Tracing Ginastera’s Map

The theme of this year’s Focus! festival is the music of Latin America. The bulk of the works, as Joel Sachs points out in his article (opposite), are by contemporary composers, but there are also nods to the region’s rich musical past. On January , Carlos Miguel Prieto conducts the Juilliard in ’s monumental Harp Concerto and other works. Faculty member Manuel Sosa considers Ginastera’s legacy.

By MANUEL SOSA

n many ways, Alberto Ginastera was a cartographer, Ginastera’s epic Cantata para América Mágica ()— a man who embraced his world, who understood that a synthesis of South American folkloric elements Icoordinates are also possibilities, that longitude and and prosody with -tone procedures—illustrated the latitude are meeting places. Perhaps infl uenced by Amerigo possibilities of combining folk materials with European Vespucci’s adventurous example, Ginastera realized early procedures and was instrumental in his being named, in on that he could also draw his own map, with lines connecting , director of the Instituto Di Tella’s new Center for his South America to audiences, musicians, and institutions Advanced Musical Studies (CLAEM), in Buenos Aires. alike around the world. He would eventually become one of He transformed it into an immensely infl uential platform the most infl uential Latin American composers of the th for creativity and experimentation while remaining century, deeply rooted in the complex fabric of invested in advancing a deep sense of locality. He invited his native but equally invested in Copland, Dallapiccola, Nono, Xenakis, and others to the European musical heritage. lecture at the center, which housed a generation of remarkable young composers who would develop a Born in Buenos Aires in , by the time more intimate, vibrant, and relevant understanding Ginastera was in his early s he’d had of what it means to be a Latin American composer. his fi rst international commission, Meanwhile Ginastera’s inaugurated La Estancia, for Lincoln Kirstein’s the New York State Theater at Lincoln Center in  American Ballet Caravan. That and his had a successful world premiere in was followed by a Guggenheim Washington, D.C., only to be banned at the Teatro Colón Foundation award that fi nanced time in Buenos Aires weeks later, an act of oppression by the in the United States (–), where totalitarian government that would eventually persuade he attended Tanglewood and cemented Ginastera to move to Geneva. a lifelong friendship with Aaron Copland. As the lines in Ginastera’s map intensifi ed, The international commissions continued; he the s brought important commissions, completed his opera just in time for the among them his fantastic String Quartet opening of the Kennedy Center, in , and in , No. , premiered by the Juilliard String soprano Benita Valente and the Juilliard String Quartet Quartet at the  Inter-American Music premiered Ginastera’s lyrical fi ve-movement Third Festival in Washington, D.C. String Quartet in Dallas. Later, attempting to reconnect with Latin America, he gathered inspiration from the Ginastera’s colorful and rhythmically driven Harp Mayan book of creation for his towering , a Concerto was commissioned in , but it was Philadelphia Orchestra commission that was unfi nished not completed and premiered until . The concerto at his death, in . presents a solo instrument that strives to strike a balance between its rhythmical needs and its melodic desires as it For many, Ginastera was a nationalistic composer, for battles the different instrumental families of an insistent others he was a committed universalist. In a sense, he and incisive full orchestra, one that also includes a was both: he passionately advanced the idea of an art that battery of  percussion instruments. Typically, Ginastera was genuinely Latin American but also eagerly universal, achieves a high degree of intensity, direction, and drama and he advocated a sort of rediscovery of the continent through the strategic juxtaposition of rhythmic and through a conscious assessment of its innate expressive melodic folk elements with fl owing nonfolk gestures, potential. At heart he was an intensely pragmatic artist creating a vibrant space through a process of addition who relished in his acute understanding of the Latin and subtraction. You feel the ghost of his beloved American sense of time, as he lived within the space of instrument—the guitar—in his writing for the harp, and his fl exible melodic intuition. His map is still intact, and the symbiosis between the two instruments, essential to as we celebrate the th anniversary of his birth, the the nature of the piece, may be the main reason behind lines are still resonating and signaling a visionary sense the unusually long time it took him to complete it. But of structure and direction to younger composers once he did, the concerto became an important addition everywhere, but especially to those from Latin America. to the harp repertoire and went on to become one of his most popular and performed works as well as one of the Manuel Sosa (BM ’91, MM ’94, DMA ’02, composition) is a most infl uential Latin American concertos. member of the Pre-College composition and ear training faculties.

The Juilliard Journal • DEC. 2016/JAN. 2017• juilliard.edu/journal | 13