• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Blue Large-Amplitude Pulsators: the Possible Surviving Companions of Type Ia Supernovae Xiang-Cun Meng1,2,3, Zhan-Wen Han1,2,3, Philipp Podsiadlowski4, Jiao Li5,1 1Yunnan Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 650216 Kunming, PR China 2 Key Laboratory for the Structure and Evolution of Celestial Objects, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 650216 Kunming, PR China 3Center for Astronomical Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100012, PR China 4Department of Astronomy, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK 5Key Laboratory of Space Astronomy and Technology, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, PR China [email protected] ABSTRACT The single degenerate (SD) model, one of the leading models for the progenitors of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), predicts that there should be binary companions that survive the supernova explosion which, in principle, should be detectable in the Galaxy. The discovery of such surviving companions could therefore provide conclusive support for the SD model. Several years ago, a new type of mysterious variables was discovered, the so-called blue large-amplitude pulsators (BLAPs). Here we show that all the properties of BLAPs can be reasonably well reproduced if they are indeed such surviving companions, in contrast to other proposed channels. This suggests that BLAPs could potentially be the long-sought surviving companions of SNe Ia. Our model also predicts a new channel for forming single hot subdwarf stars, consistent with a small group in the present hot-subdwarf-star sample. Subject headings: stars: supernovae: general - white dwarfs - supernova remnants - variables: general 1. INTRODUCTION nature of the companion star of the accreting WD, two classes of progenitor scenarios have The nature of the progenitors of Type Ia su- been proposed: the single degenerate (SD) model pernovae (SNe Ia) remains a hotly debated topic where the companion is a non-degenerate star, (Hillebrandt & Niemeyer 2000; Wang & Han 2012; i.e. a main-sequence or a slightly evolved star arXiv:2009.11059v1 [astro-ph.SR] 23 Sep 2020 Maoz, Mannucci & Nelemans 2014), even though (WD+MS), a red giant star (WD+RG) or a they have been so important for determining cos- helium star (WD + He star) (Whelan & Iben mological parameters(Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1973; Nomoto, Thielemann & Yokoi 1984), and 1999; Mengetal. 2015). At present, a ba- the double-degenerate (DD) model involving the sic framework has been established where a SN merger of two CO WDs (Iben & Tutukov 1984; Ia originates from the thermonuclear explosion Webbink 1984). Both models have some support of a carbon-oxygen white dwarf (CO WD) in on both the observational and the theoretical side a binary system (Hoyle & Fowler 1960). The (Howell 2011). WD accretes material from its companion and A basic difference between the two classes of increases its mass close to its maximum sta- models is that there still is a surviving companion ble mass, where a thermonuclear explosion oc- after the supernova explosion in the SD model but curs in the WD (Branch 2004). Based on the not in the DD model (but see Shen et al. 2018). 1 Searching for surviving companions directly in su- Meng & Podsiadlowski (2017) developed a new pernova remnants (SNRs) is a viable way to dis- version of the SD model, which they named the tinguish between the different models. The dis- common-envelope wind (CEW) model. In this covery of potential surviving companions in some model, mass transfer between a WD and its com- supernova remnants has revealed the power of panion can begin when the companion is a MS the method (Ruiz-Lapuente et al. 2004; Li et al. star or is crossing the Hertzsprung gap (HG). If 2017). However, the typical lifetime of a SNR is the mass-transfer rate exceeds the critical accre- only a few 104 yr (Sarbadhicary et al. 2017), which tion rate of the WD, the WD will expand to a is much shorter than the lifetime of any surviving RG-like object, and a common envelope (CE) is companion. Therefore, there must be a large num- assumed to form around the binary system. The ber of surviving companions in the Galaxy which WD then gradually increases its mass at the base are not associated with SNRs, freely cruising in of the CE. For a low density of the CE, the binary space, if the SD model contributes, at least in part, system is expected to survive from the CE phase to the production of SNe Ia. The surviving com- until the WD approaches the Chandrasekhar mass panion may show some unusual properties com- and explodes as a SN Ia. The WD may explode pared to normal single stars, e.g. an atmosphere while it is still in the CE phase, a phase of sta- polluted by supernova ejecta and a relative high ble hydrogen burning (and appear as a supersoft space velocity (Han 2008). If such surviving com- X-ray sources [SSS]), or a phase of weakly unsta- panions were discovered, this could provide con- ble hydrogen burning, where the system would ap- clusive support for the SD model. pear as a recurrent nova (RN), as illustrated in Recently, Pietrukowicz et al. (2017) found a Fig. 1. According to the different phases when new class of variable stars named blue large- the SN Ia occurs in the CEW model, even some amplitude pulsators (BLAPs), objects whose ori- peculiar SNe Ia may share the same origin: e.g. gin is still a complete mystery. BLAPs are sin- the so-called SNe Ia-CSM and 02cx-like objects gle, hydrogen-deficient stars associated with the may both originate from the explosions of hy- Galactic disc, and no BLAP has been discovered brid carbon-oxygen-neon (CONe) WDs in SD sys- in the Magellanic Clouds (Pietrukowicz 2018); tems (Meng & Podsiadlowski 2018). In the CEW i.e. BLAPs appear to belong to a young popu- model, if the mass transfer for a binary system be- lation with a relatively high metallicity. Model gins when the companion crosses the HG, a helium simulations show that BLAPs are core-helium- core has been formed in the center of the compan- burning or shell-hydrogen-burning stars, and ion. The core mass is determined by the initial that their total mass is smaller than ∼ 1.2 M⊙ companion mass and the initial orbital period: the (Pietrukowicz et al. 2017). Their positions in the more massive the initial companion or the longer Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram locate them the initial orbital period, the more massive the between main-sequence stars and hot sdOB stars, helium core of the companion. After the super- as do their surface gravities; this suggests that the nova explosion, such a companion may become a envelopes of BLAPs are slightly more massive than hydrogen-deficient low-mass single star (e.g. Fig. those of hot sdOB stars. However, the lifetime of 19 in Meng & Podsiadlowski 2017, where the SN the shell-hydrogen-burning stars during the BLAP Ia explodes in the CE phase), and share many stage is too short compared with the lifetime of properties with BLAPs, making them promising the BLAPs deduced from the rate of their pe- candidates for surviving companions from SD sys- riod change (Podsiadlowski et al. 2002; Wu & Li tems. Here, adopting the CEW model, we will 2018; Romero et al. 2018; Byrne & Jeffery 2018; show that all the properties of BLAPs may be C´orsico et al. 2018). This leaves core-helium- simultaneously reproduced by the surviving com- burning stars with a thin hydrogen envelope as the panions in the CEW model: their population char- only viable solution for BLAPs (Wu & Li 2018; acteristics, their single-star nature, their lifetime Byrne & Jeffery 2018). To form such a special as a BLAP, their location in the HR diagram, structure, a star needs to lose its hydrogen-rich their surface helium abundance and surface grav- envelope after a helium core has formed in its ity, their radial velocity, their pulsation periods, center. including the rate and sign of the period change, 2 CEW model Wind CO WD + MS Wind Wind Wind SNe Ia in CE phase SNe Ia in SSS or RN phase Fig. 1.— Schematic diagram illustrating the common-envelope wind (CEW) model, where the SN Ia may explode in a CE, SSS or RN phase. BLAPs originate from those exploding in the CE phase. 3 the total number of BLAPs and the number ra- as BLAPs. To examine whether the surviving tio of BLAPs to hot subdwarf stars in the Galaxy. companions can reproduce the other properties of We will also show that there is no other proposed BLAPs, we choose four typical binary systems and channel that can simultaneously explain all these continue to evolve the companion stars after the properties. Hence we suggest that BLAPs are supernova explosion and record their various pa- likely surviving companions of SNe Ia, as predicted rameters that may directly be compared with the by the SD model, and that their discovery provides properties of BLAPs. strong evidence in support of the SD model. In Fig. 3, we show the evolutionary tracks of the In section 2, we describe our methods and the companions in the HR diagram. Generally, the main results of our calculations. In section 3 we companions ascend the red-giant branch (RGB) discuss the results, and present our main conclu- after the supernova explosion, and helium is ig- sions in section 4. nited in the core at the tip of the RGB. The com- panions then become horizontal-branch (HB) stars 2. METHODS AND RESULTS and stay on the HB, while shell hydrogen burning above the helium-burning core continues to con- 2.1.

Load more

  21

Copy Link