DOCSLIB.ORG

THE FINAL WORD Issue 122 Nov

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE FINAL WORD Issue 122 Nov THE FINAL WORD Issue 122 Nov. 12, 2004 Alan Guebert 1.) Rust and rust panic News early Wednesday that USDA had confirmed the presence of Phakopsora pacyrhizi, or Asian soybean rust, in two Louisiana State University-maintained research plots hit farmers and the markets like a sledge hammer. By mid-day, the ag press fell in line to report the dire consequences of the discovery: reduced soybean plantings nationwide; $20 to $25 per acre increased production costs; 15% to 80% reduction in yields; a shortage of fungicide to treat infected acres. By late Wednesday afternoon--perhaps winded by their morning sprints--both the markets and farmers began to calm. Chicago soybean futures, up 31-cents on initial reports of the disease, settled 12-cents higher for the day. Thursday then brought this shocking news: the world had not ended. Why? Because a careful review of the facts--we got ours from the best soybean extension agronomist we know, Iowa State’s Palle Pederson--shows soybean rust here will be very different from soybean rust there--Brazil and several African nations. First, it is very likely that this year’s active and late hurricane season did indeed bring the rust spores to Louisiana as USDA suspects. Five weeks ago Pederson and a colleague ran computer simulations, based on National Weather Service data gathered during the September hurricanes that pummeled the American Gulf Coast, and predicted soybean rust spores from South America likely made it to America. Unlike USDA, however, the models showed the series of late-season hurricanes did the trick, not a big one by itself like Hurricane Ivan. The rust spores likely were shuttled to the Gulf Coast by the unprecedented wave of storms. The models, explains Pederson, are “good enough” to refute ideas that farmers, USDA officials, plant breeders or others accidentally brought rust into America. Moreover, since rust spores are an “obligated parasite”--they need living plant material to survive--South American soy importers and seed companies bringing Southern Hemisphere seed into the US can also be scratched as a likely source. Parasite is the key, he stresses. Since rust needs a living host to survive, the lack of a living host means importers, researchers or travelers weren’t the carrying culprits. More importantly, Midwestern winters and most Delta winters are too harsh to allow the rust to survive season-to-season on living plants. Southern states like Louisiana, though, often remain warm enough to harbor the fungus year around. In fact, says Pederson, Asia rust can be found in nearly 90 plants other than soybeans. Kudzu, almost as common as air in most Southern states, is a one widespread host. Many of the hosts easily survive mild Coastal winters. The weather difference between the South and the Midwest also means that Asian soybean rust must travel to key Midwestern soybean areas each year --“just like corn rust does every year,” Pederson explains--in order to reduce yields. And it likely will, he explains. But the airborne arrival doesn’t mean rust will always find a Midwestern home. Conditions must be receptive when it arrives for it to impact yields. According to the soybean specialists, rust loves moisture, high humidity and moderate temperatures. In short, too dry and it dies; too warm and it dies. A pleasant, almost perfect growing season like 2004 would, however, be a boon to rust. A dry, hot growing season like 2003 would be a bust to rust. Rust treatments are available. Syngenta currently markets a fungicide that is foliar applied once rust appears--usually at or after full canopy. The cost is a steep $20 per acre. Also, since most US farmers do not spray soybeans at that late stage, Extension agronomists are now examining equipment, techniques and economics growers may soon need to combat the disease if and when it arrives. On a more hopeful note, Pederson relates that Brazilian growers--who spend an estimated $1 billion per year fighting the fungus--are getting a better handle on how to attack it. “They are learning how to time fungicide applications better. In fact, most Brazilian producers only spray once after the rust appears.” “More importantly,” he adds, “they have discovered that spraying for rust kills other diseases and some growers have actually improved overall yields after spraying.” But, he warns, Southern US growers will be hit first and he urges them to “spend the next eight months learning all they can about rust.” 2.) Veneman coy about future at USDA In a press teleconference Tuesday to tout the Economic Research Service’s just- released record $77.5 billion net farm income forecast for 2004, Secretary of Agriculture Ann Veneman was asked if she would remain as USDA chief in a second Bush term. The questions, the first two asked Veneman by the press, and Veneman’s answers went like this: QUESTION: "This is a question for Secretary Veneman. Can you talk about the prospects for your remaining on in the next administration?" SEC. VENEMAN: "Somehow I thought I might get asked that question today. As you know, we in the cabinet serve at the pleasure of the President. And I can continue to serve at the pleasure of the President. I think he's made it clear that he will be making decisions on personnel in the coming days and weeks. And so in the meantime we continue to do our jobs as well as we possibly can, which is what we want to be doing." MODERATOR: "Our next question ... go ahead, please." QUESTION: "Well, thank you very much... Madame Secretary. My question is whether or not you intend to stay if the President will have you continue." SEC. VENEMAN: Well, as I have said many times, it is an honor to serve in this position, and it is up to the President to make that kind of decision." The weak, indirect questions permit weak, indirect and dismissive answers. Farmers and ranchers learned nothing about the Secretary’s future at USDA. Which got us to thinking, how would Secretary Veneman liked to have answered the inquiries? What would she have said if what she thought actually crossed her lips? Our best guess follows. QUESTION: “Can you talk about the prospects for your remaining in the next administration?" ANSWER THE CROSSED VENEMAN’S MIND: “I’d love to talk about my prospects for remaining in the next Administration but no one in the White House talks to me. Ever. Let me say that that’s not usual because no one in the White House talks to any Cabinet secretary unless my colleagues and I are needed for campaign appearances or to assure the American public that free trade is good and mad cows really aren’t mad. “But, as you know, I serve at the pleasure of Karl Rove. Karl had hoped my appointment at USDA would swing California into the red column in 2004, but that didn’t happen, did it? “I would point out, however, that we did get the majority of the non-gay Latino artificial inseminator vote in Tulare County. “And I must add that states I campaigned in over the last five months went mostly red. There’s a reason for that. “Reuters claims that I handed out almost $600 million in USDA grants and goodies in those states during my, ahem, official visits. Actually, it was much more than that; more like a billion. Hey, it had to be spent so I handed it out like Halloween candy. “No, the real reason is that Dick Cheney’s daughter--the other daughter!--traveled with me and the farmers loved her. You know, she’s just like her father: tough but feminine, good with guns, and absolutely unflappable. She was terrific. “I’m sorry, what was the question? “Oh, right, serving the President and Mr. Rove. Well, I served both a glass of bovine growth hormone milk election night while we waited for Ohio to turn red. (We knew it would once those farm votes came to town.) They, like the rest of America, did not know that 80% of the US milk supply contains Monsanto technology--and we ain’t talking NutraSweet, baby. And they loved it. And I loved serving it to them. So, yes, I like serving. “In the meantime, or while the President decides, I’ll continue to do my job as well as I possibly can. “That means I’ll stall on country of origin labeling, not allow mean old Chuck Grassley to cap farm program payments, reward meatpackers whose freezers are full of 50-cent Canadian beef by reopening the US border to them, and continue to give biotech a free hand in everything I do and say at USDA. “Who’s next? QUESTION: “My question is whether or not you intend to stay if the President will have you continue.” ANSWER THE CROSSED VENEMAN’S MIND: “Well, as I have said many times, it is an honor to serve in this position. Besides, it has improved my posture despite the heavy burdens placed on me by agribusiness. You know, it hasn’t been easy balancing all the needs of those who have required government assistance in the last four years: Cargill, ADM, Monsanto, Tyson Foods, Smithfield, Bunge, DuPont, my great friends at the NCBA and the Pork Producers, the two actual farmers and one rancher I met, the Board of Trade, the Farm Bureau, Soybean Association, all the trade ministers from like Argentina, Australia and Honduras as well as justices Clarence Thomas and Anthony Scalia who called about the checkoff cases.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 07-12-07 Guide to Women Leaders in the U
    2007 – 2008 Guide to Senior-Level Women Leaders in International Affairs in the U.S. and Abroad (As of 07/24/2007) The Women's Foreign Policy Group (WFPG) is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit, educational membership organization that promotes global engagement and the leadership, visibility and participation of women in international affairs. To learn more about the WFPG please visit our website at www.wfpg.org. Table of Contents Women Foreign Ministers 2 Senior-Level U.S. Women in International Affairs 4 Department of State Department of Defense Department of Labor Department of Commerce Senior-Level Women in the United Nations System 8 Women Ambassadors from the United States 11 Women Ambassadors to the United States 14 Women Ambassadors to the United Nations 16 Senior-Level Women Officials in the Organization of American States 17 Women Heads of State 19 - 1 - Women Foreign Ministers (Listed in Alphabetical Order by Country) Principality of Andorra Meritxell Mateu i Pi Republic of Austria Ursula Plassnik Barbados Dame Billie Miller Belize Lisa M. Shoman Republic of Burundi Antoinette Batumubwira Republic of Croatia Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic Republic of Ecuador Maria Fernanda Espinoza Hellenic Republic (Greece) Theodora Bakoyannis Republic of Guinea-Bissau Maria da Conceicao Nobre Cabral Republic of Hungary Kinga Goncz Republic of Iceland Ingibjorg Solrun Gisladottir State of Israel Tzipi Livni Principality of Liechtenstein Rita Kieber-Beck Republic of Malawi Joyce Banda - 2 - United Mexican States Patricia Espinosa Republic of Mozambique Alcinda Abreu State of Nepal Sahana Pradhan Federal Republic of Nigeria Joy Ogwu Republic of Poland Anna Fotyga Republic of South Africa Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma Republic of Suriname Lygia Kraag-Keteldijk United States of America Condoleezza Rice - 3 - Senior-Level U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Former Secretaries USMCA Letter
    September 18, 2019 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker Minority Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Chuck Schumer Majority Leader Minority Leader U.S. Senate U.S. Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Speaker Pelosi, Minority Leader McCarthy, Majority Leader McConnell and Minority Leader Schumer, As former Secretaries of Agriculture, we recognize how important agricultural trade is to the U.S. economy and rural America. We know from experience that improved market access creates significant benefits to U.S. farmers and ranchers. We believe that the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) will benefit American agriculture and related industries. With Canada and Mexico being the first and second largest export markets for U.S. agricultural products, we believe USMCA makes positive improvements to one of our most critical trade deals. Currently, NAFTA supports more than 900,000 jobs in the U.S. food and agriculture sector and has amplified agricultural exports to our North American neighbors to $40 billion this past year. Before NAFTA went into effect in 1994, we were exporting only $9 billion worth of agricultural products to Canada and Mexico. The International Trade Commission’s recent economic analysis concluded that USMCA would benefit our agriculture sector and would deliver an additional $2.2 billion in U.S. economic activity. Trade is extremely vital to the livelihood of American farmers and the U.S. food industry. U.S. farm production exceeds domestic demand by 25 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary Perdue Statement on USMCA Agreement
    Secretary Perdue Statement on USMCA Agreement (Washington, D.C., December 10, 2019) – U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue issued the following statement after United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi announced agreement on the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA): “USMCA is a big win for American workers and the economy, especially for our farmers and ranchers. The agreement improves virtually every component of the old NAFTA, and the agriculture industry stands to gain significantly,” said Secretary Perdue. “President Trump and Ambassador Lighthizer are laying the foundation for a stronger farm economy through USMCA and I thank them for all their hard work and perseverance to get the agreement across the finish line. While I am very encouraged by today’s breakthrough, we must not lose sight – the House and Senate need to work diligently to pass USMCA by Christmas.” Background: USMCA will advance United States agricultural interests in two of the most important markets for American farmers, ranchers, and agribusinesses. This high- standard agreement builds upon our existing markets to expand United States food and agricultural exports and support food processing and rural jobs. Canada and Mexico are our first and second largest export markets for United States food and agricultural products, totaling more than $39.7 billion food and agricultural exports in 2018. These exports support more than 325,000 American jobs. All food and agricultural products that have zero tariffs under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) will remain at zero tariffs. Since the original NAFTA did not eliminate all tariffs on agricultural trade between the United States and Canada, the USMCA will create new market access opportunities for United States exports to Canada of dairy, poultry, and eggs, and in exchange the United States will provide new access to Canada for some dairy, peanut, and a limited amount of sugar and sugar-containing products.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeland Security: Department Organization and Management
    Order Code RL31493 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Homeland Security: Department Organization and Management Updated August 7, 2002 Harold C. Relyea Specialist in American National Government Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Homeland Security: Department Organization and Management Summary After substantial congressional entreatment, President George W. Bush gave impetus to the creation of a Department of Homeland Security when, on June 6, 2002, he proposed the establishment of such an entity by Congress. At the time, bills to mandate a department were pending in both houses of Congress, the Senate legislation having been recently ordered to be reported from committee. The President’s action was viewed as an effort to move beyond the coordination efforts of the Office of Homeland Security, established by E.O. 13228 of October 8, 2001, to a strong administrative structure for managing consolidated programs concerned with border security and effective response to domestic terrorism incidents. On June 18, the President transmitted to the House of Representatives proposed legislation to establish a Department of Homeland Security. It was subsequently introduced by request (H.R. 5005). According to a legislative strategy announced by Speaker Dennis Hastert and Minority Leader Richard Gephardt, the House would begin working with this proposal on an expedited basis. Plans called for an initial review and modification of the administration bill by the Committee on Government Reform and other panels having jurisdiction over homeland security matters, followed by a similar review and refinement of the measure by an ad hoc select panel under the leadership of Majority Leader Dick Armey.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Action” Targeted Companies
    1750 Ocean Park Boulevard, #200, Santa Monica, CA 90405 - 4938 Tel: 310-392-0522 • Fax: 310-392-8874 • Net: consumerwatchdog.org News Release For Immediate Release Contact: Carmen Balber 310-392-0522 x324 October 20, 2003 Jerry Flanagan 415-497-1710 13 of 16 Cabinet Members Have Ties To “Class Action” Targeted Companies President Bush Backing Major Overhaul of Class Action Lawsuits Washington, DC – A new report, “Class Action Cabinet,” released today by the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR) shows that 13 of 16 Bush Cabinet members have been employed by, served on the board of, or have significant financial interest in corporations that have been targeted by consumer class-action lawsuits. Deliberations on the bill could start as early as tomorrow. Condoleeza Rice and Andrew Card, top advisors to President Bush, though not part of the Cabinet, were also found to have ties to companies targeted by class action lawsuits as was President Bush himself. The report by the consumer advocacy group comes as the US Senate is set to debate Bush-backed legislation, S. 274, which would limit consumers’ rights to file class action lawsuits. Read "Class Action Cabinet" online at: http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporate/rp/rp003745.pdf “The White House campaign to curb class action lawsuits is being driven by the very corporations that gave birth to the cabinet and will likely fund their retirement,” said Jamie Court, president of FTCR and author of Corporateering: How Corporate Power Steals Your Personal Freedom And What You Can Do About It (Tarcher/Putnam). “The Bush Administration has an undisclosed conflict of interest in lobbying to take away the rights of consumers to band together against corporate abuses that they could not fight alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Pigford V. Glickman
    Case: 1:97-cv-1978 As of: 10/26/2017 10:49 PM EDT 1 of 203 CONSOL,JURY,TYPE−E U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:97−cv−01978−PLF PIGFORD, et al v. VENEMAN, et al Date Filed: 08/28/1997 Assigned to: Judge Paul L. Friedman Date Terminated: 04/14/1999 Demand: $512,800,000 Jury Demand: Both Cases: 1:16−cv−01999−PLF Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other 1:05−cv−01821−JR Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant Case in other court: USCA, 04−05171 USCA, 04−05173 12−05302 13−05303 Cause: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights Special Master RANDI ILYSE ROTH Plaintiff TIMOTHY C. PIGFORD represented by Anthony Herman COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 850 Tenth Street N.W. One City Center Washington, DC 20001 (202) 662−5280 Fax: (202) 662−6291 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Charles Jerome Ware CHARLES JEROME WARE, P.A. 10630 Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 113 Columbia, MD 21044 (410) 730−5016 Fax: (410) 730−7603 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY David A. Branch LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A. BRANCH & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 1828 L Street, NW Suite 820 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 785−2805 Fax: (202) 785−0289 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Faya R. Toure P.O. Box 1290 Selma, AL 36702 (334) 875−9264 Fax: (334) 875−9853 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Case: 1:97-cv-1978 As of: 10/26/2017 10:49 PM EDT 2 of 203 Jacob A.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Appointed to Presidential Cabinets
    WOMEN APPOINTED TO PRESIDENTIAL CABINETS Eleven women have been confirmed to serve in cabinet (6) and cabinet level (5) positions in the Biden administration.1 A total of 64 women have held a total of 72 such positions in presidential administrations, with eight women serving in two different posts. (These figures do not include acting officials.) Among the 64 women, 41 were appointed by Democratic presidents and 23 by Republican presidents. Only 12 U.S presidents (5D, 7R) have appointed women to cabinet or cabinet-level positions since the first woman was appointed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933.2 Party breakdown of women appointed to Presidential Cabinets: 41D 23R Cabinet or Cabinet-level Firsts: First Woman First Black Woman First Latina First Asian Pacific First Native Appointed Appointed Appointed Islander Woman American Woman Appointed Appointed Frances Perkins Patricia Roberts Aída Álvarez Elaine Chao Debra Haaland Secretary of Labor Harris Administrator, Secretary of Labor Secretary of the 1933 (Roosevelt) Secretary of Small Business 2001 (G.W. Bush) Interior Housing and Urban Administration 2021 (Biden) Development 1997 (Clinton) 1977 (Carter) To date, 27 cabinet or cabinet-level posts have been filled by women. Cabinet and cabinet-level positions vary by presidential administration. Our final authority for designating cabinet or cabinet-level in an 1 This does not include Shalanda Young, who currently serves as Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget. 2 In addition, although President Truman did not appoint any women, Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins, a holdover from the Roosevelt administration, served in his cabinet. © COPYRIGHT 2021 Center for American Women and Politic, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University 4/6/2021 administration is that president's official library.
    [Show full text]
  • Usda Inc. : How Agribusiness Has Hijacked Regulatory Policy at the U.S
    USDA INC. : HOW AGRIBUSINESS HAS HIJACKED REGULATORY POLICY AT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BY PHILIP MATTERA CORPORATE RESEARCH PROJECT OF GOOD JOBS FIRST Released At the Food and Agriculture Conference of The Organization for Competitive Markets July 23, 2004, Omaha, Nebraska ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper was conceived by the ORGANIZATION FOR COMPETITIVE MARKETS www.competitivemarkets.com It was commissioned by a working group of the AGRIBUSINESS ACCOUNTABILITY INITIATIVE www.agribusinessaccountability.org The following working group members helped research and edit the paper: SCOTTY JOHNSON, Defenders of Wildlife www.defenders.org BEN LILLISTON, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy www.iatp.org PATTY LOVERA, Public Citizen www.citizen.org LARRY MITCHELL, American Corn Growers Association www.acga.org PETER O'DRISCOLL, Center of Concern www.coc.org MARK SMITH, Farm Aid www.farmaid.org FRED STOKES, Organization for Competitive Markets www.competitivemarkets.com The Agribusiness Accountability Initiative thanks the working group members and THE JESSIE SMITH NOYES FOUNDATION for their financial support to this project. Photos courtesy USDA or stock photography unless otherwise noted Design and layout by TIM HILL www.psycosm.com PHILIP MATTERA Director Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First 1311 L Street NW 4th floor Washington, DC 20005 202-626-3780 ext. 32 [email protected] www.corp-research.org www.goodjobsfirst.org 2 USDA INC. : HOW AGRIBUSINESS HAS HIJACKED REGULATORY POLICY AT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4 INTRODUCTION . 7 CASE STUDY: BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY . 15 CASE STUDY: CAPTIVE SUPPLY IN MEATPACKING . 19 CASE STUDY: MEATPACKING INSPECTION POLICIES . 22 CASE STUDY: BIOTECH FOODS .
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Opinion CFP 11-8-13.Indd
    Volume 124, Number 176 Friday, November 8, 2013 Opinion Other Viewpoints Guns and voting just do not mix If Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt decides that con- cealed-carry of guns must be allowed at polling places, and churches and schools bow out as a result, the responsibility will be that of the 2013 Legislature, which rushed to expand the gun law with far too little concern for such disruptive con- sequences. As the House and Senate voted 104-16 and 32-7, respec- tively, for the bill last spring and Gov. Sam Brownback signed it, the goal clearly was allowing concealed guns in as many public buildings as possible. The law requires counties, cities and other public entities to welcome concealed-carry permit holders bearing fi rearms if their buildings do not have “ad- equate security measures.” In most cases, meeting that stan- dard would mean doing unaffordable renovations and hiring security guards. Four-year exemptions were built into the law for public universities, community mental health centers and public health care facilities. But many public entities inevita- bly will give in and welcome guns, if not now then four years from now. That will be mission accomplished for lawmakers – though 55 percent of Kansans polled in the Docking Institute of Public Ag secretaries talk past, present policy Affairs’ most recent “Kansas Speaks” survey said they oppose allowing concealed-carry of guns in schools, hospitals and With more than three decades of collective During Veneman’s tenure, the Food Stamp service under their belts, six former U.S. ag- Program and child nutrition program were government buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 107Th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 107th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 147 WASHINGTON, SATURDAY, JANUARY 20, 2001 No. 6 Senate (Legislative day of Monday, January 8, 2001) The Senate met at 3:02 p.m., on the APPOINTMENT OF ACTING The resolution (S. Res. 9) was agreed expiration of the recess, and was called PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE to. to order by the Honorable HARRY REID, The PRESIDING OFFICER. The f a Senator from the State of Nevada. clerk will now read a communication NOTIFICATION TO THE HOUSE OF to the Senate. REPRESENTATIVES PRAYER The legislative clerk read the fol- The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John lowing letter: Mr. ROBERTS. I now send a second resolution to the desk also concerning Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: U.S. SENATE, the President pro tempore and ask for Almighty God, Sovereign of our Na- PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, tion and Lord of our lives, we begin Washington, DC, January 20, 2001. its immediate consideration. this 107th Senate with a renewed com- To the Senate: The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- mitment of our lives to You. The Sen- Under the provisions of rule 1, paragraph 3, pore. This resolution is also privileged. of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby ators and all of us who are privileged The clerk will report the resolution by appoint the Honorable HARRY REID, a Sen- to work with them turn over to You title. ator from the State of Nevada, to perform The legislative clerk read as follows: the control of our lives with fresh dedi- the duties of the Chair.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Women's Leadership in International Affairs
    Promoting Women’s Leadership in International Affairs The Women’s Foreign Policy Group is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit, educational membership organization that promotes global engagement and leadership, visibility, and participation of women in international affairs. The organization also aims to promote the next generation of leaders through internships and mentoring activities. Carnegie Scholars Program Information Since 1999, the Carnegie Scholars Program has been supporting individual scholars to conduct research that extends the boundaries of its grant-making priorities. For the last few years, the Scholars Program focused on supporting scholars whose research relates to intellectual and policy developments in Islam and Muslim communities. The overall aim is to build a critical mass of thoughtful and original scholarship in order to add to our fund of knowledge regarding Islam as a religion as well as the cultures and civilizations of Muslim societies and communities, both in the U.S. and abroad. Recognizing that in order for ideas to influence society they must be widely communicated to a variety of audiences, the fellowship emphasizes the communication of scholarly research beyond the academic community to policymakers and the public. The program annually awards up to 20 fellowships for a period of one to two years. At the end of the fellowship period, Scholars will submit a written report along with books or manuscripts prepared as a result of the Corporation’s support. The Women’s Foreign Policy Group Carnegie Scholar Islam Program Series bring together scholars with leaders from across the international affairs community for an in-depth exchange to increase awareness and understanding of Islam through highlighting the work of Carnegie Scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Inaugural Nominee Announcements: Trump-Clinton
    PRE-INAUGURAL NOMINEE ANNOUNCEMENTS: TRUMP-CLINTON Melanie Geller Drew Flanagan ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT The last four presidents announced 115 nominees for Senate-confirmed positions prior to taking office. Among these, 71, including 49 out of 56 Cabinet nominees, received pre-inauguration hearings.1 Only eight nominations by four presidents were withdrawn. This document contains tables listing each announcement sorted by president, along with key dates and speed of confirmation for each nominee. Secretaries of the 15 Cabinet departments are denoted in boldface. Preceding each table is a supplementary narrative discussing events and influences that affected each transition team and their pre- inaugural nominations. Summary • The Trump transition team announced 29 nominees during the transition period from election to inauguration, and the Senate confirmed 26. Fifteen nominees received pre-inaugural hearings. For a variety of reasons, including vetting, paperwork, controversy and a high number of procedural votes, the Trump nominees took much longer than the nominees of other presidents. The Senate confirmed Trump’s Cabinet secretaries in 23.9 days, on average. • The Obama transition team announced 42 nominees, including Secretary of Defense Gates, who stayed on from the George W. Bush administration. Twenty-five received pre-inaugural hearings. Obama’s Cabinet secretaries were confirmed in an average of 4.9 days. • Even with a truncated transition, the George W. Bush transition team announced 20 nominees during the transition, including Director of the CIA George Tenet, who remained in his position. Fourteen received pre-inaugural hearings. The Senate confirmed all except for one in about 3 days and confirmed Cabinet secretaries in 1.6 days, on average.
    [Show full text]