Road Network Improvement Project: CW-A1 and CW-A2 Social

Due Diligence Report

July 2019

CAM: Road Network Improvement Project

Social Safeguards

Prepared by the Ministry of Public Works and Transport for the Kingdom of Cambodia and the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 31 July 2019)

Currency unit – Khmer Riel (KR) KR1.00 = $0.00025 $1.00 = KR4,085

ABBREVIATIONS

NOTE In this report, "$" refers to United States dollars.

This due diligence report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Kingdom of Cambodia Nation Religion King

Ministry of Public Works and transport Asian Development bank

MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA ADB LoanNo.3576-CAM (COL)

Additional Scope for Road Network Improvement Project (RNIP)

DUE DILIGENCE REPORT ON SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS CW-A1 AND CW-A2

July 2019

Prepared by

KOREA CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT3 (PMU3) Report Control Form

Project Name: Additional Scope for Road Network Improvement Project (RNIP)

Project ID ADS LOAN 3576-CAM (COL)

Report Name: Due Diligence Report on Social Safeguards CW-A1 : 5.8km and CW-A2: 48.4km

PREPARATION, REVIEW AND AUTHORISATION

Prepared by: KIM Cheol Hyun Signature: -/4)~ Position: Team Leader Date: 16 TvifJ >olo/

Reviewed by: SOK Sam An Signature: ~ Position: Project Manager, PMU3 Date: /G . JI.A-I;-- -2?13

Approved by: PHENG Sovicheano Signature: !51:Jl,o k..., Position: Project Director, PMU3 Date - ~ 7., !j JLJ, 19

ISSUE REGISTER

Distribution List No. of Copies

Ministry of Public Works and Transport 1

Asian Development Bank (ADS) 1

REVISION, PREPARATION, REVIEW ISSUE

Issued to Revision Date Prepared by Reviewed by Distribution List by:

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB - Asian Development Bank AHs - Affected Households APs - Affected Persons CEMP - Contractors Environmental Management Plan COI - Corridor of Impact DED Detailed Engineering Design DMS - Detailed Measurement Survey DPWT - Department of Public works and Transport EMP - Environmental Management Plan GAP - Gender Action Plan GDR - General Department of Resettlement GDR-MEF - General Department of Resettlement – Ministry of Economy and Finance GMS - Greater Mekong Sub-region GRC - Grievance Redress Committee GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism IOL - Inventory of Loss IRC - Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee LARP - Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MEF - Ministry of Economy and Finance MPWT - Ministry of Public Works and Transport MEF - Ministry of Economy and Finance NGO - Nongovernmental Organization PAH - Project Affected Households PDoPWT - Provincial Department of Public Work and Transport PDoE - Provincial Department of Environment PGRC Provincial Grievance Redress Committee PIB - Project Information Booklet PIUs - Project Implementation Units PICSC - Project Implementation and Construction Supervision Consultants PMU - Project Management Unit PK - Post Kilometer PRSC - Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee RF - Resettlement Framework ROW - Right of Way SEO - Social and Environment Office SES - Socio-economic Survey SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

Kilometer – km Meter – m Table of Contents

1. Background ...... 5

2. Objective of the Field Assessment ...... 6

3. Project Description ...... 6

4. Information Disclosure, Consultation and Participation ...... 12

5. Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) ...... 14

6. Conclusion and Recommendations ...... 15

Appendix 1: Project Location Map and Route Map ...... 17

Appendix 2: Categorization Checklist ...... 20

Appendix 3: Public Information Booklet ...... 23

Appendix 4: Public Consultation Meetings ...... 24

Appendix 5: Attendance List ...... 36

4 Due Diligence Report on Social Safeguards for RNIP Additional Scope CW-A1: Siem Reap Downtown section(L=5.8km) and CW-A2: Kralanh – Serei Saophoan section(L=48.4km)

1. Background

1. The Government of Cambodia has requested assistance from Asian Development Bank (ADB) with improving road asset management and road safety. The Road Network Improvement Project (RNIP) was included in the Country Operations Business Plan, 2017– 2019. The RNIP was approved on 28 September 2017 to be financed from concessional loan equivalent to $70million; and the loan agreement was signed on 19 January 2018, two months behind the appraisal schedule due to the government reached the borrowing capacity for 2017. The loan became effective on 20 March 2018. The RNIP includes four outputs: (i) safer and climate-resilient national roads delivered, ii) axle load control enhanced, (iii) quality assurance for civil works in MPWT strengthened and (iv) road safety enforcement in project communes improved.

2. The project aims to provide efficient transportation on the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) Southern Economic Corridors (SECs) passing through Cambodia and connecting feeder roads to extend the benefits of GMS SECs to northwestern and southeastern provinces through the improvement of the national roads that are unsafe and prone to flooding.

3. All project roads, with a total length of about 147 km, are prone to climate change effects such as frequent flooding when the water level in Tonle Sap and Mekong rises. Thus, the project will provide the climate resiliency measures, such as reinforced embankment slope protection, increased drainage capacity, and additional urban drains and outlets. For the civil works, the project will use a hybrid performance-based contract (PBC), which includes major civil works and routine maintenance.

4. A Mission of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) visited Cambodia from 27 to 30 May 2019. The purposes of the mid-term review mission (the Mission) were: (i) assessment of proposed minor change in scope for a civil work package, equipment packages, and a consulting service package, including relevant safeguard impact screening, (ii) assessment of proposed reallocation and partial cancelation of the loan, (iii) assessment of civil works implementation period, (iv) confirmation on safeguards categorization and compliance of existing civil work packages, (v) procurement plan updates, and (vi) Gender Action Plan (GAP) implementation updates. The Mission met with Ministry of Public Works and Transport (MPWT-Executing Agency), Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF), Authority for the Protection and Safeguarding of Angkor and the Region of Angkor (APSARA), Project Management Unit 3 (PMU3-Implementing Agency), and the Project Implementation and Construction Supervision Consultants (PICSC).The Mission also conducted site visits of National Road 1 (NR1) and NR6 including two (2) additional section (CW-A1: Siem Reap Downtown 5.8km length and CW-A2: from Kralanh to Serei Saophoan 48.4km length).

Figure 1: Project Location Map

2. Objective of the Field Assessment

5. After receiving requests from relevant local authorities, DPWT and Authority for the Protection and Safeguarding of Angkor and the Region of Angkor (APSARA), MPWT/PMU3 assisted by the project consultants conducted due diligence to assess involuntary resettlement impact of the proposed new sections.

6. This due diligence report (DDR) on involuntary resettlement has been prepared to assess the project’s impacts in terms of land acquisition, resettlement and environmental impacts. The main objective is to confirm if the proposed change of scope of the Road Network Improvement Project (both downtown and rural sections) anticipates any involuntary resettlement and environmental impacts that may trigger the application of involuntary resettlement and environmental safeguards requirements in accordance with the ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009).

3. Project Description

7. The ADB Mission team reviewed and signed the MOU on 30 May 2019 the MPWT's proposal for rehabilitation of additional road sections under the project road NR6 through inclusion of (i) Siem Reap downtown section, and (ii) Kralanh–Serei Saophoan section.

8. The summary of proposed additional scope for RNIP is as follow table 1.

Table 1: Summary of Proposed Additional Scope for RNIP CW-A1 CW–A2 Classification Remarks Siem Reap Downtown Kralanh–Serei Saophoan

Section PK 311+851 – PK 317+630 PK 367+510 – PK 415+857

Length 5.8 km 48.4 km

6 CW-A1 CW–A2 Classification Remarks Siem Reap Downtown Kralanh–Serei Saophoan 4-Lane, Lane 2-Lane 2,6-Lane (Beginning section)

Pavement Asphalt Concrete Asphalt Concrete

Bridge - 29 Nos

Province Siem Reap city Banteay Meanchey

9. Based on the site survey, the status of existing road sections as follows:

(a) Siem Reap downtown section(5.8km): As a result of the field survey for the project section, (i) the starting 440m section out of total 5.8km section is operating two (2) lane and for the middle 185m section is six (6) lane as shown in below figure 2, and remaining 5.154km section is operating four (4) lane; particularly (ii) regarding the four (4) lane section, the barrier were installed in both side, and the main carriageway which installed in the central location is operating only two (2) lane as shown in below figure 3, so frequently traffic congestion occurred by inefficient operation system. In addition, the 1.5 km section out of 5.8km, existing road elevation is higher than the main carriageway in the central section for entering and exiting the commercial houses and hotels along the both side of road. And more, drainage facilities installed on the existing roads were found to be deteriorated and drainage function was degraded as shown in below figure 4. Therefore, the improvement of the existing facilities is necessary to increase the existing road traffic capacity and to enhance the function of the drainage facilities. However, no resettlement impact will be anticipated for the civil works.

...... ,______...... - ...... ______...... ,------, ! 4 lane 6 lane 6 lane 2 lane l:5,154a\, W:19m l: 100m, W: 25m l=85m, W: 21m l•40n, W: 8m BP IPK 311•851)

1 L

...... ____ ...... ,______.., Figure 2 : Operating status of Beginning Point of Proposed road, CW-A1

...... ____ ...... ______...... - ...... ·------: CW-A1 : EXISTING TYPICAL CROSS SECTION 1 -~- r Tcul WKl1h 29.0m 2.0m 3.5m 3.Sm 20m l j - --J._ l C\w.:,s: <1>450mm ~Cl>~ 12.Sm 3.0m 6.0m 3.0m 5.5m 5.Sm 3.0m 6.0m 3.0m 12.5m

60.0m ...... - ...···------...- ...... - ...... ___ Figure 3 : Existing Cross section of 4 lane

7 Existing Water supply Flooding Area Existing Box Culvert

Figure 4 : The Status of Proposed road, CW-A1

(b) Kralanh–Serei Saophoan section(48.4km): This section is operating two (2) lane- two-way, and in the case of the 3km section from the starting point, the existing pavement was damaged and road stability is deteriorated. The market and town areas including the Chak Krey market located in the Preah Netr Preah district have no drainage facility yet as shown in below figure 5, and the resident people have been suffering frequent flooding due to lack of drainage facilities during the rainy season. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the existing pavement and install the new drainage facilities in the related areas in order to provide the benefit for resident people and road users. According to field visit and verification of DED at site, no resettlement impact will arise including the market and town area proposed for drainage facility...... -·:::::n::-:::::::'l.:::u:::::u::1::::::1:::-::::} ••••••••••••••• PK 368+000 Preah Net Preah Section Serei Saophoanh ~L...... ] ...... , Sti

Figure 5 : The Status of Proposed road, CW-A2

10. Based on the site survey, the typical cross section to be applied to CW-A1 is divided into five types as shown in below table 2. Table 2:The Typical Cross Section for CW-A1 Station Length Width (m) (m) Type Overlay from to PK 311+851 AC Overlay, PK 312+291 440 8.0 Type 1 (BP) 2- Lane, 8m width AC Overlay, PK 312+291 PK 312+376 85 21.0 Type 2 6- Lane, 21m width AC Overlay, PK 312+376 PK 312+476 100 25.0 Type 3 6- Lane, 25m width AC Overlay, PK 312+476 PK 313+000 524 29.0 Type 4 6- Lane, 29m width AC Overlay with Base Course PK 313+000 PK 313+800 800 29.0 Type 5 6- Lane, 29m width AC Overlay, PK 313+800 PK 314+400 600 29.0 Type 4 6 Lane, 29mwidth AC Overlay with Base Course PK 314+400 PK 315+100 700 29.0 Type 5 6 Lane, 29mwidth

8 PK 317+630 AC Overlay, PK 315+100 2,530 29.0 Type 4 (EP) 6 Lane, 29m width

Total 5,779

Note: BP (Beginning Point), EP (End Point)

The type to be applied according to the width of the existing road and the pavement condition is shown in below figure 6.

Type 1 : AC Overlay, Width 8m ~ Ovelay wicfth (8.00m) 1 ~yer Shoulder Carr-iageway Car-r-iageway Shoulder i 0 . 50m 3.50m 3 . 50m 0 . 50m

v D /-~ D E TAIL "A" 20% 20% if _ 7~ ~ 1 1 - ·r: R400 , ,,- ~ ---l I 1 I i (,,- ~ --. 1 1 R400 I I \ / I I I I '\. J I!

Existing / =~=;==JJ f--~- a~:k_h_:-:-~-, o_n_c_,_e_te___ ----l L~ =~=; =~ Existing E xisting Asphalt Concrete E xisting Base Course E xisting Sub-Base Couse Type 2 : AC Overlay, Width 21m '¥' (Nelaywi

• 2'"' , ~ -- -M

R400: ! ;,.~,/ i ! ! i (~-~ I :R400

Asphalt Concrete Existing Y=~:{:~J Tackcoa: L~:~:{:~Existing Existirig Asphal concrete Existin,;iBaseCOU'se ExistinoSuti.-BaseCouse

Type 3 : AC Overlay, Width 25m

O~lay+ ~ (25.00m ) I 1lr-er I Carriagev.oy CarriageW1y CarriageY,lly Carriagewiy CarriageY,lly Carriageffly I Shoulder I rE~AN I Shoulder I 1.45m 3.50m I 3.50m I 3.50m 3.50m I 3.50m I 3.50m 1.45m {I, .(} {I, ',I' • D£T~L "A" 11 • 2.0% ~ 2.ll% ";:: 20% ,,,, .. R_ -- 2.0% 2.0% -----fi """ ' ... __... , R40011,--,\:I ! 1:(-'' IIR400

~\Ill I 11\ AsphalConc-ete 11 ,_,,.~ 11 Existing _/'t~:~:;:~J Tack.mat ExistingAs?halConaete L::::::~Existing Existing Base Course Existing Sub-Base Couse

Type 4 : AC Overlay, Width 29m

Elll~IUd'lal:O<:ra• Elll .. r,:iAsi:nalt eorc Eol«lr,Q-COU'IIO lEllUr,:;i~oo:u,;o Elll111r,:is..J:,,S,a•eo...., IEll•l!"l'l:!i.b&aa~

9 ...... ~ i.·.·.·.·.~·.~~·.···········~·.·.·.·.~·.·.·.·.~·.·.~·.~·.·.·.·.~~·--·····~·.~·.·.~·.~·.·.~·.·.·.·.~~·.~·.·.~·.~·.·.~·.~~-.~·.·.~·.~~·.~·.~~·.~·.·.~·.~~-.~·.·.1Type 5 : AC Overlay with Base Course, Width 29m

.======:;:;:,::;;:::e:j~ocr.-...·,-· ,_,t,::::::::::;::::: :::~=~=~=:---1 ""~:::~~ :;'cc-~;::7. ;::- =~~=:jJ! ':J[~]I !

C..a -ea.,. ~~~:;;~~~=:j ~ , ...... Ua --•c,,,• ===~S tb- ad& · : Figure 6 : Typical Cross Section of CW-A1

11. Based on the site survey, the Typical cross section to be applied to CW-A2 are divided into three (3) types as shown in below table 3;

Table 3: The Typical Cross Section for CW-A2 Station Length Width (m) (m) Type Overlay from to PK 367+510 AC Overlay with Base Course, PK 370+610 3,100 10.0 Type 3 (BP) 2 Lane, 10m width AC Overlay, PK 367+610 PK 391+800 21,190 10.0 Type 2 2 Lane, 10m width AC Overlay with Side U-ditch, PK 391+800 PK 392+900 1,100 10.0 Type 1 2 Lane, 10m width AC Overlay, PK 392+900 PK 414+100 21,200 10.0 Type 2 2 Lane, 10m width PK 415+857 AC Overlay with Side U-ditch, PK 414+100 1,757 10.0 Type 1 (EP) 2 Lane, 10m width

Total 48,347

Note: BP (Beginning Point), EP (End Point)

For the cross through Kralanh section, from beginning point to about 3km, the pavement damage such as pothole and cracks has occurred. So in this section will be applied the Typical cross section Type 3 for the pavement strengthen. Therefore, the type to be applied according to the existing pavement condition and drainage facility is shown in below figure 7.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::·...... t...... Type 1 : AC Overlay with Side U-Ditch, Width:10m ~

SfNTER UNEOFR™q:

Cx"""G A~I ConertteJOe:SJ [ 1tit!ng AQQl,tgalit8.-~ E•~f'llil $.l~ a$4: Co

10 rc::'.::::::::::::::::::=:~=:::=~'.f·------~------Type 2 : AC Overlay, Width:10m ......

! ....,..... v ......

._c..... ~°'....,...... I,_ Sc.mllou1t1ekCu1 :::E::~= .i 5...... 1 ir ...... ~ ...... Type 3 : AC Overlay with Base Course, Width:10m 1------•------•------~EAl~EOfRO,,O

! -~ On1il"S'

&wC01.11•20tlma . ~Al!NlCona•i1>8ST ...... ______:_:_:...._ ..._·,_:_:_"- ______...... ; L Figure 7 : Typical Cross Section of CW-A2

12. According to the site screening1 for involuntary resettlement impact, the project has been categorized as “C” for Involuntary Resettlement in accordance with 2009 ADB's Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS).

13. The project will rehabilitate the existing roads where social impacts are not expected to occur during and after execution of the project except some temporary and site- specific environment disturbance will be occurred which will be addressed through EMP of the project. The resettlement framework has been prepared in compliance with SPS to mitigate involuntary resettlement impacts in case they arise during construction.

14. The upgrading of NR6 from Siem Reap to Bantey Meanchey will benefit 108,976people including 54,208 (49.74%) women and 9.8% in Preah Netr Preh; Phniet is 14.1%; and 21.19% Serei Saophoan town (S/k Preah Ponlear; Kompong Svay and Phniet) of Bantey Meanchey province2.

15. The project will benefit at least 104,746 persons along BMC town and Preah Netr Preah district (50% are women) and 19,045 HHs in 5 Sangkat/communes and 1 district of a Banteay Meanchey province within the project area3.

1 Site screening was carried out during field visit on 9-10 May 2019 with consultants, ADB safeguards officer and consultants and GDR officer. 2 The Three Years Investment Book program (2019-2021) 2 The Three Years Investment Book program (2019-2021) 3 Database of Provincial Profile 2018 prepared by Provincial Department of Planning

11 16. MPWT/PMU3 has conducted Due Diligence to verify and confirm the land acquisition and/or involuntary resettlement impacts status due to the change of scope of works. The Due Diligence Report (DDR) has been prepared in compliance with the ADB's Safeguard Policy Statement and the laws and regulations of the Kingdom of Cambodia.

4. Information Disclosure, Consultation and Participation

17. Meeting with PIUs and Authorities prior to Public Consultation was carried out by MPWT’s consultants and ESO officers from 4-6 June 2019 as shown in below table 4. There have been three meeting held as shown on below table 4. During the meeting, the PMU3 and ESO from MPWT explained the purpose of the occasion, highlighting the proposed improvements and coverage area of services.

Table 4: Consultation Meetings with PIUs and Authorities No. Date Venue Participant of relevant official

Director of PDoPWT, Chief of PDoE 1 4 June 2019 Banteay Meanchey province and 2 others Kompong Svay, Phneit and Preah Chief of Phniet Commune 2 5 June 2019 Ponlear Commune at Banteay and 6 others Meanchey province Director of PDoPWT Siem Reap 3 6 June 2019 Siem Reap province And 2 others

Figure 8 : Meeting and Site Inspection with PIU and Authorities

18. Public Consultation Consultation with people living along the project road was carried out by MPWT’s consultants, PMU3 and ESO officers from 19-20 June 2019. There are three consultation held as shown in below table 5 with the total of 241 participants of which 65 participants are female. The Public Information Booklets (PIB) were distributed to all participants and also reserved at all commune offices of Banteay Meanchey province.

Table 5: Consultation Meetings for CW-A1 and CW-A2 Meeting Participant No. Date Venue Time Total Male Female 1 19 June 2019 Sangkat Svay Dankum 3:00-4:30 pm 50 36 14 Phnom Leap commune (commune 2 20 June 2019 office) at Banteay Meanchey 9:00-11:00 am 124 94 30 province Wat Svay Chas Pagoda at 3 20 June 2019 3:00-4:00 pm 67 46 21 Banteay Meanchey province Total 241 176 65

12 19. The consultation meetings discussed the proposed project sections and the scope of works to the participants and also explained related policy lay down in the resettlement framework which was approved in June 2017 and disclose on the ADB website. After explanation of the project sections, the floor also opens to the public to express their concerns, suggestions and questions. Below table summarize the questions and answers during the consultation in the three locations.

Table 6: Summarize of Consultation Meetings Participant Comment/Question Answers/Explanation Svay Dangkum District, Siem Reap 1. Mr. Thav, Micro- Will the bridges and drainage Under the project, there is no finance institute system be replaced? replacement of the bridge and no new drainage system will be proposed. Please inform us before the start of Existing drainage will be restored so that civil work by letter if possible. it can be worked to its full capacity.

Of course, the project will inform the commencement date through Department of Public Works and Transport as well as the Provincial authority. 2. Mr. Kimny, Does the project replace with old or New drainage facilities will be Villager new drainage along the road site? considered in the market and town areas in Preah Net Preah district. And for other proposed section, no new drainage will be built. Only drainage restoration works will be performed. 3. Sotha, Dara It is noted that the main holes are We noted and thank you very much for Angkor Hotel higher than the road surface. From the suggestion. We will report this to practical experience, this cause MPWT for possible verification and road accident. Therefore, the adjustment during construction if any project has to make sure that the main hole need to be re-build. main holes are not higher than the road surface. 4. Ms. Nika, Private How the project deals with business This is a very good question and the company disruption during construction? purpose of the consultation is to inform What is the construction method? about the affected people of their entitlement if there is such disruption. However, from the site observation and assessment, there will be no business disruption at all. Contractor need to plan the work carefully to avoid the disruption. But of course, some temporary and short time disruption on the entrance which will be mitigated by construction EMP. Phnom Leap Commune 5. Mr. Thong, Is this a road maintenance project? Yes, according to the project description Villager in PIBs, this road (No.6) will be overlaid with AC and it is a maintenance work only on the existing road width of about 11m. 6. Mr. Sophat, When will the construction start? The construction date will be fixed after Villager we have the Contractor. However, MPWT would like to start the construction as soon as possible and people and local authority will be informed about the commencement and

13 Participant Comment/Question Answers/Explanation completion date of the project. People will see a signboard of the project and contact phone number if people have some issue that may affect them to report. 7. Mr. Sotha and Yes, it’s just repairing or restoring The project engineer will restore the old Dara, Villagers work. Canthe old drainage system drainage system so that it can be be functional? functional. Where there is damage of the pipe, the project will of course replace. 8. Ms. Navy, Will the road build only 11m width? Yes, from the detail engineering design villager the width will be about 11m as it is now. 9. Ms. Sobin, Will it affect to water supply network Within its existing width and drainage private water underground? system will be affected by the project. It supply company is expected that there will be no impact to the water supply network since no expansion of the width and no new drainage system will be installed where land will be required for the project. Wat Svay Commune, Banteay Meanchey 10. Luth, villager Will the project install drainage There will be no new drainage system system in rural section? proposed under the project in rural section. 11. Kada, villager He suggested to all people do not throw trash/garbage in the drainage system. 12. Ms. Sokra, I’m not sure whether the existing The old drainage will be restored to villager drainage will be just repaired or make sure it will be functional. However, restored during construction. if part of the system cannot be restored Please explain again. the project will replace them on its existing area and no new proposed drainage will be considered at this stage. 13. Ms. Vantha, Does COI is not bigger than 11m? The existing width 11m will not affect phamasy shop Is there compensation? any property. The construction restricts to its original width and no land acquisition will be required. It is expected that no impact from the project. However, if there is impact, the project has to follow entitlement in the resettlement framework that all parties are aware of.

5. Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM)

20. The project section in Siem Reap will follow the GRM which already established for existing RNIP and similar GRM will be established in Banteay Meanchey (48.4km) for additional section in Preah Netr Preah district by General Department of Resettlement (GDR).

21. The MPWT/PMU3, through continuous consultations, discussions and interviews with villagers and sellers along NR6, will ensure that people along the roads are fully aware of their rights to complain and about the grievance redress mechanism (GRM) for both environmental performance and involuntary resettlement through EMP and this due diligence report. The details of the Grievance Redress Committee (GRC), including contacts of the members, the grievance redress mechanism will be displayed on the Project signboard during construction.

22. During consultation meetings, participants are informed that if affected persons do not have sufficient writing skills or are unable to express their grievances verbally, it is a common practice that they are allowed to seek assistance from any recognized local NGO or other family members, village heads or community chiefs to have their complaints or grievances written for them. GRM in Banteay Meanchey will be again informed to local residents and local authorities along the NR6 of Banteay Meanchey road section.

23. The GRM procedure for resettlement (agreed between IRC and ADB for Siem Reap section) includes four stages:

(i) First stage: Affected households will present their complaints and grievances verbally or in writing to the village chief, commune chief or IRC and Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee working groups. The receiving agent will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved affected household does not hear from the village and commune chiefs or the working groups, or if he/she is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office. (ii) Second stage: The District Office has 15 days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee. (iii) Third stage: The PGRC meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the detailed measurement survey (DMS) by the external monitor (EMA). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, DPWT, EMA, PRS/IRC and the affected household. (iv) Final stage: If the aggrieved affected household does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he or she can bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. The Court will make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PDPWT, EMO, PRS/IRC and the affected household. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he or she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

6. Conclusion and Recommendations

24. From the field visit, consultation meeting and verification of detail engineering design at the two additional road sections, followings are conclusions and recommendations for the purpose of involuntary resettlement impact mitigation and minimization during construction of civil works.

a. The site visit to these two additional road sections found no private land will be acquired for the project; only short time temporary disturbance may be expected, in Siem Reap downtown areas which will be addressed under the EMP of the project. b. According to consulation meeting with local authorities and PIUs, there is no

15 major impacts to the community and their livelihood. The project will create significant economic opportunities for the residents of both Siem Reap and Banteay Meanchey town. c. The access road improvement on the other hand, will provide huge benefits, in terms of safe travelling, fast and cost-efficient travel to commuters plying this route. None displaced person from subproject development and upgrading. d. MPWT should coordinate with GDR to ensure that the project-specific GRM is established in Banteay Meanchey province. And this project specific GRM will be disclosed to households and local authorities along the additional road section. e. SEO/MPWT shall strictly monitor enforcement of EMP implementation and report to MPWT and ADB in quarterly internal monitoring reports. SEO should ensure that a complaint log book is available at the site to register any complaint from the ground and resolve it according to the procedures depending on whether it is an environmental or social issue. f. A semi-annual integrated safeguards (social and environmental safeguards) monitoring report should be prepared and submit to MPWT and ADB for review and disclosure.

Appendix 1: Project Location Map and Route Map

PROJECT LOCATION MAPl ...... : ·:...... ···········• ...... ; .... .Ba nt~~~ Ampil ....~ . , ;-..• • \ Samraong City .\ \ 0ddar,Meanche y1 . .. ,.:.. . :rr· ... ·····: "" .: ,•: 1 56 i ...

•• /_...... /Thma Puok :~:...... •·•/ \ ...... ~ Chong / ...... " ... ; ' ••• 68 j \.. l Srei Snam i Svay Chek \ Varin ,,.:; Phnum Srok / • ...• ······· t faY~ Angkor Chum tCity Preah Netr Preah \ • ) K~!_!anh ~W ;O•Mi¥~ CW•A 1 : L = S.S Km Banteay sre1 I... r , ._J- I Ao ._,,Thom( __. , .. _.. r \ - ' . .;.· ·.. -. Bavel Toma Koul ; • ., t I ...... ~. ....••. ~ ...... CW•A2 : L=48.4km ...

:--,.w.i·.. .. '-!_ \ ,,,.. rau ••; - .____,,,-I _:,.,J~·· .... TONLE SAP ✓ A...... ~ Pailin City f / \-;~\, ..•- .., til ~-. ! .;.a.·• • ... :.•t " PROJECT SUMMARY . j\ .... Number of Lane ····•···••· ____A_ d_d_it_io_n_a_1_sc _o_p_e ___-+ ___ s_ e_c_tio_n_____ L_ e_n_g_th_+-_E=ax""is:.:.ti;;..;n.,_-+-.....:..P:..:ro= o=.:sa:.:.l---1 CW-A1 : Siem Reap Downtown Section PK 311+851-PK 317+630 5.8 km 2,4,6-Lane 2,6-Lanei

CW-A2 : Kralanh ~ Sisophon Section PK 367+510-PK 415+857 48.4 km 2-Lane

Appendix 2: Categorization Checklist

Date: 9-10 May 2019 The following checklist was used for Involuntary Resettlement identification of the Road Network Improvement projects (Additional scope of works) for rehabilitation. The objective of the checklists is to determine the categorization of the project in terms of involuntary resettlement.

Not Probable Involuntary Resettlement Yes No Remarks Effects Known Involuntary Acquisition of Land The proposed road sections will be built/improved within their existing width 1. Will there be land acquisition? X and the roadside ditches/drainage will be within the COI. DED was finalized and no land will be 2. Is the site for land acquisition known? X acquired. 3. Is the ownership status and current usage N/A of land to be acquired known? X

The civil work for 4. Will easement be utilized within an existing maintenance/improvement of NR6 will X Right of Way (ROW)? be confined to existing road widths and will not entail road widening. 5. Will there be loss of shelter and residential land due to land acquisition? X

6. Will there be loss of agricultural and other productive assets due to land acquisition? X

7. Will there be losses of crops, trees, and fixed assets due to land acquisition? X

8. Will there be loss of businesses or enterprises due to land acquisition? X

9. Will there be loss of income sources and No stall or shop along the COI was means of livelihoods due to land acquisition? X observed or will be affected by the project. Involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas 10. Will people lose access to natural resources, communal facilities and services? X

11. If land use is changed, will it have an adverse impact on social and economic X activities?

12. Will access to land and resources owned communally or by the state be restricted? X

Information on Displaced Persons: Any estimate of the likely number of persons that will be displaced by the Project? [ X ] No [ ] Yes If yes, approximately how many? ______

Are any of them poor, female‐heads of households, or vulnerable to poverty risks? [ X ] No [ ] Yes Are any displaced persons from indigenous or ethnic minority groups? [ X ] No [ ] Yes

Involuntary Resettlement Category Based on Field Assessment [ ] New [ ] Recategorization ― Previous Category [ X ]

Category A Category B Category C Category FI • • •X • Comments

Approval Proposed by: Reviewed and Endorsed by:

Project Management Unit (PMU3) Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC) Date: Date:

Appendix 3: Public Information Booklet

communities in the project area. This project will • Construction of additional canals ('U' benefit a large nut0ber of people living in some concrete drainage) in some urban areas. provinces and cities ofCambodia. However, it can • Installation of road signs and road lane also cause negative effects as a result ofgrowth of markings connections and much traffic. As the road is so far, • Check the required locatioo for coping with Ministry of Public the drivers ofheavy trucks and vehicles often stop at climate change (protecting slopes, places to rest and eat. destruction by rainfall etc.). Works and Transport 2. What are road network improvement projects? 3. Will there be land tlking-back for road Road N ehvorkl111provemo1t Project (RNIP) National Road I: The project extends from construction in our village? ADB Loan 3576--CAM(SF): KilometerNo. 62 + IOOtoKilometerNo.159+ 000 Toe project's criteria reduce the impact on land and km (96.85 Km) on the western side ofBavet. invohmtary settlement. The size ofthe construction Nahonal Road 6: It stretches from Kilometer No. worlc will only be carried out within 11 meter (I Im Public Information Booklet 317 + 100 to Kilometer No. 367 +000 (49.7km). - COI) of a right-of-way (ROW) over I I meters. 1. What is Road Network Improvement Project The construction wock includes: Local people can live temporarily, but they do not (RNIP)? • Sampling and re-test of the road foundations and have a right to build a strong structure. materials for supporting layers in the area where it 4. How does the project address it ifmy land Through the National Strategic Development Plan is observed the collapse of the road. Excavation will be affected? 2009-2013, the Royal Government of and repair of the stretches of roads which are For the private land affected by the project, they will Cambodia built roads, btidges and other found to be in poor condition or to oollapse by receive compensations at market rates. while the infrastruct\U'e projects. The promotion ofeconomic repairing the protective layers and replacing the affected land with a right-0f-way (ROW) will not be and social development is a high priority ofthe base layers. compensated. Royal Government, as reflected in the Five Year • Renovation (such as patching bitumen and S. Is any compensation provided to tree houses and Development Plan (2006-2010), replaced by the spreading bitwnen) at any stretch of the road that crops? Rectangular Strategy Phase II (2008-2013) is still in poor condition. Houses and structures are in the corridors ofthe deroonstratiog positive results of improving the • Ironing the upperbitwnen (40 to 50 mm thick) on impact ofthe projects already implemented, will not national economy and reducing poverty. Toe a good and repaired site (about 95% of stretch be eligible for compensation. However, ifthe Provincial and national road improvement project is length). structure or house is outside the scope ofthe a clear step in line with the government's goals. • Cleaning box drainage and pipe drainage and corridors of the impact ofthe previous projects, they Nation.al Road Network Improwmrenl Projecl drainage systems along some roads, will receive Alternative Rate refiwds. In October (RNIP) is a priority project ofthe Royal especially in the wban area. 1999, the Inter-Agency Task Force identified a Government of Cambodia, which is available in the corridor ofthe 20m impact from both sides ofthe agenda about the key foundation ofinfrastructure • Paform road swface maintenance only inthe area which is fonnd collapsing. road. development, as it is a strong base for managing the 6. What do they think about public property? For national and provincial road networks. This project • Maintenance of bridges, drainage pipes and drainage boxes. public property or resources ofthe community will be is supported by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) improved or reconstruct with original or good with the Ministry ofPublic Works aod Transport as • Removal ofweeds and plants along the roads condition. the implementing agency. Roads provide positive and drainage systems. social and economic conditions for families and 7. Will the proJcct provide mfonnation and Phase II: The district has IS days to settle the Persoo in charge: Mr. Kim Ponoa consultations for me? complaint to the satisfaction of all parties concerned. Phone: 012879525 Tbe project will inform the local community about its If the complaint cannot be resolved at this stage, the -Ministty ofPubli c Works and Traosport activities. Regular information will be provided 10 the District will bring this case to the Provincial Person in charge: Pok Cb.hanchenda commune offices, village chiefs and your local Resenlernent Conunissioo.. Phone: 012852281 community as wcll as the president of recognized Phase ill: The Provincial Resettlement Commission cultural community. Toe affected families "'ill meets with the protesters and attempts to resolve receive consultation directly through public them. The Commission may request external consultation sessions on key iss~. The project will monitoring officers (EMO) to update the plan 10 resolve the impacts which will be check our the Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS). approved in public through the Public Infonn21ion Within 30 days after filing a complaint with the Booklet (distnbuted to all affected families) available Commission. it shall make a wrinco decision and in Khmer language for the Commune and District submit a copy to MPWT, PDPWT, EMO, PRS, IRC Offices to enable the public to receive and upload it and affected families. on the Asian Development Bank's website. Final sr~ge: If the affected families who filed 8 If there ,s a disagreement or problem ans1Dg ID the complaints did oot hear aoything from the complaint r.mplerncntatioo of the project such as tcchrucal from the Provincial Resettlement Commission or they compcosations and issues arising out of the proJcct, are not satisfied, they cao bring the case to the court do I have a right to appeal? which will issue a written verdict and give it to If the affected people arc not satisfied with the MPWT, PDPWT, EMO, PRSIIRC and affected compensation package offered, or for any reason, families. If any party is dissatisfied with the decision compensations which are not real as agreed, the ofthe provincial court, they may apply to the court of affected people will have a right to appeal. The a higher level. complaint resolution mechanism will proceed in four 9. How can we know these tasks have been phases: implemented and achieved the purpose of the Phu~ I : Affected families will show appeals and pr0JCC!? verbal or wrinen grievances to village heads, All activities ofthe projects will be monitored by the commune chiefs or wotl

Appendix 4: Public Consultation Meetings

Pre-Public Consultation meeting with authorities and affected people Provincial for Road Network Improvement Project (RNIP)

Date: 19, June 2019 Time: 3:00 pm to 4:30 pm Location: Sangkat Svay Damkum (commune office) at Siem Reap province. Participants: Total = 50persons / F = 14 persons, Male: 36persons

Agenda

I. Consultation meeting was chair by Chief of Sangkat Svay Damkum (Commune) II. Presentation by Mr. HeaHav, Chief of Sangkat Svay Damkum (Commune) III. Representative of MPWT, Mr. Chinda (PMU) and Mr. Sambath (ESO)

Mr. Sambath introduced about project component and relevant technical of project for new component propose discussion and also descrip about Social safeguard policy statement of ADB.

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist fully introduced detail about Social Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) and ADB Policy. Detail more about Resettlement and received all concern raised by Local authorities and Affected person living along the road site of project. 1. Welcome to the participates 2. Explain about project description, component and technical propose /Loan from ADB 3. Schedule, Scope, activities, social impact during construction. 4. who is responsible for this Project and funding? 5. Brief explain safeguards policy statement. 6. What is the contribution affected assets and benefit? 7. Framework for compensation and Entitlements (No compensation base on PIB) 8. Vulnerable Group, Affected Families (Severely and marginal) 9. Cut-off date (Since 2005-2017 during construction road No.6) 10. Grievance Redress Mechanism (Have in PIB) 11. Discussion participation from all stakeholders (questions and answers)

Mr. HeaHav, chief of Sangkat Svay Damkum during conducted the public consult meeting was welcome with all of the participants jointed the meeting today. Great thanks for all of participants that gives me great pleasure to extend to you all very warm welcome on behalf of the provincial and district hall and to say how grateful we are to MPWT, DPWT and national consultants, local authority and other relevant of project component are joint our meeting and discussion today. The purpose to arrange the public consult meeting today is focus about the about new project proposed from Ministry of Public Work and Transport for improvement of our Nation Road No 6, as name of project is “Road Network Improvement project (RNIP)”. This project is support by Asian Development Bank (ADB).

Mr. Sambath, ESO, Explain about the additional section of RNIP The Road Network Improvement Project – Additional section was may include additional works for the National Road No 6 separated with two section such as CW-A1 (PK:311+851 to PK: 317+630) in Siem Reap Town and CW- fromA2 (PK: 367+510 to PK: 415+857) Banteay Meanchey provinces. The COI for RNIP requirement is only 11m from central line. The additional works would build on the achievements of RNIP-AF to ensure the continued effective use of the rehabilitated national and provincial road network. For climate resilience, the works may include improvements in side drainage in flood prone areas along the roads. The envisaged works would also support the planning and development of the road

24 maintenance program by further enhancing the capacity of MPWT to carry out data collection, processing and analysis necessary for effective road of the national and provincial road networks. It would also provide ongoing support to the community-based road safety, prevention for HIV/AIDs, human trafficking, gender-based violence and violence against children.

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguard and Resettlement Specialist explain about Social Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) • SPS – describes common objectives of ADB’s safeguards, lays out principles, outlines delivery process for ADB’s safeguard policy • A set of specific safeguard requirements that borrowers/clients are expected to meet when addressing social and environmental impacts and risks • A consolidated Operations Manual section that specifies ADB’s internal review procedures for due diligence and for supervision throughout the project cycle • Procedure Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) • Cut-off date • PIB distribution Goal: To promote the sustainability of project outcomes by protecting the environment and people from potential adverse impacts of projects

Objectives: • avoid adverse impacts of projects on the environment and affected people, where possible • minimize, mitigate and/or compensate for adverse project impacts on the environment and affected people when avoidance is impossible • help borrowers/clients to strengthen their safeguard systems and develop the capacity to manage environmental and social risks

ADB Involuntary Resettlement Policy Key principles: • Fully inform/Closely consult with Affected persons (APs) • Disclosure of IR information at early stages • Identifying eligibility Cut-off date • Compensate/rehabilitate damage before impact occurs • Recognize rights of non-titled people for entitlements • Assist vulnerable groups • Include IR costs in project costs and benefits • Covers permanent/temporary losses due to: • Impact on land • Impact on assets affected by land impacts • Impact on livelihood Losses related to land impacts

According to SPS, we try to avoid adverse impacts of project on the environment and affected people, where possible. The RNIP tries to minimize all impact as the project can. I would like to inform that, for the National Road No.6 is already compensate on 2005 and 2006 during the first national road construction with affected living along the road site. So, this stage the project needs only 11m from the COI only.

If anyone have any question, suggestion or requirement please kindly ask and sharing idea. We will support all the answers and tires to reply all the information as project can. We would like detail discussion more with all participants for receiving all the best idea and recommendation for develop our project to be success. Please starting now;

Mr. Thav, Microfinane; Q: How about bridge and drainage? is restore or replacing?

Mr. Sambath, ESO A: According to the condition of bridge and drainage is still using or not, but is cannot or broken, the project will be replacing with new standard. But if bridge can use normally but problem rush or some problem during raining season, the project will be restoring or cleaning for continue using again.

Q: Please inform us before the construction start civil work by letter if possible. A: Yes, the project always follows with the admin practice by inform all the local authority such chief of commune and chief of village as is information before starting construction. Great thanks for your suggestion.

Mr. Kimny, Villager, Q. Does the project replace with old or new drainage along the road site?

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist A: Yes like Mr. Sambath mention above, is based on the location of urban or rural. But in Project also detail in PIBs that, at the urban area we will install new cannel with U type. But some location, is no needed to replace and just to cleaning or restoring only.

Mr. Sotha, Dara Angkor Hotel, Suggestion: Please the project, road construction or rehabilitee, make sure that, road is higher Drainage along the way of road. Because I note that, is mostly accidence with all the higher than road.

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist Yes Sir, great thanks for your suggestion and comment for this issue. We will note and inform by detail discussion with the engineering design during implementation.

Mss. Navy, Villager, Suggestion: Please using the storm garbage and storm water/drainage with all drainage.

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist Great Ideas and well note with thanks, great thanks for your suggestion and comment for this issue. We will note and inform by detail discussion with the engineering design during implementation.

Ms. Nika, Company Staff, Q: How about business disruption during the implementation? What is the method road construction using?

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist A: Yes, great thanks for your question, for the business, disruption is biggest problem in the urban areas. The project tries to minimize all any impact with business disruption, where possible. But for the construction method, I’m not yet know that, the contractor needs to do the entire existing road or just one side for construction. For this issue, we will inform again after finishing the final design drawing and next public consult meeting.

Close Public Consult Meeting by chief commune and Mr. Sambath (ESO) Referring to the Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist provided detail information, he would like to inform to all of authorities and other relevant of the project to participate together hardly get success and he provide to chief of village to collaborate closely with working group also when the project need any assist for support the project next time or during implementation.

Photos Consultation meeting Svay Dangkum (Siem Reap)

Pre-Public Consultation meeting with authorities and affected people Provincial for Road Network Improvement Project (RNIP)

Date: 20, June 2019 Time: 9: 00 am to 11: 00 am Location: Phnom Leap commune (commune office) at Banteay Meanchey province. Participants: - Total = 124persons / F = 30 persons, Male: 94 persons Agenda

I. Consultation meeting was chair by Chief of Sangkat Svay Damkum (Commune) II. Presentation by Mr. HeaHav, Chief of Sangkat Svay Damkum (Commune) III. Representative of MPWT, ESO Mr. Sambath IV. Representative of MPWT, Mr. Chinda (PMU) and Mr. Sambath (ESO)

Mr. Sambath introduced about project component and relevant technical of project for new component propose discussion and also described about Social safeguard policy statement of ADB.

Chief of Phnom Leap commune during conducted the public consult meeting was welcome with all of the participants jointed the meeting today. Great thanks for all of participants that gives me great pleasure to extend to you all very warm welcome on behalf of the provincial and district hall and to say how grateful we are to MPWT, DPWT and national consultants, local authority and other relevant of project component are joint our meeting and discussion today. The purpose to arrange the public consult meeting today is focus about the about new project proposed from Ministry of Public Work and Transport for improvement of our Nation Road No 6, as name of project is “Road Network Improvement project (RNIP)”. This project is support by Asian Development Bank (ADB).

Mr. Sambath, ESO, Explain about the additional section of RNIP The Road Network Improvement Project – Additional section was may include additional works for the National Road No 6 separated with two section such as CW-A1(PK:311+851 to PK: 317+630) in Siem Reap Town and CW- fromA2 (PK: 367+510 to PK: 415+857) Banteay Meanchey provinces. The COI for RNIP requirement is only 11m from central line. The additional works would build on the achievements of RNIP-AF to ensure the continued effective use of the rehabilitated national and provincial road network. For climate resilience, the works may include improvements in side drainage in flood prone areas along the roads. The envisaged works would also support the planning and development of the road maintenance program by further enhancing the capacity of MPWT to carry out data collection,

28 processing and analysis necessary for effective road of the national and provincial road networks. It would also provide ongoing support to the community-based road safety, prevention for HIV/AIDs, human trafficking, gender-based violence and violence against children.

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguard and Resettlement Specialist

Explain about Social Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) • SPS – describes common objectives of ADB’s safeguards, lays out principles, outlines delivery process for ADB’s safeguard policy • A set of specific safeguard requirements that borrowers/clients are expected to meet when addressing social and environmental impacts and risks • A consolidated Operations Manual section that specifies ADB’s internal review procedures for due diligence and for supervision throughout the project cycle Goal: To promote the sustainability of project outcomes by protecting the environment and people from potential adverse impacts of projects

Mr. Thong, the villager Q: Does is the maintenance only?

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist A: Yes, according to the project description in PIBs, this road (No.6) is recovery and maintenance only on the existing road and only 11m for COI.

Mr. Sophat, Villager, Q. When the project stat construction?

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist A: Yes, Great thanks, we are not sure now, but maybe as soon as possible or next year I think. We will inform later for the construction date. Please follow up our project by jointing next time public consult meeting.

Mr. Sotha, Dara, Villager Q: Yes, it’s just repairing or restoring, how about old drainage? Can be used?

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist A: Yes Sir, for the old drainage is can be use if the condition still good by restoring or cleaning only. But if old drainages are broken, the project will be replacing new drainage. But some place is mostly urban areas, the project will be installing new drainages.

Mss. Navy, Villager, Q: Is not bigger than 11m COI?

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist A: Yes, that right, is not over 11 meters from the project requesting.

Ms. Sobin, Water Supply Owner (Private), Q: How about water supply in underground?

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist A: Yes, great thanks for your question, this the problem during the construction by digging for propose drainage at side drain. It will be affected with the project. If possible, please follow up with contractor and inform each other about where you water supply install un underground and main system. Because we can avoid any impact during construction by remove or need to do anything by discussion with contractor for finding the best solution each other.

Photos Consultation meeting at Phnom leap

Pre-Public Consultation meeting with authorities and affected people Provincial for Road Network Improvement Project (RNIP)

Date: 20 June 2019 Time: 3: 00 pm to 4: 30 pm Location: Wat Svay Pagoda at Banteay Meanchey province. Participants: - Total = 67 persons / F = 21 persons, Male: 46 persons

Agenda

I. Consultation meeting was chair by Chief of commune II. Presentation by Chief of commune III. Representative of MPWT, Mr. Chinda (PMU) and Mr. Sambath (ESO)

Mr. Sambath introduced about project component and relevant technical of project for new component propose discussion and also descrip about Social safeguard policy statement of ADB.

The Chief of commune during conducted the public consult meeting was welcome with all of the participants jointed the meeting today. Great thanks for all of participants that gives me great pleasure to extend to you all very warm welcome on behalf of the provincial and district hall and to say how grateful we are to MPWT, DPWT and national consultants, local authority and other relevant of project component are joint our meeting and discussion today. The purpose to arrange the public consult meeting today is focus about the about new project proposed from Ministry of Public Work and Transport for improvement of our Nation Road No 6, as name of project is “Road Network Improvement project (RNIP)”. This project is support by Asian Development Bank (ADB).

Mr. Sambath, ESO, Explain about the additional section of RNIP

The Road Network Improvement Project – Additional section was may include additional works for the National Road No 6 separated with two section such as CW-A1(PK:311+851 to PK: 317+630) in Siem Reap Town and CW- fromA2 (PK: 367+510 to PK: 415+857) Banteay Meanchey provinces.

The COI for RNIP requirement is only 11m from central line. The additional works would build on the achievements of RNIP-AF to ensure the continued effective use of the rehabilitated national and provincial road network. For climate resilience, the works may include improvements in side drainage in flood prone areas along the roads. The envisaged works would also support the planning and development of the road maintenance program by

32 further enhancing the capacity of MPWT to carry out data collection, processing and analysis necessary for effective road of the national and provincial road networks. It would also provide ongoing support to the community-based road safety, prevention for HIV/AIDs, human trafficking, gender-based violence and violence against children.

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguard and Resettlement Specialist

Mr. Luth, the villager Q: In the rural areas, is the project proposed to install drainage?

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist

A: Yes Great thanks for your question, in the rural is not yet sure with drainage proposing, but in urban areas mostly are proposed the drainage (u drain type). I will inform about this issue to the commune again after the final design drawing.

Mr. Kada, Villager, Suggestion: Please do not disposal the garbage to the drainage?

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist Yes, Great thanks for your great ideas and the best solution for reducing the drainage problem during raining and flooding by garbage. The project and MPWT always tries to advertise and advise more about this problem. Because is more affected with community and healthy. Please do not throw or disposal your garbage into the drainage.

Mss. Sokra, Villager Q: I’m not sure about the existing drainage, it’s just repairing or restoring during the construction starts.

Mss.Vantha, Medicine Seller, Q: Is not bigger than 11m COI? How about compensate processing?

Mr. Chan Narith, Social Safeguards and Resettlement Specialist A: Yes, that right, is not over 11 meters from the project requesting. For the compensation is will be process if the project is finding any AHs affect with project by over 20 meter from COI. But for our project is need more than 11m in the existing road and side drain.

Photos participants during Public Consultation meeting at Wat Savy (SereySoporn)

Appendix 5: Attendance List

Dat e and Time:

Venue

No Name G-e-n~ F/l'I Position Signature

Minis.tty of Publ,c Wotk and Tnmpon Roatd Networil tmp,ov,,,nent Proj«t Project -nacement Un,t3 AD8 loon No.3S76-cAM (COL)

ATTENDENCE SHEET

Date and Time:

Venue

No Name Position Signature

~.T G\)..).S',~ l Q, 8 4 s

Ministry of Public Work and Transport Road Network Improvement Project Project Management Unit3 ADB Loan No.3576-CAM (COL)

ATTENDENCE SHEET

Date and Time:

Venue

No Name Position Signature

Ministry of Public Work and Transport ,/ Road Network Improvement Project Project Management Unit3 ADS loan No.3576-CAM (COL)

ATTENDENCE SHEET

Date and Time:

Venue

No Name &en~:FJ M Pesitiot? Signature

~ M~

6'"5"", vu- "1 ?::) !')' {J)w g- <:J ?{ ~ ~ r s~f Cf' --

~ ~ I ~(; cinr:J'

-1'2. c'3 ~ ~ ~✓ Jfc-r f?v· l?j> NE:' U)C}: C'-!' ~ :lff r:-.r ~ -:I q ~ ::-;i--l,)'~ ~ (\[ f:J -s"' lf~ 1S {j)s ~~ .(%:}'_ ~ Ji'~ 41/ !,{~ .i'-)'~ ~~cl P. £,1 -{ ~ CA--

~~ ~~s s• .ll1c--t ~ N"/'i: 6-7,:<.1 2s fi ~~ cf; t;' (!JcG s ff~ yt/JP' ,, JI i)y ~~ ~i' ~', fi~ ~ 'Lo t✓ 5-') c,J @', i rlN ~ ':l.. ( ~s c,If cu§J: ~; i 1)\-i JJ ~,, 'L.!?_ ~~ ~ c;;,;'~ ~ \R'N . '/.!]'_ ~ ~J clhw c-w ~· sf"" .0--,,:,..- "2..S J:jJ @E'--1 fJjcl ~~ 'l..C I:<'\ ri' ~:Y-;/ ~ fjN L-(.,..9' "1,:7 ,.;n ,;: .. n1

'!?, C'-< I ";).Ji'(.\)' ':/2... 'e-' (9~ I ~·t~ --4,JJ- 33 r:J' ~A- (F,, I s,,.• fl'~ ul%J-- gJ..; Y.r~ .&)f;l ff('-" I {pN µ /Yr ~ '3£ .t'i s u5Ji , 'f ,.,Jr N 0- c:,._, ,;,, ~ti &l JS>,}- I s· ('S ~ c~ ,.., I\' N C'S ~7 i iYJJ ~ J:f ~ Ji>£' {' .fl" N" _H, µ ~ s9 r;- r:rJ ~w- i ~

Ministry of Public Work and Transpo,t Road Network lmpro11ement Project Project Management Unlt3 AOB ~n No .3576-CAM (COL)

ATTENDENCE SHEET

Date and Time: Venue

No Name G-cxide.r ~/M Position Signature

- r ,, ,_

,, , l

r ,,

,-J / ,_ u

M ,n,stry of Public Wort< and Tran$p0ft Road Networlt Improvement Pr01ect Project Management Unit3 AOB loan No.3576-CAM (COL)

ATTENDENCE SHEET

Date and Time: Venue

No Name

(ll,T G~~ Q>-fi"~ ~p U\~<;tu~ 0., iJ ~R' c}JN ~~'lJd'o 'i::)';:r- , B5') i W$~ ~ ~ f- - / 8:J 6j:if ~~ ...!!;fr' - 12 V .0 tl1 .g /;i, ,r 36'-, - .___ \_~, (J 1 fw- fJi;::1- Q"'~, <~ -- --- ~('/~ --er- ~ ~6'-- ~ . 1)1 ~F /Yln,-r- -t>-- ~,

I' I I

q~ ~ (;.}~ i9 v' {!;1)1 -t-- I ,v) c!,,__ Is- ~ .3 ?;? -- 0 l- ~ ----

J /lf.. ~.t (T '"'f,~ 12 v' (!J )1 -t..- I ('J') _(I.___ Is- j, .d -~ 01:, rtS-0:,P --- 1 f?J

~ 6'~R fj (fl) -'-- ri-1 J,ti 7/00 -~ __,_ 2-2 ~~

23 ~ ~) -"--- z~ ~'u t}.)~ _t,._ 2S hu ,!Jr)g _l-.- 2a; &, _, tJ ypi --''--- 1,,f> G>U --,,,...... _ 2 h,. ~) w- __,,_ 36 rfi';:f 'v' ~ FJ _..._

Ministry of Public Work and Transport Road Network lmprovemen\ Project Pro1ec1 Management Unit3 ADB Loan No .3576-CAM (COL)

ATTENDENCE SHEET

Date and Time:

Venue

No Position Signature J --

- 'Nlt:? ~ff76"7 F / w: b, ~ ...... r~ .:>

Ministry of Pub&4c W e rk ,ind Tn1n1port Rold Networ"k knp,ovement ProjKt ProJt,-ct M11nag~ment Unlt3 A08 l0an No 3 S76-CAM (COL)

ATTEND ENCE SH EET

DateandTime: .lo/~1~/~19 Venue : (<1/'i\ ~o.s~i -J. f->{-;:: (f7'.(} No Name ~6e<"-~---.----- ~/11 Position ~----~Signature

L u;!,-.,,J..n:,,.,, l~ /

-;: / n ---l-;;:c__'-----4-"'4,,,cf-,:::~'--{

\o I I /2.