DOCSLIB.ORG

River of Injustice: St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

River of Injustice: St. Louis’s Freedom Suits and the Changing Nature of Legal Slavery in Antebellum America by Kelly Marie Kennington Department of History Duke University Date:_________________ Approved: ___________________________ Laura F. Edwards, Supervisor ___________________________ Edward Balleisen ___________________________ Peter H. Wood ___________________________ Adriane Lentz-Smith Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2009 ABSTRACT River of Injustice: St. Louis’s Freedom Suits and the Changing Nature of Legal Slavery in Antebellum America by Kelly Marie Kennington Department of History Duke University Date:_________________ Approved: ___________________________ Laura F. Edwards, Supervisor ___________________________ Edward Balleisen ___________________________ Peter H. Wood ___________________________ Adriane Lentz-Smith An abstract of dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2009 Copyright by Kelly Marie Kennington 2009 Abstract Slavery and freedom are central issues in the historiography of nineteenth- century America. In the antebellum era (1820-1860), personal status was a fluid concept and was never as simple as black and white. The courts provide a revealing window for examining these ambiguities because court cases often served as the venue for negotiations over who was enslaved and who was free. In St. Louis, enslaved men and women contributed to debates and discussions about the meaning of personal status by suing for their freedom. By questioning their enslavement in freedom suits, slaves played an important role in blurring the law’s understanding of slavery; in the process, they incurred the enormous personal risks of abuse and the possibility of sale. Using the records of over 300 slaves who sued for freedom, as well as a variety of manuscript sources, newspapers, and additional court records, this project traces these freedom suits over time, and examines how slave law and the law of freedom suits shifted, mainly in response to local and national debates over slavery and also to the growing threat of anti-slavery encroachment into St. Louis. When the laws tightened in response to these threats, the outcomes of freedom suits also adjusted, but in ways that did not fit the pattern of increasing restrictions on personal liberty. Instead, the unique situation in St. Louis in the 1840s and 1850s, with its increasingly anti-slavery immigrant population, allowed slaves suing for freedom to succeed at greater rates than in previous decades. iv Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….iv Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………...vi Introduction……………………………………………………………………………1 1. “According to the Statute”: Missouri’s Legal Heritage and the Fluidity of Law…17 2. “Good Reasons to Fear”: Slaves’ Experiences in Freedom Suits…………………65 3. “Under the Protection and Authority”: Interests and Influences in St. Louis Freedom Suits………………………………………………………………………108 4. “Living as free”: The “Problem” Posed by Free Blacks in a Slave Society……..155 5. Changes in Law, Changes in Politics: St. Louis in the Turbulent 1850s………...203 Epilogue…………………………………………………………………………….250 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………...256 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………..263 Biography…………………………………………………………………………..274 v Acknowledgements I am blessed to have had the generous help of many people while writing this dissertation. The shortcomings of the project are all my own, of course, but the project has benefited greatly from the assistance of numerous others who deserve recognition. I want to begin by thanking my advisor, Laura Edwards. Her guidance and advice along every step of this process has been invaluable to my professional development. I know this dissertation is immensely improved by Laura’s thoughtful comments and suggestions, and I am deeply grateful for all of her help. My committee members, Peter Wood, Ed Balleisen, and Adriane Lentz-Smith also deserve special mention. Each of them brings a unique perspective to my work, and I appreciate each of their contributions. I am very lucky to have such a generous committee of scholars reading and commenting on my work. A number of other professors at Duke and elsewhere have contributed to my development as a scholar. Randy Sparks and Judy Schafer generously gave their time to help an over-eager undergraduate begin to think about a career in history. The many conversations I had with them formed the basis for my research habits and my interest in studying southern slave law. I would also like to thank Margaret Humphreys for her generosity and support throughout my time in graduate school. Thanks also to Dirk Bonker, Sally Deutsch, Lil Fenn, John French, Eric Gardner, Barry Gaspar, John Hart, Reeve Huston, Tom Robisheaux, Alex Roland, and John Thompson for their support. I also want to thank Daina Ramey Berry, Jonathan Ocko, David Gilmartin, and the members of the Triangle Legal History Seminar for reading and commenting on one of my chapters. vi I want to thank the members of my dissertation writing groups, Gordon Mantler, Sebastian Lukasik, Steve Inrig, Felicity Turner, Orion Teal, and Eric Weber, for reading and commenting on parts of the project. Heidi Giusto also read many pieces of my work, and I know that our innumerable conversations about slavery and the law have helped to improve the project. I also appreciate the conversations, advice, and friendship of: Anne-Marie Angelo, Adam Arenson, Kim Bowler, Elizabeth Brake, Jenny Crowley, Mitch Fraas, Julia Gaffield, Samantha Gervase, Reena Goldthree, Alisa Harrison, Paul Johstono, Max Krochmal, Pam Lach, Heather Marshall, Noeleen McIlvenna, Todd Olzewski, Bryan Pitts, Jacob Remes, Linda Rupert, Liz Shesko, David Silkenat, Silvermoon, Paige Welch, and Amy Williams. Several archivists provided me with assistance during my visits to Missouri, and so I want to thank the staff of the Missouri Historical Museum, the Missouri State Archives-St. Louis, and the Western Historical Manuscripts Collection not only for their help, but for their kindness. Personal relationships can make quite a difference in the course of a project, and I cannot say enough good things about the people I met through my archival journeys. In particular, I want to thank Molly Kodner and Dennis Northcott at the Missouri Historical Museum; Eben Lehmen, Patricia Barge, Sharon Kenny, Nik Henle, and Bill Glankler at the Missouri State Archives-St. Louis branch; and Ruth Ann Hager at the St. Louis County Library. Kristin E. S. Zapalac at the Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ State Historic Preservation Office deserves special thanks for her kindness and her willingness to share some of her own research and her unending knowledge about Missouri’s freedom suits. vii Thank you also to my family for their love and support through this process, especially my parents, Rohn Kennington and Leslie Kennington, for their words of encouragement, and my husband Kevin Brandewie, for his patience, his willingness to listen, and for always believing in me. It is difficult to know where to begin in thanking Mike and Diane Everman. They not only opened up their home for me to stay while researching in St. Louis, they also provided me with endless evenings of conversation and fun exploring the many museums, festivals, and restaurants of St. Louis. They are two of the most remarkable individuals I know, and I thank them from the bottom of my heart for their support, their advice, and most of all their friendship. viii Introduction Never, perhaps…was there…a century of such unvarying and unmitigated crime as is to be collected from the history of the turbulent and blood-stained Mississippi. The stream itself appears as if appropriate for the deeds which have been committed…There are no pleasing associations connected with the great common sewer. – Captain Frederick Marryat1 At the edge of the river, slaves in St. Louis lived on the border of the slave system. Only the Mississippi River separated the city of St. Louis, founded on its banks in 1764, from the free state of Illinois. Gazing across the river’s churning waters, enslaved men and women in St. Louis could actually see freedom on the other side. Some in St. Louis also lived on the edge of the slave system in a figurative sense, because Missouri provided a means of winning freedom by using the legal system to question enslaved status. Their ability to sue for freedom meant that slaves in St. Louis stood on the edge of a river of injustice, where they desperately tried to avoid getting swept away. Like the Mississippi River, the history of slavery in America was constantly changing, full of twists and turns, ebbs and flows, all of which held momentous consequences for hundreds of thousands of men and women of African descent. There were powerful continuities from decade to decade, but there were also subtle and important shifts. For generations, the Mississippi River has served as a rich symbol for all those who have lived along its banks or traveled its waters, as well as for the nation as a whole. Poet Walt Whitman once called it the “spinal river,” and in some ways it 1 Frederick Marryat, Diary in America, Series II, Volume I (Philadelphia: T.K. & P.G. Collins, 1840), chapter 8, accessed at: http://www.athelstane.co.uk/marryat/diaramer.htm (March
Recommended publications
  • Boone's Lick Heritage, Vol. 11, No. 2

    Boone's Lick Heritage, Vol. 11, No. 2

    BOONE’S LICK HERITAGE The Missouri River from the bluffs above historic Rocheport Two Historic Views of the Missouri River 19th-century Voyage Up the River and 20th-century Memoir of a One-time Riverman VOL. 11 NO. 2 — SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2012 BOONSLICK HISTORICAL SOCIETY PERIODICAL EDITOR’S PAGE A River Runs Through It . Our theme in this issue of Boone’s Lick Heritage is As a youngster growing up in the St. Louis area during water, specifically streams and rivers. Waterways have the 1940s, I was part of a family that often vacationed in played a major role in the exploration and settlement of this the southeastern Missouri Ozarks, a region defined by its country by Europeans, many of whom were finding and fol- many springs and spring-fed streams. The Current River, lowing the earlier pathways and villages of Native Ameri- for example, was born of and is sustained by spring waters, cans. Starting with the 1804-06 Corps of Discovery journey the largest of which is Big Spring near Van Buren. Big by Lewis and Clark up the Missouri, “our river” played the Spring and the Current are Ozark waters that tug at my starring role in the exploration and western movement of soul, especially when I’m absent from their rugged wa- our young nation. And the Missouri’s northern tributary, the tershed. The region’s many springs and the waters of the Mississippi (as many of us like to think), drew Gen. Lewis Current, along with those of its southern artery, called the Cass and Henry Rowe Jacks Fork, and the nearby Schoolcraft north in 1821 Eleven Point, course and Schoolcraft again in through my veins and bind 1832, seeking its head- me to place as strongly as waters and source (Lake blood to family.
  • The Politics of Ambiguity Conditional Manumission, Labor Contracts, and Slave Emancipation in Brazil (1850S–1888)*

    The Politics of Ambiguity Conditional Manumission, Labor Contracts, and Slave Emancipation in Brazil (1850S–1888)*

    Sidney Chalhoub The Politics of Ambiguity Conditional Manumission, Labor Contracts, and Slave Emancipation in Brazil (1850s–1888)* Introduction The historical process that made liberalism, old and new, the guiding ideology of Western societies brought with it the invention of new forms of unfree labor. Lib- eralism and free labor, ancien regime and serfdom and/or slavery are no longer unproblematic pairs of historical intelligibility. The first half of the nineteenth century did not see the weakening of slavery in the Americas at all, but just the partial relocation of it. The institution of slavery gradually disappeared in the British and French Caribbean while it became stronger in Brazil, Cuba, and the US South.1 In the second half of the nineteenth century, as the nightmare of an international order based on slavery was finally defeated in the American Civil War,2 there emerged extremely aggressive racist ideologies that justified Western imperial expansion and the persistence of forced labor in Africa and elsewhere. Actually, it boggles the mind to think that for so long it seemed possible to con- ceive of the nineteenth century as a time of transition from slavery to freedom, from bondage to contractual and/or free labor. In fact, contract labor, however diverse in its forms, was often thought of as a form of coerced labor, with workers * This article was first published under the same title in International Review of Social History, Vol. 60 (2015), pp. 161–191 doi:10.1017/S0020859015000176 © 2015 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis, published by Cambridge University Press, reproduced with permission.
  • Frederick Douglass

    Frederick Douglass

    Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection AMERICAN CRISIS BIOGRAPHIES Edited by Ellis Paxson Oberholtzer, Ph. D. Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection Zbe Hmcrican Crisis Biographies Edited by Ellis Paxson Oberholtzer, Ph.D. With the counsel and advice of Professor John B. McMaster, of the University of Pennsylvania. Each I2mo, cloth, with frontispiece portrait. Price $1.25 net; by mail» $i-37- These biographies will constitute a complete and comprehensive history of the great American sectional struggle in the form of readable and authoritative biography. The editor has enlisted the co-operation of many competent writers, as will be noted from the list given below. An interesting feature of the undertaking is that the series is to be im- partial, Southern writers having been assigned to Southern subjects and Northern writers to Northern subjects, but all will belong to the younger generation of writers, thus assuring freedom from any suspicion of war- time prejudice. The Civil War will not be treated as a rebellion, but as the great event in the history of our nation, which, after forty years, it is now clearly recognized to have been. Now ready: Abraham Lincoln. By ELLIS PAXSON OBERHOLTZER. Thomas H. Benton. By JOSEPH M. ROGERS. David G. Farragut. By JOHN R. SPEARS. William T. Sherman. By EDWARD ROBINS. Frederick Douglass. By BOOKER T. WASHINGTON. Judah P. Benjamin. By FIERCE BUTLER. In preparation: John C. Calhoun. By GAILLARD HUNT. Daniel Webster. By PROF. C. H. VAN TYNE. Alexander H. Stephens. BY LOUIS PENDLETON. John Quincy Adams.
  • The Woman-Slave Analogy: Rhetorical Foundations in American

    The Woman-Slave Analogy: Rhetorical Foundations in American

    The Woman-Slave Analogy: Rhetorical Foundations in American Culture, 1830-1900 Ana Lucette Stevenson BComm (dist.), BA (HonsI) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of History, Philosophy, Religion and Classics I Abstract During the 1830s, Sarah Grimké, the abolitionist and women’s rights reformer from South Carolina, stated: “It was when my soul was deeply moved at the wrongs of the slave that I first perceived distinctly the subject condition of women.” This rhetorical comparison between women and slaves – the woman-slave analogy – emerged in Europe during the seventeenth century, but gained peculiar significance in the United States during the nineteenth century. This rhetoric was inspired by the Revolutionary Era language of liberty versus tyranny, and discourses of slavery gained prominence in the reform culture that was dominated by the American antislavery movement and shared among the sisterhood of reforms. The woman-slave analogy functioned on the idea that the position of women was no better – nor any freer – than slaves. It was used to critique the exclusion of women from a national body politic based on the concept that “all men are created equal.” From the 1830s onwards, this analogy came to permeate the rhetorical practices of social reformers, especially those involved in the antislavery, women’s rights, dress reform, suffrage and labour movements. Sarah’s sister, Angelina, asked: “Can you not see that women could do, and would do a hundred times more for the slave if she were not fettered?” My thesis explores manifestations of the woman-slave analogy through the themes of marriage, fashion, politics, labour, and sex.
  • Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States

    Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States

    Library of Congress Report of the decision of the Supreme court of the United States REPORT OF THE DECISION OF THE Supreme Court of the United States, AND THE OPINIONS OF THE JUDGES THEREOF, IN THE CASE OF DRED SCOTT VERSUS JOHN F. A. SANDFORD. DECEMBER TERM, 1856. BY BENJAMIN C. HOWARD, FROM THE NINETEENTH VOLUME OF HOWARD'S REPORTS. WASHINGTON: CORNELIUS WENDELL, PRINTER. 1857. REPORT OF THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, AND THE OPINIONS OF THE JUDGES THEREOF, IN THE CASE OF DRED SCOTT VERSUS JOHN F. A. SANDFORD. DECEMBER TERM, 1856. BY BENJAMIN C. HOWARD, FROM THE NINETEENTH VOLUME OF HOWARD'S REPORTS. WASHINGTON: CORNELIUS WENDELL, PRINTER. 1857. LC Report of the decision of the Supreme court of the United States http://www.loc.gov/resource/llst.027 Library of Congress SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. DECEMBER TERM, 1856. DRED SCOTT VERSUS JOHN F. A. SANDFORD. Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error , v. John F. A. Sandford. This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Missouri. It was an action of trespass vi et armis instituted in the Circuit Court by Scott against Sandford. Prior to the institution of the present suit, an action was brought by Scott for his freedom in the Circuit Court of St. Louis county, (State court,) where there was a verdict and judgment in his favor. On a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State, the judgment below was reversed, and the case remanded to the Circuit Court, where it was continued to await the decision of the case now in question.
  • 1856 St. Louis Stampede by Cooper Wingert

    1856 St. Louis Stampede by Cooper Wingert

    1856 St. Louis Stampede By Cooper Wingert http://housedivided.dickinson.edu/sites/stampedes/the-1856-st-louis-stampede/ Slave Stampedes on the Missouri Borderlands National Park Service Network To Freedom // House Divided Project at Dickinson College DATELINE: ST. LOUIS, JULY 14, 1856 On Monday night, July 14, 1856, a group of eight to nine enslaved Missourians set out on their quest for freedom. Leaving the farm of slaveholder Robert Wash, a 65-year-old retired judge who resided on the outskirts of St. Louis, this contingent of freedom seekers charted an unknown course to liberty. Yet while the freedom seekers’ exact path is difficult to ascertain, the motivations underlying their “stampede” for freedom are somewhat easier to deduce. The group of escapees comprised a family unit––”a man and wife, three sons, two daughters, and the wife’s sister,” as reported in the St. Louis Republican. The freedom seekers may have been spurred to action by Wash’s declining health in the summer of 1856––he would die just months later, in November. Likely fearing separation at an estate sale, they chose to strike out to gain their freedom and preserve their family. [1] These freedom seekers, whose names are unknown, may have joined with three other enslaved Missourians, held by prominent St. Louis citizen John O’Fallon. The trio had escaped from O’Fallon “a few nights previous” to July 14, and the city’s leading papers instantly suspected that the two group escapes were connected. “Several other slaves are supposed to be in their company on the underground track,” noted the editors of the Republican.
  • Historical Review

    Historical Review

    HISTORICAL REVIEW APRIL 1963 Fred Geary's "The Steamboat Idlewild' Published Quarterly By The State Historical Society of Missouri COLUMBIA, MISSOURI THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MISSOURI The State Historical Society of Missouri, heretofore organized under the laws of this State, shall be the trustee of this State—Laws of Missouri, 1899, R. S. of Mo., 1949, Chapter 183. OFFICERS 1962-65 ROY D. WILLIAMS, Boonville, President L. E. MEADOR, Springfield, First Vice President LEO J. ROZIER, Perryville, Second Vice President WILLIAM L. BRADSHAW, Columbia, Third Vice President RUSSELL V. DYE, Liberty, Fourth Vice President WILLIAM C TUCKER, Warrensburg, Fifth Vice President JOHN A. WINKLER, Hannibal, Sixth Vice President R. B. PRICE, Columbia, Treasurer FLOYD C SHOEMAKER, Columbia, Sacretary Emeritus and Consultant RICHARD S. BROWNLEE, Columbia, Director, Secretary, and Librarian TRUSTEES Permanent Trustees, Former Presidents of the Society E. L. DALE, Carthage E. E. SWAIN, Kirksville RUSH H. LIMBAUGH, Cape Girardeau L. M. WHITE, Mexico GEORGE A. ROZIER, Jefferson City Term Expires at Annual Meeting, 1963 RALPH P. BIEBER, St. Louis LEO J. ROZIER, Perryville BARTLETT BODER, St. Joseph W. WALLACE SMITH, Independence L. E. MEADOR, Springfield JACK STAPLETON, Stanberry JOSEPH H. MOORE, Charleston HENRY C THOMPSON, Bonne Terre Term Expires at Annual Meeting, 1964 WILLIAM R. DENSLOW, Trenton FRANK LUTHER MOTT, Columbia ALFRED O. FUERBRINGER, St. Louis GEORGE H. SCRUTON, Sedalia GEORGE FULLER GREEN, Kansas City JAMES TODD, Moberly ROBERT S. GREEN, Mexico T. BALLARD WATTERS, Marshfield Term Expires at Annual Meeting, 1965 FRANK C BARNHILL, Marshall W. C HEWITT, Shelbyville FRANK P. BRIGGS, Macon ROBERT NAGEL JONES, St.
  • Aa000368.Pdf (12.17Mb)

    Aa000368.Pdf (12.17Mb)

    Anthrax Vaccine n Water Wars n Debating the Draft THE AMERICAN $2.50 June 2003 The magazine for a strong America MILITARY “For God and Country since 1919 Fabulous destinations. 50 Exceptional accommodations. And now, a new level of personal service. ©2006 Travelocity.com LP.All rights reserved. Travelocity and the Stars Design are trademarks of Travelocity.com LP. LP.All CST#2056372- rights reserved.Travelocity.com and the Stars Design are trademarks of Travelocity.com ©2006 Travelocity Introducing the 2006 Cruise Collection from AARP Passport powered by Travelocity.® Make your next cruise even more memorable when you book with AARP Passport powered by Travelocity. The 2006 Cruise Collection offers more than 40 sailings with Specially Trained AARP Passport Representatives – STARs – to make certain your voyage is smooth and enjoyable. AARP members also enjoy other exclusive benefits on a wide range of itineraries; each specially selected for you and delivered by trusted AARP Passport travel providers. Your next cruise sets sail at www.aarp.org/cruisecollection28. Trusted Travel | 1.888.291.1762 | www.aarp.org/cruisecollection28 Not an AARP member yet? Visit us online to join today. AARP Passport powered by Travelocity may require a minimum number of staterooms to be booked on these sailings in order for a STAR to be onboard. In the event that a STAR will not be sailing, passengers will be notified prior to departure. contents June 2006 • Vol. 160, No. 6 12 When Heroes Come Home Hurt 4 Vet Voice The Legion, the Pentagon and local 8 Commander’s Message communities must reach out to a 10 Big Issues new generation of severely wounded veterans.
  • December 1969

    December 1969

    • The phrase, "From the River to Rome," defines the geographical range apparent in the contents of this issue of the magazine. Initial focus is on St. Charles as the home of The Lindenwood Colleges, the historic city which celebrated this year the 2QOth anni­ versary of its founding. A photograph on the inside back cover, showing a January-term class studying art and my­ thology in Rome, dramatizes Lindenwood's reach from St. Charles to the campus of the world. Yet in addition to the geographical, the magazine empha­ sizes another dimension of Lindenwood: that of time. The front cover, combining a modernistic outdoor light at the New Fine Arts Building with a page from the 1828 diary of Lindenwood's co­ founder, George C. Sibley, symbolizes the historic past complement­ ing the dynamic present. How Lindenwood has built on tradition to spearhead programs in private education in the Sixties is evident from pages 2 through 48. Certain articles illmninating the old and the new, the near and the far should be of special interest. "The Possible Dream," beginning on page 7, is the most recent investigation of Lindenwood's history; "The Ghosts of Lin­ denwood" sheds light on some of the renowned dead in the campus cemetery. Companion stories, which almost shatter the generation gap, reveal the Now Generation's reaction to a 72-year-old student in the dormitory, while the lady in question proves that a senior citizen, like any other minority, can .Bnd happiness on this open campus. Then there is a photo essay capturing the exuberance that attended the opening of the New Fine Arts building.
  • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE and Lawthe a Practical Guide for Survivors

    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE and Lawthe a Practical Guide for Survivors

    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE and LAWthe A Practical Guide for Survivors Missouri Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence Published by e Young Lawyers’ Section of e Missouri Bar revised 2019 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE and LAWthe A Practical Guide for Survivors This publication is available as a downloadable PDF at: www.mobaryls.org/publications.php www.mocadsv.org/resources To order additional paper copies of this publication, please fill out the online order form at https://mobar.wufoo.com/forms/online-order-form/ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This guide is the product of a collaborative effort by Missouri Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence (MCADSV) and the Young Lawyers’ Section (YLS) of The Missouri Bar. Written and designed by MCADSV. This guide was printed by The Missouri Bar Association. This project was funded by The Young Lawyers Section of The Missouri Bar. This project was supported, in part, under Grant No. 2017-MU-AX-0009 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. IMPORTANT RESOURCES National Domestic Violence Hotline (800) 799-SAFE (7233) or TDD (800) 787-3224 24-hour chat line: www.thehotline.org click on get help National Sexual Assault Hotline - Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network (RAINN) www.rainn.org (800) 656-HOPE (4673) Missouri Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence [MCADSV) MCADSV can connect you to programs and resources throughout Missouri. www.mocadsv.org (888) 666-1911 during business hours Missouri Bar Legal Resources Line For attorney services (573) 636-3635 or use the Lawyer Search Tool at http://missourilawyershelp.org/ TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................
  • Stewart Dissertation 20126.Pdf

    Stewart Dissertation 20126.Pdf

    Copyright by Anna Rebecca Stewart 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Anna Rebecca Stewart certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Beyond Obsolescence: The Reconstruction of Abolitionist Texts Committee: Coleman Hutchison, Co-Supervisor Michael Winship, Co-Supervisor Evan Carton Gretchen Murphy Jacqueline Jones Beyond Obsolescence: The Reconstruction of Abolitionist Texts by Anna Rebecca Stewart, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2012 Dedication For Sam, with love and gratitude. Acknowledgements As an avid reader of acknowledgements sections, I am always curious about the conversations that sparked and enlivened projects as well as the relationships that sustained their writers. As I turn to write my own for this dissertation project, I realize just how impossible it is to sum up those intellectual and personal debts—the many kindnesses, questions, and encouragements that have helped me navigate this dissertation process and my own development as a thinker and writer. Coleman Hutchison and Michael Winship have been staunch supporters and careful readers, modeling the kind of mentor-teacher-scholars that we all aspire to be but can often only hope to become through the gift of such examples. Early in my graduate school career, Michael taught me a valuable lesson about not committing to projects, even short semester papers, that did not capture my imagination and interest. Our conversations kept me engaged and deep in the archive, where my project first began to take shape and where I found my footing as a researcher.
  • County Stats Template

    County Stats Template

    Ralls County Facts Census Data1 County Geography ¨¦§70 INTERSTATE PRIVATE OR OTHER ROAD o AIRPORT ¨¦§70 INTERSTATE LOOP KATY TRAIL "u HOSPITALS 50 US HIGHWAY RAILROAD "Ý CEMETERY 404 / /50 US HIGHWAY (DIVIDED) RIVER OR STREAM OTHER CITIES AND TOWNS 55 STATE NUMBERED HIGHWAY SECTION LINE MODOT SHED ú MARION COUNTY E STATE LETTERED HIGHWAY COUNTY BOUNDARY BRIDGES STATE OF ILLINOISCRD 125 COUNTY ROAD CITY LIMIT ^ STATE CAPITOL µ US LOOP, SPUR OR ALT. RT LAKE OR POND C! COUNTY SEAT R 5 W R 4 W HANNIBAL CITY STREET FOREST OR PARK R 7 W R 6 W R 6 W R 5 W 0510001 4568010 OLD HWY 36 1850021 P 1850012 S 4577801 E ILV L N MODOT COUNTY/OUTER ROADS (TO VERIFY OWNERSHIP) SBUR G RD ú E R S R 2 T 56 N E S D 4568011 ú MARION LN ú Y ú H 2890003 4577800 úú H I D 2 N ú 1850005 AVE OWENS T 56 N 1850037 G R DR ú ú 4 00OH003 ú S ú ú R 4 W R 3 W ú R R 5 0840009 D 3 3 1 E 6 3 1850013 0710001 5 4 PERCE NEZ 1850016 3 T Mississippi River E 1850017 5 4 1 6 4 2 D 5 ú H P 2790001 PONDEROSA TRL R 6 1850004 1 2 L ú E PECAN RD TUPELO RD BIG CREEK LN RENSSELAER LN V Monkey Run Ilasco ú UTE A ú DR R 7 4568867 BNSF G REVERE TRL 0270019 12 COLUMBUS DR 10 N MULBERRY RD 8 9 7 DOVE TRL O HURON Population, 2010 RIDGE RD 10,167 12 Z D 8 9 24 8 9 N 10 BIRCH LN SIOUX DR 7 L 12 HH O TR BEECH RD ú L 10 W 11 36 7 / 11 9 11 12 QUARRY LN O ANTIOCH LN ú / 0260003 10 W D 8 SAVERTON DR 4570991 ú 11 E SCOTTS LN HICKORY 4570215 GROVE PL NS TRABUE LN N ú Y 36 0690015 O LD HW HASSARD LN HASSARD LN JUNIPER LN RENSSELAER Huntington Big Cr 18 H EAGLE 13 SWEETBAY LN T 16 RIDGE PL H BNSF O T R