DOCSLIB.ORG

Michael Horton's Covenant Theology As a Defense of Reformation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Michael Horton's Covenant Theology As a Defense of Reformation Michael Horton’s Covenant Theology as a Defense of Reformation Theology in the Context of Current Discussions By Mark Kim A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Wycliffe College and the Department of Theology at the Toronto School of Theology. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Theology Awarded by Wycliffe College and the University of Toronto. © Copyright by Mark Kim, 2013 Michael Horton’s Covenant Theology as a Defense of Reformation Theology in the Context of Current Discussions Mark Kim Doctor of Theology Wycliffe College of University of Toronto 2013 Abstract In contemporary theological scholarship the federal theology of post-Reformation Reformed orthodoxy has come under trenchant criticism from two fronts: those who argue that the schema elevates the role of the human will in individual redemption to offset the problematic aspects of Augustinian predestinarianism (thereby degenerating into a form of evangelical legalism) or those who see the schema as a radical contradiction of the relation between law and gospel, which contradiction departed from the views of John Calvin, Martin Bucer, and other sixteenth century Reformers (thereby supporting a type of antinomianism). The purpose of this dissertation is to argue, through our examination of Michael S. Horton’s covenant theology (and the views of Reformed theologians of earlier times), that classic federalism avoids both the twin dangers of legalism and antinomianism through upholding the dual covenant of works/covenant of grace structure (especially as it pertains to the doctrine of justification) and through maintaining the mutually binding aspect of the covenant of grace between God and the elect. ii The study argues that post-Reformation federal theology upholds the Reformers’ cherished soteriological tenets of justification sola gratia and sola fide while at the same time preserving practical holiness in the redeemed (grounded in the bilateral character of the covenant of grace). Ensuring the relation between God’s sovereign grace and human responsibility in salvation classic federal theology, we conclude, provides a needed antidote in contemporary, evangelical church practice and preaching, which practice and preaching appear either unbiblically to elevate the human will in salvation or unbiblically to undermine the necessity of human response to God’s prior grace. iii Acknowledgments I wish to express my gratitude to many of the faculty members over the years at Wycliffe College and the Toronto School of Theology for enabling me to continue my theological studies during both encouraging and trying times. I especially wish to thank Professor Victor Shepherd for allocating his time to supervise my dissertation and for offering constructive feedback during the course of this project. The completion of this study would not have become a reality without the continuous encouragement and support of my parents, friends, and fellow students at TST. Most of all I am indebted to the Triune God who empowers me daily to run the race of faith with perseverance. iv Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Historical Background and Development of Covenant Theology .................................. 1 1.2 Contemporary Interpretations and Criticisms of the Twofold Covenant Model .................. 7 1.2.1 Covenant Theology as a Reaction to Unconditional Predestinarianism and a Degeneration into Works-Righteousness Legalism ........................................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Covenant Theology as a radical dichotomizing of Law and Gospel ........................................... 18 1.2.3 Assessing the Various Interpretations of Federal Theology in Contemporary Scholarship ........ 26 1.3 Thesis ................................................................................................................................... 28 1.3.1 Overall Thesis ............................................................................................................................. 28 1.3.2 Michael Horton’s Covenant Theology as the Context for the Thesis ......................................... 29 1.4 Significance and Implications .............................................................................................. 31 1.5 Method and Structure of the Study .................................................................................... 32 1.5.1 Method ....................................................................................................................................... 32 1.5.2 Structure ..................................................................................................................................... 34 2. Covenant Theology in Historical Perspective: A Survey of the Covenantal Views of Significant Voices Within the Reformed Tradition ........................................... 39 2.1 John Calvin (1509-1564) ...................................................................................................... 42 2.1.1 Excurses: Was Calvin at Odds with later Reformed Orthodoxy on the Relationship Between Law and Gospel? ................................................................................................................................. 56 2.2 Thomas Watson (1620-1686) .............................................................................................. 59 2.3 Francis Turretin (1623-1687) ............................................................................................... 68 2.4 Herman Witsius (1636-1708) .............................................................................................. 76 2.5 John Gill (1697-1771) .......................................................................................................... 85 2.6 Charles Hodge (1797-1878) ................................................................................................. 95 2.7 Louis Berkhof (1873-1957) ................................................................................................ 103 2.8 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 113 3. The Structural Features of Michael Horton’s Covenant Theology .................. 116 3.1 Defining the Meaning of Covenant ................................................................................... 117 v 3.1.1 The Old Testament Meaning of the Word “Covenant” ............................................................ 117 3.1.2 The New Testament Meaning of the Word “Covenant” .......................................................... 119 3.2 The Covenant of Creation (or Works) ............................................................................... 121 3.2.1 The Original Condition of Adam Under Probation ................................................................... 122 3.2.2 Law Preceding Grace during the Prelapsarian Period .............................................................. 127 3.2.3 The Reward of the Covenant of Creation: The Eschatological Sabbath ................................... 132 3.2.4 The Effects of Adam’s Original Disobedience to his Posterity: Adam as Federal Head ........... 136 3.2.5 The Perpetual Nature of the Covenant of Creation .................................................................. 140 3.2.6 Excurses: The Relationship Between the Covenant of Creation/Works and the Mosaic Covenant in Horton’s Covenant Theology ......................................................................................................... 142 3.3 The Covenant of Grace ...................................................................................................... 145 3.3.1 The Covenant of Redemption as the Foundation of the Covenant of Grace ............................ 147 3.3.2 Christ’s Role as Mediator of the Covenant of Grace ................................................................ 149 3.3.3 The Constancy of the Covenant of Grace ................................................................................. 156 3.3.4 The Unity of the Covenant of Grace ......................................................................................... 163 3.4 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 166 4. Horton’s Covenantal Law-Gospel Hermeneutic in Redemptive History and its Impact on the Doctrine of Justification .............................................................. 169 4.1 The Execution of the Covenant of Grace in the Successive Covenants of Redemptive History ..................................................................................................................................... 170 4.1.1 The Abrahamic Covenant ......................................................................................................... 171 4.1.2 The Mosaic Covenant ............................................................................................................... 176 4.1.3 The New Covenant ................................................................................................................... 182 4.2 The Implications for the Doctrine of Justification ............................................................. 187 5. The Application and Operation of the Covenant of Grace in the Life of the Elect ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pat-Abendroth-Dissertation.Pdf
    A Pastoral Note About My Doctoral Project I am glad you are interested in reading my dissertation. Given that it took a fair amount of effort and my passion for the subject matter, I am happy to share it with church members and friends. Please allow me to introduce you to the project by saying just a few things. If you ask someone what Covenant Theology is and if it is a good or bad thing, you will likely hear lots of different answers. It is fairly common for evangelicals to respond by either saying they do not know what Covenant Theology is or by describing it as something unbiblical and relating to a particular view regarding millennialism, baptism, or Israel. There are three major problems with such responses. First, classic Covenant Theology is essentially concerned with matters of sin and salvation, not something else. Second, the biblical support for such things as the federal headship of Adam and Jesus is strong (federal being from the Latin foedus meaning covenant). Third, when Covenant Theology is rejected, justification by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone is at best in serious jeopardy. My dissertation is a promotion and defense of classic Covenant Theology. I have written out of a pastoral passion to help people understand human history federally/covenantally just as the Apostle Paul did as he wrote inspired Scripture (see Romans 5:12-21). Likewise, I have written in order to demonstrate the vital connection between Covenant Theology and justification by faith alone, the doctrine that is so commonly compromised by rejecters of the federal perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus Christ: Perpetuator of the Mosaic Covenant
    JESUS CHRIST: PERPETUATOR OF THE MOSAIC COVENANT Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with honors to the Department of Theology, Carroll College Helena, Montana by Patricia H. Nelson April 1986 lC®RET E L,BRARY CARROLL COLLEGE 5962 00083 291 This thesis for honors recognition has been ii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................ 1 Mosaic Covenant .......................... 1 Christian Covenant ........................ 2 II. COVENANT IN JUDAISM ...................... 3 The Period of the Patriarchs............. 5 The Tribal Confederacy ................... 6 The Age of Kings.......................... 8 The Two Kingdoms.............................10 Covenant and Judgment .................... 10 The Prophets and Covenant.................. 11 Amos Hosea Isaiah Micah Jeremiah Ezekiel Summary..................................... 15 III. COVENANT IN CHRISTIANITY.................... 16 Christology................................. 16 Baptism of Jesus............................. 17 Ministry of Jesus...........................17 The Beatitudes............................... 19 The Twelve Apostles........................ 20 IV. ARK OF THE COVENANT CONTINUED IN JESUS . 20 The Holy Place and Holy of Holies .... 21 The Four Types ofO ffering................... 26 Jesus, Mediator of the New Covenant ... 27 V. CONCLUSION................................... 28 BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................. 30 iii I. INTRODUCTION Holy Scripture is rooted in covenant theology. The "berit" of the Old and
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Calvin and Witsius on the Mosaic Covenant
    1 1 Calvin and Witsius on the Mosaic Covenant J. V. FESKO hen it comes to the Mosaic covenant, an ocean of ink has been spilled by theologians in their efforts to relate it both to WIsrael’s immediate historical context and to the church’s exis- tence in the wake of the advent of Christ. Anthony Burgess (d. 1664), one of the Westminster divines, writes: “I do not find in any point of divinity, learned men so confused and perplexed (being like Abraham’s ram, hung in a bush of briars and brambles by the head) as here.”1 Among the West- minster divines there were a number of views represented in the assembly: the Mosaic covenant was a covenant of works, a mixed covenant of works and grace, a subservient covenant to the covenant of grace, or simply the covenant of grace.2 One can find a similar range of views represented in more recent literature in our own day.3 In the limited amount of space 1. Anthony Burgess, Vindicae Legis (London, 1647), 229. 2. Samuel Bolton, The True Bounds of Christian Freedom (1645; Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, 2001), 92–94. 3. See, e.g., Mark W. Karlberg, “Reformed Interpretation of the Mosaic Covenant,” Westmin- ster Theological Journal 43.1 (1981): 1–57; idem, Covenant Theology in Reformed Perspective (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2000), 17–58; D. Patrick Ramsey, “In Defense of Moses: A Confes- sional Critique of Kline and Karlberg,” Westminster Theological Journal 66.2 (2004): 373–400; 25 Estelle Law Book.indd 35 12/12/08 3:36:48 PM 26 J.
    [Show full text]
  • “Republican Theology: the Civil Religion of American Evangelicals”
    Benjamin T. Lynerd Приказ дела UDK 321.01: 279.12 (73)(049.3) “REPUBLICAN THEOLOGY: THE CIVIL RELIGION OF AMERICAN EVANGELICALS” Oxford University Press, 2014. ISBN: 978-0-19-936356-8, 264 pp. In Republican Theology: The Civil Religion of American Evangelicals, Benjamin Lynerd employs history, theology, and political theory in order to un- derstand the seemingly contradictory demands for both Lockean limited gov- ernment as well as a state that actively promotes virtue through law. Tracing the developments of this tradition from the early years of the Protestant Reformation and through the American Revolution, Lynerd advances the con- cept of republican theology, a civil religion with roots in Calvinism, social con- tract theory, and the “city on a hill” notion that America will redeem the world through its national virtue. By the late eighteenth century, these principles had coalesced into a form that has been present in American political thought in some capacity since the Founding. In the first three chapters, Lynerd delves into the internal logic of republican theology by explaining how these ostensi- bly contradictory principles cohere when stitched together. As a civil religion, republican theology presents a paradigm for how to reconcile the necessity of limited government to protect liberty and individual conscience, the role of the state in cultivating and promoting private virtue by acting on matters of public virtue, and the eschatological possibility that the world might be re- deemed through such a republic. By subjecting the first two principles to a higher purpose, republican theology posits that true liberty and virtue are dia- lectical and through faith they can be reconciled together in a pattern where public and private virtue restrain license while liberty promotes virtue when one’s actions are performed in service to God.
    [Show full text]
  • Unconditional Election True Or False?
    “U” – Unconditional Election True or False? Bible Answers ​About Denominations “Unconditional election” is the second of five major errors in John Calvin’s system of doctrine which we have come to identify by the familiar acrostic of the word “tulip.” The “T” stands for Total Hereditary Depravity and is discussed in the tract by that name in this series. The “U” stands for Unconditional Election which teaches that God arbitrarily selected a certain number of people to be saved. In other words, God, from all eternity, unchangeably foreordained, or predestinated, or elected all that will be in heaven with Him, and all that will be in Hell with the devil. It does not matter whether man strives to do good or is content to do evil because this election is strictly unconditional. John Calvin wrote: “Predestination, by which God adopts some to the hope of life, and adjures others to eternal death, no one, desirous of the credit of piety, dares abso- lutely to deny....Predestination we call the eternal decree of God, by which He has determined in Himself what He would have to become of every individual of mankind. For they are not all created with a similar destiny; but eternal life is fore-ordained for some, and eternal damnation for others. Every man, therefore, being created for one or the other of these ends, we say, is predestined either to life or to death. This God has not only testified in particular persons, but has given as specimen of it in the whole posterity of Abraham, which should evidently show the future condition of every nation to depend upon His decision.” (Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Irresistible Grace and Is It Biblical? Heather Riggleman | Crosswalk.Com Contributing Writer 2021 5 Jul
    What Is Irresistible Grace and Is it Biblical? Heather Riggleman | Crosswalk.com Contributing Writer 2021 5 Jul Photo credit: ©iStock/Getty Images Plus/Anastasiia Stiahailo Have you ever wondered why one person believes in God and another totally rejects Him? Some would say it has to do with irresistible grace. While it sounds like a decadent dessert that no person can deny, irresistible grace is something only God can do. Irresistible grace is defined as those whom God has elected and drawn to Himself. When God calls the elect, they respond (John 6:37, 44; 10:16). I remember very clearly how I thought the Bible, God, church, and all the things in between were stuffy, legalistic, and limiting to living life. I used to think God was just a crutch for weak people. But during my college years, God overcame my resistance to Him. God made Jesus look so compelling that He overcame my resistance, He broke through my barriers and I not only came freely to Him—I ran to Him with every fiber of my being. I came alive in Christ at the age of 23 because of His irresistible grace. Like you, I had been resisting God all my life until the Holy Spirit opened my eyes to the most compelling sight: Jesus, the cross, and God’s beautiful gift to be His daughter. Up until that moment, I was a slave to sin, dead on my feet. God’s irresistible grace means that you were dead in your sins. You were dead, living your life as a blind, rebellious lover of this world.
    [Show full text]
  • Covenant in Judaism and Christianity
    168 Theological Trends Covenant in Judaism and Christianity Dan Cohn-Sherbok HE CONCEPT OF ISRAEL AS GOD'S CHOSEN PEOPLE has been a constant T feature of Jewish thought from biblical times to the present. In the Bible the Hebrew root 'bhr' (to choose) denotes the belief that God selected the Jewish nation from all other peoples. As the Book of Deuteronomy declares: 'For you are a people holy to the Lord your God: the Lord your God has chosen you to be a people for his own possession out of all the peoples that are on the face of the earth' (Deut 7:6). According to Scripture, this act was motivated by divine love: It was not because you were more in number than any other people that the Lord set his love upon you and chose you for you were the fewest of all peoples; but it is because the Lord loves you. (Deut 7:7-8) Such love for Israel was later echoed in the synagogue liturgy, especially in the prayer for holy days, which begins" Thou hast chosen us from all peoples; thou hast loved us and found pleasure in us and hast exalted us above all tongues; thou hast sanctified us by thy commandments and brought us near unto thy service, O king, and hast called us by thy great and holy name. Through its election Israel has been given an historic mission to bear divine truth to humanity. Thus, before God proclaimed the Ten Commandments on Mount Sinai, he admonished the people to carry out this appointed task: You have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles' wings, and brought you to myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Peter A. Lillback, Phd President and Professor of Historical Theology Westminster Theological Seminary Philadelphia, United States of America
    Curriculum Vitae Peter A. Lillback, PhD President and Professor of Historical Theology Westminster Theological Seminary Philadelphia, United States of America Degrees 1985 PhD, Westminster Theological Seminary, Philadelphia, PA (Reformation and Post Reformation Studies); Dissertation: “The Binding of God: Calvin’s Role in the Development of Covenant Theology.” 1978 ThM, Dallas Theological Seminary, Dallas TX (Systematic Theology and Apologetics); Thesis: “The Significance of the Noetic Effects of Sin for a Theistic Epistemology.” 1974 BA, Cedarville College, Cedarville, OH (Pre-Seminary Bible, Speech, and minors in New Testament Greek and Philosophy) Professional 2005– President and Professor of Historical Theology Teaching Experience: Faculty of IRES in Jakarta, Indonesia (2012–); Westminster Theological Seminary, Philadelphia (1981–2005); Philadelphia Theological Seminary (1995–1999); Cranmer Theological Seminary, Shreveport, LA (1996); Chesapeake Theological Seminary (1990–1996); Center for Urban Theological Studies (1986); Reformed Bible Institute (1981); Southern Bible Training School (1976) Pastoral Experience 1991–2009 Senior Pastor, Proclamation Presbyterian Church, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 1988–1991 Associate Pastor, Evangelical Presbyterian Church, Newark, Delaware 1982–1988 Pastor, Bethany Presbyterian Church, Oxford, Pennsylvania Honors 2009 George Washington’s Sacred Fire became #1 bestseller on the Amazon List 1978 High Honor graduate of Dallas Theological Seminary 1974 Oxford Press Bible Award: Highest Honor graduate of Cedarville College 1973 Who’s Who Among Students in American Universities and Colleges 1973 President of the Philosophy Club at Cedarville College Selected Special Lectures 2005 Inaugurated as President of Westminster Seminary 1997 Dedication of Villa Grazia, Palm Beach, Florida 1996 “The Christianity of George Washington,” Contemporary Issues Conference Seminar at Westminster Theological Seminary 1995 “Apologetics & Reformation”-Conference on Apologetics at Westminster Theological Seminary 1994 Debate with Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Deans Memo July 20, 2009
    MEMO To: All University College Faculty and Students From: Dr. Daniel Scott, Academic Dean Date: July 20, 2009 Re: Fall-Winter 2009-10 Please read this entire memo carefully. It contains information you need to know as you prepare for next year. Included in this document is: • Course Offerings 2009-2010 • Breadth Requirement Courses Offered in 2009-2010 • Faculty Advisor List FACULTY ADVISING: • Students are encouraged to meet with their faculty advisor(s) when selecting courses for next year. Many of the forms and answers to frequently asked questions regarding faculty advising can be found on the website: www.tyndale.ca/universitycollege/facultyadvising . • Returning Full-Time Student Bursary – A completed Faculty Advising Form must be returned to the Registrar’s Office by April 03, 2009 to satisfy the faculty advising requirement for the Returning Full-Time Student Bursary 2009-10. Forms may be left in the drop box located outside of the Registrar’s Office, after business hours. NEW FACULTY APPOINTMENTS Amanda Morgan Azarbehi (Ph.D. University of New Brunswick) as Assistant Professor of Psychology, effective August 1, 2009. Dr. Azarbehi has a significant research background and has been able to access a number of grants. She will bring these grants with her to Tyndale. She is also a very fine teacher that will inspire students. Kenneth Badley (PhD, University of British Columbia) as Part-time Professor of Education by special appointment, effective July 1, 2009. Dr. Badley has taught in Canada for many years and has made five trips to Kenya to work with in-service K-12 teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mentoring Westminster Today
    Westminster Today WINTER 2010 | vol 2 . I s s 1 f o r m i n g . t e a c h i n g . e n g a g i n g mentoring Servant Leaders in this issue Desert Bloom | page 6 China Log | page 14 Mentoring servant Leaders Forming Specialists in the Bible ithout fear of contradiction, Jesus is the greatest educator in history. his Great Commission declares, “Go and make disciples (learners) of all nations” (Matthew 28:19). the School of Christ is worldwide and eternal in character. People from every kindred, tribe, tongue and nation are included (rev. 5:9). in the ages to come, we will still be learning of his grace (eph. 2:6-7)! in obedience to Christ’s Great Commission, Westminster theological Seminary operates as a school of higher learning to train pastors, teachers and Wleaders for the Kingdom of Christ by Declaring the Whole Counsel of God. in the spirit of Christ’s gospel imperative, we seek to make lifelong learners of the unsearchable riches of God in Christ as revealed in the historic-redemptive self- disclosure of God in the Scriptures. We have been doing that now for 80 years. our living graduates and alumni, numbering well over 6,000, are serving in over 60 countries around the globe. these have been consistently identified with what Westminster has cherished—high scholarship and depth of orthodox theology, which seeks to reflect Christ’s love and gospel service. Will you come and join our community of servant leaders and specialists in the Bible? When you do, you will join our worldwide alumni who cherish and joyfully pursue the greatest commission ever given among men—to make learners of the saving and eternal gospel of Jesus Christ, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporated Righteousness: a Response to Recent Evangelical Discussion Concerning the Imputation of Christ’S Righteousness in Justification
    JETS 47/2 (June 2004) 253–75 INCORPORATED RIGHTEOUSNESS: A RESPONSE TO RECENT EVANGELICAL DISCUSSION CONCERNING THE IMPUTATION OF CHRIST’S RIGHTEOUSNESS IN JUSTIFICATION michael f. bird* i. introduction In the last ten years biblical and theological scholarship has witnessed an increasing amount of interest in the doctrine of justification. This resur- gence can be directly attributed to issues emerging from recent Protestant- Catholic dialogue on justification and the exegetical controversies prompted by the New Perspective on Paul. Central to discussion on either front is the topic of the imputation of Christ’s righteousness, specifically, whether or not it is true to the biblical data. As expected, this has given way to some heated discussion with salvos of criticism being launched by both sides of the de- bate. For some authors a denial of the imputation of Christ’s righteousness as the sole grounds of justification amounts to a virtual denial of the gospel itself and an attack on the Reformation. Others, by jettisoning belief in im- puted righteousness, perceive themselves as returning to the historical mean- ing of justification and emancipating the Church from its Lutheranism. In view of this it will be the aim of this essay, in dialogue with the main pro- tagonists, to seek a solution that corresponds with the biblical evidence and may hopefully go some way in bringing both sides of the debate together. ii. a short history of imputed righteousness since the reformation It is beneficial to preface contemporary disputes concerning justification by identifying their historical antecedents. Although the Protestant view of justification was not without some indebtedness to Augustine and medieval reactions against semi-Pelagianism, for the most part it represented a theo- logical novum.
    [Show full text]
  • CH 756 the Theology of John Calvin J
    Asbury Theological Seminary ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange Syllabi eCommons 1-1-2005 CH 756 The Theology of John Calvin J. Steven O'Malley Follow this and additional works at: http://place.asburyseminary.edu/syllabi Recommended Citation O'Malley, J. Steven, "CH 756 The Theology of John Calvin" (2005). Syllabi. Book 1442. http://place.asburyseminary.edu/syllabi/1442 This Document is brought to you for free and open access by the eCommons at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syllabi by an authorized administrator of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Theology of John Calvin CH 756 (DRAFT) J. Steven O’Malley, Instructor Class Description and Objectives: An examination of the life and thought of John Calvin, with primary attention given to the study of his Institutes of the Christian Religion. Our purpose is to gain a working knowledge of Calvin’s theology in its historical context, that will enable the student to interact with central themes of Calvin’s thought as they relate to the responsibilities of Christian ministry. Hopefully the student may also be assisted in advancing the dialogical and ecumenical objectives of attaining greater common understanding between the Reformed and Wesleyan/Arminian communities of faith. General Goals: 1) Identify the main features in the historical context of Calvin’s era and explore their influence upon his life and thought. 2) Identify the major events in the life of Calvin and their influence upon his thought. 3.) Evidence an understanding of major historiographical considerations in the life and thought of Calvin, including the relative merits of different schools of interpreting his thought.
    [Show full text]