University Ofhawai'i at Manoa Designed to Transform

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University Ofhawai'i at Manoa Designed to Transform BOOK REVIEWS 253 designed to transform the economy, by Nauru: Environmental Damage under focusing on how the nuclear-testing International Trusteeship, by Chris­ program has transformed the economy topher Weeramantry. Melbourne: of French Polynesia and how hard Oxford University Press, 1992. ISBN 0­ choices must be made if the territory 19-553289-9, xx + 448 pp, maps, fig­ (or an independent successor state?) is ures, illustrations, appendixes, notes, ever to have a viable economy indepen­ bibliography, index. US$72. dent of massive transfers from France, Poirine has made a real contribution. In December 1986, the government of Some readers may wish that he had Nauru established a Commission of disaggregated income figures by ethnic Inquiry to establish responsibility for group and social class (ie, Metropoli­ the rehabilitation ofworked-out min­ tans, Chinese, "Demis," and indige­ ing lands on the island, and the cost nous Polynesians), had paid more and feasibility of any proposed rehabil­ attention to Polynesian cultural values, itation. The issue had lain dormant and had discussed the corruption alleg­ since Nauru's independence in 1968. At edly rampant in the territory. By con­ that time the so-called partner govern­ centrating, however, on the structure ments-Australia, New Zealand, and ofFrench Polynesia's economic dilem­ the United Kingdom-which had been ma, Poirine has provided a much­ joint owners ofthe British Phosphate needed analysis. That he chose to pub­ Commission and, under a United lish these results of his 1991 doctoral Nations trusteeship agreement, respon­ dissertation in this fairly readable sible for the administration ofNauru, form, rather than as a technical mono­ maintained that all outstanding issues graph, and that he cofounded a between the parties had been resolved monthly economic and political maga­ by the agreements that had seen the zine now published in Tahiti, indicates Nauruans win control of the phosphate that Poirine is interested in influencing industry and secure independence. policy in French Polynesia. Further­ Hammer DeRoburt, Nauru's founding more, his position at the new French president, disagreed, declaring that his University of the Pacific would seem to people had not been a willing party to put him into the position to sensitize the mining arrangements and would Polynesian students to the economic continue to seek compensation for the realities oftheir island world. It rehabilitation ofworked-out mining remains to be seen, however, what role lands. The Commission of Inquiry had his economic realism will play in shap­ been established in response to the final ing the postnuclear economy of this dissolution ofthe British Phosphate affluent but currently troubled part of Commission and the distribution to the the Pacific. partner governments ofthe very sub­ BEN FINNEY stantial surpluses it had accumulated. University ofHawai'i at Manoa Weeramantry, then Sir Hayden Starke Professor ofLaw at Monash University in Melbourne, chaired the inquiry; this " * book represents that portion of the NEihMiiijMSM'i"'JQM;U 254 THE CONTEMPORARY PACIFIC· SPRING 1994 report which deals with the obligations cations for other former trust territo­ imposed on the partner governments ries (in essence, the old German col­ by virtue ofthe trusteeship. onies), including Western Samoa, New The Commission of Inquiry found Guinea, Micronesia, and, outside the that mining had always been carried on Pacific region, South West Africa under dubious title and contrary to the (Namibia) and Tanganyika (Tanzania). rights ofthe Nauruan landowners; that Ifthis case is successful, others might the partner governments, and the phos­ follow. It is noteworthy that Weera­ phate commission on their behalf, had mantry spends very little time discus­ violated the general principles ofman­ sing Banaba (Ocean Island, in the dates and trusts, as well as the specific neighboring Republic ofKiribati), conditions of agreements affecting which was the subject of a court action Nauru, and had abused their power as for compensation brought in the trustees. It is also argued that the part­ English High Court by the Banabans. ner governments created for themselves In that case, Justice Megarry held that a monopoly that generated profits and the colonial authorities had no legal commercial advantages for them at the case to answer, though he saw a moral same time as it caused loss to the Nau­ obligation to pay compensation in ruan people. Although the Commis­ respect ofcertain aspects ofthe mining. sion ofInquiry suggested that the Nau­ Weeramantry argues that the cases are ruans' total loss might total A$1 billion, quite different by virtue ofthe fiduciary it held that the partners should accept relationship established by the trustee­ responsibility for at least the A$74 mil­ ship. The argument is pressed not only lion that it would cost to rehabilitate in terms of the "sacred trust" of the that portion ofthe island mined before original mandate, but also in terms of independence. The government of broader concerns of "the duty of care" Nauru submitted copies ofthese find­ implicit in trusteeship, reinforced by ings to the partner governments, and the principles ofenvironmental law. has taken its case (against Australia While tracing the evolution of envi­ only in the first instance) to the Inter­ ronmentallaw to earlier beginnings, national Court ofJustice. Weeramantry focuses his discussion on The book presents a comprehensive the Stockholm Declaration of1972 and review ofthe history of Nauru's phos­ subsequent developments. This raises a phate industry, exploring the details of fundamental issue underlying many of mining agreements, international nego­ the book's findings, which at times are tiations and obligations, the relevant presented with the clarity of hindsight aspects of international law, and the and with a seeming unawareness of the role ofthe United Nations. In one anachronism that some ofthem repre­ sense, much of this is not new, at least sent. There is no doubt that the partner not in its component parts, but what is governments used cheap Nauruan new is the way in which Weeramantry phosphate to assist their rural econo­ has brought it all together in his mies, or that they took steps to protect defense of the Nauruan position. their monopolist position in the Pacific The argument, if it is held to be phosphate industry. But there is rather correct by the court, has major impli- more emphasis here on applying mod- BOOK REVIEWS 255 ern legal and moral principles to past dence and its existence used by the events than there is to understanding partner governments to defend their events and attitudes within the context view that provision had been made for oftheir times. For example, the partner the long-term future either by resettle­ governments generally addressed what ment or rehabilitation. (Again, needs they saw asNauruan needs-hence the versus rights.) educational and medical services Some steps have been taken to turn praised by the Commission of Inquiry what began as a section of a report of a -and, until they were forced to do so Commission ofInquiry into a publica­ in the anticolonial atmosphere ofthe tion for a wider and less determined 1960s, did not give much attention to audience. (The original report runs to Nauruan rights. The issue is mentioned ten volumes including a large number in passing but not explored in any ofreprinted documents.) The transi­ depth. The overall argument also tion is not always easily made, how­ depends to some extent on the rejec­ ever, especially for a reader who has an tion, in the name oftrusteeship, of interest in pursuing the issues. The reports, information, and policies that argument is sometimes repetitious, and were accepted at the time by the Man­ at times a series of bald quotations dates Commission of the League of from official documents takes over Nations and the Trusteeship Council from analysis and commentary. There of the United Nations. Did the partner are difficulties with academic trap­ governments know that they were pings. The commission numbered in its acting outside the law and codes of own series the extensive array of docu­ international behavior as often as ments that it located, though much of Weeramantry implies, or were they, the claimed "vast amount ofhitherto rather, behaving as other nations did unknown material" was at least known under like, if not exactly parallel, cir­ to specialists if not published or widely cumstances? available. The report, and now the The discussion of alternatives to the book, references sources and quota­ rehabilitation ofmining lands, and tions to this numbering, which covers particularly resettlement, is disappoint­ some fifteen hundred documents, ingly brief. Contrary to the implication rather than to original series and loca­ given here, the partner governments, tions. Copies ofthe documents may be together with Nauruan leaders, gave seen at the Nauru consulate in Mel­ serious consideration to the resettle­ bourne but, for the reader, the context, ment option from 1947. The proposals or even the date or source, of the docu­ were assimilationist, even racist, at ments quoted is not always clear. times, but the fact remains that a Com­ Within the notes there are inconsisten­ munity Long Term Investment Fund cies and inaccuracies, and further was established, and that the Nauruans inconsistencies between notes and bib­ themselves did not finally reject the liography. resettlement option until 1964. The Such criticisms may be valid in aca­ fund, although financed from royalties demic terms but, in the final analysis, on phosphate exports, was handed to this is not so much an academic work the Nauruan authorities at indepen- as a tract. Although it is written in a Am = THE CONTEMPORARY PACIFIC· SPRING 1994 style that takes for granted its own three essays are each distinct in topic conclusions, and is thus to some extent and increasingly wide in focus. The an exercise in self-fulfilment, it is in first two serve as case studies of the fact a powerful statement ofthe Nau­ Polynesian expansion into the Pacific ruan case for compensation.
Recommended publications
  • I INFORMAL 1 26 April 1976 SOUTH PACIFIC COMMISSION REVIEW
    I INFORMAL 1 26 April 1976 02621 SOUTH PACIFIC COMMISSION REVIEW COMMITTEE (Nauru, 3-7 May 1976) CURRICULAE VITAE OF MEMBERS OF DELEGATIONS Chairman of the Review H. E. President Hammer DeROBURT Committee President of the Republic of Nauru. Personal: born Nauru, 1922 one of Truk deportees, 1942-1946 married 1950; 1 daughter awarded OBE 1966. Education and training: Nauru Boys Secondary School; Geelong Technical School, Vict., Australia. Career: Education, politics. Teacher, Nauru Education Department; Member Nauru Defence Force, 1940 Japanese occupation; returned to teaching in Nauru, 1946; 1947-1951 Liaison Officer, Dept. Nauruan Affairs; elected Head Chief, Nauru Local Government Council 1956; Member of the Legislative Council from 1966; elected Leader of Elected Members, and Member of Execu- tive Council; Chief Adviser to Special Repre- sentatives for Nauru at UN; Leader of Nauru delegation to Canberra for phosphate and independence talks on all occasions from 1960; President of Nauru since Independence in 1968. Previous South Pacific Conferences: Fourth (1959); Eighth (196S): Ninth (1969); Tenth (1970); Twelfth (1972); Fourteenth (1974); Fifteenth (1975). American Samoa Palauni M. ("Brownie") TUIASOSOPO Assistant to Governor. Personal: born American Samoa; age 39. Education and training: primary and secondary schools, American Samoa; Ponahou Prepara- tory School, Honolulu; Bachelor of Arts (Political Science), University Oregon, USA. Career: business, politics, administration; Pago Pago businessman: Clerk of the House of Representatives, American Samoa, 1965 until appointed Assistant to Governor. Previous South Pacific Conferences: Ninth (1969) when he was member of the General Committee," Tenth (1970); Eleventh (1971); Twelfth (1972); . Fourteenth (1974); Fifteenth (1975); 1971 265 Planning Committee Meeting. • 2 Australia W.N.
    [Show full text]
  • On Our Selection: Australian Longitudinal Research Studies
    RESEARCH ENTERPRISE On our selection: Australian longitudinal research studies Ann T Gregory, Ruth M Armstrong, Tanya D Grassi, Bronwyn Gaut and Martin B Van Der Weyden he association between smoking and lung cancer is now an not questions from ‘Trivial Pursuit’ nor is the answer to each of these accepted fact. Every day, doctors base management deci- questions readily available”, wrote Professor Paul Zimmet in the T sions on cardiovascular risk calculated using the Framing- Medical Journal of Australia in 1985.3 At that time, Zimmet was ham equation. It is because of such findings and practical frustrated that there had been little research into the growing implicationsThe Medical that theJournal British of Australia doctors ISSN:study 0025-and the Framingham problem of diabetes in Australia. Even Papua New Guinea, then one Heart729X Study 1/15 from December the United 2008 States189 11/12 are 650-657among the world’s best of the poorest countries in the world, had better diabetes data. known©The longitudinal Medical studies. Journal The of storiesAustralia of these 2008 landmark studies Zimmet’s involvement in the epidemiology of diabetes had begun in thewww.mja.com.au fields of epidemiology and public health have already been a decade earlier when, in 1975, he had gained funding from the US told;1,2Research but longitudinal enterprise researchers have also been at work in National Institutes of Health (NIH) to conduct a diabetes prevalence Australia, with implications for our particular population and the survey on Nauru, a Central Pacific island. The President of Nauru, wider world. We selected just a few of these (Box 1) — studies that Hammer DeRoburt, had invited Pincus Taft — his Australian have already demonstrated some longevity and which we judged physician and a colleague of Zimmet’s — to the island because he would be of particular interest to our readership — and inter- thought diabetes was a problem on Nauru; he was right! Zimmet viewed some of their key investigators.
    [Show full text]
  • Aingimea Commence Term As USP Chancellor
    1 REPUBLIC OF NAURU Government Information Office MEDIA RELEASE For Immediate Release Thursday, 2 July, 2020 President Aingimea commence chancellorship, wants a strong USP His Excellency President Lionel Aingimea is the third president of Nauru to hold the position of chancellor at the region’s premier institution, the University of the South Pacific. The chancellor is the titular head of the University in which President Aingimea is the 28th head of state or government to hold the title. President Aingimea says the chancellorship means “it brings what Nauru can contribute to USP” and a chance for Nauru to “put our stamp in how we think USP should be governed.” “It is my intention that as chancellor it is not just a figure head, that as chancellor I will get really involved in improving and pushing USP that will make USP proud. That will make people want to go to USP. “The USP needs to have strong staff, strong students and supported by a strong council. “The vision I see is one where staff can work in an environment without fear and without intimidation, where they can deliver what is needed either in business houses or what is needed in industries. “I want us (USP) to be at the level of excellence that is on par with the best universities in the world and I believe we are one of the premier universities in the world,” President Aingimea said, adding however, that the governance of the university needs to improve. “If the governance element of USP doesn’t improve then it gives way to corruption, it gives way to nepotism, and it gives way to an environment where people are too frightened to speak and you’ll have basically low morale and a code of ethics that is thrown out the door.” While the term of chancellor commences 1 July, President Aingimea will be officially installed at the USP’s main campus in Laucala, Suva, Fiji.
    [Show full text]
  • International Court of Justice Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru V Australia) Memorial of the Republic of Nauru Volume 1 April 1990 ERRATUM
    International Court of Justice Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v Australia) Memorial of the Republic of Nauru Volume 1 April 1990 ERRATUM Memorial Volume 1, Page 241, Line 1, delete the word, 'Nauni', and substitute, 'British' International Court of Justice Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v Australia) Mernorial of the Republic of Nauru Volume 1 April1990 Table of Contents Notes on Sources and Legislation viii Introduction 1 PART 1 AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT OF NAURU'S RELATIONS WTH EXTERNAL POWERS CHAPTER 1 FROM COLONIZATION TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE MANDATE 5 Section 1. Introduction Section 2. The German Period A. Nauni Placed within the Marshall Islands Protectorate B. Land and the German Administration C. Jaluit Gesellschaft and the Pacific Phosphate Company D. German Mining Laws E. Nauru during World War 1 CHAPTER 2 THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS MANDATE Section 1. Mandate Negotiations Section 2. The Nauru Island Agreement of 1919 and the Establishment of the British Phosphate Comrnissioners Section 3. The Administration of Nauru and the Nauni Island Agreement A. The Administration of Nauru B. The Position of the British Phosphate Comrnissioners C. The Concerns of the United States and Australia's Response: The Bailey Opinion D. The Permanent Mandates Commission CHAPTER 3 THE LANDS ORDINANCES Section 1. Land Rights and Mining Rights under the 1919 Agreement (ii) Section 2. The Lands Ordinance 1921 (Nau) Section 3. The Lands Ordinance 1927 (Nau) Section 4. Impact of the Lands Ordinances CHAPTER 4 FROM THE SECOND WORLD WAR UNTIL INDEPENDENCE Section 1. The Japanese Occupation Section 2. The Transition to Trusteeship Section 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Title : Land Ownership and Control in Nauru Author : Peter F Macsporran
    Title : Land Ownership and Control in Nauru Author : Peter F MacSporran <[email protected]> Organisation : Keywords : Nauru, Land ownership, traditional customs, colonial and : post colonial practices, mining rights. Abstract : The article traces land ownership in Nauru : (a small island in the Western Pacific) prior to, during : and post colonial administration by Germany and Australia. : Customary land dealing practices are contrasted with the : arrangements implemented by colonial administrators. : and more recently the Naruan Lands Committee. : The impact of non traditional influences such as : judicial decisions on customary practices are discussed. : The article had its origin as the basis for the Naruan : Government's submission to the Commission of Inquiry : into the Island's worked out phosphate lands. Contact Name : The Editors, E Law Contact Address: Murdoch University School of Law, PO Box 1014, : Canning Vale, Western Australia, 6155 Contact Phone : + 61 09 360 2976 Contact Email : [email protected] Last Verified : Last Updated : Creation Date : Filename : macsporr.txt File Size : 74,000 bytes File Type : Document File Format : ASCII Publication Status: Final COPYRIGHT POLICY: Material appearing in E Law is accepted on the basis that the material is the original, uncopied work of the author or authors. Authors agree to indemnify E Law for all damages, fines and costs associated with a finding of copyright infringement by the author or by E Law in disseminating the author's material. In almost all cases material appearing in E Law will attract copyright protection under the Australian *Copyright Act 1968* and the laws of countries which are member states of the *Berne Convention*, *Universal Copyright Convention* or have bilateral copyright agreements with Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • RACE, SELF-DETERMINATION and AUSTRALIAN EMPIRE Race, Self –Determination and Australian Empire ANTONY ANGHIE*
    RACE, SELF-DETERMINATION AND AUSTRALIAN EMPIRE Race, Self –Determination and Australian Empire ANTONY ANGHIE* This article focuses on Australia’s complex relationship with colonialism and empire. This relationship is most often examined through the related frameworks of settler colonialism and Australia’s place within the British Empire. This article sketches and explores a third framework based on what might be termed ‘Australia’s Empire’: Australia’s administration of Nauru and Papua New Guinea pursuant to a mandate of the League of Nations and subsequently, as trusteeship territories under the League of Nations. It seeks in this way to make an argument that these different forms and operations of colonialism must be studied simultaneously as they all influenced each other. Concepts of race and self-determination provide a means of linking together these different imperial experiences. CONTENTS I Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 II The Nauru Mandate and the Beginnings of Australian Empire ................................ 3 III Nauru: Self-Determination and Its Aftermath .......................................................... 6 IV Papua New Guinea and Beyond: Mining and the Post-Colonial State ................... 14 V Australia and Empire .............................................................................................. 20 VI Overlapping Imperial Histories ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Speech by the Vice-Chancellor and President, Professor Rajesh Chandra for the Opening of the New Nauru Campus, 2018
    SPEECH BY THE VICE-CHANCELLOR AND PRESIDENT, PROFESSOR RAJESH CHANDRA FOR THE OPENING OF THE NEW NAURU CAMPUS, 2018 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • Acting President of the Republic of Nauru, His Excellency, David Adeang; • The Speaker of the Parliament of Nauru, Honourable Cyril Buraman; • The Pro-Chancellor and Chair of USP Council, Mr Winston Thompson and Mrs Queenie Thompson; • Minister of Education, Honourable Charmaine Scotty and Honourable Ministers and Senior Officials of the Nauruan Government; • Honourable Ministers of Education of USP member countries and other Members of USP Council; • The Australian High Commissioner to Nauru, Her Excellency Ms Angela Tierney; • The Ambassador of Taiwan, His Excellency Mr Chin-Fa Chow; • USP’s Development Partners; • Members of the USP Senior Management Team; • Chair and Representatives of the Nauru Learning Village Taskforce Working Group; • The Campus Director, USP Nauru Campus – Ms Alamanda Lauti; • Representatives of Alexander & Lloyd Group, and Craig Construction Limited; • Staff and students of the USP Nauru Campus; • USP Alumni; • Invited Guests; • Members of the media; • Ladies and Gentlemen. 2. WELCOME Welcome, and Omo Yoran to you all. On behalf of the Pro Chancellor and Chair of Council, Mr Winston Thompson and The University of the South Pacific (USP) community, I am deeply honoured to join the Hon. Minister of Education and Her Excellency the Australian High Commissioner in addressing you at this historic and momentous occasion of the opening of the new USP Nauru Campus within the Nauru Learning Village. This is indeed an occasion for celebration for the Government and people of Nauru and the University. We from the Vice-Chancellor’s Office, together with the director, staff and students of the old campus have been dreaming about a new campus for many years—so today marks the realization of our collective dream and one that we believe will make such a foundational contribution to the future development of Nauru.
    [Show full text]
  • South Pacific Cohhission Report of the Fifteenth
    SOUTH PACIFIC COHHISSION REPORT OF THE FIFTEENTH SOUTH PACIFIC CONFERENCE NAURU, 29 SEPTEMBER - 8 OCTOBER, 1975 Chairman. Bie Honourable Kenas Aroi, Speaker of the Nauru Parliament Vice-Chairman The Honourable Dwight Heine, Representative of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands NAURU 1975 (467/75) ATT&HUAHCB AH HEB fOOBTEmiH SOUTH PACIFIC COHFEHEHCE CHAUMAH : 15ie Honourable Kenas Aroi, Speaker of the Hauru Parliament VICE-CHAIRMAN : The Honourable Dwight Heine, Representative of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands DELEGATIONS American Samoa Mr Palauni M. Tuiasosopo Representative Australia Senator the Honourable Douglas McClelland Leader Mr K.R. Douglas-Scott Representative Mr M.H; Casson Alternate Mr R.E. Vizard Alternate Mr A.L. Fogg Adviser Mr R.J. Muller Adviser Mr K.L. Fry Observer Mr D.M. Connolly Observer Cook Islands The Honourable Dr Joseph Williams Representative Mr Howard Henry Alternate Fi.ii The Right Honourable Ratu Sir Kanisese Mara Leader The Honourable Peniame D. Naqasima Representative Dr E.M. Salato Alternate Mr W. Thompson Adviser Mr J. Kotobalavu Adviser Mr L. Buinimasi Adviser France Mr Henry Nettre Representative Mr Jacques Pellerin Alternate French Polynesia '-. Mr Enile Vanfasee Representative Mr Jacques Teheiura Alternate Gilbert Islands The Honourable Naboua T. Ratieta Leader The Honourable Bwebvetake Areieta Representative The Honourable Teweia Uaruta Alternate Mr Babera Kirata Adviser Miss Katokarara Koboboua Adviser 2 Guam The Honourable Bicardo J. Bordallo Leader Senator Paul 0..Bordallo Representative The Honourable T.V.C. Tanaka Alternate The Honourable D. Flores Alternate Mr T.Q. Certeza ' Adviser Mr M. Pray Adviser Nauru His Excellency President Hammer DeRoburt Leader The Honourable Buraro Detudamo Eepresentative Mrs Sunshine Stephen Alternate Mrs Clarinda Daniel Alternate Miss Jeanette DeRoburt Alternate The Honourable Kinza Clodumar Alternate Mr Gideon Degidoa Alternate Mr Bene R.
    [Show full text]
  • Nauru: International Status, Imperial Form, and the Histories of International Law
    Nauru: International Status, Imperial Form, and the Histories of International Law Anne Caithleen Storr ORCID ID: 0000-0002-5351-5767 Doctor of Philosophy February 2017 Melbourne Law School University of Melbourne Submitted in total fulfilment of the degree Abstract This thesis responds to the following question: what might a close reading of the history of Nauru as an object of international legal administration reveal about the relationship between imperialism and international law that accounts focusing on more ‘central’ sites of international legal formation do not? The thesis takes the form of an historical narrative of the changing status of Nauru in international law since the island’s violent incorporation into the German protectorate of the Marshall Islands in 1888, described in relation to corresponding changes in local administrative form. Considering in turn the imposition of the protectorate, the designation of Nauru as a C Class Mandate by the League of Nations in 1920, its re-designation by the United Nations as a Trust Territory in 1947, and its recognition as a sovereign state independent of Australia in 1968, this thesis argues that while status shifts, form accretes: as the international status of Nauru has shifted in each phase, what has occurred at the level of the administrative form is an accretive process of internal bureaucratisation and external restatement according to the prevailing concepts of the period. In order to hold the history of Nauru and the history of international law together, the thesis develops a method of redescription that borrows from jurisdictional thinking and from Weberian social theory in order to focus on local administrative form as a site of international legal formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyb Template 2012
    Nauru Environment: The most significant Religion: Mainly Christians (predominantly environmental issues are devastation of some Protestants). 90 per cent of the island by intensive Health: There is a high incidence of diabetes, phosphate mining during most of the 20th cancer and heart disease. There is no malaria. century, and dependence on an ageing Medical and dental treatment is free for all desalination plant and collection of limited Nauruans and for government employees rainwater for water supply. and their families. There are two hospitals, Vegetation: The only presently fertile areas one for Nauruans and one provided by the are the narrow coastal belt, where there are Nauru Phosphate Corporation, which is coconut palms, pandanus trees and mainly for employees of the corporation. A indigenous hardwoods such as the tomano, pure water supply is provided by the Nauru and the land surrounding Buada lagoon, Phosphate Corporation’s desalination plant. where bananas, pineapples and some Infant mortality was 30 per 1,000 live births vegetables are grown. Some secondary in 2013. vegetation grows over the coral pinnacles. Education: There are 11 years of compulsory KEY FACTS Wildlife: Many indigenous birds have education starting at the age of six. Primary Joined Commonwealth: 1968 disappeared or become rare, owing to school comprises six years and secondary six, with cycles of four and two years. The school Population: 10,000 (2013) destruction of their habitat, notably the noddy, or black tern. Frigate birds have year starts in January. Official language: English traditionally been caught and tamed. Students go overseas for higher education, Time: GMT plus 12 hrs Main towns: Yaren (pop.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Objections of the Government of Australia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CERTAIN PHOSPHATE LANDS IN NAURU (NAURU v. AUSTRALIA) PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA VOLUME 1 DECEMBER 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page lntroduction ............................................. 1 Section 1: Outline of Preliminary Objections ................. 3 Section II: History and Scope of Dispute as Outlined by Nauru . 4 A . What the dispute covers .............................. 4 B: Time when the dispute arose .......................... 6 C . Summary ........................................... 6 Section III: Scheme of these Preliminary Objections ........... 6 PART 1: BACKGROUND ................................. 9 Introduction ............................................. 11 Chapter 1: Factual and Historical Background ................ 12 Section 1: Mandate Period ................................. 12 A . 1914 Capitulation .................................... 12 B . Grant of Mandate over Nauru ......................... 13 C . The 1919 Agreement ................................. 14 D . Terms of the Mandate ................................ 16 E . Administration of Nauru under the Mandate ............ 17 F. Phosphate Mining under the Mandate .................. 18 G . Period of the War .................................... 20 Section II: Nauru under the Trusteeship ..................... 21 A . The Trusteeship Agreement ............................ 21 B . The administrative system ............................. 23 C . Royalties and economic advance ....................... 24 D . Progress
    [Show full text]
  • NAURU (NAURU C
    COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE MEMOIRES,PLAIDOIRIES ET DOCUMENTS AFFAIRE DE CERTAINES TERRES ~ A PHOSPHATES À NAURU (NAURU c. AUSTRALIE) VOLUME II Exceplioiis préliminaires de l'Australie ; exposé écrit de Nauru INTERNATIONAI. COURT OF JUSTICE PLEADlNGS. OKAL ARGUMENTS. DOCUMENTS CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN PHOSPHATE LANDS IN. NAURU 1 (NAURU K AUSTRALIA) l VOLUME II I'reliminüry Objccrions of Australia ; Written Statement of Nauru Référence abrégée. CLJ Mkmoires, Certaines terres u phosphates ri Nauru (Nauru c Australie), vol. II Abbreviated reference ' I. C.J Pleadings, Cerlairi Phosphate Lands in Nauru (IVuuru v. Austrnliu), Vol. II No de vente: lSSN 0074-4433 Sales numbcr 835 1 ISBN 92- 1-070937-3 AFFAIRE DE CERTAI-NES TERRES A PHOSPHATES A NAURU (NAURU c. AUSTRALIE) CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN PI-IOSPHATE LANDS IN NAURU (NAURU v. AUSTRACIA) COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE MÉMOIRES, PLAIDOIRIES ET DOCUMENTS AFFAIRE DE CERTAINES TERRES À PHOSPHATES A NAURU (NAURU c. AUSTRALIE) VOLUME II Exceptions préliminaires de l'Australie; exposé écrit de Nauru INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE PLEADINGS, ORAL ARGUMENTS, DOCUMENTS CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN PHOSPHATE LANDS JIN NAURU (NAURU v. AUSTRALIA) VOLUME 11 Prelirninary Objections of Australia; Written Statement of Nauru L'affaire de C~riuinesterres u phosphates à Naund (Nauru c. Ausirulie), inscrite au rôle général de la Cour sous le numéro 80 le 19 mai 1489, a fait l'objet d'un arrêt rendu le 26 juin 1992 (Certaines terres à phosphure.~rI Nauru ('Nauru c. Aus- ~ralie).exceptions pr.kliminaires, nrrêr, C.1.1 Recueil 1992, p. 240). Ellc cn a ét.4 rayée par ordonnance de la Cour du 13 septembre 1993, 2 la suite du dksistc- ment par accord des Parties (Certaines ferres a phosphrires Ù Nauru (Nauru c dusaralie), C.I.1 Re~usil1993, p.
    [Show full text]