DOCSLIB.ORG

Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicle Case Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicle Case Study Table of Contents I. Executive Summary II. Body 1. Introduction a. Purpose b. Methodology b. Constraints 2. Background 3. Discussion - MRAP Chronology of Events a. MRAP-related events and documents 1996 through 2004 (1) Capt Wayne Sinclair introduces the Corps to the MRAP (2) Majors Roy McGriff and Joseph Allena advocate MRAP at Quantico (3) Majors Roy McGriff and Gert DeWet advocate MRAP at MARFORPAC b. The I MEF (Fwd) MRAP UUNS submission and combat developer response (1) 17 Feb 05 1st I MEF (Fwd) MRAP vehicle UUNS submission (2) 29-30 Mar 05 USMC Safety Conference (3) The EFDC Vehicle Survivability Study (4) Mar 05 Advocate analyses of the MRAP UUNS (5) Apr 05 CDIB/DOTMLPF Working Group presentation (6) May 2005 IGMC Equipment Readiness Assessment (7) 10 Jun 05 EFDC UUNS Update Information Paper (8) 21 Jun 05 ACMC HASC testimony on USMC C-IED measures c. Combat developer pursuit of non-urgent, non-MRAP material alternatives (1) 24 Jan 03 ONR Corporate Communications “1000 miles for the Marines” (2) 27 May 05 Quantico Sentry “UUNS cuts wait for needed materiel” (3) Oct 05 Marine Corps Combat Lessons Learned article on CTV (4) 9 Feb 06 InsideDefense.com “Marines Delay Fielding of Scout Vehicles” (5) 7 Apr 07 Nat Def Mag: “Next-gen humvee faces delays, budget crunch” d. The I MEF (Fwd) MRAP JUONS and UUNS resubmissions of 2006 (1) The 21 May 06 MNF-W (i.e. I MEF [Fwd]) JERRV JUONS (2) Jun 06 MARCENT MRAP JUONS intervention and advocacy (3) May 06 IGMC Equipment Readiness Assessment (4) 10 Jul 06 MNF-W (i.e. I MEF [Fwd]) MRAP Vehicle JUONS (5) 28 Sep 06 2nd I MEF (Fwd) MRAP Vehicle UUNS e. MRAP press and political involvement since 2006 MRAP needs resubmissions (1) 1 Mar 07 CMC letter to CJCS (2) 13 Mar 07 draft DC, PP&O S&T Advisor brief to ODDR&E (3) 23 May 07 USA Today: “Corps refused 2005 plea for MRAP vehicle” (4) 31 May 07 USA Today: “MRAPs can't stop newest weapon” (5) 28 Jun 07 Senator Biden and Senator Bond letter sent to SECDEF (6) 17 Jul 07 USA Today: “Pentagon balked at pleas for safer vehicles” (7) 26 Jul 07 USA Today: “Marine leaders defend '05 decision on MRAPs” (8) 30 Jul 07 CMC response to Sen. Biden and Sen. Bond (9) 17 Sep 07 NewsHour: “Process Slows Deployment of Improved Vehicles” (10) 18 Oct 07 ITP article on ineffective USMC UUNS handling process 4. Discussion - MRAP in the Context of COIN a. Recent arguments that question MRAP (1) 27 Dec 07 Los Angeles Times “Military Thinks Twice On Fortified Trucks” (2) 27 Nov 07 Wired Magazine “How Technology Almost Lost the War” (3) 2007 CSBA “Of IEDs and MRAPs: FP in Complex Irregular Operations” (4) Author’s perspectives on the context of the MRAP requirement b. Relating USMC combat development, COIN equipment, and MRAP emergency (1) Persistent Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) (2) Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) (3) COIN communications and translation systems (4) 25 May 07 Associated Press: “Marines Fail to Get Gear to Troops” (5) Author’s perspectives USMC combat development and MRAP emergency 5. MRAP Case Study Conclusions a. MRAP Chronology Conclusions b. MRAP Analysis Conclusions 6. Recommendations a. Immediate USMC change recommendations b. Concurrent DoD change recommendations c. Proposed supporting legislation ii III. References e.1. E-Mail – CG, 3rd MAW to DC, CDI, Apr 03 e.2. E-Mails – All Available MRAP-Relevant E-Mail, 03–07 e.3. E-Mail – MCCDC message announcing Sound Commander decision, 24 Aug 06 e.4. E-Mail – DC, CDI to CG, I MEF (Fwd), 13 Sep 06 e.5. E-Mail - Exchange between I MEF (Fwd) and MCCDC on LRAD, Sep 06 o.1. Order - MCO 3500.27B Operational Risk Management (ORM) o.2. Order - MCO 5100.8 Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Policy o.3. Order - MCO 5100.29A Safety Program o.4. Order - MCO 7510.5A FWA Oversight, Awareness, Prevention and Remedies o.5. Order - MCO 5800.13A Investigations of Allegations Against Senior Officials o.6. Order - MCWP 5-1 Marine Corps Planning Process (MCPP) r.1. Requirement – II MEF FSEBW UUNS, 14 Oct 04 r.2. Requirement – DC, PP&O MEPOP UNS, 22 Nov 04 r.2a. Requirement – S&T Addendum to the GCE ARL, 4 Dec 04 r.3. Requirement – MNC-I F-SEWS Time Critical JUON, 7 Apr 05 r.4. Requirement – II MEF (Fwd) Dazzler UUNS, 9 Jun 05 r.5. Requirement – 1st I MEF (Fwd) MRAP UUNS, 17 Feb 05 r.6a Requirement – USMC 2005 EMW Capabilities List (ECL), 15 Apr 05 r.6. Requirement – 3/6 LRNLW UUNS, 28 Jul 05 r.7. Requirement – I MEF TCVS UUNS #1, 22 Feb 05 r.8. Requirement – MNF-W JERRV JUONS, 21 May 06 r.9. Requirement – I MEF (Fwd) G-BOSS UUNS, 4 Jun 06 r.10. Requirement – I MEF (Fwd) LRAD UUNS, 26 Jun 06 r.11. Requirement – MNF-W MRAP JUONS, 10 Jul 06 r.12. Requirement – MNF-W Tier II UAV JUONS, 27 Jul 06 r.13. Requirement – MNF-W GPRS JUONS, 26 Sep 06 r.14. Requirement – 2nd I MEF (Fwd) MRAP UUNS, 28 Sep 06 r.15. Requirement – MNF-W SUCAV JUONS, 30 Sep 06 r.16. Requirement – MNF-W MASDANS JUONS, 18 Oct 06 r.17. Requirement – MNF-W CBEMPAS JUONS, 1 Nov 06 r.18. Requirement – MNF-W LRNLW JUONS, 12 Nov 06 r.19. Requirement – I MEF (Fwd) SUCAV UUNS, 1 Dec 06 r.20. Requirement – I MEF (Fwd) C-BEMPAS UUNS, 1 Dec 06 r.21. Requirement – I MEF (Fwd) LRNLW UUNS, 1 Dec 06 r.22. Requirement – I MEF (Fwd) CHPLD UUNS, 1 Dec 06 r.23. Requirement – I MEF (Fwd) TCVS UUNS #2, 12 Dec 06 r.24. Requirement – MNF-W MASDANS JUONS, 13 Dec 06 r.25. Requirement – CG, I MEF (Fwd) Letter of Needs Continuity, 27 Dec 06 r.26. Requirement – MNF-W G-BOSS JUONS, 7 Jan 07 r.27. Requirement – I MEF (Fwd) EFP Total Defeat UUNS, 13 Jan 07 r.28. Requirement – MNF-W EFP Total Defeat JUONS, 25 Jan 07 iii a.1. Article – MCG - Capt Wayne A. Sinclair – Answering the landmine, Jul 96 a.2. Article – ONR Corporate Communications Office - RST-V, 24 Jan 03 a.3. Article – Quantico Sentry - Franks - UUNS/RST-V, 27 May 05 a.4. Article – National Defense Magazine - Lethin - JLTV, Oct 05 a.5. Article – InsideDefense.com - Franks - RST-V Delay, 9 Feb 06 a.6. Article – World Tribune - McConnell - HMMWV, 15 Nov 06 a.7. Article – National Journal/Gov Exec - McConnell - JLTV, 26 Mar 07 a.8. Article – National Defense Magazine - BGen Conant - JLTV, 7 Apr 07 a.9. Article – DefenseTech.org - Are We Sure About the MRAP, 26 Apr 07 a.10. Article – USA Today - USMC MRAP Delay, 23 May 07 a.11. Article – Associated Press - USMC MRAP Delay, 24 May 07 a.12. Article – AP - Marines Fail to Get Gear to Troops, 25 May 07 a.13. Article – USA Today - MRAP EFP Vulnerability, 31 May 07 a.14. Article – Newsweek - Failure to Protect Troops, 25 Jun 07 a.15. Article – USA Today - DoD MRAP History, 16 Jul 07 a.16. Article – USA Today - CMC Defends MRAP Decisions, 26 Jul 07 a.17. Article – Associated Press - CMC Admits Flaws, 3 Aug 07 a.18. Article – USA Today - “Bull” Protection, 30 Aug 07 a.19. Article – AP - Pentagon Rejects Ray Gun Weapon in Iraq, 30 Aug 07 a.19a Article – NewsHour – Procurement Process Slows Deployment of Vehicles, 27 Sep 07 a.20. Article – Inside the Pentagon - UUNS Audit, 18 Oct 07 a.21. Article – DefenseNews.com - McConnell - CTV, 29 Oct 07 a.22. Article – Wired - Noah Shachtman - How Technology Almost Lost the War, 27 Nov 07 a.23. Article – USA Today - Army MRAP Cutback, 10 Dec 07 a.24. Article – USA Today - MRAPs Still Sought, 16 Dec 07 a.25. Article – The Weekly Standard - Goldfarb – MRAP, 19 Dec 07 a.26. Article – Los Angeles Times - Military Rethinks MRAP, 27 Dec 07 a.27. Article – Navistar Business Wire – 1,000th MRAP, 2 Jan 08 a.28. Article – Inside Defense - 1,289 MRAPs in Dec, 10 Jan 08 a.28a. Article – AP - General: Anbar Ready for Handover, 10 Jan 08 a.29. Article – Wall Street Journal - CMC and MRAP - 12 Jan 08 a.30. Article – NYT – Armored Vehicle Supply Better, 19 Jan 08 a.31. Article – USATODAY – Sen. Biden refutes Dakota Wood on MRAP, 21 Jan 08 c.1. Congress – Testimony – ACMC to HASC, 21 Jun 05 c.2. Congress – Testimony – ACMC to HASC, Jun 06 c.3. Congress – Sen. Biden to President Bush, 23 May 07 c.4. Congress – Sen. Levin to SECDEF, 26 Jun 07 c.5. Congress – Sen. Levin letter to Sen. Biden, 26 Jun 07 c.6. Congress – Sen. Biden and Sen. Bond to SECDEF, 28 Jun 07 l.1. Letter – CG, 1st Mar Div to DC, CDI requesting Sheriff, 29 Aug 04 l.2. Letter – CG, II MEF to DC, CDI requesting Sheriff, 7 Oct 04 l.3. Letter – CMC to CJCS, 1 Mar 07 l.4. Letter – CMC to Sen. Biden and Sen. Bond, 30 Jul 07 l.5. Letter – Sen. Biden and Sen. Bond to CMC, 19 Sep 07 l.6. Letter – CMC to Sen. Bond, 21 Sep 07 iv p.1. Presentation – Safety Conference Brief , 29-30 Mar 05 p.2. Presentation – MCCDC EFDC Vehicle Hardening Study, Spring 05 p.3. Presentation – DOTMLPF and CDIB MRAP UUNS brief, Spring 05 p.4.
Recommended publications
  • The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle

    The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle

    Canadian Military History Volume 20 Issue 2 Article 4 2011 The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Frank Maas Wilfrid Laurier University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Recommended Citation Maas, Frank "The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle." Canadian Military History 20, 2 (2011) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maas: Light Armoured Vehicle The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Frank Maas he seeds for Canada’s purchase Cadillac-Gage, but the owner of of the Light Armoured Vehicle Abstract: Since the 1970s, budget Swiss firm MOWAG, Walter Ruf, T constraints and debates over the (LAV) lie as far back as 1964, when tank’s relevance have prompted came to the Department of National the Defence White Paper called for the Canadian Forces (CF) to pursue Defence (DND) in Ottawa to present the creation of a force equipped with lighter, cheaper, and more flexible his company’s new vehicle design, a flexible, light, and air-transportable vehicles. The Light Armoured Vehicle the “Piranha.”7 DND indicated that vehicle to serve in UN missions. This (LAV), built in London, Ontario, has the vehicle must be built in Canada to been purchased in great numbers resulted in a confused reaction that to satisfy these demands, and it have a chance of winning the bid, and saw the Canadian Forces (CF) looking has largely succeeded.
  • Mine-Resistant, Ambush-Protected (MRAP) Vehicles: Background and Issues for Congress

    Mine-Resistant, Ambush-Protected (MRAP) Vehicles: Background and Issues for Congress

    Mine-Resistant, Ambush-Protected (MRAP) Vehicles: Background and Issues for Congress Andrew Feickert Specialist in Military Ground Forces January 18, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS22707 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Mine-Resistant, Ambush-Protected (MRAP) Vehicles Summary Congress has played a central role in the MRAP program by suggesting to defense and service officials that MRAPs would provide far superior protection for troops than did the up-armored High Mobility, Multi-Wheeled Vehicles (HMMWVs ). Congressional support for MRAPs, as well as fully funding the program, has been credited with getting these vehicles to Iraq and Afghanistan in a relatively short timeframe, thereby helping to reduce casualties. Congress may likely continue to be interested in the MRAP program to ensure that the appropriate types and numbers of these vehicles are fielded, as well as to monitor the post-conflict disposition of these vehicles, as they represent a significant investment. In 2007, the Department of Defense (DOD) launched a major procurement initiative to replace most up-armored HMMWVs in Iraq with Mine-Resistant, Ambush-Protected (MRAP) vehicles. MRAPs have been described as providing significantly more protection against Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) than up-armored HMMWVs. Currently, DOD has approved an acquisition objective of 25,700 vehicles, of which 8,100 are the newer Military-All-Terrain Vehicle (M-ATV) version, designed to meet the challenges of Afghanistan’s rugged terrain. DOD officials have indicated that this total may be increased depending on operational needs in Afghanistan. DOD reports that as of January 6, 2011, 13,624 MRAPs had been delivered to Afghanistan, including more than 6,500 M-ATVs.
  • Security & Defence European

    Security & Defence European

    a 7.90 D European & Security ES & Defence 4/2016 International Security and Defence Journal Protected Logistic Vehicles ISSN 1617-7983 • www.euro-sd.com • Naval Propulsion South Africa‘s Defence Exports Navies and shipbuilders are shifting to hybrid The South African defence industry has a remarkable breadth of capa- and integrated electric concepts. bilities and an even more remarkable depth in certain technologies. August 2016 Jamie Shea: NATO‘s Warsaw Summit Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology The backbone of every strong troop. Mercedes-Benz Defence Vehicles. When your mission is clear. When there’s no road for miles around. And when you need to give all you’ve got, your equipment needs to be the best. At times like these, we’re right by your side. Mercedes-Benz Defence Vehicles: armoured, highly capable off-road and logistics vehicles with payloads ranging from 0.5 to 110 t. Mobilising safety and efficiency: www.mercedes-benz.com/defence-vehicles Editorial EU Put to the Test What had long been regarded as inconceiv- The second main argument of the Brexit able became a reality on the morning of 23 campaigners was less about a “democratic June 2016. The British voted to leave the sense of citizenship” than of material self- European Union. The majority that voted for interest. Despite all the exception rulings "Brexit", at just over 52 percent, was slim, granted, the United Kingdom is among and a great deal smaller than the 67 percent the net contribution payers in the EU. This who voted to stay in the then EEC in 1975, money, it was suggested, could be put to but ignoring the majority vote is impossible.
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 31 July 2001 English Original: Arabic/English/French/ Russian/Spanish

    General Assembly Distr.: General 31 July 2001 English Original: Arabic/English/French/ Russian/Spanish

    United Nations A/56/257 General Assembly Distr.: General 31 July 2001 English Original: Arabic/English/French/ Russian/Spanish Fifty-sixth session Item 85 (s) of the provisional agenda* General and complete disarmament: transparency in armaments United Nations Register of Conventional Arms Report of the Secretary-General** Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction .......................................................... 1–10 2 II. Information received from Governments................................... 11–12 4 A. Composite table of replies of Governments ...................................... 5 B. Replies received from Governments ............................................ 8 III. Index of background information provided by Governments for the calendar year 2000 ...... 60 IV. Information received from Governments on military holdings and procurement through national production .............................................................. 63 Annex Views received from Governments in accordance with paragraph 5 (a) of General Assembly resolution 55/33 U .............................................................. 103 * A/56/150. ** Finalization of the present report was dependent on the receipt of a substantial number of submissions by Governments. 01-49573 (E) 200901 *0149573* A/56/257 I. Introduction 1. In accordance with General Assembly resolution 46/36 L of 9 December 1991, on transparency in armaments, the Secretary-General, on 1 January 1992, established the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms. In that resolution, the
  • A GUIDE to the GEOLOGY of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: the Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island

    A GUIDE to the GEOLOGY of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: the Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island

    A GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGY OF THE SANTA CATALINA MOUNTAINS, ARIZONA: THE GEOLOGY AND LIFE ZONES OF A MADREAN SKY ISLAND ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 22 JOHN V. BEZY Inside front cover. Sabino Canyon, 30 December 2010. (Megan McCormick, flickr.com (CC BY 2.0). A Guide to the Geology of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: The Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island John V. Bezy Arizona Geological Survey Down-to-Earth 22 Copyright©2016, Arizona Geological Survey All rights reserved Book design: M. Conway & S. Mar Photos: Dr. Larry Fellows, Dr. Anthony Lux and Dr. John Bezy unless otherwise noted Printed in the United States of America Permission is granted for individuals to make single copies for their personal use in research, study or teaching, and to use short quotes, figures, or tables, from this publication for publication in scientific books and journals, provided that the source of the information is appropriately cited. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new or collective works, or for resale. The reproduction of multiple copies and the use of articles or extracts for comer- cial purposes require specific permission from the Arizona Geological Survey. Published by the Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, #100, Tucson, AZ 85701 www.azgs.az.gov Cover photo: Pinnacles at Catalina State Park, Courtesy of Dr. Anthony Lux ISBN 978-0-9854798-2-4 Citation: Bezy, J.V., 2016, A Guide to the Geology of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: The Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island.
  • Ti for Military Ground Vehicles: Are Hopes Dashed?

    Ti for Military Ground Vehicles: Are Hopes Dashed?

    Ti for Military Ground Vehicles: Are Hopes Dashed? International Titanium Association San Diego, October 2011 T. James Dorsch BAE Systems Land and Armaments Santa Clara, CA 10/5/2011 ApprovedApproved forfor Public Public Release, Release, Distribution Distribution Unlimited, Unlimited, BAE BAE Systems Systems Communications Communications Department, Department, September September 2011 2011 1 Outline . Advantages of titanium for armor . Why the lack of titanium applications in ground combat vehicles . Current applications . Future defense challenges . General difficulty in adopting new materials . Improved fuel economy to reduce convoys and related casualties . Future vehicles – new and upgrade programs . New technologies . Opportunities 10/5/2011 Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited, BAE Systems Communications Department, September 2011 2 One of the world’s largest defense companies Defense News Top 100 BAE Systems plc Based on 2008 Revenues ($B) 45 . 107,000 employees 40 . 2009 sales of £22.4B ($35.1B**) 35 . 2009 order book of $73.4B** 30 25 . Second largest global defense company 20 . Top 10 U.S. prime contractor 15 . Seven home nations 10 5 . Presence in more than 100 nations 0 Lockheed BAE Boeing Northrop General Raytheon EADS Martin Systems Grumman Dynamics BAE Systems, Inc. 52,000 employees BAE Systems Sales from 2002 – 2009 (Figures in £000s) (44,000 in the U.S.) 25,000 . 2009 sales of £12.4B ($19.4B**) 20,000 . Major operations in 38 states, the UK, Sweden, Israel, Germany, Mexico, 15,000 Switzerland, and South
  • Marine Corps PEO LS Advanced Technology Investment Plan 2017

    Marine Corps PEO LS Advanced Technology Investment Plan 2017

    2017 PEO LS Advanced Technology Investment Plan | i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2017 PEO LS Advanced Technology Investment Plan | ii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER LAND SYSTEMS MARINE CORPS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT PLAN 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS i. Executive Summary ii. Bottom Line Up Front iii. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction pg. 1 2.0 S&T Collaboration and Engagement pg. 5 3.0 Futures pg. 17 4.0 Top Technical Issues pg. 29 5.0 PEO LS S&T Focus Areas pg. 31 5.1 Power and Energy pg. 33 5.1.1 Fuel Efficiency pg. 33 5.1.2 Intelligent Power and Thermal Management pg. 36 5.2 Survivability and Mobility pg. 41 5.2.1 Survivability pg. 41 5.2.1.1 Fuel Containment/Fire Suppression pg. 45 5.2.1.2 Safety pg. 45 5.2.2 Mobility pg. 46 5.2.2.1 Crew Visibility pg. 47 5.2.2.2 Corrosion pg. 48 5.2.2.3 Autonomy pg. 48 5.2.2.4 Weight Reduction pg. 51 5.3 Modeling and Simulation pg. 59 5.4 Open Plug-and-Play Communication Architecture pg. 65 6.0 Warfare Centers pg. 71 7.0 MCWL/DARPA Efforts pg.9 8 8.0 PEO LS Programs pg.7 9 8.1 Assault Amphibious Vehicle pg. 101 8.2 Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase 1 Increment 1 pg. 109 8.3 Common Aviation Command and Control System pg. 117 8.4 Ground Based Air Defense pg. 125 8.5 Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar pg.

  • Ralph Ziman the Casspir Project

    RALPH ZIMAN THE CASSPIR PROJECT SULGER-BUEL LOVELL 00 00 CONTENTS Introduction - 04 - 05 Personal Narrative - 06 - 09 Unveiled - 10 - 11 History - 12 - 13 The Beast - 14 - 15 Reclaiming the Casspir - 16 - 35 Collaborators - 36 - 39 Biography - 50 - 53 Contents - 61 Previous Page: The Casspir Project | Casspir 2016 | Reclaimed refitted Casspir vehicle, glass beads, yarn | 2.85m x 6.9m x 2.45m 01 04 05 INTRODUCTION The Casspir Project charts the locus of the South African military vehicle’s legacy of institutional oppression - a legacy with which we are still reckoning. The central element of the project is one of reclamation - a restored and refitted Casspir vehicle, its surfaces fully covered in elaborate, brightly-colored panels of glass beadwork, arrayed in traditional patterns and completed by artisans from Zimbabwe and the Mpumalanga province of South Africa, including women of the Ndebele tribe, known for their craftsmanship. The Casspir Project, is a multifaceted and unprecedented undertaking, ultimately comprising installation, photography, oral history, and documentary, from the South African contemporary artist, Ralph Ziman. 06 05 PERSONAL NARRATIVE People ask me, why bead a Casspir? To me it always seemed obvious: to take this weapon of war, this ultimate symbol of oppression and to reclaim it. To own it, make it African, make it beautiful. Make it shine, yes. And to make it seen and make it felt. It’s hard to explain what I mean. But there’s a line from a Rolling Stones song that goes: “I see a rainbow and I want to paint it black...” I understand that compulsion, but for me it’s different.
  • CASSPIR MK II.Indd

    CASSPIR MK II.Indd

    CASSPIR Mk-II THE MECHEM SPECIFICATION CASSPIR Mk-II ARMOURED PROTECTED PERSONNEL CARRIER The CASSPIR Armoured Protected Per- The MK II is versatile in its application sonnel Carrier (APC) is a leader in its as an APC for: class bringing high technology and battle Military use, Policing, Peacekeeping and a proven effectiveness together to provide platform for Mine Action services. one of the safest landmine resistant per- sonnel carriers in the world. Double cab 4x4 after landmine exploded Casspir MK1I with fi tted Steelwheels after landmine exploded Vision and Mission - MECHEM: A WORLD LEADER IN CREAT- MECHEM (Pty) Ltd Tel: [+27 (0) 12] 640 3000 ING SAFER ENVIRONMENTS, THROUGH PROVIDING: MINE 368 B Selborne Avenue Fax: [+27 (0) 12] 664 3528 ACTION SERVICES; BATTLE AREA CLEARANCE SOLUTIONS; Lyttelton, Centurion, 0157, RSA E-mail: [email protected] CANINE SOLUTIONS; RELATED SKILLS DEVELOPMENT; P.O. Box 14864 Website: www.mechemdemining.com MINE PROTECTED VEHICLES AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT. Lyttelton, 0140, RSA www.mechem.co.za COMPANY BACKGROUND TRANSMISSION SYSTEM Clutch Single plate, dry disc clutch • MEHCEM is a subsidiary of the Denel group and State Gearbox Manual- 5 speed forward (all synchro- owned enterprise mesh) and 1 reverse • MECHEM have been involved in military and mine action Transfer Case Two speed research and development since 1960 and became a com- Operation Pneumatic mercial demining company in 1992. • Thus far MECHEM has been involved in clearing a few mil- DRIVE AXLES (Mercedes Benz) (MB) lion square meters of minefi elds and we have successfully Front: Single reduction, palloid drive, and supplied over 120 remanufactured MPV and APC vehicles.
  • Wheeled Apcs

    Wheeled Apcs

    Wheeled APCs WHEELED ARMORED PERSONNEL CARRIERS Australian Wheeled APCs Austrian Wheeled APCs Belgian Wheeled APCs Brazilian Wheeled APCs British Wheeled APCs Canadian Wheeled APCs Chilean Wheeled APCs Chinese Wheeled APCs Croatian Wheeled APCs Czech Wheeled APCs Dutch Wheeled APCs Egyptian Wheeled APCs Finnish Wheeled APCs French Wheeled APCs German Wheeled APCs Guatemalan Wheeled APCs Hungarian Wheeled APCs Indian Wheeled APCs International Wheeled APCs Irish Wheeled APCs Israeli Wheeled APCs Italian Wheeled APCs Japanese Wheeled APCs Mexican Wheeled APCs North Korean Wheeled APCs Portuguese Wheeled APCs Romanian Wheeled APCs Russian Wheeled APCs Salvadoran Wheeled APCs Saudi Wheeled APCs Slovakian Wheeled APCs South African Wheeled APCs Spanish Wheeled APCs Swedish Wheeled APCs Swiss Wheeled APCs Turkish Wheeled APCs Ukrainian Wheeled APCs US Wheeled APCs Yugoslavian Wheeled APCs file:///E/My%20Webs/misc_pages/armored_personnel_carriers_3.html[3/22/2020 5:55:29 PM] Australian Wheeled APCs ADI/Thales Australia Bushmaster Notes: The Bushmaster Protected Mobility Vehicle was designed as a successor to the S-600, under the Bushranger Infantry Mobility Vehicle competition; it eventually emerged as the winner of that competition, with development beginning in 1998. The development and testing process was long, incloved, and troubled, and deliveries did not begin until 2005. The Bushmaster is based on a design originally conceived by the Irish company of Timoney; considerable portions of the Bushmaster are therefore manufactured under a licensing agreement with Timoney, though production is undertaken wholly in Australia. ADI began the part of the design process done in Australia, but production later passed to Thales Australia, who also developed several variants. (Virtually all of these variants differ primarily in internal arrangements and equipment; externally, almost all of the different versions differ little from each other.) The primary users of the Bushmaster are the Australian Army and Air Force, but it is also used by the Dutch Army and British Army.
  • Army Guide Monthly • Issue #2 (29) • February 2007

    Army Guide Monthly • Issue #2 (29) • February 2007

    Army G uide monthly # 2 (29) February 2007 GD Awarded Test Vehicle Contract for Four Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles US Marine Corps Announces Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle Contracts The United States Gives Weapons to Afghanistan's Army Armoured Personnel Carrier Northrop Grumman to Test Fire Kinetic Energy Interceptor Booster PVI Wins MRAP Test Contract Award Last Laser-Based Firing Simulator Handed Over for the Light Armoured Vehicle RadSpz 93 BAE SYSTEMS Receives Follow-on Contract for New Swedish Artillery System LM Receives $18.6M U.S. Army BCS3 Follow-On Contract Half-track FCS Successfully Completes Experiment and Soldier-testing of Key Technologies Textron Marine & Land Contracted to Build Test Vehicles for Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Program Cost Effective Integration Of The Fido Explosives Detection System Additional Heavy Tank Transporters for Australian Army Oshkosh Truck Signs Contract To Provide Medium Tactical Trucks To Egyptian Ministry of Defense Howitzer DRS Technologies Receives $124 M Contract to Produce Infrared Sighting Systems for U.S. Army Combat Vehicles Force Dynamics Announces $67 M U.S. Marine Corps Contract Tetra Tech Joint Venture Wins $62 M Technical Services Contract with U.S. Army Chemical Materials Agency DFNS Announces a First Order from a Leading US Supplier of Armored Buses www.army-guide.com Army Guide Monthly • #2 (29) • February 2007 Defence Industry lives by augmenting the current level of mine and GD Awarded Test Vehicle Contract for Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) protection with a Four Mine Resistant Ambush Protected V-shaped hull and raised chassis. The increased Vehicles survivability performance requirements and production rates are a direct result of theater operational needs.
  • The Us Withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Fate of the Mraps

    The Us Withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Fate of the Mraps

    ZESZYTY NAUKOWE RUCHU STUDENCKIEGO Nr 2 (2014) ISSN 2084-2279 Cdt. Richard Kovács1 Under mentoring of Col. Tomasz Smal, PhD, Assoc. Prof. THE US WITHDRAWAL FROM AFGHANISTAN AND THE FATE OF THE MRAPS Summary: This article describes the problems connected with the withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan and focuses on the hardships of transporting the MRAPs from the area of operations. Keywords: military logistics, MRAP, Global War on Terror, bilateral agreement, Afghanistan, IED INTRODUCTION Shortly after 9/11 the US and its allies started so called the Global War on Terror (GWOT), and Afghanistan (among other countries) became a battlefield. The Internation- al Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Operation Enduring Freedom is made up of the coalition of NATO countries, but the biggest contributor to the cause is without doubt the USA. Since 2001, they have deployed most of the soldiers and the equipment to the area. Now the US is considering the withdrawal from the country and is faced with a huge amount of problems. When and how exactly will they leave the country? How can they manage the withdrawal efficiently from the logistic point of view? To better under- stand the significance of these questions, we must take a look into the history of the war and the current situation. 1. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW In the opening stages of the war, the invasion of the country went extremely fast, faster than the intelligence officers at the CIA would predict. At the beginning air strikes and a limited number of ground troops (mostly CIA paramilitary officers and special op- erations forces) with the help of the local anti-taliban militias launched successful cam- paigns against enemy strongholds and captured important cities such as Mazar-i Sharif, Kabul, Kunduz and Kandahar2.