DOCSLIB.ORG

Additional Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Additional Information Arboricultural Report Proposed development at Rowan South Burlingham Road Lingwood Norfolk 16th December 2018 9th November 2018 1 South Burlingham Road, Lingwood - Arboricultural Report v1.0.docx Client & Site Rowan, S Burlingham Rd, c/o Anglian Planning Services Ltd Lingwood 48 Cere Road, Sprowston Norwich Norfolk NR7 8JX Planning authority Broadland District Council Thorpe Lodge 1 Yarmouth Road Norwich Norfolk NR7 0DU Document Arboricultural Report Version 1.0 Date 16th December 2018 Author Ben Hogben BSc Hons, Dip Surv (Rural), MICFor Reviewer Brian Herbison, APS Ltd BH Trees and Woodlands Consultancy Limited 299 Wroxham Road Norwich Norfolk NR7 8RN 16th December 2018 2 South Burlingham Road, Lingwood - Arboricultural Report v1.0.docx Table of Contents Page Summary 4 1 Introduction 5 2 Methodology 5 3 Desktop review 6 4 Field study 7 5 Arboricultural Implications Assessment 10 6 Arboricultural Method Statement 11 7 Conclusions 12 8 Bibliography 12 Appendix A Tree survey detail Appendix B Photographic record of selected trees Appendix C Default Specification for Protective Barrier Appendix D BS 5837:2012 Table 1 Cascade chart for tree quality assessment Appendix E Proposed layout 16th December 2018 3 South Burlingham Road, Lingwood - Arboricultural Report v1.0.docx Summary This report provides the results of a tree survey at Rowan, South Burlingham Road, Lingwood, Norfolk, NR13 4TE and an arboricultural constraints assessment of the site, and may be used to inform the planning process. The local planning authority is Broadland District Council and communication with the Council’s Planning Department confirms that there are no Tree Preservation Orders in the immediate vicinity and that there is no Conservation Area in this part of Lingwood. There are no high quality category “A” trees on the site, and all the trees are located on the perimeter of the site. One young conifer and a section of Lonicera hedge are required to be removed to make space for the development. No significant impacts on the retained trees are anticipated Recommended root protection areas are mapped in this report. No construction activities should take place within root protection areas, except as indicated in the detailed method statement. We consider that development can be accommodated with minimal impacts on the arboricultural interest of the site. 16th December 2018 4 South Burlingham Road, Lingwood - Arboricultural Report v1.0.docx 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. BH Trees and Woodland Consultancy Ltd has been commissioned to prepare an arboricultural report for land at “Rowan”, South Burlingham Road, Lingwood, Norfolk, Norfolk . 1.2. The current site access is located at grid reference TG 36980 08985. 1.3. The report includes a survey of those trees that may be affected and an assessment of the potential arboricultural impact of the proposed development on the trees. 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1. The tree survey and arboricultural aspects have been prepared in accordance with recommendations provided in BS 5837:2012, Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction – recommendations. 2.2. The site survey included trees, within the boundaries of the site and those considered to be potentially affected by development proposals, with a stem diameter over 75mm at 1.5m height. 2.3. The tree inspection took place from ground level using visual tree assessment methods, with the use of binoculars and Suunto clinometer. The presence and condition of bark and stem wounds, cavities, decay, fungal fruiting bodies and any structural defects that could increase the risk of structural failure were noted. 2.4. Details for each tree were recorded with management recommendations if deemed necessary for the development requirements, a category grading according to BS 5837:2012, and tree protection distance. Constraints 2.5. No internal decay devices or other invasive tools to assess tree condition were used. 2.6. No soil excavation or root inspection was carried out. 2.7. The survey has not considered the effect that trees or vegetation may have on the structural integrity of future building through subsidence or heave. 16th December 2018 5 South Burlingham Road, Lingwood - Arboricultural Report v1.0.docx 3. DESKTOP REVIEW 3.1 The proposed development site is located in the small village of Lingwood. Lingwood and Burlingham is a civil parish in the English county of Norfolk, comprising the large village of Lingwood together with the smaller villages of Burlingham Green, North Burlingham and South Burlingham. The villages are all within 4 kilometres (2.5 mi) of each other, some 15 kilometres (9.3 mi) equidistant from the town of Great Yarmouth and the city of Norwich. 3.2 The development proposal is for the extension of the existing bungalow to incorporate a garage and some internal alteration. This will include a new access off the public road and a car parking/turning area. 3.3 The local planning authority is Broadland District Council and communication with the Council’s Planning Department confirms that there are no Tree Preservation Orders in the immediate vicinity and that there is no Conservation Area in this part of Lingwood. The Site Figure 1. Site location 16th December 2018 6 South Burlingham Road, Lingwood - Arboricultural Report v1.0.docx 4. FIELD STUDY 4.1 The trees on the site are plotted on a plan shown in Figure 2 below. A schedule of the detailed survey data is reproduced in a table at appendix A. 4.2 The property “Rowan” is located on a quiet rural lane. It is a small bungalow with a loft conversion and an old timber garage. The development proposal affects only the area to the north and west of the existing building. This area is currently used as the landscaped front garden of the bungalow. The main area affected has a surfacing of crazy-paving over a large part. 4.3 The tree interest in this area is a collection of semi-mature, exotic, ornamental species. There is a low close-trimmed roadside hedge consisting of mainly Lonicera and holly, which continues along part of the eastern boundary in a less tended form. 4.4 The soils in this area are generally freely draining slightly acid loamy soils, thus of low fertility but moderately resistant to compaction. The site stands in The North East Norfolk and Flegg National Character Area (NCA 79) which slopes gently from west to east and is divided into three parts interspersed by The Broads National Character Area. Inland it is a rich agricultural area with small- to medium-scale fields, and is mainly unwooded. Isolated farmsteads and small nucleated villages with large medieval churches are linked by a dense network of lanes. 4.5 The site stands in a very rural location on the edge of the built up area. Views from the public road are currently available over the low existing hedging along the roadside. It is considered that the proposed development would cause minimal visual intrusion which can be mitigated by care with the design and suitable landscaping proposals. 16th December 2018 7 Figure 2: Tree Survey 9th November 2018 8 South Burlingham Road, Lingwood - Arboricultural Report v1.0.docx Figure 3: Tree Protection Plan 16th December 2018 9 5 ASSESSMENT OF ARBORICULTURAL IMPLICATIONS 5.1 The Tree Survey plan in figure 2 shows the trees found on the site and their quality assessment according to the grading categories stipulated in the British Standard. 5.2 There are no trees awarded a high category “A” grading. Two trees are given a moderate category B grading as promising specimens but possibly in the wrong position as one is very close to the overhead wires and the other very close to the road. The remaining trees are awarded a category C grading largely due to their poor condition and limited expected future contribution. The cascade chart for tree quality assessment from BS5837:2012 is reproduced in appendix D. 5.3 The hedgerow along the road is established but poorly structured and composed predominantly of Lonicera, a vigorous pioneer species but lacking stem strength to achieve a tall hedge without support. It is proposed to create a gap in the hedge for the new access. The hedge presumably once extended the full length of the western boundary but the northern section has been replaced with a wooden panel fence. 5.4 It is proposed to remove the redwood tree to create the access driveway to the new garage. The access has no other impacts. There is some minor encroachment on the rooting zone of the larch tree T3 where the turning area for the drive extends to the west. It would be preferable to create a shorter wider hammerhead. However, this area is already covered with a hard surface crazy paving and set a lower level than the root collar of the tree. Therefore if the new surface is created without further excavation and protected from compaction with a load bearing layer, any impact can be minimised 5.5 Table 1 –Quality assessment of trees recorded in survey in accordance with BS5837:2012 TOTALS To be Trees Groups Hedges removed Category U 1 0 0 1 1 Category A 0 0 0 0 0 Category B 2 0 0 2 0 Category C 6 0 1 7 1 TOTALS 9 0 1 10 2 9th November 2018 10 South Burlingham Road, Lingwood - Arboricultural Report v1.0.docx 6 ARBORICULTURAL METHOD STATEMENT Tree Work 6.1 No tree work is recommended or proposed other than the possible removal of T8 category U tree. 6.2 Any tree work should be undertaken to the standards set out in BS 3998:2010 British Standard Recommendations for Tree Work. Tree and Root Protection – Constraints on Development 6.3 The Tree Constraints Plan in Figure 3 shows the distance that construction should normally be kept away from retained trees to provide the Root Protection Area (RPA) recommended in BS 5837: 2012.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marriott's Way Walking and Cycling Guide
    Marriott’s Way Walking and Cycling Guide 1 Introduction The routes in this guide are designed to make the most of the natural Equipment beauty and cultural heritage of Marriott’s Way, which follows two disused Even in dry weather, a good pair of walking boots or shoes is essential for train lines between the medieval city of Norwich and the historic market the longer routes. Some of Marriott’s Way can be muddy so in some areas a town of Aylsham. Funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund, they are a great way road bike may not be suitable and appropriate footwear is advised. Norfolk’s to delve deeper into this historically and naturally rich area. A wonderful climate is drier than much of the county but unfortunately we can’t array of habitats await, many of which are protected areas, home to rare guarantee sunshine, so packing a waterproof is always a good idea. If you are wildlife. The railway heritage is not the only history you will come across, as lucky enough to have the weather on your side, don’t forget sun cream and there are a series of churches and old villages to discover. a hat. With loops from one mile to twelve, there’s a distance for everyone here, whether you’ve never walked in the countryside before or you’re a Other considerations seasoned rambler. The landscape is particularly flat, with gradients being kept The walks and cycle loops described in these pages are well signposted to a minimum from when it was a railway, but this does not stop you feeling on the ground and detailed downloadable maps are available for each at like you’ve had a challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • RUST Chart (C) My Genealogy Index Page Is: William RUST Was Baptised Nov 6Th 1800 William Charlotte M
    RUST chart (c) My genealogy index page is: http://cashewnut.me.uk/Genealogy/ William RUST was baptised Nov 6th 1800 William Charlotte m. 1825, St Augustine, Norwich Sophia's marriage to Charles ALA CASH - web pages Descendants son of James & Lydia [SMITH] RUST was a first cousin marriage - home page: http://cashewnut.me.uk of My e-mail address is: [email protected] by Buxton Particular Baptists BECK see chart (a). Charles was William RUST and Charlotte BECK (information from contact Una DAWE). b. 1800, Buxton b. 1800, Hevingham Charlotte BECK was baptised in Hevingham in 1800 known as Charles FRANKLING of d. 1875, Buxton d. 1883, Buxton daughter of William BECK and his wife Mary [GREEN]. in censuses apart from 1871, John's parents were John PALMER Agricultural labourer / See below for note Norfolk See RUST chart (a) for the Silk handloom weaver but married as Charles RUST. and his wife Charlotte whose maiden Edward's parents were Robert ALLEN Thrashing machine man on William PYE. ancestry of William RUST name was spelled ABBS or EBBS. and his wife Mary [BEALES]. m. 1847, St Augustine m. 1857, St Augustine, Norwich m. 1853, Norwich m. 1853, Buxton m. 1862, Aylsham m. 1880, Buxton William Charles John James William Ann Charlotte Charlotte's parents were William and Charlotte. William was a corn miller. Sophia Elizabeth Edward Anne Matilda RUST Valentine Sarah PALMER RUST PYE SAUL ADREWS Charlotte had 3 natural children before she married William RUST: Ann Easter ALLE RUST RUST RUST RUST RUST Edward ANDREWS born 1841, baptised 1843; Josiah ANDREWS born 1849, Bride's name in the GRO RUST b.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadland District Council Landscape Character Assessment
    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Landscape Character Assessment Documents 1. Broadland District Council Part 2 of 5 Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: ExA; ISH; 10.D3.1E 1.2 Deadline 3 Date: February 2019 Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm KEY Study Area Boundary Broads Authority Area National Landscape Character Types RBEAylsham Physiography (1st letter) RCE L Lowlands Reepham R Intermediate RBD Landcover (2nd letter) B Other Light Land RDS Wroxham C Clayland D Heath & Moorland W Wetland LWS Cultural Pattern (3rd letter) D Dispersed unwooded RBD Acle Norwich E Wooded - estateland Brundall S Wooded - secondary W Wetland/waste unwooded LWW 0 2 4 Km This map is based on Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Broadland District Council OS Licence No. 100018156. S:\projects\11107301 Broadland LCA\GIS\Projects\Figs_0208\11107301_Fig_3-2_Nat_landscape_typology.mxd FIGURE 3.2 CHRIS BLANDFORD ASSOCIATES www.cba.uk.net BROADLAND DISTRICT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT NATIONAL LANDSCAPE MARCH 2008 TYPOLOGY KEY Study Area Boundary Broads Authority Area LWT/MFS County Landscape Typology LWT/MFS LWT/MFS NATURAL LWT/urban LWT/MFS Aylsham Geology/Physiography (1st letter) RCG/CFA RSB/urban RSB/CFT F - Fluvial Drift RSB/CFA LWT/MFS RSB/SFS L - Vales & Valleys R - Rolling lowland Reepham RSB/CST LWT/MSS Rock Type (2nd
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office
    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation on Planning Applications Site Between Wroxham Road
    Planning Committee 1 February 2013 Agenda Item No 9(ii) Consultation on Planning Application: Erection of Up to 3,520 Dwellings, 16,800 m2 Employment Space, 8,800 m2 Shops, Services, Cafes and Restaurants plus Hotel Accommodation, Two Schools, Community Space, Energy Centre, Cycle and Vehicle Parking, Public Open Space and Accesses on Site between Wroxham Road, Sprowston and St Faiths Road, Old Catton Report by Head of Development Management Summary: The Broads Authority has been consulted by Broadland District Council in respect of an application for a mixed use development on land to the north of Norwich. Recommendation: That no objection is raised to the application, but that comments are made regarding landscaping, bio-diversity mitigation and off- setting. 1 Background 1.1 The Joint Core Strategy (JCS) for Norwich City, Broadland District and South Norfolk Councils identifies 37,000 houses and 27,000 jobs to be delivered in the Greater Norwich Area up to 2026. The JCS was adopted in 2011, however, following a partially successful legal challenge in 2012, parts of it have been remitted back to the three authorities for repair. The revised JCS was submitted to the Secretary of State before Christmas. As part of the “repair” process the GNDP have identified that a floating small sites allowance of 2,000 homes is appropriate for the Broadland part of the Norwich Policy Area (NPA) leaving 7,000 new homes to be appropriately located within the NPA. The revised JCS “allocates” 7,000 dwellings north east of Norwich (including 25 hectares of employment land at Rackheath.
    [Show full text]
  • Download: Broadland District Councillor Names and Addresses File Type
    Broadland District Councillors 3 vacancies as at 17 August 2021 Key Ward & Party (BCG) Broadland Conservative Group (LD) Liberal Democrat (BLG) Labour Cllr A D Adams 72 Reepham Road, Hellesdon, Norwich, NR6 5LT Taverham North Tel: 01603 405367 (BCG) [email protected] Cllr S C Beadle Old Kings Head, Haveringland, Norwich, NR10 4PT Reepham Tel: 01603 755373 (LD) [email protected] Cllr N J Brennan c/o Broadland District Council Blofield with South Thorpe Lodge, 1 Yarmouth Road, Norwich, NR7 0DU Walsham [email protected] (BCG) Cllr D J Britcher 33 Sadler Road, Hellesdon, Norwich, NR6 6PQ Hellesdon South Tel: 01603 416208 East [email protected] (LD) Cllr P E Bulman Tower Barn, Heydon Road, Heydon, Norwich, NR11 6RX Great Tel: 01263 584215 Witchingham Mob: 07775 697458 (BCG) [email protected] Cllr S J Catchpole 25 Burgh Road, Aylsham, Norwich, NR11 6AT Aylsham Tel: 01263 734192 (LD) [email protected] Cllr S M Clancy 53 The Street, Felthorpe, Norwich, NR10 4AB Taverham South Tel: 01603 754148 (BCG) Mob: 07837 299753 [email protected] Cllr B Cook c/o Broadland District Council Sprowston Central Thorpe Lodge, 1 Yarmouth Road, Norwich, NR7 0DU (BLG) [email protected] Cllr J K Copplestone Breck Farm, Reepham Road, Swannington, Norwich, Coltishall NR9 5TB (BCG) Tel: 01603 860840 Mob: 07771 540259
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Health, Heritage and Biodiversity Walks
    Norfolk health, heritage and biodiversity walks Aylsham Cromer Road Reepham • Buxton • Blickling • Cawston • Marsham Peterson’s Lane Weavers Way Blickling Road Heydon Road DismantledRailway Start Holman Road Abel Heath Norfolk County Council at your service Contents folk or W N N a o r f o l l k k C o u s n t y C o u n c y i it l – rs H ve e di alth io Introduction page 2 • Heritage • B Walk 1 Aylsham: starter walks page 6 Walk 2 Aylsham: Weavers’ Way and Drabblegate page 10 Walk 3 Aylsham: Marriott’s Way and Green Lane page 14 Walk 4 Aylsham: Abel Heath and Silvergate page 18 Walk 5 Aylsham town walk page 22 Walk 6 Blickling via Moorgate page 26 Walk 7 Marsham via Fengate page 30 Walk 8 Cawston via Marriott’s Way page 34 Walk 9 Reepham; Marriott’s Way and Catchback Lane page 38 Walk 10 Reepham via Salle Church page 42 Walk 11 Buxton via Brampton page 46 Walk 12 Buxton via Little Hautbois page 50 Further information page 56 1 Introduction ontact with natural surroundings offers a restorative These circular walks have been carefully designed to encourage you to Cenvironment which enables you to relax, unwind and re-charge your explore the local countryside, discover urban green spaces and to enjoy batteries helping to enhance your mood and reduce stress levels. the heritage of Norfolk, both natural and man made. The routes explore Regular exercise can help to prevent major conditions, such as coronary Aylsham and local surrounding villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadland Village Clusters – Site Summaries
    BROADLAND VILLAGE CLUSTERS – SITE SUMMARIES 1 BLOFIELD HEATH & HEMBLINGTON CLUSTER STRATEGY QUESTION: BLOFIELD HEATH & HEMBLINGTON OVERVIEW SETTLEMENT/ SITE REFERENCE: TOTAL NUMBER OF 11 REPRESENTATIONS: SUPPORT/ OBJECT/ COMMENT 1 Support, 2 Object, 8 Comment BREAKDOWN: The Blofield Heath and Hemblington cluster has 1 c/f allocation (BLO5), 1 preferred site (1048), 0 reasonable alternatives and 5 sites which are judged to be unreasonable. Main issues: • Preferred Site GNLP1048 – site promoter questions whether a larger number of homes on the site could be appropriate. Blofield Parish Council suggest looking at the Renenergy scheme and implications for the size of the site. • Unreasonable site GNLP2080 now has planning permission Sites not commented on through the consultation: Unreasonable Residential Sites • GNLP0099 • GNLP0288 • GNLP0300 • GNLP2172 2 Blofield Heath and Hemblington Cluster – General Comments STRATEGY QUESTION: Blofield Heath – Title SETTLEMENT/ SITE REFERENCE: (General Comments) TOTAL NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIONS: 1 SUPPORT/ OBJECT/ COMMENT 0 Support, 0 Object, 1 Comment BREAKDOWN: RESPONDENT SUPPORT/ BRIEF SUMMARY OF COMMENTS MAIN ISSUES DRAFT GNLP PROPOSED (OR GROUP OF OBJECT/ REQUIRING RESPONSE CHANGE TO RESPONDENTS) COMMENT INVESTIGATION PLAN Blofield Parish Comment • Site on Blofield Corner Road shouldn’t be Comments noted None Council approved as drainage strategy is into a blind ditch, it would be useful to link that evidence to this response. Due to drainage, not much has been done on site. • The site beside Heathlands on Woodbastwick Road also proposes to link up to this drainage path, there’s the issue of whether that also renders this site unworkable because of drainage. • The drainage strategy passed for Dawsons Lane is non-compliant and site specific for 12 properties and a small section of adoptable road, rest to be porous brick within the development itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Report Into the Flooding in Broadland Various in 2013- 2016 Report Reference: FIR037 Report Prepared by Nathalie Harris and Published on 16 August 2019
    Investigation Report into the flooding in Broadland Various in 2013- 2016 Report Reference: FIR037 Report prepared by Nathalie Harris and Published on 16 August 2019 1 Executive Summary (a) Flooding incidents and causes This report includes the internal flooding of 36 properties and highway flooding of 3 roads over a series of dates ranging from 2013-2016. Principally those included in this report are individual properties located across Broadland District within the following parishes: • Acle • Beighton • Blofield • Buxton with Lammas • Foulsham • Great and Little Plumstead • Hellesdon • Horsford • Lingwood & Burlingham • Newton St Faith • Pettywell • Reepham • Salhouse • Strumpshaw • Wroxham Catchments: • Hellesdon • Lackford Run • Reepham Beck The flooding that occurred was caused by: • Drainage system overloaded • Increased run-off • Drainage system or outfall blockage, unmaintained or obstructed • Surface run-off from roads • Surcharging of the drainage system; Entry of flood water into property • Property(ies) had structural issues • Neighbouring property • Obstruction of surface run-off flow paths by structures • Obstruction of surface run-off flow paths by debris. This led to the internal flooding of 36 properties. (b) Key recommendations Risk Management Authorities should; • Communicate with affected residents where their assets have given rise to the flooding of properties. • Review the appropriateness of their response to flooding. 2 • Determine the integrity and/or capacity of their assets and their maintenance where they have contributed to the flooding of properties to understand the systems role in accommodating rainfall events as well as mitigating flooding. Property owners of affected properties should; • Confirm the integrity, capacity and appropriateness of their property drainage • Determine if works are needed to remove the risk posed by structures that form obstructions to flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowthorpe Hethersett Costessey University Wensum
    Division Costessey New Costessey Costessey Arrangements for Bowthorpe County Old Costessey District Parish Wensum Proposed Electoral Wensum Division District/Borough Council Ward Bowthorpe Bowthorpe Bawburgh Hethersett University Hethersett University Colney Cringleford This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Little Melton GD100049926 2020. Crostwick Coltishall Division Arrangements for Horsham St. Faith & Newton St. Faith Horsford Spixworth Catton Grove Spixworth with St. Faiths Coltishall & Spixworth Horsford & Felthorpe County Drayton & Horsford Beeston St. Andrew District Parish Proposed Electoral Division District/Borough Council Ward Drayton Drayton South Old Catton & Sprowston West Old Catton Catton Grove Sprowston Central Old Catton Catton Grove Hellesdon North West Hellesdon Hellesdon Sprowston Woodside Hellesdon South East Sprowston Sprowston East Old Costessey Costessey Costessey New Costessey Mile Cross Mile Cross Sewell Sewell Crome Wensum Crome This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the Wensum permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. Thorpe St Andrew The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Mancroft Mancroft Thorpe
    [Show full text]
  • Acle Bure Loddon North Flegg Wroxham Blofield & Brundall Lothingland Breydon Waveney Valley Hoveton North Caister & Orme
    Hoveton Horning Ludham Martham Repps with Bastwick Hemsby East Flegg Hoveton St Benet's Hoveton Hoveton & Tunstead Thurne West Flegg Rollesby Ormesby St. Michael Division Wroxham North Caister & Ormesby Arrangements for Wroxham Acle Woodbastwick Ashby with Oby Ormesby Ormesby St. Margaret with Scratby North Flegg County Filby Fleggburgh District Blofield with South Walsham Caister North Parish South Walsham Upton with Fishley Caister-on-Sea Proposed Electoral Division Fleggburgh District/Borough Plumstead Hemblington Caister South Council Ward Bure West Caister Mautby Stokesby with Herringby Blofield Acle Acle Yarmouth North Blofield & Brundall Lingwood & Burlingham Burlingham Brundall Central & Northgate Halvergate Yarmouth North & Central Beighton Southtown & Cobholm Surlingham Strumpshaw Acle Yare Brundall Bradwell North Marshes Freethorpe Burgh Castle Breydon Rockland St. Mary Claydon Thorpe Hamlet Bradwell St. Andrews Thorpe Hamlet Cantley, Limpenhoe & Southwood Rockland Magdalen Claxton Reedham Hellington Magdalen Carleton St. Peter Lothingland Loddon Haddiscoe Bradwell South & Hopton Ashby St. Mary Belton with Browston Langley with Hardley Thurlton Gorleston Loddon & Chedgrave Lothingland This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the Hopton-on-Sea permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Fritton & St. Olaves Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Thurton Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and Brooke Waveney Valley database right. Norton Subcourse Bergh Apton The Local Government
    [Show full text]
  • 24Th July 2012, 7.30Pm
    LINGWOOD & BURLINGHAM PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Meeting held at the Methodist Schoolroom, Chapel Road, Lingwood on Tuesday 24th July 2012, 7.30pm. Present were: Ben Bethell – Chairperson, Marina Tubby – Vice Chairperson, Ray Britt, Cliff Fountain, Tony Gould, Richard Morton, Hannah Paul and Sonya Dickinson – Clerk. 12/138. Welcome & apologies for absence: Apologies were received from Lauren Bean, Mike Bredbere, Krisy Little, Ian White. 12/139. Declarations of interest: Sonya Dickinson 12/148. Expenses. b) i). Richard Morton 12/143. b). As brother of the applicant. Cliff Fountain 12/143. a) As neighbour of the property and item 12/145. As treasurer of Village Hall committee. Ben Bethell Item 12/145. As Chair of Village Hall Committee and item 12/148. b) iii) Finance. Marina Tubby item 12/145. As Parish Council representative on the Village Hall Committee. 12/140. Public Forum and reports from Committees: We were joined by 2 members of the public. John Peters sent an e-mail which was circulated to Councillors prior to the meeting and read out at the meeting, he requested that if a loan is given to the Village hall it should not be interest free, he was informed via e-mail that the interest on the Parish Council account is minimal at present. Concerns were raised that there should be a time limit put on the sale of the single plot of land and the loan. The loan can only be paid back when the sale of the single plot on Norwich Road goes through so there cannot be a time limit put on the loan but there has already been interest in the plot so it shouldn’t take too long to sell.
    [Show full text]