FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 WASHINGTON, D.C.

Volume 36 ■ Number 132 Pages 12889-12959

(Part II begins on page 12951)

HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE This listing does not affect the legal status of any document published in this issue. Detailed table of contents appears inside. POLITICAL ACTIVITY— CSC amendments relat­ ing to employees of Postal Service; effective 7 -1 -71 ...... 12893

BANK HOLDING COMPANIES— FRS regulations on nonbanking acquisitions; effective 6-3 0-7 1.. 12894

PESTICIDES— EPA establishment of tolerances (7 documents) and reduced tolerance (1 docu­ ment); effective 7 -9 -7 1 ______12896

PROCUREMENT— AEC revised implementation of extraordinary contracting authority______12901

BROADCAST STATIONS— FCC amendments on construction period and notification time for some applications (2 documents); effective 7-13-71 ...... 12903

RADIO DOOR CONTROLS— FCC amendments and stay of effective date until 1 1 -1-7 1 ______12905

BANK HOLDING COMPANIES— FRS proposal on control of a bank or other company; comments by 8-6-71 12896

COLOR ADDITIVES— FDA proposal to list lakes of FD&C Red No. 40 for food and drug use...... 12908

PROCUREMENT— HEW proposal to permit vesting of certain property titles with eligible contractors ...... 12909

(Continued inside) Now Available

LIST OF CFR SECTIONS AFFECTED

1949-1963

This volume contains a compilation of the “List of Sections Af­ fected” for all titles of the Code of Federal Regulations for the years 1949 through 1963. All sections of the CFR which have been ex­ pressly affected by documents published in the daily Federal Reg­ ister are enumerated.

Reference to this list will enable the user to find the precise text of CFR provisions which were in force and effect on any given date during the period covered.

Price: $6.75

Compiled by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration

Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office ' Washington, D.C. 20402

* TSl Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National FEDEML^pEGISTER Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration, Washington, D.C. 20408, pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., Ch. 15), under regulations prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, ap­ proved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I ) . Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The Federal Register will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $2.50 per month or $25 per year, payable in advance. The charge for individual copies is 20 cents for each issue, or 20 cents for each group of pages as actually bound. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published, under 50 titles, pursuant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended (44 U.S.C. 1510). The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first Federal Register issue of each month. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the Federal Register or the Code of Federal Regulations. HIGHLIGHTS— Continued

MINERAL COLLECTION— Interior Dept, proposal INTERNATIONAL CARGO— CAB notice on North on permits within national forests...... 12907 Atlantic rates; hearing on 7 -2 7 -7 1 ...... 12918

INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM— FCC pro­ NOISE ABATEMENT— EPA notice of hearings 12921 posal to reserve certain frequencies for aviation guidance; comments by 8 -1 3 -7 1 ....:.—...... 12914 PESTICIDES— EPA notices regarding tolerances (7 documents)...... 12898 RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS— DOT proposals to extend scope of reporting requirements (3 docu­ RADIATION PROTECTION— EPA reaffirmation ments); comments by 8 -3 1 -7 1 ...... — ...... 12913 notice of guidance for Federal agencies concern­ ing uranium mining...... 12921 WILDERNESS AREA— Interior Dept, announce­ ment regarding Yosemite National Park; hearings INSURED BANKS— FDIC, Comptroller of the Cur­ on 9-11-71, 9-14-71, 9-16-71 ...... 12917 rency, and FRS joint call for report of condition.. 12931

FOOD ADDITIVES— FDA notices of petitions (2 CHECK CLEARING— FRS statement of policy on documents) and withdrawal of petition...... 12917 payments mechanism ...... 12930 Contents

AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Milk in Quad Cities-Dubuque mar­ Proposed Rule Making keting area; order suspending Airworthiness directives: See Consumer and Marketing certain provision______12895 Hawker Siddley airplanes------12910 Service. Peaches grown in Mesa County, Piper airplanes______12910 Colo.; regulation by grades and ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Control zones and transition size ______12893 areas; proposed alterations Rules and Regulations Proposed Rule Making (2 documents)______12912 Procurement; extraordinary con­ Fresh pears grown in California; Radioactive materials; reports— 12913 tractual actions------12901 handling------12908 Transition areas : Oranges and grapefruit grown in Proposed alteration------12911 CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Lower Rio Grande Valley in Proposed designation (2 docu­ Notices Texas ; proposed increase in ments) ------12912 Hearings, etc.: expenses______12908 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Aeronaves Del Ecuador, S.A. COMPTROLLER OF THE “Aerodesa” ------12918 COMMISSION Eastern Air Lines, Inc. (2 docu­ CURRENCY ments) ______12918,12919 Notices Rules and Regulations International Air Transport As­ Broadcast stations; construction sociation (3 documents)----- 12919, Insured banks; joint call for re­ period and notification time for 12920 port of condition; cross refer­ some applications (2 docu­ North Atlantic Cargo Rates—— 12920 ence ______12917 ments) ______12903,12904 Overseas National Airways, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Sagamore Hill Radio Observatory; In c ______12920 frequency allocation______12905 AGENCY Radio door controls------12905 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Rules and Regulations Proposed Rule Making Rules and Regulations Pesticides; establishment of toler­ ances 8 documents)_____ 12898-12901 Certain FM broadcast stations; Excepted service : table of assignments------12914 Army Department------12893 Notices Instrument landing system; pro­ Commerce Department------12893 Noise abatement; hearing------12921 posal to reserve certain frequen­ United States Postal Service; Pesticides; tolerances (7 docu­ cies for aviation guidance------12914 political activities------12893 ments) ______12921-12923 Radiation protection; underground Notices COAST GUARD mining of uranium ore______12921 Common carrier services informa­ Proposed Rule Making tion; domestic public radio serv­ Radioactive material; immediate FEDERAL AVIATION ices applications accepted for notice of certain hazardous inci­ ADMINISTRATION filin g______12923 dents ______12909 Rules and Regulations FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CONSUMER AND MARKETING Control zones and transition areas: CORPORATION SERVICE Alterations (2 documents)----- 12896, Notices Rules and Regulations 12897 Insured banks; joint call for re­ Irish potatoes grown in certain Revocation ______12897 port of condition------12926 Transition areas; alterations (2 counties in Idaho and Oregon; (Continued on next page) shipment limitations documents)______12896,12897 ------12894 12891 12892 CONTENTS

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Proposed Rule Making Notices REGULATIONS BOARD Mineral collection; permits within national forests______12907 Southern Natural Gas Co.; notice Proposed Rule Making of applications (2 documents) _ 12926, Hazardous materials; transporta­ NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 12927 tion _:______12913 Proposed Rule Making FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Channel Islands National Monu­ HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND ment, Calif.; submerged fea­ Rules and Regulations WELFARE DEPARTMENT tures, wrecks and fishing_____ *12907 Bank holding companies; non­ banking acquisitions______12896 See also Food and Drug Adminis­ Notices tration. Yosemite National Park, Calif.; Proposed Rule Making Proposed Rule Making public hearing regarding wil­ Bank holding companies; control Procurement sources; vesting of derness proposal______12917 of bank or other company_____ 12915 certain property titles with eli­ Notices gible contractors______;_____ 12909 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Applications for approval of ac­ COMMISSION quisition of shares of bank (4 HOUSING AND URBAN Notices documents) •___ 12927, 12928, 12930 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Hearings, etc.: Insured banks; joint call for re­ Notices Commingled Investment Ac­ port of condition; cross refer­ count of First National City ence _i______,______12931 Director, Office of Counseling and Community Services; redelega­ B an k ------12931 Orders approving acquisition of Datacon International, Inc_!__ 12931 bank stock by bank holding tion of authority______12918 Ecological Science Corp______12932 companies (2 documents) _____ 12928 INTERIOR DEPARTMENT Flying Tiger Corp______12932 Order approving action to become Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al_ 12932 bank holding company______12929 See Land Management Bureau; Greater Washington Investors, Policy on payments mechanism_ 12930 National Park Service. Inc., and Greater Washington FISCAL SERVICE Industrial Investment, Inc___ 12932 INTERSTATE COMMERCE Jefferson Standard Separate Ac­ Notices COMMISSION count A eta l______12933 Surety companies acceptable on Notices Keystone Custodian Fund, Se­ Federal bonds______12952 ries K—1 and Keystone Custo­ Motor carrier, broker, water car­ dian Fund, Series B-4______12934 FOOD AND DRUG rier and freight forwarder ap­ Pilot Separate Account A et al_ 12935 plications ______12937 Phillip Morris Inc______12936 ADMINISTRATION Motor carrier transfer proceed­ Proposed Rule Making ings ______12948 TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc., et Color additives; list of lakes sub­ al.; assignment of hearings__ 12949 See Coast Guard; Federal Aviation ject to certification______12908 Administration; Hazardous Ma­ Notices LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU terials Regulation Board. Certain companies; petitions and withdrawal of petition regard­ Rules and Regulations TREASURY DEPARTMENT ing food additives (3 docu­ California; public land order; See Comptroller of the Currency; ments) ______12917 correction ______12903 Fiscal Service. List of CFR Parts Affected

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears following the Notices section of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1971, and specifies how they are affected.

5 CFR 71 (5 docum ents)_ 12911-12912 46 CFR 103- ______— 12913 213 (2 documents) 12893 P roposed R ules: 733______12893 21 CFR 2______: ______12909 7 CFR 420 (3 docum ents)______12898-12901 146______12909 919______12893 P roposed R ules: 945______12894 8 ______12908 47 CFR 1063______12895 36 CFR 12903, 12904 P roposed R ules: 1(2 documents) P roposed R ules: ...... 12905 906______12908 2______917______12908 7______12907 15______— _____ 12905 12 CFR 41 CFR P roposed R ules 2______12914 222______12894 9 - 1 7 ______12901 73______12914 P roposed R ules: P roposed R ules: 3-5— ______- ______12909 222______12915 43 CFR 49 CFR 14 CFR P ublic Land Order: 171______12913 71 (5 documents) _ 12896-12897 5069______12903 174______12913 P roposed R ules: P roposed R ules: 175 ______~ ______12913 39 (2 documents) ______12910 3540______12907 177____ .______12913 12893 Rules and Regulations

tices, distributions channels and costs, Title 5— ADMINISTRATIVE or business financing and credit prac­ Title 7— AGRICULTURE tices applicable to one or more of the PERSONNEL current segments of industry served by Chapter IX— Consumer and Market­ ’ ^ y the Bureau of Domestic Commerce, the ing Service (Marketing Agreements Chapter I— Civil Service Commission Office of Textiles, and the Office of Im­ and Orders; Fruits, Vegetables, port Programs. Appointments under this Nuts), Department of Agriculture PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE authority' may be made for a period of Department of the Army not to exceed 2 years and may, with [Peach Reg. 9] prior approval of the Commission, be Section 213.3107 is amended to show PART 919— PEACHES GROWN IN extended for an additional period of 2 THE COUNTY OF MESA IN THE that in the Defense Systems Manage­ years. ment School, Fort Belvoir, Va., the STATE OF COLORADO (5 U.S.C. secs. 3301, 3302, E.O. 10577; 3 positions of Deputy Commandant and CFR 1954-58 Comp., p. 218) professors in grades GS-13 through Grades and Sizes GS-15 are excepted under Schedule A. U nited S tates Civil S erv­ Findings. (1) Pursuant to the market­ Effective on publication in the F ederal ice Commission, ing agreement, as amended, and Order Register (7-9-71), paragraph (i) is [seal] J ames C. S pry, No. 919, as amended (7 CFR Part 919), added to § 213.3107 as set out below. Executive Assistant to regulating the handling of peaches the Commissioners. grown in the county of Mesa in the State § 213.3107 Department of the Army. [FR Doc.71-9742 Filed 7-8-71;8:53 am] of Colorado, effective under the appli­ * * * * * cable provisions of the Agricultural Mar­ (i) Defense Systems Management keting Agreement Act of 1937, as School, Fort Belvoir, Va. (1) The Deputy amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), and upon Commandant and professors in grades PART 733— POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF the basis of the recommendations of the GS-13 through 15. FEDERAL EMPLOYEES Administrative Committee, established (5 U.S.C. secs. 3301, 3302, E.O. 10577; 3 CFR Subpart D— The U.S. Postal Service under the aforesaid amended marketing 1954-58 Comp., p. 218) agreement and order, and upon other Part 733 is amended by adding a new available information, it is hereby found U nited S tates Civil S erv­ Subpart D, setting forth the jurisdiction that the limitation of shipments of such ice Commission, of the Civil Service Commission, and the peaches, as hereinafter provided, will [seal] J ames C. S pry, applicable procedures, relative to politi­ tend to effectuate the declared policy of Executive Assistant to cal activity complaints against employees the act. the Commissioners. of the U.S. Postal Service. The new Sub- (2) The recommendations by the Ad­ [FR Doc.71-9743 Filed 7-8-71;8:53 am] part D, which is effective July 1, 1971, ministrative Committee reflect its ap­ reads as follows: praisal of the crop and current and pros­ Sec. pective market conditions. Shipments of PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE 733.401 Jurisdiction. peaches from the production area are 733.402 Procedure. expected to begin on or about July IQ, Department of Commerce Authority : The provisions of this Subpart 1971. The grade and size requirements Section 213.3114 is amended to show D issued under 5 U.S.C. 1308, 3301, 3302, provided herein are necessary to prevent that the Schedule A authority for tem­ 7324, 7325, 42 U.S.C. 2729, E.O. 10577; 3 CFR the handling, on and after July 10, 1971, porary appointment to industrial and 1954—58 Comp. of any peaches of lower grades and smaller sizes than those herein specified, marketing specialist positions, GS-12 § 733.401 jurisdiction. through 15, to meet special needs in the so as to provide consumers with good Bureau of Domestic Commerce also may Sections 733.111-733.124 apply to an quality fruit, consistent with the overall be used by the Office of Textiles and the employee of the U.S. Postal Service. By quality of the crop, while maximizing Office of Import Programs, which were agreement with this agency, the Civil returns to the producers pursuant to the formerly part of the Bureau but now declared policy of the act. The grade and Service Commission investigates and ad­ size requirements reflect the necessity report directly to the Assistant Secre­ judicates an allegation of political activi­ tary for Domestic and International for eliminating the least desirable grades Business. ty in violation of these sections by a cov­ and sizes; the committee’s estimate of ered agency employee. the percentage of the fruit that will be Effective on publication in the F ed­ eliminated by such requirements; and eral R egister (7-9-71), subparagraph § 733.402 Procedure. the quantity of the more desirable grades (3) of paragraph (i) of § 213.3114 is and sizes which will be available for ship­ amended as set out below. The procedures of sections 733.131- 733.137 apply to an action taken by the ment after such elimination. § 213.3114 Department of Commerce. Civil Service Commission against an (3) It is hereby further found that it ***** is impracticable, unnecessary, and con­ employee over whom it has jurisdiction trary to the public interest to give pre­ (i) Office of the Assistant Secretary under this subpart. liminary notice, engage in public rule- for Domestic and International Business. * * * (5 U.S.C. secs. 1308, 3301, 3302, 7324, 7325, making procedure, and postpone the ef­ 7327, 42 U.S.C. sec. 2729, E.O. 10577; 3 CFR fective date of this regulation until 30 (3) Not to exceed 30 positions in 1954-58 Comp.) days after publication hereof in the F ed­ grades GS-12 through 15, to be filled eral R egister (5 U.S.C. 553) in that, as by persons qualified as industrial or mar­ U nited S tates Civil S erv­ hereinafter set forth, the time interven­ ice Commission, keting specialists, who possess specialized ing between the date when information knowledge and experience in industrial [seal] J ames C. S pry, Executive Assistant to upon which this regulation is based be­ Production, industrial operations and re­ came available and the time when this lated problems, market structure and the Commissioners. regulation must become effective in or­ trends, retail and wholesale trade prac­ [FR Doc.71-9744 Filed 7-8-71; 8:53 am] der to effectuate the declared policy of

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12894 RULES AND REGULATIONS the act is insufficient; a reasonable time PART 945— IRISH POTATOES GROWN Oregon Potato Committee held an open is permitted, under the circumstances, IN CERTAIN DESIGNATED COUN­ meeting June 18, 1971, to consider rec­ for preparation for such effective time; ommendations for a limitation of ship­ and good cause exists for making the TIES IN IDAHO AND MALHEUR ments regulation, after giving due notice provisions hereof effective not later than COUNTY, OREGON of such meeting, and interested persons July 10,1971. Â reasonable determination Limitation of Shipments were afforded an opportunity to submit as to the supply of, and the demand for, their views at this meeting; information such peaches must await the develop­ Notice of rule making with respect to regarding the provisions of the recom­ ment of the crop and adequate informa­ a proposed limitation of shipments reg­ mendation by the committee has been tion thereon was not available to the Ad­ ulation, to be made effective under Mar­ disseminated among the growers and ministrative Committee until June 24, keting Agreement No. 98 and Order No. handlers of potatoes in the production 1971; recommendations as to the need 945, both as amended (7 CFR Part 945) area; compliance with this section will for, and the extent of, regulation of regulating the handling of Irish pota­ not require any special preparation of shipments of such peaches were made by toes grown in designated counties in potato sorting and packing equipment said committee on June 24, 1971, after Idaho and Malheur County, Oreg.,. was on the part of handlers subject thereto consideration of all information then published in the F ederal R egister, June which cannot be completed on or bef ore available relative to the supply and de­ 29, 1971 (36 F.R. 12238). This program the effective time hereof. mand conditions for such peaches, at is effective under the Agricultural Mar­ which time the recommendation and keting Agreement Act of 1937, as § 945.330 Limitation of shipments. supporting information were submitted amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). During the period beginning the ef­ to the Department on June 29, 1971, and The notice afforded interested persons fective date hereof through July 31,1972, made available to growers and handlers; an opportunity to file written data, views, no person shall handle any lot of pota­ shipments of the currrent crop of. or arguments pertaining thereto not later toes unless such potatoes meet the re­ peaches are expected to begin on or about than 3 days after publication. None was quirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) the effective date hereof ; and this regu­ filed. of this section, or unless such potatoes lation should be applicable, insofar as After consideration of all relevant mat­ are handled in accordance with para­ practicable, to all shipments of such ters presented, including the proposal set graphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section. peaches in order to effectuate the de­ forth in the aforesaid notice which was (a) Minimum quality requirements— clared policy of the act; and compliance recommended by the Idaho-Eastern Ore­ (1) Grade. All varieties—U.S. No. 2, or with this regulation will not require of gon Potato Committee, established pur­ better grade. handlers any preparation therefor which suant to said marketing agreement and (2) Size, (i) Round red varieties—1% order, it is hereby found and determined inches minimum diameter. cannot be completed by the effective that this limitation of shipments reg­ time hereof. (ii) All other varieties—2 inches min­ ulation, as hereinafter set forth, will imum diameter, or 4 ounces minimum § 919.310 P each R egulation 9. tend to effectuate the declared policy of weight. the act. (a) Order. During the period July 10 The recommendations by the Idaho- (ili) All varieties—Size B if U.S. No. Eastern Oregon Potato Committee re­ 1, or better grade. through August 13,1971, no handler shall (iv) When containers of long varieties ship: flect its appraisal of the crop and pros­ pective market conditions. Shipments of of potatoes are marked with a count or (1) Any peaches of any variety which new crop potatoes from the production similar designation they must meet the do not grade at least U.S. No. 1 grade; area are expected to begin about mid- weight range for the count designation (2) Any peaches of any variety which July, however, storage potatoes from last listed below: are of a size smaller than 2% inches in year’s crop will be shipped during the Count designation Weight range diameter: Provided, That any lot of first 2 weeks of July. The proposed reg­ Larger than 50 count. 15 ounces or larger. peaches shall be deemed to be of a size ulation provided herein is necessary to 50 count______12-19 ounces. prevent potatoes of lower grades, un­ 60 count______10-16 ounces. not smaller than 2 Va inches in diameter desirable sizes, and potatoes Of lesser 70 count______9-15 ounces. (i) if not more than 10 percent, by count, 80 count______8-13 ounces. maturities from being distributed in the 90 count______7-12 ounces. of such peaches in such lot are smaller channels of commerce to improve the 100 count______6-10 ounces. than 2 y8 inches in diameter; and (ii) if returns to producers for preferred grades 110 count______5-9 ounces. not more than 15 percent, by count, of and sizes. The specific requirements, 120 count______4-8 ounces. the peaches contained in any individual hereinafter set forth, regulate the han­ 130 count_____ s.___ 4-8 ounces. dling of potatoes by grade, size, clean­ 140 count______4-8 ounces. container in such lot are smaller than liness, and maturity so as to (1) pro­ Smaller than 140 2 Va inches in diameter. mote orderly marketing, (2) standard­ count ______4-8 ounces. (b) Definitions. As used herein, ize the quality of the potatoes shipped The following tolerances, by weight, are “peaches,” “handler,” “ship,” and from the production area, and (3) max­ provided for potatoes in any lot which “varieties” shall have the same mean­ imize returns to the producers pursuant fail to meet the weight range for the ing as when used in the aforesaid to the declared policy of the act. designated count: The proposed regulation with respect (a) Not to exceed 5 percent for under­ amended marketing agreement and to special purpose shipments for other size; and, order; “U.S. No. 1,” “diameter,” and than fresh market use is designed to (b) Not to exceed 10 percent for “count,” shall have the same meaning meet the different requirements for such oversize as when used in the U.S. Standards for outlets. (3) Cleanliness. All varieties—“Gen­ Peaches (7 CFR 51.1210-51.1223). It is hereby found that good cause erally fairly clean.” exists for not postponing the effective (b) Minimum maturity require­ (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.O. ments—(1) White Rose and red skin 601-674) date of this section until 30 days after publication in the F ederal R egister (5 varieties. During the period beginning Dated: July 2,1971. U.S.C. 553) in that shipments of pota­ the effective date of this section through December 31,1971, “moderately skinned” P ath. A. N icholson, toes grown in the production area are and thereafter they may be handled Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg­ currently being marketed and the reg­ without regard to the maturity require­ etable Division, Consumer and ulation should become effective at the ments. Marketing Service. time herein provided to maximize the (2) All other varieties. “Slightly fPR Doc.71-9637 Filed 7-8-71;8:45 am] benefits to producers. Idaho-Eastern skinned.”

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 RULES AND REGULATIONS 12895

(3) Exceptions, (i) Subject to compli­ (3) At the time of applying to the specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of ance with subdivision (iii) of this sub- committee for a Certificate of Privilege, this section. paragraph, any lot of potatoes not ex­ or promptly thereafter, furnish the com­ (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. ceeding a total of 50 hundredweight of mittee with a receiver’s or buyer’s cer­ 601-674) each variety may be handled for any tification that the potatoes so handled producer without regard to the fore­ are to be used only for the purpose stated Dated July 6, 1971, to become effective going maturity requirements. in the application and that such re­ July 12,1971. (ii) If an officially inspected lot of ceiver will complete and return to the P aul A. Nicholson, potatoes meets the foregoing maturity committee such periodic receiver’s re­ Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg­ requirements, but fails to meet the grade ports that the committee may require; etable Division, Consumer and and size requirements, the Jot may be • (4) Mail to the office of the committee Marketing Service. regraded. If, after regrading; such lot a copy of the bill of lading for each Cer­ [FR Doc.71-9762 Filed 7-8-71;8:54 am] then meets the grade and size require­ tificate of Privilege shipment promptly ments but fails to meet the maturity after the date of shipment; requirements, as indicated by the appli­ (5) Bill each shipment directly to the Chapter X— Consumer and Marketing cable Federal-State inspection certifi­ applicable processor or receiver. Service (Marketing Agreements and cate, such lot if not exceeding 100 (e) Minimum quantity exception. Each Orders; Milk), Department of Agri­ hundredweight shall be exempt from the handler may ship up to, but not to ex­ foregoing maturity requirements: Pro­ ceed, 5 hundredweight of potatoes any culture vided, That the handler complies with day without regard to the inspection and [Milk Order No. 63] subdivision (iii) of this subparagraph. assessment requirements of this part, but PART 1063— MILK IN THE QUAD (iii) Prior to each shipment of po­ this exception shall not apply to any tatoes exempt from the foregoing ma­ shipment that exceeds 5 hundredweight CITIES-DUBUQUE MARKETING AREA turity requirements, the handler thereof of potatoes. Order Suspending Certain Provision shall report to the committee the name (f) Definitions. The terms “U.S. No. 1,” and address of the producer of such “U.S. No. 2,” “Size B,” “fairly clean,” This suspension order is issued pur­ potatoes, and each such shipment shall “moderately skinned,” and “slightly suant to the provisions of the Agricul­ be handled as an identifiable entity. skinned,” shall have the same meaning tural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, (c) Special purpose shipments. (1) as when used in the U.S. Standards for as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and The minimum grade, size, cleanliness, Potatoes (§§ 51.1540-51.1556 of this of the order regulating the handling of and maturity requirements set forth in title), including the tolerances set forth milk in the Quad Cities-Dubuque mar­ paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section therein. The term “generally fairly keting area. shall not be applicable to shipments of clean” means that at least 90 percent of It is hereby found and determined potatoes for any of the following the potatoes in a given lot are “fairly that for the months of July and August purposes : clean.” But on and after September 1, 1971 the following provision of the order (1) Charity; 1971, such terms shall have the same no longer tends to effectuate the de­ (ii) Certified seed; meaning as when used in said standards, clared policy of the Act: (iii) Seed pieces cut from stock eligi­ as amended, effective September 1, 1971 In § 1063.14 the proviso which reads ble for certification as certified seed; (35 F.R. 18257) including the tolerances “Provided, That in any of the months of (iv) Experimentation; set forth therein. The term “prepeeling” July through January milk diverted from (v) Canning, freezing, and “other means potatoes which are clean, sound, the farm of a producer on more than the processing” as hereinafter defined. fresh tubers prepared commercially in a number of days that the milk was de­ Provided, That shipments of potatoes prepeeling plant by washing, removal of livered to a pool plant from such farm for the purposes specified in subdivision the outer skin or peel, trimming, and during the month shall not be deemed (v) of this subparagraph shall be exempt sorting preparatory to sale in one or more to have been received by the diverting from inspection requirements specified of the styles of peeled potatoes described handler.” in § 945.65 and from assessment require­ in § 52.2422 (UJ3. Standards for Grades Statement of consideration. This sus­ ments specified in § 945.42. of Peeled Potatoes §§ 52.2421-52.2433 of pension order will revoke for the months (2) The minimum grade, size, cleanli­ this title). The term “other processing” of July and August 1971 the provision ness, and maturity requirements set has the same meaning as the term ap­ that limits for the months of July forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this pearing in the act and includes, but is through January the diversion of the section shall be applicable to shipments not restricted to, potatoes for dehydra­ milk of a producer to the same number of potatoes for each of the following tion, chips, shoestrings, starch, and flour. of days that his production was delivered purposes: It includes only that preparation of po­ during the month from the farm to a (i) Export: Provided, That potatoes tatoes for market which involves the ap­ pool plant. of a size not smaller than lVk inches in plication of heat or cold to such an extent This suspension action is necessary to diameter may be shipped if the potatoes that the natural form or stability of the provide for the efficient handling of the grade not less than U.S. No. 2; and commodity undergoes a substantial reserve milk of the market during July (ii) Prepeeling: Provided, That po­ change. The act of peeling, cooling, slic­ and August. Unless the suspension action tatoes of a size not smaller than IV2 ing, or dicing, or the application of ma­ is taken much of the reserve milk supply, inches in diameter may be shipped if terial to prevent oxidation does not con­ in order to remain pooled, necessarily the potatoes grade not less than Idaho stitute “other processing.” The terms will be moved from farms to pool plants Utility or Oregon Utility grade. “Idaho Utility grade” and “Oregon Util­ and then reshipped to manufacturing (d) Safeguards. Each handler mak­ ity grade”'shall have the same meaning plants rather than being moved directly ing shipments of potatoes for charity, as when used in the respective standards from farms to manufacturing plants. seed pieces cut from stock eligible for for potatoes for the respective States. It is hereby found and determined that certification, experimentation, canning, Other terms used in this section shall thirty days’ notice of the effective date freezing, and “other processing” as have the same meaning as when used in hereof is impractical, unnecessary, and hereinafter defined, export, or for pre­ Marketing Agreement No. 98 and Order contrary to the public interest in that: peeling pursuant to paragraph (c) of No. 945, both as amended. (a) This suspension is necessary to re­ this section shall: (g) Applicability to imports. Pursuant flect current marketing conditions and (1) First, apply to the committee for to section 608e-l of the act and § 980.1 to maintain orderly marketing condi­ and obtain a Certificate of Privilege to “Import regulations” (§980.1 of this tions in the marketing area in that the make each shipment; most efficient method of handling the (2) Upon request by the committee, chapter), Irish potatoes of the long vari­ market’s reserve milk supplies is move­ furnish reports of each shipment pur­ eties, imported during the effective pe­ ment. directly from producers’ farms to suant to the applicable Certificate of riod of this section shall meet the grade, milk manufacturing plants. This suspen­ Privilege; size, quality, and maturity requirements sion would allow such handling in July

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12896 RULES AND REGULATIONS and August 1971 and enable the dairy itself of any controlling interest in the Interested persons were afforded an farmers involved to retain producer bank. opportunity to participate in the rule status. 3. The procedural difference between making through the submission of com­ (b) This suspension order does not determinations by the Board under sec­ ments. All comments received were require of persons affected substantial or tion 2(a) (2) (C) of the Act and compli­ favorable. extensive preparation prior to the effec­ ance with the divestiture requirement In consideration of the foregoing, Part tive date; and pursuant to the irrevocable declaration 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (c) Interested parties were afforded is that with respect to the former the is amended, effective 0901 G.m.t., Sep­ opportunity to file written data, views, Board must establish that the relation­ tember 16, 1971, as hereinafter set forth or arguments concerning this suspension ship constitutes control in violation of In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the Auburn, (35 F.R. 10312). None were filed in op­ the Act whereas in the latter the com­ Ala., transition area is amended to read: position to the proposed suspension. pany must establish to the satisfaction Auburn, Ala. of the Board that its relationship with Therefore, good cause exists for mak­ That airspace extending upward from 700 ing this order effective with respect to the bank does not constitute control. feet above the surface within a 5-mile radius producer milk deliveries during July and The Board believes that this difference of Auburn-Qpelika Airport (lat. 32°37'00'' August 1971. ’ is justified in view of the favored treat­ N., long. 85°26'00" W.); within 2 miles It is therefore ordered, That the afore­ ment companies that file such a declara­ each side of the extended centerline of Run­ said provisions of the order are hereby tion have under § 222.4(d) of Regulation way 18/36, extending from the 5-mile-radius suspended for the months of July and Y so far as their nonbanking acquisitions area to 6 mile® north of the runway end; are concerned. within 2.5 miles each side of Columbia, Ga. August 1971. VOR 270° radial, extending from the 5-mile- (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 4. To clarify this matter, § 222.4(d), radius area to 17.5 miles west of the VOR. 601-674) second sentence, is amended by adding footnote 2 following the phrase “in the (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, Effective date: Upon publication in the form approved by the Board”, to read as 49 U.S.C. 1348(a); sec. 6(c>y Department of F ederal R egister (7-9 -7 1 ). follows: Transportation Act, 49 TJ.S.C. 1655(c)) Signed at Washington, D.C., on 2 Although the form of declaration is in Issued in East Point, Ga., on June July 2,1971. terms of a company divesting itself of what­ 30,1971. R ichard E. Lyng, ever interest it has in the bank, a company J ames G. R ogers, Assistant Secretary. is regarded by the Board as complying with Director, Southern Region. this condition if it furnishes the Board with [FR Doc.71-9695 Filed 7-8-71;8:49 am] convincing evidence that it does not exercise [FR Doc.71-9658 Filed 7-8-71;8:45 am] a controlling influence over the management or policies of the bank despite retention of ' [Airspace Docket No. 71-SO-89] some interest in the bank. PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL Title 12— BANKS AND BANKING A similar note is being added to the form AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, Chapter II— Federal Reserve System of declaration itself to avoid misunder­ standing. Companies that have already CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ SUBCHAPTER A— BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF filed their declaration need not refile. PORTING POINTS THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 5. The requirements of section 553(b), [Reg. Y] title 5, United States Code, with respect Alteration of Control Zone and Transition Area PART 222— BANK HOLDING to notice, public participation, and de­ ferred effective date were not followed COMPANIES On May 25, 1971, a notice of proposed with respect to this matter, because it rule making was published in the Fed­ Nonbanking Acquisitions by Certain clarifies rather than changes a substan­ eral R egister (36 F.R. 9448), subse­ One-Bank Holding Companies tive rule. quently amended as published in the Effective date. June 30,1971. F ederal R egister (36 F.R. 11429), dated 1. Pursuant to § 222.4(d), a company June 12, 1971, stating that the Federal that became a bank holding company By order of the Board of Governors, Aviation Administration was considering on December 31, 1970, as a result of the June 30,1971. an amendment to Part 71 of the Federal 1970 amendments to the Bank Holding [seal] K enneth A. K enyon, Aviation Regulations that would alter Company Act may file with the Board an Deputy Secretary. the St. Petersburg, Fla., control zone and irrevocable declaration that it will cease [FR Doc.71-9677 Filed 7-8-71;8:47 am] Tampa, Fla., transition area. to be a bank holding company by Jan­ Interested persons were afforded an uary 1, 1981. A company that has filed opportunity to participate in the rule such a declaration is permitted, pursu­ making through the submission of com­ ant to a notification procedure, to ac­ ments. All comments received were quire interests in nonbanking companies Title 14— AERONAUTICS favorable. that may not be acquired by other hold­ In consideration of the foregoing, Part ing companies. AND SPACE 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 2. The form of declaration approved [Airspace Docket No. 71-SO-97] is amended, effective 0901 G.m.t., Sep­ by the Board provides that the company tember 16, 1971, as hereinafter set forth. resolve that it will cease to be a holding Chapter I— Federal Aviation Adminis­ In §71.171 (36 F.R. 2055), the St. company “by divesting itself of whatever tration, Department of Transportation Petersburg, Fla., control zone is amended interest” it may have in its bank. In re­ to read: sponse to questions that have been PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL St. Petersburg, Fla. raised, the Board has clarified that a AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, Within a 5-mile radius of St. Petersburg company may fulfill its commitment CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ Clearwater International Airport (lat. 27°- pursuant to such a declaration by dem­ 54'33" N., long. 82°41'19^' W.); within 2.5 onstrating that it has divested itself of PORTING POINTS miles each side of St. Petersburg VORTAC control of the bank although it retains Alteration of Transition Area 343° radial, extending from the 5-mile-radius some interest in the bank. Under the zone to 6 miles northwest of the VORTAC. Act, ownership of less than 5 percent of On May 25, 1971, a notice of proposed rule making was published in the F ed­ In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the Tampa, the shares of a company is generally Fla., transition area is amended to read: regarded as not involving control. Ac­ eral R egister (36 F.R. 9448), stating cordingly, a company that demonstrates that Federal Aviation Administration Tampa, Fla. to the Board that its only relationship was considering an amendment to Part That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within an 8 .5-mile with the bank is ownership of less than 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations radius of Tampa International Airport (lat. 5 percent of the voting shares generally that would alter the Auburn, Ala., transi­ 27°58'29" N., long. 82031'38'' W .); within an would be regarded as having divested tion area. 8.5-mile radius of St. Petersburg Clearwater

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 RULES AND REGULATIONS 12897

International Airport (lat. 27° 54'33” N., long. amend the description of the Hazleton, at Champaign, 111., no additional burden 82° 41'19" W.); within 3 miles each side of Pa., control zone by deleting, “Hazleton will be imposed on any person. Therefore, St. Petersburg VORTAC 343° radial, extend­ RBN” and substituting, “Weatherly notice and public procedure hereon are ing from the 8.5-mile-radius area to 8 miles north of the VORTAC; within an 8.5-mile RBN” therefor. unnecessary. radius of MacDill APB (lat. 27°50'57” N., 4. Amend ,§ 71.171 of Part 71 of the In consideration of the foregoing, long. 82°31'18” W.); within 3 miles each Federal Aviation Regulations so as to Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ side of MacDill AFB ILS localizer northeast amend the description of the Philips­ tions is amended effective 0901 G.m.t., course, extending from the 8.5-mile-radius burg, Pa., control zone by deleting, June 30,1971, as hereinafter set forth: area to 8.5 miles northeast of the OM; within “Philipsburg RBN” and substituting, In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the follow­ a 7-mile radius of Peter O. Knight Airport “Ginter RBN” therefor. (lat. 27°54'55” N„ long. 82°27'05” W.); ing transition area is amended as follows: within a 5-mile radius of Albert-Whitted Air­ 5. Amend § 71.171 of Part 71 of the port (lat. 27°45'53” N., long. 82°37'39” W). Federal Aviation Regulations so as to Champaign, III. amend the description of the Utica, N.Y., Delete “excluding the portion which over- (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958', control zone by deleting, “Utica RBN” 49 U.S.C. 1348(a); 6(c), Department of lies the Rantoul, 111., transition area extend­ Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) and substituting, “Clay RBN” therefor. ing upward from 700 feet above the surface.” 6. Amend § 71.181 of Part 71 of the (Sec 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, Issued in East Point, Ga., on June 30, Federal Aviation Regulations so as to 49 U.S.C. 1348; sec. 6(c), Department of 1971. amend the description of the Pittsburgh, Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c) ) J ames G. R ogers, Pa., 700-foot-floor transition area by de­ Director, Southern Region. leting, “Allegheny RBN” and substitut­ Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on June 11, 1971. [PR Doc.71-9659 Piled 7-8-71;8:46 am] ing, “Cecil RBN” therefor. 7. Amend § 71.181 of Part 71 of the Chester W. Wells, Federal Aviation Regulations so as to Acting Director, Central Region. [Airspace Docket No. 71-EA-90] amend the description of the Bingham­ [PR Doc.71-9668 Piled 7-8-71;8:46 am] PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL ton, N.Y., 700-foot-floor transition area AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, by deleting, “Binghamton RBN” and substituting, “Nimmons RBN” therefor. CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ 8. Amend § 71.181 of Part 71 of the [Airspace Docket No. 71-CE-68] PORTING POINTS Federal Aviation Regulations so as to pa rt 71— designation o f f ed er a l Alteration of Control Zone and amend the description of the Hazleton, AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, Pa., 700-foot-floor transition area by de­ Transition Area leting, “Hazleton RBN” and substitut­ CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ The Federal Aviation Administration ing, “Weatherly RBN” therefor. PORTING POINTS is amending §§ 71.171 and 71.181 of Part 9. Amend § 71.181 of Part 71 of the Revocation of Control Zone and 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Federal Aviation Regulations so as to so as to alter the following control zones: amend the description of the Philips­ Transition Area Pittsburgh, Pa., (Allegheny County) (36 burg, Pa., 700-foot-floor transition area The purpose of this amendment to F.R. 2117), Morgantown, W. Va. (36 F.R. by deleting, “Philipsburg RBN” and sub­ Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ 2107), Hazleton, Pa. (36 F.R. 2088), stituting, “Ginter RBN” therefor. tions is to revoke the Wilmington, Ohio, Philipsburg, Pa. (36 F.R. 2116), Utica, 10. Amend § 71.181 of Part 71 of the N.Y. (36 F.R. 2134); and the following Federal Aviation Regulations so as to control zone and transition area. transition areas: Pittsburg, Pa. (36 F.R. amend the description of the Utica, N.Y., On September 30, 1971, the Clinton 2254), Binghamton, N.Y. (36 F.R. 21.54), 700-foot-floor transition area by delet­ County Air Force Base, Ohio, will be Hazleton, Pa. (36 F.R. 2201), Philips­ ing, “Utica radio beacon” wherever it burg, Pa. (36 F.R. 2253), Utica, N.Y. (36 closed with the result that controlled air­ appears in the description and substi­ space for the protection of IFR air traf­ F.R.2286). tuting, “Clay RBN” therefor. The agency is attempting to eliminate fic into and out of the Air Force Base is (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, duplicate names of navigational aids 72 Stat. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348; sec. 6(c), De­ no longer required. Accordingly, the (NAVAIDs) to avoid possible pilot con­ partment of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. Wilmington, Ohio, control zone and fusion. Therefore, an editorial change to 1655(c) ) transition area will be revoked effective the control zone and transition area descriptions to reflect the new name Issued in Jamaica, N.Y., on June 24, September 30,1971. assignments will be required. 1971. Since this revocation cancels desig­ Since the foregoing amendments are Louis J. Cardinali, nated controlled airspace in the Wil­ editorial in nature, notice and public Acting Director, Eastern Region. mington, Ohio, terminal area it imposes procedure hereon are unnecessary and [PR Doc.71-9660 Piled 7-8-71;8:46 am] no additional burden on any person. the amendments may be made effective Therefore, notice and public procedure in less than 30 days. In view of the foregoing, the Federal [Airspace Docket No. 71-CE-70] hereon are unnecessary. Aviation Administration, having com­ In consideration of the foregoing, Part pleted review of the airspace require­ PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is ments in the terminal airspace of the AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, amended effective 0901 G.m.t., Septem­ aforementioned locations, amends Part CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ ber 30, 1971, as hereinafter set forth: 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations, PORTING POINTS as follows, effective 0901 G.m.t. (1) In § 71.171 (36 F.R. 2055), the fol­ October 14, 1971: Alteration of Transition Area lowing control zone is revoked: 1. Amend § 71.171 of Part 71 of the The purpose of this amendment to Wilmington, Ohio Federal Aviation Regulations so as to amend the description of the Pittsburgh, Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ . (2) In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the fol­ Pa. (Allegheny County), control zone by tions is to amend the Champaign, HI., lowing transition area is revoked: deleting, “Allegheny RBN” and substi­ transition area. Wilmington, Ohio tuting, “Cecil RBN” therefor. With the revocation of the airspace at (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 2. Amend § 71.171 of Part 71 of the Rantoul, HI., effective June 30, 1971, it 49 U.S.C. 1348; sec. 6(c), Department of Federal Aviation Regulations so as to is necessary to change the transition area Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) amend the description of the Morgan­ town, W. Va., control zone by deleting, designation at Champaign, HI., to delete Issued in Kansas City, Mo„ on May 21, “Morgantown RBN” and substituting, said airspace. Action is taken herein to 1971. “Bobtown RBN” therefor. effect this change. D aniel E. B arrow, 3. Amend § 71.171 of Part 71 of the Since this amendment reduces the Acting Director, Central Region. Federal Aviation Regulations so as to amount of designated controlled airspace [PR Doc.71-9657 Piled 7-8-71;8:45 am] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 No. 132—Pt. I- -2 12898 RULES AND REGULATIONS

§ 420.295 4 -ferì-Butyl-2-chlorophenyl 2. The pesticide is useful for the pur­ Title 21— FOOD AND DRUGS methyl methylphosphoramidate: tol­ poses for which tolerances are being erances for residues. established. Chapter III— Environmental A tolerance of 1 part per million is 3. The tolerances established by this Protection Agency established for residues of the insecticide order will protect the public health. Therefore, pursuant to provisions of PART 420— TOLERANCES AND EX­ 4 - text - butyl - 2 - chlorophenyl methyl methylphosphoramidate and its metabo­ the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic EMPTIONS FROM TOLERANCES FOR lite 4-feri-butyl-2-chlorophenol (calcu­ Act (sec. 408(d)(2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 PESTICIDE CHEMICALS IN OR ON lated as the parent compound) in the U.S.C. 346a(d) (2) ), the authority trans­ RAW AGRICULTURAL COMMODI­ meat, fat, and meat byproducts of cattle, ferred to the Administrator (35 F.R. TIES goats, and sheep. 15623), and the authority delegated by Any person who will be adversely af­ the Administrator to the Deputy Assist­ 4-ferf-Butyl-2-Chlorophenyl Methyl fected by the foregoing order may at any ant Administrator for Pesticides Pro­ Methylphosphoramidate grams (36 F.R. 9038), § 420.204 is time within 30 days after its date of pub­ amended by revising the paragraph “2 A petition (PP 0P0955) was filed by the lication in the F ederal R egister file with parts per million * * *” to read as Dow Chemical Co., Post Office Box 1706, the objections Clerk, Environmental Pro­ follows: Midland, MI 48640, in accordance with tection Agency, 1626 K Street NW., provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, Washington, DC 20460, written objec­ § 420.204 Dimethoate including its oxy­ and Cosmetic Act, as amended (21 tions thereto in quintuplicate. Objections gen analog; tolerances for residues. U.S.C. 346a), proposing establishment of shall show wherein the person filing will ***** tolerances for residues of the insecticide be adversely affected by the order and 2 parts per million in or on apples, 4 - text - butyl - 2 - chlorophenyl methyl specify with particularity the provisions beans (dry, lima, snap), broccoli, cab­ methylphosphoramidate including its of the order deemed objectionable and bage, cauliflower, collards, endive (es­ metabolites containing the 4-ferf-butyl- the grounds for the objections. If a hear­ carole) , grapefruit, kale, lemons, lettuce, 2-chlorophenol moiety (calculated as 4- ing is requested, the objections must state mustard greens, oranges, pears, peas, ferf-butyl-2-chlorophenyl methyl meth­ the issues for the hearing. A hearing will peppers, spinach, Swiss chard, tan­ ylphosphoramidate) in or on the raw be granted if the objections are supported gerines, tomatoes, turnips (roots and agricultural commodities meat and meat by grounds legally sufficient to justify the tops), and wheat (green fodder and byproducts of cattle, goats, and sheep relief sought. Objections may be accom­ straw). at 1 part per million; and in milk at panied by a memorandum or brief in sup­ * .* * * * 0.05 part per million (negligible residues). port thereof. Subsequently, the petitioner amended Effective date. This order shall become Any person who will be adversely effective on its date of publication in the affected by the foregoing order may at the petition by withdrawing the proposed any time within 30 days after its date of tolerance for residues in milk and pro­ F ederal R egister (7-9-71). publication in the F ederal R egister file posing a tolerance of 1 part per million (Sec. 408(d) (2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U.S.C. 346a with the Objections Clerk, Environ­ for residues of the insecticide and its W (2)) metabolite 4-fer£-butyl-2-chIorophenol mental Protection Agency, 1626 K Street Dated: June 30,1971. NW., Washington, DC 20460, written ob­ (calculated as the parent compound) in jections thereto in quintuplícate. Objec­ meat, fat, and meat byproducts of cattle, W illiam M. U pholt, tions shall show wherein the person filing goats, and sheep. Deputy Assistant Administrator will be adversely affected by the order Prior to December 2, 1970, the Secre­ for Pesticides Programs. and specify with particularity the pro­ tary of Agriculture certified that this [FR Doc.71-9700 Filed 7-8-71;8:49 am] visions of the order deemed objectionable pesticide is useful for the purposes for and the grounds for the objections. If a which the tolerance is being established. hearing is requested, the objections must Part 120, Chapter I, Title 21 was re­ PART 420— TOLERANCES AND EX­ state the issue for the hearing. A hear­ designated Part 420 and transferred to EMPTIONS FROM TOLERANCES FOR ing will be granted if the objections are Chapter m (36 F.R. 424). PESTICIDE CHEMICALS IN OR ON supported by grounds legally sufficient Based on consideration given the data RAW AGRICULTURAL COMMODI­ to justify the relief sought. Objections submitted in the petition and other rele­ may be accompanied by a memorandum TIES or brief in support thereof. vant material, it is concluded that the Dimethoate tolerances established by this order will Effective date. This order shall become protect the public health. A petition (PP 1F1040) was filed by the effective on its date of publication in the Therefore, pursuant to provisions of American Cyanamid Co., Post Office Box F ederal R egister (7-9-71). the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic 400, Princeton, NJ 08540, proposing establishment of tolerances for total resi­ (Sec. 408(d) (2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U.S.C. 346a Act (sec. 408(d)(2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 (d)(2)) U.S.C. 346a(d) (2)), the authority trans­ dues of the insecticide dimethoate (0,0- ferred to the Administrator (35 F.R. dimethyl S- OV-methylcarbamoylmethyl) Dated: June 30,1971. phosphorodithioate) including its oxy­ 15623) , and the authority delegated by W illiam M. U pholt, the Administrator to the Deputy Assist­ gen analog (0,0-dimethyl S-OV-methyl­ Deputy Assistant Administrator ant Administrator for Pesticides Pro­ carbamoylmethyl) phosphorothioate in for Pesticides Programs. grams of the Environmental Protection or on the raw agricultural commodities Agency (36 F.R. 9038), Part 420 is grapefruit and tangerines at 2 parts per [FR Doc.71-9701 Filed 7-8-71;8:49 am] million. amended as follows; The Fish and Wildlife Service of the 1. § 420.3(e) (5) is amended by alpha­ Department of Interior advised that it PART 420— TOLERANCES AND EX­ betically inserting in the list of pesticides has no objection to this tolerance. EMPTIONS FROM TOLERANCES FOR a new item as follows: Part 120, Chapter I, Title 21 was re­ PESTICIDE CHEMICALS IN OR ON § 420.3 Tolerances for related pesticides. designated Part 420 and transferred to RAW AGRICULTURAL COMMODI­ * * * * * Chapter III (36 F.R. 424). Based on consideration given data sub­ TIES (e) * * * mitted in the petition and other relevant N-(Mercaptomethyl)Phthalimide (5) * * * material, it is concluded that: S-(0,0-Dimethyl Phosphorodithioate) 4 -tert-butyl-2 -chlorophenyl methyl methyl- 1. Established tolerances for eggs, phosphoramidate. meat, milk, and poultry are adequate to A petition (PP 1F1027) was filed by * * * * * cover residues resulting from the pro­ Stauffer Chemical Co., 1200 South 47th 2. The following new section is added posed uses. The uses are in the category Street, Richmond, CA 94804, in accord­ ance with provisions of the Federal Food, to Subpart C: specified in § 420.6(a) (2).

1 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 RULES AND REGULATIONS 12899

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 346a) ing is requested, the objections must Section 420.294 is amended by insert­ proposing establishment of tolerances state the issues for the hearing. A hear­ ing before “2 parts per million * * *” for combined residues of the insecticide ing will be granted if the objections are a new tolerance “15 parts per million N-(mercaptomethyl )phthalimide S -(0, supported by grounds legally sufficient to * * *” and after “2 parts per million O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate) and its justify the relief sought. Objections may * * *” a new tolerance “1 part per mil­ oxygen analog N- (mercaptomethyl) be accompanied by a memorandum or lion”, as follows: phthalimide S- (0,0-dimethyl phospho- brief in support thereof. § 420.294 Benomyl; tolerances for res­ rothioate) in or on the raw agricultural Effective date. This order shall be­ idues. commodities plums and prunes at 7 parts come effective on its date of publication * * * * * per million and in or on apricots and in the F ederal R egister (7-9-71). nectarines at 5 parts per million. 15 parts per million (from postharvest Subsequently, the petitioner amended (Sec. 408(d)(2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U.S.C. and/or preharvest application) in or on the petition by proposing tolerances in 346a(d)(2)) apricots, cherries, nectarines, peaches, or on the raw agricultural commodities Dated: June 30, 1971. and plums (including fresh prunes). cherries at 10 parts per million and apri­ ***** William M. Upholt, cots, nectarines, and plums (fresh Deputy Assistant Administrator 1 part per million in or on bananas, prunes) at 5 parts per million. for Pesticides Programs. of which not more than 0.2 part per mil­ Prior to December 2, 1970, the Secre­ lion (negligible residue) shall be pres­ tary of Agriculture certified that this [PR Doc.71-9702 Filed 7-8-71;8:50 am] ent in the pulp after the peel is removed pesticide chemical is useful for the pur­ and discarded, from postharvest poses for which tolerances are being PART 420— TOLERANCES AND EX­ application. established, and the Pish and Wildlife EMPTIONS FROM TOLERANCES FOR * * * * * Service of the Department of the Interior advised that it has no objection to these PESTICIDE CHEMICALS IN OR ON Any person who will be adversely af­ tolerances. RAW AGRICULTURAL COMMODI­ fected by the foregoing order may at any Part 120, Chapter I, Title 21 was re­ TIES time within 30 days after its date of pub­ designated Part 420 and transferred to Benomyl lication in the F ederal R egister file with the Objections Clerk, Environmental Chapter HI (36 F.R. 424). Two petitions (PP 0F0906 and 0F1000) Based on consideration given data Protection Agency, 1626 K Street NW., were filed by E. I. du Pont de Nemours Washington, DC 20460, written objec­ submitted in the petition and other rele­ and Co., Wilmington, DE 19898, in ac­ vant material, it is concluded that: tions thereto in quintuplicate. Objections cordance with provisions of the Federal shall show wherein the person filing will 1. The proposed usage is not reason­ Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. be adversely affected by the order and ably expected to result in residues of the 346a), proposing establishment of toler­ specify with particularity the provisions insecticide or its oxygen analog in meat, ances for residues of the fungicide of the order deemed objectionable and milk, poultry, and eggs. The uses are benomyl (methyl 1-(butylcarbamoyl)-2- the grounds for the objections. If a hear­ classified in the category specified in benzimidazolecarbamate) in or on the ing is requested, the objections must § 420.6(a) (3). raw agricultural commodities apricots, state the issues for the hearing. A hear­ 2. The tolerances established by this cherries, nectarines, peaches, plums, and ing will be granted if the objections are order will protect the public health. prunes at 15 parts per million from pre­ supported by grounds legally sufficient Therefore, pursuant to provisions of harvest and/or postharvest use and in to justify the relief sought. Objections the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic bananas at 1 part per million, of which may be accompanied by a memorandum Act (sec. 409(d)(2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 not more than 0.2 part per million (neg­ or brief in support thereof. U.S.C. 346a(d) (2) ), the authority trans­ ligible residue) shall be present in the ferred to the Administrator (35 F.R. pulp after the peel is removed and dis­ Effective date. This order shall become 15623), and the authority delegated by carded from postharvest application. effective on its date of publication in the the Administrator to the Deputy Assist­ Prior to December 2, 1970, the Secre­ F ederal R egister (7-9-71). ant Administrator for Pesticides Pro­ tary of Agriculture certified that this (Sec. 408(d)(2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U.S.C. grams of the Environmental Protection pesticide chemical is useful for the pur­ 346a(d)(2)) Agency (36 F.R. 9038), § 420.261 is poses for which the tolerances are being amended by revising the paragraph “10 established, and the Fish and Wildlife Dated: June 30,1971. parts per million * * *” and by inserting Service of the Department of Interior William M. Upholt, directly thereafter the new paragraph advised that it has no objections to the Deputy Assistant Administrator “5 parts per million * * as follows: tolerances. for Pesticides Programs. Part 120, Chapter I, Title 21, was re­ § 420.261 N -(Mercaptomethyl)phthali- designated Part 420 and transferred to [PR Doc.71-9703 Piled 7-8-71;8:50 am] mide S-(0,0-dimethyl phosphorodi­ Chapter m (36 F.R. 424). thioate) and its oxygen analog; toler­ Based on consideration given the ances for residues. data submitted in both petitions and PART 420— TOLERANCES AND EX­ * * * * * other relevant material, it is concluded EMPTIONS FROM TOLERANCES FOR 10 parts per million in or on apples, that: PESTICIDE CHEMICALS IN OR ON cherries, grapes, peaches, and pears. 1. The proposed uses with proposed RAW AGRICULTURAL COMMODI­ 5 parts per million in or on apricots, feeding restrictions are not reasonably nectarines, and plums (fresh prunes). expected to result in residues in meat TIES and milk. The uses are classified in the * * * * * category specified in § 420.6(a) (3). cis - N - [(1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethyl) Any person who will be adversely af­ 2. The tolerances established by this thiol -4-Cyclohexene-l,2-Dicarbox- fected by the foregoing order may at any order will protect the public health. imide time within 30 days after its date of pub­ Therefore, pursuant to provisions of lication in the Federal R egister, file with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic A petition (PP 1F1020) was filed by the Objections Clerk, Environmental Act (sec. 408(d)(2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 the Chevron Chemical Co., Ortho Divi­ Protection Agency, 1626 K Street NW., U.S.C. 346a(d) (2)), the authority trans­ sion, 940 Hensley Street, Richmond, CA Washington, DC 20460, written objec­ ferred to the Administrator (35 F.R. 94801, in accordance with provisions of tions thereto in quintuplicate. Objections 15623), and the authority delegated by shall show wherein the person filing will the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act be adversely affected by the order and the Administrator to the Deputy Assist­ (21 U.S.C. 346a), proposing establish­ specify with particularity the provisions ant Administrator for Pesticides Pro­ ment of tolerances for residues of the of the order deemed objectionable ànd grams of the Environmental Protection fungicide cis - N - [( 1,1,2,2-tetrachloro- the grounds for the objections. If a hear­ Agency (36 F.R. 9038). ethyl) thiol -4.cyclohexene-l,2-dicarboxi-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12900 RULES AND REGULATIONS

mide in or on the raw agricultural com­ Effective date. This order shall become supported by grounds legally sufficient to modities cranberries at 8 parts per mil­ effective on its date of publication in the justify the relief sought. Objections may lion; citrus fruits at 0.5 part per million F ederal R egister (7-9-71). be accompanied by a memorandum or (negligible residue); and onions at 0.1 (Sec. 408(d)(2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U.S.C. 346 brief in support thereof. part per million (negligible residue). , a (d )(2)) Effective date. This order shall become The Pish and Wildlife Service of the Dated: June 30,1971. effective on its date of publication in the Department of the Interior advised that F ederal R egister (7 -0 -7 1 ). it has no objection to the tolerances. William M. Upholt, Deputy Assistant Administrator (Sec. 406(d)(2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U.S.C 346a Based on consideration given data sub­ (d)(2)) mitted in the petition and other relevant for Pesticides Programs. material, it is concluded that: [PR Doc.71-9704 Filed 7-«-71;8:50 am] Dated: June 30,1971. 1. The proposed usage is not reason­ William M. Upholt, ably expected to result in residues of the PART 420— TOLERANCES AND EX­ Deputy Assistant Administrator fungicide in eggs, meat, milk, and poul­ for Pesticides Programs. EMPTIONS FROM TOLERANCES FOR try. The uses are classified in the cate­ [PR Doc.71-9705 Piled 7-8-71;8:50 am] gory specified in § 420.6(a) (3). PESTICIDE CHEMICALS IN OR ON 2. The tolerances established by this RAW AGRICULTURAL COMMODI­ order will protect the public health. TIES PART 420— TOLERANCES AND EX­ EMPTIONS FROM TOLERANCES FOR 3. The fungicide is useful for the pur­ 0,0-Diethyl O- [p-(Methylsulfinyl) poses for which the tolerances are being PESTICIDE CHEMICALS IN OR ON phenyl] Phosphorothioate established. RAW AGRICULTURAL COMMODI­ 4. The tolerance of 0.5 part per mil­ A notice was published by the Environ­ TIES lion in or on citrus fruits is not consid­ mental Protection Agency in the F ederal Ethephon ered a negligible residue. R egister of April 6, 1971 (36 F.R. 6523), Part 120, Chapter I, Title 21 was re­ proposing establishment of a tolerance A petition (PP 1F1016) was filed by designated Part 420 and transferred to of 0.1 part per million for residues of the Amchem Products, Inc., Ambler, Pa. Chapter III (36 F.R. 424). insecticide 0,0-diethyl O-[p-(methyl- 19002, in accordance with provisions of Therefore, pursuant to provisions of sulfinyl) phenyl] phosphorothioate in or the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic on rutabaga roots grown in Canada and Act (21 U.S.C. 346a), proposing estab­ Act (sec. 408(d)(2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 marketed in the United States. No com­ lishment of a tolerance for negligible U.S.C. 346a(d) (2)), the authority trans­ ments or requests for referral to an advi­ residues of the plant regulator ethephon ferred to the Administrator (35 F.R. sory committee were received. The same in or on the raw agricultural commodity -15623), and the authority delegated by tolerance applies to rutabagas grown in pineapples at 0.1 part per million. the Administrator to the Deputy Assist­ the United States. Prior to December 2, 1970, the Secre­ ant Administrator for Pesticides Pro­ It is concluded that the proposal tary of Agriculture certified that this grams of the Environmental Protection should be adopted. Therefore, pursuant compound is useful for the purpose for Agency (36 F.R. 9038), § 420.267 is to provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, which a tolerance is being established, amended by inserting a new paragraph and Cosmetic Act (sec. 408(e), 68 Stat. and the Fish and Wildlife Service of the “8 parts per million * * *” after the 514; 21 U.S.C. 346a(e)), the authority Department of the Interior advised that paragraph “15 parts per million * * *” transferred to the Administrator (35 F.R. it has no objection to this tolerance. and by adding two new paragraphs after 16523), and the authority delegated by Part 120, Chapter I, Title 21 was re­ the paragraph “2 parts per million * * * ”, the Administrator to the Deputy Assist­ designated Part 420 and transferred to as follows: ant Administrator for Pesticides Pro­ Chapter H i (36 F.R. 424) a grams of the Environmental Protection Based on consideration given data sub­ § 4 2 0 .2 6 7 cis-N- [(1,1,2,2-Tetrachloro- Agency (36 F.R. 9038), § 420.234 is mitted in the petition and other relevant ethyl) thio ] -4-cyclohexene -1,2 - dicar- amended by revising the paragraph “0.1 material, it is concluded that: boximide; tolerances for residues. part per million * * *” to read as 1. The proposed usage is not reason­ ***** follows: ably expected to result in residues of the plant regulator in meat, milk, poultry, 8 parts per million in or on cranberries. §420.234 0,0-Diethyl O- T p- ( methyl- * * * * * sulfinyl) phenyl ] phosphorothioate; and eggs. The use is classified in the tolerances for residues. category specified in § 420.6(a) (3). 0.5 part per million in or on citrus 2. The tolerance established by this fruits. * * * * * order will protect the public health. 0.1 part per million (negligible resi­ 0.1 part per million in or on corn grain Therefore, pursuant to provisions of due) in or on onions. (including field com and popcorn), fresh the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Any person who will be adversely af­ com including sweet com (kernels plus Act (sec. 408(d)(2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 fected by the foregoing order may at any cobs with husk removed), onions (dry), U.S.C. 346a(d) (2)), the authority trans­ time within 30 days after its date of pub­ potatoes, rutabagas (roots), and ferred to the Administrator (35 F.R. lication in the F ederal R egister file with tomatoes. 15623), and the authority delegated by the objections Clerk, Environmental Pro­ * * * * * the Administrator to the Deputy Assist­ tection Agency, 1626 K Street NW., ant Administrator for Pesticides Pro­ Washington, DC 20460, written objec­ Any person who will be adversely af­ grams of the Environmental Protection fected by the foregoing order may at any tions thereto in quintuplicate. Objections Agency (36 F.R. 9038), Part 420 is time within 30 days after its date of pub­ amended as follows: shall show wherein the person filing will lication in the F ederal R egister file with be adversely affected by the order and the Objections Clerk, Environmental 1. Section 420.3(e)(5) is amended by Protection Agency, 1626 K Street NW., alphabetically inserting in the list of specify with particularity the provisions cholinesterase inhibiting pesticides a new of the order deemed objectionable and Washington, DC 20460, written objec­ item, as follows: the grounds for the objections. If a hear­ tions thereto in quintuplicate. Objections shall show wherein the person filing will § 420.3 Tolerances for related pesticide ing is requested, the objections must state be adversely affected by the order and chem icals. the issues for the hearing. A hearing will specify with particularity the provisions * * * * * be granted if the objections are sup­ of the order deemed objectionable and (e) * * * ported by grounds legally sufficient to the grounds for the objections. If a hear­ (5) * * * justify the relief sought. Objections may ing is requested, the objections must E th e p h o n ((2-chloroethly)phosphonJc be accompanied by a memorandum or state the issues for the hearing. A hear­ acid). brief in support thereof. ing Will be granted if the objections are *****

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 RULES AND REGULATIONS 12901

2. The following new section is addednide; tolerances for residues is amended Sec. to Subpart C: by changing “100” to read “75” in the 9-17.207-1 Filing requests. paragraph “100 parts per million * * 9-17.207-2 Form of requests. § 420.300 Ethephon ; tolerances for 9-17.207-50 Procedure for handling cases. residues. Any person who will be adversely af­ 9-17.208 Processing cases. fected by the foregoing order may at any 9-17.208-3 Disposition. A tolerance is established for negligible time within 30 days after its date of pub­ 9-17.208-4 Records. residues of the plant regulator ethephon lication in the F ederal. R egister file with 9-17.208-50 Proceedings before the Contract ((2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid) in or the Objections Clerk, Environmental Adjustment Board. on the raw agricultural commodity pine­ Protection Agency, 1626 K Street NW., 9—17.208—51 Intra-agency coordination. apples at 0.1 part per million. Washington, DC 20460, written objec­ Subpart 9—17.3— Residual Powers Any person who will be adversely tions thereto in quintuplicate. Objec­ 9—17.304 Records. affected by the foregoing order may at tions shall show wherein the person fil­ any time within 30 days after its date ing will be adversely affected by the order Subpart 9—17.4— Records of Requests and of publication in the F ederal R egister and specify with particularity the provi­ Dispositions file with the Objections Clerk, Environ­ sions of the order deemed objectionable 9-17.402 Final records. mental Protection Agency, 1626 K Street and the grounds for the objections. If a Authority: The provisions of this Part NW., Washington, DC 20460, written ob­ hearing is requested, the objections must 9-17 issued under sec. 161 of the Atomic jections thereto in quintuplicate. Objec­ state the issues for the hearing. A hear­ Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 68 Stat. 948, tions shall show wherein the person ing will be granted if the objections are 42 U.S.C., 22Q1; sec. 205 of the Federal Prop­ filing will be adversely affected by the supported by grounds legally sufficient erty and Administrative Services Act of 1949, order and specify with particularity the to justify the relief sought. Objections as amended, 63 Stat. 390, 40 U.S.C. 486. provisions of the order deemed objection­ may be accompanied by a memorandum §9—17.000 Scope of part. able and the grounds for the objections. or brief in support thereof. If a hearing is requested, the objections This part establishes procedures to im­ must state the issues for the hearing. Effective date. This order shall become plement and supplement FPR Part 1-17. A hearing will be granted if the objec­ effective on its date of publication in the tions are supported by grounds legally F ederal R egister (7-9-71). Subpart. 9—17.1— General sufficient to justify the relief sought. (Sec. 408(e),'68 Stat. 514; 21 U.S.C. 346a(e) ) § 9—17.101 Authority. Objections may be accompanied by a Dated: July 2, 1971. (a) Pursuant to Public Law 85-804, memorandum or brief in support thereof. the President by Executive Order No. W illiam M. U pholt, Effective date. This order shall be­ Deputy Assistant Administrator 10789, authorized the Atomic Energy come effective on its date of publication for Pesticide Programs. Commission to exercise the authority in the Federal R egister (7-9-71). provided for in the Act. This authority, (Sec. 408(d)(2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U.S.C. [FR Doc.71-9733 Filed 7-8-71;8:52 am] which expands the Commission’s ordi­ 346a(d) (2)) nary contracting authority, enables it to achieve procurement objectives and pur­ Dated: July 2, 1971. sue policy goals which otherwise might W illiam M. U pholt, Title 41— PUBLIC CONTRACTS be unattained. The authority of the Act, Deputy Assistant Administrator the Executive order, and these regula­ for Pesticides Programs. tions establish no rights in any party AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT outside of the Commission and the exer­ [PR Doc.71-9732 Piled 7-8-71;8:52 am] Chapter 9— Atomic Energy cise of authority is wholly discretionary Commission with the Commission. (b> The authority vested in the PART 420— TOLERANCES AND EX­ PART 9-17— EXTRAORDINARY CON­ Atomic Energy Commission by the Act EMPTIONS FROM TOLERANCES FOR TRACTUAL ACTIONS TO FACILITATE and the Executive order, as amended, is delegated to : PESTICIDE CHEMICALS IN OR ON THE NATIONAL DEFENSE This revision of AECPR 9-17 resulted (1) The General Manager and the RAW AGRICULTURAL COMMODI­ Deputy General Manager: Provided, TIES from the report of a special study panel, appointed by the Commission to review That such delegation does not include Hydrogen Cyanide AEC implementation of the extraordi­ authority to deny relief in contractual nary contractual authority available fairness cases as defined in § 9-17.204-52. A notice was published by the En­ under Public Law 85-804 (50 U.S.C. (2) Field Managers with respect to vironmental Protection Agency in the section 1431-35) and Executive Order contractual fairness cases only, as de­ Federal R egister of March 24, 1971 (36 1Ô789. The report recommended that the fined in § 9-17.204-52, provided that such F.R. 5521), proposing to reduce the Commission revise its regulations for im­ delegation does not include authority to tolerance of 100 parts per million for deny relief. residues of hydrogen cyanide in raw plementing its authority under Public cereals to the 75 parts per million level Law 85-804. The revised regulation re­ (3) The Board of Contract Appeals recommended in the “Codex Alimen- flects a more flexible approach to the (which for the purpose of this part is tarius’’ as an international tolerance for utilization and implementation of Public designated as a Contract Adjustment Law 85-804. Board) with respect to contractual fair­ residues of hydrogen cyanide in raw ness cases as defined in § 9-17.204-52, cereals. No comments or requests for re­ Sec. and such other matters as may be re­ ferral to an advisory committee were 9-17.000 Scope of part. received. ferred to the Board by the General Manager. It is concluded that the proposal Subpart 9—T7.1— General should be adopted. 9-17.101 Authority. (c) The delegations of authority in D-17.102 General policy. paragraph (b) of this section are subject Therefore, pursuant to provisions of 9-17.103 Types of action. the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 9-17.105 Reports. to the limitations in FPR 1-17.205-1 and, Act (sec. 403(e), 68 Stat. 514; 21 U.S.C. in the case of paragraph (b) (2) of this 346a(e) >, the authority transferred to Subpart 9—17.2— Requests for Contractual section also of FPR 1-17.205-2. The dele­ the Administrator (35 F.R. 15623), and Adjustment gation of authority in paragraph (b) (2) the authority delegated by the Adminis­ 9-17.204 Standards for deciding cases. of this section may not be redelegated. trator to the Deputy Assistant Adminis­ 9-17.204-50 General. trator for Pesticides Programs of the 9-17.204-51 Cases of special management § 9—17.102 General policy. consideration. Environmental Protection Agency (36 0-17.204-52 Cases of contractual fairness. (a) The authority may be used only F.R. 9038), § 420.130 Hydrogen cya­ 9-17.207 Requests by contractors. when there exist the following two con-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12902 RULES AND REGULATIONS dirions pertaining directly to the in­ involved in its procurement or other con­ copy of the request by the requesting terests of national defense: tract activities are inadequate. party to the prime contractor for a state­ (1) The Commission is exercising a (d) All requests for use of authorityment of his position with respect to the function in connection with the national under the Act shall be decided as ex­ proposed use of authority under the Act defense, and peditiously as possible and in accordance and a copy of his reply, if available, shall ( 2 ) The Commission finds that the use with applicable policy and procedural also be filed. All possibilities for disposi­ of the authority will facilitate the na­ standards in this part. tion of any claim between the prime tional defense. § 9—17.204—51 Cases of special manage­ contractor and the party requesting relief (b) AU AEC contracts and subcon­ ment consideration. should be exhausted prior to requesting tracts are sufficiently connected with the the use of the authority under the Act. national defense to provide a basis for (a) These are cases concerned with In instances where the possibilities for satisfying condition in paragraph (a) (1) facilitating the national defense through disposition have not been exhausted, the of this section. the accomplishment of an important pro­ matter will be referred to the prime con­ (c) The basis for satisfying condition curement objective or policy goal of the tractor for consideration. in paragraph (a) (2) of this section is a Commission. Such cases include the amendment of contracts under FPR § 9—17.207—50 Procedure for handling determination that the use of the author­ cases. ity under the Act will: 1-17.204-2 (a), advance payments, and (1) Effect the accomplishment or im­ the exercise of residual powers under (a) Special management considera­ plementation of an important procure­ FPR 1-17.3. In addition to amendments tion cases: ment objective or policy goal of the Com­ without consideration in essentiality (1) All requests for the exercise of au­ mission, or cases, examples of cases for special man­ thority under the Act in cases of special (2) Provide fair and equitable treat­ agement consideration are: management consideration shall be re­ ment by the Commission to persons di­ (1) Transfer of AEC property, ferred to the General Manager for con­ rectly or indirectly involved in procure­ (2) Special terms and conditions such sideration, provided that requests under ment or other contract activities by the as indemnification or wage stabilization $50,000 may be referred by the General Commission. agreements in contracts, and Manager to the cognizant Field Office (d) If a determination is made pur­ (3) Resolution of problems arising out Manager for disposition. suant to § »-17.102(c), the required of relationships between a prime con­ (b) Cases of contractual fairness: statutory finding that the use of the au­ tractor and its subcontractors, vendors, (1) Requests for use of the authority thority will facilitate the national de­ suppliers, or consultants. under the Act in cases of contractual fense is conclusively established without (b) The exercise of the authority in fairness shall be referred to the Man­ need for further consideration. cases of special management considera­ ager of the Field Office having cognizance tion may immediately concern anyone over the contract or subcontract in­ § 9—17.103 Types of action. directly or indirectly involved in procure­ volved, or in the case of Headquarters The three types of actions under FPR ment or other contract activities of the contracts, the General Manager. 1-17.103 are classified as follows for AEC Commission, including prime contrac­ (2) Thereupon, steps shall be taken purposes: tors, subcontractors, vendors, suppliers, to ascertain promptly whether or not the (a) Cases of special management con­ and consultants. request contains the information called sideration, and for under § 9-17.207-2 and if it does not, (b) Cases of contractual fairness. § 9—17.204—52 Cases of contractual fair­ additional information needed to cure ness. the deficiency shall be requested from § 9—17.105 Reports. These are oases concerned with facil­ the person requesting relief. With respect The Director, Division of Contracts, itating the national defense through fair to each request, which meets the stand­ Headquarters, is responsible for prepar­ and equitable treatment by the Commis­ ards of § 9-17.207-2, an investigation ing the annual report to the Congress sion of its prime contractors and of its sufficient to ascertain all relevant facts required by FPR 1-17.105. subcontractors, vendors, suppliers, con­ and issues shall be conducted as soon as Subpart 9—17.2— Requests for sultants, and other persons directly or possible. indirectly involved in procurement or (3) Where a request cannot be re­ Contractual Adjustment other contract activities of the Commis­ solved by the Manager of the Field Office § 9—17.204 Standards for deciding cases. sion. Such cases include: solely because the request for relief is in § 9-17.204-50 General. (a) Correction or mitigation of the ef­ excess of $50,000, he shall forward the fects of a mistake in a prime contract of request to the General Manager with his (a) The types of situations identified the Commission (FPR 1-17.204-3), recommendation. in FPR 1-17.204 are divided into cases (b) Formalizing informal commit­ (4) In the event the resolution pro­ requiring special management considera­ ments (FPR 1-17.204-4), and posed by the Manager of the Field Office tion and cases giving rise to questions of or General Manager is unacceptable to contractual fairness. (c) Adjustments in contracts based on the person making the request, it shall (b) The authority under the Act may Commission action (FPR 1-17.204-2 (b) ). be referred to the Board of Contract Ap­ be exercised to accomplish or implement § 9—17.207 Requests by contractors. peals (acting in its capacity as a Contract important procurement objectives or Adjustment Board) for disposition in policy goals of the Commission when § 9—17.207—1 Filing requests. accordance with this part. ordinary means are deemed to be lacking A request for use of the authority may (c) The General Manager or Man­ or inadequate. In cases of special man­ be made by any party who performs serv­ agers of Field Offices may, in their discre­ agement consideration, the authority is ices for or furnishes material or facili­ tion, refer requests at any time to the a management tool available for use as ties to the AEC, either directly or in­ Board of Contract Appeals (acting in its the need requires. directly. The request shall be filed in capacity as a Contract Adjustment (c) The procurement mission of the quintuplicate with the cognizant con­ Board) for disposition. In such instances, Commission requires a firm policy of fair tracting officer or his duly authorized the General Manager or cognizant Man­ and equitable treatment by the Commis­ representative. If such filing is imprac­ ager, or their designees shall represent sion of contractors, subcontractors, ven­ tical, requests will be deemed to be prop­ the interests of the Commission before dors, suppliers, consultants, and all others erly filed if filed with the General the Board of Contract Appeals (acting in who, directly or indirectly, perform serv­ Manager. its capacity as a Contract Adjustment ices for or furnish material or capacity to Board). the Commission. In contractual fairness § 9—17.207—2 Form of requests. cases, exercise of the authority under the In addition to the requirements of §9—17.208 Processing cases. Act is proper when the normal adminis­ FPR 1-17.207-2, if the request is by a (a) When submitting cases for con­ trative means far the Commission to as­ subcontractor, vendor, supplier, or con­ sideration by the General Manager, Man­ sure fair and equitable treatment to those sultant under an AEC prime contract, a agers of Field Offices and Directors of

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 RULES AND REGULATIONS 12903

Headquarters Division shall submit to § 9—17.208—51 Intra-agency coordina­ “T. 8 S., R. 25 E.,” in Powersite Classifi­ the Director, Division of Contracts, tion. cation No. 138 should read as follows: Headquarters, four copies of the fol­ When a request for use of authority Sec. 16, SE % NE »4, NE % SE «4, NE % SE % SE 14, lowing: under the Act involves issues relating to Ei/ 2 SW % SE % SE 1,4 , NE]4 SW14 SE 14 SE %, (1) The contractor’s request in the both special management consideration S y2 SW14 SE 14 SE 1,4 , SE % SE 1/4 SE 14; form described in FPR 1-17.207-2, and contractual fairness, the handling (2) The preliminary record required of the request shall be coordinated by the by FPR 1-17.207-3. General Manager and the Chairman, (3) The facts and evidence described Board of Contract Appeals and Adjust­ Title 47— TELECOMMUNICATION in FPR 1-17.207-4, unless the Director, ments, provided that the General Man­ Division of Contracts, Headquarters, ager shall have the option of acting first Chapter I— Federal Communications shall approve their omission, and on the request. After the General Man­ Commission ager acts upon the request, the request (4) The recommended course of action. [FCC 71-690] (b) Cases within the jurisdiction of may still be regarded as a case of con­ the Board of Contract Appeals (acting in tractual fairness and handled accord­ PART 1— PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE its capacity as a Contract Adjustment ingly. Processing of Broadcast Applications Board) shall be submitted directly to the Subpart 9—17.3— Residual Powers Order. 1. Paragraph (a) (1) of §§ 1.571- Board, and the submission shall include § 9—17.304 Records. 1.574 of the Commission’s rules (process­ the data described in paragraph (a) of ing sections) specifies what constitutes this section. The Director, Division of Contracts a major change in station facilities for (for the General Manager) shall retain § 9-17.208—3 Disposition. each of the broadcast services, and also a copy of the memorandum required by contains a proviso clause which states Subject to FPR 1-17.208-3 (b) and ap­ FPR 1-17.303 (a). that the Commission may, within 15 days plicable security regulations, in cases of after the tender for filing of any other special management considerations Subpart 9—17.4— Records of Requests and Dispositions application for modification of facilities, where the authority is used and in all advise the applicant that such applica­ cases of contractual fairness, Memoranda § 9—17.402 Final records. of Decision shall be available for public tion is considered to be one for a major inspection. Managers of Field Offices, the Director, change and therefore is subject to the Division of Contracts, Headquarters (for provisions of § 1.580.1 § 9-17.208—4 Records. the General Manager) and the Chair­ 2. The Commission has received an in­ Managers of Field Offices, the Director man, Board of Contract Appeals (acting creasing number of petitions after the Division of Contracts, Headquarters (for in its capacity as a Contract Adjustment expiration of the 15-day period which the General Manager), and the Chair­ Board) shall prepare the final record request it to invoke the proviso clause man of the Board of Contract Appeals described in FPR 1-17.402 for each case and consider a given application as one (acting in its capacity as a Contract Ad­ handled within their respective areas of for a major change in facilities. We also justment Board) shall maintain the rec­ authority. note that there are often instances when ords required by FPR 1-17.208-4 for each appropriate Commission personnel are Effective date. This regulation is effec­ unaware that an application presents case handled within their respective tive upon publication as to all cases sub­ areas of authority. circumstances which would warrant con­ mitted on or after such publication. sideration as a major change until more § 9—17.208—50 Proceedings before the Pending cases shall be handled under the than 15 days have passed from the date Contract Adjustment Board. Atomic Energy Commission Procurement it was tendered for filing. It therefore Regulations dated September 27, 1969. (a) When a case is to be decided by appears that if the processing sections the Contract Adjustment Board, the CAB Dated at Germantown, Md., this 1st were amended to allow the Commission shall proceed in the same general manner day of July 1971. to act within 15 days from the date an as when it presides as the Board of Con­ For the U.S. Atomic Energy application is accepted for filing rather tract Appeals with respect to cases before Commission. than tendered for filing, both Commis­ it under the authority of 10 CFR Part 3. sion personnel and potential petitioners Any party directly affected by a request J oseph L. Smith, would be provided with a more realistic for the exercise of authority under the Director, Division of Contracts. time period within which to assess the Act shall be entitled to a hearing by the [FR Doc.71-9655 Filed 7-8-71;8:45 am] significance of the application. However, CAB of the same general character as the we wish to emphasize the fact that Com­ Board of Contract Appeals provides par­ mission action under the proviso clause ties in a 10 CFR Part 3 proceeding. The is purely discretionary and petitions CAB shall make its decision on the rec­ urging us to exercise this discretion do ord, prepare a Memorandum of Decision Title 43— PUBLIC LANDS: not lie as a matter of right. as provided in FPR 1-17.208-3, and there­ 3. Although a fair reading of both the upon transmit it to all parties to the INTERIOR processing sections and § 1.1111 (sched­ proceeding. Chapter II— Bureau of Land Manage­ ule of fees) of the rules plainly reveals that the designation of a broadcast ap­ (b) Whenever a case is before the ment, Department of the Interior Board of Contract Appeals under the plication as one for a major change in authority of 10 CFR Part 3 and it ap­ APPENDIX— PUBLIC LAND ORDERS facilities by the Commission requires the pears that the case is one of contractual [Public Land Order 5069] imposition of the larger filing and grant fees specified for major changes, the fairness under § 9-17.204-52, the Board [Sacramento 080012] may continue to hear and decide the case adoption of new and higher fees in 1970 as a Contract Adjustment Board with or CALIFORNIA has generated numerous inquiries on without sending it to the Manager of the this point. Therefore, in order to elimi­ appropriate Field Office for considera­ Powersite Cancellation No. 207; Can­ nate any uncertainty which may exist tion, depending on the particular circum­ cellation of Powersite Classification concerning the applicability of our fee stances; and the requirement of fair and No. 138 in Part, and No. 273 in Its schedule to such applications, the proc­ essing sections should be amended to equitable treatment of all parties con­ Entirety specifically refer to § 1.1111 as well as cerned: Provided, That whenever a case Correction § 1.580 (publication requirements). Ad- is based on a request for use of the au­ In F.R. Doc. 71-8611 appearing on page thority under the Act, it shall be placed 11730 In the issue for Friday, June 18, 1 This authority is delegated to the Chief, on the CAB’s docket for such cases. 1971, the description for sec. 16 under Broadcast Bureau, by § 0.281 (s) of the rules.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12904 RULES AND REGULATIONS vantage is taken in this amendment to channel), primary station (input chan­ the acceptance for filing of any other ap­ clarify the definition of a change in nel) or principal community or commu­ plication for modification, advise the ap­ area by the addition of Notes to §§ 1.572 nities: Provided, however, That, the plicant that such application is con­ and 1.573. Commission may, within 15 days after sidered to be one for a major change 4. These amendments to the rules are the acceptance for filing of any other and therefore is subject to the provisions adopted pursuant to the authority con­ application for modification of facilities, of §§ 1.580 and 1.1111 pertaining to major tained in sections 4 (i) and (j) and advise the applicant that such applica­ changes. 303(r) of the Communications Act of tion is considered to be one for a major ***** 1934, as amended, and inasmuch as they change and therefore is subject to the [FR Doc.71-9719 Filed 7-8-71;8:52 am] are interpretative and procedural in provisions of §§ 1.580 and 1.1111 pertain­ nature, compliance with the usual notice ing to major changes. [FOC 71-691] and effective date provisions of the Ad­ * * * * * ministrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. Note: For the purposes of this section, a PART 1— PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE section 553) is unnecessary. change in area is defined as the sum of the 5. Accordingly, it is ordered, That, ef­ area gained and the area lost as a percentage Modification of Uniform Time Period fective July 13, 1971, §§ 1.571, 1.572, of the original area. for Construction 1.573, and 1.574 of the Commission’s 3. Section 1.573 of the Commission’s rules and regulations is amended by re­ Order. 1. The Commission, on June 3, rules and regulations are amended as 1970, adopted its Report and Order in set forth below. vising paragraph (a) (1) and redesignat­ ing the present Note as Note 1 and add­ Docket No. 18763 (23 FCC 2d 274), in (Secs. 4, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, ing a new Note 2 to read as follows: which it revised § 1.598 of the rules to in­ 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 303) crease, generally, the time within which Adopted: June 30, 1971. § 1.573 Processing of FM and noncom­ standard, FM, and television broadcast mercial educational FM broadcast stations must be constructed following Released: July 6, 1971. applications. grant of construction permits. The time F ederal Communications (a) * * * within which a new television station Commission,2 (1) In the first group are applications must be constructed was extended to 18 [seal] B en F. W aple, for new stations or for major changes months and AM and FM broadcast sta­ Secretary. in the facilities of authorized stations. tions now have 12 months within which 1. Section 1.571 of the Commission’s A major change is, in the case of stations to construct. rules and regulations is amended by re­ authorized under Part 73 of this chapter, 2. As originally worded, the rule em-' vising paragraph (a) (1) thereof to read (i) any change in frequency, station loca­ braced all broadcast stations, but, in re­ as follows: tion or class of station, or (ii) any change vising the rule, we inadvertently worded in power, antenna location or height the rule in such a way as to exclude other § 1.571 Processing of standard broad­ above average terrain (or combination broadcast services and aiixiliaries, such cast applications. thereof) which would result in a change as translators. To rectify this error, we (a) * * * of 50 percent or more in the area within are amending the rule to provide a uni­ (1) In the first group are applicationsthe station’s predicted 1 mv/m field form 12-month period for all broadcast for new stations (except applications for strength contour. In the case of FM stations and auxiliaries except television new Class n -A stations), or for major translator stations authorized under Part stations, which will remain 18 months. changes in the facilities of authorized 74 of this chapter, it is any change in Accordingly, § 1.598(b) of the rules is stations. A major change is any change frequency (output channel), primary being amended to read as follows : in frequency, power, hours of operation, station, or authorized principal commu­ or station location: Provided, however, nity or area: Provided, however, That § 1.598 Period of construction. That the Commission may, within 15 the Commission may, within 15 days * * * * * days after the acceptance for filing of after the acceptance for filing of any (b) Other broadcast, auxiliary, and In­ any other application for modification other application for modification of structional. Television Fixed Stations. of facilities, advise the applicant that facilities, advise the applicant that such Each original construction permit for the such application is considered to be one application is considered to be one for a construction of a new standard broad­ for a major change and therefore is sub­ major change and therefore is subject cast, FM broadcast, international broad­ ject to the provisions of §§ 1.580 and to the provisions of §§ 1.580 and 1.1111 cast, television or FM translator or 1.1111 pertaining to major changes. pertaining to major changes. booster, broadcast auxiliary, or Instruc­ 2. Section 1.572 of the Commission’s tional Television Fixed Station (ITFS), rules and regulations is amended by * * * * * shall specify a period of 12 months with­ revising paragraph (a) (1) and the addi­ Note 2: For the purposes of this section, a in which construction shall be completed tion of a Note to read as follows: change in area is defined as the sum of the area gained and the area lost as a percentage and application for license be filed. § 1.572 Processing of television broad­ of the original area. 3. Prior notice of proposed rule mak­ cast applications. ing is unnecessary; clearly, there was no 4. Section 1.574 of the Commission’s intention, in amending § 1.598, to omit (a) * * * rules and regulations is amended by re­ any type of broadcast station and, addi­ (1) In the first group are applications vising paragraph (a)(1) to read as fol­ tionally, the time allowed for construct­ for new stations or for major changes in lows: ing other types of broadcast stations, the facilities of authorized stations. A § 1.574 Processing of international e.g., television or FM translator stations major change is, in the case of stations broadcast applications. or FM booster stations, is extended to 12 authorized under Part 73 of this chapter, months under paragraph (b) of § 1.598 (i> any change in frequency or station (a) * * * as amended (5 U.S.C. 553(b) (B). In the location, or (n) any change in power, (1) In the first group are applications circumstances, compliance with the ef­ antenna location or height above aver­ for new stations, or for major changes fective date provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553 (b) age terrain (or combination thereof) in the facilities of authorized stations. (A) and (d) (3) is unnecessary. which would result in a change of 50 A major change is (i) for new or addi­ 4. It is ordered, That effective July percent or more of the area within the tional target zones, or (ii) a substantial 13, 1971, § 1.598(b) of the Commission’s Grade B contour of the station. In the change (other than local) in transmitter rules and regulations is amended to read case of television translator stations au­ location, or (iii) a significant change in as set forth above. Authority for this thorized under Part 74 of this chapter the delivered median field intensity at the action is set out in sections 4(i), 303(r), it is any change in frequency (output target zone: Provided, however, That the and 319 of the Communications Act of 2 Commissioner Robert E. Lee absent. Commission may, within 15 days after 1934, as amended.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 RULES AND REGULATIONS 12905

5. It is further ordered, That this pro­ In § 2.106, footnote US117 is amended DORCMA also asks the Commission to ceeding is terminated. to read as follows : reconsider and defer for 17 months the (Secs. 4, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1082; US117 In the band 406-410MHz, all new effective date of the new rules. In a let­ 47 U.S.O. 164, 303) authorizations will be limited to a maximum ter of April 2, 1971, Telectron, Inc. (a of 7 watts per kHz of necessary bandwidth; manufacturer of such controls), requests Adopted: June 30, 1971. existing authorizations as of November 30, that the Commission defer for 3 months Released: July 6,1971. 1970, exceeding this power are permitted to the effective date of the new rules; in a continue in use. second letter of April 8, 1971, Telectron, F ederal Communications New authorizations in this band for sta­ Inc., states that it had overlooked certain Commission,1 tions, other than mobile stations, within facts in requesting a 3-month extension, [seal] B en F. W aple, the following areas are subject to prior co­ and requests that the Commission con­ Secretary. ordination by the applicant with the Secre­ tary of the Committee on Radio Frequencies sider a longer delay. [FR Doc.71-9718 Piled 7-8-71; 8:52 am] of the National Academy of Sciences: 3. DORCMA contends that the lan­ Arecibo Observatory: Rectangle between guage in § 15.268 “each receiver part and latitudes 17°30' N. and 19°00' N. and be­ each transmitter part of a certified radio [FOC 71-680] tween longitudes 65° 10' W. and 68°00' W. control for a door opener shall bear an Five College Radio Astronomy Observatory: PART 2— f r e q u e n c y a l lo c a t io n Rectangle between latitudes 41° 40' N. and identification plate * * is unduly re­ AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS: 42°50' N. and between longitudes 71°20' W. strictive, since this is construed to mean that only a metal plate attached to the GENERAL RULES AND REGULA­ and 73°20' W. Owens Valley Radio Observatory: Two unit will be acceptable. DORCMA ac­ TIONS contiguous rectangles, one between latitudes cordingly requests that the language Sagamore Hill Radio Observatory 36° N. and 37° N. and longitudes 117° 40' W. “identification plate” be changed to and 118°30' W., and the second between lat­ “identification plate, label, or legend.” Order. In the matter of amendment of itudes 37° N. and 38° N. and longitudes 4. DORCMA also objects to the re­ footnote US117 to § 2.106, the Table of 118° W. and 118°50' W. quirement in § 15.268(a) (3) that the Frequency Allocations, of the Commis­ Pennsylvania State University Radio As­ tronomy Observatory: Rectangle between lat­ name of the grantee of certification ap­ sion’s rules and regulations to add Saga­ itudes 40°00' N. and 41°40' N. and longitudes pear on the identification label on the more Hill Radio Observatory to the list 77° 15' W. and 78°40' W. ground that this requirement is contrary of observatories requiring prior coordi­ Sagamore Hill Radio Observatory: Rec­ to actual industry practice. DORCMA nation for assignments in the 406-410 tangle between latitudes 42° 10' N. and 43° 00' points out that many manufacturers pro­ MHz band. N. and longitudes 70°31' W. and 71°31' W. duce radio door controls for private label 1. The Interdepartment Radio Advi­ VermiUion River Observatory: Rectangle distributors, and that such a distributor sory Committee (IRAC), by action taken between latitudes 38°35' N. and 41°31' N. and usually insists on having his trade name on June 8, 1971, has requested the Com­ longitudes 86° 15' W. and 89°30' W. alone appear on the product without mission to amend footnote US117 to the (The foregoing provisions will be reviewed disclosing the name of the manufacturer. Table of Frequency Allocations as set in connection with U.S. implementation of In this connection, DORCMA explains the Final Acts of the 1971 Space WARC.) that, although a radio door control may forth in the above caption. The Saga­ The non-Government use of this band is more Hill Radio Observatory, Hamilton, limited to the radio astronomy service and bear the name of a private label dis­ as provided by footnote US13. tributor, it is generally the manufacturer Mass., is owned and operated by the De­ who has applied for certification, since partment of the Air Force. [FR Doc.71-9720 Filed 7-8-71;8:52 am] most distributors are unwilling and not 2. The band 406-410 MHz is presently in a position to take on this responsi­ a shared band in the United States with [Docket No. 15657; FCC 71-693] bility. Consequently, DORCMA requests radio astronomy the only permitted that the Commission revise § 15.268 to PART 15— RADIO FREQUENCY permit either the name of the grantee of service in the non-Government' sector. DEVICES certification or the trade name of the As there are no non-Government assign­ distributor to appear on identification ments presently outstanding which could Operation of Radio Door Controls labels. be affected by the amendments, the ac­ Memorandum Opinion and Order. In f 5. It was never our intention that the tion requested herein will not result in the matter of amendment of Part 15 of term “identification plate” used in any adverse effects to non-Government the Commission’s rules, to provide for the § 15.268 should be construed as strictly users. Further, the action could provide operation of radio door controls, Docket as DORCMA indicates, and there is no No. 15657, RM-524. objection to using any other form of benefits accruing to the general public 1. In a second report and order,1 label which is readily visible to prospec­ through the science of radio astronomy. adopted on March 24, 1971, the Commis­ tive purchasers and includes the infor­ Therefore, compliance with the notice sion amended Part 15 of the rules gov­ mation specified in § 15.268, as herein and effective date provisions of 5 U.S.C. erning the operation of radio door con­ revised. 553 is unnecessary. trols. The new rules revise the lirhits 6. The petition also raises the question 3. Accordingly, pursuant to authority on the levels of field strength of emis­ concerning the name to be specified on sions permitted for both the transmitter the label required by § 15.268. DORCMA contained in sections 4(c) and 303 of the and the receiver units of such controls points out that current industry practice Communications Act of 1934, as amend­ and require that both the receiver and involves identifying the device with the ed: It is ordered, That, effective July 13, transmitter units of such controls be vendor’s trade name and not with the 1971, footnote US117 to the Table of Fre­ individually certificated. Under the new name of the manufacturer. It is not our quency Allocations, § 2.106 of the Com­ certification procedure, a manufacturer intention to upset this long-standing in­ mission’s rules, is amended as set forth is required to attach to the receiver and dustry practice. Our equipment author­ below. transmitter of his control, an identifica­ ization procedure requires that discrete tion plate containing a statement noti­ (Secs. 4, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1082; fying purchasers about FCC conditions certification must be obtained for each 47 U.S.C. 154, 308) for operation. The second report and separate trade name and model number Adopted: June 30, 1971. order sets out May 7, 1971, as the effec­ under which such equipment is to be tive date for the new rules. distributed.2 Since the application for Released: July 6,1971. 2. By its petition, submitted on April F ederal Communications 26, 1971, the Door Operator and Remote 2 Section 1.1120 of the Commission’s rules Commission, Controls Manufacturers Association requires a separate certification fee for each [seal] B en F. Waple, (DORCMA) seeks clarification and in­ transmitter and each receiver bearing a dis­ Secretary. terpretation of the labeling requirements. tinct name or model number, and a separate application for each unit must be made irrespective of technical uniformity with 1 Commissioner Robert E. Lee absent. 136 F.R. 6504, Apr. 6, 1971. previously certified units.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 No. 132—Pt. I- -3 12906 RULES AND REGULATIONS certification will require disclosure of order are the same as those originally Released: July 6,1971. both the trade name and the -manufac­ proposed. Since reports continue to be F ederal Communications turer, either name will provide adequate received that these door controls con­ Commission/ identification label, and § 15.268 has been tinue to cause interference, the Commis­ [seal] B en F. W aple, amended to permit such marking. sion feels that it is essential to reduce the Secretary. 7. The second part of DORCMA’s peti­ level of emissions from the receiver unit tion deals with the effective date of the of the control at the earliest possible Part 15 is amended by revising § 15.268 rules. DORCMA argues that sufficient moment. Notwithstanding, the Commis­ and by adding a new § 15.276. time must be allowed for a manufacturer sion agrees in part with DORCMA that 1. Section 15.268 is revised to read as to clear his facility of existing inventory follows : and the resulting finished product. Hav­ some consideration be given to the mat­ ing canvassed a representative number ter of inventories now on hand. Accord­ § 15.268 Identification of a certificated of its members DORCMA has found that ingly, the Commission is deferring the radio control for a door opener. some 12 to 17 months will be required effective date of the rules adopted in its (a) Irrespective of operating fre­ for a typical manufacturer to "run-off” second report and order. The new effec­ quency, and notwithstanding the other existing inventories which he accumu­ tive date, November 1, 1971, will allow labeling requirements of this chapter, lated prior to promulgation of the Com­ manufacturers and dealers about four each transmitter unit and each receiver mission’s new rules. Such inventories of months in which to clear their inven­ unit of a radio control feu a door opener components, DORCMA states, were pur­ tories and develop new designs. This ex­ shall be identified by an appropriate la­ chased in anticipation of fabricating tension is being granted solely to give bel containing the following informa­ door controls designed for operation manufacturers time to exhaust present tion: under the rules current at the time of component inventories, and to accom­ (1) The name of the grantee of cer­ purchase. In addition, DORCMA con­ plish a full transition to controls that tification or the trade name specified in tends, time must be allowed for the will comply with the Commission’s new the application for certification. manufacturer’s distributor to “turn­ rules. In this regard, the Commission ex­ (2) The model number as given in the over” finished products to dealers who pects manufacturers of these controls to application for certification. sell radio door controls to the using pub­ convert their facilities without delay, (3) The following statement: lic and an additional period must be pro­ and anticipates that further extensions vided to give dealers reasonable time to This device complies with FCC Rules Part will not be granted. It is recognized that 15. Operation of this device is subject to sell radio door controls to the ultimate some loss may be involved in convert­ the following two conditions: 1. This device user. This additional time required by ing to new designs by November 1, 1971, may not cause harmful^ interference. 2. This the dealer is actually in excess of the 12 but the Commission feels that the over­ device must accept any interference that may to 17 months requested for manufac­ all public interest requires such accel­ be received, including interference that may turers and distributors. erated conversion. cause undesired operation. 8. DORCMA adds that, apart from the 10. Therefore, the established dead­ (b) The information required by para­ problem of clearing out existing inven­ line for the marketing of radio controls graph (a) of this section shall be per­ tories and the problem of moving fin­ for door openers which do not comply ished products into distribution chan­ manently attached to the device and with the standards adopted in the sec­ be readily visible to the prospective pur­ nels, manufacturers will be faced with ond report and order in this proceeding chaser and user. the problem of converting to the manu­ is November 1, 1971. Additionally, the facture of transmitters and receivers 2. A new § 15.276 is added to read as established deadline for the use of such follows : that will meet the Commission’s certifi­ devices is October 1, 1978; however, if in cation requirements. Conversion prob­ operation the receiver unit of such a con­ § 15.276 Date when certification of a lems, DORCMA states, involve new de­ trol is found to be a source of harmful radio control for a door opener is signs, component purchase, production interference, the Commission may re­ required. scheduling, procurement of satisfactory quire that both the receiver and the (a) A radio control for a door opener test and inspection equipment, certifica­ transmitter units of such a control com­ that operates above 70 MHz marketed tion, and more particularly the physical ply with the technical standards in the on or after November 1,1971, shall com­ modification of production lines. In these ply with the certification requirements circumstances, DORCMA states that it second report and order at a date earlier than October 1,1978. of § 15.215 and §§ 15.260-15.266 inclusive. is convinced that the Commission’s new (b) No radio control for a door opener rules for radio door controls should not 11. Accordingly, pursuant to the au­ that operates above 70 MHz marketed become effective earlier than Novem­ thority contained in sections 4(i), 302, prior to November 1, 1971, may operate ber 7,1972. and 303 (r) of the Communications Act after October 1,1978, or such earlier date 9. In this connection, the Commission of 1934, as amended: It is ordered, That that may be specified by thè Commission notes that the industry has been on no­ if the receiver thereof is found to be a tice that tighter regulations would be the Commission’s second report and or­ der in Docket No. 15657 is revised to source of harmful interference, unless forthcoming for the receiver unit of these the receiver has been certificated to dem­ controls since October 1964, when this specify a new effective date of Novem­ onstrate compliance with the provisions And it is further ordered, proceeding was instituted.* As a matter ber 1, 1971: of § 15.63(d) and the transmitter has That Part 15 of the Commission’s rules is been certificated to demonstrate com­ of fact the regulations regarding receiv­ pliance with the provisions of § 15.215. ers adopted in the second report and amended in the manner set forth below. (Secs. 4, 302, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, [FRDoc.71-9721 Filed 7-8-71;8:52 am] 1082, 290; 47 U.S.C. 154, 302, 303) «Notice of proposed rule making, 29 F.R. 14409, Oct. 20, 1964. Adopted: June 30, 1971. * Commissioner Robert E. Lee absent.

FIDERAI REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12907 Proposed Rule Making

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR § 3541.1 Permit requirements. National Park Service Any individual who desires to search [ 36 CFR Part 7 1 Bureau of Land Management for and remove mineral specimens in a National Forest must have a permit to CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL [ 43 CFR Part 3540 1 do so in that National Forest, signed by MONUMENT, CALIF. the authorized representatives of the Bu­ MINERAL COLLECTION ON ACQUIRED reau of Land Management. Permits can Submerged Features, Wrecks and LANDS WITHIN NATIONAL FORESTS be secured in person or by mail direct Fishing Permits from any office of the Bureau in the State in which the National Forest is Notice is hereby given that pursuant The purpose of this amendment is to situated or from the Forest Service Dis­ to the authority contained in section 3 incorporate into the regulations provi­ trict Ranger responsible for the area. of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. sions for authorizing mineral collectors 535, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 3), 245 DM-1 to enter upon acquired lands within na­ § 3541.2 Fees for issuance of permits. (27 F.R. 6395, as amended), and Na­ tional forests to collect mineral speci­ Fees will be determined by the Direc­ tional Park Service Order No. 21 (27 mens under terms and conditions neces­ tor and will be based on charges for F.R. 7903, as amended), it is proposed sary for the conservation of natural comparable privileges on private and to add § 7.84 to Title 36 of the Code of resources, multiple-use of national forest State lands, including recognition of the Federal Regulations as set forth below. lands, equitable distribution of recrea­ costs of supervising the removal of min­ The purpose of this proposal is to pro­ tion privileges, and public safety. Pre­ eral specimens. hibit damage to submerged features to sently there are no regulations au­ § 3541.3 Terms and conditions of per­ preserve wrecked vessels, and to protect thorizing such activity. The proposed m its. various species of fish and shellfish from regulations are based on the authority extinction and to improve fishing for of the Act of March 4, 1917 (16 U.S.C. The permit will contain terms and recreational enjoyment of visitors. 520). conditions which are deemed necessary It is the policy of the Department of It is the policy of the Department of by the Director and by the Chief to the Interior, whenever practicable, to af­ the Interior, whenever practicable, to af­ achieve the objectives of the regulations ford the public an opportunity to par­ ford the public an opportunity to par­ in this subpart, including, but not lim­ ticipate in the rule making process. ticipate in the rule making process. Ac­ ited to, the following: Accordingly, interested persons may sub­ cordingly, interested persons may sub­ (a) Limits on the amount of material mit written comments, suggestions, or mit written comments, suggestions, or that may be taken by an individual per objections regarding the proposed objections with respect to the proposed day, calendar year, or other period of amendment to the Superintendent, amendment to the Bureau of Land time, and the total number of days per Channel Islands National Monument, Management (210), Washington, D.C. calendar year any individual shall be Post Office Box 1388, Oxnard, CA 93030, 20240, within 30 days of the date of pub­ permitted to collect on any site. within 30 days of the publication of this lication of this notice in the F ederal (b) Prohibition or restriction of the notice in the F ederal R egister. Register. use of explosives. A new § 7.84 is added to read as A a new subpart is added to Part 3540 (c) Specifications as to the type of follows: to read as follows: tools and equipment which may be used. (d) Measures to be taken to prevent § 7.84 Channel Islands National Monu­ Subpart 3541— Mineral Collection destruction of other natural resources or m ent. antiquities, to rehabilitate the land after Permits (a) Submerged features. No person removal o f1 mineral specimens, and to shall cut, carve, injure, mutilate, remove, § 3541.0—1 Purpose. protect the environment in any other displace, or break off any underwater respect deemed desirable. growth or formation. Nor shall any per­ The purpose of the regulations in this (e) Use of fire. Subpart 3541 is to authorize mineral col­ son dig in the bottom, or in any other (f) Cleanup. way injure or impair the natural beauty lectors to enter upon the lands described (g) Avoidance of hazards. in § 3501.2-6 (d) of this chapter for the of the underwater scene. purpose of searching for and removing § 3541.4 Penalty for violations. (b) Wrecks. No person shall destroy, mineral specimens. molest, remove, deface, displace, or tam­ Permits are subject to immediate can­ per with wrecked and abandoned water § 3541.0—2 Objectives. cellation if any of the terms and condi­ or airborne craft or any cargo pertaining tions are violated. In such case no por­ thereto. The objective is to make use of lands tion of the fee will be refunded. The available to mineral collectors at a rea­ Director may refuse to issue a permit (c) Fishing. The taking of any fish, sonable fee and under terms and condi­ to any individual who violated the terms crustaceans, mollusk, or other marine tions necessary for the conservation of and conditions of any prior permit. life shall be in compliance with State natural resources, multiple-use of na­ regulations except that: tional forest lands, equitable distribution § 3541.5 Trespass. (1) No abalone may be taken in water of recreation privileges, and public Removal of mineral specimens from less than five (5) feet in depth. safety. lands described in § 3501.2-6 (d) of this <2) No lobster may be taken except by § 3541.0—5 Definitions. chapter without, or in violation of, a hoop net or by hand. permit issued under the regulations in (3) No person shall molest, kill, wound, For the purposes of the regulations in this subpart is a trespass against the capture, frighten, or attempt to molest, this Subpart 3541, United States. Trespassers will be liable kill, wound, capture, frighten any seal (a) “Director” is the Director of the in damages to the United States and may or sea lion. Bureau of Land Management or his be subject to criminal prosecution. delegate. (d) Commercial operations. (1) The R ogers C. B. Morton, taking of any fish, crustaceans, mollusk, (b) “Chief” is the Chief of the Forest Secretary of the Interior. or other marine life for commercial pur­ Service or his delegate. poses is prohibited. (c) “Fee” is a user charge for search­ July 1, 1971. (2) The operation of any vessel carry­ es for and removing mineral specimens. [FR Doc.71-9712 Filed 7-8-71;8:51 am] ing passengers for hire within 1 nautical

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12908 PROPOSED RULE MAKING mile of Anacapa or Santa Barbara Is­ office of the Hearing Clerk during regu­ end with the name of the variety, if lands is prohibited without a written per­ lar business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b),)/ known, or when the variety is not known, mit from the Superintendent. The per­ Dated: July 2,1971. the words “unknown variety.” mit shall be issued by the Superintendent (b) Definitions. (1) Terms used in the provided such commercial operations: P aul A. Nicholson, amended marketing agreement and (i) Are compatible with the purposes Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg­ order shall, when used herein, have the for which the national monument was etable Division, Consumer and same meaning as is given to the respec­ established. Marketing Service. tive term in said amended marketing (ii) Will not adversely affect the pres­ [FR Doc.71-9693 Filed 7-8-71;8:49 am] agreement and order. ervation of the resources or the natural (2) “Size known commercially as size features of the national monument. 165” means a size of pear that will pack (iii) Are adequately staffed and I 7 CFR Part 917 1 in standard pear box, packed in accord­ ance with the specifications of a standard equipped to insure the accomplishment FRESH PEARS GROWN IN of subdivisions (i) and (ii) of this pack, with 165 pears and with the 22 CALIFORNIA smallest pears weighing not less than 5% subparagraph. pounds. Edward A. H ummel, Handling Limitations (3) “Standard pear box’-’ means the Assistant Director, Consideration is being given to the container so designated in section 43599 National Park Service. following proposal submitted by the Pear of the Agricultural Code of California [FR Doc.71-9699 Filed 7-8-71;8:49 am] Commodity Committee, established pur­ (4) “U.S. No. 1,” “U.S. No. 2,” and suant to the amended marketing agree­ “standard pack” shall have the same ment and Order No. 917, as amended meaning as when used in the U.S. Stand­ (7 CFR Part 917; 35 F.R. 7510), regulat­ ards for Pears (Summer and Fall), ing the handling of fresh pears, plums §§ 51.1260-51.1280 of this title. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and peaches grown in California, effec­ (Sec®. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S,C. Consumer and Marketing Service tive under the applicable provisions of 601-674) the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Dated: July 2, 1971. [ 7 CFR Part 906 1 Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. ORANGES AND GRAPEFRUIT GROWN 601-674). P aul A. Nicholson, Deputy Director, Fruit and IN LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY The proposal is to amend § 917.425 (Pear Reg. 1) to extend the effective Vegetable Division, Con­ IN TEXAS period of said regulation to December 31, sumer and Marketing Service. Increase in Expenses for 1970—71 1971. [FR Doc.71-9694 Filed 7-8-71;8:49 am] Fiscal Period All persons who desire to submit writ­ ten data, views, or arguments for con­ Consideration is being given to the fol­ sideration in connection with the pro­ lowing proposal submitted by the Texas posed amendment shall file the same, in DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Valley Citrus Committee, established un­ quadruplicate, with the Hearing Clerk, der the marketing agreement, as U.S. Department of Agriculture, Room amended, and Order No. 906, as amended 112, Administration Building, Washing­ EDUCATION, AND WELFARE (7 CFR Part 906), regulating the han­ ton, D.C. 20250, not later than the sev­ Food and Drug Administration dling of oranges and grapefruit grown enth day after publication of this notice in Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas, in the F ederal R egister. All written sub­ [ 21 CFR Part 8 ] effective under the applicable provisions missions made pursuant to this notice COLOR ADDITIVE FD&C RED NO. 40 of the Agricultural Marketing Agree­ will be made available for public inspec­ ment Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. tion at the office of the Hearing Clerk Listing of Lakes for Food and Drug 601-674), as the agency to administer during regular business hours (7 CFR Use Subject to Certification the terms and provisions thereof: 1.27(b)). That the provision pertaining to ex­ Pursuant to provisions of the Federal As proposed to be amended the said Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 706 penses in paragraph (a) of § 906.210 § 917.425 reads as follows: Expenses and rate of assessment (35 F.R. (b), (c)(1), (d), 74 Stat. 399-403; 21 14607) be amended to read as follows: § 917.425 Pear Regulation 1. U.S.C. 376(b), (c)(1), (d)) a n d under authority delegated to him (21 CFR (a) Order. During the period July 9, § 906.210 Expenses and rale of assess­ 2.120): m ent. 1971, through December 31, 1971, no The Commissioner of Food and Drugs, handler shall ship: (a) Expenses. The expenses that are based on a petition filed by Allied Chemi­ reasonable and likely to be incurred by (1) Any box or container of Bartlett, cal Corp., Specialty Chemicals Division, the Texas Valley Citrus Committee, dur­ Max-Red (Max-Red Bartlett, Red Bart­ c/o Hazleton Laboratories, Inc., Post Of­ ing the period August 1, 1970, through lett) , or Rosired (Rosired Bartlett) fice Box 30, Falls Church, Va. 22046, and July 31, 1971, will amount to $724,000; varieties of pears unless at least 85 per­ other relevant material, proposes to cent, by count, of the pears contained in amend §§ 8.244 FD&C Red No. 40 and ***** such box or container grade at least U.S. 8.4104 FD&C Red No. 40 (36 F.R. 6892) All persons who desire to submit writ­ No. 1 with the remainder thereof grading to provide for the listing of the lakes, ten data, views, or arguments in connec­ not less than U.S. No. 2; subject to certification, of FD&C Red No. tion with the aforesaid proposal should (2) Any box or container of Bartlett, 40 for use in foods and drugs. file the same in quadruplicate, with the Max-Red (Max-Red Bartlett, Red Bart­ Interested persons may, within 30 days Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Ag­ lett) , or Rosired (Rosired Bartlett) after publication hereof in the F ederal riculture, Room 112, Administration varieties of pears unless such pears are R egister, file with the Hearing Clerk, Building, Washington, D.C. 20250, not of a size not smaller than the size known Department of Health, Education, and later than the 10th day after the publi­ commercially as size 165. Welfare, Room 6-62, 5600 Fishers Lane, cation of this notice in the F ederal R eg­ (3) Any box or container of pears of Rockville, IVId. 20852, written comments ister. All written submissions made any variety unless such box or container (preferably in quintuplícate) regarding pursuant to this notice will be made is stamped or otherwise marked, in plain this proposal. Comments may be accom­ available for public inspection at the sight and in plain letters, on one outside panied by a memorandum or brief in

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 12909 support thereof. Received comments eligible contractors when it is determined cordance with § 3-5.902(a). The clause may be seen in the above office during economically advantageous to the Gov­ shall be appropriately modified when title working hours, Monday through Friday. ernment to do so. Except as provided in to the property is to vest in the contrac­ § 3-5.902(c), such determinations and tor under the provisions of § 3-5.902 (b) Dated: June 28,1971. authorizations shall be made by the or (c). S am D. F ine, cognizant contracting officer unless pre­ General Services Administration Supply Associate Commissioner scribed otherwise by operating agency Sources for Compliance. implementation of this subpart. The contracting officer may issue and the [PR Doc.71-9713 Filed 7-8-71;8:51 am] (b) Contractors shall not be author­contractor agrees to accept an authorization ized to utilize General Services Adminis­ to utilize General Services Administration tration supply sources in the performance supply sources for property to be used in the of fixed-price type contracts, even though performance of this contract. Title to all Office of the Secretary such contracts provide for price adjust­ property acquired under such an authoriza­ [ 41 CFR Part 3-5 1 ment, escalation, redetermination, or tion shall be in the Government. All property cost-reduction incentive. acquired under such an authorization shall PROCUREMENT SOURCES be subject to the provisions of the clause of § 3—5.902 Authorization to contractors. this contract entitled “Government Prop­ Notice of Proposed Rule Making In addition to the criteria set forth in erty,’’ except paragraphs (identify) thereof. Notice is hereby given in accordance § 1-5.902 of this title and FPMR 101-26.7, [FR Doc.71-9730 Filed 7-8-71;8:52 am] with the administrative procedure pro­ the following factors shall be applicable visions in 5 U.S.C. 553, that pursuant to in making determinations and findings the Federal Property and Administrative and when issuing authorizations: Services Act of 1949, as amended, the (a) General. Except as provided in DEPARTMENT OF Office of the Secretary is considering an paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, amendment to 41 CFR Chapter 3 by re­ contractors shall be authorized to utilize TRANSPORTATION vising Part 3-5, Special and Directed General Services Administration sources Sources of Supply. The purpose of the of supply only when: Coast Guard revision is to modify existing policy so Cl) Title to property purchased under [ 46 CFR Parts 2, 146 1 as to authorize the vesting of title to Federal Supply Schedule contracts will property acquired from GSA supply pass to and vest in the Government di­ [CGFR 71-62] sources with specific contractors when rectly from the Federal Supply Schedule RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS required for the performance of research contractor (rather than through the contract or in connection with long prime contractor); Notice of Proposed Rule Making range programs. (2) Title to Government-owned prop­ erty ordered from General Services Ad­ The Coast Guard is considering Any person who wishes to submit writ­ amending its regulations concerning re­ ten data, views, or arguments pertaining ministration stores stock will remain in the Government; or ports and forms and dangerous cargoes to the proposed amendment may do so to add incidents involving radioactive by filing them in duplicate with the Di­ (3) Equipment ordered on a lease or rental basis under Federal Supply Sched­ materials to the reporting requirements rector, Division of Procurement and of 46 CFR 2.20-65 (35 F.R. 16832 and to Materiel Management, OASAM, Room ule contracts will be used solely in the performance of cost-reimbursement type require notification to the shipper of 3340, HEW North Building, Department such incidents. of Health, Education, and Welfare, 330 Government contracts. Independence Avenue SW., Washington, (b) Research contracts with nonprofit Interested persons may participate in DC 20201, within 30 days after publica­ educational institutions. A nonprofit in­ this proposed rule making by submitting stitution of higher education engaged in written data, views, or arguments to the tion of this notice in the F ederal R egis­ Commandant (MHM), U.S. Coast Guard, ter. All comments submitted pursuant the conduct of a research contract au­ to this notice will be available for public thorized to utilize GSA sources will be Washington, D.C. 20591. Each person inspection during regular business hours granted title to such property at time of submitting comments should include his in the Division of Procurement and acquisition to the extent permitted by name and address, identify the notice Materiel Management. statute. (CGFR 71-62), and give reasons for any (c) Contracts for long range programs. recommendations. Comments received Dated: July 2,1971. Cost-reimbursement type contractors en­ will be available for examination by in­ N orman B. H ouston, gaged in contracts under long range (10 terested persons in Room 8306, Depart­ Deputy Assistant Secretary or more years duration, such as the So­ ment of Transportation, Nassif Building, for Administration. cial Security Administration Medicare 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, program) when authorized to use Gov­ DC. As proposed, the revised Part 3-5 The Coast Guard will hold an informal would read as follows: ernment supply sources for items costing less than like or similar items obtained hearing on Tuesday, August 24, 1971, at PART 3-5— SPECIAL AND DIRECTED from commercial sources of supply, may 9:30 a.m. in Conference Room 2230, De­ SOURCES OF SUPPLY be granted title to such property when partment of Transportation, Nassif it is advantageous to the Government. Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Wash­ Subpart 3-5.9— Use of GSA Supply Sources by Reimbursement to the contractor shall ington, DC. Interested persons are in­ Contractors Performing Cost-Reimbursement be by a method similar to that set forth vited to attend the hearing and present Type Contracts in § 1-15.205-9 of this title, based on a oral or written statements on this pro­ Sec. depreciation rate commensurate to the posal. There will be no cross examina­ 3-5.901 Policy. estimated life expectancy of the equip­ tion of persons presenting statements. 3-5.902 Authorization to contractors. The Commandant will evaluate all 3-5.950 Contract clause. ment involved or the expected life of the contract, whichever is shorter. When the communications recieved before August Authority : The provisions of this Part 3-5 circumstances warrant vesting title in the 31, 1971, and take final action on this issued under 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c). contractor, the findings shall be prepared proposal. The proposed regulations may and submitted to the head of the pro­ be changed in the light of comments Subpart 3—5.9—Use of GSA Supply curing activity for determination. received. Sources by Contractors Performing By a separate document published at Cost-Reimbursement Type Contracts § 3—5.950 Contract clause. page 12913 of this issue of the F ederal The following clause shall be used in R egister, the Hazardous Materials Reg­ § 3—5.901 Policy. cost-reimbursement type contracts when ulations Board of the Department of (a) It is the policy of this Departmentit is determined advantageous to author­ Transportation proposes amendments to to make GSA supply sources available to ize the utilization of GSA sources in ac- Parts 171, 174, 175, and 177 of Title 49,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12910 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 252052 parts in accordance with Hawker Sid­ Code of Federal Regulations, to change Federal Aviation Administration deley Service Bulletin No. 30-24^(2194), the reporting requirements that were [ 14 CFR Part 39 ] dated December 23, 1970, or later ARB-ap­ published in the Saturday, October 31, proved issue or FAA-approved equivalent; or 1970 issue of the F ederal R egister (35 [Docket No. 11201] (b) Replace the pump with a new pump No. M.2601/1 in accordance with Hawker F.R. 16836) by including reporting re­ AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES quirements for incidents involving radio­ Siddeley Service Bulletin No. 30-24-(2194), dated December 23, 1970, or later ARB-ap­ active materials. The Board has fully Hawker Siddeley Model DH—125 proved issue or FAA-approved equivalent. stated the reasons for the proposed Airplanes changes in that document, Docket No. Issued in Washington, D.C., on July 1, HM-36. The Federal Aviation Administration 1971. The proposed amendments to the haz­ is considering amending Part 39 of the R . S. S liff, ardous materials regulations of the De­ Federal Aviation Regulations by adding Acting Director, partment of Transportation in Title 49 an airworthiness directive applicable to Flight Standards Service. Hawker Siddeley Model DH-125 air­ would change the reporting requirements [FR Doc.71-9661 Filed 7-8-71;8:46 am] applicable to shippers by water, air, and planes that have been modified in land, and for carriers by air and land. accordance with Hawker Siddeley Modi­ fication 252052. That modification intro­ The adoptions of this proposed amend­ [14 CFR Part 391 ment to Title 46 would prescribe the re­ duced new seals in the windscreen de­ porting requirements applicable to car­ icing handpump, and there have been [Airworthiness Docket No. 71-SW-34] reports of deterioration of these seals riers of radioactive materials by water. AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES In consideration of the foregoing, the that could result in seizure of the pump. Since this condition is likely to exist or Piper PA-23 Series Airplanes Coast Guard proposes to amend Chapter develop in other airplanes of the same 1 of Title 46, Code of Federal Regula­ type design, the proposed airworthiness The Federal Aviation Administration tions, as follows: directive would require replacing the is considering amending Part 39 of the j 1. By amending § 2.20-65 by deleting Modification 252052 seals with pre- Federal Aviation Regulations by adding the word “or” in paragraph (fo) (4), by Modiflcation 252052 seals, or replacing an airworthiness directive applicable to adding “; or” after the words “of this the handpump with a handpump con­ Piper PA-23 series airplanes modified in paragraph” in paragraph (b) (5), and taining pre-Modification 252052 seals. accordance with Supplemental Type by adding paragraphs (b) (6) and (e) Certificate SA598SW. There has been in­ to read as follows: Interested persons are invited to par­ terference between the left rear nose ticipate in the making of the proposed wheel door hinge and the front elevator § 2.20—65 Immediate notice of certain rule by submitting such written data, hazardous incidents. control tube assembly on Piper PA-23 views, or arguments as they may desire. airplanes that could result in loss of ele- j * * * * * Communications should identify the vator control. Since this condition is (b) * * * docket number and be submitted in du­ likely to exist or develop in other air-. | (6) Fire, breakage, spillage or sus­plicate to the Federal Aviation Admin­ planes of the same design, the proposed pected radioactive contamination occurs istration, Office of the General Counsel, airworthiness directive would require re­ involving shipment of radioactive mate­ Attention: Rules Docket, 800 Independ­ placement of the left rear hinge with a ence Avenue SW., Washington, DC redesigned part on Piper PA-23 series rials. 20590. All communications received on ***** airplanes modified in accordance with or before August 9, 1971, will be con­ STC SA598SW. v (e) Notification to the shipper. Thesidered by the Administrator before tak­ ing action upon the proposed rule. The Interested persons are invited to par­ owner, master, agent, or person in charge ticipate in the making of the proposed of any vessel, domestic or foreign en­ proposals contained in this notice may be changed in the light of comments rule by submitting such written data, gaged in transporting radioactive mate­ views, or comments as they may desire. rials (including loading, unloading or received. All comments will be available, both before and after the closing date Communications should identify the temporary storage) shall notify the ship­ docket number and be submitted in trip­ per by telephone, radiotelephone, radio for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. licate to the Federal Aviation Adminis­ message, or other expeditious means, at tration, Regional Counsel, Post Office the earliest practicable moment, of any This amendment is proposed under the Box 1689, Fort Worth, TX 76101. All incident that occurs on board in which authority of sections 313(a), 601, and communications received on or before 603 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 there has been fire, breakage, spillage, August 9, 1971, will be considered by the or suspected radioactive contamination (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423) and of Director before taking action upon the involving the radioactive materials ship­ section 6(c) of the Department of Trans­ proposed ride. The proposals contained portation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c) ). ment. in this notice may be changed in the light 2. By amending § 146.19-50 (a) by In consideration of the foregoing, it is adding the words “as prescribed by proposed to amend § 39.13 of Part 39 of of comments received. All comments will § 2.20-65 of this chapter,” after the the Federal Aviation Regulations by add­ be available, both before and after the words “, or his authorized representa­ ing the following new airworthiness closing date for comments, in th e office tive,” in the fourth sentence. directive : of the Regional Counsel, Federal Avia­ This proposal is made under authority Hawker Siddeley Aviation. Applies to Models tion Administration, Southwest Region, of R.S. 4405, as amended, R.S. 4417a, DH.125-1A, -1A/522, -1A/R-522, -1A/S- 4400 Blue Mound Road, Fort W orth, TX, as amended, R.S. 4462, as amended, R.S. 522, —3A, -3A/R, -3A/RA, and -400A air­ for examination by interested persons. 4472, as amended, section 6(b)(1), 80 planes which have been modified in Stat. 937; 46 U.S.C. 375, 391a, 416,170, 49 accordance with Hawker Siddeley Modi­ This amendment is proposed under the U.S.C. 1655(b)(1); 49 CFR 1.46(b). fication 252052. authority of sections 313 (a), 601, and 60 To prevent possible seizure of the wind­ of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 Dated: June 22,1971. screen deicing handpump No. M.2604, within the next 100 hours’ time in service after the U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423) and of sec­ W. F. R ea III, effective date of this AD, unless already tion 6 (c) of the Department of Transpor­ Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, accomplished, accomplish either of the tation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(0). Chief, Office of Merchant Ma­ following: rine Safety. (a) Modify the pump by replacing the In consideration of the foregoing, it ^ proposed to amend § 39.13 of Part 39 o [PR Doc.71—9727 Piled 7-8-71;8:51 am] washers and seal with pre-Modification

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 12911 the Federal Aviation Regulations by add­ ing, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, data, views, or arguments presented dur­ ing the following new airworthiness MO 64106. ing such conferences must also be sub­ directive: The instrument approach procedure mitted in writing in accordance with this Piper Aircraft Corp. : Applies to Piper PA-23 for the Storm Lake, Iowa, Municipal notice in order to become part of the series airplanes, modified by installing Airport has been altered. Accordingly, it record for consideration. The proposals nose wheel well doors in accordance with is necessary to alter the Storm Lake contained in this notice may be changed Supplemental Type Certificate SA598SW, transition area to adequately protect air­ in the light of comments received. certificated in all categories. craft executing the amended approach A public docket will be available for Compliance required within the next 50 procedure. examination by interested persons in the hours’ time in service after the effective date In consideration of the foregoing, the Office of the Regional Counsel, Federal of this AD, unless already accomplished. Federal Aviation Administration pro­ Aviation Administration, Federal Build­ To prevent interference between the left poses to amend Part 71 of the Federal ing, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, rear nose wheel door hinge and Piper P/N Aviation Regulations as hereinafter set 17238-00 or -04 tube assembly, accomplish MO 64106. the following: forth: Since designation of controlled air­ Replace existing left rear nose wheel door In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the follow­ space at Peoria, 111., a new instrument hinge and hinge bracket parts with rede­ ing transition area is amended to read: approach procedure has been developed signed parts in accordance with J. W. Miller Storm Lake, Iowa for the Ingersoll Airport, Canton, 111., Aviation, Inc., Engineering Order B1 to Draw­ utilizing the Peoria VORTAC as a navi­ ing 201, dated June 4, 1969, or with equiva­ That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 5-mile radius gational aid. In addition, the criteria for lent parts and methods approved by the the designation of control zones and Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing of Storm Lake Municipal Airport (latitude Branch, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation 42°36’00" N., longitude 95°14'31'' W.); and transition areas have changed. Accord­ Administration, Fort Worth, Tex. within 3 miles each side of the 142° bearing ingly it is necessary to alter the Peoria, from Storm Lake Municipal Airport, extend­ Note: Copies of J. W. Miller Aviation, Inc., 111., control zone and transition area to Engineering Ofder B1 to Drawing 201 may ing from the 5-mile-radius area to 8 miles adequately protect aircraft executing the be obtained from the company at Post Office southeast of the airport; and that airspace new procedure and to comply with the Box 16203, San Antonio, TX 78216. extending upward from 1,200 feet above the new control zone and transition area surface within 4 % miles southwest and 9% criteria. Issued in Fort Worth, Tex., on miles northeast of the 142° and 322° bear­ ings from Storm Lake Municipal Airport ex­ Rv consideration of the foregoing, the June 29,1971. tending from 6 miles northwest to 18% miles Federal Aviation Administration pro­ H enry L. N ewman, southeast of the airport. poses to amend Part 71 of the Federal Director, Southwest Region. Aviation Regulations as hereinafter set This amendment is proposed under the forth: [FR Doc.71-9662 Filed 7-8-71:8:46 am] authority of section 307(a) of the Fed­ eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. (1) In § 71.171 (36 F.R. 2055), the fol­ 1348), and section 6(c) of the Depart­ lowing control zone is amended to read: I 14 CFR Part 71 J ment of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. Peoria, III. [Airspace Docket No. 7vL-CE-74] 1655(c)). — ■ Within a 5-mile radius of the Greater TRANSITION AREA "Issued in Kansa§ City, Mo., on June 18, Peoria Airport (40°39'47" N., 89°41'22" W.) 1971. and within 4.6 miles each side of the Greater Proposed Alteration Peoria Airport ILS localizer northwest Chester W. W ells, course, extending from the 5-mile-radius The Federal Aviation Administration Acting Director, Central Region. zone to 17.5 miles northwest of the airport. is considering amending Part 71 of the [FR Doc.71-9663 Filed 7-8-71:8:46 am] Federal Aviation Regulations so as to ; <2) In §71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the alter the transition area at Storm Lake, following transition area is amended to Iowa. > read: [ 14 CFR Part 71 ] Peoria, III. Interested persons may participate in [Airspace Docket No. 71-CE-72] That airspace extending upward from 700 the proposed rule making by submitting feet above the surface within a 9-mile radius such written data, views, or arguments CONTROL ZONE AND TRANSITION of the Greater Peoria Airport (40°39'47" N., as they may desire. Communications AREA 89°41'22" W.); within a 7-mile radius of the should be submitted in triplicate to the Ingersoll Airport (40°34'10" N., 90°04'24" Director, Central Region, Attention: Proposed Alteration W.); within 5 miles northwest and 6.5 miles Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Avia­ southeast of the Peoria VORTAC 244° radial The Federal Aviation Administration extending from the 7-mile-radius area to tion Administration, Federal Building, is considering amending Part 71 of the 34.5 miles southwest of the VORTAC; 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, MO Federal Aviation Regulations so as to within 9.5 miles south and 4.5 miles north 64106. All communications received alter the control zone and transition area of the Peoria VORTAC 279° radial, extending within 45 days after publication of this at Peoria, 111. from the VORTAC to 18.5 miles west of the notice in the F ederal R egister will be Interested persons may participate in VORTAC; within 9.5 miles southwest and 4.5 considered before action is taken on the the proposed rule making by submitting miles northeast of the Greater Peoria Air­ Proposed amendment. No public hearing port ILS localizer northwest course, extend­ such written data, views, or arguments ing from 3.5 miles northwest of the airport is contemplated at this time, but ar­ as they may desire. Communications to 22 miles northwest of the airport; and rangements fpr informal conferences should be submitted in triplicate to the within 6.5 miles northwest and 5 miles re • ^'e(^erat Aviation Administration Director, Central Region, Attention: southeast of the Peorja VORTAC 052° radial, Officials may be made by contacting the Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Avia­ extending from the VORTAC to 12 miles Regional Air Traffic Division Chief. Any tion Administration, Federal Building, northeast of the VORTAC. data, views, or arguments presented 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, MO These amendments are proposed under during such conferences must also be 64106. All communications received the authority of section 307(a) of the submitted in writing in accordance with within 45 days after publication of this Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. tms notice in order to become part of notice in the F ederal R egister will be 1348), and of section 6(c) of the Depart­ the record for consideration. The pro­ considered before action is taken on the ment of Transportation Act (49 U S C posal contained in this notice may be 1655(c)). anged in the light of comments proposed amendments. No public hear­ received. ing is contemplated at this time, but Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on June A public docket will be available for arrangements for informal conferences 18, 1971. animation by interested persons in the with Federal Aviation Administration Chester W. W ells, * 5 of the Regional Counsel, Federal officials may be made by contacting the Acting Director, Central Region. aviation Administration, Federal Build­ Regional Air Traffic Division Chief. Any [FR Doc.71-9664 Filed 7-8-71;8:46 am]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12912 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

[ 14 CFR Port 71 1 I 14 CFR Port 71 ] 1 14 CFR Part 71 ] [Airspace Docket No. 71-CE-71] [Airspace Docket No. 71-SW-33] [Airspace Docket No. 71-SW-30] TRANSITION AREA TRANSITION AREA CONTROL ZONE AND TRANSITION AREA Proposed Designation Proposed Designation The Federal Aviation Administration The Federal Aviation Administration Proposed Alteration is considering amending Part 71 of the is considering amending Part 71 of the The Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Regulations so as to de­ Federal Aviation Regulations to desig­ is considering amending Part 71 of the signate a transition area at Carrollton, nate a 700-foot transition area at Heber Federal Aviation Regulations to alter Ohio. Springs, Ark. controlled airspace in the Oklahoma Interested persons may participate in Interested persons may submit such City, Okla., terminal area. the proposed rule making by submitting written data, views, or arguments as they Interested persons may submit such such written data, views, or arguments as may desire. Communications should be written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Communications should submitted in triplicate to the Chief, Air they may desire. Communications should be submitted in triplicate to the Director, Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Fed­ be submitted in triplicate to the Chief,! Central Region, Attention: Chief, Air eral Aviation Administration, Post Office Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region! Traffic Division, Federal Aviation Admin­ Box 1689, Fort Worth, TX 76101. All Federal Aviation Administration, Post istration, Federal Building, 601 East 12th communications received within 30 days Office Box 1689, Fort Worth, TX 76101. Street, Kansas City, MO 64106. All com­ after publication of this notice in the All communications received within 30 munications received within 45 days after F ederal Register will be considered be­ days after publication of this notice in publication of this notice in the F ederal fore action is taken on the proposed the F ederal R egister will be considered R egister will be considered before action amendment. No public hearing is con­ before action is taken on the proposed is taken on the proposed amendment. No templated at this time, but arrangements amendment. No public hearing is con­ public hearing is contemplated at this for informal conferences with Federal templated at this time, but arrangements time, but arrangements for informal con­ for informal conferences with Federal ferences with Federal Aviation Admin­ Aviation Administration officials may be Aviation Administration officials may be | istration officials may be made by con­ made by contacting the Chief, Air Traf­ made by contacting the Chief, Air Traf- tacting the Regional Air Traffic Division fic Division. Any data, views, or argu­ fic Division. Any data, views, or argu- j Chief. Any data, views, or arguments pre­ ments presented during such conferences ments presented during such confer­ sented during such conferences must also must also be submitted in writing in ac­ ences must also be submitted in writing be submitted in writing in accordance in accordance with this notice in order! with this notice in order to become part cordance with this notice in order to be­ to become part of the record for con­ of the record for consideration. The pro­ come part of the record for consideration. sideration. The proposal contained in posal contained in this notice may be The proposal contained in this notice this notice may be changed in the light changed in the light of comments may be changed in the light of com- of comments received. received. ménts received; The official docket will be available for A public docket will be available for The official docket will be available for examination by interested persons at the examination by interested persons in the Office of the Regional Counsel, South­ Office of the Regional Counsel, Federal examination by interested persons at the west Region, Federal Aviation Adminis-1 Aviation Administration, Federal Build­ Office of the Regional Counsel, South­ tration, Fort Worth, Tex. An informal ing, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, west Region, Federal Aviation Adminis­ docket will also be available for exami­ MO 64106. tration, Fort Worth, Tex., An informal nation at the Office of the Chief, Air A new public use instrument approach docket will also be available for exami­ Traffic Division. procedure has been developed for the It is proposed to amend Part 71 of the nation at the Office of the Chief, Air Federal Aviation Regulations as herein­ Carroll County-Tolson Airport, Carroll­ Traffic Division. ton, Ohio. Consequently, it is necessary after set forth. to provide controlled airspace protection It is proposed to amend Part 71 of the (1) In §71.171 (36 F.R. 2055), the for aircraft executing this new approach Federal Aviation Regulations as herein­ Oklahoma City, Okla. (Will Rogers procedure by designating a transition after set forth. World Airport), control zone is amended area at Carrollton, Ohio. In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the follow­ to read: In consideration of the foregoing, the ing transition area is added: Oklahoma City, Okla. (Will Rogers Federal Aviation Administration pro­ World Airport) Heber Springs, Ark. poses to amend Part 71 of the Federal Within a 5-mile radius of Will Rogers Aviation Regulations as hereinafter set That airspace extending upward from World Airport (latitude 35°23'45" N., longi­ forth: 700 feet above the surface within a tude 97°36'30" W.); within 3 miles each side In § 71.181 <36 F.R. 2140), the follow­ 10.5-mile radius of the Heber Springs, Ark., of the Oklahoma City runway 17R ILS local­ ing transition area is added: Airport (latitude 35°30'41" N., longitude izer north course, extending from the 5-mile- 92°00'25'' W.). radius zone to the Tulakes, Okla., RBN; Carrollton, Ohio within 2 miles southwest and 3.5 miles north­ east of the Oklahoma City VORTAC 105° That airspace extending upward from 700 The proposed transition area will af­ ford controlled airspace for aircraft radial extending from the 5-mile-radius zone feet above the surface within an 8%-mile to the VORTAC; and within 3 miles each side radius of the Carroll County-Tolson Airport executing approach/departure proce­ of the Oklahoma City runway 35R ILS local­ (latitude 40°33'45" N., longitude 81°04'30" izer south course extending from the 5-mile- W). dures at Heber Springs, Ark., Airport. This amendment is proposed under the radius zone to the LOM (latitude 35*18'36" N., longitude 97°35'17" W.), excluding that This amendment is proposed under the authority of section 307(a) of the Fed­ authority of section 307(a) of the Fed­ portion which coincides with the Oklahoma eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. City (Wiley Post) control zone. 1348), and of section 6(c) of the Depart­ 1348) and of section 6(c) of the Depart­ ' (2) In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the Okla­ ment of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. ment of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. homa City, Okla., transition area is 1655(c)). 1655(c)). amended to read: Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on Issued in Fort Worth, Tex., on June 30, Oklahoma City, Okla. June 18,1971. 1971. That airspace west of longitude 97°10'00" R. V. R eynolds, W. extending upward from 700 feet above the Chester W. Wells, surface within a 23-mile radius of latitude Acting Director, Central Region. Acting Director, Southwest Region. 35*24'25" N., longitude 97, 23'50'' W.; within [FR Doc. 71-9665 Filed 7-8-71;8:46 am] [FR Doc.71-9666 Filed 7-8-71;8:46 am] 10 miles west and 5 miles east of the wm

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 12913

Rogers World Airport, runway 35R ILS south dent in which there has been breakage, to the Department. The purpose of these course, extending from the LOM to 18.5 spillage, or suspected radioactive con­ proposed amendments to §§ 171.15, miles south of the LOM; and within a 5-mile radius of the Cimarron, Okla., Municipal tamination involving radioactive mate­ 174.588, 175.655, and 177.861 is to make Airport (latitude 35°29'15" N., longitude rials shipments. Aircraft in which radio­ the reporting requirements for incidents 95*49'00" W.). active materials have been spilled may involving radioactive materials consist­ not be again placed in service or routine­ ent with the more recent general report­ Alterations in the Oklahoma City, ly occupied until the radiation dose rate ing requirements established. Okla., terminal area are proposed to at any accessible surface is less than 0.5 The Board is also of the opinion that conform to Terminal Instrument Proce­ millirem per hour and there is no sig­ the requirement for reporting based on dures (TERPs) criteria and provide con­ nificant removable radioactive surface “unusual delay” involving radioactive trolled airspace for aircraft executing contamination (see 49 CFR 173.399). In material shipments should be deleted instrument approach/departure proce­ these instances, the package or materials from §§ 174.588(c) (1), 175.655(j) (3), and dures at Oklahoma City, Okla., Will should be segregated as far as practica­ 177.861(a). Experience and comments Rogers World Airport. ble from personnel contact. If radiologi­ from carriers have indicated that the This amendment is proposed under the cal advice or assistance is needed, the term lacks-precision and is subject to authority of section 307(a) of the Fed­ U.S. Atomic Energy Commission should serious variance in interpretation. The eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. also be notified. In case of obvious leak­ Board believes that the requirements in 1348) and of section 6(c) of the Depart­ age, or if it appears likely that the inside § 171.15(a) (4) which provide for report­ ment of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. container may have been damaged care ing on a judgment basis, are sufficient to 1655(c)). should be taken to avoid inhalation, in­ include situations involving unusual Issued in Fort Worth, Tex., on gestion, or contact with the radioactive delay. June 30, 1971. materials. Any loose radioactive materi­ A new reporting criterion is proposed to R. V. R eynolds, als should be left in a segregated area be addetfto §§ 171.15(a), 174.588(c)(1), Acting Director, Southwest Region. pending disposal instructions from quali­ 175.655(j) (3), and 177.861(a) relating to fied persons. incidents involving “suspected radio­ [FR Doc.71-9667 Filed 7-8-71;8:46 am] (B) In § 103.28, paragraph (a) (5) active contamination”. When compared would be added to read as follows: to other hazardous material hazards, § 103.28 Reporting certain dangerous radiation hazards present a special prob­ [1 4 CFR Part 103 1 article incidents. lem in detection. Radiation cannot be [Docket No. 9938; Notice No. 71-19] detected by the senses, but must be ob­ (a) * * * served by the means of special measuring REPORTS OF INCIDENTS INVOLVING (5) Fire, breakage, or spillage or sus­or detection instruments. For this reason, pected radioactive contamination occurs RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS the Board believes that immediate notifi­ involving shipment of radioactive mate­ cation should be made whenever a car­ Notice of Proposed Rule Making rials (see also § 103.23(b) ). rier suspects radioactive contamination. ***** By separate document published on In consideration of the foregoing, 49 page 12909 the Hazardous Materials Reg­ This proposal is made under the au­ CFR Parts 171, 174, 175, and 177 would ulations Board issued a notice of pro­ thority of title VI and section 902(h) of be amended as follows: posed rule making (Docket ^io. 9938; the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 I. Part 171: U.S.C. 1421-1430, 1472(h)). In § 171.15, subparagraph (a) (5) would Notice No. 71-19) concerned with the be added to read as follows: reports on incidents involving radioac­ Issued in Washington, D.C., on July 2, tive materials. For the reasons stated in 1971. § 171.15 Immediate notice of certain hazardous materials incidents. that notice, it is proposed to make certain S am S chneider, corresponding changes in Title 14, Code Board Member, for the (a) * * * of Federal Regulations, Part 103 of the Federal Aviation Administration. (5) Fire, breakage, spillage, or sus­ Federal Aviation Regulations as set forth [FR Doc.71-9726 Filed 7-8-71;8:51 am] pected radioactive contamination occurs below. involving shipment of radioactive mate­ Interested persons are invited to give rial. (See also §§ 174.588(c) (1), 175.655 their views on this proposal. Communi­ (j) (3), and 177.861(a) of this chapter.) cations should identify the docket num­ Hazardous Materials Regulations n . Part 174: ber and be submitted in duplicate to the Board In § 174.588, subparagraph (c)(1) Secretary, Hazardous Materials Regula­ would be amended to read as follows: tions Board, Department of Transporta­ [4 9 CFR Parts 171, 174, 175, 177] tion, 400 Sixth Street SW., Washington, TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS § 174.588 Disposition of damaged or astray shipments. DC 20590. Communications received on MATERIALS or before August 31, 1971, will be consid­ ***** ered before final action is taken on the [Docket No. HM-36; Notice No. 71-22] (c) * * * proposal. All comments received will be Reports on Incidents Involving (1) In addition to the incident report­ available for examination by interested Radioactive Materials ing requirements of §§ 171.15 and 171.16 persons at the Office of the Secretary, of this chapter, the carrier must also Hazardous Materials Regulations Board, On October 31, 1970, the Hazardous notify the shipper at the earliest prac­ both before and after the closing date for Materials Regulations Board published ticable moment following any incident in comments. new hazardous materials incident report­ ■which there has been breakage, spillage, In consideration of the foregoing, it is ing requirements under Docket No. or suspected radioactive contamination proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 103 as HM-36 (35 F.R. 16836 and 16837). The involving radioactive materials ship­ follows: purpose of the amendments to the De­ ments. Vehicles, buildings, areas, or (A) In §. 103.23, paragraph (b) would partment’s Hazardous Materials Regula­ equipment in which radioactive materials be amended to read as follows: tions was to establish uniform reporting have been spilled may not be again placed requirements for incidents occuring as a § 103.23 Special requirements for radio­ in service or routinely occupied until the direct result of hazardous materials in radiation dose rate at any accessible sur­ active materials. transportation. ***** face is less than 0.5 millirem per hour and Regulations for the reporting of inci­ there is no significant removable radio­ (b) In addition to the reporting re­dents involving shipments of radioactive active surface contamination (see quirements of § 103.28, the carrier must materials have been in effect for more § 173.399 of this chapter). (Notes 1 and also notify the shipper at the earliest than 2 years, requiring immediate re­ 2 remain the same.) practicable mbment following any inci- ports by the carrier to the shipper and *****

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 No. 132—Pt. I---- 4 12914 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

333. Part 175: Issued in Washington, D.C. on July 2, common system shall have priority over any In § 175.655, subparagraph (j) (3) 1971. other system in these bands. would be amended to read as follows: W. F. R ea, III, 4. Authority for the proposed amend­ §175.655 Protection of packages. Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard ment is contained in sections 4(i) and 303 By direction of Commandant of the Communications Act of 1934, as * * * * * U.S. Coast Guard. amended. (j) * * * Carl V. Lyon, 5. Pursuant to applicable procedures (3) In addition to the incident report­ set forth in section 1.415 of the Commis­ ing requirements of §§ 171.15 and 171.16 Acting Administrator, Federal Railroad Administration. sion’s rules, interested parties may file of this chapter, the carrier must also comments on or before August 13, 1971, notify the shipper at the earliest prac­ K enneth L. P ierson, and reply comments on or before Au­ ticable moment following any incident in Acting Director, Bureau of gust 24, 1971. All relevant and timely which there has been breakage, spillage, Motor Carrier Safety Federal filed comments and reply comments will or suspected radioactive contamination Highway Administration. be considered by the Commission before involving radioactive materials ship­ S am S chneider, taking final action in this proceeding. In ments. Vehicles, buildings, . areas, or reaching its decision in this proceeding, equipment in which radioactive materials Board Member for the Federal Aviation Administration. the Commission may also take into con­ have been spilled may not be again sideration other relevant information in placed in service or routinely occupied [PR Doc.71-9725 Piled 7-8~71;8:51 am] addition to the specific comments invited until the radiation dose rate at any ac­ by this notice. cessible surface is less than 0.5 millirem 6. In accordance with the provisions of per hour and there is no significant re­ § 1.419 of the Commission’s rules, an movable radioactive surface containina- FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS original and fourteen copies of all written tion (see § 173.399 of this chapter). comments, replies, statements or briefs (Notes 1 and 2 remain the same.) shall be furnished the Commission. Re­ IV. Part 177: COMMISSION sponses will be available for public in­ In § 177.861, paragraph (a) would be [ 47 CFR Part 2 1 spection during regular business hours in amended to read as follows: the Commission’s Broadcast and Docket § 177.861 Accidents; radioactive mate­ “COMMON SYSTEM” MICROWAVE Reference Room at its Headquarters in rials. LANDING SYSTEM Washington, D.C. (a) In addition to the incident report­ [Docket No. 19280; FCC 71-682] Adopted: June 30,1971. ing requirements of §§ 171.15 and 171.16 Released: July 6,1971. of this chapter, the carrier must also Notice of Proposed Rule Making notify the shipper at the earliest practi­ 1. In view of the recent increase in F ederal Communications cable moment following any incident in experimental and developmental effort in Commission, which there has been breakage, spillage, the 5.0-5.25 and 15.4-15.7 GHz bands, [seal] B en F. W aple, or suspected radioactive contamination the Commission believes that timely no­ Secretary. involving radioactive materials ship­ tice of plans for use of the bands by the [PR Doc.71-9722 Filed 7-8-71;8:52 am] ments. Vehicles, buildings, - areas, or aviation community—national as well as equipment in which radioactive mate­ international—should be afforded the rials have been spilled may not be again public. [ 47 CFR Part 73 1 placed in service or routinely occupied 2. A special study group of the Radio until the radiation dose rate at any ac­ Technical Commission for Aeronautics, [Docket No. 19249; RM-1608, RM-1667] cessible surface is less than 0.5 millirem comprised of members from industry, do­ FM BROADCAST STATIONS, KINSTON, per hour and there is no significant re­ mestic, civil, and military aviation inter­ WILMINGTON, WASHINGTON, movable radioactive surface contamina­ ests, and space, science, and international MOREHEAD CITY-BEAUFORT, AND tion (see § 173.399 of this chapter). aeronautical experts, has recently com­ (Notes 1 and 2 remain the same) pleted the development of a provisional FARMVILLE, N.C. ***** signal format to be recommended for the Order Extending Time for Filing Interested persons are invited to give next generation instrument landing sys­ Comments and Reply Comments their views on this proposal. Communi­ tem. This system, to be designated the cations should identify the docket num­ Microwave Scanning Landing Guidance 1. This proceeding was begun by no­ ber and be submitted in duplicate to the System (LGS), will be part of the na- tice of proposed rule making (FCC 71- Secretary, Hazardous Materials Regula­ tional/intemational “common system”. 536) adopted May 19, 1971, released tions Board, Départaient of Transporta­ Because of the importance of the system, May 21, 1971, and published in the Fed­ tion, 400 Sixth Street SW., Washington, it is necessary that spectrum be reserved eral R egister May 26, 1971, 36 F.R. 9569. DC 20590. Communications received on for its implementation and that develop­ The dates presently designated for filing or before August 31, 1971 will be consid­ ment of systems which would be incom­ comments and reply comments are July 9 ered before final action is taken on the patible with the LGS be curtailed. and July 19, 1971, respectively. proposal. All comments received will be 3. To reserve adequate radio spectrum 2. On June 24,1971, Arlington-Fairfax available for examination by interested for the system and to afford notice to po­ Broadcasting Co. (Arlington-Fairfax), persons at the Office of the Secretary, tential developers of other systems in the licensee of Station WKLM, filed a request 5.0-5.25 and 15.4-15.7 GHz bands, the to extend the time for filing comments Hazardous Materials Regulations Board, "Commission is proposing to amend Part and reply comments to and including both before and after the closing date 2, § 2.106, the Table of Frequency Alloca­ August 9 and August 19, 1971, respec­ for comments. tions, by adding a new footnote to be tively. Arlington-Fairfax states that the This proposal is made under the au­ applied against those bands to read as additional time is necessary so that it thority of sections 831-835 of title 18, follows: can complete its preclusion that it is pre­ United States Code, section 9 of the De­ paring in this proceeding. US118 In the bands 5.0-5.25 and 15.4- 3. It appears that the requested ex­ partment of Transportation Act (49 15.7 GHz, a “common system” microwave tension of time is warranted and would U.S.C. 1657), and title VI and section landing system is planned which is expected to have worldwide application. It is antici­ serve the public interest. Accordingly, it 902(h) of the Federal Aviation Act of pated that operational implementation will is ordered, That the request of Arlington- 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1421-1430 and 1472(h)). begin about 1976. Nationally, such an agreed Fairfax Broadcasting Co. is granted to

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 12915 and including August 9, 1971, for com­ ing or acquiring direct or indirect control tor, officer, or employee with manage­ ments and August 19,1971, for reply com­ of any voting shares of a company en­ ment functions of the bank or other com­ ments in RM-1667 only. gaged in nonbanking activities, with pany, or if (B) an individual (or mem­ 4. This action is taken pursuant to au­certain exceptions. ber of his immediate family) who is a thority found in sections 4(i) and 303(r) The question of control by a holding director, officer, or trustee of the com­ of the Communications Act of 1934, as company of nonbanking companies was pany (or owns more than 25 percent of amended, and section.0.281(d) (8) of the given added importance by the 1970 the voting shares of the company) also Commission’s rules and regulations. amendments to the Act. Under those owns shares in the bank or other com­ amendments many one-bank holding pany, and the shares owned by him plus Adopted: July 1,1971. companies will be required to divest the shares of the bank or other company Released: July 2,1971. themselves of certain of their assets. The owned by the company (or by any other standard for divestiture is that the di­ company of which the owns more than [seal] F rancis R. W alsh, vesting company shall not retain direct 25 percent of the voting shares) aggre­ Chief, Broadcast Bureau. or indirect ownership or control of any gates 25 percent or more of the voting [PR Doc.71-9723 Piled 7-8-71;8:52 am] voting shares of the company divested, shares of the bank or other company. except to the extent permitted by section (4) A company that enters into any 4(c) (6) of the Act. agreement or understanding under which In view of the increased importance of the rights of a shareholder of a bank or determinations by the Board that a com­ other company are restricted in any FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM pany controls a bank or another com­ manner presumably controls the shares [12 CFR Part 222 1 pany, the Board proposes, pursuant to involved, unless the agreement or under­ BANK HOLDING COMPANIES sections 2 and 5 of the Act, to establish standing is incident to a bona fide loan a series of presumptions regarding con­ transaction, or the restrictions are on Control of a Bank or Other Company trol, reflecting its judgments based upon transferability and continue only for its 15 years of experience in administer­ time as may reasonably be necessary to Since its inception in 1956, the Bank ing the Act. obtain Board approval of the acquisition Holding Company Act has contained This would be accomplished by amend­ by the company of such shares. conclusive presumptions that a company ing § 222.2 of Regulation Y to read as (5) A company that enters into any is a bank holding company if it directly follows: agreement or understanding with a bank or indirectly controls 25 percent or more or other company pursuant to which the of the voting shares of two or more § 222.2 Determinations regarding con­ trol. company or any of its subsidiaries exer­ banks or controls in any manner the cises significant influence with respect to election of a majority of the directors of (a) Conclusive presumptions of con­ the management or overall operations of two or more banks. In 1966, Congress, trol. Conclusive presumptions that a the bank or other company presumably confirming interpretations of the Board, company controls a bank or another controls such bank or other company. added conclusive presumptions, in sec­ company are established by § 2(a) (2) (6) A company that owns directly or tion 2(g) (1) and (2), that (1) shares (A) and (B) and by § 2(g) (1) and (2) Indirectly securities that are immedi­ owned or controlled by any subsidiary of the Act. In addition, the Board has ately convertible at-the option of the of a bank holding company are indirectly determined that, whenever 25 percent or holder or owner thereof into voting owned or controlled by such bank hold­ more of the voting shares of a company shares presumably owns the shares into ing company and (2) shares held or con­ are stapled or otherwise joined together, which such securities are convertible. trolled directly or indirectly by trustees whether pursuant to an agreement, by­ (7) If a partnership controls a bank, for the benefit of a company, the share­ law, article of incorporation, or other­ holders or members of a company, or the that partnership and all other partner­ wise, with 25 percent or more of the ships in which one of its partners is a employees of a company are controlled voting shares of another company, all by such company. partner are presumably under common such shares so joined together are under control by a “partnership” or similiar The 1966 legislation also established a common control by a “corporation” or organization for the purposes of the Act. rebuttable presumption in section 2(g) similar organization for the purposes of (3), that shares transferred by a bank the Act. (c) Procedure for determining con­ trol. (1) In any situation in which one holding company to any transferee that (b) Rebuttable presumptions of con­ is indebted to the transferor, or has one of the rebuttable presumptions estab­ trol. A rebuttable presumption that a lished by paragraph (b) (1) or (2) ap­ or more officers, directors, trustees, or company controls a bank or another beneficiaries in common with or subject plies or in any other situation where the company is established by § 2(g) (3) of Board believes that a company exercises to control by the transferor, are con­ the Act. In addition, the Board has estab­ trolled by the transferor. a controlling influence over the manage­ lished, for the purposes of proceedings ment or policies of a bank or another The 1970 amendments to the Act fur­ instituted by the Board in accordance company without having complied with ther expanded the Board’s authority to with the procedures of paragraph (c) be­ the provisions of the Act, the Board may determine that a company controls a low, the following rebuttable presump­ inform the company involved, summariz­ bank or other company. Under those tions: ing the facts upon which the preliminary amendments, any company has control (1) A company that owns at least 10 determination is based. Such company over a bank or over any company if the percent of the voting shares of each of shall thereupon either indicate its will­ Board determines, pursuant to section two banks presumably controls both ingness to terminate the control rela­ 2(a) (2) (C) of the Act, that the company banks. tionship, comply with the applicable directly or indirectly exercises a control­ (2) A company that controls at least 5 requirements of the Act, or set forth ling influence over the management or percent of the voting shares of each of such facts and circumstances as it be­ policies of the bank or company. three or more banks presumably controls lieves support its contention that there Whether a company controls another all such banks. is no control relationship. company is significant under the provi­ (3) (i) A company that owns more (2) In the event a preliminary deter­ sions of section 4 of the Act relating to than 5 percent of the voting shares of mination by the Board is contested, the interests in nonbanking organizations, a bank or other company presumably company adversely affected may request as well as to determinations under sec­ controls the bank or other company if a hearing on the matter, pursuant to tion 2 that a company is a bank holding (A) one or more of the company’s direc­ section 2(c) (2) (C) of the Act. In the company. Since 1956, section 4 has pro­ tors, officers, trustees, or employees with event a hearing is held, any applicable hibited a holding company from retain­ management functions serves as a direc­ rebuttable presumption established by

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12916 PROPOSED RULE MAKING paragraph (b) (1) or (2) shall be con­ are invited to submit relevant data, sidered in the usual manner in accord­ views, or arguments. Any such material ance with the rules of evidence. On the should be submitted hi writing to the basis of the record at the hearing, the Secretary, Board of Governors of the Board will by order decide the issues in­ Federal Reserve System, Washington, volved and direct such action as may be D.C. 20551, to be received not later than necessary or appropriate in the circum­ August 6, 1971. Such material will be stances. In the event no hearing is held, made available for inspection and copy­ but the preliminary determination is con­ ing upon request, except as provided in § 261.6(a) of the Board’s Rules Regard­ tested, the Board will decide the matter ing Availability of Information. on the basis of the evidence available to it, and will by order direct such action as By'order of the Board of Governors, appears necessary or appropriate in the June 28, 1971. circumstances. [seal] K enneth A. K enyon, To aid in the consideration by the Deputy Secretary. Board of this matter, interested persons [FR Doc.71-9678 Filed 7-8-71;8:47 am]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12917 Notices

invited to express their views in person 409(b)(5), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY at the aforementioned public hearings, 348(b)(5)), notice is given that a peti­ provided they notify the Hearing Officer, tion (FAP 1B2699) has been filed by Comptroller of the Currency in care of the Superintendent, Yosemite General Mills Chemicals, Inc., 2010 East INSURED BANKS National Park, Yosemite National Park, Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minn. Calif. 95389, by September 9 of their de­ 55413, proposed that § 121.2520 Adhe­ Joint Call for Report of Condition sire to appear. Those not wishing to ap­ sives (21 CRF 121.2520) be amended to pear in person may submit written state­ Cross R eference : For a document re­ provide for the safe use of polyamides lating to a joint call for report of condi­ ments on the wilderness proposal to the derived from dimer diamine as compo­ tion of insured banks, see F.R. Doc. Hearing Officer, at that address, for in­ nents of adhesives for bonding seams 71-9689, Federal Deposit Insurance Cor­ clusion in the official record which will be of food-packaging material. poration, infra. held open for 30 days following conclu­ sion of the hearings. Dated: June 30,1971. Time limitations may make it neces­ Albert C. K olbye, Jr., sary to limit the length of oral presenta­ Acting Director, Bureau of Foods. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR tions and to restrict to one person the presentation made in behalf of an orga­ [FR Doc.71-9715 Filed 7-8-71;8:51 am] National Park Service nization. An oral statement may, how­ ever, be supplemented by a more com­ YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK, CALIF. plete written statement which may be IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, Notice of Public Hearing Regarding submitted to the Hearing Officer at the LTD. Wilderness Proposal time of presentation of the oral state­ ment. Written statements presented in Notice of Withdrawal of Petition for Notice is hereby given in accordance person at the hearing will be considered with the provisions of the Act of Septem­ for inclusion in the transcribed hearing Food Additives ber 3, 1964 (78 Stat. 890, 892; 16 Ü.S.C. record. However, all materials so pre­ Pursuant to provisions of the Federal 1131, 1132), and in accordance with de­ sented at the hearing shall be subject to Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. partmental procedures as identified in determinations that they are appropriate 409(b), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 348(b)), 43 CFR 19.5, that public hearings will be for inclusion, in the transcribed hearing the following notice is issued: held beginning at 9 a.m. on September 11, record. To the extent that time is avail­ 1971, at the U.S. Forest Service’s Mam­ In accordance with § 121.52 With­ able after presentation of oral statements drawal of petitions without prejudice of moth Visitor Center, located approxi­ by those who have given the required ad­ mately 40 miles north of Bishop, Calif., the procedural food additive regulations vance notice, the Hearing Officer will give (21 CFR 121.52), Imperial Chemical In­ and reached via U.S. Highway 395, thence others present an opportunity to be west on State Highway 203 for 3 miles; at dustries Ltd., Plastics Division, Bessemer heard. Road, Welwyn Garden City, Hertford­ 9 a.m. on September 14, 1971, at Yosem- After an explanation of the proposal ite Valley Visitor Center, Yosemite Na­ shire, England, has withdrawn its peti­ by a representative of the National Park tion (FAP 0B2559), notice of which was tional Park, Calif.; and at 9 a.m. on Sep­ Service, the Hearing Officer, insofar as tember 16, 1971, at the California Hall published in the F ederal R egister of possible, will adhere to the following July 3, 1970 (35 F.R. 10873), proposing Auditorium, 625 Polk Street, San Fran­ order in calling for the presentation of cisco, Calif., for the purpose of receiving oral statements: that § 121.2566 Antioxidants and/or comments and suggestions as to the ap­ stabilizers for polymers (21 CFR propriateness of a proposal for the estab­ 1. Governor of the State or his 121.2566) be amended to provide for the representative. safe use of pentaerythritol as a stabilizer lishment of wilderness comprising about 2. Members of Congress. 624,000 acres within the Yosemite Na­ 3. Members of the State legislature. in the manufacture of olefin polymers in­ tional Park. The park is located in 4. Official representatives of the counties tended for food-contact use. Madera, Mariposa, and Tuolumne Coun­ in which the proposed wilderness is located. ties, Calif. 5. Officials of other Federal agencies or Dated: June 30,1971. A packet containing a map depicting public bodies. 6. Organizations in alphabetical order. Albert C. K olbye, Jr., the preliminary boundaries of the pro­ 7. Individuals in alphabetical order. Acting Director, Bureau of Foods. posed wilderness and providing addi­ 8. Others not giving advance notice, to the tional information about the proposal extent there is remaining time. [FR Doc.71-9714 Filed 7-8-71;8:51 am] may be obtained from the Superintend­ ent, Yosemite National Park, Yosemite Date: June 24, 1971. National Park, Calif. 95389, or from the Thomas F lynn, MONSANTO CO Director, Western Region, National Park Deputy Director, Service, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San National Park Service. Notice of Filing of Petition for Food Francisco, CA 94102. [FR Doc.71-9417 Filed 7-8-71;8:45 am] Additives A description of the preliminary boundaries and a map of the area pro­ Pursuant to provisions of the Federal posed for establishment as wilderness are Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 409 available for review in the above offices; (b)(5), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 348(b) at the Los Angeles Field Office, National DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, (5) ), notice is given that a petition (FAP Park Service, New Federal Building, 1B2697) has been filed by Monsanto Co., Room 2202, 300 North Los Angeles Street, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Los Angeles, CA 90012; and in Room 1013 800 North Lindbergh Boulevard, St. of the Department of Interior Building at Food and Drug Administration Louis, Mo. 63166, proposing that 18th and C Streets NW., Washington, DC. GENERAL MILLS CHEMICALS, INC. § 121.2526 Components of paper and The draft master plan for the park paperboard in contact with aqueous and likewise may be inspected at these four Notice of Filing of Petition for Food fatty foods (21 CFR 121.2526) be locations. Additives amended to provide for the safe use of Interested individuals, representatives Pursuant to provisions of the Federal polyamine-epichlorohydrin resin as a of organizations, and public officials are Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. wet-strength agent in the manufacture

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12918 NOTICES of paper and paperboard for food-contact clusion of the prehearing conference rier puts forth a justification for newly use. unless a person objects or shows reason generated traffic. for postponement on or before July 20, Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta), has filed Dated: June 30,1971. 1971. an answer to Eastern’s petition regard­ Albert C. K olbye, Jr., Dated at Washington, D.C., July 2, ing its family excursion fares, asserting Acting Director, Bureau of Foods. 1971. that fares with such broad discounts [PR Doc.71-9716 Filed 7-8-71;8:51 am] plainly can be presumed to be prima facie [seal] R alph L. Wiser, unreasonable, and that nothing in Acting Chief Examiner. Eastern’s justification or its petition for [FR Doc.71—9737 Filed 7-8-71;8:53 am] reconsideration overcomes this presump­ tion. It further alleges that there is little DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING to support Eastern’s expectation that the [Docket No. 23406 etc.] fares would generate new sales of at AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT least 6 percent of present coach traffic [Docket No. D—71—115] EASTERN AIR LINES, INC. volume, and that Eastern’s estimate of $541,000 net contribution to overhead DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF COUNSELING Order Denying Petitions for AND COMMUNITY SERVICES fails to take into account incremental Reconsideration costs that will be incurred. Redelegation of Authority Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Upon consideration of all relevant S ection A. Authority redelegated. Board at its office in Washington, D.C., matters, the Board concludes that East­ The Director,. Office of Counseling and on the 6th day of July 1971. ern’s petitions for reconsideration of Community Services, and the Deputy Di­ Round-trip youth excursion fares and Orders 71-5-74 and 71-5-100 do not rector, Office of Counseling and Commu­ Florida promotional fares proposed by establish error in the Board’s decisions, nity Services, each is authorized to Eastern Air Lines, Inc.; Dockets 23406, and accordingly the petitions will be exercise the power and authority of the 23423, 21866-5. denied. Secretary of Housing and Urban De­ By Order 71-5-74, dated May 17, 1971, Except for its reference to newly estab­ velopment under sections 101(e) and the Board suspended a proposal by East­ lished transatlantic youth and student 106(a) of the Housing and Urban De­ ern Air Lines, Inc. (Eastern), to establish fares, and a children’s fare to Bermuda, velopment Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1710w round-trip excursion fares at a 50- Eastern has submitted no facts which and 1701x(a)) and section 237(e) of percent discount for youths 12 through were not previously considered. The car­ the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 21 years of age in the Boston-New York, rier argues strongly for permitting 1715z-2(e) ), to provide, or contract with and New York-Washington Air Shuttle experimentation with discount fares, and public or private organizations to pro­ markets. By Order 71-5-100 dated for acceptance by the Board of its mar­ vide information, advice, and technical May 21,1971, the Board suspended a pro­ keting judgment (based primarily on assistance, including but not limited to posal by Eastern to establish round-trip passenger surveys) as to the results it counseling on household management, family excursion fares to Florida from 14 expects to achieve with these fares. We self-help, budgeting, money manage­ northeast and midwest U.S. cities at dis­ believe that, as a general matter, the ment, child care, and related counseling counts ranging up to 60 percent from carriers’ marketing judgment should be services. regular family fares depending on the given considerable weight in evaluating S ec. B. Authority excepted. There is size and composition of the group. discount fare proposals. By the same excepted from the authority redelegated Eastern has petitioned for reconsidera­ token, however, this does not mean that under section A the power to : tion and rescission of the Board’s orders the Board can or should abdicate its 1. Exercise the powers under section suspending the youth and family excur­ suspension powers. 402(a) of the Housing Act of 1950 (12 sion fares.1 The basic thrust of the car­ Our primary difficulty is not with U.S.C.1749(a)). rier’s petitions is that the reasons given Eastern’s generation/diversion estimates, 2. Sue and be sued. for denial of the proposals in question but with the very low level of the fares 3. .Issue rules and regulations. were either inadequate or unsupportable, and the relatively large number of mar­ kets in which it proposes to conduct the (Secretary’s delegation of authority effec­ particularly as they relate to its genera- tive Mar. 8,1971 (36 F.R. 5005, Mar. 16, 1971) ) tion/diversion estimates which allegedly experiment. The proposed Florida family show that the proposals will result in a fares, which could range down to 2 cents Effective date. This redelegation of net revenue increase. Eastern argues that per mile are substantially lower than any authority shall be effective as of June 21, the Board can never be convinced, in ad­ fares now in effect. Moreover the mar­ 1971. vance, of the economic results of promo­ kets in which it proposes to conduct this N orman V. Watson, tional fares, and that only in the market­ experiment include most of the major Assistant Secretary place can the validity of its estimates be population centers on Eastern’s system. for Housing Management. tested. It further alleges that the as­ In our opinion, there is a very real [FR Doc.71-9690 Filed 7-8-71:8:49 am] sumptions (based for the most part on question whether the proposed fares passenger surveys) as to the traffic gen­ even cover incremental costs, let alone erating effect of the fares are rational whether they are reasonably related to and afford a degree of certitude fully total costs of service. Moreover, Eastern warranting the marketing decision it has effect which, if realized, could lead to CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD made. the need for extra sections if not new [Docket No. 23572] flights, with attendant additional costs. National Airlines, Inc. (National) has For these reasons, we adhere to our AERONAVES DEL ECUADOR, S.A. filed answers to both of Eastern’s peti­ view that the proposed Florida family tions. National rejects Eastern’s argu­ fares may be unreasonably low and “AERODESA” ment that estimates should be tested should not be permitted without through experimentation, since if carried Notice of Prehearing Conference and investigation. to its logical extreme this would deny the Hearing Eastern’s motion of June 25, which Notice is hereby given that a prehear­ Board the power to suspend any promo­ tional tariff so long as the proposing car- requests that the Board vacate the sus­ ing conference in the above-entitled pension of its proposed Florida family matter is assigned to be held on July 27, excursion fares, adverts to recently 1971, at 10 a.m. (local time) in Room 503, 1 On June 25, 1971, Eastern filed a motion Universal Building, 1825 Connecticut for leave to file an otherwise unauthorized established youth and student fares for Avenue NW„ Washington, DC, before Ex­ document. Eastern alleges that subsequent to transatlantic travel, and also to newly its earlier petition intervening circumstances established children’s fares to Bermuda aminer Thomas P. Sheehan. have occurred which require prompt Board Notice is also given that the hearing approval of its Florida family excursion fares. applicable via one cruise ship. In our may be held immediately following con­ The motion will be granted. opinion, availability of these new travel

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12919 opportunities does not provide an ade­ [Docket No. 23428 etc.; Order 71-6-1(54] [Docket No. 22628; Order 71-6-143] quate basis for permitting fares which we believe may be unlawful. Accordingly, EASTERN AIR LINES, INC. INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT the motion to vacate the suspension of Order Granting Motion and Denying ASSOCIATION Florida family fares ordered in Order Petition for Reconsideration Order Regarding Fare Matters 71-5-100 is denied. Turning to the proposed youth excur­ Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Issued under delegated authority sion fares applicable on the Air Shuttle Board at its office in Washington, D.C., June 29,1971. service, Eastern argues that no addi­ on the 30th day of June 1971. Agreement adopted by Joint Confer­ tional costs are involved because this is Conditional reservation rule proposed ences 2-3 and 1-2-3 of the International a committed nonreservation service. by Eastern Air Lines, Inc.; Dockets 23428, Air Transport Association relating to However, the same contention could be 23454, 23458, 23461, 23462, 23466. fare matters; Docket 22628, Agreement made with respect to any of the shuttle By Order 71-6-120, dated June 24, CAB 22433, R-3. passengers paying regular fares since the 1971, the Board dismissed various com­ By Order 71-6-23, dated June 3, 1971, youths using the proposed excursion fare plaints against a proposal of Eastern Air action was deferred, with a view toward would travel under substantially similar Lines, Inc. (Eastern), to establish a con­ eventual approval, on an agreement conditions.* Eastern has not shown any ditional reservation rule, which is adopted by Joint Conferences 2-3 and 1- basis upon which to conclude that the marked to become effective July 1, 1971. 2-3 of the International Air Transport costs of transporting the youths would On June 30, 1971, Braniff Airways, Inc. Association (LATA). Insofar as it applies be less than the costs of regular shuttle (Braniff), Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta), in air transportation, the agreement service, or why the costs of the proposed and National Airlines, Inc. (National), would provide for increases in certain youth excursion service would be less filed a joint motion for leave to file an normal fares applying between points than carrying youths on a standby basis unauthorized document requesting the in West/West Central Africa and Guam/ which presently entails a one-third dis­ Board to suspend and investigate East­ Okinawa/American Samoa. count in these markets. Moreover, the ern’s proposal, either on reconsideration In deferring action on the agreement, very fact that the Air Shuttle guarantees of Order 71-6-120, or by treating the 10 days were granted in which interested a seat to all but standby passengers request as an independent late filed persons might file petitions in support of would appear to enhance the likelihood complaint. or in opposition to the proposed action. that additional flights will be operated as No petitions have been received within Eastern answered in opposition to the the filing period and the tentative con­ a result of the youth excursion fares. Ac­ petition alleging that the petitioners cordingly, we believe it would be inappro­ clusions in Order 71-6-23 will herein be have raised no issues not considered by made final. priate to look only at the net revenue the Board in its earlier order. impact of the proposal, as Eastern Urges. The Board finds that the petition does Accordingly, it is ordered, That: In view of the apparent substantial dis­ not establish error in its order, or raise Agreement CAB 22433, R-3, be and parity between the proposed fare and any new issues which warrant reversal of hereby is approved. costs of service, we adhere to the the its decision, or suspension of Eastern’s conclusion that these fares should be proposal.1 This order will be published in the F ederal R egister. suspended pending investigation. Accordingly, pursuant to the Federal Accordingly, pursuant to the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, and particularly [seal] H arry J. Zink , Aviation Act of 1958, and particularly sections 204(a), 403, 404, and 1002 Secretary. sections 204(a), 403, 404, and 1002 thereof: [FR Doc.71-9652 Filed 7-8-71;8:45 am] thereof: It is ordered, That: It is ordered, That: 1. The motion of Braniff Airways, Inc., 1. The petitions of Eastern Air Lines, Delta Air Lines, Inc., and National Air­ [Docket No. 20993; Order 71-6-144] Inc., filed in Dockets 23406 and 23423 lines, Inc., to file an otherwise unau­ INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT requesting reconsideration of Orders thorized document is granted; ASSOCIATION 71-5-74 and 71-5-100 are denied; 2. The request by Braniff Airways, Inc., 2. Eastern’s motion to file an other­ Delta Air Lines, Inc., and National Air­ Order Regarding Specific Commodity wise unauthorized document in Docket Rates 23423 is granted; lines, Inc., for reconsideration of Order 71-6-120 is denied; and Issued under delegated authority 3. Eastern’s motion for the Board to June 29, 1971. vacate the suspension ordered in Order 3. Copies of this order will be served upon the Aviation Consumer Action Agreement adopted by the Joint Con­ 71-5-100 is denied; and ferences of the International Air Trans­ 4. Copies of this order will be served Project, Allegheny Airlines, Inc., Amer­ port Association relating to specific com­ upon Dèlta Air Lines, Inc., Eastern Air ican Airlines, Inc., Braniff Airways, Inc., modity rates Docket 20993 Agreement Lines, Inc., and National Airlines, Inc. Delta Air Lines Inc., Eastern Air Lines, CAB 22332 R—12 through R—14. This order will be published in the Inc., National Airlines, Inc., and North­ An agreement has been filed with the Federal R egister. east Airlines, Inc. Board pursuant to section 412(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (the Act) By the Civil Aeronautics Board.® This order shall be published in the and Part 261 of the Board’s economic [seal] H arry J. Zink , F ederal R egister. regulations, between various air carriers, Secretary. By the Civil Aeronautics Board. foreign air carriers, and other carriers! [FR Doc.71-9739 Filed 7-8-71:8:53 am] embodied in the resolutions of the Joint [seal] H arry J. Zin k , Conferences of the International Air' Secretary. Transport Association (IATA), and a The only differences in application from [FR Doc.71-9740 Filed 7-8-71;8:53 am] adopted pursuant to the provisions of regular shuttle fares are the minimum and Resolution 590 dealing with specific com­ maximum stay requirements of 1 day and 60 modity rates. aays, respectively, and the Friday and Sun­ 1The petitioners concurrently filed a re­ day blackouts of 3 p.m. to 8 p.m., which we quest for issuance of an order authorizing The agreement, adopted pursuant to ao not consider to be significant limitations immediate industry discussions of the no- unprotested notices to the carriers and on these fares. show problem, relying as grounds therefor promulgated in an IATA letter dated 3 Dissenting statement of Members Minettiupon the recognition in Order 71-6-120 that June 16, 1971, names additional specific

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12920 NOTICES rates, as set forth in the attachment This order will be published in the per aircraft load, whichever was greater.2 hereto .x F ederal R egister. No provision was included for greater Pursuant to authority duly delegated [seal] H arry J. Zink, carrier liability, at the charter’s option by the Board in the Board’s economic Secretary. for an additional charge. The Board regulations, 14 CFR 385.14, it is not stated that it considered a choice of rates found, on a tentative basis, that the sub­ [FR Doc.71-9738 Filed 7-8-71;8:53 am] and liability essential to the validity of ject agreement is adverse to the public a carrier’s limitations on its common car­ interest or in violation of the Act: Pro­ rier responsibilities. vided, That tentative approval thereof [Docket No. 20522] The current proposal provides the same is conditioned as hereinafter ordered. basic liability limits that were suspend­ Accordingly, it is ordered, That : INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ed. The proposal, however, also provides Action on Agreement CAB 22332, R-12 ASSOCIATION that shippers may obtain additional car­ through R-14, be and hereby is deferred Agreements Relating to North Atlantic rier liability by paying 15 cents per $100 with a view toward eventual approval: of the load value in excess of $50. While Provided, That approval shall not con­ Cargo Rates; Notice of Hearing this proposal provides the charterer with stitute approval of the specific commod­ Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the a choice of liability, it contains two as­ ity descriptions contained therein for provisions of the Federal Aviation Act pects about which we are concerned: purposes of tariff publication: Provided of 1958, as amended, that a hearing in (1) The charge of 15 cents per 100 further, That tariff filings shall be the above-entitled proceeding will be pounds is higher than that levied in con­ marked to become effective on not less held oh July 27, 1971, at 10 a.m., e.d.s.t., nection with charter flights by any sup­ than 30 days’ notice from the date of in Room 911, Universal Building, 1825 plemental carrier and by any scheduled filing. Connecticut Avenue NW., Washington, carrier except American Airlines, Inc. Persons entitled to petition the Board DC, before Examiner William F. Cusick. (American) and Eastern Air Lines, Inc. for review of this order, pursuant to the For information concerning the issues (Eastern). The latter carriers have been Board’s regulations, 14 CFR 385.50, may, involved and other details in this pro­ permitted by the Board to increase their within 10 days after the date of service ceeding, interested persons are referred excess value charges from 10 to 15 cents of this order, file such petitions in sup­ to the Prehearing Conference Report and per $100 for both scheduled and charter port of or in opposition to our proposed other documents which are in the docket shipments on the basis of prirna facie action herein. of this proceeding on file in the Docket showings in support of their proposals Section of the Civil Aeronautics Board. (see Order 71-3-108, March 18, 1971).8 This order will be published in the The same proposal by United Air Lines, F ederal R egister. Dated at Washington, D.C., July 2, Inc., however, was suspended by the 1971. [seal] H arry J. Zink , Board (Order 71-5-8, May 4,1971) on the Secretary. [seal] W illiam F. Cusick, ground of inadequate justification. As Hearing Examiner. noted above, ONA submitted absolutely [FR Doc.71-9653 Filed 7-8-71;8:45 am] no justification for its 15-cent charge. [FR Doc.71-9736 Filed 7-8-71;8:53 am] (2) ONA’s proposal involves charging [Docket No. 22628; Order 71-6-148] 15 cents per $100 for the declared value above $50, even though it provides a cov­ INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT [Docket No. 23582; Order 71-7-19] erage of 50 cents per pound, which, in ASSOCIATION OVERSEAS NATIONAL AIRWAYS, INC. the case of the usual charter, would be significantly above $50. The charterer Order Regarding Fare Matters Order of Suspension and Investigation thus would be paying twice for liability Issued under delegated authority . Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board coverage, once in the basic charter June 29, 1971. at its office in Washington, D.C., on the charge and again in excess value charges. Agreement adopted by Traffic Confer­ 2d day of July 1971. All other domestic charter excess value ence 3 and Joint Conference 3-1 of the Cargo charter liability limitations and rates apply to the values in excess of 50 International Air Transport Association cents per pound. increased excess valuation charges pro­ Upon consideration of all relevant relating to fare matters; Docket 22628, posed by Overseas National Airways, Inc., Agreement CAB 22474. matters, the Board finds that the pro­ Docket 23582. posed revision may be unjust, unreason­ By Order 71-6-73, dated June 14,1971, By tariff revision1 bearing an issue date action was deferred, with a view toward able, unjustly discriminatory, unduly of June 7 and marked to become effec­ preferential, unduly prejudicial, or other­ eventual approval on an agreement tive July 7, 1971, Overseas National Air­ adopted by Traffic Conference 3 and wise unlawful, and should be investi­ ways, Inc. (ONA), proposes to revise the gated. We further conclude that the pro­ Joint Conference 3-1 of the International liability limits in its domestic cargo Air Transport Association (IATA). The posed tariff should be suspended pending charter tariff for loss or damage to an investigation. agreement specifies first-class and econ­ amount not exceeding 50 cents per omy fares between Jogjakarta and Sura­ Accordingly, pursuant to the Federal pound or $50 per aircraft load, whichever Aviation Act of 1958, and particularly baja on the one hand and points in is greater, unless the charterer' declares Southeast Asia including Okinawa on the sections 204(a) and 1002 thereof: a higher value and pays an additional It is ordered, That: other hand, and common rates Jogja­ charge at the rate of 15 cents for each karta and Surabaja with pjakarta as $100 by which the value exceeds $50. 1. An investigation be instituted to determine whether the charge and provi­ regards air fares to and. from the United ONA has submitted no data or state­ States. sions in Rule No. 25(B) on 16th Revised ment in support of its proposal. Page 5 of Overseas National Airways, In deferring action on the agreement, Under ONA’s current rules, the car­ 10 days were granted in which interested Inc.’s, CAB No. 22 (Overseas National rier’s liability is limited to $500 per air­ Airways Series), and rules, regulations, persons might file petitions in support craft load, unless the charterer declares of or in opposition to the proposed action. or practices affecting such charge and a higher value and pays an additional provisions are or will be unjust, unrea­ No petitions have been received within charge at the rate of 10 cents for each sonable, unjustly discriminatory, unduly the filing period and the tentative con­ clusions in Order 71-6-73 will herein be $100 by which such value exceeds $500. preferential, unduly prejudicial, or made final. By Order 71-2-36, February 8, 1971, Accordingly, it is ordered, That: the Board suspended pending investiga­ * ONA canceled the suspended proposal, Agreement CAB 22474 be and hereby is tion ONA’s proposal to limit its liability and the investigation was dismissed as moot. 8 A similar Increase for Northwest Airlines, approved. to 50 cents per pound of lading or $50 Inc., in excess value charges for scheduled transport was also permitted to become effec­ 1 Attachment filed as part of the original 1 Revision to Overseas National Airways, tive. The carrier, however, did not file any document. Inc., Tariff CAB No. 22. increase for charter movements.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12921

otherwise unlawful, and if found to be For those interested in presenting tes­ Based on the reports of these expert unlawful, to determine and prescribe the timony, please contact the EPA regional groups and the other considerations lawful charge and provisions, and rules, offices or the Director, Office of Noise noted above, EPA concludes that guid­ regulations, or practices affecting such Abatement and Control, Environmental ance not to exceed 4 WLM per year is charge and provisions; Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. warranted in order to afford adequate 2. Pending hearing and decision by 20460. radiation protection of uranium miners. the Board, Rule No. 25(B) on 16th Re­ W illiam D. R uckelshaus, Furthermore, it is emphasized that the vised Page 5 of Overseas National Air­ Administrator, exposure levels of concern are not “low” ways, Inc.’s, CAB No. 22 (Overseas Na­ Environmental Protection Agency. in the context of usual occupational radi­ tional Airways Series) is suspended and J uly 2,1971. ation protection practices; an annual its use deferred to and including October exposure greater than 4 WLM would 4, 1971, unless otherwise ordered by the [PR Doc.71-9696 Piled 7-8-71;8:49 am] probably result in a dose in rems to the Board, and that no changes be made critical tissue of the lung that exceeds therein during the period of suspension the occupational radiation standard gen­ except by order or special permission of UNDERGROUND MINING OF erally accepted in the nuclear industry. the Board; URANIUM ORE Therefore, it has been concluded that 3. The investigation herein, designated the comments suggesting that EPA Docket 23582, be assigned for hearing Radiation Protection Guidance for should recommend less stringent radia­ before an examiner of the Board at a Federal Agencies tion protection guidance than the pres­ time and place hereafter to be desig­ On May 25, 1971, the Environmental ent 4 WLM per year do not provide an nated; and adequate basis for doing so. Accordingly, 4. Copies of this order shall be filed Protection Agency published a notice in the F ederal R egister (36 F.R. 9480) con­ EPA does not recommend any change in with the tariff and served upon Over­ the guidance approved by the President seas National Airways, Inc., who is here­ cerning guidance for the protection of underground uranium miners. The notice and published in the F ederal R egister by made a party to this proceeding. stated: “The Administrator does not find (34 F.R. 576, 35 F.R. 9218) of 4 WLM This order will be published in the F ed­ a basis for modifying the guidance ap­ per year effective July 1, 1971. eral Register. proved by the President that an annual Several comments were received which referred to the means of implementing By the Civil Aeronautics Board. exposure level of 4 WLM be effective as of July 1, 1971.” The notice also stated the 4 WLM guidance. As the May 25, [seal] Harry J. Zin k , that “All interested persons who desire 1971, F ederal R egister notice indicated, Secretary. to submit written comments for consid­ decisions concerning the means of imple­ [PR Doc.71-9654 Filed 7-8-71;8:45 am] eration in connection with this matter menting the guidance for uranium mines, should send them to the Administrator, including any procedures for variances EPA, Washington, D.C. 20460, within 30 which may be made available to indi­ days after publication of this notice in vidual mining operators, must be made ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION the F ederal R egister. Comments re­ by the regulatory agencies which adopt ceived after that period will be con­ this guidance. It should be noted that sidered if it is practicable to do so, but the Secretary of the Interior on June 30, AGENCY assurance of consideration cannot be 1971, signed proposed amendments to NOISE ABATEMENT given except as to comments filed within regulations under the Federal Metal and the period specified.” Nonmetallic Mine Safety Act. These pro­ Notice of Public Hearings All written comments received on or posed amendments relate to variances Pursuant to authority contained in before June 28,1971, have been reviewed. applicable to underground uranium title IV, sec. 402(b), Noise Pollution and Letters of comment have been received mines. EPA will provide such comments Abatement Act of 1970, Public Law 91- from industry, other Government agen­ as it deems appropriate on these pro­ 604, December 31, 1970, notice is given cies and a labor union. These comments posed amendments directly to the De­ of public hearings on noise abatement to are available for inspection at EPA partment of the Interior at a later date. commence on July 8, 1971, in Atlanta, Headquarters, 1626 K Street NW., Wash­ Copies of all of the comments which Ga., and continue approximately every 3 ington, DC 20460. EPA has received in response to the May 25, 1971, F ederal R egister notice weeks thereafter throughout the country Several questions were raised on the during the succeeding 6 months. Hearing and copies of this F ederal R egister scientific basis for setting the guidance notice have been sent to the Secretaries locations and agenda items are as of 4 WLM per year and in particular follows; of the Interior and Labor under cover challenged the validity of the PHS of a letter dated July 1, 1971. epidemiologic report. Date Location Agenda items The Environmental Protection Agency Dated: July 1, 1971. has fully considered the methodology of William D. R uckelshaus, July 8-9. __ _ Atlanta, Q a... Noise in Construction. the PHS epidemiologic study on uranium Administrator. July 28-29.. Chicago, 111... Manufacturing and Trans­ miners as well as the limitations of the portation Noise (High­ [FR Doc.71-9697 Filed 7-8-71;8:49 am] way and Air). study data for the setting of standards Aug. 18-19.. Dallas, T e x ... Urban Planning Architec­ for underground uranium miners. tural Design; and Noise in the Home. In addition EPA has evaluated a con­ CHEVRON CHEMICAL CO. Sept. 9-10.. San Fran­ Standards and Measure­ siderable body of other scientific infor­ cisco, Calif. ment Methods, Legis­ lation and Enforcement mation, both experimental and epidemio­ Notice of Filing of Petition Regarding Problems. logic, available on radiation induced lung Sept. 30- Kansas City, Agriculture and Recrea­ Pesticide Chemical Oct. 1. Mo. or tional Use Noise. cancer for its relevance to establishing Denver, radiation protection guidance for ura­ Pursuant to provisions of the Federal » . Colo. nium miners. EPA has also taken into Pood, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. Oct. 23-24.. New York, Transportation (Rail and N.Y. Other), Urban Noise account reports from several expert and 408(d)(1), 68 Stat. 512; 21 Ü.S.C. Problems and Social advisory groups1 established to review 346a(d) (1) ), notice is given that a peti­ Behavior. Oct. 27-28.. Boston, Physiological and Psy­ and interpret the problem of radiation tion (PP 1F1111) has been filed by Mass.1 chological Effects of induced lung cancer. Noise. Chevron Chemical Co., 940 Hansley Nov. 9-10.. Washington, Technology and Econom­ Street, Richmond, CA 94804, proposing D.C.i ics of Noise Control; 1The DHEW review group, May 1967; (2) National Programs and NAS/NRC Advisory Committee to FRC 1968; establishment of a tolerance (21 CFR their Relation to State (3) NAS/NRC Advisory Committee to FRC, Part 420) for negligible residues of the and Local Programs. 1970/71; (4) Subgroups I-A and I - B of the Interagency Uranium Mining Radiation Re­ insecticide naled (l,2-dibromo-2,2-di- view Group, 1970/71; (5) NCRP Report 39, chloroethyl dimethyl phosphate) in the w S gton h °e^ rlng mSy be C°mbined With th6 1971; and (6) ICRP Publication 14, 1969. raw agricultural commodities eggs;

No. 132—Pt. I- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12922 NOTICES meat, fat, and meat byproducts of phosphorus-sensitive thermionic emis and Co., Indianapolis, Ind. 46206, a tem­ cattle, goats, hogs, horses, poultry, and sion detector. porary tolerance of 0.15 part per million is established for negligible residues of sheep; and in milk at 0.05 part per Dated: June 30, 1971. million. the fungicide

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12923

21 U.S.C. 346a(j)), the authority trans­ preceding the day on which the Commis­ ferred to the Administrator (33 F.R. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS sion takes action on the previously filed 15623), and the authority delegated by application, or (b) within 60 days after the Administrator to the Deputy Assist­ the date of the public notice listing the ant Administrator for Pesticides Pro­ COMMISSION first prior filed application (with which grams of the Environmental Protection [Report 551] subsequent applications are in conflict) Agency (36 F.R. 9038). as having been accepted for filing. An ap­ COMMON CARRIER SERVICES Dated: June 30, 1971. plication which is subsequently amended INFORMATION 1 by a major change will be considered to W illiam M. U pholt, Domestic Public Radio Services be a newly filed application. It is to be Deputy Assistant Administrator noted that the cutoff dates are set forth for Pesticides Programs. Applications Accepted for Filing 2 in the alternative—applications will be [FR Doc.71-9708 Filed 7-8-71;8:50 am] J uly 6, 1971. entitled to consideration with those listed below if filed by the end of the 60-day Pursuant to §§ 1.227(b) (3) and 21.30 period, only if the Commission has not N'-(4-CHLORO-o-TOLYL)-N,N- (b) of the Commission’s rules, an appli­ acted upon the application by that time DIMETHYLFORMAMIDINE cation, in order to be considered with pursuant to the first alternative earlier Notice of Establishment of Temporary any domestic public radio services appli­ date. The mutual exclusivity rights of a new application are governed by the ear­ Tolerances cation appearing on the list below, must be substantially complete and tendered liest action with respect to any one of The Ciba Agrochemical Co., Vero the earlier filed conflicting applications. Beach, Fla. 32960, and Nor-Am Agricul­ for filing by whichever date is earlier: The attention of any party in interest tural Products, Woodstock, HI. 60098, (a) The close of business 1 business day desiring to file pleadings pursuant to sec­ jointly submitted a petition requesting tion 309 of the Communications Act of temporary tolerances for residues of the 1 All applications listed below are subject 1934, as amended, concerning any domes- insecticide IV'- (4-chloro-o-tolyl) -N,N-di­ to further consideration and review and may tice public radio services application ac­ methyl formamidine and its metabolites be returned and/or dismissed if not found to cepted for filing, is directed to § 21.27 of containing the 4-chloro-o-toluidine moi­ be in accordance with the Commission’s the Commission’s rules for provisions ety (calculated as lV'-(4-chloro-o-tolyl) - rules, regulations, and other requirements. governing the time for filing and other lV,lV-dimethylformamidine) in or on cot­ 2 The above alternative cutoff rules apply requirements relating to such pleadings. tonseed at 5 parts per million, and in to those applications listed below as having the meat and meat byproducts of cattle, been accepted in Domestic Public Land F ederal Communications goats, hogs, and sheep at 0.1 part per Mobile Radio, Rural Radio, Point-to-Point Commission, Microwave Radio, and Local Television [seal] B en F. W aple, million. Transmission Services (Part 21 of the rules). The Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Secretary. Department of the Interior, advised that A pplications A c c e p t e d f o r F i l i n g is has no objection to the temporary DOMESTIC PUBLIC LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICE tolerances. File No., applicant, call sign, and nature of application It has been determined that temporary tolerances for residues of N'-(4-chloro-o- 7453- C2—P—71—Pierre Radio Paging (New), C.P. for a new one-way station to be located at tolyl) -TV JV-dimethylformamidine and its Snake Butte, 2.8 miles north of Butte, Pierre, S. Dak., to operate on frequency 152.24 MHz metabolites containing the 4-chloro-o- 7454- C2-P-(2) 71—Racine Private Police, Inc.. (KLF464), C.P. to add frequency 152.09 MHz toluidine moiety in or on cottonseed at at location No. 1: 2048 Clark Street, Racine, WI, and relocate facilities operating on 5 parts per million, and in meat and meat 152.06 MHz to a new site described as location No. 2: 1801 Phillips Street, Racine, WI. byproducts of cattle, goats, hogs, and 7455- C2-AL-71—Mobilfone Radio System. Consent to assignment of license from Phone sheep at 0.1 part per million are safe and Depots, Inc., doing business as Mobilfone Radio System, Assignor, to Phone Depots of will protect the public health. The tem­ Connecticut, Inc., doing business as Airpage, Assignee. Station: KCC802, Waterbury, Conn. 7456- C2—P—(2)71 Radio Dispatch Co. (KIY504), C.P. for additional facilities to operate on porary tolerances are therefore estab­ frequencies 454.125 and 454.175 MHz at station located on Third Avenue, Dothan, AL. lished as requested on condition that the 7457- C2-P-(6) 71—Intermountain Mobilfone, Inc. (KLF596), C.P. to change the antenna insecticide be used in accordance with system operating on 152.03 MHz; replace the transmitter and change frequency to the temporary permit which is being 459.025 MHz for repeater facilities; add 152.15 MHz base and 459.200 MHz repeater at issued concurrently and which provides location No. 1: 14 miles southeast of Idaho Falls, Idaho, and proposes to change the for distribution under the Ciba Agro­ antenna system; replace the transmitter; change frequency to 454.025 MHz and add chemical Co. and Nor-Am Agricultural 454.200 MHz for control facilities at location No. 2: 2065 Turnbull Drive, Idaho Falls, ID. Products names. 7470- C2—P-71—F & L Telephone Secretarial Service (KCC480), C.P. to add frequency 454.125 These temporary tolerances will expire MHz at location No. 1: 160 Highland Avenue, Leominster, MA. May 14,1972. 7471— C2—P—71 General Telephone Co. of Indiana, Inc. (KSJ815) , C.P. to change the antenna This action is taken pursuant to pro­ system operating on 35.22 MHz at location No. 1: 303 Bast Berry Street, Fort Wayne, IN. visions of the Federal Food, Drug, and 7504—C2—MP—71 Mobilfone Corp. (KRS633), Modification of C.P. to change the antenna Cosmetic Act (sec. 408(j), 68 Stat. 516; system operating on 454.250 MHz located at 650 25th Avenue SE„ Minneapolis, MN. 21 U.S.C. 346a(j)), the authority trans­ 7506—C2—P-71—Yakima Telephone Answering Service, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new two-way ferred to the Administrator (35 F.R. station to be located south of Yakima, Wash., to operate on frequency 152.150 MHz. 15623), and the authority delegated by 7530- C2—P—(2)71 Telanswer Radiophone Service (New), C.P. for a new one-way station to the Administrator to the Deputy Assist­ be located at Bast Butte, 31 miles west of Idaho Falls, Idaho, to operate on 158.70 MHz. ant Administrator for Pesticides Pro­ 7531- C2-P-71—Clarks Telephone Co. (New), C.P. for a new two-way station to be located grams of the Environmental Protection at South Millard and Adams Streets, Clarks, NE, to operate on 152.60 MHz. Agency (36 F.R. 9038). 7532- C2-P-(2)71—Tel-Page Corp. (KRH676), C.P. for additional facilities to operate on Dated: July 2,1971. 454.200 and 454.250 MHz at station located at 14 Lafayette Square, Buffalo, NY. W illiam M. U pholt, 7591- C2-P-71—RCC of Virginia, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new two-way station to be located Deputy Assistant Administrator at the top of Mill Mountain, Roanoke, Va., to operate on 152.03 MHz. for Pesticides Programs. 7592— C2—P—71 Santa Cruz Telephone (KMD683), C.P. to change the antenna system, re­ place the transmitter operating on 152.21 MHz and relocate facilities at location No. 1, to: [PR Doc.71-97Q6 Filed 7-8-71;8:50 am] Lot 3, Summit Park near Empire Grade, 2 miles southwest of Boulder Creek, Calif.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12924 domestic public land m obile radio service—Continued FOINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIERS)— Continued Major Amendment 7547- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJJ30), C.P. to add

6249.1 and 11,115 MHz toward Nokesvllle and add 6323.3 and 10,835 MHz toward Berea, Va. 6581-C2-P-71—Airsigna! International Inc. (KIF651), Amended to change the antenna sys­ Station location: 3.4 miles southwest of Morrisville, Va. tem and correct the coordinates for the 35.58 MHz facilities at 305 South Andrews Avenue, 7548- C1—P—71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJJ29), CP. to Fort Lauderdale, FL. See Public Notice Report No. 546, dated June 1,1971. change frequency to 6145.3 MHz and add 5967.4 and 11,565 MHz toward Morrisville and 7521-C2-P-70—Ratel Communications Co. (KLF523), Amended to change frequency to also add 5982.3 and 11,365 MHz toward Aldie, Va. Station location: 2.4 miles north of 152.09 MHz. See Public Notice dated May 25,1970. , Nokesvllle, Va. I nform ative: It appears that the following applications may be mutually exclusive and 7549- C1—P—71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJJ28), C.P. to add subject to the Commission’s rules regarding ex parte presentations, by reasons of potential 6293.6 n.nrt 10,915 MHz toward Nokesvllle and add 10,795 and 11,035 MHz toward Leesburg, electrical interference. Va. Station location: 5.3 miles northeast of Aldie, Va. Frequency 152.12 MHz 7550- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (WAY42), C.P. to add Virginia 11,245 and 11,485 MHz toward Aldie, Va. Station location: 145 East Market Street, RCC of Virginia, Inc. (KRS676), 4246-C2-MP-71. Leesburg, VA. —— 7551- Cl-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KIA32), CP. to add Maryland 6278.8 10,795 MHz toward Carter Mountain, Va. Station location: 1430 East High Radio Communications, Inc. (KGC583), 5011-C2-P-71. Street, Charlottesville, VA. Radio Communications, Inc. (KGC583), 5075-C2—P-71. 7552- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KIA30), C.P. to add Frank A. Del Vecchio (New), 6579-C2-P-71. 6130.5 and 11,445 MHz toward Shannon Hill and add 6026.7 and 11,245 MHz toward RURAL RADIO SERVICE Charlottesville, Va. Station location: Carter Mountain, 3.5 miles south of Charlottes­ 7458- C1-P/L-71—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (New), C.P. and license ville, Va. for a new rural subscriber station to be located at 7.3 miles north-northwest of Weston, 7553- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KIA25), C.P. to add Wyo., to operate on frequency 157.80 MHz communicating with Station KOH274, Gillette, 6212.1 e/nrt 10,715 MHz toward Oilville and add 6382.6 and 10,995 MHz toward Carter Wyo. 'M/vinnifea.fn Va. Station location: Shannon Hill, 5 miles east-southeast of Fercliff, Va. 7589-C1-P/L-71—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (New), C.P. and license 7554- C1—P—71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KIA24), C.P. to add for a new rural subscriber station to be located at 32.3 miles southwest of Bill, Wyo., to 5960.0 and 11,445 MHz toward Richmond and add 5960.0 and 11,645 MHz toward Shannon operate on frequency 157.77 MHz communicating with Station KPQ20, Casper, Wyo. Hill, Va. Station location: 2.5 miles east-southeast of Oilville, Va. 7555- C1-P-71_The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KIR29), C.P. to add POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIERS) 6212.1 and 10,995 mhz directed toward Oilville, Va. Station location: 703 East Grace NOTICES 7459- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KLT59), C.P. to add 4070 and 4150 Street, Richmond, VA. MHz directed toward Tulsa, Okia. Station location: 5.7 miles southwest of Mounds, Okla. 7556- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KCD65), C.P. to add 3950 MHz toward 7460- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KLT60), C.P. to add 4110 MHz directed Francestown, N.H. Station location: 3.5 miles northeast of Ashburnham, Mass. toward Mounds, Okla. Station location: 424 South Detroit Street, Tulsa, OK. 7557- C1—P—71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KCL73), C.P. to add 3990 MHz toward 7468— C1—P—71—South Central Bell Telephone Co. (KTF65), C.P. to add 5960.0 and 6049.0 Ashburnham, Mass., and add 4170 MHz toward Lempster, N.H. Station location: 2 miles MHz toward Slidell, La. Station location: 410 East Rutland Street, Covington, LA. north-northeast of Francestown, N.H. 7469- C1-P-71—South Central Bell Telephone Co. (KLU71), C.P. to add 6241.7 and 6330.7 7558- C1—P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KCL74), C.P. to add 4130 MHz toward MHz directed toward Coving-ton, La. Station location: Cousin and Carey Streets, Slidell, LA. Francestown, N.H., and Brownsville, Vt. Station location: 1.5 miles southeast of Lemp­ 7505-C1-P-71—General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. (New), C J*. for a new station. ster, N.H. Frequencies 11,405 and 11,645 MHz. Location: Corner of North Arthur and West Clear­ 7569- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KCL57), C.P. to add 4170 MHz toward water, Kennewick, WA. Lempster, and add 4150 MHz toward Meriden, N.H. Station location: 3.6 miles north-north­ 7533- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KOB26), C.P. to add 3970 MHz directed east of Brownsville, Vt. toward Riverton, Utah. Station location: 3100 Kennedy Drive, Salt Lake City, UT. 7560- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KCL76), C.P. to add 4110 MHz toward 7534- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPM66), C.P. to add 4010 MHz toward Brownsville and White River Junction, Vt. Station location: 2 miles northeast of Meri­ Payson, Utah. Station location: 0.5 mile west of Riverton, Utah. den, N.H. 7535- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPM67), C.P. to add 3970 MHz toward 7561- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KCL77), C.P. to add 4150 MHz directed Levan, Utah. Station location: 5.5 miles northwest of Payson, Utah. toward Meriden, N.H. Station location: 7 Currier Street, White River Junction, VT. 7536- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPM68), C.P. to add 4010 MHz toward 7562- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KIA95), C.P. to Soipio, Utah. Station location: 5.5 miles north-northwest of Levan, Utah. change frequency 6412.2 MHz to 6189.8 MHz toward Bald Knob and add 6352.9 and 11,545 7543- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KTS82), C.P. to add KiTHz toward Sand Mountain, Va. Correct coordinates to read latitude 37*11’13" N., 10,795 and 11,035 MHz directed toward Cauthornville, Va. Station location: 4 miles west longitude 80°27'27'' W. Station location: Price Mountain, 3.9 miles southwest of Blacks­ of Aylett, Va. burg, Va. 7544- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJJ33), C.P. to add 7563- Cl—P—71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KTG56), C.P. to 11,245 and 11,485 MHz toward Aylett and add 5982.3 and 11,505 MHz toward Bowling Green, change frequency 6160.2 MHz to 5937.8 MHz toward Price Mountain, Va. Station location: Va. Station location: On State Route 619, 1 mile south-southeast of Cauthornville, Va. Bald Knob, 0.4 mile southwest of Mountain Lake, Va. 7545- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJJ32), C.P. to add 7564- C1-P—71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KYZ80), C.P. to add 6308.4 and 10,815 MHz directed toward Berea and add 6204.7 and 11,095 MHz toward 6071.2 and 11,135 m h z toward Price Mountain, Va. Station location: Sand Mountain, Cauthornville, Va. Station location: 2.2 miles north of Bowling Green, Va. 3 miles south of Wytheville, Va. 7546- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJJ31), CJP. to 7570- C1-P-71—South Central Bell Telephone Co. (KIY24), C.P. to change point of com­ change frequencies 5937.8 and 6056.4 MHz to 6026.7 and 6145.3 MHz and'add 5967.4 and munication from Gustton, Ky., to Paynevllle, Ky. and change power on existing trans­ 11,225 MHz directed toward Bowling Green and add 5982.3 and 11,285 MHz toward mitters for frequencies 4030, 4090, 4110, and 4170 MHz. Station location: 5.8 miles Morrisville, Va. Station location: 0.3 mile southwest of Berea, Va. northeast of Fordsville, Ky.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIERS)----Continued. POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIERS)----C o n tin u ed 7571-C1-F-71—South Central Bell Telephone Co. (KIY25), C.P. to change the antenna 7517- Cl—P—71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station on Mount system to dual horn operation toward Fordsville, Ky., operating on .4050, 4070, 4130, and Harris near La Grande, Oreg., at latitude 45*26'23" N., longitude 117°53'34" W. Fre­ 4150 MHz. Station location: 720 Frederica Street, Owensboro, KY. quency 4030 MHz on azimuths 342*06' and 171*30'. 7537- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJK45), C.P. to 7518- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station at Spout add 6137.9 MHz toward Drakes Branch, Va. Station location: Near intersection of State Springs, Oreg., at latitude 45*44'47'' N., longitude 118°02'03" W. Frequency 3830 MHz on Hoad No. 746 and Southern Railway, within the town of Clover, Va. azimuths 295*28' and 162*00'. 7538- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJK44), C.P. to add 7519- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station at Jump 6360.3 MHz toward Clover, and add 6390.0 MHz toward Keysville, Va. Station location: 0.25 Off Butte, 6 miles south of Kennewick, Wash., at latitude 46®06'14" N., longitude 119® mile west of Drakes Branch, Va. 07'42" W. Frequency 4030 MHz on azimuth 114*41', frequency 6271.4 MHz on azimuth 7539- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJK43), C.P. to add 76*44', frequency 3790 MHz on azimuth 93*33', and frequencies 3870 and 4110 MHz on 6108.3 MHz toward Drakes Branch and add 6137.9 and 11,115 MHz toward Nutbush, Va. azimuth 302*54'. Station location: 0.2 mile northeast of Keysville, Va. 7520- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station at Main 7540- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJK42), C.P. to add and South Second Avenue in Walla Walla, Wash, at latitude 46°04'01" N., longitude 6360.3 and 11,565 MHz toward Keysville and add 6390.0 and 11,605 MHz toward Blackstone, 118°20'17'' W. Frequency 3910 MHz on azimuth 274*07'. Va. Station location: Nutbush, 5 miles northwest of Victoria, Va. 7521- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station 5 miles 7541- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJK41), C.P. to add east of Dayton, Wash., at latitude 46°18'09" N., longitude 117°52'12" W. Frequency 6078.6 6108.3 and 11,155 MHz toward Nutbush and add 6137.9 and 10,975 MHz toward Moseley, Va. MHz on azimu/th 22*22', and 6139.7 MHz on azimuth 257*38'. Station location: 1 mile north of Blackstone, Va. 7522- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station 5 miles 7542- C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (New), C.P. for a new south of Rosalia, Wash., at latitude 47°09'41" N„ longitude 117*21'04'' W. Frequency station to be located at Moseley, 0.7 mile northwest of Skinquarter, Va. Frequencies 6360.3 6330.7 MHz on azimuth 02*00' and frequency 6390.0 MHz on azimuth 202*44'. and 11,385 MHz on azimuth 210*26'. 7523- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station 1.5 miles 7594- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KEA77), C.P. to add 10,735 and 10,895 southeast of Spokane, Wash., at latitude 47°36'03" N., longitude 117°19'42'' W- Frequency MHz directed toward Mount Airy, N. J. Station location: 0.8 mile north of Cherryville, N.J. 6137.9 MHz on azimuth 182*01' and frequency 11,465 MHz on azimuth 317*00'. 7595- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KYS55), C.P. to add 11,625 and 11,465 7524- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station at Monroe MHz toward Cherryville and add 3730 and 3810 MHz toward Trenton, N.J. Station location: Street and Maxwell Avenue, Spokane, Wash., at latitude 47*40'15" N., longitude 117° 1.5 miles southeast of Mount Airy, N.J. 25'30" W. Frequency 10,855 MHz on azimuth 136*56'. 7596- C1-P-71—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KEM50), C.P. to add 4090 and 4170 7525- C1—P—71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station at Rattle­ MHz toward Mount Airy, N.J. Station location: 216 East State Street, Trenton, N.J. snake Hills, 11 miles north of Sunnyside, Wash., at latitude 46®29'11" N., longitude 7508- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station 6 miles 119®59'28" W. Frequencies 3830 and 4150 MHz on azimuth 122*17', and 6108.3 MHz on NOTICES north of Wells, Nev., at latitude 41°11'52" N., longitude 114°56'33" W. Frequency 5945.2 azimuth 288*19', and 6049.0 MHz on azimuth 246*47'. MHz on azimuth 14°06'. 7526- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station Yakima 7509- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station 2.5 miles Avenue and Second Street North, Yakima, WA, at latitude 46°36'08" N., longitude miles east of Henry, Nev., at latitude 41°41'50" N., longitude 114°46'30" W. Frequency 120°30'13" W. Frequency 6271.4 MHz on azimuth 107*57'. 4150.0 MHz on azimuths 17°01' and 194° 13'. 7527- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station at Satus 7510- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station 7 miles Peak, 24 miles southwest of Yakima, Wash., at latitude 46°15'27" N., longitude 120*45'08" south-southwest of Rogerson, Idaho, at latitude 42°07'10" N., longitude 114°36'05" W. W. Frequency 6330.7 MHz on azimuth 66*15' and frequency 6390.0 MHz on «tgrirmuh'h Frequency 6197.2 MHz on azimuths 321*35' and 197*07'. 228*20'. 7511- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station 8 miles 7528- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station at Mount west-southwest of Castleford, Idaho, at latitude 42°30'41" N., longitude 115®01'20" W. Defiance, 10 miles southwest of Hood River, Oreg., at latitude 45°38'55" N., longitude Frequency 6063.8 MHz on azimuths 141*18' and 337*54'. 121®43'17" W. Frequency 6019.3 MHz on azimuth 47*38' and 11,325 MHz on azimuth 7512- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station 4.5 miles 228*20'. south of Dixie, Idaho, at latitude 43°14'55'' N., longitude 115°26'08" W. Frequency 6315.9 7529- Cl-P—71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station 6 miles MHz on azimuth 315*21' and 157*37'. west-northwest of Scappoose, Oreg., at latitude 45*46'54" N., longitude 122*59'55" ,W. 7513- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station at Deer Frequency 10,835 MHz on azimuth 78*00'. Point, 9 miles northeast of Boise, Idaho, at latitude 43°44'37" N., longitude 116°06'32" W. (I n f o r m a t iv e : Applicant proposes to provide “Low Cost Customized” Interstate Com­ Frequency 5974.8 MHz on azimuths 134*53' and 310*23' and frequency 6093.5 MHz on munications System between fixed stations at Salt Lake City, Boise, Walla Walla, Spokane, azimuth 229*34'. Yakima, and Portland. This filing will interconnect with applicant’s filings Files Nos. 7514- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station 1 mile 4265/4290—Cl—P-70 and 847/871-C1-P-71). west of Boise, Idaho, at latitude 43°37'58" N., longitude 116*17'16'' W. Frequency 6226.9 MHz on azimuth 49*26'. Major Amendments 7515- C1—P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station at Morgan 6605-C1-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJG52), Delete Mountain, 3.2 miles east-northeast of Lime, Oreg., at latitude 44°26'03'' N., longitude frequency 11,305 MHz. Add frequencies 10,955 and 11,035 MHz. Location: Newport News, 117*15'03" W. Frequency 6404.8 MHz on azimuth 129*35' and frequency 4030.0 MHz on Va. azimuth 310*53'. 6526—Cl-P-71—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia (KJG53), Add fre­ 7516- C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new station at Lone quency 11,405 MHz on azimuth 318*52'. Location: Norfolk, Va. Pine Mountain, 4.5 miles southeast of Baker, Oreg., at latitude 44*44'20" N., longitude All other particulars same as reported in Public Notices dated May 24, 1971, and June 1, 117*44'46" W. Frequency 3830 MHz on azimuths 130*33' and 351*37'. 1971. 12925

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12926 NOTICES

POIN T-TO-PO INT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (NONTELEPHONE) Call No. 96,1 and shall send the same to Major Amendments the Federal Deposit Insurance Corpora­ 3515-C1-P-71—Western Tele-Communications, Inc. (New), Application amended (a) to tion. change location of receiving station at Dickinson, N. Dak., to latitude 46°65'09" N., longi­ The original Report of Condition re­ tude 102°43'45" W. and (b) to change azimuth toward Dickinson to 86°01'. Station quired to be furnished hereunder to the location: Sentinel Butte, 0.8 mile south-southeast of Beach, N. Dak. Other particulars are Comptroller of the Currency and a copy same as reported on Public Notice dated Jan. 11,1971. thereof required to be furnished to the 609- C1-P-71—Microwave Service Co. (New), Change frequency 6256.5 MHz to 6271.4 MHzFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation toward Barton, Miss. Station location: Memphis, Tenn., latitude 35°08'32'' N., longitude 90°03'06" W. shall be prepared in accordance with “In­ 610- C1-P-71—Microwave Service Co. (WAD22), Change frequency 6034.2 MHz to 6049.0 structions for preparation of Consoli­ MHz toward Ashland, Miss. Station location: Barton, Miss., latitude 34°58'05" N., dated Reports of Condition by National longitude 89°41'22'' W. Banking Associations,” dated November 611- C1-P-71—Microwave Service Co. (KUV90), Change frequency 6256.5 MHz to 6271.4 1970, and any amendments thereto.1 The MHz toward Keownville, Miss. Station location: Ashland, Miss., latitude 34°51'28'' N., original Report of Condition required to longitude 89°14'20'' W. be furnished hereunder to the Federal 612- C1-P-71—Microwave Service Co. (KLN74), Change frequency 6034.2 MHz to 6049.0 Reserve Bank of the District wherein the MHz toward Tupelo, Miss. Station location: Keownville, Miss., latitude 34°35'39'' N., bank is located and the copy thereof re­ longitude 88°54'06” W. quired to be furnished to the Federal 613- C1—P—71—Microwave Service Co. (KLH80), Change frequency 6375.2 MHz to 6390.0 Deposit Insurance Corporation shall be MHz toward Okolona, Miss. Station location: Tupelo, Miss., latitude 34°19'24" N., prepared in accordance with “Instruc­ longitude 88°42'39" W. tions for the preparation of Reports of 614- Cl—P—71—Microwave Service Co. (KLV62), Change frequency 6034.2 MHz to 6049.0 MHz Condition by State Member Banks of the toward West Point, Miss. Station location: Okolona, Miss., latitude 33°59'50" N., Federal Reserve System,” dated Decem­ longitude 88°46'20” W. ber 1970, and any amendments thereto.1 615- C1-P-71—Microwave Service Co. (KUV91), Change frequencies 6286.2 and 6404.8 MHz The original Report of Condition required to 6271.4 and 6360.3 MHz toward Columbus, Miss. Station location: West Point, Miss., to be furnished hereunder to the Federal latitude 33°36'44.5" N., longitude 88°39'42.6" W. Deposit Insurance Corporation shall be 616- C1—P—71—Microwave Service Co. (New), Change frequency 6034.2 MHz to 6108.3 MTT* prepared in accordance with “Instruc­ toward Melrose, Ala. Station location: Columbus, Miss., latitude 33°32'24" N., longitude 88°23'38'' W. tions for the preparation of Report of 617- Cl—P—71—Microwave Service Co. (New), Change frequency 6286.2 MHz to 6360.3 MTT* Condition on Form 64 by insured State toward Holman, Ala. Station location: Melrose, Ala., latitude 33°23'55" N., longitude banks not members of the Federal Re­ 88°08'47" W. serve System,” dated December 1970, and 618- Cl—P-71—Microwave Service Co. (New), Change frequency 6123.1 MHz to 6137.9 MHz any amendments thereto.1" toward Tuscaloosa, Ala. Station location: Holman, Ala., latitude 33°16'51" N., longitude Each insured mutual savings bank not 87*51'01'* W. a member of the Federal Reserve System 619- Cl—P—71—Microwave Service Co. (New), Change frequency 6375.2 MHz to 6390.0 mttk shall make its original Report of Con­ toward Woodstock, Ala. Station location: Tuscaloosa, Ala., latitude 33°10'25" N., longitude dition on FDIC Form 64 (Savings) ,* pre­ 87*29'01" W. pared in accordance with “Instructions 620- C1—P-71—Microwave Service Co. (New), Change frequency 6152.8 MHz to 6167.6 MTT*for the preparation of Report of Condi­ toward Birmingham, Ala. Station location: Woodstock, Ala., latitude 33°13'09" N., tion on Form 64 (Savings) and Report of longitude 87 *09'24'' W. Income and Dividends on Form 73 (Sav­ All other particulars same as reported in Public Notice dated Aug. 10, 1970, Report No. 504. ings) by Mutual Savings Banks,” dated The following applicant proposes to establish omnidirectional facilities for the provision December 1962, and any amendments of common carrier “Subscriber-Programed” television service. thereto,1 and shall send the same to the 7461-C1—P-71—American Communications & Electronics Carp. (New), C.P. for a new sta­ tion to be located at Arlington Building at Charles and Lexington, Baltimore, Md. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Frequencies: 2152.325 MHz (visual). 2150.20 MHz (aural) and 2158.50 MW* (visual) F rank W ille, 2154.00 MHz (aural) toward various points of the system. Chairman, Federal Deposit In­ Correction surance Corporation. 7269—Cl-P-71—Robert L. Mohr, doing business as Radiocall Corp. (New), Correct William B. Camp, location to read “temporary fixed locations within the territory of the grantee (Los Comptroller of the Currency. Angeles County, Calif.) All other terms same as Report No. 550, dated June 28, 1971. J. L. R obertson, [FR Doc.71-9724 Filed 7-8-71;8:52 am] Vice Chairman, Board of Gov­ ernors of the Federal Reserve System. the Comptroller Form, Call No. 478,1 and [FR Doc.71-9689 Filed 7-8-71;8:49 am] FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE shall send the same to the Comptroller of the Currency, and shall send a signed CORPORATION and attested copy thereof to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Each in­ FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION INSURED BANKS sured State bank which is a member of [Docket No. CP71-315] Joint Call for Report of Condition the Federal Reserve System, except a bank in the District of Columbia, shall SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS CO. Pursuant to the provisions of section make its original Report of Condition on 7(a) (3) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Federal Reserve Form 105—Call 200,1 Notice of Application Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1817(a) (3) ), and shall send the same to the Federal J uly 8, 1971. each insured bank is required to make a Reserve Bank of the District wherein the Report of Condition as of the close of Take notice that on June 28, 1971, business June 30,1971, to the appropriate bank is located, and shall send a signed Southern Natural Gas Co. (applicant), agency designated herein, within 10 days and attested copy thereof to the Federal Post Office Box 2563, Birmingham, AL after notice that such report shall be Deposit Insurance Corporation. Each in­ 35202, filed in Docket No. CP71-315 an made: Provided, that if such reporting sured State bank not a member of the application pursuant to section 7(c) of date is a nonbusiness day for any bank, Federal Reserve System, except a bank the Natural Gas Act for a certificate of public convenience and necessity author­ the preceding business day shall be its in the District of Columbia and a mutual izing the construction and operation of reporting date. savings bank, shall make its original Re­ certain offshore natural gas transmission Each national bank and each bank in port of Condition on FDIC Form 64— facilities and the transportation of nat­ the District of Columbia shall make its ural gas, all as more fully set forth in original Report of Condition on Office of 1 Filed as part of original document. the application which is on file with the

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12927

Commission and open to public inspec­ if the Commission on its own motion or before July 16, 1971, file with the tion. believes that a formal hearing is re­ Federal Power Commission, Washington, Specifically, applicant proposes the quired, further notice of such hearing D.C. 20426, a petition to intervene or a construction and operation of approxi­ will be duly given. protest in accordance with the require­ mately 7.8 miles of 14-inch pipeline and Under the procedure herein provided ments of the Commission’s rules of prac­ appurtenances extending in a westerly for, unless otherwise advised, it will be tice and procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) direction from its South Pass Block 62, unnecessary for applicant to appear or and the regulations under the Natural 20-inch pipeline, east addition, to the be represented at the hearing, Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be con­ production platform of the Shell Oil Co. K enneth F. P lumb, (Shell) in Main Pass Block 153, south Secretary. sidered by it in determining the ap­ addition, each of which are located in propriate action to be taken but will not offshore Louisiana. Applicant states that [FR Doc.71-9823 Filed 7-8-71; 10:09 ami serve to make the protestants parties to it has entered into a contract with Shell the proceeding. Any person wishing to for the purchase of natural gas from [Docket No. CP71-314] become a party to a proceeding or to Main Pass Block 153. The facilities pro­ participate as a party in any hearing posed herein will be employed to receive SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS CO. therein must file a petition to intervene natural gas purchased from Shell and to in accordance with the Commission’s transport it onshore. Applicant pro­ Notice of Application rules. poses to construct and operate various J uly 8,1971. Take further notice that, pursuant to facilities for the delivery of these vol­ Take notice that on June 28, 1971, the authority contained in and subject umes of natural gas onshore to Shell for Southern Natural Gas Co. (applicant), to the jurisdiction conferred upon the processing. Applicant also seeks author­ Post Office Box 2563, Birmingham, AL Federal Power Commission by sections ization to transport natural gas for plant 35202, filed in Docket No. CP71-314 an 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the use, fuel, loss and shrinkage from the application pursuant to section 7(c) of Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ offshore delivery point to the onshore the Natural Gas Act for a certificate of cedure, a hearing will be held without processing plant. public convenience and necessity author­ further notice before the Commission on The estimated cost of the facilities pro­ izing the construction and operation of this application if no petition to inter­ posed herein is $2,768,180, which cost ap­ certain offshore natural gas transmis­ vene is filed within the time required plicant states will be financed by the use sion facilities and the transportation of herein, if the Commission on its own re­ of cash on hand. Applicant states that natural gas, all as more fully set forth in view of the matter finds that a grant because of the weather conditions pre­ the application which is on file with of the certificate is required by the public vailing in the Main Pass Area of offshore the Commission and open to public convenience and necessity. If a petition Louisiana, this proposed pipeline must be inspection. for leave to intervene is timely filed, or constructed prior to October in order Specifically, applicant proposes the if the Commission on its own motion be­ to make these additional supplies of construction and operation of 7.8 miles lieves that a formal hearing is required, natural gas available for the 1971-72 win­ of 12%-inch pipeline and appurtenances further notice of such hearing will be ter heating season. extending in a northerly direction from duly given. It appears reasonable and consistent its Main Pass Block 144 Field 12%-inch Under the procedure herein provided with the public interest in this case to pipeline to the production platform of for, unless otherwise advised, it will be prescribe a period shorter than 15 days the California Co., a division of Chevron unnecessary for applicant to appear or for the filing of protests and petitions to Oil Co. (California), in Main Pass Block be represented at the hearing. intervene. Therefore, any person desir­ 133 each of which are located in offshore K enneth F. P lumb, ing to be heard or to make any protest Louisiana. Applicant states that it has Secretary. with reference to said application should entered into a contract with California on or before July 16, 1971, file with the for the purchase of natural gas from [FR Doc.71-9824 Filed 7-8-71;10:09 am] Federal Power Commission, Washington, Main Pass Blocks 122 and 133. The fa­ D.C. 20426, a petition to intervene or a cilities proposed herein will be employed protest in accordance with the require­ to receive natural gas purchased from ments of the Commission’s rules of prac­ California and to transport it onshore. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM tice and procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) Applicant proposes to construct and op­ and the regulations under the Natural erate various facilities for the delivery ATLANTIC BANCORPORATION Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests of these volumes of natural gas onshore Notice of Application for Approval of filed with the Commission will be con­ to California for processing, and to ac­ sidered by it in determining the appro­ cept redelivery of the natural gas after Acquisition of Shares of Bank priate action to be taken but will not processing. Applicant also seeks author­ serve to make the protestants parties to Notice is hereby given that application the proceedings. Any person wishing to ization to transport natural gas for plant has been made, pursuant to section become a party to a proceeding or to use, fuel, loss and shrinkage from the 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company participate as a party in any hearing offshore delivery point to the onshore Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1842(a)(3)), by therein must file a petition to intervene processing plant. Atlantic Bancorporation, which is a bank in accordance with' the Commission’s The estimated cost of the facilities holding company located in Jacksonville, rules. proposed herein is $2,254,930, which cost Fla., for prior approval by the Board of applicant states will be financed by the Governors of the acquisition by Applicant Take further notice that, pursuant to of not less than 60 percent of the voting the authority contained in and subject use of cash on hand. Applicant states that because of weather conditions pre­ shares of Westside Atlantic Bank of to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Orlando, Orlando, Fla. (a proposed new Federal Power Commission by sections vailing in the Main Pass Area of offshore Lousiana, this proposed pipeline must be bank). 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the constructed prior to October in order to Section 3(c) of the Act provides that Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ the Board shall not approve: cedure, a hearing will be held without make these additional supplies of natural gas available for the 1971-72 winter heat­ (1) Any acquisition or merger or con­ further notice before the Commission on ing season. this application if no petition to inter­ solidation under section 3 which would vene is filed within the time required It appears reasonable and consistent result in a monopoly, or which would herein, if the Commission on its own with the public interest in this case to be in furtherance of any combination or review of the matter finds that a grant prescribe a period shorter than 15 days conspiracy to monopolize or to attempt of the certificate is required by the public for the filing oi protests and petitions to to monopolize the business of banking in intervene. Therefore, any person desiring any part of the United States, or convenience and necessity. If a petition to be heard or to make any protest with (2) Any other proposed acquisition or for leave to intervene is timely filed, or reference to said application should on merger or consolidation under section 3

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12928 NOTICES whose effect in any section of the coun­ tion and expansion of multibank total deposits in the State would be in­ try may be substantially to lessen com­ holding companies (Act 47 of the 78th creased by only 0.1 percent, which would petition, or to tend to create a monopoly, General Assembly of the State of not significantly increase statewide con­ or which in any other manner would be Arkansas). centration of banking resources. in restraint of trade, unless the Board The Board, by order dated February 22, It is true that applicant, under present finds that the anticompetitive effects of 1971 (36 F.R. 3852), denied the applica­ Arkansas law, will continue to be the the proposed transaction are clearly out­ tion due to the existence of the legisla­ only multibank holding company, and weighed in the public interest by the tion, without reaching the merits of the that approval of this application would probable effect of the transaction in application. Subsequent to the Board’s add a third subsidiary. However, as meeting the convenience and needs of action, the State of Arkansas enacted pointed out above, the Arkansas legisla­ the community to be served. legislation which had the effect of ture has exempted this acquisition from Section 3(c) further provides that, in exempting the proposed transaction!rom the general prohibition relating to hold­ every case, the Board shall take into the general prohibition and, based upon ing company acquisitions and there consideration the financial and man­ this factor, First Arkansas Bankstock would be no adverse competitive effects agerial resources and future prospects Corp. petitioned the Board for recon­ from consummation of the proposal. of the company or companies and the sideration of its denial order. By order Considerations relating to the finan­ banks concerned, and the convenience dated May 4, 1971 (36 F.R. 8750), the cial and managerial resources and pros­ and needs of the community to be Board granted the petition for reconsid­ pects of bank lend some weight toward served. eration and provided an opportunity for approval of the application in that ap­ Not later than thirty (30) days after interested persons to submit comments plicant would provide an assured source the publication of this notice in the F ed­ and views with respect to the proposal. of management succession to bank. Con­ eral R egister, comments and views re­ The Board gave written notice of the siderations relating to the convenience garding the proposed acquisition may be granting of the petition to the State and needs of the communities to be served filed with the Board. Communications Commissioner of Banking and requested also lend some weight toward approval should be addressed to the Secretary, his views and recommendation with re­ of the application in that trust, invest­ Board of Governors of the Federal Re­ spect to the proposed transaction. The ment, and computer services would be­ serve System, Washington, D.C. 20551. Commissioner stated that he had no ob­ come available to the community through The application may be inspected at the jection to approval of the transaction. applicant’s assistance. It is the Board’s office of the Board of Governors or the judgment that consummation of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Within the time provided for public comment on the proposal, a number of proposal would be in the public interest By order of the Board of Governors, banks located in Arkansas urged denial and that the application should be July 1, 1971. of the application. Additionally, a num­ approved. ber of these banks renewed a petition It is hereby ordered, For the reasons [seal] K enneth A. K enyon, set forth above, that the petition for a Deputy Secretary. requesting that the Board conduct a for­ mal hearing, which had not been acted hearing be and hereby is denied, and that [FR Doc.71-0669 Filed 7-8-71;8:47 am] upon due to the Board’s original action said application be and hereby is ap­ denying the application. In view of the proved: Provided, That the acquisition so approved shall not be consummated FIRST ARKANSAS BANKSTOCK CORP. fact that the State Commissioner of Banking did not recommend disapproval (a) before the 30th calendar day fol­ Order Approving Acquisition of Bank of the application, no hearing on the lowing the date of this order or (b) later Stock by Bank Holding Company application is required by the Act. Fur­ than 3 months after the date of this ther, it does not appear to the Board order, unless such period is extended for In the matter of the application of that there are any issues concerning the good cause by the Board, or by the Fed­ First Arkansas Bankstock Corp., Little application on which a formal hearing eral Reserve Bank of St. Louis pursuant Rock, Ark., for approval of acquisition of or oral presentation would be useful. to delegated authority. 80 percent or more of the voting shares Time for filing comments and views has By order of the Board of Governors,1 of The Stephens Security Bank, Ste­ expired and all those received have been July 1,1971. phens, Ark. considered. There has come before the Board of [seal] K enneth A. K enyon, The Board has considered the appli­ Deputy Secretary. Governors, pursuant to section 3(a) (3) cation in the light of the factors set forth of the Bank Holding Company Act of in section 3(c) of the Act, including the [FR Doc.71-9673 FUed 7-8-71;8:47 am] 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1842(a) (3)), and § 222.3 effect of the proposed acquisition on com­ (a) of Federal Reserve Regulation Y (12 petition, the financial and managerial CFR 222.3(a)), an application by First resources and future prospects of the FIRST FINANCIAL CORP. Arkansas Bankstock Corp., Little Rock, applicant and the banks concerned, and Ark., the only registered bank holding the convenience and needs of the com­ Order Approving Acquisition of Bank company in Arkansas, for the Board’s munities to be served, and finds that: Stock by Bank Holding Company prior approval of the acquisition of 80 percent or more of the voting shares of Applicant is the only registered bank In the matter of the application of The Stephens Security Bank, Stephens, holding company in Arkansas, and the First Financial Corp., Tampa, Fla., for Ark. State’s largest banking organization, approval of acquisition of not less than controlling two banks with $247.5 mil­ 80 percent of the voting shares of The As required by section 3(b) of the Act, lion in deposits. (All banking data are as First National Bank of Kissimmee, the Board gave written notice of receipt of December 31,1970.) of the application to the State Commis­ Kissimmee, Fla. sioner of Banking, and requested his Bank, located in the city of Stephens There has come before the Board of views and recommendation. The Com­ (population 1,500), controls total deposits Governors, pursuant to section 3(a)(3) missioner recommended approval unless of $3.2 million and is the next to the of the Bank Holding Company Act of legislation were to be approved prohibit­ smallest of seven banks in the market 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1842(a) (3) ), and § 222.3 ing holding company expansion. area, holding only 4 percent of area (a) of Federal Reserve Regulation Y (12 deposits. Both of applicant’s subsidiaries Notice of receipt of the application CFR 222.3(a)), an application by First are located more than 100 miles from Financial Corp., Tampa, Fla. (Appli­ was published in the F ederal R egister bank and consummation of the proposal on December 9, 1970 (35 F.R. 18699), cant), a registered bank holding com­ would eliminate neither present nor pany, for the Board’s prior approval of providing an opportunity for interested potential competition. Neither does it persons to submit comments and views appear that there would be any adverse with respect to the proposal. Subsequent 1 Voting for this action: Vice Chairman to the filing of the application, on Febru­ effects on any bank in the area. Robertson and Governors Mitchell, Maisel, ary 5, 1971, the State of Arkansas en­ Upon consummation of the proposal, Brimmer, and Sherrill. Absent and not vot­ acted legislation prohibiting the forma­ applicant’s present 8 percent share of ing: Chairman Burns and Governor Daane.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12929 the acquisition of not less than 80 per­ consummation of the proposed acquisi­ to monopolize the business of banking in cent of the voting shares of The First tion would not adversely affect compe­ any part of the United States, or National Bank of Kissimmee, Kissimmee, tition in any relevant area. (2) Any other proposed acquisition or Fla. (Kissimmee Bank). The financial condition and man­ merger or consolidation under section 3 As required by section 3(b) of the Act, agerial resources of Applicant, its sub­ whose effect in any section of the coun­ the Board gave written notice of receipt sidiaries and Kissimmee Bank appear try may be substantially to lessen com­ of the application to the Comptroller generally satisfactory, and prospects for petition, or to tend to create a monopoly, of the Currency, and requested his views each appear favorable. Banking factors or which in any other manner would be and recommendation. The Comptroller are consistent with approval of the ap­ in restraint of trade, unless the Board offered no objection to approval of the plication, and considerations under the finds that the anticompetitive effects of application. convenience and needs'of the commu­ the proposed transaction are clearly out­ Notice of receipt of the application was nities concerned lend some support weighed in the public interest by the published in the F ederal R egister on thereto. Kissimmee Bank is located only probable effect of the transaction in May 7, 1971 (36 F.R. 8535), providing 8 miles from the Disney World project. meeting the convenience and needs of the an opportunity for interested persons Although the primary banking needs of community to be served. to submit comments and views with re­ the area aré being met at the present Section 3(c) further provides that, in spect to the proposed transaction. A time, affiliation with Applicant would every case, the Board shall take into con­ copy of the application was forwarded enable Kissimmee Bank to more effec­ sideration the financial and managerial to the U.S. Department of Justice for tively satisfy some of the credit needs resources and future prospects of the its consideration. The time for filing of the new tourist area and its support­ company or companies and the banks comments and views has expired and ing industries. Applicant has plans to concerned, and the convenience and all those received have been considered improve Kissimmee Bank’s present serv­ needs of the community to be served. by the Board. ices and to provide management person­ Not later than thirty (30) days after The Board has considered the applica­ nel as needed. It is the Board’s judgment that the proposed transaction would be the publication of this notice ih the F ed­ tion in the light of the factors set forth eral R egister, comments and views re­ in section 3(c) of the Act, including the in the public interest, and that the appli­ cation should be approved. garding the proposed acquisition may be effect of the proposed acquisition dn filed with the Board. Communications competition, the financial and mana­ It is hereby ordered, For the reasons should be addressed to the Secretary, gerial resources and prospects of Appli­ set forth in the findings summarized Board of Governors of the Federal Re­ cant and the banks concerned, and the above, that said application be and serve System, Washington, D.C. 20551. convenience and needs of the commu­ hereby is approved: Provided, That the The application may be inspected at the nities to be served and finds that: acquisition so approved shall not be con­ office of the Board of Governors or the Applicant presently controls eight summated (a) before the 30th calendar Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. banks with aggregate deposits of approxi­ day following the date of this order, or mately $428 million, representing 3.1 (b) later than 3 months after the date of By order of the Board of Governors, percent of all deposits of commercial this order, unless such period is extended July 1,1971. banks in Florida. (All banking data are for good cause by the Board, or by the [seal] K enneth A. K enyon, as of December 31, 1970, adjusted to re­ Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta pur­ Deputy Secretary. suant to delegated authority. flect bank holding company formations [FR Doc.71-9670 Filed 7-8-71:8:47 am] and acquisitions approved by the Board By order of the Board of Governors,1 through May 31,1971, and also to include July 1,1971. a recent Board action approving Appli­ FOURTH NATIONAL CORP. cant’s acquisition of Inter City National [seal] K enneth A. K enyon, Bank of Bradenton.) Upon acquisition of Deputy Secretary. Order Approving Action To Become Kissimmee Bank ($14 million deposits), [FR Doc.71-9674 Filed 7-8-71:8:47 am] Bank Holding Company Applicant would increase its share of statewide deposits by only 0.1 percent,, In the matter of the application of The and it would rank as the sixth largest FIRST FLORIDA BANCORPORATION Fourth National Corp., Tulsa, Okla., for banking organization and bank holding approval of action to become a bank company in Florida. Notice of Application for Approval of holding company through the acquisition Kissimmee Bank is the largest of the Acquisition of Shares of Bank of 100 percent (less directors’ qualifying three banks operating in Osceola County shares) of the voting shares of the suc­ and holds 48 percent of county deposits. Notice is hereby given that application cessor by merger to The Fourth National The second largest, a subsidiary of has been made, pursuant to section 3(a) Bank of Tulsa, Okla. Florida’s fifth largest bank holding com­ (3) of the Bank Holding Company Act There has come before the Board of pany, holds $9 million in deposits, repre­ of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1842(a) (3)), by First Governors, pursuant to section 3(a) (1) senting 31 percent of county deposits. Florida Bancorporation, which is a bank of the Bank Holding Company Act of The third largest holds $6 million or holding company located in Tampa, Fla., 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1842(a)(1)) and § 222.3 approximately 21 percent of such de­ for prior approval by the Board of Gov­ (a) of Federal Reserve Regulation Y (12 posits, and received Board approval to ernors of the acquisition by applicant CFR 222.3(a)), an application by The become a subsidiary of the State’s third of 90 percent or more of the voting Fourth National Corp., Tulsa, Okla. (Ap­ largest bank holding company ; however, shares of Marine National Bank of St. plicant), for the Board’s prior approval the proposal was not consummated. No Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Fla. (a pro­ of action whereby Applicant would be­ significant competition exists between posed new bank). come a bank holding company through Kissimmee Bank and Applicant’s sub­ Section 3(c) of the Act provides that the acquisition of 100 percent (less di­ sidiaries, the nearest of which is located the Board shall not approve: rectors’ qualifying shares) of the voting 45 miles from Kissimmee. It appears that (1) Any acquisition or merger or con­ shares of the successor by merger to The the distances involved, the presence of solidation under section 3 which would Fourth National Bank of Tulsa, Tulsa, intervening banks and Florida’s restric­ result in a monopoly, or which would be Okla. (Bank). tive branching laws would preclude sub­ in furtherance of any combination or As required by section 3(b) of the Act, stantial competition from developing conspiracy to monopolize or to attempt the Board gave written notice of receipt between them. It further appears that of the application to the Comptroller of competing banks in the area would not be 1 Voting for this action: Vice Chairman the Currency and requested his views adversely affected by the proposed acqui­ Robertson and Governors Mitchell, Maisel, and recommendation. The Comptroller sition. Based upon the foregoing and the Brimmer, and Sherrill. Absent and not vot­ recommended approval of this applica­ record before it, the Board concludes that ing: Chairman Burns and Governor Daane. tion.

No. 132—Ft. I——« FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12930 NOTICES

Notice of receipt of the application was HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES, INC. ing shares of Mercantile Bank and Trust published in the F ederal R egister on Company, Kansas City, Mo. May 15, 1971 (36 F.R. 8978), providing Notice of Application for Approval of Section 3(c) of the Act provides that an opportunity for interested persons to Acquisition of Shares of Bank the Board shall not approve: submit comments and views with respect Notice is hereby given that applica­ (1) Any acquisition or merger or con­ to the proposal. A copy of the application tion has been made, pursuant to section solidation under section 3 which would was forwarded to the U.S. Department of 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company result in a monopoly, or which would be Justice for its consideration. Time for Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1842(a)(3)), by in furtherance of any combination or filing comments and views has expired Huntington Bancshares, Inc., which is a conspiracy to monopolize or to attempt to and all those received have been con­ bank holding company located in Co­ monopolize the business of banking in sidered. lumbus, Ohio, for prior approval by the any part of the United States, or The Board has considered the appli­ Board of Governors of the acquisition (2) Any other proposed acquisition or cation in the light of the factors set by Applicant of 80 percent or more of merger or consolidation under section 3 forth in section 3(c) of the Act, includ­ the voting shares of The Portage Na­ whose effect in any section of the coun­ ing the effect of the proposed acquisition tional Bank, Kent, Ohio. try may be substantially to lessen com­ on competition, the financial and mana­ Section 3(c) of the Act provides that petition, or to tend to create a monopoly, gerial resources and future prospects of the Board shall not approve: or which in any other manner would be the Applicant and the banks concerned, (1) Any acquisition or merger or con­ in restraint of trade,, unless the Board and the convenience and needs of the solidation under section 3 which would finds that the anticompetitive effects of communities to be served, and finds that: result in a monopoly, on which would be the proposed transaction are clearly out­ Applicant is a nonoperating corpora­ in furtherance of any combination or weighed in the public interest by the tion formed for the purpose of acquiring conspiracy to monopolize or attempt to probable effect of the transaction in Bank ($78.8 million deposits). (All bank­ monopolize the business of banking in meeting the convenience and needs of ing data are as of December 31, 1970, any part of the United States, or the community to be served. and reflect bank holding company appli­ (2) Any other proposed acquisition or Section 3(c) further provides that, in cations approved by the Board through merger or consolidation under section 3 every case, the Board shall take into con­ May 31, 1971.) Upon consummation of whose effect in any section of the country sideration the financial and managerial this proposal, Applicant. will assume may be substantially to lessen competi­ resources and future prospects of the Bank’s present position as the third tion, or to tend to create a monopoly, company or companies and the banks largest bank holding company in the or which in any other manner would be concerned, and the convenience and Tulsa market with 5.7 percent of the in restraint of trade, unless the Board needs of the community to be served. total deposits in that market. As Appli­ finds that the anticompetitive effects of Not later than thirty (30) days after cant has no present operations or sub­ the proposed transaction are clearly out-, the publication of this notice in the F ed­ sidiaries, consummation of this proposal weighed in the public interest by the eral R egister, comments and views re­ would eliminate neither existing nor probable effect of the transaction in garding the proposed acquisition may be potential competition. It does not appear meeting the convenience and needs of filed with the Board. Communications that there would be any adverse effects the community to be served. should be addressed to the Secretary, on any bank in the area. Section 3(c) further provides that, in Board of Governors of the Federal Re­ The financial and managerial re­ every case, the Board shall take into serve, System, Washington, D.C. 20551. sources and prospects of Bank are satis­ consideration the financial and man­ The application may be inspected at the factory and consistent with approval as agerial resources and future prospects office of the Board of Governors or the would be those of Applicant upon ap­ of the company or companies and the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. proval. Consummation of the proposal banks concerned, and the convenience By order of the Board of Governors, would have no immediate effect on the and needs of the community to be served. July 2, 1971. convenience and needs of the community Not later than thirty (30) days after involved, but would enable the Applicant [seal] K enneth A. K enyon, the publication of this notice in the Deputy Secretary. to respond to the increasing needs for a F ederal R egister, comments and views complete line of financial services de­ regarding the proposed acquisition may [FR Doc.71-9672 Filed 7-8-71;8:47 am] manded by an expanding area. Consid­ be filed with the Board. Communications erations under these factors lend some should be addressed to the Secretary, PAYMENTS MECHANISM weight toward approval. It is the Board’s Board of Governors of the Federal Re­ judgment that consummation of the pro­ serve System, Washington, D.C. 20551. Statement of Policy posal would be in the public interest and The application may be inspected at the that the application should be approved. office of the Board of Governors or the The Board of Governors of the Fed­ It is hereby ordered, For the reasons Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. eral Reserve System issued on June 17, set forth above, that said application be 1971, a policy statement calling for basic and hereby is approved: Provided, That By order of the Board Governors, changes in the Nation’s system for han­ the acquisition so approved shall not be July 1, 1971. dling money payments. The Board’s consummated (a) before the 30 calendar [seal] K enneth A. K enyon, statement, which was directed to the : Deputy Secretary. Presidents of the 12 Federal Reserve day following the date of this order, or Banks, is set forth below. (b) later than 3 months after the date [FR Doc.71-9671 Filed 7-8-71;8:47 am] of this order, unless such period is ex­ Board of Governors of the Federal Re­ serve System, July 2, 1971. tended for good cause by the Board or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City MERCANTILE BANCORPORATION, [seal] K enneth A. K enyon, Deputy Secretary. pursuant to delegated authority. INC. S t a t e m e n t o f P o l ic y o n t h e P a y m e n t s By order of the Board of Governors,1 Notice of Application for Approval of M e c h a n i s m July 1, 1971. Acquisition of Shares of Bank Increasing the speed and efficiency with [seal] K enneth A. K enyon, Notice is hereby given that application which the rapidly mounting volume of checks Deputy Secretary. has been made, pursuant to section 3(a) is handled is becoming a matter of urgency. Until electronic facilities begin to replace [PE Doc.71-9675 Piled 7-8-71 ¿8:47 am] (3) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1842(a) (3)), by Mer­ check transfer in substantial volume, the cantile Bancorporation Inc., which is a present system is vulnerable to serious trans­ 1 Voting for this action: Vic« Chairman portation delays and manpower shortages. Robertson and Governors Mitchell, Maisel, bank holding company located in St. Structural changes in the present check Brimmer, and Sherrill. Absent and not Louis, Mo., for prior approval by the clearing system can effect significant savings voting: Chairman Burns and Governor Board of Governors of the acquisition by in manpower and unnecessary handling of Daane. applicant of up to 100 percent of the vot­ checks. These changes will result in faster,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12931 more convenient, and more economical bank­ Park Avenue, New York, NY 100221, reg­ quest a hearing or advice as to whether ing services for the public. They will reduce istered under the Investment Company a hearing is ordered, will receive notice the co st of operations. The Federal Reserve Act of 1940 (Act) as an open-end diver­ of further developments in this matter, Board therefore states as a matter of policy sified management investment company, including the date of the hearing (if that it places high priority upon efforts by the Federal Reserve System to improve the has filed an application for an order of ordered) and any postponements thereof. nation’s means of making payments, initially the Commission pursuant to section 8(f) For the Commission, by the Division along the following lines: of the Act declaring that applicant has of Corporate Regulation, pursuant to 1. Extending present clearing arrange­ ceased to be an investment company as delegated authority. ments, in cities with Federal Reserve offices, defined in the Act. All interested persons into larger zonès of immediate payment, con­ [ seal] T heodore L. H umes, are referred to the application on file Associate Secretary. sistent with transportation possibilities, with the Commission for a statement of check volumes, and the location of check [FR Doc.71-9681 Filed 7-8-71;8:48 am] processing centers. the representations therein which are 2. Establishing other regional clearing summarized below. facilities, in which settlements are made in Applicant was organized in 1966 as a [24C-3202] immediately available funds, located wher­ collective investment fund under regu­ ever warranted by the need for more expedi­ lations of the Comptroller of the Cur­ DATACON INTERNATIONAL, INC. tious and economical check handling, or rency and registered with the Securities Order Permanently Suspending other operating and financial conditions. and Exchange Commission under the 3. (a) Encouraging banks and their cus­ Regulation Exemption tomers to make greater use of the expanded Act. On April 5, 1971, the U.S. Supreme capabilities of the Federal Reserve wire trans­ Court handed down its decision in In­ J uly 2,1971. fer system. vestment Company Institute v. Camp Datacon International, Inc. (issuer), (b) Removing restrictions on third party holding that the Comptroller of the Cur­ 2745 Bernice Road, Lansing, IL, a Dela­ transfers of demand deposits, and extending rency’s regulation and the specific ap­ ware Corporation, filed with the Com­ the time period in which the wire transfer proval thereunder pursuant to which mission a notification and offering system can be used. Applicant had operated were invalid. On (c) Expanding facilities at Reserve Bank circular, and amendments, for the pur­ offices, where justified by traffic potentials, to April 6, 1971, Applicant decided that the pose of obtaining an exemption from include high speed tape transmission, and decision of the Supreme Court was suf­ the registration requirements of the Se­ computer-to-computer communications. ficiently adverse as to require the liqui­ curities Act of 1933 pursuant to section Plans for making these basic changes in the dation and termination of Applicant. 3(b) thereof and Regulation A there­ present money transfer system should be pur­ Accordingly, all portfolio securities were under, with respect to an offer to rescind sued actively, to achieve as soon as possible sold and Applicant’s expenses and li­ the sale of 58,933 shares of its $1 par an accelerated flow of funds along more opti­ abilities were satisfied. On April 22,1971, mal routing patterns. These initiatives are value common stock. According to the generally intended to supplement those effi­ all remaining assets were distributed to offering circular, such shares “were not cient direct check exchange programs that participants pro rata in cash and First distributed pursuant to a registration are now in existence. National City Bank notified the Comp­ statement under the Securities Act of The first objective should be expansion of troller of the Currency that Applicant’s 1933, as amended, and such distribution, the geographic area of existing immediate operations had ended and its existence therefore, may have been in violation payment zones. This should be accomplished had terminated. of section 5 of such Act.’’ as soon as necessary arrangements can be Section 8(f) of the Act provides, in made. Meantime, studies looking to the The Commission on April 6, 1971, establishment of new clearing centers, wher­ pertinent part, that when the Commis­ issued an order pursuant to Rule 261 ever warranted, should be undertaken sion, upon application, finds that a reg­ of Regulation A temporarily suspend­ promptly by each Federal Reserve Bank, and istered investment company has ceased ing the exemption. The issuer requested submitted to the Board for review. Expansion to be an investment company, it shall so a hearing to determine whether the tem­ of facilities at Federal Reserve offices for in­ declare by order, and upon the taking porary suspension order should be va­ creased access to the Reserve System’s wire effect of such order the registration of cated or an order entered permanently network should be concluded at the earliest such company shall cease to be in effect. practicable time, generally during the next suspending the exemption. At the issuer’s 12 to 18 months. Notice is further given that any in­ request, the time within which to file an. terested person may not later than July answer, as required by the suspension [FR Doc.71-9676 Filed 7-8-71;8:47 am] 21, 1971 at 5:30 p.m., submit to the order pursuant to the Commission’s Commission in writing a request for a rules of practice, was extended to May 26, INSURED BANKS hearing on the matter accompanied by 1971, but no answer-has been filed. On a statement as to the nature of his in­ June 4, 1971, the Commission’s Division Joint Call for Report of Condition terest, the reason for such request and of Corporation Finance filed a formal the issues, if any, of fact or law proposed request to enter default against issuer, a Cross Reference: F ot a document re­ lating to a joint call for report of condi­ to be controverted, or he may request copy of which was duly served on issuer, tion of insured banks, see F.R. Doc. that he be notified if the Commission and to which no response has been 71-9689, Federal Deposit Insurance should order a hearing thereon. Any such received. Corporation, supra. communication should be addressed: Under all the circumstances, it appears Secretary, Securities and Exchange that issuer has been given full and ade­ Commission, Washington, D.C. 20549. A quate opportunity to file an answer in copy of such request shall be served per­ these proceedings, and that it failed to do sonally or by mail (airmail if the person so as required. Accordingly, pursuant to SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE being served is located more than 500 Rule 7(e) of the Commission’s rules of miles from the point of mailing) upon practice, issuer is deemed to be in de­ COMMISSION Applicant at the address stated above. fault and the proceedings may be de­ [811-1385] Proof of such service (by affidavit or in termined against it upon consideration COMMINGLED INVESTM ENT AC­ case of an attorney at law by certificate) shall be filed contemporaneously with of the order temporarily suspending the COUNT OF FIRST NATIONAL CITY the request. At any time after said date Regulation A exemption, the allegations BANK as provided by Rule 0-5 of the rules of which may be deemed to be true. Notice of Filing of Application for and regulations promulgated under the Therefore, on the basis of the allega­ Order Declaring That Company Has Act, an order disposing of the matter tions contained in the order temporarily Ceased To Be an Investment Com­ herein may be issued by the Commission suspending issuer’s Regulation A exemp­ pany upon the basis of the information stated tion, it is found that issuer has not com­ J uly 2,1971. in the application, unless an order for plied with the terms and conditions of Notice is hereby given that Com- hearing upon said proposal shall be Regulation A. The offering circular is ™ngled Investment Account of First issued upon request or upon the Com­ materially deficient in that the financial National City Bank (Applicant), 399 mission’s own motion. Persons who re­ statements included therein are more

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12932 NOTICES than 6 months old contrary to the re­ [File No. 7-3811] Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule quirements of Item 11(a) .of Schedule I FLYING TIGER CORP. 12f-l thereunder, for unlisted trading adopted pursuant to Regulation A; and privileges in the common stocks of the such statements fail to disclose the Notice of Application for Unlisted following companies, which securities are method of valuing inventory, include Trading Privileges and of Oppor­ listed and registered on one or more arbitrary dollar values assigned to fixed tunity for Hearing other national securities exchanges: assets, and omit to disclose a material File No. contingent liability and material facts July 1, 1971. Forests Laboratories, Inc______7-3810 relating to sources of income and charges In the matter of application of the Instrument Systems Corp______7-3812 against income. In addition, issuer has Philadelphia - Baltimore - Washington United States Filter Corp______7-3813 failed to cooperate with the Commission Stock Exchange for unlisted trading, Upon receipt of a request, on or be­ as required by Rule 261(a) (7). privileges in a certain security. fore July 16, 1971, from any interested In view of the foregoing it is appro­ The above named national securities person, the Commission will determine priate that the exemption of the issuer exchange has filed an application with whether the application with respect to under Regulation A be permanently the Securities and Exchange Commission any of the companies named shall be suspended. pursuant to section 12(f)(1)(B) of the set down for hearing. Any such request Accordingly, it is ordered, Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and should state briefly the title of the se­ to Rule 261 of Regulation A under the Rule 12f-l thereunder, for unlisted trad­ curity in which he is interested, the na- Securities Act of 1933, that the exemp­ ing privileges in the warrants to pur­ total assets of GWII as of each of the cai- tion from registration with respect to the chase common stock of the following ture of the interest of the person making above rescission offer by Datacon Inter­ company, which security is listed and the request, and the position he proposes national, Inc., be, and it hereby is, per­ registered on one or more other national to take at the hearing, if ordered. In manently suspended. securities exchanges; addition, any interested person may sub­ For the Commission, by the Office of Flying Tiger Corp., Warrants (Expiring De­ mit his. views or any additional facts Opinions and Review, pursuant to dele­ cember 31, 1975) File No. 7-3811. bearing on any of the said applications gated authority. Upon receipt of a request, on or before by means of a letter addressed to the July 16, 1971, from any interested per­ Secretary, Securities and Exchange Com­ [seal] Theodore L. H umes, mission, Washington, D.C. 20549 not later Associate Secretary. son, the Commission will determine whether the application shall be set than the date specified. If no one re­ [PR Doc.71-9679 Filed 7-8-71;8:48 am] down for hearing. Any such request quests a hearing with respect to any should state briefly the nature of the particular application, such application [File No. 1-4847] interest of the person making the request will be determined by order of the Com­ and the position he proposes to take at mission on the basis of the facts stated ECOLOGICAL SCIENCE CORP. the hearing, if ordered. In addition, any therein and other information contained in the official files of the Commission Order Suspending Trading interested person may submit his views or any additional facts bearing on the pertaining thereto. J uly 2, 1971. said application by means of a letter ad­ For the Commission (pursuant to del­ The common stock, 2 cents par value, dressed to the Secretary, Securities and egated authority). of Ecological Science Corp. being traded Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C. on the American Stock Exchange, 20549, not later than the date specified. [seal] T heodore L. Humes, the Philadelphia-Baltimore-Washington If no one requests a hearing, this appli­ Associate Secretary. Stock Exchange and the Pacific Coast cation will be determined by order of [FR Doc.71-9686 Filed 7-8-71;8:48 am] Stock Exchange, pursuant to provisions the Commission on the basis of the facts of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 stated therein and other information [Files Nos. 811-903, 811-1622] and all other securities of Ecological contained in the official flies of the Com­ Science Corp. being traded otherwise mission pertaining thereto. GREATER WASHINGTON INVESTORS, than on a national securities exchange; For the Commission (pursuant to INC., AND GREATER WASHINGTON and delegated authority). INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT, INC. It appearing to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the sum­ [seal] T heodore L. H umes, Notice of Issuance of Certificate Associate Secretary. mary suspension of trading in such secu­ J uly 2, 1971. rity on such exchanges and otherwise [FR Doc.71-9687 Filed 7-8-71;8:48 am] Greater Washington Investors, Inc. than on a national securities exchange (GWH), and Greater Washington is required in the public interest and for Industrial Investments, Inc. (Greater the protection of investors: [File No. 7-3810, etc.] Washington), 1725 K Street NW., Wash­ It is ordered, Pursuant to sections 15 FOREST LABORATORIES, INC., ET AL. ington, DC 20036, each a closed-end, non- (c)(5) and 19(a)(4) of the Securities diversified management investment com­ Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in Notice of Applications for Unlisted pany registered under the Investment such securities on the above mentioned Trading Privileges and of Oppor­ Company Act of 1940 (Act), have filed exchanges and otherwise than on a na­ tunity for Hearing applications for an order of this Com­ tional securities exchange be summarily J uly 1, 1971. mission certifying to the Secretary of the suspended, this order to be effective for In the matter of applications of the Treasury, pursuant to section 851(e) of the period July 4, 1971, through July 13, Philadelphia - Baltimore - Washington the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 1971. Stock Exchange for unlisted trading (Code), that GWII and Greater Wash­ privileges in certain securities. By the Commission. ington were, during the year 1970, prin­ The above named national securities cipally engaged in the furnishing of [seal] T heodore L. Humes, exchange has filed applications with the Associate Secretary. Securities and Exchange Commission capital to other corporations which are [FR Doc.71-9680 Filed 7-8-71;8:48 am] pursuant to section 12(f) (1) (B) of the principally engaged in the development

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12933 or exploration of inventions, technologi­ company. By order dated July 1, 1968 A), a unit investment trust registered cal improvements, new processes or prod­ this Commission granted exemptions under the Investment Company Act of ucts not previously generally available from the Act which, in effect, permitted 1940 (Act), Jefferson Standard Life In­ (development corporations). Greater Washington to operate as surance Co. (Jefferson Standard), and Gw n and Greater Washington each GWII’s wholly owned subsidiary. Jefferson-Pilot Equity Sales, Inc. (Equity propose to qualify as a “regulated in­ In support of the applications GWII Sales), 101 North Elm Street, Greens­ vestment company” under section 851(a) and Greater Washington have submitted boro, NC 27401 (hereinafter collectively of the Code for the year ended Decem­ a detail description of each of the com­ called Applicants) have filed an appli­ ber 31, 1970. The certifications requested panies whose securities are held in their cation pursuant to section 6(c) of the are a prerequisite to qualification, pur­ portfolios and have specified those in­ Act for an order exempting applicants, suant to the provisions of section 851(e) vestments which are considered to be to the extent noted below, from the pro­ visions of sections 22(d), 26(a), and of the Code, as a “regulated investment development corporations. The follow­ company” under section 851(a). 27(c) (2) of the Act. All interested per­ ing table shows the composition of the sons are referred to the application on Greater Washington was organized on endar quarters ended March 31, 1970, file with the Commission tor a statement July 1,1968, as a wholly owned subsidiary o f the representations therein which are of GWII and succeeded to GWII’s li­ June 30, 1970, September 30, 1970, and December 31,1970. summarized below. cense as a small business investment Account A is a separate account of GWII Jefferson Standard established on April 15, 1971, as the facility for issuing Assets Mar. 31,1970 June 30,1970 Sept. 30,1970 D ec: 31,1970 certain variable annuity contracts. Under North Carolina insurance law, that por­ Investments representing capital ium ished to cor­ tion of the assets maintained in Account porations believed to be development corpora- $11,704,841 $9,023,545 $8,168,689 $7,064,444 A equal to the reserves and other con­ Investments in corporations believed not so en- tract liabilities with respect to the Ac­ 547,869 540,891 525,039 523,914 count may not, to the extent so provided Total (at value)— ...... 12,252,710 9,564,436 8,693,728 7,588,358 under the applicable contracts, be Investment in subsidiary (not classified between charged with any liability arising out of investment in development and other corpora- 6,235,109 3,964,355 2,864,424 2,588,398 any other business conducted by Jeffer­ 381,437 459,675 736,972 öl8| 025 son Standard. All amounts credited to Cash, government securities and accrued income— 199,242 171,495 'Other assets------— ...... - ...... 83,861 192,628 Account A pursuant to variable annuity 10,866,876 Total assets...... -...... --- 18,953,117 14,181,094 12,494,366 contracts will be invested in shares of JP Growth Fund, Inc., a diversified open- The following table shows the composition of the total assets of Greater Wash­ end investment company registered ington as of each of the calendar quarters ended March 31, 1970, June 30, 1970, under the Act. September 30,1970, and December 31,1970. Jefferson Standard is a stock life in­ surance company chartered under the G reater Washington laws of North Carolina. Jefferson Stand­ ard is a wholly owned subsidiary of Jef­ Assets Mar. 31,1970 June 30,1970 Sept. 30,1970 Dec. 31,1970 ferson-Pilot Corp. organized in January 1968. Equity Sales, a wholly owned sub­ Investments representing capital furnished to cor­ sidiary of Jefferson-Pilot Corp., is a reg­ porations believed to be development corpora­ tions______$7,678,984 $6,337,540 $5,518,034 $5,344,489 istered broker-dealer under the Securi­ Investments in corporations believed not so ties Exchange Act of 1934. 1,494,560 820,385 782.460 675,580 engaged___ ..... ______t - ...... -,— Section 22(d) provides, in pertinent Total investments (at value)------9,173,534 7,157,925 6,300,494 6,020,069 part, that no registered investment com­ Cash, government securities and accrued income... 375,586 484,204 159,286 235,659 pany or principal underwriter thereof Total assets before reserves...... 9,549,120 7,642,129 6,459,780 6,255,728 shall issue and sell any redeemable secu­ Reserve for possible losses...... (150,000) (530,693) (1,165,609) (1,120,982) rity to the public except at a current 9,399,120 7,111,436 5,294,171 5,134,746 offering price described in the pros­ Total assets...... pectus. Applicants request an exemption from section 22(d) to permit a bene­ On the basis of an examination of the Company Act of 1940, were, for the 12 ficiary under a variable annuity contract reports and information filed by GWII months ended December 31, 1970, prin­ participating in Account A to elect to and Greater Washington with the Com­ cipally engaged in the furnishing of have any death proceeds to which he is mission pursuant to the provisions of the capital to other corporations which were entitled applied to effect a variable an­ Investment Company Act and rules and principally engaged in the development nuity without a sales charge in lieu of regulations promulgated thereunder, as or exploitation of inventions, tech­ payment in a single sum. Applicants well as the data and information set nological improvements, new processes state that the imposition of a sales load forth in the instant applications, it ap­ or products not previously generally where the beneficiary elects a variable pears that GWn and Greater Washing­ available. annuity option would tend in practice to ton were each, for the 12 months ended By the Commission, by the Division of eliminate the election of such option. December 31, 1970, principally engaged Corporate Regulation, pursuant to dele­ Applicants further state that no signifi­ in the furnishing of capital to other cor­ gated authority. cant selling expenses are anticipated in porations which were principally en­ connection with the election of such gaged in the development or exploitation [seal] Theodore L. H umes, option. of inventions, technological improve­ Associate Secretary. Applicants request an additional ex­ ments, new processes or products not [PR Doc.71-9682 Filed 7-8-71;8:48 am] emption from section 22 (d) to permit the previously generally available within the issuance of single payment immediate or intent of section 851(e) of the Code. single payment deferred individual vari­ It is therefore certified to the Secre­ [Pile No. 812-2956] able annuity contracts at a reduced sales tary of the Treasury, or his delegate, JEFFERSON STANDARD SEPARATE charge where the single payment con­ pursuant to section 851(e) of the Code, ACCOUNT A ET AL. sists of proceeds arising from the termi­ that Greater Washington Investors, Inc., nation by death or maturity of a life Notice of Application for Exemptions insurance policy or fixed-dollar annuity and Greater Washington Industrial In­ contract issued by Jefferson Standard. vestments, Inc., each a closed-end, non- J uly 2,1971. In such circumstances the applicable diversified management investment com­ Notice is hereby given that Jefferson sales charge will be one-half of the regu­ pany registered under the Investment Standard Separate Account A (Account lar sales charge, which ranges from 7

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12934 NOTICES percent of the payment down to 3. per­ nuity contracts participating in Account own motion. Persons who request a hear­ cent depending on the amount of the A are general obligations of Jefferson ing or advice as to whether a hearing is single payment. Applicants state that Standard, and Jefferson Standard may ordered will receive notice of further de­ grant of the requested exemption will not abrogate its obligations under such velopments in this matter including the not result in disruptive distribution pat­ contracts. The assets and surplus of Jef­ date of the hearing (if ordered) and any terns since it is not possible for a sec­ ferson Standard provide assurance of its postponements thereof. ondary market to exist for variable an­ financial ability to meet, its obligations For the Commission, by the Division of nuity contracts. Applicants further state under the variable annuity contracts par­ Corporate Regulation, pursuant to dele­ that there is no unfair discrimination re­ ticipating in Account A. gated authority. sulting from the proposed reduction in Applicants have consented that the ex­ sales charge inasmuch as a sales charge emptions requested from sections 26(a) [seal] T heodore L. Humes, will have previously been included in the and 27(c)(2) may be made subject to Associate Secretary. premiums on the Jefferson Standard the conditions (1) that the charges [FR Doc.71-9683 Filed 7-8-71;8:48 am] msurance policies and fixed-dollar annu­ under the contracts for administrative ity contracts from which the single pay­ services shall not exceed such reasonable ments are derived. amounts as the Commission shall pre­ [812-2883] Sections 26(a) and 27(c)(2), as here scribe, jurisdiction being reserved to pertinent, provide in substance that a the Commission for such purpose, and KEYSTONE CUSTODIAN FUND, SERIES registered unit investment trust and any (2) that the payment of sums and K—1, AND KEYSTONE CUSTODIAN depositor of or underwriter for the trust charges out of the assets of Account A FUND, SERIES B-4 * are prohibited from selling periodic pay­ shall not be deemed to be exempted ment plan certificates unless the proceeds from regulation by the Commission Notice of Filing of Application for of all payments, other than the amount by reason of the requested order, Order Permitting Proposed Trans­ deducted for sales load, are deposited provided that the applicants’ consent to action with a qualified bank as trustee or cus­ this condition shall not be deemed to be a J uly 2,1971. todian and held under an indenture cr concession to the Commission of au­ Notice is hereby given that Keystone agreement containing, in substance, the thority to regulate the payments of sums Custodian Funds, Inc., as trustee of Key­ provisions required by sections 26(a) (2) and charges out of such assets other than stone Custodian Fund, Series K -l (K-l), and (3) for trust indentures for unit in­ charges for administrative services, and 50 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02109, vestment trusts. Section 26(a)(2) re­ applicants reserve the right in any pro­ a common law trust registered as an quires that the trustee or custodian ceeding before the Commission or in any open-end, diversified investment com­ segregate and hold in trust all securities suit or action in any court to assert that pany under the Investment Company Act and cash of the trust, and places cer­ the Commission has no authority to reg­ of 1940 (Act) and Keystone Custodian tain restrictions on charges which may ulate the payment of such other sums Fund, Inc., as trustee of Keystone Custo­ be made against the trust income and or charges. dian Fund, Series B-4 (B-4), a common corpus, and excludes from expenses Section 6(c) authorizes the Commis­ law trust registered as an open-end, di­ which the trustee or custodian may sion conditionally or unconditionally to versified investment company under the charge against the trust any payment exempt any person, security, or transac­ Act (hereinafter collectively referred to to the depositor or principal underwriter, tion or any class or classes of persons, as “Applicant”) , has filed an application other than a fee not exceeding such rea­ securities or transactions from the pro­ pursuant to section 17(d) of the Act and sonable amount as the Commission may visions of the Act or any rule or regula­ Rule 17d-l promulgated thereunder for prescribe for performing bookkeeping tion thereunder, if and to the extent that an order granting said application with and other administrative services dele­ such exemption is necessary or appro­ respect to the proposed joint participa­ gated to them by the trustee or custodian. priate in the public interest and con­ tion of B-4 and K-l in the transaction Section 26(a)(3) governs the circum­ sistent with the protection of investors described below. All interested persons stances under which the trustee or cus­ and the purposes fairly intended by the are referred to the application on file todian may resign. As a life insurance policy and provisions, of the Act. with the Commission for a statement of company, Jefferson Standard may not Notice is further given that any in­ the representations contained therein, properly place the assets of Account A in terested person may, not later than which are summarized below. trust in the hands of another. Applicants request exemptions from sections 26(a) July 21, 1971, at 5:30 p.m., submit to the In late 1966, B-4 purchased $1 million and 27(c) (2) to permit the net purchase Commission in writing a request for a of senior notes, and K -l purchased $1 payments finder the contracts allocated hearing on the matter accompanied by a million of junior notes of Santiago De­ to Account A to be held by Jefferson statement as to the nature of his interest, velopment Co. (Santiago). Concurrently Standard rather than providing for the the reason for such request and the is­ with said purchases Santa Anita Consoli­ deposit of such payments with a bank sues of fact or law proposed to be con­ dated, Inc. (Santa Anita) purchased $1 as custodian or trustee for holding under troverted, or he may request that he be million in junior notes identical in terms an agreement or indenture containing, notified if the Commission shall order to those purchased by K -l. The note pur­ in substance, the provisions required by a hearing thereon. Any such communica­ chases were undertaken to finance land sections 26(a) (2) and (3) of the Act. tion should be addressed: Secretary, Se­ development by Santiago. B-4, as the curities and Exchange Commission, holder of the senior note, was to receive In support of these requested exemp­ Washington, D.C. 20549. A copy of such interest at the rate of 8 percent per an­ tions, Applicants state that Jefferson request shall be served personally or by num. The holders of the junior notes, in­ Standard is subject to extensive super­ mail (airmail if the person being served cluding K -l and Santa Anita, were to vision and control by the North Carolina is located more than 500 miles from the receive fixed interest at the rate of 5 n insurance regulatory authorities. It files percent per annum and, after the senior with such authorities annual statements point of mailing) upon applicants at the address stated above. Proof of service (by note was repaid in full, they were to par­ of financial condition in the form pre­ ticipate to the extent of approximately scribed by the National Association of affidavit or in case of an attorney at law by certificate) shall be filed contempo­ 25 percent in the net proceeds of Santi­ Insurance Commissioners and is ex­ ago. Thus, the junior note holders includ­ amined periodically as to its financial af­ raneously writh the request. At any time after such date as provided by Rule 0-5 ing K-l, in exchange for a lower rate of fairs by such authorities. The supervision fixed interest, purchased the opportunity and inspection to which Jefferson Stand­ of the rules and regulations promulgated under the Act, an order disposing of the to participate in Santiago’s net proceeds. ard is subject are applicable to Account Applicant asserts that the obligations oi A so as to'afford protection to variable matter herein may be issued upon the basis of the information stated in said the several purchasers to purchase and annuity contract owners and provide as­ pay for the aforementioned securities surance of performance by Jefferson application, unless an order for hearing Standard of its obligations to such own­ upon said application shall be issued were several not joint. All of the notes ers. All obligations under the variable an­ upon request or upon the Commission’s were unsecured. The Applicant did not

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY *9, 1971 NOTICES 12935

apply for or receive an order of the Com­ Agreement remains in effect, (c) divide For the Commission, by the Division of mission permitting such transaction pur­ equally between Applicant and itself net Corporate Regulation, pursuant to dele­ suant to section 17(d) of the Act and profits from the project in excess of $1.32 gated authority. million until $1 million has been allo­ Rule 17d-l thereunder. The present ap­ [seal] Theodore L. Humes, plication seeks approval only for the cated to Applicant, and (d) divide equally Associate Secretary. proposed transaction. between Applicant and Santa Anita Santiago is a California limited part­ the net profits from the project in ex­ [PR Doc.71-9684 Filed 7-8-71;8:48 am] nership in which Waverly Homes, Inc., cess of $3.32 million until $1 million has a California corporation (Waverly) is the been allocated to Applicant. [Pile No. 812-2957] general partner. Waverly is a wholly The Agreement does not distinguish owned subsidiary of GSC Development between B-4 and K -l in providing for PILOT SEPARATE ACCOUNT A ET AL. Corp., a Texas corporation (GSC). GSC payment to Applicant. As between B-4 Notice of Application for Exemptions is a member of the Penn Central family and K -l, all payments received by Ap­ of corporations. plicant under the Agreement will be J uly 2, 1971. The application asserts that owing to divided equally. Notice is hereby given that Pilot Sepa­ a variety of factors, Santiago has become Rule 17d-l, adopted under section 17 rate Account A (Account A), a unit in­ unable to meet its obligations under the (d) of the Act, provides, inter alia, that vestment trust registered under the notes or under the purchase money note no affiliated person of any registered in­ Investment Company Act of 1940 (Act), and deed of trust for the property being vestment company, and no affiliated per­ Pilot Life Insurance Co. (Pilot) 5300 developed. Further, the Applicant claims son of such affiliated person, shall, acting High Point Road, Greensboro, NC 27407, that in order to salvage some return to as principal, participate in, or effect any and Jefferson-Pilot Equity Sales, Inc. the note holders, Santa Anita proposes transaction in connection with,, any joint (Equity Sales), 101 North Elm Street, to undertake continuance of the land de­ enterprise or other joint arrangement in Greensboro, NC 27401 (hereinafter col­ velopment project begun by Santiago which such registered company, or a lectively called “Applicants”) have filed and to make payments to the note holders company controlled by such registered an application pursuant to section 6(c) in accordance with the agreement de­ company, is a participant, unless an ap­ of the Act for an order exempting Appli­ scribed below. plication regarding such joint enterprise cants, to the extent noted below, from the The details of the transactions have or arrangement has been filed with the provisions of sections 22(d), 26(a), and now been incorporated in an Agreement Commission and has been granted by 27(c) (2) of the Act. All interested per­ of Purchase and Sale (Agreement) by order, and that in passing upon such ap­ sons are referred to the application on and between GSC, Santiago, Waverly, plication the Commission will consider file with the Commission for a statement Santa Anita, Applicant, and MacArthur whether the participation of the regis­ of the representations therein which are & Main Development Co., Inc. (M & M ). tered or controlled company in the joint summarized below. The Agreement is set forth in detail in enterprise or arrangement on the basis Account A is a separate account of Pilot the application and the exhibits thereto. proposed is consistent with the provi­ established on April 15,1971, as the facil­ Previously Robert H. Grant Corp. sions, policies, and purposes of the Act ity for issuing certain variable annuity (Grant), a subsidiary of ¿Santa Anita, and the extent to which such participa­ contracts. Under North Carolina insur­ purchased a portion of the land being tion is on a basis different from or ance law, that portion of the assets main­ developed by Santiago. The Agreement less advantageous than that of other tained in Account A equal to the reserves of Purchase and Sale between Santiago participants. aiid other contract liabilities with respect and Grant provided that Grant would Notice is further given that any inter­ to the Account may not, to the extent so undertake to develop and/or sell said ested person may, not later than July 15, provided under the applicable contracts, land and would share the proceeds there­ 1971, at 5:30 p.m., submit to the Com­ be charged with any liability arising out from with Santiago. , mission in writing a request for a hear­ of any other business conducted by Pilot. The Agreement provides that M & M ing on the matter accompanied by a All amounts credited to Account A pur­ purchase the remaining assets of San­ statement as to the nature of his inter­ suant to variable annuity contracts will tiago, including Santiago’s right to re­ est, the reason for such request and the be invested in shares of JP Growth Fund, ceive a share of the profits from the de­ issues of fact or law proposed to be con­ Inc., a diversified open-end investment velopment undertaken by Grant. M & M troverted, or he may request that he be company registered under the Act. will undertake to develop and market notified if the Commission shall order a Pilot is a stock life insurance company these assets with a view towards generat­ hearing thereon. Any such communica­ organized under the laws of North Caro­ ing profits. In exchange for its efforts tion should be addressed: Secretary, Se­ lina. Pilot is a wholly owned subsidiary M & m will pay its related expenses curities and Exchange Commission, of Jefferson-Pilot Corp. organized in and receive the first $1.32 million in net Washington, D.C. 20549. A copy of such January 1968. Equity Sales, a wholly profits from the project. owned subsidiary of Jefferson-Pilot request shall be served personally or by Corp., is a registered broker-dealer under As a condition of the sale by Santiago mail (airmail if the person being served the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. and the release of certain claims against is located more than 500 miles from the Section 22(d) of the Act provides, in Santiago held by GSC, Santa Anita, K -l, point of mailing) upon Applicant at the pertinent part, that no registered invest­ and B-4 agree to suspend the enforce­ address set forth above. Proof of such ment company or principal underwriter ments of the notes and any claims which service (by affidavit or in case of an at­ thereof shall issue and sell any redeem­ may have accrued in connection there­ torney at law certificate) shall be filed able security to the public except at a with and release from liability GSC, San­ contemporaneously with the request. At current offering price described in the tiago and the partners of Santiago, from any time after said date, as provided by prospectus. Applicants request an ex­ all claims arising with respect to the Rule 0-5 of the rules and regulations emption from section 22(d) to permit a notes and the note agreements. promulgated under the Act, an order dis­ beneficiary under a variable annuity In consideration for the agreement of posing of the application herein may be contract participating in Account A to Santa Anita, K -l and B-4 to suspend issued by the Commission upon the basis elect to have any death proceeds to which enforcement of their claims and grant of the information stated in said ap­ he is entitled applied to effect a variable the releases described above, M & M will plication, unless an order for hearing annuity without a sales charge in lieu (a) pay to Applicant from the gross upon said application shall be issued of payment in a single sum. Applicants Proceeds realized from the project, by upon request or upon the Commission’s state that the imposition of a sales load M & M, on or before August 31, 1971, own motion. Persons who request a hear­ where the beneficiary elects a variable the sum of .eighty-thousand dollars ing, or advice as to whether a hearing is annuity option would tend in practice to ($80,000), (b) pay to Applicant twenty- ordered, will receive notice of further eliminate the election of such option. Ap­ thousand dollars ($20,000) quarterly for developments in this matter, including plicants further state that no significant the period of one (1) year commencing the date of the hearing (if ordered) and selling expenses are anticipated in con­ November 15, 1971, so long as the any postponements thereof. nection with the election of such option.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12936 NOTICES

Applicants request an additional ex­ condition in the form prescribed by the by certificate) shall be filed contempora­ emption from section 22(d) to permit National Association of Insurance Com­ neously with the request. At any time the issuance of single payment immedi­ missioners and is examined periodically after such date as provided by Rule 0-5 ate or single payment deferred individual as to its financial affairs by such au­ of the rules and regulations promulgated variable annuity contracts at a reduced thorities. The supervision and inspection under the Act, an order disposing of the sales charge where the single payment to which Pilot is subject are applicable matter herein may be issued upon the consists of proceeds arising from the ter­ to Account A so as to afford protection basis of the information stated in said mination by death or maturity of a life to variable annuity contract owners and application, unless an order for hearing insurance policy or flxed-dollar annuity provide assurance of performance by upon said application shall be issued contract issued by Pilot. In such circum­ Pilot of its obligations to such owners. upon request or upon the Commission’s stances the applicable sales charge will All obligations under the variable an­ own motion. Persons who request a hear­ be one-half of the regular sales charge, nuity contracts participating in Account ing or advice as to whether a hearing is which ranges from 7 percent of the pay­ A are general obligations of Pilot, and ordered will receive notice of further ment down to 3 percent depending on the Pilot may not abrogate its obligations developments in this matter including amount of the single payment. Appli­ under such contracts. The assets and the date of the hearing (if ordered) and cants state that grant of the requested surplus of Pilot provide assurance of its any postponements thereof. exemption will not result in disruptive financial ability to meet its obligations For the Commission, by the Division distribution patterns since it is not pos­ under the variable annuity contracts of Corporate Regulation pursuant to del­ sible for a secondary market to exist for participating in Account A. egated authority. variable annuity contracts. Applicants Applicants have consented that the further state that there is no unfair dis­ exemptions requested from sections [seal] T heodore L. Htjmes, crimination resulting from the proposed 26(a) and 27(c)(2) may be made sub­ Associate Secretary. reduction in sales charge inasmuch as ject to the conditions (1) that the [PR Doc.71-9688 Piled 7-8-71;8:48 am] a sales charge will have previously been charges under the contracts for admin­ included in the premiums on the Pilot istrative services shall not exceed such insurance policies and flxed-dollar an­ reasonable amounts as the Commission [Piles Nos. 2-15189 (22-2587) ] nuity contracts from which the single shall prescribe, jurisdiction being re­ payments are derived. served to the Commission for such pur­ PHILIP MORRIS, INC. Sections 26(a) and 27(c)(2), as here pose, and (2) that the payment of sums Notice of Application and Opportunity pertinent, provide in substance that a and charges out of the assets of Account registered unit investment trust and any A shall not be deemed to be exempted for Hearing depositor of or underwriter for the trust from regulation by the Commission by June 30, 1971. are prohibited from selling periodic pay­ reason of the requested order, provided Notice is hereby given that Philip ment plan certificates unless the pro­ that the Applicants’ consent to this con­ Morris, Inc. (the Company) has filed an ceeds of all payments, other than the dition shall not be deemed to be a con­ application under clause (ii) of section amount deducted for sales load are de­ cession to the Commission of authority 310(b) (i) of the Trust Indenture Act of posited with a qualified bank as trustee to regulate the payments of sums and 1939 (the Act) for a finding by the Com­ or custodian and held under an inden­ charges out of such assets other than mission that the trusteeship of the First ture or agreement containing, in sub­ charges for administrative services, and National City Bank (the Bank, successor stance, the provisions required by Applicants reserve the right in any pro­ Trustee to First National City Trust Co.) sections 26(a) (2) and (3) for trust in­ ceeding before the Commission or in any under an indenture dated as of June 1, dentures for unit investment trusts. Sec­ suit or action in any court to assert that 1959, as amended and supplemented by a tion 26(a) (2) requires that the trustee the Commission has no authority to reg­ First Supplemental Indenture dated as or custodian segregate and hold in trust ulate the payment of such other sums or of July 15, 1968 (the 1959 Indenture), all securities and cash of the trust, and charges. which was heretofore qualified under the places certain restrictions on charges Section 6(c) authorizes the Commis­ Act, and the trusteeship of the Bank which may be made against the trust in­ sion conditionally or unconditionally to under an indenture dated as of June 1, come and corpus, and excludes from ex­ exempt any person, security or transac­ 1971 (the 1971 Indenture), which was penses which the trustee or custodian tion, or any class or classes of persons, not qualified under the Act, is not so may charge against the trust any pay­ securities, or transactions from the pro­ likely to involve a material conflict of in­ ment to the depositor or principal under­ visions of the Act or any rule or regu­ terest as to make it necessary in the pub­ writer, other than a fee not exceeding lation thereunder, if and to the extent lic interest or for the protection of such reasonable amount as the Commis­ that such exemption is necessary or ap­ investors to disqualify the Bank from act­ sion may prescribe for performing book­ propriate in the public interest and con­ ing as trustee under both of the inden­ keeping and other administrative serv­ sistent with the protection of investors tures. ices delegated to them by the trustee or and the purposes fairly intended by the Section 310(b) of the Act provides, in custodian. Section 26(a) (3) governs the policy and provisions of the Act. circumstances under which the trustee part, that if a trustee under an indenture or custodian may resign. As a life insur­ Notice is further given that any inter­ qualified under the Act has or shall ance company, Pilot may not properly ested person may, not later than July 21, acquire any conflicting interest (as de­ place the assets of Account A in trust in 1971, at 5:30 p.m., submit to the Com­ fined in the section), it shall within 90 the hands of another. Applicants request mission in writing a request for a hearing days after ascertaining that it has such exemptions from sections 26(a) and 27 on the matter accompanied by a state­ conflicting interest either eliminate such (c) (2) to permit the net purchase pay­ ment as to the nature of his interest, conflicting interest or resign. Subsection ments under the Contracts allocated to the reason for such request and the is­ (1) of this section provides, with certain the Accounts to be held by Pilot rather sues of fact or law proposed to be con­ exemptions, that a trustee is deemed to than providing for the deposit of such troverted, or he may request that he have a conflicting interest if it is acting payments with a bank as custodian or be notified if the Commission shall order as trustee under another indenture of the trustee for holding under an agreement a hearing thereon. Any such communi­ same obligor. However, pursuant to or indenture containing, in substance, cation should be addressed: Secretary, clause (ii) of subsection (1), there may the provisions required by sections 26(a) Securities and Exchange Commission, be excluded from the operation of this (2) and (3) of the Act. Washington, D.C. 20549. A copy of such provision another indenture or inden­ request shall be served personally or by In support of these requested exemp­ mail (airmail if the persons being served tures under which other securities of tions, Applicants state that Pilot is sub­ is located more than 500 miles from the such obligor are outstanding, if the is­ ject to extensive supervision and control suer shall have sustained the burden of by the North Carolina insurance regula­ point of mailing) upon Applicants at the tory authorities. It files with such au­ address stated above. Proof of service (by proving on application to the Commis­ thorities annual statements of financial affidavit or in case of an attorney at law sion, and after opportunity for hearing

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12937

thereon, that trusteeship under a quali­ interest of investors, unless a hearing is cute the application, or (2) that it wishes fied indenture and another indenture is ordered by the Commission. to withdraw the application, failure in not so likely to involve a material con­ For the Commission, by the Division which the application will be dismissed flict of interest as to make it necessary of Corporation Finance, pursuant to del­ by the Commission. in the public interest or for the protec­ egated authority. Further processing steps (whether tion of investors to disqualify such modified procedure, oral hearing, or trustee from acting as trustee under any [ seal] T heodore L. H umes, other procedures) will be determined of such indentures. Associate Secretary. generally in accordance with the Com­ The Company alleges that: [FR Doc.71-9685 Filed 7-8-71;8:48 am] mission’s General Policy Statement Con­ 1. It has outstanding $14,323,000 prin­ cerning Motor Carrier Licensing Proce­ cipal amount of its 4% percent Sinking dures, published in the F ederal R egister Fund Debentures due June 1,1979, under issue of May 3, 1966. This assignment the 1959 Indenture which has been qual­ INTERSTATE COMMERCE will be by Commission order which will ified under the Act. be served on each party of record. 2. It has formed a wholly owned sub­ sidiary, Philip Morris International Cap­ COMMISSION The publications hereinafter set forth ital N.V. (International), a Netherlands [Notice 54] reflect the scope of the applications as Antilles corporation, which has issued filed by applicants, and may include de­ MOTOR CARRIER, BROKER, WATER scriptions, restrictions, or limitations and sold to underwriters who have of­ CARRIER AND FREIGHT FOR­ fered and sold outside the United States, Which are not in a form acceptable to its territories and possessions to non­ WARDER APPLICATIONS the Commission. Authority which ulti­ nationals and nonresidents or Canadian mately may be granted as a result of J uly 2, 1971. the applications here noticed will not persons, $15 million principal amount of The following applications are gov­ 8 Ms percent Guaranteed Sinking Fund necessarily reflect the phraseology set erned by Special Rule 100.2471 of the forth in the application as filed, but also Debentures due 1986 (the Debentures) Commission’s general rules of practice issued Under the 1971 Indenture between will eliminate any restrictions which are (49 CFR, as amended), published in the not acceptable to the Commission. International, the Company, and the F ederal R egister issue of April 20, 1966, Bank. effective May 20, 1966. These rules pro­ No. MC 1759 (Sub-No. 27), filed June 7, 3. The Debentures are guaranteed (the vide, among other things, that a protest 1971. Applicant: FROEHLICH TRANS­ Guarantees) as to the payment of prin­ to the granting of an application must PORTATION CO., INC., 31 Victory cipal, interest, and premium, if any, by be filed with the Commission within 30 Street, Stamford, CT 06904. Applicant’s the Company and the Guarantees are days after date of notice of filing of the representative: Reubin Kaminsky, Post endorsed on the Debentures. application is published in the F ederal Office Box 17-067, 342 North Main Street, 4. The 1971 Indenture has not been R egister. Failure seasonably to file a West Hartford, CT 06117. Authority qualified under the Act. protest will be construed as a waiver of sought to operate as a common carrier, 5. The 1959 and 1971 Indentures are opposition and participation in the pro­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, wholly unsecured. ceeding. A protest under these rules transporting: Pneumatic and solid tires, 6. The obligations of the Company should comply with section 247(d) (3) of new, loose or in packages and pneumatic under the 1959 Indenture and on the the rules of practice which requires that rubber tire tubes, in packages, from the Guarantees of the Debentures rank on it set forth specifically the grounds upon plantsite of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., a parity with each other, all being un­ which it is made, contain a detailed at or near Cranberry, N.J., to points in secured senior obligations of the statement of Protestant’s interest in the Connecticut and Westchester County, Company. proceeding (including a copy of the spe­ N.Y., with the return of refused, rejected, 7. The differences in the provisions of cific portions of its authority which Pro­ and damaged shipments, and used tires, the indentures are unlikely to cause any testant believes to be in conflict with from the above-named destination ter­ conflict of interest between the respec­ that sought in the application, and de­ ritory to the above-named point of ori­ tive trusteeships of the Bank under both scribing in detail the method—whether gin. N ote: Applicant states that the indentures. by joinder, interline, or other means— requested authority cannot be tacked The Company waives notice of hearing by which protestant would use such au­ with its existing authority. If a hearing and waives hearing and waives any and thority to provide all or part of the is deemed necessary, applicant requests all rights to specify procedures under the service proposed), and shall specify with it be held at Hartford, Conn., or New rules and practices of the Securities and particularity the facts, matters, and York, N.Y. Exchange Commission with respect to things relied upon, but shall not include No. MC 2860 (Sub-No. 99), filed the application. issues or allegations phrased generally. For a more detailed account of the June 4, 1971. Applicant: NATIONAL Protests not in reasonable compliance FREIGHT, INC., 57 West Park Avenue, matters of fact arid law asserted, all per­ with the requirements of the rules may sons are referred to said application, Vineland, NJ 08360. Applicant’s repre­ be rejected. The original and one copy of sentative: Alvin Altman, 1776 Broadway, which is a public document on file in the the protest shall be filed with the Com­ offices of the Commission at 500 North New York, NY 10019. Authority sought to mission, and a copy shall be served con­ operate as a common carrier, by motor Capitol Street, Washington, DC 20549. currently upon applicant’s representa­ Notice is further given that any inter­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ tive, or applicant if no representative is ing: Such commodities as is dealt in by ested person may, not later than July 28, named. If the protest includes a request 1971, request in writing that a hearing be automotive retail chain stores, from for oral hearing, such requests shall meet Philadelphia, Pa., to Fort Worth, Dallas, l^ld on such matter, stating the nature the requirements of section 247(d) (4) of of his interest, the reasons for such re­ and San Antonio, Tex. N ote: Applicant the special rules, and shall include the states that tacking is possible but not quest, and the issues of law or fact raised certification required therein. by such application which he desires to Section 247(f) of the Commission’s contemplated. Persons interested in the controvert, or he may request that he tacking possibilities are cautioned that rules of practice further provides that failure to oppose the application may be notified if the Commission should each applicant shall, if protests to its order a hearing thereon. Any such re­ result in an unrestricted grant of au­ application have been filed, and within thority. If a hearing is deemed necessary, quest should be addressed: Secretary, 60 days of the date of this publication, Securities and Exchange Commission, applicant requests it be held at New notify the Commission in writing (1) York, N.Y., or Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. 20549. At any time that it is ready to proceed and prose- after said date, the Commission may No. MC 11685 (Sub-No. 2), filed issue an order granting the application, 1 Copies of Special Rule 247 (as amended) June 7, 1971. Applicant: CREST HAUL­ upon such terms and conditions as the can be obtained by writing to the Secretary, AGE, INC., 76 Ninth Avenue, Bay 35, Commission may deem necessary or ap­ Interstate Commerce Commission, Washing­ New York, NY 10011. Applicant’s repre­ propriate in the public interest and the ton, D.C. 20423. sentative: William D. Traub, 10 East

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 No. 132—pt. i-----7 12938 NOTICES 40th Street, New York, NY 10016. Au­ items, from the plantsite of Allied Radio containers, container ends and accesso­ thority sought to operate as a common Shack Division of Tandy Corp., at Delair, ries, materials, and equipment and sup­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular N.J., to points in Pennsylvania, Dela­ plies used in the manufacture, sale, and routes, transporting: Shoes and hand- ware, Maryland, North Carolina, Vir­ distribution of containers and container hags, between the New York, N.Y., com­ ginia, New York, and the District of ends, in mixed shipments with containers mercial zone as defined by the Commis­ Columbia. Note: Applicant states that and container ends, from New York, N.Y., the requested authority cannot be tacked to Cranston, R.I., restricted against the sion, on the one hand, and, on the other, transportation of commodities in bulk. Totowa, N.J. Note: Applicant states that with its existing authority. If a hearing the requested authority cannot be is deemed necessary, applicant requests Note : Applicant states that the re­ it be held at Philadelphia, Pa. quested authority can be tacked with its tacked with its existing authority. Appli­ existing authority but indicates that it cant further states that if the requested No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 16) (Amend­ has no present intention to tack and authority is granted, it would be willing ment) , filed May 3,1971, published in the therefore does not identify the points or to surrender so far as it pertinent to this F ederal R egister issue of May 27, 1971, territories which can be served through proceeding, its presently-held rights to and republished as amended, this issue. tacking. Persons interested in the tack­ transport shoes between New York, N.Y., Applicant: JACK COOPER TRANS­ ing possibilities are cautioned that fail­ on the one hand, and, on the other, PORT CO., INC., 3501 Manchester Traf­ ure to oppose the application may result Totowa (Passaic County), N.J. If a hear­ ficway, Kansas City, MO 63011. Appli­ in an unrestricted grant of authority. If ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ cant’s representative: Warren A. Goff, a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant quests it be held at New York, N.Y. 2111 Sterick Building, Memphis, Tenn. requests it be held at New York, N.Y., or No. MC 25798 (Sub-No. 226), filed 38103. Authority sought to operate as a Washington, D.C. June 10, 1971. Applicant: CLAY HYDER contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Automo-. No. MC 44639 (Sub-No. 39), filed TRUCKING LINES, INC., 502 East June 4, 1971*. Applicant: L. & M. EX­ Bridgers Avenue, Post Office Box 1186, biles, trucks and buses as described in Auburndale, FL 33823. Applicant’s rep­ Description in Motor Carrier Certificates, PRESS CO., INC., 220 Ridge Road, Lynd- 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, in initial move­ hurst, NJ 07071. Applicant’s represent­ resentative: Tony G. Russell (same ad­ ative: Herman B. J. Weckstein, 60 Park dress as above). Authority sought to ments, in truckaway service, from the operate as a common carrier, by motor plantsites of General Motors Corp. in Place, Newark, NJ 07102. Authority vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Janesville, Wis., to Kansas City, Mo., sought to operate as a common carrier, ing: Prepared flour mixes, frosting, and/ under contract with General Motors by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Corp. “Note: The initial authority here transporting: Wearing apparel and ma­ or icing mixes, from Chelsea, Mich., to sought may be used in combination with terials and supplies used in the manu­ points in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Applicant’s existing secondary authority facture of wearing apparel (other than Louisiana, North Carolina, South Caro­ for the transportation of vehicles mov­ commodities in bulk), between Narrows, lina, and Texas. Note: Applicant states ing from Janesville, Wis., to Kansas City, Va., and New York, N.Y. Note: Appli­ that the requested authority cannot be Mo., and subsequently reshipped by cant states that the requested authority tacked with its existing authority. Com­ General Motors Corp. to destinations be­ can be tacked at points in New York mon control may be involved. If a hear­ yond Kansas City, Mo. (Applicant pres­ with presently held authority. If a hear­ ing is deemed necessary, applicant ently holds secondary authority between ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ requests it be held at Detroit, Mich., or points in the States of New Mexico, Utah, quests it be held at New York, N.Y. or Chicago, 111. Wyoming, South Dakota, Idaho, Mon­ Washington, D.C. No. MC 27754 (Sub-No. 16), filed tana, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, June 1, 1971. Applicant: FRANK J. Arkansas, Colorado, Oklahoma, and No. MC 45736 (Sub-No. 40), filed KUBLY TRANSFER, INC., 1202 18th Texas.)” Common control may be in­ June Ilf 1971. Applicant: GUIGNARD Street, Monroe, WI 53566. Applicant’s volved. The purpose of this republica­ FREIGHT LINES, INC., North Highway representative: Rolfe E. Hanson, 121 tion is to reflect the changes in the au­ 21, Post Office Box 26067, Charlotte, West Doty Street, Madison, WI 53703. thority sought. If a hearing is deemed NC 28213. Applicant’s representative: Authority sought to operate as a com­ necessary, applicant requests it be held Edward G. Villaion, 1032 Pennsylvania mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ at Kansas City, Mo., or Detroit, Mich. Building, Pennsylvania Avenue and 13th regular routes, transporting: (1) Cheese Street NW„ Washington, DC 20004. Au­ No. MC 35628 (Sub-No. 318), filed thority sought to operate as a common and cheese supplies, from points in Olm­ June 7, 1971. Applicant: INTERSTATE carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular sted, Goodhue, Wabasha, McLeod, and MOTOR FREIGHT SYSTEM, a corpo­ routes, transporting: Petroleum and pe­ Carver Counties, Minn.; Davison and ration, 134 Grandville SW., Grand Rap­ Grant Counties, S. Dak., to Monroe, Wis.; troleum products, vehicle body sealer, ids; MI 49502. Applicant’s representa­ and sound deadening compounds, in and (2) materials and supplies used in tive: Leonard D. Verdier, Jr., 900 Old the manufacture and distribution of packages or containers, from points in Kent Building, Grand Rapids, Mich. Hancock County, W. Va., to points in cheese, from Monroe, Wis., to points in 49502. Authority sought to operate as a the counties named in (1) above. Note: North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over and Florida. Note: Applicant states that Applicant states that the requested au­ irregular routes, transporting: Food, food thority cannot be tacked with its exist­ the requested authority cannot be tacked preparations and foodstuffs (except com­ with its existing authority. If a hearing ing authority. If a hearing is deemed modities in bulk), from Champaign, 111., necessary, applicant requests it be held at is deemed necessary, applicant requests to points in Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, it be held at Washington, D.C. Madison or Milwaukee, Wis. Iowa, Kansas, Michigan (Lower Penin­ No. MC 28142 (Sub-No. 3), filed sula), Nebraska, Ohio, and Oklahoma. No. MC 51146 (Sub-No. 224), filed June 14, 1971. Applicant: SHANAHAN’S Note : Applicant states that the requested June 1, 1971. Applicant: SCHNEIDER EXPRESS, INC., 126 Prospect Street, authority cannot be tacked with its ex­ TRANSPORT & STORAGE, INC., Post Merchantville, NJ 08109. Applicant’s isting authority . If a hearing is deemed Office Box 2298, Green Bay, WI 54306. representative: Raymond A. Thistle, Jr., necessary, applicant requests it be held Applicant’s representative: D. F. Mar­ Suite 1012, 4 Penn Center Plaza, Phila­ at Washington, D.C. tin (same address as applicant). Au­ thority sought to operate as a common delphia, PA 19103. Authority sought to No. MC 42261 (Sub-No. 110), filed operate as a common carrier, by motor carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular June 10, 1971. Applicant: LANGER routes, transporting: Gems and toys, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport- TRANSPORT CORP., Route 1 and Dan- and advertising and promotional matter v ing: Radios, phonographs, tape re­ forth Avenue, Jersey City, NJ 07303. Ap­ corders, televisions, citizen hand equip­ when moving at the same time and in the plicant’s representative: W. C. Mitchell, same vehicle with games and toys, from ment, stereos, Hi-FVs, component parts 370 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY of all of the foregoing, electronic test 10017. Authority sought to operate as a City of Industry, Compton, San Gabriel, Hawthorne, Santa Ana, and South San equipment, records, tapes, tools, and ac­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over cessories used in connection with said irregular routes, transporting: Metal Francisco, Calif.; and Seattle, Wash., to

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12939

points in Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, and named, and in (2) above to the transpor­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Wisconsin. N ote: Applicant states that tation of traffic destined to said facilities. cant requests it be held at Omaha or the requested authority could be tacked N ote: Applicant states that the requested Lincoln, Nebr. with various subs of MC 51146 and appli­ authority cannot be tacked with its exist­ cant will tack with its MC 51146 where ing authority. Common control may be No. MC 67450 (Sub-No. 40), filed feasible. Applicant has various duplica­ involved. If a hearing is deemed neces­ June 3, 1971. Applicant: PETERLIN tive items of authority under various sary, applicant requests it be held at CARTAGE CO., a corporation, 9651 Chicago, HI. South Ewing Avenue, Chicago, IL 60617. subs but does not seek duplicative au­ Applicant’s representative: Joseph M. thority. Common control may be in­ No. MC 61592 (Sub-No. 219), filed Scanlan, 111 West Washington Street, volved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, June 9, 1971. Applicant: JENKINS Chicago, IL 60602. Authority sought to applicant requests it be held at Los TRUCK LINE, INC., 3708 Elm Street, operate as a common carrier, by motor Angeles, Calif., Bettendorf, IA 52777. Applicant’s repre­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 6 1592 (Sub-No. 217), filed sentative: Jack Davis, 1100 IBM Build­ ing: Soybean products and blends, from June 7, 1971. Applicant: JENKINS ing, Seattle, Wash. 98107. Authority Cedar Rapids, Iowa, to points in the TRUCK LINE, INC., 3708 Elm Street, sought to operate as a common carrier, United States (except Alaska and Bettendorf, IA 52722. Applicant’s repre­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Hawaii). Note: Common control may be sentative: Donald W. Smith, 900 Circle transporting: Lumber and lumber prod­ involved. Applicant states that the re­ Tower Building, Indianapolis, Ind. 46204. ucts, plywood, particle board, wallboard, quested authority cannot be tacked with Authority sought to operate as a com­ composition board, molding, and doors, its existing authority. If a hearing is mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over irreg­ from points in Washington, Oregon, Cali­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it ular routes, transporting: Building and fornia, Nevada, Idaho, Utah, Montana, be held at Chicago, HI. roofing slabs, tile and panels, and related Wyoming, and Colorado, to points in the materials, parts, supplies, and accesso­ United States (except Texas, Louisi­ No. MC 74321 (Sub-No. 49), filed ries, from Cornell, Wis., to points in June 7, 1971. Applicant: B. F. WALKER, ana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Hawaii, and INC., 650 17th StreeiT, Denver, CO 80202. Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Alaska). N ote: Applicant states that the Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, requested authority cannot be tacked Applicant’s representatives: Richard P. Pennsylvania, Tennessee, West Virginia., with its existing authority. Common con­ Kissinger (same address as above) and District of Columbia, Alabama, Arkansas, trol may be involved. If a hearing is Jerry C. Prestridge, Post Office Box 1148, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, deemed necessary, applicant requests it Austin, TX 78767. Authority sought to Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Massachu­ be held at Seattle, Wash. operate as a common carrier, by motor setts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, No. MC 61825 (Sub-No. 39), filed ing: Cooling towers and fluid coolers, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, June 2, 1971. Applicant: ROY STONE parts thereof, and materials and supplies Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Caro­ TRANSFER CORPORATION, V. C. used or useful in the construction of cool­ lina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, and Drive,. Collinsville, VA 24078. Applicant’s ing towers and fluid coolers, from points Virginia. N ote: Applicant states that the representative: George S. Hales, Post Of­ in San Joaquin County, Calif., to points requested authority cannot be tacked fice Box 872, Martinsville, VA 24112. in the United States (except Alaska and with its existing authority. Common con­ Authority sought to operate as a common Hawaii). N ote: Applicant states that the trol may be involved. If a hearing is carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular requested authority cannot be tacked deemed necessary, applicant requests it routes, transporting: Glass, from Clarks­ with its existing authority. If a hearing be held at Chicago, 111. burg, W. Va., Cumberland, Md., Jean­ is deemed necessary, applicant requests nette, Pa., and Fredericktown and Mount it be held at Denver, Colo. No. MC 61592 (Sub-No. 218), filed Vernon, Ohio, to Gallatin, Tenn., and June 7, 1971. Applicant: JENKINS points in Tennessee located on and east No. MC 77340 (Sub-No. 4), filed June 7, TRUCK LINE, INC., 3708 Elm Street, 1971. Applicant: E. J. DICKIE TRUCK­ of U.S. Highway 231 and points in ING COMPANY, a corporation, Box 265, Bettendorf, IA 52722. Applicant’s repre­ Georgia. N ote: Common control may be sentative: Donald W. Smith, 900 Circle involved. Applicant states that the re­ Bagdad, AZ 83621. Applicant’s repre­ Tower Building, Indianapolis, Ind. 46204. quested authority cannot be tacked with sentative: Richard Minne, 609 Luhrs Authority sought to operate as a com­ its existing authority. If a hearing is Building, Phoenix, AZ 85003. Authority mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over irreg­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it sought to operate as a contract carrier, ular routes, transporting: (1) Tractors be held at Washington, D.C. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, (except those with vehicle beds, bed transporting: Copper precipitates, in frames and fifth wheels); equipment de­ No. MC 62362 (Sub-No. 4), filed bulk, from the plantsite of Shield De­ signed for use in conjunction with trac­ May 26, 1971. Applicant: ROYAL F. velopment Co., Ltd., near Milford, Utah, tors; agricultural, industrial, and con­ LYON, doing business as LYON TRANS­ to Bagdad, Ariz., under contract with struction machinery and equipment; FER, 1366 32d Avenue, Box 131, Colum­ Bagdad Copper Corp. Note: If a hearing trailers designed for the transportation bus, NE 68601. Applicant’s representa­ is deemed necessary, applicant requests of the above-described commodities (ex­ tive: J. Max Harding, 605 South 14th it be held at Phoenix, Ariz. cept those trailers designed to be drawn Street, Post Office Box 82028, Lincoln, NE No. MC 82063 (Sub-No. 34), filed by passenger automobiles); attachments 68501. Authority sought to operate as a June 7, 1971. Applicant: KLIPSCH for the above-described commodities; common carrier, by motor vehicle, over HAULING CO., a corporation, 119 East internal combustion engines, and parts regular routes, transporting: General Loughborough, St. Louis, MO 63111. Ap­ of the above-described commodities; (a) commodities (except those of unusual plicant’s representative: Ernest A. Brooks from the plants, warehouse sites, and value, classes A and B explosives, house­ II, 1301 Ambassador Building, St. Louis, experimental farms of Deere & Co. in hold goods as defined by the Commission, MO 63101. Authority sought to operate as Rock Island County, 111., to points in commodities in bulk, and commodities re­ a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Michigan (Upper Peninsula), Minnesota, quiring special equipment); (a) between over irregular routes, transporting: (1) and Wisconsin; and (b) from the plants, Green Island and Genoa, Nebr., over U.S. Liquid fertilizer, in bulk, in tank vehicles, warehouse sites-, and experimental farms Highway 30 to Central City, thence over from Birds Point, Mo., and points in of Deere & Co. in Polk and Wapello Coun­ Nebraska Highway 14 to Fullerton, Tennessee; and (2) liquid sulphurs tri­ ties, Iowa, to points in Michigan (Upper thence over Nebraska Highway 22 to oxide (sulfant), in bulk, in tank vehicles, Peninsula) and Wisconsin; and (2) re­ Genoa, and return over the same route, from Fairmont City, HI., to points in turned shipments of the above-specified serving the intermediate point of Fuller­ Alabama, Colorado, Hlinois, Indiana, commodities, restricted in (1) above to ton, Nebr.; and (b) serving the off-route Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, the transportation of traffic originating point of Greely, Nebr., in connection with Ohio, South Carolina, and Wisconsin. at the plantsites, warehouse sites, and applicant’s regular route between Albion, N ote: Applicant states that the re­ experimental farms of Deere & Co. Spalding, and Cedar Rapids, Nebr. N ote: quested authority cannot be tacked with

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12940 NOTICES its existing authority. If a hearing is materials, insulating materials, composi­ National Plaza, Tulsa, Okla. 74151. Ap­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it tion board, and gypsum products and plicant’s representatives: Irvin Tull be held at Washington, D.C., or New materials used in the installation there­ (same address as applicant) and Leonard York, N.Y. of, from the plantsite and warehouse A. Jaskiewicz, 1730 M Street NW„ Wash­ facilities of the Celotex Corp. at or ington, DC 20036. Authority sought to No. MC 82079 (Sub-No. 24), filed near Charleston, HI., to points in Ala­ operate as a common carrier, by motor June 4, 1971. Applicant: KELLER bama, Arkansas, Colorado, Kansas, Ken­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ TRANSFER LINE, INC., 1239 Randolph tucky, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Mississippi, ing: (1) Buildings, complete, knocked Avenue SW., Grand Rapids, MI 49507. Missouri, New Mexico, Tennessee, and down, or in sections; (2) building sec­ Applicant’s representative: J. M. Neath, Texas. Note: Applicant states that the tions; (3) building panels; (4) parts and Jr., 900 One Vandenberg Center, Grand requested authority cannot be tacked accessories used in the installation and Rapids, MI 49502. Authority sought to with its existing authority. If a hearing completion of commodities described in operate as a common carrier, by motor is deemed necessary, applicant requests (1), (2), and (3) above; and (5) metal vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ it be held at Washington, D.C. prefabricated structural components, and ing: (1) Food, food preparations, and panels, and accessories used in the in­ foodstuffs (except in bulk, in tank ve­ No. MC 102616 (Sub-No. 860), filed stallation and completion thereof, from hicles), from Champaign, 111., to points June 9, 1971. Applicant: COASTAL points in Fayette County, Ohio, to points in Ohio and Michigan; and (2) returned, TANK LINES, INC., Post Office Box 7211, in the United States (except Alaska and rejected, and damaged merchandise, on 215 East Waterloo Road, Akron, OH Hawaii).. Note: The purpose of this re­ retumT restricted to the transportation 44319. Applicant’s representative: Har­ publication is to amend the commodity of traffic originating in Champaign, 111. old G. Hemly, Jr., 2030 North Adams description, specifically part (5) above. Note : Applicant states that the requested Street, Suite 510, Arlington, VA 22201. Common control and dual operations authority cannot be tacked with its ex­ Authority sought to operate as a com­ may be involved. If a hearing is deemed isting authority. Common control may mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ necessary, applicant requests it be held be involved. If a hearing is deemed nec­ regular routes, transporting: Petroleum at Columbus or Dayton, Ohio. essary, applicant requests it beheld at products, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from Washington, D.C., Chicago, 111., or Henderson, Ky„ to points in Indiana on No. MC 107012 (Sub-No. 116), filed Lansing, Mich. and south of U.S. Highway 40. Note: Ap­ June 3,1971. Applicant: NORTH AMER­ plicant states that the requested author­ ICAN VAN LINES, INC., Lincoln High­ No. MC 95540 (Sub-No. 811), filed ity cannot be tacked with its existing way East and Meyer Road, Post Office June 7, 1971. Applicant: WATKINS MO­ authority. Common control may be in­ Box 988, Fort Wayne, IN 46801. Appli­ TOR LINES, INC., 1120 West Griffin volved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, cant’s representatives: Martin A. Weis- Road, Lakeland, FL 33801. Applicant’s applicant requests it be held at Indian­ sert and Terry G. Fewell (same address representative: Paul E. Weaver, same ad­ apolis, Ind. as applicant). Authority sought to oper­ dress as above) . Authority sought to ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ operate as a common carrier, by motor No. MC 103498 (Sub-No. 20), filed hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ June 1, 1971. Applicant: W. D. SMITH New furniture, and commercial and in­ ing: Meat, meat products, and meat by­ TRUCK LINE, INC., Post Office Box 68, stitutional fixtures, from points in Clay products as described in sections A, B, De Queen, AR. Applicant’s representa­ and Greene Counties, Ark., to points in and C of appendix I to the report in tive: Louis Tarlowski, 914 Pyramid Life the United States (except Alaska and Descriptions in Motor Carriers Certifi­ Building, Little Rock, Ark. 72201. Au­ Hawaii). Note: Common control and cates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 765 (except thority sought to operate as a common dual operations may be involved. Appli­ commodities in bulk, hides, and skins); carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular cant states that a limited amount of its (a) fromBeardstown, 111.; Downs, Kans.; routes, transporting: Plywood, from the existing authority under MC 107012 St. Joseph and Phelphs City, Mo.; Darr, plantsite and storage facilities of Wood­ (Sub-No. 75) could be joined at Greene Lexington, and Minden, Nebr.; Sioux ard-Walker and Williamette at or near County, Ark., with the requested au­ Falls and Madison, S. Dak.; Madison, Minden, La., Santiam Southern Co. at thority. Applicant further states the pri­ Wis.; and points in Louisiana and Mis­ or near Rouston, La., and Louisiana Ply­ mary purpose of this application, how­ sissippi; (b) from Omaha, Nebr., to wood Corp. at or near Hunt, La., to points ever, is to provide direct service from and points in Louisiana; and (c) from Sioux in Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska, to the points and for the commodity de­ Falls and Madison, S. Dak.; Madison, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, New scription named in this application. If Wis.; and Austin, Minn.; to points in Mexico, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Ten­ a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Florida. Note: Applicant states it pres­ nessee, Mississippi, Alabama, and Geor­ requests it be held at Washington, D.C., ently holds the authority described in gia. Note: Applicant states that the re­ Indianapolis, Ind., or Chicago, 111. (a), (b), and (c) above by tacking por­ quested authority cannot be tacked with No. MC 107012 (Sub-No. 117), filed tions of its existing authority at Humbolt its existing authority. If a hearing is June 9,1971. Applicant: NORTH AMER­ or Union City, Tex., and the purpose of deemed necessary, applicant requests it ICAN VAN LINES, INC., Post Office Box the instant application is to eliminate be held at Little Rock, Ark. 988, Lincoln Highway East and Meyer these tacking points on traffic applicant No. MC 105463 (Sub-No. 7), filed June is already handling via somewhat a Road, Fort Wayne, IN 46801. Applicant’s 10, 1971. Applicant: C. E. HORNBACK, representative: Donald C. Lewis, Post circuitous route and handle these ship­ INC., Post Office Box 176, Tama, IA ments on a direct basis. Common control Office Box 988, Fort Wayne, IN 46801. 52339. Applicant’s representative: Wil­ Authority sought to operate as a com­ may be involved. If a hearing is deemed liam L. Fairbanks, 900 Hubbell Building, necessary, applicant requests it be held mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ Des Moines, Iowa 50309. Authority sought regular routes, transporting: New furni­ at Atlanta, Ga. to operate as a contract carrier, by motor ture, from Burlington, Iowa, to points No. MC 100666 (Sub-No. 189), filed vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ in Virginia, North Carolina, South Caro­ May 24, 1971. Applicant: MELTON ing: Paper boxes, from Duluth, Minn., lina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Tennes­ TRUCK LINES, INC., Post Office Box to Des Moines, Eldora, and Madrid, Iowa, see, Kentucky, Mississippi, Louisiana, 7666, 1129 Grimmett Drive, Shreveport, under continuing contract with Van Vick Iowa, Minnesota, Texas, Oklahoma, LA 71107. Applicant’s representative: Paper Box Co. Note: If a hearing is Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Wm. L. Williamson, 280 National Foun­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, dation Life Center, 3535 Northwest 58th, be held at Minneapolis, Minn. New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, and Paul No. MC 106398 (Sub-No. 526) (Amend­ Washington, Oregon, Nevada, and Cali­ Caplinger (same address as applicant). ment) , filed January 25, 1971, published fornia. Note: Applicant states that the Authority sought to operate as a com­ in the F ederal R egister, issue of Feb­ requested authority cannot be tacked mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ ruary 25,‘ 1971, and republished, as with presently held authority at Burling­ regular routes, transporting: Urethane, amended, this issue. Applicant: NA­ ton, Iowa. Common control and dual urethane products, roofing and roofing TIONAL TRAILER CONVOY, INC., 1925 ^operations may be involved. If a hearing

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12941

is deemed necessary, applicant requests No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 270), filed CARRIERS, INC., Post Oflice Box 426, it be held at Chicago, 111. June 7, 1971. Applicant: SCHNEIDER Tampa, FL 33601. Applicant’s repre­ No. MC 107227 (Sub-No. 121), filed TANK LINES, INC., 200 West Cecil sentative: J. V. McCoy (same address as June 1, 1971. Applicant: INSURED Street, Neenah, WI 54956. Applicant’s applicant). Authority sought to operate TRANSPORTERS, INC., 1944 Willimas representative: David A. Petersen (same as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Street, San Leandro, CA 94577. Appli­ address as applicant). Authority sought over irregular routes, transporting: cant’s representative: John G. Lyons, to operate as a common carrier, by motor Petroleum, petroleum products, and 1418 Mills Tower, San Francisco, CA vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ petroleum byproducts, in bulk, in tank 94104. Authority sought to operate as a ing: Clay and clay slurry, in bulk, from vehicles, from points in Duval County, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over points in Georgia, to points in Michigan, Fla., to points in Georgia. Note: Com­ irregular routes, transporting: Motor ve­ Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Note: Ap­ mon control may be involved. Applicant hicles (except passenger automobiles) plicant states that the requested author­ states that the requested authority can­ and chassis, in initial movements, in ity cannot be tacked with its existing not be tacked with its existing authority. driveaway service, and bodies, cabs, and authority. Common control may be in­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, ap­ parts and accessories for such vehicles, volved: If a hearing is deemed necessary, plicant requests it be held at Jackson­ applicant requests it be held at Chicago, ville, Fla., or Washington, D.C. when moving in connection therewith, HI., or Atlanta, Ga. from Kansas City, Mo., to points in Ari­ No. MC 111812 (Sub-No. 425), filed zona, California, Idaho, Montana, Ne­ No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 271), filed June 9, 1971. Applicant: MIDWEST vada, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington, June 8, 1971. Applicant: SCHNEIDER COAST TRANSPORT, INC., 405 & East and Utah. Note: Applicant states that TANK LINES, INC., 200 West Cecil Eighth Street, Post Oflice Box 1233, the requested authority cannot be tacked Street, Neenah,’ WI 54956. Applicant’s Sioux Falls, SD 57101. Applicant’s rep­ with its existing authority. If a hearing representatives: David A. Petersen, 200 resentative: Donald L. Stern, 530 is deemed necessary, applicant requests West Cecil Street, Neenah, WI 54956, and Univac Building, 7100 West Center Road, it be held at San Francisco, Calif. E. Stephen Heisley, 666 11th St. NW., Omaha, NE 68106. Authority sought to Washington, DC 20001. Authority sought operate as a common carrier, by motor No. MC 107515 (Sub-No. 760), filed to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ June 11, 1971. Applicant: REFRIGER­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ ing: Food, food preparations, and food­ ATED TRANSPORT CO., INC., Post Of­ ing: Liquid plastic and latex, in bulk, stuffs (except in bulk, in tank vehicles), fice Box 308, Forest Park, GA 30050. from Midland, Mich., to Neenah, and from Champaign, 111., to points in Idaho, Applicant’s representative: Paul M. Rhinelander, Wis. Note: Applicant states Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Daniell, Post Oflice Box 872, Atlanta, GA that the requested authority cannot be Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South 30301. Authority sought to operate as a tacked with its existing authority. Com­ Dakota, Wyoming, West Virginia, and common carrier, by motor vehicle, over mon control may be involved. If a hear­ points in New York, Pennsylvania, and irregular routes, transporting: Rugs, car­ ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ Maryland on and west of Interstate pet and tufted textile products, from La quests it be held at Milwaukee, Wis., or Highway 81 and Allentown, Pa. Note: Grange and Columbus, Ga., to points in Chicago, 111. Applicant states it could tack with vari­ Florida, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, ous existing authorities at both origin Texas, and New Mexico. Note : Applicant No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 272), filed and destination, however, tacking is not states that the requested authority can­ June 9, 1971. Applicant: SCHNEIDER intended. Persons interested in the tack­ not be tacked with its existing authority. TANK LINES, INC., 200 West Cecil ing possibilities are cautioned that fail­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Street, Neenah, WI 54956. Applicant’s ure to oppose the application may result cant requests it be held at Atlanta, Ga. representative: David A. Petersen (same in an unrestricted grant of authority. address as applicant). Authority sought Common control may be involved. If a No. MC 108298 (Sub-No. 32), filed to operate as a common carrier, by motor June 1,1971. Applicant: ELLIS TRUCK­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ does not specify a location. ING CO., INC., 1205 South Platte River ing: Spent carbon, in bulk, from points Drive, Denver,. CO 80223. Applicant’s in Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio, No. MC 112049 (Sub-No. 17), filed representative: John T. Coon (same ad­ to points in Illinois and New York. Note : June 7,1971. Applicant: McBRIDE’S EX­ dress as applicant). Authority sought to Applicant states that the requested au­ PRESS, INC., 1901 Wabash Avenue, operate as a common carrier, by motor thority cannot be tacked with its existing Mattoon, IL 61938. Applicant’s repre­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ authority. Common control may be in­ sentative: R. W. Burgess, 8514 Midland ing: Building materials as described in volved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63114. Author­ appendix VI to Descriptions' of Motor applicant requests it be held at Chicago, ity sought to operate as a common car­ Carrier Certificates, between West HI. rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Branch, Mich., and points in the United routes, transporting: Food, food prepara­ States (except Alaska and Hawaii). No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 273), filed tions, and foodstuffs (except in bulk, in Note: Applicant states that the re­ June 9, 1971. Applicant: SCHNEIDER tank vehicles) from Champaign, 111., to quested authority cannot be tacked with TANK LINES, INC., 200 West Cecil points in'Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska, South its existing authority. If a hearing is Street, Neenah, WI 54956. Applicant’s Dakota, North Dakota, Indiana, Michi­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it representative: David A. Peterson (same gan, Kentucky, Ohio, and points in New be held at Denver, Colo. address as above). Authority sought to York, Pennsylvania, and Maryland on operate as a common carrier, by motor and west of Interstate Highway 81 and No. MC 109448 (Sub-No. 14), filed June vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Allentown, Pa. Note: Applicant states 10, 1971. Applicant: PARKER TRANS­ ing: Chemicals, in bulk, in tank vehicles, that the requested authority cannot be FER COMPANY, a corporation, Tele- from plantsite and warehouse facilities tacked with its existing authority. If a graph Road, Elyria, OH 44035. Appli­ of Economics Laboratory, Inc., at or near hearing is deemed necessary, applicant cant’s representative: J. A. Kundtz, 1100 Joliet, 111., to points in Indiana, Iowa, requests it be held at Washington, D.C. National City Bank Building, Cleveland, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Mis­ OH 44114. Authority sought to operate as souri, New York, New Jersey, Ohio, No. MC 112822 (Sub-No. 205), filed a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, and Wis­ June 10, 1971. Applicant: BRAY LINES irregular routes, transporting: Furnace consin. Note: Applicant states that the INCORPORATED, 1401 North Little, tubes and furnace parts, from Erie, Pa., requested authority cannot be tacked Post Oflice Box 1191, Cushing, OK 74023. tv! ? lyria’ Ohio. Note: Applicant states with its existing authority. Common con­ Applicant’s representative: Thos. Lee that the requested authority cannot be trol may be involved. If a hearing is Allman, Jr. (same address as above). Au­ racked with its existing authority. No thority sought to operate as a common duplicating authority is sought. If a deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular hearing is deemed necessary, applicant routes, transporting: Roofing and roof­ request it be held at Cleveland, Ohio, or No. MC 111045 (Sub-No. 82), filed ing products, and materials, supplies, Washington, D.C. June 1, 1971. Applicant: REDWING and equipment used in the installation

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9', 1971 12942 NOTICES thereof, from Dallas-Port Worth, Tex., Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, to operate as a common carrier, by motor commercial zone as defined by the Com­ Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ mission, to points in Arkansas, Kansas, on and south of U.S. Highway 18. Note: ing: Audit media and other business Louisiana, Missouri, New Mexico, and Applicant states that the requested au­ records, between Flint, Mich., on the Oklahoma. Note: Applicant states that thority cannot be tacked with its exist­ one hand, and, on the other, points in the requested authority can be tacked ing authority. If a hearing is deemed nec­ Cook (except Chicago), Lake, McHenry, with its existing authority but indicates essary, applicant requests it be held at Kane, Du Page, Kendall, and Will that it has no present intention to tack Minneapolis, Minn., or Chicago, 111. Counties, 111. Note : Applicant holds con­ tract carrier authority under Docket No. and therefore does not identify the No. MC 113855 (Sub-No. 243), filed points or territories which can be served June 10, 1971. Applicant: INTERNA­ MC 128616, therefore, dual operations through tacking. Persons interested in TIONAL TRANSPORT, INC., 2450 Mar­ may be involved. If a hearing is deemed the tacking possibilities are cautioned necessary, applicant requests it be held ion Road SE., Rochester, MN 55901. Ap­ at Detroit, Mich., or Chicago, HI. that failure to oppose the application plicant’s representative: Alan Foss, 502 may result in an unrestricted grant of First National Bank Building, Fargo, N. No. MC 115311 (Sub-No. 122), filed authority. Common control may be in­ Dak. 58102. Authority sought to operate June 11,1971. Applicant: J & M TRANS­ volved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, PORTATION CO., INC., Post Office Box applicant requests it be held at Dallas, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) 488, Milledgeville, GA 31061. Applicant’s Tex., or Oklahoma City, Okla. Tractors (except those with vehicle beds, representative: Paul M. Daniell, Post No. MC 113267 (Sub-No. 269), filed bed frames, and fifth wheels); (2) equip­ Office Box 872, Atlanta, GA 30301. Au­ June 1, 1971. Applicant: CENTRAL & ment designed for use in conjunction thority sought to operate as a common SOUTHERN TRUCK LINES, INC., 312 with tractors; (3) agricultural, indus­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular West Morris Street, Caseyville, IL 62232. trial, and construction machinery, and routes, transporting: Cement and lime, Applicant’s representative: Lawrence A. equipment; (4) trailers designed for the from Atlanta, Ga., to points in South Fischer (same address as applicant). transportation of the above-described Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, Authority sought to operate as a common commodities (except those trailers de­ Alabama, and Florida. Note: Applicant carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular signed to be drawn by passenger auto­ states that the requested authority can­ routes, transporting: Meats, meat prod­ mobiles); (5) aftachments for the above- not be tacked with its existing authority. ucts, meat byproducts and articles dis­ described commodities; (6) internal com­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ tributed by meat packinghouses, as de­ bustion engines', and (7) parts of the cant requests it be held at Atlanta, Ga. scribed in sections A and C of appendix above-described commodities when mov­ I to the report in Descriptions in Motor ing in mixed loads with such commodi­ No. MC 115826 (Sub-No. 217) (Amend­ Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and ties; (8) materials, equipment, and sup­ ment), filed May 12, 1971, published in 766 (except hides and commodities in plies used in the manufacture and dis­ the F ederal R egister issue of June 4, bulk), from Ottumwa, Iowa, to points in tributing of the commodities described 1971, and republished as amended, this Virginia and West Virginia, restricted to in (1) through (7) above, from Grand issue. Applicant: W. J. DIGBY, INC., traffic originating at the plantsite and Island, Nebr., to points in Arizona, Cali­ 1960 31st Street, Post Office Box 5088 warehouse facilities used by John Mor­ fornia, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Ne­ T.A., Denver, CO 80217. Applicant’s rep­ resentative: Robert R. Digby, 217 Luhrs rell & Co., Ottumwa, Iowa. Note: Appli­ vada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Wash­ cant states that the requested authority ington, Wyoming, and to ports of entry Tower, Phoenix, Ariz. 85003. Authority cannot be tacked with its existing au­ on the United States-Canada boundary sought to operate as a common carrier, thority. Common control may be in­ line located in North Dakota and Min­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, volved. If a hearing is deemed neces­ nesota. Restriction: The authority sought transporting: Foodstuffs, requiring re­ sary, applicant requests it be held at St. above is restricted to traffic originating frigeration, from Lafayette, Ind., to Louis, Mo., or Chicago, HI. at Grand Island, Nebr., and movements points in Indiana (south of U.S. Highway in interstate commerce are restricted 36), Hlinois, Iowa, Colorado, Kansas, and No. MC 113362 (Sub-No. .216) (Cor­ to traffic destined to points in the above- Nebraska. Note: Applicant states it can rection) , filed May 26, 1971, published in named States. Note: Applicant states tack the requested authority with its the F ederal R egister issue of June 17, that the requested authority cannot be existing authority, but applicant does 1971, and republished in part, as cor­ tacked with its existing authority. If a not intend to do so, and therefore does rected, this issue. Applicant: ELLS­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant not identify the points or territories WORTH FREIGHT LINES, INC., 310 requests it be held at Chicago, 111. which can be served through tacking. East Broadway, Eagle Grove, IA 50533. Persons interested in the tacking possi- Applicant’s representative: James Ells­ No. MC 113861 (Sub-No. 51), filed bilities are cautioned that failure to op­ worth, 4500 North State Line Road, June 1, 1971. Applicant: WOOTEN pose the application may result in an Texarkana, AR 75501. Note: The sole TRANSPORTS, INC., 153 Gaston Avenue, unrestricted grant of authority. The pur­ purpose of this partial republication is Memphis, TN 38106. Applicant’s repre­ pose of this republication is to reflect the to reflect applicant’s representative cor­ sentative: James N. Clay III, 2700 Sterick change in the tacking information. If a rect address, inadvertently shown in er­ Building, Memphis, Tenn. 38103. Author­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant ror in previous publication. The rest of ity sought to operate as a common car­ rpmipsts it, be held at Denver, Colo.- the application remains as previously rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Chicago, HI. published. routes, transporting: Asphalt and as­ phalt products, from Memphis, Tenn., No. MC 116273 (Sub-No. 142), filed No. MC 113362 (Sub-No. 218), filed to points in Missouri. Note: Applicant June 4, 1971. Applicant: D & L TRANS­ June 8, 1971. Applicant: ELLSWORTH states it could tack with its Sub-No. 1 PORT, INC., 3800 South Laramie Ave­ FREIGHT LINES, INC., 310 East Broad­ at West Memphis, Ark., to points in nue, Cicero, IL. Applicant’s representa­ way, Eagle Grove, IA 50533. Applicant’s Missouri. If a hearing is deemed neces­ tive: William R. Lavery (same address representative: Milton D. Adams, 1105% sary, applicant requests, it be held at as applicant). Authority sought to oper­ Eighth Avenue NE., Box 562, Austin, MN Memphis, Tenn. ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ 55912. Authority sought to operate as a hicle, over irregular routes, transporting. common carrier, by motor vehicle, over No. MC 114533 (Sub-No. 230), filed Liquid fertilizer, in bulk, in tank vehicles, irregular routes, transporting: Foods, June 4, 1971. Applicant: BANKERS from Rochelle, 111., to points in Illinois, foodstuffs, and food products (except DISPATCH CORPORATION, 4970 South Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, commodities in bulk), from St. James, Archer Avenue, Chicago, IL 60632. Appli­ cant’s representatives: Warren W. Wal­ .North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wis­ Madelia, Butterfield, Minn., and Esther- consin. Note: Applicant states that the ville, Iowa, to points in Connecticut, Dis­ lin, 330 South Jefferson Street, Chicago, trict of Columbia, Delaware, Hlinois, In­ IL 60606, and Arnold Burke, 2220 Bruns­ requested authority can be tacked with diana, Maryland, Massachusetts, New wick Building, 69 W. Washington Boule­ its existing authority, but indicates that Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, vard, Chicago, IL 60602. Authority sought it has no present intention to tack, and

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12943 therefore, does not identify the terri­ from Cade and Lozes, La., to points in Island, South Dakota, Texas, Virginia, tories which can be served. Persons in­ Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, Geor­ Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia. terested in the tacking possibilities are gia, Hlinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Note: Applicant states that the requested cautioned that failure to oppose the ap­ Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michi­ authority cannot be tacked with its exist­ plication may result in an unrestricted gan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hamp­ ing authority. Applicant holds contract grant of Authority. If a hearing is shire, New Jersey, New York, North carrier authority under MC 114789 and deemed necessary, applicant requests it Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Subs thereunder, therefore, dual opera­ be held at Chicago, HI. Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Ver­ tions may be involved. If a hearing is No. MC 116763 (Sub-No. 195), filed mont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and the Dis­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it June 1, 1971. Applicant: CARL SUBLER trict of Columbia. Restriction: Restricted be held at Dallas, Tex.; Kansas City, TRUCKING, INC., North West Street, to traffic originating at Cade and Lozes, Kans.; or New Orleans, La. La. Note: Applicant states that the re­ Versailles, OH 45380, 906 Magnolia Ave­ No. MC 117940 (Sub-No. 52), filed nue, Auburndale, FL 33823. Applicant’s quested authority cannot be tacked with its existing authority. If a hearing is June 7, 1971. Applicant: NATIONWIDE representative: H. M. Richters, North CARRIERS, INC., Post Office Box 104, West Street, Versailles, OH 45380. Au­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at New Orleans, La. Maple Plain, MN 55359. Applicant’s rep­ thority sought to operate as a common resentative: Donald L. Stern, 530 Univac carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular No. MC 117465 (Sub-No. 17), filed Building, Omaha, NE 68106. Authority routes, transporting: Prepared animal June 4, 1971. Applicant: BEAVER EX­ sought to operate as a common carrier, food (except in bulk), from the plant- PRESS SERVICE, INC., doing business by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, site and warehouse facilities of Lipton as BEAVER EXPRESS, Post Office Box transporting: Meats, meat products, and Pet Foods, Inc., at or near Golden 151, Woodward, OK 73801. Applicant’s meat byproducts and articles distributed Meadow, Lockport, and New Orleans, La., representative: Max G. Morgan, 600 by meat packinghouses, as described in to points in Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Leininger Building, Oklahoma City, OK sections A and C of appendix I to the North Carolina, South Carolina, Vir­ 73112. Authority sought to operate as a report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier ginia, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, and common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (ex­ Ohio. Note: Applicant states tacking regular routes, transporting: General cept hides and commodities in bulk), possibilities may exist, but does not in­ commodities (except classes A and B ex­ from the planft/warehouse facilities of tend to tack, therefore does not identify plosives) , moving in express service Needham Packing Co., Inc., located at the points or territories which can be (Route 1) between Amarillo, Tex., and Fargo, West Fargo, N. Dak., to points in served through tacking. Persons inter­ Portales, N. Mex., from Amarillo, Tex., Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Mary­ ested in the tacking possibilities are cau­ over U.S. Highway 66 (also Interstate land, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, tioned that failure to oppose the Highway 40) to Tucumcari, N. Mex., New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, application may result in an unrestricted thence via New Mexico Highway 18, to Vermont, West Virginia, Virginia, and grant of authority. No duplicating au­ its junction with New Mexico Highway the District of Columbia. Note: Appli­ thority is being sought. If a hearing is 88; thence via New Mexico Highway 88 cant states that the requested authority deemed necessary, applicant requests it to Portales and return over the same cannot be tacked with its existing au­ be held at New Orleans, La. route serving all intermediate points; thority. Applicant holds contract carrier No. MC 116763 (Sub-No. 197), filed (Route 2) between Portales N. Mex., and authority under MC 114789 and Subs, June 7,1971. Applicant: CARL SUBLER Amarillo, Tex., from Portales, N. Mex., therefore, dual operations may be in­ TRUCKING, INC., North West Street, over U.S. Highway 70 to its junction volved. If hearing is deemed necessary, Versailles, OH 45380, also 906 Magnolia with U.S. Highway 70 at Clovis, thence applicant requests it be held at Dallas, Avenue, Auburndale, FL 33823. Appli­ over U.S. Highway 60 to Amarillo, Tex., Tex.; Kansas City, Kans., or New Or­ cant’s representative: H. M. Richters, and return over the same route serving leans, La. North West Street, Versailles, OH 45380. all intermediate points; (Route 3) be­ Authority sought to operate as a common tween Dalhart, Tex., and Clayton, N. No. MC 118570 (Sub-No. 4), filed carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Mex., from Dalhart over U.S. Highway May 24, 1971. Applicant DeFAZIO EX­ routes, transporting: Food, food prepara­ 87 to Clayton, N. Mex., and return over PRESS, INC., 1028 Springbrook Avenue, tions, and foodstuffs (except in bulk, in the same route serving all intermediate Moosic, PA 18507. Applicant’s represent­ tank vehicles), from Champaign, HI., to points; and (Route 4) between Boise ative: Christian V. Graf, 407 North Front points in Iowa, Indiana, Kentucky, City, Okla., and Clayton, N. Mex., from Street, Harrisburg, PA 17101. Authority Maryland (except points east of Inter­ Boise City, Okla., over U.S. Highway 64 sought to operate as a contract carrier, state Highway 81), Michigan, Minnesota, to Clayton, N. Mex., and return over the by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Missouri, Nebraska, New York (except same route serving no intermediate transporting: Coconut oil, coconut oil points east of Interstate Highway 81), points, as an alternate route for operat­ products, lard substitutes or compounds, Ohio, Pennsylvania (except points east ing convenience only. Note : If a hearing cooking oils, glycerine, sterine,' toilet of Interstate Highway 81), West Virginia, is deemed necessary, applicant requests preparations, soap, soap powder, soap and Wisconsin. Note: Applicant states it be held at Amarillo, Tex. products, premiums and advertising mat­ tacking possibilities may exist, but does ter pertaining to these products; grocer­ not intend to tack, therefore does not No. MC 117940 (Sub-No. 51), filed ies, from the plantsites, storage facilities, identify the points or territories which June 4, 1971. Applicant: NATIONWIDE and warehouses of the Procter & Gamble CARRIERS, INC., Post Office Box 104, Distributing Co., or the Procter & Gam­ can be served through tacking. Persons ' Maple Plain, MN 55359. Applicant’s rep­ interested in the tacking possibilities are ble Manufacturing Co., in the coun­ resentative: Donald L. Stern, 530 Univac ties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, cautioned that failure to oppose the ap­ Building, Omaha, Nebr. 68106. Authority plication may result in an unrestricted Queens, Richmond (except Clifton and sought to operate as a common carrier, Port Ivory), Rockland, and Westchester, grant of authority. If a hearing is deemed by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, necessary, applicant requests it be held N.Y., and the counties of Bergen, Essex at Washington, D.C. transporting: Canned and packaged ani­ (except Port Newark), Hudson (except mal and pet food, and canned and pack­ Kearny), Middlesex, Morris, Passaic, No. MC 116763 (Sub-No. 198), filed aged foodstuffs, from Siloam Springs Somerset, and Union, N.J., to points in June 11,1971. Applicant: CARL SUBLER and Gentry, Ark., and from the plant- the counties of Berks, Carbon, Columbia, TRUCKING, INC., 115 North West site of Allen Canning Co. approximately Lackawanna, Lehigh, Luzerne, Monroe, Street, Versailles, OH 45380. Applicant’s 10 miles northeast of Siloam Springs, Montour, Northampton, Northumber­ representative: H. M. Richters (same ad­ Ark., and from Proctor and Kansas, land, Pike, Schuylkill, Snyder, Susque­ dress as applicant). Authority sought to Okla., to points in Connecticut, Delaware, hanna, Union, Wayne, and Wyoming, Pa., operate as a common carrier, by motor Hlinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Massa­ and those in Sussex, Warren, and Hunter­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport- chusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, don Counties, N.J. Restriction: The oper­ lug: Prepared and preserved foodstuffs New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, ations authorized under the commodity (except frozen and commodities in bulk), Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode description immediately above are limited

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12944 NOTICES to a transportation service to be per­ mixed shipments with manufactured fer­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over formed under a continuing contract or tilizer and fertilizer materials, from irregular routes, transporting: Food, food, contracts with the Procter & Gamble Dis­ points on the Arkansas River and Verdi­ preparations, and foodstuffs (except in tributing Co. Note: Applicant holds gris River in Oklahoma to points in bulk, in tank vehicles), from Champaign, common carrier authority under MC Arkansas, Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Kan­ HI., to points in Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, 44302 and subs, therefore, dual opera­ sas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, West Virginia, Kentucky, Wisconsin, tions may be involved. If a hearing is Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Minnesota, Nebraska, Iowa, and Mis­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it Wisconsin; and (3) ioeed killing com­ souri; and points in New York, Pennsyl­ be held at Washington, D.C., or Harris­ pounds (herbicides) in packages, from vania, and Maryland on and west on burg, Pa. Military, Kans., to points in Idaho, Min­ Interstate Highway 81 and Allentown, nesota, Montana, North Dakota, and Pa. Note: Applicant states that the re­ No. MC 119302 (Sub-No. 14), filed June Washington. Note : Applicant states that quested authority cannot be tacked with 1, 1971. Applicant: MILLER TRANSFER the requested authority cannot be tacked its existing authority. If a hearing is AND RIGGING CO., a corporation, Post with its existing authority. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it Office Box 6077, Edinburgh, Ohio, Akron, deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C. Ohio 44312. Applicant’s representative: be held at Kansas City, Mo. A. David Millner, 744 Broad Street, New­ No. MC 119641 (Sub-No. 101), filed ark, NJ 07102. Authority sought to op­ No. MC 119531 (Sub-No. 152), filed June 3, 1971. Applicant: RINGLE EX­ erate as a contract carrier, by motor June 7,1971. Applicant: DIECKBRADER PRESS, INC., 450 East Ninth Street, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ EXPRESS, INC., 5391 Wooster Road, Fowler, IN 47944. Applicant’s representa­ ing: Copper sheets, in coils, from the Cincinnati, OH 45226. Applicant’s repre­ tive: Robert C. Smith, 711 Chamber of plantsite of Olin Corp. at East Alton, 111., sentative: Charles W. Singer, 33 North Commerce Building, Indianapolis, Ind. to the plantsites at Chase Brass & Copper Dearborn Street, Suite 1625, Chicago, IL 46204. Authority sought to operate as a Co., Inc., at Cleveland, Ohio, limited to a 60602. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over transportation service to be performed common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Iron and under a continuing contract or contracts irregular routes, transporting: Materials steel articles, from the plantsites and with Chase Brass & Copper Co., Inc., and supplies used in the manufacture, warehouse facilities of Republic Steel Cleveland, Ohio. Note: Applicant holds sale, and distribution of meat products Corp., located at or near Niles, Warren, common carrier authority under MC (except material and supplies requiring Youngstown, Canton, Massillon, and 87103 and subs, therefore, common con­ temperature control), from points in Illi­ Cleveland, Ohio, to points in Iowa and trol and dual operations may be involved. nois, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin, to Missouri, restricted to traffic originating If a hearing is deemed necessary, ap­ Fort Wayne, Ind., Fremont, Ohio, and at the plant and warehouse facilities of plicant requests it be held at Cleveland, Kalamazoo, Mich. Note : Applicant states Republic Steel Corp., as set forth above Ohio, or Washington, D.C. that the requested authority cannot be and destined to points in Iowa and Mis­ No. MC 119493 (Sub-No. 73), filed June tacked with its existing authority. Appli­ souri. Note: If a hearing is deemed nec­ 9, 1971. Applicant: NONKEM COM­ cant further states no duplicating au­ essary, applicant requests it be held at PANY, INC., West 20th Street Road, Post thority sought. If a hearing is deemed Chicago, HI. Office Box 1196, Joplin, MO 64801. Ap­ necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111., or Fort Wayne, Ind. No. MC 119767 (Sub-No. 272), filed plicant’s representative: Ray F. Kempt, June 7, 1971. Applicant: BEAVER PoSt Office Box 1196, Joplin, MO 64801. No. MC 119619 (Sub-No. 56), filed TRANSPORT CO., a corporation, 1-94 Authority sought to operate as a common June 10, 1971. Applicant: DISTRIBU­ and County Highway C, Bristol, WI. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular TORS SERVICE CO., a corporation, Applicant’s representative: Allan B. Tor- routes, transporting: Plastic containers, 2000 West 43d Street, Chicago, IL 60609. horst, Post Office Box 307, Burlington, from Atlanta, Ga., and Little Rock, Ark., Applicant’s representative: Arthur J. WI 53105. Authority sought to operate to points in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida Piken, One Lefrak City Plaza, Flushing, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, (on and west of U.S. Highway 231), NY 11368. Authority sought to operate as Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, over irregular routes, transporting: a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Food, food preparations, and foodstuffs Oklahoma, Tennessee (on and west of irregular routes, transporting: Meat, U.S. Highway 41), and Texas (on and meat products, meat byproducts, and (except in bulk, in tank vehicles), from east of U.S. Highways 283 and 277). Champaign, HI., to points in Iowa, Min­ articles distributed by meat packing­ nesota, Missouri, North Dakota, South Note : Applicant states that the requested houses as described in sections A and C authority cannot be tacked with its exist­ of appendix I to the report in Descrip­ Dakota, Wisconsin, and points in Ne­ ing authority. If a hearing is deemed nec­ tions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 braska on and west of U.S. Highway 183. essary, applicant requests it be held at M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except hides and Note: Applicant states that the re­ Little Rock, Ark. commodities in bulk), from the plantsites quested authority cannot be tacked with and facilities of Swift & Co., at or near its existing authority. Common control No. MC 119493 (Sub-No. 74), filed may be involved. If a hearing is deemed June 9, 1971. Applicant: MONKEM St. Charles, 111., to points in Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New York, necessary, applicant requests it be held COMPANY, INC., West 20th Street Road, at Chicago, 111. Post Office Box 1196, Joplin, MO Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode 64801. Applicant’s representative: Ray F. Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New No. MC 119767 (Sub-No. 273), filed Kempt, Post Office Box 1196, Joplin, MO Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, District of June 7, 1971. Applicant: BEAVER 64801. Authority sought to operate as a Columbia, Virginia, West Virginia, and TRANSPORT CO., a corporation, Post common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Louisville, Ky., restricted to traffic orig­ Office Box 188, Pleasant Prairie, WI irregular routes, transporting: (1) Petro­ inating at the plantsites and facilities of 53158. Applicant’s representative: Allan leum products, in packages or containers Swift & Co. at or near St. Charles, 111. B. Torhorst, Post Office Box 307, Bur­ (except liquid in bulk, in tank vehicles) Note : Applicant states that the requested lington, WI 53105. Authority sought to from the plantsites and storage facilities authority cannot be tacked with its exist­ operate as a common carrier, by motor of Gulf Oil Co.-U.S. at Beaumont, Tex. ing authority. If a hearing is deemed vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ (which includes Orange, and West Port necessary, applicant requests it be held ing: Foodstuffs, from Ortonville, Minn., Arthur and Houston, Tex., to points in at Chicago, 111. to points in Ohio, Hlinois, Missouri, In­ Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minne­ No. MC 119619 (Sub-No. 57), filed diana, Michigan, and Iowa. Note: Com­ sota, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, June 10, 1971. Applicant: DISTRIBU­ mon control may be involved. Applicant South Dakota, and Wisconsin; (2) fer­ TORS SERVICE CO., a corporation, 2000 states that the requested authority can­ tilizer and fertilizer materials, dry, in West 43d Street, Chicago, IL 60609. Ap­ not be packed with its existing authority. bulk, or in packages; insecticides, fungi­ plicant’s representative: Arthur J. Piken, If a hearing is deemed necessary, apph' cides, and herbicides, in packages or con­ One Lefrak City Plaza, Flushing, N.Y. cant requests it be held at Minneapolis, tainers (except liquid in bulk), also in 11368. Authority sought to operate as a Minn.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12945 No. MC 119789 (Sub-No. 68), filed East Farmingdale, Long Island, N.Y., re­ No. MC 128247 (Sub-No. 13) (Correc­ June 1, 1971. Applicant: CARAVAN RE­ stricted to traffic having a prior move­ tion), filed June 1, 1971, published in the FRIGERATED CARGO, INC., Post ment by rail, under contract with S. Klein F ederal R egister issue of June 24, 1971, Office Box 6188, Dallas, TX 75222. Appli­ Department Stores, Inc., and its subsidi­ and republished as corrected this issue. cant’s representative: James T. Moore aries and affiliate corporations and con­ Applicant: BURSAL TRANSPORT, INC., (same address as applicant). Authority cessionnaires. Note: If a hearing is Rural Route 1, Bunder Hill, IN 46914. Ap­ sought to operate as a common carrier, deemed necessary, applicant requests it plicant’s representative: Warren C. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, be held at New York. N.Y. Moberly, 77 Chamber of Commerce transporting: Canned goods, from Not­ Building, Indianapolis, Ind. 46204. Note: tingham, Kelton, Westgrove, and Ken- No. MC 124070 (Sub-No. 24), filed The purpose of this republication is to nett Square, Pa., to points in California, June 8, 1971. Applicant: CHEMICAL show the correct docket number assigned Arizona, Texas, Louisiana, Kansas, Ten­ HAULERS, INC., Post Office Box 2038, thereto, as shown above, in lieu of No. nessee, Illinois, Mississippi, New Mexico, Hammond, IN 46323. Applicant’s repre­ MC 128237 (Sub-No. 13), which was in Arkansas, Utah, and Nevada. Note: Ap­ sentative: Chester A. Zyblut, 1522 K error. The rest of the notice of filing re­ plicant states that the requested author­ Street NW., Washington, DC. Authority mains as previously published. ity cannot be tacked with its existing sought to operate as a common carrier, authority. If a hearing is deemed neces­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, No. MC 128279 (Sub-No. 16), filed sary, applicant requests it be held at transporting: Spent silica gel cracking June 8, 1971. Applicant: ARROW Philadelphia, Pa., Dallas, Tex., or Wash­ catalyst, in bulk, from Pine Bend, Minn., FREIGHTWAYS INC., Post Office Box ington, D.C. to ports of entry on the international 3783, 4800 Jefferson NE., Albuquerque, boundary line between the United States NM 87110. Applicant’s representative: No. MC 119815 (Sub-No. 10), filed and Canada located in Washington, Olif Q. Boyd, Post Office Box 3783, Albu­ June 4, 1971. Applicant: INTERSTATE Montana, North Dakota, Minnesota, querque, NM 87110. Authority sought to HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., 814 Norton Idaho, Michigan, New York, Maine, New operate as a common carrier, by motor Avenue, Bedford, IN 47421. Applicant’s Hampshire, and Vermont. Note : Appli­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ representative: Walter P. Jones, Jr., cant states that the requested authority ing: Gypsum waZlboard and gypsum Chamber of Commerce Building, Indi­ cannot be tacked with its existing au­ products, materials, and supplies used in anapolis, Ind. 46204. Authority sought to thority. If a hearing is deemed necessary, the installation and distribution thereof, operate as a contract carrier, by motor applicant requests it be held at Washing­ from Florence, Colo., to points in New vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ ton, D.C., or Chicago, HI. Mexico and the Navajo Indian Reserva­ ing: (1) Fabricated structural steel, from tion in Arizona. Note: Applicant states Bedford, Ind., to points in Kentucky, No. MC 126473 (Sub-No. 17), filed that although tacking possibilities exists Ohio, Illinois, and Michigan; and (2) June 10, 1971. Applicant: HAROLD in its Sub-No. 3, from Rosario, N. Mex., overhead cranes, from Bedford Ind., to DICKEY TRANSPORT, INC., Packwood, to points in Wyoming, Oklahoma, Texas, points in Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Mis­ Iowa 52580. Applicant’s representative: and Arizona, it has no present intention souri, Kentucky, Ohio, Michigan, Penn­ Kenneth F. Dudley, 611 Church Street, to tack. If a hearing is deemed neces­ sylvania, Tennessee, and Alabama, under Post Office Box 279, Ottumwa, IA 52501. sary, applicant requests it be held at contract with Indiana Steel & Engr. Authority sought to operate as a common Albuquerque or Santa Fe, N. Mex. Corp., Bedford, Ind. Note: If a hearing carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular is deemed necessary, applicant requests routes, transporting: Meats, meat prod­ No. MC 128325 (Sub-No. 2), filed it be held at Washington, D.C., or Indi­ ucts, meat byproducts and articles dis­ June 9, 1971. Applicant: RICHARD J. anapolis, Ind. tributed by meat packinghouses, except CODY, doing business as “MERIT” hides and commodities in bulk, as de­ TRUCK WRECKER SERVICE, 2901 No. MC 123565 (Sub-No. 2), filed scribed in sections A and C of appendix I West 73d Avenue, Westminister, CO June 16,1971. Applicant: HAYNES, INC., to the report in Descriptions in Motor 80030. Applicant’s representative: John 4151 Federal Way, Post Office Box 101, Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and H. Lewis, The 1650 Grant Street Building, Boise, ID 83701. Applicant’s representa­ 766, from points in Hlinois and Indiana Denver, CO 80203. Authority sought to tive: Kenneth G. Bergquist, Post Office to the plantsite of Armour-Dial, Inc., at operate as a common carrier, by motor Box 1775, Boise, ID 83701. Authority or near Fort Madison, Iowa. Note: Appli­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ sought to operate as a common carrier, cant states that the requested authority ing: Wrecked and disabled motor vehicles by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, cannot be tacked with its existing au­ and operative motor vehicle replacement transporting: Frozen foods and dry veg­ thority. If a hearing is deemed necessary, units (except trailers designed to be etable products, between Ontario, Oreg., applicant requests it be held at Chicago, drawn by passenger automobiles), be­ and Weiser, Buckingham, Nampa, Boise, HI., or Des Moines, Iowa. tween points in Colorado on the one Burley, and Borah, Idaho, restricted to hand, and, on the other, points in Ari­ shipments originating at or destined to No. MC 127505 (Sub-No. 43), filed zona, Idaho, Hlinois, Iowa, Kansas, plantsites or warehouse facilities of Ore- June 7, 1971. Applicant: RALPH H. Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Ida Foods, Inc. Note: Applicant states BOELK, doing business as BOELK Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, that the requested authority cannot be TRUCK LINES, Route 2, Mendota, IL Utah, and Wyoming. Note: Applicant tacked with its existing authority. If a 61342. Applicant’s representative: Walter states that the requested authority can­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Kobos, 1016 Kehoe Drive, St. Charles, IL not be tacked with its existing authority. requests it be held at Boise, Idaho. 60174. Authority sought to operate as a If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over cant requests it be held at Denver, Colo. No. MC 123634 (Sub-No. 9), filed irregular routes, transporting: (1) Alu­ June 10,1971.Applicant: K.N. DISTRIB­ minum articles, from St. Charles, HI., to No. MC 129645 (Sub-No. 36), filed June UTORS, INC., 360 Park Avenue South, points in Hlinois, Indiana, Ohio, Michi­ 9, 1971. Applicant: BASIL SMEESTER New York, NY 10010. Applicant’s repre­ gan, and Pennsylvania; and (2) alumi­ AND JOSEPH G. SMEESTER, a part­ sentative: Arthur J. Piken, One Lefrak num scrap, from destinations named in nership, doing business as SMEESTER City Plaza, Flushing, NY 11368. Author­ (1) above to St. Charles, HI., restricted BROTHERS TRUCKING, 1330 South ity sought to operate as a contract car­ against commodities in bulk in (1) and Jackson Street, Iron Mountain, MI 49801. rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular (2) above). Note: Applicant states that Applicant’s representative: Louis J. routes, transporting: General depart­ the requested authority cannot be tacked Amato, Post Office Box E, Bowling Green, ment store merchandise, from trailer or with its existing authority. Applicant fur­ KY 42101. Authority sought to operate as flat car facilities at Elizabethport and Jersey City, N.J., to the warehouse and ther states that no duplicating authority a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over storage facilities and storage locations of is sought. If a hearing is deemed neces­ irregular routes, transporting: (1) Gyp­ S. Klein Department Stores, Inc., its sub­ sary, applicant requests it be held at Chi­ sum products; (2) composition board; (3) sidiaries and concessionnaires, located at cago, HI. insulating materials; (4) roofing and

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 No. 132—Pt. i ---- 8 12946 NOTICES roofing materials; (5) urethane and ure­ interline with air freight carriers operat­ Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Mis­ thane products; and (6) related mate­ ing out of the named airports. Note: souri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Da­ rials, supplies, and accessories used in the Applicant states that the requested au­ kota, Texas, and Wisconsin. Note: Appli­ installation of the commodities named in thority cannot be tacked with its existing cant states that the requested authority 1 through 5 above (except commodities in authority. If a hearing is deemed neces­ cannot be tacked with its existing au­ bulk), from Marrero, La., to points in sary, applicant requests it be held at thority. If a hearing is deemed necessary, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Chicago, 111. applicant requests it be held at Kansas City, Mo., or Oklahoma City, Okla. North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, No. MC 134145 (Sub-No. 5), filed June points in Illinois on and north of U.S. 1, 1971. Applicant: NORTH STAR No. MC 134901 (Sub-No. 2), filed Highway 136 and points in Indiana on TRANSPORT, INC., Post Office Box 51, June 7, 1971. Applicant: UNITED and north of U.S. Highway 40. Note: Thief River Falls, MN 56701. Applicant’s TRUCKING CORP., 499 Ocean Park­ Applicant states that the requested au­ way, Brooklyn, NY. Applicant’s repre­ thority cannot be tacked with its existing representative: Jon Miller (same address as applicant). Authority sought to oper­ sentative: Bert Collins, 140 Cedar Street, authority. If a hearing is deemed neces­ ate as a contract carrier, by motor ve­ New York, NY 10006. Authority sought sary, applicant does not specify a hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: to operate as a contract carrier, by motor location. (1) Motorbikes, lawnmowers and at­ vehiclè, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 129657 (Sub-No. 8), filed tachments, snowmobiles, from Omaha, ing: Air cleaners, air coolers, air condi­ June 4, 1971. Applicant: KEN McCAR- Nebr., to points in the United States (ex­ tioners, heaters, and parts thereof, be­ VILLE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, cept Alaska and Hawaii); and (2) parts, tween Carteret, N.J., on the one hand, INC., 436 Rainbow Road, Spring Green, materials, supplies, and equipment used and, on the other, points in Connecticut, WI 53588. Applicant’s representative: in the manufacture of motorbikes, lawn- Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York Michael J. Wyngaard, 125 West Doty mowers, and attachments and snow­ on and east of U.S. Highway 14, Pennsyl­ Street, Madison, WI 53705. Authority mobiles, from points in Alabama, Illinois, vania on and east of U.S. Highway 15. sought to operate as a common carrier, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mich­ Restriction: The proposed service under by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, igan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hamp­ contract with American Standard, Inc. transporting: Malt beverages and adver­ shire, New York, North Carolina, North Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, tising equipment, premiums, material, Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Caro­ applicant requests it be held at New and supplies when shipped therewith, lina, Washington, and Wisconsin to York, N.Y. from the plants and warehouse facilities Omaha, Nebr., under contract with Gen­ eral Leisure Products Corp. Note: If a No. MC 134922 (Sub-No. 13), filed utilized by Meister-Brau, Inc., at Chi­ June 7, 1971. Applicant: B. J. Mc- cago, 111., to points in Wisconsin. Note: hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Applicant states that the requested au­ requests it be held at Omaha, Nebr., or St. ADAMS, INC., Route 6, Box 15, North Paul, Minn. Little Rock, AR 72118. Applicant’s rep­ thority cannot be tacked with its existing resentative: William J. Boyd, 29 South authority. If a hearing is deemed neces­ No. MC 134388 (Sub-No. 3), filed June La Salle Street, Chicago, IL 60603. Au­ sary, applicant requests it be held at 1,1971. Applicant: HENRY G. HARLOW! thority sought to operate as a common Madison or Milwaukee, Wis. 3 East Washington Street, Jamestown, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular No. MC 129809 (Sub-No. 7), filed OH 45335. Applicant’s representative: routes, transporting: Yarn, from Rome, June 9, 1971. Applicant: A & H, INC., James Muldoon, 50 West Broad Street, Ga., to points in Oklahoma and Texas. Pootville, Wis. 53537. Applicant’s rep­ Columbus, OH 43215. Authority sought to Note : Applicant states that the re­ resentative: David J. MacDougall, 1 East operate as a contract carrier, by motor quested authority cannot be tacked with Milwaukee Street, Janesville, WI 53545. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ its existing authority. If a hearing is Authority sought to operate as a contract ing: Buildings, complete, knocked down, deemed necessary, applicant requests it carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular or in sections, and component parts, ma­ be held at Atlanta, Ga., or Little Rock, routes, transporting: Foodstuffs, from terials, supplies, and fixtures used in the Ark. points in Wisconsin to points in Massa­ erection or assembly thereof; (a) from chusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Con­ Jamestown, Ohio, to points in Indiana No. MC 134922 (Sub-No. 14), filed necticut, New Jersey, and Rhode Island, and Kentucky; (b) from Wampum, Pa., June 7, 1971. Applicant: B. J. MC­ under a continuing contract or contracts to points in Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio, ADAMS, INC., Route 6, Box 15, North with Universal Foods Corp. of Milwaukee, under contract with Ryan Homes, Inc. Little Rock, AR 72118. Applicant’s rep­ Wis. Note: If a hearing is deemed neces­ Note: Applicant states it presently has resentatives: William J. Boyd, 29 South sary, applicant requests it be held at authority to perform service described in La Salle Street, Chicago, IL 60603, and Milwaukee or Madison, Wis. (a) above. The purpose of this applica­ George Harris c/o B. J. McAdams (same tion is to amend permit No. MC 134388 address as above). Authority sought to No. MC 133076 (Sub-No. 3), filed (Sub-No. 2) by adding service described operate as a common carrier, by motor June 7, 1971. Applicant: Pi STANLEY in (b) above. If a hearing is deemed vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ COBANE, doing business as COBANE necessary, applicant requests it be held ing: Meats, meat products, meat by­ AIR FREIGHT, Box 3, Rural Route 1, at Columbus, Ohio, or Pittsburgh, Pa. products and articles distributed by meat Deer Grove, 3L 61243. Applicant’s rep­ packinghouses as described in appendix resentative: George S. Mullins, 4704 West No. MC 134405 (Sub-No. 4), filed May I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Irving Park Road, Chicago, IL 60641. 28, 1971. Applicant: BACON TRANS­ Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and Authority sought to operate as a common PORT COMPANY, a corporation, Post 766, from Sioux City and Mason City, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Office Box 1134, Ardmore, OK 73401. Iowa, and Worthington, Minn., to points routes, transporting: General commodi­ Applicant’s representative: Wilburn L. in North Carolina, South Carolina, ties (except those of unusual value, Williamson, Suite 280, National Founda­ Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, classes A and B explosives, household tion Life Center, 3535 Northwest 58th, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West goods as defined by the Commission, com­ Oklahoma City, OK 73112. Authority Virginia. Note: Applicant states that the modities in bulk, and those requiring sought to operate as a common carrier, requested authority cannot be tacked special equipment), between points in by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, with its existing authority. If a hearing Dubuque County, Iowa, and Jo Daviess transporting: Fertilizer and fertilizer County, 111., on the one hand, and, on the materials, dry, in bulk or in packages; is deemed necessary, applicant requests other, O’Hare International Airport, insecticides, fungicides, and herbicides, it be held at Little Rock, Ark., or Midway Airport, and Meigs Field, at or except liquid in bulk, also in mixed ship­ Chicago, 111. near Chicago, 111., restricted to the trans­ ments with manufactured fertilizer and portation of traffic having a prior or sub­ fertilizer materials, from points on the No. MC 135100 (Sub-No. 5), filed sequent movement by air and/or sub­ Arkansas and Verdigris Rivers in Okla­ June 7, 1971. Applicant: SIGNAL stituted truck-for-air service and to homa, to points in Arkansas, Colorado, TRANSPORT, INC., Post Office Box 681,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12947 LaPorte, IN 46350. Applicant’s repre­ N ote : If a hearing is deemed necessary, INC., 303 East Orleans Street, Box 153, sentative: Robert H. Levy, 29 South La applicant requests it be held at Denver, Paxton, IL 60957. Applicant’s representa­ Salle Street, Chicago, EL 60603. Author­ Colo. tive: Charles R. Young, 4 West Seminary ity sought to operate as a common car­ Street, Danville, IL 61832. Authority rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular No. MC 135253 (Sub-No. 2), filed May 20, 1971. Applicant: RALPH NEFF sought to operate as a common carrier, routes, transporting: Meats, meat prod­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, ucts, and meat byproducts, from points TRUCKING INC., Box 724, Rapid City, SD 57701. Applicant’s representative: A. transporting: Anhydrous ammonia, liq­ in Illinois, Indiana, and Missouri to Fort uid fertilizer solution (including aqua Madison, Iowa. N ote: If a hearing is Milton Evans, 428 V2 St. Joe Street, Box 1286, Rapid City, SD 57701. Authority ammonia solutions and nitrogen fertil­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it izer solutions) in tank type vehicles be held at Chicago, 111. sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, and dry fertilizer in bag and bulk; (1) No. MC 135153 (Sub-No. 6), filed transporting: Scrap metal, from points between points in Illinois and Indiana: June 1, 1971. Applicant: GREAT OVER­ west of the Missouri River in South Da­ and (2) from Danville, HI., to Cleveland, LAND, INC., Fort Dodge Road, Dodge kota and at or near the following points Cairo, Washington Court House, and City, KS 67801. Applicant’s representa­ east of the Missouri River in South Da­ Wellington, Ohio. N ote: The purpose of tive: Harley E. Laughlin, Post Office Box kota, Mobridge, Gettysburg, Pierre, Fort this republication is to show the cor­ 1417, Dodge City, KS 67801. Authority Thompson, Chamberlain, and Lake An­ rect docket number assigned thereto, MC sought to operate as a common carrier, des, to Denver, Colo. N ote: Applicant 135529 (Sub-No. 2), in lieu of MC 135501 by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, states that the requested authority can­ which was in error. If a hearing is transporting: Meats, meat products, not be tacked with its existing authority. deemed necessary, applicant requests it meat byproducts, and articles distrib­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, ap­ be held at Springfield or Chicago, HI. uted by meat packinghouses as defined plicant requests it be held at Rapid City No. MC 135597 (Sub-No. 2), filed by the Commission, between Dodge City, or Pierre, S. Dak. June 1, 1971. Applicant: C. K. BROUGH, Kans., on the one hand, and, on the No. MC 135497 (Sub-No. 1) (Clarifi­ doing business as STRAIGHT ARROW other, points in Oklahoma on and west cation) , filed May 14, 1971, published in TRUCKING COMPANY, 5387 South of UJS. Highway 81. N ote: Applicant the F ederal R egister issue of June 10, 5030 West, Kearns, UT 84118. Applicant’s states that the requested authority can­ 1971, and republished as clarified this is­ representative: Irene Warr, 419 Judge not be tacked with its existing authority. sue. Applicant: 1-5 FREIGHTLINE, Building, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111. Au­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ INC., 5949 North Basin Avenue, Port­ thority sought to operate as a contract cant requests it be held at Denver, Colo. land, OR 97217. Applicant’s representa­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular No. MC 135185 (Sub-No. 4), filed tive: John G. McLaughlin, 726 Blue routes, transporting: Component parts, June 10, 1971. Applicant: COLUMBINE Cross Building, Portland, Oreg. 97201. material, and supplies used in the con­ CARRIERS, INC., 4971 South Emporia, Authority sought to operate as a com­ struction of truck bodies and finished Englewood, CO 80110. Applicant’s repre­ mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over regu­ truck bodies and accessories, between sentative: J. Max Harding, 605 South lar and irregular routes transporting: points in Utah, Nevada, California, Ari­ 14th Street, Post Office Box 82028, Lin­ General commodities (except household zona, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, New coln, NE 68501. Authority sought to oper­ goods as defined in 17 M.C.C. 467, com­ Mexico, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, ate as a contract carrier, by motor ve­ modities. in bulk, in tank vehicles, and North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: commodities which because of size or Kansas, Missouri, Iowa, Ohio, Michigan, (1) Razors and razor blades, toilet arti­ weight require the use of special equip­ Hlinois, and Indiana, under continuing cles and toilet preparations, and ball ment in transit); (1) over regular routes contracts with Williamsen Body & Equip­ point and felt tip pens, from Andover, as follows: (a) Between Portland, Oreg., ment Co., Williamsen’s Inc., and Wil­ Mass., to points in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Medford, Oreg., from Portland over liamsen Idaho Equipment Co., Inc. N ote: Indiana, Illinois, Lower Michigan, Wis­ U.S. Highway 99, 99E, and 99W and In­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ consin, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, and terstate Highway 5 to Eugene, Oreg., cant requests it be held at Salt Lake City, points in New York on and west of a thence continue over U.S. Highway 99 Utah, or Boise, Idaho. north-south line through Albany, N.Y.; (also over Interstate Highway 5) to Med­ No. MC 135697, filed June 7, 1971. Ap­ (2) materials, supplies, and equipment ford, and return over the same route, plicant: CHARLES J. ROUSSEAU, SR., utilized in the manufacture, sale, and serving all intermediate points and all AND CHARLES J. ROUSSEAU, JR., a distribution of the commodities named off-route points within 10 miles of the partnership, doing business as ROUS­ in (1) above from the destination area above-described routes (restricted against SEAU’S TOWING, 94 South Main Street, in (1) above to Andover, Mass., and the movement of traffic originating at Rochestser, NH 03867. Authority sought materials, supplies, and equipment uti­ or interlining at Portland and destined to operate as a common carrier, by motor lized in the manufacture, sale, and dis­ to points in Oregon north of Salem, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ tribution of razors and razor blades, Oreg.); (b) between Corvallis, Oreg., and ing: Wrecked or disabled motor vehicles from the destination area in (1) above Foster, Oreg., from Corvallis to Lebanon by towing, between points in Maine, New to Boston, Mass.; (3) toilet articles and over U.S. Highway 20 (also over Oregon Hampshire, and Massachusetts. N ote : If toilet preparations and hair curlers, State Highway 34), and return over the a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ from St. Paul, Minn., to points in Illinois, same route; from Lebanon to Foster over cant requests it be held at Concord, N.H. Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Newark, U.S. Highway 20, and return over the N.J., Washington, D.C., and Baltimore, same route, serving all intermediate No. MC 135695, filed June 1, 1971. Ap­ Md.; (4) materials, supplies, and equip­ points and off-route points within 10 plicant: ANNA GASPERETTI AND miles of the described routes; and (2) JOHN B. GASPERETTI, JR., a partner­ ment utilized in the manufacture, sale, ship, doing business as THE TRI-C and distribution of the commodities over irregular routes: Between points in Douglas, Jackson, and Josephine Coun­ TRANSFER AND STORAGE, 111 West named in (3) above, from the destina­ 10th Street, Walsenburg, CO 81089. Ap­ tion area in (3) above to St. Paul, Minn.; ties, Oreg. N ote: The purpose of this republication is to redescribe part (1) (a) plicant’s representative: Ernest D. Salm, and, (5) razors, razor blades, toilet arti­ 3846 Evans Street, Los Angeles, CA 90027. cles and toilet preparations, and ball above. Common control may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, ap­ Authority sought to operate as a com­ Pomf and felt tip pens, from La Grange, mon carrierx_ by motor vehicle, over ir­ t* ? *° St. Louis, and Kansas City, Mo. plicant requests it be held at Portland, Eugene, and Medford, Oreg. regular routes, transporting: Used house­ n restricted against the transportation hold goods, between points in Alamosa, of commodities in bulk, all traffic to No. MC 135529 (Sub-No. 2) (Correc­ Baca, Bent, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, either originate or terminate at the tion), filed April 12, 1971, published in Custer, Huerfano, Kiowa, Las Animas, r^ tsites or warehouse facilities uti- the F ederal R egister issue of May 13, Mineral, Otero, Prowers, Rio Grande, and zed by the Gillette Co., under a con­ 1971, and republished as corrected this Saguach Counties, Colo., restricted to the tinuing contract with the Gillette Co. issue. Applicant: COOK TRANSPORTS, transportation of traffic having a prior

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12948 NOTICES or subsequent movement, in containers, Applications for B rokerage Licenses [Notice 713] beyond the points authorized, and fur­ property MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER. ther restricted to the performance of No. MC 130147 (Correction), filed PROCEEDINGS pickup and delivery service in connec­ May 19, 1971, published in the F ederal J uly 6,1971. tion with packing, crating, and contain­ R egister issue of June 17, 1971, and re­ erization, or unpacking, uncrating, and published as corrected this issue. Ap­ Synopses of orders entered pursuant to decontainerization of such traffic. N ote: plicant: JOSEPH CAPAK, 17201 Miles section 212(b) of the Interstate Com­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44128. Applicant’s merce Act, and rules and regulations pre­ cant requests it be held at Colorado representative: Francis P. Barrett, 60 scribed thereunder (49 CFR Part 1132), Springs or Denver, Colo. Adams Street, Milton (Boston), MA appear below: No. MC 135696, filed June 7, 1971. Ap­ 02187. For a license (BMC-4) to engage As provided in the Commission’s spe­ plicant: LAKE PORT TRUCKING AND in operations as a broker at Cleveland, cial rules of practice any interested per­ LEASING INC., Martin-Williston Road, Ohio, in arranging for the transporta­ son may file a petition seeking reconsid­ Genoa, OH 43430. Applicant’s representa­ tion in interstate or foreign commerce eration of the following numbered tive: A. Charles Tell, 100 East Broad of foodstuffs and food products, from proceedings within 20 days from the date Street, Columbus, OH 43215. Authority points in Ohio to points in the United of publication of this notice. Pursuant sought to operate as a common carrier, States (except Hawaii and Alaska). to section 17(8) of the Interstate Com­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, N ote: The purpose of this republication merce Act, the filing of such a petition transporting: (1) Alfalfa and alfalfa is to include the name of applicant’s will postpone the effective date of the products, from Oak Harbor and Toledo, representative. order in that proceeding pending its dis­ Ohio to points in Michigan, Indiana, position. The matters relied upon by Kentucky, and Pennsylvania; and (21 PASSENGERS petitioners must be specified in their beet pulp, from Finlay and Fremont, No. MC 130148, filed June 7, 1971. Ap­ petitions with particularity. Ohio, to points in Michigan, Indiana, plicant: MRS. RUTH GOODWIN WIL­ No. MC-FC-72981. By order of July 1, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania. N ote: If a SON, doing business as HAPPY TRAV­ 1971, the Motor Carrier Board approved hearing is deemed necessary, applicant ELERS TRAVEL AGENCY, 106 Wilt­ the transfer to Fairside Trucking, Inc., requests it be held at Columbus, Ohio. shire Avenue, St. Matthews, KY. For a Brockton, Mass., of a portion of the op­ license (BMC-5) to engage in operations erating rights in certificate No. MC-765 Applications of F reight F orwarders as a broker at St. Matthews, Ky., in ar­ issued May 20, 1941, to Mills Transfer No. FF-407 (PROFIT BY AIR, INC., ranging for the transportation in inter­ Co., a corporation, Boston, Mass., au­ Freight Forwarder Application) filed state or foreign commerce of passengers thorizing the transportation of such June 23, 1971. Applicant: PROFIT BY and their baggage, in charter operations, commodities as heavy machinery and AIR, INC., Post Office Box 647, John F. beginning and ending at points in Jeffer­ machine parts, and articles requiring Kennedy Airport, Jamaica, NY 11430. son County, Ky., and extending to points specialized handling or rigging because Applicant’s representative: Louis P. in the United States. of size or weight, and equipment, mate­ Haffer, 1730 Rhode Island Avenue NW„ rials and supplies as are used with or Washington, DC 20036. Authority sought Applications in W hich H andling W ith­ incidental thereto, over irregular routes under section 410, part IV of the Inter­ out Oral H earing Has B een R equested between points in Massachusetts and state Commerce Act, for a permit to in­ No. MC 135694, filed June 7, 1971. Ap­ Rhode Island and a described area of stitute operation as a freight forwarder, plicant: ROBERT E. SHREWSBURY, Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. Box 111, Leckie, WV 24856. Applicant’s Francis E. Barrett, Jr., 536 Granite in interstate or foreign commerce, representative: Charles E. Anderson, Street, Braintree, MA, attorney for through the use of the facilities of com­ 1421 Kanawha Valley Building, Charles­ transferee, Kenneth B. Williams, 111 mon carriers by railroad, express, water, ton, W- Va. 25332. Authority sought to op­ State Street, Boston, MA 02109, attorney air, or motor vehicle in the transporta­ erate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ for transferor. tion of: General commodities (except hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: No. MC-FC-72982, By order of July 1, those requiring special equipment be­ Stone, crushed limestone, sand, and 1971, the Motor Carrier Board approved gravel, from stone quarries at points in the transfer to Arthur E. Kluver, doing cause of size or weight, those in bulk, Tazewell County, Va., to points in Mer­ classes A and B explosives, and house­ business as Kluver Transfer, Fairfield, cer, McDowell, and Wyoming Counties, Nebr., of the operating rights in certifi­ hold goods as defined by the Commis­ W. Va. cates No. MC-97764 (Sub-No. 1) and sion), restricted to shipments having a MOTOR CARRIER OF PASSENGERS MC-97764 (Sub-No. 2) issued April 5, prior or subsequent movement by air­ No. MC 107135 (Sub-No. 3), filed 1961, and September 20, 1966, respec­ craft, between points in the United May 21, 1971. Applicant: O. G. GOLDS- tively to Edwin F. Albrecht, doing busi­ States, including Alaska and Hawaii. ness as Albrecht Transfer, Fairfield, TON, doing business as ROSWELL- Nebr., authorizing the transportation of No. FF-408 (AIR-LAND TRANSPORT, CARRIZOZO STAGE LINES, Post Office general commodities between specified INC., Freight Forwarder Application), Box 697, Roswell, NM 88201. Applicant’s representative: W. D. Benson, Post Office points in Nebraska; household goods be­ filed June 23, 1971. Applicant: AIR­ Box 6723, Lubbock, TX 79413. Author­ tween Edgar, Nebr., and points within 20 LAND TRANSPORT, INC., 5615 West ity sought to operate as a common car­ miles thereof, on the one hand, and, on Marginal Way SW., Seattle, WA 98106. the other, points in Iowa, Kansas, rier, by motor vehicle, over regular Missouri, Colorado, and Illinois; and Applicant’s representative: James T. routes, transporting: Passengers and livestock and agricultural commodities, Johnson, 1610 IBM Building, 1200 Fifth their baggage, and mail, express, and newspapers in the same vehicle with the between Edgar, Nebr., and points within Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. Authority passengers, between Roswell, N. Mex., 20 miles thereof, on the one hand, and, sought under section 410, part IV of the and Brownfield, Tex., from Roswell over on the other, points in Iowa, Kansas, Interstate Commerce Act, for a permit U.S. Highway 380 to Brownfield, Tex., Missouri, South Dakota, and Colorado. to institute operation as a freight for­ and return over the same route, serving Bernard Sprague, 342 North Webster warder, in interstate or foreign com­ all intermediate points. Street, Red Cloud, NE 68970, attorney merce, through use of the facilities of By the Commission. for applicants. common carriers by water and motor [seal] R obert L. Oswald, ' [seal] R obert L. Oswald, vehicle in the transportation of general Secretary. Secretary. commodities, between points in Oregon [FR Doc.71-9735 Filed 7-8-71;8:53 am] and Washington and points in Hawaii. [FR Doc.71-9624 Filed 7-8-71;8:45 am]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12949 of hearings as promptly as possible, but MC 30837 Sub 421, Kenosha Auto Transport RED BALL MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., Corp., assigned September 15, 1971, at ET AL. interested parties should take appro­ Washington, D.C., at the offices of the priate steps to insure that they are noti­ Interstate Commerce Commission. Assignment of Hearings fied of cancellation or postponements of MC 40915 Sub 44, Boat Transit, Inc., as­ J uly 6, 1971. hearings in which they are interested. signed September 13, 1971, at Washington, D.C., at the offices of the Interstate Com­ Cases assigned for hearing, postpone­ MC 2229 (Sub-No. 157), Bed Ball Motor merce Commission. ment, cancellation, or oral argument ap­ Freight, Inc., now assigned July 12, 1971, MC-19778 Sub 73, The Milwaukee Motor pear below and will be published only at Dallas, Tex., canceled and application Transportation Co., now being assigned once. This list contains prospective as­ dismissed. September 13, 1971, at Helena, Mont., in signments only and does not include MC 133863 Sub 4, Frank Murphy Contract Montana Highway Commission Audito­ cases previously assigned hearing dates. Carrier, Inc., application dismissed. rium, Corner Sixth and Roberts Street. The hearings will be on the issues as MC 29886 Sub 269, Dallas & Mavis Forward­ presently reflected in the Official Docket ing Co., Inc., assigned September 9, 1971, [seal] R obert L. Oswald, of the Commission. An attempt will be at Washington, D.C., at the offices of the Secretary. made to publish notices of cancellation Interstate Commerce Commission. [FR Doc.71-9734 Filed 7-8-71; 8:53 am]

CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— JULY The following numerical guide is a list of parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during July.

3 CFR page 7 CFR—Continued Page 14 CFR Page Proclamations: 945______!______12894 39______12688, 12733, 12842 4062 __;______12671 1063______—— 12895 71_____ 12511, 12734, 12843 12896-12897 4063 ______12673 1434______12842 91______12512 Executive Orders: 1464______12509 9 7 .,— .______12512 1474______12509 121— ____ 12512 9835 (see EO 11605)____ .— 12831 127—______12512 10450: 1488— — ______12595 P roposed R ules: 385______— 12597 See EO 11603______12675 399—______12513 Amended by 11605------12831 52______12745, 12746 1208______12597 10924 (see EO 11603)______12675 101______12695 P roposed R ules: 11041 (superseded by EO 906___ —,______12908 11603)______12675 911______— 12748 39______12688, 12910 11223 (see EO 11603)___ 12675 915______- 12629 71______12511, 12864, 12911-12912 11248 (amended by 11604).— 12725 917______12908 91.------12865 11250 (superseded by EO 922______12863 97______12865 11603).___ 12675 923..—______12864 103______12913 11390 (amended by EO 11601) _ 12473 924______12864 207— ______12748 11470 (superseded by EO 932„_____ 12864 288______12541 11603)______. . . 12675 958— ______- 12629 399— ______12541 11600 ______12471 980______12695 11601 ______12473 989______12696 15 CFR 11602 ______12475 1079______;______12534 371—------12515 11603 ______12675 379______±___ 12515 11604 ______12727 9 CFR 385------12515 11605 ______12831 76_____ 12510, 12688 Presidential D ocuments Other 331—______12596 16 CFR than P roclamations and Ex­ P roposed R ules: 13______12598,12600, 12843-12850 ecutive Orders: 11— ______12586 Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 18 CFR 1971 (see EO 11603)______12675 113.______12694 154— . . ------____ 12851 5 CFR 10 CFR 213____ 30— ...... 12731 19 CFR 12681,12729, 12893 40— ______12731 550______12729 4...... 12601 733____ 50______— 12731, 12733 ______12893 70______12731 20 CFR 7 CFR P roposed R ules: 405______— ...... 12606 6 ______12506 50______12697 32______12681 210______12685 12 CFR 21 CFR 220______12685 222___ 12896 3______12516 250______12686 745— ___ —______12688 121______12692 406.. . _____ 12729 P roposed R ules: 135a______— ______12691 409______12730 222...... — 12915 135b______12608 717______12730 703.______..._ 12867 135c______12608, 12609 775______12835 135e______!______12691 794______12839 13 CFR 908_ 12507,12840 146d__ 12609 910 ______-12687, 12841 121______12596 148q...... ;_____ 12609 911 ______12507 P roposed R ules: 301______12734 917.. __ 12508, 12841 107______12630 308— ...... 12734 919______12893 121...... 12631, 12749 420...... 12517, 12692, 12898-12901

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— fRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12950 NOTICES

21 CFR—Continued Page 32A CFR Page 43 CFR—Continued Pa&e P roposed R ules: BDC (Ch. VI) : P ublic Land Order: 3___ 12534 DMS Order 1 _ ------_____ 12742 5069------12902 8______12908 DMS Order 2______12743 5069------_------12903 DMS Order 3 ______12743 P roposed R ules: 22 CFR DMS Order 4______12744 3540—------12907 42______- ______- 12609 DMS Reg. I______12742 DMS Reg. 1, Dir. 3______12742 45 CFR 24 CFR DPS Reg. 1— ______12741 177------1------12744 203______12610 35 CFR 250------12621 207______12610 1201------12652 220______12610 51______-_____ 12616 1600__ 12517 P roposed R ules: 1914______12611 36 CFR 15— ------12534 1915______12612 1201...... 12664 P roposed R ules: 1930______—— 12517 1931 ______12519 7______12628, 12907 46 CFR 1932 ______12521 1933 ______12522 37 CFR 531______12691 1934 ______12529 1 ______12616,12689 P roposed R ules: 2 ______12616 2______12909 25 CFR 3___ 12689 146______12909 P roposed R ules: 221______12745 38 CFR 47 CFR 1 ____ 12903,12904 26 CFR P ublic Land Order: 5082 2 ______12905 1______12612,12689, 12736 ______— 12690 15______12905 194______12852 21______12484 196 ______12853 39 CFR 73______12622 197 ______•____ .__ 12853 41______12532 81______12502 201______-____ |__ 12855 169______12833 83______12502 245______- ______12856 89______12488 41 CFR 91______12492 P roposed R ules: 93— ______12498 1_...... 12534, 12624, 12628,12861 5A-7______12533 P roposed R ules: 13______12624, 12861 5A-53______12533 5A-76______12533 2______12914 12542, 12629, 12914 28 CFR 9*17______12900 73______0...... 12739 14H-1______12619 101-25______12834 49 CFR 29 CFR 101-32______12619 l ______12622 12834 391 ______12857 102___ 12532 114-25______12857 12834 392 ______1904______*______12612 114-26.______571______12691,12858 P roposed R ules: 1033______12859 30 CFR 3-5______12909 P roposed R ules: 70...... 12739 171_____ :__ 12913 P roposed R ules: 42 CFR 174 ______12913 57______12693 175 ___ 12913 P roposed R ules: 177______12913 12866 31 CFR 415______;-- 571______12866 1207______12750 306______—— 12833 43 CFR 32 CFR 3_. 12618 50 CFR 80 722__----- 12689 17. 12618 ______12623

LIST OF FEDERAL REGISTER PAGES AND DATES—-JULY Pages Date 12465-12588______July 1 12589-12664______2 12665-12718------3 12719-12824______7 12825-12887______— 8 12889-12959______9 FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 WASHINGTON, D.C.

Volume 36 ■ Number 132

PART II

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service, Bureau of Accounts

C IR C U L A R 570/ 1971 R E V IS IO N

Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds 12952 NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Fiscal Service, Bureau of Accounts [Dept. Circular 570; 1971 Rev.] COMPANIES HOLDING CERTIFICATES OF AUTHORITY AS ACCEPTABLE SURETIES ON FEDERAL BONDS AND AS ACCEPTABLE REINSURING COMPANIES J uly 1, 1971 This circular is published annually, as of July 1, solely for the information of Federal bond-approving officers and persons required to give bonds to the United States. Copies of this circular may be obtained from: Audit Staff, Bureau of Accounts, Treasury Department, Washington, D.C. 20226. Telephone: (202) WO-4-5284. Interim changes in this circular are published in the F ederal R egister as they occur...... , _ ...... _ The following companies, except where otherwise noted, have complied with the law and the regulations of the Treasury Department and are acceptable as sureties on Federal bonds, to the extent and with respect to the localities indicated opposite their respective names. [seal] Fiscal Assistant Secretary. Companies H olding Certificates of A uthority F rom Secretary of the Treasury U nder Sections 6 to 13 of Title 6 of the U nited States Code as Acceptable Sureties on F ederal Bonds (a)

Underwriting limitations State or other area in which incorporated and judicial (net limit districts in which process agents have been appointed. Names of companies and locations of on any one States and other areas in which licensed to transact a (State or other area of incorporation in capitals. Letters principal executive offices risk) See fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) preceding names of States indicate judicial district^,) footnote (b) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars)

The Aetna Casualty and Surety Com­ 29,789 All...... -...... -...... - ...... -—-...... CONN.—AIL pany, Hartford, Conn. Aetna Fire Underwriters Insurance 651 All except Ala., C.Z, Del., Kans, La., Oreg., S.C., CO N N —D.C.,M d.,wPa. Company, Hartford, Conn. Aetna Insurance Company, Hartford, 12,903 AUexcept C.Z...... CO N N —All except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Virgin Islands. Conn. Aetna Life and Casualty Company, 83,740 Conn...... '...... -...... CO N N —D.C Hartford, Conn. Agricultural Insurance Company, ’■we ASSs ‘ c z - Elc0' ^ Watertown, N.Y. Virgin islands, W. Va. Allegheny Mutual Casualty Company, 103 Alaska, Fla., 111., Ind., La., Md., Mich., N.J., Ohio, Pa., P A —D.C., sFla., nlll., sind., Md., eMich., N.J., Ohio, MeadvUle, Pa. Wis eVa., eWis. Allied Fidelity Insurance Co., Indian­ 66 Ind., Ky...... -...... IND. D.C. apolis, Ind. Allied Insurance Company, Los 506 Cal., N.Y., Tex., Wash...... -...... -...... C A L —D.C , Tex. Angeles, Cal. Allied Mutual Insurance Company, Des Moines, Iowa. 2,111 AMont?Nebrd,aN: D ^O M ^S . d £ ’ T e ^ ' Ä ***' Allstate Insurance Company, North­ 57,453 A Ä e p f C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands...... - - S o , brook, 111. ePa., sTex., wVa, wWash., eWis. American Automobile Insurance Com­ 5,276 AUexcept C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands...... MO.—AU except C.Z, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islan s. pany, San Francisco, Cal. 73 Alaska, Ariz, Ark., Cal, Colo, D.C, Idaho, Iowa, Kans, NEBR—Alaska, Ariz, Ark, CM, Colo, D.C, Idaho, American Bonding Company, Los Mo, Mont, N ebr, N ev, N. Mex, Oreg, Utah. Iowa, wMo, N ev, N . Mex., Oreg, wWash. Angeles, CM. American Casualty Company of Read­ 3,661 All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands...... -...... PA.—All except Guam, Virgin Islands. ing, Pennsylvania, Chicago, 111. A-mp.r1p.ftn Credit Indemnity Company 2,434 CM, Colo, Conn, Del, Hl^Jnd, Iowa, Ky, Me, Md, N.Y.—D.C. of New York, Baltimore, Md. Mass, Minn, Mo, N.H, N.J, N. Mex, N.Y, N.C, Ohio, Okla, Pa, R.I, Vt, Wash, W. Va. ___ American Economy Insurance Com­ 1 442 All except C.Z, Conn, D el, Guam, HawaU, Mass, M inn, IND.— pany, Indianapolis, Ind. Miss, N .H , N J , N .Y , N .C , N. D ak, Puerto Rico, R .I, S.C, S. D ak, Va, Virgin Islands. . _____ Amprlpftn Employers’ Insurance Com­ 4,636 AU except Guam...... MASS.—All except Guam. pany, Boston, Mass. 491 Conn,Iowa, Me,Mass, Miss, N.H, R.I,Vt...... * ...— . VT^-AU except C.Z, Guam, Kans, Puerto Rico, Virgin American Fidelity Company, Man­ chester, N.H. Amprican Fidelity Fire Insurance Com­ 387 AUexcept Alaska, C .Z, Colo, Guam, Hawaii, K ans, Mo, N^Y.—Ariz, CM, D .C , L a, Mich, N ev, Oreg, Puerto pany, Westbury, Long Island, N.Y. 738 A l Z ^ o 1!“ :, Fla, Ga, Kans, Ky, La, Md, FLA.—Ala, Ark., Colo, D.C, Oa,Kans, Ky, La, Md, American Fire and Casualty Company, Miss, Mo, N.C, Okla, S.C, Tenn, Tex, Va. Miss, Mo, N.C, Okla, S.C, lenn, lex, va. Hamilton, Ohio. American and Foreign Insurance Com­ 1,402 AUexcept C.Z, D el, Guam, L a, Oreg, Puerto Rico, S.C , N.Y.—D .C , Tex. pany, New York, N.Y. 29,391 Mich.’, P a.f Tex!^*?8'...... TEX.—AU except Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. American General Insurance Company, Houston, Tex. American Guarantee and Liability In­ 1,187 AU except C.Z, D el, Guam, HawaU, Puerto Rico, S.C.. ^ - A l ^ k a ^ C M ^ surance Company, Chicago, 111. N. Mex, Ohio, P a , nswTex, Vt. American Home Assurance Company, 3,355 AU except Ark, C.Z, Guam, Me, Oreg, Puerto Rico, N.Y.—D.C. New York, N.Y. Afin Ail^r^l^Cofo8* D C Fla. Ga. H I,In d , Iowa, Kans, T E X —AU except Alaska, w Ark, C.Z, Guam, HawaU, American Indemnity Company, Gal­ K y , L a, Miss!, M o,’Mont, N. k e x , N .C , Ohio, Okla, wMich, nOkla, Puerto kico, Virgin Islands, wV . veston, Tex. 12,237 AU exwpt6(LZ.^Giiamf Virgin M m 'ds...... N .J.-A ll except C.Z, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. The American Insurance Company, Principal Office: Newark, N .J. Home Office: San Francisco, Cal. American International Insurance Com­ 296 AU except C.Z, D el, Guam, HawaU, N .H , Puerto Rico, N.Y.— pany, New York, N.Y. American Manufacturers Mutual Insur­ ***• ance Company, Chicago, HI. M» ASIslands- r Gu*“ h™‘“’ “•* V*» » N ebr, a N ev, a dreg, ftÄ m P a, Puerto S Rico, S S.C, S. S Dax, Term, Tex, Utah, Va, Virgin Islands, wWis. » American Motorists Insurance Com­ 1,750 All except Guam, Oreg, Virgin Islands...... IslaiidS’ Wy°' pany, Chicago, 111. American Mutual Liability Insurance 4,336 AU MASS—D.C. Company, Wakefield, Mass. American National Fire Insurance Com­ 1 020 All except C .Z, Conn, Guam, L a, Me, Mich, N J , N.Y.—AU. pany, New York, N.Y. Puerto Rico, S.C , Virgin Islands. See footnotes at end of table.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12953

Companies H olding Certificates of Authority F rom Secretary of the T reasury U nder Sections 6 to 13 of T itle 6 of the U nited States Code as Acceptable Sureties on F ederal B onds (a)—Continued.

Underwriting limitations State or other area in which incorporated and judicial (net lim it districts in which process agents have been appointed. Names of companies and locations of on any one States a fid other areas in which licensed to transact a (State or other area of incorporation in capitals. Letters principal executive offices risk) See fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) preceding names of States indicate judicial districts.) footnote (b) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars)

American Re-Insurance Company, New 7,048 All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands...... N .Y .—All except Guam. York, N.Y. American States Insurance Company, 4,991 All except C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, Hawaii, Mass., N.H., IND.—Alaska, Ariz., Cal., Colo., D.C., Idaho, 111., Iowa, Indianapolis, Ind. N.Y., N.C., Puerto Rico, R.I., 8.C.,Va., Virgin Islands. Hans., Ky., Mich., Mo.,$Mont., N. Mex., Ohio, Okla. Oreg., Pa., Tenn., Tex., Utah, eVa., Wash., W. Va., Wis., Argonaut Insurance Company, Menlo 3,149 All except C.Z., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands______CAL.—D.C., nGa., Idaho, eLa., Mont. Park, Cal. Associated Indem nity Corporation, San 1,452 All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands______CAL.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Colo., Guam, Hawaii, Francisco, Cal. Idaho, Iowa, La., Minn., Miss., N . Mex., newN.Y., N. Dak., neOkla., Puerto Rico, S. Dak., Vt., wVa., Virgin Islands, W. Va., wWis., Wyo. Atlantic Insurance Company, Dallas, 1,182 All except C.Z., Colo., Conn., Del., Guam., Hawaii, Idaho, TEX.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, eN.Y., Tex. Iowa, La., Me., Mass., Nebr., N.H., N.Y., N.Dak., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Oreg., Puerto Rico, R.I., Vt., Va., Virgin Islands, Wash., Wis., Wyo. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, 4,931 All except Ala., C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Virgin Islands...... N .Y .—D.C. New York, N .Y . Auto-Owners Insurance Company, 3,460 Ala., Fla., Ga., 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., Mich., Minn., MICH.—D.C., nsFla., 111., Ind., Iowa, Minn., Mo., N. Dak; Lansing, Mich. Mo., Nebr., N.C., N. Dak., Ohio, Pa., S.C., S. Dak., Ohio, S. Dak. Tenn., Wis. Balboa Insurance Company, Newport 1,192 All except Ala., Ark., C.Z., Guam., Kans., La., Me., Mass., CAL.—D.C. Beach, Cal. Miss., Nebr., N.H., N.J., N.C., N. Dak., Oreg., Puerto Rico, R.I., S.C., S. Dak., Tenn., Vt., Va., Virgin Islands, W. Va., Wis. Bankers Multiple Line Insurance Com­ 626 All except C.Z., Del., Ga., Guam, Idaho, Kans., La., Me., IO W A —D .C . pany, Chicago, 111. Oreg., Puerto Rico, S.C., Tenn., Virgin Islands. Bankers and Shippers Insurance Com­ 517 All except. C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Virgin N.Y.—mAla., Ariz., Ark., Del., D.C., nFla., nGa., sind., pany of New York, New York, N.Y. Islands. slowa, eKy., Me., Mass., Mich., Minn., sMiss., wMo., N.H., N.J.. sOhio, wOkla., R.I., S. Dak., nwTex., Wyo. Boston Old Colony Insurance Com­ 2,744 All except C .Z., G uam .______MASS.—Ala., Alaska, Ark., ncCal., Conn., Del., D.C., pany, New York, N.Y. sFla., Ga., Hawaii, Idaho, Kans., La., Me., Md., Minn., Miss., eMo., Mont., Nebr., N . Mex., wseN. Y., N .C ., S.C., Wyo. The Buckeye Union Insurance Com­ 4,804 D .C., Fla., 111., Ind., Kans., Ky., Mich., Mo., N .Y ., Ohio, OHIO—D;C., Hl., Ind., Ky., Mich., Minn., Pa., eTenn. pany, Columbus, Ohio. Pa. Va. W. Va. Va., W. Va. The Camden Fire Insurance Associa­ 4,103 Ala. (fidelity only), Alaska, Ariz., Ark., Cal., C.Z., Colo., N .J.—D.C. tion, Philadelphia, Pa. Conn., D.C., 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Mo., Nev., N.H., N.J., N. Mex., N.Y., N.C., N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., Pa., R.I., S.C. (fidelity only), U tah ,V t., Va., W. Va., Wyo. Capitol Indemnity Corporation, Mad­ 154 Ariz., IB., Iowa, Mich., Minn., N. Mex., Wis...... WIS.—D.C., nGa., 111., sind., Iowa., Mich., Minn., wMo: ison, Wis. Cascade Insurance Company, Tacoma, 798 Alaska, Ariz., Cal., Colo., D.C., Hawaii, Idaho, Ind., WASH.—All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Wash. Minn., Miss., Mont., Nev., Oreg., Utah, Wash. Islands. The Celina Mutual Insurance Company, 458 111., Ind., Ky., Mich., Ohio, Pa., W. Va...... OHIO.—D.C. Celina, Ohio. Centennial Insurance Company, New 1,545 All except Ala., C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands...... N .Y .—D .C; York, N.Y. Century Indemnity Company, Hart­ 562 All except Ala., C.Z., Del., Kans., Nebr...... CONN—D.C., Md., wPa. ford, Conn. The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Com­ 1,600 All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. CONN.—Ariz., Ark., neCal., D.C., msFla., sGa., nlll., pany, Hartford, Conn. Iowa, Kans., wKy., eLa., Mass., Mich., nMiss., wMo., Neb., N.J., nesN.Y., mN.C., sOhio, ePa., S.C., , meTenn., nwTex., U tah, eVa., nW. Va., eWis., Wyo. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, ■1,064 Ala., Ariz., Fla., Ga., 111., Ind., Ky., Mich., Ohio., Pa., OHIO—mAla., D.C., sFla., nGa., sind., Ky. Cincinnati, Ohio. Tenn.. Citizens Insurance Company of New 857 All except C .Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands...... N.J.—All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands; Jersey, Hartford, Conn. Colonial Surety Company, Philadelphia,Pa. 254 Del.,. N.J., Pa...... PA.— Commercial Insurance Company of 2,744 All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands...... N.J.—All except Guam. Newark, N.J., New York, N .Y . Commercial Standard Insurance Com­ 414 All except Alaska, C.Z., Conn., Del., Ga., Guam, Me., TEX.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Minn;,' pany, Fort Worth, Tex. Mass., Mich., Mo., N.H., N. Mex., Ohio., Pa., Puerto Miss., Puerto Rico, S. D ak., Virgin Islands. Rico, R.I., S.C., Vt., Wash. The Connecticut Indem nity Company, 926 All except Alaska, C.Z., Del., Guam, Hawaii, Oreg., CONN.—All except Alaksa, cesCal. C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Hartford, Conn. Puerto Rico, S.C., Virgin Islands. Nev. Oreg., Virgin Isalnds, Wash. Consolidated Insurance Company, Indi­ 208 111., Ind., Ky., Mich., Ohio...... anapolis, Ind. IND.—D.C., 111., Ky., Mich., Ohio. Consolidated M utual Insurance Com­ 1,487 All except Ala., Alaska, C.Z., Del., Guam, La...... N .Y .—D .C. pany, Brooklyn, N .Y . Continental Casualty Company, Chi­ 25,248 All except Guam______cago, 111. ILL.—All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands. The Continental Insurance Company, 49,487 All______...... New York, N .Y . N.Y.—All except Guam. Cornhusker Casualty Company, 162 Nebr...... Omaha, Nebr. N E B R .—D .C; Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Com­ 835 All except Alaska, Ariz., C.Zt Colo., Del., Guam, Hawaii, N .Y .—D.C . pany, New York, N .Y . Idaho, Iowa, Kans., Minn., Miss., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N. Mex., N. Dak., Ohio, Oreg., S. Dak., Utah, Virgin Islands, Wash., Wyo. ^ Wis'S ^nsurance Society, Inc., Madison, 431 All except C.Z., Conn., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin WIS—nsAla., Colo., D.C., Fla., HI., Md., Mich;, Nev;: Islands. Utah. Dependable Insurance Company, Inc. 109 Fla., Ga., Miss., Va...... FLA.— Jacksonville, Fla. Fmmco Insurance Company, SoutI 2,068 All except C.Z., Colo., Conn., Guam, Mass., Puerto Rico, IND.—D.C; Bend, Ind. Virgin Islands. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance 122 Ala., Alaska, Ariz., Colo., Ga., Hawaii, Idaho, 111., Ind., NEBR.—D.C; Company, Omaha, Nebr. Iowa, Kans., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N. Mex., N. Dak., Okla., S. Dak., Utah, Vt., Wash., Wyo. Employers Casualty Company, Dallas, 1,946 Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., HI., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., Minn., T E X —D .C; Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N. Mex., Tex., Utah, Wash., Wis. Employers Commercial Union Insur- 13,336 All except Guam------MASS.—All except C.Z., Guam; TP l°e Company, Boston, Mass.» ne Employers’ Fire Insurance Com­ pany, Boston, Mass. 1,930 All except Guam ...... MASS.-A11 except C.Z., Guam; See footnotes at end of table.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12954 NOTICES

C ompanies H olding Certificates of A uthority F rom Secretary of the T reasury U nder Sections 6 to 13 of Title 6 of the United States Code as Acceptable Sureties on F ederal Bonds (a)—Continued

Underwriting limitations State or other area in which incorporated and judicial (net lim it districts in which process agents have been appointed. Names of companies and locations of on any one States and other areas in which licensed to transact a (State or other area of incorporation in capitals. Letters principal executive offices risk) See fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) preceding names of States indicate judicial districts.) footnote (b) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars)

Employers Mutual Casualty Company., 1,842 All except Ala., C.Z., Del., Guam, La., Oreg., Puerto IOWA—Alaska, Colo., D .C., 111., Ind., Kans.,,Md., Minn., Des Moines, Iowa. Rico, Virgin Islands, W. Va. Miss., Mo., Nebr., N .C ., N . Dak., Ohio, Okla,, Oreg., Pa., S.C., S. D ak., Wis. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance 14,493 All except C.Z., Virgin Islands...... W IS— D.C. Company of Wisconsin, Wausau, Wis. Employers Reinsurance Corporation, 4,740 All except C.Z., Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands...... MO.—All except Guam. Kansas City, Mo. Equitable Fire and Marine Insurance 2,300 All except C.Z., Guam, La., Oreg...... —■ R.I.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Company, Hartford, Conn. Rico, Virgin Islands. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance 771 Colo., Kans., Mo.. Nebr., N. Mex., Okla., Tex., (reinsur­ K ANS.—Colo., D .C., Mo., Nebr., N. Mex., Okla., nweTex. Company, McPherson, Kans. ance only in Ark., Idaho, 111., Iowa, Md., Mass., Mich., N.H., N.J., N. Y., N.C., Ohio, Vt., W. Va., Wyo.). Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance 669 Colo., 111., Iowa, Kans., Minn., Mo., Nebr., N. Dak., IOWA—Colo., D.C., 111., Kans., Nebr., Okla., S. Dak. Company, Des Moines, Iowa. Okla., S. Dak., Tex., Wyo. Farmers Home Mutual Insurance Com­ 721 Cal-., Colo., Iowa, Minn., Nev., Wash., Wis., Wyo. M INN—Cal., D.C. pany, Minneapolis, Minn. Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance Com­ 1,591 Iowa...... I------1...... ------IOWA—D .C. pany of Iowa, Des Moines, Iowa. Federal Insurance Company, New 16,794 A ll....:...... — — ...... N .J.—All. York, N .Y . Federated Mutual Insurance Company, 2,042 AH except Alaska, C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, Me., Puerto M INN.—Ala., Ark., D .C ., Fla., Ga., IU., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Owatonna, Minn. Rico, Virgin Islands. Ky., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., N .C., N. Dak., Okla., S.C., S. Dak., Term., Va., W. Va., Wis. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of 6,004 All except Guam, Virgin Islands...... N.Y.—All except Guam, Hawaii, Virgin Islands. New York, New York, N.Y. Fidelity and Deposit Company of 8,971 All except Guam...... MD.—AU except Guam. Maryland, Baltimore, Md. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, 38,648 All except C .Z ...'------...... -...... C A L —AH. San Francisco, Cal. Firemen’s Insurance Company of 12,350 All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands...... N.J.—AR except C.Z. Newark, New Jersey, New York, N.Y. First Insurance Company of Hawaii, _ 971 Cal., Guam, Hawaii, Oreg. HAWAII—D.C. Ltd., Honolulu, Hawaii. First National Insurance Company of 1,444 All except C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, Hawaii, La., Me., WASH.—AU except C.Z., Del., Guam, Hawaii, La., Me., America, Seattle, Wash.- N.H., Puerto Rico, Vt. N.H., Puerto Rico, Vt., Virgin Islands. General Fire and Casualty Company, 641 All except C.Z., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands ..... N .Y .—D .C. Carle Place, N.Y. General Insurance Company of Amer­ 16,952 All except Virgin Islands------WASH.—AU except Virgin Islands. ica, Seattle, Wash. General Reinsurance Corporation, New 14,428 Aik except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Virgin N .Y .—AU except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands. York, N .Y . Islands. The Glens Falls Insurance Company, 5,506 All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands------______N .Y .—D .C. New York, N.Y.2 Globe Indemnity Company, New York, 6,040 All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. N .Y .—AU except Alaska, Guam, Virgin Islands. IN . X . Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Com- 762 AU except Ala., Alaska, C.Z., Conn., Del., D.C., Fla., IND.—eArk., Colo., D.C., El., Iowa, Kans., Nebr., Ohio, pany, IndianapoUs, Ind. Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Me., Md., Mass., Mont., N.H., wOkla. N.Dak., Oreg., Puerto Rico, R.I., S.C., Term., Vt., Virgin Islands. ■ " - ' Granite State insurance Company, 449 AU except C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Oreg., N.H.—AU except Guam, Puerto Rico. Manchester, N.H. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Great American Insurance Company, 7,802 AUexcept C . Z ...... N .Y .—AU. Los Angeles, Cal. Great Northern Insurance Company, 773 Ariz., Colo., 111., Indy Iowa, Minn., Mo., Mont., Nebr., MINN.—D.C., nsEl., Iowa, Mo., Mont., N. Dak., S. Minneapolis, Minn. Nev., N. Mex., N. Y., N. Dak., S. Dak., Vt., Wis., Wyo. Dak., Wis. Greater New York M utual Insurance 3,282 All except .Alaska, Ark., C.Z., Del., Guam, Hawaii, La., N. Y.—D.C. _ Company, New York, N.Y. Miss., S.C., Term., Virgin Islands. Gulf American Fire and Casualty Com- 167 Ala., Fla., Ga., La., Miss., S.C., T enn______ALA.—Alaska, D.C., mnGa., sMiss. pany, Montgomery, Ala. _ Gulf Insurance Company, Dallas, Tex.. 1,539 AU except C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, Idaho, Puerto Rico, M O—AUexcept C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, N.J., eN. Y., Puerto Virgin Islands. Rico, Virgin Islands. The Hamilton Mutual Insurance Com­ 397 Ind., Ky., Mich., Ohio...... - ...... O HIO—D.C. pany of Cincinnati, Ohio, Cincinnati, Ohio. The Hanover Insurance Company, 4,373 All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands------N.Y.—All except Guam. Worcester, Mass. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Com­ 19,459 AU except Guam ...... ------CONN.—AU except Guam, Virgin Islands. pany; Hartford, Conn. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, 60,888 AUexcept C .Z ...... 1...... - CONN.—Ariz., Cal., D.C., Guam, HawaU, La., N.Y-, Hartford, Conn. Va. ... . Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company, 944 Ariz., Colo., D.C., Fla., Idaho, El., Ind., Iowa, Kans., IOWA—Colo., D .C ., nsFla., El., slnd., Kans., wMich., Des Moines, Iowa. Md., Mich., Minn., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N. Mex., Mo., Nebr., N. Mex., S. Dak., Wyo. Ohio, Pa., 8. Dak., Tex., Utah, Va., Wis., Wyo. r Highlands Insurance Company, Hous­ 2,205 AU except C.Z., Conn., Guam, Hawaii, N.H., Puerto T E X .—mAla., Alaska, Ariz., eArk., ncCal., Colo., D-C., Rico, Virgin Islands. mFla., nGa., Idaho, nEl., slnd., slowa, Kans., La-i ton, Tex. Me., Md., eMich., Minn., sMiss., eMo., Mont., Nebr., N.J., N.Mex., sN.Y., N.Dak., Ohio, wOkla, Oreg., wePa., S.C., S.Dak., eTenn., Utah, Vt., eVa., wWasn-, sW.Va., wWis., Wyo. Highlands Underwriters Insurance 232 Ark., Cal., La., Tex. T E X .—D .C. Company, Houston, Tex. The Home Indemnity Company, New 3,429 AU except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, HawaU, Puerto Rico, N.Y.—AU except Alaska, Guam, HawaU, Puerto Rico, York, N .Y . Virgin Islands. Virgin Islands. ^ The Home Insurance Company, New 25,315 AUexcept C.Z...... -...... N.Y.—Alaska, D.C., Guam, wPa., Puerto Rico, S.C. York, N .Y . Hudson Insurance Company, New 410 N .Y ...... N .Y .—D.C. York, N .Y . Illinois National Insurance Co., Spring- 771 Bl., Ind., Iowa, K y., Mo., Nebr., N . Mex., Ohio, Tex...... IL L .—AU except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islandsj field, El. Imperial Insurance Company, Los 251 Ariz., Cal., HawaU, Ind., La., Minn., Mont., Nev., N.Y., CAL.— Angeles, Cal. Okla., Oreg., Wash. See footnotes at end of table.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12955

Companies H olding Certificates of A uthority F rom Secretary of the T reasury U nder Sections 6 to 13 of T itle 6 of the U nited States Code as Acceptable Sureties on F ederal B onds (a)—Continued

Underwriting limitations State or other area in which incorporated and judicial (net lim it districts in which process agents have been appointed. Names of companies and locations of on any one States and other areas in which licensed to transact a (State or other area of incorporation in capitals. Letters principal executive offices risk) See fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) preceding names of States indicate judicial districts.) footnote (b) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars)

Indiana Bonding and Surety Company, 92 In d ...... IN D .—D .C . Indianapolis, Ind. Indiana Insurance Company, Indianap­ 1,278 Hl., Ind., Ky., Mich., Ohio...... IN D —D.C., 111., Ky., Mich., Ohio. olis. Ind. Industrial Indem nity Company, San 3,203 AllexceptC.Z., Conn., N.Y.,N. Dak., Ohio, Puerto Rico, CAL.—Alaska, Ariz., eArk., Colo., D.C., sFla., nGa., Francisco, Cal. Virgin Islands, W. Va. Hawaii, Idaho, nlll., sind., eLa., Md., eMich., eMo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N.J., N. Mex., mN.C., wOkla., , Oreg., S. Dak., eTenn., Tex., Utah, Wash., Wyo. Inland Insurance Company, Lincoln, 433 Colo., Iowa, Kans., Minn., Nebr., Okla., S. Dak., Wyo...- NEBR.—Ariz., Ark., Colo., D.C., 111., Iowa, Kans., Ky., Nebr. Minn., eMo., Mont., Nev., N. Mex., N. Dak., Ohio’ Okla., Oreg., S. Dak., Tex., Utah, Wash., Wyo. Insurance Company of N orth America, 47,518 A ll—--_...... P A —All. Philadelphia, Pa. The Insurance Company of the State of 681 Ala. (except official), Alaska, Ariz., Cal., Colo., Conn., P A —D.C. Pennsylvania, New York, N.Y. Del., D.C., Fla., Ga., Hawaii, 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N .H ., N .J., N . Mex., N .Y ., N .C ., N . Dak., Ohio, Okla., Pa., R.I., S.C. (fidelity only), S. Dak., Tenn., Tex., Utah, Vt., Va., Wash., W. Va., Wis., Wyo. Integrity M utual Insurance Company, 172 Minn., Wis...... 7...... W IS— D.C., Minn. Appleton, Wis. International Fidelity Insurance Com­ 69 Alaska, Ariz., 111., Mass., Mich., Nev., N.J., N. Mex., N.J.—Ariz., D.C., Ga., nlll., sInd., nIowa, Mass., Minn. pany, Newark, N J. N.Y., Okla., Oreg., Pa., Tex. Nev., seN.Y., N. Dak., nwOkla., S. Dak., nTex., Wyo. International Insurance Company, New 1,305 All except Ala., C.Z., Del., Guam, La., Miss., Oreg., S.C., N.Y.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, Me York, N.Y. Virgin Islands. Md., Mass., N.H., N.J., Ohio, Pa., Puerto Rico, R.l!, eTenn., Vt., Virgin Islands, W. Va. International Service Insurance Com­ 680 Alaska, Cal., C.Z., Nebr., N. Mex., Tex—...... ; ...... T E X .—D.C. pany, Forth Worth, Tex. Iowa Mutual Insurance Company, De 643 Colo., 111., Iowa, Kans., Minn., Mo., Mont., Nebr., N.C., IOWA—nAla., Colo., D.C., sill., Kans., Minn., Mont., Witt, Iowa. • N. Dak., Okla., S.C., S. Dak., Wis., Wyo. Nebr., wN.C., wOkla., Oreg., S. Dak. Jersey Insurance Company of New 1,031 All except Ariz., C.Z., Del., Guam., Hawaii, N.H., N. N.Y.—mAla., Ariz., Ark., D.C., nFla., nGa., sind., slowa, York, New York, N .Y . Mex., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Wyo. eKy., Mass., Mich., Minn., sMiss., wMo., N.J., Ohio wOkla., R .I., S. Dak., nwTex. John Deere Insurance Company, 343 Ala. (except official), Alaska, Ariz. Ark., Cal.. Colo., N.Y.—All except Ala., C.Z., Del., Guam, Idaho, Puerto Moline, 111. Conn., D.C., Fla., Ga., Hawaii, Idaho, 111., Ind., Iowa, Rico, Virgin Islands, sW. Va. Kans., Ky., La., Me., Md., Mass.. Mich.. Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N.H., N.J., N. Mex., N.Y., N.C., N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., Puerto Rico, R.I., S.C., S. Dak., Tenn., Tex., Utah, Vt., Va., Wash., W. Va., Wis., Wyo. The Kansas Bankers Surety Company, 86 Kans...... KANS.—D.C. Topeka, Kans. Kansas City Fire and Marine Insur­ 580 All except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Virgin MO.—Ala., Alaska, Ark., Colo., D.C., nsFla., Ga., 111. ance Company, New York, N.Y. Islands. Iowa, Kans., Minn., Nebr., Okla., S.C., Tex., Va., Wis! Wyo. Lawyers Surety Corporation, Dallas, 106 Tex...... T E X —D .C. Tex. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 17,549 All except Guam, Virgin Islands. MASS.—All except C.Z., Guam. Boston, Mass. London Guarantee & Accident Com­ 1,447 All except Alaska, Ariz., C.Z., Conn., Guam, Idaho, N.Y.—D.C. pany of New York, New York, N .Y .3 Kans., La., N. Dak., Oreg., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Lumbermens M utual Casualty Com­ 9,636 All except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Virgin ILL.—All except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, wLa., Puerto Rico pany^ Chicago, 111. Islands. Virgin Islands. ’ Maine Bonding and Casualty Company, 690 Me., Mass., N.H., R.I., Vt...... ME.—Conn., D.C., Mass., N.H., R.I.,-Vt. Portland, Me. The Manhattan Fire and Marine In­ 372 All except Ala., C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, N. Dak., Ohio, N .Y .—D .C. surance Company, Stamford, Conn. Oreg., Puerto Rico, S.C., Tenn.j VirgimTslands. Maryland American General Insurance 1,102 N. Mex., T ex ...... T E X .—D.C., La., N. Mex., Okla. Company, Houston, Tex. Maryland Casualty Company, B alti­ 10,688 All except Guam...... MD.—All except Guam. more, Md. Massachusetts Bay Insurance Com­ 386 All except Ala., Alaska, Ariz., Ark., C.Z., Conn., Del., MASS.—Colo., D.C., nFla., Ga., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., pany, Worcester, Mass. Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Ky., La., Miss., Mont., Nev., Me., Md., wMich., N.H., Okla., wePa., R.I., S.C., Tenn.. N . Mex., N .C., N. Dak., Oreg., Puerto Rico, S. Dak., Tex., Vt., Wash., Wis., Wyo. Utah, Va., Virgin Islands, W. Va. Merchants Mutual Bonding Company, 40 Ariz., Iowa, Mont., Nebr., N.C., N. Dak., Okla., S. Dak., IOWA.—D.C., sill., Nebr., wOkla. Des Moines, Iowa. Tex. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance 1,359 All except Ala., Alaska, Ariz., C.Z., Ga., Guam, Hawaii, MICH.—eArk., Cal., Colo., D.C., 111., Ind., Iowa., Kans., Company, Lansing, Mich. Idaho, La., Nev., N. Mex., Oreg., Puerto Rico, S.C., eKy., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., nwN.Y., N. Virgin Islands, Wyo. Dak., Ohio, wOkla., S. Dak., wmTenn., Utah, wWash. Michigan Mutual Liability Company, 2,592 Ala., Alaska, Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., Conn., D.C., (Fidel­ M ICH.—D.C. Detroit, Mich. ity'only), Fla., Ga., Idaho, 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Me., Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N.H., N.J., N. Mex., N.Y., N.C., N. Dak., (Fidelity only) Ohio, Okla., Pa., R.I., S.C., S. Dak., Tenn., Tex., U tah, Vt., Va., Wash., W. Va., Wis., Wyo. Mid-Century Insurance Company, Los 1,260 All except Ala., Alaska, C.Z., Conn., Del., D.C., Guam, CAL.—Ariz., Ark., Colo., D.C., Idaho, 111., Ind., Iowa, Angeles, Cal. Hawaii, Ky, La., Me., Md., Mass., Miss., N.H., N.J„ Kans., Mich, Minn., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N . Mex., N.Y., N.C., Pa., Puerto Rico, R.I., S.C., Tenn., Va., N . Dak., Okla., Oreg., S. Dak., Tex., Utah, Wash., Wis. Virgin Islands, W. Va. Wyo. Midland Insurance Company, New 724 All except Ariz., C.Z., Conn., Guam. Hawaii, Mass., N.Y.—D.C., Kans. York, N.Y. Virgin Islands, W. Va., Wis. Mid-States Insurance Company, Chi­ 203 Ala., Ariz., Cal., Colo., Ga., Idaho, 111., Ind., Ky., La., ILL.— cago, 111. Mich., Minn., Miss., Nebr., Nev., N . Mex., N .C ., Ohio, Okla., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Utah, Wash., Wis. Midwestern Casualty & Surety Com­ 77 Iow a...... 1...... pany, Des Moines, Iowa, IOWA—D .C j fhe Millers Casualty Insurance Com- Pany of Texas, Fort Worth, Tex. 126 A Ok'la ^°TexD 'C’’ Idah°’ La’’Miss,>Mo-> Mont->N- Meï-> TEX.—Ark., D.C., Fla;, La., Miss., Mo;, N . Mex., Okla: rue Millers Mutual Insurance Com­ 237 Ga., Ilici., Ky., Mo., N.Y., N.C., Pa., R.I., S.C., Tex., PA.—D .C v pany, Harrisburg, Pa. Vt., W. Va. See footnotes at end of table;

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12956 NOTICES

Companies H olding Certificates of Authority P rom Secretary of the T reasury U nder Sections 6 to 13 of Title 6 of the U nited States Code as Acceptable Sureties on F ederal B onds (a)—Continued

Underwriting limitations State or other area in which incorporated and judicial (net lim it districts in which process agents have been appointed. Names of companies and locations of on any one States and other areas in which licensed to transact a (State or other area of incorporation in capitals. Letters principal executive offices risk) See fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) preceding names of States indicate judicial districts.) footnote (b) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars)

The Millers M utual Fire Insurance 752 Ala., Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., D.C., Fla., Ga., Idaho, 111., TEX.—All except Ala., Alaska, 0:2., Conn., Del., Guam., Company of Texas, Fort Worth, Tex. Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Hawaii, Idaho, Me., M d.,Nev., N.H., N.C., Puerto Rico, Mo., Mont., Nebr., N.H. (Reinsurance), N.J., N. Mex., R.I., S.C., Vt., Va., Virgin Islands, Wash., W.Va., Wyo. N.Y., N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., S. Dak., Tenn., Tex., Utah, Va. (Reinsurance), Wash., Wis. Millers’ Mutual Insurance Association 2,041 All except Ala., Alaska, Ariz., Cal., C.Z., Conn., Del., ILL.—nmAla., Ark., Colo., D.C., Ind., Iowa, Kans.,1 of Illinois, Alton, 111. D .C ., Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, K y., La., Me., Mass., Minn., Mo., Mont., N. D ak., S. Dak. Miss., Nebr., Nev., N.H., N. Mex., Oreg., Puerto Rico, R.I., Tenn., Utah, Virgin Islands. Millers National Insurance Company, 490" All except Alaska, C.Z., Colo., Conn., Del., Guam, Ha­ ILL.—Ariz., sCal., Colo., D.C., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., Chicago, 111. waii, La., Me., Miss., Puerto Rico, Vt., Virgin Islands, Mass., Mich., Minn., Mo., Mont., Nev., N. Mex., N. Wyo. D ak., R .I., S. Dak., nwsTex., U tan, wWis., Wyo. M utual Boiler and Machinery Insurance 1,613 Alaska, Ariz., Colo., Conn., D.C., Ind., Iowa, Ky., Mass., M ASS—D.C. Company, Waltham, Mass. Mich., Minn., Mont., Nev., N.H., N.J., N. Mex., N.Y., N.C., R.I., Tex., Utah, W. Va., Wis., Wyo. National Automobile and Casualty In­ 361 Alaska, Ariz., Cal., Colo., Idaho, 111., Ind., Kans., CAL.—All except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, surance Company, Los Angeles, Cal. Ky., La., Mich., Mo., Mont., Nev., N. Mex., Okla., Virgin Islands. Oreg., Tenn., Tex., Utah, Wash., Wyo. National-Ben Franklin Insurance Com­ 2,363 All except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Oreg., Puerto Rico, P A —D.C., Md., W. Va. pany of Pittsburgh, Pa., New York, Virgin Islands. N.Y. National Casualty Company, Detroit, 1,000 All except C.Z., Guam, Me., Miss., Puerto Rico, Virgin MICH.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Mich. Islands. Rico, Virgin Islands. National Fire Insurance Company, of 9,725 All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands..;.--.-...... CONN.—All except Ariz., C.Z., Guam, Nev., Virgin Hartford, Chicago, 111. Islands. National Grange Mutual Insurance 2,388 Conn., Del., D.C., 111., Ind., Me., Md., Mass., Mich., N.H.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Virgin Company, Keene, N.H. N.H., N.J., N.Y., N.C., Ohio, Pa., R.I., S.C., Tenn., Islands. V t.,V a., W .Va., Wis. National Indemnity Company, Omaha, 1,453 All except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Me., Mass., N.H., N.J., NEBR.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Nebr. N.Y., Puerto Rico, S.C., Vt., Virgin Islands. Rico, Virgin Islands. The National Reinsurance Corporation, 2,535 All except Ala., C.Z., Conn., Fla., Ga., Guam, La., Me., N.Y.—D.C., sOhio. New York, N.Y. Miss, Mo., N.C., Oreg., Puerto Rico, S.C., S. Dak., Tenn., Va., Virgin Islands. National Standard Insurance Company, 281 La., N . Mex., Tex...... T E X .—D.C. Houston, Tex. National Surety Corporation, Principal 6,550 All except Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands...... N.Y.—All except Guam. Office:New York, N .Y ., Home Office: San Francisco, Cal. National Union Fire Insurance Com­ 2,099 . All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands...... PA .—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin pany of Pittsburgh, Pa., New York, Islands. N.Y. National Union Indemnity Company, 253 All except Ark., C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Me., Oreg., Puerto PA.—AU except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Philadelphia, Pa. Rico, Virgin Islands. Islands. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Com­ 10,491 AU except Cal., C.Z., Guam, Hawaii...... OHIO.—D.C. pany, Columbus, Ohio. New Hampshire Insurance Company, 4,045 AU except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islan d s...... N .H .—AU except Guam. Manchester, N.H. New York Underwriters Insurance 2,175 AU except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands--...... N.Y.—All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Company, Hartford, Conn. Newark Insurance Company, New 1,732 All except C.Z., Guam, Oreg., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. N.J.—All except Alaska, nCal., C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, York, N .Y . Virgin Islands, Wyo. Niagara Fire Insurance Company, New 2,149 AU except C.Z., Guam...... 1___ .... N.Y.—AU except C.Z., Guam. York, N .Y . North American Reinsurance Corpora­ 4,729 AU except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands...... N.Y.—AU except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. tion, New York, N.Y. The North River Insurance Company, 4,322 AU except C.Z., Guam, Virgin I s l a n d s ...... N.Y.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puèrto New York, N.Y. Rico, Virgin Islands. Northeastern Insurance Company of 1,049 Cal., Colo., Conn., IU., Iowa, Kans., La., Mich., Nev., C O NN .—D.C. Hartford, Des Moines, Iowa. N.H., N J., N.Y., Ohio, Okla., Tex., W. Va. The Northern Assurance Company of 1,374 AU except Guam...... MASS.—All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands, sW. Va. America, Boston, Mass. Northern Insurance Company of New 4,501 AU except C.Z., Guam, HawaU, La., Oreg., Puerto Rico, N .Y .—D.C., Me. York, Baltimore, Md. Virgin Islands. „ ... Northwestern National Casualty Com­ 942 AU except Alaska, Ark., C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, Hawaii, WIS.—nsAla., Ariz., Cal., Colo., D.C., Fla., Ga., Ill-, pany, Milwaukee, Wis. Idaho, La., Me., Mass., Miss., Nev., N.H., N.J., N.Y., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., Md., Mich., Minn., Mo., Mont., N.C., N. Dak., Oreg., Puerto Rico, S.C., Tenn., Utah, Nebr., N. Mex., Ohio, Okla., Pa., R.I., S. Dak.,nesTex., Vt., Va., Virgin Islands. Wash., W. Va., Wyo. Northwestern National Insurance Com­ 3,673 AU except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands_____ .; ____WIS.—All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands. pany of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Mil­ waukee, Wis. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Com­ 4,269 All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands_____ OHIO—AU except C.Z., Guam. pany, Hamilton, Ohio. Ohio Farmers Insurance Company 2,593 AU except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Kans., La., Me., OHIO—AU except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Le Roy, Ohio. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Rico, Virgin Islands. Oklahoma* Surety Company, Tulsa, 61 Okla...... - ...... r...... O K L A —D .C . Okla. Oregon Automobile Insurance Com­ 1,020 Cal., HawaU, Idaho, Nev., Oreg., Utah, W ash ...... ____OREG.—Cal., D.C., Hawaii, Idaho, Nev., Utah, Wash. pany, Portland, Oreg. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, 2,761 Ariz., Cal., Colo., Idaho, IU., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Me.,Miss., CAL.—Ariz., Conn., Del., D.C., sFla., wKy., Md., Mass., Los Angeles, Cal. Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N. Mex., N.Y., Ohio, Okla., N. Mex., N.Y., Ohio, R.I., wTex., W.Va., Wis. Oreg., S. Dak., Tenn., Tex., U tah, Wash., Wis., Wyo. , r. . Pacific Indemnity Company, Los 6,456 AU except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Isla n d s...... CAL.—AU except Conn., Guam, Me., N.H., Vt., Virgif Angeles, Cal. Islands. Pacific Insurance Company, New York, 3,066 Alaska, Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., D.C., Fla., Hawaii, CAL.—D.C. N.Y. Idaho, IU., Ind., Iowa, Mich., Mont., Nev., N.J., N . Mex., N . Y., N.C., Okla., Tex., U tah, Va., Wash., Wyo. Pacific Insurance Company, Limited, 1,120 Hawaii, G uam ______<______... HAWAII—D.C. Honolulu, Hawaii. Peerless Insurance Company, Kenne, 830 AU except C.Z., Guam, HawaU, Puerto Rico, Virgin N.H.—AU except Guam, Hawaii, Virgin Islands; N.H. Islands. Pekin Insurance Company, Pekin, 111__ 154 HI., Ind., Iowa, Mo...... ILL.—D.C., Ind., Iowa: See footnotes at end of tab le;

FEDERAL REGISTER, VO L 36, NO. 132—-FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12957

Companies Holding Certificates of Authority F rom Secretary of the T reasury Under Sections 6 to 13 of T itle 6 o r the United States Code as Acceptable , Sureties on F ederal B onds (a)—Continued

Underwriting limitations State or other area in which incorporated and judicial (net limit districts in which process agents have been appointed. Names of companies and locations of on any one States and other areas in which licensed to transact a (State or other area of incorporation in capitals. Letters principal executive offices risk) See fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) preceding names of States indicate judicial districts.) footnote (b) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars)

Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Associa­ 2,947 Del., D .C ., Md., N .J., N .Y ., Ohio, Pa., W. V a - ...... P A —D .C. tion Insurance Company, Philadel- phia, Pa. Pennsylvania MiUers M utual Insurance 1,138 D .C., P a______- ...... , ...... PA .—D.C. C o m p a n y , WUkes-Barre, Pa. Pennsylvania National Mutual Cas­ 1,628 All except Alaska, Ariz., Ark., Cal., C.Z., Colo., Conn., PA.—D.C., Kans., Md., Mo., N.J., N.C., Okla., Tenn., u a lty Insurance Company, Harris­ Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, 111., La., Me., Mass., Mont., Va. ,, burg, Pa. Nev., N.H., N. Mex., N.Y., N. Dak., Oreg., Puerto Rico, S. Dak., Virgin Islands, Wash., Wyo. Phoenix Assurance Company of New 2,865 All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands_____————...... N.Y.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, York, New York, N .Y . Virgin Islands. The Phoenix Insurance Company, 15,900 All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico...... CONN.—All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Hartford, Conn. Islands. Planet Insurance Company, Philadel- 2,360 All except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Virgin WIS.—All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands. phia, Pa. Islands. Potomac Insurance Company, Phila­ 7,339 Ala. (fidelity only), Ariz., Cal., Colo., Conn., D.C., Fla., PA.—All except Ala., Alaska, Ark., C.Z., Del., Guam, delphia, Pa. Ga., 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Md., Mass., Hawaii, Idaho, Me., Mont., Nev., N.H., N. Dak., Oreg Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Nebr., N .J., N. Mex., N .Y ., Puerto Rico, S. Dak., Vt., Virgin Islands. N.C., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., R.I., S.C. (fidelity only), Tenn., Tex., Utah, Va., Wash., W. Va., Wis., Wyo. Protective Insurance Company, In­ 420 All except Alaska, Ark., C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, IND.—D.C. dianapolis, Ind. Hawaii, La., N. Mex., N.Y., Puerto Rico, S.C., Virgin Islands. Providence Washington Insurance Com­ 2,392 All except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Oreg., Virgin Islands. R.I.—Ala., Cal., Conn., D.C., Fla., Ga., Me., Mass., N.H , pany, Providence, R.I. N.J., N.Y., N.C., nwOkla., Pa., S.C., Tex., Vt., Va. The Prudential Insurance Company of 882 Cal., N.Y_ N.Y.-D.C. ’ ’ ’ Great Britain Located in New York, New York, N.Y. Public Service Mutual Insurance Com­ 1,480 ' Conn., Del., D.C., Fla., Ga., Idaho, HI., Iowa, Me., Md., N.Y.—D.C., sFla., N.J.: ePa.. wTex. pany, New York, N .Y . Mass., Mich., N.H., N.J., N.Y., N.C., Pa., R.I., Vt., Va., W. Va., Wis. Puerto Rican-American Insurance 660 Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands______PUERTO RICO—D.C. Company, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Queen Insurance Company of America, 4,446 All except C.Z., Guam, Oreg., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. N.Y.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Idaho New York, N.Y. , „ Virgin Islands, Wyo. The Reinsurance Corporation of New 2,967 All except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Virgin N.Y.—D.C. York, New York, N .Y . Islands. (In Fla., Mass., Va., licensed for co-surety only.) Reliance Insurance Company, Phila­ 19,345 AU except Guam------P A —AU except Guam. delphia, Pa. Republic Insurance Company, Dallas, 3,121 All except Ala., Alaska, C.Z., Fla., Guam, Hawaii, Me., TEX.—D.C. Tex. Mass., Mont., Nev., N.H., N. Dak., R.I., S.C., S. Dak., V t., Virgin Islands, Wyo. Reserve Insurance Company, Chicago, 1,521 All except C.Z., Conn., Guam, N.Y., Puerto Rico, ILL.—All except C.Z., Conn., Guam, Hawaii. N.Y Virgin Islands. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Resolute Insurance Company, Hartford, 1,399 All except C.Z., Guam, N.Y., Pa., Puerto Rico, Virgin R.I.—AU except wArk., C.Z., mGa., Guam, Hawaii, La., Conn. Islands. Me., wMich., nMiss., nwN.Y., N.C., Oreg., Puerto Rico, S.C., S. Dak., weTenn., Utah, Vt., wVa., Virgin Islands, nW. Va., wWis. Royal Indemnity Company, New York, 4,756 N.Y. All------N.Y.—AU except Guam, Virgin Islands. Safeco Insurance Company of America, 10,138 A1^ i ^ . eUty,°?1?lI AlH ï,AikV CaL* Colo., Conn., D.C. WASH.-AU except Alaska, C.Z., Del., Fla., Ga., Guam, Seattle, Wash. (fidelity only), Idaho, Hl., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Md. (fidel- HawaU, Ky., La., Me., Md., Mass., Miss. N Y Ohio itÿ only), Mich., Minn., Miss. (fideUty only), Mo., Mont., Puerto Rico, S.C., Tenn., V t., Va., Virgin Islands ' Nebr., Nev., N.H., NJ., N. Mex., N.C., N. Dak., w . Okla., Oreg., Pa., R.I., S. Dak., Tex., Utah, Wash., W. Va., Wis., Wyo. Safeguard Insurance Company, New 1,651 York, N.Y. All except Del., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands...... CONN.—All except C.Z., Guam, eLa., Miss., wN C ill i-, wOkla., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, wVà., W.Va. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance 19,331 All except C.Z., Guam...... MINN.—All except Guam. Company, St, Paul, Minn. Ny® Surety Company, New York, 3,350 AU...... — ...... N .Y .—All. Security Insurance Company of Hart- 2, 787 All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands...... C O NN .—All except Alaska, cesCal., C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, ford, Hartford, Conn. selll., slowa, Nev., neN.Y., N. Dak., Tenn., Virgin Islands, eWash., sW. Va. Security Mutual Casualty Company, 878 AU except Alaska, C.Z., Conn., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto ILL.—D.C. Chicago, Hi. Rico, Virgin Islands. Security National Insurance Company, 3 9 9 Ala., Ark., Cal., Colo., IU., Ind., Kans., Ky., La., Mich., T E X —Au except C.Z., Guam, Mont; Dallas, Tex. Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Tex., Wash., Wis. Select Insurance Company, Dallas, Tex.. - • 529 AHexcept Ariz., Ark., C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, Hawaii, TEX.—All except C.Z., Guam. Hawaii. Puerto Rico Kans., Ky., La., Me., Md., Mass., N.H., N.Y., N. Dak.) Virgin Islands. ' 0 Klco’ Pa., Puerto Rico., R.I., S.C., Tenn., Utah, Va., Virgin Islands, Wis. Sentry Insurance a M utual Company, 4,023 Stevens Point, Wis.4 AU except C.Z., Idaho, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands______WIS.— Angeles! “ 1106 Company’ Los 170 Cal., Idaho, Nev., Oreg., Wash___: ...... ___ CAL.— Ala.. Ariz., Cal., Colo., Fla., Ga., Ind., Iowa, Ky., Md., S.C.—nmAla., D.C., Fla., Ga.. N.C.. Va; ^CohimbTafsc InSUranC6 Company’ 312 Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N.H., N.J., N.Y., N.C., Okla., Oreg., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Va., (reinsurance only in Conn., Ohio). SAltentorTOIpaal Insuraace Company, 205 Àrk., Cal., Colo., Del., D.C., Fla., Ga., Idaho, IU., Ind., GA.—Ariz., Cal., D.C., nsFla., nlnd.. Md., sMiss.. N.J Md., Miss., Mo., Nev., N.J., N.C., Pa., R.I., S.C., mwN.C., wePa., enTex. Tex., U tah, Wash., Wis. T}lirt?Ar^ar^Jiartiord, Conn. Fire Insurance Company, 2,944 AU except Ala., C.Z., Del., Guam, La., N.J., Puerto CONN.—All. Rico, Tenn., Virgin Islands, W. Va. Com ■^n^nnmbile M utual Insurance 2,394 A-la., Fla., Ga., Ind., Kans., Ky., Md., Mich., Miss., Mo., OHIO—Ala., D.C., Fla., Ga., Ky., Md., Mich.. Miss.. Stnti i?any’ Columbus, Ohio. N.J., N.C., Ohio, Pa., S.C., Tenn., Va., W.Va. eMo., N .C ., Pa., S.C., Tenn., Va., W. Va. Danv1™ F}re and Casualty Com- 12,528 Pany, Bloomington, 111. AU except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands...... ILL.—cCal., Colo., D.C., mGa., Minn., wOkla., mPa. See footnotes at end of table.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 12958 NOTICES

Companies H olding Certificates or Authority From S ecretary or the T reasury Under Sections 6 to 13 or Title 6 or the United States Code as Acceptabu Sureties or F ederal Bonds (a)—Continued

Underwriting limitations State or other area in which incorporated and judicial (net lim it districts in which process agents have been appointed; Names of companies and locations of on any one States and other areas in which licensed to transact a (State or other area of incorporation in capitals. Letters principal executive offices risk) See fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) preceding names of States indicate judicial districts.) footnote (b) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars)

State Surety Company, Des Moines, 90 Colo., D.C., Iowa, Kans., Minn., Mo., Nebr., S. Dak____ IOWA—eArk., Colo., D .C., sFla., 111., Kans., eLa.,wMich., Iowa. Minn., sMiss., Mo., Nebr., sN .Y ., N . Dak., nOhio wnOkla., S. Dak. Statesman Insurance Company, Indian­ 268 Ala., Fla., 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Md., Minn., IND.—Arte., cCal., Colo., D.C., 111., nlowa, Kans., eLa. apolis, Ind. Miss., Mont., N. Mex., N. Dak., Pa., S. Dak., Tenn. Minn., wMo., Mont., Nebr., N. Mex., N. Dak., nwOkla., w m Pa., S. Dak., nesTex., Wyo. The Stuyvesant Insurance Company, 903 All except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Virgin Islands...... N.Y.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Virgin Allentown, Pa. Islands. Sun Insurance Company of New York, 330 All except Ala., Alaska, Arte., Ark., C.Z., Colo., Fla., N.Y.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto New York, N.Y. Ga., Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Ind., Kans., La., Miss., Rico, Virgin Islands. Nebr., Nev., N.C., N. Dak., Puerto Rico, S.C., S. Dak. Surety Company of the Pacific, Los 64 Cal...... -...... C A L —D.C. Angeles, Cal. Surety Insurance Company of Califor­ 45 Alaska, Cal., Colo., N .M ex., Tex...... CAL—Alaska, Colo., D.C., N. Mex., Tex. nia, La H abra, Cal. Traders & General Insurance Company, 302 Colo., Kans., La,, Miss., Mo.,N. Mex., Okla., Tex______T E X .—D.C . Dallas, Tex. Transamerica Insurance Company, Los 7,270 All except Guam ...... „ ...... CAL.—All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands. Angeles, Cal. Transcontinental Insurance Company, 2,326 All except C.Z., Del., Guam, Hawaii, La., Oreg:, Virgin N.Y.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Del., msGa., Guam, Chicago, 111. Islands. Hawaii, La., Miss., Oreg., Puerto Rico, S.C., Vt., Virgin Islands. Transport Indemnity Company, Los 483 All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands...... CAL.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, eKy., eLa., Nev.; Angeles, CaL nwN.Y., eOkla., Puerto Rico, mTenn., wVa., Virgin Islands, nW. Va. Transportation Insurance Company, 1,033 All except C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, S.C., Vir- ILL.—All except Alaska, nCal., C.Z., Conn., sFla., Guam, Chicago, 111. gin Islands. Hawaii, eKy., Minn., wMo., Nev., N.H., wN.Y., Ohio, ePa., Puerto Rico, 8. Dak., Virgin Islands, wWash., nW. Va., Wis. The Travelers Indemnity Company, 21,900 All except Guam...... - ...... — CONN.—All except-Guam; Hartford, Conn. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, 1,778 All except Alaska, C.Z., Conn., Del., Fla., Guam, Ha- TEX.—All except Guam; Dallas, Tex. wail, Me., Md., Mass., Mont., Nev., N.H., N.J., N.Y., Puerto Rico, R.I.,Tenn., Utah,Vt.,Va., Virginlslands, W.Va., Wyo. Tri-State Insurance Company, Tulsa, 272 All except Cal., C.Z., Conn., Del., D.C., Guam, Hawaii, OKLA.—All except Cal., C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, Ha- Okla. Me., Md., Mass., Mich., N.H., N X , N.Y., N.C., Ohio, waii, Me., Md., Mass., Mich., N.H., N J., N.Y., N.C, Oreg., Pa., Puerto Rico, R.I., S.C., Vt., Va., Virgin Ohio, Oreg., Pa., Puerto Rico, R.L, S.C., Vt., Va., Islands, W.Va., Wis. Virgin Islands, W. Va., Wis. Twin City Fire Insurance Company, 925 All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands_____MINN.—sCal., Conn., D.C., La., Va; Hartford, Conn. United Fire & Casualty Company, 271 Arte., Colo., 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Minn., Mo., Nebr., IOWA—D.C., nslll., Minn., Mo., Nebr., 8. Dak., Wis. Cedar Rapids, Iowa. N. Dak., 8. Dak., Wis., Wyo. United Pacific Insurance Company, 2,145 All except C.Z., Conn., Del., Ga., Guam, Me., Md., Mass., WASH.—All except C.Z., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin T&conid Wash. Pa., Puerto Rico, R.I., Vt., Virgin Islands. Islands. United States Fidelity and Guaranty 42,904 All except Guam______;------—— MD.—All except Guam. Company, Baltimore, Md. United States Fire Insurance Company, 8,617 All except C.Z., Guam, Virgin Islands...... N.Y.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Virgin New York, N.Y. Islands. „ I Universal Surety Company, Lincoln, 290 Arte., Ark., Colo., 111., Iowa, Kans., Minn., Mo., Mont., N E B R .—Arte., Colo., D .C., Iowa, Kans., Minn., Mo., N ebr. Nebr., N. Mex., N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., 8. Dak., Utah, Mont., N. Mex., N. Dak., wOkla., 8. Dak., nTex., Wash., Wis., Wyo. Utah, Wyo. ,, Utica Mutual Insurance Company, 2,210 All except C.Z., Guam, Kans., La., Virgin Islands------N.Y.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Me,, Utica, N.Y. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Valley Forge Insurance Company, Chi­ 1,004 All except Alaska, Cal., C.Z., Del., Fla., Guam, Hawaii, PA.—All except Guam, Virgin Islands, Wis. cago, I1L Idaho, Kans., Ky., La., Nebr., N.H., N. Mex., N.G., Oreg., Puerto Rico, 8. Dak., Tenn., Virgin Islands, Wyo. Vigilant Insurance Company, New 1,689 All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico------N.Y.—All except Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Bico, Y ork, N .Y . Virgin Islands. West American Insurance Company, 1,410 All except Ala., Alaska, C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, Hawaii, CAL.—Ala., Colo., D.C., nsFla., Ga., 111., Ind., Iowa, Hamilton, Ohio. Idaho, Me., Mass., Mont., N.H., N.C., Puerto Rico, Kans., K y., eLa., Md., Mich., Minn., Mo., Nev., N. Mex., R.I., 8. Dak., Vt., Virgin Islands, W. Va. N. Dak., Ohio, nOkla., Oreg., Pa., m Tenn., Tex., Utah, Va., Wash., Wis., Wyo. Westchester Fire Insurance Company, 4,265 All except C.Z., Guam, Virginlslands______-______... N.Y.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto New York, N.Y. Rico, Virgin Islands. The Western Casualty and Surety 4,725 All except Alaska, C.Z., Conn., Del., Guam, Hawaii, Me., KANS.—AH except Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Company, Fort Scott, Hans. Mass., N.H., N.Y., N.C., Puerto Rico, R.I., Vt., Virgin Islands. The Western Fire Insurance Company, 2,867 All except Alaska, C.Z., Del., Guam, Hawaii, Me., Md., KANS.—All except Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Fort Scott, Kans. Mass., N.H., N.C., Pa., Puerto Rico, R.I., Vt., Va., Virgin Islands, W. Va. Western Surety Company, Sioux Falls, 1,342 All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, N.Y., Puerto 8. DAK.—All except Alaska, C.Z., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto S. Dak. Rico, Virgin Islands. Rico, Virgin Islands. _ Westfield Insurance Company, Le- 1,174 All except Ala., Alaska, Ark., C.Z., Fla., Ga., Guam, OHIO—All except Alaska, eCal., C.Z., Del., mFla., Guam, Roy, Ohio.8 Hawaii, La., Me., Miss., Mo., N .H ., N . Mex., N. Dak., Hawaii, Idaho, nslll., eKy., Me., Mass., Mo., Mont., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. N .J., eN.Y., Oreg., Pa., Puerto Rico, S.C., sTex., wva., Virgin Islands. Wilshire Insurance Company, Los 135 Ariz., Cal., Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Mont., Nev., Oreg., CAL — Angeles, Cal. N . Mex., Utah, Wash. Wisconsin Surety Corporation, Madison, 87 Alaska, Cal., D.C., 111., Iowa, Minn., Mo., Nev., Pa., WIS.—D.C., Iowa, Minn., wmPa., S. Dak., nTex. Wis. $• Dak. T gx. Wis. Wolverine Insurance Company, Battle 1,991 Ark., Cal.’ Fla.,’ Ga., Hl., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Mich., Minn., M ICH.—D .C., Ga., HI., Ind., Iowa, Minn., Ohio, S. Dak. Creek, Mich. Nebr., Nev., N . Mex., N . Dak., Ohio, Pa., S. Dak., V t., W. Va., Wyo.

N otes (a) All certificates of authority expire June 30, and are renewable July 1, annjially. cutes (signs) the bond, but need not be licensed in the State or other area in whicl (b) Treasury requirements do not limit the penal sum of bonds which surety the principal resides or where the contract is to be performed (28 Op. A tty- ueu. companies may execute. The net retention, however, cannot exceed the underwriting 127, Dec. 24,1909; 31 cfr §223.5(b)). The term “ other areas” includes the Canal ¿one. limitation and excess risks must be protected by coinsurance, reinsurance, or other District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. - «... methods in accordance with Treasury Circular 297, Revised January 2,1970 (31CFR (d) Abbreviated capital letters preceding judicial districts indicate State or oin j § 223.10, § 223.11). When excess risks on bonds in favor of the United States are pro­ area in which the company is incorporated. Process agents are required in tne , tected by reinsurance, such reinsurance is to be effected by use of a Treasury reinsur­ lowing districts: Where principal resides; where obligation is to be performea, “ ance form to be filed with the bond or within 45 days thereafter. Risks in excess of where the bond is returnable or filed. No process agent required in State or limit fixed herein must be reported for quarter in which they are executed. In pro­ wherein company is incorporated. Letters “n, s, e, m, c, and w” preceding h®“ ®“ , tecting such excess, the rating in force on the date of the execution of the risk will States indicate respectively the Northern, Southern, Eastern, Middle, Central, govern absolutely. This limit applies until a new rating is established by the Treasury Western judicial districts of States indicated. If letters do not precede names of era , Department. process agents have been appointed in all judicial districts of such States. (c) A surety company must be licensed in the State or other area in which it exe­ FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 NOTICES 12959

Companies H olding Certificates of Authority from the Secretary of the T reasury as A cceptable R einsuring Companies U nder T reasury Circular N o 297 R evised January 2,1970, as Supplemented

Underwriting Judicial limitations Districts in Name of companies (net limit on which process any one risk) agents have [In thousands been of dollars] appointed

Accident and Casualty Insurance Company of W interthur, Switzerland (U.S. Office, New York, N . Y.)...... 2,258 D.C. Alliance Assurance Company, Limited, London, England (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)...... 758 D.C. Atlas Assurance Company, Limited, London, England (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)...... 817 D.C. Constellation Reinsurance Company, New York, N .Y ...... 1,981 D.C. ELAC Insurance Company, Limited, London, England (U.S. Office, Boston, Mass.)...... *’ 6,549 General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Limited, Perth, Scotland (U.S. Office, Philadelphia, Pa.) 11,077 D.C. The London Assurance, London, England (Ü.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)...... 1,448 D.C. The London & Lancashire Insurance Company, Limited, London, England (U.S. Office, New York, N.Y.~)_...... 657 D.C; The Marine Insurance Company, Limited, London, England (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)...... 472 D.C. Metropolitan Fire Assurance Company, Hartford, Conn...... 615 D.C. Munich Reinsurance Company, Munich, Germany (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)...... : ...... I! 977 . D.C. The Netherlands Insurance Company, Est. 1845, The Hague, Holland (U.S. Office, Keene, N.H.)...... 685 D.C. Rochdale Insurance Company, New York, N .Y ______263 D.C. Royal Insurance Company, Limited, Liverpool, England (U.S. Office, New York, N.Y.)...... 3,247 D.C. The Sea Insurance Company, Limited, Liverpool, England (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)...... 730 D.C. The Skandia Insurance Company, Stockholm, Sweden (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)...... 1,082 D.C. Sun Insurance Office, Limited, London, England (U.S. pffice, New York, N.Y.)__...... 1,356 D.C; Swiss Reinsurance Company, Zurich, Switzerland (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)...... 4,985 D.C. Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, New York, N .Y ______237 D.C. The Unity Fire and General Insurance Company, New York, N .Y ______463 D.C. Zurich Insurance Company, Zurich, Switzerland (U.S. Office, Chicago, 111.)...... 8,251 D.C.

1 Formerly Employers Commercial Union Insurance Company of America. Name Company, Ltd., effective January 1, 1970. (See Federal Register of December 10, changed effective March 31, 1971. (See Federal Register May 4, 1971, Page 8331 for 1970, Page 18752 for details.) details.) ^Form erly Hardware Mutual Casualty Company. Name changed effective July 1, 2 Formerly Fidelity-Phenix Insurance Company. Name changed effective Janu­ ary 1,1971. (See Federal Register of March 30, 1971, Page 5868 for details.) 5 Formerly Superior Risk Insurance Company. Name changed effective Decem­ 2 Assumed business of United States Branch of London Guarantee & Accident ber 15, 1970. [FR Doc.71-9456 Filed 7-8-71;8:45 am]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 132— FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971 PUBLIC PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES

CONTENTS

• Messages to the Congress • Public speeches and letters • The President's news conferences • Radio and television reports to the American people • Remarks to informal groups

PUBLISHED BY

Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration

ORDER FROM

Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402

PRIOR VOLUMES

Volumes covering the adminis* trations of Presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Richard Nixon — 19 6 9 Johnson are available at vary* ing prices from the Superin* tendent of Documents, U.S. 1183 Pages - Price: $14-50 Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.