C M C M
Y K Y K
CTP do B2
011/242 2298
Edited by Slobodan Cvejić
INFORMAL POWER NETWORKS, POLITICAL PATRONAGE AND CLIENTELISM IN SERBIA AND KOSOVO*
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SDC
Papir: 300g • Mat plastika• Tiraz 200 sa zvezdicom 100 bez zvezdice.
C M C M
Y K Y K
Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* Edited by Slobodan Cvejić Edited by Slobodan Cvejić Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
Publisher SeConS
Reviewers Dr Zoran Stojiljković - Chairman of the Board of An -Corrup on Agency Dr Vladimir Vule ć – Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade Dr Danilo Vuković - Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade
Design and Print Dosije
ISBN 978–86–89515–08–4
Circula on 200
The RRPP promotes social science research in the Western Balkans (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia). Social science research aids in the understanding of the specifi c reform needs of countries in the region and in iden fying the long-term implica ons of policy choices. Researchers receive support through research grants, methodological and thema c trainings as well as opportuni es for regional and interna onal networking and mentoring. The RRPP is coordinated and operated by the Interfaculty Ins tute for Central and Eastern Europe (IICEE) at the University of Fribourg (Switzerland). The programme is fully funded by the Swiss Agency for Develop- ment and Coopera on (SDC), Federal Department of Foreign Aff airs. The views expressed in this publica on are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent opinions of the SDC and the University of Fribourg. Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
Edited by Slobodan Cvejić
Belgrade, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...... 5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...... 7
INTRODUCTION...... 9
Jelena Pešić, Dragan Stanojević INFORMAL RELATIONS BETWEEN POLITICS AND ECONOMY IN POST-SOCIALISM...... 11
Marija Babović, Dragan Stanojević, Jelena Pešić, Slobodan Cvejić, Dragana Gundogan METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS ...... 23
INFORMALITY AND CLIENTELISM IN SERBIA Marija Babović, Slobodan Cvejić, Jelena Pešić HISTORICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT OF INFORMAL RELATIONS BETWEEN POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC ACTORS IN SERBIA...... 29
Dragan Stanojević, Marija Babović, Dragana Gundogan ACTORS, RESOURCES AND MECHANISMS OF CLIENTELISM IN SERBIA ...... 44
Jelena Pešić, Slobodan Cvejić SOCIAL REPRODUCTION THROUGH INFORMAL SPHERE – THE STRUCTURE AND THE SYSTEM OF CLIENTELISM IN SERBIA ...... 65
INFROMALITY AND CLIENTELISM IN KOSOVO* Adnan Hoxha, Dina Milovanović, Yllka Buzhala HISTORICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT OF INFORMAL RELATIONS BETWEEN POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC ACTORS IN KOSOVO...... 77
Adnan Hoxha, Dina Milovanović, Yllka Buzhala ACTORS, RESOURCES AND MECHANISMS OF INFORMALITY AND CLIENTELISM IN KOSOVO . . . . 87
Adnan Hoxha, Dina Milovanović, Yllka Buzhala INFORMALITY AND CLIENTELISM IN KOSOVO EXPLAINED ...... 110 * * *
Slobodan Cvejić, Dragan Stanojević VARYING CONTEXTS OF POLITICAL CLIENTELISM – COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SERBIA AND KOSOVO* ...... 123
SUMMARY...... 133
REZIME...... 136
PËRMBLEDHJE...... 139
5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
his publica on is based on the research or- ovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia). Social ganized within the project ‘Informal Prac- science research aids in the understanding of the T ces of Capturing Economic Resources by specifi c needs for reform and in iden fying the Poli cal Elite: Exploring Party Patronage in Kos- long-term implica ons of poten al policy choic- ovo and Serbia.’ The project was made possible es. Researchers receive support through research through the support of the Regional Research grants, methodological and thema c trainings, and Promo on Program (RRPP) which is operated as well as opportuni es for regional and inter- by the Interfaculty Ins tute for Central and East- na onal exchange and networking. The RRPP ern Europe (IICEE) at the University of Fribourg is coordinated and operated by the Interfaculty (Switzerland) and has been fully funded by the Ins tute for Central and Eastern Europe (IICEE) Swiss Agency for Development and Coopera on at the University of Fribourg (Switzerland). The (SDC), the Federal Department of Foreign Aff airs. programme is fully funded by the Swiss Agency The research was implemented by SeConS – De- for Development and Coopera on (SDC), Federal velopment Ini a ve Group from Belgrade and Department of Foreign Aff airs. Center for Research, Documenta on and Publi- ca on (CRDP) from Prish ne. More on website: www.rrpp-westernbalkans.net SeConS, CRDP and the authors would like to thank Peter Rodgers, from the University of SeConS Development Ini a ve Sheffi eld, for his invaluable comments and sug- ges ons during the process of defi ning the theo- Group re cal framework and establishing the methodol- ogy. We would also like to thank many colleagues SeConS was founded by a group of sociolo- who took part in the October 2015 ‘Informality in gists and social researchers, who for many years Central and Southeast Europe: Linkages Between worked on issues of social development at the Poli cal and Economic Actors’ interna onal con- university and in civil society organiza ons in the ference (h p://secons.net/conf/) which was held country and abroad. In 2005, this group of ex- in Belgrade and had been organized as part of perts decided to become more socially engaged this project. Extended gra tude is given to those and use their knowledge and experience in order colleagues who had contributed insight and in- to contribute to long-term socio-economic devel- forma on on earlier versions of this work. We opment and improvement of living condi ons of are also thankful to the Rectorate of the Univer- individuals and social groups in Serbia and the sity of Belgrade for suppor ng the conference. region. Lastly, we owe many thanks to all our col- SeConS is an independent think-thank or- leagues from SeConS and CRDP who were part ganiza on with experts who conduct empirical of this project and who helped to facilitate the research, analyze policies and processes, specifi c research process. Their eff orts in the prepara- social and economic challenges, educate, and on of policy deliverables of this project were train and empower diff erent actors. Data col- extremely valuable. lec on and analysis conducted by SeConS are a reliable basis for development of methodolo- gies, recommenda ons and policies. This is an Regional Research Promo on important contribu on to the development and Programme in the Western Balkans implementa on of na onal, regional and local (RRPP) policies. SeConS mission is to contribute to ade- The RRPP is aimed at fostering and pro- quate and eff ec ve socio-economic development mo ng social science research in the Western policies and programs and to contribute to eff ec- Balkans (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kos- ve work of various stakeholder from the public,
7 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* private and civil sector for development on the The SeConS Research Team: na onal, regional and local level. Main fi elds of ac vity where SeConS has yielded exper se and Marija Babović is a full- me professor spe- high quality results are: social inclusion, gender cializing in the courses Sociology of Labor and equality, rural development, regional and local Economic Sociology at Department of Sociology, sustainable development, migra on, ins tu on- Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade and aliza on, organiza onal reform, development of serves as the Director of Programs at SeConS. the public sector, management and development Slobodan Cvejić is an associate professor of human resources. specializing in the courses Sta s cs in Social Sci- More on website: www.secons.net ences and Economic Sociology at Department of Sociology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade and serves as the Director of Research Centre for Research Documenta on at SeConS. and Publica on (CRDP) Dragana Gundogan is a PhD student and an associate researcher at the Ins tute for Socio- Centre for Research, Documenta on and logical Research, in the University of Belgrade. Publica on – CRDP was established in 2010 with Jelena Pešić is a teaching assistant in the a mission to promote mechanisms of transi onal courses General Sociology and Sta s cs in Social jus ce that can normalize local and regional rela- Sciences at Department of Sociology, Faculty of onships and aid Kosovo in addressing its history Philosophy and a researcher at the Ins tute for of human rights viola ons. CRDP endeavours to Sociological Research, in the University of Bel- be the focal point for transi onal jus ce in Kos- grade. ovo, represen ng the needs of ethnic minori es and the vic ms of confl ict. Through the years Dragan Stanojević is an assistant professor CRDP has pursued its mission via research, advo- in the courses Sociology of Family and Sociology cacy, networking and event organiza on, engag- of Religion at Department of Sociology, Faculty of ing with partner civil society organiza ons, schol- Philosophy and a researcher at the Ins tute for ars, decision-makers and ins tu ons at na onal, Sociological Research, in the University of Bel- regional and EU level. grade. CRDP is part of RECOM an ini a ve con- cerned with human rights viola ons commi ed The CRDP Research Team: during the confl icts in the former Yugoslavia. In Nora Ahmetaj is founder of CRDP, Re- order to assist the vic ms in Kosovo CRDP moni- searcher and Expert on Transi onal Jus ce. Ms. tors the law for martyrs veteran and invalids as Ahmetaj was engaged as a consultant for the Eu- result of the war. CRDP also is involved in creat- ropean Commission, and worked for a variety of ing the human security index in Kosovo and ex- interna onal organiza ons such as HLC, UNDP, ploring party patronage and its eff ect in Kosovo’s ICG, AI and HRW. society. Adnan Hoxha is a researcher and an expert The main funding organiza ons of CRDP in project management and economics. He was include the European Union, Konrad Adenauer engaged as a Senior Researcher in this project. S ung, Embassies of the US, Switzerland and Netherlands, Kosovo Open Society Fonda on, Dina Milovanović is a researcher and an Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Charles Stuart Mo expert on minority issues. She worked with Fonda on, Balkan Civil Society Development number of CSOs and interna onal organisa ons Network, Pon s Fonda on, The German Marshall in Kosovo*. In this project she did research on Fund of the United States, Techsoup Global, For- Serb non-majority community. eign Cmomonwealth Offi ce, Regional Research Yllka Buzhala is a sociologist. She worked Promo on Programme, Swiss Agency for Devel- as a researcher in various empirical research opment and Coopera on. projects organized by diff erent research compa- More on website: www.crdp-ks.org nies and NGOs.
8 INTRODUCTION
his book presents results from empirical re- 2004, 2006; Nee, 2003; Nee and Ingram, 1998), search on the informal rela ons between poli cal patronage and clientelism (Hopkin, Tpoli cal and economic elite, and of the 2004, 2006; Kitschelt, 1995, 2000; Kitschelt and spectrum of poli cal and economic actors from Wilkinson, 2007; Kopecky and Scherlis, 2008; Ko- Serbia and Kosovo*1. Informality represents an pecky and Spirova, 2011; Lauth, 2000; Robertson important feature of post-socialist socie es. In- and Verdier, 2013; van Biezen, 2004) and poli cal formal and personal networks that predate the capitalism (Antonić, 1993, 2006; Arandarenko, socialist period are an important legacy for the 2000; Holcombe, 2015; Kolko, 1963; Lazić and development of democra c systems and market Pešić, 2012; Weber, 1922)2. economy in former socialist countries. Par cu- Through research, valuable empirically- larly in the context of weak and blurred ins tu- based evidence had been collected therefore onal and norma ve frameworks, individuals tend to rely more on the informal ins tu ons providing the team with a clearer descrip on of and prac ces. The assump on was that these in- the actors involved in poli cal patronage and cli- formal rela ons inside and between the poli cal entelism as well as a solidly-grounded scien fi c and economic spheres were based on high asym- elabora on of the mechanisms of clientelis c metry of power and a high level of dependence exchange and the detec on of resources being (where usually economic actors depend on will exchanged – through various informal prac ces of poli cal power holders). Therefore, pa erns – all of which have helped form the mechanisms of clientelism and the ques on of the ‘culture of clientelism. Moreover, such a thorough inves- of informality’ became important facets for un- ga on of the phenomena of informal power derstanding the contemporary trajectories in the networks, clientelis c exchange and the abuse of poli cal and economic subsystems of former so- public resources has opened a space for deeper cialist socie es. theore cal insights. Within this space, analy cal insights were then able to address the following The general aim of this research was to ques on: are informality and clientelism wide- iden fy the main forms, determinants and social spread and rooted enough to shape the whole eff ects of informal norms, rela ons and prac ces system of poli cal capitalism? Finally, in compar- –through which poli cal elite captured economic ing Serbian and Kosovan experiences and dis n- resources in Serbia and Kosovo*. The literature guishing between the similari es and diff erences used to complete this research includes elabora- of the two, it became easier to emphasize the ons and cri ques of the concepts of: informality importance of some of the factors that signifi - (e.g. Chavance, 2008; Misztal, 2000), informality cantly shaped the trajectories of the Serbian and in former socialist countries (e.g. Aliyev, 2015; Kosovan systems of poli cal patronage and clien- Burawoy and Verdery, 2000; Grødeland and telism. Aasland, 2007; Ledeneva, 1998, 2013; Smith and The book is organized in ten chapters. Stenning, 2006; Stark, 1992, 1996; Wedel, 1986, In the fi rst chapter, Jelena Pešić and Dragan 1992), rela on between formal and informal Stanojević present a conceptual framework that ins tu ons (e.g. Acemoglu and Robinson 2012; provides insights and sugges ons on the applica- De Soysa and Ju ng, 2007; Helmke and Levitsky, on of the theore cal approach for further elab- 1 * Designa on for “Kosovo” is without prejudice to ora ons. In the second chapter, Marija Babović, posi ons on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declara on of In- 2 See the reference list in chapter 2 ‘Theore cal dependence. framework.’
9 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
Dragan Stanojević, Jelena Pešić, Slobodan Cvejić Buzhala wrote the sixth chapter that covers his- and Dragana Gundogan present basic methodo- torical context. In the seventh chapter, the same logical considera ons that help shape the proc- authors have presented a descrip on of the ac- ess of data collec on and analysis. The next part tors, mechanisms and resources exchanged in of the book presents results of the analysis for clientelis c networks in Kosovo*. In the eighth Serbia. In the third chapter, Marija Babović, Slo- chapter, Adnan Hoxha, Dina Milovanović and Yl- bodan Cvejić and Jelena Pešić describe an his- lka Buzhala discussed, in more theore cal terms, torical context in which informal prac ces and the characteris cs of informal networks between clientelism were shaped in Serbia. In the fourth poli cal and economic actors in Kosovo*. Finally, chapter, Dragan Stanojević, Marija Babović in the ninth chapter, Slobodan Cvejić and Dragan and Dragana Gundogan widely describe actors, Stanojević show the results of the compara ve mechanisms and exchanged resources in clien- analysis of Serbian and Kosovan systems of cli- telis c networks in Serbia. In the fi h chapter, entelism. The book ends with a brief summary Jelena Pešić and Slobodan Cvejić provide more of the research and the major fi ndings, respec- theore cal elabora ons on the nature of infor- vely. mal networks and poli cal patronage in Serbia. The same outline is applied in the sec on where the results of the analysis for Kosovo* are pre- sented. Adnan Hoxha, Dina Milovanović and Yllka Belgrade, 2016 Slobodan Cvejić
10 ä Jelena Pešić ä Dragan Stanojević
INFORMAL RELATIONS BETWEEN POLITICS AND ECONOMY IN POST-SOCIALISM
he main subject of the research presented and blurred ins tu onal and norma ve frame- in this book are informal rela ons, prac ces work, individuals tend to rely more on informal Tand norms (meaning structures) which are ins tu ons. Because of that, pa erns of clien- established between members of the poli cal telism and the ques on of the “culture of infor- elite (on central and local levels), and economic mality” (Grødeland, 2007: 218) are prevalent in actors, including members of the economic elite the contemporary literature concerning the post- in Serbia and Kosovo* a er socialism. Having in socialist context and development of democra c mind the extent of their infl uence on poli cal poli cal ins tu ons. This is usually connected structures and behaviours as well as their poten- with studies dealing with corrup on, which is al to build parallel structures and norms, it be- perceived as one of the crucial problems in the comes clear why analysing informal ins tu ons transi onal period (Karklins 2005; Kotkin & Sajo (such as personal and patron-client rela ons 2002; Miller et al. 2001). networks, clientelism and patronage) is impor- Diff erences between informality in post- tant for understanding the modern governance. socialist countries and in other parts of the Hayoz (2013: 52) stresses: “Governance is then world have not been thoroughly inves gated in happening somewhere between the poles of the exis ng literature, although several studies formality and informality”. Similarly, Helmke and have shown that post-socialist informal prac- Levitsky point out that: “good ins tu onal analy- ces are not only widespread and historically sis requires rigorous a en on to both formal and entrenched, but also represent important parts informal rules. Careful a en on to informal in- of everyday life of the popula on (Aliyev, 2015). s tu ons is cri cal for understanding the incen- Studies on”Russian blat (Ledeneva, 1998), Polish ves that enable and constrain poli cal behavior. zalatwic’sprawy (Butler, 1995) and Bulgarian blizki Poli cal actors respond to a mix of formal and (Begg and Pickles, 1998) demonstrates that over informal incen ves, and in some instances, in- the last 20 years the importance of informality formal incen ves trump the formal ones”(2004: in post-communist countries did not signifi cantly 726). decrease” (Aliyev, 2015:185). Evidence suggest Informality represents an important fea- that far more people in post-socialist socie es ture of post-socialist socie es. David Stark point rely on informal social capital and networks (such out that social actors create strategies and ins - as friends, family members, acquaintances) than tu ons not “on the ruins of communism”, but people in developed capitalist countries or peo- “with the ruins of communism” (Stark, 1996: ple in socialist countries (Rose, 1997; Grødeland, 995). Although o en disregarded in analyses of 2007; cf. Aliyev, 2015). new ins tu ons, informal networks established Many authors point out the diff erent char- in the socialist period play crucial role in their acter of informality in post-socialist countries as crea on and maintenance. As the old system compared to developed ones. In addi on to that, with its state’s monopoly was crumbling, infor- some authors also emphasise the importance mal groups and networks successfully managed of analysing specifi city of informality in diff er- to fi ll the ins tu onal voids (Burawoy et al. 2000; ent post-socialist contexts. A path-dependency Wedel, 2006). Especially in the context of weak theorist explains that the reason why ins tu ons
11 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* remain so long is not only due to legi macy, but Finally, although capitalism represented a also because “powerful individuals or groups targeted model of transforma on, it entails vari- have a vested interest in maintaining the status ous levels of formality and “diff erent degrees of quo. Moreover, like organiza ons, ins tu ons generality and specifi city in formal ins tu ons” face powerful iner al forces that are not only (Chavance, 2008:64There are no unique typical interest–based, but locked into inter-related in- capitalist formal ins tu ons. They get various s tu onal structures” (Nee & Cao, 1999: 800). forms, depending on various factors, such as cur- This theory put forth an idea that pre-exis ng rent poli cal and economic contexts, inherited ins tu ons are con nued to be used in spite of ins tu onal framework and external infl uences changed circumstances. Nee and Cao (1999: 802) (e.g. interna onal organisa ons). Introducing explain that in the following way: “path depend- new formal rules is not an easy process and it of- ency is embodied in the persistence of long- ten creates many problems: new rules may pro- standing ins tu onal arrangements, despite at- duce unexpected outcomes or inten onally col- tempts to change them.” “(I)ns tu onal change lide the exis ng rules; also, their low legi macy is likely to involve mul ple equilibria in which hinders the possibility of their implementa on certain ins tu ons can persist despite compe - (Chavance, 2008). on from others that once established might be equally or even more viable. The consequence of previous events can determine which ins tu- THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS onal arrangement will prevail. Once a solu on OF INFORMAL RELATIONS is reached, powerful interests lock into emergent BETWEEN POLITICS AND ins tu onal arrangements, making it diffi cult to exit from them”. Ins tu ons are not merely the ECONOMICS sources of resistance to changes that had to be overcome, but also the resource for new rou- Social context: post-socialist poli cs nes to be made. David Stark (1992) deals with and economy the issue of plurali es of transi onal changes in diff erent post-socialist countries as well as within In order to perceive and understand de- single coun es where diff erent social spheres velopments in formal and informal spheres of undergo the transi on diff erently. According to post-socialist poli cs and economy in Serbia him, ins tu onal gaps of post-socialism became and Kosovo*, we need an adequate conceptual a frui ul material for those who want to engage framework. Basic theore cal considera ons rel- in building a new social order and reconstruc ng evant to our research begin with Weber’s dis nc- poli cal and economic ins tu ons. The way it on between the legal-ra onal and patrimonial would be done largely depends on the way how government. His no on of poli cal capitalism is the system dissolved. Restructuring of the new of key importance for understanding the transi- ins tu onal regime is thus constrained by the onal context in Serbia and Kosovo*. In order to exis ng set of ins tu onal resources. Therefore point to diff erent forms of development of capi- it is necessary to “highlight the diff erent condi- talist socie es, Max Weber (1978) made a dis- ons of embeddedness, that is, historically se- nc on between economic development driven lec ve processes within which some embedded by ra onal planning and market calcula ons, in condi ons are transformed into specifi c ins tu- which the main objec ve of economic actors is onal confi gura ons of development” (Ghezzi & to achieve profi t (ra onal capitalism) and devel- Mingione, 2007: 18). opment specifi c to oriental and an c socie es where profi t was gained by non-ra onal means, Kopecky and Spirova (2011) are basically state monopolies, benefi ts, fi nancial specula ons whistling the same tune as Stark: communist so- and corrup on (poli cal capitalism). In the soci- cie es, in their opinion, were not cra ed on the e es of poli cal capitalism, economic success is same type of socie es and same type of ins tu- not dependent on market mechanisms but on onal structures that preceded them. Instead of the privileges assigned by the state. It represents the monolithic view on socialist socie es, they such a system of social rela ons in which poli - propose the no on of plurality of communist re- cal and economic elites cooperate for their mu- gimes (Kopecky & Spirova, 2011; cf. Aliyev, 2015: tual benefi t. “The economic elite infl uences the 187).
12 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* government’s economic policies to use regula- Informality on, government spending and the design of the tax system to maintain their elite status in the Apparently, for understanding the rela- economy. The poli cal elites are then supported ons between the poli cal and economic elite, by the economic elite which helps the poli cal informality is one of key concepts. Informality elite maintain their status; an exchange rela on- can be defi ned in numerous ways. The term it- ship that benefi ts both the poli cal and econom- self emerged in the 1940s and 1950s in order to ic elite” (Holcombe, 2015: 41). describe dual economic models which comprised formal and informal economic spheres. Over the In their study on why na ons fail, Acemog- past two decades research of “informality” has lu and Robinson (2012) categorize poli cal ins tu- been established within the studies of ins tu- ons as inclusive (developmental) and extrac ve onal economics, (Aliyev, 2015: 183). As a result, (predatory). According to them, inclusive ins tu- numerous defi ni ons have been created, the ons enable prosperity, economic development majority of which tend to “encapsulate primarily and sustainable democra c ins tu ons. On the the economic nature of informal sector, informal other hand, extrac ve ins tu ons are created to sphere, employment and more generally, infor- please the interests of poli cal elites rather than mal economy” (Ibid: 183). In the literature, the the general popula on with the nega ve eff ect on term ‘informality’, however, also implies various development of inclusive economic ins tu ons types of organisa ons and phenomena, includ- and society as a whole.However, as Holcombe ing kingship groups and inter-personal networks noted, poli cal capitalism is not, contrary to Ace- (Granove er, 1973). The context of poli cal in- moglu and Robinson’s argumenta on, restricted s tu ons and a broader sociological context only to poor countries, but it implies that elites have recently become relevant in analyses of in- can, even in developed countries, design poli cal formality, contribu ng to the increased gap be- ins tu ons for their own benefi t: “Poli cal capi- tween the economic and socio-poli cal meaning talism is more than just an explicit recogni on of this term. Furthermore, “unlike the informal that poli cs infl uences the economic system—an sphere of developed capitalist states, informality idea that is well recognized in the public choice in the developing world is o en diffi cult to grasp literature. Rather, it is a system in which the po- in terms of binary formal-informal divisions.” (Al- li cal and economic elite design the rules so that iyev, 2015: 184). On the other hand, in develop- they can use the poli cal system to maintain their ing countries this rela on is much more visible, elite posi ons” (Holcombe, 2015: 43). as formal ins tu ons are weak while importance The idea of closeness and inseparability of informal ins tu ons is very big. Having all this of poli cal and economic ins tu ons is not new. in mind, we understand informality as a broad Karl Polanyi (2001) has argued that economic in- generic concept that encompasses a wide range s tu ons are embedded and enmeshed in other of ac vi es – social, poli cal and economic – oc- economic and noneconomic ins tu ons. Accord- curring outside the formal sphere. ing to him, the ins tu ng of the economic proc- ess vests that process with unity and stability; it Informal and formal ins tu ons and produces a structure with a defi nite func on in norms society. “The economic process, in other words, consists in a system of social rela ons and in To understand the content and the scope of shared rules and beliefs, which reveal con nu- informality one needs to defi ne its rela on to the ity and impose constraints on individuals while formal sphere. New ins tu onalism theorists, de- at the same me opening up opportuni es to veloping Polanyi’s idea of embeddedness, argue them. Ins tu ons have to be understood as so- that ins tu ons, as webs of interrelated norms cially constructed en es in which economic – formal and informal – which govern social re- processes are culturally codifi ed in such a way la onships by structuring social interac ons, are that the fl uidity inherent in economic move- embedded in a wider framework of historical, ments acquires stability” (Maucourant & Plocin- structural and cultural legacy of the given society iczak, 2013: 514). This involves understanding (Nee & Ingram, 1998: 19; Granove er, 1973). Ac- the specifi city of the culture in which economic cording to Ghezzi and Mingione “embeddedness ins tu ons were formed. expresses the no on that social actors can be
13 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* understood and interpreted only within rela on- through channels widely accepted as offi cial”. al, ins tu onal and cultural contexts and cannot The la er encompasses state ins tu ons and be seen as atomized decision-makers maximizing legal framework, but also offi cial organiza onal their own u li es” (Ghezzi & Mingione, 2007:11). rules of the poli cal par es, interest groups, cor- Nee (2003:8) points out that ins tu ons “com- pora ons, etc. prise the formal and informal social constraints However, Helmke and Levitsky (2004) that shape the choice-set of actors. Conceived as stress the necessity of making a clear dis nc on such, ins tu ons reduce uncertainty in human between informal ins tu ons and other informal rela ons by specifying the limits of legi mate ac- phenomena, such as weak ins tu ons, informal on in the way that the rules of the game specify behavioural regulari es, informal organiza ons the structure within which players are free to and culture. pursue their strategic moves using pieces that have specifi c roles and status posi ons. Norms 1. Informal ins tu ons are not the same as weak are implicit or explicit rules of expected behav- ins tu ons. Many formal ins tu ons may be iour that embody the interests and preferences ineff ec ve, with exis ng wri en rules that are of members of a close-knit group or a commu- widely circumvented or ignored. However, in- nity.” Informal norms, on the other hand, are s tu onal weakness does not automa cally defi ned as rules of the social groups which rely imply the existence of informal ins tu ons. on informal mechanisms of monitoring (such as Departure from formal rules may end up social approval or disapproval). Although both crea ng informal ins tu ons (such as clien- formal and informal norms govern interpersonal telism), but it also may result in non-ins tu- rela ons by constraining or facilita ng behaviour onal behaviour (the absence of ins tu on- (providing the structure of incen ves), formal alized checks on execu ve power) (Helmke & rules are explicit and rely on formal mechanisms Levitsky, 2004). for their monitoring and enforcement. Nee and 2. Informal ins tu ons should also be dis n- Ingram further stress out that interac on be- guished from other informal behavioural reg- tween formal and informal norms is quite com- ulari es. As the authors pointed out, “not all plex. “When the formal norms are perceived to pa erned behaviour is rule-bound or rooted be congruous with the preferences and interests in shared expecta ons about others’ behav- of actors in diff erent subgroups, the rela onship iour. Behavioural regulari es may be a prod- between formal and informal norms tends to be uct of a variety of incen ves. (...) To be con- closely coupled”, mutually reinforcing each other sidered an informal ins tu on, a behavioural and lowering the costs of monitoring and en- regularity must respond to an established rule forcement (by using informal mechanisms) (Nee or guideline, the viola on of which generates & Ingram, 1998:33–34). In such a case, formal some kind of external sanc on” (Helmke & and informal norms and ins tu ons tend to be complemen ng. Formal and informal norms may Levitsky, 2004: 725). decouple in cases when formal norms represent 3. Informal ins tu ons are not the same as infor- a ceremonial structure that is designed to sa sfy mal organiza ons. Poli cal or economic actors external cons tuencies and provide legi macy, (as members of specifi c organiza ons) should whereas informal ones guide prac cal ac vi es. be dis nguished from the more or less per- However, if formal ins tu onal sanc ons are manent set of rules they follow (ins tu ons). weak in rela on to contradic ng group interests, As we can analy cally dis nguish formal ins - then informal norms tend to become “opposi on tu ons and organiza ons, the same applies norms” that encourage individuals to oppose the for informal ones. Although informal rules formal rules (Nee & Ingram, 1998: 35). may be embedded within informal organiza- In a similar manner as Nee, Helmke and ons, as Victor Nee (2003) showed, they may Levitsky (2004: 725) defi ne informal ins tu ons also be a part of formal organiza ons. as “socially shared rules, usually unwri en, that 4. Finally, even if informal ins tu ons can be are created, communicated, and enforced out- shaped by the culture of a given society or side of offi cially sanc oned channels. By con- community, the two should be analy cally trast, formal ins tu ons are rules and procedures dis nguished. The authors propose that infor- that are created, communicated, and enforced mal ins tu ons should be defi ned in narrow
14 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
terms of shared expecta ons (which are be- the given rela ons. For example, informal ins tu- ing expressed in certain norms) rather than ons which obstruct the formal ins tu on may shared values. These shared expecta ons at the same me boost its func on or even sub- may or may not be rooted in broader societal s tute it completely. Therefore, they introduced values. The proposed dis nc on allows us a two-dimensional matrix for classifying the rela- then to analyse poten al causal rela onships ons between formal and informal ins tu ons: between culture and informal ins tu ons and 1. the degree to which formal and informal in- make statements on whether broader societal s tu onal outcomes converge and 2. the eff ec- values reinforce or undermine informal ins - veness of relevant formal ins tu ons. The fi rst tu ons (Helmke & Levitsky, 2004). Helmke & dimension captures the dis nc on between situ- Levitsky (2006: 7) point out that broader social a ons in which informal rules produce similar or values are not always ones which create infor- diff erent results from those expected from strict mal norms as in case of formal ins tu ons. To adherence to formal rules. Thus, the outcomes put it diff erently, some informal ins tu ons can converge or diverge. The second dimension are strongly embedded in a society’s culture refers to the extent to which wri en rules and and tradi on; however, others are rather a procedures are reinforced and complied with in product of modern ins tu onal changes and prac ce. inven ons with no root in tradi on. The la er Based on these two dimensions, authors norms are more likely to be subject to rapid made a fourfold typology of informal ins tu- changes in comparison to the ones strongly ons: connected to tradi onal features of a society. 1. Complementary informal ins tu ons build up Accordingly, De Soysa and Ju ng point the func oning of eff ec ve formal ins tu ons out that, when explaining informal ins tu ons, ruled by some formal wri en rules. However, researchers have to take into account both meta- these rules are applied along with the infor- ins tu ons (culture and iden ty) and contextual mal ones. Informal ins tu ons thus fi ll in the (historical) variables, as exogenous factors: “infor- gaps of the formal rules, either by “address- mal ins tu ons are largely self-enforcing through ing con ngencies not dealt with in the formal mechanisms of obliga on, such as in patron-cli- rules or by facilita ng the pursuit of individual ent rela onships or clan networks, or simply be- goals within the formal ins tu onal frame- cause following the rules is in the best interests work” (Helmke & Levitsky, 2004: 727). This of individuals who may fi nd themselves in a situ- type of informal ins tu ons o en may en- a on in which everyone is be er off through co- hance effi ciency, but also, they may serve as a opera on.” (De Soysa & Ju ng 2007: 33). founda on for formal ins tu ons, crea ng or strengthening incen ves to comply with for- mal rules that would otherwise exits merely The modes of informal – formal on paper. Good examples are norms, rou nes rela onship and opera ng procedures that facilitate deci- As we saw in the case of norms within an sion making and coordina on within bureauc- organiza on, formal and informal ins tu ons racies. may also interact in a variety of ways. Helmke 2. Accommoda ng informal ins tu ons are and Levitsky (2004) have, therefore, developed a those that combine eff ec ve formal ins tu- typology of these rela ons, star ng from sharp ons and divergent outcomes, crea ng in- classifi ca on of func onal (or problem solving) cen ves for behaviour that is altering the and dysfunc onal (problem crea ng) rela ons. substan ve eff ects of formal rules, without In the fi rst case, informal ins tu ons may pro- directly viola ng them. “They contradict the vide solu ons to problems of social rela on- spirit, but not the le er, of the formal rules” ships within formal ins tu ons contribu ng to (Helmke & Levitsky, 2004: 727). “They are of- a be er performance, while in the second case, ten created by those actors who are not sat- informal ins tu ons undermine the perform- isfi ed with the outcomes generated by the ance of formal ins tu ons. However, as these formal rules, although they are not able to authors have noted, this simple division proved change or openly violate those rules.” (Helm- to be insuffi cient in capturing the complexity of ke & Levitsky, 2006: 15). Accommoda ng
15 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
informal ins tu ons within formal ones usu- perspec ves: the fi rst includes mo va on ally foster increased compa bility of mutual of individuals or collec ve actors to cre- interest the two, in that way enhancing the ate and maintain them, while the second stability of formal ins tu ons by amor zing argues about broader structural and sys- demands for ins tu onal change. A good ex- temic factors that encourage emergence ample of accommoda ng informal ins tu on of informal ins tu ons. is blat, as a set of informal norms emerged In the eff orts to answer the ques- in Soviet poli cal and economic life in which on about incen ves that encourage dif- strict adherence to formal rules did not al- ferent actors to create informal ins tu- low personal needs and state targeted goals ons, Helmke and Levitsky (2006: 19–22) of enterprises to be met. In such a situa on, propose the following classifi ca on of mo- personal networks of exchange served the ves: need for individuals to obtain essen al goods and services and for managers of enterprises When formal rules are not suffi ce to meet state targets, by fi nding a way around to address a problem, actors linked to the established procedures. formal ins tu ons are prompted to create the norms and procedures enabling them 3. Compe ng informal ins tu ons are those that to do so. coexist with ineff ec ve formal ins tu ons and divergent outcomes. Their func oning di- Even though preferring a formal rectly violates the formal rules (examples are solu on, actors may opt to crea ng an clientelism, clan poli cs or corrup on). informal ins tu on as a way of solving a 4. Subs tu ve informal ins tu ons are those problem that otherwise they would not be that combine ineff ec ve formal ins tu ons able to solve within a formal ins tu on. with compa ble outcomes. These ins tu ons Some mes, formal ins tu ons exist only are employed by actors who seek outcomes on paper but do not fulfi l their role. Also, that are convergent with formal rules and actors some mes fi nd it less costly and procedures, in environments where formal me-consuming to create an eff ec ve in- rules are not rou nely enforced. Therefore, formal ins tu on than a formal one. subs tu ve informal ins tu ons appear when Informal ins tu ons are also cre- formal ins tu ons exist, but fail to achieve ated in order to sa sfy the need for imple- their goals. For example, subs tu ve ins tu- men ng ac vi es that are either unpopu- ons tend to emerge where state structures lar or illegal. An example is development are weak or lack authority (Helmke & Levit- of formally democra c ins tu ons in some sky, 2004). post-communist transi onal socie es along with various informal authoritarian Origins of informal ins tu ons mechanisms exerted. However, in addi on to understand- To fully comprehend the role of informal ing the actors’ mo va on to create and ins tu ons in social reproduc on of a given so- maintain informal ins tu ons, there is the ciety, it is not enough to analyse its performance ques on of the role of the formal system in current circumstances (Helmke & Levitsky, in this process. The fact that formal ins - 2006). They should also be analysed in historical tu ons o en lack adequate solu ons to perspec ve. One of the most important ques- many problems is not suffi cient for explain- ons in analyzing informal ins tu ons is address- ing the issue of their origin. Such approach o en ing the causes of their forma on (Helmke includes interpreta on of a phenomenon in the & Levitsky, 2006). That is why mechanisms light of its cultural and historical origin, however of crea on of informal ins tu ons must disregarding the process of changes and trans- be inves gated. Making of informal ins - forma ons of the informal ins tu ons. tu ons is completely diff erent than formal ones, primarily in terms of their transpar- The crea on and reproduc on of ency and u lized channels (Helmke & Lev- informal ins tu ons, alongside formal itsky, 2004). Being hidden from the public ones, can be analysed from two diff erent and enforced through informal channels,
16 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
the origin of informal ins tu ons is o en 3. changes of wider societal condi ons that blurred. That is why it is usually diffi cult sustained informal ins tu ons (for example, to iden fy main actors, coali ons and in- changes in diff erent poli cal or economic terests involved in their crea on. Further- spheres may lead to changed distribu on of more, such process usually produces in- power and resources in a society, weakening equality in distribu on of resources and those actors who benefi ted from par cular consequently confl icts between the in- informal ins tu ons and strengthening those volved actors. who wanted to change them, etc.); 4. pping (meaning that if a suffi ciently large As Helmke and Levitsky (2004) warned, number of actors become convinced that the forma on of informal ins tu ons may vary: new and be er alterna ves exist, and if a some mes it is a “top down” process, when in- mechanism through which to coordinate ac- formal ins tu ons appear as part of the elite tors’ expecta ons exists, a shi from one set design, or they may emerge independently from of norms to another may occur quite rapidly) elite strategies. On the other hand, informal (Helmke & Levitsky, 2004). rules can be created in a decentralised process by many diff erent actors (examples of corrup on or clientelism). In this context, authors stress out Clientelism the need for inves ga ng the crea on of infor- Clientelism is another concept important mal ins tu ons in terms of focal points, repeat- for understanding of informal rela ons between ed interac ons and bargaining. Also, confl icts or poli cs and economy. Patronage and clientelism compromises on some issue can uninten onally are used as synonyms by some authors (Kitschelt lead to the crea on of informal ins tu ons to & Wilkinson, 2007). However, some point out deal with that issue. that “clientelism is a much broader phenomenon than patronage, with patronage being simply one Informal ins tu ons and the process of specifi c type of clientelis c exchange” perhaps ins tu onal change restricted to “the use of resources and benefi ts that fl ow from public offi ce” (Hicken, 2011: 295, Although it is o en thought that informal cf. Robinson & Verdier, 2013: 262). ins tu ons are resistant to change or change rather slowly (Lauth, 2000), Helmke and Levitsky In our view, party patronage represents (2004; 2006) present quite opposing argumenta- a term that relies on a dis nc ve type of poly- on: namely, they argue that informal ins tu ons centric poli cal system in which poli cal par es not only change, but o en may change rather are compe ng over public resources. The patron- quickly, depending on the sources of change. age network func ons as a pyramidal structure Several factors may serve as impetus for informal with the patron at the top and number of clients ins tu onal change: (‘brokers’) who themselves represent patrons at the lower hierarchical level with their own clien- 1. changes of formal rules: telis c network at the ground fl oor of the system a. change in formal ins tu onal design, (Kitschelt & Wilkinson, 2007; Gashi & Emerson, which may aff ect the costs and benefi ts of 2013). The main mechanism of the party patron- adhering to related complementary or ac- age includes clientelism, as a type of informal re- commoda ve informal rules; la ons. By clientelism we will assume such rela- b. changes in formal ins tu onal strength and ons that rest on the forms of exchange between eff ec veness, when change in the level of poli cal par es and other agents, wherein one enforcement of formal rules may alter the side provides benefi ts that the other side seeks, costs and benefi ts of adhering to informal in order to insure poli cal support and loyalty. ins tu ons that compete or subs tute for “This exchange is focused on par cular classes of those rules, or may simply weaken infor- goods, though the feasibility and persistence of mal ins tu ons; clientelis c reciprocity is not determined by the type of goods exchanged” (Kitschelt & Wilkinson, 2. evolu on of wider societal values (leading to 2007: 7). This exchange o en implies uneven rather slow and incremental informal ins tu- distribu on of resources, which is in accordance onal change);
17 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* with uneven power distribu on between actors, have to build expensive organiza onal surveil- even when they consciously accept the terms of lance and enforcement structures” (Kitschelt & the exchange (Kopecky & Scherlis, 2008; Kitschelt, Wilkinson, 2007: 8). 2000). Clientelist rela ons may appear in various Kitschelt and Wilkinson (2007: 7) stated forms: at one end of the con nuum of informal that clientelism represents: “a par cular mode poli cal exchange lies personalis c clientelism, of ‘exchange’ between electoral cons tuencies “based on face-to-face rela ons with norma ve as principals and poli cians as agents in demo- bonds of deference and loyalty between patron cra c systems”. According to them, this kind of and client, but without legal codifi ca on; at the exchange implies long-term rela ons which func- opposite end to this tradi onal clientelism stands on within hierarchical exchange networks ruled the modern clientelism of anonymous poli cal by shared norms (2007: 3–4). Furthermore, they machinery” (Kitschelt, 2000: 849). Although cli- dis nguish: “electoral clients at the ground fl oor entelism is o en perceived as a form of personal of the system, various levels of brokers organized exchange, Kitschelt (2000) argues that only the in a pyramidal fashion and patrons at the top” tradi onalist type of clientelism implies a rela- (2007: 8). Finally, the crea on and maintenance onship based on a direct exchange between of the clientelist networks is organized in a se- poli cians and their clients who are ed by fi rm cre ve manner (2007: 19). For them, three com- obliga ons. Even if “clientelist rela ons involve ponents that represent cons tu ng elements of exchanges between par cular individuals and clientelis c exchange are: con ngent direct ex- small cons tuency groups arranged in hierarchi- change, predictability and monitoring (Kitschelt cal poli cal machines, the la er may be highly & Wilkinson, 2007: 9). However, clientelism is ins tu onalized (and thus impersonal) in the not only limited to exchange between poli cal sense that actors express stable expecta ons vis- par es and other actors; this kind of rela onship à-vis the nature of the players and the interac- also exists within the poli cal par es. ve linkage that they have entered” (Kitschelt, 2000: 852). Some authors stress that the clien- Kitschelt and Wilkinson (2007) consider telist rela on is dyadic in its nature (patron-client that countries with a mul party system and a However, some other actors may also par cipate low level of economic development are frui ul in this rela on, such as mediatory brokers, who places for the development of the clientelist rela- represent clients of the patrons. These brokers ons. In a similar manner, Robertson and Verdier can parallely act as patrons to the clients at the (2013) point out rela ve importance of clien- bo om of the pyramid. Unlike the patron, the telism in less developed countries with high level broker has no independent control over resourc- of inequality: loyalty of clients is less expensive es but only distribute some resources to the cli- and easily bought in such countries while em- ents under the patron’s control (Muno, 2010). ployment off ers are here o en included in the clientelis c exchange. Clientelist exchange between principals and agents is not usually simultaneous but takes place over me, which imposes the risk of a par- Party patronage and clientelism ty in the exchange process (e.g. voter and poli- Another important term is party patron- cian) to abandon the deal as soon as they are age. Kopecky and Scherlis understand “party “paid” (Kitschelt & Wilkinson, 2007) Therefore, in patronage as the power of a party to appoint order to sustain, clientelism requires an obligato- people to posi ons in public and semi-public life, ry rela onship of the involved par es where ful- considering the scope of patronage to be the fi lment of at least one of the following condi ons range of posi ons so distributed” (2008:356). As is necessary: 1. cogni ve condi on (expecta ons we men oned, we connect the term with clien- of predictable behaviour of cons tuencies), 2. telism and use them to depict dynamics of creat- mo va onal condi on – self-induced consent of ing and maintaining (power) networks. The clear involved par es to voluntary engage in mutual dis nc on is possible on a conceptual, and in clientelis c rela onship. When these condi ons postsocialist context, very diffi cult on empirical are not met, “poli cians may develop ways to level. monitor defec on from the bargain and capabili- es to punish free-riding groups and individuals Kitschelt and Wilkinson (2007: 30) stress based on that knowledge. In order to do so, they that “par es make more eff ort to build princi-
18 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* pal–agent linkages of accountability whenever fi eld have interests at the expense of the public “compe veness” is intense”. However, whether good. The main goal which leads poli cal par es being based either on clientelis c or program- is to survive on the poli cal scene and remain in ma c principles, it is largely dependent on of power. In this game for power, the main risk for socio-economic development. They “defi ne party increasing clientelism lies in the way par es are systems as compe ve when ci zens and poli - funded (Hopkin, 2004; 2006). cians have strong incen ves to try hard to win Dangers of clientelism are especially prev- supporters at the margin for one or the other alent in developing and post-socialist countries par san camp”. These situa ons occur when: 1. (Protsyk, Wilson, 2003, Roper, 2002). The poli - rival blocks, iden fi able as alterna ve govern- cal par es exchange with their clients diff ernet ing teams by voters, are closely posi oned in goods and services such as “non-material status terms of expected votes; and 2. suffi ciently large improvements, jobs in the civil service, jobs in number of undecided voters who can dictate the public-sector fi rms, government contracts and rela onship between poli cal actors. However, licenses, subsidies and grants (including tax re- they point out that elec ons are also relevant liefs), public construc on works” in order to in terms of resource control by the government. achieve party goals (Muller, 2000:141– 142). Namely, “they are compe ve only if small changes in electoral support might bring about large shi s in public policy or control of patron- Networks: power and personal networks age” (Kitschelt & Wilkinson, 2007: 28). Oligopolis- c poli cal environment create the most intense Diff erent networks intersect poli cal par- compe veness as poli cal alterna ves are dis- es, state, public ins tu ons and economy, and advantaged and distribu on of public resources create power networks at the top. According to is fully controlled. In this context, it is crucial to Ledeneva (2013:13) “power networks operate know the loca on of fl oa ng voters, while the on principles similar to other informal networks outcome of their vo ng is quite certain (Kitschelt and impose certain norms of reciprocity and in- & Wilkinson, 2007: 30). Finally, “under the condi- formal constraints on people in offi cial posi ons: ons of democra c contesta on, ethno cultural (a) blurred boundaries between friendship and pluralism may represent a signifi cant catalyst of the use of friendship; (b) helping friends at the intensifying cilentelism, as compe on between expense of public/corporate resources or access; par es usually tends to be in line with ethnic and (c) recruitment into networks according to a divisions” (Kitschelt & Wilkinson, 2007: 33). In par cular logic – it could be loyalty, dependence, ethnically mixed socie es, in which ethnic groups or compliance based on transgression/compro- have their own poli cal representa ves, it is very mised recrui ng – rather than the logic of com- diffi cult to organize poli cal life on the basis of pe on and professionalism”. These networks universal values. The clearer the ethnic lines and are based on strong and weak es intersec ng the greater distance between the ethnic groups, the private and public domain. Inside these net- policies are more focused on the distribu on of works actors can be located according to their public goods in accordance with the ethnic lines. func on. Ethnicity is probably the most prominent form of social solidarity, which fi nds its expression in the individual Strong es poli cal fi eld. There are also other forms of net- 1. “Inner 3. “Core working, such as class, genera onal or regional, circle” contacts” which can take on similar characteris cs and fi nd Private Public se ngs a poli cal ar cula on. se ngs 4. “Medi- (de-centered) (centered) 2. “Useful ated, or For this purpose, we will use Van Biezen’s friends” periphery, (2007: 241) defi ni on of “party clientelism”: “a contacts” form of representa on based on the selec ve re- lease of public (material) resources – 1. contracts, Weak es Ins tu on 2. housing, 3. subsidies, 4. pork-barrel legisla- on, etc. – in order to secure electoral support Figure. 1 Types of networks, Source: from individuals or selected sectors of society”. Ledeneva (2013:55) In other words, individuals and groups in poli cal
19 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
As Ledeneva points out: “The inner circle Cellarius, Barbara. 2004: In the Land of Orpheus. serves to back up a leader and to ‘programme’, Madison: Wisconsin Press. ‘filter’ and ‘develop’ the power network. Useful Chavance, Bernard. 2008: Formal and informal in- friends benefit from ‘authorized’ business oppor- s tu onal change: the experience of postso- tuni es, outside the ver cal power, and generate cialist transforma on, The European Journal resources for the survival of the power network of Compara ve Economics, Vol. 5, n. 1, pp. and/or increasing its financial base. Core contacts 57–71. are more likely to benefit from public appoint- De Soysa, Indra and Jonannes Ju ng. 2007: In- ments within the power ver cal and serve as formal Ins tu ons and Development: How safeguards of both the hierarchy’s and the net- They Ma er and What Makes Them Change, work’s interests. The mediated contacts are used in: Ju ng et al (eds.), Informal ins tu ons. for outreaching, ‘switching’ to a diff erent mode How social norms help or hinder develop- and channelling changes” (Ledeneva, 2013:82). ment. Development Centre of OECD. Gashi, Drilon and Shogi Emerson. 2013: A Class of Its Own: Patronage and its impact on Social LITERATURE Mobility in Kosovo. Prish na: Democracy for Development. Acemoglu, Daron and James A. Robinson. 2012: Why Na ons Fail?. New York: Crown Publish- Ghezzi, Simone and Enzo Mingione. 2007: Embed- ing. dedness, Path Dependency and Social Ins - tu ons. An Economic Sociology Approach, Aliyev, Huseyn. 2015: Post-Soviet informality: to- Current Sociology, vol. 55 no. 1, pp. 11–23. wards theory-building, Interna onal Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 35, No. Grabher, Gernot and David C. Stark, eds. 1997: Re- 3/4, pp.182 – 198. structuring Networks in Post-Socialism. Lega- cies, Linkages and Locali es. Oxford: Oxford Antonić, Slobodan. 1993: Srbija između populizma University Press. i demokra je; poli čki procesi u Srbiji 1990– 1993. Beograd: Ins tut za poli čke studije. Granove er, Marc. 1973: The Strength of Weak Antonić, Slobodan. 2006: Elite, građanstvo i slaba Ties, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, država. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. No. 6, pp 1360–1380. Arandarenko, Mihail. 1995: Srbija devedese h: Granove er, Marc. 1985: Economic Ac on and So- prvobitna akumulacija ili poli čki kapitali- cial Structure: The Problem of Embedded- zam, Srpska poli čka misao, god. II, br. 4, ness, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, 35–50. pp. 481–93. Arandarenko, Mihail. 2000: Ekonomska stvarnost Grødeland, Åse Berit and Aadne Aasland. 2007: In- Srbije, u: Lazić Mladen (ur.), Račji hod. Be- formality and Informal Prac ces in East Cen- ograd: Filip Višnjić. tral and South East Europe. CERC (Contem- porary Europe Research Centre, University Begg, Robert and John Pickles, 1998: Ins tu ons, of Melbourne) Working Papers Series, No. 3 social networks and ethnicity in the cul- / 2007. tures of transi on: industrial change, mass unemployment and regional transforma on Hale, Henry. 2011: Formal cons tu ons in informal in Bulgaria, in Smith, A. and Pickles J. (Eds): poli cs: ins tu ons and democra za on in Theorising Transi on: The Poli cal Economy Post-Soviet Eurasia, World Poli cs, Vol. 64, of Post-Socialist Transforma ons, pp. 115– No. 4, pp. 581–617. 146. London: Routledge Hall, Peter and David Soskice. 2011: Varie es of Burawoy, Michael and Katherina Verdery, eds. Capitalism: The Ins tu onal Founda ons 2000: Uncertain Transi on. Ethnographies of of Compara ve Advantage. Oxford; Oxford Change in Postsocialist World. Lanham, Boul- University Press. der, New York and Oxford: Rowman and Lit- Hayoz, Nicolas. 2013: Observa ons on the Changing tlefi eld Publishers INC. Meanings of Informality, in: Giordano, Chris- Butler, Amy. 1995: The impact of social welfare pol- an and Nicolas Hayoz (eds.), Informality in icies on self-ini a ve and family structure: Eastern Europe. Pieterlen: Peter Lang. the case of Poland, Social Service Review, Helmke, Gretchen and Steven Levitsky. 2004: Infor- Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 1–30. mal Ins tu ons and Compara ve Poli cs: A
20 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
Research Agenda, Perspec ves on Poli cs, Lazić, Mladen. 2011: Čekajući kapitalizam. Beograd: Vol. 2/No. 4, pp 725–740. Službeni glasnik. Helmke, Gretchen and Steven Levitsky. 2006: In- Ledeneva, Alena. 1998: Russia’s Economy of Fa- troduc on, in: Helmke and Levitsky (eds.), vours: Blat, Networking, and Informal Ex- Informal ins tu ons and democracy. Bal - change. Cambridge University Press, Cam- more: John Hopkins University Press. bridge. Hicken, Allen. 2011: Clientelism, Annual Review of Ledeneva, Alena. 2013: Can Russia Modernize? Sis- Poli cal Science, Vol. 14, pp. 289–310. tema, Power Networks and Informal Govern- Holcombe, Randall. 2015: Poli cal Capitalism, Cato ance. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 41–66. Press. Hopkin, Jonathan. 2004: The Problem with Party Love, John R. 1991: An quity and Capitalism: Max Finance: Theore cal Perspec ves on the Weber and the Sociological Founda ons of Funding of Party Poli cs, Party Poli cs, 10: Roman Civiliza on. London: Routledge. 627–621. Maucourant, Jerome and Sebas en Plociniczak. Hopkin, Jonathan. 2006: Conceptualizing Poli cal 2013: The Ins tu on, the Economy and the Clientelism: Poli cal Exchange and Demo- Market: Karl Polanyi’s Ins tu onal Thought cra c Theory. Paper prepared for APSA an- for Economists, Review of Poli cal Economy, nual mee ng, Philadelphia. Panel 46–18. Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 512–531. http://personal.lse.ac.uk/hopkin/apsahop- Misztal, Barbara. 2000: Informality. Social The- kin2006.pdf. ory and Contemporary Prac ce. London: Karklins, Rasma. 2005: The System Made Me Do It: Routledge. Corrup on in Post-Communist Socie es. Ar- Montanaro, Lucia, 2009: The Kosovo state building monk, New York, and London, England: M. Conundrum: Addressing Fragility in a Con- E. Sharpe. tested State. Working Paper no. 91., Fride. Kitschelt, Herbert and Steven Wilkinson. 2007: Pa- Muller, Wolfgang C. 2000: Patronage by na onal tron, Clients and Policies. Cambridge: Cam- governments. in: Blondel, J. and Co a, M. bridge University Press. (eds) The Nature of Party Government: A Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995: Forma on of party cleav- Compara ve European Perspec ve. Basing- ages in post-communist democracies. Theo- stoke: Palgrave, 141–160. re cal proposi ons, Party Poli cs, Vol. 1, No. Muno, Wolfgang. 2010: Conceptualizing and 4, pp. 447–472. Measuring Clientelism, h p://www.poli k. Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000: Linkages between ci zens uni-mainz.de/cms/Dateien/Clientelism__ and poli cians in democra c policies, Com- GIGA_paper_neopat_workshop_Muno.pdf para ve Poli cal Studies, Vol. 33, pp. 845– (accessed on June 4th, 2015). 879. Nee, Victor and Paul Ingram. 1998: Embeddedness Kopecky, Petr and Gerardo Scherlis. 2008: Party Pa- and Beyond: Ins tu ons, Exchange, and So- tronage in Contemporary Europe. European cial Structure, in: Brinton Mary and Victor Review, Vol. 16, pp. 355–371. Nee (eds.), The New Ins tu onalism in Soci- ology. New York: Russell Sage Founda on. Kopecký, Petr and Maria Spirova. 2011: ‘Jobs for the boys’? Pa erns of party patronage in post- Nee, Victor. 2003: New Ins tu onalism, Eco- communist Europe”, West European Poli cs, nomic and Sociological. h p://www. Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 897–921. researchgate.net/profile/Victor_Nee/ publica on/237643624_NEW_INSTITUTION- Kotkin, Stephen and Andras Sajo. 2002: Poli - ALISM_ECONOMIC_AND_SOCIOLOGICAL/ cal Corrup on in Transi on. Budapest: CEU links/0deec53a3b1696c153000000.pdf (ac- Press. cessed on June 5th 2015). Lauth, Hans-Joachim. 2000: Informal ins tu ons Nee, Victor and Yang Cao. 1999: Path Dependent and democracy, Democra za on, Vol. 7, No. Societal Transforma ons, Theory and Soci- 4, pp. 21–50. ety, Vol. 28, pp. 799–834. Lazić, Mladen and Jelena Pešić. 2012: Making and Neef, Rianer. 2002: Aspects of the informal econ- Unmaking State-centered Capitalism in Ser- omy in a transforming country: the case of bia. Belgrade: ISI FF. Romania, Interna onal Journal of Urban and
21 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
Regional Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 299– među građanima Srbije, Sociologija, Vol. LVI, 322. No. 2, pp.181–200. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1994: Delega ve Democra- Stark, David. 1992: Path-Dependency and Priva za- cy?, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. on Strategies in East Central Europe, East 55–69. European Poli cs and Socie es, Vol. 6, No. 1, Olson, Mancur. 2002: The Logic of Collec ve Ac on. pp. 17–52. Cambridge, Massachuse s: Harvard Univer- Stark, David. 1996: Recombinant property in East sity Press. European capitalism, American journal of so- Polanyi, Karl. 2001: The Great Transforma on, Bos- ciology, Vol. 101, No. 4, pp 993–1027. ton: Beacon Press. Strøm, Kaare. 1990: A behavioural theory of com- Praščević, Aleksandra. 2013: Dome ekonom- pe ve poli cal par es, American Journal ske poli ke u prevazilaženju efekata glo- of Poli cal Science, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 565– balne ekonomske krize na ekonomiju srbije, 598. Ekonomski horizon , Januar – April 2013, Turner, Thomas and Young Crawford. 1985: The Godište XV, Sveska 1, 17 – 30. Rise and Decline of the Zairian State. Univer- Protsyk, Oleh and Andrew Wilson. 2003: Centre Pol- sity of Wisconsin Press. i cs in Russia and Ukraine: Patronage, Power van Biezen, Ingrid. 2004: Poli cal Par es as Public and Virtuality, Party Poli cs, 9: 703–727. U li es, Party Poli cs, 10: 701–722. Robertson, James and Thierry Verdier. 2013: The Thiel, Van. 2008: Poli cal appointments in Dutch Poli cal Economy of Clientelism, The Scandi- public sector organiza ons: old and new navian Journal of Economics, Vol. 115, No. 2, forms of patronage, h p://soc.kuleuven.be/ pp. 260–291. io/egpa/org/2008Rot/papers/VanThiel.pdf Roper, Roper D. 2002: The Infl uence of Romanian (accessed on June 3rd, 2015). Campaign Finance Laws on Party System De- velopment and Corrup on, Party Poli cs, 8: Weber, Max. 1978: Economy and Society: An Out- 175 –192. line of Interpre ve Sociology. edited by G. Roth and C. Wi ch. Berkeley: University of Rose, Richard, William Mishler and Chris an Haerp- California Pres. fer. 1997: Social capital in civic and stressful socie es, Studies in Compara ve Interna on- Wedel, Janine R. 1986: The Private Poland. New al Development. Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 85–111. York: Facts on File Publica ons. Smith, Adrian and Alison Stenning. 2006: Beyond Wedel, Janine R. 1992: The Unplanned Society. New household economies: ar cula ons and York: Columbia University Press. spaces of economic prac ce in postsocial- Wedel, Janine R. 2006: “State” and “Private”: Up ism, Progress in Human Geography.Vol. 30 against Organiza onal Reali es of Central No. 2, pp. 190–213. and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Stanojević, Dragan and Dragana Stokanić. 2014: Union. Washington: The Na onal Council for Između Sicilije i Lombardije. Odnos poveren- Eurasian and East European Research. ja, građanskih normi i društvene par cipacije
22 ä Marija Babović ä Dragan Stanojević ä Jelena Pešić ä Slobodan Cvejić ä Dragana Gundogan
METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
n order to iden fy, describe and explore the c) In the area of exper se –specialists and informal prac ces of capturing economic re- experts; Isources by poli cal elite, we have chosen qualita ve research design. The research goal Interviews were chosen as the primary was thus accomplished in two steps: method for collec ng data, mainly because they enable researchers to learn more (and in greater 1. Analy cal reviewing of relevant literature and depth and detail) about respondents’ experienc- data sources with the aim of recognizing: es and perspec ves on a specifi c topic. a) trends in rela ons between economic and With the informa on gathered through poli cal elite over the last 20 years; desk research and mul ple workshops the re- b) current state-of-art research and analysis; search team was able to agree on a theore cal framework to use. Out of this framework, several The research relied heavily on social sci- hypotheses were formulated and therefore used ence journals and books in order to grasp a bet- as tools to help: build the data collec on, con- ter understanding on the historical legacies and struct the fi eld research instruments and target changes in the social context of the two socie- the analysis and elabora on of fi ndings. es. Hypothesis 1: Poli cal party patronage is 2. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews with present on the central and local levels of govern- three groups of respondents1: ance and among all key poli cal par es, those a) In poli cs –people occupying high posi- being either in the rule or in opposi on in Serbia ons in public administra on, infl uen al and in Kosovo*. people in poli cal par es (on the na onal and local level); Poli cal patronage represents an asymmetric exchange of resources, with b) In economy –execu ves/managers in pri- the ul mate purpose to provide poli cal vate companies (small, middle and big en- par es be er chances or opportuni es for terprises). entering –or remaining – in power within the system of poli cal compe on. This 1 From an ethical perspec ve, all par cipants were clearly informed about the objec ves of the study, is frequently accompanied by transi onal were given the right to remain anonymous, and socie es. were guaranteed confi den ality. All of the inter- views were recorded. Keeping in mind the sensi v- Pa erns of poli cal patronage –at ity of the issue, all respondents were approached the central and local levels– hold a certain individually and interviewed at places of their number of similar characteris cs. Char- choosing or discre on. With the aim of establishing acteris cs of patronage prac ces may in- and maintaining an open, trust-based “discussion,” clude: all responses – including those that were viewed as controversial – were met with an honest, benevo- lent and respec ul a tude by all interviewers.
23 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
1) appointment of loyal party members to the 2) economic resources such as: money for fi - managing (managers, board members) posi- nancing poli cal campaigns, contracts, jobs ons of important public enterprises; in public or private enterprises (for voters or 2) providing jobs and employment opportuni es poli cians’ post –poli cal occupa on); for loyal party members or other clients; 3) the regula on of prices on certain products; 3) informal agreements about control over pub- 4) informa on –usually informa on that gives lic enterprises between poli cal par es; feu- an advantage to the client over other compet- daliza on of the public sector; itors (during tender procedures, license grant- 4) public contrac ng, tenders, awarding licenses, ing, giving concessions, priva za on process- concessions, gran ng monopolies (or tolerat- es); ing the monopoliza on of certain market seg- 5) other favors –votes, poli cal agita on in favor ments); of one poli cal party (patron’s party), expand- 5) contrac ng the private sector out of free ing networks of voters, etc. compe on (‘se ng the business’) –contracts that are not part of the public sector and not Hypothesis 5: Poli cal patronage rela ons subjected to the public tender procedures, develop between various types of actors: but are pre-arranged and exclude free com- pe on, such as prin ng party materials, 1) poli cal actors –party members, members of ren ng premises to par es, catering, etc.; governments at all levels; 6) corrup on and manipula on during priva za- 2) economic actors –entrepreneurs, managers, on processes; ci zens (cons tuents, second degree clients, such as rela ves of loyal party members or 7) changing laws in favor of the interests of cer- other important clients); tain lobbyists, interest groups; 3) interlocking brokers (individuals taking posi- 8) gran ng protec on from legal consequences ons at the intersec on of two elite circles even when legal norms have been broken. –poli cal and economic. Hypothesis 2: Party patronage unfolds Hypothesis 6: Through the process of po- through formal, informal and mixed exchange li cal patronage, clientelis c networks emerge: prac ces. Due to the development path of Ser- bian and Kosovan socie es, it is to be expected The dynamics of establishing and that the rela ons between formal and informal reproducing clientelis c rela ons are very ins tu ons today, will be frequently compe ve complex. And as a result of poli cal pa- although they have func oned, in historical per- tronage rela ons, whole clientelis c net- spec ve, as complementary and even subs tu- works can emerge. These networks can ve. take various forms, but are generally dis- Hypothesis 3: Informal prac ces are sup- nguished as personal networks and pow- ported or framed by the culture of informality. er networks. That culture includes specifi c norms, rituals, cus- toms, language, places. Interviews were conducted on non-random Hypothesis 4: Under party patronage, po- samples of poli cians, businessmen and experts li cal par es capture public resources and use in Serbia and Kosovo*, taking into considera on them to their own advantage (collec ve and in- the representa on of women and ethnic minori- dividual). es. The research was conducted on the central and local level (two local communi es –each in Resources exchanged through clientelis c Serbia and Kosovo*). rela ons may include: In order to recognize poten al pa erns 1) power posi ons –within party ranks, local of changes in informal rela ons, both levels of government and in the central legisla on of research –i.e. na onal and local– have encom- execu ve power; passed both current and former offi ce holders.
24 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
SAMPLE PLAN FOR RESEARCH ON The samples were iden fi ed and selected THE CENTRAL LEVEL as the following:
Subsamples (each in Serbia and Kosovo*): # of Respondents 1. Poli cal elite: 25 representa ves of the fi ve Category of Respondents largest poli cal par es in the last 5 years; The Kosovo* Serbia interviewees were high and middle range Poli cal Elite 40 55 poli cians who had, or used to had, impor- tant posi ons within the poli cal structures Central level 25 30 and public administra ons; Local level 15 25 2. Economic actors: 15 entrepreneurs/top man- Economic Actors 20 26 agers of big, medium and small-sized, private- ly– and publicly-owned enterprises (excluding Central level 15 20 members of the poli cal elite); Local level 5 6 3. Interlocking brokers: 10 persons occupying Experts 10 8 poli cal and economic power posi ons at the same me, thus linking and bridging the polit- Interlockers 10 9 ical and economic elite (poli cians on boards Total 80 98 of public companies, as well as big entrepre- neurs or tycoons in poli cal power-holding posi ons); In the fi rst phase of analysis, data were 4. Experts: 10 experts – representa ves of state coded, depersonalized and decomposed to com- and independent bodies that deal directly or ponents that responded to respec ve hypothe- indirectly with relevant issues (such as the ses, while in the second phase, all data was proc- An -corrup on Agency or the An -corrup on essed in NVivo so ware and analyzed. Council) as well as representa ves of civil so- ciety organiza ons dealing with these issues and independent experts from the academic Disclaimer Regarding Northern Kosovo community. For the purpose of this research, four northern municipali es (Mitrovica North, SAMPLE PLAN FOR RESEARCH ON Zvecan, Zubin Potok, Leposavic) have been THE LOCAL LEVEL en rely excluded as the issues of poli cal patronage and informality in the north were Two local communi es were selected not researched for three main reasons: –each in Serbia and Kosovo* (one of two was 1) northern municipali es fi rst had local mul -ethnic): elec ons within the Kosovo* system in Serbia: Velika Plana and Novi Pazar (the 2013 and those local governances are s ll Bosniak minority cons tutes 77% of the popula- not fully opera onal due to a number of on); issues; Kosovo*: Prish na and Gračanica (the Serb 2) most of the poli cal patronage and infor- minority cons tutes 68% of the popula on); mality relates to Serbia rather than Kos- ovo*, thus a diff erent research approach The subsamples in each local community: would be needed to cover the other mu- 1. Poli cal elite: 15 representa ves of the fi ve nicipali es; largest poli cal par es in the local commu- 3) most of the interlocutors provided state- nity; ments such as: “depending if you ask 2. Economic actors: 5 managers or entrepre- about the north or the south, as those neurs of local public or private, big, medium are two diff erent worlds.” and small-sized enterprises.
25
INFORMALITY AND CLIENTELISM IN SERBIA
ä Marija Babović ä Slobodan Cvejić ä Jelena Pešić
HISTORICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT OF INFORMAL RELATIONS BETWEEN POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC ACTORS IN SERBIA
n our a empts to explain the causes of per- shaped structural and norma ve grounds of sistence of informal rela ons between poli - informality in the pre-socialist period, leading Ical and economic actors in Serbia, we una- to establishment of the specifi c type of infor- voidably pay a en on to weak ins tu ons and mal culture. The culture of informality in the troublesome ins tu onal change that marked pre-modern Serbia had a strong foothold in the the whole modern history of Serbia. By apply- non-ins tu onal way of dealing with social and ing historical analysis we can dis nguish be- poli cal problems. In some cases informal prac- tween longue duree historical processes that ces were the consequence of lacking formal aff ect deep structures and cultural pa erns in ins tu ons, while in others, they were devel- the society on the one hand and current actors oped besides and parallel to formal norms and and processes that mark the poli cal scene and ins tu ons, subs tu ng, compe ng or comple- norma ve framework on the other. Further on men ng them. we will present interplay between formality and Un l the early 19th century, Serbia rep- informality in social reproduc on in three his- resented a peripheral and weakly integrated torical stages, all of which contributed by their province within the O oman Empire. Not only own specifi ci es to the development of con- had its development been petrifi ed within the temporary informal prac ces: 1. pre-socialist subsistence economy of extended families (as period marked by late and rather slow mod- economic units) and feudal social rela ons, erniza on, leading to establishment of informal but also Serbian popula on, mainly residing in structures and ins tu ons, which were internal- remote and isolated rural areas, was not inte- ized through socializa on processes as parts of grated either into the O oman state admin- common culture of the society; 2. heritage of istra ve apparatus or urban economy, lacking the socialist system with its revolu onary inter- almost any formal ins tu onal and norma ve ven ons in the norma ve system and cons tu- structure. O oman policy was not aimed at ac- on of public good; 3. prolonged post-socialist complishing fi rm integra on of rather heteroge- transforma on, resul ng in establishment of a neous parts of the empire, leaving to the local specifi c type of capitalist system on peripheral elders to independently and in tune with the grounds (poli cal capitalism, with elements of tradi ons solve issues of local social and admin- neopatrimonialism and party patronage). istra ve organiza on (tax collec on or arrange- ments of family rela ons, for example). For the Chris an popula on, this meant existence of a PRE-SOCIALIST HISTORICAL certain autonomy (self-government of the lo- LEGACIES cal communi es, which were in the territories inhabited by Serbian popula on organized as In the fi rst part of this chapter we will districts, municipali es and coopera ves, based address the issue of historical processes that on collec ve ownership of land and the princi-
29 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* ples of egalitarian distribu on of goods), but also founda on for the modern ins tu onal building. preserva on of tradi onal organiza onal forms For example, the extended family, based on the of societal life. In this way, the state appeared as autarchic peasant society, provided increased an absolute, abstract and distant (foreign) central security of property, life, commercial ac vi es government towards the local popula on, as well and administra ve preroga ves of local poli cal as an immediately visible local authority embod- leaders in the period that followed the retreat- ied in foreign representa ves and in local village ing of Turkish authori es from Serbian territories elders. As a consequence, ambivalent a tude (Pavlović, 2004). Therefore, in the newly formed towards state ins tu ons was developed: on the state, despo c rule of the sovereign (knjaz) at one hand the uncondi onal acceptance of power state level was homologous to the patriarchal of the central authority and patriarchal seniority nature of basic social rela ons at lower instances within the local community, and on the other, of societal organiza on – local community and resistance to its direct manifesta ons embodied extended family. in the form of a lower Turkish administra ve and The legi ma ng basis of the state repre- repressive apparatus (Lazić, 2005: 15). The Ser- sented peasantry – encompassing the majority of bian Orthodox Church represented the only in- the popula on – encouraging the maintenance s tu on that remained from the statehood and of egalitarian syndrome and preven ng stronger that func oned autonomously under the O o- social diff eren a on and cons tu on of local man rule. Although ins tu onally undeveloped bourgeoisie that is reproduced on market prin- (Radić, 1994: 349), in some cases it represent- ciples. At the same me, this created a poli cal ed an ins tu onal channel for nego a on with obstacle to rapid moderniza on and establish- Turkish authori es thanks to a small clergy caste. ment of the ra onal– legal apparatus of power, However, for the most part, the social life of this since the central poli cal role was given to the popula on took place outside of towns, signifi - supreme ruler as a mediator between the mass cantly infl uenced more by tradi onal norms and of poor peasants and the underdeveloped and less by formal rules (Turkish authori es defi ned a poli cally dependent rising bourgeoisie (Lazić, minimum set of rules for Chris an subjects and 2011). In this way, during the fi rst half of the 19th le most of their life to be ruled by customary century, the state apparatus had the character- norms of these peoples). is cs of personalized power, where public offi - th Star ng from the early 19 century, Serbia cials o en represented personal servitude of the entered a decade long process of gaining state higher levels of the sovereign, while formal rules autonomy and na on building. In the fi rst half of and ins tu ons were s ll in the process of slow th the 19 century, Serbia was faced with a com- forma on. This lack of certainty, formal rules pletely underdeveloped ins tu onal structure of and ins tu ons, however, induced occurrence the state administra ve, judiciary and repressive of armed revolts of the local elders, disenfran- apparatus that had to be built from scratch. The chised and marginalized traders and clerks (most main feature of this period was specifi c symbio- of which were severely suppressed). sis of poli cal and economic factors that led to amalgama on of private and public interests. For the poor and poli cally dependent The new state elite emerged from the insurrec- commercial bourgeoisie, clerical service in the on movement, encompassing local poli cal state apparatus represented almost the only leaders and members of the young commercial mechanism of protec on of their own econom- bourgeoisie (developed mostly by cross-border ic interests. In this way, the poli cal sphere ab- livestock trading with Austria) that took public sorbed almost all valuable human resources, posi ons in the state apparatus, using them for crea ng a society in which poli cs infl uenced the further accumula on of their own private capital structuring of almost all social rela ons – from (Čalić, 2004). In this way, common public interests economic to private (Stojanović, 2013). As a re- were strongly interlaced with private interests of sult of this intertwining of poli cal and economic the newly arisen elite, while the state apparatus processes, growing rich of a small class of peo- served the need for strengthening the authority ple ran in parallel with the process of se ng up of the sovereign (Lazić, 2011). Since the new state the administra ve, judicial and repressive appa- was lacking in formal ins tu ons and structures, ratus. On the one hand, taking a higher posi on tradi onal patriarchal structures were used as a within the apparatus ensured the acquisi on of
30 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* economic capital, while accumula on of capital, rules of conduct, made the state appear alien on the other hand, allowed taking senior poli cal and foreign at the micro-level. The state appears posi ons. However, it is indica ve that acquisi- as an external force that people are afraid of, at on of the posi ons within the state apparatus the same me trying to cheat on it. This “distrust took precedence over economic accumula on of the subjects and the government does not (Lazić, 2011). represent a fer le ground for widening domains The second half of the 19th century was of freedom and ra onality” (Bogdanović 1994: marked by the slow, but steady process of mod- 182). erniza on of the state apparatus, introduc on of The specifi c dynamics of poli cal par es formal norma ve-ins tu onal structures, pro- (formed in the 1860s, but started with ins tu- fessionaliza on of the state administra on and onal work within the parliament in the early establishment of legal-ra onal power (the rela- 1880s), which were formed almost exclusively in vely modern 1869. cons tu on to some extent the capital by a narrow group of clerks and urban constrained the sovereign rule by introducing intelligentsia, was marked not only by par san independent legisla ve and judiciary power and and non-par san poli cal interests and mo ves by gran ng certain level of autonomy to the lo- but also by strong infl uence of personal rela on- cal communi es). Parallel to that, the local bour- ships, services and animosi es (Stojanović, 2010), geoisie slowly started to develop independently crea ng a specifi c poli cal system. Poli cal par- from the state apparatus, although remaining es were understood as a form of extended fam- economically weak. ily, while party leaders had a strong paternalist Modern poli cal ins tu ons were not func- role, making this ins tu on a semi-personal do- oning according to the envisioned model: domi- main in which public and personal interests and nant pre-modern understanding of the poli cs, rela ons were intertwined. Poli cal rela ons which relied on tradi onal autocra c elements, were o en reduced to personal affi ni es, making hindered and stul fi ed democra c ins tu ons the whole public domain fi lled with elements of that ended up being empty forms without ad- informal and personal rela ons. equate content. Over me, the once established In the economically underdeveloped and ins tu ons were derogated and formal norma- poor society, poli cal par es had another impor- ve rules made pointless. Division of power was tant role – establishing and maintaining informal frequently violated, while laws were broken even economic rela ons with the members of the eco- by the government itself. The deroga on of state nomic elite. Historians tes fy to close rela ons of ins tu ons made space for the monarch to take almost all poli cal par es with fi nancial ins tu- over jurisdic ons not granted by the law and ons – mostly banks – which served as fi nancers to infl uence poli cal and economic processes of their party ac vi es (Stojanović, 2013). Close (Stojanović, 2013). rela ons of the bourgeoisie with poli cal actors, Parallel to that, the process of strong op- therefore, s ll represented a mechanism of pro- posi on to formaliza on of the rules within the tec on and improvement of their economic in- ins tu onal structure of the state went on. The terests, in this way crea ng a system based on largest poli cal party at the me – the Radi- a specifi c clientelist network. Closeness to the cal party– strongly opposed the liberal concep- ruling regime provided state granted businesses, on of the state, op ng for people’s democracy, forcing even those rare fi nancially strong mem- emana ng absolute sovereignty of the people. bers of the economic elite to close coopera on Representa ves of the Radical party expressed with the state. In this way, the weak business a scep cal a tude towards the state and formal elite remained dependent on the poli cal posi- ins tu ons (relying on the already deeply rooted on holders and vulnerable to poli cal turbu- suspiciousness of the peasantry with the O o- lences. Established party patronage relied on a man state), trying to push the state centralism in system based on state monopolies, prolifera ons, favour of the local governments and reduce the gran ng concessions and control of the market state bureaucra c apparatus (including schools, (Stojanović, 2013). gendarmerie and diploma c missions) (Zund- In this way, fragile democra c ins tu ons hausen, 2009). Such resistance to centralized became even more derogated and reliant on the authority and to subjec ng to the strict formal capital and money fl ows. Not only members of
31 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* the economic elite became dependent on the followed the lines of ethnic division). Carteliza- poli cal power holders, but poli cal par es also on of industry and establishment of monopolies became fi nancially dependent on their fi nancers, (which were mostly in the hands of foreign capi- making the autonomous poli cs of the par es tal) relied on clientelist and informal networks compromised by the reciprocal expecta ons of of economic and poli cal elites. As Dimitrijević poli cal and economic actors. Furthermore, in (1958) noted, concre on of foreign capital with an economically poor society, membership in a the Yugoslav state apparatus was enabled by the poli cal party became one of the main mecha- use of the already established clientelist network, nisms of social promo on and mobility, bringing consis ng of poli cal power holders, foreign in- substan al privileges to its members. Therefore, vestors and domes c mediators. In addi on to the internal structure of the par es also took tolera ng monopolies and illegal concentra on the form of clientelist network. Remaining in of ownership, the state used other mechanisms power (or gaining power) represented the most to protect foreign capital: it made changes in important aim of poli cal ac vity, since the loss customs policy, adopted the laws which were of power usually brought the loss of almost all directed against the domes c industry, made ex- economic and social privileges, making clientelist emp ons from taxes and du es, providing state networks, beside the use of violent means, the jobs, privileges and concessions, etc. (more on most important instrument of poli cal struggles. corrup on aff airs that shook mid-war Yugoslav Finally, the establishment of the Kingdom society, see in: Dimitrijević, 1958). of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (1918) introduced Apart from that, in the mid-war period, new elites in the poli cal fi eld and created alli- the state appeared as one of key economic play- ances based on ethnic interests (Bakić, 2004). A ers, not only in regula on of economic ac vi es, very turbulent party life but also signifi cant abuse but also in ini a ng and organizing them. In this of offi cial posi ons, arbitrary interpreta on of way, the state emerged as the largest single in- laws and regula ons as well as the arbitrari- vestor, entrepreneur and employer in the coun- ness of power marked this period (Stojanović, try, by the late 1930s, establishing a specifi c form 2013). In the structure of the division of powers of state-centred capitalism. The whole process between the monarch and the parliament, with was characterized by the state’s widening control ethnic compe on between Croats and Serbs, a over strategic sectors of the economy and crea- lot of space was opened for composing informal on of state monopolies (Lazić & Pešić, 2012). coali ons and cliques o en with the idea of vio- In conclusion, in a weak ins tu onal en- lent, illegal or illegi mate realiza on of interests. vironment and in specifi c socio-historical con- Parliamentary instability and turbulent di ons (marked by late moderniza on and poli cal confl icts led to frequent blockades of inclusion into the world capitalist system on the parliament, genera ng deep poli cal crisis. peripheral grounds), clientelism and informal- Encouragement of the confl icts by the monarch ity represented one of the structuring principles and his branched royal-clientelist network ena- of socio-economic and poli cal development of bled him to widen his poli cal infl uence which Serbian society. In this way, informality was not culminated in dissolu on of the parliament, re- only induced on the macro-structural level of the peal of the cons tu on and introduc on of mon- society, but also penetrated into the micro-level arch’s dictatorship. of everyday life. In the absence of formal rules and ins tu ons, people relied on tradi onal or Strong involvement of the state in the invented informal ins tu ons, thus crea ng a economy (especially in the 1930s), together with specifi c culture of informality. massive infl ow of foreign capital, made the do- mes c, ethnically divided bourgeoisie poli cally dependent (from poli cal par es established on INFORMALITY DURING SOCIALISM ethnic grounds) and economically weak. Cor- rup on of the members of the state apparatus In the beginning of socialism, informal reached enormous propor ons in the mid-war prac ces established in the former period were period, in which the most prominent clients were challenged by profound societal changes that af- representa ves of foreign capital, but also the fected every aspect of social life: economy, com- domes c business elite (clientelist network here muni es, family, ins tu ons, etc. However, as
32 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* the system was developing, the strength of the only depending on class rela ons defi ned in the culture of informality built in previous mes was formal norma ve and ins tu onal framework, increasing and also ge ng new forms adapted but also in a way characteris c for local cultural to prevailing ins tu onal se ng and norma ve and social specifi ci es (ineffi cient bureaucracy, framework. Therefore, informality in Serbia dur- uncompleted na onal state forma on, dominant ing socialism was a mul -faceted phenomenon. rural popula on, etc.). It played a signifi cant role in maintenance and While applying the func onal-structural development of the system and in consolida on approach to analysis of informality, we neglect of class posi on of the ruling class in par cular. neither the role of informality in individual histo- In order to defi ne its real determinis c value, we ries, as manifested in coping strategies of millions have to reveal its scope, forms and main actors. of households, nor its substan ve importance for Here we will approach informality in social- survival of many, especially the poorest ones. ist Serbia as a social mechanism relevant for the However, we assume that similarity of behav- dominant mode of social reproduc on – that of ioural pa erns in combining formal and informal the reproduc on of the class of collec ve own- resources among large numbers of households ers (Feher, Heler, Markus, 1984). Naturally, re- and individuals (which formed typical models produc on of the posi on of the dominant class for peasants, unskilled manual workers, skilled in socialist Serbia assumes refl ec on on the re- manual workers, nomenklatura, etc.) points to produc on of the posi on of other social classes pre-determina on of their social ac on caused and social strata (through imposing laws, manag- by prevailing class rela ons. In other words, ing resources, etc.), as well as unintended con- what might seem as deliberate ac on based on sequences deriving from ambivalence of ‘ra onal free will, in most cases turns out to be reac ve ac on’ of actors pursuing their interests in com- behaviour based on necessity and restricted by mand economy (Lazić, 1994b: 151–162)1. Here vola le law-making and fear of unpredictable informality will be observed as the sphere of so- and o en oppressive implementa on of rules by cial reproduc on complemen ng the dominant the holders of control func ons in ‘party state’ formal processes established through norma ve administra on. For example, a skilled manual and ins tu onal se ng or opposing them, de- worker would be tolerated to commit unregis- pending on the historically specifi c circumstanc- tered paid work a er formal working hours (or es in the development of the socialist system. even unpaid if serving a member of nomenclat- However, system relevant social rela ons repro- ura), but would not be allowed to open a private duced in private sphere, through social networks shop while working in a state owned company of diff erent kinds, will be treated not as a parallel and even his/her moonligh ng would be pun- sphere, but as a sphere func onally dependent ished (the law would be applied) if it exceeded on the workings of the formal system. Therefore, the tolerable limit. It was only the members of informality in socialist Serbia will be analysed as the class of collec ve owners, rela vely small in yet another fi eld of emana on of basic class re- number, whose informal prac ces were freer and la on and arguments for such an approach will more deliberate, but this freedom also evolved be off ered. As such, informality in Serbia during over me. It could be said, actually, that the socialism went through several stages of devel- sphere of informality evolved over me, from its opment following transforma on from its begin- ini al stage (end of WWII) when the Communist ning a er the end of WWII to its end during the Party dominated in all spheres of life, with zero 1980s and 1990s. Being defi ned in such historical ‘degrees of freedom’ from the ‘iron hand’ le way, it necessarily falls in line with the process for individual or collec ve ac on, to a developed of social transforma on of longer dura on that stage in which the system matured and its class assumes persistence of elements of former sys- structure crystallized thanks to, among other fac- tems, their norma ve and cultural components, tors, informal prac ces that paralleled offi cial as well as structural agencies. This means that in- interpreta on of laws. What was important was formality during socialism was transforming not that in me formally egalitarian access to diff er- ent resources (jobs, informa on, educa on, fi - 1 Ra onal u litarian individual behavior of members nancial resources, housing...) diff eren ated as to of the ruling class ul mately led to economic irra- onality of the whole system and implosion of Euro- emphasize the class structure of Serbian society pean socialism. and much of this diff eren a on was based on in-
33 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* formal prac ces. Although informality, counted changed the previous society. The new Cons tu- per head, was more present among the lower on was enacted which negated private owner- classes (small farmers’ unregistered produc on, ship, with the excep on of small farm holdings manual workers moonligh ng, etc.), it was the and some shops. In the coming years, a new upper class that captured much more available ins tu onal order was built as to introduce po- resources (usually formally state owned) through li cal control of the Communist Party over eve- infl uencing important decisions in the economy ry sphere of social and economic life. The new and poli cs. Communist party membership was order, based on closeness to the Soviet regime, condi onal to entering the circle of power, but was built with strict discipline and severe punish- informal es were important for staying in and ment for disobedience. being promoted. The middle class was gener- On the other hand, this was also the be- ously compensated through diff erent benefi ts ginning of unprecedented wave of moderniza- (higher salaries, be er housing, easier access to on of Yugoslavia. In several years, large parts public educa on) for providing transmission to of the country were urbanized and industrialized the system and it was o en based on informal which completely reshaped the social structure. networks (‘social es’). Thousands of hundreds of new class posi ons For the above reason, here we will pay were opened mostly for the rural popula on of most a en on to informal prac ces of the class Serbia and as many ci zens experienced upward of collec ve owners. We will analyse how they social mobility. combined formal and informal means in order However, recruitment to any important so- to pursue their individual interest and how ul- cial posi on, from the local to the central level, mately their class interest prevailed over the in economy or administra on, was carefully con- 2 common (public) interest of all . trolled and directed by the poli cal establish- Historical sequencing of transforma on of ment. Loyalty to the Communist Party was con- the role of informality in reproduc on of social di o sine qua non of social promo on, however living during socialism would be the following: informal es were also important. Very o en members of party commi ees as well as admin- 1. totalitarian stage, 1945 to mid 1950s istra on offi cials and company managers were 2. liberaliza on stage, mid 1950s to beginning of selected on the basis of war companionship, kin- the 1980s ship or local origin. In this way, circles of power 3. na onalis c stage, beginning of the 1980s to were established parallel to the offi cial system beginning of the 1990s of promo on, which helped their members keep important posi ons in the system and benefi ts Of course, historical occurrences evolved resul ng from them. Nevertheless, it could be in a more con nuous manner and elements of said that informality was not very developed. each stage were gradually formed during former At the bo om of the social ladder, small farm- stages. Such clear cut sequencing is theore cally ers were severely oppressed and their economic produced for the sake of more precise analysis reproduc on was kept at the level of bare sur- and refl ects the dominant form of legi macy at vival, while the response to the demand for extra each stage which will be explained below. hours of the rising class of industrial workers in the informal sphere was limited mostly to sea- sonal support to their parents’ farm holdings. At TOTALITARIAN STAGE the top of the social ladder, informal es were also challenged all the me by vola le decisions A er the end of WWII, in former Yugosla- of the narrowest circle around Josip Broz Tito via the totalitarian regime was established under (Kuljić, 2004: 151). the rule of the Communist Party. The new state The whole system with a monolithic po- was born from social revolu on that radically li cal party at the core was legi mated through 2 It is important to stress that there is no much evi- the quasi democra c poli cal system and heavy dence on this (anyway well hidden) phenomenon propaganda. Things started changing slowly with from the socialist me due to authoritarian charac- the breaking of close es with the Soviet Union ter of the rule and lack of independent sources of informa on.
34 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* in 1948 and infl ux of economic support from the 1995: 168–169). Withdrawal of the state from USA in the beginning of the 1950s. the economy and introduc on of elements of compe ve market raised the social posi on of company managers to a high level (Lazić, 1994b: LIBERALIZATION STAGE 117–121). In the weak ins tu onal surrounding and with underdeveloped culture of the rule of By the mid 1950s several changes were law they just needed proper legi miza on from made in the legisla ve and ins tu onal se ng the Communist Party offi cials to access state that marked the entry to the liberaliza on stage budget, avoid taxa on, take a loan, and so on, of Yugoslav socialism. The economy transferred in order to establish a ‘successful’ business for from the eta st model to a par cipa ve model their companies. On the other hand, poli cians of self-management which assumed more inde- counted on managers to pacify social unrest dur- pendence for enterprises, broader worker rights ing the mes of crisis and used their social es and elements of market prac ces and most en- in rota ng between top posi ons in poli cs and terprises were given over to their employees to economy throughout their career. manage them. Also, private ownership was al- lowed in agriculture, some services, transport, It was s ll a mono-party system with tourism and cra s, but this insignifi cantly con- poli cs penetra ng each pore of social life, but tributed to the overall GDP (Gapinski, Škegro, decentraliza on brought diff eren a on within Zuehlke, 1988: 32). the Communist Party and forma on of cliques. This meant that posi oning inside the party de- At the beginning it seemed that self-man- pended on membership in informal networks, agement was bringing libera on of work, direct which was favourable for spreading clientelis c democracy and economic growth. ‘From 1952 to rela ons. What happened in the meanwhile was 1965, Yugoslavia witnessed the golden age of its that economic inequali es had tremendously in- economy, rivalling Japan as the fastest growing creased. Although on the other side of the so- worldwide economy (...) In par cular, the year cial ladder small farmers increased their informal 1960 saw Yugoslavia riding a wave of unprec- economic ac vity and moonligh ng and small edented prosperity. Agricultural yields, the rise in stealing from the factories became common be- imports, demand in consumer goods along with haviour, informal prac ces of lower class mem- extended lines of consumer credit were as high bers poorly compensated for growing class ine- as ever. Yugoslavia, the “diff erent” Communist quali es. These were refl ected not only in wages state, a racted worldwide a en on (...) By 1962, and total incomes of the households, but also in overextension of credit, a rapid decline—and access to educa on, quality health care, hous- eventual deple on—of personal savings, and a ing and other social services (Lazić, 1987: 41). failure in industrial output to match the boom in Research in class mobility in Serbia showed that demand brought serious consequences that the already in mid 1970s class structure of the Ser- miracle of the 1950’s could not sustain’ (Neal, bian society became closed and that major social 1997, in Lio a, 2001: 18–19). The most visible classes were self-reproducing to a large extent structural consequence of this period was forma- (Cvejić, 2006). This meant that many posi ons in on of the stratum of company managers, a new higher class, but also in the middle class, were component of higher class to become increas- transferred from parents to children through the ingly infl uen al for reproduc on of social life in complex process of socializa on, important part the coming years. of which was ac va on of (informal) social es During the a empts to bring economy at major points in building a life career (enroll- back on prosperity tracks, a lot of space for in- ing in university, ge ng the fi rst job, being pro- formal prac ces among top managers and poli - moted, etc). cians was opened. S. Woodward states that loos- However, it should be stressed that, pre- ening state control over fi nancial accountability cisely due to a more democra c character of Yu- in order to release available resources for man- goslav self-management socialism as compared ufacturers led to the rise in corrupt misuse of to the dominant Soviet model, informality in this measure and further abuse of funds as they socialist Serbia was not brought to that systemic were made available to enterprises (Woodward, level as in the USSR (Aliyev, 2015: 186). ‘Self-man-
35 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* agement in its true sense, nevertheless, provided beginning of the 1980s), civic ac ons (groups of a number of advantages over a Marxist-Leninist- dissidents, ar sts) or poli cal confl icts (between Stalinist type economy. Not only did the system cliques inside the Communist Party). These were allow for compe on between similar enterpris- circumstances in which informal rela ons es- es, it allowed equally for worker and manager tablished in the former period gained in impor- innova on and the prac ce of free market-type tance. While the whole system was s ll formally rela ons’ (Lio a, 2001: 34). This openness and func oning in accordance with the form of self- exposure to the market provided more fl exibil- management and democra c socialism, tenden- ity and manoeuvring space for formal prac ces. cies towards na onal sovereignty were gaining Nevertheless, it only meant that the breakdown in strength. However, even na onalis c tenden- was postponed and inherent weaknesses of the cies were just a cover for reconstruc on of the system (lack of entrepreneurial spirit, unaccount- higher class (Mirić, 1985: 13). Na onalism was a able management, lack of fi scal discipline, etc.) legi miza on principle for realignment of poli - ul mately led to its terminal stage. cal and economic elites who were maintaining or increasing their power and wealth through failed investments and increase of indebtedness (ibid: NATIONALISTIC STAGE 149). Informal networks were important in two aspects: one was for strengthening na onalis c It is quite common that analysts of post fac on(s) inside the Communist Party in order WWII Yugoslavia recognize the Cons tu on of to provide poli cal legi miza on for the separa- 1974 as the birth place of its destruc on. The on, while the other was for maintaining control Cons tu on of 1974 is considered as Tito’s at- over state owned enterprises in order to provide tempt to pacify rising ethnic elites and their na- fi nancing for this act. onalis c claims, but decentraliza on formalized through it only postponed the bloody breakdown In conclusion, a er signifi cant scaling down (Sekulic, D., G. Massey and R. Hodson, 1994; Li- at the beginning of socialism, informality gradu- o a, 2001). Viewed from the angle of our topic, ally increased during this period and reaffi rmed this was ini a on of signifi cant social change that itself as an important sphere of social structuring led to the na onalis c stage in the development by the end of the 1980s. It was based on diff er- of Yugoslav socialism. During the 1980s the Com- ent legi miza on principles during this period, munist Party was losing its power due to internal but served the same purpose throughout: it em- divisions along ethnic lines. Instead of a single phasized economic inequali es and supported poli cal structure, several independent poli cal class diff eren a on. For the lower classes it ap- elites were formed which, a er Tito’s death in peared as a mode of survival, while for the upper 1980, more or less openly opted for having their classes it served for more effi cient concentra on own piece of economy to control. ‘Confl icts over of poli cal and economic power. The outcome substan ve policy were redefi ned as confl icts was extremely high economic inequali es at the over the distribu on of money—over budgetary end of a seemingly egalitarian regime and main- revenues and tax policy, transfers and subsidies, tenance of poli cal control over economy. and the locus of control over monetary policy, foreign exchange alloca on and banking’ (Wood- INFORMALITY AFTER SOCIALISM ward, 1995: 335). Yugoslav economy was already damaged As it was diff erent from other European by constant crises in the last 15 years. On the socialist countries in the nature of the socialist other hand, economic liberaliza on led to higher system, Yugoslavia was also diff erent in the way expecta ons among ci zens, while poli cal de- socialism was dismantled. The Fall of the Berlin centraliza on weakened control power of the Wall which symbolized the end of a socialist era Communist Party and opened space for stronger in Central and East Europe, followed by introduc- voices of social groups that felt like losers in the on of reform packages meant to quickly de- everyday more visible process of social diff eren- velop basic elements of capitalism on the ruins a on. Social unrests were taking faces of class of socialist ins tu ons, were not the main way confl icts (the rapidly rising number of worker of dismantling socialism in Yugoslavia. Instead, strikes), ethnic uprisings (Kosovo Albanians in the fi erce wars and violence were the way through
36 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* which both – socialism and the state – were dis- The process of blocking transforma on mantled. which lasted for years, enabled former nomen- The period a er the fall of socialism in Ser- klatura members to convert their previous posi- bia is usually divided into two broad stages: pe- onal capital into private economic capital. Re- riod of blocked transforma on during the 1990s search on the recruitment pa erns of the elite and the period of intensive reforms a er 2000. in Serbia during the early 1990s shows a high In each of these stages informality and rela ons level of reproduc on of elites. About one third between poli cal and economic actors were of large entrepreneurs in 1993 were descendants shaped in diff erent ways. of the persons who held command posi ons in the socialist system (mainly managerial echelon). Moreover, almost 45% of large entrepreneurs BLOCKED TRANSFORMATION belonged to the command hierarchy (managerial IN SERBIA or poli cal posi on) before they became entre- preneurs (Lazić, 2000: 133). The consequence of The socialist ruling class in Serbia man- this process of conversion was an extremely high aged to swi ly convert their posi onal capital rate of entrance of nomenklatura members into accumulated during socialism into poli cal and the new economic elite during the early 1990s economic capital more appropriate to the new (Lazić, Cvejić, 2006). situa on marked by (at least formal) poli cal At the same me, the poli cal elite showed pluralism, introduc on of private property and signs of closure. While in the socialist period it market liberaliza on. This capital was based on was heterogeneous by social origin of its mem- the interlocked posi ons of economic and poli - bers, in the early period of post-socialism its cal dominance and it was used to block transfor- social background was more homogenous as ma on, to postpone the development of market its members were prevalently from middle and economy and poli cal compe on which could higher strata (Lazić, 2000: 134–135). undermine its dominant posi on (Lazić, 2000). As the social group who ‘possess concen- The new-old elite in Serbia managed to trated control over accumulated resources that postpone reforms and processes of transforma- are necessary for reproducing the basic condi- on in order to consolidate its new posi on af- ons upon which a given (or poten al) social ter breakdown of its former socialist basis of le- mode of produc on rests’ (Lazić, 2000: 126), the gi macy and social reproduc on. The ‘blocked elite has the essen al role in the processes of transforma on’ was marked by following key building up new ins tu onal framework. During features: the 1990s, there was huge debate about elite cir- cula on or reproduc on (see more in Selenyi and 1) Pseudo-democra c poli cal system, which Selenyi, 1995; Lengyel and Highley, 2000). ‘Circu- was formally cons tuted as a pluralist parlia- la onists’ argued that there was a new elite on mentary democracy, but it persisted basically the scene, and that new elite was created by new as an authoritarian regime, characterized by pa erns of recruitment based on new criterions. poli cal power highly concentrated and cen- ‘Reproduc onists’ claimed that elites showed a tralized in the narrow circles of the ruling par- 3 high degree of reproduc on a er state socialism, ty (par es). meaning that former nomenklatura members 2) Control over economic resources and the eco- had an important part in the composi on of the nomic system, maintained by several instru- elite. In addi on to these two standpoints, a third ments: postponement of priva za on process- one argued that post-socialist socie es faced the es, crea on of inter-organiza onal networks, adap ve reconstruc on of elites, which meant co-opta on of important big entrepreneurs in that ‘with a new reproduc on basis and new so- poli cal power circles. This dimension is very cial roles, a er state socialism breakdown, elites were being forged from the old socialist cadres 3 Firstly there was one ruling party (Milosevic’s So- at the same me that they were infi ltrated by cialist Party of Serbia). Later, as legi miza on crisis outsiders. These elites were construc ng a social deepened, the coali on between SPS and The Jugo- slav Le (Milosevic’s wife’s party) was established, order in which they will form the core of a new and at the end of the 1990s, a coali on between ruling class’ (Lazić, 2000: 139). SPS, the Jugoslav le and Serbian Radical Party (Vo- jislav Seselj) was established.
37 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
important because it ensured the economic es and overall impoverishment of the popula- basis for the poli cal elite reproduc on and on, general insecurity in the society engaged in prevented the processes of power redistribu- surrounding wars, these were all main features on. Postponement of priva za on (with only of living condi ons in Serbia during blocked sporadic priva za on, and o en illegal priva- transforma on. In the fi rst years of the decade za on), together with control over economic of 1990, the volume of informal economy was resources prevented social promo on of po- rising and peaked in 1993, when it accounted ten ally autonomous economic actors, whose for 54% of the recorded na onal product. In power could be uncontrolled by the poli cal the coming years, the volume of informal econ- elite. omy gradually dropped, reaching around 1/3 of 3) Control over ins tu ons, organiza ons and the na onal product by the end of this period social channels necessary for interac ons and (Krs ć et al., 1998: 7). In 1996 the Gini coeffi cient interests ar cula on of autonomous social reached 37.8 indica ng signifi cant increase in in- groups, such as free media, universi es, trade equali es (Bolčić, 2002: 40). Research at the end unions, social movements and NGOs. of the 1990s and beginning of 2000 showed that 4) Informal economy, with two main roles: to informal economy was rather a generator than pacify lower social strata whose socio-eco- suspensor of inequali es. The benefi ts of the nomic posi on had deteriorated during the tax evasion were distributed more in favour of prolonged economic crisis (Cvejić, 2002), but the employers than the employees, while lesser at the same me, to give the opportunity to budget infl ows and consequently expenditure members of the elite or actors close to them were at the expense of public services for ci - for accumula on of economic capital. zens and support for growing groups of vulner- 5) Isola on from the interna onal community4 able people (Cvejić, 2002). that prevented the impact of external trans- Some authors describe the new system in forma onal infl uences. In the short run, isola- Serbia as poli cal capitalism since members of onist policy of Serbian regime favoured the the old socialist elite a empted to get unrestrict- process of elite reproduc on, preven ng the ed control over collec ve property through proc- impact of external infl uences, and by creat- esses of priva za on (Antonić, 1993). According ing specifi c paternalis c connec ons between to this view, the early phase of poli cal capital- some social groups from the bo om of society ism was marked by various forms of manipula- and the elite. But in the long run, by deepen- on, including smuggling, in the situa on where ing the economic crisis, isola on undermined interna onal economic sanc ons were imposed the economic basis of elite reproduc on and on Serbia, and overwhelming corrup on. The induced diff erent social groups (especially economic system became the arena for various middle strata) to sharpen their interests for fi nancial specula ons and new fi nancial-specu- changes (Babović, 2002). la ve companies managed to accumulate capi- tal at the expense of industrial enterprises and Blocking transforma on processes had devasta ng consequences on Serbian society and ci zens (Antonić, 1993). One of the main factors its popula on. It led to the destruc on of ins tu- that enabled monopoly over public assets and ons, the social structure, culture and the overall their conversion into private hands of the poli - social system. In the absence of func onal ins - cal elite was the postponed priva za on which tu ons, informal actors, networks and prac ces retained about 85% of the capital in the state took the roles of providing func ons necessary ownership during this early post-socialist phase for the reproduc on. The scope of destruc on (Antonić, 2006). This enabled members of the was so broad that some authors were using the poli cal elite to control both spheres – poli cal term ‘destroyed society’ to describe the society and economic – and to convert poli cal capital of Serbia in the fi rst half of the 1990s (Bolčić, into economic. During this process they broad- 1994; Lazić, 1994a). ened the network of regime clients. Individuals included in the protégé network could expect The rise of informality in every aspect but some kind of profi t, depending on their posi on par cularly in the economy, increase of inequali- within the hierarchy. At the top of the hierarchy, 4 Sanc ons against Serbia, as a consequence of the there were members of the economic elite who regime’s war-oriented poli cs. could get high profi ts due to the trade monopo-
38 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* lies on goods from public stocks, involvement started to contradict interests of the new eco- in barter arrangements, illicit tobacco and arms nomic elite. Withdrawal of this elite’s support of trade, purchase of building lots under preferen- the regime, increasing dissa sfac on among the al condi ons, etc. (Antonić, 1993). According to popula on in Serbia that was massively pauper- the same author, the middle posi oned mem- ized, consolida on of opposi on par es and help bers of the network could rely on somewhat from the Western countries, fi nally led to the re- lower rewards, such as undisturbed businesses, gime change in 2000 (Lazić, Cvejić, 2006: 99). secure employment, right to buy state owned housing under favourable condi ons, while the lowest ranks were people who could count on UNBLOCKED TRANSFORMATION keeping their jobs or on being le alone during smuggling ac vi es. The author concludes that The second stage of post-socialist transfor- in the fi rst period of post-socialist transforma on ma on in Serbia, o en labelled as ‘unblocked’, specifi c structures were established with a neo- ‘reac vated’ transforma on (Lazić, M Cvejić, patrimonial state in their centre. S: 2005, Bolčić: 2004), began in the autumn of 2000 by dismantling of the regime of Slobodan Describing the network made of inter- Milosevic and establishment of legisla ve and locked poli cal and economic elites in the fi rst execu ve power by the broad coali on of oppo- phase of post-socialist transforma on in Serbia, si on par es. This stage was marked by eff orts some authors conclude that at the top of this to build new ins tu ons and transpose those power pyramid were ministers-managers, per- which developed during the 1990s within the sons who had shared experience in the poli - informal “para-system” into formal order. Even cal and economic elite, followed by the layer of during this period the remains of Milosevic’s managers of big public enterprises who were at regime (and even earlier periods) slowed down the same me members of coordina on com- the change and hindered development. This was mi ees in the government. The third layer was evident from the fact that organized crime was made of managers of medium and small public undermining the new founda on of poli cal enterprises while at the bo om were managers power5 as well as from the widespread culture of whose poli cal loyal es were ques onable and corrup on and lack of trust in ins tu ons which small entrepreneurs. Depending on their po- remained high even a er Milosevic’s opponents si on in this pyramid, actors had access to im- took power (Cvejić, Babović, Pudar, 2011: 22). portant resources and assets, such as contracts in profi table businesses (oil, gas industry or The poli cal scene in Serbia during a ma- similar), export or import licences, benefi cial ex- jor part of the period a er 2000 was marked by change rates, credits with low interest rates, etc. poli cal instability. Premature elec ons, frequent (Arandarenko, 2000). changes of governments, shi ing coali ons and changes in the balance of power in parliament Complementary processes – blocking trans- and government, were main features of the forma on and transferring economic (and other poli cal system during this period. Numerous social) func ons into the informal system – even- poli cal par es were established and then dis- tually contributed to the reconstruc on, division appeared from the poli cal scene6 a er a few and even confl ict among elite fac ons. Here it years. Consequently, this period is featured by is important to note that the shi of centre of power from poli cs to economy had occurred as absence of a clear poli cal strategy, as the result the consequence of conversion of members of of compromise between the coali on partners in the poli cal elite into big private owners. Simul- power (Cvejić, Babović, Pudar, 2011). taneous priva za on ‘from above’ (through con- version of posi on to private economic capital by 5 The murder of pro-reform Prime Minister in 2003 by former nomenklatura members) and ‘from be- members of organized crime and paramilitary forces indicated the power and strength these groups s ll low’ (through gradual accumula on of economic had in the new phase. capital by entrepreneurs and professionals com- 6 A er enactment of the Law on poli cal par es in ing from middle class) created condi ons, by the 2009, about a hundred poli cal par es were regis- end of the 1990s, in which the con nued poli cal tered and presently there are 101 poli cal par es domina on of the regime of Slobodan Milosevic registered at the Ministry of Jus ce and Public Ad- ministra on, h ps://archive.is/HOR0N
39 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
Another important process that occurred had a high share in the recorded GDP – almost during this period was decentraliza on. The new 40% (Schneider, 2004, Cris e and Holzner 2004, Cons tu on and legal reforms enabled certain in Krs c and Sanfey, 2010). Informal employment transfer of power and responsibili es to local au- was s ll high before the outbreak of the eco- thori es (i.e. taxa on, some fi scal preroga ves, nomic crisis, as the percentage of the informally economic and social policies and services, etc.) employed was 35% in 2007 (Krs c and Sanfey, which also made room for increased importance 2010). According to the Survey on Business Envi- of local poli cal actors and structures. ronment in Serbia, informal economy was at the Lack of poli cal stability throughout the level of 21% of the recorded GDP in 2012 (Krs c period of post-socialist transi on was fer le et al., 2013: 6). ground for growth of importance of informal Since 2008, in conjunc on with the global rela ons among major poli cal actors. Informal economic crisis, Serbian economy started de- poli cal es were a major tool for acquiring po- clining. No stable trend of economic growth has li cal power and the whole process of poli cal been achieved since then. Recession and weak stabiliza on was made sacrifi ce to illegi mate in- economic performance, coupled with austerity terests of a few. measures lead to signifi cant cuts in welfare provi- Concerning economic features and trends sions and social policy measures. Despite recent of the ‘unblocked transforma on’ era, two dis- slight improvements, the labour market situa on nc ve stages could be iden fi ed. The fi rst stage, remained unfavourable. In 2014 the unemploy- 2001–2008, was the period of economic stabili- ment rate of the working age popula on (15–64) was 19.7%, while the unemployment rate of the sa on and growth, while the second period, a er 8 the breakout of the interna onal economic crisis young popula on (15–24) was 47.1% . The social situa on in Serbia is marked by high risks of pov- in 2008 un l present me, has been marked by erty and social exclusion. According to SILC data, recession cycles and stagna on. the at risk of poverty and social exclusion rate in During the ‘growth’ phase, macroeconom- 2014 amounted to 43.2% (RZS, 2015). ic stabilisa on and favourable economic growth rates were achieved, priva sa on was intensi- During the en re period of unblocked transforma on, the state performed a strong fi ed, considerable economic restructuring was interven on in the economic life (Lazić, Pešić, conducted, while the popula on experienced 2012). Through selec ve implementa on of pri- general increase of the standard of living (poverty va za on laws the state enabled the process of rate dropped from 14% in 2002 to 6.6% in 2007) conversion of poli cal into economic capital and (RZS, 2008). During this period, investments in legaliza on of illegal or semi-legal profi ts of ty- the economic infrastructure doubled7, and new coons and criminal structures. Coordina ng the technologies and equipment represented an im- process of priva za on and restructuring which portant factor of growth (Jakopin, 2009). Howev- was several mes postponed, redefi ned, the er, economic growth during this period was not state maintained control over key resources, accompanied by growth in employment (jobless such as electricity, telecommunica ons to some growth). On the contrary, intensive restructuring extent, etc., using them to keep social peace. of the economy which occurred through simulta- Besides, preserva on of state monopolies in im- neous ownership and sector transforma on proc- port and trade of some strategic goods such as esses, resulted in the growth of unemployment, oil and electricity, and subsidizing losses of big and consequently, in structural inconsistencies of public companies, places state companies in a the supply and demand of labour. Basic market privileged posi on on the market, distor ng the indicators showed a constantly low employment regulatory func ons of market compe on. The rate but some posi ve trends (increase of em- over-regulated labour market and burdensome ployment and decrease of unemployment rates) tax system, as well as complicated market en- were recorded towards the end of this period try and exit procedures, led to inadequate for- (2007 – 2008) (Cvejić, Babović, Pudar, 2011). eign investments and slow development of small During the early years of unblocked trans- and medium size enterprises (Lazić, Pešić, 2012: forma on (2002–2003) informal economy s ll 8 Sta s cal Offi ce of Republic of Serbia, Labour Force 7 In 2007, share of investments in GDP was 23.4%. Survey Bulle n, 2014.
40 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
96–97). However, the opposite trends were also During the post-socialist period, informal- evident. During the last stage withdrawal of the ity had developed to high levels. A decade of state from large segments of the economy and blocked transforma on represented the age of further development of market ins tu ons to- informality as the main pa ern of structuring gether with advances in priva za on and re- func ons and prac ces necessary for the repro- structuring, led to substan al increase of the duc on of society and all social groups. The pe- private sector, including increase of entrepre- riod of ‘unblocked transforma on’ also brought neurship ‘from below’. The state withdrew from transforma on of informality forms. Despite the some sectors of the economy almost completely problems in economic performance and poli cal (banking and non-banking fi nancial sectors, capi- stability, or in line with them, capitalism has been tal and security markets) (Lazić, Pešić, 2012: 99). consolidated in Serbia, as well as the new ruling The described trends provided grounds for fl our- class, which set a new scene for the rela ons be- ishing of diverse economic actors, from those ap- tween poli cal and economic actors. New forms pointed to manage public economic resources in of rela ons between economic and poli cal ac- state enterprises, big tycoons who emerged from tors developed, marked by mutual interdepend- illegal or semi-legal business, to entrepreneurs ence, as poli cal par es needed funds coming who appeared from the bo om, through new from economic actors, while economic actors market business ac vi es which reached various had to secure poli cal support for the benefi t of scales, but among which dominate micro, small maintaining or growing a business. However, this and medium size businesses. rela onship is also marked by the level of greater autonomy in comparison to the previous decade, as a certain level of detachment of the economy CONCLUDING REMARKS from poli cs is a necessary precondi on for mar- ket economy (Lazić, Pešić, 2012: 52). To sum up, in a weak ins tu onal environ- The described changes in socio-economic ment and in specifi c socio-historical condi ons and poli cal context at the same me led to the (marked by late moderniza on and inclusion reproduc on and transforma on of clientelist re- into the world capitalist system on peripheral la ons and structures. As it will be described in grounds), clientelism and informality represent- the following chapters, a variety of actors within ed one of the structuring principles of socio-eco- and across poli cal and economic systems have nomic and poli cal development of Serbian soci- been exchanging through these rela ons a mul- ety. In this way, informality was not only induced tude of resources that are underpinning their on the macro-structural level of the society, but structural posi on and interests. These exchang- also penetrated into the micro-level of everyday es are unfolding through diverse mechanisms life. In the absence of formal rules and ins tu- that are revealed by the survey implemented at ons, people relied on tradi onal or invented the central and local level among poli cal and informal ins tu ons, thus crea ng a specifi c cul- economic actors. ture of informality. A er signifi cant scaling down at the begin- ning of socialism, informality gradually increased LITERATURE during this period and reaffi rmed itself as an im- portant sphere of social structuring by the end Antonić, Slobodan. 1993: Demokra ja u Srbiji – of the 1980s. It was based on diff erent legi mi- stvarno i moguće, u Antonić, Slobodan (ur.), za on principles during this period, but served Srbija između populizma i demokra je. Be- the same purpose all the me: it emphasized ograd: Ins tut za poli čke studije. economic inequali es and supported class dif- Antonić, Slobodan. 2006: Elita, građanstvo i slaba feren a on. For the lower classes it appeared as država. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. a mode of survival, while for the upper classes Arandarenko, Mihail. 2000: “Ekonomska stvarnost it served for more effi cient concentra on of po- Srbije” Lazić, Mladen (ur.), Račji hod. Be- li cal and economic power. The outcome was ex- ograd: Filip Višnjić (335–372). tremely high economic inequali es at the end of Babović, Marija. 2002: Akteri blokade društvenih a seemingly egalitarian regime and maintenance promena i akteri transformacije, u: Bolčić, of poli cal control over the economy.
41 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
Silvano i Anđelka Milić (ur.) Srbija krajem Kopecký, Petr and Maria Spirova. 2011: ‘Jobs for the milenijuma: razaranje društva, promene i boys’? Pa erns of party patronage in post- svakodnevni život. Beograd: ISIFF, str: 67–93. communist Europe”, West European Poli cs, Bakić, Jovo. 2004: Ideologije jugoslovenstva između Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 897–921. srpskog i hrvatskog nacionalizma 1918–1941. Krs ć, Gorana et al. 1998a: Analiza sive ekonomi- Zrenjanin: Gradska narodna biblioteka Žarko je u SR Jugoslaviji sa procenama za 1997. i Zrenjanin. preporukama za njenu legalizaciju. Beograd: Bogdanović, Mira. 1994: Modernizacijski procesi u Ekonomski ins tut. Srbiji u XX veku, u: Perović, La nka (ur.) Sr- Krs c, Gorana and Peter Sanfey. 2010: Earnings in- bija u modernizacijskim procesima XX veka. equality and the informal economy: evidence Beograd: Ins tut za noviju istoriju Srbije. from Serbia. European Bank for Reconstruc- Bolčić, Silvano. 1994: Tegobe prelaska u on and Development. preduzetničko društvo. Beograd: ISIFF. Krs c, Gorana et al. 2012. The Shadow Economy in Bolčić, Silvano. 2002: Post-socijalis čka transfor- Serbia. New Findings and Recommenda ons macija i društvene nejednakos u Srbiji u for Reform. Belgrade: USAID, FREN. kompara vnoj perspek vi u Bolčić, Silvano i Kuljić, Todor. 2004: Tito. Sociološkoistorijska studija. Anđelka Milić, (ur.) Srbija krajem milenijuma: Zrenjanin: GNB ‘Žarko Zrenjanin’. razaranje društva, promene i svakodnevni život. Beograd: ISIFF (str. 35–48). Lazić, Mladen. 1987: U susret zatvorenom društvu. Zagreb: Naprijed. Čalić, Mari-Žanin. 2004: Socijalna istorija Srbije 1815–1945. Beograd: Clio. Lazić, Mladen. 1992: Prisoners of the Command Economy. The Managerial Stratum and the Cvejić, Slobodan. 2002: Neformalna privreda u post-socijalis čkoj transformaciji: “Siva Disintegra on of ‘Actually Exis ng Social- ekonomija” u Srbiji 90-ih u Bolčić, Silvano i ism’, in Lengyel, G, C. Off e and J Tholen, eds. Anđelka Milić (ur.) Srbija na kraju mileniju- Economic Ins tu ons, Actors and A tudes: ma. Beograd: Ins tut za sociologiju. East-Central Europe in Transi on. Working papers. Budapest: Budapest University of Cvejić, Slobodan. 2006: Korak u mestu. Društvena Economic Science, Department of Sociology. pokretljivost u Srbiji u procesu post- socijalis čke transformacije. Beograd: ISI FF. Lazić, Mladen. (ur.) 1994a: Razaranje društva, Be- ograd: Filip Višnjić. Cvejić, Slobodan, Marija Babović i Gazela Pudar. 2011: Studija o humanom razvoju Srbija Lazić, Mladen. 1994b: Sistem i slom. Raspad socijal- 2010. Izvori i ishodi socijalnog isključivanja. izma i struktura jugoslovenskog društva, Be- Program za razvoj Ujedinjenih nacija, Be- ograd: Filip Višnjić. ograd. Lazic, Mladen. 2000) “Serbia: The Adap ve Recon- Dimitrijević, Sergije. 1958: Strani kapital u privredi struc on of Elites”, in Higley, J., Lengyel, G. bivše Jugoslavije. Beograd: Nolit. (eds.), Elites A er State Socialism, Rowman Feher, Ferenc, Agnes Heller and Gyorgy Markus. and Li lefi eld Publishers, 123–142. 1984: Dictatorship over Needs. London: Basil Lazić, Mladen. 2005: Promene i otpori. Beograd: Blackwell. Filip Višnjić. Gapinski, James H., Borislav Škegro and Thomas W. Lazić, Mladen. 2011: Čekajući kapitalizam. Beograd: Zuehlke. 1988: Modeling the Economic Per- Službeni glasnik. formance of Yugoslavia. New York: Praeger. Lazić, Mladen i Slobodan Cvejić. 2006: Changes in Goa , Vladimir. 2004: Par je i par jski sistem u Sr- the Recruitment Pa erns of the Economic biji. Niš: Odbor za građansku inicija vu i Ogi and Poli cal Elites in Serbia, Sociologija, Vol. centar. XLVIII, No. 2: 97–112. Jakopin, Edvard. 2009: Izveštaj o razvoju Srbije u Lazić, Mladen and Jelena Pešić. 2012: Making and 2008. Beograd: Republički zavod za razvoj. Unmaking State-centered Capitalism in Ser- Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995: Forma on of party cleav- bia. Belgrade: ISI FF. ages in post-communist democracies. Theo- Lenyiel, Gyorgy, and John Higley (eds.). 2000: Elites re cal proposi ons, Party Poli cs, Vol. 1, No. A er State Socialism, Boston: Rowman & Lit- 4, pp. 447–472. tlefi eld Publishers.
42 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
Lio a, Peter H. 2001: Paradigm Lost: Yugoslav Self- Republički zavod za sta s ku 2014: Anketa o radnoj Management and the Economics of Disaster. snazi, izveštaj za 2014. Beograd. Balkanologie, Vol. V, No. 1–2. (h p://balka- Sekulic, Dusko, Garth Massey and Randy Hod- nologie.revues.org/681#body n17, accessed son. 1994: Who Were the Yugoslavs? Failed on 28.07.2015). Sources of a Common Iden ty in the Former Madžar, Ljubomir. 1990: Suton socijalis čkih privre- Yugoslavia. American Sociological Review, da. Beograd: Ekonomika. 59/1. Mirić, Jovan. 1984: Sistem i kriza. Zagreb: CEKADE. Stojanović, Dubravka. 2010: Ulje na vodi. Beograd: Neal, Fred Warner. 1997: Yugoslavia at the Cross- Peščanik. roads. Atlan c Unbound (from the original Stojanović, Dubravka. 2013: Iza zavese. Beograd: December 1962 Atlan c Monthly ar cle), 3 Udruženje za društvenu istoriju. December. Szelenyi, Ivan and Sonja Sezelenyi. 1995: Circula- Pavlović, Stevan. 2004: Srbija. Istorija iza imena. on or Reproduc on of Elites during the Beograd: Clio. Postcommunist Transforma on of Eastern Radić, Radmila. 1994: U caj razvoja Srpske pravo- Europe: Introduc on. Speciall issue, Theory slavne crkve na modernizacijske procese u and Society 24 (October). Srbiji i Jugoslaviji, u: Perović La nka (ur.) Sr- Woodward, Susan. 1995: Socialist Unemployment: bija u modernizacijskim procesima XX veka. The Poli cal Economy of Yugoslavia, 1945– Beograd: Ins tut za noviju istoriju Srbije. 1990, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Republički zavod za sta s ku 2015: Siromaštvo i Zundhausen, Holm. 2009: Istorija Srbije. Beograd: socijalna nejednaksot u Republici Srbiji. Be- Clio. ograd. Republički zavod za sta s ku (RZS) 2008: Studija o merenju životnog standarda: Srbija 2002– 2007, Beograd.
43 ä Dragan Stanojević ä Marija Babović ä Dragana Gundogan
ACTORS, RESOURCES AND MECHANISMS OF CLIENTELISM IN SERBIA
ACTORS OF CLIENTELISM AND used to arrange, structure, build and reconstruct PARTY PATRONAGE IN SERBIA power networks in line with confi gura ons based on certain interests. Within governance poli cal n this chapter, the actors in the poli cal ac on, power generated in the poli cal par es is and economic fi eld, resources which are ex- transferred onto ins tu ons, governance struc- Ichanged and mechanisms which provide in- tures. Finally, the third power area/func on is formal arrangements will be described. related to the establishment of linkages between the poli cal and economic system. Very rarely can one poli cal actor perform all three func- Mapping the key actors ons, and there is usually a certain func onal di- vision between poli cal actors. Based on the respondents’ statements, it is possible to dis nguish the following actors which On the other side, the primary fi eld of pri- are relevant to the situa on inside the poli cal vate entrepreneurs is the economy. As we will see and economic fi eld: 1. Formal organiza ons / in the forthcoming chapters, they rely on public poli cal par es 2. Networks of trust consisted of resources to great extent. Actors in this fi eld dif- individuals who form more or less stable power feren ate according to their economic strength networks and they are divided onto the one con- which is connected with the formal and informal sisted of: a) poli cians b) interlockers and c) pri- strength to infl uence the general and par cular vate business people, 3. Interna onal factor (em- business condi ons. bassies and foreign mul na onal companies). On every level (republic, regional and lo- The following graph shows the key actors, cal), more or less stable arrangements based on the fi elds of their ac vi es, resources which are the informal agreements are formed between exchanged and networks the actors create. The these actors. The networks which form these primary fi eld of poli cal par es are state ins tu- agreements are real power networks because in- ons and coming to the controlling posi ons of side those networks the key decisions concerning public enterprises through them. In this process, func oning of the rela on between the poli cal poli cal actors are divided into three subgroups and economic sphere are made. based on the func ons they perform: the ones For all actors, except economic actors in who are in charge of the ac vi es inside ins tu- the private sector, poli cal infl uence is based on ons (government and administra on), the ones the engagements in poli cal par es (by the direct who work in the economy (public enterprises) poli cal career in the party, or by doing favours and poli cians who primarily work inside the and loyalty rela ons with the party leadership). par es themselves. Par es represent the primary fi eld for compe - There are three areas of exercising poli - on in which the individual and networks form cal power: intra-party, governance posi ons and the posi ons of power inside the party and then brokerage between the poli cal and economic inside the ins tu ons and public enterprises. system. Within poli cal par es, the power is In that sense, the key actor is the very complex
44 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*
Field of Political Infl uence poli cal party structure. Without the party or- or manager posi ons. These actors are o en ganiza onal infrastructure, informal networks, called interlockers, because they are the key histories, individuals who are ac ve in the party actors through which poli cal and economic would not have importance. 1 power are interlinked. 3. Economic actors with no (at least direct or 1. Poli cal actors who interact with or infl uence formal) poli cal background which include economic actors whether in the public or pri- top managers in the private sector and entre- vate sector, but do not occupy any economic preneurs as actors who are at the same me posi on in public or private enterprises. They owners of the capital and who perform lead- can be considered as purely poli cal actors, ing management roles in their enterprises. but their interac on with economic actors Their background lies primarily in the econ- depends on the posi on in the power hier- archies at central or local level, as well as on omy, entrepreneurship and their recruitment their specifi c social capital represented by the channels are from entrepreneurial or profes- linkages and loyal es shared and exchanged sional circles. with specifi c power circles. As we will see from further presenta on of 2. Poli cal actors who presently or formerly research fi ndings, intensive dynamics of diverse occupied a posi on in the public economic rela ons is unfolding between these actors dur- system. Although at some point they were ing the en re observed period (unblocked trans- posi oned in both systems, their source of forma on a er 2000) and at all levels. Poli cal power relies on poli cal power and their re- actors interact with economic actors in various cruitment channels are clearly from poli cal ways and with diff erent intensity and dynamics. circles. They are usually appointed to board A small group of ‘gate keepers’ (if we observe from the perspec ve of the economic system) 1 Many examples can prove that when individuals or ‘network brokers’ (if we observe from the po- lose the support of a party they can lose public po- li cal system perspec ve) can be iden fi ed, in si ons, and it rarely goes in the opposite direc on. Most of poli cal aff airs which were induced outside the sense used by Burt to describe persons who the party which had the aim to discredit some poli- bridge structural holes, (in this case the hole be- cian (even though they are jus fi ed from the legal tween poli cal and economic elites) and who in- point of view) were not successful if the poli cians terlink the two systems, as we will see in a man- had full support from their party.
45 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo* ner that refl ects rela ons deeply entrenched in informal se ngs far from the public, decisions clientelism. These brokers or gatekeepers are and plans are just formally presented and ac- mandated by highest poli cal power to control cepted in offi cial mee ngs.3 the access to poli cal power and state resources Even though it is very centralized, the available to the economic sector through poli - power inside the party structures is based on cal power circles. These actors are not even nec- the loyalty networks in which the party leader is essarily party members, but they are persons of one of the actors. Loyalty networks are created high loyalty to the most powerful poli cal actors in the long term and o en are rela vely stable and are socially, o en privately, closely linked to structures of trust (unless there is a big overturn them. They are also less visible than other actors inside the party). These networks are colloquially who occupy more visible posi ons in the govern- called groups (“ekipe”) and they intersect party ment, at the top of poli cal par es or in the high structures horizontally (inside the Board, Coun- level business circles. cils and Presidency etc.) and ver cally (from the Presidency to local boards). The infl uence of the 1. Poli cal par es party network is big as long as the network man- ages to hold intraparty discontent at minimum The structure of power within a poli cal using distribu on of resource or party discipline. party. The formal aspect of the poli cal party organiza on is consisted of the Assembly, Main Every me someone comes to the board, Presidency, Execu ve board, diff erent top of the party his/her group comes along councils and a network of municipal Boards. Ac- to the spot, his/her trustworthy people. cording to the organiza onal scheme, the power There is no democracy inside the party, should be moved from local Boards, through the there never was. People vote as they agree Assembly to the Main and Execu ve board and beforehand. As an example, you can follow the Presidency. The reality is completely diff erent how 5–6 people inside the party vote and since the par es are extremely centralized. if they are part of the same group they will all vote in the same way for ten years. Basically, it is a mul -level system with local, city and state level and every (male respondent, poli cal elite) level decides on relevant topics. Of course, all promo ons start and end on the top Networks inside a poli cal party. Certain- and then go to the lower posi ons. On the ly, the poli cal par es are not a monolithic struc- lower level, members have just to imple- ture and confl ict emerges as a result of prevalent ment decisions taken on higher levels. disagreements. The respondents indicate that debate inside a party is rarely about the poli cal (male respondent, expert) program or ideology, but rather there are inter- And while most formal procedures inside ests that connect and divide party members. As par es are nominally followed, the key decisions in all organiza ons, there are oligarchic tenden- are crystalized, nego ated and made in closed cies within diff erent interest groups which tend circles which represent the informal loyalty to present their own interests as the general networks inside the par es. Behind the formal (shared) ones. Discontents and frac ons emerge structure, our respondents reveal the complex mostly in the top of the party, and mostly dur- and hidden structure with informal connec ons, ing the periods of delega on of strategic posi- networks and centres of power crea ng the in- ons inside the party and public func ons a er formal structure of the party. This informal party the elec ons. In these situa ons, individuals and pyramid plays a crucial role in shaping the party networks which have been excluded or “underes- life, having a strong eff ect on the promo ons, party poli cs and coali ons. It is the way to prepare the audience and compan- ions for implementa ons of new ideas. The respondents state that the decisions made in formal mee ngs are usually already ne- 3 This sort of ‘bonding’ between close poli cal com- rades usually takes place behind closed doors and go ated and discussed in previous smaller, infor- in a more informal atmosphere. Some respondents mal and in mate mee ngs.2 A er agreement in claimed that the tradi onal Serbian kafana is s ll an important site for diff erent sorts of informal meet- 2 Some mes, more personal mee ngs are used to ings and nego a ons where people can speak freely test some ideas or plans, check reac ons of others. and openly.
46 Informal Power Networks, Poli cal Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*