Innovations in Smart Packaging Concepts for Food: an Extensive Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

foods Review Innovations in Smart Packaging Concepts for Food: An Extensive Review Emanuela Drago , Roberta Campardelli , Margherita Pettinato * and Patrizia Perego Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering (DICCA), Polytechnique School, University of Genoa, Via Opera Pia 15, 16145 Genova, Italy; [email protected] (E.D.); [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (P.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 October 2020; Accepted: 4 November 2020; Published: 7 November 2020 Abstract: Innovation in food packaging is mainly represented by the development of active and intelligent packing technologies, which offer to deliver safer and high-quality food products. Active packaging refers to the incorporation of active component into the package with the aim of maintaining or extending the product quality and shelf-life. The intelligent systems are able to monitor the condition of packaged food in order to provide information about the quality of the product during transportation and storage. These packaging technologies can also work synergistically to yield a multipurpose food packaging system. This review is a critical and up-dated analysis of the results reported in the literature about this fascinating and growing field of research. Several aspects are considered and organized going from the definitions and the regulations, to the specific functions and the technological aspects regarding the manufacturing technologies, in order to have a complete overlook on the overall topic. Keywords: food safety; food product shelf-life; packaging technologies; polymers packaging; additives; sensors; nanocomposites 1. Introduction Traditional food packages are passive barriers designed to delay the adverse effects of the environment on the food product [1]. Modern food packages, instead, besides the passive role of containment, protection, and marketing of the product are characterized by an active function that allows packages to play a dynamic role in food preservation (during processing and storage), retaining the safety and quality of food throughout the distribution chain [2]. In other terms, the key safety objective for traditional packaging materials coming in contact with food is to be as inert as possible; whereas the innovative packaging systems concepts are based on the useful interaction between packaging and the environment inside, to provide active protection to the food [3]. Many terms are used to describe innovative packaging technologies such as “active”, “interactive”, “smart”, “clever”, “intelligent”, “indicators”, etc. [4]. These terms often lack in a clear definition and are interchangeable in some literature. Therefore, it is important to differentiate their meanings [5]. Intelligent and active packaging are two very different concepts united by the fact of having started a new way of conceiving food packaging. The main difference is that intelligent packaging does not act directly on food with any action other than monitoring the condition of the packaged product, while active packaging acts on the environment surrounding food to increase the shelf-life. Therefore, active packaging is the component that takes some action, while intelligent packaging is the component that senses and shares the information [6]. Intelligent and active packaging can, almost inevitably, work in synergy to create what is called a “smart” packaging [7]. Foods 2020, 9, 1628; doi:10.3390/foods9111628 www.mdpi.com/journal/foods Foods 2020, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 41 Foods 2020, 9, 1628 2 of 42 injection molding, injection stretch blow molding, casting, blown film, thermoforming, foaming, blending,Considering and compounding. the manufacturing The active techniques componen for innovativet can be directly packaging incorporated production, in the ithas polymer- to be consideredbased package that mostmatrix of and/or the time film the otherwise package is sachet produceds and in pads the conventionalcan be inserted way in such the aspackage. extrusion, The injectionintelligent molding, component injection can be stretch instead blow integrated molding, in casting,the primary blown or secondary film, thermoforming, packaging. However, foaming, blending,also polymer and compounding.packaging manufacturing The active component innovations can are be interesting, directly incorporated in order to in follow the polymer-based the progress packageemerging matrix in packaging and/or film composition otherwise sachetsand structure. and pads can be inserted in the package. The intelligent componentFrom cana market be instead point integratedof view, the in position the primary covered or secondary by active packaging.and intelligent However, packaging also in polymer Europe packagingis far behind manufacturing foreign markets, innovations in particular are interesting, Japan, USA in orderand Australia, to follow thewhere progress these emergingproducts are in packagingwidely commercialized composition and [8]. structure. This lag was often attributed to inadequate and very strict European regulationFrom a of market food pointpackaging of view, [9]. the To positiondate, the covered only regulation by active andentirely intelligent dedicated packaging to intelligent in Europe and isactive far behind materials foreign for markets, food inpackaging particular is Japan, Regulation USA and 450/2009 Australia, [10], where which these productsestablishes are widelyspecific commercializedrequirements on [8 ].the This use lag and was authorization often attributed of active to inadequate and intelligent and very materials strict European as materials regulation intended of foodto come packaging into contact [9]. To with date, foods. the only regulation entirely dedicated to intelligent and active materials for foodThe packaging aim of this is Regulationreview is to 450 present/2009 [10an], overview which establishes of recent specificinnovations requirements in food packaging on the use andwith authorizationthe objective ofof activeproviding and intelligentclear definitions materials and as classifications materials intended of each to comekind of into active contact and with intelligent foods. packaging,The aim and of thisrelated review manufacturing is to present technologies an overview up of to recent commercial innovations applications. in food A packaging comprehensive with thediagram objective of all of providingthe categories clear of definitions active and and intelligent classifications packaging of each detailed kind ofin activethis work and is intelligent shown in packaging,Figure 1, from and related which manufacturingit is also possible technologies to deduce up the to commercialdifferent function applications. that these A comprehensive two types of diagrampackaging of allperform the categories with resp ofect active to packaged and intelligent foods. packaging detailed in this work is shown in Figure1, from which it is also possible to deduce the di fferent function that these two types of packaging perform with respect to packaged foods. Figure 1. Active and Intelligent packaging classification and their main properties. 2. Definition and Regulatory Aspects Figure 1. Active and Intelligent packaging classification and their main properties. In Europe, active and intelligent packaging must be in agreement with the Legislation about food-contact materials, which includes the evaluation of the overall migration limits (OMLs), specific 2. Definition and Regulatory Aspects migration limits (SMLs) and toxicological properties. In particular, the Regulation 1935/2004/EC [11] establishesIn Europe, in art. active 3 that anyand material intelligent or articlepackaging intended must to be come in agreement into contact with directly the orLegislation indirectly about with foodfood-contact shall be manufactured materials, which in compliance includes the with evaluation good manufacturing of the overall practice, migration in suchlimits a (OMLs), way that specific under themigration normal andlimits foreseeable (SMLs) and conditions, toxicological their properties. constituents In do particular, not migrate the toward Regulation food 1935/2004/EC in quantities that [11] couldestablishes represent in art. a risk 3 that of human any material health thator article could in changetended food to come composition into contact or that directly could or deteriorate indirectly foodwith organoleptic food shall be properties. manufactured National in compliance and International with good regulations, manufacturing specific practice, for categories in such of a materials way that areunder available, the normal among and them foreseeable Regulations conditions, (EU No. thei 10/r2011 constituents [12] and Regulationdo not migrate (EU) toward 2016/1416 food [13 ],in amendingquantities andthat correcting could represent the former, a risk are of ofhuman particular health interest that could in the change field of food packaging. composition In addition, or that thecould Regulation deteriorate 1935 food/2004 organoleptic/EC in article properties. 4 regulates National the labeling and International which must regulations, indicate that specific the parts for arecategories non-edible of materials and that are intelligent available, materials among them shall notRegulations give information (EU No. 10/2011 about the [12] condition and Regulation of the Foods 2020, 9, 1628 3 of 42 food which could mislead consumers [11]. The Commission Regulation 450/2009/EC [10] specifically deals with active and intelligent materials and
Recommended publications
  • Seaweed Polysaccharide in Food Contact Materials (Active Packaging, Intelligent Packaging, Edible Films, and Coatings)

    Seaweed Polysaccharide in Food Contact Materials (Active Packaging, Intelligent Packaging, Edible Films, and Coatings)

    foods Review Seaweed Polysaccharide in Food Contact Materials (Active Packaging, Intelligent Packaging, Edible Films, and Coatings) Kalpani Y. Perera 1,2,† , Shubham Sharma 1,2,†, Dileswar Pradhan 1,2,†, Amit K. Jaiswal 1,2,* and Swarna Jaiswal 1,2 1 School of Food Science and Environmental Health, College of Sciences and Health, Technological University Dublin—City Campus, Central Quad, Grangegorman, Dublin D07 ADY7, Ireland; [email protected] (K.Y.P.); [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (D.P.); [email protected] (S.J.) 2 Environmental Sustainability and Health Institute (ESHI), Technological University Dublin—City Campus, Grangegorman, Dublin D07 H6K8, Ireland * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally. Abstract: Food contact materials (FCMs) are materials that come in contact with food products such as food packaging which play a significant role in the food quality and safety. Plastic, which is a major food packaging material, harms the eco-system, wildlife, and the environment. As a result, numerous researches have been in progress on alternative polymers, which has similar properties as plastic but is also environmentally friendly (biodegradable). In recent years, the utilization of seaweed polysaccharides has piqued interest due to its biodegradability, non-toxicity, antioxidant capabilities, and excellent film formation ability. However, it has a number of drawbacks such as low tensile strength, water solubility, and moderate antibacterial characteristics, among others. The Citation: Perera, K.Y.; Sharma, S.; addition of other biopolymers, nanoparticles, or natural active agents improves these features. In Pradhan, D.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Jaiswal, S. this review article, we have summarized the current state of seaweed polysaccharide research in Seaweed Polysaccharide in Food active packaging, intelligent packaging, edible films, and coatings.
  • FDA Compliance and Printing Inks Often Printers Have Questions

    FDA Compliance and Printing Inks Often Printers Have Questions

    FDA Compliance and Printing Inks Often Printers have questions concerning the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and compliance of the inks used to print on food packaging applications. The FDA permits the use of inks (e.g. solvent base, water base and UV) as components of food packaging under certain conditions. Several items must be understood before one can determine if a printing ink is suitable for use on food packaging applications: “Direct Food Additives” are substances directly and intentionally added to foods, including, but not limited to, ingredients, preservatives, colors and stabilizers. “Indirect Food Additives” generally refer to substances that are not intended to, but can become, components of food as a result of use in articles that contact food (e.g. ink on food packaging applications). Both “Direct and Indirect Food Additives” require complex petitions and filings with the FDA that can be very costly, burdensome and time consuming. Nazdar inks are not designed to be and are not approved as Direct or Indirect Food Additives. However, if an ink on food packaging applications is not expected to become a component of the food under its intended conditions of use, it is not a food additive by definition and, therefore, may be used without the need to obtain any FDA clearance. A properly conducted migration study is considered to be a sound basis for concluding that the substance is not a food additive. This study should be performed in accordance with FDA’s guidance document, entitled; Preparation of Food Contact Notifications and Food Additive Petitions for Food Contact Substances: Chemistry Recommendations https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry- preparation-premarket-submissions-food-contact-substances-chemistry Another method of concluding that a substance is not a food additive is the use of a functional barrier.
  • Packaging Food and Dairy Products for Extended Shelf-Life Active Packaging: Films and Coatings for Ex- 426 Shelf Life, ESL Milk and Case-Ready Meat

    Packaging Food and Dairy Products for Extended Shelf-Life Active Packaging: Films and Coatings for Ex- 426 Shelf Life, ESL Milk and Case-Ready Meat

    Packaging Food and Dairy Products for Extended Shelf-Life Active packaging: Films and coatings for ex- 426 shelf life, ESL milk and case-ready meat. In the last two years, there tended shelf life. Paul Dawson*, Clemson University. has been substantial growth in extended shelf life milk packaged in sin- gle serve PET or HDPE containers. The combination of ESL processing Shelf life encompasses both safety and quality of food. Safety and and a plastic container results in an extended shelf life of 60 to 90 days, spoilage-related changes in food occur by three modes of action; bi- and at the same time provides consumers with the attributes they are ological (bacterial/enzymatic), chemical (autoxidation/pigments), and demanding from the package: convenience, portability, and resealabil- physical. Active packaging may intervene in the deteriorative reactions ity. The second example of how polymers are part of the solution to by; altering the package film permeability, selectively absorbing food extend shelf life is focused on case-ready beef. Here, a combination of components or releasing compounds to the food. The focus of this re- a polymer with the appropriate gas barrier and a modified atmosphere port will consider research covering impregnated packaging films that re- allows beef to retain its bright red color longer, extending its shelf life. lease compounds to extend shelf life. The addition of shelf life extending Plastics are increasingly used in food packaging and will be part of the compounds to packaging films rather than directly to food can be used future of extended shelf life products. to provide continued inhibition for product stabilization.
  • 4 Active Packaging in Polymer Films M.L

    4 Active Packaging in Polymer Films M.L

    4 Active packaging in polymer films M.L. ROONEY 4.1 Introduction Polymers constitute either all or part of most primary packages for foods and beverages and a great deal of research has been devoted to the introduction of active packaging processes into plastics. Plastics are thermoplastic polymers containing additional components such as antioxidants and processing aids. Most forms of active packaging involve an intimate interaction between the food and its package so it is the layer closest to the food that is often chosen to be active. Thus polymer films potentially constitute the position of choice for incorporation of ingredients that are active chemically or physically. These polymer films might be used as closure wads, lacquers or enamels in cans and as the waterproof layer in liquid cartonboard, or as packages in their own right. The commercial development of active packaging plastics has not occurred evenly across the range of possible applications. Physical processes such as microwave heating by use of susceptor films and the generation of an equilibrium modified atmosphere (EMA) by modification of plastics films have been available for several years. Research continues to be popular in both these areas. Chemical processes such as oxygen scavenging have been adopted more rapidly in sachet form rather than in plastics. Oxygen scavenging sachets were introduced to the Japanese market in 1978 (Abe and Kondoh, 1989) whereas the first oxygen-scavenging beer bottle closures were used in 1989 (see Chapter 8). The development of plastics active packaging systems has been more closely tied to the requirements of particular food types or food processes than has sachet development.
  • Food Brochure Audion

    Food Brochure Audion

    //// F O O D PACKAGING SOLUTIONS THE STORY OF AUDION Audion Elektro B.V. was established in 1947 in Amsterdam. In the fifties the company started to focus on manufacturing sealing machines besides the trading business. In the past decades Audion has grown to become a leading name in the packaging industry. Today, with a worldwide dealer network, Audion is represented in more than 65 countries throughout the world. Audion packaging machines are characterised by outstanding quality. By keeping control over the development and production of the machines in the Netherlands and Germany, Audion has ma- naged to stay flexible and customer oriented. The service Audion provides is regarded as a decisive advantage by our customers. Short delivery times of machines, parts and accessories and innovative solutions to diverse packaging problems are important qualities that distinguish Audion in the industry. With Audion, you have a large choice of packaging machines that meet your production requirements. The experience and expertise accumulated over the years, in finding solutions for customers, is unique. The extensive machine range on our website (audion.com) shows that there’s a solution for every packaging problem. Together we make the perfect package. Audion, Groenburgwal 31, Amsterdam Established 1947 |||| FOOD MARKETS |||| |||| |||| |||| |||| E-FULFILLMENT |||| MEDICAL / PHARMA / HIGH-TECH |||| PARTS MARKETS |||| |||| |||| |||| FOOD MAGNETA 300 GPS If we speak about a machine which Hygienic stainless steel machine made for has proven itself! The Magneta is a user the food/retail industry. friendly and low maintenance impulse The GPS range consists of versatile systems sealer. The Magneta range consists of a to pack and present your deli products in SEALING complete range with different sized mo- the best possible way.
  • Radiation Processing for Safe, Shelf-Stable and Ready-To-Eat Food

    Radiation Processing for Safe, Shelf-Stable and Ready-To-Eat Food

    IAEA-TECDOC-1337 Radiation processing for safe, shelf-stable and ready-to-eat food Proceedings of a final Research Co-ordination Meeting held in Montreal, Canada, 10–14 july 2000 January 2003 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Food and Environmental Protection Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria RADIATION PROCESSING FOR SAFE, SHELF-STABLE AND READY-TO-EAT FOOD IAEA, VIENNA, 2003 IAEA-TECDOC-1337 ISBN 92–0–100703–5 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2003 Printed by the IAEA in Austria January 2003 FOREWORD The increasingly busy lifestyles of populations in many countries have driven the demand for safe, convenient and ready-to-eat food. Traditional food processes such as drying, canning or refrigeration offer a partial solution to this demand as the sensory quality of such food may be significantly affected or the products may be contaminated by pathogenic bacteria during preparation. For developing countries, safe shelf-stable food without the need for refrigeration would offer advantages. In addition, the increasing number of immuno-compromised populations in many countries requires a new approach to food safety to meet their needs. Irradiation offers a potential to enhance microbiological safety and quality of food through shelf-life extension. The benefits of irradiation as a sanitary treatment of many types of food are well known, some of which are applied commercially in several countries. Little data were available, however, on the effect of irradiation on minimally processed food and composite food including prepared meals. A Co-ordinated Research Project (CRP) on the Development of Safe, Shelf-Stable and Ready-to-Eat Food through Radiation Processing therefore was implemented by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture in 1996 to evaluate the role of irradiation for such food.
  • International Journal of Food Microbiology 291 (2019) 189–196

    International Journal of Food Microbiology 291 (2019) 189–196

    International Journal of Food Microbiology 291 (2019) 189–196 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Food Microbiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijfoodmicro Biopreservation potential of antimicrobial protein producing Pediococcus spp. towards selected food samples in comparison with chemical T preservatives ⁎ Sinosh Skariyachan , Sanjana Govindarajan R & D Centre, Department of Biotechnology, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, Bangalore-560 078, Karnataka, India ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The present study elucidates biopreservation potential of an antimicrobial protein; bacteriocin, producing Pediococcus spp. Pediococcus spp. isolated from dairy sample and enhancement of their shelf life in comparison with two chemical Biopreservation preservatives. The antimicrobial protein producing Pediococcus spp. was isolated from selected diary samples Chemical preservative and characterised by standard microbiology and molecular biology protocols. The cell free supernatant of Microbiological quality Pediococcus spp. was applied on the selected food samples and monitored on daily basis. Antimicrobial potential Enhanced shelf life of the partially purified protein from this bacterium was tested against clinical isolates by well diffusion assay. Antimicrobial potential The preservation efficiency of bacteriocin producing isolate at various concentrations was tested against selected food samples and compared with two chemical preservatives such as sodium sulphite and sodium benzoate. The bacteriocin was partially purified and the microbiological qualities of the biopreservative treated food samples were assessed. The present study suggested that 100 μg/l of bacteriocin extract demonstrated antimicrobial potential against E. coli and Shigella spp. The treatment with the Pediococcus spp. showed enhanced preservation at 15 mL/kg of selected samples for a period of 15 days in comparison with sodium sulphite and sodium benzoate.
  • Concept of Hurdle Technology for Food Safety of Food Products of Animal Origin

    Concept of Hurdle Technology for Food Safety of Food Products of Animal Origin

    ACTA SCIENTIFIC MICROBIOLOGY (ISSN: 2581-3226) Volume 3 Issue 11 November 2020 Review Article Concept of Hurdle Technology for Food Safety of Food Products of Animal Origin Anita Chappalwar1, Vikas Pathak2, Meena Goswami3*, Raghvendra Received: July 10, 2020 Mishra1 and Prashant Singh1 Published: October 30, 2020 1PhD Scholar Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary © All rights are reserved by Meena Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India Goswami., et al. 2Professor and Head, Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India 3Assistant Professor, Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India *Corresponding Author: Meena Goswami, Assistant Professor, Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India. Abstract Foods obtained by animals like milk and meat products are highly perishable and very prone to different physic-chemical and microbial spoilage. These are nutritionally dense food with higher amount of moisture and other nutrients, hence provide conducive environment for growth of microorganisms. Hurdle technology deliberately combines existing and new preservation techniques to establish a series of preservative factors that can achieve multi-target, mild but reliable preservation effects against microbial spoilage of food.
  • Amcor/Bemis: Flexible Medical Packaging Overlaps Draw DOJ Scrutiny

    Amcor/Bemis: Flexible Medical Packaging Overlaps Draw DOJ Scrutiny

    Vol. 6 No. 400 November 9, 2018 Amcor/Bemis: Flexible Medical Packaging Overlaps Draw DOJ Scrutiny Deal Update DOJ staff attorneys investigating Amcor’s proposed $5.2 billion purchase of packaging rival Bemis (BMS) have keyed in on two healthcare product lines in which the merging parties overlap, sources familiar with the matter said. The deal would combine two of the three dominant producers of coated TyVek, a breathable medical packaging film that can be sterilized. The tie-up would also join two significant U.S. converters of vented medical bags. DOJ staff has interviewed industry participants about these overlaps as recently as two weeks ago, the sources said. Given market shares and competitive dynamics, the merging firms’ overlap in coated TyVek raises a more significant antitrust issue than the vented medical bag overlap, industry sources said. Reflecting this dynamic, sources said that over time, DOJ interviews have become more focused on coated TyVek, to the exclusion of vented medical bags. The merging parties also overlap in food packaging, but these markets are generally fragmented and characterized by a more robust competitive environment than their medical counterparts. Amcor and Bemis, who announced their deal on August 6, have not disclosed the receipt of a DOJ second request. Spokespeople for Amcor and the DOJ declined to comment. Bemis did not respond to requests for comment. Coated flexible medical packaging. Amcor and Bemis both produce various types of sterile flexible medical packaging, which is sold to medical device manufacturers to protect medical equipment and devices ultimately sold to hospital groups and doctors.
  • Food Packaging Technology

    Food Packaging Technology

    FOOD PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY Edited by RICHARD COLES Consultant in Food Packaging, London DEREK MCDOWELL Head of Supply and Packaging Division Loughry College, Northern Ireland and MARK J. KIRWAN Consultant in Packaging Technology London Blackwell Publishing © 2003 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered Editorial Offices: trademarks, and are used only for identification 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ and explanation, without intent to infringe. Tel: +44 (0) 1865 776868 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK First published 2003 Tel: +44 (0) 1865 791100 Blackwell Munksgaard, 1 Rosenørns Allè, Library of Congress Cataloging in P.O. Box 227, DK-1502 Copenhagen V, Publication Data Denmark A catalog record for this title is available Tel: +45 77 33 33 33 from the Library of Congress Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton South, British Library Cataloguing in Victoria 3053, Australia Publication Data Tel: +61 (0)3 9347 0300 A catalogue record for this title is available Blackwell Publishing, 10 rue Casimir from the British Library Delavigne, 75006 Paris, France ISBN 1–84127–221–3 Tel: +33 1 53 10 33 10 Originated as Sheffield Academic Press Published in the USA and Canada (only) by Set in 10.5/12pt Times CRC Press LLC by Integra Software Services Pvt Ltd, 2000 Corporate Blvd., N.W. Pondicherry, India Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA Printed and bound in Great Britain, Orders from the USA and Canada (only) to using acid-free paper by CRC Press LLC MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall USA and Canada only: For further information on ISBN 0–8493–9788–X Blackwell Publishing, visit our website: The right of the Author to be identified as the www.blackwellpublishing.com Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
  • Oxygen-Reducing Enzymes in Coatings and Films for Active Packaging |

    Oxygen-Reducing Enzymes in Coatings and Films for Active Packaging |

    Kristin Johansson | Oxygen-reducing enzymes in coatings and films for active packaging | | Oxygen-reducing enzymes in coatings and films for active packaging Kristin Johansson Oxygen-reducing enzymes in coatings and films for active packaging Oxygen-reducing enzymes This work focused on investigating the possibility to produce oxygen-scavenging packaging materials based on oxygen-reducing enzymes. The enzymes were incorporated into a dispersion coating formulation applied onto a food- in coatings and films for packaging board using conventional laboratory coating techniques. The oxygen- reducing enzymes investigated included a glucose oxidase, an oxalate oxidase active packaging and three laccases originating from different organisms. All of the enzymes were successfully incorporated into a coating layer and could be reactivated after drying. For at least two of the enzymes, re-activation after drying was possible not only Kristin Johansson by using liquid water but also by using water vapour. Re-activation of the glucose oxidase and a laccase required relative humidities of greater than 75% and greater than 92%, respectively. Catalytic reduction of oxygen gas by glucose oxidase was promoted by creating 2013:38 an open structure through addition of clay to the coating formulation at a level above the critical pigment volume concentration. For laccase-catalysed reduction of oxygen gas, it was possible to use lignin derivatives as substrates for the enzymatic reaction. At 7°C all three laccases retained more than 20% of the activity they
  • Active and Intelligent Packaging

    Active and Intelligent Packaging

    Paper No.: 12 Paper Title: FOOD PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY Module – 25: Active and Intelligent Packaging 1. Introduction: For a long time packaging also had an active role in processing and preservation of quality of foods. Variations in the way food products are produced, circulated, stored and sold, reflecting the continuing increase in consumer demand for improved safety, quality and shelf- life for packaged foods are assigning greater demands on the performance of food packaging. Consumers want to be assured that the packaging is fulfilling its function of protecting the quality, freshness and safety of foods. Thus, advances in food packaging are both anticipated and expected. Society is becoming increasingly complex and innovative packaging is the outcome of consumers' demand for packaging that is more advanced and creative than what is currently offered. “Active packaging” and “intelligent packaging” are the result of innovating thinking in packaging. Active packaging can be defined as “Packaging in which supplementary constituents have been deliberately added in or on either the packaging material of the package headspace to improve the performance of the package system”. In simple terms, Active packaging is an extension of the protection purpose of a package and is commonly used to protect against oxygen and moisture. It permits packages to interact with food and environment. Thus, play a dynamic role in food preservation. Developments in active packaging have led to advances in many areas, like delayed oxidation and controlled respiration rate, microbial growth and moisture migration. Other active packaging technologies include carbon dioxide absorbers/emitters, odour absorbers, ethylene removers, and aroma emitters. On the other hand, intelligent packing can be defined as “Packaging that has an external or internal indicator to provide information about characteristics of the history of the package and/or the quality of the food packed”.