DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 – Scientific Notes, Second Edition, Tome 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 – Scientific Notes, Second Edition, Tome 2 ocean-climate.org OCEAN AND CLIMATE SCIENTIFIC NOTES ocean-climate.org Why an “Ocean and Climate” Platform? The ocean is a key element of the global climate system, but so far it has been relatively absent from discussions on climate change. For all of us participating in the Ocean and Climate Platform, it is essential to include the ocean among the issues and challenges discussed in the context of climate negotiations. Covering 71 % of the globe, the World Ocean is a It is therefore urgent to maintain the functional qua- complex ecosystem that provides essential services lity of marine ecosystems and restore those that for the maintenance of life on Earth. More than 25 % are deteriorating. of the CO2 emitted annually by humans into the at- mosphere is absorbed by the ocean, and it is also the The Ocean and Climate Platform was established from largest net supplier of oxygen in the world, playing an alliance of non-governmental organizations and an equally important role as forests. research institutes, with support from the UNESCO Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. The ocean is therefore the principal “lung” of the pla- net and is at the center of the global climate system. Today the Platform includes scientific organizations, universities, research institutions, non-profit associa- Although the ocean continues to limit global war- tions, foundations, science centers, public institutions ming, for several decades the pressure of human and business organizations, all acting to bring the beings – principally CO2 emissions, over-exploitation ocean to the forefront in climate discussions. of resources and pollution – has been degrading ma- rine ecosystems. The role of the ocean in regulating the climate is likely to be disrupted. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Scientific Committee Coordinator Françoise Gaill [email protected] WITH THE HELP OF: Nausicaá: Christine Causse Institut Océanographique, Prince Albert Ier de Monaco: Corinne Copin Ocean and Climate Platform: Ludovic Frère Escoffier, Clara Grillet, Louise Ras, Rebecca Daniel, Julien Voyé and Romain Schumm Translation: Marianne Biron Graphic design: Elsa Godet CITATION OCEAN AND CLIMATE, 2016 – Scientific Notes, Second edition, Tome 2. www.ocean-climate.org, 92 pages. With the support of October 2016 ocean-climate.org Our objectives During COP21, the Ocean and Climate Platform emphasized the importance of “a healthy ocean, a protected climate”. It is important to continue to show how the ocean is affected by climate change, and more importantly to show that “the ocean is part of the solution” against climate change. After the signature of the Paris Agreement, the • The fourth line is that of citizens and youth mobilization Platform has decided to pursue its action, in the field regarding June 8th World Ocean Day and mobilization of scientific knowledge, ecosystem based manage- days for Ocean and Climate issues (Ocean for Climate ment, maritime transport and mobilization based Days) during the Conferences of the Parties of the United on solid scientific grounds and its advocacy for Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. the integration of the ocean in the climate regime. This mobilization focuses on advocacy toward public The Platform has chosen to focus on 4 lines and to and private decision makers, disseminates scientific develop different topics in relation to economic so- knowledge and raises awareness toward the general lutions and nature based solutions in order to incor- public. June 8th and the Ocean for Climate Days will porate them into the Paris Agreement. become an international must for ocean and climate issues relayed on the web at the international level. Many • The first central line of the Platform refers to other converging events will punctuate the year 2016. the international reinforcement of the Scientific Committee and network for the production and As a transversal approach to these four lines, the Platform dissemination of climate solution. The Platform sup- follows the climate negotiation in order to facilitate the ports international scientific collaboration, notably in integration of ocean and climate advocacy. Lastly, the the framework of FACT-O (French American Climate Platform develops alliances with States committed to Talks on Ocean) which aims at promoting innova- the integration of the ocean in climate issues and of tive solutions at a global scale. These solutions will the climate in ocean governance. feed the advocacy thematic, define the ocean and climate science needs and feed the argument for an This year and beyond, depending on opportunities, the ocean report with the IPCC. Platform will be able to generate new topics within the “economic solutions” line, including Marine Renewable • The second line identified within the economic Energies (MRE) and within “ecosystem based mana- solutions is the development of maritime transpor- gement” including the consideration of blue carbon tation involved in the reduction of greenhouse gas in the climate regime. Lastly, in the end the Platform emissions. can develop a regional complementary approach to expand these lines. • The third line focuses on ecosystems resilience issues regarding climate change, including the key role of marine protected areas (MPAs). ocean-climate.org Table of contents Foreword Françoise Gaill..................................................................................................................................................................................06 Sea-level is rising Benoît Meyssignac...........................................................................................................................................................................08 The Long-Term Consequences of Climate Change on Oceans Xavier Capet….................................................................................................................................................................................10 Ocean Circulation and Climate: an Overview Bertrand Delorme and Yassir Eddebbar........................................................................................................................................12 The Ocean is Losing its Breath Kirsten Isensee, Lisa A. Levin, Denise Breitburg, Marilaure Gregoire, Veronique Garçon and Luis Valdés...............................20 Ocean, Biodiversity and Climate Gilles Bœuf........................................................................................................................................................................................28 Coral Reefs and Climate Change Denis Allemand................................................................................................................................................................................32 Coral Bleaching, an Imminent Threat to Marine Biodiversity Leïla Ezzat and Lucile Courtial........................................................................................................................................................40 A Case for the Deep Ocean Lisa A. Levin, Nadine Le Bris, Erik Cordes, Yassir Eddebbar, Rachel M. Jeffreys, Kirk N. Sato, Chih-Lin Wei and the climate change work group of DOSI Deep-Ocean Stewardship Initiative…............................................................45 Ecosystem Services of the Deep Ocean Jennifer T. Le and Kirk N. Sato.......................................................................................................................................................49 Marine Ecosystem Services in Europe Clara Grillet, Claire Bertin, Jennifer T. Le and Adrien Comte....................................................................................................55 Marine Protected Areas Networks and Climate Change, a Political Advocacy Christophe Lefebvre........................................................................................................................................................................63 Ocean, Environment, Climate Change and Human Migration Christine Causse, Daria Mokhnacheva and Guigone Camus.........................…........................................................................66 The Ocean in National Contributions of Mediterranean States Louise Ras.........................................................................................................................................................................................72 Which international law for ocean and climate? Bleuenn Guilloux and Romain Schumm........................................................................................................................................79 5 ocean-climate.org Foreword Françoise Gaill The ocean is an essential component of our planet’s cli- integrate the ocean – to mobilise. The marine civil society mate. Scientists know this, and have repeatedly proven it: must take part in the Action Agenda, suggest alternatives, without the ocean, our greenhouse gas emissions would bring forth and support initiatives, communicate good have disrupted the climate machine to a much greater practices and disseminate knowledge. The Ocean and extent. It is hence an essential regulator that is constantly Climate Platform is already on this path. threatened by human activity and by the consequences of global climate change. But above all, we must better understand the ocean – this vast, wide, diverse environment that contains so much The numbers speak for themselves. The ocean covers biodiversity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CP-2019-161 Lessons from a High CO2 World: an Ocean View from ~3 Million Years Ago Reply to Editor
    CP-2019-161 Lessons from a high CO2 world: an ocean view from ~3 million years ago Reply to Editor This document addresses the concerns of the Editor on our revised manuscript. We also include the “tracked changes” manuscript text. No changes have been made to the Supplement text. We thank the Editor for the remaining comments, which are addressed here and shown as tracked changes in the document below: Upon final reading of the manuscript I noticed 2 areas, that I feel need addressing before the manuscript can be published. These are minor and the second I think is a result of some changes you made to the manuscript in the most recent submission. 1. Please reference the underlying SST data in Figure 2. At present, the figure caption only makes reference to the the PlioVAR sites. Thank you for flagging this, we had omitted to cite our source data. The PlioVAR sites have been overlaid on the World Ocean Atlas (2018) mean annual SSTs. We have cited this source in the caption. We also felt that we should highlight that the compiled information on sites and proxies is included in the Supplement file and in the Pangaea archive. Our caption has been edited accordingly: Figure 2: Locations of sites used in the synthesis, overlain on mean annual SST data from the World Ocean Atlas 2018 (Locarnini et al., 2018). A full list of the data sources and K proxies applied per site are available in Table S3 (U 37’) and Table S4 (Mg/Ca), and can be accessed at https://pliovar.github.io/km5c.html.
    [Show full text]
  • World Ocean Thermocline Weakening and Isothermal Layer Warming
    applied sciences Article World Ocean Thermocline Weakening and Isothermal Layer Warming Peter C. Chu * and Chenwu Fan Naval Ocean Analysis and Prediction Laboratory, Department of Oceanography, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-831-656-3688 Received: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 13 November 2020; Published: 19 November 2020 Abstract: This paper identifies world thermocline weakening and provides an improved estimate of upper ocean warming through replacement of the upper layer with the fixed depth range by the isothermal layer, because the upper ocean isothermal layer (as a whole) exchanges heat with the atmosphere and the deep layer. Thermocline gradient, heat flux across the air–ocean interface, and horizontal heat advection determine the heat stored in the isothermal layer. Among the three processes, the effect of the thermocline gradient clearly shows up when we use the isothermal layer heat content, but it is otherwise when we use the heat content with the fixed depth ranges such as 0–300 m, 0–400 m, 0–700 m, 0–750 m, and 0–2000 m. A strong thermocline gradient exhibits the downward heat transfer from the isothermal layer (non-polar regions), makes the isothermal layer thin, and causes less heat to be stored in it. On the other hand, a weak thermocline gradient makes the isothermal layer thick, and causes more heat to be stored in it. In addition, the uncertainty in estimating upper ocean heat content and warming trends using uncertain fixed depth ranges (0–300 m, 0–400 m, 0–700 m, 0–750 m, or 0–2000 m) will be eliminated by using the isothermal layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Coupled Oscillations of Volcanic CO2 Emissions and Glacial Cycles
    Modelling Coupled Oscillations of Volcanic CO2 Emissions and Glacial Cycles Jonathan M.A. Burley∗1, Peter Huybers2, and Richard F. Katz1 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, UK 2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA October 30, 2017 1 Introduction Following the mid-Pleistocene transition, glacial cycles changed from 40 kyr cycles to longer 80 or 120 kyr cycles[Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005, Elderfield et al., 2012]. The 40 kyr glacial cycles are broadly accepted as being driven by cyclical changes in Earth’s orbital parameters and the consequent insolation changes — Milankovitch cycles. However, Milankovitch forcing does not readily explain the > 40 kyr glacial cycles that occur after the mid-Pleistocene transition. These > 40 kyr cycles therefore require that internal dynamics in the Earth system create a glacial response that is not linearly related to insolation [Tziperman et al., 2006]. Any proposed mechanism to extend glacial cycles’ periods beyond 40 kyrs must give the Earth’s climate system a memory on the order of 10s-of-kyrs, creating either a response that counteracts the 40 kyr Milankovitch forcing (allowing the Earth to ‘skip’ beats in the 40 kyr forcing) or a climate state with sufficient inertia — low climate sensitivity — that it is not af- fected by 40 kyr obliquity forcing [Imbrie and Imbrie, 1980]. The atmosphere/ocean has typical adjustment timescales on the order of 1000 years, thus oceanic theories for glacial cycles rely on other, long-timescale processes (eg. weathering [Toggweiler, 2008]) to trigger arbitrary rules- based switches in the oceanic carbon system at tens-of thousands-of-years intervals.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Rapid Climate Change in the Arctic a Planetary Emergency? Peter Carter, November 2013 Updated 2019
    Is Rapid Climate Change in the Arctic a Planetary Emergency? Peter Carter, November 2013 updated 2019. Introduction This paper presents a compelling case, supported by the climate change research, that the combination of: • global inaction on greenhouse gas emissions, • climate system inertias, and • multiple enormous Arctic sources of amplifying feedbacks (covered in this paper) constitutes an extreme-risk planetary emergency, for the survival of civilization, the human race and most life Research on climate change and the Arctic shows that we face a catastrophic risk of uncontrollable, accelerating global warming due to several amplifying feedbacks from enormous feedback sources in the Arctic. These include the Arctic snow/ice-albedo feedback and greenhouse gas feedbacks (methane, nitrous oxide, and carbon dioxide). Under global warming, the Arctic is changing far faster than other regions of Earth. Numerous – and extremely large – Arctic sources of amplifying feedbacks are already responding (have been triggered in response) to rapid Arctic warming. These Arctic feedbacks, if not addressed in time (now) and with the appropriate degree of mitigation, can only be expected to accelerate the rate of global warming. They constitute a very large risk of planetary catastrophic consequences, including Arctic greenhouse gas feedback so-called "runaway" chaotic climate disruption / runaway global heating/ hot house Earth. This paper describes global warming positive feedbacks already operant in the Arctic, and explains the large risk of planetary
    [Show full text]
  • New Constraints on Ocean Carbon
    Ref. Ares(2020)7216916 - 30/11/2020 New constraints on ocean carbon Deliverable D1.6 Authors: Peter Landschützer, Nicolas Gruber, Jens D. Müller, Lydia Keppler, Luke Gregor This project received funding from the Horizon 2020 programme under the grant agreement No. 821003. Document Information GRANT AGREEMENT 821003 PROJECT TITLE Climate Carbon Interactions in the Current Century PROJECT ACRONYM 4C PROJECT START 1/6/2019 DATE RELATED WORK W1 PACKAGE RELATED TASK(S) T1.2.1, T1.2.2 LEAD MPG ORGANIZATION AUTHORS P. Landschützer, N. Gruber, J.D. Müller, L. Keppler and L. Gregor SUBMISSION DATE x DISSEMINATION PU / CO / DE LEVEL History DATE SUBMITTED BY REVIEWED BY VISION (NOTES) 18.11.2020 Peter Landschützet (MPG) P. Friedlingstein (UNEXE) Please cite this report as: P. Landschützer, N. Gruber, J.D. Müller, L. Keppler and L. Gregor, (2020), New constraints on ocean carbon, D1.6 of the 4C project Disclaimer: The content of this deliverable reflects only the author’s view. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. D1.6 New constraints on ocean carbon| 1 Table of Contents 2 New observation-based constraints on the surface ocean carbonate system and the air-sea CO2 flux 5 2.1 OceanSODA-ETHZ 5 2.1.1 Observations 5 2.1.2 Method 5 2.1.3 Results 6 2.1.4 Data availability 7 2.1.5 References 7 2.2 Update of MPI-SOMFFN and new MPI-ULB-SOMFFN-clim 8 2.2.1 Observations 9 2.2.2 Method 9 2.2.3 Results 9 2.2.4 Data availability 10 2.2.5 References 11 3 New observation-based constraints on interior
    [Show full text]
  • Slow-Onset Processes and Resulting Loss and Damage
    Publication Series ADDRESSING LOSS AND DAMAGE FROM SLOW-ONSET PROCESSES Slow-onset Processes and Resulting Loss and Damage – An introduction Table of contents L 4 22 ist of a bbre Summary of Loss and damage via tio key facts and due to slow-onset ns definitions processes AR4 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report 6 22 What is loss and damage? Introduction AR5 IPCC Fifth Assessment Report COP Conference of the Parties to the 23 United Nations Framework Convention on 9 What losses and damages IMPRINT Climate Change can result from slow-onset Slow-onset ENDA Environment Development Action Energy, processes? Authors Environment and Development Programme processes and their Laura Schäfer, Pia Jorks, Emmanuel Seck, Energy key characteristics 26 Oumou Koulibaly, Aliou Diouf ESL Extreme Sea Level What losses and damages Contributors GDP Gross Domestic Product 9 can result from sea level rise? Idy Niang, Bounama Dieye, Omar Sow, Vera GMSL Global mean sea level What is a slow-onset process? Künzel, Rixa Schwarz, Erin Roberts, Roxana 31 Baldrich, Nathalie Koffi Nguessan GMSLR Global mean sea level rise 10 IOM International Organization on Migration What are key characteristics Loss and damage Editing Adam Goulston – Scize Group LLC of slow-onset processes? in Senegal due to IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change sea level rise Layout and graphics LECZ Low-elevation coastal zone 14 Karin Roth – Wissen in Worten OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs What are other relevant January 2021 terms for the terminology on 35 RCP Representative
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Conservation and Management in The
    Management in a Changing Climate Policy Challenges for Wildlife Abstract: Try as it might, wildlife management cannot make wild living things adapt to climate change. Management can, Mark L. Shaffer however, make adaptation more or less likely. Given that pol- Office of the Science Advisor, icy is a rule set for action, policy will play a critical role in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service society’s efforts to help wildlife cope with the challenge of cli- mate change. To be effective, policy must provide clear goals and be based on a clear understanding of the problem it seeks to affect. The “National Fish, Wildlife, and Plants Climate Ad- aptation Strategy” provides seven major goals and numerous policy related actions for wildlife management in a period of climate change. The underlying themes of these recommenda- tions and the major challenges to their achievement are identi- fied and discussed. INTRODUCTION As one of the major biome types on Earth, forests are of fundamental importance to wildlife. (Note: the term “wildlife” when used alone is meant as short hand for all species living in an undomesticated state: both plant and animal.) From the standpoint of species diversity, the most diverse terrestrial habitats on Earth are the great tropical rainforests. From the standpoint of sheer stand- ing biomass, the great temperate rainforest of the Pacific Northwest may be unequalled. In terms of charismatic megafauna, which for most people are the face of wild- life, many signature North American species (e.g., deer, bear, elk, wolf, moose, cougar) are principally forest spe- cies. A large fraction of the lands American society has chosen to devote to conservation are forested lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Acidification in Washington State
    University of Washington • Washington Sea Grant Ocean Acidification in Washington State What is Ocean Acidification? OA in Washington State cean Acidification (or ‘OA’) is a long-term decrease ur region is experiencing ocean acidification sooner Oin seawater pH that is primarily caused by the Oand more severely than expected, due to a combina- ocean’s uptake of carbon dioxide (CO2 ) from the atmo- tion of human and natural causes. In the spring and sum- sphere. CO2 generated by humans’ use of fossil fuels and mer, acidification along our coast is compounded by up- deforestation has been accumulating in the atmosphere welling, which mixes deep, naturally low-pH seawater into since the industrial revolution. About one quarter of this the already acidified surface layer. In Puget Sound, nutri- CO2 is absorbed by the oceans, pH describes the acidity of a liquid ents generated by human activities (mostly where it reacts with water to form nitrogen and phosphorus from sewage, carbonic acid. As a result, the aver- fertilizers and manure) fuel processes that age pH of seawater at the ocean add even more CO2 to this ‘doubly-acidified’ surface has already dropped by ~0.1 seawater. The combination can be deadly units, a 30% increase in acidity. If to vulnerable organisms. pH levels as low atmospheric CO2 levels continue as 7.4 have been recorded in Hood Canal, to climb at the present rate, ocean an important shellfish-growing region. acidity will double by the end of this State and federal agencies, scientists, tribes, century. shellfish growers and NGOs are working together to address OA in our region.
    [Show full text]
  • Steering the Climate System: Using Inertia to Lower the Cost of Policy: Comment
    Steering the Climate System: Using Inertia to Lower the Cost of Policy: Comment The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Mattauch, Linus, et al. "Steering the Climate System: Using Inertia to Lower the Cost of Policy: Comment." American Economic Review, 110, 4 (April 2020): 1231-37. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190089 Publisher American Economic Association Version Final published version Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125321 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. American Economic Review 2020, 110(4): 1231–1237 https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190089 Steering the Climate System: Using Inertia to Lower the Cost of Policy: Comment† By Linus Mattauch, H. Damon Matthews, Richard Millar, Armon Rezai, Susan Solomon, and Frank Venmans* Lemoine and Rudik 2017 argues that it is efficient to delay reduc- ing carbon emissions(, due )to supposed inertia in the climate system’s response to emissions. This conclusion rests upon misunderstand- ing the relevant earth system modeling: there is no substantial lag between CO2 emissions and warming. Applying a representation of the earth system that captures the range of responses seen in complex earth system models invalidates the original article’s implications for climate policy. The least-cost policy path that limits warming to 2°C implies that the carbon price starts high and increases at the interest rate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Difference of Sea Level Variability by Steric Height and Altimetry In
    remote sensing Letter The Difference of Sea Level Variability by Steric Height and Altimetry in the North Pacific Qianran Zhang 1, Fangjie Yu 1,2,* and Ge Chen 1,2 1 College of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China; [email protected] (Q.Z.); [email protected] (G.C.) 2 Laboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical Modeling, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266200, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-0532-66782155 Received: 4 December 2019; Accepted: 22 January 2020; Published: 24 January 2020 Abstract: Sea level variability, which is less than ~100 km in scale, is important in upper-ocean circulation dynamics and is difficult to observe by existing altimetry observations; thus, interferometric altimetry, which effectively provides high-resolution observations over two swaths, was developed. However, validating the sea level variability in two dimensions is a difficult task. In theory, using the steric method to validate height variability in different pixels is feasible and has already been proven by modelled and altimetry gridded data. In this paper, we use Argo data around a typical mesoscale eddy and altimetry along-track data in the North Pacific to analyze the relationship between steric data and along-track data (SD-AD) at two points, which indicates the feasibility of the steric method. We also analyzed the result of SD-AD by the relationship of the distance of the Argo and the satellite in Point 1 (P1) and Point 2 (P2), the relationship of two Argo positions, the relationship of the distance between Argo positions and the eddy center and the relationship of the wind.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Acidification Due to Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
    Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide Policy document 12/05 June 2005 ISBN 0 85403 617 2 This report can be found at www.royalsoc.ac.uk ISBN 0 85403 617 2 © The Royal Society 2005 Requests to reproduce all or part of this document should be submitted to: Science Policy Section The Royal Society 6-9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG email [email protected] Copy edited and typeset by The Clyvedon Press Ltd, Cardiff, UK ii | June 2005 | The Royal Society Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide Contents Page Summary vi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background to the report 1 1.2 The oceans and carbon dioxide: acidification 1 1.3 Acidification and the surface oceans 2 1.4 Ocean life and acidification 2 1.5 Interaction with the Earth systems 2 1.6 Adaptation to and mitigation of ocean acidification 2 1.7 Artificial deep ocean storage of carbon dioxide 3 1.8 Conduct of the study 3 2 Effects of atmospheric CO2 enhancement on ocean chemistry 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 The impact of increasing CO2 on the chemistry of ocean waters 5 2.2.1 The oceans and the carbon cycle 5 2.2.2 The oceans and carbon dioxide 6 2.2.3 The oceans as a carbonate buffer 6 2.3 Natural variation in pH of the oceans 6 2.4 Factors affecting CO2 uptake by the oceans 7 2.5 How oceans have responded to changes in atmospheric CO2 in the past 7 2.6 Change in ocean chemistry due to increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activities 9 2.6.1 Change to the oceans
    [Show full text]
  • ON the RISK of OVERSHOOTING 2°C Paper Presented at Scientific Symposium “Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change”, Metoffice, Exeter, 1-3 February 2005
    MEINSHAUSEN – ON THE RISK OF OVERSHOOTING 2°C Paper presented at Scientific Symposium “Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change”, MetOffice, Exeter, 1-3 February 2005 On the Risk of Overshooting 2°C Malte Meinshausen Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), Environmental Physics, Department of Environmental Sciences, Rämistrasse 101, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland, Email: [email protected] Abstract This article explores different greenhouse gas stabilization levels and their implied risks of overshooting certain temperature targets, such as limiting global mean temperature rise to 2°C above pre-industrial levels. The probabilistic assessment is derived from a compilation of recent estimates of the uncertainties in climate sensitivity, which summarizes the key uncertainties in climate science for long-term temperature projections. The risk of overshooting 2°C equilibrium warming is found to lie between 68% and 99% for stabilization at 550ppm CO2 equivalence. Only at levels around 400ppm CO2 equivalence are the risks of overshooting low enough so that the achievement of a 2°C target can be termed “likely”. Based on characteristics of 54 IPCC SRES and post-SRES scenarios, multi-gas emission pathways are presented that lead to stabilization at 550, 450 and 400ppm CO2eq in order to assess the implications for global emission reductions. Sensitivity studies on delayed global action show that the next 5 to 15 years might determine whether the risk of overshooting 2°C can be limited to a reasonable range. 1. Introduction For these reasons, this study focuses on an 2 analysis of the risk of overshooting global mean In 1996, the European Council adopted a temperature levels of 2°C above pre-industrial climate target that reads “[…] the Council believes levels.
    [Show full text]