DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historical Development Published on Eurydice (https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice) The Name The name "Crna Gora" (Montenegro) was mentioned for the first time in the Charter of King Milutin (of the Nemanjić dynasty) in 1296. It is believed that the name was derived from the dense forests that covered Mount Lovćen and the surrounding area. The forests were so dark that the viewers got the impression of a "black" mountain. Key Historical Points and Periods During the Roman Empire, the territory of Montenegro was actually the territory ofDuklja (Doclea) named after Illyrian tribe that inhabited it. With the arrival ofthe Slaves in the 7thcentury, Christianity quickly gained primacy in this region. Duklja incorporated the area of Skadar Lake with the nearby mountains. The first ruler of Duklja was Duke Vladimir, the father of Vojislav who founded Vojislavljević dynasty, the first Montenegrin dynasty. Duklja fought its independence from Byzantine Empire in 1042, and was proclaimed kingdom in 1077. Thus, it became one of the first independent states in the Balkans. It was named Zeta, which in the old Slavic languages meant “the harvesters”. Vojislavljević dynasty ruled until the end of the12 th century, when the state was conquered by Serbian ruler Stefan Nemanja. The area of Montenegro was under rule of Serbian lords until the beginning of the second half of the 14th century, when local dynasty of Balšići gained power. They represent the second Montenegrin dynasty. In the 14th century, under the leadership of the Balšić and Crnojević dynasties, it became an independent feudal state and slowly expanded, fighting tirelessly the armies such as the Albanian, and later, the Turkish and the Venetian one. During the period of the Crnojevićs’ rule, due to the strong attacks of the Turkish army, the people, together with the Crnojević family, had to retreat towards the Lovćen Mountain. Ivan Crnojević chose Cetinje as his base and constructed a castle and a monastery there. Cetinje thus became the synonym of spiritual freedom and freedom of the state. Đurađ Crnojević, the son of Ivan Crnojević, ruled for a short period of time, but left invaluable wealth. During his rule, in 1493, the first printing shop in the Balkans was opened, and one year later, in 1494, the first book was printed - "Oktoih" (Octoechos). The Turks took the rule over Montenegro in 1496 and join it to the Skadar province. Still, Montenegro kept a high level of autonomy, and fully regained its independence in 1645. Then the spiritual leaders - Metropolitans took power in Montenegro and also the administration of the country. At the time, the authorities in Montenegro were the All-Montenegrin Assembly and the Assembly of Governors, while on the lower levels there were meetings of the governors. In 1697, the Montenegrin Assembly elected Danilo I of Njeguši (ruled 1696–1735) as the Metropolitan. At that time the establishment of the Petrović Njegoš dynasty started, as well as their struggle for the unity of religion and politics. Petar I Petrović Njegoš (1782 - 1830) is one of the most renowned persons in the Montenegrin history. Under his leadership, Montenegro strengthened its independence, and after the great victories over the more numerous Turkish army, it freed itself from the Turkish influence and domination. He unified the Montenegrin clans and brought them closer to the coastal population, as the coast was under the influence of Austro-Hungary at the time. The successor of Petar I Petrović wasPetar II Petrović Njegoš(1830-1851). He was an extraordinary statesman, philosopher and writer. During his rule, this superb ruler established the state institutions, administrative and state authorities. He maintained links with Russia and often engaged in the fights against the Turks. He wrote many literary works, such as "Gorski vijenac" ("The Mountain Wreath") and "Luča mikrokozma" ("The Light of Microcosm”), which made him one of the world’s greatest writers. During the rule of his successor, Danilo, the sovereignty of Montenegro was strengthened further and formally recognized. The important victory against the Turks in the Grahovac battle in 1858 contributed to that. During his rule, the Prince and King Nikola (1860 - 1910) enabled Montenegro to achieve significant political objectives.At the Berlin Congress in 1878, Montenegro received full international recognition. The fact that Montenegro was the only country in the Balkans that successfully fought against the Ottoman Empire impressed Europe and Montenegrobecame a kingdom in 1910. The 20th century represented a difficult period for Montenegro, as it lost its independence at the time and it disappeared from the political map of Europe. When the World War I broke out, Montenegro sided with Serbia and the Entente Powers. In 1916, after surrendering to Austro-Hungary, King Nikola went to exile. He spent a period of time in Italy, and then went to France. The attempts of the King and his Government to influence the events in Montenegro at the time were not successful. Serbia annexed Montenegro in 1918 and thus Montenegro lost everything that it gained through the centuries: its statehood, army and dynasty.The Kingdom of Serbs, Croatians and Slovenians was created, which, in 1929, became Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Within this new country of the southern Slavs Montenegro didn’t even exist as a geographical denomination, being part of so-called Zeta Banovina, within broader administrative borders. With the fall of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia before the fascist Germany in World War II, Montenegro proved again that the spirit of freedom cherished by its people did not disappear. On July 13th, 1941, a large number of Montenegrins stood up against the Italian occupiers. This wasfirst the nation-wide uprising in occupied Europe. After World War II Montenegro improved its legal and state status and became one of the six equal republics of the Yugoslav federation.Montenegrin state and national identity was fully recognized. This was the time of the greatest socio-economic and cultural progress in the history of Montenegro by that time. After the turbulent years, at the end of the 20th century, and after the disintegration of former Yugoslavia, Montenegro remained in the union with Serbia, thus these two republics formed the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro. Most citizens at referendum held on May 21st, 2006 voted independence of Montenegro. This day was proclaimed the Day of Independence. Thus today Montenegro is an internationally recognized independent state. UN admitted Montenegro as 192nd member country on July 27th, 2006. In 2016 Montenegro celebrates 10th anniversary of regaining its independence. On May 21st, there was a central celebration organised in Podgorica, the capital. For this purpose, the Gala program “Decade of Independence Regaining” was held at the Independence Square with the Montenegrin Prime Minister and the European Council President as the key speakers. Strategic goals of the independent Montenegro are memberships in NATO and EU, first of which was accomplished - on the 5th of June 2017 Montenegro became full member of NATO on a ceremony held in State Department. Montenegro’s road to NATO began in 2006 by joining Partnership for Peace initiative and ended by submission of ratification instruments in Washington after all 28 member states ratified the accession protocol. EU Integration Montenegrin independence was followed by a rapid process of international recognition and accession to international institutions and organizations. On October 15th, 2007 Stabilization and Association Agreement (SAA) was signed between the Government of Montenegro and the European Union, and came into force on May 1st, 2010. Decision of the Council of Ministers to abolish visas for Montenegrin citizens from November 30th, 2009, which came to force on December 19th of the same year, represents major step on the European way of Montenegro. Montenegro fulfills its obligations deriving from visa liberation regime in a responsible manner. Montenegro has submitted its application for EU membership on December 15th, 2008. The country obtained the status of EU Candidate country on December 17th, 2010. Formal accession negotiations between Montenegro and the EU began on June 29th, 2012. Screenings for all 33 Chapters of the EU Acquis Communautaire have been conducted. Up to now 32 Chapters have been opened for negotiations with three of them provisionally closed: Chapter 25 on Science and Research (on December 18th, 2012), Chapter 26 on education and culture (provisionally closed on April 15th, 2013) and Chapter 30 on International Relations (on June 6th, 2017). Following the decision of the European Council, the country has been supported through Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA), established by the Council Regulation (EC) 1085/2006 [1] of th July 17 , 2006, and Regulation (EU) 231/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] of March 11th, 2014 (establishing IPA II). Education, together with the Employment and Social Policies, is being supported under IPA to promote sustainable human resources development by modernizing and developing the educational and training systems, following EU policies and standards, in order to better match and respond to the needs of the labor market. Current IPA in this sector is being implemented through decentralized management meaning that Montenegrin national administration is responsible for programming, implementation and management of IPA funding. Sources: http://www.me/index.php/en/ [3] http://www.visit-montenegro.com/history.htm
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Montenegro Old and New: History, Politics, Culture, and the People
    60 ZuZana Poláčková; Pieter van Duin Montenegro Old and New: History, Politics, Culture, and the People The authors are focusing on how Montenegro today is coming to terms with the task of becoming a modern European nation, which implies recognition not only of democracy, the rule of law, and so forth, but also of a degree of ‘multiculturalism’, that is recognition of the existence of cultural, ethnic, linguistic and religious minorities in a society that is dominated by a Slavic Orthodox majority. In his context they are analyzing the history of the struggle of the Montenegrin people against a host of foreign invaders – after they had ceased to be invaders themselves – and especially their apparently consistent refusal to accept Ottoman sovereignty over their homeland seemed to make them the most remarkable freedom fighters imaginable and led to the creation of a special Montenegrin image in Europe. This im- age of heroic stubbornness and unique martial bravery was even consciously cultivated in Western and Central Europe from the early nineteenth century onwards, as the Greeks, the Serbs, the Montenegrins and other Balkan peoples began to resist the Ottoman Empire in a more effective way and the force of Romantic nationalism began to influence the whole of Europe, from German historians to British politi- cians, and also including Montenegrin and Serbian poets themselves. And what about the present situa- tion? The authors of this essay carried out an improvised piece of investigation into current conditions, attitudes, and feelings on both the Albanian and the Slavic-Montenegrin side (in September 2012). key words: Montenegro; history; multiculturalism; identity; nationalism; Muslim; Orthodox Montenegro (Crna Gora, Tsrna Gora, Tsernagora) is a small country in the Western Balkans region with some 625,000 inhabitants,1 which became an independent nation in 2006 and a can- didate-member of the EU in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
    Public Disclosure Authorized FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA BREAKING WITH THE PAST: THE PATH TO STABILITY AND GROWTH Volume II: Assistance Priorities and Public Disclosure Authorized Sectoral Analyses Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS………………………………………………………...viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT……………………………………………………………………….. ix CHAPTER 1. AN OVERVIEW OF THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND TRANSITION PROGRAM…………………………………………………………………………………….... 1 A. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..... 1 B. The Government’s medium-term Challenges…………………………………………..... 3 C. Medium-term External Financing Requirements………………………………….……... 4 D. The 2001 Program………………………………………………………………………... 8 E. Implementing the Program………………………………………………………….…....13 CHAPTER 2. FISCAL POLICY AND MANAGEMENT………………….…………………..15 A. Reducing Quasi Fiscal Deficits and Hidden Risks…………………………………….. ..16 B. Transparency and Accountability of Public Spending………………….………………..27 C. Public Debt Management………………………………………………………………...34 D. Tax Policy and Administration…………………………………………….…………... ..39 CHAPTER 3. TRADE………………………………………...…………………….…………..48 A. Patterns of Trade in Goods and Services ……………………………..………..……… ..48 B. Trade Policies: Reforms to date and plans for the future………………………………...51 C. Capacity to Trade: Institutional and other constraints to implementation…………….....55 D. Market Access: The global, European and regional dimension……………………….. ..57 E. Policy recommendations………………………………………………………………....60 F. Donor Program……………………………………………………………….…………..62
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro's Tribal Legacy
    WARNING! The views expressed in FMSO publications and reports are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. Montenegro's Tribal Legacy by Major Steven C. Calhoun, US Army Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS. This article appeared in Military Review July-August 2000 The mentality of our people is still very patriarchal. Here the knife, revenge and a tribal (plemenski) system exist as nowhere else.1 The whole country is interconnected and almost everyone knows everyone else. Montenegro is nothing but a large family—all of this augurs nothing good. —Mihajlo Dedejic2 When the military receives an order to deploy into a particular area, planners focus on the terrain so the military can use the ground to its advantage. Montenegro provides an abundance of terrain to study, and it is apparent from the rugged karst topography how this tiny republic received its moniker—the Black Mountain. The territory of Montenegro borders Croatia, Bosnia- Herzegovina, Serbia and Albania and is about the size of Connecticut. Together with the much larger republic of Serbia, Montenegro makes up the current Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). But the jagged terrain of Montenegro is only part of the military equation. Montenegro has a complex, multilayered society in which tribe and clan can still influence attitudes and loyalties. Misunderstanding tribal dynamics can lead a mission to failure. Russian misunderstanding of tribal and clan influence led to unsuccessful interventions in Afghanistan and Chechnya.3 In Afghanistan, the rural population's tribal organization facilitated their initial resistance to the Soviets.
    [Show full text]
  • SEA of Montenegro's National Climate Change Strategy
    The European Union’s IPA Programme for Montenegro SEA of Montenegro’s National Climate Change Strategy (NCCS) EuropeAid/127054/C/SER/multi SEA Report Prepared by: Juan Palerm, Jiří Dusík, Ivana Šarić, Gordan Golja and Marko Slokar Ref. Contract N° 2014/354504 Final Report 14 September, 2015 Development of the Strategic Environment Assessment (SEA) for the Project Title: National Climate Change Strategy by 2030 (EuropeAid/127054/C/SER/multi) Financing: IPA Reference No: (EuropeAid/127054/C/SER/multi) Starting Date: February 2015 End Date (Duration): June 2015 Contract Number: 2014/354504 Contracting Authority: Delegation of the European Union to Montenegro Task Manager: Mr. Sladjan MASLAĆ, Task Manager Address: Vuka Karadžića 12, 81000 Podgorica Phone: + 382 (0) 20 444 600 Fax: + 382 (0) 20 444 666 E-mail: [email protected] Beneficiary: Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism [MSDT] Head of PSC: Ivana VOJINOVIC Address: IV Proleterske brigade 19, 81000 Podgorica Phone: + 382 (0) 20 446 208 Fax: + 382 (0) 20 446 215 E-mail: [email protected] Contractor: Particip GmbH Address: Merzhauser Str. 183, D - 79100 Freiburg, Germany Phone: +49 761 79074 0 Fax: +49 761 79074 90 Project Director: Martin GAYER E-mail address: [email protected] Date of report: 27/03/2015 Revision NA Author of the report: Juan PALERM .............................................. Controlled by: Martin GAYER .............................................. Approved: Mr. Siniša STANKOVIĆ [Head PSC] .............................................. Approved: Mr. Slađan MASLAĆ [Task Manager of EUD] .............................................. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this Report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the EU Delegation or any other organisation mentioned in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines
    World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/8A Paris, 4 June 2021 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Extended forty-fourth session Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting 16 – 31 July 2021 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2021, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2021. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2019. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 44 COM 8A, see point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section L
    L (The sound) Formal languages La Boderie family (Not Subd Geog) [P235.5] Machine theory UF Boderie family BT Consonants L1 algebras La Bonte Creek (Wyo.) Phonetics UF Algebras, L1 UF LaBonte Creek (Wyo.) L.17 (Transport plane) BT Harmonic analysis BT Rivers—Wyoming USE Scylla (Transport plane) Locally compact groups La Bonte Station (Wyo.) L-29 (Training plane) L2TP (Computer network protocol) UF Camp Marshall (Wyo.) USE Delfin (Training plane) [TK5105.572] Labonte Station (Wyo.) L-98 (Whale) UF Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (Computer network BT Pony express stations—Wyoming USE Luna (Whale) protocol) Stagecoach stations—Wyoming L. A. Franco (Fictitious character) BT Computer network protocols La Borde Site (France) USE Franco, L. A. (Fictitious character) L98 (Whale) USE Borde Site (France) L.A.K. Reservoir (Wyo.) USE Luna (Whale) La Bourdonnaye family (Not Subd Geog) USE LAK Reservoir (Wyo.) LA 1 (La.) La Braña Region (Spain) L.A. Noire (Game) USE Louisiana Highway 1 (La.) USE Braña Region (Spain) UF Los Angeles Noire (Game) La-5 (Fighter plane) La Branche, Bayou (La.) BT Video games USE Lavochkin La-5 (Fighter plane) UF Bayou La Branche (La.) L.C.C. (Life cycle costing) La-7 (Fighter plane) Bayou Labranche (La.) USE Life cycle costing USE Lavochkin La-7 (Fighter plane) Labranche, Bayou (La.) L.C. Smith shotgun (Not Subd Geog) La Albarrada, Battle of, Chile, 1631 BT Bayous—Louisiana UF Smith shotgun USE Albarrada, Battle of, Chile, 1631 La Brea Avenue (Los Angeles, Calif.) BT Shotguns La Albufereta de Alicante Site (Spain) This heading is not valid for use as a geographic L Class (Destroyers : 1939-1948) (Not Subd Geog) USE Albufereta de Alicante Site (Spain) subdivision.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Materials and Techniqu63 in the Eastern
    BUILDING MATERIALS AND TECHNIQU63 IN THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN FRUM THE HELLENISTIC PERIOD TO THE FOURTH CENTURY AD by Hazel Dodgeq BA Thesis submitted for the Degree of'PhD at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne Decembert 1984 "When we buildq let us thinjc that we build for ever". John Ruskin (1819 - 1900) To MY FAMILY AND TU THE MEMORY OF J. B. WARD-PERKINS (1912 - 1981) i ABSTRACT This thesis deals primarily with the materials and techniques found in the Eastern Empire up to the 4th century AD, putting them into their proper historical and developmental context. The first chapter examines the development of architecture in general from the very earliest times until the beginnin .g of the Roman Empire, with particular attention to the architecture in Roman Italy. This provides the background for the study of East Roman architecture in detail. Chapter II is a short exposition of the basic engineering principles and terms upon which to base subsequent despriptions. The third chapter is concerned with the main materials in use in the Eastern Mediterranean - mudbrick, timber, stone, mortar and mortar rubble, concrete and fired brick. Each one is discussed with regard to manufacture/quarrying, general physical properties and building uses. Chapter IV deals with marble and granite in a similar way but the main marble types are described individually and distribution maps are provided for each in Appendix I. The marble trade and the use of marble in Late Antiquity are also examined. Chapter V is concerned with the different methods pf wall construction and with the associated materials.
    [Show full text]
  • YUGOSLAVIA Official No
    YUGOSLAVIA Official No. : C. 169. M. 99. 1939. Conf. E. V. R. 23. Geneva, August 1939. LEAGUE OF NATIONS EUROPEAN CONFERENCE O N RURAL LIFE National Monographs drawn up by Governments YUGOSLAVIA Series of League of Nations Publications EUROPEAN CONFERENCE « « O N RURAL LIFE ^ « 5 Peasant from the Cettinje neighbourhood (Montenegro). TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I n t r o d u c t io n ................................................................................................ 5 I. P op u lation : General C onsiderations............................ g II. A griculture : Structure........................................................ 16 III. A grarian R e f o r m .................................................................. 18 1. Ancient Provinces of the Voivodine, Syrmia, Slavonia, Croatia and S lo v en ia .................... 18 2. Southern S e r b i a ......................................................... 19 3. Bosnia and H erzegovina.......................................... 19 4 . D a lm a tia ....................................................................... 19 IV. T echnical I mprovement of the So i l ....................... 21 V. Improvement of Live-stock and Plants .... 24 VI. A gricultural In d u st r ie s .................................................... 27 VII. L and Settlemen r .................................................................. 28 Technical and Cultural Propaganda in Country D i s t r i c t ............................................................................. 30 VIII. A gricultural Co-operation
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION 1. the Project the National
    Archeologia e Calcolatori Supplemento 11, 2019, 11-17 INTRODUCTION 1. The project The National Research Council of Italy (CNR), under the aegis of the International Relations Office, has started in the last years a productive collaboration with the Ministry of Science and the Ministry of Culture of Montenegro on the broad topic of the Montenegrin cultural heritage. The first specific scientific agreement between CNR and the Ministry of Science of Montenegro was signed in 2014, and since then a series of bilateral activities have started. In Cultural Heritage studies, in particular, two bilateral projects have been conducted with the Historical Institute of Montenegro-Uni- versity of Montenegro (HIM-UoM). Two CNR Institutes were involved: the Institute for Technologies Applied to Cultural Heritage (CNR-ITABC) – that signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Ministry of Culture of Montenegro in 2016 – and the Institute for Ancient Mediterranean Studies (CNR-ISMA) – that started a Joint Archaeological Laboratory with HIM- UoM in 2017 (Alberti, Sfameni 2015, 2017; Alberti, Koprivica 2017). Both of these CNR Institutes were recently merged in the newly created CNR Institute for Cultural Heritage Sciences (Istituto di Scienze del Patrimonio Culturale, CNR-ISPC). The first step of our collaboration has been a better knowledge of the Montenegrin Cultural Heritage, in order to strengthen the scientific relation between the two countries and the two scientific communities. In agreement with the Montenegrin Institutions, the Roman city of Doclea, located only few kilometres from the capital Podgorica, has been chosen as the scientific arena of this new collaboration, in view of its importance for the Montenegrin history and cultural identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Cßr£ S1ÍU2Y M Life ;-I;
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bilkent University Institutional Repository p fr-; C ß R £ S1ÍU2Y lifem ; - i ; : : ... _ ...._ _ .... • Ûfc 1î A mm V . W-. V W - W - W__ - W . • i.r- / ■ m . m . ,l.m . İr'4 k W « - Xi û V T k € t> \5 0 Q I3 f? 3 -;-rv, 'CC/f • ww--wW- ; -w W “V YUGOSLAVIA: A CASE STUDY IN CONFLICT AND DISINTEGRATION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES BILKENT UNIVERSITY MEVLUT KATIK i ' In Partial Fulfillment iff the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Arts February 1994 /at jf-'t. "•* 13 <5 ' K İ8 133(, £>02216$ Approved by the Institute of Economics and Socjal Sciences I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate,in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. Prof.Dr.Ali Karaosmanoglu I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. A j ua. Asst.Prof. Dr. Nur Bilge Criss I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. Asst.Prof.Dr.Ali Fuat Borovali ÖZET Eski Yugoslavya buğun uluslararasi politikanin odak noktalarindan biri haline gelmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • DAFTAR PUSTAKA Buku Baylis, John, Et Al. the Globalization of World Politics: an Introduction to International Relations. Oxford
    DAFTAR PUSTAKA Buku Baylis, John, et al. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 2008. Bremer, Ian. The J Curve (Soft Cover) Strategi untuk Memahami Mengapa Bangsa- Bangsa Berjaya dan Jatuh. Jakarta. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. 2013. C, C, Rodee. Pengantar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta. Rajawali. 2002. Coplin, D, William. Pengantar Politik Internasional: Suatu Telaah Teoritis. Bandung. CV. Sinar Baru. 1992. Djaja, Wahjudi. Sejarah Eropa : Dari Eropa Kuno Hingga Eropa Modern. Yogyakarta. Penerbit Ombak. 2012. Endaswara, Suwardi. Metode, Teori, Teknik Penelitian Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Widyatama. 2006. Holsti, K.J. Politik International: Suatu Kerangka Analisis. Bandung. Bina Cipta. 1992. Jackson, Robert dan Sorensen, Gorge. Pengantar Studi Hubungan Internasional. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar. 2005. Keohane, O, Robert. International Institutions and State Power (Essay in International Relations Theory). London. Westvie Press. 1989. Maso’ed, Mochtar. Ilmu Hubungan Internasional: Disiplin dan Metodologi. Jakarta. LP3ES. 1990. Moleong, Lexy J. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya. 2007. Murdiyatmoko, Janu. Sosiologi : Memahami dan Mengkaji Masyarakat. Bandung. Grafindo Media Pratama. 2007. Rudy, T, May. Study Strategis Dalam Transformasi Sistem Internasional Pasca Perang Dingin. Bandung : Refika Aditama. 2002. Russet, Bruce dan Starr, Harvey. World Politics: The Menu for Choice. 2nd ed. New York. W.H.Freeman and Co. 1988. Sugiyono. Cara Mudah Menyusun : Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung. Alfabeta. 2014. 134 135 Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung. Alfabeta. 2009. Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu dan Yani, Yanyan M. Pengantar Ilmu Hubungan Internasional. Bandung. Rosda Karya. 2006. Jurnal Commission, European. EU Enlargement Strategy. Strategy Paper. Brussels, Belgium. 2015. Commission, European. How the European Union works.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio Economic Analysis of Northern Montenegrin Region
    SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO Podgorica, June 2008. FOUNDATION F OR THE DEVELOPMENT O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO (FORS) SOCIO -ECONOMIC ANLY S I S O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR : Veselin Šturanović STUDY REVIEWER S : Emil Kočan, Nebojsa Babovic, FORS Montenegro; Zoran Radic, CHF Montenegro IN S TITUTE F OR STRATEGIC STUDIE S AND PROGNO S E S ISSP’S AUTHOR S TEAM : mr Jadranka Kaluđerović mr Ana Krsmanović mr Gordana Radojević mr Ivana Vojinović Milica Daković Ivan Jovetic Milika Mirković Vojin Golubović Mirza Mulešković Marija Orlandić All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means wit- hout the prior written permission of FORS Montenegro. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for Interna- tional Development. For more information please contact FORS Montenegro by email at [email protected] or: FORS Montenegro, Berane FORS Montenegro, Podgorica Dušana Vujoševića Vaka Đurovića 84 84300, Berane, Montenegro 81000, Podgorica, Montenegro +382 51 235 977 +382 20 310 030 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS: ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]