DOCSLIB.ORG

Classification—Content Regulation and Convergent Media

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Classification—Content Regulation and Convergent Media Classification—Content Regulation and Convergent Media FINAL REPORT ALRC Report 118 February 2012 This Final Report reflects the law as at 29 February 2012. The Australian Law Reform Commission was established on 1 January 1975 by the Law Reform Commission Act 1973 (Cth) and reconstituted by the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996 (Cth). The office of the ALRC is at Level 40 MLC, 19 Martin Place, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia Postal Address GPO Box 3708 Sydney NSW 2001 Telephone: within Australia (02) 8238 6333 International +61 2 8238 6333 Facsimile: within Australia (02) 8238 6363 International +61 2 8238 6363 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.alrc.gov.au ALRC publications are available to download free of charge or to purchase in hard copy from the ALRC website. If you require assistance, please contact the ALRC. ISBN: 978-0-9871777-3-5 Commission Reference: ALRC Report 118, 2012 © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in whole or part, subject to acknowledgement of the source, for your personal, non- commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), all other rights are reserved. Requests for further authorisation should be directed to the Australia Law Reform Commission. The Hon Nicola Roxon MP Attorney-General of Australia Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 28 February 2012 Dear Attorney-General Review of Censorship and Classification On 24 March 2011, the Australian Law Reform Commission received Terms of Reference to undertake a review of Censorship and Classification. On 17 November 2011, the Commission’s reporting date was extended from 31 January 2012 to 28 February 2012. On behalf of the Members of the Commission involved in this Inquiry—and in accordance with the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996—I am pleased to present you with the Final Report on this reference, Classification—Content Regulation and Convergent Media (ALRC Report 118, 2012). Yours sincerely, Professor Rosalind Croucher Professor Terry Flew President Commissioner in Charge Contents Terms of Reference 5 Participants 7 Recommendations 11 Executive Summary 21 Part 1—Introduction 31 1. Introduction to the Inquiry 33 Introduction 33 Related inquiries 34 Scope of the Inquiry 36 The law reform process 38 Economic impact 40 Report outline 41 2. The Current Classification Scheme 47 Summary 47 From censorship to classification 47 Classification cooperative scheme 49 Broadcasting Services Act 50 Assessing the current scheme 53 The need for fundamental reform 59 3. Media Convergence and the Transformed Media Environment 63 Summary 63 Media convergence and the transformed media environment 64 Media convergence and ‘broken concepts’ in legislation 74 4. Guiding Principles for Reform 77 Summary 77 Context for the Reform Principles 78 Guiding Principles 80 Platform Neutrality and the Question of Media Effects 96 5. The New National Classification Scheme 101 Summary 101 The Classification of Media Content Act 102 Responses to the Discussion Paper 104 Content and content providers 106 2 Classification—Content Regulation and Convergent Media Obligations for online content 109 The new Act and online content providers 113 The ABC and SBS 120 Part 2—A New Classification Scheme 123 6. Films, Television Programs and Computer Games 125 Summary 125 Determining what content should be classified 126 Films, television programs and computer games 130 Exemptions 141 Voluntary classification 143 Classify notices 144 7. Classification Decision Makers 147 Summary 147 Who currently classifies content? 148 Determining who should classify content 150 Content to be classified by the Classification Board 153 Industry classification 159 Checks and safeguards 170 Classification decisions database 178 8. Markings, Modifications, Time Zones and Advertising 181 Summary 181 Markings 182 Modifications 186 Packaging media content 190 New consumer advice 192 Television time-zone restrictions 193 Advertisements for films, television programs and computer games 197 Public display of media content 200 9. Classification Categories and Criteria 203 Summary 203 Classification categories 204 Consumer advice 213 Classification criteria 217 Research 226 10. Restricting Access to Adult Content 229 Summary 229 Restricting access to adult content 230 Should all adult content be classified? 238 Reasonable steps to restrict access 243 Removing mandatory restrictions on MA 15+ content 254 Young people and cyber-safety 256 Content 3 11. The Scope of Prohibited Content 259 Summary 259 Overview of the RC category 260 The current scope of RC content 262 Renaming the RC category 268 Reforming the scope of Prohibited content 269 Pilot study into community attitudes to higher-level media content 279 12. Prohibiting Content 283 Summary 283 The obligation 284 Classifying before enforcement 287 Prohibitions offline 289 Prohibitions online 290 International cooperation 298 Part 3—Administering and Enforcing the New Scheme 301 13. Codes and Co-regulation 303 Summary 303 Regulatory forms 304 Factors in determining regulatory form 305 Existing industry codes 306 Codes and co-regulation 308 Industry codes and the new scheme 310 14. The Regulator 321 Summary 321 Existing agencies 322 The Regulator 325 Functions of the Regulator 331 15. Enacting the New Scheme 341 Summary 341 The Classification of Media Content Act 341 The classification cooperative scheme 342 Commonwealth legislative powers 344 Enacting the new Act 345 Inconsistency of Commonwealth and state laws 349 Consultation with states and territories 351 16. Enforcing Classification Laws 353 Summary 353 Enforcement of classification laws offline and online 354 Enforcement under the classification cooperative scheme 354 Enforcement under the Broadcasting Services Act 357 State and territory online content regulation 359 Enforcement problems 359 Enforcement under Commonwealth law 360 4 Classification—Content Regulation and Convergent Media Appendix 1. Agencies, Organisations and Individuals Consulted 371 Appendix 2. Key Obligations Under the New Scheme 379 Appendix 3. International Comparison of Classification and Content Regulation 381 Appendix 4. Glossary of Key Terms 395 Terms of Reference Review of Censorship and Classification Having regard to: • it being twenty years since the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) was last given a reference relating to Censorship and Classification • the rapid pace of technological change in media available to, and consumed by, the Australian community • the needs of the community in this evolving technological environment • the need to improve classification information available to the community and enhance public understanding of the content that is regulated • the desirability of a strong content and distribution industry in Australia, and minimising the regulatory burden • the impact of media on children and the increased exposure of children to a wider variety of media including television, music and advertising as well as films and computer games • the size of the industries that generate potentially classifiable content and potential for growth • a communications convergence review, and • a statutory review of Schedule 7 of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 and other sections relevant to the classification of content I refer to the ALRC for inquiry and report pursuant to subsection 20(1) of the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996, matters relating to the extent to which the Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Act 1995 (the Classification Act), State and Territory Enforcement legislation, Schedules 5 and 7 of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992, and the Intergovernmental Agreement on Censorship and related laws continue to provide an effective framework for the classification of media content in Australia. Given the likelihood of concurrent Commonwealth reviews covering related matters as outlined above, the Commission will refer relevant issues to those reviews where it would be appropriate to do so. It will likewise accept referral from other reviews that fall within these terms of reference. Such referrals will be agreed between the relevant reviewers. 6 Classification—Content Regulation and Convergent Media 1. In performing its functions in relation to this reference, the Commission will consider: 1. relevant existing Commonwealth, State and Territory laws and practices 2. classification schemes in other jurisdictions 3. the classification categories contained in the Classification Act, National Classification Code and Classification Guidelines 4. any relevant constitutional issues, and 5. any other related matter. 2. The Commission will identify and consult with relevant stakeholders, including the community and industry, through widespread public consultation. Other stakeholders include the Commonwealth Attorney-General’s Department, the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, the Australian Communications and Media Authority, the Classification Board and Classification Review Board as well as the States and Territories. 3. The Commission is to report by 30 January 2012. Participants Australian Law Reform Commission President Professor Rosalind Croucher Commissioner in Charge Professor Terry Flew Commissioners The Hon Justice Berna Collier, Part-time Commissioner The Hon Justice Susan Kenny, Part-time Commissioner Executive Director Sabina Wynn Legal Team Bruce Alston, Acting Principal Legal Officer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Australia's Northern Territory: the First Jurisdiction to Legislate Voluntary Euthanasia, and the First to Repeal It
    DePaul Journal of Health Care Law Volume 1 Issue 3 Spring 1997: Symposium - Physician- Article 8 Assisted Suicide November 2015 Australia's Northern Territory: The First Jurisdiction to Legislate Voluntary Euthanasia, and the First to Repeal It Andrew L. Plattner Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jhcl Recommended Citation Andrew L. Plattner, Australia's Northern Territory: The First Jurisdiction to Legislate Voluntary Euthanasia, and the First to Repeal It, 1 DePaul J. Health Care L. 645 (1997) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jhcl/vol1/iss3/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Journal of Health Care Law by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AUSTRALIA'S NORTHERN TERRITORY: THE FIRST JURISDICTION TO LEGISLATE VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA, AND THE FIRST TO REPEAL IT AndreivL. Plattner INTRODUCTION On May 25, 1995, the legislature for the Northern Territory of Australia enacted the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act,' [hereinafter referred to as the Act] which becane effective on July 1, 1996.2 However, in less than a year, on March 25, 1997, the Act was repealed by the Australian National Assembly.3 Australia's Northern Territory for a brief time was the only place in the world where specific legislation gave terminally ill patients the right to seek assistance from a physician in order to hasten a patient's death.4 This Article provides a historical account of Australia's Rights of the Terminally Ill Act, evaluates the factors leading to the Act's repeal, and explores the effect of the once-recognized right to assisted suicide in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Physician-Assisted Suicide
    Recent Developments in Physician-Assisted Suicide October 2001 Copyright © 2001 Valerie J. Vollmar, all rights reserved. LITIGATION 1. Sampson v. Alaska, No. 3AN-98-11288CI (Alaska Super. Ct.), aff'd, 31 P.3d 88 (Alaska 2001). On 12/15/98, Kevin Sampson (a 43-year-old HIV-positive man) and "Jane Doe" (a female physician in her 60's with cancer) filed suit in Alaska Superior Court in Anchorage challenging Alaska's ban on physician-assisted suicide based on state constitutional claims of privacy, liberty, and equal protection. On 9/9/99, Judge Eric T. Sanders issued a written opinion rejecting the plaintiffs' claims and granting summary judgment to the defendant. On 11/14/00, the Alaska Supreme Court heard arguments on the appeal. On 9/21/01, the supreme court issued an opinion affirming the lower court's decision. 2. Cooley v. Granholm, No. 99-CV-75484 (E.D. Mich.), appeal pending, No. 01-1067 (6th Cir.). On 11/12/99, Professor Robert Sedler filed a federal lawsuit against Attorney General Jennifer Granholm and the Michigan Board of Medicine on behalf of two Michigan physicians, Roy Cooley and M.W. El-Nachef. The plaintiffs claimed that Michigan's ban on assisted suicide violates the Fourteenth Amendment right "to be relieved from unbearable pain and suffering." On 12/20/00, Judge Nancy G. Edmunds granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. On 1/12/01, plaintiffs appealed to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. The final brief on appeal was filed on 6/4/01. Both sides have requested oral argument.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Philip Nitschke
    July-August 2014 The Good News! Medical Board suspends The place with the Nitschke “For lease” sign is On 23 July 2014 the the former Fertility Medical Board of Australia Control Clinic in suspended Dr Phillip Moonah, Hobart, Nitschke, or “Dr Death,” as Tasmania – now he was called by Margaret closed – thanks be to Tighe, because they view God! Well done to the him as “a serious risk to Tasmanian Helpers of public health and safety that God’s Precious Infants needs to be managed.” - frequent protestors His organisation “Exit there. International” said the Board In a media release to the Mercury newspaper, Susie Allanson, the claimed “that people have Fertility Control Clinic spokeswoman for the abortuary at Wellington a right to choose suicide Parade in Melbourne, complained that additional paperwork and is incompatible with his standards had made the Tasmanian service uneconomic. responsibility as a doctor.” Dr Phillip Nitschke One of their abortionists, Dr Kathy Lewis had been flying to Hobart As a doctor, Nitschke has a duty to counsel people away from and back weekly, performing abortions for the last 10 years. suicidal intentions. Many complaints had been made over the past Patients were advised that their records are being kept now at the two years against Dr Nitschke, but it seems the Brayley case has Wellington Parade abortuary in Melbourne. finally triggered this action. Dr Nitschke assisted 45 year old Nigel Brayley in Perth and 25 year old Jo Waterman on the Mornington Peninsula, to commit suicide. Help the many first Dr Nitschke believes that the suicide pill should be easily available to anyone.
    [Show full text]
  • New Nitrogen System
    Oct-November 2011 NEW NITROGEN SYSTEM THE LAWFUL UNDETECTABLE ALTERNATIVE After much time and research, gas can be acquired and stored away, rumour that the manufacturer Exit is pleased to announce that it some problems with the system have (Worthington) will soon add has finally sourced a user-friendly emerged. 10% oxygen to the helium in the methodology for a take-home supply cylinders. While this gas mixture will system of compressed Nitrogen gas. When stored for long periods, some still work well floating balloons for a folk have found their cylinders have party, contamination of this nature Until recently, helium has been the leaked (for whatever reason). A would make it impossible to use for gas of choice by those seeking the half-full cylinder should be rejected a hypoxic death. Indeed, following option of a peaceful hypoxic death. and not used for self-deliverance. the tragic suicide of a young man To obtain this gas, Balloon-time Some have even reported that on in New Zealand using a Balloon- helium cylinders have been acquired purchasing their cylinders, they have time cylinder, that country’s coroner from stores such as Spotlight (in shown a lower pressure than the called for a mandatory introduction Australia), Tescos (in the UK) and expected 220psi (1500kPa) of a full of oxygen to be added to disposable Walmart (in Nth America). While cylinder. sources of helium. While this the Balloon-time cylinders have recommendation has been rejected offered an anonymous, disposable Another concern with Balloon Time for the time being, such changes are means by which compressed helium cylinders has been the persistent perhaps only a matter of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadly Censorship Games: Keeping a Tight Lid on the Euthanasia Debate
    21 November 2011, 6.39am AEST Deadly censorship games: keeping a tight lid on the euthanasia debate Author 1. Brian Martin Professor of Social Sciences at University of Wollongong Disclosure Statement Brian Martin joined Exit International in order to be able to attend members-only workshops. Provides funding as a Member of The Conversation. uow.edu.au The Australian government vigorously censors information about peaceful ways of dying even though we have access to violent means of ending life. Alex @ Faraway TALKING ABOUT DEATH AND DYING - Why don’t we talk about death and dying? We can choose so many of our life experiences, but it seems we can have no say in whether we die in pain or at peace. Today we look at the Australian government’s efforts to suppress discussion of euthanasia. There’s plenty of information available on how to kill yourself violently, so why does the Australian government so vigorously censor information on peaceful methods? Voluntary euthanasia societies have long been pushing to legalise death with dignity. According to opinion polls, a strong majority of Australians support legalisation , yet Australian governments have been unreceptive. When the Northern Territory government legalised euthanasia in 1996, the federal parliament overruled the law less than a year later. Philip Nitschke, despairing of the legal route , set up Exit International to enable people to learn how to obtain a peaceful death through their own initiative. Exit publications provide information about obtaining pentobarbital, commonly known as Nembutal, the drug of choice everywhere that death with dignity is legal. Censorship and response The Australian government has responded with amazingly draconian censorship.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Immensity of Confrontable Selves': the 'Split Subject'and Multiple Identities in the Experimental Novels of Christine Brooke-Rose Stephanie Jones
    ‘THE IMMENSITY OF CONFRONTABLE SELVES’: THE ‘SPLIT SUBJECT’ AND MULTIPLE IDENTITIES IN THE EXPERIMENTAL NOVELS OF CHRISTINE BROOKE-ROSE STEPHANIE JONES ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY 01/03/2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my deepest thanks to my supervisor Professor Tim Woods, who has shown constant, unwavering support for the project, and read it multiple times with uncommon care. I would also like to thank Professor Peter Barry whose comments on my written work and presentations have always inspired much considered thought. I am extremely grateful to Dr. Luke Thurston for his translation of the letters between Hélène Cixous and Christine Brooke-Rose from the French. I am also greatly indebted to Dr. Will Slocombe whose bravery in teaching Brooke-Rose’s fiction should be held directly responsible for the inspiration for this project. I should also like to extend my thanks to my fellow colleagues in the English and Creative Writing department at Aberystwyth University. I am also deeply indebted to the Harry Ransom Centre of Research, the location of the Christine Brooke-Rose archive, and the John Rylands Library that holds the Carcanet archive, and all the staff that work in both institutions. Their guidance in the archives and support for the project has been deeply valued. Special thanks go to Michael Schmidt OBE for allowing me to access the Carcanet archive and Jean Michel Rabaté and Ali Smith for their encouragement throughout my studies of Christine Brooke-Rose, and their contributions to the project. For my family LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS These abbreviations will appear embedded within the text in parentheses, with page numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • DILUTING the MEANING of LIFE and DEATH by Ladisa Onyiliogwu
    DILUTING THE MEANING OF LIFE AND DEATH by Ladisa Onyiliogwu A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Government Baltimore, Maryland December, 2020 © 2020 Ladisa Onyiliogwu All Rights Reserved Abstract Changes in semantics has diluted the meaning of abortion and euthanasia. Using political philosophy, this paper examines the treatment of terminology and linguistic choice and how they serve as a quiet catalyst for both movements. In the first chapter, the rhetorical question ‘what is death’ allows the readers of this thesis to ponder the finality of all that is living. The abortion chapter is chronologically structured beginning with an overview of state laws and national legislation criminalizing activity. Political movements, scientific advancements and new terminology are included and presented in a parallel manner. The euthanasia chapter reveals quite intriguing discoveries of priming and framing techniques. Research pertaining to historical connotations of good death and syntax was also conducted to expand this chapter. Peer reviewed articles, Supreme Court cases, books on death and even one piece of strategic management research was used to develop the thesis. The results are fascinating and divulge a litany of terms, titles and phrases used to describe two words – abortion and euthanasia. The resounding sentiment in the United States at this point in time (circa 2020) is to follow the science. In contrast, there seems to be a loss of appetite when the science leads in a direction opposite a preferred ideological path. Immoral activity that may have seemed unreasonable yesteryear are now deemed reasonable, cost effective and moral today.
    [Show full text]
  • National Classification Scheme Review
    National Classification Scheme Review DISCUSSION PAPER You are invited to provide a submission or comment on this Discussion Paper. Discussion Paper 77 September 2011 This Discussion Paper reflects the law as at 30 September 2011. © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in whole or part, subject to acknowledgement of the source, for your personal, non- commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), all other rights are reserved. Requests for further authorisation should be directed to the Australia Law Reform Commission. Commission Reference: DP 77 ISBN: 978-0-9871777-0-4 The Australian Law Reform Commission was established on 1 January 1975 by the Law Reform Commission Act 1973 (Cth) and reconstituted by the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996 (Cth). The office of the ALRC is at Level 40 MLC, 19 Martin Place, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia. ALRC publications are available to download free of charge or to purchase in hard copy from the ALRC website. If you require assistance, please contact the ALRC. Telephone: within Australia (02) 8238 6333 International +61 2 8238 6333 Facsimile: within Australia (02) 8238 6363 International +61 2 8238 6363 E-mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.alrc.gov.au Making a submission Making a Submission to the Inquiry Any public contribution to an inquiry is called a submission. The Australian Law Reform Commission seeks submissions from a broad cross-section of the community, as well as from those with a special interest in a particular inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Speech 2014 Symposium Thursday, 7 August 2014 Aerial Function Centre, Sydney
    Free Speech 2014 symposium Thursday, 7 August 2014 Aerial Function Centre, Sydney Starts Ends Theme Format Topic Speakers 08.00 08.50 Registrations 08.50 09.00 Speech Attendees asked to be seated Conference Chair: Jana Wendt 09.00 09.10 Presentation Welcome to country Aunty Norma Ingram - Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council 09.10 09.20 Speech Introductory remarks Professor Gillian Triggs - President, Australian Human Rights Commission Opening session 09.20 09.50 Keynote address Free speech reflections Senator the Hon George Brandis QC - Attorney-General 09.50 10.10 Speech Free speech stocktake Tim Wilson - Australian Human Rights Commissioner 10.10 10.30 Speech ALRC Inquiry into Freedoms Professor Rosalind Croucher - President, Australian Law Reform Commission 10.30 10.50 Morning tea Free speech in a liberal democracy Chris Berg - Director of Policy, Institute of Public Affairs Accommodating rights Speeches & Does defamation law deserve ridicule? Dr Roy Baker - Macquarie School of Law 10.50 11.55 (Session 1) questions Vilification laws Dr Augusto Zimmermann - School of Law, Murdoch University The commercial environment Dr Kesten Green - University of South Australia Business School Combating online harassment Dr Monika Bickert - Head of Global Content Policy, Facebook Free speech in the digital Speeches & 11.55 12.50 Reforming intellectual property Trish Hepworth - Australian Digital Alliance age questions Free speech & the internet Professor Julian Thomas - Swinburne Institute for Social Research 12.50 13.30 Lunch Dr Gary Johns
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Read More
    ALRC 2009–10 R E P O R T 113 ANNUAL REPORT Requests and inquiries regarding this report should be addressed to: The Executive Director Australian Law Reform Commission GPO Box 3708 Sydney NSW 2001 Telephone: (02) 8238 6333 Fax: (02) 8238 6363 Email: [email protected] This report is also accessible online at: www.alrc.gov.au ISBN 978-0-9807194-3-7 Print Post Approval Number: PP255003/02228 © Commonwealth of Australia 2010 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in whole or part, subject to acknowledgement of the source, for your personal, non- commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), all other rights are reserved. Requests for further authorisation should be directed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Copyright Law Branch, Attorney-General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600. Alternatively, an online request form is available at <www. ag.gov.au/cca>. Printed by Union Offset Printers ii Professor David Weisbrot AM ProfessorProfessor Rosalind David WeisbrotF Croucher AM PresPresidentident President The Honourable Robert McClelland MP The Honourable Philip Ruddock MP TheAttorney-General Honourable Philip Ruddock MP Attorney-General Attorney-GeneralParliament House Parliament House Parliament House CanberraCanberra ACT ACT 2600 2600 Canberra ACT 2600 2219 OctoberSeptember 2007 2010 19 October 2007 Dear Attorney-General Dear Attorney-General Dear Attorney-General On behalf of the members of the Australian Law Reform Commission, I am pleased to present the On behalf of the members of the Australian Law Reform Commission, I am pleased to present the Annual Report of the Australian Law Reform Commission for the period 1 July 2006 to 30 June Annual Report of the Australian Law Reform Commission for the period 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Law Special Edition
    LAW INSTITUTE JOURNAL INSTITUTE LAW OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY | LEGAL FIRMS | EMPLOYMENT STATUS | WAGES | FAIR WORK ACT | EMPLOYEE PROTECTION MAY 2021 MAY 2021 WORKPLACE LAW SPECIAL EDITION WHY THE LAW SHOULD ALLOW FOR COMPULSORY TESTING IN A PANDEMIC WORKPLACE LAW SPECIAL EDITION • VACCINATION GUIDE • LEGAL FIRMS • EMPLOYMENT STATUS • WAGES • FAIR WORK ACT • EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION COVID-19 • BUSINESS POST-LOCKDOWN www.liv.asn.au/LIJ www.liv.asn.au/LIJ • ZOOMING INTO NEW JOBS HEALTH AND WELLBEING PP100007900 ISSN 0023-9267 PP100007900 ISSN 0023-9267 ACCENTUATE THE POSITIVE RRP $20 95.5 Successful law firms are agile Whether you’re at home or back in the office, LEAP lets you work with flexibility. On the go In the office In court At home leap.com.au/agile-law-firms Contents May 2021 WORKPLACE LAW SPECIAL EDITION FROM PAGE 22 Vaccination guide Legal firms Employment status Wages Fair Work Act Employment protection Law firms after COVID-19 How firms have adapted By Karin Derkley PAGE 11 Zooming into new jobs The challenge of starting a new role during the pandemic By Karin Derkley PAGE 15 Health and wellbeing Accentuate the positive By Megan Fulford PAGE 87 ADOBE STOCK MAY 2021 LAW INSTITUTE JOURNAL 1 Contents May 2021 workplace law special edition Protect the best interests FEATURES NEWS EVERY ISSUE 4 Contributors OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY FIRMS 6 From the president Law firms after COVID-19 of your clients with 22 A shot in the arm 11 8 Unsolicited A COVID-19 vaccine has arrived but the The pandemic dealt an initial blow COURTS & PARLIAMENT pandemic's twists and turns are not over yet.
    [Show full text]
  • NVVE Conference Dec 2016 Amersfoort
    NVVE Conference Dec 2016 Amersfoort Choosing your own peaceful reliable death Philip Nitschke End of Life Models • The Medical Model Patients of doctors who are sick enough to qualify get help to die • The Human Right Model All rational adults have the right to a peaceful elective death at the time of their choosing Medical Registration Burning Darwin, Dec 15 Exit Philosophy The right of a rational adult to a peaceful death at the time of one’s choosing is fundamental – it is not dependent on degree of sickness or the permission or authority of the medical profession. Exit’s goal is to ensure that ALL elderly members get access to their own ‘peaceful pill’ which they control and can use at the time of their choosing. Constant revision of The Peaceful Pill eHandbook Keynote Presentation: Dr Deb Campbell Doing us Slowly What happened to the Australian Voluntary Euthanasia Debate? Internet Security • Use Email Encryption • Use a VPN • Use TOR Bowser • Pay using Bitcoins Scam Websites offering euthanasia drugs Marketing themselves as “Exit International”! www.quickbuynembutalonline.com The ‘cool’ pill to die! • The ‘Drion’ Pill • The ‘Last Will’ Pill • The ‘Peaceful Pill’ Professor Huib Drion Nembutal in the 1950s Nembutal P 198 Overseas importation P 190 Tijuana (Mexico) Bangkok (Thailand) Cusco (Peru) Mexican veterinary Nembutal (2015) Mexican Nembutal Prescription Nembutal Mexican Mail Order Mail order veterinary Nembutal from Mexico Sodium Pentabarbitol P 212 (Soluble Nembutal Powder) ‘Flat Pack’ Nembutal fromP 217 China Nembutal Purity
    [Show full text]