DOCSLIB.ORG

Study of Aspects of Deep Hydrodesulfurization by Means of Model Reactions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study of Aspects of Deep Hydrodesulfurization by Means of Model Reactions DISS. ETH No. 15376 STUDY OF ASPECTS OF DEEP HYDRODESULFURIZATION BY MEANS OF MODEL REACTIONS A dissertation submitted to the SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ZURICH for the degree of Doctor of Technical Sciences presented by MARINA EGOROVA Master of Science in Chemistry, Novosibirsk State University born 05.05.1976 citizen of Russia accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. R. Prins, examiner Prof. Dr. A. Wokaun, co-examiner Zurich, 2003 To my husband Valeri and my parents Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................. V Zusammenfassung............................................................................................ VIII Chapter 1. Deep Desulfurization of Oil Refinery Streams.............................1 1.1 Hydrotreating in refining...........................................................................................1 1.2 Deep hydrodesulfurization ........................................................................................5 1.3 Catalytic HDS technologies ......................................................................................6 1.3.1 Conventional HDS............................................................................................6 1.3.2 Advanced HDS.................................................................................................7 1.3.2.1 Advanced HDS catalysts ......................................................................8 1.3.2.2 New reactor systems.............................................................................9 1.3.2.3 Combination of hydrotreating with other reactions............................10 1.3.2.4 Catalytic distillation............................................................................11 1.4 Monolith reactor/catalysts for HDS of refinery streams .........................................12 1.5 Conclusion...............................................................................................................15 1.6 References ...............................................................................................................16 Chapter 2. Structure of Sulfide Catalysts .......................................................21 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................21 2.2 Structure of the catalyst ..............................................................................................22 2.2.1 Structure of the oxidic catalyst precursor.......................................................22 2.2.2 Structure of the sulfidic catalyst .....................................................................23 2.2.3 Nature of active sites ......................................................................................28 2.3 References ..................................................................................................................33 I Chapter 3. Experimental .................................................................................... 37 3.1 Model compounds...................................................................................................... 37 3.1.1 S-containing molecules.................................................................................. 37 3.1.2 N-containing molecules ................................................................................. 40 3.2 High-pressure set-up .................................................................................................. 43 3.3 Catalysts preparation.................................................................................................. 45 3.4 Product analysis ......................................................................................................... 46 3.4.1 Pulsed flame photometric detector................................................................. 47 3.5 References.................................................................................................................. 48 Chapter 4. On the Role of β Hydrogen Atoms in the Hydrodenitrogenation of 2-Methylpyridine and 2-Methylpiperidine ........ 51 4.1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 51 4.2 Experimental .............................................................................................................. 53 4.3 Results........................................................................................................................ 54 4.3.1 HDN of 2-methylpyridine.............................................................................. 54 4.3.2 HDN of 2-methylpiperidine........................................................................... 55 4.3.3 Comparison of piperidine, 2-methylpiperidine, and 2,6-dimethylpiperidine..57 4.3.4 HDN of 1-aminohexane................................................................................. 60 4.3.5 HDN of 2-aminohexane................................................................................. 62 4.4 Discussion .................................................................................................................. 63 4.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 67 4.6 References.................................................................................................................. 68 Chapter 5. Mutual Influence of the HDS of Dibenzothiophene and HDN of 2-Methylpyridine.................................................................................................. 71 5.1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 71 5.2 Experimental .............................................................................................................. 73 5.3 Results........................................................................................................................ 73 5.3.1 HDS of dibenzothiophene.............................................................................. 73 5.3.2 Inhibition of the HDS by N-containing molecules ........................................ 76 5.3.3 Effect of H2S on the HDN of 2-methylpyridine ............................................ 79 II 5.3.4 Influence of DBT on the HDN of N-compounds ...........................................82 5.4 Discussion...................................................................................................................84 5.5 Conclusion..................................................................................................................89 5.6 References ..................................................................................................................90 Chapter 6. Promotion Effect of 2-Methylpiperidine on the Direct Desulfurization of Dibenzothiophene over NiMo/γ-Al2O3 ............................93 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................93 6.2 Experimental...............................................................................................................95 6.3 Results ........................................................................................................................95 6.4 Discussion.................................................................................................................100 6.5 Conclusion................................................................................................................102 6.6 References ................................................................................................................103 Chapter 7. Competitive HDS of 4,6-Dimethyldibenzothiophene, HDN of 2- Methylpyridine and Hydrogenation of Naphthalene over sulfided NiMo/γ- Al2O3 .....................................................................................................................105 7.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................105 7.2 Experimental.............................................................................................................106 7.3 Results ......................................................................................................................107 7.3.1 HDS of 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene........................................................107 7.3.2 Influence of N-containing molecules on HDS .............................................109 7.3.3 Influence of S-containing molecules on HDN .............................................111 7.3.4 Effect of solvent on HDS..............................................................................113 7.3.5 Effect of naphthalene on HDS......................................................................113 7.3.6 Influence of S-containing molecules on hydrogenation...............................114 7.4 Discussion.................................................................................................................115 7.5 Conclusion................................................................................................................124 7.6 References ................................................................................................................124 III Chapter 8. Hydrodesulfurization of Dibenzothiophene and 4,6- Dimethyldibenzothiophene
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenolysis Reactions for Lignin Valorization to Fuels and Chemicals
    catalysts Review Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenolysis Reactions for Lignin Valorization to Fuels and Chemicals Antigoni Margellou 1 and Konstantinos S. Triantafyllidis 1,2,* 1 Department of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; [email protected] 2 Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 October 2018; Accepted: 10 December 2018; Published: 4 January 2019 Abstract: Lignocellulosic biomass is an abundant renewable source of chemicals and fuels. Lignin, one of biomass main structural components being widely available as by-product in the pulp and paper industry and in the process of second generation bioethanol, can provide phenolic and aromatic compounds that can be utilized for the manufacture of a wide variety of polymers, fuels, and other high added value products. The effective depolymerisation of lignin into its primary building blocks remains a challenge with regard to conversion degree and monomers selectivity and stability. This review article focuses on the state of the art in the liquid phase reductive depolymerisation of lignin under relatively mild conditions via catalytic hydrogenolysis/hydrogenation reactions, discussing the effect of lignin type/origin, hydrogen donor solvents, and related transfer hydrogenation or reforming pathways, catalysts, and reaction conditions. Keywords: lignin; catalytic transfer hydrogenation; hydrogenolysis; liquid phase reductive depolymerization; hydrogen donors; phenolic and aromatic compounds 1. Introduction The projected depletion of fossil fuels and the deterioration of environment by their intensive use has fostered research and development efforts towards utilization of alternative sources of energy. Biomass from non-edible crops and agriculture/forestry wastes or by-products is considered as a promising feedstock for the replacement of petroleum, coal, and natural gas in the production of chemicals and fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalyst Precursors for Hydrodesulfurization Synthesized in Supercritical Fluids Manuel Théodet
    New generation of ”bulk” catalyst precursors for hydrodesulfurization synthesized in supercritical fluids Manuel Théodet To cite this version: Manuel Théodet. New generation of ”bulk” catalyst precursors for hydrodesulfurization synthesized in supercritical fluids. Material chemistry. Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux I,2010. English. NNT : 2010BOR14092. tel-00559113 HAL Id: tel-00559113 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00559113 Submitted on 24 Jan 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License N° d’ordre : 4092 THÈSE présentée à L’UNIVERSITÉ BORDEAUX I ÉCOLE DOCTORALE DES SCIENCES CHIMIQUES Par Manuel THEODET Ingénieur ENSCPB POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR SPÉCIALITÉ : Physico-Chimie de la Matière Condensée ___________________ NOUVELLE GENERATION DE PRECURSEURS « BULK » DE CATALYSEUR D’HYDRODESULFURATION SYNTHETISES EN MILIEU FLUIDE SUPERCRITIQUE ___________________ NEW GENERATION OF « BULK » CATALYST PRECURSORS FOR HYDRODESULFURIZATION SYNTHESIZED IN SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS ___________________ Co-superviseurs de recherche : Cristina Martínez & Cyril Aymonier Soutenue le 03 Novembre 2010 Après avis favorable de : M. E. PALOMARES, Professor, UPV, Valencia, Spain Rapporteurs M. M. TÜRK, Professor, KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany Devant la commission d’examen formée de : M.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Refinery Sector
    Gujarat Cleaner Production Centre - ENVIS Centre CLEANER PRODUCTION OPPURTUNITIES IN OIL REFINERY SECTOR Gujarat Cleaner Production Centre - ENVIS Centre OIL REFINERY An oil refinery or petroleum refinery is an industrial process plant where crude oil is processed and refined into more useful products such as petroleum naphtha, gasoline, diesel fuel, asphalt base, heating oil, kerosene and liquefied petroleum gas. Oil refineries are typically large, sprawling industrial complexes with extensive piping running throughout, carrying streams of fluids between large chemical processing units. Common process units found in a refinery: • Desalter unit washes out salt from the crude oil before it enters the atmospheric distillation unit. • Atmospheric distillation unit distills crude oil into fractions. • Vacuum distillation unit further distills residual bottoms after atmospheric distillation. • Naphtha hydrotreater unit uses hydrogen to desulfurize naphtha from atmospheric distillation. Must hydrotreat the naphtha before sending to a Catalytic Reformer unit. • Catalytic reformer unit is used to conver t the naphtha-boiling range molecules into higher octane reformate (reformer product). The reformate has higher content of aromatics and cyclic hydrocarbons). An important byproduct of a r eformer is hydrogen released during the catalyst reaction. The hydrogen is used either in the hydrotreater or the hydrocracker. • Distillate hydrotreater unit desulfurizes distillates (such as diesel) after atmospheric distillation. • Fluid catalytic cracker (FCC) unit upgrades heavier fractions into lighter, more valuable products. • Hydrocracker unit uses hydrogen to upgrade heavier fractions into lighter, more valuable products. • Visbreaking unit upgrades heavy residual oils by thermally cracking them into li ghter, more valuable reduced viscosity products. • Merox unit treats LPG, kerosene or jet fuel by oxidizing mercaptans to organic disulfides.
    [Show full text]
  • THE H-OIL PROCESS: a Worldwxide LEADER in VACUUM RESIDUE HYDROPROCESSING” \ ^
    —t&CR I'd, D 3 YJj TT-097 CONEXPO ARPEL '96 . i ' 1 "THE H-OIL PROCESS: A WORLDWXiDE LEADER IN VACUUM RESIDUE HYDROPROCESSING” \ ^ J.J. Colyar1 L.I. Wisdom2 A. Koskas3 SUMMARY With the uncertainty of market trends, refiners will need to hedge their investment strategies in the future by adding processing units that provide them with flexibility to meet the changing market. The various process configurations involving the H-Oil® Process described in this paper have been tested commercially and provide the refiner with the latest state of the art technology. ABSTRACT The H-Oil® Process is a catalytic hydrocracking process, invented by HRI, Inc., a division of IFP Enterprises, Inc. which is used to convert and upgrade petroleum residua and heavy oils. Today the H-Oil Process accounts for more than 50 percent of the worldwide vacuum residue hydroprocessing market due to its unique flexibility to handle a wide variety of heavy crudes 'while producing clean transportation fuels. The process is also flexible in terms of changes in yield selectivity and product quality. The unconverted vacuum residue from the process can be utilized for fuel oil production, blended into asphalt, routed to resid catalytic cracking, directly combusted or gasified to produce hydrogen. This paper will discuss additional background information on the H-Oil Process, some of the key advances made to the process and applications for the Latin America market. The paper will also discuss the status of recent commercial plants which are in operation or which are under design or construction and which utilize these new advances.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Stability Analysis of Hydroprocessing Unit A
    THERMAL STABILITY ANALYSIS OF HYDROPROCESSING UNIT A Thesis by YONGCHUL CHO Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, M. Sam Mannan Committee Members, Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi Maria A. Barrufet Head of Department, M. Nazmul Karim May 2018 Major Subject: Chemical Engineering Copyright 2018 Yongchul Cho ABSTRACT Thermal stability is one of the most critical safety issues in the hydroprocessing units. Runaway reactions in the units can lead to catastrophic consequences as the reactors are being operated at high temperature and pressure, and the reactor effluent is a highly explosive mixture which contains hydrogen and hydrocarbons. For example, a fire and explosion due to a runaway reaction in a hydrocracking unit caused one death and forty-six injuries in 1997, in California. While the temperature runaway is the topic which has been studied extensively, most of the studies worked on simple reactions and little focused on the complex reactions such as hydroprocessing reactions. Also, in the studies on the hydroprocessing reactions, a lumping kinetic model was used which is less accurate and requires experiments for each application. In this research, the thermal stability of a naphtha hydrotreater will be analyzed by using a commercial process simulator ProMax where a novel mechanistic kinetic model, Single Event Kinetics has been integrated. Also, a simplified model will be established by using the data provided by ProMax for further analysis. The continuity and energy equations and parametric sensitivity equations will be solved by Matlab based on the methodology presented by Morbidelli and Varma.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Selected Petroleum Refining Residuals
    STUDY OF SELECTED PETROLEUM REFINING RESIDUALS INDUSTRY STUDY Part 1 August 1996 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Solid Waste Hazardous Waste Identification Division 401 M Street, SW Washington, DC 20460 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................... 1 1.2 OTHER EPA REGULATORY PROGRAMS IMPACTING THE PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY ............................. 2 1.3 INDUSTRY STUDY FINDINGS .................................. 3 2.0 INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION ........................................... 8 2.1 PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY PROFILE ..................... 8 2.2 INDUSTRY STUDY ........................................... 10 2.2.1 Site Selection ......................................... 11 2.2.2 Engineering Site Visits .................................. 13 2.2.3 RCRA §3007 Questionnaire .............................. 13 2.2.4 Familiarization Sampling ................................ 14 2.2.5 Record Sampling ....................................... 15 2.2.6 Split Samples Analyzed by API ........................... 20 2.2.7 Synthesis ............................................. 20 3.0 PROCESS AND WASTE DESCRIPTIONS ............................... 21 3.1 REFINERY PROCESS OVERVIEW .............................. 21 3.2 CRUDE OIL DESALTING ...................................... 25 3.2.1 Process Description ..................................... 25 3.2.2 Desalting Sludge ....................................... 26 3.3 HYDROCRACKING
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrodeoxygenation of Vegetable Oil in a Trickle Bed Reactor for Renewable Diesel Production
    International Journal of Technology 11(7) 1292-1299 (2020) Received July 2020 / Revised November 2020 / Accepted December 2020 International Journal of Technology http://ijtech.eng.ui.ac.id Hydrodeoxygenation of Vegetable Oil in a Trickle Bed Reactor for Renewable Diesel Production Yuswan Muharam1*, Jessica Adeline Soedarsono1 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia Abstract. The hydrodeoxygenation of vegetable oil in a trickle bed reactor for renewable diesel production was observed in this research. Vegetable oil was represented by triolein. The NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst with a composition of 6.13% w/w Ni, 12.49% w/w Mo, and 81.33% w/w Al2O3 was used. The reactions took place in the temperature range of 272–327.5°C and pressures of 5 and 15 bar. A trickle bed reactor of 2.01 cm in diameter and 24 cm in bed length was able to convert triolein into renewable diesel. C18 hydrocarbons became the dominant reacting compounds at temperatures above 310°C and a pressure of 15 bar, which reached more than 50% w/w. At 5 bar pressure, fatty acids with stearic acid as the acid with the highest concentration were the dominant reacting component, reaching more than 60% w/w at temperatures above 280°C. This led to double bond saturation once the reactants were mixed. Keywords: Hydrodeoxygenation; Renewable diesel; Trickle bed reactor 1. Introduction The Fuel is one of the basic needs for transportation and industry, which mostly comes from petroleum processing (fossil-based). Economic oil reserves are depleting, while energy demand continues to increase with population size and advancing technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Sulfide Capture: from Absorption in Polar Liquids to Oxide
    Review pubs.acs.org/CR Hydrogen Sulfide Capture: From Absorption in Polar Liquids to Oxide, Zeolite, and Metal−Organic Framework Adsorbents and Membranes Mansi S. Shah,† Michael Tsapatsis,† and J. Ilja Siepmann*,†,‡ † Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0132, United States ‡ Department of Chemistry and Chemical Theory Center, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0431, United States ABSTRACT: Hydrogen sulfide removal is a long-standing economic and environ- mental challenge faced by the oil and gas industries. H2S separation processes using reactive and non-reactive absorption and adsorption, membranes, and cryogenic distillation are reviewed. A detailed discussion is presented on new developments in adsorbents, such as ionic liquids, metal oxides, metals, metal−organic frameworks, zeolites, carbon-based materials, and composite materials; and membrane technologies for H2S removal. This Review attempts to exhaustively compile the existing literature on sour gas sweetening and to identify promising areas for future developments in the field. CONTENTS 4.1. Polymeric Membranes 9785 4.2. Membranes for Gas−Liquid Contact 9786 1. Introduction 9755 4.3. Ceramic Membranes 9789 2. Absorption 9758 4.4. Carbon-Based Membranes 9789 2.1. Alkanolamines 9758 4.5. Composite Membranes 9790 2.2. Methanol 9758 N 5. Cryogenic Distillation 9790 2.3. -Methyl-2-pyrrolidone 9758 6. Outlook and Perspectives 9791 2.4. Poly(ethylene glycol) Dimethyl Ether 9759 Author Information 9792 2.5. Sulfolane and Diisopropanolamine 9759 Corresponding Author 9792 2.6. Ionic Liquids 9759 ORCID 9792 3. Adsorption 9762 Notes 9792 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines for Petroleum Refining
    ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY GUIDELINES PETROLEUM REFINING November 17, 2016 ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY GUIDELINES FOR PETROLEUM REFINING INTRODUCTION 1. The Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines are technical reference documents with general and industry-specific examples of Good International Industry Practice (GIIP).1 When one or more members of the World Bank Group are involved in a project, these EHS Guidelines are applied as required by their respective policies and standards. These industry sector EHS Guidelines are designed to be used together with the General EHS Guidelines document, which provides guidance to users on common EHS issues potentially applicable to all industry sectors. For complex projects, use of multiple industry sector guidelines may be necessary. A complete list of industry sector guidelines can be found at: www.ifc.org/ehsguidelines. 2. The EHS Guidelines contain the performance levels and measures that are generally considered to be achievable in new facilities by existing technology at reasonable costs. Application of the EHS Guidelines to existing facilities may involve the establishment of site-specific targets, with an appropriate timetable for achieving them. 3. The applicability of the EHS Guidelines should be tailored to the hazards and risks established for each project on the basis of the results of an environmental assessment in which site-specific variables— such as host country context, assimilative capacity of the environment, and other project factors—are taken into account. The applicability of specific technical recommendations should be based on the professional opinion of qualified and experienced persons. 4. When host country regulations differ from the levels and measures presented in the EHS Guidelines, projects are expected to achieve whichever is more stringent.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalytic Glycerol Hydrogenolysis to Produce 1,2-Propanediol with Molecular Hydrogen and in Situ Hydrogen Produced from Steam Reforming
    Catalytic Glycerol Hydrogenolysis to Produce 1,2-propanediol with Molecular Hydrogen and in situ Hydrogen Produced from Steam Reforming by Yuanqing Liu A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemical Engineering Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2014 ©Yuanqing Liu 2014 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Biodiesel has shown great promise to supplement the fossil diesel since it is a renewable energy resource and is environmentally friendly. However, the major obstacle to biodiesel large scale commercialization is the high production cost; so converting glycerol, the by- product of a biodiesel process, into value-added products is an efficient way to promote biodiesel production. 1,2-propanediol (1,2PD), also known as propylene glycol, is an important commodity chemical used for many applications such as polyester resins, liquid detergents and anti-freeze. It can be produced via dehydration of glycerol into acetol followed by hydrogenation of acetol into 1,2PD using a bi-functional catalyst. Currently high pressure gaseous hydrogen added for hydrogenation causes safety issues as well as additional costs of hydrogen purchasing, transportation and storage. Therefore, the utilization of the in situ hydrogen produced by steam reforming of a hydrogen carrier could be a novel route for this process. In this work, processes of glycerol hydrogenolysis to produce 1,2PD have been developed using different hydrogen sources, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulphur Recovery Process:[14] Major Cause of Air Pollution Because of S
    2/16/2015 NPTEL PHASE ­II :Petroleum Refinery Engineering Sulphur Recovery Process:­[1­4] Major cause of air pollution because of S compounds HDS to H2S can be converted to S. S recovery process from acid gas (H2S). Claus process :­ H2S oxidation process) Overall reaction H2S + 1/2 O2 ­> S + H2O In two step: H2S+3/2 O2­> SO2 + H2O 2H2S+SO2 3S+2H2O Clave reaction exothermic As 22% solution of KOH in water.For maximum sulphur recovery H2S/SO2 mole reaction. S recovery efficiency for 3 cascade reactor stage is 96­97% With rich acid o gas feed(~50%H2S) reaction became exothermic where T reactor ~ 1200 C(thermal process) Clause Process :­ Work well for gas strem containing greater than 20% H2S(by value) and less than 5% HCS .When reaction is. 1. Heat is recovered from the reaction gases in the waste heat boiler by generating high pressure steam. 2. Reaction gases leaving the waste heat boiler are then passed to a condenser where cooling to 150­190oC result in condensation to elemental S formula. 3. The gases containing unconverted H2S passed to a reactor containing bed of bauxite cat. 4. Finally waste gases are incinerated to oxidize the last traces of H2S and elemental S and then vented to atmosphere via stack. Total S recovery with the subsequent class stages ranges from 94 to 96 percent.Complete conversation of H2S to SO2 elemental sulphur is not possible due to thermodynamic chemical equilibrium of class reaction. Selective oxidation of H2S to sulphur can be thermodynamically complete by reaction: H2S +1/2 O2 S+H2O Series of proprietary catalyst for direct oxidation of H2S to elemental S are used (Hi activity process).
    [Show full text]
  • 5.1 Petroleum Refining1
    5.1 Petroleum Refining1 5.1.1 General Description The petroleum refining industry converts crude oil into more than 2500 refined products, including liquefied petroleum gas, gasoline, kerosene, aviation fuel, diesel fuel, fuel oils, lubricating oils, and feedstocks for the petrochemical industry. Petroleum refinery activities start with receipt of crude for storage at the refinery, include all petroleum handling and refining operations and terminate with storage preparatory to shipping the refined products from the refinery. The petroleum refining industry employs a wide variety of processes. A refinery's processing flow scheme is largely determined by the composition of the crude oil feedstock and the chosen slate of petroleum products. The example refinery flow scheme presented in Figure 5.1-1 shows the general processing arrangement used by refineries in the United States for major refinery processes. The arrangement of these processes will vary among refineries, and few, if any, employ all of these processes. Petroleum refining processes having direct emission sources are presented on the figure in bold-line boxes. Listed below are 5 categories of general refinery processes and associated operations: 1. Separation processes a. Atmospheric distillation b. Vacuum distillation c. Light ends recovery (gas processing) 2. Petroleum conversion processes a. Cracking (thermal and catalytic) b. Reforming c. Alkylation d. Polymerization e. Isomerization f. Coking g. Visbreaking 3.Petroleum treating processes a. Hydrodesulfurization b. Hydrotreating c. Chemical sweetening d. Acid gas removal e. Deasphalting 4.Feedstock and product handling a. Storage b. Blending c. Loading d. Unloading 5.Auxiliary facilities a. Boilers b. Waste water treatment c. Hydrogen production d.
    [Show full text]