DOCSLIB.ORG

Sunlite 3 3.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SUNlite Shedding some light on UFOlogy and UFOs Volume 3 Number 3 May-June 2011 Front Cover: A photograph of a waxing crescent moon. The moon can be a source of UFO reports and I mention how on pages 15-16 Left: Do these look familiar? Of course they do. They are the landing lights of an airplane shot using simi- lar camera settings as those used in the Ramilles photograph. It was a 737 aircraft and it was pretty low on approach for landing. In my opinion, this image bears a resemblance to the Ramilles image. comments about the Eupen explanations I mentioned briefly in SUNlite 2-6. Despite Meessen’s argument against Paquay’s article, I still consider the imag- es in question show lights that look a lot like airplane lights. I wonder how these photographs would fair if an indepen- dent group of scientists examined them? It is up to Mr. Meessen to provide a con- vincing argument that they could not be from an airplane. I did not see him do this Remember, it’s only UFOs in his article. hose are the sage words I received that supposedly was a Roswell smoking Abductology continues to revolve around Trecently regarding some people who gun. Many already know the story but I Carol Rainey and Emma Woods. Their in- seem to think that UFOs are a life and wrote about it anyway in the Roswell cor- formation is being ignored or shouted death struggle. When one looks at UFOs ner so everyone can follow some good down by defenders of Budd Hopkins and in the grand scheme of things, they lose links as well as some of the information David Jacobs. One has to wonder how their significance. Recent events in Ja- I had on the matter. long this will continue. pan demonstrate what really is impor- TABLE OF CONTENTS tant. The power of the tsunami and the On page 5-6, I discuss the infamous solar death toll overshadows quibbling over eclipse UFOs in 1991. I did this because how people interpret various documents I have received some recent e-mails de- Who’s blogging UFOs..................................2-4 and sighting reports. One can only feel claring that this was a case of an alien The Roswell Corner .......................................4 intense sorrow for the people of Japan spaceship appearing over a major city. and their great loss. Couriers of chicanery..................................5-6 There are two new contributions this Hollywoodn’t by Martin Kottmeyer....7-9 As tragic as this all was, there were indi- month. Martin Kottmeyer has an in- viduals that chose to take advantage of teresting piece about Hollywood and More UFOs and Nukes nonsense......10-12 the news coverage. They found various Jean-Michel Abrassart adds his point of More crashed debris claims....................12 bits of debris, clouds, or whatever float- view about UFOlogy and folklore. Both Those elusive “best evidence” UFO ing around in the videos and used them are excellent pieces that are well worth photographs and videos...................13-14 to promote UFOs. Yes, they are, by defi- reading. nition, “unidentifieds”. However, in my IFO University: The moon..................15-16 opinion, these people used this tragedy Speaking of Jean-Michel, I received an 1979 binary code..........................................16 to elevate their own personal interests. e-mail from Auguste Meessen, who felt By linking their sensationalized UFO vid- that SUNlite was not being truthful. He Another source of an IFO friend..........16 eos/blogs to the tsunami/earthquake, has posted his rebuttal on his web site UFOlogy, a contemporary folklore they made sure that google searches (http://www.meessen.net/AMeessen/ by Jean-Michel Abrassart........17-18 would get them noticed. Ramillies.pdf). In that rebuttal, he states More tainted Trindade.................................18 he was presenting the “truth”. I have a In UFO news, I noticed that the anniver- problem with anybody who like to use Battle of LA photo exposed...............19 sary of the “Phoenix lights” came and the word “truth” because usually it is Answer to “The Belgium UFO wave went with barely a whimper. It seems to that persons own biased interpretation and the photos of Ramillies”....20-22 have been overshadowed by the Japan of what they consider the “truth”. This event. kind of language is often used by politi- Questions about the Eupen UFO cians and religious leaders. That being explanation................................23 What was a really slow few months with said, there have been some questions UFOs on the tube.......................................24 UFO news, took a big jump in April, when raised about the content. Roger Paquay people “discovered” an old FBI document responds in this issue and I added a few Buy it, borrow it, bin it..............................24 1 The UFO disclosure countdown clock is ter stated what seems to be the opinion at 11:30! Supposedly, this means disclo- Who’s blogging of quite a few people. Hopkins’ and Ja- sure is just around the corner. How long cobs’ research and the ethics surround- have UFOlogists been promising this UFOs? ing it are the real issue. The research has great revelation? I seriously doubt that it produced nothing other than book sales is going to happen but would UFO pro- and notoriety for the researchers. Good- ponents be willing to bet money on this Hot topics and varied opinions ness knows how many abductees have occurring by a given date? suffered because of their ham-handed approach towards them. Rich Phillips then seemed shocked that the Russians Magonia put up a disclo- would launch two rockets sure poll after Kevin Randle over several days! The first had completed his. Kevin’s rocket launch was of a Russian original poll did not give the Navigation satellite on February option to his readers if they 26th from the Plesetsk Cosmo- thought there was anything drome. The second, supposedly to disclose at all. Magonia launched on March 1st, appears gave a far easier poll, which to have been a video from the asked the question in three Progress M03-M launch in Oc- clear choices (UFO/ET disclo- tober of 2009. sure will happen, it will never happen, and there was noth- Speaking of disclosure, Dr. ing to disclose). Kevin Ran- Clarke reports that the next dle then put up a new poll wave of MOD files have been on his blog but added extra released. This is the real dis- options. I voted on both that closure of UFO documents. The biggest there was nothing to disclose because I news was the “mysterious” destruction of make them all look the same said a lot. have yet to see any evidence that there files from DI-55 for the years 1980-82. This is a cover-up. The Magonia poll resulted is the Rendlesham time period so it im- Between Carol Rainey and Emma Woods, in about 60% saying there was nothing mediately brought forth calls of conspir- abduction research appears to be split- to disclose. Randle’s poll, which had a acy from people like John Burroughs. Dr. ting UFOlogy the same way the contact- larger sample (and included more UFO Clarke added in another posting that the ees did many years ago. Emma Woods proponents) had about 30% stating that files were destroyed about the same time became a four-letter word on UFO Up- there was nothing to disclose. This prob- as the files for the years 1967-1979, 1983. dates as Errol Bruce-Knapp shut down ably says something about the readers of It seems the files were simply destroyed any conversation on the subject. When these blogs more than anything else. en masse. Dr. Clarke also notes that those Rainey suggested that Budd Hopkins files from the DI-55 that did survive were should not be immune to criticism just A scientist claimed he found life in a essentially duplicates of sighting reports because he is ill, Bruce-Knapp banned meteorite, which became big news. The made to “The UFO desk”. This bit of in- her as well and forbade mentioning her news appeared in something called “The formation seems to indicate there really research. journal of Cosmology”, which, according was nothing important in these files but I to the bad astronomer, seems to have doubt it will satisfy conspiracy fanatics. Mrs. Rainey responded at www.paratopia. problems with checking the accuracy of net (see the Rainey update for 25 April) their articles. Some microphotographs Abduction research continues to suf- with some rather interesting comments showed objects that looked like microbe fer from the Carol Rainey effect. Her regarding John Velez (an abductee and fossils to the untrained eye but it seems first video revealed certain aspects of the personal friend of Bud Hopkins), who ap- that just because they look like fossilized Linda Cortile case, which caused a fire pears to have great influence on the run- microbes does not mean they are. This storm among UFOlogists. Rainey would ning of UFO updates. After Bruce-Knapp appears to be a case of a scientist trying then add another video documenting the issued his “ruling”, he allowed Velez to to make a splash in the news rather than saga of Linda Cortile and some of her out- post a “rebuttal” to Rainey (even though displaying the proper amount of skepti- landish claims. As before, it shows how Velez stated it was not a rebuttal). One cism regarding a claim that is “extraordi- gullible Budd Hopkins can be concerning can only assume this was done so Mr. nary”. what people tell him. The last installment Velez could have the final word.
Recommended publications
  • Humanoid-Encounters-1975-1979

    Humanoid-Encounters-1975-1979

    Humanoid Encounters THE OTHERS AMONGST US 1975-1979 Albert S. Rosales 2 Triangulum Publishing. Copyright © 2016 Albert S. Rosales ISBN: 978-1523450473 ISBN 10: 1523450479 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. Designed and edited by Ash Staunton Center cover image used with permission from Rino Di Stefano, ‘The Zanfretta Case: Chronicle of an Incredible True Story.’ 3 ~ In memory of Frederick Valentich. ~ (1958 - ?) 4 Introduction My hope is that this information will be useful for future generations, be it for entertainment or any other purpose, just hopefully useful. Something strange has been happening, perhaps for thousands of years, mostly ignored, covered up, debunked, but it still happens. Every day someone becomes part of the mystery. ‘Others’ amongst us are reaching out to us, be it from outer space, other dimensions, other realms, etc. Beware, some might not have the best intentions. But I feel this is a necessary process for our species to make that giant leap forward and become the Universal citizens that we were meant to be. 1975 was the year of the high profile Walton abduction and of SAC base intrusions. It was also a year of unrelenting humanoid activity and encounters almost at a worldwide scale. The United States was in the midst of an epidemic of mysterious and bizarre cattle mutilations. It remained the focus of activity as far as humanoid encounters. The same states reporting the cattle mutilations reported humanoid encounters.
  • CIA), Oct 1997-Jan 1999

    CIA), Oct 1997-Jan 1999

    Description of document: FOIA Request Log for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Oct 1997-Jan 1999 Requested date: 2012 Released date: 2012 Posted date: 08-October-2018 Source of document: FOIA Request Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 FOIA Records Request Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. 1998 Case Log Creation Date Case Number Case Subject 07-0ct-97 F-1997-02319 FOIA REQUEST VIETNAM CONFLICT ERA 1961 07-0ct-97 F-1997-02320 FOIA REQUEST PROFESSOR ZELLIG S. HARRIS FOIA REQUEST FOR MEETING MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COORDINATING COMMITTEE 07-0ct-97 F-1997-02321 (PDCC) 07-0ct-97 F-1997-02322 FOIA REQUEST RE OSS REPORTS AND PAPERS BETWEEN ALLEN DULLES AND MARY BANCROFT 07-0ct-97 F-1997-02323 FOIA REQUEST CIA FOIA GUIDES AND INDEX TO CIA INFORMATION SYSTEMS 07-0ct-97 F-1997-02324 FOIA REQUEST FOR INFO ON SELF 07-0ct-97 F-1997-02325 FOIA REQUEST ON RAOUL WALLENBERG 07-0ct-97 F-1997-02326 FOIA REQUEST RE RAYMOND L.
  • Ufo Research Evidence and Resources

    Ufo Research Evidence and Resources

    UFO RESEARCH EVIDENCE AND RESOURCES Copyright © 2020 Ronald Olch Revision 12-18-20 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Five Good Reasons to Believe in UFOs ...................................................... 2 History of the search for intelligent life beyond Earth .................................. 6 The Best Evidence for existence of UFOs/UAPs and for continued study ... 9 UFO sightings at ICBM sites and Nuclear Weapons Storage Areas Including interference with missile launch systems ................................... 13 Large-scale studies of UFOs..................................................................... 14 Scientific Data Collection Efforts ............................................................... 16 UFO Classification Systems ...................................................................... 20 Size and Weight Estimates ....................................................................... 22 Statements about UFOs by Credible Individuals ....................................... 23 Recommended Books and Periodicals ..................................................... 31 Researchers by Primary Field of Interest and Publications ....................... 37 Cerology ("Crop Circles") Research .......................................................... 41 UFO-Related PhD and MS Degrees ......................................................... 43 Compilations of Evidence ........................................................................
  • The Ufo Enigma 21R2 Oirs Crscir2 Crs Crsoirs

    The Ufo Enigma 21R2 Oirs Crscir2 Crs Crsoirs

    CR C S UG 633 76-52 SP THE UFO ENIGMA 21R2 OIRS CRSCIR2 CRS CRSOIRS MAR CIA S. SMITH Analyst in Science and Technology Science Policy Research Division March 9, 1976 CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CR _ t' TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 What is a UFO? 2 A. Definitions 2 B. Drawings by Witnesses 5 C. Types of Encounters 10 II. Witness Credibility 15 A. Sociological and Psychological Factors 15 B. Other Limitations on Witnesses 21 C. Strangeness-Probability Curve 24 III. Point - Counterpoint 25 A. Probable Invalidity of the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis 26 B. Alleged Air Force Secrecy and Cover Ups 29 C. Hoaxes and Witness Credibility 31 D. Possible Benefits to Science From a UFO Study 34 IV. Pre-1947 Accounts 37 A. Biblical Sightings 37 B. Other Early Reports 38 C. The Wave of 1896 41 D. The Post-War European Wave 44 V. 1947-1969 Accounts and Activities 46 A. United States 46 1. Kenneth Arnold and the 1947 Wave 46 2. U. S. Air Force Involvement (1948-1969) 48 a. Projects Sign and Grudge (1948-1952) 49 b. The Robertson Panel and Project Blue Book (1952-1953) 53 c. Special Report #14 and the O'Brien Report: Project Blue Book (1953-1966) 56 d. The Condon Report and Termination of USAF Interest (1967-1969) 63 3. Congressional Interest 69 a. House Armed Services Committee Hearings (1966) 69 b. House Science and Astronautics Committee Hearings (1968) 72 4. Private Organizations 80 a. APRO 81 b. NICAP 82 c. CUFOS 83 d. MUFON 84 e.
  • Ufo Investigations in Cold War America, 1947-1977 Kate Dorsch University of Pennsylvania, Kate.Dorsch.Hps@Gmail.Com

    Ufo Investigations in Cold War America, 1947-1977 Kate Dorsch University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2019 Reliable Witnesses, Crackpot Science: Ufo Investigations In Cold War America, 1947-1977 Kate Dorsch University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Dorsch, Kate, "Reliable Witnesses, Crackpot Science: Ufo Investigations In Cold War America, 1947-1977" (2019). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3231. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3231 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3231 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reliable Witnesses, Crackpot Science: Ufo Investigations In Cold War America, 1947-1977 Abstract This dissertation explores efforts to design and execute scientific tuds ies of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) in the United States in the midst of the Cold War as a means of examining knowledge creation and the construction of scientific uthora ity and credibility around controversial subjects. I begin by placing officially- sanctioned, federally-funded UFO studies in their appropriate context as a Cold War national security project, specifically a project of surveillance and observation, built on traditional arrangements within the military- industrial-academic complex. I then show how non-traditional elements of the investigations – the reliance on non-expert witnesses to report transient phenomena – created space for dissent, both within the scientific establishment and among the broader American public. By placing this dissent within the larger social and political instability of the mid-20th century, this dissertation highlights the deep ties between scientific knowledge production and the social value and valence of professional expertise, as well as the power of experiential expertise in challenging formal, hegemonic institutions.
  • JUST CAUSE - Editor: W

    JUST CAUSE - Editor: W

    rUST CAU APRIL 1976 VOL. 1, NO. 1 The official newsletter of C1. tizens Against UFO Secrecy (CAUS) JUST CAUSE - Editor: W. Todd Zechel _ Associate Editor: steven Stoikes - Legal Consultant: Peter A. Gersten, Rothblatt, Rothblatt, Seijas & Peskin, Bronx,\ N.Y. - Technical Consultant: Brad Sparks Offices _ 191 E. 161st st., Bronx. N.Y. 10451 CJUS Picking Up Where GSW and NICAP Left Of! - Ground Saucer Watch, Inc •• started the ball rolling last September with a precedent-setting suit against the CIA. GSW's action was the tirst in over ten years in which a civilian UFOlogical organization focused its efforts on the govern­ .ent cover_up. NICAP, under the guidance -of Major Keyhoe and Dick Hall. lobbied extensively--and successfully--to end UFO secrecy during the 111~19608. Untortunately, NICAP did not have the one tool available which GSW is now using to hammer away at government suppression: the amended (1974) Freedom of Information Act. While the FOIA is not quite the panacea many people pictured it as, it does ofter the unique oppOrtunity tor citizens to obtain heretofore unavailable government documents. Moreover. provisioJls of the Act allow tor redress in U.S. District Courts should the government deny access to particular documents. This is called in camera inspection, and it calls JUST CAUSE .2- VOL. 1 • RO. 1 tor Federal judges ,to view the documents, hear opposing arguments and decide whether the government has a legal right to withhold requested aterial. The normal. course ot action leading' to the filing ot a suit under the FOIA is as tollowsl (1) Initial request tor intormation trom an individual - or organization to a government agency; (2) initial denial ot access to the dOCWllent or portions ot doCWllents claiming exemptions trom the Act by the agenoy; () appeal.
  • “Ufos, an Air Force Dilemma” by Hector Quintanilla, USAF (Retired)

    “Ufos, an Air Force Dilemma” by Hector Quintanilla, USAF (Retired)

    Preface to “UFOs, An Air Force Dilemma” by Hector Quintanilla, USAF (retired) National Institute for Discovery Science For the first time NIDS is electronically publishing a book manuscript written in 1975 by Lt. Col. Hector Quintanilla, the head of the USAF Project Blue Book. Project Blue Book was supposed to be an objective investigation and documentation of the UFO phenomenon carried out by the United States Air Force from March 1952 until December 1969. Project Blue Book was the successor to Projects Sign and Grudge. The book is a summary in Quintanilla’s own words of his involvement, as head of project Blue Book, in the investigation of the UFO phenomenon. “UFOs, an Air Force Dilemma” was also given the title “UFOs: A $20,000,000 Fiasco” by Quintanilla in a book proposal to unnamed publishers. NIDS’s purpose in making available this previously unpublished manuscript is twofold: (a) to demonstrate to the interested public, through the authors own unedited words, Lt. Col. Quintanilla’s attitudes, preconceptions, and biases that dominated Project Blue Book, and (b) to make available to historians and to the public the methodology and practices employed by the United States Air Force in investigating and cataloging the UFO phenomenon. NIDS had the choice of introducing editorial changes into the manuscript. We refrained in order to preserve the historical accuracy of this document. The manuscript covers the years of Quintanilla’s own involvement from July 1963 to December1969 in Project Blue Book and also contains many valuable insights into the public and media reaction to the USAF funded study, from the perspective of the author.

  • A History of Government Management of UFO Perceptions Through Film and Television

    49th Parallel, Vol. 25 (Spring 2011) Graham & Alford ISSN: 1753-5794 (online) A History of Government Management of UFO Perceptions through Film and Television Robbie Graham University of Bristol* & Matthew Alford University of Bath† On 22 January 1958, the popular CBS television show Armstrong Circle Theatre presented an entire programme dedicated to the subject of unidentified flying objects entitled: “UFO: Enigma of the Skies.” Among the high-profile experts invited to speak on the show, retired US Navy Major Donald Keyhoe – director of the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) – was notable for his outspoken views on government secrecy surrounding the UFO phenomenon. Arguing against UFO reality on the programme were astronomer and vehement UFO sceptic Donald Menzel and Air Force representative Col. Spencer Whedon of the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC). Their task should have been an easy one as the show’s content had been scripted in advance by CBS in conjunction with the US Air Force, and all guests – especially Keyhoe – had been instructed to read their pre- approved material from a teleprompter. When it came time for Keyhoe to speak, in frustration he veered from his script and stated to the nation: “And now I’m going to reveal something that has never been disclosed before...”1 The rest of his announcement went unheard by television viewers: unbeknownst to Keyhoe, his microphone had been cut by the station. Keyhoe continued: For the last six months, we have been working with a congressional committee investigating official secrecy about UFOs. If all the evidence we have given this committee is made public in open * Robbie Graham is a doctoral candidate at the University of Bristol for a PhD examining Hollywood’s historical representations of UFOs and extraterrestrial visitation.
  • Unidentified Flying Object

    Unidentified Flying Object

    Unidentified flying object An unidentified flying object (UFO) is any aerial phenomenon that cannot immediately be identified or explained. Most UFOs are identified or investigated as conventional objects or phenomena. The term is widely used for claimed observations of extraterrestrial spacecraft, and was coined as an anacronym by Project Blue Book project head Edward J. Ruppelt. Another widely used term for the phenomenon is "flying saucer." Studies and investigations have been conducted by various governments worldwide, along with private individuals and organizations. In the United States, studies began in the late 1940s and have included Project Grudge, Project Sign and Project Blue Book. The latter was ended in 1969-70 after the Condon Committee officially concluded that the subject failed to merit further study. However, an unpublicized study named the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program was funded by the U.S. government from 2007-2012, and a successor program named the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force is currently operational. Unidentified lights and flying objects have been reported in the skies for much of human history. Skeptics including various scientists, and organizations such as the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, state that the entire topic can be explained as conventional objects or phenomena, while Ufologists suggest various unproven theories. Public polling indicates a considerable portion of the U.S. population feels that their government is withholding information on the subject. Photograph of a purported UFO in Passaic, New Jersey, taken The topic of UFOs has been, and is currently, popular in worldwide culture in fictional on July 31, 1952 movies, television and other media.
  • How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.S Seriously

    How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.S Seriously

    How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s Seriously newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/10/how-the-pentagon-started-taking-ufos-seriously Gideon Lewis-Kraus On May 9, 2001, Steven M. Greer took the lectern at the National Press Club, in Washington, D.C., in pursuit of the truth about unidentified flying objects. Greer, an emergency-room physician in Virginia and an outspoken ufologist, believed that the government had long withheld from the American people its familiarity with alien visitations. He had founded the Disclosure Project in 1993 in an attempt to penetrate the sanctums of conspiracy. Greer’s reckoning that day featured some twenty speakers. He provided, in support of his claims, a four-hundred-and-ninety-two-page dossier called the “Disclosure Project Briefing Document.” For public officials too busy to absorb such a vast tract of suppressed knowledge, Greer had prepared a ninety-five-page “Executive Summary of the Disclosure Project Briefing Document.” After some throat-clearing, the “Executive Summary” began with “A Brief Summary,” which included a series of bullet points outlining what amounted to the greatest secret in human history. Over several decades, according to Greer, untold numbers of alien craft had been observed in our planet’s airspace; they were able to reach extreme velocities with no visible means of lift or propulsion, and to perform stunning maneuvers at g-forces that would turn a human pilot to soup. Some of these extraterrestrial spaceships had been “downed, retrieved and studied since at least the 1940s and possibly as early as the 1930s.” Efforts to reverse engineer such extraordinary machines had led to “significant technological breakthroughs in energy generation.” These operations had mostly been classified as “cosmic top secret,” a tier of clearance “thirty-eight levels” above that typically granted to the Commander-in-Chief.
  • Sunlite 9 6.Pdf

    Sunlite 9 6.Pdf

    SUNlite Shedding some light on UFOlogy and UFOs Volume 9 Number 6 November-December 2017 Cover: A sample of record cards and forms that Dr. Hynek reviewed and commented. It was interesting to see him agreeing with “possible” explanations as late as 1966. Left: How hard is it to create a hoaxed UFO that might get past UFO investigators? I don’t really know and have not tried. But this is an interest- ing demonstration of how one might do it using a simple cell phone camera without Photoshop or strings. TABLE OF CONTENTS Who’s blogging UFOs..................................2-3 The Roswell Corner .......................................3 Case study of a Close Encounter of the Third Kind (Nancy, France, 1969): Hallu- cination or false memory? by Robé, R. & Abrassart, J.-M.............................................4-6 The UFO evidence under review:. No- vember 5 1957: The USCGC Sebago sighting............................................7-10 The 701 club: Case 1023 December 7, 1951 Sunbury Ohio................................11-13 The Blue Book case files: UFO treasure or UFO trap?.................................14-26 Caveat emptor The “Possible meteor”.........................27 om DeLonge has finally entered the UFOlogical fray by creating a business that will develop UFO-like technologies and sell DVDs, TCDs, and other items that will reveal the truth about UFOs. You have to give him credit for the publicity that he was able to achieve. I also have to give DeLonge credit for discovering a new way to separate UFO aficionado’s from their money. I doubt they will ever create their advanced spacecraft but I am sure they will probably make money by convincing everyone they can.
  • Minnesota MUFON Journal Issue #112 Mar./Apr. 2005

    Minnesota MUFON Journal Issue #112 Mar./Apr. 2005

    Minnesota MUFON Journal Issue #112 Mar./Apr. 2005 Directors Report The Robertson Panel Report - What Else Is In It? by Dick Moss, MN MUFON State Dir. On the ABC UFO documentary of Feb. 24th, UFOs: Seeing is Believing, a short reference was made to the Robertson Panel Report. Quoting Minnesota Mufon Meetings the program, "It was public hysteria, not the flying saucers themselves, that threatened the national security. President Truman ordered the Sat., Mar. 12th & Sat., Apr. 9th CIA to make recommendations on how the Air Force should handle the 1:30-5pm UFO problem. The CIA convened a panel headed by physicist H. P. Robertson. The Robertson Panel said we must do something to New Brighton Family remove the aura of mystery from the UFO phenomenon so that people Service Center no longer take them seriously and don't bother to report them. That's 400 - 10th St. NW what we want." (located 1/4-mile S.W. The UFO wave during the summer of 1952, which included displays of Hwy 694 and 35W.) over Washington D.C. along with the concerns of President Truman and the CIA, played the main role in the formation of the top secret PARK FREE! Robertson Panel along with the objective to establish a national policy The building is designated as to deal with UFOs. non-smoking. It was assumed that Eisenhower would win the approaching election See map on back cover against Adlai Stevenson. Administration changes always create (Note: The building has no difficult adjustments and adaptations, especially in the various special security, so you can agencies.