Arxiv:1901.05418V1 [Gr-Qc] 16 Jan 2019 H at Ra Pl H Pn a D Ozero

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arxiv:1901.05418V1 [Gr-Qc] 16 Jan 2019 H at Ra Pl H Pn a D Ozero Gravity with spin and electromagnetism with a nonsymmetric metric tensor Richard T. Hammond∗ University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, North Carolina and Army Research Office Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (Dated: January 17, 2019) It is shown the antisymmetric part of the metric tensor is the potential for the spin field. Various metricity conditions are discussed and comparisons are made to other theories, including Einstein’s. It is shown in the weak field limit the theory reduces to one with a symmetric metric tensor and totally antisymmetric torsion. It is also shown, due to gauge invariance, the electromagnetic field must be present. PACS numbers: 04.20.Cv, 04.20.Fy, 04.40.Nr Keywords: non-symmetric metric, torsion, spin I. INTRODUCTION However, the source used for composite bodies is al- ways some averaged out model of the true source, the One of the strongest motivations for developing elementary particles that make up matter. To have a theory with a nonsymmetric metric tensor comes a realistic theory, it must be formulated in terms from the nonsymmetric energy momentum tensor, of a source which is an elementary particle (macro- but first, let us address a common proof, appearing scopic averaging may be done later), and each el- in many textbooks, that the energy momentum ten- ementary particle has intrinsic spin. The electron, sor must be symmetric. These “proofs” assume the quarks, and the electron neutrino, and the two other angular momentum is orbital angular momentum, so families each have spin. Exempted here are the two the contribution from a small region is the density exchange particles with zero spin; the Higgs and the times the volume times the radius. As the volume quantum of torsion. With this proviso, since parti- goes to zero so does the contribution to the angu- cles have spin, the energy momentum tensor cannot lar momentum, which, as the proof shows, yields a be symmetric and so, we take the metric tensor to symmetric energy momentum tensor. However, if be nonsymmetric. the angular momentum is intrinsic spin the argu- More modern developments in physics, after the ment fails, as discussed in detail by Sciami.[1] In Einstein era, make the nonsymmetric metric tensor fact, Papapetrou showed the antisymmetric part of more cogent than ever. Anti-commuting variables, the energy momentum tensor is related to spin (by non-commutative geometry and superspace can be spin I will always mean intrinsic spin), [2],[3] and related to the antisymmetric part of the metric ten- so we are naturally led to consider a nonsymmetric sor. For example, for anti-commuting Grassmann metric tensor if spin is included. variables θµ, which satisfy dθµ, dθν = 0, the line { } µ ν The exception to this argument arises from gravi- element can be generalized to include φµν dθ dθ tation with a symmetric metric tensor with torsion. where φµν is the antisymmetric part of the met- In this case, as is known, the torsion can describe ric tenor. In the metricity conditions (discussed spin. However, the torsion arises from an antisym- fully below), the antisymmetric part of the metric arXiv:1901.05418v1 [gr-qc] 16 Jan 2019 metric source tensor and, as we will see below for tensor appears in the skew symmetric derivative, torsion of the string theory type, the source of tor- φµν,σ + φσµ,ν + φνσ,µ. The temptation to set this sion turns out to be the antisymmetric part of the to zero may have fueled attempts to interpret φµν metric tensor. Thus, we end up with a nonsymmet- as being related to the electromagnetic field, but to- ric energy momentum tensor. day we see this combination is used to define torsion These arguments also tell us what the physical in- (as discussed below) both from generalized gravity[4] terpretation of the nonsymmetric part of the metric and string theory.[5] tensor is, it is related to spin. However, all this as- The older work is well known. Soon after Einstein sumes the source has intrinsic spin. For bodies like published his theory of general relativity he, and the Earth or an apple the spins may add to zero. others, began serious investigations into the phys- ical theory based on a non-symmetric metric tensor gµν [6],[7],[8], a detailed review may be found in the literature.[9] For almost 100 years this search led to ∗ [email protected] many dead-ends and disappointing quagmires. Al- 2 though early investigations of Einstein sought to de- A. previous related work velop a fully geometric theory in which the energy momentum tensor was of a geometric origin, most It will be shown that the linearized version of the of his efforts sought to find a unified theory of grav- nonsymmetric theory developed below reduces to a itation and electromagnetism. Various researchers well studied theory with a symmetric metric tensor picked up the torch, including Schr¨odinger,[10] but and torsion of the string theory type, i.e., finally the light dimmed as it became evident these dark paths led nowhere. 1 Sµνσ ψ = (ψµν,σ + ψσµ,ν + ψνσ,µ) (1) ≡ [µν,σ] 3 Two notable approaches followed. One is the work of Sciama,[1] who showed the antisymmetric part of where the metric tensor is associated with intrinsic spin. 1 This followed work by Papapetrou and Belinfante S σ = Γ σ Γ σ (2) µν 2 µν − νµ who considered a nonsymmetric energy momentum σ tensor.[3] Sciama adopted Einstein’s variational ap- where Γµν is the affine connection and where ψµν is proach but did not associate the theory with electro- the antisymmetric torsion potential. The geometri- magnetism. Soon after, however, Sciama adopted a cal part of the action is simply symmetric metric tensor but considered spacetime to be endowed with torsion. This notion of classical spin in general relativity with a symmetric metric I = √ gd4xR (3) tensor was carried forward by Hehl and his collab- − Z orators in the 1970s and later others.[11] [12] [13] The other well-known approach is due to Moffat.[14] where R is the curvature scalar and, in that theory, He adopted Einstein’s equations with a nonsymmet- variations are taken with respect to a general po- tential defined by Φµν gµν + ψµν where gµν is the ric metric tensor, but he eschewed the notion of ≡ electromagnetism, taking the theory to be one of symmetric metric tensor.[12] This theory is very suc- gravitation only. It was shown if the metric tensor cessful. One of the most important results is that the was expanded about a background metric, the an- correct conservation law of total angular momentum tisymmetric potential appears without a derivative. is obtained if the source of torsion is intrinsic spin. This non gauge invariant term gave rise to ghosts, From this viewpoint, it was argued that torsion must but they were removed by adding cosmological type exist. A phenomenological source was constructed terms.[15] The revenant idea of the antisymmetric and the weak field limit of the torsion was found. part of the metric tensor being associated with spin This coincided exactly with the low energy limit of was described more recently.[16] the Dirac equation in spacetime with torsion, which is a very important confirmation of the theory. It was then shown strings are a natural source for the One of the problems with using a nonsymmetric material action, and it was further shown how the metric is the proliferation of tensors, such as in the correct equations of motion arise from strings. How- definition of the covariant derivative, the curvature ever, the notion of a general potential Φµν was not tensor, and its contractions that form scalars to be a geometrical foundation. It was simply a tidy way used in the Lagrangian. Einstein used transposi- of deriving the field equations. Variations with re- tion invariance as a guiding principle. This is not a spect to the general potential are identical to inde- physics principle, unless one interprets it as coming pendent variations of the metric tensor and torsion from a charge invariance,[17], but even if this fragile potential. However, it was suggestive. It certainly notion stood up, it is based on the idea the theory invites the question, can the theory be formulated in involves electromagnetism. Even recently, for exam- terms of a nonsymmetric metric tensor? In addition, ple, the notion that the antisymmetric part of the it is known the skew symmetric derivative appear- metric tensor is associated with nuclear forces has ing in (1) arises naturally in the nonsymmetric the- been considered.[18] ory when metricity conditions are used. Instead of thinking this is related to electromagnetism, as Ein- stein did, it is more natural that this may be related In the current paper it is shown the non- to spin, as will be seen in detail below. symmetric part of the metric tensor is associated This notion gives us very useful direction, and es- with spin. With this, physical principles are used to pecially what to expect in the weak field limit. Also, choose the appropriate terms so that the prolifera- the notion that the (dimensionless) antisymmetric tion of tensors is not an issue. part of the metric potential acts like a potential for 3 the field coincides with the idea that the symmetric II. AFFINE GEOMETRY part is like the potential of the gravitational field. Finally, one of the original complaints about the We begin by looking at a spacetime endowed with nonsymmetric theory was that the symmetric part an affine connection, more details may be found in and antisymmetric part transform separately, which the literature.[21] At this point there is no concept of was considered bad.
Recommended publications
  • Unified Field Theory Quest Synopsis
    Unified Field Theory Quest Synopsis file:///Documents/TheoryOfEverything/quest.html The Unified Field Theory - Synopsis of a Personal Quest John A. Gowan June 2014 Home Page The Charges of Matter are the Symmetry Debts of Light Papers: Symmetry Principles of the Unified Field Theory (a "Theory of Everything") - Part I Symmetry Principles of the Unified Field Theory (a "Theory of Everything") - Part 2 Symmetry Principles of the Unified Field Theory (a "Theory of Everything") - Part 3 (Summary) See also: NY Times article on Emmy Noether 26 Mar 2012 Neuenschwander, D. E. Emmy Noether's Wonderful Theorem. 2011. Johns Hopkins University Press. Part I: History When I turned 40 (in 1977), I started to build my personal version of the Unified Field Theory. I did so as a faithful disciple of Einstein, attempting to help the scientific hero of my youth reach his unfulfilled goal. At that time the strong and weak forces were just becoming understood, gravity remained where Einstein had left it (with some more recent help from Hawking, Wheeler, and Bekenstein concerning black holes), and the electromagnetic force had long been solved by a parade of many geniuses, beginning with Faraday and Maxwell, and culminating with Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga ("quantum electrodynamics"- QED). Because of limitations of time, intellect, and energy, I decided not to work on those parts of the theory that others had already solved - so far as I could tell - satisfactorily. Accordingly, I accepted most of what had been done with the electromagnetic and strong forces (the Gell-Mann/Zweig colored-quark model for the latter: "quantum chromodynamics" - QCD).
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetism and Magnetic Monopoles
    Physics & Astronomy Institute for theoretical physics Electromagnetism and magnetic monopoles Author Supervisor F. Carere Dr. T. W. Grimm June 13, 2018 Image: Daniel Dominguez/ CERN Abstract Starting with the highly symmetric form of electromagnetism in tensor notation, the consideration of magnetic monopoles comes very natural. Following then the paper of J. M. Figueroa-OFarrill [1] we encounter the Dirac monopole and the 't Hooft-Polyakov monopole. The former, simpler { at the cost of a singular Dirac string { monopole already leading to the very important Dirac quantization condition, implying the quantization electric charge if magnetic monopoles exist. In particular the latter monopole, which is everywhere smooth and which has a purely topological charge, is found as a finite-energy, static solution of the dynamical equations in an SO(3) gauge invariant Yang-Mills-Higgs system using a spherically symmetric ansatz of the fields. This monopole is equivalent to the Dirac monopole from far away but locally behaves differently because of massive fields, leading to a slightly different quantization condition of the charges. Then the mass of general finite-energy solutions of the Yang-Mills-Higgs system is considered. In particular a lower bound for the mass is found and in the previous ansatz a solution saturating the bound is shown to exist: The (very heavy) BPS monopole. Meanwhile particles with both electric and magnetic charge (dyons) are considered, leading to a relation between the quantization of the magnetic and electric charges of both dyons and, when assuming CP invariance, to an explicit quantization of electric charge. Finally, the Z2 duality of Maxwell's equations is extended.
    [Show full text]
  • Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in Historical Perspective
    FERMILAB–PUB–15/058–T Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in Historical Perspective Chris Quigg∗ Theoretical Physics Department Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510 USA The discovery of the Higgs boson is a major milestone in our progress toward understanding the natural world. A particular aim of this article is to show how diverse ideas came together in the conception of electroweak symmetry breaking that led up to the discovery. I will also survey what we know that we did not know before, what properties of the Higgs boson remain to be established, and what new questions we may now hope to address. I. INTRODUCTION The first goal of this article is to sketch how a broad range of concepts, drawn mainly from weak-interaction A lively continuing conversation between experiment phenomenology, gauge field theories, and condensed- and theory has brought us to a radically simple con- matter physics, came together in the electroweak the- ception of the material world. Fundamental particles ory. The presentation complements the construction of the electroweak theory given in my pre-discovery article, called quarks and leptons are the stuff of direct expe- 26 rience, and two new laws of nature govern their in- “Unanswered Questions in the Electroweak Theory”. teractions. Pursuing clues from experiment, theorists Presentations similar in spirit may be found in Refs. have constructed the electroweak theory1–3 and quantum 27,28. Next, I will briefly summarize what we now know chromodynamics,4–7 refined them within the framework about the Higgs boson, what the discovery has taught of local gauge symmetries, and elaborated their conse- us, and why the discovery is important to our conception quences.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Cone Gauge Quantization of Strings, Dynamics of D-Brane and String Dualities
    Light Cone Gauge Quantization of Strings, Dynamics of D-brane and String dualities. Muhammad Ilyas1 Department of Physics Government College University Lahore, Pakistan Abstract This review aims to show the Light cone gauge quantization of strings. It is divided up into three parts. The first consists of an introduction to bosonic and superstring theories and a brief discussion of Type II superstring theories. The second part deals with different configurations of D-branes, their charges and tachyon condensation. The third part contains the compactification of an extra dimension, the dual picture of D-branes having electric as well as magnetic field and the different dualities in string theories. In ten dimensions, there exist five consistent string theories and in eleven dimensions there is a unique M-Theory under these dualities, the different superstring theoies are the same underlying M-Theory. 1ilyas [email protected] M.Phill thesis in Mathematics and Physics Dec 27, 2013 Author: Muhammad Ilyas Supervisor: Dr. Asim Ali Malik i Contents Abstract i INTRODUCTION 1 BOSONIC STRING THEORY 6 2.1 The relativistic string action . 6 2.1.1 The Nambu-Goto string action . 7 2.1.2 Equation of motions, boundary conditions and D-branes . 7 2.2 Constraints and wave equations . 9 2.3 Open string Mode expansions . 10 2.4 Closed string Mode expansions . 12 2.5 Light cone solution and Transverse Virasoro Modes . 14 2.6 Quantization and Commutations relations . 18 2.7 Transverse Verasoro operators . 22 2.8 Lorentz generators and critical dimensions . 27 2.9 State space and mass spectrum . 29 SUPERSTRINGS 32 3.1 The super string Action .
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 74-17,764
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Interactions, Lattice and HQET
    Strong interactions, Lattice and HQET Vicent Gimenez´ Gomez´ Introduction Strong interactions, Lattice and HQET Historical background Quark model Vicent Gimenez´ Gomez´ Color The parton Departament de F´ısica Teorica-IFIC` model Universitat de Valencia-CSIC` QCD Lagrangian Feynman rules May 3, 2013 Elementary Calculations + e e− annihilation into hadrons 1 / 153 Renormalization Contents Strong interactions, Lattice and 1 Introduction HQET Vicent 2 Historical background Gimenez´ Gomez´ 3 Quark model Introduction 4 Color Historical background 5 The parton model Quark model Color 6 QCD Lagrangian The parton model 7 Feynman rules QCD Lagrangian 8 Elementary Calculations Feynman rules + Elementary 9 e e− annihilation into hadrons Calculations + e e− 10 Renormalization annihilation into hadrons 2 / 153 Renormalization Introduction Strong interactions, Lattice and HQET Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), first introduced by Gell-Mann and Vicent Frizsch in 1972, is the theory of strong interactions. It is a renormaliz- Gimenez´ able nonabelian gauge theory based on the color SU(3) group which Gomez´ elementary fields are quarks and gluons. Introduction Why is QCD important for Particle Physics? Historical background Electroweak processes of hadrons necessarily involve strong • Quark model interactions. Color A quantitative understanding of the QCD background in • The parton searches for new physics at present and future accelerators is model crucial. QCD Lagrangian In this lectures we give an introduction to the foundation of perturba- Feynman rules tive and nonperturbative QCD and some important physical applications: Elementary Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS) and e+ e annihilation into hadrons. Calculations − + e e− annihilation into hadrons 3 / 153 Renormalization History Strong interactions, The history that led to the discovery of QCD is fascinating.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Special Relativity
    Introducing Special Relativity W. S. C. Williams ""Oded Contents Preface xi Acknowledgements xii 1 Introduction 1 2 Momentum and energy in special relativity 4 **2.I Introduction 4 **2.2 Momentum and energy 4 **2.3 More useful formulae 6 **2.4 Units 8 **2.5 Rest mass energy 9 **2.6 Nuclear binding energy 10 **2.7 Nuclear decays and reactions 11 **2.8 Gravitation and E = Me2 13 **2.9 Summary 14 Problems 15 3 Relativistic kinematics I 17 **3.1 Introduction 17 **3.2 Elementary particle physics 18 **3.3 Two-body decay of a particle at rest 20 *3.4 Three-body decays 24 *3.5 Two-stage three-body decay 26 **3.6 The decay of a moving particle 28 3.7 Kinematics of formation 30 3.8 Examples of formation 33 **3.9 Photons 35 **3.10 Compton scattering 35 **3.11 The centre-of-mass 37 viii Contents **3.12 The centre-of-mass in two-body collisions 41 *3.13 Reaction thresholds in the laboratory 42 *3.14 Summary 43 Problems 43 4 Electrodynamics 46 **4.1 Introduction 46 **4.2 Making contact with electromagnetism 46 **4.3 Relativistic mass 49 **4.4 Historical interlude 50 *4.5 Bucherer 51 *4.6 Accelerators 54 *4.7 The cyclotron frequency 55 *4.8 The cyclotron 56 *4.9 The limitations of the cyclotron 57 4.10 The synchrocyclotron 58 4.11 The synchrotron 59 4.12 Electron accelerators 60 4.13 Centre-of-mass energy at colliders 60 *4.14 Summary 61 Problems 62 5 The foundations of special relativity 64 **5.1 Introduction 64 **5.2 Some definitions 65 **5.3 Galilean transformations 68 **5.4 Electromagnetism and Galilean relativity 70 **5.5 Einstein's relativity 72
    [Show full text]
  • Unified Field Scientific Format Table
    unified field scientific format table file:///Documents/TheoryOfEverything/science.html METAPHYSICAL REALM - Expanded Form - Rational Mind: (4 Conservation Laws Connected in Triplets) Jaccaci's Terms Transform ---> Gather Repeat Share Emergent New Unit Pair Group or Field Gowan's Terms Unit ---> 4 Forces of Electromagnetism Gravitation Strong Weak Physics ---> Comments on the FORCES Energy State Rows: (virtual) Free Energy: Elementary 3-D Space; massless Particles; Light: E = hv (Planck); Suppression of Time by (virtual) electromagnetic Neutrinos; Invariant Motion "c"; "Velocity c"; Composite and (EM) Leptons; All Charges = 0; Space is Created by Sub-Elementary radiation; space; Leptoquarks; Symmetric Light's Particles; "Ylem"; symmetric forms; Particle Pairs; Free Energy Entropy Drive Fractured Leptons; virtual particles; Higgs, "X" IVBs; ("c" gauges light's (intrinsic motion); Quarks; Gluons; "global" symmetric 3 Families; entropy drive Expansion and "Quark Soup"; energy state Neutral Particles; and "non-local" Cooling of Space; Particle- followed by Symmetry- distributional Conservation/Entropy Antiparticle pairs; symmetry- Breaking: symmetry); Domain of Light; Leptoquarks; T breaking; "Higgs Cascade"; Non-local, A-causal, Light's "Interval" = 0; Neutral Particles; R invariance of the Weak Force A-temporal Energy; The Spatial Metric; 3 Energy "Families"; EM constant "c"'; Asymmetric A virtual particle- Gravitational Negative Particle Symmetry (reprising the Decays; antiparticle pairs Energy and Entropy; Total Charge = 0 N "Big Bang"); Real
    [Show full text]
  • Core Electrodynamics Copyright Sandra C Chapman
    CHAPMAN C SANDRA COPYRIGHT ELECTRODYNAMICS CORE Core Electrodynamics Sandra C. Chapman June 29, 2010 Preface CHAPMAN C This monograph is based on a final year undergraduate course in Electro- dynamics that I introduced at Warwick as part of the new four year physics degree. When I gave this course my intention was to engage the students in the elegance of electrodynamics and special relativity, whilst giving them the tools to begin graduate study. Here, from the basis ofSANDRA experiment we first derive the Maxwell equations, and special relativity. Introducing the mathematical framework of generalized tensors, the laws of mechanics, Lorentz force and the Maxwell equations are then cast in manifestly covari- ant form. This provides the basis for graduate study in field theory, high energy astrophysics, general relativity and quantum electrodynamics. As the title suggests, this book is ”electrodynamics lite”. The journey through electrodynamics is kept as brief as possible, with minimal diversion into details, so that the elegance of the theory can be appreciated in a holistic way. It is written in an informalCOPYRIGHT style and has few prerequisites; the derivation of the Maxwell equations and their consequences is dealt with in the first chapter. Chapter 2 is devoted to conservation equations in tensor formulation, here Cartesian tensors are introduced. Special relativity and its consequences for electrodynamics is introduced in Chapter 3 and cast in four vector form, here we introduce generalized tensors. Finally in Chapter 4 Lorentz frame invariant electrodynamics is developed. Supplementary material and examples are provided by the two sets of problems. The first is revision of undergraduate electromagnetism, to ex- pand on the material in the first chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • General Systems Form 12/4/10 6:16 AM
    General Systems Form 12/4/10 6:16 AM Table of Forces (Columns) and Energy States (Rows) (Simple Table #1) 4 Forces of Physics ---> Electromagnetism Gravitation Strong Weak Below: Comments on the FORCES Energy State Rows: Light: E = hv (Planck); (virtual) (virtual) Free Energy, Light: Intrinsic Motion "c"; Space; Composite and Elementary Particles; electromagnetic All Charges = 0; Created by Light's Sub-Elementary Neutrinos; Leptons; radiation; space; Symmetric Entropy Drive; Particles; "Ylem"; Leptoquarks; symmetric energy; Free Energy Conservation/Entropy Fractured Leptons; Particle- virtual particles; ("c" gauges Light's Domain of Light; Quarks; Gluons; Antiparticle Pairs; symmetry-breaking; entropy drive Light's "Interval" = 0; Particle- Higgs (Mass Gauge); (reprising the and "non-local" The Spatial Metric; Antiparticle pairs; Intermediate "Big Bang"); distributional Gravitational Negative Leptoquarks; Vector Bosons; (incurring the debt); symmetry); Energy and Entropy; Neutral Particles; Symmetry-Breaking: Spatial Energy Forms; Non-local, Acausal, Total Energy = 0 Particle Symmetry "Higgs Cascade"; (row 1) Atemporal Energy Total Charge = 0 Real Particles Bound Energy: Mass: Gravitational Creation Alternative matter; history; E = mcc; hv = mcc; of Time from Space; Mass Carriers; Charge Carriers; asymmetric energy; (Einstein-deBroglie); Historic Spacetime; Quarks, Leptons, massive real particles Matter, Momentum; Conservation/Entropy Mesons, Neutrinos: (consequences of row 1 Asymmetric Domain of Information; Baryons, Electron Shell; symmetry-breaking);
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Tetryonic Theory
    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 4, Issue 5, May 2014 1 ISSN 2250-3153 An Introduction to Tetryonic Theory Kelvin C. ABRAHAM [Author] [email protected] Abstract- Tetryonics is a new geometric theory of mass- models on which we can discern our known results and ENERGY-Matter and the forces of motion, stemming from a observations thus excluding any false or misleading assumptions geometric re-interpretation of what squared numbers are in (mathematical or philosophical). physics and its application to quantized angular momentum (QAM). It can now be shown through geometry that the QAM In doing so there exists the promise that a simple underlying of Planck’s constant is in fact the result of its quantized foundation can be found to the physics of our Universe, revealing equilateral ‘triangular’ geometry (and not a vector rotation new and exciting advances in Science that will allow us to usher about a point as has been historically assumed to date). in a new age of scientific and technological advancement for the betterment of humanity as a whole. This quantum geometry gives rise to the physical properties . of electrical permittivity, magnetic permeability and charge along with the rigid physical relationships between inertial I. PLANCK MASS-ENERGY MOMENTA QUANTA mass-energy and momenta in physical systems at all scales of physics. And quantum charge in addition to its role as the Energy, in physics, is an indirectly observed quantity of a system geometric source of physical constants, also provides the that imbues it with the ability to exert a Force or to do Work over quantum field mechanics for radiant 2D mass-energies to a distance.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unified Electro-Gravity (UEG) Thery of Nature
    A Unified Electro-Gravity (UEG) Theory of Nature Nirod K. Das New York University Copyright c 2018 by Nirod K. Das. All Rights Reserved. Registration # TXu 2-128-436, December 20, 2018 i Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................ (Page 1) Part-I: Unified Electro-Gravity (UEG) Theory in the Small Scale: Particle Physics and Quantum Mechanics .................................(Page 3) 1. A New Unified Electro-Gravity Theory for the Electron................(Page 4) 2. A Generalized Unified Electro-Gravity (UEG) Model Applicable to All El- ementary Particles ............................................................................(Page 14) 3. Unified Electro-Gravity (UEG) Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics ..........................................................................................................(Page 31) Part-II: Extension of the Unified Electro-Gravity (UEG) Theory to Physics in the Large Scale: Stellar, Galactic and Cosmology Models ..........................................................................................................(Page 43) 4. Unified Electro-Gravity (UEG) Theory Applied to Stellar Gravitation, and the Mass-Luminosity Relation (MLR)..............................................(Page 44) 5. Unified Electro-Gravity (UEG) Theory Applied to Spiral Galaxies.............. ..........................................................................................................(Page 59) 6. A Unified Electro-Gravity (UEG) Model as
    [Show full text]