DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Studying Satirical Prints

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Studying Satirical Prints Notes 1 Studying Satirical Prints 1. Eirwen E.C. Nicholson, ‘The English Political Print and Pictorial Political Argument c. 1640–c. 1832: a study in historiography and methodology’, University of Edinburgh unpublished Ph.D. thesis (1994), 468–77. 2. Ibid., 483. 3. Vic Gatrell, City of Laughter: Sex and Satire in Eighteenth-Century London (London: Atlantic, 2006), 212. 4. Thomas Milton Kemnitz, ‘The Cartoon as a Historical Source’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 4 (1973), 82. For discussion of definitions of ‘distor- tion’ and varying types, meanings and extent of distortion see Lawrence H. Streicher, ‘On a Theory of Political Caricature’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 9 (1967), 433. 5. E.H. Gombrich, Meditations on a Hobby Horse (London: Phaidon, 1978), 129. 6. Diana Donald, The Age of Caricature: Satirical Prints in the Reign of George III (London: Yale University Press, 1996), 12–14. 7. Gatrell, City of Laughter, 227. 8. Nicholson, English Political Print, 480–1; Draper Hill, Mr Gillray The Caricaturist (London: Phaidon, 1965), 1. 9. Nicholson, English Political Print, 132. 10. W.A. Coupe, ‘Observations on a Theory of Political Caricature’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 11 (1969), 85. 11. James Baker, ‘Isaac Cruikshank and the Notion of British Liberty: 1783–1811’, University of Kent unpublished PhD thesis (2010), 27. 12. Nicholson, English Political Print, 485. 13. Ibid., 488, 486. 14. Ibid., 486. 15. Dorothy George, English Political Caricature to 1792: A Study of Opinion and Propaganda (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959), 1; H.T. Dickinson, Caricatures and the Constitution, 1760–1832 (Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey, 1986), 11; Donald, Age of Caricature, vii; Gatrell, City of Laughter, 9. 16. Ibid., 213. 17. Ibid., 160–5. 18. Ibid., 218. 19. Mark Hallett, The Spectacle of Difference: Graphic Satire in the Age of Hogarth (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999), 24. 20. Eirwen E.C. Nicholson, ‘Consumers and Spectators: The public of the politi- cal print in eighteenth-century England’, History 81 (1996), 12. 21. Tamara L Hunt, Defining John Bull: Political Caricature and National Identity in Late Georgian England (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003), 233–4. 22. Ibid., 8–9. 23. Dickinson, Caricatures and the Constitution, 15. 215 216 Notes 24. Cindy McCreery, The Satirical Gaze: Prints of Women in late Eighteenth-Century England (Oxford: Clarendon, 2004), 37. 25. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 13. 26. Donald, Age of Caricature, 5. 27. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 3. Examples of ceramics appear in David Bindman, The Shadow of the Guillotine: Britain and the French Revolution (London: British Museum Publications, 1989), 109, 120, 121, 137, 140, 141. 28. Richard Clay, ‘Riotous Images: representations of Joseph Priestley in British prints during the French Revolution’, History of Education 37 (2008), 596. 29. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 13; McCreery, Satirical Gaze, 37. 30. Nicholson, ‘Consumers and Spectators’, 5–21. 31. Ibid., 17. 32. Dickinson, Caricatures and the Constitution, 15. 33. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 10, 318 n.64. 34. Eric Foner, ‘Introduction’, in Thomas Paine, Rights of Man (London: Penguin, 1986), 18. 35. Adam Fox, Oral and Literate Culture in England 1500–1700 (Oxford University Press, 2000), 5, 6, 19. 36. Clay, ‘Riotous Images’, 594. 37. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 12. 38. Streicher, ‘Theory of Political Caricature’, 438. 39. Coupe, ‘Observations’, 81. 40. Dickinson, Caricatures and the Constitution, 15; Nicholson, ‘Consumers and Spectators’, 19; Gatrell, City of Laughter, 55, 83. 41. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 15. 42. McCreery, Satirical Gaze, 26–7. 43. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 16. 44. Gatrell, City of Laughter, 494. 45. Ben Wilson, The Laughter of Triumph: William Hone and the Fight for the Free Press (London: Faber and Faber, 2005), 186–9. 46. Donald, Age of Caricature, 21. 47. McCreery, Satirical Gaze, 36. 48. Donald, Age of Caricature, 19. 49. E.A. Wrigley, People, Cities and Wealth: The Transformation of Traditional Society (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987), 138. 50. Donald, Age of Caricature, 20. 51. Lorraine Welling Lanmon, ‘American Caricature in the English Tradition: the personal and political satires of William Charles’, Winter Portfolio 11 (1976), 1–51. 52. Frederick Wendeborn, A View of England towards the Close of the Eighteenth Century (1791), vol. ii, 155. 53. Donald, Age of Caricature, 20; Christiane Banerji and Diana Donald (eds), Gillray Observed: The Earliest Account of His Caricatures in London und Paris (Cambridge University Press, 2008), 245. 54. Hill, Gillray, 73–80. 55. Dorothy George, Catalogue of Prints in the British Museum, Division 1, Political and Personal Satires (Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey) [10994]; Matthew and James Payne, Regarding Thomas Rowlandson, 1757–1827: His Life, Art and Acquaintance (Cornwall: Hogarth Arts, 2010), 273. Notes 217 56. Gatrell, City of Laughter, 231–2, 239. 57. Nicholson, English Political Print, 500. 58. Ibi d., 500–10. 59. Ibid., 503. 60. http://www.grosvenorprints.com. 61. Tim Clayton, Caricatures of the People of the British Isles (London: British Museum Press, 2007), 11. 62. Dickinson, Caricatures and the Constitution, 13; Gatrell, City of Laughter, 234; Hunt, Defining John Bull, 7. 63. Nicholson, ‘Consumers and Spectators’, 9. 64. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 7. 65. Gatrell, City of Laughter, 234. 66. Richard Godfrey, ‘Introduction’, in James Gillray: The Art of Caricature, ed. Richard Godfrey (London: Tate, 2001), 18. 67. Gatrell, City of Laughter, 93. 68. Robert L Patten, ‘Conventions of Georgian Caricature’, Art Journal 43 (1983), 335. 69. Baker, Cruikshank, 8. 70. John Barrell, ‘Radicalism, Visual Culture, and Spectacle in the 1790s’, Romanticism on the Net 46 (2007), http://www.erudit.org/revue/ron/2007/v/ n46/016131ar.html [14 September 2008]. 71. Gatrell, City of Laughter, 241. 72. Edward J. Olszewski questions Goya’s subversive leanings, specifically in The Family of Charles IV, but in doing so lists many critics who promote the view. Edward J. Olszewski, ‘Exorcising Goya’s The Family of Charles IV’, Artibus et Historiae 20 (1999), 169–85. 73. Donald, Age of Caricature, 99. 74. Gatrell, City of Laughter, 141–6. 75. Ibid., 136–56. 76. Massacre at St. Peter’s or ‘Britons Strike Home’!!! [BMC 13258] (George Cruikshank, 16 August 1819). 77. Nicholson, English Political Print, 307–9. 78. Dustin Griffin, Satire: A Critical Reintroduction (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1994), 65–6. 79. Ibid., 149–50. 80. Clay, ‘Riotous Images’, 599. 81. Gatrell, City of Laughter, 213. 82. Gombrich, Meditations, 131. 83. Coupe, ‘Observations’, 87. 84. See Chapter 4. 85. Quoted in Coupe, ‘Observations’, 85. 86. Albert Boime, ‘The Sketch and Caricature as Metaphors for the French Revolution’, Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 55 (1992), 261. 87. Patten, ‘Conventions’, 335. 88. Gatrell, City of Laughter, 213. 89. Ibid., 230. 90. Nicholson, ‘Consumers and Spectators’, 11. 91. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 21. 92. Kemnitz, ‘The Cartoon as a Historical Source’, 84–5, 92–3. 218 Notes 93. Streicher, ‘Theory of Political Caricature’, 431. 94. Linda Colley, Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837 (London: Yale University Press, 2005), 210. 95. See Chapter 3. 96. Quoted in Hunt, Defining John Bull, 18. 97. Hill, Gillray, chapter 6. 98. Ibid., 4. 99. Baker, Cruikshank, 7–10. 100. Lubber’s-hole [BMC 7909] (1 November 1791), Fashionable Contrasts [BMC 8058] (24 January 1792). 101. McCreery, Satirical Gaze, 22–3. 102. Gatrell, City of Laughter, 236–7. 103. Ibid., 444–7. 104. Ibid., 11. 105. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 17–18. 106. Sandy Petrey, ‘Pears in History’, Representations 35 (1991), 54–7. 107. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 17–18. 108. Clay, ‘Riotous Images’, 585–7. 109. Griffin, Satire, 152–60. 110. Dickinson, Caricatures and the Constitution, 21. 111. Baker, Cruikshank, 14. 112. Ibid., 21. 113. John Barrell and Jon Mee (eds), Trials for Treason and Sedition, 1792–1794, Volume 1 (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2006), xxi–xxii, 291–313. 114. Gatrell, City of Laughter, 503. 115. Ibid., 493, 520–9. 116. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 20; McCreery, Satirical Gaze, 33–4. 117. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 20. 118. Gatrell, City of Laughter, 538. 119. Dickinson, Caricatures and the Constitution, 21. 120. Kemnitz, ‘The Cartoon as a Historical Source’, 85. 121. The pension stopped in 1801 but may have resumed in 1808; Hill, Gillray, 67, 104, 115. 122. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 20. 123. Nicholson, English Political Print, 311. 124. John Brewer, The Common People and Politics, 1750–1790s (Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey, 1986); Dickinson, Caricatures and the Constitution; Paul Langford, Walpole and the Robinocracy (Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey, 1986); J.A. Sharpe, Crime and the Law in English Satirical Prints, 1600–1832 (Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey, 1986); Donald, Age of Caricature; Hallett, Spectacle of Difference; Hunt, Defining John Bull; McCreery, Satirical Gaze; Gatrell, City of Laughter. 125. Michael Duffy, The Englishman and the Foreigner (Cambridge: Chadwyck- Healey, 1986); Michael Duffy, ‘The Noisie, Empty, Fluttering French: English Images of the French, 1689–1815’, History Today 32 (1982), 21–6. 126. Duffy, Englishman and the Foreigner, 45. 127. Ibid., 31. 128. Herbert M Atherton, Political Prints in the Age of Hogarth: A Study of the Ideographic Representation of Politics (Oxford: Clarendon, 1974), 84–5. Notes 219 129. Robert R Williams, Hegel’s Ethics of Recognition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), chapter 3. 130. G.W.F. Hegel, The Phenomenology of Mind (London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1910), 176. 131. Edward Said, Orientalism (London: Penguin, 2003). 132. Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities (London: Verso, 2006), 45. 133. Colley, Britons, 5. 134. Hunt, Defining John Bull, 300. 135. Gerald Newman, ‘Nationalism Revisited’, Journal of British Studies 35 (1996), 124–5. 136. Gerald Newman, The Rise of English Nationalism: A Cultural History, 1740–1830 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1987). 137. Steven Pincus, ‘Review of Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837 by Linda Colley’, Journal of Modern History 67 (1995), 132–6; J.C.D. Clark, ‘Protestantism, Nationalism, and National Identity, 1660–1832’, Historical Journal 43 (2000), 249–76.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Franciscan Saints, Blesseds, and Feasts (To Navigate to a Page, Press Ctrl+Shift+N and Then Type Page Number)
    Franciscan Saints, Blesseds, and Feasts (to navigate to a page, press Ctrl+Shift+N and then type page number) Saints St. Francis de Sales, January 29 ................................................ 3 St. Agnes of Assisi, November 19 ..........................................29 St. Francis Mary of Camporosso, September 20 ................24 St. Agnes of Prague, March 2 ...................................................6 St. Francis of Paola, April 2 ........................................................9 St. Albert Chmielowski, June 17 ............................................. 16 St. Francisco Solano, July 14 .....................................................19 St. Alphonsa of the Immaculate Conception, July 28........20 St. Giles Mary of St. Joseph, February 7 ................................4 St. Amato Ronconi, May 8 .......................................................12 St. Giovanni of Triora, February 7 ............................................4 St. Angela Merici, January 27 ................................................... 3 St. Gregory Grassi, July 8 ........................................................ 18 St. Angela of Foligno, January 7 ................................................1 St. Hermine Grivot, July 8 ....................................................... 18 St. Angelo of Acri, October 30 .............................................. 27 St. Humilis of Bisignano, November 25 .................................30 St. Anthony of Padua, June 13 ................................................ 16 St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Family Bible Preservation Project Has Compiled a List of Family Bible Records Associated with Persons by the Following Surname
    The Family Bible Preservation Project's - Family Bible Surname Index - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Page Forward to see each Bible entry THE FAMILY BIBLE PRESERVATION PROJECT HAS COMPILED A LIST OF FAMILY BIBLE RECORDS ASSOCIATED WITH PERSONS BY THE FOLLOWING SURNAME: HEATH Scroll Forward, page by page, to review each bible below. Also be sure and see the very last page to see other possible sources. For more information about the Project contact: EMAIL: [email protected] Or please visit the following web site: LINK: THE FAMILY BIBLE INDEX Copyright - The Family Bible Preservation Project The Family Bible Preservation Project's - Family Bible Surname Index - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Page Forward to see each Bible entry SURNAME: HEATH UNDER THIS SURNAME - A RECORD EXISTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING FAMILY/PERSON: THE RECORD HERE BELOW REFERENCED IS NOT ACTUALLY A FAMILY BIBLE. BUT RATHER A REV WAR PENSION FAMILY OF: HEATH, AARON (1754-1843) SPOUSE: RHODA EDSON MORE INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN RELATION TO THIS RECORD - AT THE FOLLOWING SOURCE: SOURCE: ANCESTRY.COM FILE/RECD: REV WAR PENSION *W13440 NOTE: Bible record is part of Revolutionary War pension claim THE FOLLOWING INTERNET HYPERLINKS CAN BE HELPFUL IN FINDING MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS RECORD: LINK: CLICK HERE TO ACCESS LINK LINK: CLICK HERE TO ACCESS LINK GROUP CODE: 01 Copyright - The Family Bible Preservation Project The Family Bible Preservation Project's - Family Bible Surname Index - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Page Forward to see each Bible entry SURNAME: HEATH UNDER THIS SURNAME - A RECORD EXISTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING FAMILY/PERSON: THE RECORD HERE BELOW REFERENCED IS NOT ACTUALLY A FAMILY BIBLE.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the Royal Character in the Public Imagination 1
    Notes Introduction: The Royal Character in the Public Imagination 1. I use the words “royal” and “monarch” (and their variants, “royalty,” “monarchy,” “monarchical,” etc.) interchangeably. By the late eigh- teenth century both terms in common usage referred equally to kings and to those who ruled (queens, regents). “Royal” also referred, and still does, to near relatives of the monarch, as in “royal family,” and I use it in this sense also. 2. Austen’s conservatism is famously unstable. Feminist critics espe- cially have suggested that a feminist subtext undercuts or at least tempers the conservative trajectories of her novels. In Equivocal Beings, Claudia Johnson provides a comprehensive discussion of the conservative reading of Emma as well as its implicit feminist critique (192–96). 3. Unlike Pride and Prejudice, in which she was revising an earlier draft, Austen wrote Mansfield Park, Emma, and Persuasion after 1810. She began writing Mansfield Park in February 1811, the same month in which the Regency began (Sturrock 30; see also Tomalin 223–24). 4. Clara Tuite suggests that Mansfield Park can be read as “a provincial deflection of the wider national issues of responsible hereditary gov- ernment” (Romantic Austen 132). 5. The phrase “Queen Caroline affair” historically refers to the events of 1820 and 1821, when the uncrowned King attempted to divorce his wife by Act of Parliament. Although Caroline was technically Queen, supporters of the new King used a variety of means, some political, some rhetorical, to contest her legitimacy. Similarities as well as an evident continuity between this episode and the Prince’s first attempt to obtain a divorce, some fifteen years earlier, have often led scholars to refer to their marital disputes before, during, and after the Regency as the Queen Caroline affair.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining John Bull: Political Caricature and National Identity in Late Georgian England
    Published on Reviews in History (https://reviews.history.ac.uk) Defining John Bull: Political Caricature and National Identity in Late Georgian England Review Number: 360 Publish date: Saturday, 1 November, 2003 Author: Tamara Hunt ISBN: 1840142685 Date of Publication: 2003 Price: £57.50 Pages: 452pp. Publisher: Ashgate Publisher url: https://www.ashgate.com/default.aspx?page=637&calcTitle=1&title_id=1454&edition_id=1525 Place of Publication: Aldershot Reviewer: David Johnson The period between 1760 and 1820 was the golden age of British pictorial satire. But only in the last 20 years have the artists and their work attracted serious study in their own right. Rather than being seen as attractive but essentially incidental illustrations for the study of British society and politics, political and social caricatures are now analysed in depth as both a reflection of, and sometimes a formative influence upon, public opinion. Increasingly their propagandist role as tools in the hands of national government or opposition is recognised. The creators of what are often highly sophisticated and intricate images are now regarded as serious artists, and the importance of their place in the political and social world of the time recognised. The setting up of a national centre in Britain for the study of cartoons and caricature at the University of Kent at Canterbury (see http://library.kent.ac.uk/cartoons [2]) and the major James Gillray exhibition at the Tate Gallery in 2001 (see http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/exhibitions/gillray/ [3]) have set the agenda, while Diana Donald's The Age of Caricature: Satirical Prints in the Reign of George III (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1996) is currently the seminal text.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CATHOLIC TELEGRAPH Have Good Reading." in Essentials, Unity; in Non-Essentials, Liberty; in All Things, Charity
    "Nothmg is more de.irable 1- Oldest Catholic Paper than that Catholic paper. 1 in United States. should have a large circuilJ­ 1 Established tion, so that everyone mall I October 22, 1831. THE CATHOLIC TELEGRAPH have good reading." In Essentials, Unity; in Non-Essentials, Liberty; in All Things, Charity. -POPE BENEDICT XV. l __-------l -,- - Vol. LXXXXV. No. 44 CINCINNATI, NOVEMBER 4, 1926 TWELVE PAGES PRICE SEVEN CENTS. ~ nOPE- PIUS XI ;-"""'''''''''''''........ ~ I - RELATlVE OF HENRY WARD _ NAME PIUS DEAR IARCHBISHOP'S COLUMN IGERMAN CATHOLIC :'s~;~~;"~~~~;;""""""""11 KIN~SHIP OF PERSONALLY : BEECHER PRIORESS OF NEW : __ : BENEDICTiNE MOTHERHOUSE : TO EPISCOP ACY p-~~o~J'J'~I{)l.AL~~_ VIEWS O_F_AMERICA ~ AC!~D_A~_U';.~T~nR 11 JE_SU_S CHRIST Officiates As Consecrator When ,,: (N. c. W. C. News Service) -: Says Archbishop McNicholas In Scarcity of Vocations Disturb the - Cleveland, Oct. 28.-Rt. Rev. _ , First Observance of Feast Found · Ch' A Manchester, N. H., Oct. 29.- Toast To Holy Father At Churchmen of the Central ; Bishop Schrembs demonstrated; Faithful of Cincinnati Six N'lbve !Dese re : Establishment here of the first : • his versatility, last week, when, • I · h - motherhouse of the Benedictine _ Ma d e BIS ops. _ Sisters in the New England _ Grand Rapids. European Countrjes. : during the closing ceremonies in- : Well Prepared. , cident to the dedication of the : States has just been announced. : INSTALLATION BANQUET. LOSS OF 40,000 CHILDREN : Ursuline high school in Youngs- ;'ARCHBISHOP PONTIFICATED ARGENTINA AND HOLY SEE. _ It will be known as St. Mary _ town, he served first as a music • : Priory and will be in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish of the Sacred Heart
    PARISH OF SAINT FELIX, FELIXSTOWE Parish Priest : Fr. John Barnes MA VF The Presbytery, 8, Gainsborough Road, Felixstowe, IP11 7HT Tel.01394 282561 e-mail [email protected] Parish Website: stfelixfelixstowe.uk Helping Hands - 07342722521 July 12th, 2020 : 15th SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME Sunday Masses Saturday 6:00pm (St.F) Int. Fr.Tony Hogarth Exposition of the Blessed Sacrament (Golden Jubilee) Sunday, Tuesday, Friday and Saturday 4.0pm- Sunday 9:30am (St.F) Int. For the People 5.0pm 11:00am (St.F) Int.+John Edwards Sacrament of Reconciliation Weekday Masses During times of Exposition, as above, or by Monday FERIA appointment 'phone 282561 2.30pm (St.F) FUNERAL MASS FOR ANNE PORTER RIP The Rosary Friday at 11.15am Tuesday FERIA 9:30am (St.F) Int. +Anna Easton Fr.John writes : Wednesday ST.BONAVENTURE 9:30am (St.F) Int. +Elsie Fenton (FM) Dear Parishioners, Thursday OUR LADY OF MOUNT CARMEL How are you? How are you coping? I feel Friday FERIA that maybe many of us are going through an Noon (St.F) Int. +Maura Bennet especially difficult time just now. In the first Saturday FERIA months of the Coronavirus pandemic, maybe we 9.30am (St.F) Int.+Bernadette Sexton felt we were coping very well. We were, perhaps, 6:00pm (St.F) Int. For the People more resiliant and purposeful than we expected. The whole thing was a novelty then -- even if a At present all Masses will take place at St.Felix: somewhat scary one - and we were positive about the Convent continues in lockdown for the time the opportunities which it presented us with, and being.
    [Show full text]
  • Caricature in the Novel, 1740-1840 a Dissertation Submitted in Part
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Sentiment and Laughter: Caricature in the Novel, 1740-1840 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in English by Leigh-Michil George 2016 © Copyright by Leigh-Michil George 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Sentiment and Laughter: Caricature in the Novel, 1740-1840 by Leigh-Michil George Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Jonathan Hamilton Grossman, Co-Chair Professor Felicity A. Nussbaum, Co-Chair This dissertation examines how late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century British novelists—major authors, Laurence Sterne and Jane Austen, and lesser-known writers, Pierce Egan, Charles Jenner, and Alexander Bicknell—challenged Henry Fielding’s mid-eighteenth-century critique of caricature as unrealistic and un-novelistic. In this study, I argue that Sterne, Austen, Egan, and others translated visual tropes of caricature into literary form in order to make their comic writings appear more “realistic.” In doing so, these authors not only bridged the character-caricature divide, but a visual- verbal divide as well. As I demonstrate, the desire to connect caricature with character, and the visual with the verbal, grew out of larger ethical and aesthetic concerns regarding the relationship between laughter, sensibility, and novelistic form. ii This study begins with Fielding’s Joseph Andrews (1742) and its antagonistic stance towards caricature and the laughter it evokes, a laughter that both Fielding and William Hogarth portray as detrimental to the knowledge of character and sensibility. My second chapter looks at how, increasingly, in the late eighteenth century tears and laughter were integrated into the sentimental experience.
    [Show full text]
  • The King Falls Into the Hands Ofcaricature
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Kremers, Anorthe ; Reich, Elisabeth (Hrsgg.): Loyal subversion? Caricatures from the Personal Union between England and Hanover (1714-1837), Göttingen 2014, S. 11-34 Werner Busch The King Falls into the Hands of Caricature. Hanoverians in England Durch die Hinrichtung Karls I. auf Veranlassung Cromwells im Jahr 1649 wurde das Gottesgnadentum des Konigs ein erstes Mai in Frage gestellt. Als nach dem Tod von Queen Anne 1714 die Hannoveraner auf den englischen Thron kamen, galten diese den Englandern als Fremdlinge. 1760 wurde mit Georg III. zudem ein psychisch labiler, spater geisteskranker Konig Regent. Als 1792 der franzdsische Konig Ludwig XVI. inhaftiert und spater hingerichtet wurde, musste das Konigtum generell um seinen Fortbestand fiirchten. In dieser Situation bemdchtigte sich die englische Karikatur endgilltig auch der koniglichen Person. Wie es schrittweise dazu kam und welche Rolle diesfilr das konig- liche Portrat gespielt hat, wird in diesem Beitragzu zeigen sein. If I were to ask you how you would define the genre of caricature, then you would perhaps answer, after brief reflection that Caricature is basically a drawing reproduced in newspapers or magazines that comments ironically on political or social events in narrative form and both satirises the protagonists shown there by exaggerating their features and body shapes on the one hand and by reducing them at the same time to a few typical characteristics on the other hand characterising them unmistakably. Perhaps you would then add that the few typical characteristics of well-known peo­ ple become binding stereotypes in the course of time and as such are sufficient to let the person become instantly recognisable.
    [Show full text]
  • Yahr2013 Pdf (1.194Mb)
    The University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire An Exploration in Representation and Reality: The Divide in Women’s Portrayals During the French Revolution of 1789 Department of History By Becca Yahr Supervising Professor: Joseph Orser Cooperating Professor: Louisa Rice Eau Claire, Wisconsin December 2013 Copyright of this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, with the consent of the author. Yahr 2 CONTENTS Abstract……………..……………………………………………………………………………..3 Introduction: Representation and History………………………………………………………....4 Historiography...…………………………………………………………………………………..6 Historical Background...…………………………………………………………………………..8 Analysis of Creative Texts……………………………………………………………………….10 Conclusion: The Power of Representation………………………………………………………31 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………..34 Yahr 3 Abstract: This essay examines artistic representations of French women in the period contemporaneous to the French Revolution of 1789. Through the analysis of literary texts and visual art, a better understanding of the social perception of women in this time period can be achieved. Sources like novels, narratives, newspaper accounts, prints, etchings, and sculptures are used to show a distinct dichotomy in the portrayals of French women. In the artistic work from Britain, Ireland, Germany, and France, women who were active participants in the revolutionary proceedings were disparaged for being violent and ruthless, while women who were limited to the private sphere where glorified as mothers and moral anchors. Additionally, this essay argues that the inclusion of creative texts, such as these, is important for developing a more complete view of social ideas in historical periods. Yahr 4 Introduction: Representation and History When discussing the French Revolution of 1789, it is safe to say that with the advent of the revolution the entirety of French society was forced into a period of drastic social change.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. X. No. 2. Price Per Number 2/- (50 Cents.); for the Year, Payable in Advance, 5/- ($1.25)
    Vol. X. No. 2. Price per number 2/- (50 cents.); for the year, payable in advance, 5/- ($1.25) THE JOURNAL OF THE FRIENDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOURTH MONTH (APRIL), 1913 London: HEADLEY BROTHERS, 140, BISHOPSGATE, E.C, Philadelphia: HERMAN NEWMAN, 1010 ARCH New York : DAVID S. TABER, 144 EAST 20TH CONTENTS. Reminiscences of Some Old Edinburgh Friends.—II. By William F. Miller .. 45 The Cambridge Journal of George Fox.—V. 50 A Literary Circle in Sheffield in 1816 51 James Montgomery to Sarah Smith, 1813 54 Edward Pease to Sarah Smith, 1827 55 Joseph J. Gurney and Elizabeth Fry to Sarah Smith, 1829 56 Meeting Records—South Wales; Kingston 59 An Unauthorised Philadelphia " Discipline" .. 60 Notes relating to Elizabeth Heath, of Mansfield. By Emily Manners. Illustrated 61 Letters to Daniel Wheeler, 1832-3 64 Dr. Lettsom's Rural Fete at Camberwell. By Joseph J. Green 66 A Scheme for Expediting the Transport of the Mails. By Jonathan Dymond 68 Keith's " Gospel Order and Discipline " 70 Anecdote relating to William Harrison of Brighton 77 John H. Dillingham at a Funeral 78 Extracts from the Diary of Abiah Darby 79 Women Writers among Friends of the Seventeenth Century and later 93 The Paintings of Sir Peter Lely 96 Queen Catherine at Devonshire House, 1662 97 Account of an Early Business Journey of John Hill Lovell, 1822 98 The Quaker Lady and the Prizefighter 103 " A Submissive Wife " 104 Friends in Current Literature. By The Editor .. 105 Obituary—Thomas Hodgkin in The Richardson MSS. By Elsie M. Smith.. 112 Notes and Queries:— A Lancashire Quaker referred to by Macaulay —Wandsworth—William Massey—Matern, of Silesia—An Interrupted Burial—Early Swarth- more Register—Spiritual Heraldry—Diary of Ann Young—The Priest and the Indian- Friends Meeting at Dalmailing—List of Patents granted to Thomas Motley .
    [Show full text]
  • Reynolds-Obituaries Aaron L. Reynolds
    REYNOLDS-OBITUARIES AARON L. REYNOLDS: is the newly elected president of the Elkton Kiwanis Club. Mr. Reynolds, Pennsylvania Railroad Agent for Elkton, has been a member since he came to Elkton eleven years ago from Newark, Delaware. He is married and has one son is a member of the Kiwanian sponsored Key Club of the Elkton High School. At the regularer meeting of the club on Thursday, November 10, Mr. Reynolds and other officers for 1950 were elected. New officers are, Harry F. Patterson, vice president, John J. Ward, Jr., immediate past president, Horace L. Scott, treasurer, Dr. Harold E. Collins, secretary. Members of the Board of Directors for two year term are Franklin C. Coburn, Benjamin T. Geary, Ralph Robinson, Wallace Williams, Jr. Hold over Directors for one year are Ralph H. Beachley, Douglas W. Connellee and J. Ewing Lort. (Cecil Whig 11/17/1949) AARON L REYNOLDS: 76, husband of Mrs. Mary P. Reynolds of Elkton, died on Saturday, January 18 in the Memorial Division in Wilmington, Del. Born in Rising Sun, he attended West Nottingham Academy and had been employed by the Pennsylvania Railroad in Pennsylvania and Delaware until 1936, when he was transferred to Elkton as station agent and held that position for twenty seven years until retiring in 1963. He was a member and deacon of the Elkton Presbyterian Church, member and past president of the Elkton Kiwanis Club and a member of the Historical Society of Cecil County. Surviving is one son, Major George Proctor Reynolds with the U. S. Army in Arlington, Va.
    [Show full text]
  • James Gillray's Representation of King George Iii in Monstrous Craws at a New Coalition Feast (1787)
    SEAT OF POWER, SITE OF SATIRE: JAMES GILLRAY'S REPRESENTATION OF KING GEORGE III IN MONSTROUS CRAWS AT A NEW COALITION FEAST (1787) By LORA REMPEL B.A., University of British Columbia, 1989 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Fine Arts) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA May 1992 ©Copyright Lora Rempel, 1992 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. (Signature) Department of FINE ARTS The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date MAY 25. 1992 DE-6 (2/88) ABSTRACT Two features that were viewed by Britons as distinguishing their nation from other Western countries in late-eighteenth century were its Constitutional Monarchy and the comparative freedoms enjoyed by the press. Graphic political satire lies at the juncture of these two features. This thesis examines the dual role that graphic caricatures of King George III played as satirical commentary and as political critique on the unique political stage of "out-of-doors" politics in the 1780s.
    [Show full text]