluid–structure interaction; degrees-of-freedom; junction coupling; Poisson coupling; friction coupling; Bourdon coupling. 1. Introduction The first scientific contributions to the field of Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI) in transient pipe flow took place in the 19th century when authors like [1,2] realized the need for considering both fluid compressibility and pipe-wall distensibility as interacting mechanisms. Classical water–hammer theory is also based on this principle. Since then, many researchers have added their contributions in a step-wise manner, building up and shaping the theory of hydraulic transients in pipe flow. Software in the field of hydraulic transients is developed to cope with water–hammer waves, which are pressure waves associated with a sudden momentum change of fluid flow embedded in a closed-conduit. FSI models deal with the original principle of classical water–hammer theory, i.e., the consideration of water–hammer waves as a result of the relation between fluid and pipe deformations. A milestone was presented in [3] with a PhD thesis entitled ‘An extension of the theory of water–hammer’. The basis of one-dimensional (1D) FSI was established, pipe vibration modes were described and the basic formulation for straight pipes was presented. Skalak’s work triggered the FSI research on the two-way coupling between fluid dynamics and structural mechanics. Contributions by [4–12] developed and completed the theory for all the basic degrees-of-freedom (DOF) of pipe-systems. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1844; doi:10.3390/app8101844 www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1844 2 of 33 Some historical reviews on hydraulic transients in pipe flow are given by [13–18]. The developments in water–hammer research before the 20th century are well summarized by [19]. In addition, Refs. [20,21] presented in-depth reviews that served, at that time, as vision papers. More recently, Ref. [22] presented a complete state-of-the-art review focusing on both historic and most recent research and practice covering most of the water–hammer research topics. Surveys more specific in the field of Fluid–Structure Interaction are given by [8,11,23] and, more recently, by [24]. The aim of the current review is to report the most significant contributions carried out in water–hammer research related to Fluid–Structure Interaction in 1D hydraulic transients modelling, giving emphasis on the time-domain analyses and focusing on the most recent research. A novel classification of FSI models based on pipe-degrees-of-freedom is presented. The paper starts with the basic definitions and background theory that frame the research of FSI in water–hammer modelling. Numerical and experimental research is documented following the physics-based classification of pipe degrees-of-freedom. Finally, insights of engineering applications of Fluid–Structure Interaction developments in pipe flow are pointed out. 2. Definitions and Basic Concepts 2.1. Fluid–Structure Interaction In the present review, Fluid–Structure Interaction in pipe systems is defined as the transfer of momentum and forces in both ways, between the pipe-wall and the contained fluid during unsteady flow [8]. Hence, FSI in pipe flow involves, at least, transient responses of two different physical systems. The interaction arises when the time scales of both system responses are shorter than the time scale of the overall transient event (i.e., time lag between the initial and the final steady state). If the disturbance source is shorter than both system responses, then fast fluid and solid transients simultaneously occur. If their interaction is strong enough, then the description of FSI might be worthwhile in water–hammer analyses and interaction mechanisms have to be taken into account. In a broad sense, Fluid–Structure Interaction embraces any form of energy transfer, one upon another, between the fluid and the structure. In common engineering problems, this transferred energy is typically kinetic and elastic or thermal. The former is termed mechanical Fluid–Structure Interaction and the latter thermal Fluid–Structure Interaction. Heat exchange effects in transient pipe flow are barely significant, processes are assumed adiabatic, and FSI analyses are mainly focused on the momentum exchange between the fluid and the pipe structure. Two different approaches may be followed to account for the momentum transfer into the structure [25]: considering that the structure moves as a rigid solid or by the propagation of a local excitation/deformation of the solid. In the first, no transient event is considered propagating throughout the solid, the structure element moves as a rigid body and its effect on the fluid is analysed. In the second, the modes of vibration of the structure element are excited and their respective transient states are taken into account and coupled with the fluid transient. The present review is focused only on the second form. FSI analyses may be classified according to the dimensions and the degrees-of-freedom with which the pipe system is allowed to move. Normally, in 1D water–hammer analysis, the classification criterion is based on the modes of vibration of the pipe, which is quite convenient for frequency-domain approaches. However, for time-domain analyses, a classification based on the pipe degrees-of-freedom is more physically intuitive. The latter is the classification criterion used herein. 2.2. Degrees-of-Freedom in Fluid-Filled Pipes Degrees-of-freedom (DOF) are the number of independent coordinates or parameters that describe the position or configuration of a mechanical system at any time [26]. Systems with a finite number of degrees-of-freedom are called discrete systems, and those with infinite degrees-of-freedom are called Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1844 3 of 33 continuous systems. Pipe systems are continuous systems; however, these can be treated as discrete systems for numerical modelling purposes, with many DOFs depending on the number of nodes. Pipes are slender elements; therefore, a 1D approach assuming that the fluid pressure propagates axially during hydraulic transients is reasonable. However, transient pressures transmit forces over the pipe wall that make the pipe system move in a 3D space. The basic degrees-of-freedom for a rigid body in a 3D space are three for translation (i.e., heaving, swaying and surging) and three for rotation (i.e., pitching, yawing and rolling). An infinitesimal control volume of a pipe-segment (like in Figure1) will have the referred six basic degrees-of-freedom. The pipe-wall control-volume is a hollow cylinder; therefore, axisymmetric vibration due to hoop (circumferential) strain must be considered as well, adding another degree-of-freedom. Also called pipe breathing, this degree-of-freedom has to do with the radial displacements of the pipe-wall. Additionally, the infinitesimal control volume of the 1D contained fluid accounts for another degree-of-freedom. In other words, the fluid is indeed an inner coaxial cylinder with only one degree-of-freedom in the axial direction. Henceforth, in the present 1D FSI analysis, eight degrees-of-freedom compose the infinitesimal control volume of a pipe. For each degree-of-freedom, momentum and mass conservation laws are applied, giving as a result a set of 16 partial differential equations (cf. Equations (1)–(16)), with time and space coordinates as independent variables, governing two basic dependent variables related with the loading and the movement in each degree-of-freedom (i.e., load and deformation relation). Depending on the pipe geometry, axial, shear, bending and torsional forces and displacements alternate throughout the pipe. A schematic of such displacements is shown in Figure1. Figure 1. Spatial reference system and sign convention in a straight pipe element. FSI models in 1D water–hammer analyses can be classified according to the pipe degrees-of-freedom as follows: • 1-DOF (fluid surging): only the axial fluid transient event is described. • 2-DOF (breathing): radial inertia of the fluid and the pipe are taken into account. • 3-DOF (solid surging): refers to the axial movement of the pipe. • 4-DOF (swaying): includes the effect of horizontal displacement of the pipe.
Recommended publications
  • On an Experimentum Crucis for Optics
    Research Report: On an Experimentum Crucis for Optics Ionel DINU, M.Sc. Teacher of Physics E-mail: [email protected] (Dated: November 17, 2010) Abstract Formulated almost 150 years ago, Thomas Young’s hypothesis that light might be a transverse wave has never been seriously questioned, much less subjected to experiment. In this article I report on an attempt to prove experimentally that Young’s hypothesis is untenable. Although it has certain limitations, the experiment seems to show that sound in air, a longitudinal wave, can be “polarized” by reflection just like light, and this can be used as evidence against Young’s hypothesis. Further refinements of the experimental setup may yield clearer results, making this report useful to those interested in the important issue of whether light is a transverse or a longitudinal wave. Introduction In the course of development of science, there has always been a close connection between sound and light [1]. Acoustics stimulated research and discovery in optics and vice-versa. Reflection and refraction being the first common points observed between the two, the analogy between optical and acoustical phenomena has been proven also in the case of interference, diffraction, Doppler effect, and even in their mode of production: sounds are produced by the vibration of macroscopic objects, while light is produced by vibrating molecules and atoms. The wave nature of sound implies that light is also a wave and, if matter must be present for sound to be propagated, then aether must exist in order to account for the propagation of light through spaces void of all the matter known to chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Young the Man Who Knew Everything
    Thomas Young The man Who Knew Everything Andrew Robinson marvels at the brain power and breadth of knowledge of the 18th-century polymath Thomas Young. He examines his relationship with his contemporaries, particularly with the French Egyptologist Champollion, and how he has been viewed subsequently by historians. ORTUNATE NEWTON, happy professor of natural philosophy at childhood of science!’ Albert the newly founded Royal Institution, F Einstein wrote in 1931 in his where in 1802-03 he delivered what foreword to the fourth edition of is generally regarded as the most far- Newton’s influential treatise Opticks, reaching series of lectures ever given originally published in 1704. by a scientist; a physician at a major London hospital, St George’s, for a Nature to him was an open book, quarter of a century; the secretary of whose letters he could read without the Admiralty’s Board of Longitude effort. ... Reflection, refraction, the and superintendent of its vital Nauti- formation of images by lenses, the cal Almanac from 1818 until his mode of operation of the eye, the death; and ‘inspector of calculations’ spectral decomposition and recom- for a leading life insurance company position of the different kinds of in the 1820s. In 1794, he was elected light, the invention of the reflecting a fellow of the Royal Society at the telescope, the first foundations of age of barely twenty-one, became its colour theory, the elementary theory foreign secretary at the age of thirty, of the rainbow pass by us in and turned down its presidency in procession, and finally come his his fifties.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Weirdness: a Beginner's Guide
    Quantum Weirdness: A Beginner’s Guide Dr. Andrew Robinson Part 1 Introduction The Quantum Jump 9:38 AM About Me • From Bakewell • PhD in Physical Chemistry • Worked in Berlin, Liverpool, Birmingham • In Canada since 2000 • Worked at University of Saskatchewan • Moved to Ottawa in 2010 • Teach Physics at Carleton 9:38 AM In This Lecture Series • We will talk about • What does Quantum Mean? • Quantum Effects • What are the ramifications of Quantum Theory • How Quantum Theory impacts our everyday lives • I will show a few equations, but you don’t need to know any mathematics • Please ask questions at any time 9:38 AM Books “How to Teach Quantum Physics to your Dog” by Chad Orzel “30-Second Quantum Theory” By Brian Clegg (ed.) 9:38 AM Definition of “Quantum” Physics • A discrete quantity of energy proportional in magnitude to the frequency of the radiation it represents. Legal • A required or allowed amount, especially an amount of money legally payable in damages. 9:38 AM • Quantum Satis “as much as is sufficient“ – pharmacology and medicine • Quantum Salis “the amount which is enough” • Quantum comes from the Latin word quantus, meaning "how great". Used by the German Physicist Hermann von Helmholtz ( who was also a physician) in the context of the electron (quanta of electricity) Use by Einstein in 1905 "Lichtquanta” – particle of light 9:38 AM “Quantum Jump” & “Quantum Leap” • Colloquially “A sudden large increase or advance”. • In physics “A jump between two discrete energy levels in a quantum system” (Actually a rather small leap in terms of energy!) 9:38 AM Quantum Properties in Physics • Properties which can only take certain values When you are on the ladder, you must be on one of the steps: 4 1 3 2 Quantum 2 3 Numbers 1 4 9:38 AM • Not every quantity in physics is quantized • Your height from the ground when on the slide varies continuously Maximum height Minimum9:38 AM height • Whether you can treat the system as continuous, or quantum depends on the scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Young's Research on Fluid Transients: 200 Years On
    Thomas Young's research on fluid transients: 200 years on Arris S Tijsseling Alexander Anderson Department of Mathematics School of Mechanical and Computer Science and Systems Engineering Eindhoven University of Technology Newcastle University P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU The Netherlands United Kingdom ABSTRACT Thomas Young published in 1808 his famous paper (1) in which he derived the pressure wave speed in an incompressible liquid contained in an elastic tube. Unfortunately, Young's analysis was obscure and the wave speed was not explicitly formulated, so his achievement passed unnoticed until it was rediscovered nearly half a century later by the German brothers Weber. This paper briefly reviews Young's life and work, and concentrates on his achievements in the area of hydraulics and waterhammer. Young's 1808 paper is “translated” into modern terminology. Young's discoveries, though difficult for modern readers to identify, appear to include most if not all of the key elements which would subsequently be combined into the pressure rise equation of Joukowsky. Keywords waterhammer, fluid transients, solid transients, wave speed, history, Thomas Young NOTATION c sonic wave speed, m/s p fluid pressure, Pa D internal tube diameter, m R internal tube radius, m E Young’s modulus, Pa t time, s e tube wall thickness, m v velocity, m/s f elastic limit, Pa x length, m g gravitational acceleration, m/s 2 δ change, jump h height, pressure head, m ε longitudinal strain K fluid bulk modulus, Pa ρ mass density, kg/m
    [Show full text]
  • Three Music-Theory Lessons
    Three Music-Theory Lessons The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Rehding, Alexander. 2016. “Three Music-Theory Lessons.” Journal of the Royal Musical Association 141 (2) (July 2): 251–282. doi:10.1080/02690403.2016.1216025. Published Version doi:10.1080/02690403.2016.1216025 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34220771 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP Three Music Theory Lessons ALEXANDER REHDING To make the familiar strange and the strange familiar was as much a central feature of Novalis’ conception of Romanticism as it is a mainstay of semiotics.1 In this spirit, we will begin with what seems like a mundane description of music- theoretical practice. If we enter a music theory classroom in the western world, we would normally expect to find a number of objects. We see a blackboard, ideally with five-line staffs already printed on it. We also expect a piano in the room, and we would probably have some sheet music, perhaps with the quintessential music theory teaching material: Bach chorale harmonizations. Let’s further imagine it is this passage, the simple opening line of the Lutheran hymn “Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern,” from Bach’s Cantata BWV 1, shown in Fig. 1, that is marked on the board.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackbody” Radiation
    Applications of Photonics Technologies 2019 Introduction: what is light and basic properties Cristina Masoller [email protected] www.fisica.edu.uy/~cris MÀSTER UNIVERSITARI EN ENGINYERIA DE SISTEMES AUTOMÀTICS I ELECTRÒNICA INDUSTRIAL MÀSTER UNIVERSITARI EN ENGINYERIA AERONÀUTICA MÀSTER UNIVERSITARI EN ENGINYERIA INDUSTRIAL Introducing myself • Originally from Montevideo, Uruguay • PhD in physics (lasers, Bryn Mawr College, USA 1999) • Since 2004 @ Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya • Profesora Catedratica, Physics Department, research group on Dynamics, Nonlinear Optics and Lasers • Web page: http://www.fisica.edu.uy/~cris/ Introducing our research group Dynamics, Nonlinear Optics and Lasers Senior researchers / PhD students: 11/8 Introducing our research group . Research topics: Nonlinear phenomena (photonics, biophysics, complex systems) . Lab facilities in Gaia Building, UPC Terrassa: . Website: https://donll.upc.edu 4 Learning objectives and references . To understand the basic properties of light, which will allow us to understand photonic techniques and applications. There is no required text. The slides are based on previous courses by Prof. Ramon Vilaseca (UPC Prof. Emerito), the slides of Prof. Rick Trebino (Georgia Tech, USA) and freely available material in the Optical Society (OSA) web page. 5 what is light? Particles and waves Particles are localized in space and time (classical physics). Particles have well-defined trajectories. Waves are extended in space and time. Waves have poorly defined trajectories. waves bend around corners (diffraction) Two ways in which energy is transported Point-mass interaction, which transfers energy and momentum: particles. Extended regions wherein energy is transferred by vibrations and rotations (collective motions of particles): waves. Poll Is light constituted by particles or by waves? 9 The nature of light: Huygens Huygens promoted the wave theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Young and Eighteenth-Century Tempi Peter Pesic St
    Performance Practice Review Volume 18 | Number 1 Article 2 Thomas Young and Eighteenth-Century Tempi Peter Pesic St. John's College, Santa Fe, New Mexico Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr Pesic, Peter (2013) "Thomas Young and Eighteenth-Century Tempi," Performance Practice Review: Vol. 18: No. 1, Article 2. DOI: 10.5642/perfpr.201318.01.02 Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol18/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Performance Practice Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thomas Young and Eighteenth-Century Tempi Dedicated to the memory of Ralph Berkowitz (1910–2011), a great pianist, teacher, and master of tempo. The uthora would like to thank the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation for its support as well as Alexei Pesic for kindly photographing a rare copy of Crotch’s Specimens of Various Styles of Music. This article is available in Performance Practice Review: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol18/iss1/2 Thomas Young and Eighteenth-Century Tempi Peter Pesic In trying to determine musical tempi, we often lack exact and authoritative sources, especially from the eighteenth century, before composers began to indicate metronome markings. Accordingly, any independent accounts are of great value, such as were collected in Ralph Kirkpatrick’s pioneering article (1938) and most recently sur- veyed in this journal by Beverly Jerold (2012).1 This paper brings forward a new source in the writings of the English polymath Thomas Young (1773–1829), which has been overlooked by musicologists because its author’s best-known work was in other fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Young and the Wave Theory of Light
    Thomas Young and the wave theory of light by Riad Haidar Researcher at Onera,1 lecturer at the École polytechnique Thomas Young is considered as a genius and polymath, a man who was equally gifted at languages and science. The founder of physiological optics and father of the wave theory of light, he was also the first person to decipher a number of Egyptian hieroglyphics. Figure 1: Thomas Young, 1773–1829 (portrait by Sir Thomas Lawrence, 1769–1830) He was born on 13 June 1773 in Milverton in Somerset, the son of Sarah David and Thomas Young, a cloth merchant and prosperous banker. Shortly after his birth he was entrusted to his maternal grandfather, Robert Davis, who would raise him in Minehead, a village a few miles from the family home. The young Thomas was an extraordinarily gifted pupil. He was self-taught and an avid reader, consuming books in half the time it took his tutors to read them. In 1782 he was sent to a school in Crompton where pupils were free to learn at their own pace, and which seemed better suited to his intellectual precociousness. Yet, even there, Thomas was a prodigy. He left in 1786 with a 1. [Translator’s note] Office national d’études et de recherches aérospatiales (National Office for Aerospatial Study and Research). 1 solid grounding in Newtonian physics and in optics. He spoke more than twelve European, Oriental, extinct and modern languages. MEDICAL SCHOOL In 1792 he moved to London to study medicine at the Hunterian School, and was accepted as an intern at the Saint Barthelemy Hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Electron Microscopy I. Introduction
    Transmission Electron Microscopy I. Introduction EMA 6518 EMA 6518: Transmission Electron Microscopy C. Wang • Instructors: Dr. Chunlei (peggy) Wang EC 3463 Tel: 305-348-1217, Email: [email protected] http://web.eng.fiu.edu/~wangc/ Dr. Yanqing Liu Advanced Materials Engineering Research Institute (AMERI) Tel: 305-348-1371 • Time: Mon 2:00-4:00pm • Location: MME conference room • Office hours: by appointment • Prerequisite: EMA 5507 EMA 6518: Transmission Electron Microscopy C. Wang • Reference: Transmission Electron Microscopy I: Basics II: Diffraction III: Imaging IV: Spectrometry by D.B.Williams and C.B.Carter Plenum Press, New York and London, 1996 • Grading: V 1 Written exam: 20% V Lab: 30% V Homework: 20% V Report & presentation: 30% EMA 6518: Transmission Electron Microscopy C. Wang Extremely expensive equipment! • A typical commercial TEM costs about $2 (up to $4-5) for each electron volt of energy in the beam. • Beam energy of a TEM: 100,000-40,000 eV ? • Why use electrons? • Why you need TEM to characterize materials? • Advantages and Drawbacks? EMA 6518: Transmission Electron Microscopy C. Wang Brief History • In 1801, Thomas Young passed a beam of light through two parallel slits in an opaque screen, forming a pattern of alternating light and dark bands on a white surface beyond. This led Young to reason that light was composed of waves. wave theory of light Thomas Young (1773-1829) EMA 6518: Transmission Electron Microscopy C. Wang Brief History • In 1897, J.J.Thomson discovered “corpuscles”, small particles with a charge/mass ratio more than 1000 times greater than that of protons, swarming in a see of positive charge (“plum pudding model”).
    [Show full text]
  • Young and Fresnel
    YOUNG AND FRESNEL: A CASE-STUDY INVESTIGATING THE PROGRESS OF THE WAVE THEORY IN THE BEGINNING OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY IN THE LIGHT OF ITS IMPLICATIONS TO THE HISTORY AND METHODOLOGY OF SCIENCE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY YEVGENIYA KULANDINA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY SEPTEMBER 2013 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Prof. Dr. Ahmet İnam Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Doç. Dr. Samet Bağçe Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Ahmet İnam (METU, PHIL) Doç. Dr. Samet Bağçe (METU, PHIL) Doç. Dr. Burak Yedierler (METU, PHYS) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Yevgeniya Kulandina Signature : iii ABSTRACT YOUNG AND FRESNEL: A CASE-STUDY INVESTIGATING THE PROGRESS OF THE WAVE THEORY IN THE BEGINNING OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY IN THE LIGHT OF ITS IMPLICATIONS TO THE HISTORY AND METHODOLOGY OF SCIENCE Kulandina, Yevgeniya MA, Department of Philosophy Supervisor: Doç.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Young on Fluid Mechanics
    J Eng Math (2010) 67:95–113 DOI 10.1007/s10665-009-9298-7 Thomas Young on fluid mechanics Alex D. D. Craik Received: 11 December 2008 / Accepted: 18 May 2009 / Published online: 12 June 2009 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Thomas Young was a prolific scholar who made many contributions to science, medicine and the humanities. Here, his writings on fluid mechanics are reviewed. The best known of these are on tides and on surface tension; but he did much else besides. These include his wide-ranging lectures to the Royal Institution, his rather eccentric reworking of Book 1 of Laplace’s Mécanique céleste, and papers on pneumatics and hydraulics. Among the latter are perhaps the first observation of transition to turbulence in jets of air; an empirical formula for the resistance of hydraulic flow in pipes, suggested by his own experiments with thin tubes; and probably the first, but incomplete, attempt at a theory of the hydraulic jump or bore. All of this work is characterised by sound physical insight but mathematical limitations. Keywords Cohesion and surface tension · History of fluid mechanics · Hydraulics · Tides · Water waves 1 Introduction Thomas Young (1773–1829) is rightly hailed as one of Britain’s great polymaths, his achievements recently cele- brated in Andrew Robinson’s best-selling biography The Last Man Who Knew Everything [1]. Young was a child prodigy with an indefatigable appetite for learning foreign languages, both ancient and modern, and for studying and conducting experiments on what was then called “natural philosophy”. As a Quaker, he did not attend Angli- can-dominated Oxford or Cambridge universities, but instead chose to study medicine in London and Edinburgh, Britain’s major centres for that subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Instruments of Music Theory
    Instruments of Music Theory The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Rehding, Alexander. 2016. "Instruments of Music Theory." Music Theory Online 22, no. 4. Published Version http://mtosmt.org/issues/mto.16.22.4/mto.16.22.4.rehding.html Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34391750 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUTHOR: Rehding, Alexander TITLE: Instruments of Music Theory KEYWORDS: History of Music Theory, Critical Organology, Sound Studies, Acoustics, Epistemic Thing, Pythagoras, Gaffurius, Vicentino, Cowell, monochord, archicembalo, siren, rhythmicon. ABSTRACT: This article explores musical instruments as a source for the historical study of music theory. The figure of Pythagoras and his alleged penchant for the monochord offers a way into this exploration of the theory-bearing dimensions of instruments. Musicians tend to think of instruments primarily in terms of music-making, but in other contexts instruments are, more broadly, tools. In the context of scientific experimentation, specifically, instruments help researchers come to terms with “epistemic things”—objects under scrutiny that carry specific (but as yet unknown) sources of knowledge within them. Aspects of this experimental practice can productively be transferred to the study of music theory and are explored in a two test cases from different periods of musical theorizing (and instrument building): Nicola Vicentino’s archicembalo from mid-sixteenth century Italy, and Henry Cowell’s rhythmicon from the early-twentieth century America.
    [Show full text]