Northern Ireland: Stormont, Collusion, and the Finucane Inquiry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Northern Ireland: Stormont, Collusion, and the Finucane Inquiry NORTHERN IRELAND: STORMONT, COLLUSION, AND THE FINUCANE INQUIRY HEARING BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 18, 2015 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe [CSCE 114–1–2] ( Available via http://www.csce.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 94–241 PDF WASHINGTON : 2015 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HOUSE SENATE CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi, Chairman Co-Chairman ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas RICHARD BURR, North Carolina STEVE COHEN, Tennessee JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania TOM UDALL, New Mexico LOUISE McINTOSH SLAUGHTER, SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island New York RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois ALAN GRAYSON, Florida EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Department of State Department of Commerce Department of Defense [II] NORTHERN IRELAND: STORMONT, COLLUSION, AND THE FINUCANE INQUIRY MARCH 18, 2015 COMMISSIONERS Page Hon. Christopher H. Smith, Chairman, Commission on Secu- rity and Cooperation in Europe .............................................. 1 Hon. Robert Aderholt, Commissioner, Commission on Secu- rity and Cooperation in Europe .............................................. 22 MEMBERS Hon. Brendan Boyle (R–13), a Member of Congress from the State of Pennsylvania ....................................................... 3 Hon. William Keating (D–9), a Member of Congress from the State of Massachusetts ..................................................... 4 Hon. Joseph Crowley (D–14), a Member of Congress from the State of New York ............................................................. 5 WITNESSES Geraldine Finucane, Widow of Murdered Human Rights Lawyer Patrick Finucane ........................................................ 6 Professor Kieran McEvoy, Queen’s University School of Law, Belfast, Northern Ireland ....................................................... 11 Anne Cadwallader, Author, ‘‘Lethal Allies: British Collusion in Ireland ’’ ............................................................................... 15 APPENDICES Prepared statement of Hon. Christopher H. Smith ................. 28 Prepared statement of Hon. Benjamin L. Cardin .................... 30 Prepared statement of Secretary of State John Kerry ............. 31 Prepared statement of Geraldine Finucane .............................. 32 Prepared statement of Kieran McEvoy ..................................... 39 Prepared statement of Anne Cadwallader ................................ 45 [III] NORTHERN IRELAND: STORMONT, COLLUSION, AND THE FINUCANE INQUIRY March 18, 2015 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE WASHINGTON, DC The hearing was held at 2:45 p.m. in room 2175, Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC, Hon. Christopher H. Smith, Chairman, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, presiding. Commissioners present: Hon. Christopher H. Smith, Chairman, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe; and Hon. Rob- ert Aderholt, Commissioner, Commission on Security and Coopera- tion in Europe. Members present: Hon. Brendan Boyle (R–13), a Member of Con- gress from the State of Pennsylvania; Hon. William Keating (D–9), a Member of Congress from the State of Massachusetts; and Hon. Joseph Crowley (D–14), a Member of Congress from the State of New York. Witnesses present: Geraldine Finucane, Widow of Murdered Human Rights Lawyer Patrick Finucane; Professor Kieran McEvoy, Queen’s University School of Law, Belfast, Northern Ire- land; and Anne Cadwallader, Author, ‘‘Lethal Allies: British Collu- sion in Ireland. ’’ HON. CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, CHAIRMAN, COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE Mr. SMITH. Good afternoon, and first of all, let me just say at the outset I apologize for the lateness in starting this hearing. We did have a series of votes on the floor preventing and precluding all of my colleagues and myself being here. So again, I thank you for your patience at the late start of the hearing. I want to begin by welcoming everyone at this hearing today, es- pecially our witnesses, all of whom are joining us from Northern Ireland. We thank you for giving us the opportunity to hear from you, to learn from you about ongoing efforts for accountability, jus- tice and reconciliation in Northern Ireland. This is the 15th congressional hearing that I’ve chaired on human rights in Northern Ireland—the first one was back in 1997—and many of my colleagues on the Commission with us today have joined us for these hearings. This is to say many of us in Congress deeply care about these issues, follow them regularly, (1) 2 and will continue to do so. This is one of the most bipartisan issues on Capitol Hill. It has been, is, and will continue to be. In December of 2014, the parties of the Northern Ireland Execu- tive and the governments of the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland approved the Stormont House Agreement, with commit- ments for ‘‘dealing with the past’’—that is, addressing crimes and the consequences of crimes of ‘‘the Troubles.’’ Other provisions ad- dress government reform and other controversial issues. And the British Government committed to funding new structured deal with conflict-related crimes and to assist the victims of ‘‘the Trou- bles.’’ Today we look forward to hearing about steps to implement the Stormont House Agreement, and prospects for full, unfettered real- ization of processes to hold those who committed crimes account- able and finally provide a measure of justice to victims and to their families. We also look forward to learning about increasing revelations of government collusion in crimes committed by paramilitaries. For years British officials denied collusion in crimes committed by the paramilitaries. In recent years, however, evidence has mounted that its security services enabled or had direct knowledge of a sub- stantial number of paramilitary murders. We hope to find out what the British Government has done in response. Is it on track to holding itself accountable? One particularly shocking instance of collusion was the 1989 murder of human rights defense attorney Patrick Finucane. The Good Friday Agreement of 1998—one of the most outstanding dip- lomatic achievements of recent decades—left a number of issues unresolved, including the issue of British collusion in paramilitary crimes. In 2001, however, the British and Irish Governments dealt with this in negotiations at Weston Park. There the British Gov- ernment assumed a solemn obligation to initiate a full, inde- pendent, public judicial inquiry into the Finucane murder and five other crimes if so recommended by retired Canadian Supreme Court Justice Peter Cory. On May 5th, 2004, Justice Cory did recommend a public inquiry in the case of Patrick Finucane. He released this recommendation at a public hearing of this Commission. To date, the Finucane mur- der remains the only case Judge Cory investigated where his rec- ommendation has not—I repeat, not—been honored. This is deeply unsatisfactory for many reasons, but not the least of which because it is evidently the one where the British Government is probably the most culpable. The Finucane murder is also a case in which—until the Prime Minister’s apology in December of 2011—there has been the great- est level of sustained official denial and obstruction by various state agencies. Obstruction went to such a point that, rather than provide the promised inquiry, in 2004, the British Government pre- pared new legislation governing inquiries. This would allow the government to withhold evidence from the inquiry process. Total subterfuge. The Finucane family rightfully declined to accept such an in- quiry. And Judge Cory wrote a letter to me in which he stated, and I quote in pertinent part: ‘‘The proposed new Act would make a 3 meaningful inquiry impossible. The commissions would be working in an impossible situation. For example, the Minister, the actions of whose ministry was to be reviewed by the public inquiry, would have the authority to thwart the efforts of the inquiry at every step. It really creates an intolerable Alice in Wonderland situa- tion.’’ Close quote. Though in 2012 Prime Minister Cameron acknowledged and ad- mitted ‘‘shocking’’—that’s his word—levels of collusion between the state and loyalist paramilitaries in the murder of Patrick Finucane, this does not substitute for the full exposition of the facts behind the British state’s involvement in the murder of Patrick. Rather, the steady increase in the amount of evidence being revealed pub- licly that senior officials in the British state colluded in the murder has made honoring that commitment more important than ever. There is no statute of limitations on getting to the truth. The many previous denials and the time that has passed in the Finucane case has drained public confidence in the peace process and diminished respect for the rule of law in Northern Ireland. It must be said that there are those who oppose the peace process and their opposition is dangerous. The failure to address the case of Patrick Finucane in the manner promised by the British Govern-
Recommended publications
  • His Honour Judge Peter Smithwick for the Tribunal
    A P P E A R A N C E S The Sole Member: His Honour Judge Peter Smithwick For the Tribunal: Mrs. Mary Laverty, SC Mr. Justin Dillon, SC Mr. Dara Hayes, BL Mr. Fintan Valentine, BL Instructed by: Jane McKevitt Solicitor For the Commissioner of An Garda Siochana: Mr. Diarmuid McGuinness, SC Mr. Michael Durack, SC Mr. Gareth Baker, BL Instructed by: Mary Cummins CSSO For Owen Corrigan: Mr. Jim O'Callaghan, SC Mr. Darren Lehane, BL Instructed by: Fintan Lawlor Lawlor Partners Solicitors For Leo Colton: Mr. Paul Callan, SC Mr. Eamon Coffey, BL Instructed by: Dermot Lavery Solicitors For Finbarr Hickey: Fionnuala O'Sullivan, BL Instructed by: James MacGuill & Co. For the Attorney General: Ms. Nuala Butler, SC Mr. Douglas Clarke, SC Instructed by: CSSO For Freddie Scappaticci: Eavanna Fitzgerald, BL Pauline O'Hare Instructed by: Michael Flanigan Solicitor For Kevin Fulton: Mr. Neil Rafferty, QC Instructed by: John McAtamney Solicitor For Breen Family: Mr. John McBurney For Buchanan Family/ Heather Currie: Ernie Waterworth McCartan Turkington Breen Solicitors For the PSNI: Mark Robinson, BL NOTICE: A WORD INDEX IS PROVIDED AT THE BACK OF THIS TRANSCRIPT. THIS IS A USEFUL INDEXING SYSTEM, WHICH ALLOWS YOU TO QUICKLY SEE THE WORDS USED IN THE TRANSCRIPT, WHERE THEY OCCUR AND HOW OFTEN. EXAMPLE: - DOYLE [2] 30:28 45:17 THE WORD “DOYLE” OCCURS TWICE PAGE 30, LINE 28 PAGE 45, LINE 17 I N D E X Witness Page No. Line No. OWEN CORRIGAN CROSS-EXAMINED BY MR. O'CALLAGHAN 4 1 Smithwick Tribunal - 1 August 2012 - Day 119 1 1 THE TRIBUNAL RESUMED ON THE 1ST AUGUST 2012 AS FOLLOWS: 2 3 MR.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fresh Start: the Stormont Agreement and Implementation Plan and the Northern Ireland (Welfare Reform) 2015-16 [Bill 99]
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 7389 , 20 November 2015 A Fresh Start: the Stormont By Paul Bowers, Steven Agreement and Implementation Plan Kennedy, Lizzie Parkin, and the Northern Ireland (Welfare Hazel Armstrong, Wendy Wilson Reform) Bill 2015-16 [Bill 99] Inside: 1. Introduction 2. Welfare 3. The Fresh Start Agreement: non-welfare www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 7389, 20 November 2015 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 5 1.1 Fresh Start agreement 5 Process 5 Content 6 Political intent 6 1.2 Stormont House Agreement 7 2014 negotiations 7 Finance and welfare 8 Other elements 9 Implementation: January-August 2015 10 1.3 Political events summer 2015 11 1.4 Reaction to the Fresh Start agreement 12 2. Welfare 15 2.1 Introduction 15 2.2 UK Governments’ welfare reforms 15 2.3 Welfare reform in Northern Ireland 17 The parity principle 17 Welfare Reform Bill timeline 17 Agreed “flexibilities” and mitigation measures 19 2.4 Welfare announcements in the Fresh Start Agreement 23 Implementing welfare reform and associated “top-up” arrangements 23 Legislative Consent Motion 26 2.5 The Bill 26 Fast-track procedure 27 3. The Fresh Start Agreement: non-welfare 29 3.1 Ending paramilitarism and tackling organised crime 29 3.2 Northern Ireland Executive Financial Reforms and Context 31 3.3 UK Government financial support 32 Balanced budget 32 Funding for action against paramilitary activity 33 3.4 Irish Government financial support 33 3.5 Other parts of the Stormont House Agreement 34 Flags, identity, culture and tradition 34 Parades 34 The Past 34 Institutional reform 35 Contributing Authors: Steven Kennedy and Lizzie Parkin, Social Policy Section, Welfare Paul Bowers and Hazel Armstrong, Parliament and Constitution Centre, Non-welfare Cover page image copyright: : Volunteer's Reception, Assembly Buildings, Stormont, Belfast by Joel Riley.
    [Show full text]
  • New Decade, New Approach Deal
    2 New Decade, New Approach January 2020 3 Contents Context and Responsibilities 4 The New Decade, New Approach Deal Part 1: Priorities of the Restored Executive 6 Part 2: Northern Ireland Executive Formation Agreement 11 UK Government and Irish Government Commitments Annex A: UK Government Commitments to Northern Ireland 45 ​ Annex B: Irish Government Commitments 57 4 Context and Responsibilities 1. The Rt Hon Julian Smith CBE MP, Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, and Simon Coveney TD, Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, have published this text of a deal to restore devolved government in Northern Ireland. 2. The deal will transform public services and restore public confidence in devolved government and has been tabled at talks at Stormont House for the political parties in Northern Ireland to agree. 3. These talks were convened to restore the institutions created by the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement and, particularly, to restore a functioning Northern Ireland Executive delivering for the people of Northern Ireland on a stable and sustainable basis. 4. The participants throughout these talks were the UK and Irish Governments, each participating in accordance with their respective responsibilities, and the five main Northern Ireland parties. 5. Over several months of discussions, all the issues were extensively explored with the opportunity for each participant to put forward proposals. The New Decade, New Approach deal represents a fair and balanced basis upon which to restore the institutions. The commitments of each Government are attached here as annexes for the information of the participants and the public. They are the respective responsibility of each Government, and no agreement is asked or required from the parties for those commitments.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard)
    Committee for Justice OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard) Draft Programme for Government 2016-2021 and Delivery Plans: Department of Justice 10 November 2016 NORTHERN IRELAND ASSEMBLY Committee for Justice Draft Programme for Government 2016-2021 and Delivery Plans: Department of Justice 10 November 2016 Members present for all or part of the proceedings: Mr Paul Frew (Chairperson) Mrs Pam Cameron (Deputy Chairperson) Mr Alex Attwood Ms Clare Bailey Mr Doug Beattie Mr Roy Beggs Ms Michaela Boyle Mr Sammy Douglas Mr Declan Kearney Mr Trevor Lunn Mr Pat Sheehan Witnesses: Ms Louise Cooper Department of Justice Mr David Lavery Department of Justice Mr Steven McCourt Department of Justice Ms Karen Pearson Department of Justice The Chairperson (Mr Frew): I welcome to the Committee David Lavery, director of access to justice; Steven McCourt, head of community safety division; Karen Pearson, head of protection and organised crime division; and Louise Cooper, deputy director of rehabilitation and reducing offending directorate. They are all from the Department of Justice. You are all very welcome. I advise you that the session will be recorded by Hansard and the transcript will be published on the Committee web page. Without further ado, David, you will be leading off, I am sure. Mr David Lavery (Department of Justice): Thank you, Chair. With your permission, I will make some introductory remarks. My colleagues and I are grateful for the opportunity to brief the Committee this afternoon on the Department's role in delivering the commitments set out in the draft Programme for Government. As you said, Chair, I have colleagues with me who lead on the three indicators for which the Department is immediately responsible.
    [Show full text]
  • Dziadok Mikalai 1'St Year Student
    EUROPEAN HUMANITIES UNIVERSITY Program «World Politics and economics» Dziadok Mikalai 1'st year student Essay Written assignment Course «International relations and governances» Course instructor Andrey Stiapanau Vilnius, 2016 The Troubles (Northern Ireland conflict 1969-1998) Plan Introduction 1. General outline of a conflict. 2. Approach, theory, level of analysis (providing framework). Providing the hypothesis 3. Major actors involved, definition of their priorities, preferences and interests. 4. Origins of the conflict (historical perspective), major actions timeline 5. Models of conflicts, explanations of its reasons 6. Proving the hypothesis 7. Conclusion Bibliography Introduction Northern Ireland conflict, called “the Troubles” was the most durable conflict in the Europe since WW2. Before War in Donbass (2014-present), which lead to 9,371 death up to June 3, 20161 it also can be called the bloodiest conflict, but unfortunately The Donbass War snatched from The Troubles “the victory palm” of this dreadful competition. The importance of this issue, however, is still essential and vital because of challenges Europe experience now. Both proxy war on Donbass and recent terrorist attacks had strained significantly the political atmosphere in Europe, showing that Europe is not safe anymore. In this conditions, it is necessary for us to try to assume, how far this insecurity and tensions might go and will the circumstances and the challenges of a international relations ignite the conflict in Northern Ireland again. It also makes sense for us to recognize that the Troubles was also a proxy war to a certain degree 23 Sources, used in this essay are mostly mass-media articles, human rights observers’ and international organizations reports, and surveys made by political scientists on this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Over Ten Years of Cover-Ups Left Nineteen People Dead
    Irelandclick.com January 22 2007 Site Search DailyIreland.com Advanced Home As of 11th April 2006, www.dailyireland.com, incorporating www.irelandclick.com is Registered with ABC ELECTRONIC (www.abce.org.uk) and supports industry agreed standards for website News traffic measurement Comment Sport Over ten years of cover-ups left nineteen Features people dead ------------------------- RUC’s Special Branch gave Mount Vernon UVF a licence to kill Lá North Belfast News ------------------------- By Ciaran Barnes Downloads 19/01/2007 ------------------------- Andersonstown News 17 January 1993, Sharon McKenna: Two former policemen claim Mark Haddock told them he shot Shraon Home McKenna dead at the house of an elderly Protestant friend on the Shore Road. News Jonty Brown and Trevor McIlwrath claim Special Branch blocked attempts Comment by them to charge the UVF men involved despite the detectives having the confession. Sport Features 24 February 1994, Sean McParland: Murdered by a UVF Special Branch agent from Newtownabbey nicknamed ------------------------- the Beast. The paramilitary is the current boss of the organisation in Southeast Antrim. North Belfast News No one has been charged with the killing. Home News 17 May 1994, Eamon Fox and Gary Convie: The Catholic builders were allegedly shot dead by Haddock as they worked on a building site in Tiger's Comment Bay. Despite admitting to Special Branch handlers that he was involved Haddock was never charged. Sport Features 17 June 1994, Cecil Dougherty and William Corrigan: The Protestant builders were shot dead in a hut on a construction site in Rathcoole. They ------------------------- were mistaken for Catholics. South Belfast News The killing was carried out by a paramilitary who was trying to wrest control of the Southeast Antrim UVF from Haddock, shooting the men while Home his boss was on holiday.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Blind
    Double Blind The untold story of how British intelligence infiltrated and undermined the IRA Matthew Teague, The Atlantic, April 2006 Issue https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2006/04/double-blind/304710/ I first met the man now called Kevin Fulton in London, on Platform 13 at Victoria Station. We almost missed each other in the crowd; he didn’t look at all like a terrorist. He stood with his feet together, a short and round man with a kind face, fair hair, and blue eyes. He might have been an Irish grammar-school teacher, not an IRA bomber or a British spy in hiding. Both of which he was. Fulton had agreed to meet only after an exchange of messages through an intermediary. Now, as we talked on the platform, he paced back and forth, scanning the faces of passersby. He checked the time, then checked it again. He spoke in an almost impenetrable brogue, and each time I leaned in to understand him, he leaned back, suspicious. He fidgeted with several mobile phones, one devoted to each of his lives. “I’m just cautious,” he said. He lives in London now, but his wife remains in Northern Ireland. He rarely goes out, for fear of bumping into the wrong person, and so leads a life of utter isolation, a forty-five-year-old man with a lot on his mind. During the next few months, Fulton and I met several times on Platform 13. Over time his jitters settled, his speech loosened, and his past tumbled out: his rise and fall in the Irish Republican Army, his deeds and misdeeds, his loyalties and betrayals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Good Friday Agreement at Twenty Years: Achievements and Unfinished Business
    THE GOOD FRIDAY AGREEMENT AT TWENTY YEARS: ACHIEVEMENTS AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MARCH 22, 2018 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe [CSCE 115–2–2] ( Available via www.csce.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 29–384PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:07 May 21, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 X:\_HS\WORK\GOODFR~1.TXT NINA COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HOUSE SENATE CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi, Co-Chairman Chairman ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas CORY GARDNER, Colorado STEVE COHEN, Tennessee MARCO RUBIO, Florida RICHARD HUDSON, North Carolina JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois THOM TILLIS, North Carolina SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas TOM UDALL, New Mexico GWEN MOORE, Wisconsin SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Vacant, Department of State Vacant, Department of Commerce Vacant, Department of Defense [II] VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:07 May 21, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 X:\_HS\WORK\GOODFR~1.TXT NINA THE GOOD FRIDAY AGREEMENT AT TWENTY YEARS: ACHIEVEMENTS AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS MARCH 22, 2018 COMMISSIONERS Page Hon. Christopher H. Smith, Co-Chairman, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe ...................................... 1 Hon. Benjamin L. Cardin, Ranking Member, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe ................................. 3 MEMBER Hon. Brendan Boyle, a Member of Congress from the State of Pennsylvania (D-13) ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sinn Féin Ard Fheis 2014 Dé Haoine 7Ú & Dé Sathairn 8Ú Feabhra, Loch Garman Friday 7Th & Saturday 8Th Febuary, Wexford Bí Le Shinn Féin / Join Sinn Féin
    Clar 2014 Cover spread no spine 24/01/2014 11:36 Page 1 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis 2014 Dé hAoine 7ú & Dé Sathairn 8ú Feabhra, Loch Garman Friday 7th & Saturday 8th Febuary, Wexford Bí le Shinn Féin / Join Sinn Féin Bí le Téacs / Join by Text: Seol an focal SINN FEIN ansin d’ainm agus seoladh chuig / Text the word SINN FEIN followed by your name and address to: 51444 (26 Chondae / 26 counties) 60060 (6 Chondae / 6 counties) Ar Líne / Join online: www.sinnfein.ie/join-sinn-fein PUTTING IRELAND Sinn Féin Sinn Féin 44 Cearnóg Pharnell, 44 Parnell Square, Baile Átha Cliath 1, Éire. Dublin 1, Ireland. FIRST Tel: (353) 1 872 6100/872 6932 Tel: (353) 1 872 6100/872 6932 Fax: (353) 1 889 2566 Fax: (353) 1 889 2566 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] ÉIRE CHUN TOSAIGH Sinn Féin Sinn Féin 53 Bóthar na bhFál, 53 Falls Road, Béal Feirste, BT 12PD, Éire. Belfast, BT 12PD, Ireland. Tel: 028 90 347350 Tel: 028 90 347350 Fax: 028 90 347386 Fax: 028 90 347386 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] www.sinnfein.ie www.sinnfein.ie SFAF Clar 2014.qxd 24/01/2014 11:34 Page 1 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis 2014 Wexford Friday 7th February 16.00 » Registration 18.00 » David Cullinane Opening 18.15 » Economy • Decent Work for Decent Pay Motions 1-13 | Pages 5-8 • Reducing the Tax Burden on Ordinary Workers Motions 14-19 | Pages 8-10 • Protecting the Conditions of those in Work Motions 20-21 | Pages 10-11 • Economic Sovereignty Motions 22-25 | Pages 11-13 19.00 » Keynote Address from Martin McGuinness 19.15 » Peace Process • Dealing with the Legacy of
    [Show full text]
  • Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XX-3 | 2015 Northern Ireland: Devolution As an Electoral Issue in the 2015 UK General Ele
    Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XX-3 | 2015 The 2015 General Election in the United Kingdom Northern Ireland: Devolution as an Electoral Issue in the 2015 UK General Election L’Irlande du Nord : la dévolution en tant qu’enjeu électoral lors des élections législatives de 2015 Valérie Peyronel Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/647 DOI: 10.4000/rfcb.647 ISSN: 2429-4373 Publisher CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d'études en civilisation britannique Electronic reference Valérie Peyronel, « Northern Ireland: Devolution as an Electoral Issue in the 2015 UK General Election », Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique [Online], XX-3 | 2015, Online since 01 December 2015, connection on 30 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/647 ; DOI : 10.4000/rfcb.647 This text was automatically generated on 30 April 2019. Revue française de civilisation britannique est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. Northern Ireland: Devolution as an Electoral Issue in the 2015 UK General Ele... 1 Northern Ireland: Devolution as an Electoral Issue in the 2015 UK General Election L’Irlande du Nord : la dévolution en tant qu’enjeu électoral lors des élections législatives de 2015 Valérie Peyronel By comparison with its counterparts, Scotland and Wales, devolution in Northern Ireland is very particular. After 26 years of Direct Rule from 1972 to 1998, the Agreement1 (usually better known as the Good Friday Agreement) was signed on April 10, 1998 after nearly a decade of harsh negotiations including representatives of the unionist and nationalist parties in Northern Ireland2 as well as representatives of the British and Irish governments3 and external mediators.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Answers to Questions Official Report (Hansard)
    Written Answers to Questions Official Report (Hansard) Friday 17 February 2012 Volume 72, No WA2 This publication contains the written answers to questions tabled by Members. The content of the responses is as received at the time from the relevant Minister or representative of the Assembly Commission and has not been subject to the official reporting process or changed in any way. Contents Written Answers to Questions Office of the First Minister and deputy First Minister ............................................................... WA 195 Department of Agriculture and Rural Development .................................................................. WA 202 Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure ................................................................................ WA 210 Department of Education ...................................................................................................... WA 219 Department for Employment and Learning .............................................................................. WA 255 Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment .................................................................... WA 263 Department of the Environment ............................................................................................. WA 279 Department of Finance and Personnel ................................................................................... WA 285 Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety ......................................................... WA 289 Department
    [Show full text]
  • THE APPARATUS of IMPUNITY? Human Rights Violations and the Northern Ireland Conflict: a Narrative of Official Limitations on Post-Agreement Investigative Mechanisms
    THE APPARATUS OF IMPUNITY? Human rights violations and the Northern Ireland conflict: a narrative of official limitations on post-Agreement investigative mechanisms Committee on the Administration of Justice January 2015 The Apparatus of Impunity? Committee on the Administration of Justice (CAJ) © Committee on the Administration of Justice January 2015 The material may be reproduced, free of charge, in any format or medium without specific permission, provided the reproduction is not for financial or material gain.The material must be reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. If the material is to be republished or issued to others, acknowledgement must be given to its source, copyright status, and date of publication. This publication is available on our website. CAJ Committee on the Administration of Justice 2nd Floor, Sturgen Building 9-15 Queen Street Belfast BT1 6EA Tel: 028 9031 6000 Fax: 028 9031 4583 [email protected] www.caj.org.uk ISBN 978 1 873285 94 7 The Apparatus of Impunity? Committee on the Administration of Justice (CAJ) THE APPARATUS OF IMPUNITY? Human rights violations and the Northern Ireland conflict: a narrative of official limitations on post-Agreement investigative mechanisms Committee on the Administration of Justice January 2015 The Apparatus of Impunity? Committee on the Administration of Justice (CAJ) Recent comments from key Council of Europe and UN human rights bodies in relation to existing mechanisms investigating the conflict in Northern Ireland: The absence of any plausible explanation for the failure to collect key evidence at the time when this was possible, and for attempts to even obstruct this process, should be treated with particular vigilance.
    [Show full text]