DOCSLIB.ORG

Analyzing Teacher-Student Relationships in the Life and Thought of William James to Inform Educators Today

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analyzing Teacher-Student Relationships in the Life and Thought of William James to Inform Educators Today Analyzing Teacher-Student Relationships in the Life and Thought of William James to Inform Educators Today DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Julia Teal Novakowski, M.Ed, MA Graduate Program in Educational Studies The Ohio State University 2019 Dissertation Committee: Bryan Warnick, Advisor Jackie Blount Antoinette Errante Copyrighted by Julia Teal Novakowski 2019 Abstract Enriching teacher-student relationships is timely considering the increase in school violence, the changing demographics in schools, and the fact that educational aims focused on high-stakes testing often ignore relationships. When applying philosophy to teacher-student relationships, we must ask both whose voices are missing from our current conversation and how we can apply their insights to improve education. While philosophers such as John Dewey, Paulo Freire, and Nel Noddings have all contributed to that conversation, William James’s philosophy and pedagogy provide a unique perspective on teacher-student relationships that is largely absent within the field of philosophy of education. In this dissertation, I explore the relationship between the philosophy of James, his personality, and the productive relationships he had with students. I suggest that there is a link between his pragmatism, pluralism, and psychology, and the way he interacted with students. His philosophy can be evaluated from its actual effects in the world and by how it changes us as individuals. I suggest that the cash value, or impact in real life, of James’s philosophy in the context of education, plays out in particular forms of relationships of openness, experimentation, curiosity about others, spontaneity, and communication. ii Dedication I would like to dedicate this dissertation to the first two philosophers I knew, my parents. I would also like to dedicate this to my family; my brother Max, my husband Scott, and my dogs Riley and Hank. I also dedicate this work to anyone who has become academically engaged in the scholarship of William James and has found a historical friend in the sea of educational research. This is also dedicated to all of the teachers I have had and all of the students who have taught me. iii Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge Deb Zabloudil for being one of the first people I spoke with at Ohio State. She was my guide and sage in the navigational process to beginning my academic journey. I would like to acknowledge and thank my advisor Bryan Warnick for his patience, support, time, insight, and kindness. I would like to acknowledge my committee and professors Jackie Blount, whose critiques were thoughtful and supportive, and Antoinette Errante, whose critical lens pushed my thinking. I would like to thank all my colleagues whose office banter sharpened my argumentative skills. I would also like to thank Bruce Kimball for pushing me academically to engage in historical scholarship in the history of education, which led me to discover William James. I would like to thank the Graduate School for providing me the opportunity and funding to engage in meaningful scholarship at Ohio State. I would like to acknowledge the support of my family throughout my academic journey, and my husband for his unwavering support. iv Vita June 2004 ……………………………………Albert Einstein High School, Maryland 2008…………………………………………. B.A. History, University of Maryland 2009…………………………………………. M.Ed Curriculum and Instruction, University of Maryland 2009-2014……………………………………Social Studies Teacher, Maryland 2014-2017…………………………………… Graduate Teaching Associate, Educational Studies, The Ohio State University 2017…………………………………………..M.A. Educational Studies, The Ohio State University Publications Novakowski, Julia. “Revisiting Pluralism and Multiculturalism in the works of William James and W.E.B. Du Bois for Guidance in Education Today.” Philosophical Studies in Education. Ohio Valley Philosophy of Education Society. 49. (2018) 47-57. Novakowski, Julia. “A Second Wind for Philosophy of Education; The Application of The Energies of Men by William James.” Philosophical Studies in Education. Ohio Valley Philosophy of Education Society. 48. (2017) 96-106. Fields of Study Major Field: Educational Studies v Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. iv Vita ...................................................................................................................................... v Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... vi Chapter 1: Understanding the Relevance of Teacher-Student Relationships in Education Today .................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of this Study..................................................................................................... 10 Literature Review: James and Education ...................................................................... 16 Structure of Dissertation by Chapter ............................................................................. 27 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 31 Chapter 2: Analyzing Teacher-Student Relationships in Philosophy of Education ......... 32 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 32 Part I: Analyzing Teacher-Student Relationships through the Philosophy of John Dewey............................................................................................................................ 35 John Dewey on Teacher-Student Relationships ........................................................ 35 Teacher as Sympathetic Observer ............................................................................. 37 The Teacher-Student Relationship as Democratic Community/Participation and Meliorism................................................................................................................... 45 The Teacher-Student Relationship Focused on Experience and Environment ......... 47 Conclusion and Shortcomings of John Dewey .......................................................... 52 Part II: Analyzing Teacher-Student Relationships through the Philosophy of Paulo Freire ............................................................................................................................. 56 Freire on Teacher-Student Relationships .................................................................. 56 Teacher as Student-Liberator ..................................................................................... 58 The Teacher-Student Relationship as a Solution to Banking; Liberation, Problem- Posing, and Humanizing Pedagogies......................................................................... 61 Conclusion and Shortcomings of Freire .................................................................... 69 Part III: Analyzing Teacher-Student Relationships through the Philosophy of Nel Noddings ....................................................................................................................... 71 Nel Noddings on Teacher-Student Relationships ...................................................... 71 Teacher as Carer: Feminist Perspectives and Moral Theory ..................................... 72 Teacher as “Carer”: Criteria and Reciprocal Relationship ........................................ 75 Deconstructing the Reciprocal Relationship; Asymmetry and Responsiveness ....... 81 Happiness in Education and Democracy ................................................................... 86 Conclusion and Shortcomings of Noddings .............................................................. 89 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 90 Chapter 3: Analyzing Teacher-Student Relationships in the Life of William James ....... 91 Introduction: .................................................................................................................. 91 Part I: Educating William James: The Childhood and Development of James’s Education with a Focus on Teacher-Student Relationships. ......................................... 93 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 93 vi The Education of William James ............................................................................... 95 Freedom ..................................................................................................................... 98 Experience as Teacher (Social Activity As Teacher) .............................................. 103 Connecting with the Authentic Self; Emotion as Educator; Life and Death ........... 104 Areligious as Educative/
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In N. Noddings' Caring : a Feminine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education
    Journal of Philosophy and Ethics in Health Care and Medicine, No.6, pp.98-116, August 2012 Scientific Contribution Considering the central ideas of the ethics of care in N. Noddings' Caring : A Feminine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education Kanae ONOTANI (Josai International University, E-mail：[email protected]) Abstract： The purpose of this paper is to examine N. Noddings’ central ideas regarding the ethics of care. Noddings defines the core sense of care as engrossment toward those with whom the caretaker is emotionally attached, and she encourages caregivers to act not according to moral reasoning and principles, but according to personal existential decisions. She also rejects the concept of universalizability of moral values. However, caring in itself is not necessarily morally good. To evaluate the act of caring as morally good or moderate, caregivers must have another frame of reference outside of caring. Therefore, one must employ the notion of universalizability to maintain a frame of reference with which one can then examine the value of caregiving acts. I argue that these incongruences in her theory stem from her rejection of the concept of universalizability of moral values, along with her rejection of principles and rules as the major guides to ethical behavior. Keywords：Nel Noddings, caring, engrossment, universalizability, emotion, rationality Introduction Caring, 1 N. Noddings’ representative work on her theory of care, has captivated many readers in Japan and has been reprinted numerous times. Her books and articles have been introduced in various forms. 2 Noddings’ thinking, which emphasizes subjective sentiment over objective and universal principles, has had a 98 Journal of Philosophy and Ethics in Health Care and Medicine, No.6, pp.98-116, August 2012 significant impact not only in her field (i.e., education), but also on those attempting to bring original values into the field of nursing care.
    [Show full text]
  • Caring Teacher in Developing Empathy in Moral Education
    The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science Volume 1, Issue 1 Caring Teacher in Developing Empathy in [1] Department of Foundational Education and Humanities, Moral Education Faculty of Education, University of Malaya Ilhavenil Narinasamy [1], Wan Hasmah Wan Mamat [2] Tel: 017-3866711 [email protected] [2] Department of Foundational Education and Humanities, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya [email protected] ABSTRACT In this paper, a case study of an experienced teacher is highlighted illuminating her understanding as a caring agent in the classroom, her caring ways to enhance teacher-student relationships and how she incorporated empathy as a basis of caring in her moral lessons. Methods such as non-participant observations, semi-structured interviews, teacher’s journal and document analysis were adopted in over eight months of this study. The findings highlighted teacher modelling, engaging students and pedagogical content knowledge as central themes in teacher exhibiting care to students. In displaying caring, it also accentuates the approaches the teacher embarked in developing empathy among the culturally diverse students in the classroom. Keywords: Caring, Empathy, Teacher-student relationships INTRODUCTION Do teachers educate students to excel academically or do they educate them on values? This question has put many teachers in a dilemma as in recent times, curriculum standardization, high-stakes testing and emphasis on economically demanding subjects like mathematics and science (Zhao, 2010) has sidelined values needed to balance out the material world. In this era of globalization, challenges to education are on the rise and teachers face tough situations. While it is the responsibility of teachers to cultivate global competence among students (Wang et al., 2011), it is also necessary for teachers to instill values in the students.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialogic Education for and from Authorial Agency
    ISSN: 2325-3290 (online) Dialogic education for and from authorial agency Eugene Matusov Mark Smith University of Delaware, USA University of Delaware, USA Elizabeth Soslau Ana Marjanovic-Shane University of Delaware, USA Chestnut Hill College, USA Katherine von Duyke Newmann University, USA Abstract In this paper, we extend Bakhtin's ethical philosophical ideas to education and introduce a dialogic authorial agency espoused approach. We then consider this approach in opposition to the mainstream technological espoused approach, while focusing our contrasting analysis on student’s authorial agency and critical dialogue. We argue that the technological approach assumes that the "skills" or "knowledge" are garnered in pursuit of preset curricular endpoints (i.e., curricular standards). Since the goals of the technological approach are divorced from the students’ personal goals, values, and interests, they are incompatible and irreconcilable with what we idealize as the true goal of education, education for agency. The authorial agency approach to education (Dialogic Education For and From Authorial Agency) emphasizes the unpredictable, improvisational, eventful, dialogic, personal, relational, transcending, and ontological nature of education. The authorial agency of the student and of the teacher are valued and recognized by all participants as the primary goal of education – supported by the school system and broader society. The approach defines education as a learner’s leisurely pursuit of critical examination of the self, the life, and the world in critical dialogue. The purpose of authorial agency pedagogy is to facilitate this process by promoting students’ agency and unique critical voices in socially desired practices – critical voices, recognized by the students themselves and others relevant to the particular practice(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Getting the Bear Off the Table: Reaching and Teaching the Postmodern Student
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 409 309 SP 037 441 AUTHOR Thomas, Stephen TITLE Getting the Bear off the Table: Reaching and Teaching the Postmodern Student. PUB DATE May 95 NOTE 38p.; Paper presented at the Klingenstein Seminar (New York, NY, May, 1995). PUB TYPE, Opinion Papers (120) Speeches/Meeting Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Cultural Influences; Culture; *Educational Environment; *Hidden Curriculum; High School Students; High Schools; Individual Development; Secondary School Teachers; Social Influences; Student Attitudes; *Student Characteristics; *Student Experience; Teacher Attitudes; Teacher Education; *Teacher Student Relationship IDENTIFIERS *Postmodernism ABSTRACT The "bear" sitting in the middle of the classroom, on the seminar table, or prowling around the edges of a discussion group arises from the subtext that is created whenever teachers and students interact with a curriculum, lesson, or topic. The situation in the postmodern classroom has been destabilized by the unprecedented intrusion into the school environment of societal issues that are increasingly complex and often contradictory. Teachers are no longer voices of unquestioned authority in student lives. There is the recognition on both sides of the education equation that the teacher/student relationship has become polarized and politicized. This paper examines the two sides of the equation: learner and teacher. Each section of the paper is centered on a particular text that illustrates some of the issues pertinent to the topic. The paper begins by defining the "postmodern" student, then examines the perspectives of both these students and their teachers. It continues with a discussion of ways in which the postmodern student might be taught, and concludes with thoughts relating to teacher education, and steps towards a new vision of schools and education.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Dewey, Kohlberg, and Noddings' Models of Moral Growth Mark J
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Critical and Creative Thinking Capstones Critical and Creative Thinking Program Collection 6-1998 Three Theories of Development: A Comparison of Dewey, Kohlberg, and Noddings' Models of Moral Growth Mark J. Connerty University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/cct_capstone Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Connerty, Mark J., "Three Theories of Development: A Comparison of Dewey, Kohlberg, and Noddings' Models of Moral Growth" (1998). Critical and Creative Thinking Capstones Collection. Paper 67. http://scholarworks.umb.edu/cct_capstone/67 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Critical and Creative Thinking Program at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in Critical and Creative Thinking Capstones Collection by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THREE THEORIES OF DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARISON OF DEWEY, KOHLBERG, AND NODDINGS' MODELS OF MORAL GROWTH A Synthesis Project Presented by MARK J. CONNERTY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies, University of Massachusetts Boston, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS June 1998 Critical and Creative Thinking Program ©1998 by Mark J. Conm;rty All rights reserved THREE THEORIES OF DEVELOPMENT: A COMPA.RISON OF DEWEY, KOHLBERG, AND NODDINGS' MODELS OF MORAL GROWTH A Thesis Presented by MARKJ. CONNERTY Approved as to style and content by: Delores Gallo, Assoc· te Professor Chairperson of Committee Arthur Millman, Associ;;ie Professor Member Delores Gallo, Progr, m Director Critical and Creative Thinking ABSTRACT THREE THEORIES OF DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARISON OF DEWEY ' KOHLBERG, AND NODDINGS' MODELS OF MORAL GROWTH May 1998 Mark J.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialogic Pedagogy and Semiotic-Dialogic Inquiry Into Visual Literacies and Augmented Reality
    ISSN: 2325-3290 (online) Dialogic pedagogy and semiotic-dialogic inquiry into visual literacies and augmented reality Zoe Hurley Zayed University, Dubai Abstract Technological determinism has been driving conceptions of technology enhanced learning for the last two decades at least. The abrupt shift to the emergency delivery of online courses during COVID-19 has accelerated big tech’s coup d’état of higher education, perhaps irrevocably. Yet, commercial technologies are not necessarily aligned with dialogic conceptions of learning while a technological transmission model negates learners’ input and interactions. Mikhail Bakhtin viewed words as the multivocal bridge to social thought. His theory of the polysemy of language, that has subsequently been termed dialogism, has strong correlations with the semiotic philosophy of American pragmatist Charles Sanders Peirce. Peirce’s semiotic philosophy of signs extends far beyond words, speech acts, linguistics, literary genres, and/or indeed human activity. This study traces links between Bakhtin’s dialogism with Peirce’s semiotics. Conceptual synthesis develops the semiotic-dialogic framework. Taking augmented reality as a theoretical case, inquiry illustrates that while technologies are subsuming traditional pedagogies, teachers and learners, this does not necessarily open dialogic learning. This is because technologies are never dialogic, in and of themselves, although semiotic learning always involves social actors’ interpretations of signs. Crucially, semiotic-dialogism generates theorising of the visual literacies required by learners to optimise technologies for dialogic learning. Key Words: Dialogism / signs / semiotics / questioning / opening / augmented reality / technologies Zoe Hurley (PhD, Lancaster University, UK) is the Assistant Dean for Student Affairs in the College of Communication and Media Sciences at Zayed University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
    [Show full text]
  • Nel Noddings
    CURRICULUM VITAE EDUCATION B.A. Mathematics and Physical Science Montclair State College, New Jersey M.A. Mathematics 1964 Rutgers University, New Jersey Ph.D. Education (Educational Philosophy and Theory) 1973 Stanford University, California 1974 Standard Administration Credential Stanford University, California EXPERIENCE 2005 Lee Jacks Professor of Education Emerita, Stanford University 2003- Lee Jacks Professor of Education Emerita, Stanford University; Adjunct Professor of Philosophy and Education, Teachers College Columbia. 2002- Lee Jacks Professor Emerita, Stanford; also John W. Porter Chair in Urban Education, Eastern Michigan University. 2001 Lee Jacks Professor Emerita, Stanford; also A. Lindsay O’Connor Professor of American Institutions, Colgate University (Fall, 2001); Libra Professor, University of Southern Maine (Spring). 1998- Lee L. Jacks Professor of Child Education, Emerita, Stanford University and Professor of Philosophy and Education, Teachers College Columbia 1997- Lee L. Jacks Professor of Child Education, Stanford University and Professor of Philosophy and Education, Teachers College Columbia 1994- Lee L. Jacks Professor of Education, Stanford University Fall 1994 Visiting Professor, Teachers College, Columbia University 1992-1994 Lee L. Jacks Professor of Child Education and Acting Dean, School of Education, Stanford University 1990-1992 Professor and Associate Dean of Academic Affairs, School of Education, Stanford 1 University 1986- Professor of Education, Stanford University 1983-1986 Associate Professor and Director of Teacher Education (STEP), Stanford University 1979-1983 Assistant Professor of Education, Stanford University 1977-1979 Acting Assistant Professor of Education, Stanford University. Taught courses in curriculum and instruction. 1976 Private educational consulting. Clients included NIE (Curriculum Development Task Force); Policy Studies in Education, NY (workshops for elementary principals on instructional leadership); Sequoia Union H.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dialogic Approach to Online Facilitation
    A dialogic approach to online facilitation Jennie Swann Centre for Learning and Teaching Auckland University of Technology Social construction of understanding has long been a significant underlying principle of learning and teaching and while there are many models for the design of online activities to promote this there are considerably fewer models for the facilitation of such dialogue. This paper examines some of these facilitation models from the point of view of a university lecturer seeking to encourage social construction of understanding through online dialogue and proposes an alternative which extends the principles of Community of Inquiry theory. It unpacks conceptions of knowledge and dialogue in order to aid learning and teaching through online dialogue. Further, it provides principles for the active encouragement of participation in that dialogue. Keywords: dialogic, Community of Inquiry, online facilitation If we declare that we value different perspectives, as a commitment to dialogic literacy will lead us to do, perspectives of those new to a discipline or to academia, perspectives different from ours culturally, then we must develop practices which also value these differences. Such practices in turn commit us to a dialogic theory of learning that sees knowledge not only as the product of disciplined inquiry, where well-established conventions allow the accumulation of co-ordinated data, but also as the product on ongoing discourse, where different perspectives draw on the power of the negative to lead to a higher integration of understandings. Practices that value difference and a dialogic approach to language and learning are not easy to formulate or to employ in our academic environment (Cooper, 1998, p.
    [Show full text]
  • John Dewey's Democracy and Education 100 Years On
    CONTENTS Editorial Experience is Not The Whole Bob Davis Story: The Integral Role of the JOURNAL OF EDUCATION OF PHILOSOPHY 52: ISSUE 2 VOLUME 2018 MAY Situation in Dewey’s Democracy Original Articles and Education 287 Philosophy, Translation and the David L. Hildebrand Anxieties of Inclusion 197 Growth and Growing in Education: Journal of Naoko Saito Dewey’s Relevance to Current Teaching as an Immortality Malaise 301 Project: Positing Weakness in Ruth Heilbronn Philosophy of Education Response to Terror 216 Courage, Uncertainty and Cathryn van Kessel and Kevin Burke Imagination in Deweyan Work: Inferentialism at Work: The Challenging the Neo-Liberal Significance of Social Educational Agenda 316 Epistemology in Theorising Vasco D’Agnese Education 230 Devil, Deceiver, Dupe: Hanno Su and Johannes Bellmann Constructing John Dewey Peirce and Aesthetic from the Right 330 Education 246 Kelley M. King Juliana Acosta López de Mesa ‘To Be Is To Respond’: Realising Working through Resistance to a Dialogic Ontology For Resistance in Anti-racist Teacher Deweyan Pragmatism 345 Education 262 Rupert Higham Jenna Min Shim Dewey as Virtue Epistemologist: Open-Mindedness and the The Journal of John Dewey and Democracy Training of Thought in Democracy and Education and Education 359 John Dewey’s Democracy and Ben Kotzee Philosophy of Education Education 100 Years On 284 Philosophy of Education Book Series Christine Doddington, Ruth Heilbronn Society of Great Britain and Rupert Higham 52: ISSUE 2 VOLUME JJOPE_52_2_cover.inddOPE_52_2_cover.indd 1 117/09/187/09/18
    [Show full text]
  • Nel Noddings Chapter 8: Ethics and Moral Education
    Nel Noddings Chapter 8: Ethics and Moral Education Just as there are debates between the believers in absolute universal Truth & those who argue for some relativity to truth, there are debates between those who believe in absolute moral standards & those who argue for some relativity here too. The believers in absolute independent universal moral standards of right & wrong believe that without such standards, all we have left is power. Believers in absolute standards of right and wrong tend to believe that moral relativism necessarily descends into an “anything goes” attitude. Those who argue for relativity say the believers in absolute Truth create elaborate intellectual systems that don’t really help us in concrete day-to-day situations. Those who argue for relativity ask why, if there is absolute truth, its advocates disagree with one another about what it is. TWO CHOICES: • Believe in absolute universal moral truths that are valid for everyone everywhere. Or • Believe that morality is relative to the situation, so that you might accept discrimination, oppression, torture & killing if a particular cultural group considered it appropriate in the situation. • Are there any other choices? Plato argued for the absolute world of Ideas, and absolute standards of right & wrong that were independent of our situations. Aristotle believed that there was such a thing as “the good life,” the life of satisfaction, meaning, and contentment; and that virtue was necessary to the good life. Aristotle believed that you become virtuous by practicing virtue, by doing the right things regularly. (Remember Denis Doyle’s emphasis on example, teaching, and practice, all three being necessary to develop character.) Aristotle believed that you become virtuous by practicing virtue, by doing the right things regularly.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy
    ISSN: 2325-3290 (online) Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy Eugene Matusov Kiyotaka Miyazaki University of Delaware, USA Waseda University, Japan Abstract In September 2011 in Rome at the International Society for Cultural and Activity Research conference, Eugene Matusov (USA), Kiyotaka Miyazaki (Japan), Jayne White (New Zealand), and Olga Dysthe (Norway) organized a symposium on Dialogic Pedagogy. Formally during the symposium and informally after the symposium several heated discussions started among the participants about the nature of dialogic pedagogy. The uniting theme of these discussions was a strong commitment by all four participants to apply the dialogic framework developed by Soviet-Russian philosopher and literary theoretician Bakhtin to education. In this special issue, Eugene Matusov (USA) and Kiyotaka Miyazaki (Japan) have developed only three of the heated issues discussed at the symposium in a form of dialogic exchanges (dialogue-disagreements). We invited our Dialogic Pedagogy colleagues Jayne White (New Zealand) and Olga Dysthe (Norway) to write commentaries on the dialogues. Fortunately, Jayne White kindly accepted the request and wrote her commentary. Unfortunately, Olga Dysthe could not participate due to her prior commitments to other projects. We also invited Ana Marjanovic-Shane (USA), Beth Ferholt (USA), Rupert Wegerif (UK), and Paul Sullivan (UK) to comment on Eugene-Kiyotaka dialogue-disagreement. The first two heated issues were initiated by Eugene Matusov by providing a typology of different conceptual approaches to Dialogic Pedagogy that he had noticed in education. Specifically, the debate with Kiyotaka Miyazaki (and the other two participants) was around three types of Dialogic Pedagogy defined by Eugene Matusov: instrumental, epistemological, and ontological types of Dialogic Pedagogy.
    [Show full text]
  • ©2007 Benjamin Johnson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
    ©2007 Benjamin Johnson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE VARIETIES OF AESTHETIC EXPERIENCE IN AMERICAN MODERNIST LITERATURE by BENJAMIN JOHNSON A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Literatures in English written under the direction of Marcia Ian and approved by ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October, 2007 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Varieties of Aesthetic Experience in American Modernist Literature By BENJAMIN JOHNSON Dissertation Director: Marcia Ian My dissertation focuses on three American Modernists—Henry James, Marianne Moore, and Wallace Stevens—whose major works portray the sacralization of art as a problematic aspiration. All three are known for essays, journals, or letters which argue that literature can be seen either as a secular replacement for religion (James, Stevens), or a secular conduit for rumination on divine grace (Moore). However, the dominant tendency in their literary writing is to depict these projects as unaccomplished and perhaps unaccomplishable. In their fiction and poetry, James, Moore, and Stevens suggest that when aesthetic experience is spiritualized, the writing that results will be solipsistic, imprecise, and ontologically implausible. I examine these writers’ descriptions of the limitations and inconsistencies of imagining literature as a source of spiritual experience,
    [Show full text]