Stratigraphy of the Koobi Fora Formation (Pliocene and Pleistocene) in the Loiyangalani Region of Northern Kenya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stratigraphy of the Koobi Fora Formation (Pliocene and Pleistocene) in the Loiyangalani Region of Northern Kenya Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Journal of African Earth Sciences 51 (2008) 277–297 www.elsevier.com/locate/jafrearsci Stratigraphy of the Koobi Fora Formation (Pliocene and Pleistocene) in the Loiyangalani region of northern Kenya Patrick N. Gathogo a, Francis H. Brown a,*, Ian McDougall b a Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, 135 South 1460 E, Room 209, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA b Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Mills Road, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia Received 30 October 2007; received in revised form 17 January 2008; accepted 29 January 2008 Available online 20 February 2008 Abstract Tuffaceous marker beds in the Loiyangalani region were previously identified as correlative with similar beds in the Shungura and Koobi Fora Formations of southwestern Ethiopia and northwestern Kenya. Associated sedimentary strata correlate with the Koobi Fora Formation, and include intercalated basalt flows. In the Loiyangalani region the Koobi Fora Formation has a composite thickness of at least 257 m, and records one time interval for which no strata are known in the Koobi Fora region. Four members of the Koobi Fora Formation (Lonyumun, Tulu Bor, Burgi, and KBS) are recognized in the region, and a composite member (Moiti–Lokochot) pro- posed because the Lokochot Tuff, the formal boundary between the Moiti and Lokochot Members has not been identified. This extends the known geographic area of the Koobi Fora Formation 100 km southward. These strata, together with others, were previously termed ‘Loiyangalani formation (or Formation)’. Deposition in the Loiyangalani region began at about the same time as in the Koobi Fora and Nachukui Formations. Newly named basalts are Kankam (3.2–3.3 Ma), Lenderit (2.02 to 2.18 ± 0.02 Ma), and Balo (1.79 ± 0.02 Ma). We also report K/Ar ages on basalts from Mt. Kulal (2.04 ± 0.02 to 2.40 ± 0.03 Ma) east of the region and from Serima Gorge (0.77 ± 0.01 Ma) south of the study area. Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Kenya; Turkana Basin; Omo Group; Koobi Fora Formation; Stratigraphy; Loiyangalani 1. Introduction mation and intercalated basalts in the Loiyangalani region southeast of Lake Turkana (Figs. 1 and 2). The Koobi Fora Formation northeast of Lake Turkana Sedimentary and volcanic sequences of the Loiyangalani in northern Kenya is renowned for its prehistoric sites and region discussed in this study were previously mapped and comparatively complete stratigraphic Pliocene and Pleisto- assigned pre-Pliocene ages by Ochieng’ et al. (1988), Wil- cene sections. Detailed accounts of the stratigraphic record kinson (1988), and Rop (1990). Preliminary visits to the of the formation are available for the Ileret, Karari, Koobi region, however, showed that the area preserves tuffaceous Fora, and Allia Bay regions (Brown and Feibel, 1986, marker beds that lie within the Omo Group (de Heinzelin, 1991; Gathogo and Brown, 2006), and the mammalian fos- 1983), a sedimentary sequence that crops out elsewhere in sil record is described by Leakey and Leakey (1978), Harris the Omo–Turkana Basin (southwestern Ethiopia and (1983, 1991), Wood (1991), and Isaac and Isaac (1997).In northwestern Kenya). Potassium–argon dates on basalts this study we describe newly recognized sections of the for- from the Loiyangalani region are of Pliocene age. Motiva- tion for this study, therefore, commenced from the need to * clarify inconsistencies about the geology of the region. Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 801 581 8767; fax: +1 801 581 7065. Potassium–argon ages reported here were obtained at E-mail addresses: [email protected] (P.N. Gathogo), [email protected] (F.H. Brown), [email protected] (I. the Research School of Earth Sciences, the Australian McDougall). National University, using methods described in McDou- 1464-343X/$ - see front matter Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2008.01.010 278 P.N. Gathogo et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 51 (2008) 277–297 Fig. 1. Map of the Loiyangalani region with contours at 100 m intervals taken from the 90-m USGS digital topographic dataset. Locations of dated samples are shown as filled circles with the sample number. Locations of measured sections are shown as short lines identified by the last two digits of the section number (of the form PNG-LY08) given in italics. gall and Feibel (1999). Electron microprobe analyses on the (2004) for the Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary at 1.81 Ma, glass phase of tuffs were obtained at the University of Utah and the Pliocene–Miocene boundary at 5.33 Ma. following procedures described by Nash (1992), and using standards reported in Brown et al. (2006). Trace element 1.1. Previous studies analyses on the glass phase of tuffs were obtained by X-ray fluorescence at the University of Utah following pro- Hitherto the geology of the Loiyangalani region has cedures described by Cerling and Brown (1982). For our been based on studies conducted at reconnaissance scale discussion, we accept the age estimates of Gradstein et al. by Ochieng’ et al. (1988), Wilkinson (1988), and Rop P.N. Gathogo et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 51 (2008) 277–297 279 Fig. 2. Geological map of the Loiyangalani region. See Fig. 1 for sample locations and section locations. (1990). Their published geologic maps (scale 1:250,000) outcrop areas in the region. Metamorphic rocks regarded show Neogene sedimentary and volcanic rocks as the dom- as being of late Proterozoic or early Phanerozoic age (Ochi- inant exposures, comprising nearly equal proportions of eng’ et al., 1988) are also present, but they are exposed over 280 P.N. Gathogo et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 51 (2008) 277–297 Composite Column Named markers Koobi Fora Fm. Members Balo Basalt KBS 250 KBS Tuff Member upper Lenderit Basalt 200 Burgi Member middle Kokiselei Tuff 150 lower Lokalalei Tuff Kankam Basalt Tulu Bor Member Thickness(m) Tulu Bor Tuff 100 Moiti-Lokochot Member Moiti Tuff 50 Gombe Group basalts Lonyumun Member Key to lithology Basalt flow Volcanic ash Sediments(claystone, mudstone, and sandstone) 0 Fig. 3. Composite section of the Koobi Fora Formation in the Loiyangalani region. a very limited area. These earlier studies assigned conflict- that the ‘‘base of the Loiyangalani formation appears to be ing geologic ages to rock sequences in the region, and no contemporaneous with the Kajong Formation (early to standard stratigraphic scheme for the rock units was mid Miocene; Savage and Williamson (1978)), being simi- defined or used. A synopsis of these three studies is pre- lar in lithologic composition and stratigraphic position sented below to demonstrate the nature of stratigraphic (overlying metamorphic rocks).” Wilkinson (1988) maps problems that exist. deposits exposed in the northern part of the region as Ochieng’ et al. (1988) map sedimentary rocks in the cen- ‘‘[s]ub-volcanic sediments (‘Turkana Grits’)” that ‘‘includes tral and southern parts of the Loiyangalani region as the Sera Iltomia and Kajong Formations of previous work- ‘‘Loiyangalani formation”, an informal stratigraphic unit ers”, and he tentatively assigns these deposits to the Creta- to which they tentatively assign a Miocene age. They note ceous System. Rop (1990, Fig. 15) mapped all sedimentary P.N. Gathogo et al. / Journal of African Earth Sciences 51 (2008) 277–297 281 rocks exposed in the northern and southern parts of the Five members that constitute the Pliocene sequence of region as one stratigraphic unit, the ‘‘Kajong Formation.” the formation have been identified, most outcrops of which Assignment of sedimentary strata in the region to pre- occur in the central and western parts of the region. These Miocene by Rop (1990) is based on his observations that Pliocene deposits are locally underlain by metamorphic these strata are overlain by ‘‘Loiyangalani Formation”, rocks of presumed late Proterozoic and/or early Phanero- and he notes that ‘‘recent K–Ar dates in the base of the zoic age, and are disconformably overlain by the Holocene Loiyangalani Formation yield a date of 18.4 ± 0.5 m.y. Galana Boi Formation of Owen and Renaut (1986).In (Fitch and Miller Associates, Cambridge, unpub. data).” thickness and exposure Pliocene basalts dominate over sed- Virtually all volcanic rocks in the Loiyangalani region imentary strata in the northern, eastern, and southern parts are mapped as plateau basalts and assigned a Pliocene of the region. Reconnaissance work and satellite imagery age in the northern part of the region by Wilkinson suggest that these basalts also extend north and east (1988), but a Miocene age in the central and southern parts beyond the region of study. of the region by Ochieng’ et al. (1988). In addition Ochieng’ Strata of the Lonyumun, Tulu Bor, Burgi, and KBS et al. (1988) mapped the two northern hills at El Molo Bay members in the Loiyangalani region are identified and (islands during high lake levels) as Pliocene and Pleistocene described under their corresponding formal names below. volcanic breccia, and two igneous rock outcrops immedi- The remaining two Pliocene members, Moiti and Loko- ately northeast and southeast of the bay as dolerite plugs chot, cannot be differentiated as separate formal units and sheets. Rop (1990) mapped all plateau basalts in the because the base of the Lokochot Tuff, the formal bound- region as Miocene. A revised geological map of the region ary between the two members, has not been identified in (Fig. 2) is based on work reported here and a summary of the Loiyangalani region. Thus, using conventions set by the stratigraphy is shown in Fig. 3. the International Stratigraphic Code (Salvador, 1994) for naming of units with stratigraphic uncertainty, we provi- 2. Koobi Fora Formation and Omo Group deposits sionally adopt the name Moiti–Lokochot Member to refer to undifferentiated strata of the Moiti and Lokochot Mem- Brown and Feibel (1986) formally defined the Koobi bers in the Loiyangalani region.
Recommended publications
  • Curren T Anthropology
    Forthcoming Current Anthropology Wenner-Gren Symposium Curren Supplementary Issues (in order of appearance) t Humanness and Potentiality: Revisiting the Anthropological Object in the Anthropolog Current Context of New Medical Technologies. Klaus Hoeyer and Karen-Sue Taussig, eds. Alternative Pathways to Complexity: Evolutionary Trajectories in the Anthropology Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age. Steven L. Kuhn and Erella Hovers, eds. y THE WENNER-GREN SYMPOSIUM SERIES Previously Published Supplementary Issues December 2012 HUMAN BIOLOGY AND THE ORIGINS OF HOMO Working Memory: Beyond Language and Symbolism. omas Wynn and Frederick L. Coolidge, eds. GUEST EDITORS: SUSAN ANTÓN AND LESLIE C. AIELLO Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas. Setha M. Low and Sally Early Homo: Who, When, and Where Engle Merry, eds. Environmental and Behavioral Evidence V Dental Evidence for the Reconstruction of Diet in African Early Homo olum Corporate Lives: New Perspectives on the Social Life of the Corporate Form. Body Size, Body Shape, and the Circumscription of the Genus Homo Damani Partridge, Marina Welker, and Rebecca Hardin, eds. Ecological Energetics in Early Homo e 5 Effects of Mortality, Subsistence, and Ecology on Human Adult Height 3 e Origins of Agriculture: New Data, New Ideas. T. Douglas Price and Plasticity in Human Life History Strategy Ofer Bar-Yosef, eds. Conditions for Evolution of Small Adult Body Size in Southern Africa Supplement Growth, Development, and Life History throughout the Evolution of Homo e Biological Anthropology of Living Human Populations: World Body Size, Size Variation, and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Early Homo Histories, National Styles, and International Networks. Susan Lindee and Ricardo Ventura Santos, eds.
    [Show full text]
  • Lieberman 2001E.Pdf
    news and views Another face in our family tree Daniel E. Lieberman The evolutionary history of humans is complex and unresolved. It now looks set to be thrown into further confusion by the discovery of another species and genus, dated to 3.5 million years ago. ntil a few years ago, the evolutionary history of our species was thought to be Ureasonably straightforward. Only three diverse groups of hominins — species more closely related to humans than to chim- panzees — were known, namely Australo- pithecus, Paranthropus and Homo, the genus to which humans belong. Of these, Paran- MUSEUMS OF KENYA NATIONAL thropus and Homo were presumed to have evolved between two and three million years ago1,2 from an early species in the genus Australopithecus, most likely A. afarensis, made famous by the fossil Lucy. But lately, confusion has been sown in the human evolutionary tree. The discovery of three new australopithecine species — A. anamensis3, A. garhi 4 and A. bahrelghazali5, in Kenya, Ethiopia and Chad, respectively — showed that genus to be more diverse and Figure 1 Two fossil skulls from early hominin species. Left, KNM-WT 40000. This newly discovered widespread than had been thought. Then fossil is described by Leakey et al.8. It is judged to represent a new species, Kenyanthropus platyops. there was the finding of another, as yet poorly Right, KNM-ER 1470. This skull was formerly attributed to Homo rudolfensis1, but might best be understood, genus of early hominin, Ardi- reassigned to the genus Kenyanthropus — the two skulls share many similarities, such as the flatness pithecus, which is dated to 4.4 million years of the face and the shape of the brow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pliocene Hominin Diversity Conundrum: Do More Fossils
    SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE The Pliocene hominin diversity conundrum: Do more fossils mean less clarity? SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE Yohannes Haile-Selassiea,b,1, Stephanie M. Melilloc, and Denise F. Sud Edited by Richard G. Klein, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved January 7, 2016 (received for review November 6, 2015) Recent discoveries of multiple middle Pliocene hominins have raised the possibility that early hominins were as speciose as later hominins. However, debates continue to arise around the validity of most of these new taxa, largely based on poor preservation of holotype specimens, small sample size, or the lack of evidence for ecological diversity. A closer look at the currently available fossil evidence from Ethiopia, Kenya, and Chad indicate that Australopithecus afarensis was not the only hominin species during the middle Pliocene, and that there were other species clearly distinguishable from it by their locomotor adaptation and diet. Although there is no doubt that the presence of multiple species during the middle Pliocene opens new windows into our evolutionary past, it also complicates our understanding of early hominin taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships. hominin diversity | Australopithecus | Kenyanthropus | Pliocene | ecological diversity If one looks back over the controversies of human When Australopithecus bahrelghazali was named evolution, they have one element in common: new in 1995 based on an approximately 3.5-Ma partial discoveries, theories, methods came along which “ ” mandible from Chad (12), it was quickly dismissed as no one in the controversy anticipated. The facts – changed, and consequently people were not right a geographic variant of Au. afarensis (13 15). The or wrong in any simple way.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Potential Hydrological Impact of the Gibe III Dam on Lake Turkana Water Level Using Multi-Source Satellite Data
    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3561–3578, 2012 www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/3561/2012/ Hydrology and doi:10.5194/hess-16-3561-2012 Earth System © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Sciences Assessing the potential hydrological impact of the Gibe III Dam on Lake Turkana water level using multi-source satellite data N. M. Velpuri1,* and G. B. Senay1,2 1GISc Center of Excellence, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA 2USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, Sioux Falls, SD, USA *now at: ASRC Research and Technology Solutions, Contractor to US Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, Sioux Falls, SD, USA Correspondence to: G. B. Senay ([email protected]) Received: 4 February 2012 – Published in Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: 8 March 2012 Revised: 3 July 2012 – Accepted: 6 September 2012 – Published: 11 October 2012 Abstract. Lake Turkana, the largest desert lake in the world, were found to be within the natural variability of the lake of is fed by ungauged or poorly gauged river systems. To meet 4.8 m. Moreover, modeling results indicated that the hydro- the demand of electricity in the East African region, Ethiopia logical impact of the Gibe III dam would depend on the ini- is currently building the Gibe III hydroelectric dam on the tial lake level at the time of dam commencement. Areas along Omo River, which supplies more than 80 % of the inflows the Lake Turkana shoreline that are vulnerable to fluctuations to Lake Turkana. On completion, the Gibe III dam will be in lake levels due to the Gibe III dam were also identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Imaginary Human Evolution Dots: the Case Of
    Perspectives Connecting definition ‘intermediates’ between the Earlier anamensis finds two species. It is all based on the as- It was in 1995 that dental, cranial imaginary human sumption of evolution and the alleged and postcranial specimens from two evolution dots: age-date of the fossil. It is in fact separate localities in Kenya, dated difficult to see how anyone can argue from about 3.8 to 4.2 Ma ago, were an- the case of on the basis of the morphology of the nounced as belonging to a new hominid fossil scraps themselves that they are a species Au. anamensis.11 Most of the Australopithecus link between afarensis and ramidus. fossil scraps undoubtedly came from anamensis It is important to note that some evo- an ape, such as the chimp-like jaws, lutionists have attributed earlier finds but controversy has surrounded the al- Peter Line of anamensis to the existing species legedly more human-like nature of the afarensis,8 and the simplest explana- tibia and humerus.12 The anamensis n the seemingly endless bombard- tion may be that the latest finds labelled humerus lacks a deep, oval hollow, Iment of ‘human evolution’ anamensis simply represent within- used as a locking mechanism between propaganda, the latest headlines to species variation of afarensis. the humerus and ulna, which is present grab attention boast: ‘Fossil connects Probably the most significant find in chimpanzees, but not in humans. human evolution dots’,1 and ‘Fossils by the researchers is the Asa Issie right And the anamensis tibia is wide, as fill gap in human lineage’.2 The femoral shaft (ASI-VP-5/154), which in humans, because of extra spongy tissue, which acts as a shock absorber above headlines are in response to a they characterize as being morphologi- during bipedal locomotion.13 paper recently published in Nature3 cally similar to the left proximal femur 9 At the time of publication, pale- about allegedly 4.1 to 4.2 Ma-old of AL 288-1 (Lucy).
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology of Australopithecus Anamensis from Kanapoi and Allia Bay, Kenya
    C. V. Ward Morphology of Australopithecus anamensis Departments of Anthropology from Kanapoi and Allia Bay, Kenya and Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, The hominid species Australopithecus anamensis was originally 107 Swallow Hall, described in 1995, with new specimens and more secure dates given University of Missouri, in 1998. This paper lists all fossils attributed to A. anamensis, and Columbia, Missouri 65211, provides anatomical descriptions of those not yet described in detail U.S.A. E-mail: with photographs of all but undiagnostic fragments. We also provide [email protected] comparative analysis of these specimens. The A. anamensis holotype mandible was found at Kanapoi, as were most of the paratypes. The M. G. Leakey Allia Bay sample is less well represented, and does not preserve many Division of Palaeontology, anatomical elements diagnostic of this species. Still, the Allia Bay National Museums of Kenya, sample most closely resembles that from Kanapoi, and we suggest P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, that for the time being it be retained as A. anamensis. A. anamensis Kenya. E-mail: most closely resembles A. afarensis, but can be distinguished from it [email protected] in many features. Most of these features are inferred to be primitive for the genus. Based on the limited postcranial evidence available, A. Walker A. anamensis appears to have been habitually bipedal, although it retained some primitive features of its upper limbs. A. anamensis Departments of ff Anthropology and Biology, di ers from A. afarensis in having narrower, more parallel jaws with a Pennsylvania State very slightly more ape-like canine/premolar complex than is found in University, University Park, A.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA TODAY • Stealth Attack on Science, P
    Vol. 7, No. 3 March 1997 INSIDE GSA TODAY • Stealth Attack on Science, p. 37 • Award Citations, Responses, p. 13 A Publication of the Geological Society of America • Employment Service, p. 41 Debating the Environmental Factors in Hominid Evolution Craig S. Feibel, Department of Anthropology, Douglass Campus, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0270 ABSTRACT Environmental factors, particularly climatic fluctu- ations, are widely viewed as important controls on the path of evolution. The broad coincidence of two adaptive transitions in hominid evolution with major climatic milestones supports models in which these evolutionary shifts are climatically driven. In the first, the origin of the Hominidae is tied to the Messinian desiccation of the Mediterranean. A second, more convincing case, involves the origin of the genus Homo and the first appearance of stone-tool technology, which occur in broad contem- poreneity with the onset of Northern Hemisphere glacia- tion in the Pliocene. Detailed analysis, however, encoun- ters difficulties in tying large-scale forcing phenomena to the terrestrial evidence for hominid evolution, and in resolving the effects of interacting environmental factors. The influences of climate, tectonics, volcanism, and community evolution all act at varying scales, and are reflected in different ways in the geologic record. Current research is tying detailed studies from the African conti- nent to records of global change, and to better under- Figure 1. The hominid cranium standing of the interactive effects of various environ- KNM-ER 1470, attributed to Homo mental factors with human evolution. rudolfensis (Wood, 1992), illustrates the enlarged braincase that chatacter- izes the genus Homo. Photo courtesy INTRODUCTION of the National Museums of Kenya.
    [Show full text]
  • TBI-Ebook.Pdf
    TURKANA BASIN INSTITUTE Science & Research in the Turkana Basin, Kenya This book © 2015 by the Turkana Basin Institute. All rights reserved. Cover photo: Mike Hettwer, www.hettwer.com. The Stony Brook Foundation is a private 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that handles philanthropic contributions to TBI. 1 2 O M 3 O MAPMAP OFOF THETHE R I V E TURKANATURKANA R BASINBASIN ETHIOPIA E G N A R BULUK R U B A Ileret Village L TBIILERET E M O T O K O I R A N NORTH ISLAND A R O Sibiloi F I National B LOMEKWI O Park O K NACHUKUI CENTRAL ISLAND TBITURKWEL Lodwar Nakechichok Village W E R K L U T R I V E R M A G A H T O L Loiyangalani M T . K U L A L A SOUTH ISLAND KENYA N A Nairobi K R U L T A K E N 0 25 50 Miles 0 25 50 Kilometers 4 TBI International Advisory Board Dexter Bailey Meave G. Leakey Kitili Mbathi Mark Read Executive Director of the Research Professor, Stony Brook University; Managing Director, CFC Stanbic Bank Limited; Director and Chair, Everard Read Gallery, Stony Brook Foundation Director, Plio-Pleistocene Research, TBI Chief Executive, CFC Stanbic Holdings Limited; Johannesburg, South Africa East Africa Regional Director, Simon Cairns Richard E. Leakey James H. Simons Standard Bank Group Co-founder, Africa’s Voices Foundation Professor of Anthropology, Stony Brook Chairman, Simons Foundation; University; Chair of the Board, TBI Titus Naikuni Chairman & Founder, Richard L. Gelfond Chairman, AirTel Kenya Renaissance Technologies Chief Executive Officer, IMAX Corporation Julia Marton-Lefèvre Former Director General of IUCN Martin Oduor-Otieno Marilyn H.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of Paleontological Collecting Areas 106, 107 and 109
    STRATIGRAPHY OF PALEONTOLOGICAL COLLECTING AREAS 106, 107 AND 109, KOOBI FORA REGION, NORTHERN KENYA by Orion Merrell Rogers A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Utah August 2010 Copyright © Orion Merrell Rogers 2010 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Orion Merrell Rogers has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Francis H. Brown , Chair 4-29-10 bate Approved Ronald L. Bruhn , Member 4-29-10 Date Approved Thure E. Cerling , Member 4-20-10 Date Approved and by i olo on ' Chair of __________"'K "'·p 1:...::S'-' "' "'m= "''----_________ the Department of Geologyand Geophysics and by Charles A. Wight, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT The KBS and the upper Burgi Members of the Koobi Fora Formation are exposed on the eastern shore of Lake Turkana in northern Kenya ~11 km southeast of Koobi Fora in paleontologic collecting areas 106, 107 and 109. The upper Burgi Member is only exposed in very low lying outcrops in the southern portion of the study area therefore a stratigraphic section for this unit was not established. All other strata in the areas listed belong to the KBS Member and total ~145 m of section. During KBS Member time a large lake was present in this region, and most of the KBS Member in this area was deposited in nearshore lacustrine settings as lake level fluctuated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cenozoic Magmatism of East Africa: Part II – Rifting of the Mobile Belt
    The Cenozoic Magmatism of East Africa: Part II – Rifting of the Mobile Belt Tyrone O. Rooney Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA Abstract Despite the foundational role East Africa has played in the advancement of our understanding of continental rifting, there remains substantial ambiguity as to how magmatism has evolved during progressive rift development. This contribution is a comparative study that explores the temporal development of magmatism in both rifts, and within the interposing Turkana Depression. Notwithstanding the independent evolution of the Main Ethiopian Rift and Kenya Rift prior to their quaternary linkage, magmatic events within them show remarkable parallelism. Following an initial pulse of basaltic magmatism ca. 20 Ma, more evolved compositions (flood phonolites in Kenya, rhyolites in Ethiopia) dominated the landscape until ca. 12 Ma. From ca. 12 Ma to 9 Ma, a renewed phase of widespread basaltic volcanism (Mid-Miocene Resurgence Phase) impacted the entire region from the Afar margin to Kenya, though activity in the south slightly predates equivalent basaltic events to the north. Following this widespread basaltic event, silicic magmatism again dominated the now nascent rifts until a renewed phase of basaltic activity commenced ca. 4 to 1.6 Ma termed the ‘Stratoid Phase’. Following the termination of the Stratoid Phase, the modern expression of volcanism in both rifts has been dominated by central silicic volcanoes. Magmatic activity within the Turkana
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Fossil Fish from the Kibish Formation, Omo Valley, Ethiopia
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Human Evolution xxx (2008) 1–10 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Human Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol Quaternary fossil fish from the Kibish Formation, Omo Valley, Ethiopia Josh Trapani* Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution NHB, MRC121 Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA article info abstract Article history: The late Quaternary Kibish Formation of the Omo Valley, southwestern Ethiopia, preserves environments Received 24 April 2007 reflecting a history of fluctuations in the level of nearby Lake Turkana over the past 200,000 years. The Accepted 15 May 2008 Kibish Formation has yielded a diverse mammalian fauna (as well as birds and crocodiles), stone tools, Available online xxx and the oldest anatomically modern Homo sapiens. Fish, the most common vertebrate fossils in this unit, are reported in this study. Catfish (especially clariids and Synodontis) and Nile perch (Lates niloticus) predominate, but the gymnarchid Gymnarchus, a cyprinid (Barbus), tigerfish (Hydrocynus), pufferfish Keywords: (Tetraodon), and other catfish are also present. In total, nine teleost genera are found in the Kibish For- Ethiopia Fish mation, representing a subset of the 37 genera that constitute the modern Omo-Turkana ichthyofauna. Kibish Formation Several taxa present in the modern fauna, including Polypterus and members of the family Cichlidae, are Omo Valley not found in the Kibish deposits. Most specimens are preserved as disarticulated or broken skeletal el- Paleoecology ements, but some preservation of articulated elements (e.g., sets of vertebrae, crania with lower jaws or Quaternary cleithra) also occurs. Many of the catfish and Nile perch specimens are larger than the largest reported Taphonomy from the modern river or lake.
    [Show full text]
  • New Look at Human Evolution Copyright 2003 Scientific American, Inc
    ORIGINS early hominid fossils from AFRICA The year was 1965. Bryan Patterson, a paleoanthropologist ern humans than the one other Australo- Yet Patterson’s fossil would eventu- from Harvard University, unearthed a pithecus humerus known at the time. ally help establish the existence of a new fragment of a fossil arm bone at a site And yet the age of the Kanapoi fossil species of Australopithecus—the oldest called Kanapoi in northern Kenya. He proved somewhat surprising. Although yet to be identified—and push back the and his colleagues knew it would be hard the techniques for dating the rocks where origins of upright walking to more than to make a great deal of anatomical or the fossil was uncovered were still fairly four million years ago. But to see how evolutionary sense out of a small piece of rudimentary, the group working in Ken- this happened, we need to trace the steps elbow joint. Nevertheless, they did rec- ya was able to show that the bone was that paleoanthropologists have taken in ognize some features reminiscent of a probably older than the various Austra- constructing an outline for the story of ) species of early hominid (a hominid is lopithecus specimens that had previous- hominid evolution. right any upright-walking primate) known as ly been found. Despite this unusual result, and Australopithecus, first discovered 40 however, the significance of Patterson’s An Evolving Story years earlier in South Africa by Raymond discovery was not to be confirmed for an- SCIENTISTS CLASSIFY the immediate center Dart of the University of the Witwater- other 30 years.
    [Show full text]