DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Appraisal Report CDC/11.01 SOS005C/009A/30CA Chichester

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Appraisal Report CDC/11.01 SOS005C/009A/30CA Chichester Form FCERM 2: Flood risk management scheme − application for grant funding Project appraisal report Authority scheme reference CDC/11.01 National project number SOS005C/009A/30CA Authority applying for a grant Chichester District Council Scheme name Selsey, Bracklesham and East Wittering Beach Management Plan. 2016-2021 1. Shingle Losses around Selsey Bill between 2003 and 2. Shingle losses at East Wittering between 2004 and 2014 (Channel Coastal Observatory, 2014) 2014 (Channel Coastal Observatory, 2014) 4. Breastwork failure at East Wittering as a result of 3. Overtopping at Selsey East Beach 14th December 2012 undermining due to low beach levels 6th January 2014 FCERM 2 Version 1, January 2016 page 1 Form FCERM 2: Flood risk management scheme − application for grant funding Project appraisal report for Selsey, Bracklesham and East Wittering Beach Management Plan 2016- 2021 Version Status Signed off by Date signed Date issued 01 Draft FCERM 2 Version 1, January 2016 page 2 Form FCERM 2: Flood risk management scheme − application for grant funding 1 Contents 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................5 1.1 Introduction and Background..............................................................................................................5 1.2 Problem...............................................................................................................................................6 1.3 Options Considered ............................................................................................................................6 1.4 Preferred Option .................................................................................................................................6 1.5 Recommendation..............................................................................................................................10 1.6 Briefing Paper ...................................................................................................................................10 1.7 Key Plans..........................................................................................................................................12 2 Introduction and background .................................................................................................................18 2.1 Purpose of this Report ......................................................................................................................18 2.2 Background.......................................................................................................................................18 2.3 Current Approach to Flood & Erosion Risk Management.................................................................23 3 Problem definition and objectives..........................................................................................................24 3.1 Outline of the problem.......................................................................................................................24 3.2 Consequence of Doing Nothing........................................................................................................24 3.3 Strategic Issues ................................................................................................................................26 3.4 Key Constraints.................................................................................................................................26 3.5 Objectives .........................................................................................................................................26 4 Options for Managing Flood and Erosion Risks...................................................................................28 4.1 Potential FCERM Measures .............................................................................................................28 4.2 Lond List of Options..........................................................................................................................28 4.3 Options rejected at the preliminary stage .........................................................................................28 4.4 Options Shortlisted for Appraisal ......................................................................................................28 5 Options Appraisal and Comparison.......................................................................................................29 5.1 Technical Issues ...............................................................................................................................29 5.2 Environmental Assessment ..............................................................................................................29 5.3 Social and Community Impacts ........................................................................................................30 5.4 Option Costs .....................................................................................................................................30 6 Selection and details of the prefered option .........................................................................................32 6.2 Sensitivity Testing .............................................................................................................................32 6.3 Details of the Preferred Option .........................................................................................................32 7 Implementation.........................................................................................................................................35 7.1 Project Planning................................................................................................................................35 7.2 Delivery Risks ...................................................................................................................................35 7.3 Please read through this form and the guidance notes that came with it. Please write clearly in the answer spaces............................................................................................................................37 7.4 only ...................................................................................................................................................40 FCERM 2 Version 1, January 2016 page 3 Form FCERM 2: Flood risk management scheme − application for grant funding Approval History sheet 1 Review Project title Selsey, Bracklesham and East Wittering Beach Management Plan yrs. 2016-2021 Authority project code Date of PAR January 2016 Lead authority Chichester District Council Consultant Royal Haskoning DHV Version number 01 Job title Name Signature Date Senior Engineer David Lowsley ‘I have reviewed this document and confirm that this project meets our quality assurance requirements, all of the required environmental obligations and Defra investment appraisal conditions. I confirm that all internal approvals, including member approval, have been completed for this project and recommend we apply to the Environment Agency for a capital grant of £ 1,250,000 Authority Project Executive Alison Stevens ‘I have reviewed this document and confirm that it meets the current PAR guidelines for local authority and Internal Drainage Board applications.’ PAR reviewer ‘I confirm that I have consulted with the Director of Business Finance and that we are ready to send the project for assurance.’ Area Flood Risk Manager NPAS Assurance Projects <£10m Large project review group (LPRG) Projects (Tick the appropriate box) >£10m Recommended for approval Date Version number (Lead Assurer or NPAB Chair) Capital grant of £ 2 Project approval Financial Scheme of Delegation (FSoD approval): Limit Approval Over £20m Chief Executive in consultation with Executive Director of Operations and Director of Business Finance Up to £20m Executive Director of Operations and Director of Business Finance Up to £10m Director of Operations and Director of Business Finance Up to £1m Area Manager and Director of Business Finance Up to £100k of combined FCERM GiA and Local Levy expenditure (and with a total Area FCRM Manager even if the project value is greater than £100k project value below £1m) (but less than £1m) including contributions from other parties Name Date Name Date Name Date 3 Defra approval Date sent to Defra (or write N/A) Version number (if different) Date approved by Defra (or write N/A) Comments FCERM 2 Version 1, January 2016 page 4 Form FCERM 2: Flood risk management scheme − application for grant funding 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction and Background 1.1.1 This application seeks FDGiA to continue the successful work that has been carried out over the past 5 years under the first tranche (2011-2016) of the Selsey, Bracklesham and East Witteering BMP and this project should be viewed as a second tranche of work required to maintain the momentum of improving beach conditions in the longer term. As with the first tranche, this project covers the open coastal frontages of Selsey and Bracklesham / East Wittering, but for the period 2016-2021. The plan excludes the low-lying Medmerry coastal frontage, which divides the two. These frontages are located on the coastline of the Manhood Peninsula, south of Chichester, between Pagham Harbour and Chichester Harbour, West Sussex (see Plan 1, Section 1.7). The Selsey coastal frontage is 5.1km long and Bracklesham
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SC1: South Coast Shoreline
    Overall Character THE WEST SUSSEX LANDSCAPE Land Management Guidelines This long narrow Character Area extends between West Wittering and Shoreham and comprises the majority of the West Sussex coastline. It is a distinctive low, open and exposed landscape which has an overriding visual and physical association with the sea. Its wide and gently curved bays are further defined by the protruding shingle headland of Selsey Bill, and the chalk headland of Beachy Head in neighbouring East Sussex. This is a dynamic character area whose key characteristics are linked by coastal evolution, weather and tides. Sheet SC1 The character varies considerably according to weather condition and seasons. Key Characteristics G Relatively narrow undeveloped sections of coastline behind beaches. Bounded by low South Coast growing scant vegetation and small areas of wind-sculpted scrub and trees. Often G To the east of Selsey Bill, mainly shingle banks with bands of sand and mud exposed at providing separation of urban areas. Areas of both high ecological and landscape Shoreline low tide. importance. South Coast Plain G To the west of Selsey Bill, mainly sandy beaches, dry sand dunes and grassland habitats. G Shingle and sand dune habitats of national importance, notably at West Wittering, G Influence of extensive linear urban coastal resort development.To the east,almost Shoreham and Climping. The area covered by the Sheet is derived from: continuous conurbation of Bognor Regis, Littlehampton,Worthing and Shoreham.To the G Reed beds, streams and deep drainage ditches known as rifes. west, notably villages of West Wittering, East Wittering and Bracklesham. Separated by G Frequent wooden and rock groynes and breakwaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Earnley Conservation Area Character Appraisal & Management Proposals
    EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL & MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS Originally published September 2006 with updated appendices March 2012 Approved by Cabinet: 7 May 2013 EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL & MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS On the 5th September 2006 Chichester District Council approved this document as planning guidance and therefore it will be a material consideration in the determination of relevant planning applications. Cover: Map of Earnley 1875 This document has been written and illustrated on behalf of Chichester District Council by: The Conservation Studio 1 Querns Lane Cirencester Gloucestershire GL7 1RL Telephone: 01285 642428 email: [email protected] PART 1 EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1 INTRODUCTION 2 LOCATION AND LANDSCAPE SETTING 2.1 Location 2.2 Topography 2.3 Relationship of the conservation area to its surroundings 2.4 Geology 2.5 Biodiversity 3 HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT AND ARCHAEOLOGY 3.1 Historic development 3.2 Surviving historic features 3.3 Archaeology 4 SPATIAL ANALYSIS 4.1 Character areas 4.2 Plan form, building types and boundaries 4.3 Open spaces, trees and views 5 DEFINITION OF THE SPECIAL INTEREST OF THE CONSERVATION AREA 5.1 Activities and uses 5.2 Listed buildings 5.3 Positive buildings 5.4 Building materials and colours 5.5 Public realm 6 ISSUES PART 2 EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS 1 BACKGROUND 2 RECOMMENDATIONS 3 MONITORING AND REVIEW 4 CONTACT DETAILS APPENDICES Appendix 1 Legislative background Appendix 2 Community involvement Appendix 3 Good Practice Guidance Appendix 4 Draft Local List Criteria Appendix 5 Bibliography PART 1 EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1 INTRODUCTION This document has been produced for Chichester The Management Proposals make the following District Council following consultation with the local recommendations: community.
    [Show full text]
  • West Sussex Low Carbon Study Carbon Low Sussex West Landscape Sensitivity Analysis & Guidance for for Guidance & Analysis Sensitivity Landscape Land Use Consultants
    Land Use Consultants Landscape Sensitivity Analysis & Guidance for West Sussex Low Carbon Study Final Report Prepared for the Centre for Sustainable Energy by Land Use Consultants September 2009 Landscape Sensitivity Analysis & Guidance for West Sussex Low Carbon Study Prepared for the Centre for Sustainable Energy by Land Use Consultants September 2009 43 Chalton Street London NW1 1JD Tel: 020 7383 5784 Fax: 020 7383 4798 [email protected] CONTENTS 1. Approach to the Landscape Sensitivity Analysis & Guidance for West Sussex Low Carbon Study........................................................ 3 Wind energy developments..........................................................................................................................................3 Biomass planting and harvesting ................................................................................................................................4 Approach to Landscape Sensitivity Assessment...................................................................................5 Landscape Character Baseline..................................................................................................................6 Assessment Criteria .................................................................................................................................10 Undertaking the Landscape Sensitivity Assessment ..........................................................................12 Presentation of Results............................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Earnley Gardens, Almodington Lane, Earnley, Chichester
    Earnley Gardens, Almodington Lane, Earnley, Chichester todansteehancock.com 01243 523723 Earnley Gardens, Almodington Lane, Earnley, Chichester, West Sussex, PO20 7JR A rare opportunity to acquire a business and freehold site, totaling just under 4 acres, a few miles south of the A27 and the historic City of Chichester, with consent to build a 3 bedroom owners / managers dwelling. Description: Earnley Butterflies, Birds and Beasts currently occupies and trades from the site which is accessed from Almodington Lane. There is plenty of parking located at the front of the site for approximately 40+ cars. The current operation runs from a selection of glass houses and buildings, including a cafe with large picnic and play area, butterfly and bird sanctuaries, covered themed gardens and towards the rear of the plot there are various open spaces for other animals and attractions the business has to offer. Located near the northern boundary is a planning application which has been implemented to create a 3 bedroom detached owner/managers dwelling (further details can be provided on request) The site is located approximately 1.5 miles from the south coast, equidistance between the villages of Earnley and Almodington. Slightly further a field are the very popular villages of Bracklesham Bay, East and West Wittering and Birdham, offering a selection of popular primary schools, churches, village halls, shops and post offices, along with various restaurants and cafes. A few miles from the site, is Birdham Pool Marina and just beyond, Chichester Marina which accesses Chichester Harbour at all time. Distances and transport: Bracklesham Bay: 1.8miles | West Wittering: 3.8 miles | Chichester: 6.3 miles | Goodwood: 9 miles Distances & | Southampton Airport: 39 miles | Gatwick Airport: 54 miles | London: 85 miles Itchenor Planning ref: E/01/00986/OUT Consent granted for a 3 bedroom detached owners / managers house Please contact Tod Anstee Hancock for further details.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the South-East IAP Report Here
    Important Areas for Ponds (IAPs) in the Environment Agency Southern Region Helen Keeble, Penny Williams, Jeremy Biggs and Mike Athanson Report prepared by: Report produced for: Pond Conservation Environment Agency c/o Oxford Brookes University Southern Regional Office Gipsy Lane, Headington Guildbourne House Oxford, OX3 0BP Chatsworth Road, Worthing Sussex, BN11 1LD Acknowledgements We would like to thank all those who took time to send pond data and pictures or other information for this assessment. In particular: Adam Fulton, Alex Lockton, Alice Hiley, Alison Cross, Alistair Kirk, Amanda Bassett, Andrew Lawson, Anne Marston, Becky Collybeer, Beth Newman, Bradley Jamieson, Catherine Fuller, Chris Catling, Daniel Piec, David Holyoak, David Rumble, Debbie Miller, Debbie Tann, Dominic Price, Dorothy Wright, Ed Jarzembowski, Garf Williams, Garth Foster, Georgina Terry, Guy Hagg, Hannah Cook, Henri Brocklebank, Ian Boyd, Jackie Kelly, Jane Frostick, Jay Doyle, Jo Thornton, Joe Stevens, John Durnell, Jonty Denton, Katharine Parkes, Kevin Walker, Kirsten Wright, Laurie Jackson, Lee Brady, Lizzy Peat, Martin Rand, Mary Campling, Matt Shardlow, Mike Phillips, Naomi Ewald, Natalie Rogers, Nic Ferriday, Nick Stewart, Nicky Court, Nicola Barnfather, Oli Grafton, Pauline Morrow, Penny Green, Pete Thompson, Phil Buckley, Philip Sansum, Rachael Hunter, Richard Grogan, Richard Moyse, Richard Osmond, Rufus Sage, Russell Wright, Sarah Jane Chimbwandira, Sheila Brooke, Simon Weymouth, Steph Ames, Terry Langford, Tom Butterworth, Tom Reid, Vicky Kindemba. Cover photograph: Low Weald Pond, Lee Brady Report production: February 2009 Consultation: March 2009 SUMMARY Ponds are an important freshwater habitat and play a key role in maintaining biodiversity at the landscape level. However, they are vulnerable to environmental degradation and there is evidence that, at a national level, pond quality is declining.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Ornithological Interest of Sssis in England
    Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England Allan Drewitt, Tristan Evans and Phil Grice Natural England Published on 31 July 2008 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2008 Project details This report results from research commissioned by Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN015 – A review of bird SSSIs in England. Project manager Allan Drewitt - Ornithological Specialist Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA [email protected] Contractor Natural England 1 East Parade Sheffield S1 2ET Tel: 0114 241 8920 Fax: 0114 241 8921 Acknowledgments This report could not have been produced without the data collected by the many thousands of dedicated volunteer ornithologists who contribute information annually to schemes such as the Wetland Bird Survey and to their county bird recorders. We are extremely grateful to these volunteers and to the organisations responsible for collating and reporting bird population data, including the British Trust for Ornithology, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Joint Nature Conservancy Council seabird team, the Rare Breeding Birds Panel and the Game and Wildlife Conservancy Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking and Cycling Strategy 2016-2026
    West Sussex Walking and Cycling Strategy 2016–2026 www.westsussex.gov.uk Contents Foreword p4 Chapter 1 Introduction p5 Chapter 2 Existing situation p9 Approach to Infrastructure Design Chapter 3 p17 and Safety Chapter 4 Supporting Activities p21 Chapter 5 Infrastructure Priorities p26 Chapter 6 Delivering the Strategy p28 Appendix 1 Full list of schemes entered by p30 stakeholders sub-divided by scheme type and prioritised by Sustrans’ ‘Rate’ tool ranking Appendix 2 Walking and cycling case study p47 examples Appendix 3 Cycling marketing segmentation and p49 propensity to cycle evidence information 3 Foreword Making the most of active travel is important because it contributes to environmental protection, economic enhancement and improving public health. Increasing levels of walking and cycling - particularly for shorter journeys, or as part of a longer journey - will help to tackle poor air quality, which can cause or exacerbate respiratory diseases such as asthma, and tackle health problems linked with sedentary living thereby reducing NHS costs. Reducing traffic congestion will also have a positive impact on our economy as less time will be spent stuck in traffic and make West Sussex a more attractive place to live and do business. It is therefore important that we recognise walking and cycling as a key part of the transport mix, making improvements that promote these modes as the natural choice for shorter journeys. The West Sussex Walking and Cycling Strategy is designed to complement the Government’s emerging Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy and sets out the County Council’s aims and objectives for walking and cycling together with our priorities for investment in infrastructure improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Management
    Coastal Management Mapping of littoral cells J M Motyka Dr A H Brampton Report SR 326 January 1993 HR Wallingfprd Registered Office: HR Wallingford Ltd. Howbery Park, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OXlO 8BA. UK Telephone: 0491 35381 International+ 44 491 35381 Telex: 848552. HRSWAL G. Facsimile; 0491 32233 lnternationaJ+ 44 491 32233 Registered in England No. 1622174 SR 328 29101193 ---····---- ---- Contract This report describes work commissioned by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food under Contract CSA 2167 for which the MAFF nominated Project Officer was Mr B D Richardson. It is published on behalf of the Ministry of Agricutture, Fisheries and Food but any opinions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the funding Ministry. The HR job number was CBS 0012. The work was carried out by and the report written by Mr J M Motyka and Dr A H Bramplon. Dr A H Bramplon was the Project Manager. Prepared by c;,ljl>.�.�············ . t'..�.0.. �.r.......... (name) Oob title) Approved by ........................['yd;;"(lj:�(! ..... // l7lt.i�w; Dale . .............. f)...........if?J .. © Copyright Ministry of Agricuhure, Fisheries and Food 1993 SA 328 29ro t/93 Summary Coastal Management Mapping of littoral cells J M Motyka Dr A H Brampton Report SR 328 January 1993 As a guide for coastal managers a study has been carried out identifying the major regional littoral drift cells in England and Wales. For coastal defence management the regional cells have been further subdivided into sub-cells which are either independent or only weakly dependent upon each other. The coastal regime within each cell has been described and this together with the maps of the coastline identify the special characteristics of each area.
    [Show full text]
  • Pagham Harbour
    Visiting the West Sussex countryside a guide for parents and teachers This book is the third in a series of local guides being produced by Autism and Nature. It is designed to help parents, carers and teachers in West Sussex to engage of children with autism children on the autistic spectrum with the natural environment. It should also prove useful to those living and working with adults with autism. It begins by introducing some of the benefits of nature and the countryside for children with autism. This is followed by a guide to ‘natural’ places to visit in the West Sussex countryside, which the authors believe many children with autism might enjoy. Twenty-four natural places are described, all of which are also good for wildlife. The guide concludes with a series of case stories set in West Sussex, which describe visits to the countryside by small groups of school children with autism and related conditions. Supported by ISBN 978-0-9571525-4-0 Published by David Blakesley and Tharada Blakesley Visiting the West Sussex countryside a guide for parents and teachers of children with autism David Blakesley and Tharada Blakesley Foreword by Nick Baker i Citation For bibliographic purposes, this book should be referred to as Blakesley, D and Blakesley, T. 2013. Visiting the West Sussex countryside: a guide for parents and teachers of children with autism. Autism and Nature, Kent. The rights of David Blakesley and Tharada Blakesley to be identified as the Authors of this work have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • About West Sussex
    Introduction About West Sussex Geography Environment 6 Geography of the county 29 Sustainability 30 Carbon emissions This edition of West Sussex Life Demographics 31 Renewable energy 9 Population 33 Energy consumption has four sections, three of which 10 Projected population 35 Fuel poverty are aligned with the three core 12 Population density 37 Waste disposal 13 Population change 39 Composition of waste priorities in the Future West 14 Country of birth, ethnicity 41 Mineral extraction Sussex Plan: and refugees 43 Natural environment 15 Religion and language 16 Marital status Health and wellbeing • Giving children the best 17 Internal migration 46 Physical activity 47 Obesity start in life Voting and elections 48 Drugs and alcohol • Championing the local 18 2015 General Election 50 Smoking 19 2016 EU Referendum 51 Sexual health economy 20 District councils 53 Statutory homelessness • Independent for longer in 21 West Sussex County 56 Rough sleepers Council 57 Mental health later life 59 Learning disabilities Transport 60 Personal wellbeing 23 Railways This first section contains 24 Road network and traffic Community safety information on a variety of flows 61 Recorded crime Sussex West About 25 Road casualties and bus 64 Restorative Justice subjects that are relevant to the transport 66 Domestic abuse county’s population as a whole. 26 National Transport Survey 69 Sexual offences 27 Highways enquiries 72 Hate incidents and crime 28 Cycle paths 74 Fire and rescue Section Contents [email protected] West Sussex County Council
    [Show full text]
  • Pagham, West Sussex, South Coast, Uk
    Palaeo-environmental Study Area P13 Selsey Bill - Pagham, West Sussex, south coast UK PALAEO-ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY AREA P13 SELSEY BILL - PAGHAM, WEST SUSSEX, SOUTH COAST, UK AN ASSESSMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALAEO-ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR COASTAL CHANGE ON THE EASTERN MARGIN OF THE SOLENT REGION AT SELSEY, WEST SUSSEX, UK Plate P13 beach regrading along a shingle ridge in Bracklesham Bay, near Selsey, east Solent, UK (HR Wallingford Ltd. And Chichester District Council) 1. LOCATION Selsey Bill is a low-lying coastal peninsular occupied by a 19th century resort town. The peninsular is an southward extension of the Sussex coastal plain and it projects some 6km into the English Channel. The landscape comprises low-lying pasture and arable land seldom exceeding 5m in height (Plate P13). The soft light soils of the peninsular rest on the Bracklesham Beds, a unit of Tertiary sands which offers little resistance to coastal erosion. Selsey lies within the county of West Sussex which is responsible for strategic planning and the maintenance of environmental data-bases on the natural and historic environments of the area. The control of development and the defence of the coastline is the responsibility of Chichester District Council. There are few special designations affecting this coast. However, Pagham Harbour is an internationally designated Ramsar Site for the protection of birds and a meadow adjacent to the Broad Rife stream is recognised as a Site of Nature Conservation Interest. 2. MODERN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY The resort town of Selsey now accommodates some 10,000 residents but during the summer the population increases to 25,000 when the number of visitors is boosted by a very large 1 Palaeo-environmental Study Area P13 Selsey Bill - Pagham, West Sussex, south coast UK caravan park west of the town.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Capacity Profiles
    Settlement Capacity Profiles www.chichester.gov.uk Update October 2013 Contents Introduction and Methodology 1 Introduction 3 2 Methodology 4 Settlement Profiles 3 Apuldram Parish 10 4 Birdham Parish 16 5 Bosham Parish 23 Settlement Capacity Profiles - Update October 2013 6 Boxgrove Parish 33 7 Chichester City 39 8 Chidham and Hambrook Parish 48 9 Donnington Parish 61 hester District Council 10 Earnley Parish 71 Chic 11 East Wittering & Bracklesham Parish 77 12 Fishbourne Parish 85 13 Hunston Parish 93 14 Kirdford Parish 100 15 Loxwood Parish 107 16 Lynchmere Parish 113 17 North Mundham Parish 123 18 Oving Parish 133 19 Plaistow & Ifold Parish 140 20 Selsey Parish 150 21 Sidlesham Parish 157 22 Southbourne Parish 165 23 Tangmere Parish 179 24 West Itchenor Parish 186 25 West Thorney Parish 192 Contents Chic 26 West Wittering Parish 198 hester District Council 27 Westbourne Parish 204 28 Westhampnett Parish 211 29 Wisborough Green Parish 218 Settlement Capacity Profiles - Update October 2013 Appendices Appendix 1 - List of Information Sources 224 Appendix 2 - Community Facilities in Local Plan Area 225 Appendix 3 - Public Transport Provision in Local Plan Area 226 Appendix 4 - Maps of Local Plan Area 227 Appendix 5 - Settlement Capacity Profile Maps 230 Appendix 6 - Glossary 268 1 . Introduction Introduction 1.1 This report presents background evidence on the characteristics and future development potential of the settlements within the Chichester Local Plan area. It forms part of the evidence base supporting the Chichester Local Plan Key Policies document. 1.2 The report has two main aims: 1. To assess the key characteristics of the different settlements in the Plan area, including their demographic and socio-economic profile; physical form and character; historic growth and recent development; the range of available local facilities; and accessibility, including the availability and frequency of public transport; and 2.
    [Show full text]