arXiv:0807.2831v2 [astro-ph] 31 Aug 2008 as h la iia k uvy(DS losthe arcsec as allows mag brightnesses (SDSS) 30 surface as central Survey faint with Sky galaxies of Digital detection Sloan be- primarily the satellites, cause Way Milky ultra-faint of coveries ls ooeo u te eetdsoeis namely very Galaxy. discoveries, Way companion lies Milky a recent is It the it of other Hence, V. companion 2007). a our Leo al. to nam- et of it (Belokurov for IV call one Leo convention we to the spheroidals, Following close dwarf Leo. ing of stellation ri ta.20;Wlhe l 07 ooo tal. et Koposov 2007; this al. of et Walsh purpose The 2007; 2007; 2006, al. al. 2007). et et al. Belokurov (Willman et 2006a,b; clusters Irwin unusu- al. globular et 4 Zucker faint with 2005; or together extended galaxies, dwarf ally Way Milky new byadafglx htmyb negigdisrup- undergoing be of may prob- distance heliocentric that satellite, a galaxy Way at dwarf tion, Milky a additional ably an of discovery rde aige od abig B 0HA, CB3 Cambridge Road, Madingley UK; bridge, 52,USA 85721, ro,M 80,USA 48109, MI Arbor, edleg Germany Heidelberg, .Belokurov V. 4 3 2 ntels e er,teehv ennmru dis- numerous been have there years, few last the In 1 rpittpstuigL using typeset Preprint to submitted twr bevtr,Uiest fAioa usn AZ Tucson, Arizona, of University Observatory, Steward eateto srnm,Uiest fMcia,Ann Michigan, of University Astronomy, of Department a lnkIsiuefrAtooy ¨ngth 7 69117 17, K¨onigstuhl Astronomy, for Institute Planck Max nttt fAtooy nvriyo Cam- of University Astronomy, of Institute vasily,walker,[email protected] r orce o h enGlci foreground Galactic mean the A for reddening, corrected are a oriae J00 13 96+21 12.0 13 +02 09.6 31 11 (Galactic) Coordinates (J2000) Coordinates r µ M (m v v ufc rgtessaditgae magnitudes integrated and brightnesses Surface nepeaino h ieai aai htbt bet a i nt on lie may objects ( both eccentric that modestly is only is data orbit kinematic implied the of interpretation ujc headings: Subject n pcrsoyfo h etcel brsetorp tth fr at imaging spectrograph is follow-up fiber velocity present Hectochelle heliocentric We the from IV. spectroscopy Leo and discovery, recent another rmteSonDgtlSySre.I isa itneof distance a at lies It Survey. Sky Digital Sloan the from h ⊙ GSR 0 tot , − V Pumr 0 (Plummer) erpr h icvr fanwMlyWystliei h constellation the in satellite Way Milky new a of discovery the report We M) rpriso h e Satellite V Leo the of Properties , V Pumr 27 (Plummer) Parameter 0 1 srpyia ora Letters Journal Astrophysical .G Walker G. M. , E :ACMAINO OPNO FTEMLYWYGALAXY? WAY MILKY THE OF COMPANION A OF COMPANION A V: LEO 1. V 0 = INTRODUCTION a A − T m . E 2 AL 1 TABLE 1. tl mltajv 08/22/09 v. emulateapj style X h e icvre nld 10 include discoveries new The . aais wr aais niiul(e)—LclGroup Local — (Leo) individual galaxies: — dwarf galaxies: ℓ Letter +173 261 = 1 ∼ .W Evans W. N. , 6. kms +60.8 − ∼ 173 . 4 3 . . 86 . 5 m ′ . 21 8 p ntecon- the in kpc 180 ± 8 st nonethe announce to is ± 3 ◦ m . ± . 3 3 ± b , 0 25 . umte to submitted 0 kms 1 m . ± 0 . 58 = ′ 5 m 1 . − .Olszewski E. 3 5 a 1 . kms 1 . − 54 1 1 ◦ .C Faria C. D. , e − ∼ 1 ABSTRACT srpyia ora Letters Journal Astrophysical ffe by offset , 0 . 2) 4 .B Zucker B. D. , 1 h oe aesso he Ms h rti re- is first The 1. 2 Fig. CMDs. of within panel three stars right to show upper stricted panels the lower in shown The convinc- as a yield diagram object, does color-magnitude ing however, members, the likely overden- from Fine-tuning to V. an stars (CMD) Leo also of of location selection is the the There to close unclear. galaxies of but object sity V, any a Leo of the of is leaving nature location substructure, There extensive the shows density background at respectively. the the SDSS stars show galaxies, in the overdensity 1 and in visible Fig. stars of visible resolved panels is two of next object The no cut-out. dwarfs, the ultrafaint in the stars indicator. (BHB) an such branch was horizontal data SDSS blue possible of u fhrzna rnhsas nmvn uwrsto outwards moving On hand- a 5 stars. and within branch (RGB) stars horizontal branch of giant red ful tentative a shows h oe idergtpnli opsdo tr within stars of composed is in panel shown right CMD middle comparison lower The the visible. becomes clump ercbns namely bands, metric fLoV t culsgicneis significance case actual the In its V, effort. and Leo time of of needed expenditure thus the warrant are to by reasons induced Additional se- positives false structure. are and large-scale that noise Poisson candidates to many due ineffi- are signif- lected, rather the there As lowered, course (7) is of results. icance negative is eq yields This (see generally (2008)). and 6 cient, al. candi- than et the significance possible Koposov statistical pursued of of lower imaging we of deeper Accordingly, dates acquiring of nature. imaging further strategy their any followup that confirm substantial and to found require been would had candidates DR5 SDSS in lites Pole. Galactic North the covers proper- around 2002; al. (DR6) primarily et 6 al. grees, Schlegel astrometric et Release using Smith Data de-reddened (1998). 1999; and and pipelines 2004) Szalay & al. Ivezi´c through photometric Gunn, et (Lupton, processed ties measure The automatically 2006). to al. are et Gunn data 2006; al. et Adelman-McCarthy .Gilmore G. , i.1sosteSS iwo e .A sa with usual As V. Leo of view SDSS the shows 1 Fig. DSiaigdt r rdcdi v photo- five in produced are data imaging SDSS ooo ta.(08 rudta lotaltesatel- the all almost that argued (2008) al. et Koposov ∼ ∼ 0kms 40 8 p,adi eaae by separated is and kpc, 180 utpeMro eecp.LoV’s Leo Telescope. Mirror Multiple e 1 2. − ′ 1 h oiotlbac wlsadtered the and swells branch horizontal the , 1 .J Irwin J. M. , mteIacNwo Telescope Newton Isaac the om AAADDISCOVERY AND DATA rmta fLoI.Asimple A IV. Leo of that from esm tem huhthe though stream, same he u e,ietfidi data in identified Leo, ′ , ftecne fLoV and V, Leo of center the of 1 g .Koposov S. , , r , ∼ i and , ,bttepresence the but 4, . ∼ 3 00sur de- square 8000 ◦ 2 .Mateo M. , from z see.g., (see 3 , 2

Fig. 1.— The Leo V Satellite: Upper Left: SDSS cut-out (9′ ×9′) around the center of Leo V. Upper Middle Left: The spatial distribution of all objects classified as stars in a 30′ × 30′ field. Upper Middle Right: The spatial distribution of all objects classified as galaxies. Upper Right: Density of candidate RGB stars selected with the CMD mask shown in the panel directly below. Lower Left: CMD of all stars in a circle of radius 2′, which is expected to be dominated by Leo V members. Lower Middle Left: CMD of all stars within 5′, with the red clump and BHB marked. Lower Middle Right: CMD of stars within the annulus 9′ to 10.3′ showing the foreground. Lower Right: Difference in Hess Diagrams, showing the red giant branch and BHB of Leo V. The mask is built with M92 ridgelines offset to the distance modulus of 21.25. an annulus of 9′ to 10.3′ and shows the foreground. In the differential Hess diagram in the lower right panel, there is a convincing detection of the red giant and hor- izontal branch. The mask is based on the ridgeline of M92 ([Fe/H] = -2.28, Clem 2005) and is used to select possible RGB members. Fig. 2 is a gray-scale density plot of the BHB stars selected with the cuts: 20.5

Fig. 3.— Leo V in INT data: Left and middle left: CMD and Hess differential diagram of stars within 3′ with ridgelines of M92 (solid) and M13 (dotted). Note the possible detection of a red horizontal branch. Middle right and right: The same but for stars within 6′. Note that the BHB stars sit tightly on the ridgeline of M92s BHB, offset to the distance modulus of Leo V. The masks are used to select red giants (within the magnitude range marked by the dashed lines) and BHBs.

the central surface brightness. Integrating the Plummer law model fit then gives a total flux from resolved stars. Comparison with the M92 luminosity function suggests we are missing roughly 1/2 of the light from fainter mem- bers which would yield a total magnitude in the central 3′ m radius region of Mtot,V ≈−4. 3. This number is a lower limit on the luminosity, as it ignores any contribution at larger radius, such as from the plume. We obtained spectra of 159 red giant candidates using the Hectochelle fiber spectrograph at the MMT 6.5-m telescope on Mt. Hopkins, Arizona. Spectroscopic tar- gets were selected from the red giant branch of Leo V (Figure 5) within a field of radius 30′, centered on the Fig. 4.— Left: The density of RGB candidate members selected object. The Hectochelle spectra sample at high resolu- from the INT photometry. The extent of Leo V as judged from two ∼ − ˚ half-light radii is marked. Right: The locations of BHB candidate tion (R 25000) the wavelength range 5150 5300 A, members. Note that the BHB distribution is elongated and more which includes the prominent magnesium triplet (MgT) extended than that of the RGB stars. Black dots are RGB stars absorption feature. For each of two distinct Hectochelle −1 with spectroscopy, v⊙ ≈ 173 kms and low ΣMg (see Fig. 5). configurations targeting Leo V, we obtained 3 × 2700s exposures during the nights of 28 and 29 May 2008. Spectra were reduced following a procedure described by Mateo et al. (2008). For each star we measure the branch. The BHBs are now aligned with the ridgeline de- (solar rest frame) line-of-sight velocity, v⊙, by cross- rived from M92, which is used to measure the distance ± correlating the spectrum against a high-S/N template of to Leo V as 180 10 kpc. Having fixed the distance, we known velocity. We also measure the pseudo-equivalent can experiment with different stellar populations, shown width of the MgT feature, ΣMg, using the technique of in the first panel by the ridgelines of M92 (solid) and Walker et al. (2007). The data include 70 stars with INT M13 (dotted). M13 ([Fe/H] = -1.54) has a giant branch photometry, of which 52 lie inside the mask shown in that is too red, while the more metal-poor M92 ([Fe/H] the left panel of Fig. 5. We calculate errors in v⊙ and = -2.28) is a closer match to the stellar population. We ΣMg from models which consider the quality of the cross- also show masks wrapped around the red giant and hor- correlation function and spectral S/N, respectively (see izontal branches which are used to select the candidate Mateo et al. 2008; Walker et al. 2007). members for Fig. 4. The two populations are distributed The left panel of Figure 5 shows the CMD of the INT differently; most of the light from the RGB stars is lim- stars with the candidate selection mask superimposed. ited to the inner 3′, whereas the BHB stars extend out ′ This is slightly broader than the one shown in the right- to at least 10 . This phenomenon has been seen in other most panel of Fig. 3, to include all possible candidates. dSphs such as Carina and Sculptor (Harbeck et al. 2001; Solid dots show stars with spectra, gray lie outside the Tolstoy et al. 2004; Koch et al. 2006) mask and black lie inside. We circle the five most proba- The number density of stars defined by the RGB and ble Leo V members, which have a mean velocity of 173.3 BHB selection boxes is sharply peaked in the central re- ± 3.1 kms−1. The remaining three panels show the cor- gion with a half-light radius, from Plummer and expo- relation between r magnitude, distance from center and nential model fits, of ∼0.8′, or 42 pc for a distance of ΣMg. Note in particular that in the plane of (v⊙, ΣMg), 180 kpc. However, the profile also shows an extended the giants in Leo V are clearly separated from the dwarfs plume of stars slightly above the general background level in the thick disk and halo of the Milky Way. It is also (Fig. 4). This extended appearance makes the luminosity clear that there are 2 more possible members that lie at of the satellite difficult to estimate directly. We first con- large distance from the center. verted the number density radial profile to a (luminosity- weighted) surface brightness profile to directly estimate 4

Fig. 5.— Left: CMD of INT stars within 3′, shown as small dots, together with the mask selecting most likely RGB members. Stars with spectra are full dots, with gray used for stars outside the mask and black for those within. The five most probable members are circled. Middle left: r magnitude versus velocity for all INT stars with spectra. The line marks is the likely systemic velocity of Leo V (173.3 kms−1). Middle right: Distance from the center as a function of velocity. Right: The pseudo-equivalent width ΣMg as a function of velocity. The mean and median error in ΣMg is shown as vertical bars in the left-hand corner. Note the clear separation of the giants in Leo V from Galactic stars. There are two more likely members (marked with crosses) located in the data cluster. The three horizontal bars have widths corresponding to 7.5, 15 and 30 kms−1 to aid calibration.

4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS in Evans et al. (1997) to construct artificial samples of 50 Leo V is most probably a new dwarf galaxy, based satellites, we estimate that there is a . 1 per cent prob- on the presence of an old, metal-poor population with a ability of this coincidence happening by chance. We re- characteristic size of between 50 and 200 pc. There are mark that one of BHB stars considered by Simon & Geha (2007) for possible membership of Leo IV, but then dis- several hints that it may be a disrupting satellite, but our −1 data do not support the idea that it is merely an over- carded, has a heliocentric velocity of 160 kms . This density in a stellar stream. The most remarkable feature hints at the possible existence of extended stellar struc- of Leo V is the disparity in the spatial extent of the RGB tures around Leo IV and Leo V. If Leo IV and Leo V and BHB populations. The red giants are confined to a are assumed to be on the same stream, then the orbit ∼ can be computed, assuming a singular isothermal sphere tight core of 50 pc, whereas the BHBs extend out at −1 with amplitude v0 = 220 kms . The pericenter is ∼ 160 least as far as 200 pc. There even appear to be BHBs ∼ associated with Leo V at distances of 500 pc. One pos- kpc and the apocenter is 244, so that the eccentricity sible explanation for the apparent difference is that the is modest (e = 0.2) and the orbit never approaches the RGB stars do follow the BHBs much further out, perhaps inner parts of the Milky Way (in which case both objects because the object is disintegrating, but they are more should be relatively intact, at odds with their seemingly difficult to distinguish from the foreground populations irregular appearances). in our data. A hint that this the case is perhaps pro- Leo V may prove to be an important object for testing vided by the two RGB candidates that are even further theories of galaxy formation. Ricotti et al. (2008) has than the most distant BHBs, although their membership argued that very old dwarf galaxies must form preferen- needs to be confirmed. With deeper photometry reach- tially in chain structures, tracing the filamentary dark ing down to the turn-off, it should be possible to verify matter in the early universe. These chains or groups of this hypothesis. Another explanation is that the RGB dwarfs may retain some of their integrity even on accre- and BHB populations probe different epochs of star for- tion and merging into the Milky Way halo. Is it possible mation in an ultra-low mass system. that Leo IV and Leo V are two links in such a chain? Leo V’s possible association with Leo IV is also unique. Although there are other examples of dSphs separated on the sky by a few degrees – such as CVn I and CVn II – Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been pro- they are at different distances and velocities. By con- vided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Partic- trast, Leo IV is at a heliocentric distance of ∼ 160 ipating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, kpc (Belokurov et al. 2007) and a heliocentric velocity of the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Aeronau- 132 kms−1 (Simon & Geha 2007). These are very close tics and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbuka- to our estimates of ∼ 180 kpc and 173 kms−1 for the gakusho, the Max Planck Society, and the Higher Educa- distance and velocity of Leo V. Referred to the Galactic tion Funding Council for England. The SDSS Web Site Standard of Rest, the velocities of Leo IV and V are low, is http://www.sdss.org/. EO acknowledges NSF grants 11.0 kms−1 and 59.5 kms−1 respectively. Using the ve- AST-0205790, 0505711, and 0807498; MM acknowledges locity distribution for the ρ ∼ r−3.5 radial profiles given NSF grants AST-0206081 0507453, and 0808043

REFERENCES Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., et al. 2006, ApJS, 162, 38 Harbeck, D., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 3092 Belokurov, V. et al. 2006, ApJ, 647, L111 Irwin, M. J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, L13 Belokurov, V. et al. 2007, ApJ, 654, 897 Irwin, M.J., & Lewis, J. 2001, New Astronomy Review, 45, 105 Clem, J. L. 2005, PhD Thesis, University of Victoria Ivezi´c, Z.ˇ et al., AN, 2004, 325, 583 Evans, N. W., Hafner, R. M., & de Zeeuw, P. T. 1997, MNRAS, 286, 315 Gunn, J.E. et al. 2006, ApJ, in press Leo V Dwarf 5

Koch, A., Grebel, E. K., Wyse, R. F. G., Kleyna, J. T., Simon, J. D., & Geha, M. 2007, ApJ, 670, 313 Wilkinson, M. I., Harbeck, D. R., Gilmore, G. F., & Evans, Sirko, E., et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 899 N. W. 2006, AJ, 131, 895 Smith, J. A., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 2121 Koposov, S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 669, 337 Tolstoy, E., et al. 2004, ApJ, 617, L119 Koposov, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, in press, arXiv:0706.2687 Walker, M. G., Mateo, M., Olszewski, E. W., Bernstein, R., Sen, Li, Y.-S., & Helmi, A. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1365 B., & Woodroofe, M. 2007, ApJS, 171, 389 Lupton, R., Gunn, J., & Szalay, A. 1999, AJ, 118, 1406 Willman, B., et al. 2005, ApJ, 626, L85 Mateo, M., Olszewski, E. W., & Walker, M. G. 2008, ApJ, 675, Walsh, S. M., Jerjen, H., & Willman, B. 2007, ApJ, 662, L83 201 Zucker, D. B., et al. 2006a, ApJ, 643, L103 Ricotti, M., Gnedin, N. Y., & Shull, J. M. 2008, ArXiv e-prints, Zucker, D. B., et al. 2006b, ApJ, 650, L41 802, arXiv:0802.2715 Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525