DOCSLIB.ORG

"Audition" In: Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Online

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CHAPTER 2 Audition JOSH H. MCDERMOTT INTRODUCTION challenges of everyday audition are reflected in the gap between biological and machine Sound is created when matter in the world hearing systems—machine systems for vibrates and takes the form of pressure waves interpreting sound currently fall short of that propagate through the air, containing human abilities. At present, smart phones clues about the environment around us. and other machine systems recognize speech Audition is the process by which organisms reasonably well in quiet conditions, but in utilize these clues to derive information about a noisy restaurant they are all but useless. the world. Understanding the basis of our success in Audition is a crucial sense for most ani- perceiving sound will hopefully help us to mals. Humans use sound to infer a vast replicate it in machine systems and restore number of important things—what some- it in biological auditory systems when their one said, their emotional state when they function becomes impaired. said it, and the whereabouts and nature of The goal of this chapter is to provide a objects we cannot see, to name but a few. bird’s-eye view of contemporary hearing When hearing is impaired (via congenital research. The chapter is an updated version conditions, noise exposure, or aging), the of one I wrote a few years ago (McDermott, consequences can be devastating, such that 2013). I provide brief overviews of classic a large industry is devoted to the design of areas of research as well as some central prosthetic hearing devices. themes and advances from the past 10 years. As listeners, we are largely unaware of the The first section describes the sensory trans- computations underlying our auditory sys- duction of the cochlea. The second section tem’s success, but they represent an impres- discusses modulation and its measurement by sive feat of engineering. The computational subcortical and cortical regions of the audi- tory system, a key research focus of the last This chapter is an updated version of a chapter written for The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience. few decades. The third and fourth sections I thank Dana Boebinger, Alex Kell, Wiktor Mlynarski, describe some of what is known about the and Kevin Woods for helpful comments on earlier drafts primary and nonprimary auditory cortex, of this chapter. Supported by a McDonnell Scholar Award and a National Science Foundation CAREER respectively. The fifth section discusses Award. the perception of sound source properties, Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Fourth Edition, edited by John T. Wixted. Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: 10.1002/9781119170174.epcn202 1 2 Audition focusing on location, loudness, and pitch. The “auditory scene analysis” (Bregman, 1990), sixth section presents an overview of auditory this problem has analogs in other sensory scene analysis. I conclude with a discussion modalities, but the nature of sound presents of where hearing research is headed. the auditory system with unique challenges. THE PROBLEM SOUND MEASUREMENT—THE PERIPHERAL AUDITORY SYSTEM Just by listening, we can routinely apprehend many aspects of the world around us: the The transformation of the raw acoustic input size of a room in which we are talking, into representations that are useful for behav- whether it is windy or raining outside, the ior is apparently instantiated over many brain speed of an approaching car, or whether the areas and stages of neural processing, span- surface someone is walking on is gravel or ning the cochlea, midbrain, thalamus, and marble. This ability is nontrivial because the cortex (Figure 2.1). The early stages of this properties of the world that are of interest cascade are particularly intricate in the audi- to a listener are generally not explicit in tory system relative to other sensory systems, the acoustic input—they cannot be easily with many processing stations occurring recognized or discriminated from the sound prior to the cortex. The sensory organ of the waveform itself. The brain must process the cochlea is itself a complex multicomponent sound entering the ear to generate represen- system, whose investigation remains a con- tations in which the properties of interest are siderable challenge—the mechanical nature more evident. One of the main objectives of of the cochlea renders it much more difficult hearing science is to understand the nature to probe (e.g., with electrodes) than the retina of this transformation and its instantiation in or olfactory epithelium, for instance. Periph- the brain. eral coding of sound is also unusual relative Like other senses, audition is further to that of other senses in its degree of clinical complicated by a second challenge—that of relevance. Unlike vision, for which the most scene analysis. Although listeners are gener- common forms of dysfunction are optical in ally interested in the properties of individual nature, and can be fixed with glasses, hearing objects or events, the ears are rarely pre- impairment typically involves altered periph- sented with the sounds from isolated sources. eral neural processing, and its treatment has Instead, the sound signal that reaches the ear benefited from a detailed understanding of is typically a mixture of sounds from differ- the processes that are altered. Much of hear- ent sources. Such mixtures of sound sources ing research has accordingly been devoted occur frequently in natural auditory environ- to understanding the nature of the measure- ments, for example in social settings, where ments made by the auditory periphery, and a single speaker of interest may be talking they provide a natural starting point for any among many others, and in music. From the discussion of how we hear. mixture it receives as input, the brain must derive representations of the individual sound Frequency Selectivity and the Cochlea sources of interest, as are needed to under- stand someone’s speech, recognize a melody, Hearing begins with the ear, where sound or otherwise guide behavior. Known as the is transduced into action potentials that are “cocktail party problem” (Cherry, 1953), or sent to the brain via the auditory nerve. Sound Measurement—The Peripheral Auditory System 3 Auditory Medial cortex geniculate nucleus Inferior colliculus Left cochlea Superior olivary nucleus Auditory nerve Cochlear nucleus Figure 2.1 The auditory system. Sound is transduced by the cochlea, processed by an interconnected set of subcortical areas, and then fed into the core regions of auditory cortex. Source: From Goldstein (2007). © 2007 South-Western, a part of Cengage, Inc. Reproduced with permission. www.cengage/com/permissions The transduction process is marked by named for the stereocilia that protrude from several distinctive signal transformations, them. The inner hair cells are responsible the most obvious of which is produced by for sound transduction. When the section of frequency tuning. membrane on which they lie vibrates, stere- The key components of sound transduc- ocilia shear against the membrane above, tion are depicted in Figure 2.2. Sound induces opening mechanically gated ion channels and vibrations of the eardrum, which are then inducing a voltage change within the body of transmitted via the bones of the middle ear to the cell. Neurotransmitter release is triggered the cochlea, the sensory organ of the auditory by the change in membrane potential, gener- system. The cochlea is a coiled, fluid-filled ating action potentials in the auditory nerve tube. Several membranes extend through fibers that the hair cell synapses with. This the tube and vibrate in response to sound. electrical signal is carried by the auditory Transduction of this mechanical vibration nerve fibers to the brain. into an electrical signal occurs in the organ of The frequency tuning of the transduction Corti, a mass of cells attached to the basilar process occurs because different parts of membrane. The organ of Corti in particu- the basilar membrane vibrate maximally in lar contains what are known as hair cells, response to different frequencies. This is 4 Audition Cross section of cochlea Cochlea Auditory Reissner’s membrane nerve Vestibular Tectorial membrane nerve Auditory Middle nerve canal Vestibular canal Inner Oval hair cells window Spiral Round ganglion window Cochlea Tympanic canal Outer hair cells Tectorial Basilar Stereocilia Organ membrane membrane of Corti Outer Basilar Tunnel Efferent hair cells membrane Afferent Inner of Corti fibers Auditory nerve fibers hair cells Figure 2.2 Structure of the peripheral auditory system. (Top left) Diagram of ear. The eardrum trans- mits sound to the cochlea via the middle ear bones (ossicles). (Top middle) Inner ear. The semicircular canals abut the cochlea. Sound enters the cochlea via the oval window and causes vibrations along the basilar membrane, which runs through the middle of the cochlea. (Top right) Cross section of cochlea. The organ of Corti, containing the hair cells that transduce sound into electrical potentials, sits on top of the basilar membrane. (Bottom) Schematic of section of the organ of Corti. The shearing that occurs between the basilar and tectorial membranes when they vibrate (in response to sound) causes the hair cell stereocilia to deform. The deformation causes a change in the membrane potential of the inner hair cells, transmitted to the brain via afferent auditory nerve fibers. The outer hair cells, which are 3 times more numerous than the inner hair cells, serve as a feedback system to alter the basilar membrane motion, tightening its tuning and amplifying the response to low-amplitude sounds. Source: From Wolfe (2006, Chapter 9). Reproduced with permission of Oxford University Press. partly due to mechanical resonances—the rather than transduce it. They expand and thickness and stiffness of the membrane contract in response to sound (Ashmore, vary along its length, producing a differ- 2008; Dallos, 2008; Hudspeth, 2008). Their ent resonant frequency at each point.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Design for Auditory Displays: Identifying Temporal and Spatial Information Conveyance Principles
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2007 Design For Auditory Displays: Identifying Temporal And Spatial Information Conveyance Principles Ali Ahmad University of Central Florida Part of the Industrial Engineering Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Ahmad, Ali, "Design For Auditory Displays: Identifying Temporal And Spatial Information Conveyance Principles" (2007). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 3050. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3050 DESIGN FOR AUDITORY DISPLAYS: IDENTIFYING TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL INFORMATION CONVEYANCE PRINCIPLES by ALI AHMAD B.S. University of Jordan, 2000 M.S. University of Central Florida, 2003 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2007 Major Professor: Kay M. Stanney © 2007 Ali Ahmad ii ABSTRACT Designing auditory interfaces is a challenge for current human-systems developers. This is largely due to a lack of theoretical guidance for directing how best to use sounds in today’s visually-rich graphical user interfaces. This dissertation provided a framework for guiding the design of audio interfaces to enhance human-systems performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael G. Heinz Page 1 of 18 Curriculum
    Curriculum Vitae Michael G. Heinz Nov 2018 Contact 715 Clinic Drive, Heavilon Hall, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA Phone: (765) 496-6627 Fax: (765) 494-0771 [email protected] https://engineering.purdue.edu/auditory/ Research Interests Neural correlates of normal and impaired auditory perception, noise-induced hearing loss, models of auditory signal processing and perception Education Ph.D. 2000 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Speech and Hearing Sciences, Division of Health Sciences and Technology Dissertation Title: “Quantifying the effects of the cochlear amplifier on temporal and average-rate information in the auditory nerve” Dissertation Advisor: Laurel H. Carney, Ph.D. M.S.E 1994 Johns Hopkins University Electrical and Computer Engineering Sc.B. 1992 Brown University Engineering (Electrical) Professional Experience Professor Dept. of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sci., Purdue Univ. 2015 – present Professor Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue Univ. 2015 – present Academic Visitor Dept. of Psychology, University of Cambridge, England. 2013 Visiting Fellow Wolfson College, University of Cambridge, England. 2013 Associate Professor Dept. of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sci., Purdue Univ. 2011 – 2015 Associate Professor Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue Univ. 2011 – 2015 Assistant Professor Dept. of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sci., Purdue Univ. 2005 – 2011 Assistant Professor Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue Univ. 2005 – 2011 Research Associate Dept. of Biomedical Engineering,
    [Show full text]
  • The Psychology of Music: an Overview An
    The Psychology of Music: An Overview An Honors Thesis (HONRS 499) by Joey Thomas Thesis Advisor Dr. Robert Fischer Ball State University Muncie, Indiana April 2009 Graduation May 2009 f L' !, f j '1 '_1 Psychology of Music 2 Abstract , - . Relative to other areas of psychology, not a great deal of literature is available on research pertaining or even relating to music. A history of the subfield known as the psychology of music (or music psychology), in particular, does not to my knowledge exist in the form of a single source. Here, I provide an overview of events and concepts that define the study of music psychology . Psychology of Music 3 The Psychology of Music: An Overview Introduction Edgard Varese, an influential French composer of the early 20th century, is quoted as having described music as "organized sound" (Levitin, 2006). Igor Stravinsky was of similar opinion, saying, "tonal elements become music only by virtue of their being organized, and that such organization presupposes a conscious human act" (Storr, 1992). This organization Varese and Stravinsky tell of takes into account very specific rules (hence the existence of music theory and, in part, musicology)--but even these are not set in stone across time, cultures, or musical styles (Levitin; Revesz, 2001; Storr). It follows that we must ask what brings us to see certain arrangements of sounds as "musical," while others are deemed "noisy," "atonal" or otherwise unpleasant. In other words, why do we tend to find great beauty and emotion in the operas of Gustav Mahler or in the surf-centric vocal harmonies of the Beach Boys, but not in the Great Dane barking two houses down or in the sounds of a crowded restaurant on a Saturday evening? Is experimental or avant-garde music such as French musique concrete or that ofYoko Ono "real" music then? I own a vinyl reissue of composer Tony Conrad's 1969 release Fantastic Glissando, an album nearly an hour in length consisting of little more than static and harsh, incessant electronic ringing.
    [Show full text]
  • Music As Biology
    Music as Biology The Tones We Like and Why DALE PURVES HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Dale Purves All rights reserved Jacket art: Courtesy of Thinkstock Jacket design: Tim Jones 978-0-674-54515-1 (alk. paper) 978-0-674-97296-4 (EPUB) 978-0-674-97297-1 (MOBI) The Library of Congress has cataloged the printed edition as follows: Names: Purves, Dale, author. Title: Music as biology : the tones we like and why / Dale Purves. Description: Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2017. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016020279 Subjects: LCSH: Music—Physiological aspects. | Musical perception. | Music and science. Classification: LCC ML3820 .P87 2017 | DDC 781.1—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016020279 FOR READERS WHO LOVE MUSIC BUT ARE MYSTIFIED BY MUSIC THEORY Contents Preface 1. Sound Signals and Sound Stimuli 2. The Perception of Sound Signals 3. Human Vocalization 4. Music and Vocal Similarity 5. Consonance and Dissonance 6. Musical Scales 7. Music and Emotion 8. Music and Speech across Cultures 9. Implications Appendix: An Overview of the Human Auditory System Glossary Bibliography Acknowledgments Index Preface The aim of this book is to argue that when considered in terms of biology, the whys and wherefores of tonal music are easier to understand than when considered in terms of mathematics, physics, psychology, or conventional music theory. The centerpiece of the argument is the ecological benefits that arise from recognizing and responding to conspecific vocalization. While biology provides a limited perspective for tackling a topic as complex as musical tones and their effects on listeners, there is a good reason for this stance: the sources of tones in the world in which we evolved are almost exclusively animate, and the animals whose tonal utterances are most important to us are other human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • 'False Relations': Hermann Von Helmholtz's Study of Music and the Delineation of Nineteenth-Century Physiology
    Nineteenth-Century Music Review, page 1 of 22 © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S1479409820000117 ‘False Relations’: Hermann von Helmholtz’s Study of Music and the Delineation of Nineteenth-Century Physiology Julia Kursell University of Amsterdam Email: [email protected] This article discusses the delineation between physiology and music theory in Hermann von Helmholtz’s On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music (1863). It takes the phenomenon of ‘false relations’ as a point of departure to question the method- ology Helmholtz devised to study music and hearing. The key to understanding this experimental method is the concept of ‘controlled deviation’, which is substantiated in two main sections. After providing some background information on the history of music theory, the first section explores ‘false relations’ within the context of physiological experimentation and hydrodynamics, the two most important areas of Helmholtz’s scientific research. The second section of the article is centred on the experimental methods of Helmholtz as used in his investigation of vision and hearing. More specifically, it introduces notions of distortion, defamiliarization and deviation to distinguish levels of physiology that relate to the body and to cognition. As it turns out, music posed specific problems for the researcher. Beyond the ephemerality of sound, the malleability of hearing and of musical aesthetics proved even more of an obstacle for controlled experimentation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Faculty for Music: What’S Special About It?
    Bispham (2018) 0 The Human Faculty for Music: What’s special about it? John Christopher Bispham1,2 Wolfson College 1 Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies (LCHES) Division of Biological Anthropology Department of Archaeology and Anthropology 2 Centre for Music and Science (CMS) Faculty of Music University of Cambridge PhD Thesis Submitted 03/2018 Supervisor: Professor Ian Cross Abstract (short version) This thesis presents a model of a narrow faculty for music - qualities that are at once universally present and operational in music across cultures whilst also being specific to our species and to the domain of music. The comparative approach taken focuses on core psychological and physiological capabilities that root and enable appropriate engagement with music rather than on their observable physical correlates. Configurations of musical pulse; musical tone; and musical motivation are described as providing a sustained attentional structure for managing personal experience and interpersonal interaction and as offering a continually renewing phenomenological link between the immediate past, the perceptual present and future expectation. Constituent parts of the narrow faculty for music are considered most fundamentally as a potentiating, quasi- architectural framework in which our most central affective and socio-intentional drives are afforded extended time, stability, and a degree of abstraction, intensity, focus and meaning. The author contends, therefore, that music's defining characteristics, specific functionalities and/or situated efficacies are not demarcated in broadly termed “musical” qualities such as melodic contour or rhythm or in those surprisingly elusive “objective facts” of musical structure. Rather they are solely the attentional/motivational frameworks which root our faculty to make and make sense of music.
    [Show full text]
  • Pitch Perception [Version 090507]
    Draft. To appear in Plack, C. Auditory Perception (Oxford University Press Handbook of Auditory Science), 2008 or 2009. Pitch Perception [version 090507] Alain de Cheveigné 1 Introduction Pitch is the stuff of which music is made. Melody, harmony, tonality are either built upon pitch, or else they depend upon similar properties of the physical stimulus. In speech, pitch is a vector of prosody, and for tonal languages it carries also syllabic information. Pitch (or its physical correlate, periodicity) is important to perceptually segregate competing sound sources. Pitch and harmony have fascinated thinkers since antiquity and, for many early authors, to explain pitch amounted to explaining auditory perception. For the psychoacoustician, pitch is the perceptual correlate of fundamental frequency (F0), that is, the rate at which a periodic waveform repeats itself. A periodic sound produces a pitch that depends on the period T=1/F0: the shorter the period, the higher the pitch. The quantitative relation between period of vibration and notes of the musical scale was established early in the 17th century by Mersenne and Galileo (see de Cheveigné 2005 for a review). Recent work has been invested in mapping out the properties and limits of pitch perception (Plack and Oxenham 2005), and probing the mechanisms by which the pitch percept emerges within the auditory system (Winter 2005). Stimuli may differ in amplitude, duration, spatial position, and spectral content, and nevertheless evoke the same pitch. Pitch is a many-to-one mapping from a high dimensional set of sounds to a percept that is unidimensional (in first approximation). Thus, a trained listener may accurately match a piano note to a pure tone, to a complex tone with high- order partials, or to an exotic binaural stimulus that sounds like a featureless "shhhh" when listened to with one ear, but is distinctly pitch-like when listening with both ears (Cramer and Huggins 1958).
    [Show full text]
  • False-Relations-Hermann-Von-Helmholtzs-Study-Of-Music-And-The-Delineation-Of-Nineteenth
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) ‘False Relations’: Hermann von Helmholtz's Study of Music and the Delineation of Nineteenth-Century Physiology Kursell, J. DOI 10.1017/S1479409820000117 Publication date 2020 Document Version Final published version Published in Nineteenth-Century Music Review License CC BY Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Kursell, J. (2020). ‘False Relations’: Hermann von Helmholtz's Study of Music and the Delineation of Nineteenth-Century Physiology. Nineteenth-Century Music Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479409820000117 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:30 Sep 2021 Nineteenth-Century Music Review, page 1 of 22 © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • My Life in Music Cognition Research
    Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, & Brain Copyright 2010 Psychomusicology 2009, Vol. 20, No. 1 & No. 2 doi: 10.5084/PMMB2009/20/53 My life in music cognition research W. JAY DOWLING University of Texas at Dallas abstract—The author traces his interest and was playing records at my education in music from childhood through adulthood. grandparents’ house, and He describes the development of ideas about his core I inadvertently sat on a work, involving interleaved melodies, auditory attention, Gigli “La Donna é Mobile”; memory representation for melody, and “expectancy of course the lacquer windows,” among other topics. Important ideas, influential disc was smashed. I was teachers, and main collaborators are described from his very embarrassed, but dissertation work at Harvard to early jobs at UCLA and I think my grandfather Cal State L.A., to his position in the School of Behav- was just relieved that it ioral and Brain Sciences at UT Dallas. The author’s wasn’t something less interest in the development of melody perception stems W. Jay Dowling expendable. from observation of his own children. More recent work My father’s collec- on memory for melodies and on aging and music cogni- tion differed from my grand- father’s in its tion is also covered. The article ends with a discussion devotion to Gilbert and Sullivan; he had five or six of changes that have taken place in music psychology of the operettas in their massive twelve-disc albums. over the past 40 years. During the 1940s one of my father’s friends, who taught metal shop and who came from somewhere in the Southwest of England, got the high-school faculty and students to put on a Gilbert and Sullivan I was born in Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception Enrique A
    The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda ● Alan R. Palmer Ray Meddis Editors The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception Editors Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda Alan R. Palmer Universidad de Salamanca MRC Institute of Hearing Research Institute of Neurociencias de Castilla University Park y León Nottingham C/Pintor Fernando Gallego 1 United Kingdom 37007 Salamanca [email protected] Spain [email protected] Ray Meddis University of Essex Wivenhoe Park Colchester, Essex United Kingdom [email protected] ISBN 978-1-4419-5685-9 e-ISBN 978-1-4419-5686-6 DOI 10.1007/ 978-1-4419-5686-6 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2009943543 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of going to press, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments in Hearing Georg Von Békésy Originally Published in 1960; Reprinted in 1989
    Experiments in Hearing Georg von Békésy Originally published in 1960; Reprinted in 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface to the Reprint Edition Effects of an Absorbent Surface on a Sound Field Preface to the First Edition PART 4. COCHLEAR MECHANICS PART 1. INTRODUCTION 11. The Pattern of Vibrations in the Cochlea 1. Problems of Auditory Research Vibratory Pattern of the Basilar Membrane 2. The Anatomy of the Ear Vibrations of the Cochlear Partition in Preparations and 3. Anatomical Techniques Models 4. Experimental Apparatus and Methods Resonance and Decay Processes in the Cochlear Partition PART 2. CONDUCTIVE PROCESSES Variations of Phase along the Basilar Membrane 5. The Action of the Middle Ear Elasticity of the Cochlear Partition Movements of the Auditory Ossicles Direct Observation of the Vibrations of the Cochlear Physics of the Middle Ear Partition Differences in Sound Pressure between the Cochlear 12. Wave Motion in the Cochlea Windows Mechanical Properties of the Organ of Corti 6. Bone Conduction Frequency Analysis in the Cochleas of Various Animals Nature of Bone Conduction Paradoxical Wave Travel along the Cochlear Partition Absolute Bone-conduction Threshold Simplified Model to Demonstrate Energy Flow and Vibration of the Head in a Sound Field Traveling Waves Structure of the Middle Ear and Hearing of the Voice by 13. Frequency Analysis and the Law of Contrast Bone Conduction Frequency Analysis in the Human Cochlea Current Status of the Theories of Hearing PART 3. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF HEARING Human Skin Perception of Traveling Waves 7. Just-noticeable Differences of Amplitude and Sensations on the Skin Similar to Auditory Phenomena Frequency Neural Volleys and Similarities between Tonal and Fechner's Law and Its Significance Cutaneous Sensations Low-frequency Thresholds for Hearing and Feeling Funneling in the Nervous System and Its Role in Effects of the Head and External Auditory Meatus on the Loudness and Sensory Intensity on the Skin Sound Field 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 1, Part 1: Course Introduction and Overview of the Structure of Music
    HST.725 Music Perception and Cognition, Spring 2009 Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology Course Director: Dr. Peter Cariani Music Perception & Cognition HST 725 Peter Cariani Department of Otology and Laryngology Harvard Medical School Speech, Hearing and Biotechnology Program Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology www.cariani.com Wednesday, February 4, 2009 Outline • Course mechanics • Class survey • Music, mind, and brain – FORM & QUALITY – PATTERNS OF EVENTS IN TIME – NEURAL MECHANISMS – MEMORY/GROUPING – EMOTION/MEANING – ORIGINS • Overview of topics • Music introduction Wednesday, February 4, 2009 Wednesday, February 4, 2009 Texts Texts: (Available at the MIT Coop and/or MIT Press Bookstore) •Deutsch, D. ed. 1999. The Psychology of Music. San Diego: Academic Press. Required. (MIT Coop) •Snyder, Bob. 2000. Music and Memory. MIT Press. (Currently required, may be optional, MIT Coop & MIT Press Bookstore) •Handel, S. 1989. Listening: an Introduction to the perception of Auditory Events. MIT Press. Recommended. (MIT Press Bookstore) •Levitin, D. 2006. This is Your Brain on Music. Required. (MIT Coop, optional) •McAdams & Bigand. 1993. Thinking in Sound: The Cognitive Psychology of Human Audition. Oxford. Recommended. Not at the Coop. •Aello, R. ed. 1994. Musical Perceptions. OUP. Recommended, not at the Coop. •Moore BCJ. 2003. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, Fifth Ed.. San Diego: Academic Press. Recommended. At the Coop. Wednesday, February 4, 2009 Format Format: Lecture format + demonstrations, discussions & presentations. Begin promptly at 7 PM. We will always have a 5-10' break at 8 PM. Lecture Music presentations, of one sort or another Student presentation followed by discussion (when we do this) For each aspect of music, we’ll try to cover topics in this order: Music & sound (stimuli) Psychoacoustics, psychology (listener’s response, incl.
    [Show full text]