ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT/ ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Rammam Hydro Power Project, Stage-III (3x40 MW) in District- & West State- & Sikkim

NTPC Limited (A Government of Enterprise)

July’ 2021

PREPARED BY SV ENVIRO LABS & CONSULTANTS Visakhapatnam Phone: 0891-2755528, Fax: 0891-2755529 Email: [email protected] Recognized by MoEF&CC and QCI – Accredited, Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1821/SA 0118

UNDERTAKING BY CONSULTANT

This is to certify that M/s. SV Enviro Labs & Consultants is a NABET & NABL Accredited,

ISO 9001:2015 certified company and is recognised by Ministry of Environment, Forest and

Climate Change under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

Further, this Environmental Impact Assessment/ Environmental Management Plan for the

Rammam Hydro Electric Project Stage-III (3 x 40 MW) in of West

Bengal and of Sikkim has been carried out by M/s. SV Enviro Labs &

Consultants and the prescribed ToR’s have been complied with and the data submitted in the

Final EIA report is factually correct.

Thanks and Regards, M. Murali Krishna

Managing Partner July, 2021 DECLARATION BY EXPERTS CONTRIBUTING TO THE EIA

“Environmental Impact Assessment/ Environmental Management Plan” for the proposed Rammam Hydro Electric Project Stage-III (3 x 40 MW) in Darjeeling District of West Bengal and West Sikkim District of Sikkim

I hereby certify that I was a part of the EIA team in the following capacity that developed the above EIA.

EIA Co-ordinator :

Name : Dr. G.V.A Ramakrishna

Signature :

Period of Involvement : July’ 2020 to September’2020

Functional Area Experts:

S.No Functional Name of the Expert Category Involvement Signature and Date as per (Period and Areas NABET task**) 1 AP * M. Murali Krishna A Air Pollution monitoring, prevention & control 2 WP * V. Hemalatha A Water Pollution monitoring, prevention & control

3 SHW * K. Anitha A Solid waste management

4 SE * Dr. B. Vijay A Socioeconomic Bhaskara Rao studies

5 EB * Dr. M. Tarakeswara A Ecology and Bio- Naidu diversity

6 HG * Dr. G.V.A A Hydrology Ramakrishna

7 GEO * Dr. G.V.A A Geology Ramakrishna

8 SC * D. Sunder Rao A Soil conservation

9 AQ * M. Murali Krishna A Air quality modelling

10 NV * M. Murali Krishna A Noise and vibration

11 LU * Dr. G.V.A A Land use studies Ramakrishna

12 RH * Shaik Kasim A Risk and hazard study

Declaration by the Head of the accredited consultant organization/ authorized person

I, M. Murali Krishna, hereby, confirm that the above mentioned experts prepared the EIA/EMP for proposed Rammam Hydro Electric Project Stage-III (3 x 40 MW) in Darjeeling District of West Bengal and West Sikkim District of Sikkim.

Signature:

Name: M. Murali Krishna

Designation: Managing Partner

Name of the EIA consultant organization: SV Enviro Labs & Consultants NABET Certificate No. & Issue Date: NABET/EIA/1821/SA0118 Dt: 28.09.2020 valid up to 21.07.2021

Certificate of Plagiarism check

Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Rammam Hydro Electric Title of EIA Report Project Stage-III (3 x 40 MW) in Darjeeling District of West Bengal and West Sikkim District of Sikkim Name of Accredited Organization SV Enviro Labs & Consultants Unique Identification Number SVELC/EIA/NTPC/FINAL/2021 Name of EIA Co-ordinator (EC) Dr. G.V.A. Ramakrishna Name of the Software Plagiarism Checker X Date of Check 05.07.2021 Time of Check 5:00 PM

Declaration by the Head of the accredited consultant organization/authorized person I hereby certify that this EIA/EMP Report has been evaluated using in-house software Plagiarism Checker X version 6.0.11. The report produced has been analyzed by the system and based on it, I certify that the EIA report produced in accordance with good scientific practice.

Date and Sign of EIA Coordinator: 06.07.2021

Name: Dr. G.V.A. Ramakrishna

Designation: EIA Coordinator

Date and Sign of Head of Accredited Organization: 06.07.2021 (M. Murali Krishna)

Name of the EIA consultant organization: SV ENVIRO LABS & CONSULTANTS

NABET Certificate No. & Issue Date: NABET/EIA/1821/SA 0118 Dt. 28.09.2020

CONTENTS

Table of Contents C0-1

List of Tables C0-9

List of Figures C0-12

List of Annexures C0-14

Index of Compliance with TOR for EIA Study – Additional TOR C0-15

Index of Compliance with TOR for EIA Study – Standard TOR C0-20

Chapter I Introduction C1-1

Chapter II Project Description C2-1

Chapter III Description of the Environment C3-1

Chapter IV Anticipated Environmental Impacts &Mitigation Measures C4-1

Chapter V Analysis of Alternatives C5-1

Chapter VI Environmental Monitoring Program C6-1

Chapter VII Additional Studies C7-1

Chapter VIII Project Benefits C8-1

Chapter IX Environment Cost Benefit Analysis C9-1

Chapter X Environmental Management Plan C10-1

Chapter XI Summary and Conclusions C11-1

Chapter XII Disclosure of Consultants C12-1

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-1 of 49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

S. No. TITLE Page No.

Chapter I: Introduction 1.0 General C1-1 1.1 Brief Details of The Project C1-1 1.2 Identification of Project & Project Proponent C1-2 1.3 Hydro Potential C1-3 1.4 Purpose of The Study C1-4 1.5 Brief Description of Nature, Size, Location of The Project C1-5 1.5.1 Nature of The Project C1-5 1.5.2 Size of The Project C1-5 1.5.3 Locations of The Project C1-5 1.6 Background of The Project C1-6 1.6.1 Statutory Clearances C1-6 1.6.2 Current Status of Work C1-7 1.7 Location & Accessibility C1-9 1.8 Need for The Project & its Importance to The Country and Region C1-13 1.8.1 Demand Supply Gap C1-14 1.9 Policy, Legal and Administrative Framework C1-15 1.10 Scope of The Study C1-17 1.11 Environmental Parameters in The Study Area C1-18 1.12 Generic Structure of EIA Document C1-18

Chapter II: Project Description 2.0 General C2-1 2.1 Location of Project C2-1 2.2 Size or Magnitude of Operation C2-3 2.3 Salient Features of The Project C2-6 2.4 Project Description C2-10 2.4.1 Diversion Structure C2-10 2.4.2 Intake and Intake Tunnel C2-13 2.4.3 Desilting Chamber C2-13 2.4.4 Head Race Tunnel (HRT) C2-13 2.4.5 Surge Shaft C2-14 2.4.6 Pressure Shaft C2-14 2.4.7 Power House C2-14 2.4.8 Tail Race Channel C2-14 2.4.9 Hydro-Mechanical Works C2-14 2.4.10 Minimum Flow in The River Downstream of The Barrage C2-15 2.5 Land Requirement C2-16 2.6 Infrastructure Facilities C2-17

0 ‐ 1

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-2 of 49

2.6.1 Access Roads C2.17 2.6.2 Construction Materials and Equipment C2-19 2.6.3 Project Township/Colonies C2-20 2.6.4 Water & Power Requirement C2-20 2.6.5 Muck Generation & Disposal C2-20 2.7 Manpower Requirement C2-21 2.8 Project Schedule & Cost Estimates C2-21

Chapter III: Description of the Environment 3.0 Introduction C3-1 3.1 Study area C3-2 3.2 Study period C3-2 3.3 Methodology of EIA study C3-2 3.4 Micro-meteorological data C3-3 3.4.1 Wind Speed and Direction C3-4 3.4.2 Temperature C3-4 3.4.3 Rainfall C3-4 3.4.4 Site Specific Met Data C3-4 3.5 Air Environment C3-7 3.5.1 Selection of Sampling Locations C3-7 3.5.2 Methodology of Sampling and Analysis C3-7 3.5.3 Summary of Existing Ambient Air quality C3-16 3.6 Water Environment C3-17 3.6.1 Surface Water and Ground Water Quality Assessment C3-18 3.6.2 Selection of sampling locations C3-18 3.6.3 Sampling techniques C3-18 3.6.4 Water Sampling Stations C3-21 3.6.5 Surface water Quality Results are Summarized Below C3-29 3.6.6 Groundwater Quality Results are summarized Below C3-29 3.7 Soil Environment C3-30 3.7.1 Selection of Sampling locations C3-30 3.7.2 Sampling and Analytical Techniques C3-30 3.7.3 Summary of Soil analysis Data C3-35 3.8 Noise Environment C3-37 3.8.1 Identification of Sampling Locations C3-37 3.8.2 Methodology C3-37 3.8.3 Description of Locations C3-38 3.8.3.1 Noise Levels in The Study Area C3-38 3.9 Traffic Study C3-42 3.10 Geology and Hydrogeology C3-43 3.10.1 Geological Setting C3-44 3.10.2 Minerals C3-48 3.10.3 Hydrogeological Setting C3-50 3.10.4 Land Slide in The Area C3-52 3.10.5 Seismicity C3-53

0 ‐ 2

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-3 of 49

3.10.6 Soils C3-54 3.11 Hydrology C3-54 3.11.1 Objective of The Study C3-55 3.11.2 Rainfall Data C3-56 3.11.3 Water Availability Studies C3-58 3.11.4 Runoff-Runoff Correlation C3-59 3.11.5 Extending Singlabazar flow series based on Rangit Stage-IV data C3-60 3.11.6 Rainfall –Runoff Correlation C3-61 3.11.7 Design Flood Studies C3-62 3.11.8 Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph C3-62 3.11.9 Derivation of synthetic Unit Hydrograph C3-64 3.11.10 Flood Frequency analysis C3-67 3.11.12 Diversion Flood C3-68 3.11.13 Drainage Pattern C3-69 3.11.14 Catastrophic Events like Cloud Burst and Flash Floods C3-69 3.11.15 Sedimentation Data C3-70 3.11.16 Environmental Flow C3-70 3.12 Biological Environment C3-72 3.12.1 Introduction C3-72 3.12.2 Objectives C3-73 3.12.3 Study Area C3-73 3.12.4 Cropping Pattern C3-77 3.12.5 Agriculture production System C3-79 3.12.6 Vegetation Composition in The Study Area C3-81 3.12.7 Methodology C3-84 3.12.8 Secondary Data Collection C3-87 3.12.9 Floristic composition C3-89 3.12.10 Medicinal Plants C3-111 3.12.11 Economically Important Plant C3-112 3.12.12 Phytosociology Analysis for Community Structures C3-113 3.12.13 Biodiversity Indices C3-132 3.12.14 Fauna C3-148 3.12.15 C3-156 3.12.16 Aquatic Ecology C3-157 3.12.17 Methodology C3-158 3.12.18 Sampling Locations C3-159 3.12.19 Phytoplankton C3-161 3.12.20 Zooplankton C3-163 3.12.21 Macro-Benthic Biota C3-163 3.12.22 Primary Productivity C3-164 3.12.23 Fisheries C3-165 3.12.24 National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries C3-168 3.13 Landuse Pattern C3-173 3.13.1 Land Use Pattern-remote sensing Data C3-173 3.13.2 Methodology C3-174

0 ‐ 3

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-4 of 49

3.13.3 Landuse map analysis C3-174 3.13.4 Spatial Data from SOI Topographical Sheets C3-175 3.13.5 Contour Map and Elevations of Study Area C3-178 3.15.6 Digital Elevation Model C3-178 3.13.7 Land use land cover statistics of study area C3-178 3.14 Socio-economic Environment C3-185 3.14.1 Overview C3-185 3.14.2 Methodology C3-185 3.14.3 Brief Profile of West Bengal district C3-186 3.14.3.1 Demographical details of the District C3-186 3.14.3.2 Demographical details of the study area C3-188 3.14.3.3 Economy and Land based Livelihood C3-193 3.14.3.4 Landuse Pattern C3-193 3.14.3.5 Working Population C3-193 3.14.3.6 Cropping Pattern C3-194 3.14.3.7 Agricultural Implements C3-194 3.14.3.8 Irrigation C3-195 3.14.3.9 Horticulture C3-196 3.14.3.10 Industries C3-197 3.14.3.11 Tea Industry of Darjiling District () C3-197 3.14.3.12 Physical and Social Infrastructure Facilities in Darjeeling C3-198 3.14.4 Brief Profile of the Sikkim District C3-203 3.14.4.1 Communities of Sikkim C3-203 3.14.4.2 Demographical details of the study area C3-203 3.14.4.3 Economy and Land based Livelihood of Sikkim C3-210 3.14.4.4 Physical and Social Infrastructure Facilities in Sikkim C3-213 3.14.5 Primary Survey C3-215

Chapter IV: Anticipated Environmental Impacts &Mitigation Measures 4.0 Introduction C4-1 4.1 Impact Assessment C4-1 4.2 Identification of Impacts C4-2 4.3 Impacts On Land Environment C4-3 4.3.1 Construction Phase C4-3 4.3.2 Operation Phase C4-10 4.4 Impacts On Water Quality C4-11 4.4.1 Construction Phase C4-11 4.4.2 Operation Phase C4-14 4.5 Impacts On Air Environment C4-19 4.5.1 Construction Phase C4-19 4.5.2 Operation Phase C4-22 4.6 Impacts On Noise Environment C4-22 4.6.1 Construction Phase C4-22 4.7 Impacts On Ecology C4-28 4.7.1 Terrestrial Ecology C4-28

0 ‐ 4

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-5 of 49

4.7.2 Aquatic Ecology C4-31 4.8 Impact On Socio-Economic Environment C4-34 4.8.1 Positive Impacts C4-35 4.8.2 Negative Impacts C4-36 4.9 Impact On Geological Environment C4-40 4.10 Impact of Natural Resources C4-41

Chapter V: Analysis of Alternatives 5.0 General C5-1 5.1 Alternate Location for the project C5-1 5.2 Alternate Technology C5-2 5.3 Conclusion C5-2

Chapter VI: Environmental Monitoring Program 6.0 Introduction C6-1 6.1 Objective of Monitoring C6-1 6.2 Area of Concern C6-1 6.3 Ambient Air Quality and Meteorology C6-2 6.4 Water Quality C6-3 6.5 Noise Monitoring C6-4 6.6 Erosion and Siltation C6-5 6.7 Ecology C6-5 6.8 Incidence of Water-Related Diseases C6-5 6.9 Summary of Environmental Monitoring Programme C6-6 6.10 Environmental Management Group (Emg) C6-8 6.11 Cost for Implementing Environmental Monitoring Programme C6-9 6.12 Environmental Audits and Corrective Action Plans C6-9 6.13 Submission of Monitoring Reports To Regulatory Authorities C6-10 (MOEF&CC, CPCB, WBSPCB & SSPCB)

Chapter VII: Additional Studies 7.0 Additional Studies C7-1 7.1 Public Consultation C7-1 7.2 Catchment Area Treatment Plan C7-11 7.2.1 Need for Catchment Area Treatment C7-12 7.2.2 Objectives of Catchment Area Treatment Plan C7-14 7.2.3 Approach For The Study C7-14 7.2.3.1 Data Acquisition C7-15 7.2.3.2 Data Preparation C7-15 7.2.3.3 Output Presentation C7-18 7.2.4 Estimation of Soil Loss Using Silt Yield Index (SYI) Method C7-20 7.2.5 Watershed Management – Available Techniques C7-22 7.2.6 Catchment Area Treatment Measures C7-23 7.2.7 Cost Estimate C7-25 7.3 Disaster Management Plan C7-28

0 ‐ 5

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-6 of 49

7.3.1 Purpose of The Plan C7-28 7.3.2 Scope of The Plan C7-28 7.3.3 Hazardous Chemicals On-Site & Their Normal Inventories C7-29 7.3.4 Emergencies Scenarios C7-32 7.3.5 Factors To Control Emergency C7-34 7.3.6 Emergency Organization C7-43 7.3.7 Response Functions C7-43 7.4 R&R Action Plan C7-44 7.4.1 Details of Land Acquired C7-45 7.4.2 Resettlement & Rehabilitation C7-46 7.4.3 Basis of R&R Action Plan C7-47 7.4.4 Process of formulation of R&R Action Plan C7-47 7.4.5 Social Assessment & Project Design C7-48 7.4.6 R&R Basic Approach C7-51 7.4.7 R&R Entitlement Matrix C7-52 7.4.8 Rehabilitation Measures C7-54 7.4.9 Resettlement Measures C7-57 7.4.10 Additional Resettlement Benefits C7-57 7.4.11 Socio-Economic Profile of PAPs C7-58 7.4.12 Community Development Measures C7-59 7.4.13 Implementation Mechanism for One Time Rehabilitation Package C7-60 7.4.14 Cost Incurred C7-60 7.5 Power Potential Study C7-63

Chapter VIII: Project Benefits 8.0 General C8-1 8.1 Benefits to Economy C8-1 8.2 Social Infrastructure C8-1 8.2.1 R & R Benefits C8-2 8.2.2 CSR/CER Activities C8-2 8.3 Employment Potential C8-5 8.4 CO2 Emissions C8-6 Chapter IX: Environment Cost Benefit Analysis 9.0 General C9-1 9.1 Need for The Hydropower Project C9-1 9.1.1 Power Evacuation C9-2 9.2 Environment Cost Benefit Analysis C9-2 9.3 Environment Cost C9-3 9.3.1 Cost of Forest Land Diverted C9-3 9.3.2 Compensatory Afforestation C9-4 9.3.3 Cost Incurred In Rehabilitation & Resettlement C9-4 9.4 Environment Benefits C9-5 9.4.1 Increase In Electricity Production C9-5 9.4.2 Economic Benefits C9-5 9.4.3 Employment Generation C9-6

0 ‐ 6

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-7 of 49

9.4.4 Economic Benefits Due To Catchment Area Treatment Plan C9-6 9.4.5 Positive Social Impact Assessment of Project C9-6 9.5 Environment Cost and Benefits C9-7 9.5.1 Cost Estimate for R&R Action Plan C9-7 9.5.2 Cost for Implementing Environmental Management Plan C9-8

Chapter X: Environmental Management Plan 10.0 Introduction C10-1 10.1 EMP During Various Project Phases C10-1 10.2 Control of Pollution From Labour Camps During Construction Phase C10-2 10.2.1 Facilities In Labour Camps C10-2 10.2.2 Sanitation Facilities C10-2 10.2.3 Solid Waste Management From Labour Camps C10-3 10.2.4 Provision of Free Fuel C10-3 10.3 Environmental Management In Road Construction C10-3 10.4 Management of Muck Disposal Sites C10-5 10.5 Restoration and Landscaping Of Project Sites C10-6 10.6 Greenbelt Development C10-7 10.7 Compensatory Afforestation C10-8 10.8 Biodiversity and Wildlife Conservation and Management Plan C10-9 10.8.1 Introduction C10-9 10.8.2 Biodiversity Policy of NTPC C10-9 10.8.3 Objectives C10-11 10.8.4 Study Area C10-11 10.8.5 Protected Areas C10-12 10.8.6 Conservation Plan For IUCN Threatened Category Plants C10-13 10.8.7 Establishment of For Voucher Specimens (Threatened C10-15 Category Plants) 10.8.8 Conservation And Cultivation of Medicinal Plants C10-15 10.8.9 Forest Protection Plan C10-17 10.8.10 Biodiversity Management Committee (BMC) C10-18 10.9 Public Health Delivery System C10-19 10.10 Control of Air Pollution C10-19 10.11 Control of Water Pollution C10-20 10.12 Fish Management C10-21 10.12.1 Release of Minimum Flow C10-21 10.12.2 Fish Migration C10-21 10.12.3 Sustenance of Endemic Fisheries C10-22 10.13 Wildlife Conservation C10-23 10.14 Seismicity Considerations C10-24 10.15 Noise Control Measures C10-24 10.16 Establishment of an Environmental Management Group C10-25 10.17 Summary of Impacts and EMP C10-26 10.18 NTPC’s Environmental Policy C10-30 10.19 Cost for Implementing Environmental Management Plan C10-30

0 ‐ 7

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-8 of 49

Chapter XI: Summary and Conclusions 11.0 Introduction C11-1 11.1 Location & Accessibility C11-2 11.2 Need of the Project C11-5 11.3 Project Description C11-5 11.3.1 Project Cost C11-6 11.3.2 Minimum water flow in the River C11-6 11.4 Baseline Environmental Status C11-7 11.4.1 Physical Environment C11-7 11.4.2 Biological Environment C11-11 11.4.3 Traffic Survey C11-11 11.4.4 Socioeconomic Environment C11-11 11.5 Environmental Impact Assessment and Mitigation Measures C11-12 11.5.1 Impact on Land Environment - Construction Phase C11-12 11.5.2 Impact on Air Quality C11-13 11.5.3 Impact on Noise Quality C11-14 11.5.4 Impact on Topography and drainage C11-14 11.5.5 Impact on Water Quality C11-15 11.5.6 Impact on Biological Environment C11-15 11.5.7 Impact on Socio economic Environment C11-16 11.6 Public Consultation C11-17 11.7 Risk Assessment Plan and Disaster Management Plan C11-17 11.8 Catchment Area Treatment Plan C11-18 11-9 Project Benefits C11-18 11-10 Environment Cost Benefit Analysis C11-18 11-11 Environmental Management Plan and Monitoring Plan C11-19 11-12 Disclosure of Consultant C11-20 11-13 Conclusions and Recommendations C11-21

Chapter XII: Disclosure of Consultants 12.0 Disclosure of Consultants Engaged C12-1 12.1 About SV Enviro Labs & Consultants (SVELC) C12-1 12.2 Services offered by SV Enviro C12-2

0 ‐ 8

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-9 of 49

LIST OF TABLES

S. No. Description Page no. 1.1 Coordinates of Project Components C1-9 1.2 All India Installed Capacity (In MW) Of Power Stations (As On C1-13 31.01.2021) 1.3 All India Demand-Supply Scenarios By 2026-27 C1-14 1.4 Eastern Region Demand-Supply Scenarios By 2026-27 C1-14 1.5 Key Environmental Legislations Pertaining To Hydro Projects C1-16 2.1 Salient Features of Rammam Stage-III Hydroelectric Project C2-6 2.2 Details of Land Acquired C2-17 2.3 Length of Project Road C2-18 3.1 Summary of Methodology for Baseline Data Collection C3-2 3.2 IMD Climatological Data of Period 1981-2010 C3-3 3.3 Site-Specific Meteorological Data C3-4 3.4 Techniques and Detectable Limits For Ambient Air Quality Monitoring C3-8 3.5 Location of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations C3-9 3.6 Summary of Ambient Air Quality Analysis C3-11 3.7 Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) For Water Sampling C3-19 3.8 Analytical Techniques for Water Analysis C3-19 3.9 Ground Water Sampling Locations C3-21 3.10 Surface Water Sampling Locations C3-21 3.11 Ground Water Quality of The Study Area C3-25 3.12 Surface Water Quality of The Study Area C3-27 3.13 Analytical Techniques for Soil Analysis C3-30 3.14 Details of Soil Sampling Locations C3-31 3.15 Soil Analysis Results In The Study Area C3-33 3.16 Standard Soil Classification C3-36 3.17 Noise Monitoring Locations C3-37 3.18 Noise Levels In The Study Area C3-38 3.19 Traffic Density Monitoring Locations C3-42 3.20 Traffic Volume Counts C3-43 3.21 Gauge and discharge data C3-56 3.22 Time Distribution Coefficients C3-66 3.23 Areas Under Field Crops From West Sikkim District (Ha) C3-77 3.24 Areas Under Horticultural Crops From West Sikkim District (Ha) C3-77 3.25 Areas Under Field Crops From Darjeeling District (Ha) C3-78 3.26 Areas Under Horticultural Crops From Darjeeling District (Ha) C3-79 3.27 Production And Productivity of Major And Horticultural Crops From C3-79 West Sikkim District 3.28 Production And Productivity of Major And Horticultural Crops From C3-80 Darjeeling District

0 ‐ 9

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-10 of 49

3.29 Details Of Sampling Locations And Number Of Quadrats C3-86 3.30 Flora Recorded In The Study Area C3-89 3.31 Checklist Of Medicinal Plants Recorded During The Field Study C3-111 3.32 Checklist Of Economic Importance Plants From Study Area C3-112 3.33 Importance Value Index of Tree Species At Salangdang Area C3-114 3.34 Phytosociology of The Shrubs And Lainas At Salangdang Area C3-116 3.35 Phytosociology of The Herbs At Salangdang Area C3-117 3.36 Phytosociology of The Tree Species In The Right Side of The Barrage C3-119 3.37 Phytosociology of The Shrubs And Lainas Species In The Right Side C3-121 of The Barrage 3.38 Phytosociology of The Herbs In The Right Side of The Barrage C3-122 3.39 Phytosociology of The Trees In The Near Township Area C3-123 3.40 Phytosociology Of The Shrubs And Climbers In The Near Township C3-125 Area 3.41 Phytosociology of The Herbs In The Near Township Area C3-126 3.42 Phytosociology of The Trees In The Karmi Area C3-128 3.43 Phytosociology of The Shrubs And Climbers In The Karmi Area C3-129 3.44 Phytosociology of The Herbs In The Karmi Area C3-130 3.45 Biodiversity Indices Of All Four Study Sites C3-132 3.46 List of Major Species Reported In The Study Area C3-149 3.47 Locations Of Aquatic Samples C3-161 3.48 List Of Phytoplankton Species Observed In Various Sampling Sites In C3-161 The Study Area 3.49 Zooplanktons Observed In Various Sampling Sites C3-163 3.50 Phytoplankton Primary Productivity In Various Sampling Sites C3-165 3.51 List of Fish Species Recorded From Teesta System C3-165 3.52 Fish Species Recorded In Rammam River C3-167 3.53 Vegetation Reported In C3-169 3.54 Land Use Land Covers Statistics of Study Area C3-184 3.55 Demographical Details of The Study Area C3-189 3.56 The Important Hydel Power Projects In Darjeeling District, West C3-200 Bengal 3.57 Details of Physical And Social Amenities In The Study Area C3-202 3.58 Demographical Details Of The Study Area C3-205 3.59 Details of Physical And Social Amenities In The Study Area C3-214 3.60 Particulars of The Participants C3-215 4.1 Activities – Impacts/Risks Interaction Environmental Sensitivities C4-2 4.2 Details of road construction in the project C4-7 4.3 Details of land acquired C4-9 4.4 Component Wise Detail of Land acquired for Rammam Stage-III C4-10 HEPP 4.5 Free Flowing Stretch of Rammam River C4-17 4.6 Emissions Limits for DG sets C4-21 4.7 Summary of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring C4-22

0 ‐ 10

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-11 of 49

4.8 Noise level due to operation of various construction equipment C4-23 4.9 Increase in noise levels due to increased vehicular movement C4-24 4.10 Noise generated due to drilling C4-25 4.11 Noise generation due to blasting C4-26 4.12 Maximum Exposure Periods specified by OSHA C4-27 4.13 Tree density at various sampling sites C4-29 6.1 Ongoing Env. Monitoring Programme During Construction Phase C6-6 6.2 Proposed Env. Monitoring Programme During Operation Phase C6-7 6.3 Cost For Env. Monitoring Programme During Construction Phase C6-9 6.4 Cost For Env. Monitoring Programme During Operation Phase C6-9 7.1 Land use pattern of the catchment area C7-18 7.2 Criteria for erosion intensity rate C7-21 7.3 Basis for selection of catchment area treatment measures C7-22 7.4 Erosion intensity categorization as per SYI classification C7-23 7.5 Area under various erosion categories C7-23 7.6 Cost for Catchment Area Treatment - Biological Measures C7-25 7.7 Cost for Catchment Area Treatment - Engineering Measures C7-27 7.8 Year wise target (physical and financial) for Catchment Area C7-27 Treatment Plan 7.9 Hazardous Chemicals and their normal inventory at different sites C7-29 7.10 Location-wise list of Portable Fire Extinguishers C7-41 7.11 Detail of Type of Land Acquired For Rammam Stage-III HEPP C7-45 7.12 Component Wise Detail of Land acquired for Rammam Stage-III C7-46 HEPP 7.13 Category Wise Detail of PAPs as Per NTPC R&R Policy C7-58 7.14 R&R Measures Identified to be Undertaken for Rammam Stage-III C7-61 HEP 7.15 Summary of Actual Exp.Incurred on RAP for Rammam Stage-III HEP C7-63 8.1 CER/CSR-CD Activities Undertaken in and Around The Project Area C8-3 8.2 Details of Expenses of CSR-CD/CER Activities C8-4 8.3 Proposed CER/CD Activities for 2021-2024 C8-4 9.1 Summary of R&R Budget C9-8 9.2 Cost for Implementing Environmental Management Plan (EMP) C9-8 10.1 List of Plant Species for Greenbelt C10-7 10.2 Techniques of ex-situ Conservation C10-14 10.3 Farm Components in Snowtrout Facilities Proposed for Rammam C10-22 Stage-III HEP 10.4 Organization Structure of NTPC for Overall Environmental C10-25 Management 10.5 Summary of Impacts, Suggested Management Measures and C10-26 Implementing Agency 10.6 Cost for Implementing Environmental Management Plan (EMP) C10-30 11.1 Coordinates of Project Components C11.2

0 ‐ 11

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-12 of 49

LIST OF FIGURES

S. No. Description Page no. 1.1 Location Map C1-10 1.2 Vicinity Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW) C1-11 1.3 Topo Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW) C1-12 2.1 Topo Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW) C2-2 2.2 Location Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III C2-4 2.3 Location Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III w.r.t. NP/ WLS & C2-5 their Ecosensitive Zones 2.4 A Layout Map of Project Component C2-11 2.4 B General Layout Plan of Project C2-12 2.5 Road Construction Work by NTPC Rammam HEPP C2-18 2.6 Project Township View C2-20 3.1 Wind Rose for The Period of July 2020 To Sep 2020 C3-6 3.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Location Map C3-10 3.3 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Photographs C3-17 3.4 Groundwater Sampling Location Map C3-22 3.5 Surface Water Sampling Location Map C3-23 3.6 Water Sampling Photographs C3-24 3.7 Soil Sampling Photographs C3-31 3.8 Soil Sampling Location Map C3-32 3.9 Ambient Noise Monitoring Location Map C3-39 3.10 Ambient Air Monitoring Stations C3-40 3.11 Geomorphology Map C3-46 3.12 Lineament Map C3-47 3.13a Mineral map of Sikkim Part of Study Area C3-48 3.13b Mineral map of West Bengal Part of Study Area C3-49 3.14 Drainage Map Around 10 Km Radius C3-69 3.15 Barrage Area C3-82 3.16 Power House C3-83 3.17 Vegetation At Township Area C3-84 3.18 Terrestrial Ecology Sampling Locations C3-88 3.19 Photographs of various plant species in area C3-147 3.20 Photos of Butterflies C3-157 3.21 Collection of Water Samples for aquatic study C3-159 3.22 Aquatic Ecological Sampling Locations C3-160 3.23 Location Map Of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III With Singalila C3-171 National Park and Barsey WLS ESZ Boundary 3.24 Flow Chart of Methodology C3-176 3.25 Satellite Image C3-177 3.26 Digital Elevation Map C3-179

0 ‐ 12

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-13 of 49

3.27 Contour Map C3-180 3.28 LULC Map C3-181 3.29 Road Network Map C3-182 3.30 Slope Map C3-183 3.31 Graphical Presentation of Land Use Statistics C3-184 3.32 Demographical Details of The District C3-187 3.33 Details of The Working Population C3-194 3.34 Primary Consultation With Local Communities C3-216 3.35 Community Need of The Study Area C3-217 4.1 Settling Tank provided near crusher plant C4-12 4.2 Cascade Development of Hydro Power Projects on Rammam C4-18 River 7.1 Directly Draining Catchment Area C7-13 7.2 Land Use Classification Of The Catchment Area C7-17 7.3 Slope Map Of Directly Draining Catchment Area C7-19 7.4 Prioritization Of Directly Draining Catchment Area C7-24 7.5 Catchment Area Treatment Measures C7-26 7.6 Layout Of Project Site C7-30 7.7 Barrage Complex – Layout Plan C7-31 7.8 Power House – Layout Plan C7-31 7.9 Emergency Communication Organization C7-36 7.10 Emergency Organization Chart C7-43 11.1 Vicinity Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW) C11-3 11.2 Topo Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW) C11-4 12.1 NABET Certificate C12-4 12.2 NABET Validity Extension Certificate C12-5 12.3 NABL Certificate C12-6

0 ‐ 13

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-14 of 49

LIST OF ANNEXURES (VOLUME-II)

Annexure No. Description Page No. Annexure-I MoEF&CC Notification dated 18.01.2021 A-1 Annexure-II ToR Copy A-5 Annexure-III MoEF&CC Notification S.O. 1247(E) dated 18.03.2021 A-11 Annexure-IV Memorandum of Implementation Agreement with WBSEB A-14 Annexure-V Techno Economic Clearance (TEC) accorded by CEA A-20 Annexure-VI Inter State Agreement between West Bengal & Sikkim A-23 Annexure-VII NOC obtained from Ministry of Defence A-27 Annexure-VIII Copies of Earlier Environmental Clearance A-29 Annexure-IX Clearance accorded by Directorate of Forest, GoWB A-37 Annexure-X Forest Clearance accorded by MOEF&CC A-40 Annexure-XI Consent to Establish from West Bengal Pollution Control Board A-44 and SPCB, Sikkim Annexure-XII MoEF&CC Notification S.O. 4254 (E) dated 27.11.2020 A-58 Annexure-XIII Certified Compliance Report A-62 Annexure-XIV CCF (WL), West Bengal letter dated 01.02.2008 A-69 Annexure-XV MoEF&CC Notification No. S.O.3613(E) dated 16.11.2017 A-72 Annexure-XVI MoEF&CC Notification No.S.O.2172 (E) dated 27.08.2014 A-94 Annexure-XVII-A Hydrology Report A-118 Annexure-XVII-B Hydrology Flow Series A-179 Annexure-XVIII Conservation plan for Schedule-I species A-182 Annexure-XIX Public Hearing Proceedings, West Bengal A-277 Annexure-XX Public Hearing Proceedings, Sikkim A-292 Annexure-XXI Emergency Action Plan A-330 Annexure-XXII Power Potential Study A-414 Annexure-XXIII Guidelines for conducting Cost Benefit Analysis A-432 Annexure-XXIV NTPC Biodiversity Policy A-439 Annexure-XXV NTPC Environment Policy A-445 Annexure-XXVI Catchment Area Treatment Plan, West Bengal A-451 Annexure-XXVII Catchment Area Treatment Plan, Sikkim A-457 Annexure-XXVIII Seismotectonic Study for Rammam HEPP A-475 Annexure-XXIX CWC Clearance for Design of Rammam HEPP A-497 Annexure-XXX Project Layout Superimposed on Counter Map A-499

0 - 14 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-15 of 49

Compliance Index for TOR for EIA Study (MOEF&CC File No. J-12011/11/2020-IA-I (R))

A. Compliance with Additional ToR

S.No. Condition Compliance Page reference in EIA report 1. Land acquired for the project Entire land for the project has already been shall be suitably compensated acquired and the PAPs have been in accordance with the law of compensated. However, the provisions of the land with the prevailing Right to Fair Compensation and guidelines. Private land shall Transparency in Land Acquisition, be acquired as per provisions Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 of Right to Fair Compensation were not applicable at that time. Approved and Transparency in Land Budget for R&R plan is 59.20 Crore. Acquisition, Rehabilitation One time settlement for R&R package to and Resettlement Act, 2013 affected PAPs has been agreed during VDAC meeting as per R&R policy. Total of Rs. 3.58 Crores disbursed as per R&R policy till 31.03.2021. C2-16 Details are given in Section 2.5 of Chapter- 2. 2. The details of funds allocation The details of funds allocated for CER/CD and activities for CER shall be activities for the FY 2021-2024 provided in C8-4 incorporated in EIA/EMP Table 8.3 at Chapter-8. The total allocation report of Rs 9.25 Crores has been kept for CER/CD.

The Corporate Environment Responsibility C8-3 (CER)/Community Development (CD) activities undertaken are provided in Table 8.1 of Chapter-8. 3. Consolidated EIA/EMP report The EIA/EMP is prepared as per the generic is to be submitted as per the structure (Appendix III & III A) given in the Table of generic structure (Appendix EIA Notification, 2006. Contents III & III A) given in the EIA Notification, 2006 4. One season baseline data shall One season baseline data July’2020 to C3-1 be collected for all the Sep’2020 has been included in EIA/EMP environmental attributes report in Chapter-3 Description of including biological Environment. The baseline data are given in environment Chapter-3. 5. The EIA report should clearly The EMP Budget allocated with clear mention activity wise EMP breakup of capital and recurring cost

0 ‐ 15 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-16 of 49

and CER cost details and provided in Section 10.19 of Chapter-10. C10-31 should earmark clear break up The CER cost details for various activities of the capital and recurring provided in Table 8.1 of Chapter-8 cost along with the timeline C8-3 for incurring the capital cost 6. Conservation Plan for the Conservation Plan for the Scheduled I A-182 Scheduled I species, if any, in species in the project study area has been the project study area shall be provided as Annexure-XVIII. It will prepared and submitted to the be submitted to State Forest Department. competent authority for approval 7. DPR on Hydrology and DPR for Rammam HEPP Stage-III ( 3x40 Layout Map and Power MW) prepared by M/s WAPCOS Ltd. A Potential Studies duly summary of DPR is being submitted approved by CWC/CEA shall separately along with EC Application. be submitted 8. Dam break analysis, Disaster As the Rammam HEPP stage-III is Run of Management Plan and River project, no Dam is envisaged. Further, Fisheries Management Plan be the height of barrage is 23 m only and the prepared and submitted in the storage capacity is limited to 0.27 MCM. As EIA/EMP report the river passes through deep gorge, the water spread in case of failure shall be restricted within the river banks only. Disaster Management Plan provided under Section 7.3 of Chapter-7 . C7-28 Fish Management Plan provided under C10-21 Section 10.12 of Chapter-10. 9. Environmental matrix during The environmental matrix for prediction of C4-2 construction and operational impacts provided in Table 4.1 at Chapter- phase needs to be submitted 4. 10. Both capital and recurring The EMP Budget allocated with clear expenditure under EMP shall breakup of capital and recurring cost C10-31 be submitted provided in Section 10.19 of Chapter-10. 11. Environmental Cost Benefit Environmental Cost Benefit analysis C9-2 analysis shall be done provided in Chapter-9. 12. Impact of developmental Impact of Wildlife due to the activity/project on the wildlife developmental activity is provided in habitat, if any, within 10 km Section 4.7.1 at Chapter-4. C4-28 of the project boundary shall be studied. 13. Detailed Social Impact Land for project has already been acquired. analysis along with status of Few local people were affected in the form R&R plan shall be submitted of acquisition of their land and Houses. in the EIA/EMP report Members of these families were provided with R&R package as per NPRR-2003. Details of social impact are given Section C4-35 4.8.1 at Chapter-4 and R&R Plan C7-44 is enclosed at Section 7.4 of Chapter 7. 14. Certificate from the Chief None of the project components are located Wildlife Warden that project within National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuary or 0 ‐ 16 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-17 of 49

components are outside the other protected area or within the notified Eco Sensitive Zone of Barsey Eco sensitive zones of these protected area. Rhododendron Wildlife As confirmed by CCF (WL), West Bengal Sanctuary of Sikkim vide letter dated 01.02.2008. The project area is at a distance of about 7.1 km from the nearest boundary of Eco- sensitive Zone of Singalila National Park. However, the Singalila National Park is about 9.0 km from the project components as notified by MOEF&CC notification No. S.O. 3613 (E) dated 16.11.2017. The Eco Sensitive Zone of Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary is at 4.2 km from the project site and 4.4 km away from boundaryf o Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary, West Sikkim notified by MOEF&CC notification No.S.O.2172 (E) dated 27.08.2014. Details are given in Section 4.7.1 of Chapter-4. C4-28

15. Compliance report from the Certified Report No: 102-166/07/EPE dated A-62 Regional Office of MoEF&CC 06.04.2021 from MoEF&CC, Integrated for the earlier EC issued vide Regional Office, attached as letter dated 17.08.2007 Annexure-XIII 16. The consultant engaged for SV Enviro Labs & Consultants has been preparation of EIA/EMP registered with Quality Council of India report has to be registered with (QCI/NABET) under the scheme of Quality Council of India Accreditation & Registration of MoEF&CC. (QCI/NABET) under the NABET Certificate No: C12-4 scheme of Accreditation & NABET/EIA/1821/SA 0118 valid up to Registration of MoEF&CC. C12- 5 21.07.2021 is enclosed as Figure-12.1 This is a pre-requisite &12.2 of Chapter-12.

17. Consultant shall include a “Certificate” in EIA/EMP report regarding After “Certificate” in EIA/EMP portion of EIA/EMP prepared by them and Cover page report regarding portion of data provided by other EIA/EMP prepared by them organization(s)/laboratories incorporated in and data provided by other EIA/EMP Report. organization(s)/ laboratories Declaration by the Consultant that including status of approval of information submitted in the EIA/EMP is such laboratories. Declaration factually correct is included in the EIA/EMP by the Consultant that Report information submitted in the EIA/EMP is factually correct and shall be submitted along with EIA/EMP reports 18. An undertaking as part of the Undertaking by the Project Proponent as per After EIA report from Project MoEF&CC OM No. 11013/41/2006-IA.II Cover page Proponent, owning the (I) Dt: 05.10.2011 incorporated in the contents (information and EIA/EMP Report data) of the EIA report with 0 ‐ 17 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-18 of 49

the declaration about the contents of the EIA report pertaining to a project have not been copied from other EIA reports 19. As per Ministry’s Notification ToR accorded by MoEF&CC vide F.No. 17.02.2020, the ToR will J-12011/11/2020-IA-I (R) dated 12th remain valid for a period of 5 February, 2021 and is valid upto 11th years from the date of issue of February, 2026 this letter for submission of EIA/EMP report along with public consultation. The ToR will stand lapsed after completion of 5 years in case final EIA/EMP is not submitted 20. Baseline data and public The Baseline data for one season as per the C3-1 to consultation shall not be older approved ToR was collected during C3-219 than 3 years at the time of July’2020 to September’ 2020. submission of the proposal, for grant of Environmental Clearance 21. In case of any change in the Project is in advance stage and more than 50 scope of the project such as % work has been completed. Hence there is capacity enhancement, change no change in capacity enhancement, change in submergence, etc., fresh in submergence. scoping clearance has to be obtained 22. Details of the name and Environmental Management Group headed number of posts to be engaged by Additional General Manager and assisted by the project proponent for by Sr. Manager is already established at site. implementation and This department is responsible for monitoring of environmental environmental related issues and monitoring parameters be specified in the of environmental parameters. Details is EIA report. given in Section 10.16 of Chapter-10. C10-25 23. The EIA/EMP report must An index showing the details of compliance contain an Index showing of all ToR conditions along with reference details of compliance of all of page numbers is incorporated in the ToR conditions. The Index EIA/EMP report. will comprise of page No. etc., vide which compliance of a specific ToR is available. It may be noted that without this index, EIA/EMP report will not be accepted 24. Appropriate Biodiversity Biodiversity Conservation and Management C10-9 Conservation and Plan for the Native, Rare & Endangered Management Plan for the floral and faunal species getting affected due Native, Rare & Endangered to the project is given in Section 10.8 of floral and faunal species Chapter-10. getting affected due to the

0 ‐ 18 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-19 of 49

project shall be prepared 25. The PP should complete all The EIA/EMP report is prepared as per the the tasks as per the provisions approved Terms of Reference and EIA of EIA Notification, 2006 and Notification, 2006 and its subsequent as amended time to time and amendments. submit the application for final clearance within the stipulated time.

0 ‐ 19

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-20 of 49

B. Compliance with Standard TOR

Sl. No. Condition Reference Section Page reference in EIA Report Standard Terms of Reference 1 Scope of EIA Studies The EIA Report should identify the Environmental concerns and relevant environmental concerns potential impacts that may change C4-1 to and focus on potential impacts that due to the construction of proposed C4-41 may change due to the construction project are provided in Chapter-4 of proposed project. Based on the anticipated environmental impacts baseline data collected for three (3) and mitigation measures. seasons (Pre-monsoon, Monsoon The baseline data for one season as and Winter seasons), the status of per the approved tor was collected C3-1 to the existing environment in the area during July’2020 to September’ C3-219 and capacity to bear the impact on 2020 and provided in Chapter-3. this should be analysed. Based on this analysis, the mitigation measures for minimizing the impact shall be suggested in the EIA/EMP study. 2 Details of the Project and Site i General introduction about the Introduction about the project is C1-1 proposed project. provided in Section 1.0 of Chapter-1. ii Details of project and site giving L- Details of project and project site C4-14 sections of all U/S and D/S projects with all relevant maps and figures of River with all relevant maps and are provided in Section 4.4.2 of figures. Connect such information Chapter-4. as to establish the total length of interference of Natural River, the total length of tunneling of the river and the committed unrestricted release from the site of diversion into the main river. iii A map of boundary of the project Singalila National Park is about 9.0 C2-4 site giving details of protected areas km and Barsey Rhododendron in the vicinity of project location Sanctuary is 4.4 km away from the

0 ‐ 20 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-21 of 49

project. Details are given in Figure-2.2 of Chapter-2. iv Location details on a map of the The superimposed project layout on project area with contours a contour map of ground elevation indicating main project features. showing main project features is The project layout shall be provided in chapter-2 project superimposed on a contour map of description along with location ground elevation showing main details on a map of the project area. project features (viz. location of Please also refer Annexure-XXX. A-499 dam, Head works, main canal, branch canals, quarrying etc.) shall be depicted in a scaled map

v Layout details and map of the Project layout and map details with A-499 project along with contours with clear markings are provided in project components clearly marked chapter-2 project description. with proper scale maps of at least a Please also refer Annexure-XXX. 1:50,000 scale and printed at least on A3 scale for clarity vi Existence of National Park, The project area is at a distance of Sanctuary, Biosphere Reserve etc. about 9.0 km from the nearest in the study area, if any, should be boundary of Singalila National detailed and presented on a map Park and about 4.4 km from the with distinct distances from the Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary, project components West Sikkim. None of the project components are located within National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuary or other protected area or their Ecosensitive Zones. As confirmed by CCF (WL), West Bengal vide letter A-69 dated 01.02.2008 attached as Annexure-XIV. Details are given in Section 2.1 of Chapter- 2. C2-1 vii Drainage pattern and map of the Drainage pattern and map of the river catchment up to the proposed river catchment is provided in project site Section 7.2 of Chapter-7. C7-1 viii Delineation of critically degraded Delineation of critically degraded areas in the directly draining areas in the directly draining catchment on the basis of silt Yield catchment details provided in Index as per the methodology of All Catchment Area Treatment Plan in India Soil and Land Use Survey of 0 ‐ 21 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-22 of 49

India. Section 7.2 of Chapter-7. C7-11 ix Soil characteristics and map of the Soil characteristics provided in Section 3.7 of Chapter-3. project area. C3-30 x Geological and seismo-tectonic Geological and seismo-tectonic details and maps of the area details provided under Geology and C3-43 surrounding the proposed project Hydrogeology in Section 3.10 of site showing location of dam site Chapter-3. A detailed seismo- and powerhouse site. tectonic evaluation of Rammam A-475 HEPP Stage-III is enclosed as Annexure-XXVIII. xi Remote Sensing studies, Remote Sensing studies, interpretation of satellite imagery, interpretation of satellite imagery, topographic sheets along with topographic sheets along with ground verification shall be used to ground verification used to develop develop the land use/land cover the land use/land cover pattern of pattern of the study using the study and provided under overlaying mapping techniques viz. Section 3.11 in Chapter-3. Geographic Information System (GIS), False Color composite (FCC) generated from satellite data C3-54 of project area. xii Land details including forests, Land details including forests, private and other land. private and other land provided in C2-3 Table 2.2 of Chapter-2. xiii Demarcation of snow fed and rain Details of snow fed and rain fed is C3-54 fed areas for a realistic estimate of given in Section 3.11 of Chapter- the water availability. 3. xiv Different riverine like Details about riverine habitats are C3-157 rapids, pools, side pools and provided in Section 3.12.16 of variations in the river substratum – Chapter-3. bedrocks, rocks, boulders, sand/silt or clay etc. need to be covered under the study. 3 Description of Environment and Baseline Data To know the present status of The baseline data for one season as environment in the area, baseline per the approved ToR was data with respect to environmental collected during July’2020 to components air, water, noise, soil, September’ 2020 is provided in land and biology & biodiversity Chapter-3. (flora & fauna), wildlife, socio-

0 ‐ 22 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-23 of 49

economic status etc. should be collected with 10 km radius of the main components of the project/site i.e. dam site and power house site. The air quality and noise are to be monitored at such locations which are environmentally& ecologically more sensitive in the study area. The baseline studies should be collected for 3 seasons (PreMonsoon, Monsoon and Post Monsoon seasons). The study area should comprise of the following: i Catchment area up-to the dam site Catchment area details are provided C2-3 in section 2.2 of Chapter-2. ii Submergence Area Submergence area details are C2-3 provided in section 2.2 of chapter- 2. iii Project area or the direct impact The study area of 10 km radius C1-12 area should comprise of area falling from the periphery of the barrage within 10 km radius from the has been considered as shown in periphery of reservoir, land coming Figure 1.3 in Chapter-1. under submergence and area downstream of dam upto the point where Tail Race Tunnel (TRT) meets the river. iv Downstream upto 10 km from tip of Downstream upto 10 km from tip C1-12 Tail Race Tunnel (TRT) of Tail Race Tunnel (TRT) considered as shown in Figure 1.3 in Chapter-1. 4 Details of the Methodology i The methodology followed for The methodology for collection of collection of base line data along base line data, number of samples with details of number of samples and their locations, sample sites and their locations in the map and demarcated study area is should be included. Study area provided in chapter-3 description of should be demarcated properly on environment. the appropriate scale map. Sampling sites should be depicted on map for each parameter with proper legends. For forest classification, Champion and Seth (1968) classification should be followed.

0 ‐ 23 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-24 of 49

5 Methodology for collection of Biodiversity Data i The number of sampling locations The no. of sampling locations and Table 3.29 and should be adequate to get a map provided in C3-86 reasonable idea of the diversity and Fig 3.18 of Chapter-3. other attributes of flora and fauna. C3-88 The guiding principles should be the size of the study area (larger area should have larger number of sampling locations) and inherent diversity at the location, as known from secondary sources (e.g. eastern Himalayan and low altitude sites should have a larger number of sampling locations owing to higher diversity) ii The entire area should be divided in Details provided under Section C3-27 grids of 5km X 5km preferably on a 3.12 of Chapter-3. GIS domain. There after 25% of the grids should be randomly selected for sampling of which half should be in the directly affected area (grids including project components such as reservoir, dam, powerhouse, tunnel, canal etc.) and the remaining in the rest of the area (areas of influence in 10 km radius form project components). At such chosen location, the size and number of sampling units (e.g. quadrats in case of flora/transects in case of fauna) must be decided by species area curves and the details of the same (graphs and cumulative number of species in a tabulated form) should be provided in the EIA report. Some of the grids on the edges may not be completely overlapping with the study area boundaries. However these should be counted and considered for selecting 25% of the grids. The number of grids to be surveyed may come out as a decimal number (i.e. it has an integral and a fractional part) which should be rounded to the next whole number

0 ‐ 24 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-25 of 49 iii The conventional sampling is likely Details provided under Section C3-27 to miss the presence of rare, 3.12 of Chapter-3. endangered and threatened (R.E.T.) species since they often occur in low densities and in case of faunal species are usually secretive in behaviour. Reaching the conclusion about the absence of such species in the study area based on such methodology is misleading. It is very important to document the status of such species owing to their high conservation value. Hence likely presence of such species should be ascertained from secondary sources by a proper literature survey for the said area including referring to field guides which are now available for many taxonomic groups in India. Even literature from studies/surveys in the larger landscapes which include the study area for the concerned project must be referred to since most species from adjoining catchments is likely to be present in the catchments in question. In fact such literature form the entire state can be referred to. Once a listing of possible R.E.T. species form the said area is developed, species specific methodologies should be adopted to ascertain their presence in the study area which would be far more conclusive as compared to the conventional sampling. If the need be, modern methods like camera trapping can be resorted to, particularly for areas in the eastern and for secretive/nocturnal species. A detailed listing of the literature referred to, for developing lists of R.E.T. species should be provided in the EIA reports. iv The R.E.T. species referred to in Details provided under Section C3-27 this point should include species 0 ‐ 25 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-26 of 49

listed in Schedule I and II of 3.12 of Chapter-3. Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and those listed in the red data books (BSI, ZSI and IUCN) 6 Components of the EIA Study A. Physical and Chemical Environment Geological & Geophysical Aspects and Seismo – Tectonics: i Physical geography, Topography, Physical geography, Topography, C3-21 Regional Geological aspects and Regional Geological aspects and structure of the Catchment structure of the Catchment provided under Section 3.10 of Chapter-3 ii Tectonics, seismicity and history of The seismic study has been past earthquakes in the area. A site conducted by IIT Roorkee. The specific study of the earthquake suggested Earth Quake (EQ) design parameters will be done. The results parameters have been cleared from of the site specific earthquake National Committee of Seismic design shall be sent for approval of Design Parameters (NCSDP) of the NCSDP (National committee of CWC and are being adopted for Seismic Design Parameters, Central design of the project components. water commission, New Delhi for (Report already submitted to large dams MOEF, Shillong through e-mail in May 2011) (Ref. Compliance Report submitted vide NHL/RammamIII/11-12/01 dated 9th May 2011). Copy of Seismo-tectonic evaluation is enclosed as Annexure-XXVIII. Central A-475 Water Commission has accorded clearance vide letter dated 05.08.2014 based on TEC clearance dated 12.09.2006. Copy of CWC letter is A-20 enclosed as Annexure-XXIX. A-497 iii Landslide zone or area prone to Landslide zone or area prone to landslide existing in the study area landslide existing in the study area should be examined examined in Section 3.10.4 of Chapter-3. C3-52 iv Presence of important economic There are no economic mineral mineral deposit, if any deposits in the project area. The mineralogical maps are presented

0 ‐ 26 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-27 of 49

in Section 3.10.2 of Chapter-3. C3-48 v Justification for location & The project is in advanced stage of execution of the project in relation construction after Techno- to structural components (dam economic Clearance by CEA and height) Environmental Clearance by MOEF&CC. The location for execution of the project was found feasible. Details are given in Section 2.1 of Chapter-2. C2-1 vi Impact of project on geological Details of local geology of area is C3-43 environment given at Section 3.10 of Chapter- 3. As the proposed project is Run of River project, no major impacts on local geology are envisaged. The impact due to tunneling will be restored by thick concreting. The details of impact on geological environment are covered in Section 4.9 of Chapter-4. C4-40 Meteorology, Air and Noise: i Meteorology (viz. Temperature, Meteorology (viz. Temperature, Relative humidity, wind Relative humidity, wind speed/direction etc.) to be collected speed/direction etc.) collected from from nearest IMD station. IMD provided in Section 3.4 of C3-3 Chapter-3. ii Ambient Air Quality with Ambient air quality with parameters viz. Suspended parameters at 7 locations is Particulate Matter (SPM), provided in Section 3.5 of Respirable Suspended Particulate Chapter-3. C3-7 Matter (RSPM) i.e. suspended particulate materials iii Existing noise levels and traffic Ambient noise levels at 7 locations is provided in Section 3.8 of density in the study area at 6 C3-37 locations Chapter-3. Traffic Study of study area id given in Section 3.9 of Chapter-3. C3-42 Soil Characteristics: i Soil classification, physical Soil classification, physical parameters (viz., texture, porosity, parameters and chemical bulk density and water holding parameters at 10 locations is capacity) and chemical parameters provided in Section 3.7 of C3-30

0 ‐ 27 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-28 of 49

(viz. pH, electrical conductivity, Chapter-3. magnesium, calcium, total alkalinity, chlorides, sodium, potassium, organic carbon, available potassium, available phosphorus, SAR, nitrogen and salinity, etc.) (6 locations) Remote sensing and GIS Studies: i Generation of thematic maps viz., Thematic maps provided under Section 3.11 of Chapter-3. slope map, drainage map, soil map, C3-54 land use and land cover map, etc. Based on these, thematic maps, an erosion intensity map should be prepared Water Quality: i History of the ground water table Depth of the ground water table fluctuation in the study area fluctuation in the study area is provided in Section 3.10.3 of Chapter-3. C3-50 ii Water quality for both surface Water quality at 8 locations for water and ground water for (i) surface water and 4 location for Physical parameters (pH, ground water for physical temperature, electrical conductivity, parameters, chemical parameters, TSS); (ii) Chemical parameters bacteriological parameter and (Alkalinity, Hardness, BOD, COD, heavy metals is provided in Section NO2, PO4, CI, SO4, Na, K, Ca, 3.6.1 of Chapter 3. Mg, Silica, Oil & Grease, phenolic compounds, residual sodium carbonate); (iii) Bacteriological C3-18 parameter (MPN, Total coliform) and (iv) Heavy Metals (Pb, As, Hg, Cd, Cr-6, total Cr, Cu, Zn, Fe) (6 locations) iii Delineation of sub and micro- Details provided under Catchment Section 7.2 watersheds, their locations and Area Treatment Plan in C7-11 extent based on the All India Soil of Chapter-7. and Land Use Survey of India (AISLUS), Department of Agriculture, Government of India. Erosion levels in each micro- watershed and prioritization of micro-watershed through silt yield index (SYI) method of AISLUS

0 ‐ 28 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-29 of 49

B. Water Environment & Hydrology i Hydrometeorology of the project Hydrometeorology of the project viz. precipitation (snowfall, like rainfall, temperature, relative rainfall), temperature, relative humidity etc. provided in Section humidity, etc. Hydro- 3.4 of Chapter-3. No snowfall is meteorological studies in the observed in the area. C3-3 catchment area should be established along-with real time telemetry and data acquisition system for inflows monitoring. ii Run off, discharge, water Run off, sedimentation, water availability for the project, availability for the project provided C3-54 sedimentation rate, etc. in Section 3.11 of Chapter-3. iii Basin characteristics iv Catastrophic events like cloud Flash flood and cloud brust details Section 3.11.14 of bursts and flash floods, if any, are provided in C3-69 should be documented. Chapter-3. v For estimation of Sedimentation The project is a Run of River Rate, direct sampling of river flow (ROR) project in which barrage is to be done during the EIA study. bays with crest level at riverbed The study should be conducted for level have been proposed for minimum one year. Actual silt flow flushing out the silt at regular rate to be expressed in ha-m km2 intervals. Suitable sediment year-1 management practices like routine flushing during flood period will be evolved to avoid sediment deposition in the pond. Details are provided in Section 3.11.15 of Chapter-3. The calculated values of Silt Yield C7-20 Index, erosion intensity and water shed management is given in C7-22 Section 7.2.4, 7.2.5 and 7.2.6 of C7-23 Chapter-7. vi Set up a G&D monitoring station The G&D monitoring Stations are C3-56 and a few rain gauge stations in the located at Singlabazar, Lodhama catchment area for collecting data Khola and Rammam-II. For the during the investigation proposed project, the available ten daily discharge data of Singlabazar as well as discharge data as derived based on Rammam stage-II H.E. Project generation data are considered for water availability studies. Details are given in

0 ‐ 29 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-30 of 49

Section 3.11.2 of Chapter-3. vii Flow series, 10 daily with 90%, Flow series, average ten daily flows A-118 & 75% and 50% dependable years with various % discharges A-179 discharges are given in Annexure-XVII. viii Information on the 10-daily flow Information on the 10-daily flow basis for the 90 per cent dependable basis for the 90 per cent dependable year the flow intercepted at the year the flow intercepted at the dam, the flow diverted to the power Barrage, the flow diverted to the house and the spill comprising the power house and the spill environmental flow and additional comprising the environmental flow flow towards downstream of the and additional flow towards dam for the project may be given downstream of the dam for the project provided in Section 3.11 of A-118 Chapter-3 and Annexure- XVIIA. ix The minimum environmental flow National Green Tribunal in the shall be 20% of the flow of four matter of Pushp Saini Vs. Ministry consecutive lean months of 90% of Environment, Forest & Climate dependable year, 30% of the Change & Others dated 09/08/2017 average monsoon flow. The flow regarding environmental flow of for remaining months shall be in the River directs that all the rivers between 20-30%, depending on the in the country shall maintain site specific requirements. A site minimum 15 % to 20% of the specific study shall be carried out average lean season flow of that by an expert organization. river. Accordingly, as per site specific C2-10 requirement, NTPC Rammam HEPP shall maintain the minimum Environmental flow of 18 % in River Rammam. Details are given in Section-2.4 of Chapter-2. x Hydrological studies/data as The Central Water Commission A-118 & approved by CWC shall be utilized (CWC) has accorded clearance for in the preparation of EIA/EMP design data of Rammam HEPP A-179 report. Actual hydrological annual Stage-III (3x40 MW) vide letter yield may also be given in the dated 05.08.2014 considering the report TEC clearance dated 12.09.2006 and its revalidation dated 01.08.2013. Copy of TEC letter is enclosed as Annexure-V and CWC approval letter is enclosed as Annexure-XXIX. Hydrological studies/data as approved by CWC has been utilized in preparation of EIA report.

0 ‐ 30 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-31 of 49

xi Sedimentation data available with Sedimentation data is useful for CWC may be used to find out the large Dam projects. As, the project loss in storage over the years. is a Run of River (ROR) project in which barrage bays with crest level at riverbed level have been proposed for flushing out the silt at regular intervals. Barrage height is also smaller 23 m to to minimize the sedimentation. Suitable sediment management practices like routine flushing during flood period will be evolved to avoid

sediment deposition in the pond. Moreover, intake has been proposed to be located at suitably higher level above the spillway crest to prevent the entry of the silt in the water conductor system. However, underground desilting chambers have been proposed for removal of silt particles of size 0.20 mm and above. Details are given in C3-70 Section 3.11.15 of Chapter-3. xii A minimum of 1 km distance from There is no hydro power project the tip of the reservoir to the tail downstream of Rammam HEPP. race tunnel should be maintained The details of distances among between upstream and downstream Upstream project are given in C4-14 projects Section 4.4.2 of Chapter-4. C. Biological Environment Besides primary studies, review of Secondary data incorporated in the secondary data/literature published EIA report from available for project area on flora & fauna published literature (books, including RET species shall be websites, scientific papers, articles reported in EIA/EMP report etc.). The State Forest/ Working Plan were also referred for secondary information. Details are C3-72 given in Section 3.12 of Chapter- 3. Flora i Characterization of forest types (as Characterization of forest types C3-73 per Champion and Seth method) in provided in section 3.12.3 of the study area and extent of each Chapter-3. forest type as per the Forest Working Plan

0 ‐ 31

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-32 of 49

ii Documentation of all plant species Documentation of all plant species i.e. Angiosperm, Gymnosperm, reported and observed in study area Pteriodophytes, Bryophytes (all are provided in Section 3.12 of groups). Chapter-3. C3-72 iii General vegetation profile and General vegetation profile and floral diversity covering all groups floral diversity covering all groups C3-72 of flora including lichens and of flora provided in Section 3.12 of orchids. A species wise list may be Chapter-3. The list of species provided. given in Table 3.30 at Chapter-3. C3-89 iv Assessment of plant species with Assessment of plant species with respect to dominance, density, respect to dominance, density, frequency, abundance, diversity frequency, abundance, diversity index, similarity index, importance index, similarity index, importance value index (IVI) , Shannon Weiner value index (IVI), Shannon Weiner C3-72 index etc. of the species to be index etc. provided in Section 3.12 provided. Methodology used for of Chapter-3. calculating various diversity indices along with details of locations of quadrates, size of quadrates etc. to be reported within the study area in different ecosystems. v Existence of National Park, Singalila National Park is about 9.0 Sanctuary, Biosphere Reserve etc in km and Barsey Rhododendron the study area, if any, should be Sanctuary is 4.4 km away from the detailed. project. Details are provided in C3-168 Section 3.12.24 of Chapter-3. vi Economically important species Economically important species like medicinal plants, timber, fuel like medicinal plants, timber, fuel wood etc wood etc. provided in Section 3.12 of Chapter-3. C3-72 vii Details of endemic species found in Details of endemic species found in Section the project area. the project area provided in C3-81 3.12.6 of Chapter-3. viii Flora under RET categories should Details provided in Section 3.12 of C3-72 be documented using International Chapter-3. Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) criteria and Botanical Survey of India’s Red Data list along-with economic significance. Species diversity curve for RET species should be given. ix Cropping pattern and Horticultural Details provided in Section 3.12 of C3-72

0 ‐ 32

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-33 of 49

Practices in the study area Chapter-3. Fauna i Fauna study and inventorisation Details provided in Section 3.12 of C3-72 should be carried out for all groups Chapter-3. of in the study area. Their present status along with Schedule of the species ii Documentation of fauna plankton Documentation of fauna plankton, (phyto and zooplankton), periphyton, benthos and fish C3-157 periphyton, benthos and fish should carried out and details provided in be done and analyzed Section 3.12.16 of Chapter-3. iii Information (authenticated) on Avi- Details on Avi-fauna provided in C3-148 fauna and wildlife in the study area Section 3.12.14 of Chapter-3. Status of avifauna their resident/ Details provided in Section 3.12.14 C3-148 migratory/ passage migrants etc. of Chapter-3. Documentation of butterflies, if Details provided in Table 3.46 and C3-149 Section 3.12.15 of Chapter-3 any, found in the area. . C3-156 Details of endemic species found in Details provided in Section 3.12.14 C3-148 the project area. of Chapter-3. RET species-voucher specimens Details provided in Section 3.12.14 C3-148 should be collected along-with GPS of Chapter-3. readings to facilitate rehabilitation. RET faunal species to be classified as per IUCN Red Data list and as per different schedule of Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Existence of barriers and corridors, There is no wildlife corridors in

if any, for wild animals. study area. The main barriers for wild life are River Rammam and Rangit, however existing bridges has removed these barriers. Details C3-148 of wildlife is provided in Section 3.12.14 of Chapter-3. Compensatory afforestation to Amount deposited to State Forest compensate the green belt area that Department, West Bengal and will be removed, if any, as part of Sikkim for Compensatory the proposed project development Afforestation.

and loss of biodiversity. Details provided in Section 10.7 of C10-8 Chapter-10. Collection of primary data on Details provided in Sub-section C3-194 agricultural activity, crop and their 3.14.3.6 to 3.14.3.9 of Chapter-3.

0 ‐ 33

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-34 of 49

productivity and irrigation facilities C3-196 components For categorization of sub-catchment Details provided in Catchment C7-11 into various erosion classes and for Area Treatment Plan in Section 7.2 the consequent CAT plan, the entire of Chapter-7. catchment (Indian Portion) is to be considered and not only the directly the draining catchment. D. Aquatic Ecology i Documentation of aquatic fauna Details of aquatic fauna like macro- like macro-invertebrates, invertebrates, zooplankton, zooplankton, phytoplantktons, phytoplantktons, benthos etc benthos etc. provided in Sub-section 3.12.16 of C3-157 Chapter-3. ii Fish and fisheries, their migration Details provided in Sub-section C3-165 3.12.23 Chapter-3 Section and breeding grounds. of and C10-21 10.12 of Chapter-10. iii Fish diversity composition and Details provided in Sub-section C3-165 maximum length & weight of the 3.12.23 of Chapter-3. measured populations to be studies for estimation of environmental flow. iv of aquatic Details provided in Sub-section C3-157 fauna. 3.12.16 of Chapter-3. v Sampling for aquatic ecology and Aquatic ecology and fisheries fisheries and fisheries must be sampling has been done at 4 conducted during three seasons – locations and important fish species Pre-monsoon (summer), monsoon has been recorded. Details provided and winter. Sizes (length & weight) in Sub-section 3.12.16 of C3-157 of important fish species need to be Chapter-3. However, as per collected and breeding and feeding specific TOR, the data has been grounds should also be identified collected for one season only.

along the project site or in vicinity

E. Socio-Economic i Collection of baseline data on Collection of baseline data on human settlements, health status of human settlements, health status of the community and existing the community etc. done and infrastructure facilities for social details provided under Section 3.14 C3-185 welfare including sources of of Chapter-3. livelihood, job opportunities and 0 ‐ 34

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-35 of 49

safety and security of workers and surroundings population. ii Collection of information with Details provided in Section 3.14 of C3-185 respect to social awareness about Chapter-3. the developmental activity in the area and social welfare measures existing and proposed by project proponent. iii Collection of information on Details provided in Section 3.14 of C3-185 sensitive habitat of historical, Chapter-3. cultural and religious and ecological importance iv The socio-economic survey/ profile Details provided in Section 3.14 of C3-185 within 10 km of the study area for Chapter-3. demographic profile; Economic Structure; Developmental Profile; Agricultural Practices; Infrastructure, education facilities; health and sanitation facilities; available communication network etc. v Documentation of demographic, Details provided in Section 3.14 of C3-185 Ethnographic, Economic Structure Chapter-3. and development profile of the area vi Information on Agricultural Details provided in Section 3.14 of C3-185 Practices, Cultural and aesthetic Chapter-3. sites, Infrastructure facilities etc. vii Information on the dependence of Details provided in Section 3.14 of C3-185 the local people on minor forest Chapter-3. produce and their cattle grazing rights in the forest land. viii List of all the Project Affected The Socio-economic Impact Families with their name, age, Assessment Study was conducted educational qualification, by Indian Institute of Social size, sex, religion, caste, sources of Welfare and Business income, land & house holdings, Management, Kolkata in 2007. The other properties, occupation, source The Socio-economic profile of of income, house/land to be PAPs are given in Section 7.4.11 of acquired for the project and Chapter-7. house/land left with the family, any R&R Plan has been approved and C7-58 other property, possession of cattle, implemented and land has been

type of house etc. acquired by NTPC long ago. 0 ‐ 35 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-36 of 49

Project is under advance stage of construction. R&R action plan summary is provided in Section 7.4 of Chapter-7.

ix Special attention has to be given to R&R plan has one of the criteria vulnerable groups like women, ‘Socio-economic status of the PAPs aged persons etc. and to any i.e. vulnerable groups, occupation, ethnic/indigenous groups that are educational status, income, etc. for getting affected by the project. the identification of the target group’. Special efforts for welfare measures was made for SC/ST, Physically Challenged, Women Headed Household, Aged, etc. These also include special vocational training programmes, priority in engagement for suitable jobs and facilities, free/enhanced subsidized medical treatment, etc. C7-44 Details provided in Section 7.4 of Chapter-7. 7 Impact Prediction and Mitigation Measures The adverse impact due to the The adverse impact due to the proposed project should be assessed project delineated in Chapter-4. and effective mitigation steps to abate these impacts should be described. Air Environment i Changes in ambient and ground As all equipment and DG sets have level concentrations due to total preventive maintenance program emissions from point, line and area and pollution control system during sources. construction. Therefore, no major impacts are envisaged due to total emissions from point, line and area sources. During operation phase, no pollutant emissions envisaged except intermittent low-level emissions from DG sets and vehicles. No major industry is located in study area, except 0 ‐ 36 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-37 of 49

Rammam HEPP Stage-II. Hence thre would be no significant change in ambient air quality and ground level concentrations due to project. Ambient air quality levels in study area are well within the permissible limits of NAAQS 2009. It indicates that there is no major impact on air quality due to DG sets and other emissions sources. Details are given in Section 4.5 of C4-20 Chapter-4. ii Effect on soil, material, vegetation No significant effects on soil,

and human health. material, vegetation and human C4-3 health are envisaged. Details are given in section 4.3, 4.7,4.8 of C4-28 Chapter-4. C4-34 iii Impact of emissions from DG set A 250 kVA DG set with acoustic used for power during the enclosure being utilized in the construction, if any, on air project site and emission levels are environment. within the standards. Ambient air quality levels in study area are within the permissible limits of NAAQS 2009. It indicates that there is no major impact on air quality due to DG sets emissions. Details are given in section 4.5 of C4-19 Chapter-4. iv Pollution due to fuel combustion in The SPM emissions are minimal

equipment’s and vehicles hence no significant impact on ambient air quality. Ambient air quality levels in study area are well within the permissible limits of NAAQS 2009. It indicates that there is no significant impact on ambient air quality due to fuel combustion in equipment and vehicles. Details are given in section 4.5 of C4-19 Chapter-4. v Fugitive emissions from various Adverse impacts on this account

sources are not expected to be significant and water sprinkling is being resorted to at necessary places to

0 ‐ 37

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-38 of 49

suppress the dust. Details are given C4-19 in section 4.5 of Chapter-4. Water Environment i Changes in surface and ground No change in ground water quality

water quality and minimal change in surface water quality due to the construction activities, which is short-term impact. No ground water is being used for construction and same is also not envisaged during operation phase. Details are C4-11 given in section 4.4 of Chapter-4. ii Steps to develop pisci-culture and It is proposed to develop small

recreational facilities gardens at 2 locations and few viewpoints along the periphery of the water spread area and power house site. pisci-culture activities will be promoted in consultation with fishery department. Details are C10-6 given section 10.5 & 10.11 of C10-20 Chapter-10. iii Changes in hydraulic regime and No major changes are envisaged as

downstream flow. project is run-of-river hydraulic electric project. However, minimum environmental flow to be discharged from barrage will be about 18% of normal flow of river. Details are given in Section 2.4.10 C2-15, of Chapter-2 and Section 4.4.2 of C4-14 Chapter-4. iv Water pollution due to disposal of No sewage disposal is envisaged as

sewage it is sent biodigester septic tank and treated water is being reused/recycled in plantation. Details are given in section 4.4 of C4-11 Chapter-4. v Water pollution from labour The sewage quantity is too small colonies/ camps and washing w.r.t to river water to cause any equipment adverse impact. However, it is being treated in biodigester septic tank. Settling tanks has been installed at crushers site to prevent sediments. Details are given in C4-11 section 4.4 of Chapter-4.

0 ‐ 38

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-39 of 49

Land Environment

i Adverse impact on land stability, Minimal impacts are envisaged and C4-3 catchment of soil erosion, reservoir specific management measures are sedimentation and spring flow (if suggested in Section-4.3 of any) (a) due to considerable road chapter-4. construction / widening activity (b) interference of reservoir with the inflowing stream (c) blasting for commissioning of HRT, TRT and some other structures. ii Changes in land use / land cover Impacts due to changes in land use and drainage pattern / land cover and drainage pattern and mitigation measures are provided in Section 4.3 of C4-3 Chapter-4. iii Immigration of labour population Immigration of labour is occurring only during the construction period only. Impact on land, air quality, water quality, local ecology and socio- C4-3 economic environment due to C4-19 immigration of labour and mitigation measures has been C4-28 described in Section 4.3, 4.5 4.7 C4-34 and 4.8 of Chapter-4. iv Quarrying operation and muck A suitable area is earmarked for the disposal disposal of muck generated during the construction phase. Muck disposal and mitigation measures are covered in Section 4.3 of Chapter-4. No quarrying is envisaged for the project and the C4-3 requirement of construction material is met from muck generated. v Changes in land quality including Minimal changes in land quality is

effects of waste disposal envisaged as the land requirement C4-3 is less due to Run of River project. Detailed are given in Section 4.3 of Chapter-4. Necessary management C10-3 plan to minimize impact on land is provided in Section 10.3, 10.4 and C10-5 10.5 of Chapter-10. C10-6

0 ‐ 39 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-40 of 49

vi River bank and their stability Impacts on riverbank and its Sub-section stability are shown in C4-3 4.3.1 and 4.4.1 of Chapter-4. C4-11 vii Impact due to submergence Minimal impact as the project is envisaged as a run of river (ROR) scheme, with significant diurnal variations in water level. Impact is described in Sub-Section 4.4.2 of Chapter-4. C4-14 Biological Environment i Impact on forests, flora, fauna Anticipated environmental impacts including wildlife, migratory avi- and mitigation measures on fauna, rare and endangered species, biological environment is provided medicinal plants etc. in Section 4.7 of Chapter-4. C4-28 ii Pressure on existing natural No significant pressure has

resources envisaged on existing natural resources for long term. The impact on natural resources due to project has been discussed in Section 4.10 C4-41 at Chapter-4. iii Deforestation and disturbance to No wild animal’s migratory wildlife, habitat fragmentation and corridors, National Park and wild animal’s migratory corridors Wildlife sanctuary is located within the project area. Only 1.927 Ha. of forest land is converted which is quite degraded. The details are given in Sub-section 4.7.1 at C4-28 Chapter-4. iv Compensatory afforestation- The total land acquired for the identification of suitable native tree project is about 74.007 ha, of which species for compensatory 1.927 ha is the forest land. During afforestation and green belt. field study, it was found that the forest land acquired for the project do not contain any unique or rare or endangered species. Compensatory afforestation and identification of suitable native tree species are done by State Forest Department. The details of Compensatory C10-8 afforestation are given in Section 10.7 of Chapter-10.

0 ‐ 40

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-41 of 49

v Impact on fish migration and The project is a Run of River habitat degradation due to (ROR) scheme, hence minimum decreased flow of water impact on fish migration and habitat degradation due to decreased flow of water. The impact on fishes due to project C4-31 is provided in Section 4.7.2 of Chapter-4. A Fish Management Plan to mitigate these impacts is provided in Section 10.12 of Chapter-10. C10-21 vi Impact on breeding and nesting The project is a Run of River

grounds of animals and fish. (ROR) scheme, therefore nesting C4-31 and breeding will not have major impact. The impact is discussed in Section 4.7.2 of Chapter-4. A Fish Management Plan to mitigate these impacts is provided in Section C10-21 10.12 of Chapter-10. Socio-economic aspects i Impact on local community There is some migration of labor

including demographic profile. force from outside into the project area during construction phase, which may put some pressure on local settlements and resources. The project envisages all round development and growth in the region. However, few local people were affected in the form of acquisition of their land. Members of families were provided with R&R package as per NPRR-2003.

Impact have been discussed in C4-34 Section 4.8 of Chapter-4. ii Impact on socio-economic status Details provided in in Section 4.8 C4-34 of Chapter-4. iii Impact on economic status. Various types of business-like shops, food-stall, tea stalls, etc. besides a variety of suppliers, traders, transporters will concentrate here and benefit immensely as demand will increase significantly for almost all types of goods and services. The business

0 ‐ 41

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-42 of 49

community as a whole will be benefited.

Development of infrastructure and availability of reliable power supply as a result of the project realization would contribute to the stimulation of economic activities like small scale industries in the area. Details provided in Section 4.8.1 of C4-35 Chapter-4. iv Impact on human health due to Details provided in Section 4.8.2 of C4-36 water / vector borne disease Chapter-4 v Impact on increase traffic Details provided in Section 4.5.1 of C4-19 Chapter-4. vi Impact on Holy Places and Tourism No Holy place like temples, Church, mosque and Monastery are located within project site. No Holy place of national importance is located within Study Area. The barrage of project will promote the tourism activities in the area. Details provided in section 4.8.2 of C4-36 Chapter-4. vii Impacts of blasting activity during There would be controlled blasting project construction which is being done at project with all C4-19 generally destabilize the land mass preventive measures to prevent any and leads to landslides, damage to damage to surrounding area. C4-22 properties and drying up of natural Details provided in Section 4.5.1, C4-40 springs and cause noise population 4.6.1 and 4.9 at Chapter-4. will be studies. Proper record shall be maintained of the baseline information in the post project period. viii Positive and negative impacts likely Details provided in Section 4.8 of C4-34 to be accrued due to the project are Chapter-4. listed. 8 Environmental Management Plans i Catchment Area Treatment Catchment Area Treatment (CAT) (CAT) Plan 7.2 of should be prepared Plan provided in section C7-11 micro-watershed wise. Chapter-7.

0 ‐ 42

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-43 of 49

Identification of free draining/ directly draining catchment based upon Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System (GIS) methodology and Sediment Yield Index (SYI) method of AISLUS, Deptt. of Agriculture, Govt. of India coupled with ground survey. Areas or watersheds falling under ‘very severe’ and ‘severe’ erosion categories should be provided and required to be treated. Both biological as well as engineering measures should be proposed in consultation with State Forest Department for areas requiring treatment. Year-wise schedule of work and monetary allocation should be provided. Mitigation measures to check shifting cultivation in the catchment area with provision for alternative and better agricultural practices should be included. ii Compensatory Afforestation shall Compensatory Afforestation Plan be prepared by the State Forest was prepared by the State Forest Department in lieu of the forest Department West Bengal and land proposed to be diverted for Sikkim. construction of the project as per Amount deposited to State Forest the Forest (Conservation) Act, Department, West Bengal and 1980. Choice of plants for Sikkim for Compensatory afforestation should include native Afforestation. Sikkim has been and RET species, if any. This will implemented the plan. Final Forest be a part of the forest clearance Clearance already accorded by

proposal. MOEF&CC on 23.05.2008. Details provided in Section 10.7 of C10-8 Chapter-10. iii Biodiversity and Wildlife Biodiversity and Wildlife Conservation and Management Conservation and Management Plan for the conservation and Plan for the conservation and preservation of rare, endangered or preservation of rare, endangered or endemic floral/faunal species or endemic floral/faunal species is some National Park/Sanctuary/ provided in Section 10.8 of Biosphere Reserve or other Chapter-10. A detailed Wildlife protected area is going to get Conservation Plan has been C10-9

0 ‐ 43

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-44 of 49

affected directly or indirectly by enclosed at Annexure-XVIII. construction of the project, then suitable conservation measures should be prepared in consultation with the State Forest Department and with the physical and financial details. Suitable conservation techniques (in-situ/ex-situ) will be proposed under the plan and the areas where such conservation is proposed will be marked on a project layout map iv Fisheries Conservation and Fish Management Plan provided C10-21 Management Plan – a specific under Section 10.12 of Chapter- fisheries management measures 10. should be prepared for river and reservoir. If the construction of fish ladder/ fishway etc. is not feasible then measures for reservoir fisheries will be proposed. The plan will detail out the number of hatcheries, nurseries, rearing ponds etc. proposed under the plan with proper drawings. If any migratory fish species is getting affected then the migratory routes, time/season of upstream and downstream migration, spawning grounds etc will be discussed in details. v Resettlement and Rehabilitation One-time settlement for R&R Plan package to affected PAPs has been needed to be prepared on the basis of findings of the socio- agreed during VDAC meeting as per economic survey coupled with the R&R policy. Cost provision for land including R&R was Rs. 59.20 Crores outcome of public consultation held. The R&R package shall be out of which, spent/ committed prepared after consultation with the expenditure as on date under land head is Rs. 45.20 crores while R&R representatives of the project affected families and the State including CD/CER provisions is Rs. Government. Detailed budgetary 19.03 Crores (within overall amount of Rs. 59.20 crores). Total of Rs. estimates are to be provided. 3.58 Crores disbursed as per R&R Resettlements site should be policy till 31.03.2021. Land identified. The plan will also acquisition has been completed and

incorporate community R&R plan has been implemented by

development strategies. NTPC. Detailed R&R action Plan and its implementation is C7-44

0 ‐ 44

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-45 of 49

given in Section 7.4 of Chapter-7. vi Green Belt Development Plan As the proposed project is located along the periphery of the reservoir, in hilly area the area available for approach roads around the colonies plantation is limited. Therefore and other project components, local NTPC will carry out plantation in plant species must be suggested nearby villages in consultation with with physical and financial details. forest department. Green belt A layout map showing the proposed development plan is provided in sites for developing the green belt section 10.6 of Chapter-10. should be prepared.

C10-7 vii Reservoir Rim Treatment Plan As the Rammam HEPP stage-III is for stabilization of land slide / land Run of River project and the slip zones, if any, around the storage capacity is limited to 0.27 reservoir periphery is to be MCM, no reservoir is envisaged. prepared based on detailed survey The surrounding loose rocks in of geology of the reservoir rim area. water storage area of barrage will Suitable engineering and biological be dressed to prevent land slide, in measures for treatment of identified future. Plantation will be done in slip zones to be suggested with surrounding area of barrage to physical and financial schedule. mitigate land slide and land slip. Layout map showing the Details has been provided in C10-30 landslide/landslip zones shall be Section 10.20 of Chapter-10. prepared and appended in the chapter. viii Muck Disposal Plan suitable sites Anticipated environmental impacts for dumping of excavated materials and mitigation measures for Muck C4-3 should be identified in consultation disposal is provided in Section with State Pollution Control Board 4.3.1 of Chapter-4. and State Forest Department. All Muck disposal plan provided in C10-5 muck disposal sites should be section 10.4 of chapter-10 minimum 30 m away from the HFL C10-6 of river. The quantity of muck to be generated and the quantity of muck proposed to be utilized shall be calculated in consultation with the project authorities. Details of each dumping site viz. area, capacity, total quantity of muck that can be dumped etc. should be worked out and discussed in the plan. Plan for rehabilitation of muck disposal sites should also be given. The L-section / cross section of muck disposal sites and approach roads should be 0 ‐ 45 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-46 of 49

given. The plan shall have physical and financial details of the measures proposed. Layout map showing the dumping sites vis-à-vis other project components will be prepared and appended in the chapter. ix Restoration Plan for Quarry Sites No quarrying is envisaged for the and landscaping of colony areas, project and the requirement of working areas, roads etc. Details of construction material is met from the coarse/fine aggregate/clay etc. muck generated. required for construction of the project and the rock/clay quarries/river shoal sites identified for the project should be discussed along-with the Engineering and Biological measures proposed for their restoration with physical and financial details. Layout map showing quarry sites vis-à-vis other project components, should be prepared. x Study of Design Earthquake The seismic study has been Parameters: A site specific study conducted by IIT Roorkee. The A-499 of earthquake parameters should be suggested Earth Quake (EQ) design done. Results of the site specific parameters have been cleared from earthquake design parameters National Committee of Seismic should be approved by National Design Parameters (NCSDP) of Committee of Seismic Design CWC and are being adopted for Parameters, Central Water design of the project components. Commission (NCSDP), New Delhi. (Report already submitted to MOEF, Shillong through e-mailin May 2011) (Ref. Compliance Report submitted vide NHL/RammamIII/11-12/01 dated 9th May 2011). A detailed seismo-tectonic evaluation of Rammam HEPP Stage-III is enclosed as Annexure- XXVIII. xi Dam Break Analysis and Disaster As the Rammam HEPP stage-III is Management Plan The outputs of Run of River project, no Dam is dam break model should be envisaged. Further, the height of illustrated with appropriate graphs barrage is 23 m only and the and maps clearly bringing out the storage capacity is limited to 0.27

0 ‐ 46 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-47 of 49

impact of Dam Break scenario. To MCM. As the river passes through identify inundation areas, deep gorge, the water spread in population and structures likely to case of failure shall be restricted be affected due to catastrophic within the river banks only. floods in the event of dam failure. Disaster Management Plan C7-28 DMP will be prepared with the help provided in Section 7.3 of of Dam Break Analysis. Maximum Chapter-7. water level that would be attained at various points on the downstream in case of dam break will be marked on a detailed contour map of the downstream area, to show the extent of inundation. The action plan will include Emergency Action and Management plan including measures like preventive action notification, warning procedure and action plan for co-ordination with various authorities. xii Water, Air and Noise Management Water, Air and Noise Management C10-19 ection 10.10, Plans to be implemented during Plans provided in S C10-20 construction and post-construction 10.11 & 10.15 of Chapter-10. periods C10-24 C10-30 xiii Public Health Delivery Plan Public Health Delivery Plan C10-19 including the provisions of drinking provided in Section 10.9 of water supply for local population Chapter-10. shall be in the EIA/EMP Report. Status of the existing medical facilities in the project area shall be discussed. Possibilities of strengthening of existing medical facilities, construction of new medical infrastructure etc. will be explored after assessing the need of the labour force and local populace. xiv Labour Management Plan for Labour Management Plan provided C10-2 their Health and Safety. in Section 10.2 of Chapter-10. xv Sanitation and Solid waste Adequate facilities for collection, management plan for domestic conveyance and disposal of solid waste from colonies and labour waste are developed. The solid camps etc. wastes being disposed regularly through Nayabazar Municipal Corporation (NJMC).

0 ‐ 47

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-48 of 49

Sanitation and Solid waste management details are provided in Section 10.2.3 of Chapter-10. xvi Local Area Development Plan to VDAC (Village Development be formulated in consultation with Advisory committee) for the Revenue Officials and Village monitoring R&R activities have Pancahayats. Appropriate schemes been constituted by DM of shall be prepared under EMP for concerned districts which include the Local Area Development Plan representatives of Project Affected with sufficient financial provisions. Persons. Infrastructure facilities like schools, community centre, roads are being developed by NTPC. Various plan and activities under CD/CER/CSR has been provided in Section 8.2 of C8-1 Chapter-8 for development of local area and other welfare measures. xvii Environmental safeguards during Environmental protection measures construction activities including during construction activities Road Construction. including Road Construction provided in Section 10.3 chapter- C10-3 10. xviii Energy Conservation Measures Energy Conservation Measures for the work force during with provision of LPG provided in C10-3 construction with physical and Section 10.2.4 of Chapter-10. financial details. Alternatives will At present LPG gas is being used be proposed for the labour force so for officers & staff engaged in the that the exploitation of the natural construction work. Adequate fuel resource (wood) for the domestic for labour camp (30 LPG cylinders,

and commercial use is curbed. Kerosene & fire wood) is provided by the contractor. Also, fuel depot at Jorethang (South Sikkim) is available within accessible reach from site. Regular preventive maintenance of heavy equipment is being done to save fuel and energy. LED lights are being used at road side to conserve energy. Environmental Monitoring xxi Environmental Monitoring C6-1 Programme to monitor the Programme provided in Chapter-6 mitigatory measures implemented at the project site is required will be prepared. Provision for

0 ‐ 48 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Date: 30/06/2021 Page No.: C0-49 of 49

Environment Management Cell should be made. The plan will spell out the aspects required to be monitored, monitoring indicators/ parameters with respect to each aspect and the agency responsible for the monitoring of that particular aspect throughout the project implementation. xx A summary of Cost Estimates for Summary of Cost Estimates for all all the plans, cost for implementing the plans, cost for implementing all all the Environmental Management the Environmental Management Plans. Plans provided in Section 10.19 of C10-30 Chapter-10.

0 ‐ 49

CHAPTER – I INTRODUCTION

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-1 of 20

CHAPTER-1 INTRODUCTION 1.0 GENERAL Electrical energy has a vital and significant role to play in the economy of any State. To accommodate the need of growing population of country and an improved quality of life, the demand for irrigation, drinking water and electric power is increasing day by day. Comparing the projected growth of peak power demand, anticipated energy requirement, there would be requirement of new projects and completion of under construction projects.

NTPC has been exploring the possibility of tapping the potential of non-conventional sources such as solar power, wind power, hydro power etc. Rammam Hydro Power Project is one such project, the construction of which was started by NTPC in year 2014. However, due to several reasons, (due to late receipt of tree felling permission, Gorkha land movement, intermittent strikes by villagers, etc.) the construction of the project could not be completed within the extended validity period of its Environmental Clearance. The present EIA Report is prepared to obtain a fresh Environmental Clearance for Rammam HEPP (3x40 MW), in order to complete its construction.

Hydropower or water power is power derived from the energy of falling or fast- running water, which may be harnessed for useful purposes. Hydro power is a renewable, economical, non-polluting and eco-friendly source of energy. This form of green energy, unlike energy from fossil fuel sources, entails no discharge of waste or emission of harmful hydrocarbons and other gases in the atmosphere. Power generation from such projects is also comparatively less damaging for the environment. Hydropower has generated a great deal of interest in India because it is in-exhaustible source of energy and a clean method of providing electricity to far flung areas in hilly regions.

1.1 BRIEF DETAILS OF THE PROJECT NTPC Limited is constructing Rammam Hydro Electric Power Project (HEPP), Stage III (3x40 MW) in Darjeeling District of West Bengal. The project is located on

1 - 1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-2 of 20

Rammam River, which flows along the border of West Bengal and Sikkim at about 50 km from Ghoom and 130 km from on Siliguri-Darjeeling Road in District Darjeeling of West Bengal.

The site for diversion structure is located downstream at the confluence of Rammam with Lodhama khola near Lodhama village just downstream of the power house of Rammam Stage-II hydroelectric project (51 MW under operation by West Bengal State Electricity Board). The site for power house is located near village Barbatia on the right bank of River Rammam. All the major project components are located in the State of West Bengal except the right abutments of the Barrage structure and a portion of submergence area in Siktam Block of West Sikkim. Techno Economic Clearance (TEC) for the project has been obtained from Central Electricity Authority (CEA)/Govt. of India vide letter dated 12.09.2006 and revalidated on 01.08.2013 and the construction of the project started in September 2014. However, as the construction of the project is likely to continue beyond the validity period of Environmental Clearance (EC), the EIA study has been conducted to obtain fresh EC from MOEF&CC.

1.2 IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT & PROJECT PROPONENT NTPC Limited (A Govt. of India Enterprise), is the largest power generating company in India. It was set up by Government of India (GoI) in November, 1975 with the objective of planning, promoting and organizing integrated development of thermal power in the country. In 1997, NTPC was conferred “Navratna” status by GoI and in 2007, it became the first public sector company to be granted “Maharatna” status. NTPC is now emerging as a well-diversified company on its way of becoming an Integrated Power Major, having entered into hydro power, coal mining, power trading, equipment manufacturing, power distribution business and renewable energy generation. Company also plans to enter into nuclear power development.

Presently, NTPC generates power from Coal, Gas, Hydro and Renewable (i.e. Solar and Wind) projects. With an installed capacity of 65,810 MW (as on June 2021), NTPC is the largest power generating major in the country. With an increasing presence in the power value chain, NTPC is well on its way to becoming an Integrated Power Major. Considering the track record of the company, Govt. of India,

1 - 2

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-3 of 20

subsequently allowed NTPC to venture into hydro power development and other non- conventional energy sources. NTPC is presently implementing number of Greenfield and expansion projects in thermal and hydro areas.

NTPC is already operating Koldam Hydro Power Project (800 MW) in Himachal Pradesh. Further Rammam Hydro Power Project (120 MW) in West Bengal & Tapovan Vishnugad Hydropower Project (540 MW) in Uttarakhand are under execution.

1.3 HYDRO POTENTIAL India has an estimated hydropower potential of 1,45,320 MW, excluding small hydro projects (SHPs). At the end of February 2020, installed capacity was about 45,700 MW. Only about 10,000 MW of hydropower could be added over the last 10 years. In a bold move, the Government of India accorded Renewable Energy (RE) status to large HEPs in March 2019, enabling new HEPs to receive concessions and green financing available to RE projects.

Advantage of Hydro Power  A renewable source of energy - saves scarce fuel reserves.  Non-polluting and hence environment friendly.  Long life - The first hydro project completed in 1897 is still in operation at Darjeeling.  Cost of generation, operation and maintenance is comparable than the other sources of energy.  Ability to start and stop quickly and instantaneous load acceptance/rejection makes it suitable to meet peak demand and for enhancing system reliability and stability.  Has higher efficiency (over 90%) compared to thermal (35%) and gas (around 50%).  Cost of generation is free from inflationary effects after the initial installation.  Storage based hydro schemes often provide attendant benefits of irrigation, flood control, drinking water supply, navigation, recreation, tourism, pisciculture etc.

1 - 3

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-4 of 20

 Being located in remote regions leads to development of interior backward areas (education, medical, road communication, telecommunication etc.)

1.4 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a systematic process to identify, predict and evaluate the environmental effects of proposed actions and projects. The purpose of EIA study is to provide information for decision-making on the environmental consequences of proposed actions and promote environmentally sound and sustainable development through the identification of appropriate enhancement and mitigation measures. The EMP (Environmental Management Plan) provides a plan meant for reducing the adverse impacts of the project.

As per Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification dated 14th September, 2006 and its subsequent amendments, hydroelectric power generation projects >50 MW falls under category ‘A’ of activity 1(c) requires prior Environmental Clearance (EC) to be obtained from MoEF&CC before the commencement of ground activity.

Earlier Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change (MOEF&CC) accorded the Environmental Clearance (EC) for project vide letter No. J-12011/42/2007-IA.I dated 17.08.2007 with a validity period of 10 years. Further, MOEF&CC vide its letter dated 13.07.2017, extended the validity of Environmental Clearance (EC) for a further period of 3 years i.e. up to 16.08.2020.

MOEF&CC vide Notification dated 18.01.2021 (Copy enclosed at Annexure-I) has amended the EIA Notification, 2006 and made a provision that period from 01.04.2020 to the 31.03.2021 shall not be considered for the purpose of calculation of the period of validity of prior Environmental Clearance in view of outbreak of Corona Virus (COVID-19) and subsequent lockdowns. In this regard, the Environment Clearance for Rammam HEPP is valid till 16.08.2021.

An application for extending the validity of the Environment Clearance (EC) of the Rammam Hydro Power Project, Stage-III (3X40 MW) was submitted by NTPC vide letter dated 28.02.2020 and 11.05.2020 citing the reasons for delay and plan of commissioning. The proposal was considered during the EAC meeting held on 15.05.2020 and as per MOM of EAC posted on the website of MoEF&CC, EAC

1 - 4

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-5 of 20

suggested the Project Proponent to apply de novo for processing of fresh Environmental Clearance.

Application for approval of Terms of Reference (TOR) for generation of fresh baseline environmental data and upgradation of EIA report for Rammam HEPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW) was submitted to MoEF&CC on 07.07.2020. The proposal was considered in the EAC meeting held on 29.07.2020. MoEF&CC issued Terms of Reference for the Rammam Hydro Power Project, Stage III (3x40 MW) vide F.No. J- 12011/11/2020-IA-I (R) dated 12th February, 2021 (Copy enclosed at Annexure-II) for the preparation of the EIA/EMP report. Pointwise compliance of Additional TOR and Standard TOR along with the Index of Compliance is presented in the Contents Section (C0-15 to C0-49) is enclosed as Annexure-II A. NTPC has appointed M/s. SV Enviro Labs & Consultants, Visakhapatnam for carrying out this Environmental Impact Assessment study for Rammam HEPP as per the EIA Notification, 2006 and MOEF&CC TOR. SV Enviro Labs & Consultants has accreditated by NABET, Quality Council of India, New Delhi for carrying out EIA studies of various sectors including hydro power projects. Since the project is in advanced stage of construction and more than 50% has been completed, it is exempted from requirement of public hearing as per MoEF&CC Notification S.O. 1247(E) dated 18.03.2021 (Copy enclosed at Annexure-III).

1.5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, SIZE, LOCATION OF THE PROJECT 1.5.1 Nature of the Project The Rammam Stage-III project is a Run of River (ROR) scheme utilizing power potential of Rammam River from elevation EL. 900.0 m to EL. 397.0 m.

1.5.2 Size of the Project The capacity of the project is 120 MW (3x40MW). The total land required for the project is 74.007 Ha of which 66.777 Ha is acquired in West Bengal and the balance 7.3 Ha is acquired in Sikkim.

1.5.3 Location of the Project All the major project components are located in the State of West Bengal except the right abutments of the Barrage structure and a portion of submergence area in Siktam Block of West Sikkim.

1 - 5

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1

RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-6 of 20

1.6 BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change (MOEF&CC) accorded the Environmental Clearance (EC) for Rammam Hydro Electric Power Project (HEPP), Stage-III (3X40 MW), vide letter No. J-12011/42/2007-IA.I dated 17.08.2007 with a validity period of 10 years. Further, MoEF&CC vide its letter dated 13.07.2017, extended the validity of Environmental Clearance (EC) for a further period of 3 years i.e. up to 16.08.2020.

MOEF&CC vide Notification dated 18.01.2021 (Copy enclosed at Annexure-I) has amended the EIA Notification, 2006 and made a provision that period from 01.04.2020 to the 31.03.2021 shall not be considered for the purpose of calculation of the period of validity of prior Environmental Clearance in view of outbreak of Corona Virus (COVID-19) and subsequent lockdowns. In this regard, the Environment Clearance for Rammam HEPP is valid till 16.08.2021.

MoEF&CC has issued Terms of Reference for the Rammam Hydro Power Project, Stage III (3x40 MW) vide F.No. J-12011/11/2020-IA-I (R) dated 12th February, 2021.

1.6.1 Statutory Clearances The construction of the project was started after obtaining all statutory clearances. The details of statutory clearances for the project is as follows: 1. Memorandum of Implementation Agreement with WBSEB signed on 28.04.2005 which is provided as Annexure-IV 2. Techno Economic Clearance (TEC) was accorded by CEA on 12.09.2006 and re-validated on 01.08.2013 which is attached as Annexure-V 3. Inter State Agreement between West Bengal & Sikkim signed on 26.06.2007 which is attached as Annexure-VI 4. NOC obtained from Ministry of Defence on 20.01.2006 which is attached as Annexure-VII 5. EC was accorded by MOEF&CC vide letter No. J-12011/42/2007- IA.I dated 17.08.2007 with a validity period of 10 years which was subsequently extended vide MoEF&CC letter dated 13.07.2017, for a further period of 3 years i.e. up to 16.08.2020 and attached as Annexure-VIII. EC was further extended up to 16.08.2021.

1 - 6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1

RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-7 of 20

6. Wildlife Clearance accorded by Directorate of Forest, GoWB on 01.02.2008 which is attached as Annexure-IX 7. Final Forest Clearance accorded by MOEF&CC on 23.05.2008 which is attached as Annexure-X 8. Consent to Establish are available from West Bengal Pollution Control Board and SPCB, Sikkim which are attached as Annexure-XI 9. MoEF&CC notification S.O. 4254 (E) dated 27.11.2020 Extension of Validity of Environmental Clearance attached as Annexure-XII 10. Investment Approval accorded/ Construction started in September, 2014. Scheduled completion of the project was in September, 2019 and the anticipated completion is by December, 2026. 11. NTPC has already spent Rs. 762.68 Crores out of the total approved project cost of Rs. 1381.84 Crores on the project. Total spent is about 55% of the said approved Project cost.

12. Out of total approved expenditure of Rs. 34.14 crores towards environment & ecology and community development an amount of Rs. 17.48 crores has already been spent.

13. The project site was inspected by Integrated Regional Office, MOEF&CC Kolkata on 23.03.2021 and 24.03.2021. Certified Report No: 102-166/07/EPE dated 06.04.2021 from MoEF&CC, Integrated Regional Office, Kolkata is attached as Annexure-XIII.

1.6.2 Current Status of Work The units are under advance stage of construction and is expected to be commissioned by  Unit I: October, 2026  Unit II: November, 2026  Unit III: December, 2026

The EIA is required for seeking fresh Environmental Clearance (EC) from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC). The progress of construction work is shown in following photographs.

1 - 7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-8 of 20

ADIT – 1 DC -1 GANTRY (ADIT-1)

BARRAGE ADIT – 1

POWER HOUSE SLOPE SWITCH YARD Progress of Construction Work at Rammam HEPP

1 - 8

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-9 of 20

1.7 LOCATION & ACCESSIBILITY Rammam Hydro Power Project, Stage-III (3X40 MW) is located in District Darjeeling (West Bengal) & West Sikkim (Sikkim). It is a Run of the River (ROR) scheme utilizing power potential of Rammam River from elevation EL. 900.0 m to EL. 397.0 m. All the major project components are located in the State of West Bengal except the right abutments of the Barrage structure and a portion of submergence area in Siktam Block of West Sikkim. The Latitude and Longitude of the Diversion Structure and Barrage are given in Table-1.1

Table-1.1 Coordinates of Project Components Project Component Latitude Longitude Diversion Structure 27°06'47" N 88°08'39" E Township 27°07'47" N 88°12'55" E Power House 27°07'25" N 88°13'20" E

The location map and vicinity map of the project is shown in Fig 1.1 and 1.2 respectively. The topographical map with project components superimposed is shown in Fig 1.3

The project is about 50 km from Ghoom (Siliguri-Darjeeling Road) and about 130 km from Siliguri in Darjeeling District of West Bengal. The nearest rail head is New Jalpaiguri (at about 115 km) and the nearest airport is (at about 110 km).

1 - 9

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-10 of 20

Fig 1.1 Location map

1 - 10

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-11 of 20

Fig 1.2 Vicinity Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW)

1 - 11

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE - III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-12 of 20

Fig 1.3 Topo Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW)

1 - 12

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-13 of 20

1.8 NEED FOR THE PROJECT & ITS IMPORTANCE TO THE COUNTRY AND REGION Power development is one of the key infrastructural elements for the economic growth of the country. The power system operation stability requires the system to minimize fluctuations between demand and supply. In the recent years, India’s energy consumption has been increasing at fast rates in the world due to population growth and economic development. As per the CEA Annual Report 2019, the projected Peak Demand is 226 GW and Energy requirement is 1,566 BU at the end of year 2021-22. By 2021-22, the Renewable Energy capacity target has been set to 175 GW. The Renewable Energy Generation will contribute about 20.1 % of the total energy requirement in 2021-22.

More than 60% of India’s total installed capacity is thermal-based (Table-1.2). However expansion of this energy source is encountering difficulties because of the burden it places on the infrastructure for supply (mines) and transportation (railways) of coal. Hydropower provides a number of ancillary services which are needed in order to manage a transmission system in a way that secures system stability and security of supply. Hydropower brings a strong contribution to flexibility in the power system today filling the gap between supply and demand that has been induced by the non-dispatchable variability of RES.

Table-1.2 All India Installed capacity (in MW) of power stations (As on 31.01.2021) Region Ownership/ Mode wise breakup Grand Sector Thermal Nuclear Hydro RES* Total Coal Gas Diesel Total Northern State 16909.00 2879.20 0.00 19788.20 0.00 5103.75 725.51 25617.46 Region Private 14450.00 558.00 0.00 15008.00 0.00 2613.00 17038.11 34659.11 Central 12540.00 2344.06 0.00 14884.06 1620.00 11516.52 379.00 28399.58 Sub Total 43899.00 5781.26 0.00 49680.26 1620.00 19233.27 18142.62 88676.15 Western State 23400.00 2849.82 0.00 26249.82 0.00 5391.00 565.53 32206.35 Region Private 44296.00 4676.00 0.00 48972.00 0.00 481.00 27296.31 76749.31 Central 18200.00 3280.67 0.00 21480.67 1840.00 1520.00 666.30 25506.97 Sub Total 85896.00 10806.49 0.00 96702.49 1840.00 7392.00 28528.14 134462.63 Southern State 19052.50 791.98 159.96 20004.44 0.00 11694.50 586.88 32285.82 Region Private 9590.00 5340.24 273.70 15203.94 0.00 0.00 42767.76 57971.71 Central 12390.00 359.58 0.00 12749.58 3320.00 0.00 541.90 16611.48 Sub Total 41032.50 6491.80 433.66 47957.96 3320.00 11694.50 43896.54 106869.00 Eastern State 7450.00 100.00 40.05 7590.05 0.00 4458.25 280.36 12328.66

1 - 13

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-14 of 20

Region Private 7667.00 0.00 0.00 7667.00 0.00 399.00 1318.81 9384.81 Central 19710.00 0.00 0.00 19710.00 0.00 1005.20 15.10 20730.30 Sub Total 34827.00 100.00 40.05 34967.05 0.00 5862.45 1614.27 42443.77 North State 0.00 498.85 36.00 534.85 0.00 422.00 233.25 1190.10 Eastern Private 0.00 24.50 0.00 24.50 0.00 0.00 105.92 130.42 Region Central 750.00 1253.60 0.00 2003.60 0.00 1455.00 30.00 3488.60 Sub Total 750.00 1776.95 36.00 2562.95 0.00 1877.00 369.17 4809.12 ALL State 66811.50 7119.85 236.01 74167.36 0.00 27069.50 2391.52 103628.39 INDIA Private 76003.00 10598.74 273.70 86875.45 0.00 3493.00 88526.91 178895.36 Central 63590.00 7237.91 0.00 70827.91 6780.00 15496.72 1632.30 94736.93 Sub Total 206404.50 24956.51 509.71 121870.72 6780.00 16059.22 92550.74 377260.67 Source: Central Electricity Authority *RES-Renewable Energy Sources

1.8.1 Demand Supply Gap The demand supply scenario has been analyzed in the following sections to establish the techno-economic feasibility of the project. The anticipated power demand supply position of All India, Eastern Region and West Bengal with and without the benefits of subject project has been worked out considering the following: 1. The demand as per 19th EPS. 2. The benefit of Power from Private Sector Projects is considered only to the state in which the Project is located. 3. The project is in advanced stage of construction and its all three units (Unit 1, 2 & 3) are expected to be commissioned by December 2026. 4. The All India Demand-Supply scenarious by 2026-27 was given in Table-1.3 and the Eastern Region Demand-Supply Scenarios by 2026-27 was given in Table- 1.4. Table-1.3 All India Demand-Supply Scenarios by 2026-27 Description Units 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Peak Load MW 238899 25228 266844 282418 298774 Energy MKWH 1650594 173961 1836001 1939111 2047434

Table-1.4 Eastern Region Demand-Supply Scenarios by 2026-27 Description Units 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Peak Load MW 29428 30879 32401 33998 35674 Energy MKWH 179613 188410 197636 207315 217468

1 - 14

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-15 of 20

Although, the proportion of Hydro Electric Power (13.84%) in terms of installed Capacity (MW) at Eastern Region (ER) is close to the national average of 12.33%, but the proportion of Hydro + Renewable Energy source (RES) at ER is only 17.42% in comparison to the national average of 35.92% (Country wide installed capacity dated 31.05.20 has been considered). As the scope of installation of Wind Power or Solar PV generating stations, the main two components of RES in India are less in ER, hence in ER, emphasis should be put on installing medium to small hydro power generating units for enriching the proportion of green energy.

As per National Electricity Plan (NEP), 2018, Capacity addition in between 2017-22 in Hydro Power Sector in ER is limited to only one project, i.e. Rammam HPP, Stage- III (3x40 MW) by NTPC.

Ministry of Power has given following allocation: S.No. State Share in installed Equivalent quantum in capacity (%) installed capacity (MW) 1. West Bengal 73 87.6 2. Sikkim 12 14.4 3. Unallocated 15 18 Total 100 120

As per the interstate agreement between Sikkim & West Bengal, the share of power of the Sikkim Government (12%) will be made available to the Sikkim Government at free of cost. The Rammam Stage-III Hydro Electric Power Project would not only meet the power requirements, but would also improve the ratio of hydro, thermal mix as well.

1.9 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK The emerging environmental scenario calls for requisite attention on conservation and proper use of natural resources and also development without destruction. There is a need of integrate the environmental consequences of the development activities and to planning suitable mitigation measures in order to ensure sustainable development in the region. The environmental consideration in any development process have become a necessity for achieving sustainable developmental to achieve these goals,

1 - 15

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-16 of 20

the Ministry of Environment & Forest, Govt. of India has enacted Acts, Legislations, Guidelines and Standards from time to time.

The regulation of environment acts, legislation, guidelines and standards is the responsibility of different government agencies. The principle environmental regulatory agency in India in the Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, New Delhi. MoEF&CC formulates environmental policies and accords environmental clearances for different projects. The important environmental legislations in India are given in Table-1.5. Table-1.5 Key Environmental Legislations pertaining to Hydro projects Scope and Operational Name Key Areas Objective Agencies/Key Play Water (Prevention To provide for the Control sewage and Central and State and Control of prevention and industrial effluent Pollution Control Pollution) Act, control of water discharges Boards 1974, 1988 pollution and enhancing the quality of water Air (Prevention and To provide for the Controls emission of Central and State Control of Pollution) prevention and air pollutants Pollution Control Act, 1981, 1987 control of air Board pollution Forest To consolidate Regulates access to State Government and (Conservation) Act, acquisition of natural resources, Central Government 1980 common property state has a monopoly such as forest, halt right over land, India’s rapid categories forests, deforestation and restriction on de- resulting reservation and environmental using forest for non degradation forest purpose Wildlife (Protection) To protect wildlife Creates protected Wildlife Advisory Act, 1972 areas (national parks Boards, Central zoo / sanctuaries) Authorities categories of wildlife which are protected Environment To provide for the An umbrella Central government

1 - 16

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-17 of 20

(Protection) Act, protection and legislation, nodal agency, 1986 improvement of supplements MoEF&CC can environment pollution laws delegate to state departments of environment National Policy on Resettlement and Social issues Central and State R & R, 2007 and rehabilitation of Government Rehabilitation and project affected Resettlement Act, people 2013”. EIA Notification Environment Impact Environmental Project Development, 14th September 2006 Assessment Protection State and Central Government

1.10 SCOPE OF THE STUDY The scope of the EIA study considers the impact due to setting up Rammam Satge-III Hydro Electric Project (ROR) of 3x40 MW capacity in Darjeeling district of West Bengal and West Sikkim district of Sikkim on physical, biological and socioeconomic environment of the surrounding areas in compliance to the approved ToR provided by MoEF&CC. The scope of the EIA study includes the following:  To establish the prevailing environmental and socio-economic condition of the study area;  To assess environmental and socioeconomic impacts arising out of the proposed activities;  To recommend appropriate preventive and mitigation measures to eliminate or minimize pollution;  To identify and propose management plans in terms of good practices that may help in abating environmental or socio-economic impacts due to the project;  To prepare a Disaster Management Plan (DMP), Catchment Area Treatment (CAT) Plan and Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan.

The study area for the EIA study shall be as under:  Submergence area

1 - 17

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-18 of 20

• Area within 10 km of periphery of submergence area & other project appurtenances viz. Barrage, Power House, Muck Disposal etc. and

As per the approved Terms of Reference, one season baseline data has been collected for all environmental attributes including biological environment for the preparation of the EIA/EMP report. Environmental baseline monitoring was carried out during July’ 2020 to September’ 2020 representing monsoon season and used to identify potential significant impacts.

1.11 ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS IN THE STUDY AREA Collection of base line data is an integral aspect of the preparation of Environmental Impact Assessment report. Baseline data reflects the present scenario of Environment before the initiation of any activity of the project. The possible effects due to the project are estimated and superimposed on the compiled baseline data subsequently to assess Environmental impacts.

Project environment assessment was conducted in the study area during July’ 2020 to September’ 2020. Studies were under taken to generate base line data of the following:- 1. Geology 2. Hydrology 3. Meterology 4. Ambient Air Quality 5. Water Quality – Ground Water & Surface Water 6. Ambient Noise Quality 7. Soil Quality 8. Ecology 9. Land Use / Land Cover 10. Socio-Economy.

1.12 GENERIC STRUCTURE OF EIA DOCUMENT In terms of the EIA notification of MoEF&CC dated 14th September 2006 and its subsequent amendments, the generic structure of the EIA document is as follows:

1 - 18 Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-19 of 20

Chapter – I: Introduction The chapter gives an overview of the project details, identification of project & project proponent, nature, size and location of the project, purpose of the study, need for the project and its importance to country and region, policy, legal and administrative framework, scope and methodology adopted for EIA study.

Chapter – II: Project Description The chapter narrates the project background, size or magnitude of the operation, salient features of the project, project description, infrastructure requirements and associated facilities, project colonies/buildings and project schedule and cost estimate.

Chapter – III: Environmental Baseline Study The chapter covers identification of the study area and baseline study of the physico- chemical and biological environmental condition of the study area. The rationale is to evaluate the key environmental parameters of the project area before its actual implementation. The planning of baseline survey emanated from short listing of impacts assessed during identification. The baseline study involved both review of secondary data and generation of primary data through field studies.

Chapter – IV: Impact Assessment & Mitigation Measures The chapter assesses the anticipated impacts (positive and negative) arising during various phases of the project. Prediction is essentially a process to forecast the future environmental conditions of the project area that may occur as a result of the project activities. An attempt has been made to predict future environmental conditions quantitatively on the present and possible scenario. Based on the anticipated impacts, the mitigation measures have been suggested.

Chapter – V: Analysis of alternatives (Technology and site) The chapter provides the alternate location and technology analyzed for various parameters in the project.

1 - 19

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C1-20 of 20

Chapter – VI: Environmental Monitoring Programme Environmental Monitoring Programme to ensure effectiveness of the environmental management plan during various phases of project advancement and health, safety and environmental management cell is briefed in this chapter.

Chapter – VII: Additional Studies The Chapter depicts the Public Hearing outcomes and identifies the risks associated with the project, CAT Plan, and Disaster Management Plan to be implemented in the event of an emergency.

Chapter – VIII: Project Benefits The Chapter discusses the overall benefits which will accrue after implementation of the project to cover power demand of central and state governments, employment generation and overall economic development.

Chapter – IX: Environmental Cost Benefit Analysis The chapter covers details of cost and Benefits related to Rammam HEPP.

Chapter – X: Environmental Management Plan The chapter details the Environment Management Plan (EMP) to maximize the positive environmental impacts and to minimize the negative ones.

Chapter – XI: Summary & Conclusion

This chapter provide the summary of EIA study and gives conclusions & recomondations for appraisal of EC.

Chapter – XII: Disclosure of Consultants engaged

This chapter describe the accreditation of EIA Consultant and associated expert in EIA Study.

1 - 20

CHAPTER – II

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-1 of 21

CHAPTER-2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.0 GENERAL Rammam HEPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW) is a Run of the River (ROR) Scheme Project located on Rammam River ( basin), which flows along the border of West Bengal and Sikkim at about 130 km from Siliguri on Siliguri-Darjeeling Road in District Darjeeling of West Bengal.

The site for diversion structure is located downstream at the confluence of Rammam with Lodhama khola near Lodhama village just downstream of the power house of Rammam Stage-II HEPP (51 MW under operation by WBSEB). The site for powerhouse is located near village Barbatia on the right bank of River Rammam.

2.1 LOCATION OF PROJECT Rammam Stage-III H.E Project is a Run of the River (ROR) scheme utilizing power potential of Rammam River from elevation 900 m to 397 m, in the District of Darjeeling, West Bengal with an installed capacity of 120 MW (3x40 MW). All the major project components are located in the State of West Bengal except the right abutments of the Barrage structure and a portion of submergence area in Siktam Block of West Sikkim.

Location of the project components on 1:50,000 scale toposheet is presented in Fig. 2.1.

The location of the project on google map is shown in Fig 2.2.

The location of the project with respect to National Park, Wildlife Sanctuary and their eco-sensitive zones is shown in Fig 2.3.

2 - 1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-2 of 21

Fig 2.1: Topo Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW)

2 - 2

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-3 of 21

Justification of location & execution of the project in relation to structural components (Barrage height)

As the project is a Run of River project, a barrage is being constructed in place of Dam. The barrage height (23 m) has kept considering the location and structure component of project. Details of structural components of Rammam HEPP project are given in Table: 2.1.

The project is in advanced stage of construction after Techno-economic Clearance by CEA and Environmental Clearance by MOEF&CC. As per Detailed Project Report (DPR), the location for execution of the project was found feasible.

None of the project components are located within National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuary or other protected area or within the notified Eco sensitive zones of these protected area. As confirmed by CCF (WL), West Bengal vide letter dated 01.02.2008 copy attached as Annexure-XIV, the project area is at a distance of about 7.1 km from the nearest boundary of Eco-sensitive Zone of Singalila National Park. However, the Singalila National Park is about 9.0 km from the project components as notified by MOEF&CC notification No. S.O. 3613 (E) dated 16.11.2017 (copy enclosed as Annexure-XV). The Eco Sensitive Zone of Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary is at 4.2 km from the project site and 4.4 km away from boundary of Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary, West Sikkim notified by MOEF&CC notification No.S.O.2172 (E) dated 27.08.2014 (copy enclosed as Annexure-XVI) and about 10 km from the nearest boundary of the reserve forest area of Darjeeling Territorial Forest Division.

2.2 SIZE OR MAGNITUDE OF OPERATION The capacity of the project would be 120 MW with installation of 3 units of 40MW each. Township with adequate nos. quarters/facilities/infrastructure shall be constructed to accommodate staffs of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III. . Project Area: 74.077 Ha (excluding submergence area) . Submergence area: 3.852 Ha. . Catchment Area: 5273 Ha (WB side: 3808 Ha + Sikkim side: 1465 Ha)

2 - 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-4 of 21

Fig 2.2 Location Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III

2 - 4

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-5 of 21

Fig 2.3 Location Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III w.r.t. NP/ WLS & their Eco-sensitive Zones

2 - 5

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-6 of 21

2.3 SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT The project consists of 23 m high Barrage (above u/s apron level) 122.5m long Barrage near Lodhama Village and approximately 10.75km of water conductor system (8.2 km long 3.5m dia horse shoe shape head race tunnel, 1.6 km long Penstock and 0.74 km long tailrace channel etc.). It has also a 14.5 m dia 53.75m high surge shaft and a deep seated surface power house near Barbatia village on right bank of the Rammam River.

The project is envisaged to use water from catchment area of 247sq. km. The Full Reservoir Level (FRL) of the pondage behind the Barrage structure has been fixed at EL903m with a view to provide sufficient storage capacity above Minimum Draw Down Level to provide optimum peaking operation of more than 2 hours at a time. The Minimum Draw Down Level (MDDL) is fixed at EL 892m. The storage at FRL is 0.27MCM and at MDDL is 0.05MCM.

Storages between FRL and MDDL is 0.22 MCM. About 476 MU will be generated using 28.31 cumec of discharge excluding a 4.69 cumec of water to flush silt and 1 cumec of water as environmental flow. Upstream of Rammam Stage-III is 51 MW Rammam Stage-II project and on the downstream there is no project on the Rammam River till its confluence with Rangit River.

However at present during the construction stage, no impounding/ stoppage of river water flow is being done. The river has been diverted through diversion channel to facilitate the construction of Barrage. The salient features of the project are given in Table 2.1 Table-2.1 Salient Features of Rammam Stage-III Hydroelectric Project 1 LOCATION a) State West Bengal b) District Darjeeling c) Latitude & Longitude Diversion Structure: 27°06'47" N, 88°08'39" E Township: 27°07'47" N, 88°12'55" E Power House: 27°07'25" N, 88°13'20" E d) Nearest rail head New Jalpaiguri (115 KM) e) Nearest Airport Bagdogra (110 KM) 2 - 6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-7 of 21

f) Approach/Access Road 50 Km From Ghoom (Siliguri- Darjeeling Road), 130 KM From Siliguri g) Name of the River, Tributary Rammam h) Name of River basin Teesta Basin 2 HYDROLOGY AND CLIMATE a) Catchment Area up to head works 247 sq.km b) Average Annual Yield 686.56 MCM c) Maximum/Minimum Yield 1040.37 / 485.65 MCM d) Average annual rainfall 2800 mm e) Design Flood 1825 cumecs f) Ninety percent available discharge 15.43 cumecs g) Max. temperature 30o C h) Min. temperature 3o C i) Max. relative humidity 100% j) Design discharge for barrage/dam 1825 cumecs 3 BARRAGE/DAM a) Length of Barrage 122.5 m b) Height of Barrage 23 m (above u/s apron level) c) Number of gated bays 5 d) Type of gate Radial Gate (operated by hydraulic hoists) e) Crest elevation 884.00 m (4bays)/882.00 m (1bay) f) Width of the top roadway 6.5 m

4 RESERVOIR a) Full Reservoir Level (FRL) 903.00 m b) Maximum Drawdown Level (MDDL) 892.00 m 5 INTAKE a) No of Intake 2 b) Design discharge of Intake 33.0 m3/sec d) Center line of Intake EL 887.50 m e) Nos. and size of Gates 2 (2.60 m x 2.850 m) each f) Type of Gates Fixed Wheel g) Intake Bulk Head Gate 1 No. 2.60 x 2.85 m fixed wheel type 6 DESILTING CHAMBER (Underground) a) Numbers 2 b) Size 140.0 x 7.50 x 12.55m c) Top level of trough EL. 876.85 m d) Bottom Level of Conduits EL. 875.85 m e) Design discharge 33.0 cumec f) Discharge (for flushing) 4.69cumec (for both SFT) g) Particle size to be removed 0.2 mm & above h) Efficiency of removal 90 % 7 HEAD RACE TUNNEL a) Alignment Right bank b) Length 8200 m

2 - 7

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-8 of 21

c) Shape &Diameter Horseshoe & 3.5 m diameter d) Design discharge 28.31 m3/sec. e) Velocity 1.93m/sec. f) Number of adits 3 8 SURGE SHAFT a) Type Restricted orifice type b) Dia (m) 14.50 c) Height (m) 53.75 m d) Top Elevation (m) 923.0 e) Bottom Elevation (m) 869.25 9 PRESSURE SHAFT / PENSTOCK a) Type Circular b) Number of Pressure Shafts / One Penstocks c) Maximum discharge through pressure 28.31 cumecs shaft / penstocks (cumecs) d) Dia. Of each pressure shaft / penstock 2.7 m e) Maximum Velocity 4.9 m / sec f) Length of pressure shaft / penstock 1526 m g) Penstock valve (type &dia) , 2.5 m dia 10 POWER HOUSE a) Type Deep Seated Surface Power House b) Location Near village Barbatia in West Bengal c) Number of units 3 Size of Power House 73.50 m x 22.40 m x 41.60 m d) Rated unit capacity 40 MW e) Installed capacity 120 MW f) Max. Gross Head 495.33 m g) Rated Head (m) 484.33 m h) Type of turbine Vertical shaft pelton i) Maximum flow through each unit 9.33 cumec j) Generator - Type Synchronous, Vertical Shaft - Power factor, generator voltage 0.9, 11.0 kV - Speed 428.6 rpm k) Size of machine hall 65.0 x 19 x 35m l) Transformers – Type, Nos., No. of Single phase, 11 Nos., 16 mVA, Phases, step – up voltage capacity 11/132/ √3 kV m) Power House Cranes - Nos. and Capacity (Ton) 1 EOT Crane with 125 T main hook & 25 T auxiliary hook 11 TAIL RACE CHANNEL a) Size 4m x 3m, Rectangular Section b) Length 740 m c) Tail Water Level 397.0 m (max.)

2 - 8

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-9 of 21

12 SWITCHYARD a) Type of Switchyard Conventional b) Number of bays in the switchyard 9 c) Voltage Level 132 kV d) Location Outdoor 13 ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY Singalila National Park None of the project components are within the Eco-sensitive zone of Singlila National Park notified by MOEF&CC notification No. S.O. 3613 (E) dated 16.11.2017 (copy enclosed as Annexure-XV). The nearest boundary of Singalila National Park Eco-Sensitive Zone is located at about 7.1 km from the Rammam Stage-III HEPP. However, the Singalila National Park is about 9.0 km from the project components. Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary, West None of the project components are Sikkim within the Eco-sensitive zone of Barsey Rhododendron wild life Sanctuary notified by MOEF&CC notification No.S.O.2172 (E) dated 27.08.2014 (copy enclosed as Annexure-XVI). The nearest boundary of Barsey Rhododendron Wildlife Sanctuary Eco-sensitive Zone is about 4.2 km from the Rammam Stage-III HEPP. However, the Barsey Rhododendron Wildlife Sanctuary is about 4.4 km from the project components. 14 R & R  275 families have lost only land.  61 families have lost land as well as homesteads.  11 families have lost only homesteads. 15 TARIFF (As per Investment approval) Levellised Rs. 6.51 kWhr First years Rs. 7.88 kWhr 16 PROJECT COST Total Cost of the Project  As per EC: Rs. 633.92 Crores  As per Inv. Approval: Rs. 1,381.84 Crores (2ndQtr, 2014)

2 - 9 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-10 of 21

2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is envisaged to harness the hydropower potential of River Rammam. The project comprises of diversion arrangement, desilting chamber, water conveyance system, power house and tailrace. Installed capacity of the project will be 120 MW and will utilize a design discharge of 28.31 cumecs.

The project comprises of the following components: . Barrage/dam as a diversion structure . Intake tunnel . Underground desilting chamber . HRT (Head Race Tunnel) . Surge Shaft . Surface Penstock . Vertical Pressure Shaft . Power House . Tail Race Channel (TRC) The layout Map of the project component is shown in Fig 2.4A & General Layout Plan is shown in Fig 2.4B. The above referred project appurtenances are briefly described in the following sections:

2.4.1 Diversion structure It is planned to construct a barrage with its axis about 200 m downstream of confluence of Rammam River with Lodhama Khola. The barrage/dam has been designed to have optimum pondage and capacity so as to safely pass a designed flood of 1825 cumecs which correspond to Standard Project Flood (SPF) of the Rammam River. It is proposed to provide surge shaft, hence, storage for diurnal peaking has been made in the barrage only. The average bed level at barrage/dam site is 883.0 m and maximum pond level for the barrage/dam has been kept at 903.0 m considering the out fall level of Rammam Stage-II (EL 908.00 m). Storage between Maximum Pond Level (EL 903.0) and Minimum Draw Down Level (EL 892.0) is 220,000.0 cum.

2 - 10

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-11 of 21

Fig 2.4 A: Layout Map of Project Component

2 - 11

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-12 of 21

Fig 2.4 B: General Layout Plan of Project

2 - 12

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-13 of 21

The barrage is planned with three piers each of 4 m width and two abutments each of size 2.75 m and the floor of the Barrage/dam has been designed as raft. Since barrage/dam width is less than River width, it is proposed to construct flank wall through in filled cellular wall. To prevent the seepage through foundation two rows of grout curtain have been proposed. The grout curtain is proposed to be extended at least 1.0 m in the fresh rock, which will provide a barrier for seepage below barrage/dam foundation.

2.4.2 Intake and Intake Tunnel Two intakes have been proposed on the right bank of the River at about 40 m upstream of the barrage/dam axis to enable withdrawal of 32 cumecs of water. The intake sizes have been fixed in such a way that the entry velocity through trash racks is less than 1.0 m/sec. Two D -shaped intake tunnels of size 2.85 m have been proposed to feed desilting chamber independently. As the geographical conditions of rock on the right bank are quite competent and steep, placing of intake will not need much stabilization measures. For preventing the entry of trash in the intake, trash rack of adequate size has been provided.

2.4.3 Desilting Chamber Considering the stability problem of hill slope and associated land acquisition etc. an underground desilting chamber has been constructed in the project. Two underground desilting chambers each of size 140.0 m x 7.5 m x 12.55 m is provided for collecting the settled silt particle, which passes through a duct of size 0.75 m x 1.0 m for flushing the settled silt particle. Combined silt flushing duct of size 2.0 m x 2.5 m will be provided for disposing the settled silt back in the Rammam River. The total length of silt flushing tunnel is 230 m.

2.4.4 Head Race Tunnel (HRT) A horse shoe-shaped HRT with 3.5 m as finished diameter has been proposed with a capacity to convey 28.31 cumecs from desilting chamber to surge shaft. The length of HRT will be 8200m. For ease in construction, three adits of length 100m, 800m & 90m each have been proposed.

2 - 13

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-14 of 21

2.4.5 Surge Shaft Restricted orifice type, surge shaft of 14.5 m diameter is proposed to take care of rise in water level due to surge created because of sudden change in operating conditions.

2.4.6 Pressure Shaft For conveying the water from surge tank to power house, combination of surface penstock and pressure shaft has been proposed. Optimum penstock diameter has been finalized as 2.7 m. Initial 175 m penstock passes through tunnel, a surface valve house is proposed. Subsequently 1211 m length of penstock runs on surface and considering the topography and deep seated power house, last 140 meter has been proposed as vertical and horizontal pressure shaft.

2.4.7 Power House Surface power house of 120 MW (3 x 40 MW) is at the right bank of the Rammam River, 50.0 m upstream of the confluence of the Ramsu Khola with Rammam River. It houses three units of Pelton turbine having center line at EL 400.0 m.

2.4.8 Tail Race Channel Tail Race Channel (TRC) of 4.0 m x 3.0 m is planned from power house to 707 m downstream of power house. For protection against flood of intensity greater than 1 in 100 years, gated arrangement is proposed at the outfall structure. TRC will be a concrete cut and cover section.

2.4.9 Hydro-Mechanical Works The following are the hydro mechanical works: i. Two sets of fixed type trash racks ii. Four Nos. Radial gates, (3 nos-8 x 6m and 1 no-8 x 14m) operated with Hydraulic hoist. iii. One set of stop logs operated with gantry crane and lifting beam. iv. Two Nos. of Intake gates operated with rope drum hoist supported on trestles. v. One No. of Intake Bulk head gate operated with gantry crane. vi. Two Nos. of desilting chamber gates operated with rope drum hoist. vii. Two Nos. of silt flushing gates operated with hydraulic hoist. viii. One No. surge shaft gate operated with rope drum hoist.

2 - 14

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-15 of 21

ix. One No. Tail race gate operated with mono rail crane. x. One No. tail race outfall gate at out fall operated with rope drum hoist supported on trestle.

2.4.10 Minimum Flow in the River downstream of the barrage: Environmental clearance for the projects was been accorded with a condition that

iv) A minimum flow of 1 cumec shall always be released from the barrage. The minimum flow to be released is about 22% of the minimum flow of 4.47 cumec recorded in the river

The project has been designed accordingly. However, the standard TOR condition stipulates that the minimum environmental flow shall be 20% of the flow of four consecutive lean months of 90% dependable year, 30% of the average monsoon flow. The flow for remaining months shall be in between 20-30%, depending on the site specific requirements.

The change in minimum flow as per Standard TOR at this stage shall drastically reduce the power generation from the project and render the project commercially unviable.

The issue of minimum flow in the rivers downstream of the hydro power projects has been a subject of study and deliberations at different levels.

(a) National Green Tribunal in its Order dated 09/08/2017 in the matter of Pushp Saini Vs. Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change & Others regarding environmental flow of the rivers directed that all the rivers in the country shall maintain minimum 15 % to 20% of the average lean season flow of that river. During the same case, counsel appearing for Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change submitted that the Ministry has already completed river basin study of 6 river basins i.e. Siang River Basin, Twang River Basin, Bichom River Basin, Subansiri River Basin, Dibang River Basin and Lohit River Basin and upon study the Ministry has recommended the minimum flow of the river to be 18% of the average of lean

2 - 15 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-16 of 21

season flow of the river. However, in some of the cases, it has stated to be even 20%.

(b) Further, MOEF&CC has also undertaken a Cumulative Impact Assessment and Carrying Capacity Study (CIA & CCS) of Teesta River Basin. The minutes of EAC (Hydro) meeting held on 23.04.2019, during which a presentation was made on the CIA and CCS Study, it was noted that Rammam-II & Rammam-III are under operation and construction stage respectively. However, for Rammam-I and Rammam Intermediate HEP Environmental Flows have been recommended as per the following Norms:

Monsoon 30% of average Discharge of monsoon season for 90% Season Dependable Year

Non Monsoon 25% of average Discharge of Non-Monsoon Lean season Non Lean for 90% Dependable Year Season

Lean Season 20% of average Discharge of lean season for 90% Dependable Year

In view of the above, NTPC Rammam HEPP will maintain the minimum Environmental flow of 1 cumecs as stipulated in the original environmental clearance.

2.5 LAND REQUIREMENT The total land required for the project is 74.077 Ha of which 66.777 Ha is acquired in West Bengal and the balance 7.3 Ha is acquired in Sikkim. Details of Land Acquisition for Rammam HEPP, Stage-III given in Table 2.2  Total Govt. & Pvt. Land Acquired - 72.150 Ha.  Total Forest Land Diverted - 1.927 Ha.  Grand Total: 74.077 Ha

2 - 16

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-17 of 21

Table-2.2 Details of land acquired Description of Land Acquired Acres Hectares Government Land 25.561 10.344 Private Land 152.725 61.806 Diverted Forest Land (ROU) 4.761 1.927 Total Land 183.047 74.077

Entire land for the project has been acquired and is in physical possession of NTPC. The land use has been permanently changed to industrial use due to construction of Barrage Complex & Power House Complex including Approach Road, Muck Disposal Area, Storage Facilities and Camps etc.

Entire land for the project has already been acquired earlier and the PAPs have been compensated. However, the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 were not applicable at that time.

On time settlement for R&R package to affected PAPs has been agreed during VDAC meeting as per R&R policy. Total of Rs. 3.58 Crores disbursed as per R&R policy till 31.03.2021.

2.6 INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES 2.6.1 Access Roads The project is about 50 km from Ghoom (Siliguri-Darjeeling Road). Transportation of heavy machines and equipment’s is required for construction of various components of the project. The total length of road constructed is 29 km and details given in Table-2.3. The road construction works done by NTPC is depicted in Fig 2.5 below

2 - 17 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-18 of 21

Table-2.3 Length of Project Roads Location Length (km) Location Remark Barrage/dam 4 Right bank of Rammam 3.7 Km length under complex (Lodhama Bridge-Adit1-Adit2) construction Jhepi Adit 11 Along right bank of Jhepi khola crossing Power house 2.7 Along right and left bank of 2.0 Km Constructed complex River Rammam Surge shaft 11.3 Road from power house to surge 6KM Constructed, complex shaft WBM & protection measures under progress Total 29 11.7 km constructed

KHARYA KHOLA BRIDGE (PUL BAZAR) ROAD FROM POWER HOUSE TO NEJI VIA KHOPRAIL

Fig 2.5 Road Construction Work by NTPC Rammam HEPP

2 - 18

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-19 of 21

2.6.2 Construction Materials and Equipment Cement, Steel and Aggregates are the main raw materials required for construction of project components. The aggregates can be easily obtained from nearby feasible locations, which are acquired by the NTPC Rammam site. The lists of major equipment being used during construction phase are:  Dozer  Dumpers  Loaders  Transit mixers  Drill jumbos  Rock bolting machine  Compressors  Drilling machines  DG sets  Pneumatic concrete placers  Concrete pumps  Ventilation equipment  Batching plant  Grouting, Guniting and Shotcreting equipment  Crushers, screening plant and rod mill

Mechanized construction has been adopted for almost all types of construction activities so as to achieve consistent quality at a faster progress rate. Special attention has been paid to the equipment planning for the underground works since the large quantities involved and restricted work space coupled with geological constraints and interdependence of various construction activities make this work very critical.

The sequencing of construction activities, wherever possible, has been attempted in such a way that equipment from one activity, on its completion can be shifted to the other. This way, the total requirement of equipment at a time would be reduced and also, sufficient utilization of equipment on the project would be ensured.

2 - 19

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-20 of 21

2.6.3 Project Township/Colonies The area possesses moderate level of infrastructural facilities. The township being constructed near Barbatia village shall be permanent residence for the project. About 100 number of employees, supporting staff and CISF Staff will be residing at site during operation phase of the project. NTPC has developed prefabricated bachelor and office accommodation and other non-residential buildings for staff of NTPC, CISF, Support Staff, etc. are under different stages of construction. The project township view in shown in Fig 2.6 below

Fig 2.6 Project Township View

2.6.4 Water & Power Requirement Water requirement from Rammam River is being met for the construction and other activity. During operation phase, project will utilize the water from flow of River. The domestic water requirement is about 50 m3/day. Water supply to the colony will be met through pumping from Rammam River to treatment plant at EL 475 meters, and piping network through gravity. Construction Power required for operating the construction machineries during the construction phase, is being met from West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (WBSEDCL) and by DG set.

2.6.5 Muck generation & disposal Muck of 0.99 Mm3 is expected to be generated from construction of project. Out of which 0.40 Mm3 is being utilized as construction material. At the present the dumping sites are already identified for muck disposal. The balance 0.59 Mm3 muck will be

2 - 20 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C2-21 of 21

disposed at designated/identified site in a planned manner so that it takes a least possible space and is not hazardous to the environment.

2.7 MANPOWER REQUIREMENT The estimated no. of employees during operation phase of the project is estimated to be about 50. Considering the staff of CISF and support services, it is estimated that about 100 families will reside in the project township during operation stage. However, during construction stage, the number of workers are much higher (about 1000). Temporary labour colonies with amenities like water supply and sanitation facilities including biodigester has been developed for the construction phase. Total capacity of Biodigester being installed is 98 KL, cost of supply & installation is Rs 70 Lakhs.

2.8 PROJECT SCHEDULE & COST ESTIMATES The project is in advance stage of construction and anticipated completion of its all three units (i.e. I, II & III) is by December 2026. Total Cost of the Project is: o As per EC: Rs. 633.92 Crores o As per Inv. Approval: Rs. 1,381.84 Crores (2nd Qtr, 2014)

2 - 21

CHAPTER – III DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-1 of 219

CHAPTER-3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT

3.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the existing environmental and socio-economic baseline for the project and its surrounding area. Baseline data establishes the present status of the environment identifies the sensitive receptors in the study area and provides the basis for assessment of the impacts due to the project, and enabling the development of a robust and comprehensive environmental management and monitoring plan. The baseline quality of various components of the environment, viz. air, noise, water, land, biological, meteorological and socio-economic factors are assessed within the impact zone of 10 km radius around the project site. Secondary data has also been incorporated from authentic sources viz. Govt./Non-Governmental Agencies, Universities, Indian Meteorological Department (IMD), Ground Water Board etc. Various environmental components were monitored and samples analyzed. The main purpose & objective of the study is:  To delineate the prevailing environmental condition of project/study area as per TOR accorded by MoEF&CC for EIA study.  To understand the project need and environmental characteristics of the area.  To assess the existing environmental quality  To identify environmentally significant factors or sensitive geographical locations.  To generate &/or collect the information of physical-chemical properties of the environment of the project area, which includes data indicating quality & prevailing status of air, water resources, soil fertility, noise, flora & fauna, ecological habitats etc.  To study & generate/prepare the Land Use/Land Cover map, Topographic map, Cartographic Map of 10 km radial area from the site.  To generate &/or collect details regarding climatic condition of project area.

3 - 1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-2 of 219

3.1 STUDY AREA Study area covers 10 km radius from the project site located in Rammam Hydro Electric Power Project (HEPP), Stage III (3x40 MW) in Darjeeling district of West Bengal and West Sikkim District of Sikkim.

3.2 STUDY PERIOD MoEF&CC issued Terms of Reference for the Rammam Hydro Power Project, Stage III (3x40 MW) vide F.No. J-12011/11/2020-IA-I (R) dated 12th February, 2021 for preparation of Environmental Impact Assessment with one season basline data for all the environmental attributes. Environmental baseline monitoring was carried out during July’ 2020 to September’ 2020 representing monsoon season and used to identify potential significant impacts. Primary baseline data has been supplemented with requisite secondary data wherever necessary.

3.3 METHODOLOGY OF EIA STUDY A. Approach & Methodology of Baseline Study The methodology for conducting the baseline environmental survey has been obtained from the guidelines provided in the “Guidance Manual for Environmental Impact Assessment and Clearance of River Valley Projects” issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC).

B. Primary Data Collection: Monitoring Plan and Quality Assurance Procedures The study period and methodology for primary data collection is followed as per the approved ToR accorded by MoEF&CC. Summary of monitoring plan with sampling testing methodology followed is summarised in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 Summary of Methodology for Baseline Data Collection

S. Environmental No. of Duration and frequency of sampling No. Attributes Locations/ and other remarks Area 1. Meteorology Data At one station Meteorology data was collected on an hourly basis for 3 months. 2. Ambient Air Quality 7 Twice a week for 24 hours; for 3 months

3 - 2

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-3 of 219

S. Environmental No. of Duration and frequency of sampling No. Attributes Locations/ and other remarks Area 3 Ambient Noise Levels 7 For 24 hours each in a month; for 1 season 4 Surface Water Quality 6 Once per a month 5 Groundwater Quality 6 Once per a month 6 Soil Quality 10 Once per a month 7 Ecology & Biodiversity Study area Once during the study period 8 Socio-economic Studies Study area Primary consultations were carried out in villages within 10 km radius during study period. List of villages surveyed within 10 km radius is enclosed – Refer Social Baseline for details

3.4 MICRO-METEOROLOGICAL DATA The study area falls under Humid Subtropical zone according to Koppen’s classification of climate zones. Winter and early summer are long and dry; summer is exceedingly hot leading to heat waves. The rainy season lasts from Juneto September.

Historical meteorological data were obtained from climatological tables pertaining to Darjeeling (as the nearest representative IMD station) for the period 1981-2010 and is summarised in Table 3.2. Table 3.2 IMD Climatological data of Period 1981-2010 Month Temperature ºC Mean Relative Rainfall Wind Predominant Humidity (%) mm speed wind Maximum Minimum 8.30AM 05.30PM kmph direction January 10.7 1.5 78 81 13.5 1.7 SW, N February 12.4 2.9 81 78 14.0 2.3 SW March 15.6 5.7 76 75 30.8 3.1 SW April 18.5 8.8 79 78 76.9 3.3 SW May 19.3 10.6 89 88 137.9 3.0 SW June 19.8 12.8 94 93 466 2.6 SW July 19.6 13.4 96 94 656.7 2.2 SW August 20.0 13.4 94 92 528.2 2.2 SW September 19.8 12.4 93 90 379.7 2.0 SW 3 - 3

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-4 of 219

October 19.5 10.5 84 84 59.1 1.7 SW November 17.1 6.3 74 75 14.4 1.6 SW December 14.0 3.8 75 74 2.9 1.5 SW, N (Source-IMD Darjeeling)

3.4.1 Wind Speed and Direction Wind speed is high and found mostly between 1.5 to 3.3 kmph for all the months. The wind speed during summer recorded is high, and during rainy season, and winter recorded low. The predominant wind direction is from Southwest (Fig 3.1).

3.4.2 Temperature: December and January constitutes winter months with daily mean minimum temperature around 1.5oC. With daily mean maximum temperature around 20.0oC. August is the hottest month.

3.4.3 Rainfall The distribution of rainfall in the region, which includes the study area, is regular. Annual total rainfall in the region is 2380 mm. Over 80% of the total annual rainfall is received during the monsoon period between June and September.

3.4.4 Site specific Met data An automatic met station was established at Lodhama village, Darjeeling, West Bengalto collect the site-specific data.The predominant wind direction was from southwest direction. Clam conditions remain 11.44% of the time (Table 3.3).

Table 3.3 Site-specific meteorological data Sl. Parameters July.20 Aug.20 Sep.20 No. 1 Temperature Maximum 21.90 21.10 20.50 0 ( C) Minimum 17.10 16.30 15.70 Average 20.04 19.24 18.70 2 Relative Maximum 84.20 85.50 82.80 Humidity (%) Minimum 55.40 56.70 56.00 Average 68.66 69.96 69.10 3 Wind Speed Maximum 3.80 4.36 4.83 (m/s) Minimum 0.00 0.00 0.00

3 - 4

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-5 of 219

Sl. Parameters July.20 Aug.20 Sep.20 No. Average 0.69 0.81 0.86 4 Wind Direction E 1.61 2.15 1.25 (%) ENE 0.67 1.75 1.67 ESE 0.94 1.48 1.67 N 1.88 0.81 1.81 NE 1.88 2.02 1.11 NNE 1.08 1.75 1.67 NNW 1.08 1.48 2.08 NW 2.02 1.88 1.25 S 8.20 0.40 3.06 SE 1.34 1.61 2.08 SSE 2.96 1.08 1.53 SSW 7.12 5.24 5.56 SW 3.23 9.14 9.03 W 1.34 3.09 3.61 WNW 1.48 1.88 1.39 WSW 1.48 8.06 5.56 CALM 61.69 56.18 55.69

3 - 5

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-6 of 219

Fig 3.1 Wind rose for the period of July 2020 to Sep 2020

3 - 6

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-7 of 219

3.5 AIR ENVIRONMENT 3.5.1 Selection of Sampling Locations: To assess the baseline ambient air quality a scientifically designed ambient air quality monitoring network was established. Air quality monitoring study was carried out during pre-monsoon season (i.e. July’20 to Sep’20) within 10km radius of the project site. The ambient air quality monitoring stations were selected after a brief study based on the following considerations  Meteorological conditions  Topography of the study area  Predominant wind direction  Emission sources  Receptors sensitivity Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations were set up at seven locations with due consideration to the above mentioned points. The locations of the sampling stations are given in the Table 3.5 and the same are shown in the Fig 3.2.

3.5.2 Methodology of Sampling and Analysis Air samples collected were tested for the following parameters

 PM10

 PM2.5

 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)  Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)  Carbon Monoxide (CO)

 Ozone (O3)  Lead (Pb)

 Ammonia (NH3)

 Benzene (C6H6)  Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP)  Arsenic (As)  Nickel (Ni),  Hydro Carbon HC (Methane and Non Methane)  Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)

3 - 7

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-8 of 219

The sampling and analysis of ambient air quality parameters was carried out as per the procedures detailed in relevant parts of IS: 5182 (Indian Standards for Ambient Air Quality Test Methods). The methods used for determining the above mentioned parameters and furnished hereunder in the Table 3.4.

Frequency of Sampling: 24 hourly samples for PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx were collected from each station (Table 3.5), at a frequency of twice a week for the monsoon season

Table 3.4 Techniques and detectable limits for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring S. No. Parameter Technique Technical Protocol Minimum Detectable Limit 1 PM10 (µg/m3) Respirable Dust IS-5182 5.0 g/m3 Sampler (Gravimetric (Part-XXIII) method) 2 PM2.5 (µg/m3) Fine Particulate IS-5182 2.0 g/m3 Sampler (Gravimetric (Part-XXIV) method) 3 3 Sulphur dioxide SO2 Modified West and IS-5182 (Part-II) 4.0 g/m (µg/m3) Gaeke 4 Oxides of Nitrogen Jacob &Hochheiser IS-5182 (Part-VI) 4.0 g/m3 NOx (µg/m3) 5 Carbon Monoxide Non Dispersible Infra- IS:5182 (Part-X) 0.10 mg/m3 (CO) mg/m3 red Spectroscopy (NDIR) 3 3 6 Ozone (O3) µg/m Chemical Method IS:5182 (Part-IX) 10 µg/m

7 Lead (Pb) µg/m3 ICP after sampling on IS:5182 (Part-XXII) 0.06 µg/m3 EPM 2000 or equivalent filter paper 3 8 Ammonia (NH3) Indophenol blue IS:5182 (Part-XXV) 20 µg/m µg/m3 method 3 9 Benzene (C6H6) Gas Chromatography IS:5182 (Part-XI) 2.0 µg/m µg/m3 10 Benzo(a)Pyrene (BaP) Solvent extraction IS:5182 (Part-XII) 0.5 ng/m3 ng/m3 followed by GC 11 Arsenic (As) ng/m3 ICP after sampling on CPCB guidelines 0.44 ng/m3 EPM 2000 or equivalent filter paper 12 Nickel (Ni), ng/m3 ICP after sampling on IS:5182 (Part- 0.6 ng/m3 EPM 2000 or XXVI) equivalent filter paper 3 - 8

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-9 of 219

13 Hydro Carbon (Methane and Non Gas Chromatography IS-5182 (Part-XVII) 0.5 ppm Methane) 14 Volatile Organic GC Method EPA 21 PID 0.5 ppm Compound

Table 3.5 Location of Ambient Air Quality monitoring stations Station Direction Distance from Latitude and Environmental S. No Location Code Project Site (km) Longitude Setting 1 A1 27° 6'48.39"N, Industrial Area Project Site -- Near barrage site 88° 8'38.84"E

2 A2 2.43 km from 27° 6'12.77"N Residential Area SW adit-1 88° 7'19.44"E

3 A3 3.45 km from 27° 8'5.76"N Residential Area Tikpur NW barrage site 88° 7'10.03"E

4 A4 1.03 km from 27° 7'11.68"N Residential Area Salyangdang NE barrge site 88° 9'4.16"E

5 A5 2.90 km from 27° 8'37.74"N Residential Area Tharpu NE township 88°11'26.02"E

6 A6 3.63 km from 27° 8'20.12"N Residential Area Daramdin NE barrage site 88° 9'59.85"E

7 A7 4.39 km from 27° 5'42.67"N Residential Area Namla SW adit-1 88° 6'17.01"E

3 - 9

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-10 of 219

Fig 3.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Location Map

3 - 10

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-11 of 219

Table 3.6 Summary of Ambient Air Quality Analysis

PM10(µg/m3) PM2.5(µg/m3) SO2(µg/m3) NOx(µg/m3) 8 8 9 98 98 98 98 98 98 Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min itoring Locations Locations itoring Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean No of Samples of Samples No percentile percentile percentile percentile percentile percentile percentile percentile Mon

A1 26 54.5 42.3 48.8 54.2 28.1 15.3 21.6 27.6 10.6 8.4 9.5 10.5 11.9 9.3 10.6 11.8

A2 26 48.6 35.6 43.7 48.3 23.5 12.7 17.3 22.6 9.7 7.8 8.8 9.6 10.8 8.3 9.6 10.6

A3 26 52.5 39.6 47.1 52.2 27.3 15.5 20.4 26.2 10.7 8.4 9.6 10.6 12.0 9.3 10.6 11.9

A4 26 66.9 48.5 57.0 65.4 33.0 20.5 27.4 32.6 13.1 9.9 11.7 13.0 14.6 11.7 13.4 14.4

A5 26 55.9 43.7 50.5 55.7 29.8 16.2 22.7 29.1 11.1 8.8 9.9 11.0 12.4 9.7 11.2 12.3

A6 26 53.8 29.0 37.1 47.6 19.5 8.1 12.3 19.0 8.8 6.8 7.5 8.5 9.2 7.2 8.2 9.1

A7 26 63.8 47.7 55.3 62.6 32.4 19.8 26.1 32.1 12.6 9.7 11.3 12.5 13.9 11.0 12.8 13.8

NAAQ 100(µg/m3) 60(µg/m3) 80(µg/m3) 80(µg/m3) Standards

3 - 11

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-12 of 219

3 3 CO(mg/m ) O3(µg/m ) of Samples of Samples 98 98 98 Min Min Min Max Max Max itoring Locations itoring Mean Mean Mean ercentile ercentile No p percentile Mon

A1 26 0.18 0.11 0.13 0.17 32.2 16.2 24.4 31.7

A2 26 0.15 0.10 0.11 0.14 30.2 14.2 22.2 29.7

A3 26 0.18 0.10 0.13 0.17 34.2 18.2 25.9 33.2

A4 26 0.30 0.15 0.22 0.29 44.2 26.2 34.7 43.2

A5 26 0.19 0.11 0.14 0.18 35.2 17.2 26.4 34.2

A6 26 0.14 0.10 0.11 0.13 23.2 9.2 16.5 22.7

A7 26 0.29 0.14 0.2 0.27 42.2 23.2 31.6 40.2

NAAQ Standards 4.0mg/m3 at 1hr 180µg/m3 at 1hr

3 - 12

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-13 of 219

GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IN THE STUDY AREA

98 Percentile of PM10 (µg/m3) 120.0 A1 100 100.0 A2

A3 80.0 65.4 62.6 A4 55.7 60.0 54.2 52.2 48.3 47.6 A5

40.0 A6

A7 20.0 Standard 0.0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 Standard

PM2.5 (µg/m3) 70.0 A1 60 60.0 A2

50.0 A3

40.0 A4 32.6 32.1 29.1 A5 30.0 27.6 26.2 22.6 19.0 A6 20.0 A7 10.0 Standard 0.0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 Standard

3 - 13

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-14 of 219

GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IN THE STUDY AREA

SO2 (µg/m3) 90.0 80 80.0 A1 70.0 A2 60.0 A3 50.0 A4 40.0 A5 30.0 A6 20.0 13.0 12.5 A7 10.5 9.6 10.6 11.0 8.5 10.0 Standard 0.0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 Standard

NOx (µg/m3) 90.0 80 80.0 A1 70.0 A2 60.0 A3 50.0 A4 40.0 A5 30.0 A6 20.0 14.4 11.8 11.9 12.3 13.8 A7 10.6 9.1 10.0 Standard 0.0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 Standard

3 - 14

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-15 of 219

GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IN THE STUDY AREA

CO (mg/m3) 4.5 4 4 A1 3.5 A2 3 A3 2.5 A4 2 A5 1.5 A6 1 A7 0.29 0.27 0.5 0.17 0.14 0.17 0.18 0.13 Standard 0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 Standard

O3 (µg/m3) 200.0 180.00 180.0 160.0 A1 140.0 A2 120.0 A3 100.0 A4 80.0 A5 60.0 A6 43.2 40.2 40.0 31.7 29.7 33.2 34.2 A7 22.7 Standard 20.0 0.0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 Standard

3 - 15

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-16 of 219

3.5.3 Summary of Existing Ambient Air Quality On the perusal of above summary of analysis of ambient air quality in the study area it is evident that all monitored values in various locations are well within the specified limits of NAAQS. The results are summarized below:

3 PM10: The highest PM10 concentration 66.9µg/m was observed in the ambient air

was recorded at station A4 while the lowest PM10 concentration was found to be 3 29.0µg/m at A6. All the monitored values of PM10 are well below the specified limit of 100 µg/m3.

3 PM2.5: The highest PM2.5 concentration 33.0µg/m was observed in the ambient air

was recorded at station A4 while the lowest PM2.5 concentration was found to be 3 8.1µg/m at A6. All the monitored values of PM2.5 are well below the specified limit of 60µg/m3.

3 SO2: The highest SO2 concentration 13.1µg/m was observed in the ambient air was 3 recorded at station A4 while the lowest SO2 concentration was found to be 6.8µg/m 3 at A6. All the monitored values of SO2 are well below the specified limit of 80 µg/m .

NOx: The highest NOx concentration 14.6µg/m3was observed in the ambient air was recorded at station A4 while the lowest NOx concentration was found to be 7.2µg/m3 at A6. All the monitored values of NOx are well below the specified limit of 80µg/m3.

CO: The highest CO concentration 0.30mg/m3was observed in the ambient air was recorded at station A4 while the lowest CO concentration was found to be <0.10mg/m3 at A6. All the monitored values of CO are well below the specified limit of 4.0mg/m3.

3 OZONE (O3): The highest O3 concentration 44.2µg/m was observed in the ambient

air was recorded at station A4 while the lowest O3 concentration was found to be 3 9.2µg/m at A6. All the monitored values of O3 are well below the specified limit of 180µg/m3.

3 - 16

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-17 of 219

Ammonia (NH3, Lead (Pb), Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), Arsenic (As), Nickel (Ni), HC (methane and non methane Hydro Carbon), Volatile Organic Carbon (VOC) - are remained below detection limit (BDL) in the study area.

Fig 3.3: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring photograhs

3.6 WATER ENVIRONMENT The water resources, both surface and groundwater play an important role in the development of the area. Likewise, the water resources of the area have been studied to establish the current status of water quality in the area. The parameters of prime importance were selected under physical, chemical inorganic, chemical organic and heavy metal groups. Water samples from ground and surface water sources were collected. The water samples were collected in pretreated sampling cans and transported to laboratory for analysis. Due care was taken during sampling & transportation of these samples.

3 - 17

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-18 of 219

3.6.1 Surface Water and Ground Water Quality Assessment In order to assess water quality impacts surface water and ground water samples are collected from the surrounding villages. The samples analyzed for various physical and chemical parameters to know the contamination levels and compared as per the IS Standards. 1. Ground water quality --- IS 10500-2012 2. Surface/canal/sea water quality --- IS 2296

3.6.2 Selection of sampling locations Sampling locations (Table 3.9 & 3.10) were selected on basis of: a) Drainage pattern b) Location of residential areas respecting different activities c) Likely areas those can represent baseline conditions Samples for bacteriological analysis were collected in sterilized glass bottles. Selected physico-chemical and bacteriological parameters have been analyzed for projecting the existing water quality status in the study area. Water sampling locations are shown in Fig 3.5. The samples were analyzed in accordance with “Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater Analysis” published by APHA.

3.6.3 Sampling techniques Samples for chemical analysis were collected in polyethylene carboys. Samples

collected for metal content were acidified with 1 ml HNO3. Samples forbacteriological analysis were collected in sterilized glass bottles. Selected physico- chemical and bacteriological parameters have been analyzed for projecting the existing water quality status in the study area. Parameters like temperature, Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and pH were analyzed at the time of sample collection.

The methodology for sample collection and preservation techniques was followed as per the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) mentioned in Table 3.7.

3 - 18

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-19 of 219

Table 3.7 Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for water sampling Parameter Sample Collection Sample Size Storage/ Preservation pH Grab sampling 50 ml On site analysis Plastic /glass container Electrical Grab sampling 50 ml On site parameter Conductivity Plastic /glass container Total suspended Grab sampling 100 ml Refrigeration, solids Plastic /glass container can be stored for 7 days Total Dissolved Grab sampling 100 ml Refrigeration, Solids Plastic /glass container can be stored for 7 days BOD Grab sampling 500 ml Refrigeration, 48 hrs Plastic /glass container

Hardness Grab sampling 100 ml Add HNO3 to pH<2, Plastic /glass container refrigeration; 6 months Chlorides Grab sampling 50 ml Not required; 28 days Plastic /glass container Sulphates Grab sampling 100 ml Refrigeration; 28 days Plastic /glass container Nitrates Plastic containers 100 ml Refrigeration; 48 hrs Fluorides Plastic containers only 100 ml Not required; 28 days Alkalinity Plastic/ glass containers 100 ml Refrigeration; 14 days

Ammonia Plastic/ glass containers 100 ml Add H2SO4 to pH>2, refrigeration, 28 days

Heavy Metals (As, Plastic/ Glass rinse with 500 ml Filter, add HNO3 to pH>2; Cd, Mn, Cu, Fe, 1+1 HNO3 Grab sample; 6 months Zn, Pb etc.)

Analytical Techniques The analytical techniques used for water analysis is given in the Table 3.8. Table 3.8 Analytical techniques for water analysis Parameter Method pH APHA-4500-H+ Colour APHA-2120 C Odour IS: 3025, Part-4 Temperature APHA-2550 B Dissolved Oxygen APHA-4500 O BOD APHA-5210 B

3 - 19

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-20 of 219

Parameter Method Electrical conductivity APHA-2510 B Turbidity APHA-2130 B Chlorides APHA-4500 Cl- Fluorides APHA-4500 F- Total dissolved solids APHA-2540 C Total suspended solids APHA-2540 D Total hardness APHA-2340 C -2 Sulphates APHA-4500 SO4 Arsenic APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3114 B/ APHA-3500 As Calcium APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Ca Magnesium APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Mg Sodium APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Na Potassium APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 K Manganese APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Mn Mercury APHA-3112 B/ APHA-3500 Hg Lead APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Pb Copper APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Cu Cadmium APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Cd Iron APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Fe Zinc APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Zn Boron APHA-4500 B Coliform APHA-9215 D Alkalinity APHA-2320 B COD APHA-5220 D Phenolic Compounds APHA-510 C Nitrates APHA 22nd Edition -4500- NO3- B Residual Chlorine IS : 3025 Part 32-1988 (Reaff: 2014) Total kjeldal Nitrogen APHA 22nd Edition -4500- NH3 B&C Dissolved phosphates IS : 3025 Part 31-1988 (Reaff:2014) Hexavalent Chromium Cr+6 APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Cr+6 Aluminum APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Al Ionic Detergents IS : 3025 Part 23- 1986 (Reaff:2012) Barium APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Ba SAR Calculation Free Ammonia APHA 22nd Edition -4500- NH3 B&C Salinity APHA 22nd Edition -2520 B Source: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Published By APHA, AWWA, WEF 23rd Edition, 2017

3 - 20

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-21 of 219

3.6.4 Water Sampling Stations Table 3.9 Ground water sampling locations Code Station Direction Distance in km Latitude & Source of Longitude collection 4.26 km from 27° 5'51.97"N GW1 SW Tube well Namla barrage site 88° 6'17.02"E 2.2 km from 27° 6'13.69"N GW2 SW Tube well Lodhoma barrage site 88° 7'28.41"E 1.87 km from 27° 5'52.50"N GW3 SE Bore well Kankiabong adit-1 88° 9'8.14"E 0.97 km from 27° 7'14.45"N GW4 NE Bore well Salyandang barrage site 88° 8'56.70"E 3.4 from from 27° 8'8.63"N GW5 NE Tube well Daramdin barrage site 88°10'2.12"E Rammam sub 0.66 km from 27° 7'6.93"N Bore well GW6 NE station barrage site 88° 8'48.13"E

Table 3.10 Surface water sampling locations Code Station Direction Distance in km Latitude & Source of Longitude collection SW1 1.93 km from 27° 7'17.01"N River NW (Upstream) Tikpur barrage site 88° 7'37.14"E SW2(Down 2.04 km from 27° 7'0.17"N River NE stream Longchok adit-1 88° 9'51.70"E 4.15 km from 27° 8'32.29"N Surface Water SW3 NE Daramdin Bazar barrage site 88°10'13.05"E 27° 5'2.10"N Surface Water SW4 SW 5.78 from adit-1 Bansbotay Bazar 88° 5'45.16"E 2.27 km from 27° 6'17.28"N Surface Water SW5 SW Lodhoma barrage site 88° 7'23.47"E 27° 7'49.22"N SW6 NE Near township River NTPC Township 88°13'3.00"E

3 - 21

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-22 of 219

Fig 3.4 Groundwater sampling location map

3 - 22

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-23 of 219

Fig 3.5 Surface water sampling location map

3 - 23

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-24 of 219

Fig 3.6 Water sampling photographs

3 - 24

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-25 of 219

Table 3.11 Ground water quality of the study area S.No. PARAMETER UNIT GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4 GW5 GW6 IS:10500-Standards Acceptable Permissibl e 1. pH - 6.1 6.4 5.8 6.7 6.1 6.6 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5 2. Temperature of Water 0C 21.7 23.4 21.9 22.6 23.4 22.9 - - 3. Turbidity NTU 0.31 0.39 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.25 1 5 4. Electrical conductivity mmhos/cm 188 255 174 218 209 148 - - 5. Total Dissolved Solids mg/l 101 113 89 104 112 89 500 2000 6. Total Hardness (as CaCO3) mg/l 38 44 36 33 48 37 300 600 7. Total alkalinity (as CaCO3) mg/l 42 59 41 54 51 48 200 600 8. Chlorides as Cl mg/l 19.2 21.6 20.4 21.8 24.6 17.5 250 1000 9. Sulphates as SO4 mg/l 21 29 14 20 37 14 200 400 10. Nitrates as NO3 mg/l 1.7 2.6 1.7 2.1 2.6 1.2 45 45 11. Residual Chlorine mg/l <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 - - 12. Fluoride as F mg/l 0.31 0.43 0.27 0.46 0.59 0.33 1 1.5 13. Sodium as Na mg/l 7.7 9.2 6.4 8.6 8.1 4.7 - - 14. Potassium as K mg/l 1.4 2.1 1.1 1.6 2.2 1.0 - - 15. Salinity PSU <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 16. Total kjheldal Nitrogen mg/l < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 - - 17. Dissolved phosphates mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - 18. Dissolved Oxygen mg/l 3.3 3.8 3.5 2.9 3.7 4.1 - - 19. Phenolic Compounds as mg/l 0.001 0.002 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 C6H5OH 20. Arsenic as As mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.01 0.05 21. Cadmium as Cd mg/l <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 0.003 0.003 22. Mercury as Hg mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - - 23. Nickel as Ni mg/l <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 - - 24. Manganese as Mn mg/l <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.1 0.3 25. Hexavalent Chromium as Cr6+ mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.01 0.01 26 Lead as Pb mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.01 0.01 27 Iron as Fe mg/l 1.28 1.46 1.25 1.48 1.65 1.1 0.3 0.3

3 - 25

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-26 of 219

28 Copper as Cu mg/l <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 1.5 29 Zinc as Zn mg/l 0.11 0.22 0.10 0.14 0.24 0.10 5 15 30 Total Coliforms MPN/100 Not Not 28 44 31 26 44 20 ml Detectable Detectable 31 Faecal Coliforms MPN/100 Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not ml Detectable Detectable Detectable Detectable Detectable Detectable Detectable Detectable 32 Aluminium (asAl) mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - - 33 Ionic Detergents mg/l <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 - - 34 Barium as Ba mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - - 35 Calcium as Ca mg/l 6.4 8.2 7.1 6.9 9.5 8.1 75 200 36 chloraminine as Cl2 mg/l <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - - 37 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 3.9 4.8 4.1 4.4 5.2 3.1 30 100 38 Mineral oil mg/l <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - 39 Selenium mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - - 40 Cyanide as Cn mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - - 41 Molybdenum as Mo mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - - 42 Pesticides µg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - 43 Polychlorinated biphenyles ng/l <10ng/l <10ng/l <10ng/l <10ng/l <10ng/l <10ng/l - - 44 PAH ppb <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - - 45 Trialomethanes mg/l <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - - 46 SAR milli eq/l 0.54 0.61 0.59 0.62 0.61 0.52 - - 47 Free ammonia mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - -

3 - 26

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-27 of 219

Table 3.12 Surface water quality of the study area S. No PARAMETER UNIT SW1 SW2 SW3 SW4 SW5 SW6 IS:2296 – Standards 1. Color Hazen <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 2. Odour - Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable - 3. Taste - Taste less Taste less Taste less Taste less Taste less Taste less - 4. pH - 6.8 6.8 7.0 6.9 7.1 7.2 6.50 – 8.50 5. Temperature of Water 0C 22.8 21.9 23.3 24.1 23.4 23.9 - 6. Turbidity NTU 2.2 2.6 2.8 1.9 2.7 2.4 - 7. Electrical conductivity mmhos/c - 138 144 149 121 141 126 m 8. Total Dissolved Solids mg/l 79 84 77 86 74 71 1500 9. Total Hardness (as CaCO3) mg/l 24 26 29 31 36 26 - 10. Total alkalinity (as CaCO3) mg/l 39 43 46 40 45 39 - 11. Chlorides as Cl mg/l 7.7 7.9 8.1 7.2 7.7 8.2 600 12. Sulphates as SO4 mg/l 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.0 1.4 1.2 400 13. Nitrates as NO3 mg/l 0.16 0.18 0.28 0.14 0.24 0.31 50 14. Residual Chlorine mg/l ND ND ND ND ND ND - 15. Fluoride as F mg/l 0.31 0.32 0.34 0.28 0.33 0.29 1.5 16. Sodium as Na mg/l 3.1 3.6 4.1 2.9 3.3 3.8 - 17. Potassium as K mg/l 4.4 4.8 5.6 4.7 5.9 5.5 - 18. Salinity PSU 2.1 1.8 1.1 1.6 1.2 1.4 - 19. Total kjheldal Nitrogen mg/l <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 - 20. Dissolved phosphates mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - 21. Dissolved Oxygen mg/l 5.2 5.8 5.6 5.1 5.8 6.1 5.0 min 22. Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/l 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.3 3 23. Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/l 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.1 2.8 3.2 - 24. Phenolic Compounds as mg/l 0.005 C6H5OH <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 25. Arsenic as As mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - 26. Cadmium as Cd mg/l <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 - 27. Mercury as Hg mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 -

3 - 27

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-28 of 219

28. Nickel as Ni mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - 29. Manganese as Mn mg/l <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - 30. Hexavalent Chromium as Cr6+ mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05 31. Lead as Pb mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - 32. Iron as Fe mg/l 0.26 0.31 0.38 0.21 0.33 0.25 - 33. Copper as Cu mg/l 1.0 1.1 1.37 1.0 1.28 1.34 1.5 34. Zinc as Zn mg/l < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 15 35. Total Coliforms MPN/100 ml 460 480 490 440 470 460 5000 36 Faecal Coliforms MPN/100 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Not specified ml 37 Aluminium (asAl) mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - 38 anIonic Detergents mg/l <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 - 39 Barium as Ba mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - 40 Calcium as Ca mg/l 4.9 5.1 5.8 4.9 5.6 5.2 - 41 chloraminine as Cl2 mg/l <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - 42 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 4.6 4.9 4.7 4.1 3.9 4.3 - 43 Mineral oil mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - 44 Selenium mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - 45 Cyanide as Cn mg/l <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 - 46 Molybdenum as Mo mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 - 47 Pesticides µg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - 48 SAR milli eq/l 0.22 0.25 0.29 0.21 0.23 0.26 -

3 - 28

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-29 of 219

3.6.5 Surface water quality results (Table 3.12) are summarized below:  pH of the surface water collected was slightly acidic in nature with pH ranging from 6.8 – 7.2  TDS was found to be 71 mg/l to 86 mg/l. The tolerance limit of 1,500 mg/l as per IS:2296  Total hardness was found to be 24 mg/l to 36 mg/l  Presence of Nitrate was recorded as 0.14 mg/l to 0.31 mg /l  DO was observed as 5.1 mg/l to 6.1 mg /l  Total coliform in water was 440MPN/100 ml to 480MPN/100 ml. The likely source of bacteriological contamination was due to the proximity to residential area  All the heavy metals were found to be within below detectable limits.

3.6.6 Groundwater quality results (Table 3.11) are summarised below:  During the study period, the pH of the groundwater was found varying between 5.8 and 6.6 and found to be slight acidic due to high iron content in the water. The best way to treat this is to use aeration/ filtration or chlorination techniques. The TDS of all the samples were within the permissible limit of 2000 mg/l.  The Chloride levels in the groundwater samples collected in the study area were ranging from 19.2-24.6 mg/l.  In the groundwater samples collected from the study area, the hardness was found to be varying from 33 mg/l to 48 mg/l.  In the groundwater samples of study area the fluoride values were found to be within a range of 0.31 mg/l to 0.59 mg/l.  Total coliforms were present in the GW results due to human sewage or animal droppings which could contain other , viruses, or disease causing organisms. All the heavy metals in all samples were found to be below the permissible limits except Iron (Fe).

3 - 29

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-30 of 219

3.7 SOIL ENVIRONMENT 3.7.1 Selection of sampling locations For studying soil profile of the region, sampling locations were selected to assess the existing overall soil conditions around the project site. The study of the soil profile establishes the baseline characteristics and this will help in future for identifying the incremental concentrations if any, due to the project. The sampling locations have been identified with following objectives. a) To determine the baseline soil characteristics of the study area b) To determine the impact of the project activities on soil characteristics

3.7.2 Sampling and analytical techniques Ten sampling locations were selected to assess the existing soil conditions representing various land use conditions and geological features. At each location, soil samples were collected from three different depths viz. 30 cm, 60 cm and 90 cm below the surface and are homogenized. This is in line with IS: 2720 & Methods of Soil Analysis, Part-1, 2nd edition, 1986 of (American Society for Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America). The homogenized samples were analyzed for physical and chemical characteristics. The soil samples were collected at different locations (Table 3.14).The samples have been analyzed as per the established scientific methods for physico-chemical parameters. Soil sampling locations are shown in Figure 3.7. The methodology adopted for each parameter is described in Table 3.13. Table 3.13 Analytical techniques for Soil analysis Parameter Method (ASTM number) Textural classification Chart developed by Public Roads Administration pH pH meter (D 1293-84) Electrical conductivity Conductivity meter (D 1125-82) Nitrogen Kjeldahl distillation (D 3590-84) Phosphorus Molybdenum blue, calorimetric (D 515-82) Potassium Flame photometric (D 1428-82) Sodium Flame photometric (D 1428-82) Calcium IS:2720 Magnesium IS:2720 Chlorides Argentometric (D 512-81 Rev 85)

3 - 30

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-31 of 219

Table 3.14 Details of soil sampling locations Latitude and Code Location/Villages Direction Distance (km) Longitude 27° 6'48.29"N S1 Near Project site -- Barrage site 88° 8'38.50"E 2.15 km from 27° 6'13.53"N S2 Lodhoma SW adit-1 88° 7'30.69"E 5.83 km from 27° 5'3.44"N S3 Bansbotay Bazar SW barrage site 88° 5'41.65"E 3.98 km from 27° 5'54.51"N S4 Namla SW barrage site 88° 6'26.93"E 0.92 km from 27° 7'4.71"N S5 Longchok NE barrage site 88° 9'5.90"E 3.77 km from 27° 8'16.53"N S6 Daramdin NE barrage site 88°10'12.57"E 27° 7'49.35"N S7 NTPC Township NE Near township 88°12'58.87"E 2.9 km from 27° 8'20.61"N S8 Sombaria N barrage site 88° 8'49.20"E 1.8 km from 27° 7'22.33"N S9 Tikpur NW barrage site 88° 7'46.99"E 5.82 km from 27° 9'24.56"N S10 Karthok NE barrage site 88°10'35.92"E

Fig 3.7 Soil Sample Collection

3 - 31

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-32 of 219

Fig 3.8 Soil sampling location map 3 - 32

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-33 of 219

Table 3.15 Soil Analysis Results in the Study Area S.No Parameter Unit S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 1 pH (1:5) Aq Extract -- 5.8 5.5 5.4 5.7 5.9 6.1 5.8 5.5 5.4 5.6 2 Conductivity  mhos (1:5 Aq Extract) /cm 59.1 62.3 55.4 49.3 56.5 52.4 58.2 61.5 52.3 62.9 3 Texture (a) Sand 17.1 18.2 18.4 18.6 19.4 17.5 18.2 19.6 19.5 19.1

(b) Silt % 34.8 37.3 36.5 37.5 36.4 38.2 37.6 36.5 38.2 38.4

(c) Clay 48.1 44.5 45.1 43.9 44.2 44.3 44.2 43.9 42.3 42.5

4 Bulk Density gm/cm3 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.9 2.2 1.8 2.1 2.4 1.8 2.0 5 Moisture Content % 24.5 24.8 21.4 17.8 23.1 19.6 25.1 25.4 16.5 21.6 6 Availabe Nitrogen as N kg/ha 272 281 265 242 261 249 283 291 224 257 7 Availabe Phosphorous as P kg/ha 3.1 3.2 2.8 2.6 2.9 2.7 3.3 3.4 2.3 3.1 8 Available Potassium as K kg/ha 20.2 21.5 16.5 15.1 18.5 16.3 21.2 22.5 12.4 21.4 9 Exchangeable Sodium as Na mg/kg 101 105 94 79 96 88 101 116 78 86 10 Exchangeable Calcium as Ca mg/kg 774 785 758 736 765 748 731 765 705 786 11 Exchangeable Magnesium as Mg mg/kg 198 186 182 161 188 165 214 219 142 188 12 Water Soluble Chlorides as Cl mg/kg 61 68 55 42 65 49 77 73 71 65 13 Water Soluble Sulphates as SO4 mg/kg 265 278 255 239 255 240 274 286 216 258 14 Organic matter % 0.83 0.82 0.65 0.51 0.77 0.55 0.94 0.92 0.46 0.74 15 Organic Carbon % 0.48 0.56 0.38 0.27 0.44 0.29 0.65 0.82 0.26 0.53 16 Porosity % 29 26 31 36 22 25 18 33 25 22 17 Infiltration capacity mm/hr 11 9 11 14 6 10 7 11 10 9 18 Arsenic as As mg/kg 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.07 0.04 19 Cadmium as Cd mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 20 Mercury as Hg mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 21 Nickel as Ni mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 22 Manganese as Mn mg/kg 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.06 0.05

3 - 33

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-34 of 219

23 Hexavalent Chromium as Cr+6 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 24 Lead as Pb mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 25 Iron as Fe mg/kg 0.78 0.70 0.58 0.64 0.52 0.62 0.60 0.58 0.54 0.58 26 Copper as Cu mg/kg 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.08 0.07 0.09 27 Zinc as Zn mg/kg 3.9 3.6 4.1 3.9 3.4 4.1 3.6 3.2 3.9 4.1 28 SAR m.eq/100g 4.5 5.9 7.4 4.9 2.6 5.2 4.8 4.6 5.4 5.1 29 Permeability cm/hr 1.1 1.0 1.6 1.1 1.5 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.1 30 Water holding capacity % 25 28 22 26 31 22 25 22 21 26 31 Metals: Sb mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 32 Ba mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 33 Cr+3 mg/kg 5.8 5.2 5.8 5.1 5.4 5.9 5.6 5.4 5.1 5.6 34 Co mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 35 Mo mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 36 Cyanide mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 37 Thiocyanide mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

*Note: Detection Limits for Cd, Hg, Ni, Pb, Cr+6 are 0.01mg/kg; for Sb, Ba, Cr+3, Co, Mo is 0.02mg/kg and for Cyanide and thiocyanide is 0.1mg/kg

3 - 34

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-35 of 219

3.7.3 Summary of Soil Analysis Data The analytical results of the soil samples are summarized below. The pH of the soil is an important property; the normal range of pH in the soil is 6.0 to 8.5. The pH values in the study area are varying from 5.4 to 6.1 indicating that the soils are falling in acidic soil.

Based on the electrical conductivity, the soils are classified into four groups (Normal, Critical for germination, Critical for growth of the sensitive crops, Injurious to most crops). The electrical conductivity in the study area is varying from 52.3 to 62.9 micro-mhos/ cm (µmhos/cm). This is average for germination.

The other important parameters for characterization of soil for irrigation are the primary nutrients – Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium (N, P, K) and the secondary nutrients-Calcium, Magnesium and Sulphur (Ca, Mg, S). The primary and secondary nutrient elements are known as major elements. This classification is based on their relative abundance, and not on their relative importance.

Nitrogen encourages the vegetative development of plants by imparting a healthy green color to the leaves. The available Nitrogen as N in the study area is varying from 224 to 281 kg/ha. This is less for crops when compared with soil standards.

Phosphorus influences the vigour of plants and improves the quality of crops. In the study area available, Phosphorus was found in varying quantities of 2.3 to 3.4kg/ha. This is less sufficient level when compared to soil standards.

Potassium enhances the ability of the plants to resist diseases, attacks, cold and other adverse conditions. The available potassium in the study area varies between 12.4 to 22.5 kg/ha. This is very less sufficient level for crops.

Organic Carbon in the study area ranges from 0.0.26 to 0.82%. This is very less level for crops. Based on the above results, the soils in the region are average fertile enough for cultivation of crops.

3 - 35

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-36 of 219

Table 3.16 Standard soil classification S. No Soil Test Classification 1. pH <4.5 Extremely acidic 4.51- 5.50 Very strongly acidic 5.51-6.00 moderately acidic 6.01-6.50 slightly acidic 6.51-7.30 Neutral 7.31-7.80 slightly alkaline 7.81-8.50 moderately alkaline 8.51-9.0 strongly alkaline >9.00 very strongly alkaline 2. Electrical Conductivity (ppm) (1ppm = Up to 1.00 Average 640 µmhos) 1.01-2.00 harmful to germination 2.01-3.00 harmful to crops (sensitive to salts) 3. Organic Carbon Up to 0.2: very less 0.21-0.4: less 0.41-0.5 medium, 0.51-0.8: on an average sufficient 0.81-1.00: sufficient >1.0 more than sufficient 4. Nitrogen (Kg/ha) Up to 50 very less 51-100 less 101-150 good 151-300 Better >300 sufficient 5. Phosphorus (Kg/ha) Up to 15 very less 16-30 less 31-50 medium 51-65 on an average sufficient 66-80 sufficient >80 more than sufficient 6. Potassium (Kg/ha) 0 -120 very less 120-180 less 181-240 medium 241-300 average 301-360 better >360 more than sufficient

3 - 36

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-37 of 219

3.8 NOISE ENVIRONMENT 3.8.1 Identification of sampling locations Noise at different generating sources (Table 3.17) was identified based on the activities in the village area, ambient noise due to construction activities, traffic and the noise at sensitive areas. A detailed survey on noise environment was carried in and around the project site to study the levels of noise, as the high dB (A) levels may cause adverse effect on human beings and associated environment, including structures, domestic animals and natural ecological systems. The locations were identified keeping in view the land use pattern and environmental setting.Spot noise levels were measured using a precision noise level meter at seven locations within study zone. Noise sampling locations are shown in Figure 3.9.

3.8.2 Methodology The monitoring was carried out at seven locations for a period of 24hrs, once during the study period. The day levels of noise have been monitored during 6 am to 10 pm and the night levels during 10 pm to 6 am. The Ld, Ln and Ldn were calculated based on the hourly Leq values. Spot noise levels were measured using a precision noise level meter at residential areas, industrial areas and commercial centres etc., in all seven locations which were covered with in study zone. The noise levels include vehicular movement and local activities. Table 3.17 Noise Monitoring Locations Station Distance in Latitude and Environmental S.No Location Direction Code km Longitude Setting Near barrage 27° 6'48.39"N, 1 Project Site N1 -- Industrial Area site 88° 8'38.84"E 2.43 km 27° 6'12.77"N Residential 2 Lodhoma N2 SW from adit-1 88° 7'19.44"E Area 3.45 km 27° 8'5.76"N Residential 3 Tikpur N3 NW barrage site 88° 7'10.03"E Area 1.03 km 27° 7'11.68"N Residential 4 Salyangdang N4 NE barrge site 88° 9'4.16"E Area

3 - 37

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-38 of 219

2.90 km from 27° 8'37.74"N Residential 5 Tharpu N5 NE township 88°11'26.02"E Area

3.63 km 27° 8'20.12"N Residential 6 Daramdin N6 NE barrage site 88° 9'59.85"E Area 4.39 km 27° 5'42.67"N Residential 7 Namla N7 SW adit-1 88° 6'17.01"E Area

3.8.3 Description of Locations: N1 to N7 – the locations have been selected to assess noise levels near to the project in residential areas with light Vehicular Movement.

3.8.3.1 Noise Levels in the Study Area The noise level monitored during the study period are given in following Table 3.18 in the form of Lday, Lnight and Ldn compared with CPCB Standards.

Table 3.18 Noise levels in the study area Location Environmental CPCB norms Leq (dBA) Leq day Leq night Code Setting Day Night dB(A) dB(A) N1 Industrial 75 70 62.5 51.9 N2 Residential 55 45 51.6 42.6 N3 Residential 55 45 50.8 43.8 N4 Residential 55 45 56.4 48.3 N5 Residential 55 45 52.8 47.6 N6 Residential 55 45 55.1 49.1 N7 Residential 55 45 61.4 55.6

3 - 38

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-39 of 219

Fig 3.9 Ambient Noise Monitoring Location map

3 - 39

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-40 of 219

Fig 3.10 Ambient Noise Monitoring Stations

3 - 40 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-41 of 219

Graphical representation of Noise

Equivalent Noise Day Time Leq dB(A)

80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0

Equivalent Noise Night Time Leq dB(A)

80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0

3 - 41 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-42 of 219

Results and discussions Ambient noise equivalent levels were measured at seven locations in and around the project site. Noise equivalent levels varied from 50.8 to 62.5 Leq dB(A) during day time and 42.6 to 55.6 Leq dB(A) during night time. The noise levels at N1 were observed to be high as it is close to the construction operations at the project site. An overview of the above results indicate the noise levels in the study area are well within the prescribed limits of CPCB.

3.9 TRAFFIC STUDY The baseline traffic studies in the EIA Project study area were carried to assess the traffic flow. The traffic survey is essential to realistically and accurately assess the prevailing traffic volumes and travel characteristics by undertaking classified volume count. The objective of traffic volume count survey is to assess the traffic intensity on the most vulnerable section of the road. Traffic density was recorded at approach roads to the powerhouse and barrage site and in the surrounding areas of the project site for 24 hours. In order to record the traffic density the vehicles plying on the roads were divided into heavy and light vehicles, three wheelers and two wheelers. Table 3.19 shows the traffic monitoring sites.

Table 3.19 Traffic density monitoring locations S.No. Location Latitude Longitude 1. Jorethang- Road 27° 7'50.39"N 88°16'19.25"E 2. Jorethang-Sombaria Road 27° 8'5.78"N 88° 9'5.38"E

The analysis of traffic counts provides an estimate of average daily traffic (ADT). In order to convert recorded vehicles into a common scale, the passenger car units (PCU) equivalent factor as per IRC:64-1990 has been adopted. Table 3.16 shows the details of traffic density and PCU/day.

3 - 42

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-43 of 219

Table 3.20 Traffic volume counts Types of Vehicles T1 T2 No. of PCU/day No. of PCU/day vehicles/day vehicles/day Two wheelers 56 28 31 15.5 Three wheelers 12 6 9 4.5 Cars/Van/Jeep 128 128 96 96 Trucks 83 249 66 198 Mini-Bus 23 34.5 15 22.5 Total 302 445.5 217 336.5 (PCU Factor – Light duty vehicles – 1.0, 2/3 wheelers – 0.5, Mini bus – 1.5, Trucks/Buses – 3.0)

Observation During monsoon collection, mainly four wheelers/cars/jeeps were observed to be more than the trucks or heavy vehicles. It is because tourists from all over India transport in the region. Highest traffic volume was recorded on Jorthang-Soreng road. The road widths in the region vary from 6-10 m as it is a hilly terrain. Most of the roads are blacktop, there would not be much of dust emission. Considering the design service volume of 5200 PCU/day for hilly terrain road, the existing traffic volume at the point of traffic count is found to be level of service (LOS) is “A”.

3.10 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY The Himalayan belt of northern India run in a general east-west direction for a length of 2400 km over a width which varies from 230 to 320 km. The chain is a part of Alpine Meso-cenzoic seismic belt. Major crustal deformations, thrust movements, intrusive action, volcanic activities and metamorphism occurred mainly between pre-tertiary and late eras.

The three important groups of rocks observed in the vicinity of the project area are:  Older Daling group represented by Garubathan formation comprising of quartz- chlorite-sesicite phyllite/schists with occasional quartz vein and the Rayang formation comprising greywork type of slaty quartzite.

3 - 43

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-44 of 219

 The tectonic window in the Rangit River valley restricted to the north of the Great Rangit River and known as Rangit window is the most important geological structure of the area. The younger Gondwana group is observed and is represented by pebbly phyllite, shale, carbonaceous shale, with occasional thin coal band and sandstone of Danuda formation. The older Daling/Buxa group of rocks are exposed as a result of prolonged weathering. The youner Gondwana group of rocks, encircles the older Daling/Buxa group of rocks.  Within the window zone, along either bank of River Rangit, extensive occurrences of dolomitic rocks of Buxa group are observed. These then meet in the sub-surface with tectonic slices within the flaggy quartzite in Gok area.

3.10.1 Geological setting Diversion Structure The intake structure is located on a straight course of River Rammam having steep rocky cliff on the right bank upto a height of 100 m and a wide shoal deposit and terrace resting over slumped disjointed rock mass on the left bank. The rock exposed on either side is quartz-muscovite-biotite gneiss.

The rocks exposed at the barrage/dam site on the hill slope are garnetiferous quartz biotite muscovite gneiss with quartz veins and lenses.

Desilting Chamber The desilting chamber is proposed underground in the right side hill of River Rammam near Lodhama confluence. The rocks exposed in this area are garnetiferrous quartz biotite muscovite gneiss.

Head Race Tunnel The tunnel alignment passes through different geological conditions. The alignment passes below Jhepi Khola. The rock type exposed on left bank of Jhepi Khola towards downstream below the ground elevation of 900 m is quartz-biotite gneiss. On the right

3 - 44 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-45 of 219 bank chlorite mica schist with some band of mica schist generally strike N 30o to 60o W – S 30o to 60o E with dip of 20o to 60o towards SSW.

Surge shaft The major rock type observed at the surge shaft is massive bedded quartzite with phyllitic intercalation, striking NNW-SSE dipping hillward at an angle of 35o.

Penstock The area around the underground pressure shaft portion from the surge shaft is mostly occupied by surfacial soil and overburden with sporadic rock outcrops of flaggy sericite quartzite interbanded with phyllite and chlorite-sercite schist.

Power house The power house is proposed as deep seated surface type structure near the confluence of Rammam and Ramsu Khola confluence on a rocky lodge, comprising chlorite schist intercalated with quartzite or vein quartz, striking along the slope and dipping upstream side at a steep angle. At this location, width of River Rammam is nearly 150-200 m wide. The banks are stable and firm with rocky ledges.

Tail Race Channel In the initial stage, the tail race is expected to have a rocky foundation, after which it shall be laid within riverine boulders and sand.

3 - 45

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-46 of 219

Fig 3.11 Geomorphology map 3 - 46 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-47 of 219

Fig 3.12 Lineament map

3 - 47

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-48 of 219

3.10.2 Minerals No major occurrence of economic deposit has been found in the study area, except materials likeboulder, pebbles, sand that bears no economic mineral importance, being utilized as construction material. The mineral map of Sikkim and West Bengal Parts of the study area are shown in Fig 3.13(a) and (b) respectively.

It is evident from the maps that the project and study area are located in the areas devoid of any minerals of economic importance.

Fig 3.13(a) Mineral map of Sikkim Part of Study Area

3 - 48 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-49 of 219

Fig 3.13(b) Mineral map of West Bengal Part of Study Area

3 - 49 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-50 of 219

3.10.3 Hydrogeological setting The study area is divided into two parts: . North of Rammam River part of West Sikkim district of State Sikkim and . South of Rammam River which is a part of Darjeeling district of West Bengal

Hydrogeological setting on the northern part of Rammam River in study area Physiographically the area is represented by moderate to steeply sloping hills, cliffs and valleys. The rugged and hilly topography of the area does not favour the construction of large scale multipurpose irrigation scheme. Irrigation practice is very limited due to soil erosion issues. Rainwater and spring fed cultivation is predominant.

Geologically the area comprise of Buxa formation comprising of dolomite, phyllite and quartzite,Darjeeling formation comprise of migmatite gneiss, calc-silicate lenses, Kanchanjunga formation is represented by augen gneiss, quartzite, amphibolites, migmatitic gneiss rocks,Chungthang formation comprise of quartz-biotite gneiss, calc- silicate, marble, quartzite, kyanite and granite schists and Quatenary deposits of alluvium with assorted gravel and fragments of gravels, pebbles, boulders and terrace covers are developed sporadically along the streams and rivers.

The major water bearing formations are Darjeeling, Daling and Gondwana groups where ground water occurs in weathered zones, joints and fractures.

Since the area is characterised by hilly terrain - it acts as a recharge area where surface runoff is very high, has limited infiltration in the intermountain valleys. Ground water is harnessed using perennial springs and jhoras. The discharge of most of the springs ranges from 1 to 50 lpm during lean period and a few jhorasi kholas give discharge in the range of 50 to 500 lpm.

Ground water occurs in largely disconnected localised along weathered zones, joints and fracture zones. As such till date no ground water abstraction structures like wells are present.

3 - 50

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-51 of 219

Hydrogeological setting on the southern part of Rammam River in study area Because of heavy rainfall and high infiltration through highly permeable formations the Bhabar and Terai formations have developed promising ground water regime. Hydrogeologically the area can be broadly divided into consolidated formation represented by Buxa group of metamorphic rocks semi consolidated formation comprising of Gondwana and Siwalik sedimentary formations unconsolidated formation consisting of piedmont and alluvial deposits.

Secondary porosity like joints, fractures, bedding planes etc. give rise to development of potential aquifers in consolidated and semi-consolidated formations with moderate to low yield prospects. Boulder, pebble, gravels and sand of unconsolidated formation constitute highly potential aquifers under unconfined to semi-confined conditions. Piedmont zone with high permeability, sloping topography and sub-surface runoff is characterised by poor to moderate yield ranging from 5 to 50 cum per hour. Aquifers in alluvial plain are highly potential with yield prospects ranging from 50 to 150 cum per hour.

The contact of these two formations is marked by an E-W trending discontinuous spring line. In shallow unconfined aquifers the depth to water level is in the range of 4 to 10 m below ground level. The depth to water level deepens progressively in the northern foot hill areas. Water level in shallow aquifers is shallow with in 4m below ground level. In the deeper semi-confined aquifers the depth to water level is observed with in 8m below ground level. Water level fluctuation is in the order of 2 to 6 m in the northern foot hill part and less than 2m in the central and southern parts.

Deeper aquifers are productive with yields ranging from 50 to 180 cum per hour. The stage of development of ground water is less than 10% hence is Safe category. In the piedmont zone the ground water occurs under water table conditions. In flood plain and alluvial plains the ground water occurs under both water table as well as confined conditions. Aquifers at 200m below ground level with expected yield of 27 litres per

3 - 51

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-52 of 219

second are reported. Long term trend of water level does not show any significant change - indicating a stable ground water regime.

3.10.4 Land Slide in the area The Darjeeling Hill area represents a unique geo- environmental perception. The area of study is primarily composed of erosional landforms produced by southerly flowing streams, which have exposed a full cross section of different tectonic units. The form units are, however approximately the same throughout the hill area, having more or less uniform lithology, structure, climate, soil and vegetative covers.

The soils of Darjeeling Hill area have developed depending upon the underlying geological structure. But, in general the soils have been developed by both fluvial action and lithological disintegration. The soils are predominantly reddish in color. Occasional dark soils are found due to extensive existence of phyllitic and schists. Soils in the highlands stretching from the west to the east of the district along most of the interfluvial areas are mainly mixed sandy loam and loamy, while those on the southern slopes are mainly clayey loam and reddish in color. Sandy soils are mainly found along Rammam River.

All the soils are definitely acidic in nature with the tendency to increase slightly in depth in most cases indicating the lacking of bases from surface and accumulation in the lower horizons. The weathering of lateritic type is the substantial mechanism in the transformation of the substratum. The variable thickness of the regolith and soils depend on the rate of weathering and gradient of the longitudinal slope profiles and intensity / gravity of mass movements. The basic soil types are yellow soils, red brown soils and brown forest soils. Red and yellow soils have developed on gneiss while brown on schists and shales. Coarse pale yellow to red brown soils are found on the Siwaliks while clayey dark soils are developed on Daling series.

3 - 52

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-53 of 219

The character of the bedrock is reflected only in the grain size composition of the soil. On the Darjeeling gneiss, very coarse-grained (50% -80%) particles are found. In Damuda and Daling series percentage of sandy and coarse particles in the soils are high. On the Siwaliks, silty – clay fraction is higher. The chemical content of the soil over Darjeeling gneiss is characterized by a high proportion of potassium derived from feldspar and muscovite mica. This soil is poor in lime, magnesium, iron oxides, phosphorous and nitrogen. Therefore, lime is used in the tea plantation areas.

The landslide affected areas are areas cultivated with root crops like potato, ginger, cardamom and onions. These root crops are harvested just after monsoon in the months of September – October. This particular practice changes the cohesiveness of the soil and makes it vulnerable to erosion. The slope instability factors along the main thoroughfares due to heavy vehicular movements is another big problem that causes frequent land slides along the roads, especially during rainy season. The problem of quarry operation and their effect on environment is also another threatening problem. The illegally operated quarries not only disturb the slope stability but also overburden the river and their tributaries with excessive amount of load that ultimately leads to massive siltation along the river beds and the adjoining plains. Thus, they destroy the ecological equilibrium of the area. The landslides may be attributed to the effect of stone quarrying under the main thoroughfare.

3.10.5 Seismicity The project area belongs to the Lesser Himalaya, exposing varied rock types belonging to different tehono-stratigraphic units thrown into complex fold system and tectonically disturbed by faults and thrusts of different composition.

The Rammam basin has experienced quite a few earthquakes of moderate to severe intensities in the last 100-120 years. The significant ones are the Great Assam Earthquake of 12thJune 1897 and Dhubri Earthquake of 15thJanuary, 1934. The project area forms a part of the seismic zone-IV (as per seismic zoning map of BIS). As per Bureau of Indian

3 - 53

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-54 of 219

Standard (BIS) recommendation 0.1 g horizontal and 0.05 g vertical acceleration is to be considered for design of structures on consolidated foundations.

The seismic study has beenconducted by IIT Roorkee. The suggestedEarth Quake (EQ) design parameters have beencleared from National Committee of Seismic Design Parameters (NCSDP) of CWC and arebeing adopted for design of the projectcomponents. (Report already submitted toMOEF, Shillong through e-mailin May 2011) (Ref. Compliance Report submitted videNHL/RammamIII/11-12/01 dated 9th May 2011).

3.10.6 Soils Soil is the product of geological, chemical and biological interactions. The soil in a region varies according to altitude and climate. The soil like any other region of Himalayas are young. The vegetal cover is one of the most important influencing factor characterizing the soil types in a region. Soil on the slope above 30o, due to erosion and mass wasting processes, are generally shallow and usually have very thin surface horizons. Such soils have medium to coarse texture. Residual soils are well developed on level summits of lesser Himalayas, sub-soils are deep and heavily textured. High contents of organic matter are found in its `A’ horizon and are acidic in nature.

3.11 HYDROLOGY Hydrological data for the Rammam River available in the DPR of Rammam HEPP Stage- III was utilized. The baseline data was studied for evaluating the basin characteristics, drainage pattern, hydrology, ground water regime and downstream wateruse.

The river Rammam is a major tributary of the Ranjit river which confluences with the Teesta river. It rises from the Mane Bhanjan – Tongbu – ridge of the lower Himalayas which are continuation of Kanchan Jungha mountain ranges, at an elevation of about 3631 m. The River Rammam forms a natural boundary between the states of West Bengal & Sikkim. The main tributaries of Rammam river are Kali Khola, Shiri Khola, Lodhama khola, Jhepi Khola and Riyang Khola. In the initial stretch the river Rammam

3 - 54

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-55 of 219

flows along westernly direction for about 6 Km upto the confluence with its tributary Kali Khola at an elevation of 2448 m. Further, its course changes towards N-S direction and after traversing for a length of about 18 Km from origin, one of its major tributary Shiri Khola joins the river at an elevation of about 1542 m where Stage-I of Rammam H.E project is located. The slope of the river is moderate in their stretch (1 in 11.25).

Further downstream, the river takes a U-bend near the confluence point of tributary Lodhama Khola. The Stage-II of the Rammam H.E project is located upsteam of confluence point of Lodhama, Khola. The tributaries Jhepi Khola and Riyang Khola join the river at about 2.5 Km and 6.5 Km downstream of confluence point of Lodhama Khola. At an elevation of 700m the river takes an ~S’ bend and the stage III diversion structure is located at about 1.5 Km upstream from the bend. The river flows in we sternly direction upto confluence with Rangit river at an elevation of 305m. There is considerable snow fed region in the catchment area of Rammam river in its upper reaches. A significant portion of the catchment area is densely forested. The meandering course between the diversion weir and the proposed power house of Stage-III project is about 26 Km and the average gradient is about 1 in 26.

The Rammam river has a total length of about 42 km from its source in Phalut to its confluence point with Rangit river at Naya Bazar. The total Catchment area of Rammam river upto the project site is 24.7 Km2.

3.11.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

i) To assess the water availability of the proposed project so as to carryout simulation studies for estimation of power potential.

ii) To determine the probable maximum floods corresponding to different probabilities so as to ensure safe passage of flood.

3 - 55

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-56 of 219

3.11.2 Rainfall Data

The daily rainfall data for the first four rain gauge stations given below is observed by the India Meteorological Department (IMD). Three of these stations are located on the periphery of the catchment area whereas Darjeeling station is located outside the catchment area.

Table 3.21 Gauge and Discharge Data

S.No. Name of Station Annual Data Elevation(m) Average Availability Rainfall (mm) 1. Sandakpu 3828 1976-86 3400 2. Phalut 4326 1976-83 3596 3. 2024 1976-86 1065 4. Darjeeling 2758 1976-86 2127 5. Dandegaon 2780 1967-75 2439 6. Rammam Village 2820 1985-86 900 (Lingsingbong)

The following gauge and discharge data is available in neighbouring downstream catchment.

Sl. No. Name of G & D Site Period of Availability of Daily Discharge

1. Singlabazar 1973-74 to 1983-84 2. Lodhama Khola 1985-86 to 1990-91 (upto Dec.) & 1994-95 (Jan to May) 3. Discharge calculated from 1997-98 to 2004-05 Generation Data (in Mw) for Rammam Stage-II H.E Project

For the proposed project, the available ten daily discharge data of Singlabazar as well as discharge data as derived based on Rammam Stage-II H.E Project generation data are considered for water availability studies.

3 - 56

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-57 of 219

Before the available data could be used for developing the flow series at diversion site, the consistencies of observed data are required to be established. The average of annual rainfall of two raingauge stations at Dandagaon and Lingsingbong established in the project vicinity is 2800mm. The annual average discharge at Singlabazar is 2514 mm which gives a runoff factor of 89% which, though on higher side is quite responsible considering the rocky terrain in most of the upper reaches. For the river Lodhama Khola, which has a catchment area of 79 Km2, the annual specific yield based on six years of observed discharge data is 31.3 Cumecs/Sq. Km.

For Singlabazar, the specific yield based on discharge data for the period 1973-74 to 1984-85 is 29.17 Cumecs/Sq. Km which is found to be consistent.

Comparison of Specific Yield of Singlabazar & Lodhama (G&D Sites

Site May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Annual Singlabazar 2.2 5.9 6.1 5.9 3.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.98 29.17 Lodhama 2.4 6.5 8.2 5.8 3.1 1.6 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 1.1 31.3

For discharge data of Rammam Stage-II (based on generation data), an attempt has been made to establish the consistency and the annual average specific yield worked out based on generation data for the period 1997-98 to 2004-05 is 10.3 Cumecs/Sq. Km. This value is quite low compared to specific yields at Singlabazar and Lodhama. The flows of River Rammam are diverted to Stage-II power house through a trench weir and the discharges from the tail race are released into Lodhama Nala.. Since the Stage-II discharge flows account for only the diverted flows and not the entire available flows of the river and especially during the monsoon period (June to October) considerable spill over flows occur which are not gauged, specific yield turned out to be low.

Alternatively regression analysis has been carried out by correlating lean flow peiods (November to May) of Singlabazar and Rammam Stage-II ten daily flows as almost entire flows are utilized for power generation during lean period. Since, concurrent period data is not available, the average ten daily flows for the available periods for the

3 - 57

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-58 of 219

respective sites is used. The correlation coefficient is found to be quite high which shows and consistency of the data. The correlation relationship equation so developed is as follows:

(i) Y = 1.8802x-0.1545 R = 0.898 (Nov to May) The non-monsoon flow series of Singlabazar and Rammam Stage-II flows are found to be consistent. However for Monsoon period, these flow series cannot be correlated as only partial utilization of flow series will be done at Rammam Stage-II site.

3.11.3 Water Availability Studies

The discharge data available at Singlabazar for the period 1973-74 to 1984-85(12 years) and the discharge data of Rammam-II H.E. Scheme (based on generation data) are utilized for evolving flow series. Any gaps in the flow series data are filled based on the average flows or based on the preceding and succeeding year flows. Since, sufficient rainfall data for considerable period is not available. Rainfall-Runoff correlation could not be attempted. Hence, the ten daily flows at Singlabazar (C.A 390 Km2) are transposed to Rammam Stage-II Site (C.A 247 Km2) in catchment area proportion.

An attempt has been made to evolve flow series based on the hourly generation data of Rammam Stage-II and assuming n as 0.9 and Hnet as 502m. For the lean flow period, the ten daily flow series of Rammam Stage-II H.E scheme (C.A : 162 Km2) are transposed to Stage-III site in catchment area proportion as for non-monsoon months the entire available flows are utilized. However, for monsoon months (June-October), this approach is not suitable as only a part of available flows are diverted to power house. Hence, for evolving ten daily flow series for the monsoon months, the ratio of each ten daily flow value of Singlabazar for the monsoon flow period with respect to the corresponding total non-monsoon runoff for the entire lean period has been calculated and the average of ten daily ratios for the 12 years for the monsoon period are considered for assessing the monsoon flows of Stage-III Rammam H.E Scheme. Using these average ratios, each ten

3 - 58

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-59 of 219

daily value for the monsoon period is deduced by multiplying the corresponding average ten daily ratio with the total non-monsoon flows for that particular year.

The Lodhama flow series based on the discharge data available on the lodhama nala (C.A 31.5 Km2, inclusive of Dilpa Khola flows) are available for the period 1985-86 to 1990- 1991. These have been transposed to joining point of Lodhama and Rammam (C.A : 79 Km2) in catchment area proportion. An alternate flow series has been evolved for Stage- III by transposing the Singlabazar ten daily flow series for a catchment area of 168 Km2 (i.e. Rammam Stage III catchment area –Lodhama catchment area (247-79) and then adding entire Lodhama flows.

In compliance to CWC’s observations regarding updating the flow series, additional studies have been carried out for evolving the flow series at Rammam Stage-III by adopting the following three approaches:

i) Monthly Runoff – Runoff correlation between Singlabazar discharge data and Rangit Stage-IV data (available since June 1975 for 26 years) for the concurrent period (1975-76 to 1984-85) after elimination of outliers after carrying detailed regression analysis.

ii) Extending Singlabazar Flow series based on Rangit Stage-IV data in catchmean area proportion after applying necessary correction.

iii) Rainfall-Runoff Correlation between SinglaBazar discharge data and available rainfall data.

3.11.4 Runoff-Runoff Correlation

The Rangit Stage-IV H.E Project is located abount 10 km downstream of Rangit Stage-III on river Rangit and has a catchment of 1232 Sq. Kms. The approved flow series evolved for Rangit Stage-V are based on transposing the discharge data of Rangit Stage III (catchment area : 979 Km2) in catchment area proportion for which flow data is available since June 1975 for a period of 26 years and is found to be consistent. Hence, an attempt has been made to correlate mean monthly Singlabazar flow data and Rangit IV flow data 3 - 59

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-60 of 219

(as obtained from Rangit Stage-IV H.E Project DPR) for the concurrent period 1975-76 to 1984-85 after elimination of a few outliers after carrying out detailed regression analysis.

The correlation coefficients are reasonably good considering the variation in catchment size. Hence using the correlation equations developed and the monthly flows available for Rangit Stage-IV from June 1985 onwards. The Singlabazar data is extended for a period of 16 years thus evolving a series of 28 years.

For the extended monthly series for Singlabazar from 1985 onwards, the monthly series are broken up into ten daily series on the basis of corresponding ten daily ratios of observed data at Rangit Stage IV. The 28 year flow series at Singlabazar are transposed to Rammam Stage-III in catchment area proportion and T-test carried out for the evolved series.

Alternatively an attempt has been made to correlate mean Monsoon Singlabazar flow data and Rangit IV flow data (as obtained from Rangit Stage-IV H.E Project DPR) for the concurrent period 1975-76 to 1984-85 after elimination of a few outliers. However, this approach is not found to be suitable as it gives negative flows for several months.

3.11.5 Extending Singlabazar flow series based on Rangit Stage-IV data.

The catchment area of Rangit Stage-IV Project and Singlabazar G&D site are 1232 & 390 Km2 respectively. The flow series of Rangit from 1985-86 onwards are reduced in catchment area proportion (390/1232) to extend Singlabazar flows for a period of 16 years thus evolving a total length of flow series of 28 years. However, the flow ratios of the monthly flows of Singlabazar and Rangit –IV far exceed the catchment ratio. Hence, a correction factor need to be applied on the evolved flow series derived on catchment area proportion as the tributary Rangit has significant snowmelt contribution whereas it is not so in case of Singlabazar.

3 - 60

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-61 of 219

For the extended monthly series for Singlabazar from 1985 onwards, the monthly series are broken up into ten daily series on the basis of corresponding ten daily ratios of observed data at Rangit Stage IV.

3.11.6 Rainfall –Runoff Correlation

Efforts have been made for collection of additional rainfall data for Rainfall Runoff Correlation Studies. It has been confirmed by Forest Department officials that no raingauge data is available for the project catchment area. However, some rainfall data has been procured from IMD as per the following details.

S.No. Name of Raingauge Station Periodof data availability 1 Bijanbari 1971 to 2004 2. Phalut 1971 to 1983 3. Sandakpu 1970-72, 1980-83 & 1986 4 Darjeeling 1970-2004

Since Darjeeling Raingauge is located for away from project area, it has been ignored. For the proposed project catchment area rainfall for significant period is available only for Bijanbari and Phalut raingauges (for the period 1973 to 1983). Since the catchment area is quite small (247 Sq. Kms), these stations have been considered as the index rainfall for the catchment in absence of any other raingaue date. Using Singlabazar G & D date and average of Bijanbari and Phalut Rajnfall date for the concurrent period 1975- 84, an attempt has been made to establish Rainfall –Runoff correlation for monsoon period (June to Oct.)

Rainfall –Runoff correlation is very good (R=0.93). However the flow series cannot extended using this correlation as Phalut rainfall data is available only upto 1983 and correlation of Singlabazar frow data with Bijanbari rainfall data alone gave unsatisfactory results (as given in the earlier report)

3 - 61

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-62 of 219

Comparison of Results After evaluating the results obtained from the above approaches, it is decided to adopt the flow series derive based on monthly correlation between Singlabazar and Raingit stage – IV frowns for power potential simulation studies.

3.11.7 DESIGN FLOOD STUDIES

The design flood is the flood selected for design or safety evaluation of the structure. For a diversion structure, 100-year design flood or standard project flood value is considered for hydraulic design based on following methods.

I) Hydro-meteorological approach (Dimensionless unit hydrograph method as well as synthetic hydrograph approach).

II) Statistical Approach-Flood frequency analysis.

The return period design flood proposed to be adopted would be as per criteria delineated in the CWC Manual on estimation of design flood.

Inflow design flood return Cross Storage (Mm3) Hydraulic Head (m) period

100 yr flood Between 0.5 and 10 Between 7.5 and 12

SPF Between 10 and 60 Between 12 & 30

PMF /10000 yr Greater then 60 Greater than 30

For the proposed project, the height of the barrage is more than 12m and gross storage is less than 1 MCM. Hence standard Project Flood (SPF) can be considered as design flood.

3.11.8 Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph

The choice of the method of design flood estimation depends upon the specific requirement and the data availability. For the proposed project short interval rainfall – runoff data is not available which is the basic requirement for derivation of unit

3 - 62

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-63 of 219 hydrograph & for assessing the time distribution curves for the rainfall. Hence transposing of dimensionless unit hydrograph as derived based on flood Unit Hydrograph of Ranjit H.E scheme on river Teesta (carried out by C.W.C to derive unit hydrograph for the proposed project has been attempted.

The unit hydrograph derived for Ranjit H.E. Scheme (Catchment area 979 Km2) is made dimensionless by plotting a graph T/Tm vs Q/Qp. For the project catchment area of Rammam, the basic parameters QP and Tm are calculated using empirical formulae given in sub-zone 2(a) Report. The dimensionless unit hydrograph has been transposed to Rammam catchment by dividing the time and discharge ordinate values (i.e T/Tm and Q/Qp) of the dimensionless graph with Tm and Tm/V values of Rammam catchment respectively. Using time distribution coefficients as given is Sub zone 2(a) Report, Rainfall excess were calculated and are convoluted with unit hydrograph ordinated. The derivation of U.H for Rammam H.E scheme based on 3 hour U.H of Ranjit H.E Scheme is as follows.

Ranjit H.E Scheme Dimensionless U.G. Rammam H.E Scheme U.G U.H ordinates ordinated (V=2719m3) Ordinates (Tm=5, V=686.66m3)

T Q t/tm Q*tm/V T/tm*Tm Q*(Tm/V)*(V/Tm) 3 14 0.33 0.05 1.51 0.000. 6 107 .67 0.35 3.01 0.000 9 294 1.00 0.97 4.52 147.813 15 140 1.67 0.46 7.53 70.387 18 52 2.00 0.17 9.04 25.993 21 26 2.33 0.09 10.55 13.072 24 12 2.67 0.04 12.05 5.882

One day PMP value as per IMD PMP Atlas is 560 mm. Assuming a moisture adjustment factor (MAF) as 1.25, one-day SPP value is 448 mm. The 100 year, 50 year and 25 year return period 24 hour rainfall values are read from the isopluvial lines prepared by I.M.D

3 - 63

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-64 of 219

as given in Sub zone 2 (a) report and are 400, 360 & 320 mm respectively. Affter applying areal correction factor on 0.9 for accounting the day rainfall recorded in the proximately located raingauge station has been examined and it is found that Linsingbong has the highest 1-day rainfall (221.5 mm) followed by Dandagaon (208.6mm), Phalut (201.2 mm), Raman Village (180.4mm) and

Sandakphu (100.4 mm). The design loss rate and base flow (0.24 cm/hr & 0.05. Cumecs/Km2 respectively) are adopted from sub-zone 2 (a) report.

The 100 year return period flood is 1825 Cumecs and the SPF value derived using IMD value is 2864 Cumec.

3.11.9 Derivation of synthetic Unit Hydrograph

CWC in association with IMD and MOST has prepared Flood Estimation Reports for small and medium catchment for efficient hydro meteorological sub-zones. The proposed project area is located in sub zone 2a. Accordingly the present flow studies are based on Flood Estimation Report for Sub Zone 2a (1991) prepared by CWC.

The formulae for calculation of various parameters of synthetic U. are given below.

Parameter Calculations

Parameters Formulae qp 2.272(LLC/VS)-0.409 Tp 2.164 (qp)-0.940 W50 2.084(qp)-1.065 W75 1.028(qp)-1.071 WR50 8.856(qp)-0.865 WR75 0.440(qp)-0.918 Tb 5.428(tp)-0.852 Qp Qp xA

Where Tm=tp+t-2 hrs

Tp Time from the center of effective rainfall duration to the U.G. Peak (hrs.

3 - 64

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-65 of 219

L Length of longes main stream along the river course in m

Lc length of longer main stream from a point opposite to centroid of the catchment area to the gauging site along the main stream in Km.

S Equivalent stream slope in m/km.

Qp peak discharge of unit hydrograph in Cumec

W50 Width of U.G. measured at 50% of peak discharge ordinated (hrs.)

W75 Width of U.G. measured at 75% of peak discharge ordinated (hrs.)

WR50 Width of the rising limp of U.G. measures at 50% of peak discharge ordinate (hr.)

WR75 Width of the rising limp of U.G. measures at 75% of peak discharge ordinate (hr.)

Qp peak discharge of unit hydrograph (cumecs.)

The above relationship are recommended to estimate the parameters of 1-hour synthetic unit graph for an ungauged catchment with known physiographic parameters A, L, Lc and S for catchment area below 5000 km2.

For calculation of Lc (centroid distance), a cardboard template have been cut out in the shape of sub-catchment area of Rammam river (upto diversion site) and is hung freely using plumb bob and thread. Three axial lines were drawn by hanging cardboard in three different directions. The point of intersection of these three lines gives the centroid of the sub-catchment area. A point on the river which is nearest to centroid is considered and the distance from that point to the project site is measured which gives the Lc. a) Design Loss Rate: A design loss rate of 0.24 cm/hr has been adopted as recommended by CWC’s sub zone report r (a) b) Design Storm Duration: The base period of the SUG is for more than 24 hours, hence one day design storm is considered c) Pint to Areal Rainfall Ratios: areal correction factors as recommended in CWC’s sub zone 2 (a) has been adopted.

3 - 65

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-66 of 219 d) Time Distribution Coefficients: The Time Distribution Coefficients for 24 hours is given below: (vide sub-zone 2(a)

Table 3.22 Time Distribution Coefficients

Time in Hours Distribution Time in hours Distribution Coefficient coefficient 1 0.13 13 0.79 2 0.25 14 0.81 3 0.32 15 0.84 4 0.40 16 0.86 5 0.47 17 0.88 6 0.52 18 0.90 7 0.56 19 0.92 8 0.61 20 0.93 9 0.65 21 0.95 10 0.69 22 0.97 11 0.73 23 0.98 12 0.76 24 1.00

e) Design Base Flow: As recommended by CWC’s sub zone report 2(a) a base flow rate of 0.05 cumecs/sq. km has been adopted for the catchment area. f) Critical Sequence of Rainfall Excess: The critical sequence of rainfall excess should be characteristic of the area under study. When data is not available, to facilitate the adoption of this principle, the arrangement of g) Rainfall increments into design hyetograph may be made in the form of two bells of 12 hours each per day. h) Convolution: In convolution the U.G. ordinates at unit duration interval are multiplied by each of the rainfall excess ordinates of the design hyetograph and these are added by lagging one hour duration at a time. i) Computation of Unit Hydrograph: Using the basic physiographic parameters, unit hydrograph is plotted and its each volume is calculated and adjusted to 1 cm while adjusting the hydrograph the volumes Qp Tm & Ta are not changed. The design flood hydrograph have been computed after the rainfall excess increments have been 3 - 66

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-67 of 219

arranged in a critical sequence (after matching with UG ordinates) and reversed and convoluted. The base flow from rain fed area & snow fed contribution is added to the ordinates of the surface flow hydrograph to obtain total flood hydrograph.

The 100 year return period flood value thus obtained by Synthetic UG Hydro- meterorological Approach is 1540 Cumec.

3.11.10 Flood Frequency Analysis

Flood frequency anaysisi provides a quick estimate of the design flood and is also useful for cecking the design flood values computed by other methods.

It is carried out in two methods viz. – The Annual Maximum method and the Peak over Threshold (POT) method (also known as partial duration method). For the present study daily annual maximum values are used for carrying out flood frequency studies.

The long term annual instanteous peak flow series at project site is not available . As such the 12 year annual peak discharge series of Singlabazar G & D site on the

River Rammam has been used for frequency analysis. The results obtained were transposed to proposed diversion site with due consideration to the variation of catchment size. The available data has been subjected to randomness check, stationary test, outlier test. Extreme value distribution also known as Gumbel distribution and Log Pearson Type III distribution are attempted for the present study. Chi square test for LPT-III distribution and Gumbel distribution is used to test the goodness of fit and it is found that Gumbel distribution is found to be a good fit.

The final results of various return period floods estimated at Singlabazar are transposed to Proposed Scheme site using Dicken’s formula Q = CA.

The 100 year return period flood of 1825 Cumecs as obtained from dimenstionless hydrograph approach is recommended as design flood (for design of barrage). The SPF value derived using IMD value is 2864 Cumec which may be used for other considerations.

3 - 67

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-68 of 219

3.11.12 Diversion Flood

The diversion flood for the proposed project has been computed using non monsoon peaks for the period 1973-84 of Singlabazar G & D site. The diversion flood for various return periods as calculated using Gumbel distribution, which is found to be the best fit, is as follows.

Sl.No. Return Period Diversion Flood for Rammam Stage-III Years (Cumecs) 1 2 20.75 2 10 40.21 3 25 50.01 4 50 57.29 5 100 64.50 6 500 81.17

The risk factors involved in adoption of such floods have also been estimated as per different probable construction periods using the following relationship:

Risk(P) = 1 – (1-Td)/Td

Where Td = Return Period of design food

L = Construction period in years

The risk factors corresponding to different return period flood and probable construction period of 4 years, 6 years, 8 years & 10 years have been worked out and given below.

Sl.No. Return Magnitude Risk during construction period of Period of Flood 4 Yrs 6Yrs 8 Yrs 10 Yrs (Yrs) (Cumec) 1 10 40.21 0.344 0.469 0.570 0.651 2 25 50.01 0.151 0.217 0.279 0.335 3 50 57.29 0.078 0.114 0.149 0.183

3 - 68

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-69 of 219

The details study on Hydrology is enclosed as Annexure-XVIIA. The Hydrological series as placed at Annexure-XVIIB has been considered for further analysis and design of the project.

3.11.13 Drainage Pattern The drainage pattern of the study area exhibits dendritic pattern as shown in Fig 3.14 below. The main tributaries of river Rammam are Kali Khola, Shiri Khola, Lodhama Khola, Jhepi Khola and Riyang Khola.

Fig 3.14 Drainage map around 10 km radius

3.11.14 Catastrophic Events like Cloud Burst and Flash Floods Rammam River is river in the Darjeeling district of West Bengal, India. It originates in the Singalila range and has much of its course through Darjeeling district. The Teesta is a 3 - 69

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-70 of 219

transboundary river shared by Bangladesh and India, which has a steep slope and high seasonal flow variability. Flash flooding occurs from May to September during the monsoon period. However, river flow decreases significantly from October to April. Teesta river starts rising in late March due to snow melt in the Himalayas. The peak flow occurs between July and September due to heavy rain.

3.11.15 Sedimentation data Sediment is one of the major obstructions on the flow line or channel of water and unmanageable quantity of it shorten longevity of channels. Moreover, it causes soil erosion. Therefore, study of sediments and nature of its deposits on downstream are very important for preparation of any water supply projects.

The project is a Run of River (ROR) project in which barrage bays with crest level at river bed level have been proposed for flushing out the silt at regular intervals. Suitable sediment management practices like routine flushing during flood period will be evolved to avoid sediment deposition in the pond. Moreover, intake has been proposed to be located at suitably higher level above the spillway crest to prevent the entry of the silt in the water conductor system. Underground desilting chambers have been proposed for removal of silt particles of size 0.20 mm and above.

3.11.16 Environmental flow Environmental clearance for the projects was been accorded with a condition that

iv) A minimum flow of 1 cumec shall always be released from the barrage. The minimum flow to be released is about 22% of the minimum flow of 4.47 cumec recorded in the river

The project has been designed accordingly. However, the standard TOR condition stipulates that the minimum environmental flow shall be 20% of the flow of four consecutive lean months of 90% dependable year, 30% of the average monsoon flow. The flow for remaining months shall be in between 20-30%, depending on the site specific requirements. 3 - 70

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-71 of 219

The change in minimum flow as per Standard TOR at this stage shall drastically reduce the power generation from the project and render the project commercially unviable.

The issue of minimum flow in the rivers downstream of the hydro power projects has been a subject of study and deliberations at different levels. (a) National Green Trbunal in its Order dated 09/08/2017 in the matter of Pushp Saini Vs. Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change & Others regarding environmental flow of the rivers directed that all the rivers in the country shall maintain minimum 15 % to 20% of the average lean season flow of that river. During the same case, counsel appearing for Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change submitted that the Ministry has already completed river basin study of 6 river basins i.e. Siang River Basin, Twang River Basin, Bichom River Basin, Subansiri River Basin, Dibang River Basin and Lohit River Basin and upon study the Ministry has recommended the minimum flow of the river to be 18% of the average of lean season flow of the river. However, in some of the cases, it has stated to be even 20%.

(b) Further, MOEF&CC has also undertaken a Cumulative Impact Assessment and Carrying Capacity Study (CIA & CCS) of Teesta River Basin. The minutes of EAC (Hydro) meeting held on 23.04.2019, during which a presentation was made on the CIA and CCS Study, it was noted that Rammam-II & Rammam-III are under operation and construction stage respectively. However, for Rammam-I and Rammam Intermediate HEP Environmental Flows have been recommended as per the following Norms:

Monsoon 30% of average Discharge of monsoon season for 90% Season Depenable Year Non Monsoon 25% of average Discharge of Non-Monsoon Lean season Non Lean for 90% Depenable Year Season Lean Season 20% of average Discharge of lean season for 90% Depenable Year

3 - 71

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-72 of 219

In view of the above, NTPC Rammam HEPP will maintain the minimum Environmental flow of 1 cumecs as stipulated in the original environmental cleaarnce.

3.12 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 3.12.1 Introduction An ecological survey of the study area was conducted particularly with reference to recording the existing biological resources in the study area. Ecological studies are one of the important aspects of Environmental Impact Assessment with a view to conserve environmental quality and biodiversity. Ecological systems show complex inter- relationships between biotic and abiotic components including dependence, competition and mutualism. Biotic components comprise of both plant and animal communities, which interact not only within and between themselves but also with the abiotic components viz. physical and chemical components of the environment.

Generally, biological communities are good indicators of climatic and edaphic factors. Studies on biological aspects of ecosystems are important in Environmental Impact Assessment for safety of natural flora and fauna. The biological environment includes terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

The animal and plant communities co-exist in a well-organized manner. Their natural settings can get disturbed by any externally induced anthropological activities or by naturally occurring calamities or disaster. So, once this setting is disturbed, it sometimes is either practically impossible or may take a longer time to come back to its original state. Hence, changes in the status of flora and fauna are an elementary requirement of Environmental Impact Assessment studies, in view of the need for conservation of environmental quality and biodiversity. Information on flora and fauna was collected within the study area. Relevant details on aquatic life within the study area were collected from related government offices.

3 - 72

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-73 of 219

3.12.2 Objectives (i) To study the present ecological status and biodiversity of core and buffer zones of project areas (ii) To generate baseline data on flora and fauna, and aquatic ecology of core and buffer zones with assessment of possible impacts 3.12.3 Study area The study area 10 km area of the existing site situated in Darjeeling district of West Bengal and West Sikkim district of Sikkim states. The study area falls mainly in lower and middle hill forest only. The forests present in the study area have been grouped into different forest types following the classification of Champion & Seth (1968), Hajra & Das (1982), Negi, (1989, 1996), Hajra & Verma (1996), Srivastva (1998). As the 10 km study area of the existing barrage as well as powerhouse site and township falls within the altitude of 1000m hence the major forest types found in this catchment are discussed below.  Semi tropical Low-level forest  Tropical Moist Deciduous Forests  Temperate forests  Sub alpine forest The above mentioned forest classes are briefly described in the following paragraphs

Semi-tropical low level forests These forests are found in the valleys and the lower slopes of the hills upto an elevation of 1000 to 1300 m above mean level. Sal (Shorea rubusta) is the dominant tree species in these forests found in association with Champa (Michelia champaea), Lampata (Duabanga sonneratioides), Pakasaj (Terminalia tomentosa), Panisaj (Terminelia myriocarpa), and rubber ( elastica). The soils in the forests are generally freshly laid allvium deposited by the rivers and streams.

3 - 73

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-74 of 219

Tropical Moist Deciduous Forests This type of forest is a common feature of the study area as this type of forest is found near the powerhouse site, township area and the barrage site. These low hill forests occur from 230 m up to 900 m. The important species of the forest are Haldinia cordifolia, Aglaia lawii, Altsonia neriifolia, A. scholaris, Artocarpus integrifolia, Bombax ceiba, Canarium strictum, Duabanga grandiflora, Erythrina arborescens, Ficus semicordata, F. racemosa, Mangifera sylvatica, Shorea robusta, Terminalia myriocarpa, Tetrameles nudiflora, etc. The shrubs are Boehmeria pendulifera, B. platyphylla, Callicarpa arborea, Clerodendrum japonicum, Dendrocalamus sikkimensis, Eupatorium odoratum, camara, Phyllostachys bambusoides, Saurauia roxburghii, Leea aequatica, L. indica and Ziziphus mauritiana. Among twiners are Bauhinia vahlii, Celastrus paniculatus, Cryptolepis buchananii, Entada phaseoloides, Stephania glabra, etc. There are some riverine semi-evergreen types of elements such as Albizia chinensis, Bischofia javanica, Oroxylum indicum, Pandanus nepalensis, Rhus chinensis, etc. found along the river bank. The other riverine elements are tall grasses like Imperata cylindrica, Neyraudia arundinacea, Pennisetum orientale, P. purpureum, Saccharum spontaneum and Thysanolaena latifolia.

Temperate forests These forests are observed at elevation between 1200 to 3000 m above mean sea level. The forests area characterized by excessive atmospheric moisture, and their most striking feature is the wealth of orchids, fern and mosses and other epiphytes and creepers which load the branches of old trees. Large number of tree ferns, interspersed with small bamboo and wild plants are observed at lower elevations of this zone. The trees, many of which grow to a great height and girth belong to great number of different genera, the principle being Oak, Magnolias, Chestnut and maples, though laurels are also well represented. The most valuable tree species, Michelia excelsa, whose timber is used for panelling and flooring in houses, and is consequently in great demand. The other important tree species observed in these forests is Toon (Cedrela toona) which provides one of the best light planking wood in India. Earlier, the timber from this tree was most

3 - 74

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-75 of 219 popular in the country for making tea boxes. The other tree species found in these forests are Bak (Quercus lamellose), Phalat (Quercus lineate), Singari Katus (Quercus pachyphylla), Katus (Castonopsis hystrix), Pipli (Bucklandia populnea), etc.

Sub-alpine Forests These forests are observed at elevation above 2500 to 3600 m. At higher elevations Silver fir is dominant, while spruce is the dominant species at lower elevations. The other dominant tree in these forests is Birch (Betula utilis). At higher elevation, the undergrowth consists of hill bamboos (Arundinaria recemosa) which are used for making mats. Several species of aconite are also found which have some economic value.

Forest view Shorea robusta tree stand

Riverine forest Forest stand

3 - 75

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-76 of 219

Tea plantation Stepping cultivation

Invasion of Chromolaena odorata Tree cutting

Landslide

3 - 76

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-77 of 219

3.12.4 Cropping pattern West Sikkim District Sikkim belongs to Eastern Himalayan Zone. The state being hilly, the agro-climatic condition ranges from sub-tropical in the lower valley to alpine in the upper reaches. Out of the net 7096 sq. km., approximately 11% of the total geographical area is under agriculture. Due to agro-climatic advantages, West district has considerable potential for growing a variety of horticulture crops such as large cardamom, orange, passion fruit, mushroom, off-season vegetables and floriculture. The Horticulture and Cash Crop Development Department may provide adequate support like supply of quality planting materials and other post-harvesting facilities. Necessary infrastructure may be created for food processing, marketing of horticulture crops and extension services to farmers. Crops and areas of the West Sikkim District is given in the Table 3.23 & 3.24. Table 3.23 Areas under field crops from West Sikkim District (Ha) Major field Kharif Rabi Grand crops cultivated total Irrigated Rainfed Total Irrigated Rainfed Total Maize 12.88 12.88 12.88 Rice 4.19 4.19 4.19 Blackgram 1.4 1.4 1.4 Fingermillet 0.78 0.78 Buck wheat 2.16 2.16 2.16 Rape and Mustard 1.61 1.61 1.61 Wheat 1.02 1.02 1.02 Barley 0.5 0.5 0.5 Other pulses 0.31 0.31 0.31 Source: Agriculture Contingency plan of West Sikkim District

Table 3.24 Areas under horticultural crops from West Sikkim District (Ha) Horticulture Fruit crops Irrigated Rrainfed Total Orange 2.32 2.32 Other fruits 0.9 0.9 Horticulture crops Vegetables 3 - 77

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-78 of 219

Rabi vegetables 0.96 0.96 Kharif vegetables 0.91 0.91 Vegetable (Off season) 0.39 0.48 0.87 Potato 3.26 3.26 Other roots and tubers 0.12 0.12 Medicinal and Aromatic crops Large Cardamom 2.39 2.39 Ginger 1.98 1.98 Turmeric 0.18 0.18 Source: Agriculture Contingency plan of West Sikkim District

Darjeeling District Rice is the most important Kharif crop, which presently accounts for 77% of the total rice area and 68% of total area of the state. The Darjeeling district is a mountainous region situated on the Himalayan chains which is acknowledged agriculturally and economically backward region according to the indicators prescribed by different institutions to determine agricultural development of a region. It is an area of great physical inequalities with varied topographical features. The physical constraints are: (i) variations in topography (ii) variations of soil fertility (iii) problems due to drainage and floods (iv) uncertainty and uneven rainfall and temperature (v) soil erosion and landslides and (vi) problems due to irrigation. All these factors directly or indirectly wholly or partly stood in way of development of agriculture Darjeeling district in particular. The major field and horticultural crops of the Darjeeling district is given in the Table 3.25 & 3.26. Table 3.25 Areas under field crops from Darjeeling District (Ha) Major field crops Kharif Rabi Grand cultivated Irrigated Rainfed Total Irrigated Rainfed Total total Rice 31.4 31.4 2.41 2.41 34.48 Maize 14.6 14.6 14.6 Wheat 1.5 1.5 1.5 Oilseed ( Mustard, Linseed) 14.3 14.3 14.3 Source: Agriculture Contingency plan of Darjeeling district

3 - 78

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-79 of 219

Table 3.26 Areas under horticultural crops from Darjeeling District (Ha) Horticultural crops Fruits Area Pineapple 124.9 Mandarin 0.5 Other Citrus 5.7 Banana 3.3 Litchi 3 Horticultural crops vegetables Cucumbers 65 Brinjal 46.4 Cabbage 29.2 Cauliflower 26.2 Radish 13.6 Medicinal/Aromatic and Plantation crops Tea 21.3 Ginger 2.2 Chillies 0.5 Potato 6.7 Large Cardamom 4.8 Source: Agriculture Contingency plan of Darjeeling district 3.12.5 Agricultural production system The Darjeeling Himalaya of the ecosystem can be classified as forests, grasslands and croplands or agricultural lands. Livestock and poultry are a strong and integral component. Different species of animals are reared for draught, milk, and meat purposes and they also supplement manure to meet the nutrient requirement of crops. Details of the crop production and productivity given in Tables 3.27 & 3.28 Table 3.27 Production and productivity of major and horticultural crops from West Sikkim District Major field Kharif Rabi Total crops Production Productivity Production Productivity Production Productivity cultivated (Tonnes) (Kg/Ha) (Tonnes) (Kg/Ha) (Tonnes) (Kg/Ha)

Rice 7.262 1640 7.262 1640 maize 21.76 1645 21.76 1645 Finger Millet 1.085 920 1.085 920 Pulses 1.766 898 1.766 898 Wheat 2.296 1316 2.296 1316 Barley 0.384 1208 0.384 1208

3 - 79

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-80 of 219

Buck Wheat 2.13 986 2.13 986 Rapeseed 0.608 721 0.68 721 Mustard Soyabean 0.476 822 0.476 822 Major Horticultural crops Orange 3.43 1414 Passion fruits 0.087 174 Other fruits 1.45 1576 Vegetables 4.579 4556 4.677 4493 9.246 4524 Off-season 5.479 4715 vegetables Potato 14.2428 4325 Large 0.575 230 Cardamom Ginger 11.235 5350 Flowers 5.792 Source: Agriculture Contingency plan of West Sikkim District

Table 3.28 Production and productivity of major and horticultural crops from Darjeeling District Name of crop Kharif Rabi Summer Total Production Productivity Production Productivity Production Productivity Production Productivity (Tonnes) (Kg/Ha) (Tonnes) (Kg/Ha) (Tonnes) (Kg/Ha) (Tonnes) (Kg/Ha) Rice 48.7 1673 9.3 1576 2.6 1625 60.7 4874 Maize 29.2 2300 0 0 0 0 29.2 2300 Wheat 0 0 4.7 1700 0 0 4.7 1700 Millet (Kodo 0.8 1600 0 0 0 0 0.8 1600 millet) Rape seed 0 0 0.5 600 0 0 0.5 600 Vegetables 2 7500 1.012 1000 1.4 7200 4.43 15700 (cabbage, Cauliflower, Radish etc) Chilli 0.3 750 0 0 0 0 0.3 750 Ginger 0.6 3100 0 0 0 0 0.62 3100 Turmeric 0.2 1500 0 0 0 0 0.15 1500 Cardamon 0 245 0 0 0 0 0 245 Potato 0 0 113.1 15700 0 0 113.1 15700 Source: Agriculture Contingency plan of Darjeeling district

3 - 80

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-81 of 219

3.12.6 Vegetation composition in the study area Submergence and Barrage area The submergence area is 3.852 Ha, which is located in upstream of confluence of Rammam Rivernear Lodhama Village in the Darjeeling district. The area in the vicinity of project comprised degraded mixed broad-leaf tropical deciduous forest with few Semi- evergreen riverine tree species. On right bank of Rammam river, the tree canopy is comprised of Albizia chinensis, Bischofia javanica, Duabanga grandiflora, Engelhardtia spicata, Erythrina arborescens, Ficus reticulata, Gynocardia odorata, Schima wallichii and Tetradium fraxinifolium. Second storey is also very thin and composed of some small trees and tall spreading weeds. Boehmeria platyphylla, Caesalpinia decapetala, Euonymus pendulus, Chromolaena odorata, Holmskioldia anguinea, , Rhamnus nepalensis, etc. are found in the understorey. Climbers and epiphytes are often seen on the forest floor. Cissus discolor, Cuscuta reflexa, Jasminum humile, Lygodium japonicum, Piper sylvaticum, Stephania glabra, Todalia asiatica, etc. are important trailing species. Herbaceous flora was represented by some pteridophytic plants, grasses and weeds. The pteridophytes are represented by species of Adiantum, Coniograme, Lygodium, Selaginella, etc. on this bank. Among the herbs and grasses are Ageratum conyzoides, Artemisia nilagirica, Arundinella nepalensis, Arthraxon hispidus, Capillipedium assimile, Commelina benghalensis, Eupatorium adenophorum, Imperata cylindrica, Lespedeza gerardiana, Oxalis corniculata, Pilea scripta, Pogonatherum paniceum, Saccharum spontaneum and Thysanolaena latifolia.

Species composition of left bank is more or less similar to the right bank but Dendrocalmus hamiltonii clumps is the dominant and Alnus nepalensis was found as a dominant tree species with other tree associates. Important tree associates were Albizia chinensis, Bischofia javanica, Bombax ceiba, Duabanga grandiflora, Erythrina arborescens, Oroxylum indicum, Pandanus nepalensis, Schima wallichii, etc. Second storey was very open and occupied by few trailing and spreading shrubby species. Dendrocalmus hamiltonii, Chromolaena odorata, Mimosa himalayana, etc. were in the

3 - 81

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-82 of 219 under storey. Climbers and epiphytes were rare. Herbs were represented by few non vascular pteridophytic plants, weeds and few grasses.

Fig 3.15 Barrage area Powerhouse site Surface power house of 120 MW (3 x 40 MW) has been proposed at the right bank of the Rammam River, 50.0 m upstream of the confluence of the Ramsu Khola with Rammam River. The species composition of the vegetation on the left bank and right bank is more or less similar with the presence of more semi evergreen, mixed moist deciduous and rivierine plant species found in the vicinity of power house. Major tree associates in this area include Albizia chinensis, Bischofia javanica, Bombax ceiba, Callicarpa arborea, Duabanga grandiflora, Haldinia cordifolia, Lagerstroemia lanceolata, Malotus philippensis, Neolamarckia cadamba, Oroxylum indicum, Rhus chinensis, Shorea robusta, Terminalia bellerica, and Terminalia myriocarpa. The composition of second story plants are Brassiopsis mitis, Clerodendrum bracteatum, Debregeasia salicifolia, etc. Boehmeria platyphylla, Leea aequata, Saurauia roxburghii, Vitex nigundo, Woodfordia fruticosa, and many invasive fast growing species like Clerodendrum japonicum, Chromolaena odorata, Lantana camara, etc. Climbers and epiphytes were

3 - 82 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-83 of 219 also very few at this bank. Cissus repens, Cissampelos pariera, Mimosa himalayana, Pueraria tuberosa, Stephania glabra, Vigna retusa, etc. were found trailing in the forest. Epiphytes were represented by Dendrobium aduncum, Pepromia spp., Polypodium sp., Vittaria sp., etc. Among herbs were Ageratum conyzoides, Arthraxon hispidus, Desmodium renifolium, Dichanthium annulatum, Eupatorium adenophorum, Flemingia fruticosa, Neyraudia arundinacea, Oplismenus compositus, Parthenium hysterophorus, Pogonatherum paniceum, Saccharum spontaneum and Thysanolaena latifolia.

Township area The area possesses moderate level of infrastructural facilities. The township being constructed near Barbatia village shall be permanent residence for the project. About 100 numbers of staff/employees and CISF Staff will be residing at site during operation phase of the project. NTPC has developed prefabricated bachelor and office accommodation and other non-residential buildings for staff of NTPC, CISF, Support Staff, etc. are under different stages of construction.

Fig 3.16 Power house

3 - 83 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-84 of 219

Fig 3.17 Vegetation nearby township area 3.12.7 Methodology Floral diversity A comprehensive list of the plant species of the study area was made based on the plant species collected during monsoon season by the survey teams. The species were further separated in to trees, shrubs, climbers (perennials), herbaceous species, medicinal and aquatic plants. These plants were identified with the help of Flora of Darjeeling Himalayas and Foothills (Ghosh and Mallick, 2017) and eFloras (2014). For the purpose of calculation of Importance Value Indices (IVI), quadrat sampling and line intercept methods were used for estimation of frequency, density and cover. For determination of frequency and density of herbaceous species, a nested quadrat of 1 m x 1 m was used. A total of 25 quadrats from each sampling location (Table 3.29) were taken at random. However, for calculating the frequency and density of different shrubs, 25 quadrats of 5m x 5 m were used. For determination of the frequency and density of different trees 25 quadrats of 20m x 20m were taken. Density was calculated as the number per m2 in case of herbaceous plants and as number per hectare in case of trees and tree like plants.

3 - 84

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-85 of 219

The IVI values were calculated as the sum of relative frequency, relative density and relative dominance (dominance was based on cover). Frequency, density, abundance, IVI values and the indices of diversity of the plant species in the study area including the area of submergence were determined basing on standard ecological methods (Curtis and Mc Intosh, 1950) widely used in phytosociology as outlined hereunder:

Total number of quadrats in which a species occur Frequency = ------× 100 Total number of quadrats studied

Total number of individuals of a species Density = ------Total number of quadrats studied

Total number of individuals of the species occurring Abundance = ------Total number of quadrats in which the species occur

Frequency of one species Relative frequency (RF) = ------× 100 Sum of all frequencies

Number of individuals of a species Relative density (RD) = ------× 100 Total number of individuals of all species

Combined basal area of a single species Relative dominance (RDom) = ------× 100 Total basal area of all species

Importance Value Index (IVI) = RF + RD + RDom

Based on the IVI values, Shannon –Wiener Indices of Diversity and Simpson Index of dominance were calculated by using a computer progamme called “PAST”. The data collected were also used to compute community indices like species diversity (H') of different tree species was calculated by using the Shannon- Weiner Index (Shannon and Weiner, 1963), as such:

3 - 85

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-86 of 219

H' = -Σ (ni/N)/ n (ni/N),

Where, ni/N, which denotes the importance probability of each species in a population, ni= Importance of value of species and N is the total number of individuals of all species in that vegetation type. Species dominance (Cd) was calculated following Simpson (Simpson, 1949): Such that Cd = Σ (ni/N)2,

Where, ni and N are the same as those for Shannon-Weiner information function. Table 3.29 Details of sampling locations and number of quadrtas S.No. Location Latitude Longitude No of quadrats 1 Salangdang 27° 7'1.71"N 88° 8'54.58"E 25 2 Kankiabang 27° 6'26.86"N 88° 8'31.84"E 25 3 Near Township area 27° 7'29.87"N 88°12'52.68"E 25 4 Karmi 27° 7'3.46"N 88°13'58.54"E 25

Faunal diversity A linear transect of 1 km each was chosen for sampling at each site. Each transect was trekked for 1.5 hr for the sampling of faunal diversity through following methods for different categories. For the sampling of butterflies, the standard ‘Pollard walk’ method was employed and all the species that could not be identified in the field were collected using a butterfly net besides photographing them.

For ’s sampling ‘point sampling’ along the fixed transects (foot trails) was carried out. All the species of were observed through a binocular and identified with the help of field guide book and photographs.

For sampling of mammals, direct count on open width (20m) transect was used. In addition, information on recent sightings/records of mammals by the villagers/locals was also collected. For carnivores, indirect sampling was carried out and the mammals wee identified by foot marks, faeces and other marks/sign created by them. In case of reptiles mainly lizards were sampled by direct count on open width transects.

3 - 86

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-87 of 219

The study of fauna takes substantial amount of time to understand the specific faunal characteristics of area. The assessment of fauna has been done by extensive field survey of the area. During survey, the presence of wildlife was also inhabitants depending on animal sightings and frequency of their visits in the project area which was later confirmed from forest department, Wildlife department etc.

3.12.8 Secondary data collection An extensive desktop review of available published literature (books, websites, scientific papers, articles etc.) was conducted. The State Forest/ Working Plan were also referred for secondary information. Additional information was sourced from the project proponent, governmental institutions and local residents of the survey-area. The secondary data was appropriately supplemented by a field survey for primary data collection. The species have been identified using relevant floras and standard literature such as Carrying capacity study of Teesta Basin in Sikkim (MoEF&CC), Red data Book of Indian Plants (Nayar and Shastry 2000). In course of the collection we came across Rare, endangered and threatened species which have been included in the Red Data Book of Indian Plants , CITES plants (www.bsienvis.org/citesplant), IUCN Red List ( https://www.iucnredlist.org/) of threatened species and several other papers from the country. Other plants which have not been listed in the Red Data Book but are now rare or endangered in the study area are also documented based on literature published by BSI, ZSI and research articles. Rarity of species is determined by field study, visual estimation, literature, herbaria and from discussions with the local forest officials. The criterion for categorization of threatened species is based on the IUCN Redlist

3 - 87

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-88 of 219

Fig 3.18 Terrestrial ecology sampling locations

3 - 88

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-89 of 219

3.12.9 Floristic composition The study area is totally forested area such as villages, Tea gardens and forest areas. Vegetation is semi evergreen, moist deciduous and riverine forest in condition, composition and density. Dependence of villagers on natural vegetation in hits region is more for timber and medicinal plants. During primary and secondary study carried out under present project, a total 695 plant species observed including 256 tree species, 104 shrubs, 104 climbers, 202 herbs, 17 grasses, 4 sedges and 7 species of ferns were recorded from the study area. The total list of the plant species for command as well as 10 km study area observed in the study area is given Table 3.30

Table 3.30 Flora recorded in the study area S.No. Botanical name Local name Family Habit 1 Abroma augusta (L.) L. f. Ulatkamal Sterculiaceae Shrub 2 Abrus pulchellus Thwaites Fabaceae Climber 3 Acacia catechu (L. f.) Willd. Khayar Mimosoideae Tree 4 Acacia pennata (L.) Willd. Arkhu Mimosoideae Climber 5 Acampe papillosa (Lindl.) Lindl. Orchidaceae Herb 6 Acer campbelli Hook.f. & T. ex Hiern Kapasi Santalaceae Tree 7 Acer sterculiaceum Wall. Melo Kapasi Tree 8 Achyranthes aspera L. Apamarg Amaranthaceae Herb 9 Achyranthes bidentata Blume Rato Apamarg Amaranthaceae Herb 10 Acmella calva (D.C.) Jansen. Kalijhar Asteraceae Herb 11 Acmella paniculata (Wall.ex DC) Lato Jhar Asteraceae Herb R.K.Jans. 12 Aconogonom molle (D.Don)Hara Thotne Polygonaceae Climber 13 Acorus calamus L. Bojho Araceae Herb 14 Acrocarpus fraxinifolius Arnott. Mandane Fabaceae Tree 15 Actinidia callosa Lindl. Theki Phal Actinidiaceae Climber 16 Actinodaphne obovata (Nees)Blume Runche pat Lauraceae Tree 17 Actinodaphne angustifolia Nees Petarichewa Lauraceae Tree 18 Actinodaphne sikkimensis Meisn. Lauraceae Tree 19 Adiantum lunulatum Burm. Adiantaceae Herb 20 Adiantum philippense Linnaeus Adiantaceae Herb 21 Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa Bael Rubiaceae Tree

3 - 89

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-90 of 219

22 Aerides odorata Loureiro. Orchidaceae Herb 23 Aerva javanica Juss. ex Schult. Kapok bush Amaranthaceae Herb 24 Aeschynanthus acuminatus Wall .ex Gesneriaceae Herb A.DC. 25 Aeschynanthus hookeri C.B. Clarke Gesneriaceae Herb 26 Aeschynanthus novogracilisW.T.Wang Nilgiri Blushwort Gesneriaceae Herb 27 Aeschynanthus parviflorus (D.Don) Thirjo Gesneriaceae Herb Spreng. 28 Agapetes serpens(Wight) Sleumer Khorsane Ericaceae Shrub 29 Ageratina adenophora (Sprengel) Kalo Banmara Asteraceae Shrub R.M.King &H.Rob. 30 Ageratum conyzoides L. Ilame Jhar Asteraceae Herb 31 Ageratum houstonianum Miller Asteraceae Herb 32 Aglaia chittagonga Miq. Meliaceae Tree 33 Ailanthus excelsa Roxb. Gokul Simaroubaceae Tree 34 Ailanthus integrifolia Lam. Saragphula Simaroubaceae Tree 35 Alangium salvifolium (L. F.) Wangerin Asare Alanginaceae Tree 36 Alangium chinense (Lour.) Harms Phir Phire Alanginaceae Tree 37 Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth. Kalo siris Fabaceae Tree 38 Albizia procera (Roxb.) Benth. Seto Siris Fabaceae Tree 39 Albizia odoratissima (L.f.) Benth. Kalo shirish Fabaceae Tree 40 Allium wallichii Kunth. Ban lasun Amyrallidaceae Herb 41 Alnus nepalensis D.Don. Utis Betulaceae Tree 42 Aloe barbadensis Miller. Chal-kuori Liliaceae Climber 43 Alseodaphne owdenii R.Parker Tilkhundi Lauraceae Tree 44 Alsophila glaucas (Sw.)Urb. Rukh unio Cyatheacea Fern 45 Alstonia scholaris (L.)R.Br. Chatiwan Tree 46 Alternanthera sessile (L.) DC. Saranchi saag Amaranthaceae Herb 47 Amaranthus lividus L. Latte saag Amaranthaceae Herb 48 Amaranthus spinosus L. Lude saag Amaranthaceae Herb 49 Amaranthus viridus L. Lude saag Amaranthaceae Herb 50 Amomum dealbatum Roxb. Churumpha Zingiberaceae Shrub 51 Amomum subulatum Roxb. Alaichi Zingiberaceae Herb 52 Ampelocissus barbata (Wall.) Jarila laha Vitaceae Climber Planchon. 53 Anaphalis contorta (D. Don) Hook.f. Bukiphul Asteraceae Herb 54 Anaphalis margaritacea (L.)Benth & Indian Cudweed Asteraceae Herb Hook.f.

3 - 90

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-91 of 219

55 Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) ankuri phul Acanthaceae Herb Wall. ex Ness. 56 Angiopteris evecta (G.Forst.) Hoffm. Gaikhurae Marratiaceae Fern 57 Anisomeles indica (L.) Kuntze Rato Charpate Lamiaceae Herb 58 Anthogonium gracile Wall ex Lindl. Lei-nauban Orchidaceae Herb 59 Antidesma acidum Retzium. Archal Shrub 60 Aphanamixis polystachya (Wall.) Lhasunae Meliaceae Tree R.N.Parker 61 Aporosa octandra (Buch.-Ham. ex Bor heloch Phyllanthaceae Tree D.Don) Vickery 62 Aralia gigantea J. Wen. Chindey Araliaceae Climber 63 Aralia leschenaultii (DC.) J. Wen. Chinde Araliaceae Tree 64 Archidendron clypearia (Jack) Rhasahu Leguminosae Tree I.C.Nielsen 65 Ardisia macrocarpaWall. Damai phal Shrub 66 Ardisia solanacea Roxburgh Myrsinaceae Shrub 67 Argyreia hookeri Clarke Climber 68 Argyreia roxburghii Choisy Convolvulaceae Climber 69 Arisaema nepenthoides (Wall.)Mart. ex Tuwa Araceae Herb Schott 70 Arisaema tortuosum (Wall.) Schott Toa Araceae Herb 71 Aristolochia saccata Wall Sanghar-vaibel Aristolochiaceae Shrub 72 Artemisia dubia Wall. ex Besser. Titepati Asteraceae Herb 73 Artemisia indica Willd. Titepati Asteraceae Shrub 74 Artocarpus heterophyllus Lamarck. Rukh Tree 75 Artocarpus lacucha Buch-Ham. Badar Moraceae Tree 76 Arundinaria intermedia Munro Malingo Grass 77 Arundinaria maling Gamble Malingo Poaceae Grass 78 Asparagus racemosus Willd. Kurilo Liliaceae Herb 79 Asparagus officinalis L. Kurilo Asperagaceae Climber 80 Astilbe rivularis Buch-Ham. ex D.Don Buro okhati Saxifragaceae Shrub 81 Asystasia macrocarpa Nees Obul-oing Acanthacea Shrub 82 Azadirachta indica Juss. Neem Meliaceae Tree 83 Baccaurea ramiflora Lour. Kusum Phyllanthaceae Tree 84 Bambusa nutans Wallich Poaceae Shrub 85 Bambusa tulda Roxb. Katta bans Poaceae Shrub 86 Bauhinia purpurea L. Tanki Fabaceae Tree 87 Bauhinia vahlii Wight & Arnott. Bharla Fabaceae Climber

3 - 91

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-92 of 219

88 Bauhinia variegata L. Koirala Fabaceae Tree 89 Beaumontia grandiflora Wall. Chimale lahara Apocynaceae Climber 90 Begonia cathcartii Hook. f. D. Don. Dieng Jajew Begoniaceae Herb 91 Begonia dioica Buch._Ham. Ex D.Don Mangarkanche Begoniaceae Herb 92 Begonia hatacoa D. Don Begoniaceae Herb 93 Begonia picta Sm. Magarkache Begoniaceae Herb 94 Begonia rubella Buch._Ham. Ex D.Don Magar kanche Begoniaceae Herb 95 Beilschmiedia clarkei Hook.f. Tarsing Lauraceae Tree 96 Beilschmiedia roxburghiana Nees Thulo Tarsing Lauraceae Tree 97 Beilschmiedia dalzellii (Meisn.) Lauraceae Tree Kosterm. 98 Belamcanda chinensis (L.) DC. Tarware phool Iridaceae Herb 99 Bergenia ciliata (Haworth) Sternberg. Pakhen bet Saxifragaceae Herb 100 Betula alnoides Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don Saur Betulaceae Tree

101 Bidens pilosa L. Kalo Kuro Asteraceae Herb 102 Biophytum reinwardtii (Zuccarini) Oxalidaceae Herb Klotzsch 103 Bischofia javanica Blume Kainjal Phyllanthaceae Tree 104 Boehmeria macrophylla Hornemann Urticaceae Herb 105 Boehmeria rugulosa Weddell Dar Urticaceae Tree 106 Boehmeria ternifolia D. Don Chalnu sisnu Urticaceae Herb 107 Boenninghausenia albiflora (Hook.) Ankuree Rutaceae Herb Reichb. ex Meisn. 108 Bombax ceiba L. Simal Tree 109 Brassaiopsis glomerulata (Blume) Reg. Kalo Chuletro Araliaceae Shrub 110 Brassaiopsis hainla (Buch.-Ham. Ex Seto Chuletro Araliaceae Shrub D.Don) Seem 111 Brassaiopsis hispida Seem Putta Araliaceae Shrub 112 Brassaiopsis mitis C.B.Clarke Chuletro/Phutta Araliaceae Tree 113 Bridelea retusa (L.) Juss. Gayo lahara Phyllanthaceae Climber 114 Bridelia stipularis (L.) Blume Gayo lahara Euphorbiaceae Climber 115 Bridelia sikkimensis Gehrm. Phyllanthaceae Tree 116 Bryonopsis laciniosa (L.) Naud. The bryony Cucurbitaceae Climber 117 Buchanania lanzan Spreng. Charoli Anacardiaceae Tree 118 Buddleja asiatica Loureiro. Karukattaan Buddlejaceae Climber 119 Butea parviflora Roxb. Dhak Papillionoideae Climber 120 Caesalpinia cucullata Roxb. Boksi Kara Fabaceae Climber

3 - 92

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-93 of 219

121 Calamus erectus Roxb. Phyakre Areceae Tree 122 Calamus latifolius Roxb. Phekre Bet Arecaceae Climber 123 Calamus tenuis Roxb. Kukhre bet Arecaceae Climber 124 Callicarpa arborea Roxb. Guenlo Verbenaceae Tree 125 Callicarpa vestita Wall. Ex C.B.Clarke Guenlo Verbenaceae Tree 126 Calophyllum polyanthum Wall. Ex Rate Clausiaceae Tree Choisy 127 gigantea (L.) Dryander. Aank Asclepiadaceae Shrub 128 Canarium sikkimense King. Gokul Dhup Burseraceae Tree 129 Cannabis sativa L. Phul tarul Cannabiaceae Shrub 130 Capillipedium assimile (Steudel) A. Poaceae Grass Camus 131 Carex baccans Nees ex Wight Harkatta Cyperaceae Sedge 132 Carex filicina Nees Harkatta Cyperaceae Sedge 133 Careya arborea Roxb. Kumbh Lecythidaceae Tree 134 Caryota urens L. Rangbhang Arecaceae Tree 135 Casearia glomerata Roxb. Barkaulae Salicaceae Tree 136 Casearia tomentosa Roxb. Saptrangi Salicaceae Tree 137 Casearia vareca Roxb. Salicaceae Tree 138 Cassia fistula L. Amaltas Caesalpinoideae Tree 139 Castanopsis hystrix Hook f & Thomson Jat/Patle Katus Fagaceae Tree 140 Castanopsis indica (Roxb.exLindley) Dhalnae Katus Fagaceae Tree A.de Cand. 141 Castanopsis tribuloides (Sm.) A. DC. Musre katus Fagaceae Tree 142 Castanopsis lanceifolia (Oerst.) Hickel Serang Fagaceae Tree & A.Camus 143 (L.) G. Don. Nayantara Apocynaceae Herb 144 Catunaregam spinosa (Thunb.) Maidal Rubiaceae Shrub Tirveng. 145 Cautleya gracilis (Sm).Dandy Zingiberaceae Herb 146 Cayratia trifolia (L.) Domin. Amalbel Vitaceae Climber 147 Celtis tetranda Roxb. Khari Ulmaceae Tree 148 Celtis timorensis Span Khari Ulmaceae Tree 149 Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Athane Jhar Apiaceae Herb 150 Cephaelis ipecacuanha(Brot.) A. Rich. Rubiaceae Shrub

151 Cephalostachyum capitatium Munro Gope/ Dallo Bans Poaceae Grass 152 Chamabainia cuspidata Wight Urticaceae Herb

3 - 93

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-94 of 219

153 Chenopodium album L. Bethu saag Chenopodiacee Herb 154 Choerospondias axillaris (Roxb.) B. L. Lapsi Anacardiaceae Tree Burtt and A. W. Hill 155 Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & Aula Banmara Asteraceae Herb H.Rob. 156 Chukrasia tabularis A. Juss. Chekrasi Meliaceae Tree 157 Cinchona succirubra Pavon ex Klotz. Rubiaceae Tree 158 Cinnamomum bejolghota (Buch.- Bahale Sinkowli Lauraceae Tree Ham.) Sweet 159 Cinnamomum glanduliferum (Wall.) Malagiri Lauraceae Tree Meissner 160 Cinnamomum tamala (Buch.-Ham.) Sinkowli/Tejpata Lauraceae Tree Nees & Eberm. 161 Cinnamomum glaucescens (Nees) Sugandhakokila Lauraceae Tree Hand.-Mazz. 162 Cinnmomum impressinerviun Meisn. Sissi Lauraceae Tree 163 Cissampelos pareira L. Tamarke/Batulpate Menipermaceae Climber 164 Citrus medica L. Bimbira Rutaceae Tree 165 Cleidion javanicum Blume Palapkung Euphorbiaceae Tree 166 Cleistocalyx operculatus (Roxb.) Merr Kyamuna Myrtaceae Tree and Perry 167 Clematis buchnaniana DC. Pinase Lahara Menispermaceae Climber 168 Clematis acuminata DC. Pinase Lahara Menispermaceae Climber 169 Clerodendrum infortunatum L. Bhante Verbenaceae Shrub 170 Clerodendrum serratum (L.) Moon. Chitu Verbenaceae Shrub 171 Coelogyne ovalis Lindl. Orchidaceae Herb 172 Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Dosul Lamiaceae Herb 173 Colocasia affinis Schott Ban piralu Araceae Herb 174 Combretum album Pers. Thakauli/Seti Combretaceae Climber Lahara 175 Combretum decandrum Jacq. Kali-lara Combretaceae Climber 176 Commelina suffruticosa Blume Commelinaceae Sedge 177 Compylandra aurantiaca Baker Nakima Liliaceae Herb 178 Cordia myxa L. Bohri Boraginaceae Tree 179 Cordia dichotoma G.Forst. Nimat-kung Boraginaceae Tree 180 Cornus capitata Wall. Ex Roxb. Bamora Cornaceae Tree 181 Costus speciosus Koen. ex Retz. Smith. Betlouree Zingiberaceae Herb

182 Crassocephalum crepidioides Asteraceae Herb (Bentham) S. Moore

3 - 94

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-95 of 219

183 Croton caudatus Geis. Supare Lahara Euphorbiaceae Climber 184 Cryptocarya amygdalinaNees Patpatae Lauraceae Tree 185 Cryptomeria japonica (L.f.) D.Don. Dhupi Taxodiaceae Tree 186 Cupressus cashmeriana Carriere Kasmiri Dhupi Cupressaceae Tree 187 Curcuma aromatica Salisbury. Banhaldi Zingiberaceae Herb 188 Curcuma longa L. Haldi Zingiberaceae Herb 189 Curcuma zedoaria (Berg.) Rosc. Kochura Zingiberaceae Herb 190 Cuscuta reflexa Roxb. Akashi-lata Cuscutaceae Climber 191 Cyanotis vaga (Lour.) J.A & J.H.Sc. Commelinaceae Herb 192 (L.) H.Rob. Cineria Asteraceae Herb 193 Cyathea brunoniana (Wall.ex Hook.) Rukh unio Cyatheacea Fern Clarke & Baker 194 Cyathea spinulosa Wall ex Hook Rukh unio Cyatheacea Fern 195 Cyclea bicristata (Griffith) Diels Menispermaceae Climber 196 Cymbidium aloifolium (L.) Sw. Mota-kopou-phul Orchidaceae Herb 197 Cymbopogon citratus Stapf. Lemon grass Poaceae Herb 198 Cynadon dactylon (L.) Pers. Dubo Poaceae Grass 199 Cyperus cyperoides (Retzius) O. Cyperaceae Sedge Kuntze 200 Dactylicapnos scandens (D.Don.) Mutu Jhar Papaveraceae Herb Hutch. 201 Dalbergia stipulacea Roxb. Lahare Siris Fabaceae Climber 202 Dalbergia volubilis Roxb. Bar medeluwaa Fabaceae Climber 203 Daphne bholua D. Don. Thymelaeaceae Shrub 204 Daphne papyraceae Wall. Ex G.Don Lokoti Thymelaeceae Shrub 205 Daphne sureil W.W.Sm.& Cave Thymelaeceae Shrub 206 Daphniphyllum himalayense (Benth.) Lal or Rakta Daphniphyllaceae Tree Mull. chandan 207 Debregeasia longifolia (Burman f.) Tusarae Urticaceae Tree Weddell 208 Dendrobium nobile Lindl. Orchidaceae Herb 209 Dendrocalamus hamiltoniiNees & Choya Bans Poaceae Grass Arn.ex Munro 210 Dendrocnide sinuata (Blume) Chew Morngay Urticaceae Shrub 211 Dendrophthoe falcata (L. f.) Etting. Banda Loranthaceae Shrub 212 Desdmodium heterocarpon (Linnaeus) Fabaceae Shrub DC. 213 Dicentra scandens (D. Don) Walpers. Mutu jhar Fumariaceae Climber 214 Dichroa febrifuga Lour. Basak Hydrangeaceae Shrub

3 - 95

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-96 of 219

215 Dichrocephala integrifolia (L.f.) Hadchun Jhar Asteraceae Herb Kuntze 216 Dicliptera bupleuroides Nees Acanthaceae Herb 217 Didymocarpus aromaticus Wall. ex D. Gesneriaceae Herb Don. 218 Digitalis purpurea L. Jhandi phool Scrophularaceae Herb 219 Dillenia indica L. Panchphale Dilleniaceae Tree 220 Dillenia pentagyna Roxb. Tatri Dilleniaceae Tree 221 Dioscorea alata L. Ghartarul Dioscoreaceae Climber 222 Dioscorea belophylla (Prain)Voigit ex Tarul Dioscoreceae Climber Haines 223 Dioscorea bulbifera L. Githa/Ban Tarul Dioscoreaceae Climber 224 Dioscorea deltoidea Wall.ex Griseb. Kukur tarul Dioscoreaceae Climber 225 Dioscorea hamiltonii Hook.f. Ban tarul Dioscoreace Climber 226 Dioscorea hispida Dennstedt Dioscoreaceae Climber 227 Dioscorea pentaphylla L. Bhyagur Dioscoreaceae Climber 228 Diplazium esculentum (Retzius) Swart Saune niuro Athyriaceae Herb 229 Diplazium maximum(D. Don) C. Chr. Danthe niuro Athyriaceae Herb 230 Diploknema butyracea (Roxb.) Baehni Chiuri Sapotaceae Tree 231 Dobinea vulgaris Buch. Ham.ex D.Don Sangli phul Anacardiaceae Shrub 232 Dolichos biflorus L. Fabaceae Herb 233 Drimycarpus racemosus (Roxb.) Kagi Anacardiaceae Tree Hook.f. ex Marchand. 234 Drymaria cordata Willd. Avijal Caryophyllaceae Herb 235 Drymaria villosa Cham .& Schl. Abhijal Caryophylaceae Herb 236 Dryopteris cochleata (D. Don) C. Chr. Danthe niuro Dryopteridaceae Herb 237 Dryopteris sikkimensis (Beddome) O. Dryopteridaceae Herb Kuntze 238 Duabanga grandiflora (Roxb.ex Lampatae Lythraceae Tree DC.)Walpers. 239 Duchesna indica(Andrews) Focke Bhui Aiselu Herb 240 Dysoxylum binectariferum (Roxb.) Lhasune Meliaceae Tree Hook.f. ex Bedd. 241 Dysoxylum excelsum Blume Lhasune Meliaceae Tree 242 Eclipta prostrata (L.) L. Bhringraj Asteraceae Herb 243 Edgeworthia gardneri(Wall.) Meissn. Argeli Thymelaeceae Shrub 244 Elaeagnus infundibularis Momiy. Malledo Elaeagnaceae Shrub 245 Elaeocarpus lanceifolius Roxb. Bhadrasae Elaeocarpaceae Tree 246 Elaeocarpus sikkimensis Mast. Bhadrasae Elaeocarpaceae Tree

3 - 96

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-97 of 219

247 Elaeocarpus sphaericus (Gaertn.) Jalpai Elaeocarpaceae Tree Schumann. 248 Elaeocarpus varunua Buch._ Ham. Bhadrasae Elaeocarpaceae Tree 249 Elaeocarpus rugosus Roxb. ex G.Don Nandiki Elaeocarpaceae Tree

250 Elatostema lineolatum Wight Urticaceae Herb 251 Elatostema platyphyllum Wedd. Gagleto Urticaceae Herb 252 Elatostema reptans Hook.f. Gagleto Urticaceae Herb 253 Elatostema sessile Forster Gagleto Urticaceae Herb 254 Elephantopus scaber Linnaeus Asteraceae Herb 255 Elsholtzia blanda (Benth.) Benth. Mrigay-jhar Lamiaceae Herb 256 Elsholtzia strobilifera (Benth.) Benth. Ban Babri Lamiaceae Herb 257 Emelia sonchifolia (Linnaeus) DC. Asteraceae Herb 258 Endospermum chinense Benth Seti Kath Euphorbiaceae Tree 259 Engelhardtia spicata Lesch.ex Blume Mauwa Juglandaceae Tree 260 Entada phaseoloides (L.) Merr. Pangra Fabaceae Climber 261 Entada rheedii Sprengel. Tahlakhyam Mimosoideae Climber 262 Entada gigas (L.) Fawc. & Rendle Pangra Fabaceae Climber 263 Equisetum debile Roxb.ex Voucher Kurkure Jhar Equisetaceae Fern 264 Eranthemum indicum (Nees) Seto Chuwa Acanthaceae Herb C.B.Clarke 265 Erigeron bellidioides DC. Tare phul Asteraceae Herb 266 Eriobotrya petiolata Hook.f. Maya Rosaceae Tree 267 Eryngium foetidum L. Bhote dhania Apiaceae Herb 268 Erythrina stricta Roxb. Phaledo Fabaceae Tree 269 Eugenia kurzii Duthie Ambakey Myrtaceae Tree 270 Eugeniabracteata Rich. Nyasey Myrtaceae Shrub 271 Euphorbia hirta L. Pusidudh Euphorbiaceae Herb 272 Eurya acuminata DC. Sanu Jhiganae Theaceae Tree 273 Eurya japonica Thunb. Jhigni Theaceae Tree 274 Evodia fraxinifolia (D. Don) Hook.f. Khanakpa Rutaceae Tree 275 Exbucklandia populnea (R.Br.ex Griff.) Pipli Hamamelidaceae Tree R.W.Br. 276 Fagopyrum dibotrys (D. Don) H. Hara Tite phapar Polygonaceae Herb 277 Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Fapar Polygonaceae Herb 278 Ficus auriculata Lour. Nevara Moraceae Tree 279 Ficus benjamina L. var. comosa Swami Moraceae Tree 280 Ficus clavata Wall. Ex Miq. Lutey Khanew Moraceae Tree

3 - 97

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-98 of 219

281 Ficus hirta Vahl. Khasreto Moraceae Tree 282 Ficus hispida L.F. Khasre Moraceae Tree 283 Ficus hookeriana Corner Nebara Moraceae Tree 284 Ficus lacor Buch.- Ham. Kavra Moraceae Tree 285 Ficus neriifolia J.E.Smith Dudhilo Moraceae Tree 286 Ficus pubigera Miquel Dude Lahara Moraceae Climber 287 L. Dumri Moraceae Tree 288 Ficus sabincisa J.E.Smith Lutae Khanium Moraceae Shrub 289 Ficus semicordata Buch.-Ham. ex Sm Khasre Khaneu Moraceae Tree 290 Firmiana colorata (Roxb.) R.Br. Samarri pisi Malvaceae Tree 291 Flemingia stricta Roxburgh Fabaceae Shrub 292 Flueggea virosa (Willdenow) Voigt Euphorbiaceae Shrub 293 Fragaria nubicola (Lindl. Ex Hook.f.) Bhuin Aselu Rosaceae Herb Lac. 294 Fraxinus floribunda Wall. Lankuri Oleaceae Tree 295 Galinsoga parviflora Cavanilles Asteraceae Herb 296 Gallium elgans Wall. Ex Roxb. Lahare Kuro Rubiaceae Herb 297 Gamblea ciliata C.B.Clarke Kursimla Araliaceae Tree 298 Garcinia cornea L. Chunyel Clusiaceae Shrub 299 Garcinia cowa Roxb. ex DC. Kaphal Clusiaceae Tree 300 Garcinia stipulata T.Anderson Sanakadan kung Clusiaceae Tree 301 Garuga floribunda Decne. Dabdabe Burseraceae Tree 302 Garuga pinnata Roxb. Dabdabe Burseraceae Tree 303 Gaultheria fragrantissima Wall. Patpate Ericaceae Tree 304 Geodorum densiflorum (Lam.) Schltr. Orchidaceae Herb 305 Geranium nepalenseEdgew.&Hook.f. Jerenium Geraniaceae Herb 306 Girardiana diversifolia (Link) Friis Bhangre sisnu Urticaceae Shrub 307 Gleichenia gigantea Wall.exHook. Kalame uneo Gleicheneaceae Fern 308 Globba racemosa Smith Zingiberaceae Herb 309 Glochidion acuminatum Mull. Lati Kath Phyllanthaceae Tree 310 Gloriosa superba L. Bishalanguli Liliaceae Herb 311 Gmelina arborea Roxb. Kasnar Verbenaceae Tree 312 Gonostegia hirta (Blume ex Hassk.) Chiple Urticaceae Herb Miq. 313 Gordonia dipterosperma Kurz. Hinguwa Theaceae Tree 314 Gordonia excelsa (Blume) Blume Theaceae Tree 315 Grewia sapida Roxb.ex DC. Kuail Malvaceae Shrub 316 Grewia eriocarpa Juss. Fuhura Malvaceae Shrub

3 - 98

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-99 of 219

317 Grewia optiva J.R.Drumm. ex Burret Bauel Malvaceae Tree 318 Grewia serrulata DC. Malvaceae Tree 319 Guizotia abyssinica (L.f.) Cass Philunge Asteraceae Herb 320 Gynocordia ordorota R.Br. Gante/Bandare Flacourtiaceae Tree 321 Gynura cusimbua (D.Don)S.Moore Asteraceae Shrub 322 Haldina cordifolia (Roxb.) Ridsdale Karam Rubiaceae Tree 323 Hedychium coccineum Buch.-Ham ex Sara Zingirberaceae Herb Sm. 324 Hedychium coronarium Koen. Pankha Phool Zingiberaceae Herb 325 Hedychium ellipticum Buch.-Ham ex Rato Sara Zingirberaceae Herb Sm. 326 Hedyotis scandens Roxb. Bakhra Kanae Rubiaceae Climber 327 Helicia nilgerica Bedd. Bandare Proteaceae Tree 328 Helixanthera ligustrina(Wall.)Danser Aijaru Loranthaceae Shrub 329 Helixanthera parasitica Lour.(Wall.) Sanu Aijaru Loranthaceae Shrub 330 Helwingia himalaica Hook.f.&T. Pipli Hamamelidaceae Shrub exC.B.Clarke 331 Hemiphragma heterophyllum Wall. Nashe/Lalgeri Jhar Herb 332 Heracleum nepalense D. Don. Chimphing Apiaceae Herb 333 Heracleum wallichii DC Chimphing Apiaceae Herb 334 Herpetospermum pedunculosum (Ser.) Jungali Ghiraula Cucurbitaceae Climber C.B. Clarke 335 Heteropanax fragrans Seeman. Lal Totola Araliaceae Tree 336 Heynea trijuga Roxb. ex Sims Akhaterwa Meliaceae Tree 337 Himalayacalamus hookerianus (Munro) Pareng Bans Poaceae Grass Stapl. 338 Hiptage benghalensis (L.) Kurz Shempati Malpighiaceae Climber 339 Hodgsonia heteroclita Hook.f. and Ghiuphal Cucurbitaceae Climber Thomson 340 Holarrhena pubescens Wall. ex G.Don Madhese Khirro Apocynaceae Tree

341 Holboellia angustifolia Wall. Gufla Lardizabalaceae Climber 342 Holboellia latifolia Wall. Golpha Lardizabalaceae Climber 343 Horsfieldia kingii (J. D. Hooker) Ramguwa Myristicaceae Tree Warburg 344 Houttuynia cordata Thunb. Gande jhar Saururaceae Herb 345 Hoya parasitica (Roxb.)Wall.ex Wight Asclepiadaceae Climber 346 Hydrangea aspera D.Don Phirphire ghans Hydrangeaceae Shrub 347 Hydrocotyl himalaica P.K.Mukh. Golpatta Umbelliferae Herb 348 Hydrocotyl javanica Thunb. Dhungrijhar Umbelliferae Herb

3 - 99

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-100 of 219

349 Hymenodictyon orixense (Roxb.) Mabb. Latikaram Rubiaceae Tree 350 Hypericum uralum Buch.-Ham. ex D. Urillo Hypericaceae Shrub Don. 351 Impatiens bicornuta Wall. Tiuri Balsaminaceae Herb 352 Impatiens trilobata Colebrooke Balsaminaceae Herb 353 Imperata cylindrica (L.) Reauschel. Siru Poaceae Herb 354 Iris clarkei Baker ex Hook. f. Iridaceae Herb 355 Isachne globosa (Thunberg) O. Kuntze Poaceae Grass

356 Ixora undulata Roxb. Takchirnyok Rubiaceae Shrub 357 Jasminum elongatum (Berg.) Willd. Jasmin Oleaceae Shrub 358 Jasminum nepalense Sprengel Oleaceae Climber 359 Jasminum scandens (Retz.) Vahl. Hade lahara Oleaceae Climber 360 Jatropha curcas L. Bhernada Euphorbiaceae Shrub 361 Juglans regia L. Okhar Juglandaceae Tree 362 Justicia adhatoda L. Basak Acanthaceae Shrub 363 Kaempferia rotunda L. Vuinchampa Zingiberaceae Herb 364 Knema erratica (Hook. f. & Thomson) Ramguwa Myristicaceae Tree J. Sinclair 365 Kydia calycina Roxb. Kubinde Malvaceae Tree 366 Lagerstroemia hirsuta (Lamarck) Lythraceae Tree Willd. 367 Lagerstroemia parvifloraRoxb. Sida Lythraceae Tree 368 Lagerstroemia speciosa (L.) Pers. Jarul Lythraceae Tree 369 Lannea coromandelica (Houtt.) Merr. Doka Anacardiaceae Tree

370 Lantana camara Linnaeus Verbenaceae Shrub 371 Laportea terminalis Wight. Patle sisnu Urticaceae Shrub 372 Lasiococca symphyllifolia (Kurz) Jagrikat Euphorbiaceae Tree Hook.f. 373 Leea asiatica (L.)Rid. Galeni Leeaceae Shrub 374 Lepidagathis incurva Buchanon- Acanthaceae Herb Hamilton ex D. Don 375 Lepidium sativum L. Changsur Brassicaceae Herb 376 Leucosceptrum canum Sm. Gurpis Lamiaceae Shrub 377 Lindera neesiana (Wall ex Nees) Kurz. Siltimbur Lauraceae Tree 378 Lithocarpus elegans (Blume) Soep Arkawlo Fagaceae Tree

3 - 100

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-101 of 219

379 Lithocarpus fenestratus (Roxb.) Rehder Arkawlo Fagaceae Tree 380 Lithocarpus pachyphylla (Kurz.) Bante/Sungure Fagaceae Tree Rehder. katus 381 Litsea cubeba (Lour.) Pers. Siltimbur Lauraceae Tree 382 Litsea hookeri (Meisn.D.G. DudheLampatae Lauraceae Tree 383 Litsea lancifolia (Roxb.ex Nees) Kali pahenle Lauraceae Tree Benth.& Hook.f. 384 Litsea monopetala (Roxb.)Pers. Kutmero Lauraceae Tree 385 Litsea salicifolia (Wall.exNees) Hook.f. Sano Pahalae Lauraceae Tree 386 Litsea glutinosa (Lour.) C.B.Rob. Suppatnyok Lauraceae Tree 387 Lycopodium clavatum L. Nagbeli Lycopodiaceace Climber 388 Lycopodium japonicum Thumb. Naagbeli Solanaceae Herb 389 Lygodium alatum (Clarke) V.A.V.R. Bahun Lahara Lygodioceae Climber 390 Lygodium flexosum (L.)Sw. Parawa andri Schizaeaceae Climber 391 Lygodium japonicum (Thunb.)Sw. Parawa andri Schizaeaceae Climber 392 Lyonia ovalifolia (Wall.) Drude. Angeri Ericaceae Tree 393 Macaranga denticulata(Blume)Mull. Jogi Malata Euphorbiaceae Tree 394 Macaranga indicaWight Rani Malata Euphorbiaceae Tree 395 Macaranga peltata (Geis.) Mull. Malata Euphorbiaceae Tree 396 Macaranga roxburghianus Mull. Phusre Malata Euphorbiaceae Shrub 397 Machilus edulis King ex Hook.f. Lapche Lauraceae Tree Kawlo/Pumsi 398 Machilus gammieana King ex Hook.f. Chiple Kawlo Lauraceae Tree 399 Machilus glaucescens (Nees)Wight Bhainsi Kawlo Lauraceae Tree 400 Maclura cochinchinensis (Lour.) Bhale phul Moraceae Shrub Corner 401 Macropanax dispermus (Wallich ex G. Chinde Araliaceae Tree Don) Seemann 402 Maesa chisia Buch-Ham ex D. Don Bilaunae Myrsinaceae Shrub 403 Maesa indica (Roxb.)A.de Candolle Kalo Bilaunae Myrsinaceae Shrub 404 Maesa macrophylla (Wallich) A.DC. Myrsinaceae 405 Magnolia cathcartii (Hook.f.& T.) Tite champ Magnoliaceae Tree Noot. 406 Magnolia doltsopa (Buch.-Ham. Ex Rani/Mithe Champ Magnoliaceae Tree DC.) Figlar 407 Magnolia hodgsonii (Hook.f.&T.) Patpate Magnoliaceae Tree H.Keng 408 Magnolia lanuginosa (Wall.) Figlar & Phusre Champ Magnoliaceae Tree Noot 409 Magnolia pterocarpa Roxb. Gogay champ Magnoliaceae Tree 410 Mahonia nepaulensis DC. Mandre chutro Berberidaceae Tree

3 - 101

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-102 of 219

411 Mallotus nudiflorus (L.) Kuju Pitali Euphorbiaceae Tree 412 Mallotus philippensis (Lam.) Muller Sindure Euphorbiaceae Tree 413 Mangifera sylvatica Roxb. Chuche Anp Anacardiaceae Tree 414 Mazus surculosus D.Don Malati Jhar Scrophulariaceae Herb 415 Melastoma malabathricum L. Angeree Melastomataceae Shrub 416 Melocana baccifera (Roxb.) Kurz Philing bans Poaceae Grass 417 Mentha arvensis L. Pudina Lamiaceae Herb 418 Mesia montana A.DC. Kalo Bilaunae Myrsinaceae Shrub 419 Meyna spinosa Link Rubiaceae Shrub 420 Michelia champaca (L.) Bail. Ex Pierre Aule Champ Magnoliaceae Tree 421 Mikania micrantha Kunth Asteraceae Climber 422 Millettia extensa (Benth.) Baker Gonjo Leguminosae Climber 423 Millettia pachycarpa Benth. Kojulara Leguminosae Climber 424 Mimosa himalayana Gamble Ararae kanra Fabaceae Climber 425 Mimosa pudica L. Lajwanti Mimosaceae Herb 426 Momordica dioica Roxb. Chetheli Cucurbitaceae Climber 427 Morinda angustifolia Roxb. Hardi Kath Rubiaceae Shrub 428 Moringa oleifera Lam. Sajana Moringaceae Tree 429 Morus macroura Miquel Kimbu Moraceae Tree 430 Morusaustralis Poir. Singtok Moraceae Tree 431 Mucuna macrocarpa Wall. Baldengra Fabaceae Climber 432 Mucuna nigricans (Lour.) Steudel. Baldengra Papilionoideae Climber 433 Mucuna pruriens (L) DC Kaoucho Fabaceae Climber 434 Murraya paniculata (L.) Jack. Kamini Rutaceae Tree 435 Musa balbisiana Colla. Bankera Musaceae Herb 436 Musa thompsonii (King ex Schu.) Ban Kera Musaceae Herb Cowan & Cowan 437 Myrica esculenta Buch.- Ham.ex D. Kaphal Myricaceae Tree Don 438 Myrsine semiserrata Wall. Bilauni Primulaceae Shrub 439 Nasturtium officinale W. T. Aiton Simrayo Brassicaceae Herb 440 Natsiatum herpeticum Buch.-Ham. Ex Seti Lahara Icacinaceae Climber Arn. 441 Nayariophyton zizyphifolium (Griff.) Kubinde Malvaceae Tree D.G. Long & A.G. Mill. 442 Neolamarckia cadamba (Roxb.) Bosser Kadam Rubiaceae Tree 443 Neonauclea purpurea (Roxb.) Merr. Kadam Rubiaceae Tree 444 Nephrolepis auriculata Linnaeus Nephrolepidaceae Herb

3 - 102

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-103 of 219

445 Nephrolepis cordifolia (L.) C. Persl. Pani Amla Dryopteridaceae Herb 446 Neyraudia zollingeri (Buese) Hooker f . Poaceae Grass

447 Nyssa javanica (Blume)Wangerin Lekh chiloune Nyssaceae Tree 448 Ocimum basilicum L. Lamiaceae Herb 449 Ocimum tenuiflorum L. Tulasipatta Lamiaceae Herb 450 Ophiopogon intermedius D. Don. Kaligeri Liliaceae Herb 451 Oplismenus burmanii (Retzius) P. Poaceae Grass Beauvois 452 Oplismenus compositus (Linnaeus) P. Poaceae Grass Beauvois 453 Oroxylum indicum (L.) Benth. Ex Kurz Totola Bignoniaceae Tree 454 Osbeckia nepalensis Hook.f. Anger/Seto Melastomataceae Shrub Chulesii 455 Osbeckia stellata Buch.-Ham. ex Ker Babui tulsi Melastomataceae Shrub Gawl. 456 Ostodes paniculata Blume Bepari Euphorbiaceae Tree 457 Oxalis corniculata L. Chariamilo Oxalidaceae Herb 458 Oxyspora paniculata (D.Don) DC Chulesi Melastomataceae Shrub 459 Paederia cruddasiana Prain Pade/Bire Lahara Rubiaceae Climber 460 Paederia foetida L. Barilahara Rubiaceae Shrub 461 Panax pseudoginseng Wall. Panchapattey Araliaceae Herb 462 Pandanus furcatas Roxb. Tarika Pandanaceae Tree 463 Paris polyphylla Sm. Satuwa Liliaceae Herb 464 Parthenocissus semicordata (Wall.) Charcharae(Thulo) Vitaceae Climber Planch. 465 Pavetta polyantha (Hook.f.) Wall. ex Sundok Rubiaceae Shrub Bremek. 466 Peliosanthes griffithii Baker Convallariaceae Herb 467 Pentapanax fragrans (D. Don) Ha Araliaceae Tree 468 Peperomia pellucida (L.) Kunth Silverbush Piperaceae Herb 469 Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton Silam Lamiaceae Herb 470 Peristrophe speciosa (Roxburgh) Nees Acanthaceae Herb

471 Persea macrantha (Nees) Kosterm. Lauraceae Tree 472 Persea odoratissima (Nees) Kosterm. Lalikaulo Lauraceae Tree

473 Persea pallida (Nees) Oliv. Lauraceae Tree

3 - 103

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-104 of 219

474 Persicaria chinensis (L.) H.Gross Kukur Thotnae Polygonaceae Climber 475 Persicaria microcephala (D. Don) H. Polygonaceae Herb Gross 476 Persicaria runcinata (D. Don) H. Gross Polygonaceae Herb

477 Phaius tankervilleae (Bank ex I-Herit.) Orchidaceae Herb Blume. 478 Phaseolus coccineus Linnaeus Fabaceae Herb 479 Phlogacanthus pubinervius T. Chuwa Acanthacea Shrub Anderson 480 Phlogacanthus thyrsiformis Acanthaceae Shrub (Hardwicke) Mabberley 481 Phlogacanthus thyrsiformis (Roxb.ex Chuwa Acanthacea Shrub Hard.) D. J. Mab. 482 Phoebe attenuata (Nees) Nees Aule lapchae kawla Lauraceae Tree 483 Phoebe hainesiana Brandis Angare Lauraceae Tree 484 Phoebe lanceolata (Nees) Nees Jhakri Kath Lauraceae Tree 485 Phoenix rupicola T. Anders Cliff date Palm Arecaceae Tree 486 Phoenix loureiroi Kunth Betgera Arecaceae Tree 487 Pholidota imbricata Hook Orchidaceae Herb 488 Phyllanthus emblica L. Aonla/Amala Phyllanthaceae Tree 489 Phyllanthus fraternus Webster. Bhui-amla Euphorbiaceae Herb 490 Phyllanthus urinaria L. Bhumi Amla Phyllanthaceae Herb 491 Phymatosorus cuspidatus D. Don Polypodiaceae Herb 492 Physalis divaricata L. Bon Tepari Solanaceae Herb 493 Physalis minima L. Jungali tamatar Solanaceae Herb 494 Phytolacca acinosa Roxb. Jaringo Phytolacaceae Herb 495 Pilea bracteosa Weddell Urtcaceae Herb 496 Pilea cordifolia Hook f. Gaglato Urticaceae Herb 497 Pilea scripta (D.Don) Weddell Seto Gagleto Urticaceae Herb 498 Pilea umbrosa Blume Urticaceae Herb 499 Pinus roxburghii Sargent Dhup Pinaceae Tree 500 Piper boehmeriifolium (Miq.)Wall. ex Chaba Piperaceae Climber DC. 501 Piper hamiltonii DC. Chabo or Jungli Piperaceae Climber Pan 502 Piper longum L. Pipla Piperaceae Climber 503 Piper mullesua Buch.- Ham.ex D. Don Chabo/Hill pepper piperaceae Climber 504 Piper nigrum L. Chhimpri-gupai Piperaceae Climber

3 - 104

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-105 of 219

505 Piper peepuloides Roxburgh Piperaceae Herb 506 Plantago asiatica ssp.erosa (Wall.) Nasey jhar Plantaginaceae Herb Z.Yu.Li 507 Plantago erosa Wall. Jibray Jhar Plantaginaceae Herb 508 Plumbago zeylanica L. Chitigni Shrub 509 Podophyllum sikkimense Chatterjee & Podophyllaceae Herb Mukherjee. 510 Pogonatherum paniceum (Lam.) Hack Kharuki Poaceae Grass 511 Pogonetherum paniceum (Lamarck) Kharuki Poaceae Grass Hack. 512 Polyalthia simiarum (Buch. Ham.ex Lapche Kath Anonaceae Tree Hook.f.&T.) Benth. 513 Polygala arrilata Buch-Ham ex D.Don Marcha Polemoniaceae Shrub 514 Polygonum molle D. Don Thotne Polygonaceae Herb 515 Polystichum lentum (D.Don.) T.Moore Kuthurke Ningro Dryopteridaceae Fern 516 Potentilla lineata Trevir. Bansupari Rosaceae Herb 517 Pothos scandens L. Sanu kanchirna Araceae Climber 518 Pouzolzia hirta (Blume) Hasskarl Urticaceae Herb 519 Pouzolzia sanguinea (Blume) Merrill Chiple Urticaceae Herb 520 Pratia nummularia (Lamk) A. Br. Lanka Sanay Campanulaceae Herb 521 Premna longifolia Roxb. Gineri Verbenaceae Tree 522 Premna scandens Roxb. Gineri Lahara Verbenaceae Climber 523 Premna mollissima Roth Gineri Tree 524 Premnabracteata Wall. ex C.B.Clarke Verbenaceae Tree

525 Prunus cerasoides D. Don Payun Rosaceae Tree 526 Pseudognaphilum affine (D.Don.) Buki phul Asteraceae Herb Anderb. 527 Pseudostachyum polymorphum Munro Philing bans Poaceae Grass 528 Psilanthus benghalensis (Schultes) Rubiaceae Shrub Leroy 529 Pteris biaurita L. Dwathey Pteridaceae Herb niuro/Unio 530 Pterospermum acerifolium (L.)Willd. Hatipailae Malvaceae Tree 531 Pterygota alata (Roxb.) R.Br. Narkeli Malvaceae Tree 532 Pupalia atropurpurea Moq. Amarantaceae Herb 533 Pyrularia edulis (Wall.ex Roxb.) A.DC Amphi Santalaceae Tree 534 Pyrus pashia Buch.- Ham.ex D. Don Mael Rosaceae Tree 535 Quercus glauca Thunb. Phalant Fagaceae Tree

3 - 105

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-106 of 219

536 Quercus lamellosa Smith. Buk Fagaceae Tree 537 Ranunculus diffusus DC. Nakkore Jhar Ranunculaceae Herb 538 Raphidophora glauca (Wall.) Schott Kanchirna Araceae Climber 539 Rauwolfia serpentina (L.) Benth.ex Nagbeli Apocynaceae Herb Kurz. 540 Rhaphidophora decursiva (Roxb.) Kanchirna Araceae Climber Schott 541 Rheum acuminatum Hook. f. Khokim Polygonaceae Herb 542 Rheum nobile Hook.f. and Thoms. Padamchal Polygonaceae Herb 543 Rhododendron arboreum Smith Lali gurans Ericaceae Tree 544 Rhododendron dalhousae Hook. f. Lahare chimal Ericaceae Shrub 545 Rhododendron grande Wight Patle korlinga Ericaceae Tree 546 Rhopalephora scaberrima (Blume) R. Commelinaceae Herb Faden 547 Rhus chinensis Mill. Bhakimlo Anacardiaceae Tree 548 Rhus insignis Hook. f. Thaksing Anacardiaceae Tree 549 Rhynchoglossum obliquum Blume Gesneriaceae Herb 550 Rhynchostylis retusa (L.) Blume. Orchidaceae Herb 551 Rosa sericea Lindl. Sebimendo Rosaceae Shrub 552 Rubia cordifolia Wallich ex G. Don Rubiaceae Herb 553 Rubia manjith Roxb.ex Fleming Manjito Rubiaceae Climber 554 Rubia sikkimensis Kutz. Bhale Majito Rubiaceae Climber 555 Rubus ellipticus Sm. Aiselu Rosaceae Shrub 556 Rubus indicus Thunb. Jungali aiselu Rosaceae Shrub 557 Rubus lineatus Rein. Ex Blume Ghyampe Aselu Rosaceae Herb 558 Rubus moluccanus L. Bhote Pan Rosaceae Climber 559 Rubus paniculatus Sm. Kalo Aselu Rosaceae Climber 560 Rubus rosifolius Sm. Gempe Aselu Rosaceae Shrub 561 Rumex nepalensis Spreng. Halhale Polygonaceae Herb 562 Saccharum arundinaceum Retzius Poaceae Grass 563 Salacia chinensis L. Celastraceae Tree 564 Salix tetrasperma Roxb. Beis Salicaceae Tree 565 Sambucus adnata Wall. Moti phool Adoxaceae Shrub 566 Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn. Ritha Sapindaceae Tree 567 Sapindus rarak DC. Achatia Sapindaceae Tree 568 Sapium baccatum Roxb. Pudlikat Euphorbiaceae Tree 569 Sarcosperma arboreum Hook.f. Pahar Lampati Sapotaceae Tree 570 Satyrium nepalense D.Don Salammisri Orchidaceae Herb

3 - 106

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-107 of 219

571 Saurauia nepaulensis DC. Gogun Actinidiaceae Tree 572 Saurauria fasciculata Wall. Gogun Actinidiaceae Tree 573 Saurauria roxburgii Wall. Aulae gagun Actinidiaceae Tree 574 Schefflera elata(Buch.-Ham.) Harms Gufla Araliaceae Tree 575 Schefflera rhododendrifolia (Griff.) Bhalu Chinde Araliaceae Tree Frodin 576 Schima wallichii (DC.) Korth. Aule Chilaunae Theaceae Tree 577 Schisandra grandiflora (Wall.) Hook.f. Singauto Schisandraceae Climber and Thomson 578 Schisandra propinqua (Wall.) Baill. Nyalchu Schisandraceae Climber 579 Scoparia dulcis L. Khareto Jhar Scrophulariaceae Herb 580 Scurrula parasitica L. Aijaru Loranthaceae Shrub 581 Selaginella monospora Spring Selaginellaceae Herb 582 Semecarpus anacardium L.f. Bhayla Anacardiaceae Tree 583 Setaria palmifolia (J. Koenig) Stapf Poaceae Grass 584 Shorea robusta Gaertn. Sal Dipterocarpaceae Tree 585 Sida acuta Burm.f. Khareto Malvaceae Herb 586 Sida rhombifolia Linnaeus Malvaceae Herb 587 Sigesbeckia orientalis L. Asteraceae Herb 588 Smilax ovalifolia Roxburgh Smilacaceae Climber 589 Smilax zeylanica L. Kukurdaine Smilacaceae Climber 590 Smilaxaspericaulis Wall. ex A.DC. Kukurdainey Smilaceae Climber 591 Solanum capsicoides All. Kanre Bee Solanaceae Shrub 592 Solanum nigrum L. Kalo bihi Solanaceae Herb 593 Solanum pseudocapsicum L. Boksi Kanra Solanaceae Shrub 594 Solanum torvum Swartz. Gothbegun Solanaceae Shrub 595 Solanum viarum Dunal Clarke Solanaceae Shrub 596 Solena amplexicaulis (Lam.) Gandhi Ban kakri Cucurbitaceae Climber 597 Sonchus oleraceus L. Ban-rayo Asteraceae Herb 598 Sorindeia madagascariensis Thouars ex Anacardiaceae Shrub DC. 599 Spatholobus parviflorus (DC.)Kuntze Debre Lahara Fabaceae Climber 600 Spermacoce latifolia Aublet Rubiaceae Herb 601 Spermadictyon suaveolens Roxb. Ban Champ Rubiaceae Shrub 602 Spondias pinnata (L. f.) Kurz. Amaro Anacardiceae Tree 603 Spondias axillaris Roxb. Hug Plum Anacardiaceae Tree 604 Stellaria media(L.)Vill. Boksi Jhar Caryophyllaceae Herb 605 Stephania glabra (Roxb.) Miers. Nimi Lahara/ Menispermaceae Climber

3 - 107

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-108 of 219

Tambarke 606 Stephania japonica (Thunb.) Mier. Tambarkae Menispermaceae Climber 607 Sterculia villosa Roxb. Odal Sterculiaceae Tree 608 Stereospermum chelonoides (L.f.) DC. Parari Bignoniaceae Tree 609 Stereospermum tetragonum DC. Singyen-kung Bignoniaceae Tree 610 Streptolirion volubile Edgew. Akashveli Commelinaceae Herb 611 Strobilanthes capitata Nees Ankhle Acanthacea Herb 612 Strobilanthes divaricatus (Nees)T. Aakhlae Acanthacea Shrub Anders. 613 Strobilanthes himalayana J.R.I. Wood Acanthaceae Herb

614 Strobilanthes wallichii Nees Ankhle Acanthacea Shrub 615 Swertia bimaculata (Sieb.&Zucc.) Bhale Chirowto Gentianaceae Herb Hook.f.&T. 616 Swertia chirayita (Roxb.)H.Karst. Chiraito Gentianaceae Herb 617 Symplocos glomerata King ex Kharane Symplocaceae Tree C.B.Clarke 618 Symplocos lucida (Thunb.) Sieb & Ghole/Kharane Symplocaceae Tree Zucc. 619 Syzigium cumini (L.) Skeels Jamun Myrtaceae Tree 620 Syzigium ramosissimum (Blume) Jhare Jamuna Myrtaceae Tree N.P.Bal. 621 Syzigium balsameum (Wight) Wall. ex Archal Myrtaceae Tree Walp. 622 Syzigium claviflorum (Roxb.) Wall. ex Hare jamuna Myrtaceae Tree A.M.Cowan & Cowan 623 Syzigium formosum (Wall.) Masam. Ambakae Myrtaceae Tree 624 Tabernaemontana divericata (L.) Chandnee/Tagar Apocynancea Shrub R.Br.ex Roem.Schult. 625 Talinum portulacifolium (Forssk.) Dalda saag Portulacaceae Herb Asch.ex Scheinf. 626 Tamarindus indica L. Titri Fabaceae Tree 627 Taxus baccata L. Cheongboo Taxaceae Tree 628 Tectaria coadunata (J. Sm.) C. Chr. Kalo unew Tectariaceae Herb 629 Tectaria griffithii (Baker) C. Dryopteridaceae Herb Christensen 630 Tectona grandis L.f. Teak Verbenaceae Tree 631 Terminalia arjuna (Roxb.ex DC.) Arjun Combretaceae Tree Wight & Arn. 632 Terminalia bellirica (Gaertn.) Roxb. Barra Combretaceae Tree

3 - 108

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-109 of 219

633 Terminalia chebula Retz. Harra Combretaceae Tree 634 Terminalia crenulata Roth. Pakasajh Combretaceae Tree 635 Terminalia tomentosa Wight & Arn. Saj Combretaceae Tree 636 Terminilia myriocarpa Van Heurck & Panisaj Combretaceae Tree Muller 637 Tetradium fraxinifolium (Hook.f.) Khanakpa Rutaceae Tree T.G.Hart. 638 Tetradium glabrifolium (Champ.ex Thulo Khankpa Rutaceae Tree Benth.) T.G.Hart. 639 Tetrameles nudiflora R. Br. Maina Tetramelaceae Tree 640 Tetrastigma bracteolatum (Wall.) Charcharae lahara Vitaceae Climber Planch. 641 Tetrastigma planicaule (Hooker f.) Vitaceae Climber Gagnepain 642 Tetrastigma serrulatum (Roxb.) Planch. Charchare (Syaano) Vitaceae Climber 643 Thladiantha cordifolia (Blume) Cucurbitaceae Climber Cogniaux 644 Thunbergia fragrance Roxb. Kanasae Lahara Acanthacea Climber 645 Thysanolaena latifolia (Roxb. ex Phul jharu Poaceae Shrub Hornem) Honda. 646 Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) Hook. f. Gurjo lahara Menispermaceae Climber & Thoms. 647 Tinsopora sinensis (Lour.) Gurjo Lahara Menispermaceae Climber 648 Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsley) A. Gray Asteraceae Shrub

649 Toona ciliata M. Roem. Tooni Meliaceae Tree 650 Toxicodendron hookeri (Sahni & Kag bhalayo Anacardiaceae Tree Bahadur) C.I.Wu &T.L.Ming 651 Toxicodendron succedaneum (L.) Rani Bhalayo Anacardiaceae Tree Kuntze 652 Trema politoria Plancon Kuail Ulmaceae Tree 653 Trema orientalis (L.) Blume Khari Ulmaceae Tree 654 Trevesia palmata (Roxb.ex Lindl.) Vis. Phutta Araliaceae Tree 655 Trewia nudiflora L. Pithali Euphorbiaceae Tree 656 Trichosanthes tricuspidata Lour. Indreni Cucurbitaceae Climber 657 Trichosanthes wallichiana (Ser.) Wight Indreni Cucurbitaceae Climber 658 Trichosanthes lepiniana (Naudin) Indreni Cucurbitaceae Climber Cogn. 659 L. Asteraceae Herb

3 - 109

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-110 of 219

660 Triumfetta rhomboidea Jacquin Tiliaceae Herb 661 Tupistra nutans Wall.ex Lind. Nakima Liliaceae Herb 662 Turpinia pomifera (Roxb.)DC Thali Staphyleaceae Tree 663 Urena lobata L. Samthai Malvaceae Herb 664 Urtica dioica L. Gharia sisnu Urticaceae Herb 665 Urtica parviflora Roxb. Urticaceae Shrub 666 Uvaria hamiltonii Hook.f.&Thom. Bandar Jhula Anonaceae Climber 667 Vaccinum nummularia Hook.f.&T. Ericaceae Shrub 668 Vaccinum retusum (Grif.) Hook.f.ex Ratay Ericaceae Shrub C.B.Clarke 669 Vaccinum vacciniaceum (Roxb.) Sleum. Charu Ericaceae Shrub 670 Valeriana hardwickii Wall. Valerianaceae Herb 671 Vallaris solanacea (Roth) O. Kuntze Apocynaceae Herb 672 Ventilago denticulata Willd. Rhamnaceae Climber 673 Vernonia saligna DC. Asteraceae Shrub 674 Vernonia talaumifolia Hook.f.&T. Nundheki Asteraceae Tree 675 Vernonia volkameriifolia DC. Nundheki Asteraceae Tree 676 Viburnum erubescens Wall. Ex DC. Asarae Adoxaceae Shrub 677 Viola cerasifolia Saint-Hiaire. Ghatte jhar Violaceae Herb 678 Viola pilosa Blume Ghatte jhar Violaceae Herb 679 Viscum album L. Hadjor Loranthaceae Shrub 680 Viscum liquidambaricolum Hayata. Loranthaceae Shrub 681 Viscum nepalense Sprengel Harchur Loranthaceae Shrub 682 Vitex negundo L. Nisinda Verbenaceae Tree 683 Vitis heyneana Roemer & Schultes Jarila Lahara Vitaceae Climber 684 Wallichia oblongifolia Griff. Thakal Palmae Shrub 685 Woodfordia fruticosa (L.) Kurz. Dhangayro Lythraceae Shrub 686 Wrightia arborea (Dennst.)Mabb Khirra Apocynaceae Tree 687 Youngia japonica (L.) DC. Asteraceae Herb 688 Zanthoxylum acanthopodium DC. Bhale Timbur Rutaceae Shrub 689 Zanthoxylum armatum DC. Boke timur Rutaceae Tree 690 Zanthoxylum oxyphyllum Edgew. Siltimbur Rutaceae Climber 691 Zanthoxylum nitidum (Roxb.) DC. Timbur Tree 692 Zingiber officinale Rocs. Aduwa Zingiberaceae Herb 693 Zingiber rubens Roxb. Zingiberaceae Herb 694 Ziziphus mauritiana Lam. Baer Rhamnaceae Tree 695 Ziziphus rugosa Lam. Bukh baer Rhamnaceae Tree

3 - 110

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-111 of 219

Recorded floral species from the study area were assessed for their conservation status by crosschecking with red data book of Indian plants (Nayar & Sastri, 1987-90) and none of the plant taxa were found under RET category.

3.12.10 Medicinal plants Medicinal plants have curative properties due to the presence of various complex chemical substances of different composition. The ethnobotanical information serves as indicators for new compounds with active principles for phytochemical, pharmacognostical and pharmacological. Indigenous people use many of the medicinal plants traditionally for treating their ailments. The conservation of medicinal plants means every species of plants in its natural habitat should be protected and preserved. Because of continuous exploitation of medicinal plants from their natural habitats, it is required to replant and regenerate them in other areas having similar habitat or environment. The recorded medicinal palnts during site visit are given in Table 3.31

Table 3.31 Checkist of medicinal plants recorded during the field study S.No. Botanical name Vernacular Parts used name 1 Aconitum ferox Wall. Ex Ser. Bikhumma Rhizome 2 Aconitum heterophyllum Wall. Ex Royle Aatish Rhizome 3 Acorus calamus L. Bojo Rhizome 4 Adhatoda vasica L. Basak Leaves and roots 5 Allium wallichii Kunth. Dung-dunge Whole plant 6 Aloe barbadensis Mill. Gheukumari Whole plant 7 Artemisia vulgaris L. Titepati Leaves 8 Astilbe rivularis Ham. Buro Okhoti Root 9 Berginia ciliata (How.) Sternb. Pakhanbed Rhizome and root 10 Centella asiatica (L.) Urban Brahmi Whole plant 11 Costus speciosus Smith Betlauree Rhizome and root 12 Curcuma aromatica Salisb. Fatcheng Rhizome 13 Curcuma caesia Roxb. Kalohaldi Rhizome 14 Hedychium spicatum Sm. Sara Rhizome 15 Kaempferia rotunda L. Bhuichampa Tuber

3 - 111

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-112 of 219

16 Kalanchoe pinnata (Lam) Pers. Patharkuchi Leaves 17 Nardostachys jatamansi DC. Jatamansi Rhizome 18 Ocimum basilicum L. Tulsi Leaves and seeds 19 Orchis latifolia L. Panch- aunlay Tuber and root 20 Panax pseudoginseng Wall. Panchapatte y Rhizome 21 Picrorrhiza kurroa Royle ex Benth. Kutki Root 22 Podophyllum hexandrum Royle Rhizome and root 23 Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn. Ritha Fruits and root bark 24 Swertia chirata Ham. Chireto Whole plant 25 Taxus baccata L. Dhegreshalla Leaves and bark 26 Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) Miers Gurjo Stem 27 Tupistra nutans Wall. Teeta Whole plant 28 Zingiber cassumunarRoxb. Banada Rhizome/ inflorescence

3.12.11 Economically Important Plant Species The wood used in lower areas for timber include Bischofia javanica, Castanopsis indica, Garuga pinnata, Fraxinus floribunda, Juglans regia, Schima wallichii, Shorea robusta, Terminalia tomentosa and Toona ciliata. In addition to these trees, some tall and woody bamboos like Bambusa tulda, Dendrocalamus hamiltonii, Dendrocalamussikkimensis, etc. are also used for these purposes. At higher altitudes various oak and coniferous species were used as timber trees and fuel wood. Some of the other plant species in the study area are used by the local inhabitants for various purposes. A list of some commonly occurring plant species and their miscellaneous uses are given in Table 3.32 Table 3.32 Checklist of economic importance plants from study area S.No. Plant name Uses 1 Acorus calamus L. Rhizomes are used as insectisides in storage of cereals 2 Andrographis paniculata (Burm. Dried flowers are decorative and also used for f.) Wall. ex Ness. preparation of pillow 3 Arisaema tortuosum (Wall.) Tubers are used as an insectisidal purposes Schott 4 Artemisia nilagirica L. Leaves and flowering tops used for flavouring in alcoholic drinks

3 - 112

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-113 of 219

5 Bambusa nutans Gamble House construction, support for prayer flags by Buddhist 6 Cardamine corymbosa Hook.f. Leaves are eaten as vegetables 7 Castanopsis hystrix Miq. Fruits edible, fuelwood, leaves are good ingredients for composts. 8 Castanopsis tribuloides (Smith) Fruits edible, fuelwood, leaves are good ingredients A.DC. for composts. 9 Daphne cannabina (Buch.-Ham. Bark is used as ropes but also have potential for ex D. Don) Keissl. preparation of paper. 10 Dendrocalamus hamiltonii Nees Water pipes, water vessels, young shoots as & Arn. ex Munro vegetables, house construction, local handicrafts, fodder for cattle etc. 11 Echinochloa frumentacea Link Seeds are good source of potent beer 12 Elaeocarpus lanceafolius Roxb. Fruits edible 13 Geranium wallichianum D.Don Flowers used for ornamental purposes ex Sweet 14 Juniperus recurva BuchHam. ex Local Buddhist uses leaves as incense. D. Don 15 Pinus longifolia Roxb. Cones are used as decorative 16 Rhododendron setosum D. Don. Local Buddhist uses leaves as incense. 17 Rhododendron arboreum Sm. Flowers used for squace preparation 18 Terminalia myriocarpa Van It is planted for landscaping Heurck & Müll. Arg. 19 Thysanolaena latifolia (Roxb. ex Plants used for broom preparation Hornem.) Honda

3.12.12 Phytosociology Analysis for Community Structure The total picture of the relative ecological importance and the sociological structure of a given plant species in any community can’t be obtained by relative parameters (relative frequency, relative density, relative dominance, etc.,) singly, which give individual clues, although the quantitative value of each such parameter has its own importance. Frequency gives an idea as to how a species is dispersed in the area but we will not get an idea about its number or the area covered. Density on the other hand gives the numerical strength and nothing about the spread or cover. Dominance gives the basal cover only. In order to express the dominance and ecological success of any species with a single value,

3 - 113

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-114 of 219 the concept of important value index has been developed. This index utilizes three characteristics, viz., relative frequency, relative density and relative dominance.

Salangdang (Left side of the Barrage area) On the left side of the barrage area, the highest IVI value recorded for Schima wallichii (13.1) followed by Callicarpa arborea and Alstonia scholaris represented by 12 each, and Terminalia myriocarpa detailed phytosociological studies shown in Table 3.33 Distribution of shrubs and climbers in the study area of the project, the various quadrats indicated that Dichroa febrifugahad highest IVI (50.6), followed by Allophyllus zeylanica, Atlantia monophylla and pallida remaining species were given in the Table 3.34 As the study area is dominated by the forest, the area is with remarkably rich herbaceous ground cover. The herbs observed in the sampling plots, during the survey period, Oxalis corniculata had heighet IVI (9.44), followed by Begonia picta, Anaphalis margaritacea and Adiantum lunulatum have been enlisted in the Table 3.35

Table 3.33 Importance Value Index of Tree Species at Salangdang Area S.No. Plant name RF Rden Rdom IVI 1 Schima wallichii 4.83 5.9 2.41 13.1 2 Alstonia scholaris 4.3 4.33 3.4 12 3 Callicarpa arborea 4.3 4.33 3.33 12 4 Terminalia myriocarpa 4.45 4.68 2.42 11.6 5 Aphanamixis polystachya 3.3 3.08 3.4 9.78 6 Diploknema butyracea 4.11 3.21 2.35 9.67 7 Artocarpus lakoocha 3.11 2.96 3.27 9.34 8 Rhus chinensis 3.11 2.84 3.3 9.25 9 Artocarpus heterophyllus 1.92 1.96 3.33 7.21 10 Phoebe attenuata 1.72 2.08 2.36 6.16 11 Chukrasia tyabularis 1.96 1.86 2.25 6.07 12 Sloanea sterculiacea 1.96 1.61 2.08 5.65 13 Mallotus philippensis 1.57 1.49 2.3 5.36 14 Neolamarckia cadamba 1.92 1.84 1.4 5.16

3 - 114

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-115 of 219

15 Bischofia javanica 1.57 1.49 2.1 5.16 16 Cinnamomum 1.57 1.37 2.2 5.14 glanduliferum 17 Michelia champaca 1.92 1.84 1.35 5.11 18 Toona ciliata 1.72 1.96 1.38 5.06 19 Baccaurea sapida 1.57 1.37 2.11 5.05 20 Terminalia tomentosa 1.92 1.72 1.4 5.04 21 Litsea monopetala 1.57 1.49 1.95 5.01 22 Cassia fistula 1.77 1.98 1.15 4.9 23 Syzygium cumini 2.11 1.47 1.3 4.88 24 Chrysophyllum roxburghii 1.77 1.98 1.1 4.85 25 Terminalia chebula 1.53 1.84 1.34 4.71 26 Daubanga grandiflora 1.72 1.59 1.39 4.7 27 Spondias pinnata 1.72 1.72 1.23 4.67 28 Macaranga denticulata 1.92 1.72 1.03 4.67 29 Antidesma acidum 1.53 1.59 1.26 4.38 30 Caryota urens 1.34 1.72 1.32 4.38 31 Ficus glomerata 1.34 1.72 1.31 4.37 32 Pentapanax fragrans 1.34 1.59 1.39 4.32 33 Bombax ceiba 1.34 1.47 1.39 4.2 34 Shorea robusta 1.34 1.47 1.39 4.2 35 Ficus semicordata 1.34 1.72 1.14 4.2 36 Canarium bengalensis 1.34 1.47 1.26 4.07 37 Kydia calycina 1.19 1.47 1.35 4.01 38 Ficus racemosa 1.15 1.47 1.37 3.99 39 Terminalia bellerica 1.34 1.35 1.29 3.98 40 Ficus ariculata 1.34 1.35 1.25 3.94 41 Glochidion lanceolarium 1.34 1.35 1.24 3.93 42 Tectona grandis 1.34 1.23 1.28 3.85 43 Chassalia curviflora 1.15 1.47 1.2 3.82 44 Elaeocarpus floribundus 1.15 1.23 1.38 3.76 45 Gmelina arborea 1.15 1.23 1.37 3.75 46 Styrax serrulatus 1.34 1.1 1.29 3.73 47 Terminalia arjuna 1.34 1.23 1.13 3.7 48 Cinnamomum 1.15 1.23 1.3 3.68 glanduliferum 49 Sterculia versicolor 1.34 0.98 1.34 3.66

3 - 115

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-116 of 219

50 Dillenia indica 1.31 0.98 1.31 3.6 51 Sapium baccatum 1.15 0.98 1.29 3.42 52 Garuga pinnata 0.38 0.37 2.09 2.84 53 Sterculia villosa 0.52 0.37 1.94 2.83 54 Dillenia pentagyna 0.38 0.37 2.05 2.8 55 Randia dumetorum 0.38 0.37 2.03 2.78 56 Ehretia acuminata 0.38 0.3 1.1 1.78 57 Elaeocarpus lanceifolius 0.38 0.37 1 1.75 58 Bridelia retusa 0.57 0.37 0.59 1.53 59 Macaranga peltata 0.38 0.37 0.72 1.47 Total 100 100 100 300

Table 3.34 Phytosociology of the Shrubs and Liana at Salangdang Area S.No. Plant name RF Rden Rdom IVI 1 Dichroa febrifuga 15.8 24.42 10.4 50.6 2 Eupatorium adenophorum 13.4 20.63 6.043 40 3 Daphne papyraceae 0.34 0.211 38.21 38.8 4 Millettia pachycarpa 12 10.11 5.158 27.3 5 Eugeniabracteata 0.34 0.211 21.28 21.8 6 Osbeckia nepalensis 6.51 6.947 1.323 14.8 7 Rubus ellipticus 3.42 4 1.403 8.83 8 Aconogonom molle 4.11 2.737 1.672 8.52 9 Mesia montana 5.14 3.158 0.103 8.4 10 Holmskioldia sanguinea 4.11 2.526 0.903 7.54 11 Desdmodium heterocarpon 1.37 1.053 4.545 6.97 12 Wallichia oblongifolia . 3.77 2.316 0.06 6.14 13 Thunbergia grandiflora 3.08 2.105 0.648 5.84 14 Pavetta polyantha 2.4 2.105 0.723 5.23 15 Natsiatum herpeticum 2.74 2.316 0.073 5.13 16 Melastoma malabathricum 2.74 2.316 0.011 5.07 17 Rhododendron dalhousae 2.4 1.474 0.034 3.9 18 Ventilago denticulata 1.71 1.474 0.579 3.77 19 Hiptage benghalensis 1.37 1.053 0.603 3.03 20 Dobinea vulgaris 1.37 0.842 0.737 2.95 21 Uvaria hamiltonii 1.03 0.632 1.18 2.84

3 - 116

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-117 of 219

22 Argyreia nervosa 1.37 1.053 0.009 2.43 23 Solanum torvum 0.68 0.421 1.211 2.32 24 Cephaelis ipecacuanha 1.03 0.632 0.456 2.11 25 Combretum decandrum 1.03 0.842 0.227 2.1 26 Clerodendrum serratum 1.03 0.632 0.329 1.99 27 Rubus paniculatus 0.68 0.421 0.652 1.76 28 Boehmeria platyphylla 0.68 0.421 0.359 1.46 29 Persicaria chinensis 0.68 0.632 0.127 1.44 30 Ixora undulata 0.68 0.421 0.184 1.29 31 Sambucus adnata 0.34 0.211 0.212 0.77 32 Caesalpinia cucullata 0.34 0.211 0.166 0.72 33 Debregeasia longifolia 0.34 0.211 0.141 0.69 34 Mikania micrantha 0.34 0.211 0.064 0.62 35 Tetrastigma bracteolatum 0.34 0.211 0.053 0.61 36 Lantana camara 0.34 0.211 0.051 0.6 37 Combretum indicum 0.34 0.211 0.037 0.59 38 Abrus pulchellus 0.34 0.211 0.035 0.59 39 Grewia eriocarpa 0.34 0.211 0.003 0.56 Total 100 100 100 300

Table 3.35 Phytosociology of the Herbs at Salangdang Area S.No. Name of the plant R.F R.D R.A IVI 1 Oxalis corniculata 3.46 3.91 2.06 9.44 2 Begonia picta 3.46 3.59 1.89 8.94 3 Anaphalis margaritacea 3.19 3.45 1.98 8.62 4 Adiantum lunulatum 3.46 2.99 1.58 8.03 5 Rheum nobile 3.46 2.99 1.58 8.03 6 Rhopalephora scaberrima 1.91 2.99 2.85 7.76 7 Boehmeria ternifolia 2.82 2.99 1.93 7.75 8 Aeschynanthus 2.73 2.99 2 7.72 novogracilis 9 Begonia picta 2.28 2.99 2.4 7.67 10 Colebrookea oppositifolia 2.28 2.99 2.4 7.67 11 Ariesaema nepenthoides 2.55 2.72 1.94 7.21 12 Arisaema tortuosum 2.46 2.62 1.95 7.03

3 - 117

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-118 of 219

13 Acorus calamus 1.91 2.39 2.28 6.59 14 Drymaria villosa 2.19 2.35 1.96 6.49 15 Begonia dioica 2.55 2.25 1.61 6.42 16 Cymbopogon citratus 2.55 2.21 1.58 6.34 17 Dicliptera bupleuroides 2.19 2.21 1.84 6.24 18 Didymocarpus aromaticus 2.37 2.07 1.6 6.04 19 Nephrolepis auriculata 2.28 2.07 1.66 6.01 20 Pilea scripta 1.73 2.07 2.18 5.99 21 Duchesna indica 1.91 2.07 1.98 5.96 22 Elatostema platyphyllum 2.09 1.93 1.68 5.71 23 Dactylicapnos scandens 1.82 1.93 1.94 5.69 24 Hedychium ellipticum 1.09 1.66 2.77 5.52 25 Elsholtzia blanda 2.19 1.75 1.46 5.39 26 Eranthemum indicum 2.46 1.61 1.2 5.27 27 Fagopyrum esculentum 1.37 1.61 2.15 5.13 28 Centella asiatica 1.37 1.61 2.15 5.13 29 Aeschynanthus hookeri 1.37 1.61 2.15 5.13 30 Gloriosa superba 1.91 1.61 1.54 5.06 31 Hedychium coccineum 1.55 1.61 1.9 5.06 32 Heracleum wallichii 1.64 1.61 1.79 5.04 33 Nasturtium officinale 1.64 1.56 1.74 4.95 34 Strobilanthes himalayana 1.09 1.43 2.38 4.9 35 Pouzolzia hirta 1.64 1.47 1.64 4.75 36 Rumex nepalensis 1.73 1.43 1.5 4.66 37 Ophiopogon intermediu 1.73 1.43 1.5 4.66 38 Tupistra nutans 1.64 1.43 1.59 4.65 39 Impatiens trilobata 1.09 1.29 2.15 4.53 40 Tectaria griffithii 1.37 1.29 1.72 4.38 41 Rubus lineatus 0.91 1.15 2.31 4.37 42 Peristrophe speciosa 0.91 1.1 2.21 4.23 43 Panax pseudoginseng 1.09 1.15 1.92 4.16 44 Persicaria microcephala 1.64 1.15 1.28 4.07 45 Persicaria runcinata 1.37 1.1 1.48 3.95 46 Phyllanthus urinaria 1.09 0.97 1.61 3.67 47 Pilea cordifolia 1.55 0.97 1.14 3.65 48 Swertia bimaculata 1.28 0.97 1.38 3.62 49 Satyrium nepalense 0.91 0.87 1.75 3.54

3 - 118

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-119 of 219

50 Selaginella monospora 1.09 0.87 1.46 3.43 51 Potentella lineata 0.73 0.69 1.73 3.15 52 Sonchus oleraceus 0.82 0.69 1.54 3.05 53 Urtica dioica 0.82 0.64 1.43 2.9 54 Valeriana hardwickii 0.82 0.55 1.23 2.6 55 Rheum acuminatum 0.46 0.32 1.29 2.07 Total 100 100 100 300

Kankiabang (Right side of the Barrage area) Analysis of the vegetation will help in determining the relative importance of each species in the study area and to reveal if any economically valuable species is threatened in the process. The major tree species recorded in the study area were Lithocarpus pachyphyllus, Symplocos ramosissima, Castanopsis hystrix, Castanopsis tribuloides, Schima wallichii, Rhododendron arboreum and Shorea robusta etc. Phytosociology of the treespecies presented in Table 3.36 Table 3.36 Phytosociology of the Tree Species in The Right Side of The Barrage S.No Species RD RF Rdom IVI 1 Lithocarpus pachyphyllus 6.22 7.04 15.27 28.54 2 Symplocos ramosissima 7.16 8.31 13.06 28.5 3 Castanopsis hystrix 7.56 5.05 10.63 23.25 4 Castanopsis tribuloides 6.89 3.97 8.92 19.78 5 Schima wallichii 7.14 6.49 3.8 17.44 6 Rhododendron arboreum 4.15 2.89 8.31 15.35 7 Shorea robusta 5.73 4.33 1.39 11.45 8 Eurya acuminata 5.56 4.33 1.1 11 9 Quercus lamellosa 4.32 4.33 1.95 10.61 10 Symplocos heishanensis 3.06 3.96 2.13 9.18 11 Engelhardtia spicata 2.74 2.17 4.15 9.05 12 Gynocardia odorata 2.66 2.35 3.86 8.87 13 Betula alnoides 2.49 3.07 2.46 8.02 14 Macaranga denticulata 2.91 2.88 1.85 7.65 15 Albizia lebbeck 3.57 3.07 0.87 7.51 16 Alnus nepalensis 2.4 2.52 2.28 7.22

3 - 119

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-120 of 219

17 Brassaiopsis hispida 2.83 3.24 1.01 7.08 18 Viburnum erubescens 2.16 0.36 2.27 4.79 19 Symplocos heishanensis 2.08 1.81 0.85 4.73 20 Elaeocarpus sikkimensis 1.96 2.16 0.74 4.65 21 Magnolia campbellii 1.5 2.16 0.87 4.54 22 Rhododendron hodgsonii 1.18 1.98 1.29 4.44 23 Acer campbellii 0.83 0.9 2.47 4.2 24 Beilschmiedia roxburghiana 1.16 1.81 0.91 3.88 25 Litsaea oblonga 0.75 0.72 2.17 3.64 26 Betula cylindrostachys 0.82 2.26 0.21 3.35 27 Nyssa sessiliflora 1.17 1.08 0.5 2.76 28 Michelia excelsa 0.84 1.26 0.47 2.57 29 Juglans regia 0.74 1.26 0.36 2.37 30 Macranga pustulata 0.75 1.26 0.13 2.14 31 Casearia glomerata 0.66 0.9 0.57 2.13 32 Prunus nepalensis 0.75 1.26 0.1 2.11 33 Cinnamomum tamala 0.58 1.08 0.27 1.93 34 Ostodes paniculatus 0.66 0.72 0.27 1.66 35 Albizia procera 0.48 1.08 0.06 1.62 36 Actinodaphne sikkimenss 0.66 0.72 0.13 1.52 37 Glochidion acuminatum 0.33 0.72 0.4 1.46 38 Celtis tetrandra 0.17 0.18 0.94 1.29 39 Phoebe lanceolata 0.32 0.72 0.14 1.19 40 Ficus glomerata 0.32 0.72 0.02 1.08 41 Spondias axillaris 0.25 0.36 0.37 0.98 42 Maesa chisia 0.33 0.54 0.04 0.91 43 Sapium baccatum 0.33 0.54 0.04 0.91 44 Ficus semicordata 0.17 0.36 0.07 0.6 45 Vitex heterophylla 0.17 0.36 0.06 0.59 46 Ficus neriifolia 0.25 0.18 0.03 0.46 47 Engelhardtia spicata 0.08 0.18 0.13 0.4 48 Daphniphyllum chartaceum 0.08 0.18 0.08 0.34 49 Tetradium fraxinifolium 0.08 0.18 0 0.26 Total 100 100 100 300

3 - 120

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-121 of 219

Phytosociology of the shrubs and climbers in the study area were represented by Breynia vitis-idea, Elaeagnus infundibularis, Lantana camara, Leea indica, Flemingia stricta and Ampelocissus barbata. These species are top five of IVI. The ecological parameters of shrubs and climbers are given in Table 3.37 Table 3.37 Phytosociology of the Shrubs and Liana Species in The Right Side of The Barrage S.No Species Name R.D. R.F. R.Dom IVI 1 Breynia vitis-idea 8.36 4.35 7.91 20.62 2 Elaeagnus infundibularis 6.57 4.35 6.75 17.66 3 Lantana camara 5.37 4.35 6.55 16.27 4 Leea indica 5.07 4.35 5.82 15.25 5 Flemingia stricta 4.48 4.35 5.49 14.31 6 Ampelocissus barbata 4.48 4.35 5.37 14.2 7 Daphne papyraceae 4.48 4.35 5 13.82 8 Grewia eriocarpa 5.67 4.35 2.82 12.83 9 Rubus ellipticus 4.78 4.35 3.56 12.69 10 Bridelia stipularis 4.18 4.35 4.06 12.59 11 Stephania japonica 3.88 4.35 2.69 10.92 12 Combretum albidum 3.88 2.17 4.72 10.78 13 Osbeckia stellata 3.58 4.35 2.52 10.45 14 Leea asiatica 3.88 2.17 3.78 9.837 15 Combretum flagrocarpum 2.39 4.35 2.31 9.042 16 Woodfordia fruticosa 2.09 2.17 4.04 8.299 17 Dichroa febrifuga 2.09 4.35 1.73 8.163 18 Entada rheedii 2.69 2.17 2.92 7.776 19 Laportea terminalis 2.09 2.17 3.29 7.555 20 Zanthoxylum acanthopodium 2.99 2.17 2.3 7.457 21 Dalbergia volubilis 2.99 2.17 2.24 7.403 22 Urtica parviflora 2.09 2.17 2.33 6.59 23 Holarrhena antidysenterica 2.09 2.17 1.34 5.605 24 Paederia foetida 1.79 2.17 1.45 5.418 25 Pavetta polyantha 1.19 2.17 1.8 5.17 26 Calamus latifolius 1.49 2.17 1.48 5.149 27 Microcos paniculata 1.49 2.17 1.39 5.059 28 Ardisia solanacea 0.9 2.17 1.66 4.727

3 - 121

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-122 of 219

29 Tinospora cordifolia 0.9 2.17 1.13 4.204 30 Smilax zeylanica 0.9 2.17 0.5 3.568 31 Caesalpinia bonduc 0.6 2.17 0.54 3.308 32 Crotalaria pallida 0.6 2.17 0.52 3.292 Total 100 100 100 300

Phytosociology of the herbs and grass species in the study area are represented by Senecio scandens, Geranium nepaliansis, Capillipedium assimile, Cephalostachyum capitatium and Viola surpense. These five species are dominant within the stuay area. The ecological parameters of the herbs and grasses are shown in Table 3.38

Table 3.38 Phytosociology of the herbs in the right side of the barrage S.No Name of the plant RF RD RA IVI 1 Senecio scandens 5.92 5.61 3.53 15.06 2 Geranium nepaliansis 4.55 5.57 4.83 14.96 3 Capillipedium assimile 5.28 5.52 3.83 14.63 4 Cephalostachyum capitatium 4.74 4.6 3.57 12.91 5 Viola surpense 4.73 4.6 3.47 12.81 6 Plantago major 3.82 4.42 4.38 12.62 7 Urtica dioica 4.1 4.28 3.82 12.2 8 Pseudostachyum polymorphium 5.01 3.96 2.72 11.68 Munro 9 Porgonetherum paniceum 4.83 3.68 2.8 11.31 10 Fragaria nubicola 3.19 3.86 4.15 11.21 11 Viola betonicifolia 3.82 3.36 3.18 10.37 12 Trifolium repens 3.19 3.36 3.66 10.21 13 Saccharum arundinaceum 3.01 3.17 3.89 10.08 14 Ophiorrhiza nutans 3.1 3.04 3.65 9.79 15 Arundinaria maling 2.46 2.76 4.21 9.43 16 Hydrocotyle nepaliansis 3.01 2.9 3.51 9.42 17 Phyllanthus maderaspatensis 3.19 3.45 1.98 8.62 18 Phyllanthus debilis 1.91 2.99 2.85 7.76 19 Rubia cordifolia 2.73 2.12 2.89 7.74 20 Gnaphalium luteoalbum 2.46 2.12 3.13 7.7 21 Phyllanthus amarus 2.28 2.99 2.4 7.67 3 - 122

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-123 of 219

22 Oplismenus burmanii 2.55 2.72 1.94 7.21 23 Trianthema portulacastrum 2.55 2.21 1.58 6.34 24 Primula malacoides 2.28 2.07 1.66 6.01 25 Parthenium hysterophorus 1.73 2.07 2.18 5.99 26 Neyraudia zollingeri 2.19 1.75 1.46 5.39 27 Stachytarpeta jamaicansis 1.37 1.61 2.15 5.13 28 Tephrosia purpurea 1.64 1.47 1.64 4.75 29 Oplismenus burmannii 1.09 1.29 2.15 4.53 30 Commelina benghalensis 0.91 1.1 2.21 4.23 31 Melocana baccifera 1.09 1.15 1.92 4.16 32 Sida cordata 1.37 1.1 1.48 3.95 33 Sida acuta 1.09 0.87 1.46 3.43 34 Spermacoce hispida 0.73 0.69 1.73 3.15 35 Sebastiania chamaelea 0.82 0.64 1.43 2.9 36 Mollugo pentaphylla 0.82 0.55 1.23 2.6 37 Ocimum gratissimum 0.46 0.32 1.29 2.07 Total 100 100 100 300

Near Township Area Based on importance value index (IVI), the highest IVI recorded (Table 3.39) at township area is for Schima wallichii (37.44), followed by Toona ciliate (29.84), Glochidion lanceolarium(26.82), Shorea robusta(24.23), Alangium chinense(20.05) and Callicarpa arborea(18.92). Table 3.39 Phytosociology of the trees near township area S. No Name of the species RD RF RDo IVI 1 Schima wallichii 12.7 8.79 15.95 37.44 2 Toona ciliata 5.29 11.29 13.27 29.85 3 Glochidion lanceolarium 14.04 9.99 2.79 26.82 4 Shorea robusta 3.75 8.09 12.39 24.23 5 Alangium chinense 10.02 8.99 1.04 20.05 6 Callicarpa arborea 8.1 9.49 1.33 18.92 7 Cinnamomum tamala 7.05 3 6.32 16.37 8 Careya arborea 2.02 2.4 11.26 15.68 9 Tectona grandis 5.65 7.09 0.95 13.69

3 - 123

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-124 of 219

10 Trema orientalis 4.11 4.2 1.39 9.7 11 Chrysophyllum roxburghii 4.54 3.4 1.66 9.6 12 Aegle marmelos 1.14 1.6 4.52 7.26 13 Castanopsis indica 1.14 1.1 4.82 7.06 14 Elaeocarpus floribundus 1.83 2.1 2.04 5.97 15 Dillenia pentagyna 1.53 1.5 2.43 5.46 16 Dillenia indica 1.31 2.1 1.91 5.32 17 Sapindus mukorossi 1.63 1 2.13 4.76 18 Baccaurea ramiflora 1.66 2.1 0.19 3.95 19 Aporosa octandra 2.71 0.6 0.49 3.8 20 Alstonia scholaris 0.72 0.8 1.92 3.44 21 Dalbergia lanceolaria 1.6 1.1 0.63 3.33 22 Litsea glutinosa 1.8 1.2 0.14 3.14 23 Parkia roxburghii 0.55 0.7 1.79 3.04 24 Terminalia arjuna 0.69 1 1.31 3 25 Duabanga grandiflora 0.52 0.9 1.1 2.52 26 Phyllanthus acidus 0.33 0.5 1.64 2.47 27 Mallotus philippensis 0.82 0.8 0.15 1.77 28 Syzygium fruticosum 0.2 0.3 0.84 1.34 29 Syzygium cumini 0.49 0.2 0.42 1.11 30 Anthocephalus chinensis 0.16 0.3 0.57 1.03 31 Aporosa octandra 0.29 0.5 0.07 0.86 32 Aphanamixis polystachya 0.23 0.3 0.27 0.8 33 Mangifera indica 0.13 0.3 0.37 0.8 34 Ardisia neriifolia 0.14 0.3 0.34 0.78 35 Antidesma acidum 0.2 0.4 0.15 0.75 36 Butea monosperma 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 37 Caryota urens 0.13 0.2 0.37 0.7 38 Albizia chinensis 0.23 0.3 0.16 0.69 39 Antidesma bunius 0.16 0.3 0.11 0.57 40 Terminalia bellirica 0.13 0.1 0.19 0.42 41 Spondias pinnata 0.1 0.2 0.03 0.33 42 Ficus auriculata 0.07 0.1 0.06 0.23 43 Beilschmiedia assamica 0.03 0.1 0.07 0.2 44 Azadirachta indica 0.07 0.1 0.02 0.19 Total 100 100 100 300

3 - 124

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-125 of 219

It was also observed that a fewspecies including Eugenia bracteata, Chromolaena odorata, Mikania micrantha, Lantana camara, Osbeckia nepalensis, and Tetrastigma planicaule had quite good IVI (Table 3.40). Table 3.40 Phytosociology of the shrubs and climbers near township area S. No Name of the species RD RF RDo IVI 1 Eugenia bracteata 14.61 11.8 17.457 43.867 2 Chromolaena odorata 8.76 7.638 19.21 35.608 3 Mikania micrantha 4.87 5.555 17.193 27.618 4 Lantana camara 6.81 8.333 5.32 20.463 5 Osbeckia nepalensis 10.38 7.638 0.1 18.118 6 Tetrastigma planicaule 8.11 9.027 0.753 17.89 7 Tetrastigma serrulatum 1.29 1.388 13.467 16.145 8 Abrus pulchellus 6.16 5.555 1.834 13.549 9 Stephania japonica 6.48 4.165 1.738 12.383 10 Artemisia dubia 4.54 4.861 2.101 11.502 11 Thladiantha cordifolia 4.65 4.166 1.799 10.615 12 Maesa chisia 2.91 2.776 3.746 9.432 13 Mimosa himalayana 2.59 3.471 1.331 7.392 14 Rubus ellipticus 2.91 2.776 1.153 6.839 15 Psilanthus bengalensis 1.29 2.083 2.999 6.372 16 Aconogonom molle 1.62 2.083 2.656 6.359 17 Mesia montana 1.94 2.083 1.421 5.444 18 Bambusa nutans 1.94 2.083 1.128 5.151 19 Holmskioldia sanguinea 1.94 2.083 1.007 5.03 20 Desdmodium heterocarpon 1.29 2.088 0.302 3.68 21 Maesa macrophylla 0.97 2.088 0.516 3.574 22 Desdmodium heterocarpon 1.29 2.088 0.045 3.423 23 Wallichia oblongifolia 0.72 0.702 1.19 2.612 24 Dioscorea bulbifera 0.97 1.388 0.041 2.399 25 Melastoma malabathricum 0.32 0.694 1.35 2.364 26 Argyreia hookeri 0.32 0.694 0.124 1.138 27 Thunbergia grandiflora 0.32 0.694 0.019 1.033 Total 100 100 100 300

3 - 125

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-126 of 219

The dominant species in terms of IVI value in the open forests are Ageratum houstonianum (15.42), Globba racemosa (13.49), Oxalis corniculata (9.43), Boehmaria macrophylla (8.74), Commelina suffruticosa (8.37) and others shown in (Table 3.41).

Table 3.41 Phytosociology of the herbs near township area S.No. Name of the plant R.F R.D R.A IVI 1 Ageratum houstonianum 3.39 7.2 4.83 15.42 2 Globba racemosa 3.14 6 4.35 13.49 3 Oxalis corniculata 3.46 3.91 2.06 9.43 4 Boehmaria macrophylla 1.51 2.88 4.35 8.74 5 Commelina suffruticosa 3.48 2.96 1.93 8.37 6 Rheum nobile 3.46 2.99 1.58 8.03 7 Boehmeria ternifolia 2.82 2.99 1.93 7.74 8 Colebrookea oppositifolia 2.28 2.99 2.4 7.67 9 Lepidagathis incurva 1.95 2.48 2.9 7.33 10 Dryopteris sikkimensis 1.88 2.4 2.9 7.18 11 Acorus calamus 1.91 2.39 2.28 6.58 12 Begonia dioica 2.55 2.25 1.61 6.41 13 Dicliptera bupleuroides 2.19 2.21 1.84 6.24 14 Nephrolepis auriculata 2.28 2.07 1.66 6.01 15 Impatiens trilobata 1.73 1.84 2.42 5.99 16 Rhopalephora scaberrima 2.64 2.68 1.45 6.77 17 Dactylicapnos scandens 1.82 2.93 1.94 6.69 18 Triumfetta rhomboidea 1.13 2.44 2.9 6.47 19 Elsholtzia blanda 2.19 2.75 1.46 6.4 20 Oxalis corniculata 1.79 2.52 1.93 6.24 21 Fagopyrum esculentum 2.37 2.61 2.15 7.13 22 Centella asiatica 2.37 2.61 2.15 7.13 23 Aeschynanthus hookeri 2.37 2.61 2.15 7.13 24 Gloriosa superba 2.91 2.61 1.54 7.06 25 Hedychium coccineum 2.55 2.61 1.9 7.06 26 Heracleum wallichii 2.64 2.61 1.79 7.04 27 Nasturtium officinale 2.64 1.56 1.74 5.94 28 Strobilanthes himalayana 2.09 1.43 2.38 5.9 29 Pouzolzia hirta 2.64 1.47 1.64 5.75 30 Rumex nepalensis 2.73 1.43 1.5 5.66

3 - 126

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-127 of 219

31 Ophiopogon intermediu 2.73 1.43 1.5 5.66 32 Pteris biaurita 3.39 1.72 1.48 6.59 33 Selaginella monospora 2.41 1.2 2.93 6.54 34 Impatiens trilobata 2.09 1.29 2.15 5.53 35 Rubus lineatus 1.09 1.15 2.31 4.55 36 Persicaria runcinata 1.76 1.12 2.45 5.33 37 Peristrophe speciosa 1.01 1.1 2.21 4.32 38 Panax pseudoginseng 1.09 1.15 2.92 5.16 39 Saccharum arundinaceum 1.63 1.04 2.45 5.12 40 Persicaria microcephala 1.64 1.15 2.28 5.07 41 Persicaria runcinata 1.37 1.6 2.48 5.45 42 Selaginella monospora 1.09 0.79 1.46 3.34 43 Isachne globosa 1.69 0.72 0.97 3.38 44 Adiantum philippense 1.13 0.72 1.45 3.3 45 Potentella lineata 0.73 0.68 1.73 3.14 46 Cyperus cyperoides 1.51 0.64 0.97 3.12 47 Costus speciosus 0.38 0.08 0.48 0.94 48 Hedychium ellipticum 0.38 0.08 0.48 0.94 Total 100 100 100 300

Karmi (Left bank of the River Rammam at Power house) A total of 39 species were recorded in the tree layer. The dominant and co-dominant species were Shorea robusta and Bischofia javanica showing their values of IVI of 37.64 and 24.17 respectively, the highest values of density was also recorded for Shorea robusta (Table 3.42). 40 species of shrubs and climbers were recorded in the shrub- layer. The highest IVI score was attained by Eupatorium adenophorum (IVI 34.93) followed by Chromolaena odorata (IVI 20.68) (Table 3.43). In the herb layer, 59 species were investigated through the process among which the dominant species was Oplismenus compositus and the co-dominant was Oplismenus burmanii scoring IVI values of 21.72 and 20.28 respectively. The maximum density and the abundance to frequency ratio in the herb layer were recorded respectively for Oplismenus compositus and Pteris biaurita (Table 3.44).

3 - 127

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-128 of 219

Table 3.42 Phytosociology of the trees in Karmi area S.No Plant name RA RD RF IVI 1 Shorea robusta 6.18 20.26 11.19 37.64 2 Bischofia javanica 7.49 11.45 5.22 24.17 3 Actinodaphne longipes 5.26 10.35 6.72 22.33 4 Pandanus furcatus 5.62 8.59 5.22 19.43 5 Tectona grandis 6.8 5.95 2.99 15.74 6 Ostodes paniculata 5.04 5.51 3.73 14.28 7 Albizzia chinensis 1.34 2.64 6.72 10.7 8 Haldina cordifolia 1.87 2.86 5.22 9.96 9 Litsea monopetala 4.37 2.86 2.24 9.47 10 Leucosceptrum cannum 2.62 2.86 3.73 9.22 11 Brassaiopsis mitis 2.42 2.64 3.73 8.79 12 Syzygium tetragonum 2.02 2.2 3.73 7.95 13 Betula alnoides 3.36 2.2 2.24 7.8 14 Ailanthus integrifolia 2.27 1.98 2.99 7.24 15 Castanopsis indica 2.02 1.76 2.99 6.76 16 Wrightia arborea 2.69 1.76 2.24 6.69 17 Duabanga grandiflora 3.02 1.32 1.49 5.84 18 Engelhardtia spicata 2.02 1.32 2.24 5.58 19 Eurya acuminata 2.02 1.32 2.24 5.58 20 Macaranga denticulata 2.52 1.1 1.49 5.11 21 Persea macrantha 1.34 0.88 2.24 4.46 22 Gmelina arborea 3.02 0.66 0.75 4.43 23 Cryptomeria japonica 2.02 0.88 1.49 4.39 24 Rhus chinensis 1.01 0.66 2.24 3.91 25 Ficus neriifolia 1.51 0.66 1.49 3.67 26 Albizzia procera 2.02 0.44 0.75 3.2 27 Chukrasia tabularis 2.02 0.44 0.75 3.2 28 Cinnamomum tamala 2.02 0.44 0.75 3.2 29 Litsea elongata 2.02 0.44 0.75 3.2 30 Michelia doltsopa 2.02 0.44 0.75 3.2 31 Styrax serrulatus 2.02 0.44 0.75 3.2 32 Alangium chinense 1.01 0.44 1.49 2.94 33 Alcimandra cathcartii 1.01 0.44 1.49 2.94

3 - 128

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-129 of 219

34 Ficus auriculata 1.01 0.44 1.49 2.94 35 Ficus religiosa 1.01 0.44 1.49 2.94 36 Albizzia gamblei 1.01 0.22 0.75 1.97 37 Magnifera sylvatica 1.01 0.22 0.75 1.97 38 Phyllanthus emblica 1.01 0.22 0.75 1.97 39 Quercus griffithii 1.01 0.22 0.75 1.97 Total 100 100 100 300

Table 3.43 Phytosociology of the shrubs and climbers in Karmi area S.No. Plant name RA RD RF IVI 1 Eupatorium adenophorum 5.87 19.5 9.55 34.93 2 Chromolaena odorata 5.62 9.96 5.1 20.68 3 Mikania micrantha 5.15 6.85 3.82 15.82 4 Lantana camara 4.84 6.43 3.82 15.1 5 Tetrastigma planicaule 2.5 4.98 5.73 13.21 6 Tetrastigma serrulatum 1.87 3.73 5.73 11.34 7 Abrus pulchellus 2.41 3.73 4.46 10.6 8 Stephania japonica 1.87 3.32 5.1 10.29 9 Artemisia dubia 2.5 3.32 3.82 9.64 10 Thladiantha cordifolia 3 3.32 3.18 9.5 11 Maesa chisia 1.25 2.49 5.73 9.47 12 Mimosa himalayana 4.37 2.9 1.91 9.19 13 Psilanthus bengalensis 1.61 2.49 4.46 8.55 14 Bambusa nutans 2.81 2.49 2.55 7.85 15 Maesa macrophylla 1.69 1.87 3.18 6.74 16 Desdmodium heterocarpon 3.75 1.66 1.27 6.68 17 Dioscorea bulbifera 1.87 1.66 2.55 6.08 18 Melastoma malabathricum 1.87 1.66 2.55 6.08 19 Argyreia hookeri 3.28 1.45 1.27 6.01 20 Debregeasia longifolia 2.19 1.45 1.91 5.55 21 Cassia floribunda 2.81 1.24 1.27 5.33 22 Flueggea virosa 2.81 1.24 1.27 5.33 23 Dioscorea hispida 1.41 1.24 2.55 5.2 24 Aconogonum molle 2.34 1.04 1.27 4.65 25 Flemingia stricta 2.34 1.04 1.27 4.65

3 - 129

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-130 of 219

26 Thunbergia fragrans 2.34 1.04 1.27 4.65 27 Tithonia diversifolia 2.34 1.04 1.27 4.65 28 Jasminum nepalense 2.81 0.62 0.64 4.07 29 Smilax ovalifolia 2.81 0.62 0.64 4.07 30 Solanum torvum 2.81 0.62 0.64 4.07 31 Brugmansia suaveolens 1.25 0.83 1.91 3.99 32 Phlogacanthus thyrsiformis 1.87 0.83 1.27 3.98 33 Natsiatum herpeticum 0.94 0.62 1.91 3.47 34 Ardisia solanacea 1.41 0.62 1.27 3.3 35 Argyreia roxburghii 1.87 0.41 0.64 2.93 36 Mussaenda roxburghii 1.87 0.41 0.64 2.93 37 Pterygota alata 1.87 0.41 0.64 2.93 38 Solanum viarum 1.87 0.41 0.64 2.93 39 Cyclea bicristata 0.94 0.21 0.64 1.78 40 Meyna spinosa 0.94 0.21 0.64 1.78 Total 100 100 100 300

Table 3.44 Phytosociology of the herbs in Karmi area S.No. Plant name RA RD RF IVI 1 Oplismenus compositus 4.49 11.44 5.8 21.72 2 Oplismenus burmanii 3.11 9.92 7.25 20.28 3 Nephrolepis auriculata 5.84 7.44 2.9 16.17 4 Ageratum houstonianum 3.39 7.2 4.83 15.42 5 Polystichum lentum 2.64 6.72 5.8 15.15 6 Globba racemosa 3.14 6 4.35 13.49 7 Spermacoce latifolia 3.01 5.76 4.35 13.12 8 Boehmaria macrophylla 1.51 2.88 4.35 8.73 9 Commelina suffruticosa 3.48 2.96 1.93 8.38 10 Persicaria microcephala 2.56 2.72 2.42 7.7 11 Pouzolzia hirta 2.48 2.64 2.42 7.54 12 Phymatosorus cuspidatus 2.92 2.48 1.93 7.33 13 Lepidagathis incurva 1.95 2.48 2.9 7.32 14 Dryopteris sikkimensis 1.88 2.4 2.9 7.18 15 Impatiens trilobata 1.73 1.84 2.42 5.99 16 Rhopalephora scaberrima 2.64 1.68 1.45 5.76

3 - 130

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-131 of 219

17 Triumfetta rhomboidea 1.13 1.44 2.9 5.47 18 Oxalis corniculata 1.79 1.52 1.93 5.24 19 Sida rhombifolia 1.6 1.36 1.93 4.89 20 Pteris biaurita 3.39 0.72 0.48 4.59 21 Capillipedium assimile 1.41 1.2 1.93 4.54 22 Selaginella monospora 1.41 1.2 1.93 4.54 23 Persicaria runcinata 1.76 1.12 1.45 4.33 24 Physalis divaricata 2.26 0.96 0.97 4.19 25 Saccharum arundinaceum 1.63 1.04 1.45 4.12 26 Bidens pilosa 1.88 0.8 0.97 3.65 27 Pupalia atropurpurea 1.88 0.8 0.97 3.65 28 Isachne globosa 1.69 0.72 0.97 3.38 29 Adiantum philippense 1.13 0.72 1.45 3.3 30 Cyperus cyperoides 1.51 0.64 0.97 3.11 31 Biophytum reinwardtii 1.32 0.56 0.97 2.84 32 Drymaria cordata 1.32 0.56 0.97 2.84 33 Emelia sonchifolia 1.32 0.56 0.97 2.84 34 Pilea scripta 1.32 0.56 0.97 2.84 35 Equisetum diffusum 1.88 0.4 0.48 2.77 36 Neyraudia zollingeri 1.88 0.4 0.48 2.77 37 Rubia charaefolia 0.75 0.48 1.45 2.68 38 Peristrophe speciosa 1.13 0.48 0.97 2.58 39 Urena lobata 1.13 0.48 0.97 2.58 40 Galinsoga parviflora 1.51 0.32 0.48 2.31 41 Peperomia pellucida 1.51 0.32 0.48 2.31 42 Rhynchoglossum obliquum 0.94 0.4 0.97 2.31 43 Strobilanthus himalayana 1.51 0.32 0.48 2.31 44 Begonia hatacoa 0.75 0.32 0.97 2.04 45 Crassocephalum crepidioides 0.75 0.32 0.97 2.04 46 Persicaria chinensis 0.75 0.32 0.97 2.04 47 Urtica dioica 0.75 0.32 0.97 2.04 48 Piper peepuloides 1.13 0.24 0.48 1.85 49 Setaria palmifolia 1.13 0.24 0.48 1.85 50 Dicliptera bupleuroides 0.56 0.24 0.97 1.77 51 Phaseolus coccineus 0.56 0.24 0.97 1.77 52 Aeschynanthus hookeri 0.38 0.16 0.97 1.5 53 Elastostema lineolatum 0.75 0.16 0.48 1.4

3 - 131

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-132 of 219

54 Elephantopus scaber 0.75 0.16 0.48 1.4 55 Peliosanthes griffithii 0.75 0.16 0.48 1.4 56 Tectaria griffithii 0.75 0.16 0.48 1.4 57 Vallaris solanacea 0.75 0.16 0.48 1.4 58 Costus speciosus 0.38 0.08 0.48 0.94 59 Hedychium ellipticum 0.38 0.08 0.48 0.94 Total 100 100 100 300

3.12.13 Biodiversity Indices Species diversity indices can be considered as a measure of environmental quality and it indicates the eco-system well being. The diversity measurements reflect as to how many diverse species are present. Species diversity is the best measure of community structure and it is sensitive to various environmental stresses. Smaller value of Simpson’s Diversity Index shows healthy ecosystem and the higher value shows that an ecosystem is under environmental stress. The vegetation (trees, Shrubs and Herbs) sampling was carried out at four different sampling locations near Barrage site, Power house site and near township area. Tree species had Shannon diversity (H’) index is 3.96 at Salangdang area whereas lowest in Kankiabang (3.76), shrubs and lainas had maximum Shannon diversity (H’) index is 3.38 and lowest in near tonship area and herbs have Simpson index having highest in Karmi area (3.86) and lowest at Kankiabang (3.11). There is no major difference in the Simpson index for all communities (Table 3.45). Table 3.45 Biodiversity indices of all four study sites Location Community Shannon-Wiener Simpson Index (1- Index (H) D) Salangdang Trees 3.96 0.97 Shrubs and lainas 3.29 0.95 Herbs 3.62 0.96 Trees 3.76 0.96 Kankiabang Shrubs and lainas 3.20 0.95 Herbs 3.11 0.93

3 - 132

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-133 of 219

Near Township Trees 3.90 0.97 area Shrubs and liana 3.00 0.93 Herbs 3.61 0.96 Trees 3.89 0.98 Karmi Shrubs and liana 3.38 0.95 Herbs 3.86 0.97

Acorus calamus Actinodaphne sikkimensis

Aegle marmelos Ailanthus excels

3 - 133

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-134 of 219

Alangium salvifolium Albizia odoratissima

Albizia procera Ampelocissus barbata

Anaphalis contorta Ardisia solanacea

3 - 134

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-135 of 219

Arisaema tortuosum Bauhinia vahlii

Begonia picta Bischofia javanica

Bridelia stipularis Buchanania lanzan

3 - 135

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-136 of 219

Careya arborea Caryota urens

Casearia tomentosa Cassia fistula

Centella asiatica Clerodendrum serratum

3 - 136

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-137 of 219

Colebrookea oppositifolia Combretum album

Costus speciosus Cyathea spinulosa

Daphne bholua Debregeasia longifolia

3 - 137

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-138 of 219

Dendrophthoe falcata Desmodium heterocarpon

Dichroa febrifuga Dillenia indica

3 - 138

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-139 of 219

Dillenia pentagyna Dioscorea bulbifera

Elephantopus scaber Elsholtzia blanda

Entada rheedii Eurya Japonica 3 - 139

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-140 of 219

Ficus benjamina Ficus semicordata

Firmiana colorata Garuga pinnata

Girardiana diversifolia Gloriosa superba

3 - 140

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-141 of 219

Haldinia cordifolia Hiptage benghalensis

Holarrhena pubescens Houttynia cordata

Macaranga denticulata Milletia extensa

3 - 141

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-142 of 219

Musa balbasiana Myrsine semiserrata

Oroxylum indicum Osbeckia stellata

Oxyspora paniculata Phoenix loureiroi

3 - 142

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-143 of 219

Phyllanthus emblica Pinus roxburghii

Plumbago zeylanica Rauwolfia serpetina

Rhaphidophora decursiva Rhus chinensis

3 - 143

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-144 of 219

Rhododendron arboretum Rubia cordifolia

Rubia manjith Rubus ellipticus

Rubus paniculatus Semicarpus anacardium

3 - 144

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-145 of 219

Stereospermum chelonoides Stereospermum tetragonum

Strobilanthes capitata Terminalia chebula

Terminalia tomentosa Tetrastigma serrulatum

3 - 145

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-146 of 219

Thysanolaena latifolia Toona ciliate

Trema orientalis Vaccinum vacciniaceum

Valeriana hardwickii Ventilago denticulate

3 - 146

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-147 of 219

Woodfordia fruticosa Wrightia arborea

Zanthoxylum armatum Ziziphus rugosa

Fig 3.19 Photographs of various plant species in area

3 - 147

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-148 of 219

3.12.14 Fauna For the documentation of the faunal biodiversity of the study area with respect to birds, reptiles, amphibians, and butterfly species, a baseline survey conducted in monsoon period. To prepare a detailed report on the status of faunal diversity within study area of 10 Km radius around Rammam hydro power project area, field studies were conducted. Both direct (sighting) and indirect (evidences) observations methods were used to survey the faunal species around the study area. Additionally reference of relevant literatures (published/unpublished) and dialogues with local people were also varied out to consolidate the presence of faunal distribution in the area (Smith 1933-43, Ali and Ripley 1983, Daniel 1983, Prater 1993).

Livestock like cattle, goat, poultry, duck and pig are reared for dairy products, meat, egg and for agriculture purpose. Majority of cattle are of local variety. Backyard poultry farms are mostly common in this area.

All the direct sightings were recorded at the study period and also noted faunal species after consultation with local villagers and secondary sources from DFO offices of Department of Forests of Darjeeling district of West Bengal and West Sikkim district of Sikkim states, Common five stripped Squirrel, Common Indian Mongoose, Indian Rabbit, Large Indian Squirrel were observed during primary survey. Since birds are considered to be the indicators for monitoring and understanding human impacts on ecological systems attempt was made to gather quantitative data on the avifauna by walk through survey within the study area and in the agricultural lands within the close proximity to the rivers of this region is Lodhama and Rammam Rivers. Systematic account of the fauna along with birds in the study area with the status of occurrence is given in the Table 3.46.

3 - 148

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-149 of 219

Table 3.46 List of major animal species reported in the study area S.No. Scientific name Trade name Family IWPA,1972, Schedule Mammals 1 Elephas maximus Asian Elephant Elephantidae Schedule-I 2 Tupaia belangeri Northern Treeshrew Tupaiidae Schedule-II 3 Macaca assamensis Assam Macaque Cercopithecidae Schedule-II 4 Macaca mulatta Rhesus Macaque Cercopithecidae Schedule-II 5 Semnopithecus hector Tarai Gray Langur Cercopithecidae Schedule-II 6 Ratufa bicolor Black Giant Squirrel Sciuridae Schedule-II 7 Belomys pearsonii Hairy-footed Flying Sciuridae Schedule-II Squirrel 8 Eupetaurus cinereus Woolly Flying Squirrel Sciuridae Schedule-II 9 Funambulus pennantii Five- striped Palm Sciuridae Schedule-IV Squirrel 10 Tamiops macclellandii Himalayan Striped Sciuridae Schedule-II Squirrel 11 Cannomys badius Lesser Bamboo Rat Spalacidae Schedule-V 12 Neodon sikimensis Sikkim Vole Muridae Schedule-V 13 Tatera indica Indian Gerbil Muridae Schedule-V 14 Bandicota bengalensis Lesser Bandicoot Rat Muridae Schedule-V 15 Bandicota indica Greater Bandicoot Rat Muridae Schedule-V 16 Mus booduga Little Indian Field Mouse Muridae Schedule-V 17 Mus cervicolor Fawn-colored Mouse Muridae Schedule-V 18 Mus musculus House Mouse Muridae Schedule-V 19 Mus pahari Gairdner’s Shrewmouse Muridae Schedule-V 20 Niviventer eha Smoke- bellied Rat Muridae Schedule-V 21 Niviventer fulvescens Chestnut White- bellied Muridae Schedule-V Rat 22 Niviventer niviventer Himalayan White-bellied Muridae Schedule-V Rat 23 Rattus nitidus Himalayan Field Rat Muridae Schedule-V 24 Rattus pyctoris Himalayan Rat Muridae Schedule-V 25 Rattus rattus House Rat Muridae Schedule-V 26 Hystrix brachyura Malayan Porcupine Hystricidae Schedule-II

3 - 149

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-150 of 219

27 Ochotona curzoniae Plateau Pika Ochotonidae Not assigned 28 Ochotona macrotis Large-eared Pika Ochotonidae Not assigned 29 Ochotona roylei Royle's Pika Ochotonidae Schedule-IV 30 Ochotona sikimaria Sikkim Pika Ochotonidae Not assigned 31 Neofelis nebulosa Clouded Leopard Felidae Schedule - I 32 Lepus nigricollis Indian Hare Leporidae Schedule-IV 33 Lepus oiostolus Wolly Hare Leporidae Not assigned 34 Crocidura attenuata Grey Shrew Soricidae Not assigned 35 Suncus etruscus Pygmy White-toothed Soricidae Not assigned Shrew 36 Suncus murinus House Shrew Soricidae Not assigned 37 Episoriculus macrurus Long-tailed Mountain Soricidae Not assigned Shrew 38 Euroscaptor micrura Himalayan Mole Talpidae Not assigned 39 Cynopterus sphinx Greater Short-nosed Fruit Pteropodidae Schedule-V Bat 40 Eonycteris spelaea Lesser Dawn Bat Pteropodidae Schedule-V 41 Megaerops niphanae Northern Tailless Fruit Pteropodidae Schedule-V Bat 42 Macroglossus sobrinus Greater Long-nosed Fruit Pteropodidae Schedule-V Bat 43 Pteropus giganteus Indian Flying Fox Pteropodidae Schedule-V 44 Rousettus leschenaultii Leschenault's Rousette Pteropodidae Schedule-V 45 Sphaerias blanfordi Blanford's Fruit Bat Pteropodidae Schedule-V 46 Rhinolophus affinis Intermediate Horseshoe Rhinolophidae Not assigned Bat 47 Rhinolophus Horseshoe Bat Rhinolophidae Not assigned ferrumequinum 48 Rhinolophus lepidus Blyth’s Horseshoe Bat Rhinolophidae Not assigned 49 Rhinolophus luctus Great Woolly Horseshoe Rhinolophidae Not assigned Bat 50 Rhinolophus trifoliatus Trefoil Horseshoe Bat Hipposideridae Not assigned 51 Coelops frithii Tailless Leaf-nosed Bat Hipposideridae Not assigned 52 Taphozous nudiventris Naked- rumped Tomb Megadermatidae Not assigned Bat 53 Tadarida teniotis European Free-tailed Bat Molossidae Not assigned 54 Arielulus circumdatus Bronze Sprite Molossidae Not assigned

3 - 150

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-151 of 219

55 Pipistrellus Indian Pipistrelle Molossidae Not assigned coromandra 56 Hypsugo cadornae Cadorna's Pipistrelle Molossidae Not assigned 57 Hypsugo joffrei Joffre’s Pipistrelle Molossidae Not assigned 58 Tylonycteris pachypus Lesser Bamboo Bat Molossidae Not assigned 59 Myotis annectans Hairy-faced Bat Molossidae Not assigned 60 Myotis formosus Hodgson’s Bat Molossidae Not assigned 61 Myotis sicarius Mandelli’s Mouse- eared Molossidae Not assigned Myotis 62 Myotis siligorensis Himalayan Whiskered Molossidae Not assigned Myotis 63 Harpiocephalus harpia Lesser Hairy-winged Bat Molossidae Not assigned 64 Murina aurata Little Tube- nosed Bat Molossidae Not assigned 65 Kerivoula picta Painted Woolly Bat Molossidae Not assigned 66 Felis chaus Jungle Cat Felidae Schedule-II 67 Pardofelis marmorata Marbled Cat Felidae Schedule-II 68 Panthera pardus Leopard Felidae Schedule-I 69 Paguma larvata Masked Palm Civet Viverridae Schedule-II 70 Viverricula indica Small Indian Civet Viverridae Schedule-II 71 Herpestes Small Indian Mongoose Herpestidae Schedule-IV auropunctatus 72 Herpestes edwardsii Grey Mongoose Herpestidae Schedule-II 73 Herpestes urva Crab-eating Mongoose Herpestidae Schedule-II 74 Canis aureus Golden Jackal Canidae Schedule-II 75 Cuon alpinus Dhole Canidae Schedule-II 76 Vulpes bengalensis Bengal Fox Canidae Schedule-II 77 Vulpes vulpes Red Fox Canidae Schedule-II 78 Ursus thibetanus Asiatic Black Bear Ursidae Schedule-II 79 Ailurus fulgens Ailuridae Schedule-I 80 Martes foina Beech Marten Mustelidae Schedule-II 81 Melogale personata Large-toothed Ferret Mustelidae Schedule-II Badger 82 Mustela altaica Mustelidae Schedule-II 83 Mustela kathiah Yellow-bellied Weasel Mustelidae Schedule-II 84 Mustela sibirica Siberian Weasel Mustelidae Schedule-II 85 Sus scrofa Wild Boar Suidae Schedule-III 86 Axis axis Chital Cervidae Schedule-III

3 - 151

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-152 of 219

87 Muntiacus vaginalis Northern Red Muntjac Cervidae Schedule-III 88 Rusa unicolor Sambar Cervidae Schedule-III Aves 89 Corvus splendens Common house crow Corvidae Schedule-V 90 Corvus macrorhynchos Jungle crow Corvidae Schedule-IV 91 Pycnonatus cafer Red vented bulbul Pycnonotidae Schedule-IV 92 Pycnonotus jocosus Red whiskered bulbul Pycnonotidae Schedule-IV 93 Dicrurus adsimilis Common drongo Dicruridae Schedule-IV 94 Acridotheres tristis Common house myna Sturnidae Schedule-IV 95 Sturnus contra The pied myna Sturnidae Schedule-IV 96 Passer domesticus House Sparrow Passeridae Schedule-IV 97 Dendrocitta vagabunda Indian Tree pie Corvidae Schedule-IV 98 Turdoides caudatus Common babbler Leiothrichidae Schedule-IV 99 Dicrurus paradiseus Great Racket tailed Dicruridae Schedule-IV Drongo 100 Chloropsis jerdoni Jerdons chloropsis Irenidae Schedule-IV 101 Ploceus philippinus Striated green bulbul Ploceidae Schedule-IV 102 Copsychus The shama Muscicapidae Schedule-IV malabaricus 103 Prinia subflava Indian Wren Warbler Cisticolidae Schedule-IV 104 Cisticola juncidis Streaked fantail warbler Cisticolidae Schedule-IV 105 Orthotomus sutorius Tailor bird Cisticolidae Schedule-IV 106 Acridotheres fuscus Jungle myna Sturnidae Schedule-IV 107 Gracula religiosa Hill myna Sturnidae Schedule-IV 108 Oriolus xanthornus Black headed oriole Oriolidae Schedule-IV 109 Motacilla alba White wagtail Motacillidae Schedule-IV 110 Motacila citreola Yellow headed wagtail Motacillidae Schedule-IV 111 Motacilla cinerea Grey wagtail Motacillidae Schedule-IV 112 Lonchura punctulata Spotted munia Estrildidae Schedule-IV 113 Amandava amandava Red munia Estrildidae Schedule-IV 114 Lonchura striata White munia Estrildidae Schedule-IV 115 Nectarinia asiatica Purple sunbird Nectariniidae Schedule-IV 116 Nectarinia zeylanica Purple rumped sunbird Nectariniidae Schedule-IV 117 Aethopyga siparaja Indian yellow backed Nectariniidae Schedule-IV sunbird 118 Pericrocotus flammeus Scarlet minivet Campephagidae Schedule-IV 119 Coracias benghalensis Indian roller of the blue Coraciidae Schedule-IV

3 - 152

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-153 of 219

jay 120 Merops orientalis Common Bee eater Meropidae Schedule-IV 121 Halcyon smyrnensis White breasted king Alcedinidae Schedule-IV fisher 122 Alcedo atthis Common kingfisher Alcedinidae Schedule-IV 123 Halcyon pileata Black capped king fisher Alcedinidae Schedule-IV 124 Upupa epops Indian Hoopoe Upupidae Schedule-IV 125 Cuculus micropterus Indian cukoo Cuculidae Schedule-IV 126 Clamator jacobinus Pied crested cukoo Cuculidae Schedule-IV 127 Centropus sinensis Crow pheasant Cuculidae Schedule-IV 128 Eudynamys scolopacea Common Koel Cuculidae Schedule-IV 129 Psittacula Blossom-headed parakeet Psittaculidae Schedule-IV cyanocephala 130 Psittacula fasciatus Indian Red breatsed Psittaculidae Schedule-IV Parakeet 131 Psittacula krameri Eastern rose ringed Psittaculidae Schedule-IV Parakeet 132 Ketupa zeylonensis Brown fish owl Strigidae Schedule-IV 133 Otus scops Scops owl Strigidae Schedule-IV 134 Spilopelia chinensis Indian spotted Dove Columbidae Schedule-IV 135 Gallus gallus Red jungle fowl Phasianidae Schedule-IV 136 Gallicrex cinerea Water cocks Rallidae Schedule-IV 137 Grus antigone Sarus crane Gruidae Schedule-IV 138 Metopidius indicus Bronze winged jacana Jacanidae Schedule-IV 139 Hydrophasianus Pheasant tailed jacana Jacanidae Schedule-IV chirurgus 140 Burhinus oedicnemus Stone Curiew Burhinidae Schedule-IV 141 Vanellus indicus Red wattled lapping Charadriidae Schedule-IV 142 Ciconia episcopus White necked stork Ciconiidae Schedule-IV 143 Bubulcus ibis Cattle Egret Ardeidae Schedule-IV 144 Ardeola grayii Paddy bird or the pond Ardeidae Schedule-IV Heron 145 Nycticorax nycticorax Night Heron Ardeidae Schedule-IV 146 Ixobrychus Chestnut Bittern Ardeidae Schedule-IV cinnamomeus 147 Anas clypeata Shovellers Anatidae Schedule-IV 148 Anas crecca Common Teal Anatidae Schedule-IV

3 - 153

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-154 of 219

149 Nettapus Cotton Teal Anatidae Schedule-IV coromandelianus 150 Dinopium benghalensis Lesser Golden Backed Picidae Schedule-IV Woodpecker 151 Fulica atra Common coot Rallidae Schedule-IV 152 Anhinga melanogaster Indian Darter Anhingidae Schedule-IV 153 Himantopus Black winged Stilts Recurvirostridae Schedule-IV himantopus 154 Anastomus oscitans Openbilled stork Ciconiidae Schedule-IV 155 Gyps himalayensis Himalayan Griffon Accipitridae Schedule-I Vulture 156 Gyps bengalensis White rumped Vulture Accipitridae Schedule-I 157 Gyps indicus Slender Billed Vulture Accipitridae Schedule-I 158 Haliaeetus leucoryphus Palla's fish Eagle Accipitridae Schedule-I 159 Anser indicus Bar headed goose Anatidae Schedule-IV 160 Leptoptilos javanicus Lesser Adjutant Stork Ciconiidae Schedule-IV 161 Leptoptilos dubius Greater Adkitant Stork Ciconiidae Schedule-IV 162 Netta rufina Red crested Ponchard Anatidae Schedule-IV 163 Anas penelope Eurasian wigeon Anatidae Schedule-IV 164 Anas cypeata Northern Shoveller Anatidae Schedule-IV 165 Anas acuta Garganey Anatidae Schedule-IV 166 Anser anser Greylagloose Anatidae Schedule-IV 167 Anas poecilorhyncha Spot billed duck Anatidae Schedule-IV 168 Anas platyrhynchos Mallard Anatidae Schedule-IV 169 Tyto alba Barn owl Tytonidae Schedule-IV Amphibians 170 Rana tigrina Frog Ranidae Schedule-IV 171 Hoplobatrachus Indian bull frog Dicroglossidae Schedule-IV bengalensis 172 Fejervarya limnocharis Cricket frog Schedule-IV Reptiles 173 Naja naja Binocellate cobra Elapidae Schedule-II 174 Varanus bengalensis Monitor Lizard Varanidae Schedule-II 175 Xenochropis piscator Asiatic water snake Colubridae Schedule-II 176 Naza kaouthia Monocled cobra Elapidae Schedule-II 177 Bungarus coeruleus Indian krait Elapidae Schedule-IV 178 Vipera russellis Russel's Viper Crotalidae Schedule-II

3 - 154

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-155 of 219

179 Ptyas mucosus Rat snake Colubridae Schedule-II 180 Calotes versicolor Lizard Agamidae Schedule-II 181 Hemidactylis brooki Brooks geeko Gekkonidae Schedule-II 182 Gongylophis conicus Common Sand Boa Boidae Schedule-II Butterflies 183 Junonia orithya Blue Pansy Schedule-IV 184 limniace Blue Tiger Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 185 Junonia iphita Chocolate Pansy Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 186 Euthalia garuda Common Baron Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 187 Jamides celeno Common Cerulean Lycaenidae Schedule-IV 188 Catopsilia pomona Common emigrant Pieridae Schedule-IV 189 Eurema hecabe Common Grass yellow Pieridae Schedule-IV 190 Common Indian Crow Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 191 Delias eucharis Common Jezebel Pieridae Schedule-IV 192 Phalanta phalantha Common Leopard Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 193 Papilio polytes Common Mormon Papilionidae Schedule-IV 194 Neptis hylas Common sailor Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 195 Parantica algae Glassy Tiger Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 196 Euchrysops cnejus Gram Blue Lycaenidae Schedule-IV 197 bolina Great Egg Fly Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 198 Junonia atlites Grey Pansy Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 199 Spialia galba Indian Skipper Hesperiidae Schedule-IV 200 Junonia lemonias Lemon Pansy Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 201 Junonia almana Peacock Pansy Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 202 Anaphaeis aurota Pioneer Pieridae Schedule-IV 203 chrysippus Plain Tiger Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 204 echerius Plum Judy Schedule-IV 205 Striped Tiger Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 206 Junonia hierta Yellow Pansy Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 207 Atrophaneura Common windmill Papilinoidae Schedule-IV polyeuctes 208 Eurema sani Chocolate Grass yellow Hespariidae Schedule-IV 209 Cepora nadina Lesser gul Pieridae Schedule-IV 210 Porantica melaneus Chocolate Tiger Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 211 Poritia hewitsoni Common gem Lycaenidae Schedule-IV 212 Rapala pheretima Copper flash Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 213 Hypolycaena erylus Common tit Lycaenidae Schedule-IV

3 - 155

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-156 of 219

214 Symbrenthia hysselis Himalayan Jester Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 215 Spindasis lohita Long-banded silverline Lycaenidae Schedule-IV 216 Bhagadatta austenia Grey Commodore Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 217 Aglais cashmiriensis Indian Tortoiseshell Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 218 Apatura ambica Indian Purple Emperor Nymphalidae Schedule-IV 219 Lethe sinorix Tailed Red Forester Nymphalidae Schedule-IV Source: Primary study and public consultation,  State Forest Departments of West Bengal and Sikkim

3.12.15 Butterflies A total of 37 butterfly species were recorded during the present study (Table 3.46). Species such as Chocolate Pansy, Common Jezebel, Plain Tiger, Common Crow, and Common Grass Yellow were commonly seen in and around the proposed project site. Crimson Rose, Blue Mormon and Crimson Rose are common species found occurring in the present study area, the distributions of butterflies are restricted to the India and Srilanka (Kunte, 2000). The photographs of butterflies shown in Fig 3.20

Danaus chrysippus Euchrysops cnejus

Euthalia garuda Jamides celeno

3 - 156

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-157 of 219

Junonia orithya Neptis hylas

Phalanta phalantha Tirumala limniace Fig 3.20 Photos of Butterflies

3.12.16 Aquatic ecology Water and ecological quality are the important concern for human use of lentic and lotic ecosystems. These water bodies have significant economic values including hydropower generation, supplying water for drinking water for irrigation, providing food via fish and aquatic products, and preserving the health and biodiversity of important life support ecosystem. However, all these functions depend on a well-balanced environment in terms of its physical, chemical and biological variables. Like water quality monitoring, biological or aquatic monitoring is an ecosystem assessment tool which can be used as the basis for management programmes, restoring and maintaining the physico-chemical and biological integrity of freshwater. Live organisms provide valuable information by their presence, absence and abundance regarding their surrounding habitat and can be used to evaluate the local environmental impact by their physical, chemical and biological properties and their cumulative effects.

3 - 157

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-158 of 219

Biological parameters are very important in the aquatic ecosystem, since they determine the productivity of a water body. The present study to assess the aquatic ecological status, phytoplankton, zooplankton, macro-invertebrates and benthos was monitored within study area of project. Primary productivity is an important indicator of pollution level in any aquatic ecosystem. Fish production is dependent on production of zooplanktons which in turn is dependent on the phytoplankton production or primary productivity. All these are related to the physio-chemical characteristics of the water. Primary data regarding fisheries, fish diversity composition, their migration and breeding grounds has been collected from the study area, where as secondary data on fish and fisheries has also been collected from Fisheries Department of Darjeeling.

3.12.17 Methodology Collection and preservation of Phytoplankton sample: The plankton samples were collected from sub surface water. In the case of phytoplankton, 500 ml sample water was collected in polyethylene bottles and 1ml of Lugol’s solution was added for fixation and preservation. The samples were centrifuged and decanted. A volume of 10 ml was collected in double stoppered polyethylene bottles for further qualitative analysis of phytoplankton. Identification of phytoplankton was dome with the help of standard books and monographs (Turner, 1892; smith, 1924, Ward and Whipple 1959). Collection and preservation of Zooplankton sample: The zooplankton samples were collected by filtering 100 liters of sub-surface water through plankton net made up of bolting silk cloth no 20. A sub sample of 30 ml was collected again, in polyethylene double stoppered bottles and 4-5 drops of formalin and glycerin were added. The samples were stored for further qualitative and quantitative study of zooplanktonic . The identification of zooplankton was done up to species in most cases, according to the reference books including that of Ward and Wipples (1959), Koste (1978), Battish (1992) and Dhanapathi (2000).

Collection and preservation of macro-invertebrate and benthic samples: Samples have been collected on monthly basis with the help of Ekman’s dredge, scoop and D-frame

3 - 158

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-159 of 219

nets. Samples were sieved through a sieve having mesh size of 0.5 to 0.6 mm. The animals were picked up by hand picking and preserved in 4% formalin solution.

Fig 3.21 Collection of Water Samples for Aquatic Study 3.12.18 Sampling locations Surface water samples were collected from 4 locations which are shown in Fig 3.22 for analysis of aquatic ecological status. Sampling location details are provided in Table 3.47

3 - 159

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-160 of 219

Fig 3.22 Aquatic ecological sampling locations

3 - 160

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-161 of 219

Table 3.47 Locations of aquatic samples S.No. Location Latitude Longitude Direction 1 Lodhama River 27°6'38.25"N 88°8'4.41"E SW Upstream Side of Ramam 27°7'2.92"N 88°8'3.90"E NW 2 River Second Order Stream at 27°6'33.88"N 88°9'38.72"E E 3 Samalbong Village 4 Near Power House Site 27° 7'27.26"N 8°13'19.89"E NE

3.12.19 Phytoplankton A total of 45 species of phytoplankton were observed in diffent locations. Among the Phytoplanktons highest (31 species) recorded at up stream side of the Rammam River and lowest species (22) recorded at powerhouse site. Details list of the Phytoplankton community recorded from the study area is presented in Table 3.48

Table 3.48 List of phytoplankton species observed in various sampling sites in the study area S.No. Taxa Lodhama Upstream Second Order Near River Side of Stream at Power Ramam Samalbong House River Village Site 1 Achnanthes affinis + + + + 2 Achnanthes biasolttiana + - - + 3 Achnanthes brevipes - + - - 4 Achnanthes exigua + - - - 5 Achnanthes gidderula - + + + 6 Achnanthes microcephala + + + + 7 Achnanthes minitussima + + - - 8 Achnanthes spp + + + + 9 Amphora eneta + - - + 10 Anomoeoneis serianus - + + + 11 Ceratonies - - - + 12 Ceratonies arcus - - - + 13 Cocconies placentula + - - +

3 - 161

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-162 of 219

14 Cocconies vulgare - + + + 15 Cymbella affinis + - + + 16 Cymbella linearis - - - + 17 Cymbella nagaperense + - - - 18 Cymbella spp + - + + 19 Cymbella turgida + + + - 20 Cymbella ventricosa - + + - 21 Dia vulgare - + - - 22 Diatoma anceps - + - - 23 Diatoma hiemale + + + - 24 Diplonies spp - + - + 25 Eun prearuta - + - - 26 Eunotia lunaris + - + + 27 Eunotia spp - + - + 28 Fragilaria capucina + - + - 29 Fragilaria construens + + - - 30 Fragilaria familiaris + + + + 31 Fragilaria pinnata + + + + 32 Gomphonema intricatum + + + - 33 Gomphonema oilvaceoides + + + - 34 Gomphonema olivaceum + - + + 35 Gomphonema parvulum - + + - 36 Gomphonema undulatum + - + + 37 Navicula microcephala + + + - 38 Navicula minima - + + - 39 Navicula mitica colini - + - - 40 Navicula radiosa - + - - 41 Navicula spp + + + - 42 Raphonies amphiceros - + - + 43 Reimaria sinuata - + - - 44 Synedra ac + + + - 45 Synedra ulna - + + -

The density observed at various sampling locations ranged from 8 to 40 no./ml for the four sampling locations which is an indicator of low phytoplankton productivity. Since

3 - 162

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-163 of 219

phytoplankton is first link in a food chain, the phytoplankton density is an indicator of low primary productivity of river water at the project site.

3.12.20 Zooplankton A total 13 species of the zooplankton observed in different locations. The density ranged from 2 to 3 no./ml during study period from 3 to 4 no./litre. The list of zooplankton species observed during the surveys conducted in study period and is given in Table 3.49

Table 3.49 Zooplanktons observed in various sampling sites S.No. Taxa Lodhama Upstream Second Order Near Power River Side of Stream at House Site Ramam Samalbong River Village 1 Archella + + + + 2 Bosmina + + + - 3 Brachionus + + + - 4 Cypris + - + + 5 Daphnia spp. - + + - 6 Diffugia lebes + - + + 7 Diffugia spp + + + - 8 Keratella - + + - 9 Lecane signifera - + - - 10 Lecane spp - + - - 11 Mesocyclops + + + - 12 Philodina - + - + 13 Trichocera spp. - + - -

3.12.21 Macro-Benthic Biota The macro-benthic communities consist of invertebrate & vertebrates. Among the invertebrates contribute nearly 80% of the total biota. There are four orders of insects and certain families of benthic fish species whose representatives in some stage are found in water and that all of them are met with in greater or lesser numbers as clear and rapid flowing waters in project area. The insect reported in the areas belongs to Plecoptera, Ephimero-ptera, Trichoptera and Diptera. 3 - 163

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-164 of 219

During the survey of macro-benthic insects, nymphs of Trichoptera were commonly observed in rapid flowing streams. Among Plecoptera, nymphs of Isoperlidae (Ietimes) recorded from swift flowing streams. The nymphs of Ephemerid insects recorded belongs to Heptogenidae Ephemerellidae Bactidae. The most abundant were Ecohyonurus, Epeorus, Iron, Heptogenia and Rithrogena. The species recorded amongst Bactidae were represented by Bactinae (Bactis) and Ephemerellinae (Ephemerella). The larvae of Diptera which have been recorded belongs to Clucidae and Chiromidae. The macro-benthic vertebrates recorded include Acrossocheilus hexgonalepis in pools; Schizothorax, Barilius living permanently in swift water and Garra, Naemacherilus, Glyptothorax and Pseudechneis living attached to substratum. Aquatic macrophytes belonging to species namely Equisetum spp., Adiantum spp. and Selanginella spp. were recorded along the bank of river Rammam.

3.12.22 Primary Productivity The phytoplankton primary productivity was determined by light and dark bottle method. The water samples for determination of the productivity were collected in light and dark BOD bottles. Three replicates were maintained for each sample. The experimental bottles were kept for 4 hours in the river from where the water samples were collected. Winkler’s method was used for determination of oxygen in the light and dark bottles. Following formula was used for calculation of phytoplankton primary productivity. Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) =

3 Gross Primary Productivity (GPP)=O2 content of light bottle - O2 content of dark bottle x 1000 x 0.375 (mgC/m /hour)

1.2 x Incubation hour

3 Net Primary Productivity (NPP) = O2 content of light bottle - O2 content of initial bottle x 1000 x 0.375 (mgC/m /hour)

1.2 x Incubation hour

It was found from the analysis that Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) and Net Primary Productivity (NPP) of the river ranged between 38.12 to 44.27 and 27.03 to 28.91 mgC/m3/hour during study period and this level indicate low to moderate biological

3 - 164

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-165 of 219

productivity. The productivity measure of during study period at all sampling locations is given in Table 3.50 Table 3.50 Phytoplankton Primary Productivity in various sampling sites Sampling site Gross Primary Net Primary Productivity (mg Productivity(mg C/m3/hour) C/m3/hour) Lodhama River 44.27 27.03 Upstream Side of 38.12 28.04 Ramam River Second Order Stream at 39.84 28.91 Samalbong Village Near Power House Site 32.45 26.7

3.12.23 Fisheries Fish is one of the most important species of the aquatic fauna as well as the important source of proteinaceus food for human beings. No scientific documentation on fish life is available on River Rammam. However, some published account of Teesta-Rangeet river system is available. A total of 61 species have been recorded by different authors for Teesta-Rangeet River. This list is outlined in Table 3.51

Table 3.51 List of fish species recorded from Teesta Rangeet river system ______1. Chela laubuca (Hamilton) 2. Salmostoma bacaila (Hamilton) 3. Barilius bacaila (Hamilton) 4. B.barna(Hamilton) 5. B. bendelisis(Hamilton) 6. B. bola (Hamilton) 7. B. schacra (Hamilton) 8. B. tileo (Hamilton) 9. B. vagra (Hamilton) 10. Danio.(Danio) acquipinnatus (McClelland) 11. Danio (Danio) dangila (Hamilton) 12. Danio (Danio) davario (Hamilton)

3 - 165

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-166 of 219

13. Danio (Brachydanio) rerio (Hamilton) 14. Esomus danrica (Hamilton) 15. Rasbora daniconius (Hamilton) 16. Amblypharyngodon mola (Hamilton) 17. Aspidopario jaya (Hamilton) 18. Puntius caschonius (Hamilton) 19. P. stigma (Cuvierand valencrneo) 20. P. tieto (Hamilton) 21. Cirrhina reba (Hamilton) 22. Crossocheilus latius latius (Hamilton) 23. Garra lamta (Hamilton) 24. G. annandalei (Hora) 25. G. gotyla gotyla (Gray) 26. Labeo boga (Hamilton) 27. L. dero (Heekal) 28. L. dyocheilus (McClelland) 29. L. pangusia (Hamilton) 30. Tor putitora (Hamilton) (M) 31. Acrossocheilus hexagonolepis (McClelland) (M) 32. Semiplotus semiplotus (McClelland) 33. Schizothorax richardsonii (Grary) (M) 34. Schizopyge progastus (McClelland) 35. Psilorhynchus balitora (Hamilton) 36. P. sneatio (Hamilton) 37. Aborichtys elongatus Hora 38. Lepidocephalus annandalei Chandhuri 39. Lepidocephalus guntea (Hamilton) 40. Naemacheilus botia (Hamilton) 41. N. cosiea (Hamilton) 42. N. devdevi (Hora) 43. N. rupecola rupecola (McClelland) 44. N. Schebbearei (Hora) 45. Somileptis gongota (Hamilton) 46. Mystus bleekeri (Day) 47. M. vittatus (Block) 48. Amblyceps mangois (Hora) 49. Bagarius bagarius (Hamilton) 50. Hora hora(Hamilton) 51. Euchiloglanis hodgarti (Hora) 52. Glyptothorax horavi (Shaw and Schebbeare) 53. G. lineatus (Day) 54. Pseudeehneis suleatus (McClelland) 55. Sisore rhabdophorus (Hamilton)

3 - 166

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-167 of 219

56. Xenentodon cancila (Hamilton) 57. Channa gachua (Hamilton) 58. C. merulius (Bloch) 59. Macrognathus aevleatus (Bloch) 60. Mastacembelus armatus (Lacepedi) 61. M. pancalus (Hamilton) ______(M) - Migratory species

Of the 61 species recorded in Teesta–Rangit river system, 10 species were recorded in River Rammam. The list of the fish species observed in River Rammam is given in Table 3.52 Table 3.52 Fish species recorded in Rammam River Scientific Name Local Name Schizothorax richardsonii Asala Schizothorax progastus Asala Semiplotus semiplotus Chepti Acrossacheilus hexagonalepis Katlay Gara anandolei Buduna Glyptothorax stiatus Kavry Glyptothorax sp. Dhodray Pseudochneis suleatus Kabray Barilius barna Khasray Naemacheilus sikkimensis Godela

The physiographic feature of the River Rammam signals that occurrence of fish life in the river is typical of a mountain torrent. Sample netting with local cast net was done at various locations i.e. upstream of barrage/dam site, downstream of power house site, between barrage/dam site and power house in River Rammam and its tributaries. The cast method (1 cm mesh size) carried out in rapid stretch and pool was carried out.

A gill net was also put overnight across the river at barrage/dam site. The various fish species caught confirm the presence of Schizothorax sp. and Pseudocheneis sp. to understand the fish composition and distribution pattern sample netting with local cast net was also done at various locations i.e. upstream of barrage site, downstream of power

3 - 167

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-168 of 219

house site, between barrage site and power house in River Rammam and its tributaries. The cast method (1 cm mesh size) carried out in rapid stretch and pool confirm that Schizothorax contributes about 62.5% of total catch followed by Acrossocheilus hexagonolepis (14.5%) Gara (14.6%) and others (8.4%). However, during winter season the catch dominated by Schizothorax sp. (60%) followed by Pseudocheneis sp. (20.5%) and others (19.5%). The size of Schizothorax ranged 50-100 mm in total length and 20 to 150 gm in weight. The catch per man hour has been worked out as 250 gm.

3.12.24 National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries Singalila National Park Singalila National Park Eco-sensitive zone is located on the West side of project area at a distance of about 7.1 km from the barrage site. Singalila National Park is a transboundary-protected area at the border with . Singalila National Park is located at 27°14'N and 88°07'E, in the north-western part of Darjeeling District. Its total area is about 78.6 km², and it is well known owing to the trekking route that runs through it. It is bordered on the north by the state of Sikkim, west by the country of Nepal and to the south & east by the state of West Bengal. The Core Area of Singalila National Park is located on the at altitudes ranging from 8000 - 12000 ft in Darjeeling district of West Bengal, although the average altitude of the Buffer area is about 6000 ft. The Park was declared as wildlife Sanctuary in 1986, and was made a National Park in 1992. The two highest peaks Sandakphu (3630 m) and Phalut (3600 m) are located on the ridge and inside the Park.

The Rammam and Srikhola Rivers flow down through the Park. This forest became part of Darjeeling District (West Bengal) and in 1992, it was declared as the National Park for the conservation of this forest and was placed under the Wildlife Forest Department and named “Singalila National Park”. The main motivation of the Government in declaring Singalila forest as Singalila National Park was that it was a home to 80-90 species of mammals, and several threatened medicinal plant species such as Aconitum spp., Dactylorhiza sp., Rheum nobile, Valeriana jatamansi, Picrorhiza kooroa, Swertia

3 - 168

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-169 of 219

chirayita, Himalayan ginseng etc. The vegetation of this area has extended vertically in three successive layers. The average height of the upper storey of the communities, with the cover of dominant tree species, stretched from 9 m to 18 m. Next was the layer of tree saplings and shrubs; the middle storey was mainly up to 2 m height on the sites dominated by Yushania maling and in other places from 0.5 - 1.5 m with various shrubs species like Gaultheria, Berberis, Cotoneaster, Rosa, and mixed with scattered shrubs like Daphne, Rubus, Aconogonum, Cardamine, and Osbeckia. The dense growth of Y. maling reaching upto 3400 m asl made it an important floristic group of the region. Berberis species spreads throughout the transect with the greater density along 3100 m to 3600 m asl. The other less predominant shrubs were Rosa sp., Gaultheria sp., and Aconogonum molle. The ground layer was represented by herbaceous flora; there were appreciable amount of moss, lichens, mushrooms, and ferns. We recorded marked presence of Berberis aristata, Gaultheria pyroloides, Gaultheria trichophylla, and Rosa sp. above 3300 m asl, reflected by their high relative density and high relative frequency. However, we observed frequent presence of B. aristata in many sites with a relatively high frequency. In the higher ranges beyond 3400 m asl, Iris decora along with the scrubs of Rhododendron spp., forms the common vegetation composition. The location map of Rammam HEPP Stage-III with Singalila National Park and Barsey Rhododendron Wildlife Sanctury ESZ boundary is shown in Fig 3.23. The flora reported in the Singalila National Park is given in Table 3.53.

Table 3.53 Vegetation reported in Singalila National Park Altitude (2400-2700 m ) Altitude(2700- 3000m) Altitude (>3000 m) Quercus pachyphylla Quercus spp. Abies densa Quercus lamellosa Betula utilis Tsuga brunoniana Quercus lineata Sorbus cuspidata Rhododendron campanulatum Machilus odoratissima Castanopsis spp. Rhgododendrou barbatam Acer campbellii Lkitsea elougata Rhododendrou cinnabarium Mellisoma wallichii Tsuga brannoniana Rhododendrou hodgsonii Castanopsis tribuloides Arundinaria maling Rhododendrou grande Magnolia campbellii Arundinaria aristata Rhododendrou galeoneri

3 - 169

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-170 of 219

Rhododendron arboreuem Daphne spp. Rhododendrou lepidotum Viburnum erubesans Berberis aristata Arundiwaria spp. Dapne cannabina Piptanthus spp. Cotoneaster microphylla Symplocas spp. Rhododendrou grandi Betula utilis Schefflera impressa

Some threatened species of animals, such as Red Panda, Leopard, Chinese Pangolin, Himalayan Black Bear, Red Throated Hill Partridge, Satyr Tragopan, Blood Pheasant, and Slender Billed Babbler etc. are found in this National Park. The park has major mammalian fauna like the Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens), Himalayan Black Bear (Selenarctos thibetanus) Leopard cat (Felis benghalensis), Clouded Leopard (Neofeis nebulosa), Barking Deer (Muntiacus muntjak) Serow (Capricornis sumatraensis), Yellow Throated Marten (Matres flavigula), Wild Boar (Sus Scrofa), Himalayan Mouse Hare (Ochotona royle), Wild dog (Cunon alpinus), Porcupine (Hystrix indica) and fox (Vulpes vulpes). Of the above mentioned species, five species belong to endangered category. These are Red Panda (Ailurus sp.), Leopard Cat (Felis benghalensis), Barking deer (Muntiacus muntjak), Wild boar (Sus scrofa), Fox (Vulpes vulpes).

Barsey Rododendron Sanctuary The Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary (BRS) Eco-sensitive zone is at a distance of 4.2 km from the barrage site on NW side. The sanctuary established in 1998, occupies an area of 104 km2 sharing its border with Nepal to the west and West Bengal to the south over the Rambong Khola in the Singalila Range. The altitudinal gradient of 2200–4100 m asl provides a wide range of topography leading to various forest types, viz., sub-tropical moist deciduous forest (2200–2400 m), wet temperate forest (2400–2700 m), moist temperate forest (2700–3250 m), sub-alpine forest (3200–4000 m) and alpine meadows (>4000 m).

3 - 170

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-171 of 219

Figure-3.23 Location Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III with Singalila National Park and Barsey Rhododendron WLS ESZ boundary

3 - 171

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-172 of 219

The sanctuary harbors over dozen of rhododendron species, pure patches of Lithocarpus pachyphyllus and epiphytes, climbers, ferns and fern-allies, moss and lichens. BRS is a biologically diverse sanctuary and famous for its rhododendron stand which blooms usually between April and May. The climate is wet and cold which is highly favorable for the growth of . There is Hilley enter point of BRS, Hilley gives the best view of sunrise while Barsey gives a splendid view of Mt. Khangchendzonga, Mt. Pandim and Mt. Sinolchu, etc., which becomes more picturesque between October and November. The sanctuary is flourished with trees of Rhododendron arboreum, R. barbatum, R. falconeri, R. grande, R. griffithianum and R. hodgsonii and shrubs such as R. campanulatum, R. dalhousieae and R. lepidotum giving the forest a beautiful look at the time of blooming. Other commonly available tree species are Abies densa, Acer campbellii, A. caudatum, A. palmatum, A. pectinatum, Lithocarpus pachyphyllus, Maddenia himalaica, Magnolia campbellii, Prunus sp., Symplocos lucida and Tsuga dumosa. While many epiphytic species such as orchids, mosses and lichens are seen growing on trees, shrubs such as Berberis insignis, Daphne cannabina, Gaultheria nummularioides, Gaultheria trichophylla, Piptanthus nepalensis, Rosa sericea, Rubus sp. and Viburnum erubescens are frequently seen throughout the forest. The forest floor is covered by various species of herbs such as Arisaema sp., Frageria nubicola, Hemiphragma heterophyllum, Oxalis sp., Potentila sp., Primula sp., Rubus sp., Swertia sp. and Viola sp. The sanctuary is also rich in medicinal herbs such as Swertia sp., Paris polyphylla, Oxalis corniculata, Meconopsis paniculata, Heracleum wallichii and Rumex nepalensis. Thick growth of bamboo such as Bambusa sp. and Sinarundinaria microphylla is encountered habitually along the trial serving a habitat for Red Panda.

The sanctuary is also home to many faunal species, Barking Deer (Muntiacus muntjak) belonging to Cervidae family, Red Panda, Wild Boar, Himalayan Black Bear, Barking Deer and Serow, etc. BRS is also notable for habitat of Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens) which is the State Animal of Sikkim. Birds such as Verditer Flycatcher, Large-billed Crow, Plain mountain finch, Spotted laughingthrush, Grey-backed shrike, Green-tailed

3 - 172

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-173 of 219

sunbird and Green-backed tit were spotted and recorded. The male and female Blood Pheasant were spotted at 3352m asl in R. hodgsonii forest. Many beautiful avians were encountered in the sanctuary out of which Indian Common Crow (Euploea core) was recorded at around 3000 m asl, Indian Tortoise shell (Aglais caschmirensis) recorded at around 2800 m asl and Painted Lady (Vanessa cardui ) recorded at around 2700 – 2800 m asl) butterflies (Pradhan et al 2018). The dense forests of Lithocarpus pachyphyllus provides shelter as well as abundant fruits and as such are good indicators of faunal presence and richness (Subba et al 2018). Pradhan et al and Subba et al 2018, Rapid biodiversity survey report III by Department of Forest, Environment and Wildlife Management, Government of Sikim. Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule-I species has been prepared and submitted to State Forest Department for approval. After approval, plan will be implementated in consultation with State Forest Department. Copy of Wildlife Conservation Plan is enclosed as Annexure XVIII.

3.13 LANDUSE PATTERN 3.13.1 Land use Pattern-Remote Sensing data The basic purpose of land use pattern and classification in an EIA study is to identify the manner in which different parts of land area is utilized or not utilized. Remote sensing data provides reliable accurate baseline information for land use mapping as it is a rapid method of acquiring up-to-date information of over a large geological area.

Studies on land use aspects of eco-system play an imperative role in identifying susceptible issues and to take appropriate action to uphold ecological equilibrium in the region. The main objective of this section is to provide a baseline status of the study area covering 10 km radius around the project area so that temporal changes due to the proposed activities on the surroundings can be assessed in future.

The objectives of Land use Pattern are to:  Determine the present Land use pattern

3 - 173

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-174 of 219

 Study area with proposed unit as epicenter 10 km radius from the core area of Rammam HEPP Stage-III Run of River (ROR) is considered for land use study. Satellite Data: The Satellite IRS P-6 LISSIV images are obtained from National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC) . The satellite image of the site for the year 2020 is presented in Fig 3.25.

3.13.2 Methodology: The overall methodology adopted and followed  Collection of source data of Survey of India (SOI) toposheets. These are the main inputs for the preparation of essential layers.  Satellite data of IRS P-6 LISSIV sensor is geometrically corrected and enhanced using principal component method and nearest neighborhood resampling technique  Preparation of basic themes like layout map, transport & settlement map and contour map from the source data. Then updating of layout map, transport map and drainage map from the satellite image by visual interpretation.  Essential maps (related to natural resources) like Land use / Land cover map are prepared by visual interpretation of the satellite imagery. Visual interpretation is carried out based on the image characteristics like tone, size, shape, pattern, texture, location, association, background etc. in conjunction with existing maps/ literature  Preliminary quality check and necessary corrections are carried out for all the maps prepared  All the maps prepared are converted into soft copy by digitization of contours and drainages. In that process editing, labeling, mosaicking, quality checking, data integration etc. are done, finally Land use areas are measured in Sq.km. 3.13.3 Land use Map Analysis Land use Map Analysis carried out based on the image color, texture, tone etc. Following steps are used to analyze the Land use pattern of project site:  Collection of scanned toposheets and Geo-reference the scanned image using the available coordinates

3 - 174

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-175 of 219

 Collection of IRS LISS IV images and made fused and blended the images for color combinations using Image interpreter-Utilities and Layer stack option available in ERDAS  Identification Area of interest (AOI) and made a buffer of 10 km radius.  Enhance the Fused and blended LISS IV image using the Spatial, Radiometric and Temporal options in ERDAS  Rectified the LISS IV image using Geo-referencing technique, Toposheet to get UTM coordinate system  Subset the LISS images and Toposheet using 10 km buffer AOI  Automatic classifications done for LISS IV images using maximum iterations and number of options in unsupervised classification options  Created the signature file by selecting the more samples of different features with AOI on Unsupervised classification image  Visual interpretation and supervised classification mixed with recoding practice  Verified through the QC / QA and finalized the data.

3.13.4 Spatial Data from SOI Topographical Sheets Creating a GIS spatial database is a complex operation, and is the heart of the entire work; it involves data capture, verification and structuring processes. Raw geographical data are available in many different analogue and digital form such as toposheets, aerial photographs, satellite imageries and tables. Out of all these sources, the source of toposheets is of much concern to natural resource scientist and an environmentalist.

3 - 175

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-176 of 219

Fig 3.24 Flow chart of methodology

3 - 176

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-177 of 219

Fig 3.25 Satellite Image

3 - 177

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-178 of 219

3.13.5 Contour Map and Elevations of Study Area The contours in Toposheet have been digitized in the GIS environment and assigned the respective elevation values in meters with reference to the mean sea level. Using the SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) data, the elevation values has been verified. Thereafter final contour map has been prepared with combination of Toposheet and SRTM ith contour interval of 10 m. Project site contours vary from 854 m to 897 m above MSL and the study area contours vary from 300 m to 3000 m above MSL. Contour Map and Elevations of Study Area is presented in Fig 3.27.

3.13.6 Digital Elevation Model A digital elevation model (DEM) is a digital representation of ground surface topography or terrain (Fig 3.26). It is also widely known as a digital terrain model (DTM). A DEM can be represented as a raster (a grid of squares, also known as a height map when representing elevation) or as a triangular irregular network. The project site is shown in that Relief map. For the relief study of the area very higher quality SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) and DEM is downloaded. These DEMs of the Terra represents elevation at a 30 m resolution.

3.13.7 Land use land cover statistics of study area Map showing the Land Use Land Cover classification in the study area is presented in Figure 3.28. It is clearly that the area is covered with Dense Vegetation around 43.86% respectively of the total area. Other class is Grass/Agricultual Fields occupies around 25.31%. The Contour Farming & Fallow Lands is 5.60% in the total study area. The scrub area covers 20.83% of the total area. The Barren land & Fallow lands cover about 3.61% of total area. Water body and Built-up area is covered with 0.69% and 0.1% respectively. The statistical break-up of the land use classes of buffer zone are presented in Table 3.54 and depicted in Fig 3.31.

3 - 178

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-179 of 219

Fig 3.26 Digital Elevation Map of Study Area

3 - 179

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-180 of 219

Fig 3.27 Contour Map of Study Area

3 - 180

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-181 of 219

Fig 3.28 Land Use and Land Cover Map of Study Area

3 - 181

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-182 of 219

Fig 3.29 Road Network Map of Study Area

3 - 182

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-183 of 219

Fig 3.30 Slope Map of Study Area

3 - 183

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-184 of 219

Fig 3.31 Graphical Presentation of Land Use Statistics

Table 3.54 Land Use Land Covers Statistics of Study area Sl. No. LULC_Class Area (Ha) Area (%) 1 Dense Vegetation 23773.99 57.83

2 Grass/Agricultural Fields 4663.11 11.4

3 Contour Farming & Fallow Lands 2300.74 5.60

4 Barren Land or Dry Bed 1485.05 3.61

5 Scrub 8564.44 20.83

6 Water Body 282.89 0.69

7 Built-up 43.09 0.10

Total 41113.31 100%

3 - 184

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-185 of 219

3.14 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 3.14.1 Overview The socio-economic baseline focuses on demographic patterns, economic and livelihood profile and infrastructure facilities, risks and opportunities – from the proponent’s perspective – and to provide policy and planning options for mitigating negative impacts and enhancing project benefits. Essential elements of the study approach were its strategic, issues-based and participatory nature. The impact assessment will envisage and evaluate any potential impacts of the project on the local community, livelihoods and other social systems.

3.14.2 METHODOLOGY Aim and objectives: The study area presented in the socio-economic baseline comprises of the following: . Project location – within the limits of Rammam, Hydro-Electric Power Project (HEPP), Stage-III (3x40 MW), Darjeeling District (West Bengal) & West Sikkim (Sikkim) and India . To examine the socio-economic conditions of the study project. . To develop attainable mitigation measures to enhance positive impacts and reduce or avoid negative impacts; and . To develop management and monitoring measures to be implemented throughout the life of the project.

Procedure and data collection The socio-economic baseline has been prepared in two folds of secondary and primary methods. . The secondary data source adopted for the study mainly includes review of published secondary data (District Census Statistical Handbooks 2011 and Primary Census Abstract of Census-2011), and other govt related govt office and web sources of available secondary sources of information as well as select primary consultations in the vicinity of the project area with respect to population,

3 - 185

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-186 of 219

density, household size, , social stratification, literacy rate and occupational structure for 10 km radius study area. . The primary survey was conducted in two different methods such as; Individual Questionnaire Survey (IQS) and Focused Group Discussions (FGD). The primary data has been collected within the vicinity of the project area with respect to population, density, household size, sex ratio, social stratification, literacy rate and occupational structure for 10 km radius study area. Data has been analyzed by using SPSS. This will help measure the impacts with project in various aspects, awareness of the project and community perceptions about the project and other related information.

3.14.3 Brief Profile of West Bengal district Darjeeling district is the northern most district of West Bengal. It is located in the lap of the Himalayas. For administrative and revenue purposes, the district has four subdivisions namely, Darjeeling Sadar, Kalimpong, and Siliguri. Further, the district has 12 development blocks. Darjeeling Himalaya forms a part of eastern Himalayan ranges and is bounded by Sikkim, Nepal and on the north, west and east respectively. The district occupies a geographical area of 3149sq.Km.

3.14.3.1Demographical details of the District The initial provisional data released by Census of India 2011, shows that density of Darjeeling district for 2011 is 586 people per sq.km. The sex ratio in Darjeeling is 937 females per thousand males. Rural population of Darjeeling according to Census 2011 is 11,23,859. Darjeeling’s urban population according to Census 2011 is 7,18,175. The total population living in rural area is 1,118,860 of which males and females are 566,965 and 551,895 respectively. As per 2011 census, 60.58 percent population of Darjeeling district lives in rural areas of villages. Out of the total Darjeeling population for 2011census, 39.42 percent lives in urban regions of district. In total 727,963 people lives in urban areas of which males are 370,294 and females 357,669. In 2011 census, the male and female literacy rate in Darjeeling was 80.05 percent and 62.94 percent respectively. Total

3 - 186

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-187 of 219

workers were 5,69,442 and non- workers were 10,39,730 (Census of West Bengal, 2001). The district has a sizeable SC and ST population and the present study attempts to explore the differential household decision-making status of men and women of such households.

Demographical details of the District

Literates Male Total Child Population Female Average Literacy Population Growth Sex Ratio (Per 1000) Density/km2 Density/km2 Sex Ratio (Per 1000)

Population Growth Average Literacy Total Child Population Female Literates Male

0 5,00,000 10,00,000 15,00,000

Fig 3.32 Demographical details of the district

3 - 187

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-188 of 219

3.14.3.2Demographical details of the study area

The study area of Darjeeling district study area is located in the sub districts namely; Darjeeling pulbazar and Jore bunglow sukaipokhri. It is surrounded with 74 villages in this district area. The total study area has population of 2,40,451 with 52,938 households of which males and females are 1,20,060 and 1,20,391 respectively. With regard to children (0-6 age) are 21009 in this area. The Schedule caste (SC) and Schedule Tribes (ST) are 12,278 and 70,651. Average literacy rates 2011 were 79.56. If things are looked out at gender wise, male and female literacy were 80.05% and 62.94% respectively. The village wise details are provided in Table 3.39.

3 - 188

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-189 of 219

Table 3.55 Demographical details of the study area

S.No Name No_HH TOT_P TOT_M TOT_F P_06 P_SC P_ST P_LIT Darjeeling Pulbazar 27470 126935 63828 63107 11696 5863 36563 93091 1 Singalila Forest 329 1632 842 790 189 7 1039 1033 2 1406 6980 3544 3436 659 242 2150 5137 3 Namla 616 2989 1534 1455 310 96 1603 2158 4 Lodhama 142 703 348 355 40 1 235 578 5 Hatta 645 3436 1799 1637 384 85 1390 2245 6 Dangia 396 1768 895 873 222 198 748 1118 7 Singbhumdera 460 2192 1141 1051 232 1 810 1524 8 Majua 238 1164 580 584 127 0 591 773 9 Kankibong 775 3765 1949 1816 441 80 1538 2505 10 Jhepi 351 1576 832 744 168 106 543 1088 11 Lamagaon 548 2630 1336 1294 326 63 1530 1846 12 Relling 774 3568 1825 1743 293 39 502 2468 13 Kaijalia 934 4150 2066 2084 452 88 1092 2963 14 Samalbong 454 2077 1035 1042 230 48 876 1507 15 Kolbong 178 885 445 440 77 16 352 630 16 Murmidong 442 2181 1174 1007 298 38 819 1274 17 Goke 1826 9100 4664 4436 1101 646 2125 6391 18 Bijanbari 1206 5338 2685 2653 514 390 1584 4156 19 Liza Hill Tea Garden 356 1439 703 736 129 90 273 960 20 Barnesbeg Tea Garden 315 1381 711 670 79 355 191 1009 21 Singla Tea Garden 746 3400 1715 1685 293 233 1007 2254 22 Rangli Forest 17 65 33 32 4 0 13 58

3 - 189

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-190 of 219

23 Banockburn Tea Garden 354 1725 854 871 144 59 538 1335 24 Phubsering Tea Garden 690 3208 1595 1613 250 155 265 2539 25 Rungneet Tea Garden 309 1252 628 624 78 7 611 1067 26 Pattabong Tea Garden 506 2347 1137 1210 153 117 508 2012 27 Patliabas Forest 24 158 76 82 6 28 44 146 28 Tukvar Tea Garden 1043 4791 2339 2452 397 320 851 3529 29 Lebong Tea Garden 521 2276 1159 1117 197 54 952 1670 30 Soom Tea Garden 757 3578 1757 1821 290 68 770 2458 31 Happy Valley Tea Garden 303 1310 630 680 90 76 344 1019 32 Arya Tea Garden 293 1236 587 649 112 16 304 926 33 Rishihat Tea Garden 407 1651 815 836 111 224 373 1147 34 Rishihat Khasmahal 187 824 417 407 47 0 387 647 35 Barbatia Khasmahal 155 769 399 370 60 30 202 628 36 Bloomfield Tea Garden 640 2901 1434 1467 219 226 444 2229 37 Darjiling (P) 511 2270 1098 1172 160 273 261 1917 38 Alubari Tea Garden 27 116 60 56 5 19 40 88 39 Lebong & Mineral Spring Tea 1417 6236 3184 3052 551 174 1044 4856 Garden 40 Pandam Tea Garden 932 3959 1965 1994 292 240 509 3245 41 Alubari Basty 237 1063 553 510 83 12 438 848 42 Badamtam Tea Garden (CT) 1256 6102 2987 3115 520 463 1053 4536 43 Ging Tea Garden (CT) 902 4089 2037 2052 345 80 1577 3086 44 Chongtong Tea Garden (CT) 1340 5802 2876 2926 471 143 1884 4098 45 Tea Garden (CT) 1289 5792 2850 2942 416 257 1818 4649 46 Jorebunglow Sukiapokhri 25468 113516 56232 57284 9313 6415 34088 86004

3 - 190

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-191 of 219

47 Salu Tea Garden 155 677 325 352 65 28 23 491 48 Kacel Tea Garden 202 855 418 437 100 9 179 596 49 Mariabong Tea Garden 607 2404 1203 1201 183 243 769 1721 50 Lingia Tea Garden 415 1841 910 931 127 66 228 1342 51 Tumsong Tea Garden 374 1700 815 885 123 133 416 1367 52 Tumsong Khasmahal 120 586 290 296 35 0 46 460 53 Mim Tea Garden 402 1842 884 958 151 64 419 1386 54 Ghoom Pahar Forest 116 484 242 242 40 14 322 402 55 Pulung Dong Khasmahal 533 2573 1296 1277 246 12 840 1974 56 Pulung Dong Tea Estate 127 622 317 305 61 0 3 511 57 Pubong Tea Garden 450 2170 1098 1072 165 61 625 1660 58 Pussinbong Tea Garden 651 2879 1425 1454 202 181 577 2203 59 Senchal Forest 120 527 283 244 56 17 188 358 60 Rangaroong Tea Garden 320 1423 702 721 113 107 460 1143 61 Rang Bul 904 3916 1920 1996 283 187 1908 3331 62 Hill 275 1355 684 671 112 167 410 1149 63 Kalej Valley Tea Garden 596 2640 1311 1329 244 207 742 1846 64 Dooteria Forest 84 368 182 186 32 2 122 306 65 Dooteria Tea Garden 1166 5113 2636 2477 505 291 1401 3613 66 Okas Tea Garden 283 1262 614 648 100 65 34 921 67 Moonda Kotee Tea Garden 963 3972 1989 1983 325 120 849 2783 68 Ring Tong Tea Garden 183 820 419 401 57 13 259 551 (Gunawar) 69 Nahori Tea Garden (Balasom) 559 2402 1195 1207 170 164 1015 1743 70 Ringtong Tea Garden (Margaret 1429 6025 2969 3056 455 351 2746 4243 Hope) 3 - 191

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-192 of 219

71 Simana Basti 562 2841 1424 1417 256 91 1558 2168 72 Mim Nagri Range 138 561 271 290 54 0 493 414 73 Achhalal Hatta(Rong Bong 751 3508 1759 1749 329 105 1249 2598 Basty) 74 Chamu Tea Garden 527 2352 1163 1189 182 167 577 1779 75 Soolbongs Tea Garden 509 2196 1033 1163 173 136 257 1723 https://censusindia.gov.in/pca/cdb_pca_census/Houselisting-housing-WB.html

3 - 192

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-193 of 219

3.14.3.3Economy and Land based Livelihood The two most significant contributors to Darjeeling's economy are tourism and the tea industry. Darjeeling tea, due to the unique agro-climatic conditions of Darjeeling, has a distinctive natural flavor, is internationally reputed and recognized as a geographical indicator. The office of the Darjeeling Indian Tea Association (DITA) is located at Darjeeling. Darjeeling produces 7% of India's tea output, approximately 9,000,000 kilograms (20,000,000 lb) every year. The tea industry has faced competition in recent years from tea produced in other parts of India as well as other countries like Nepal. Widespread concerns about labour disputes, worker layoffs and closing of estates have affected investment and production. Several tea estates are being run on a workers' cooperative model, while others are being planned for conversion into tourist resorts. More than 60% of workers in the tea gardens are women. Besides tea, the most widely cultivated crops include maize, millets, paddy, cardamon, potato and ginger.

3.14.3.4Landuse Pattern Land is the basic resource. A comprehensive estimation of landuse and potentials of the fallow and wastelands is imperative for policy planning in rural development, environmental protection, wasteland development, agriculture, pisciculture etc. at village level. The landuse pattern of the project area has already been discussed in the earlier chapter.

3.14.3.5Working Population The total working population (main and marginal) in the study area (Darjeling Pulbajar and Jorebunglow Sukiapokhri) are 91,790, of which male and female worker are 55623 and 36167 respectively. Out of total population, 91,790 were engaged in work activities. 42.4% of workers describe their work as Main Work (Employment or Earning more than 6 Months) while 58.6% were involved in Marginal activity providing livelihood for less than 6 months.

3 - 193

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-194 of 219

70000 60000

50000

40000 Main Workers

xis Title 30000 marginal Workers A 20000

10000

0 Main Workers marginal Workers

Fig 3.33 Details of the working population

3.14.3.6Cropping Pattern The major crops in Darjeeling District and study area are maize, ginger, paddy, tamarind, mustard, elachi, etc. in Kharif season (summer season), primarily maize and ginger, which accounts nearly 80 – 90% of total crops of the season. However, paddy accounts for 10 – 20% of the total crop, which is cultivated during Rabi season. In few pockets, mustard, elachi, tamarind, vegetables, etc. are also being cultivated in less than 25% of the total crop area.

3.14.3.7Agricultural Implements The study area owing to its diverse geo-morphological conditions, has different agro- climatic conditions. The highest altitude are covered with snow almost through-out the year and are unsuitable for crop cultivation. The lower hills are mainly used for plantation crops like Tea, Cinchona and Rubber. Study area is also famous for variety of fruits and vegetables grown at different elevations. Pineapples are the highest growing fruit variety in the district. Darjiling Orange is also a distinguished variety of fruit; famous for its juiciness and texture. Banana, Papaya, Jackfruit, Guava, Lychee, Mango and Jackfruit 23 are the other major varieties of fruits cultivated in Darjiling depending upon the quality of

3 - 194

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-195 of 219

land and topography. The plain-lands under the Tarai and Dooars region are favourable for cultivation of rice, jute and potato. Maize (Corn) and ginger are cultivated primarily in the sloping lands at the foot of the hills. Organised sugarcane cultivation in the district has been accelerated in recent years (after 2006-07). Among the vegetables, production of Cucurbits like Squash, Pumpkin, Zucchini, Gourds etc. are maximum in this area, followed by Cabbage, Cauliflower, Tomato, Bringal etc.

Rice Paddy Tea gardens

3.14.3.8Irrigation: Since the advent of modern cultivation in district Darjiling during the 1840s, irrigation became an important and integral part of the agricultural activity. Although the entire district is highly rain-fed, due to typical characteristic of the soil, the agricultural fields are to be watered artificially. Initially, water from the rivers and small springs called Jhora’s were used to water the fields. At present, the major sources of irrigation in district Darjiling are Canals made by Government, Shallow Tube Wells, Open Dug Wells, River Lift irrigation from the numerous rivulets and springs coming down from the Himalayas. In the plains under Siliguri Sub-division also, the River Lift irrigation is most important source of irrigated water. Beside this, the traditional method of cutting small water channels from the nearby rivers and harvested streams from the adjacent hills to water the agricultural lands are also practiced.

3 - 195

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-196 of 219

3.14.3.9Horticulture Horticulture is also one of the economy sources in the study area consists of fruits, vegetables, spices and herbal products. These are proteinous and full of minerals and salts. In a broader term, it incorporates floriculture also. These are cash crops, whose per acre yield is higher and less disease prone than that of cereals. Horticulture is also one of the economy sources in the study area. The climate and soil of Darjeeling District is aptly suitable for horticultural development and in all the three seasons i.e. Winter, Summer and monsoon, horticultural production can be done. In rainy season, main seasonal horticultural products are Lady finger, Nenua (Taroi), Jhingi, Bitter gourd (Karaila), Beans, Raddish, Brinjal, Tomato, Pumpkin group, Cucumber group, French bean, Potato, Seem, Kanda, Cauliflower, etc. The main horticulture produce in Winter Season are Brinjal, Tomato, Potato, Cabbage, Cauliflower, Turnip, Carrot, Raddish, Cucumber, Beet, Spinach, Palak, Peanut, French beans, Seem, etc. In Summer Season, Nenua (Taroi), Jhingi, Pumpkin group, Bitter gourd, Beans, Lady’s finger, Raddish, Cucumber, Brinjal, Cauliflower, Tomato, Spinach, etc. are produced. The prime fruit crop of the area are Mango, Guava, Lemon, Sharifa, Berries, Pomegranate, Jamun, Shahatut, Coconut, Papaya, Banana, etc. Certain varieties of flowers viz., Rose, Hibiscus, Kamini, Rukmini, Jasmin, Bela, Night , Chameli, Juhi, Kewda, Land lotus and other seasonal flowers

3 - 196

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-197 of 219

like Dahalia, Merry gold, etc. are also grown in the area. The main spices, that are being cultivated in this area, are Red chillies, Coriander, Dhania, Ginger, Garlic, Methi, etc.

3.14.3.10Industries There are no Large-Scale or Heavy industrial units in Darjiling. Historically, production of tea from the plantations in and around the district has remained the largest industrial activity. In later years, several MSME (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises) and SSI (Small Scale Industries) units have emerged in the district industrial scenario. The industrial group wise distribution of factory units in the district Darjiling (for the Financial Year 2008-09) is 178 industrial units in the district, production of food products has the largest number of units with 154. In the category of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises and Artisan Units in the district Darjiling, there are a total of 13 Units presently functioning in the district whose category wise distribution are as follows:

3.14.3.11Tea Industry of Darjiling District (Darjeeling Tea): The plantation of Tea in the study area and district is as old as the history of the Darjiling town itself. Tea plantation in the district started in a commercial basis during the earliest years of establishment of British colonies in the district in 1830s and propagated by the British Officer, Sir Arthur Campbell, primarily with an objective to reduce the monopoly of the Chinese tea merchants. Although, the plantation of Assam tea started few decades earlier, it was the ‘Darjeeling Tea’ that received the iconic status due to its significant aroma, taste and colour. In order to encourage the tea plantation in and around Darjiling, the Britishers distributed saplings and seeds from the Government nurseries. As a result of this encouragement, the tea production in the district increased manifold and by the advent of twentieth century, Darjeeling tea became world famous as the most exotically flavoured and finest tea and has got the status of ‘Champagne of Tea’. As per the definition, “Darjeeling Tea” can only refer to tea that has been cultivated, grown, produced, manufactured and processed in tea gardens in few specific hilly areas of the district. At present there are 87 Tea Gardens in the district covered under this GI Tag.

3 - 197

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-198 of 219

3.14.3.12Physical and Social Infrastructure Facilities in Darjeeling Transport: Despite a hilly terrain and high altitude, study area and Darjiling have a very wide spread road-network covering almost all areas of the district. Since the expansion of British territory in the early Nineteenth Century across the area, structured transformation of the hilly rural roads to metalled and non-metalled road took place and within the end of Nineteenth Century, owing to the important strategic location, far-flung places of the district were well connected with district Head Quarter at Darjiling Town. Till date the most famous and prominent mode of transport in the district is the Darjeeling Himalayan Railway (The Toy Train of Darjiling). Established in 1881, with primary purpose of transporting Darjeeling Tea from the Tea-Gardens in Hills to Kolkata, which was as important Port City of Nineteenth Century. Subsequent to Indian independence, it came under the control of Indian Government in 1948. In 1999, the Darjeeling Himalayan Railway (DHR) was included in the list of World Heritage Site by the UNESCO World Heritage Convention on the following grounds :

(a) The Darjeeling Himalayan Railway is an outstanding example of the influence of an innovative transportation system on the social and economic development of a multi- cultural region, which was to serve as a model for similar developments in many parts of the world. (Criterion ii)

(b) The development of railways in the 19th century had a profound influence on social and economic developments in many parts of the world.

This process is illustrated in an exceptional and seminal fashion by the Darjeeling Himalayan Railway (Criterion iv) Presently its journey starts from the New Jalpaiguri Railway Station near Siliguri and stretches upto Darjiling Town travelling a distance of 78 Kilometres. In the journey the elevation level changes from 100 Metres above sea level to 2,200 Metres. However, owing to the factors like steep changes in elevation, existence of several Loops in the path and a journey through a landslide prone path, the services in the complete route is hindered. The Road network of district Darjiling is well

3 - 198

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-199 of 219 built and several National and State Highways pass through the district. NH-31, NH-31A, NH-31C and NH-110 crosses the district and important locations are connected by SH-12 and SH-12A beside numerous medium, small and minor road networks. The length of Road network maintained by P.W.D., DCAHC, Siliguri Mahakuma Parishad and Prime Minister’s Gram Sarak Yojana exceeds 4,100 kilometres

Educational Facilities In general the number of Primary, Junior High and High School in the project region has increased over the years. The most of the study areas have schools and colleges in both private and Govt. sectors. There are 2 nos.primary schools, 1 no. Secondary school, 2 nos. senior secondary schools in Darjeeling. The number of Primary Schools is 6, number of Middle and Secondary/Matriculation schools is 2 in each in the study area.

Medical Facilities Medical facilities available in the Project Affected Villages are presented in Table 5.4. has 1 Health Sub-Centre. Other Health Sub-Centres are located at 2 - 15 km distance from Sajbotey, Takbay, Nezi, Salandong and Kankibong. It may be pertinent to mention here that villagers of Kankibong, Salandong, Takbay, Nezi and Sajbotey have to travel 4 - 20 km distance to avail the facilities of even Primary Health Centre. The villagers of PAVs have to cover a distance of upto approx. 18 km to reach Bijonbari Rural Hospital. Also in many cases, it is very difficult for the patients to avail of the medical services because of the bad condition of roads especially during the monsoon season as well as non-availability of staff including doctors. Moreover the transport cost is also very high as the fare is Rs 20-40 per person per trip which is not affordable to specially poor people. Even there is no Private Allopathic/Ayurvedic/Homeopathic Medical Practitioner in the PAVs. There is only 1 Medical Store at Sumbuk. Villagers of the remaining 5 PAVs have to travel a distance of 1 - 14 km to avail the facility of the nearest medical store. There is no Veterinary Dispensary in the PAVs.

3 - 199

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-200 of 219

Water Supply Facilities The analysis of water supply facilities shows that the major sources of the supply of drinking water are tap water and Rammam River in the PAVs. Being in the hilly terrain, none of the people have tube wells. Most of the people have to bring drinking water from tap water, which are at distances upto 0.5 – 2 km from their houses.

Water requirement for the other purposes like bathing, washing, cattle rearing, etc. are met by nearby rivers and streams/canals. In Sajbotey, Nezi and Takbay, villagers use tap water. People of Kankibong get facility of Rammam river besides tap water for bathing and washing and sometimes also for drinking purposes. Villagers of Sumbuk quench their thirst from natural sources.

Electricity and Power: The oldest Hydro-Electric power plant in India is located in district Darjiling at a distance of 12 kilometres from the Darjeeling town is known as Sidrapong Hydel Power Station. The Hydel Power plant at Sidrapong became operational in the year 1896 and is located at an elevation 1,100 Metres from the mean sea level. The Power Plant came under the control of State-run West Bengal State Electricity Board from 1978 and presently beside river Great Rangeet, three river streams named Kotwali, Hospital and Barbatia feed the power plant. The status important hydel power projects of Darjiling district are depicted in the following Table 3.56 Table 3.56 The important hydel power projects in Darjeeling district, West Bengal S.No. Name of the Project Capacity (MW) Operational Status 1. Rammam Hydel Power Project 51 MW In Operation Stage-II 2. Jaldhaka Hydel Power Project 27 MW In Internittent Stage-I & II Operation 3. Teesta Canal Fall Hydel Power 9x7.5 MW In Operation Project 4. Fazi Jhora 2.448 MW In Operation 5. Rinchington 2.0 MW In Operation

3 - 200

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-201 of 219

6. Little Rangeet 2.0 MW In Operation 7. Sidrapong 0.6 MW In Operation (Source: Website of West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Report on Hydel Projects)

3 - 201

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-202 of 219

Table 3.57 Details of physical and social amenities in the study area

S.No. Name of the Number of Type of amenity available CD Block inhabited villages ucation Banks Medical Medical societies Ed Telephone Post Post Office Power SupplyPower Drinking water Agricultural credit Approach by pucca road Transport communications 1. Darjeeling 43 42 34 43 25 41 6 5 8 27 43 Pulbazar (97.67) (79.07) (100) (58.14) (95.35) (13.95) (11.63) (18.6) (62.79) (100) 2. Jorebunglow 42 41 40 42 21 42 11 2 1 25 42 Sukiapokhri (97.62) (95.24) (100) (50) (100) (26.19) (4.76) (2.38) (59.52) (100) Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB.html

3 - 202

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-203 of 219

3.14.4 Brief Profile of the Sikkim District Sikkim state fall in the 1.4 Meso Regions, namely North Eastern Himalayas of the Macro Region 1 the Northern Mountains of the Natural Division of India. Nearly two third of its hilly regions are very high mountains perpetually covered with snow are the sources of glaciers like Talung, Zemu, Lhonak etc. The state being the part of inner mountain ranges of Himalayas is hilly having varied elevations ranging from 300 meters to 7000 meters. The largest portion of Sikkim is in its North-West, a large number of mountains having the altitude of about nine thousand meters stand here which includes the famous Kanchenjunga (8598 meters), the third highest peak in the world.Sikkim state has four districts which are named according to their regional location and they are the: 1) North District, 2. West District 3. South District and the 4. East District

3.14.4.1Communities of Sikkim Communities, Cultures, Religions and Customs of different hues intermingle freely here in Sikkim to constitute a homogeneous blend. The predominant communities are the LEPCHAS, and NEPALESE. In urban areas, many plainsmen have also settled and they are almost engaged in business and Government service. Because of the development activities in the state, like the construction of roads, bridges and buildings a small part of the population consists of migrant laborers from the plains and Nepal.

3.14.4.2Demographical details of the study area The proposed study area is covered with two major districts of Sikkim state, that is west Sikkim and south Sikkim. There are 34 large Revenue Blocks having above 2000 population of which 2 falls in North districts followed by 12 in West district, 7 in South district and 13 in East district. There are only 3 Revenue Blocks which has population above 5,000 and they fall in East district only

West Sikkim is the second largest district in the Indian state of Sikkim with an area of 1,166 sq km. The headquarters of the district is at , also known as Geyzing.The town is connected to the capital by a metalled road. Geyzing is also connected to the West Bengal towns of Darjeeling and Kalimpong via Jorethang. In West district

3 - 203

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-204 of 219

96.15 per cent population lives in rural area while only 3.85per cent population lives in the urban areas at Gyalshing (NP) and xi Nayabazaar (NBA). In West district 96.15 per cent population lives in rural area while only 3.85per cent population lives in the urban areas at Gyalshing (NP) and Nayabazaar (NBA).

South District of Sikkim lies at an altitude of 400 mtr to 2000 mtr with unique and countryside escape of endless waves of agricultural fields and the terraced slopes, intercepted by spring patched forests and encompasses a total area of around 75000 hectares. Area wise, it is the smallest district of Sikkim and population-wise, second one. Its total population is 1,46,742 (as per 2011 census) among which 76,663 are male and 68,241 female. In South district 85.56 per cent population lives in rural areas while the only 10.62 per cent are in urban area at Mangan (NP). In South district 85.56 per cent population lives in rural areas while the remaining 14.44 per cent lives in the urban areas at (M.Cl) and Jorethang (NP).

These two districts, Soreng and Namchi sub districts are the major covered areas in the study. Those demographical details are provided on below table-

3 - 204

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-205 of 219

Table 3.58 Demographical details of the study area Sno Name No_HH TOT_P TOT_M TOT_F P_06 P_SC P_ST P_LIT P_ILL 1 Soreng 13462 63525 32405 31120 6797 2463 25789 43943 19582 2 Tadong} 283 1445 769 676 164 9 336 1040 405 3 298 1458 737 721 139 25 471 1111 347 4 Sangadorji 237 1198 638 560 139 25 466 796 402 5 Jeel 159 744 398 346 91 35 393 406 338 6 Hathidunga 206 957 471 486 105 22 517 655 302 7 Bum 132 635 323 312 78 0 28 420 215 8 Rishi 117 659 330 329 85 0 490 434 225 9 Bara-Samdong 295 1385 707 678 158 12 827 1005 380 10 Sribadam 239 1127 576 551 131 47 747 820 307 11 Deythang 274 1283 648 635 145 0 612 822 461 12 Parrengaon 277 1301 674 627 154 6 521 755 546 13 Takuthang 278 1282 617 665 148 20 571 817 465 14 Chuchen 183 875 457 418 88 31 482 612 263 15 Tinzerbong 217 1037 553 484 110 41 500 679 358 16 Suldung 143 754 378 376 92 34 42 421 333 17 Kamling 230 1247 641 606 166 116 267 773 474 18 Mabong 237 1094 559 535 134 25 135 686 408 19 Segeng 175 864 426 438 120 6 285 546 318 20 Samsing 353 1802 983 819 221 128 270 1149 653 21 Geling 257 1306 659 647 155 53 236 760 546 22 Suntaley 86 414 210 204 45 19 93 207 207 23 Khanisherbung 235 1089 536 553 148 12 534 723 366 24 Aroobotey 154 787 415 372 92 0 559 504 283 25 Chota-Samdong 176 846 459 387 87 2 670 539 307

3 - 205

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-206 of 219

26 Singling 518 2376 1200 1176 240 94 1557 1651 725 27 Karthok 128 619 333 286 69 9 234 426 193 28 Burikhop(Dodok) 422 2167 1084 1083 216 226 689 1522 645 29 Burikhop(Rumbuk) 282 1337 690 647 104 5 313 971 366 30 Rumbuk 403 1838 936 902 188 68 1151 1302 536 31 Bhareng 101 390 184 206 54 5 292 281 109 32 Ribdi 229 1034 535 499 124 34 730 702 332 33 Okhery 366 1683 821 862 171 70 1445 1216 467 34 Tikpur 434 1911 1019 892 199 3 1135 1303 608 35 Siktam 109 510 260 250 55 96 194 351 159 36 Salyangdang 202 963 488 475 98 62 88 638 325 37 Longchok 235 1023 509 514 109 47 360 730 293 38 Lower Fambong 145 723 365 358 82 0 611 508 215 39 Dhalam(Daramden) 372 1886 921 965 181 242 563 1408 478 40 Upper Fambong 663 2995 1506 1489 297 173 1737 2285 710 41 Timberbong 427 2156 1078 1078 234 79 738 1520 636 42 Tharpu 253 1117 584 533 119 134 376 767 350 43 Soreng 887 3818 1937 1881 368 100 1490 2877 941 44 Malbasey 627 2888 1481 1407 314 86 680 2044 844 45 Mendo-Goan 204 925 470 455 84 62 306 663 262 46 Chakung 380 1859 930 929 142 53 325 1359 500 47 Chumbong 390 1796 909 887 202 38 428 1249 547 48 Zoom 422 1841 945 896 148 100 255 1421 420 49 Namchi 16057 77696 40517 37179 8078 3591 20392 56715 20981 50 Chumlok 154 622 335 287 69 25 266 481 141 51 Jaubari 124 579 292 287 58 4 429 330 249 52 Tingrithang 112 514 267 247 52 0 75 366 148

3 - 206

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-207 of 219

53 Mamley 206 1079 543 536 99 17 260 754 325 54 Pabong(Mamley) 127 603 309 294 50 0 170 398 205 55 Kamrang 311 1440 745 695 143 23 249 1052 388 56 Tinzer 55 237 113 124 24 7 24 161 76 57 Denchung 212 980 511 469 84 1 361 715 265 58 Poklok (Polok) 363 1768 887 881 195 49 143 1243 525 59 Tinik 190 942 510 432 91 56 86 659 283 60 Chisopani 299 2172 1510 662 155 104 346 1644 528 61 Salghari 184 850 412 438 88 9 126 629 221 62 Dorop 156 765 364 401 90 10 209 603 162 63 Gom 234 1163 636 527 125 80 215 815 348 64 Sorok 103 474 230 244 52 63 236 353 121 65 Sangbung 186 874 443 431 101 58 257 680 194 66 Assangthang 168 785 404 381 95 30 144 606 179 67 Kopchey 168 727 345 382 73 8 120 547 180 68 Mikkhola 147 687 341 346 74 54 94 553 134 69 Kitam 213 1036 502 534 100 54 222 798 238 70 Kartickey 161 876 435 441 73 125 8 660 216 71 Sumbuk 240 1069 584 485 103 52 167 773 296 72 Suntaley (Sumbuk) 94 410 212 198 38 8 65 307 103 73 Rong 139 589 300 289 67 1 58 476 113 74 Palum 40 204 102 102 22 19 3 126 78 75 Singtam 57 265 152 113 39 0 11 160 105 76 Bul 55 265 134 131 29 0 24 178 87 77 Bomtar 201 944 525 419 81 35 227 747 197 78 Singhithang 74 338 166 172 24 0 95 286 52 79 Saleumbong 122 606 302 304 69 92 186 435 171

3 - 207

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-208 of 219

80 Phalidara 171 808 402 406 88 6 305 549 259 81 Maniram 222 990 494 496 78 13 474 729 261 82 Longchok 193 901 444 457 94 1 174 723 178 83 Panchgharey 192 939 488 451 98 15 355 603 336 84 Turuk 226 1050 540 510 66 0 142 817 233 85 Ramabong 179 844 414 430 99 51 129 587 257 86 Kerabari 145 670 357 313 82 57 36 383 287 87 Mellidara 338 1670 815 855 152 62 459 1201 469 88 Paiyong (Kerabari) 220 1054 548 506 106 74 192 732 322 89 Suntaley (Sadam) 239 1125 576 549 134 102 165 740 385 90 Sukrabarey 262 1203 597 606 116 56 31 915 288 91 Sadam 189 940 477 463 100 49 77 595 345 92 Rabitar 151 753 392 361 100 6 356 542 211 93 Rabikhola 69 373 197 176 29 1 59 293 80 94 Tangji 146 774 391 383 96 54 61 561 213 95 Bikmat 131 621 327 294 78 20 114 454 167 96 Rateypani 252 1269 637 632 150 170 415 870 399 97 Kateng-Bokrang 195 1021 534 487 101 28 730 670 351 98 Nalam-Kolbong 221 1013 514 499 106 42 402 814 199 99 Nagi 194 988 513 475 110 54 245 757 231 100 Maneydara 189 892 468 424 104 50 196 636 256 101 Kabrey 180 931 463 468 112 30 399 666 265 102 Karek 226 1177 628 549 144 21 142 800 377 103 Phong 129 680 362 318 61 10 122 500 180 104 Chuba 153 772 393 379 86 4 256 571 201 105 347 1617 817 800 166 0 1091 1174 443 106 Rameng 116 571 307 264 84 0 287 388 183

3 - 208

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-209 of 219

107 Nijarmeng 102 498 258 240 49 0 86 405 93 108 Tokal 182 934 474 460 85 34 418 707 227 109 Tokdey (Resep) 99 487 263 224 47 6 296 365 122 110 Gangchung 131 546 286 260 70 8 378 362 184 111 Aifaltar 57 289 152 137 27 0 30 212 77 112 Temi Tea Estate 247 1323 662 661 130 158 356 991 332 113 Temi 278 1195 600 595 103 83 270 927 268 114 Tarku 371 1856 949 907 193 136 239 1393 463 115 Pabong (Gangchung) 101 541 275 266 39 27 279 364 177 116 Doring 254 1064 532 532 175 28 433 746 318 117 Rashyap 241 1129 580 549 153 55 426 747 382 118 Namphing 581 2522 1279 1243 309 105 786 1870 652 119 Tsalumthang 173 901 459 442 94 107 265 670 231 120 Turung 225 1121 578 543 150 181 339 803 318 121 Kanamtek 110 612 332 280 73 2 307 472 140 122 Pamphok 211 1269 1005 264 83 126 218 1035 234 123 Donok 60 302 151 151 29 1 0 198 104 124 Mamring 327 1421 704 717 164 23 170 1090 331 Source: https://censusindia.gov.in/pca/cdb_pca_census/Houselisting-housing-SK.html

3 - 209

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-210 of 219

3.14.4.3Economy and Land based Livelihood of Sikkim Agriculture Sikkim is a hilly State in the Eastern Himalayas where agricultural practices and adaptations are highly variable in time and space due to varying altitudes and agro- climatic situations. Agriculture is the primary activity of the people of Sikkim. About 15.36% of the total geographical area of the land is devoted to agriculture but the actual area available for agricultural purpose is declining due to diversion of cultivable land for non-agricultural purposes like establishment of industries, township expansion, construction of roads, hydel projects, buildings etc. Farming has been considerably handicapped by small and fragmented holdings, limited irrigation, and lack of farm mechanization and frequent occurrence of natural calamities like landslides, floods and earthquakes. In view of these facts, emphasis is being given to intensive and judicious use of limited land so that the per capita land productivity and overall production is maintained at a desired level. Agriculture in an entirely mountainous state like Sikkim operates under many constraints resulting into low average yield per unit area for most of the crops. The low productivity is seriously characterised by two important features, viz. land holding size and socio-economic condition of the farmers. The majority of the farming communities of the state fall in the small and marginal farmers.

50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 Main Workers Marginal Workers

3 - 210

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-211 of 219

Irrigation The study area being a mountainous state consisting of steep rugged hills, narrow valleys and rocky terrains, the topographical condition is not favourable to go in for medium or major irrigation schemes. Hence all the irrigation schemes fall under minor irrigation scheme category only. The rate of rainfall in Sikkim is very high and due to the geographical characteristics, the irrigation channel is prone to extensive damages during the monsoons. Even the optimal utilisation of the completed schemes is truncated due to such damages inflicted during the rainy season. During lean periods, small discharges will be collected in reservoirs for cultivation of Rabi crops. The implementation of non- perennial irrigation system in most cases is unavoidable. The reason being the regular and sufficient quantity of water is not available at the source throughout the year. Besides, rice is the main crop grown in Sikkim for which the irrigation is mostly required. Hence, inundation irrigation system in which sufficient quantity of water flowing in the rivulets and streams during the monsoons and post monsoon period is diverted to irrigate the kharif crops.

Animal Husbandry The congenial temperate climate and the temperate vegetation existing in the study areas are highly favorable for exotic high producing livestock. Moreover, the highlanders have a traditional pastoral economy handed over from generation to generation with their typical kind of livestock such as yaks, sheep, mountain goats, pigs and poultry. Livestock

3 - 211

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-212 of 219 sector in the study area is highly livelihood intensive. Agriculture along with livestock is the single largest employer in the state. Over 80 per cent of the farmers in the state and study area own livestock and earn supplementary incomes from them. The livestock in Sikkim available in the high altitude areas such as yaks, sheep and local goats known as "Chengra" predominate.

Tourism Sikkim is an ever enchanting state with its elegant natural beauty of snowing mountains, luxuriant forests with exotic flora and fauna, pristine waterfalls, sacred lakes, holy caves, medicinal hot springs and gentle streams. The state of study area is a destination for all season for those seeking solitude for meditation and those seeking leisure holidays to the more adventurous visitors. The tourism is one of major sector of the state economy. Tourism sector has been accorded priority as it is deemed to be one of the major revenue earning and employment generating sector. It being the fastest growing industry, there has been tremendous growth in terms of standard and quality of service, infrastructural development and competitive promotional packages. For those who want to experience Sikkimese rural lives, village tourism with home stay facilities are encouraged by the government. Tourists are offered opportunities to know not only about Sikkimese culture but also engage oneself in the day to day activities of a rural life.

3 - 212

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-213 of 219

3.14.4.4Physical and Social Infrastructure Facilities in Sikkim Electricity and Power The present peak demand of the state is of 96 MW even with considering industrial units. The state currently generates 38.2 MW, but since 32.2 MW is generated through hydel projects, which are run of the river scheme, there output comes down to 50% (up to 12 MW) during the winter months. Now with the liberalized power policy, Sikkim can look forward for developing and exploiting its huge Hydo Power Potential which has been assessed to 8000 MW peak with a firm base of 3000MW. 43% of the household have power supply in the study area.

3 - 213

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-214 of 219

Table 3.59 Details of physical and social amenities in the study area

S.No. Name of the Number of Type of amenity available CD Block inhabited villages ucation Banks Medical Medical societies Ed Telephone Post Post Office Power SupplyPower Drinking water Agricultural credit Approach by pucca road Transport communications 1. Soreng 51 47 24 51 20 51 33 3 35 41 51 (92.16) (47.06) (100) (39.22) (100) (64.71) (5.88) (68.63) (80.39) (100) 2. Namchi 94 88 33 94 34 94 48 4 28 85 94 (93.62) (35.11) (100) (36.17) (100) (51.06) (4.26) (29.79) (90.43) (100) Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB.html

3 - 214

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-215 of 219

3.14.5 PRIMARY SURVEY Community perception The primary data collection was subsequently undertaken during process. This included Individual and group assessments. The Individual assessment was done by using standard questionnaire in non probability sampling method. The data were collected on demographical particulars of the participants and perception of the participants towards the project. The demographical details are included as household composition, education levels, general health status, livelihood strategies, employment, This survey was also focused five major various dimensions such as: 1) Economical; 2) Public Infrastructure and services; 3) Social/cultural; 4) Environmental; 5) Health and well-being 6) Psychological/personal. These domains assess the significant impact differences about this proposed project. Apart from this expert done focused group discussion for community and collective opinions of the proposed project. This study was carried on population living in the 10 villages. The hamlets covered within 10 km of core and buffer areas.

A primary study was collected from 165 participants from both, Darjeeling and West Sikkim locations of the study area. This survey was conducted to identify the community perception. In this connection, field experts used the technique of sampling to administer a questionnaire on the existing awareness among the community on the project and its potential impacts. Table 3.60 Particulars of the participants No Name No_HH TOT_P No of Participants 1 Tadong} 283 1445 14 2 Takuthang 278 1282 12 3 Chuchen 183 875 08 4 Tinzerbong 217 1037 10 5 Suldung 143 754 07 6 Segeng 175 864 08 7 Samsing 353 1802 18

3 - 215

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-216 of 219

8 Suntaley 86 414 05 9 Dhalam 372 1886 18 10 Bomtar 201 944 09 11 Sadam 189 940 09 12 Rabikhola 69 373 04 13 Tsalumthang 173 901 09 14 Singbhumdera 460 2192 20 15 Liza Hill Tea Garden 356 1439 14

Total No of Participants 165

Source: Primary Data

Fig 3.34 Primary consultation with local communities

3 - 216

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-217 of 219

Need assessment: The Primary consultations survey has ascertained certain key expectations that are also indicative of the local community’s attitude towards industrial development in the study area. The Fig below shows the different needs and expectation of the respondents in hierarchy with this project

Need Assessment Health and medical Job support Opportunities 17% 26%

Educatonal assistance Civic 20% Amenities 22%

Skill Development 15% Source: Primary survey Fig 3.35 Community Need of the Study area

. 26% people from the participant group have more expectations on job (contractual or regular) opportunities. . Development of civic amenities (22%) in the study area will be useful to development of communities. . Most of the younger and educated people (20%) shared their view on conducting skill development programs for the local communities, . Few of them said that encourage skilled and poor community people, this will help and enhance their life and economic livelihood. . Most of the old age (above 60 years), women, and poor people (17%) looking for free medical and health related support. . Support during natural calmaties, unexpected incidents will be helpful to the local communities

3 - 217

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-218 of 219

Major Findings of Socio-economic study The following major socioeconomic findings are observed in the study area are presented below  Most of the communities in the area are well aware about the project.  This hydro power project plays an important role in the development of the local vicinities and state  It provides direct and indirect economical development within the study area.  This type of projects provides power at cheaper rate being perpetual and renewable sources of energy.  Positive in the form more income to the local people, better infrastructure.  Increases the agricultural production increased and rural poverty declined.  The micro/mini hydels contribute to the meet the primary electricity needs.  This project also would help provide safe, reliable, sufficient and affordable electricity for domestic consumption and industrial use.  It enhances income generation of agro-processing and small service business such as mills and shops  Increase economic activity and tax revenues to the govt.  Picnic spot near the barrage as it can attract many visitors from the nearby places and generate additional revenue not only for the government but also for the local people as well.  R&R activated was done before starting the project, hence there are no chances for migration and cultural influence on local communities.  Improve the quality of lives of students, housewives (women) and the rural households and improved conditions in the quality of services  Exposure to health hazards from smoke created by fuel wood has been reduced.  The communities’ safety in general improves due to street lighting at night. Furthermore women and children have more productive time which can be used for studying and thus education is improved.

3 - 218

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C3-219 of 219

 Injuries and sickness of the staffs and workers and also of local residents due to accidents and fires is not a regular phenomenon.  Hydroelectric power plant, the energy of water is utilized for generating electricity which is pollution free and also inflation free energy due to absence of fuel costs.  Natural hazards such as land slide or cloud burst often seen in these villages.  The heavy movement of project vehicle sometimes may create traffic in roads and transportation problem.  Fumes and dust start spoil the air quality which is a controllable factor. It is observed during the survey that as the villages are surrounded mostly by hills and forests, hence the air quality is relatively good in the project area.  People in the study area have high expectations from the potential of improvement in connectivity of roads, bridges and public infrastructure in the immediate vicinity of the project area.  The respondents believed that this project enhance their quality of life due to social and economical growth.  They said that increasing of land and labour cost, employment generation and other civic amenities will generate positive attitude for individual and community people.

CONCLUSION The present Social Impact Assessment study was conducted within the study area of Rammam HEPP Stage-III Run of River (ROR) in Darjeeling and Sikkim districts of West Bengal and Sikkim. Both, secondary and primary details within the study area discussed. It traditionally involved the use of technical and participatory analytical methods to anticipate change but also encouraging the life cycle of projects to minimize negative outcomes and maximize benefits. The early consideration of social impacts, the alignment of activities with regional and community planning objectives, and meaningful participation of community in decision making are key features. Apart from the SIA process and findings it can be concluded that most the respondents have positive perception towards implementation of the project.

3 - 219

CHAPTER – IV ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-1 of 41

CHAPTER-4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

4.0 INTRODUCTION The actual and anticipated impacts of the project activities on the environment have been evaluated and predicted based on the information collected at the site and the information provided by NTPC. The objective of the impact identification is to update and supplement Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to mitigate the probable negative impacts that might arise during further project activities. Therefore, in order to work out a strategic EMP, it is imperative to identify the possibilities at various project stages, impact type and affected environmental component, extent and severity. EIA is an activity designed to identify and predict the impact on the environment, on human health and ecology, taking into account the requirements of legislative proposals, policies, programs, operational procedures and to communicate information about the impact.

The project is in construction stage since 2014 and more than 50% work has been completed. The current impact assessment includes the actual impacts under various attributes of the environment during construction and operation phase of the project. Rammam Stage-III HEPP opeartional activities also includes positive socioeconomic impacts in terms of increase in local business opportunities and on a larger perspective, by providing potential energy security at a national level.

4.1 IMPACT ASSESSMENT This section discusses the impacts of the project activities during construction and operation phases on the environmental receptors that stand to get affected adversely by the project. It discusses probable impacts during various phases of the project lifecycle on the environmental and socioeconomic components. Adequate Environmental management measures were incorporated during the entire planning of construction and operation stages

4 - 1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1

RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-2 of 41

of the project to minimize the adverse Environmental impacts and assure sustainable development of the area.

4.2 IDENTIFICATION OF IMPACTS Generally, the environmental and social impacts can be categorized as either primary or secondary. Primary impacts are those, which are attributed directly by the project and secondary impacts are those, which are indirectly induced and typically include the associated investment and changed patterns of social and economic activities by the proposed actions. The identification and prediction of likely impacts form the base of identification of monitoring requirements and mitigating measures. Considering the various project activites of Rammam Stage-III HEPP their likely impacts have been identified and shown in the Table 4.1. Table 4.1 Activities – Impacts/Risks Interaction Environmental Sensitivities Environmental Attributes Physical Biological Socio-Economic

Project Activities ort crews Noise Flora Fauna Fauna Soil and Economy Sediment Land Use pp Personnel/ Air Quality Quality Air Archaeology su of local people of local people Water Quality Quality Water Tourism/Leisure Tourism/Leisure Living conditions A. Construction Phase Immigration of labour √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Clearing Ground Cover √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Hauling / Excavation of construction material √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Operation of construction equipment √ √ √ √ √ √ Soil Erosion / Siltation √ √ √ √ √ Road Construction √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Muck disposal √ √ √ √ √ Sewage √ √ Noise and Vibration √ √ √ √ √ √ Atmospheric Air Emissions √ √ √ Wastewater Generation √ √ √ √ Soild / Hazardous Waste Disposal √ √ √ √ √ √ Fuel Combustion √ √

4 - 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-3 of 41

Environmental Attributes Physical Biological Socio-Economic

Project Activities ort crews crews ort Noise Flora Fauna Soil and Sediment Sediment Economy Land Use pp Personnel/ Personnel/ Air Quality Archaeology su of local people of local people Water Quality Quality Water Tourism/Leisure Living conditions Socio-economic Impacts √ √ Water related diseases √ √ √ √ B. Operation Phase Change in hydrological regime √ √ √ √ √ Sewage √ √ √ √ - Shows Impact

4.3 IMPACTS ON LAND ENVIRONMENT 4.3.1 Construction Phase During the construction period, topography of construction area has changed due to erection of buildings, fills and cuts for construction of intake components of powerhouse, penstock and other associated structures. The submergence area is 3.852 Ha which is located in upstream of confluence of Rammam River near Lodhama Village in the Darjeeling district. The major impacts anticipated on land environment are as follows: . Movement and operation of construction equipment . Soil erosion . Muck disposal . Impacts due to construction of roads . Acquistion of land

Movement and operation of construction equipment As the project is in advanced stage of construction in its all three units (Unit 1, 2, & 3) and various types of equipment are already made available within the site. These include crushers, batching plant, drillers, earth movers, rock bolters, etc. The siting of these construction equipment is selected in such a way that causes minimum adverse impacts in

4 - 3

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-4 of 41 terms of air pollution, water pollution, noise pollution and safety of labour on surrounding environment based on the criteria of . Proximity to the site of use . Sensitivity of forests in the nearby areas . Proximity to habitations

In addition, land is also acquired for storage of quarried material before crushing, crushed material, cement, rubble, etc. Efforts were made to site the contractor’s working space (construction sites) in such a way that the adverse impacts on environment are minimal. These are located on Government land at a safe distance from human population. The human population too resides at a distance of at least 0.8 to 1 km from the construction sites. Hence, adverse impacts on human population too are not anticipated.

Soil Erosion The runoff from the construction sites will have a natural tendency to flow towards River Rammam or its tributaries. For some distance downstream of major construction sites, such as barrage/dam, power house, etc. there is a possibility of increased sediment levels which will lead to reduction in light penetration, which in turn could reduce the photosynthetic activity to some extent of the aquatic plants as it depends directly on sunlight. This change is likely to have an adverse impact on the primary productivity of the affected stretch of River Rammam. The runoff would increase the turbidity levels with corresponding adverse impacts on photosynthetic action and productivity. Adequate measures need to be implemented as a part of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to ameliorate the adverse impact on this account to the extent possible.

4 - 4

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-5 of 41

Concreting for Slop Stability and prevent Soil erosion at Power House Slope Impact on Soil Materials, Vegetation and Human Health To preprare site for construction, drilling, blasting and exchavation invariably results in land degradation and generation of loose soil particles which are mostly fugitive dust. These suspended dust particles are generally blown away along the wind direction and get deposited on the canopy of surrounding trees, plant and agricultural crops thereby interfering with photosynthesis and other physiological activities of the green vegetation.

The construction work is being carried out in river bed plain and hills which is far from habitation and villages. Therefore fugitive dust emissions kept within the site and no impact will be occure on human population.

The NOx gases react in the atmosphere to form Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) which may have adverse effects on human health, particularly among people with respiratory illness. NOx are pollutants that cause repiratory problems and weaken the body's immune system against respiratory diseases such as influenza and pneumonia, can cause shortness of breath and chest pains and increase a person's susceptibility to asthma. NOx emissions also contribute into formation of green house gases.

However, hydro power project does not have major NOx emission sources like Thermal Power plants. NOx emissions occur intermittently due to vehicular emissions, heavy construction equipments, DG sets. However, these concentrations are negligible and does

4 - 5

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-6 of 41 not have significant on ambient air quality. The ambient air quality at study are well below the permissible limits of NAAQS, 2009.

Carbon monoxide (CO) is a product of incomplete combustion of fosil fuel (Diesel, Petrol, Kerosin etc.) and it may cause impact on human health. Carbon monoxide can badly affect the central nervous system and people with cardiovascular disease. Carbon monoxide leaves the brain struggling for sufficient levels of oxygen and this in turn affects the heart, brain and central nervous system. As the traffic density of trucks is about 45-50 trucks/hour which is very low than road traffic at plain areas or cities. The study area is remote and undeveloped area, therefore vehicular density is also low. Pollution levels from equipments and machinery, vehicles will be regularly monitored. Therefore there would be insignificant impacts due to low emissions of CO on helath of workers and nearby population.

Muck disposal About 0.99 Mm3 muck is expected to be generated as a result of tunneling operations, construction of roads, etc. Based on the geological nature of the rocks and engineering properties of the soil, a part of muck is utilized as construction material. The balance muck is being disposed at designated dumping sites in a planned manner so that it takes a least possible space and is not hazardous to the environment.

An area of 6.66 Ha has been earmarked which can cater the entire quantity of muck to be disposed. About 0.148 Mm3 of aggregate is utilized for filling and construction works from muck generated during excavation of underground works like HRT and desilting chamber. A toe wall has been created around the muck disposal site and more landscaping to be done in the muck site. The overall idea is to enhance/maintain aesthetic view in the surrounding area of the project in post-construction period and avoid contamination of any land or water resource due to muck disposal. The terraces of the muck disposal area ultimately covered with fertile soil and suitable plants planted adopting suitable bio-technological measures.

4 - 6

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-7 of 41

Construction of roads The project construction would entail significant vehicular movement for transportation of large construction material, heavy construction equipment. About 18 km of new access roads were planned as part of the project and the current status of the road construction is given in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2 Details of Road Construction in the Project Component Length (km) Location Present Status Barrage/dam 4 Right bank of Rammam 3.7 km length under complex (Lodhama Bridge – Adit1 construction – Adit2) Power house 2.7 Along right and left banks 2.0 km length has been complex of River Rammam constructed and 0.7 km is yet to be constructed Surge Shaft Complex 11.3 Road from power house to 6.0 km length has been surge shaft constructed and 5.3 km is yet to be constructed. WBM and protection measures under progress. Total 18

The construction of roads leads to the following impacts: . The topography of the project area can give rise to erosion hazards due to net downhill movement of soil aggregates. Removal of trees on slopes and re-working of the slopes in the immediate vicinity of roads, erosion gullies, etc. With the removal of vegetal cover, erosive action of water gets pronounced and accelerates the process of soil erosion and formation of deep gullies. Consequently, the hill faces are removed of vegetative cover and enormous quantities of soil and rock can move down the rivers, and in some cases, the road itself may get washed out. . Construction of new roads increases the accessibility of an hitherto undisturbed areas resulting in greater human interferences and subsequent adverse impacts on the ecosystem.

4 - 7

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-8 of 41

. Increased air pollution during construction phase. . Postive impact on local population by increased accessibility from one bank of the River Rammam to another.

The mitigation measures for above impact due to contruction of roads are provision of appropriate drainage systems and water management structures, and promoted surface protection and erosion control by using bioengineering methods. Retaining walls are most important structures in hill road construction. To provide adequate stability to the roadway and to the slope, retaining walls are being constructed on the valley side of the roadway. It is also provided on the cut hill side to prevent land slide towards the roadway. Dry stone masonry prefers to masonry in mortar as the former permits easy drainage of seeping water.

Impact on Micro-Climate As the proposed project is Run of River (ROR) project, no large area would be submerged. The barrage height is 23 m. In hydropower project major construction activities involve blasting, drilling, surface excavation and concreting works at barrage site and excavation in borrow areas. These activities shall not affect the ambient temperature, humidity, rainfall, wind speed and direction and other meteorological parameters during construction.

Wind Speed: The wind speed in any area is dependent upon local topography and is intimately connected with the development as high- and low-pressure zones. As the barrage height is only 23 m and no high structure is proposed, hence it will not obstract in blow of wind. Thus, no adverse impact on the regional wind speed is anticipated due to the construction activities.

Temperature: No thermal process is involved in hydro power project. Although, Run of River hydropower project involve cutting of tress at small scale which may cause a localized temperature increase which shall be moderated by the trees in the green belt/afforstation around the reservoir periphery. The impoundment of reservoir will also have slight colling

4 - 8

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-9 of 41 effect in the vicinity area. The temperature pattern is a regional behavior and is not likely to be affected very much by the construction activity.

Humidity: The variation in relative humidity depends mainly on the rainfall, wind, temperature and other weather phenomenon that are regional in behavior. The excavation and concreting activities are not likely to have any impact on the relative humidity in the surrounding area. However; the humidity in the area may slightly increase due to creation of waterbody (reservoir).

Atmospheric Pressure : As the wind speed and direction will not change due to project, there would be no change in atmospheric pressure in the area.

Rainfall: The trend of rainfall depends on a regional pattern and is mainly governed by the south west monsoon and disturbances in the Arabian Sea. There are limited number of tree felling which will be compensated by compensatory afforestation and plantation. The construction activities, therefore, are not likely to have any adverse impacts on rainfall pattern.

Acquisition of Land The total land required for the project is 74.077 Ha of which 66.777 Ha is acquired in West Bengal and the balance 7.3 Ha is acquired in Sikkim. Details of Land Acquisition for Rammam HEP, Stage-III given in Table 4.3 Table 4.3 Details of land acquired Description of Land Acquired Acres Hectares Government Land 25.561 10.344 Private Land 152.725 61.806 Diverted Forest Land (ROU) 4.761 1.927 Total Land 183.047 74.077

4 - 9

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1

RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-10 of 41

Entire land for the project has been acquired and is in physical possession of NTPC. The landuse has been permanently changed to industrial use due to construction of Barrage Complex & Power House Complex including Approach Road, Muck Disposal Area, Storage Facilities and Camps etc. The families who lost their land or homestead were provided with adequate compensation etc. as per norms specified in National Policy on Resettlement and Rehabilitation (2003) and R&R policy of NTPC (2005). One time settlement for R&R package to affected PAPs has been agreed during VDAC meeting as per R&R policy. Total of Rs. 3.58 Crores disbursed as per R&R policy till 31.03.2021.

4.3.2 Operation Phase The operation phase, is likely to envisage impacts on the land use pattern due to diversion of forest land for non – forest purposes i.e., for construction and widening of roads, installation of surface components both upstream and downstream stretch of the river.

Diversion of Land/Change in Land Use Pattern The project area lead to permanent change in the land use pattern. The total land requirement for this project has been finalized to be 74.077 ha in which 1.927 ha is forest land, 10.334 Ha is Government land and 61.806 ha is private land. The component wise details of land use for Rammam Stage-III HEP is shown in Table 4.4 below

Table-4.4 Component Wise Detail of Land acquired for Rammam Stage-III HEPP S. No. Components Area (ha) % 1 Barrage 8.50 11.47 2 Approach Roads 36.10 48.73 3 Tail Race Channel 8.130 10.97 4 Pen Stock and Surge Shaft 3.815 5.15 5 Power House 1.971 2.66 6 Township 8.903 12.0 7 Muck Disposal 6.661 8.99 Grand Total 74.076 100.00

4 - 10 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-11 of 41

4.4 IMPACTS ON WATER QUALITY 4.4.1 Construction Phase The major sources of surface and ground water contamination during project construction phase are as follows:

. Sewage from labour camps/colonies. . Effluent from crushers. . Impacts due to extraction of fine sand from riverbed . Impact on Ground water

Sewage from labour camps/colonies The project is in advanced stage of construction in its all three units (Unit 1, 2, & 3) and the construction is likely to last for a period of 6 years. The peak labour strength employed during project construction phase is about 1000. It has been observed from construction phase of the project that major works are contracted out and they bring their own skilled labour. However, it is only in the unskilled category, that locals were employed. The construction phase however, led to various allied activities in the area, thereby improvement in the employment scenario.

The labour population resides in 2 to 3 colonies near to the construction site. The total water requirements work out to be 70.0 KLD @ 70 lpcd. It is assumed that about 80% of the water supplied will be generated as sewage. Thus, total quantum of sewage generated is 56.0 KLD. This is being sent to Biodigester septic tank and treated water reused for landscaping or disposed into the river after treatment to achieve discharge standards.

Biodigestor Septic Tanks for Treatment of Sewage

4 - 11

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-12 of 41

Effluents from crushers During construction phase, the contractor involved in construction activities has commissioned one crusher each at the barrage and the power house sites. The total capacity of the two crushers is of 120-150 TPH. Water is required to wash the boulders and to lower the temperature of the crushing edge. About 0.1 m3 of water is required per tonne of material crushed. The effluent from the crusher contains high suspended solids, i.e. 3,000 to 4,000 mg/l. About 12-15 m3/hr of wastewater is being generated from each crusher. The effluent, if disposed without treatment leads to marginal increase in the turbidity levels in the receiving water bodies. The natural slope in the area is such that, the effluent from the crushers will ultimately find its way in River Rammam. This amounts to a discharge of 0.0033 to 0.0042 cumecs. For minimum flow of 4.47 cumecs in River Rammam, the composite value of suspended solids increased by about 3-4 mg/l, which is not expected to lead to any significant impact on water quality. The crusher plant effluent is passed through settling tank to remove the suspended solids and only the sediment free water is allowed to enter the natural stream. The photographs of settling tanks provided at the construction sites is shown below in Fig 4.1. Thus, the composite value of suspended solids increased by about 0.2-0.4 mg/l. This increase is not expected to cause any significant impact on the turbidity levels.

Fig 4.1 Settling Tank provided near crusher plant

4 - 12

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-13 of 41

Impacts due to extraction of fine sand from river bed The aggregate required for the project is being met by crushed fine sand. The natural sand of River Rammam is also being used. The extraction of large quantity of building material like stones, pebbles, gravel and sand affected the river water quality by increasing the turbidity levels. This is mainly because of the fact that during excavation of material from river, the dredged material gets released during: - excavation of material from the river bed - loss of material during transport to the surface - overflow from the dredger while loading - loss of material from the dredger during transport.

The cumulative impact of the above is the increase in turbidity levels during dredging operations. It has also been observed that slope collapse is the major factor in increasing the turbidity levels. If the depth of cut is too high, there is slope collapse, which releases a sediment cloud, which goes outside the suction radius of dredged head. In order to ensure that this does not happen, the depth of cut should be restricted such that:  H/C < 5.5

where  - unit weight of the soil H - depth of soil C - cohesive strength of soil

The following measures are being taken care of during extraction of fine sand from river bed . Establish an absolute elevation below which no extraction may occur . Concentrate in-stream extraction activities to minimise area of disturbance . Maintain river channel flood discharge capacity . Minimise activities that release fine sediment to the river . Review of cumulative effects by monitoring program

4 - 13

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-14 of 41

Impact on Ground water The ground water levels in the region could not be established, as is often the case in mountainous terrain. Since the water usage is mainly from the river water for construction purposes, no adverse impact on groundwater availability is expected. Dumping of wastes also being undertaken at specified exposed surface locations only. The solid wastes being disposed regularly through Nayabazar Jorethang Municipal Corporation (NJMC). Hence, no negative effect is envisaged on the groundwater quality of the area.

4.4.2 Operation Phase The major sources of water pollution during project operation phase include: . Domestic sewage from project colony . Impacts due to flooding and Heavy Rain . Operation and Maintenance of equipments and heavyVehicles . Sediments . Change in Hydraulic Regime and Downstream Flows

Domestic sewage from project colony During project operation phase, only source of liquid waste is sewage generated from staff colony and office premises. In the operation phase, about 50 memebers will reside in the project colony. Considering the staff of CISF and support services, it is estimated that about 100 families will reside in the project township during operation phase. Since, only a small number of O&M staff of about 50 employees will reside in the well designed colony with sewage treatment plant and other infrastructure facilities, the problems of water pollution due to disposal of sewage is minimum. About 45 to 50 KLD of sewage will be generated. Considering the BOD level in the untreated sewage as 200 mg/l, the total BOD loading will be order of 8 to 9 kg/day. The disposal of sewage without treatment may lead to adverse impacts on the receiving water bodies or land. Thus, the sewage generated from the project colony will be treated in Biodigestor septic tanks of total capacity 97 KL. Thus, the impact as a result of disposal of sewage by staff involved in project operation phase is anticipated of low significance.

4 - 14

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-15 of 41

Impacts due to flooding, Submergence and Heavy Rain The flooding of previously forest and agricultural land in the submergence area will increase the availability of nutrients resulting from decomposition of vegetative matter. In the project, most of the land coming under water spread area is barren, with few patches of trees.

Due to submergence, the major impacts will be on river regime and its existing land use will be changed from river vally & green area to water body. However, the submergence area is very small (3.852 Ha) only due to significantly small sized reservoir behind barrage. Due to low tree density in the submergence area i.e. 290 per ha, will have insignificant impact on local ecology. In view of above, the impact shall have no significance as well as magnitude.

The project is envisaged as a Run of River (ROR) scheme, with significant diurnal variations in water level. In such a scenario, significant re-aeration from natural atmosphere takes place, which maintains Dissolved Oxygen in the waterbody. Thus, in the project, no significant reduction in D.O. level in reservoir water is anticipated. In the operation phase of the project the water environment in general will not deteriorate as the water will be continuously used for power generation and will be released simultaneously. For downstream usages of river course will have a minimum environmental flow of 1.0 cumec. The regular flushing operation of pond during monsoon shall not lead to the development of unwanted heaps / shoal in the flow section of the river bed which cause change in the river regime. The baseline study of water quality in respect of surface water and ground water has revealed that both are of good quality and the various water characteristics are within the tolerance limit as per IS: 10500 2012. The surface water meets the standards of drinking water quality. Therefore, seepage of good quality surface water from pond through rock acquirer shall least impair the obtaining quality of ground water.

Operation and Maintenance of equipments and heavy Vehicles There would be routine maitenenece of power equipments like transformers generators motors & pumps which may involve leakage of oil and grease. Further, maitenence and

4 - 15

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-16 of 41 washing of the heavy vehocles involved generation of effluents.The effluents from these activities will be suitably treated.

Sediments When a river flows along a steep gradient, it could carry a significant amount of sediment load, depending on the degradation status of the catchment. When a hydraulic structure is built across the river, it creates a reservoir, which tends to accumulate the sediment, as the suspended load settles down due to decrease in flow velocity. The project is envisaged as a Run of River (ROR) scheme, with a barrage. At regular intervals, the gates of the barrage shall be opened to flush out the sediments. Thus, in the project, sedimentation problems are not anticipated. However, during rainy season sedimentation may occur from disposal area which will be mitigate by constructing toe wall and plantation on slopes and surface.

Change in Hydraulic Regime and Downstream Flows Rammam river, the natural boundary between the states of West Bengal and Sikkim, is a major tributary of the Ranjit river which rises from the Mane Bhanjan - Tongbu - Phalut ridge of the lower Himalayas at an elevation of about 3631 m. Kali Khola, Shiri Khola, Lodhama khola, Jhepi Khola and Riyang Khola are the main tributaries of Rammam. Initially, Rammam flows along W-E direction for about 6 km upto the confluence with its tributary Kali Khola at EL. 2448 m. Further, its course changes towards N-S direction upto confluence with Shiri Khola at EL. 1542 after traversing 18 km from origin, where Stage-I of Rammam H.E scheme is located. The slope of the river is moderate in this stretch (1 in 11.25). Further downstream, river confluences with its tributary Lodhama Khola at EL. 900m where the power house of Stage-II of the Rammam H.E scheme is located. The tributaries Jhepi Khola and Riyang Khola join the river at about 2.5 km and 6.5 km downstream of confluence point of Lodhama Khola respectively. At an elevation of 700 m, the river takes an 'S' bend at 1.5km downstream of diversion structure of stage-III. The meandering course between the diversion weir and the proposed power house of Stage-III project is about 26 km and the average gradient is about 1 in 26. The river flows in westerly direction up to confluence with Rangit river at an elevation of 305 m. There is considerable

4 - 16

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-17 of 41 snowfed region in the catchment area of Rammam river in its upper reaches. A significant portion of the catchment area is covered with dense forest. Rammam river has a length of about 42 km from its source in Phalut to its confluence point with Rangit river at Naya Bazar. There are four hydroelectric projects located on the river:  Rammam Stage-I HEP (Under Development)  Rammam Intermediate HEP (Under Development)  Rammam Stage-II HEP (Under Operation)  Rammam Stage-III HEP (Under Construction)

The biggest impact of hydro power projects on hydrologic regime is on account of change in the free flowing condition of the river. With the construction of the proposed hydroelectric projects, the free flowing river in Rammam shall be available on an intermittent basis only for a length of 10.3 Km in a stretch of 31.6 km in River Rammam. The details are as presented in Table- 4.5 and Figure 4.2. Table 4.5: Free Flowing Stretch of Rammam River S. Project Length of Free No. Flow of River (km) 1 TWL of Rammam-I HEP & FRL of Rammam Intermediate HEP 1.0 2 TWL of Rammam Intermediate HEP and Trench Weir of 1.0 Rammam-II HEP 3 TWL of Rammam-II HEP & FRL of Rammam-III HEP 1.60 4 TWL of Rammam-III to confluence with Great Rangit River 6.70

The current norms of Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change are that atleast 1 km free river stretch should be available between TWL of upstream and FRL of downstream hydroelectric projects. These norms are followed in all the hydroelectric projects in the study area. Further, during operation phase, the minimum flow based on average lean weather flow that will be maintained in the river will be 1.0 cumecs downstream of barrage for meeting ecological flow requirement. Therefore, the downstream flow after implementation of the project is not likely to have any significant adverse impact.

4 - 17

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-18 of 41

Figure 4.2 Cascade Development of Hydro Power Projects on Rammam River

4 - 18

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-19 of 41

4.5 IMPACTS ON AIR ENVIRONMENT 4.5.1 Construction Phase In this project, air pollution occurs mainly during the project construction phase. Considerable amount of air pollution during different stages of construction of diversion structure, dam, power house, approach roads, etc. is identified. Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM) is the main pollutant during construction. The major sources of air pollution during construction phase are: . Pollution due to fuel combustion in various construction equipment . Fugitive emissions from crushers . Blasting Operations . Emissions from DG sets . Impacts due to vehicular movement . Impact due to Muck disposal

Pollution due to fuel combustion in various construction equipment The lists of major equipment being used during construction phase are:  Dozer  Dumpers  Loaders  Transit mixers  Drill jumbos  Rock bolting machine  Compressors  Drilling machines  DG sets  Batching plant  Crushers, screening plant and rod mill

Air Pollution due to fuel combustion by above mentioned construction machinery and equipment is minimum and short-term. Various construction machinery and equipment consume fuel, normally diesel during their running / operation. Routine preventive

4 - 19

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-20 of 41 maintenance of construction machinery and equipment will be done to comply with vehicular emission norms.

Based on past experience in similar projects, the increase in PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx is not expected to increase significantly due to combustion of fuel in construction equipment. In the project, no significant impact on ambient air quality is expected as a result of operation of various construction equipment.

Fugitive emissions from crushers For the utilization of the river borne material for construction purposes one crusher each at the barrage and the power house sites were installed. The total capacity of the two crushers is of 120-150 TPH whose operation is likely to generate fugitive emissions. During crushing operations, fugitive emissions comprising of the suspended particulate was identified. Regular mist spray to contain the fugitive emissions from crushing operations is being followed. During finalising the project layout, it was ensured that the labour camps, colonies, etc. are located on the leeward side and outside the impact zone (about 0.8 to 1.0 km) of the crushers. Further water sprinkling is being resorted to at necessary places to suppress the dust.

Blasting Operations Blasting will result in vibration, which shall propagate through the rocks to various degrees and causes loosening of rocks/boulders. CIMFR (Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research) has been engaged by both the Major Civil Contractors for design of blast pattern and monitoring of tunnelling works. Geological Survey of India (GSI), is also associated with NTPC, Rammam, vide MoU dated 8th Feb’ 2015, for supervision and advice on tunnelling/ road construction and/ or any other vulnerable area of construction. During tunneling operations, dust will be generated during blasting. ID blowers provided with dust handling system to capture and generated dust. The dust will settle on vegetation, in the predominant down wind direction. Appropriate control measures have been recommended to minimize the adverse impacts on this account.

4 - 20

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-21 of 41

Emissions from DG sets It has been observed that 250 kVA silent DG set is being operated during emergency situation. The emissions from the DG set include Particulate Matter (PM), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Oxides of Nitirogen (NOx) and unburnt Hydrocarbons (HC). The emission limits for DG sets as per notification GSR 232 (E) dated 31.03.2014 and GSR (E) dated 07.03.2016 are presented in Table 4.6 below.

Table 4.6 Emissions Limits for DG sets Power Category Emission Limits (g/kWh) Smoke Limit (Light NOx + THC or NOx CO PM absorption co- + NMHC or RHC efficient per meter) Up to 19 kW ≤ 7.5 ≤ 3.5 ≤ 0.3 ≤ 0.7 More than 19 kW ≤ 4.7 ≤ 3.5 ≤ 0.3 ≤ 0.7 up to 75 kW More than 75 kW ≤ 4.0 ≤ 3.5 ≤ 0.2 ≤ 0.7 up to 800 kW proper maitennece of DG set with regular monitoring of emissions from DG set shall be carried out to achieve emission norms.

Impacts due to vehicular movement Presently the vehicular movement for transportation of various construction materials and equipment at the project site is maximum of 45-50 trucks/hour. The current number of vehicles is not of the magnitude so as to cause adverse impacts on ambient air quality.

The vehicular movement leads to generation of dust. However, such ground level emissions do not travel for long distances, and their effect is limited to a distance of about 100 m from the point of their origin. Similarly, marginal increase in Hydrocarbons, SO2 and NOx levels are anticipated for a short duration. Thus, no major adverse impacts are anticipated on this account. Ambient air quality levels in study area are well within the permissible limits of NAAQS 2009. It indicates that there is no significant impact on ambient air quality due to fuel combustion in equipment and vehicles. However, regular maintenance of vehicles,

4 - 21

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-22 of 41

sprinkling of water where construction activities are prevalent, providing subsequent vegetation etc. would greatly reduce such impacts.

The following mitigative measures are being followed during transportation activities . Transport trucks/tippers is being properly maintained. . Only PUC certificate issued vehicles are being used. . Avoiding of overloading of trucks beyond stipulated capacity by installing weigh bridges. . Strict compliance of traffic rules and regulations

4.5.2 Operation Phase The results of ambient air quality monitoring baseline data for the period July 2020 to Sept

2020 shows that the parameters PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx are well within the standards prescribed by NAAQS, 2009 as shown in Table 4.7 Table 4.7 Summary of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring S.No. Parameter Range (µg/m3) Standard (µg/m3) 1. PM10 29.0-66.9 100 2. PM2.5 8.1-33.0 60 3. SO2 6.8-13.1 80 4. NOx 7.2-14.6 80

Since the project is a Run of River (ROR) scheme and does not involve major air emissions during operation phase, therefore, it will have insignificant impact on the air quality of the region.

4.6 IMPACTS ON NOISE ENVIRONMENT 4.6.1 Construction Phase In a water resource project, the impacts on ambient noise levels are expected only during the project construction phase, due to earth moving machinery, etc. Likewise, noise due to excavation, blasting, vehicular movement will have some adverse impact on the ambient noise levels in the area. Various likely impacts considered include: . Impacts due to operation of various construction machinery and equipment

4 - 22

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-23 of 41

. Impacts due to increased vehicular movement . Noise generated due to drilling . Noise generated due to blasting . Impacts due to ground vibrations . Impacts on labour

Impacts due to operation of various construction machinery and equipment The noise is generated during project construction by various operating heavy machinery & equipments like pumps, air compressors, DG sets, drilling machines, dumpers etc. The areas likely to be affected will be in the vicinity of main project components. Generally, the noise levels due to operation of various construction machinery and equipment is given in Table 4.8. Table 4.8 Noise level due to operation of various construction equipment Equipment Noise level (dB(A)) Compressors 75-85 Cranes 82-85 DG Sets 72-82 Concrete placers 70-80 Batching plant 75-85 Pneumatically operated monkers 70-80 Drilling machines 85-95 Grouting, guniting, equipment 80-90 Crushers 68-70 Pumps 68-70 Vibrators 69-81 Saws 74-81

As seen from the above table, construction machinery & equipment produce noise levels in the range 68-90 dB (A) from noise source as per CPCB. Under the worst case scenario, considered for prediction of noise levels during construction phase, it has been assumed that all these equipment generate noise from a common point. The crusher within the project area shall be housed in a shed to contain noise. Screening activities shall generate average

4 - 23

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-24 of 41

noise level of about 90 dB (A). Workers in the noise generating zone will be provided with earmuffs/earplugs besides dust mask.

Walls of various houses or other structure will attenuate at least 30 dB(A) of noise. In addition there is noise attenuation due to the following factors. . Air absorption . Rain . Atmospheric inhomogeneties. . Vegetal cover

Thus, no increase in noise levels are anticipated as a result of various activities, during the project construction phase due to the following: . assumption that all equipment are operating from a common point leads to over- estimation of increase in noise level . attenuation of 30 dB(A) of noise by wall of any structure . noise attenuation due to various factors.

Impacts due to increased vehicular movement During construction phase, there is significant increase in vehicular movement for transportation of construction material. At present, the vehicular movement is maximum of 45 to 50 trucks/hour. As a part of EIA study, impact on noise level due to increased vehicular movement was studied using Federal Highway Administration model. The results of modelling are outlined in Table 4.9.

Table 4.9 Increase in noise levels due to increased vehicular movement Distance (m) Ambient noise Noise levels due to Increase in ambient noise level dB(A) increased vehicular level due to increased movement dB(A) vehicular movement dB(A) 10 42.6 70.6 28 20 43.8 66.8 23 50 47.6 68.6 21 100 40 56 16

4 - 24

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-25 of 41

Distance (m) Ambient noise Noise levels due to Increase in ambient noise level dB(A) increased vehicular level due to increased movement dB(A) vehicular movement dB(A) 200 39 51 12 500 42 49 7 1000 40 44 4

As mentioned earlier, there will be significant attenuation due to various factors, e.g. absorption by construction material, air absorption, atmospheric inhomogeneties, vegetal cover. The vehicle movement is restricted to day time to reduce the impact of noise pollution on surrounding environment. Thus, no significant impact on this account is anticipated.

Noise generated due to drilling The noise levels monitored at a 10 m distance from the source and operator’s cabin is given in Table 4.10. Table 4.10 Noise generated due to drilling Equipment Noise level at source dB(A) Standing idle (inside cabin) 70-72 Standing idle (10 m radius) 72-74 On load (inside cabin) 78-80 On load (10 m radius) 82-84

The noise levels during various construction activities have been compared to various standards prescribed by Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which are being implemented in our country through rules framed under Factories Act. It can be observed (Refer Table 4.12) that for an 8 hour duration, equivalent noise level exposure should be less than 90 dB(A).

The Director General of Mines Safety in its circular no. DG(Tech)/18 of 1975, has prescribed the noise level in mining operations for workers in 8 hour shift period with unprotected ear as 90 dB(A) or less. Similar norms can be considered for construction phase of the project as well. The workers who are expected to be exposed to noise levels greater

4 - 25

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-26 of 41

than 90 dB(A), should not work in these areas beyond 6 to 8 hours. In addition, they also need to be provided with ear plugs. Thus, increased noise levels due to drilling are not expected to adversely affect the workers operating the drill or involved in other mining activities closely.

Noise generated due to blasting Noise generated by blasting is instantaneous, site specific and depends on type, quantity of explosives, dimension of drill hole, degree of compaction of explosives in the hole and rock. Noise levels generated due to blasting have been monitored at various sites and the results have been summarized in Table 4.11. Table 4.11 Noise generation due to blasting No. of holes Total charge Maximum Distance (m) Noise level (kg) charge/delay (kg) dB(A) 15 1500 100 250 76-85 17 1700 100 250 76-86 18 1800 100 250 74-85 19 1900 100 400 70-75 20 2000 100 100 76-80

At the blast site with the given diameter of holes and their pattern, the noise levels are expected to be in the range of 120-130 dB (A) and tend to decrease with increase in distance of receptor. It can be observed from Table 4.11, that noise level due to blasting operations are expected to be of the order of 75-86 dB(A) at a distance of 250 m. The baseline noise level monitoring shows that the ambient noise levels in the area during day time ranged from 50.8-62.5 dB(A) and night time noise level ranged from 42.6 to 55.6 dB(A). Since, the nearest settlement is about 0.8 to 1.0 km away, the incremental noise due to blasting is expected to be 40-50 dB(A). As the blasting is likely to last for 4 to 5 seconds depending on the charge, noise levels over this time would be instantaneous and short in duration. Considering attenuation due to various sources, even the instantaneous increase in noise level is not expected to 70 dB(A). Hence, noise level due to blasting is not expected to cause any significant adverse impact.

4 - 26

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-27 of 41

Impacts due to ground vibrations The explosive energy generated during blasting sets up a seismic wave within the surface, that affects the structures and cause discomfort to human population. When an explosive charge is fired in a hole, stress waves traverse in various directions, causing the rock particles to oscillate. Blasting also generates ground vibrations and instantaneous noise. Ground vibrations are acoustic waves that propagate through rocks. Although the difference in accelerations, amplitude, particle velocities and the frequencies in three direction result into damage to structures but the peak particle velocity and frequency are normally taken into consideration for evaluating the structural response. Various measures have been recommended to minimize the adverse impacts due to blasting: . Proper design & development of blast hole. . Use of non-electric system of blasting for true bottom hole initiation. . Use of muffling mats to arrest the dust and fly rock.

Impacts on labour Due to high noise levels of construction machinery the personnel operating the machines, workers and technical staff stationed, working near to the machines are prone to exposure of high levels of noise. It is known that continuous exposures to high noise levels above 90 dB(A) affects the hearing acuity of the workers/operators and hence, should be avoided. To prevent these effects, it has been recommended by Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that the exposure period of affected persons be limited as in Table 4.12. Table 4.12 Maximum Exposure Periods specified by OSHA Maximum equivalent continuous Unprotected exposure period per day for 8 hrs/day Noise level dB(A) and 5 days/week 90 8 95 4 100 2 105 1 110 ½ 115 ¼ 120 No exposure permitted at or above this level

4 - 27

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-28 of 41

4.7 IMPACTS ON ECOLOGY The impacts on the biodiversity of the area will be very low as it is "Run-of- River" (ROR) scheme. The ecological setup in the project affected stretch between barrage, HRT and TRT site is of concern.

4.7.1 Terrestrial Ecology Increased Human Interferences The direct impact of construction activity of any water resource project in a Himalayan terrain is generally limited in the vicinity of the construction sites only. As mentioned earlier, a large population (about 1000) including technical staff, workers and other group of people are engaged during the project construction phase. It can be assumed that the technical staff will be of higher economic status and will live in a more urbanized habitat, and will not use wood as fuel, if adequate alternate sources of fuel are provided. Around 200 labours are local residents. To minimize this impact, LPG gas is being used for officers & staff engaged in the construction work. Adequate fuel for labour camp (30 LPG cylinders, Kerosene & fire wood) is provided by the contractor. Also, fuel depot at Jorethang (South Sikkim) is available within accessible reach from site.

The other major impact on the flora in and around the project area is due to increased level of human interferences. The workers may also cut trees to meet their requirements for construction of houses, furniture. Normally in such situations, lot of indiscriminate tree felling or wastage of wood is also observed, especially in remote or inaccessible areas. Thus, proper measures are being undertaken, so as to avoid any significant adverse impacts on terrestrial flora.

Acquisition of forest land The project requires 74.077 ha of the land for project related activities of which about 1.927 ha is the forest land which has been diverted. The details of land required for various project appurtenances are listed in Table 4.4.

4 - 28

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-29 of 41

As a part of the EIA study, detailed Ecological survey was conducted for one season. Based on the findings of the survey, it can be concluded that the density and diversity in the project area acquired is quite low. The forest in and around the project area is quite degraded. No rare or endangered species are observed within the project area. The tree density observed at various sampling sites is given in Table 4.13. Table 4.13 Tree density at various sampling sites Sampling location Tree density (No/ha) Submergence area 290 Penstock alignment 200 Power house site and colony area 190 Adit at desilting chamber 240 Adit at Jhepi khola 210

The tree density at various sampling site ranges from 190 to 290 trees/ha. At submergence area, the tree density is 290 trees/ha, while at other sampling locations, the density ranges from 190 to 240 trees/ha. Normally in a good forest, the tree density is of the order of 1000- 1200 per Ha. The diversity too is high in such forests. However, in the project area, a maximum of 8 to 10 tree species of trees viz. Albizia chinensis, Alnus nepalensis, Bischofia javanica, Duabanga grandiflora, Engelhardtia spicata, Erythrina arborescens, Ficus reticulata, Gynocardia odorata, Schima wallichii and Tetradium fraxinifolium have been observed at any sampling sites covered as a part of the Ecological Survey. No rare and endangered floral species are observed. Thus, overall project area is categorized as degraded and no major impact due to various activities during project construction and operation phases are envisaged. The forest area was already diverted and compensatory afforestation fund have been deposited to the Forest Department of West Bengal and Sikkim.

Impacts due to increased accessibility Improved access to the presently virgin area during and after construction of the Project would put pressure on the forest adjoining to the Project site and will open an avenue to

4 - 29

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-30 of 41 encroachers for illegally entering in to the forests which may lead to degradation of nearby forests, if not managed properly.

The project area is located at a distance of about 9 km from nearest boundary of Singalila National Park and about 4.4 km from the Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary, West Sikkim. None of the components of the project are situated within the National Park. Thus, no impact is expected on the National Park. However, Wildlife Conservation Plan has been prepared and will be submitted to state forest department for implementation. The details of measures to improve the terrestrial ecology of the area are covered in Chapter 10 Environmental Management Plan (EMP).

Disturbance to Wildlife During construction phase, large number of machinery and construction labour was mobilized. The operation of these construction equipment, and blasting generates noise which lead to some disturbance to wildlife population. From the available data, the area does not have significant wildlife population. Likewise, siting of construction equipment, godowns, stores, labour camps, etc. lead to adverse impacts on fauna, in the area. Likewise, area does not appear to be on the migratory routes of any animals and therefore the construction of the project is not being affected the wildlife.

Based on field observations and interactions with locals, etc. it was found that no major fauna is observed in the project area. The forests in the area are quite degraded (tree density 190-290 trees/ha). Normally, in such conditions, human interferences are generally high, leading to large scale tree falling. As a result, major wildlife species is not reported in such areas. Thus, impact on terrestrial fauna is not expected to be significant. Stray animals, however, may some times drift to the construction site. It should be ensured through stringent anti-poaching surveillance that the stray animals are not killed.

4 - 30

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-31 of 41

National Park and Wildlife Sanctuary

None of the project components are located within National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuary or other protected area or within the notified Eco sensitive zones of these protected area. As confirmed by CCF (WL), West Bengal vide letter dated 01.02.2008 copy attached as Annexure-XIV, the project area is at a distance of about 7.1 km from the nearest boundary of Eco-sensitive Zone of Singalila National Park. However, the Singalila National Park is about 9.0 km from the project components as notified by MOEF&CC notification No. S.O. 3613 (E) dated 16.11.2017 (copy enclosed as Annexure-XV). The Eco Sensitive Zone of Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary is at 4.2 km from the project site and 4.4 km away from boundary of Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary, West Sikkim notified by MOEF&CC notification No.S.O.2172 (E) dated 27.08.2014 (copy enclosed as Annexure-XVI) and about 10 km from the nearest boundary of the reserve forest area of Darjeeling Territorial Forest Division.

Project components are outside the Eco Sensitive Zone of Barsey Rhododendron Wildlife Sanctuary of Sikkim. The officals from Forest/wildlife department have visted site on 05/04/2021 to certify the that the no project component falls within boundary of any National Nark and Wild life Sanctuary.

4.7.2 Aquatic Ecology Construction Phase The construction of the Rammam Stage-III HEPP involves large scale extraction of different types of construction material from the river bed including boulders, stones, gravel, sand, etc. Extraction of gravel and sand causes considerable damage to fish stocks and other aquatic life by destabilizing the sub-stratum, increasing the turbidity of water, silting of the channel bottom and modifying the flow which in turn may result in erosion of the river channel. These alterations upset the composition and balance of aquatic ecosystem. The material at the river sub-stratum like stones and pebbles often provide anchorage and home to the invertebrates who remain attached in a fast flowing streams. During fish spawning season, fertilized eggs are laid amidst the gravel, where it is made sure, that eggs are not

4 - 31

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-32 of 41 washed away in fast flowing stream. The eggs of almost all species are sticky in nature which provide additional safety. The turbidity in excess of 100 ppm brought by suspended solids chokes the gills of young fish.

During construction of a river valley project, huge quantity of debris is generated at various construction sites. The debris, if a separate area for dumping of the material is not marked, invariably would flow down the river during heavy precipitation. Such a condition adversely affects the development of aquatic life. AT Rammam HEPP, muck is being disposed at designated dumping sites so that it takes a least possible space and is not hazardous to the environment. A toe wall has been created around the muck disposal site and landscaping to be done in the muck site.

Impacts due to excavation of construction material from river bed The excavation of construction material is likely to affect the survival and propagation of micro-benthic organisms. The macro-benthic life which remains attached to the stones, boulders etc. gets dislodged and is carried away downstream by turbulent flow. The areas from where construction material is excavated, benthic flora and fauna gets destroyed. In due course of time, however, the area gets recolonized. The density and diversity of benthic flora and fauna, is however, much lesser as compared to the pre-dredging levels.

Impacts due to discharge of sewage from labour camp/colony During construction phase wastewater mostly from domestic source will be discharged from various camps of workers actively engaged in the project area. Around 70 KLD of water is required for the workers during the peak construction phase out of which 80% (i.e. about 56 KLD) will be discharged back to the river as wastes, more or less as a point sources from various congregation sites where workers will reside. Due to perennial nature of River Rammam sufficient water for dilution is available to keep the DO of the river to significantly high levels. Therefore there would be no significant impact envisaged due to discharge of treated sewage.

4 - 32

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-33 of 41

Impacts due to increased human activities The increase of human activities in the project area, results in enhancement in indiscriminate fishing, which can adversely affect the riverine ecology. Indiscriminate fishing will reduce fish stock availability for commercial and sport fishermen. Thus, it is recommended that adequate surveillance measures are implemented during project construction phase to ameliorate such impacts.

Operation Phase The completion of Rammam Stage-III HEP would bring about significant changes in the riverine ecology, as the river transforms from a fast-flowing water system to a quiescent lacustrine environment. Such an alteration of the habitat would bring changes in physical, chemical and biotic life. Amongst the biotic communities, certain species can survive the transitional phase and can adapt to the changed riverine habitat. There are other species amongst the biotic communities, which, however, for varied reasons related to feeding and reproductive characteristics cannot acclimatize to the changed environment, and may disappear in the early years of impoundment of water. The micro-biotic organisms especially diatoms, blue-green and green algae before the operation of project, have their habitats beneath boulders, stones, fallen logs along the river, where depth is such that light penetration can take place. But with the damming of river, these organisms may perish as a result of increase in depth. Amongst the aquatic animals, it is the fish life which would be most affected. The migratory route of fish species, like Mahaseer and snow trout is likely to be affected due to the construction of the project.

With the completion of project, and diversion of flow for hydropower generation, following changes are expected - reduced flow rate - increase in water temperature - reduction in availability of stano-thermal aquatic animals - increase in population of euro-thermal species.

4 - 33

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-34 of 41

Unless the desired flow is maintained downstream of the barrage/dam, aquatic ecology in general and fisheries in particular would be affected. Mahaseer (Schizothorax sp.) is reported in River Rammam which may not be able to cross the barrage/dam for breeding. The implementation of fish management plan including construction of a hatchery has been taken up with fisheries department, Govt. of West Bengal as well as with the Fisheries Department of Sikkim.

Impacts on migratory fish species The obstruction created by the barrage would hinder the migration of certain migratory species especially Mahaseer. Schizothorax (from upper reaches to the lower reaches). This species undertakes annual migration for feeding and breeding. Finding their migratory path obstructed due to the barrage, they are expected to congregate below the barrage wall and will be indiscriminately caught by the poachers. This leads to adverse impact on the migratory fish species. It is proposed to stock River Rammam upstream and the downstream sides. On upstream side, stocking will be done upto diversion structure of Rammam-II HEP. On the downstream, stocking will be done upto confluence of River Rangit with River Rammam.

4.8 IMPACT ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT The socio-economic profile of the families of the study area has been outlined in Chapter 3 of this EIA Report. It is observed that a subsistence economy prevails amongst most of the people. Most of them are primarily dependent upon agriculture. However, a few of families to augment their income through / are dependent on jobs and business.

There is some migration of labor force from outside the project area during construction phase, which may put some pressure on local settlements and resources. The project envisages all round development and growth in the region as a whole. However, few local people were affected in the form of acquisition of their land. Members of families were provided with R&R package as per NPRR-2003.

4 - 34

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-35 of 41

4.8.1 Positive Impacts The following positive impacts are anticipated on the socio-economic environment of the local people of villages around the project area during the Project construction and operation phases:

A number of marginal activities and jobs would be available to the locals in the vicinity of project thus providing opportunities for the skilled or unskilled people such as jobs, petty contracts during project construction phase etc. . The availability of electricity to the rural areas will reduce the dependence of the locals on forests. . With increased availability of electricity, small-scale & cottage industries are likely to come up in the area. . Better Living Standards . Access to improved infrastructure facilities . Health facilities are likely to develop further. . Implementation of Catchment Area Treatment will reduce soil erosion, increase soil fertility and improve forest resources.

Clean and Renewable Source of Energy Hydropower is one of the non-polluting and eco-friendly Renewable source of Energy. On completion, the project would provide 3x40 MW of electricity. Also, there will be less consumption of fuel by saving the depleting resources and reduction in Greenhouse Gas

emissions. With the construction of Ramman Stage-III HEP, CO2 emissions will be eliminated. The other indirect benefits of hydropower project over thermal one are reduction in water pollution, noise pollution, thermal, fly-ash and health effects in and around the area.

Increased Infrastruture Besides improvement to the existing infrastructure, new infrastructure will be created with the implementation of the project. Basic infrastructures like roads, health facilities, educational facilities etc. will be developed. The people of the area will be benefited due to

4 - 35

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-36 of 41

development of better infrastructure in the project area. About Rs.1149.26 Lakhs have been spent on CSR-CD activities till date.

Benefits to Economy Apart from direct employment, the opportunities for indirect employment will also be generated which would provide great impetus to the economy of the local area. Various types of business-like shops, food-stall, tea stalls, etc. besides a variety of suppliers, traders, transporters will concentrate here and benefit immensely as demand will increase significantly for almost all types of goods and services. The business community as a whole will be benefited.

Development of infrastructure and availability of reliable power supply as a result of the project realization would contribute to the stimulation of economic activities like small scale industries in the area. Additional power generation will mitigate the power shortage in the country. Some of the local people may be permanent jobs during the operational phase of the project depending on their skill and performance. The project will act as stimulant to improve the economy both at the local and National levels.

Impact on Holuy Places and Tourism No Holy place like temples, Church, mosque and Monastery are located within project site. No Holy place of national importance is located within Study Area. Therefore no significant impact on holy places due to project. The barrage of project will promote the tourism activities in the area.

4.8.2 Negative Impacts Increased Incidence of Water-Related Diseases There is a close relationship between water and public health. The commissioning of project can have both beneficial and adverse impacts on the health of the people in and around the project area. The negative impacts foreseen are increase of certain vector-borne diseases like malaria. The following factors are rendered responsible for vector-borne diseases: a) Aggregation of labour population.

4 - 36

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-37 of 41

b) Excavations and water accumulation.

Aggregation of Labour Population During the construction phase, new groups come and go constantly keeping the human population in aflux. These people, if housed in temporary dwelling without proper sanitary conditions and water supply may pose health hazard, if precautions are not taken the vector- borne disease epidemiology may show sudden or long lasting change. Once they settle in labour camps/colonies, increased incidence of various diseases may occur. The over crowding may lead to increased incidence of respiratory infection and tuberculosis. The scarcity of water in the houses and the absence of sanitary facilities in labour camps may be responsible for increased prevalence of gastro enteritis and other diarrhoeal diseases. This aspect needs to be looked into with precaution, and effort must be made to ensure that a thorough check up of the labour population congregating in the area is conducted.

Excavations and water accumulation The excavation of earth from burrow pits etc. is one of the major factors for the increase in prevalence of malaria. After the excavation of sand/earth the burrow areas if left without treatment, water will be collected. These pools of water then will serve as breeding grounds for mosquitoes. However, area having cold climatic condition does not help much on this account. These depressions are likely to be filled up during the subsequent floods. But, these borrow sites may not serve as a potential breeding habitats for mosquitoes as the water will always be running/flowing through the pits.

The NTPC Rammam Stage-III HEP will result on positive socio-economic development in and around the project area. However the minimal adverse impact on the socio economic environment would be experienced. Assuming that mitigation measures are incorporated to minimize potential adverse impacts on socio economics would be expected to be nominal.

4 - 37

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-38 of 41

Summary of Anticipated Social Impact Assessment & Mitigation Measures:

Impact Area Pre Mitigation Mitigation Post Mitigation Significance Significance Relocation of Local Medium R&R completed for this Low Community project General Characteristics and Low No potential change on Low trends in population of population of region due to region this project & hence no mitigation envisaged. Migration trends in study Low/NIL No Impact on migration Low area trends as local labour utilized during construction and very few people of non locals with necessary expertise during Construction & Operation stage Population characteristics in Low No Impact on population Low study area, including Distributions, and hence no distributions by age, sex, mitigation envisaged. ethnic groups, educational level and family size Distinct settlement of ethnic Low No Disruption in settlement Low groups or deprived patterns of people envisaged economic/ minority groups Economic history for the Low Positive Impact due to Medium region Increase of income levels of the region due to this project Employment pattern in Low Temporary or regular Low/Medium study area, including employment is expected to occupational distribution work during jetty construction and location and availability period and laying activity. of work force Income levels and tends for Low/Medium Positive Impact - Increase the Medium study area income levels Land values in study area Low Positive Impact - Increase Low/Medium land values around the vicinity

4 - 38

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-39 of 41

Housing characteristics in Low/Medium No Change Envisaged Low study area, including in types of housing and occupancy levels Health and social services in Low - Periodic Health Check up Medium study area, including health, of Construction Workers workforce, law & necessary medication enforcement, fire protection, being conducted water supply, wastewater - Periodic Check on Potable treatment facilities, solid Water supplied and good waste collection and housekeeping practices. disposal and utilities Public and private Low No Change Envisaged Medium educational resources in study area Community cohesion, Low No Potential impact on Low including organized community cohesions community groups Areas of unique significance Low No Disruption of unique areas Low such as cemeteries of religious camps Archaeological Heritage Low No Archaeological Heritage Low Sites effected Sites are disturbed or lost or effected in any way and hence no preservation plan required,

The resulting terms for the overall assessment for each socio economic environment aspect were defined as follows: High: impact acceptable if any criterion is awarded as high grade. Medium: tolerable risk/ impact not acceptable if managed to level that is As low As reasonably practicable, if the criteria have grades combining medium & low; and Low/NIL: negligible risk/impact acceptable than all criteria are low or Nil

4 - 39

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-40 of 41

4.9 IMPACT ON GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT

Geological study for the project and study area was carried out and have been discussed in Chapter-3 of EIA report. Geologically the area comprise of Buxa formation comprising of dolomite, phyllite and quartzite,Darjeeling formation comprise of migmatite gneiss, calc- silicate lenses, Kanchanjunga formation is represented by augen gneiss, quartzite, amphibolites, migmatitic gneiss rocks,Chungthang formation comprise of quartz-biotite gneiss, calc-silicate, marble, quartzite, kyanite and granite schists and Quatenary deposits of alluvium with assorted gravel and fragments of gravels, pebbles, boulders and terrace covers are developed sporadically along the streams and rivers.

As the project is Run of River Project, no large dam or reservoir is envisaged to construct. Therefore no large scale drilling and blasting is involved for construction of barrage. As per site specific investigations, the geological formations in the underconstruction project sites are considered stable and will be able to withstand the impacts of drilling and blasting. Hence, controlled blasting with use of multi-second delay detonators is being used at such geologically fragile locations. Intensity of anticipated impacts on geology will be low based on magnitude of operation and degree of disturbance. Therefore, intensity of anticipated environmental impact on geology of the area will be weak and extent of anticipated impact will be local. Duration of impact will be shor term leading to low significance of the impact. The Rammam basin has experienced quite a few earthquakes of moderate to severe intensities in the last 100-120 years. The significant ones are the Great Assam Earthquake of 12thJune 1897 and Dhubri Earthquake of 15thJanuary, 1934. The project area forms a part of the seismic zone-IV (as per seismic zoning map of BIS). As per Bureau of Indian Standard (BIS) recommendation 0.1 g horizontal and 0.05 g vertical acceleration is considered for design of structures on consolidated foundations.

The intensity of anticipated environmental impact on geology of the area will be weak and the disturbances to local geology due to tunneling work will be restored by concreting. No impact is anticipated on the geology of the area during the operation phase.

4 - 40

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C4-41 of 41

4.10 IMPACT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

The project is a run of river (ROR) scheme. Therefore use of natural resources boulders, sand stones in construction will be less in comparision of large hydro power project. The area nearby upstream of barrage site will have sufficient amount of water for domestic use. But on the other side, population between downstream of barrage and tail race may face water scarcity . However, minimum environmental flow will be maintained for existence of aquatic life and meet the water demand of local population. The water flow after penstock and tailrace area will be normal as during pre-construction stage. The immigration of labour may results in increased use of fuelwood and cutting of trees. Adequate LPG Cylinders are being provided to avoid the tree cutting for fuel.

4 - 41

CHAPTER – V ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C5-1 of 2

CHAPTER-5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 5.0 GENERAL The analysis of alternative is the process of comparing potential impacts and mitigation options of a series of alternative location, technologies, operation to identify optimal alternatives that meets national legislation. These alternatives can include variations in layout, alternative engineering process, routing, linear facilities and screening of material suppliers to select those with appropriate environmental and risk management system.

5.1 ALTERNATE LOCATION FOR THE PROJECT The project was accorded Environmental Clearance (EC) in 2007 and MOEF&CC vide its letter dated 13.07.2017, extended the validity of Environmental Clearance (EC) for a further period of 3 years i.e. up to 16.08.2020.

MOEF&CC vide Notification dated 18.01.2021 (Copy enclosed at Annexure-I) has amended the EIA Notification, 2006 and made a provision that period from 01.04.2020 to the 31.03.2021 shall not be considered for the purpose of calculation of the period of validity of prior Environmental Clearance in view of outbreak of Corona Virus (COVID- 19) and subsequent lockdowns. In this regard, the Environment Clearance for Rammam HEPP is valid till 16.08.2021.

MoEF&CC issued Terms of Reference for the Rammam Hydro Power Project, Stage III (3x40 MW) vide F.No. J-12011/11/2020-IA-I (R) dated 12th February, 2021 and Environmental Impact Assessment was prepared for one season baseline data i.e. July’ 2020 to September’ 2020.

As the project is already in advanced stage of construction, no change in site is possible at this stage and the analysis of site is not relevant for this project.

5- 1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C5-2 of 2

5.2 ALTERNATE TECHNOLOGY The site for diversion structure is located downstream at the confluence of Rammam with Lodhama khola near Lodhama village just downstream of the power house of Rammam Stage-II HEPP (51 MW under operation by WBSEDCL formerly by WBSEB). The site for power house is located near village Barbatia on the right bank of River Rammam. The alternative that envisages the construction of a diversion structure on River Rammam just downstream of its confluence with River Lodhama Khola gives the maximum returns in terms of energy generation, higher load factor with lowest cost, therefore was considered to be the best option.

The Rammam Hydro Electric project is a Run of River (ROR) project on River Rammam and envisages several developments and facilities. The advantage of not having a large amount of water storage is that less land is flooded and therefore the potential environmental footprint impacts are reduced. Run of River (ROR) hydro projects directly distribute economic benefits to a larger number of communities and municipalities compared to large hydroelectric projects.

As the project is already in advanced stage of construction, and more than 50% work has been completed, no change in technology is possible at this stage and the analysis of alternate technology is not relevant for this project.

5.3 CONCLUSION The project will have positive benefits in terms of revenue generation to central and state government by generating electricity. The project has generated direct and indirect employment opportunities as well as opportunities for self-employment.

In addition, the proposed project is not located in any Eco Sensitive Zone or National Park or Wildlife Sanctuary. Consideration of these alternatives with strict compliance to the Environment Management and Monitoring Plans suggested will ensure minimal impact on the Environment.

5- 2

CHAPTER –VI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C6-1 of 10

CHAPTER-6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

6.0 INTRODUCTION Periodic monitoring of environmental parameters is of immense importance to assess the sustainability of any water resources project during construction as well as operation phase. With the knowledge of baseline conditions, the environmental monitoring programme serve as an indicator for any deterioration in environmental conditions due to operation of the project, to enable taking up suitable mitigatory steps in time to safeguard the environment. The post monitoring results compared with the baseline status of the environment provide an important tool to check the implementation of the management plan. Monitoring is as important as that of control of pollution since the efficiency of control measures can only be determined by monitoring.

Usually, as in the case of the study, an Impact Assessment study is carried over short period of time and the data cannot bring out all variations induced by the natural or human activities. Therefore, periodic monitoring programme of the environmental parameters is essential to take into account the seasonal variation and changes in the environmental quality due to project operations.

6.1 OBJECTIVE OF MONITORING The objectives of monitoring are to:  Verify effectiveness of planning decisions;  Measure effectiveness of operational procedures;  Confirm statutory and corporate compliance; and  Identify unexpected changes.

6.2 AREA OF CONCERN From the monitoring point of view, important parameters considered are meteorology, air quality, water quality, soil, noise, ecology, erosion and siltation, land use, afforestation, socio-economy, etc. Monitoring becomes essential to ensure that the mitigation measures

6 - 1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C6-2 of 10

planned for environmental protection function effectively during the entire period of project operation. Suggested monitoring details are outlined in the following sections:

6.3 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY AND METEOROLOGY Construction Phase The ambient air quality monitoring during construction phase is being carried out by an external agency, approved by SPCB at four stations namely Salingdong, Lodhama, Jhepi and Barbatia. Every year monitoring is done for the following three seasons: - Winter - Summer - Post-monsoon The frequency of monitoring is twice a week for four consecutive weeks at each station

for each season. The parameters to be monitored are Particulate Matter 10 (PM10),

Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5), Sulphur dioxide (SO2) and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx). Every year, ambient air quality is to be monitored for (4 stations * 2 days/week * 4 weeks x 3 seasons) 96 days as per NAAQS 2009.

Operation Phase An automatic online meteorological station will be installed at the project site, during the operation phase. Automatic recording for ambient temperature, wind speed and direction, humidity, atmospheric pressure, rainfall will be carried out at the site. This will be a permanent monitoring station and will continue throughout the life of the project.

Air Quality monitoring includes ambient air quality monitoring, stack emissions from existing DG sets of capacity 25 kVA, 125 kVA and 250 kVA equipped with acoustic enclosure. The numbers and locations of ambient air quality monitoring locations during operation of project shall be decided in consultation with SPCB. However, four stations (three stations at nearby villages and one station at project site) are proposed for ambient air quality monitoring during whole year (except monsoon season).

The frequency of monitoring is twice a week for four consecutive weeks at each station for each season (except monsoon). The parameters to be monitored are Particulate 6 - 2

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C6-3 of 10

Matter-10 (PM10), Particulate Matter-2.5 (PM2.5), Sulphur dioxide (SO2) and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx). The monitoring is being carried out as per Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) guidelines and in consultation with SPCB, standard procedures like CPCB/BIS/ASTM/EPA will be followed for sample collection, and analysis by MOEF&CC/NABL accredited laboratory.

6.4 WATER QUALITY Construction Phase It is proposed to monitor the effluent before and after treatment from septic tanks/Biodigestors. The frequency of monitoring is quarterly. The parameters being monitored include pH, Bio-chemical Oxygen Demand, Total Suspended Solids and Total Dissolved Solids. The analysis work will be carried out by a laboratory recognized by the State Pollution Control Board. Currently monitoring is being done at 6 nos. of locations for surface water quality for EIA study.

There is a monitoring location each for surface water quality of Rammam River at upstream and downstream of project. The ground water is also monitored to check any contamination due to the project. The parameters monitored will be as per IS: 10500- 2012.

Operation Phase The surface water quality of the Rammam River will be monitored during all the seasons in a year (winter, pre-monsoon, monsoon and post-monsoon). The proposed parameters to be monitored include pH, temperature, Electrical Conductivity (EC), turbidity, total dissolved solids, Calcium, Magnesium, Total Hardness, Chlorides, Sulphates, Nitrates, DO (Dissolved Oxygen), COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand), Iron, Zinc and Manganese. The sampling sites will be - One km upstream of the barrage site - Water spread area - One and three km downstream of the confluence of the tail race discharge

6 - 3

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C6-4 of 10

Existing Biodigester of capacity 97 KL with different stages of installation shall treat the sewage from the township during operation of the project. The analysis of sample, before and after treatment from the Biodigester shall be done periodically. The parameters to be analyzed include pH, Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Chemical Oxygen Demand, Total Suspended Solids and Total Dissolved Solids.

The ground water will also be monitored to check any contamination due to the operation of the project. The proposed parameters to be monitored will be as per IS: 10500-2012. The monitoring shall be carried out for all the seasons’ i.e. winter, summer, monsoon and post-monsoon for at least 3 locations for ground water, once in every season.

The analysis will be done throughout the life of the project. The analysis work will be conducted by a reputed laboratory recognized by the State Pollution Control Board and MOEF&CC.

6.5 NOISE MONITORING Construction Phase Noise emissions from vehicular movement, operation of various construction equipment’s, DG sets is being monitored during construction phase at major construction sites and nearby villages at six locations. The frequency of monitoring is once in every six months.

Operation Phase Ambient Noise monitoring includes monitoring during day time as well as night time. The monitoring at six locations shall be carried out as per CPCB guidelines and in consultation with SPCB through MOEF&CC/NABL recognized laboratory using standard instruments and methodology. The noise monitoring in work zone and at surrounding villages shall be done once in 6 months.

6 - 4

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C6-5 of 10

6.6 EROSION AND SILTATION Operation Phase Soil erosion rate, slope stability of embankments of barrage, efficacy of soil conservation measures, need to be closely monitored twice a year. The study can be done by an expertise agency. The study should be undertaken throughout the life of the project so as to design the soil erosion prevention measures.

In addition to above, soil quality at various locations in the catchment area needs to be monitored annually. The parameters to be monitored are pH, organic matter, N, P, K and texture, etc.

6.7 ECOLOGY Construction Phase A detailed ecological survey covering forestry, fisheries, wildlife is undertaken during the entire construction phase and being conducted currently during the EIA Study. The survey will be conducted once in every three years for the entire construction period. The various aspects covered include qualitative and quantitative assessment of flora & fauna and monitoring of restoration of muck disposal area.

Operation Phase Monitoring of aquatic ecology will be essential to achieve sustainable yield of fish. Some of the parameters to be monitored are phytoplankton, zooplanktons, benthic life and fish composition, etc. The parameters will be monitored once in three years at the surface water sampling sites. Status of greenbelt development, changes in migration patterns of the aquatic and terrestrial fauna species should also be studied once in three years.

6.8 INCIDENCE OF WATER-RELATED DISEASES Construction Phase Identification of water-related diseases, adequacy of local vector control and curative measures, status of public health are some of the parameters, are monitored with the help of data maintained in the Government dispensaries/hospitals.

6 - 5

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C6-6 of 10

Implementation: Public Health Department and Dispensary constructed as a part of Rammam Stage-III hydroelectric project. Regular health check-up of workers and employees are being carried out as per statutory norms.

Operation Phase Increased prevalence of various vector borne diseases and adequacy of local vector control and curative measures need to be monitored. The monitoring will be done once in two years. Implementation: Dispensary at the project site

6.9 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME The summary of Environmental Monitoring Programmes implemented in project construction and operation phases is given in Tables-6.1 and 6.2 respectively.

Table-6.1 Ongoing Environmental Monitoring Programme during Construction Phase S. No. Item Parameters Frequency Location 1. Ambient Air PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NO2 Every year for At four stations quality three seasons namely Salingdong, Lodhama, Jhepi and Barbatia 2. Effluent from pH, BOD, COD, TSS, Once in Before and after septic tank/ O&G, Colour, odour, quarter treatment from septic STP/Bio- conductivity tank/Bio-digestors, digestors tunnel portal, Crusher & batching plant 3. River water Physicochemical Once in Rammam River at Parameters quarter upstream and downstream of project 4. Noise Equivalent noise level Once in six At major construction (Leq) months sites, operation of DG sets and nearby villages 5. Water-related Identification of water Twice in a Labour camps and diseases related diseases, adequacy year colonies of local vector control and curative measure, etc.as per IS 10500

6 - 6

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C6-7 of 10

Table-6.2 Proposed Environmental Monitoring Programme during Operation Phase S. No. Items Parameters Frequency Location 1. Meteorology Wind speed & Direction, Continues Project site Temperature, Atmospheric pressure , Rainfall, Humidity 2. Ambient Air PM10, PM2.5,SO2 and NOx Every year  One station at project Quality for each site season  Three stations at except nearby villages monsoon 3. Surface Water Physicochemical All the  One km upstream of Parameters (pH, seasons in a the barrage/dam site Temperature, EC, year  Water spread area Turbidity, Total Dissolved  One km downstream Solids, Calcium, of the confluence of Magnesium, Total the tail race discharge Hardness, Chlorides, Sulphates, Nitrates, DO. COD, BOD, Iron, Zinc, Manganese) and Bacteriological Parameters 4. Waste water pH, BOD, COD, TSS, periodically  Before and after from TDS treatment from Biodigestor Biodigestor 5. Ground Water As per IS:1500-2012 One every  3 locations at project season site and surrounding villages 6. Noise Equivalent noise level Twice a  Work zone and at (Leq) year surrounding villages 7. Erosion & Soil erosion rates, stability Twice a - Siltation of bank embankment, etc. year 8. Soil pH, EC, texture, organic Once in a Catchment area matter three years 9. Terrestrial Status of afforestation Once in a  Green Belt area and Ecology programs of green belt three years project site location development 10. Aquatic Phytoplanktons, Once in a  One km upstream of ecology zooplanktons, benthic life, three years the barrage site fish composition  Water spread area  One and three km downstream of the 6 - 7

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C6-8 of 10

S. No. Items Parameters Frequency Location confluence of the tail race discharge 10. Water-related Identification of water- Once in a  Project Township diseases related diseases, sites, two year and surrounding area. adequacy of local vector  Villages adjacent to control measures, etc. project sites 11. Stack As per GSR 771 (E) or as Quarterly DG set monitoring specified by Consent to operate issued by State pollution control board (SPCB) 12. Socio- Living standards, Once in a Project Affected economic employment generations, three years Families (PAFs) and conditions skill development, through surrounding villages. social & Need based assessment survey

6.10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GROUP (EMG) An Environmental Management Group (EMG) consisting of competent workforce headed by AGM level has been established by the proponent to deal with various environmental aspects including follow-up with SPCB, Regional office MOEF&CC and CPCB and to interact with inter-disciplinary groups responsible for maintenance and operation of pollution control equipment and environmental protection measures. The group reports to head of the station and responsible for following functions.  Obtaining Consent Order from SPCBs;  Environmental monitoring;  Analysis of environment data, reports preparation and transmission of report to statutory authorities and Corporate Centre etc.;  Compliance with guidelines and statutory requirements;  Coordination with statutory bodies, functional groups of the station, Corporate EMG / Engineering etc.;  Interaction for evolving and implementation of modification programs to improve the availability / efficiency of pollution control devices / systems;

6 - 8

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C6-9 of 10

 Environmental Appraisal (Internal) and Environmental Audit; and

Further Environment Management Group at regional level (ER-II HQ) and corporate level (CC) monitor the environmental performance of the station and provide regular guidance in consultation with MOEF&CC and CPCB, Delhi. The Environmental Management Group at regional level reports to Executive Director (Hydro) and at corporate level reports to Director (Operation).

6.11 COST FOR IMPLEMENTING ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME The cost required for implementation of Environmental Monitoring programme during construction phase is Rs. 7.0 lakhs/year. The details are provided in Table-6.3 below

Table-6.3 Cost for Environmental Monitoring Programme during Construction phase Item Cost (Rs. lakh) Sewage from labour camps 3.00 Ambient air quality monitoring including Noise 2.25 Incidence of water related diseases 1.75 Total 7.00

The cost required for implementation of Environmental Monitoring programme during operation phase is Rs. 27.0 lakhs. The details are provided in Table-6.4 below Table-6.4 Cost for Environmental Monitoring Programme during Operation phase Item Cost (Rs. Lakh/year) Ambient air quality monitoring including Noise 3.00 Water quality and effluent from township 3.70 Ecology 7.10 Riverine fisheries 8.10 Incidence of water related diseases 2.10 Other studies 3.00 Total 27.00

6.12 ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS To assess whether the implemented EMP is adequate, the project proponent’s Environmental division will conduct the periodic environmental audits. These audits will

6 - 9

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C6-10 of 10

followed by Corrective Action and Preventive Action Plan to correct various issues identified during the audits and to stop the recurrence of the same.

6.13 Submission of Monitoring Reports to Regulatory Authorities (MOEF&CC, CPCB, WBSPCB & SSPCB) As per the statutory requirements, the compliance status of Environmental Clearance stipulations being submitted to Regional office of MOEF&CC in hard and soft copy every six months. After operation of the project, the conventional pollutants will be monitored as per schedule and reports will be submitted to SPCB, as per the requirements.

The project site was inspected by Dr. Tandra Sarkar, Scientist C & Dr. Viplav Chandra Sarkar, Technical Officer, (Forestry), IRO Kolkatta on 23.03.2021 and 24.03.2021. Certified Report No: 102-166/07/EPE dated 06.04.2021 from MoEF&CC, Integrated Regional Office, Kolkata attached as Annexure-XIII.

6 - 10

CHAPTER –VII

ADDITIONAL STUDIES

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-1 of 63

CHAPTER-7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES

7.0 ADDITIONAL STUDIES The following are the list of additional studies considered for the Rammam HEPP Stage- III (3x40 MW) in Darjeeling District of West Bengal and West Sikkim District of Sikkim.

S.No. Description Source 1. Public Consultation PH conducted in WB on 27.04.2007 and in Sikkim on 04.05.2007. 2. Catchment Area Treatment Plan Earlier EIA prepared by WAPCOS 3. Disaster Management Plan . Emergency Action Plan prepared by National Safety Council, July 2018 . NTPC Limited 4. R&R Action Plan . Indian Institute of Social Welfare & Business Management, Kolkata, . NTPC Limited

7.1 PUBLIC CONSULTATION As per MOEF&CC Notification S.O. 1247(E) dated 18.03.2021, Public Hearing is not essential for the projects, in which construction have been undertaken more than 50%. The details of Public Hearing undertaken at the time of original EC West Bengal Pollution Control Board and State Pollution Control Board, Sikkim are enclosed as Annexure – XIX and XX respectively.

In order to fulfill the EIA Notification, 2006 and its subsequent amendments, formal public hearings have been conducted by the West Bengal Pollution Control Board at Dist. - Darjeeling, West Bengal on 27.04.2007 and by State Pollution Control Board, Sikkim at West Sikkim, Sikkim on 04.05.2007. The advertisement for the public hearing in West Bengal was published on 26th March, 2007 in The Statesman, an English daily, Anandabazar Patrika, a Bengali daily and Dainik Jagaran, a local daily. The advertisement for the public hearing in Sikkim was published in one national daily

7 - 1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-2 of 63

“Hindustan Times” (all India editions), “Sikkim Express” (local English daily) and “Samay Dainik” (Regional Vernacular daily). After completion of the Public Hearings, the applicant addressed all the environmental concerns expressed during this process and respective State Pollution Control Boards have submitted the official report on the public hearing proceedings to Director (Hydro) of MoEF&CC. The Final EIA Report was submitted by the applicant to the MoEF&CC for appraisal, based on which Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change (MOEF&CC) accorded the Environmental Clearance (EC) for Rammam HEPP Stage-III (3x40 MW) vide letter No. J- 12011/42/2007-IA.I dated 17.08.2007.

Public Consultation at West Bengal The Public Hearing of M/s. NTPC Limited was organized by West Bengal Pollution Control Board (WBPCB) on 27.04.2007 at 11:30 AM at Community Hall/Recreation Hall at Lodhama Hat, West Bengal State Electricity Board Township, Dist. - Darjeeling, West Bengal.

The public hearing was presided by Mr. Gen Omdi Phipon, Additional District Magistrate, Darjeeling. About 156 people attended the Public Hearing (PH). Dr. T.K. Gupta, Senior Environmental Engineer and In charge – Consent Cell, WBPCB explained about the provisions of the MoEF notification. Mr. R. Khetarpal, General Manager explained about the project. Mr. Rajesh K Baderia, DGM (Env. Engg.) briefed the details of the project through power point presentation, the likely environmental impacts arising out of the same as well as the proposed pollution abatement/ environmental management/ socio-economic issued considered by them.

The issues raised during the public hearing conducted at Darjeeling, West Bengal given below:

Issues raised and Response given during Public Hearing at Darjeeling, West Bengal

S.No. Name of Question/comments by Remarks / Clarification by Participant & participant Company Representative Address

7 - 2

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-3 of 63

1. Mr. M.K. Singh, He raised issues regarding He explained that the design of the President Bhumi water scarcity during proposed project is such that Brangsha Bekari construction of the tunnel, the minimum water discharge would Sangha, Rimbik availability of potable be allowed in the Rammam River drinking water, greeneries, keeping the sustainable environmental health care establishment, situation. He also explained that the land slides, etc. He has proposed project activities are not categorically mentioned that likely to affect the water table. To the project proponent should check the landslides as and when take adequate measures to required, and would adopt modem minimize the landslides technologies to minimize the during construction same.The community development work would include strengthening of educational and health facilities, widening and strengthening of village road network, providing potable drinking water, improving the sanitation and drainage networks etc. 2. Mr. PremSubba, They welcomed the project He ensured that all the likely damage Mr. Birkha Rai, but mentioned that the project of roads, trees etc. during the Mr. Jitendra Rai, proponent should take the construction activities of project Mr. Prakash necessary measures to would be restored by NTPC. However, Gurung, Mr. minimize any kind of damage he also appraised that the technology Amar Subba, or loss to the local proposed to be used for the Mr. Deng environment. The project construction work would be advanced Phinzo Sherpa proponent to consider for and all the measures would be taken to of local areas involvement of the local keep the damage to local environment people for setting up of such at minimum level. He also explained project the should take the NTPC Policy regarding the necessary measures for employment opportunities to the local adequate water supply, people and highlighted that although supply of fuel other than the direct employment opportunities wood, sanitation and may not be there but there would be improvement of local road number of economic opportunities to networks. They have the local people viz. Hiring of vehicle, requested the project petty contract, employment with the proponent to consider for contract agencies, allotment of the improvement of education shops and kiosks at NTPC township, 7 - 3

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-4 of 63

and health facilities at the vending contract, STD/ISD booth etc. local area. 3. Mr. Abhijit Roy, They have mentioned that the He gave the emphasis on considering Paschim Banga project proponent should the various major issues raised by the Vigyan Mancha consider the issues like local people like local meeting would (PBVM), seepage due to blasting, be organized at all the major project Siliguri, drying of agricultural land, affected villages to appraise local Mr. Sankar Kar, alterative supply of fuel, people regarding the R&R benefits. construction and repairing of He also mentioned that NTPC Asst. Secretary, State roads, compensation normally undertake number of welfare packages during resettlement, activities in the project affected Committee, deployment of local people in villages viz. organizing the health PBVM the job, improvement of camps, providing the medical Mr. Wangel sanitation facilities, water dispensaries, organizing the cultural Sherpa, supply etc. and rural sports events etc. besides President of undertaking the community Manibhanjan development work as approved by Zonal Village Development Advisory committee of Committee (VDAC) formed under the PBVM guidance and leadership of local administration. The R&R issues will be settled in consultation with local and district administration with the involvement of VDAC. Additional District Magistrate, Darjeeling emphasized that all possible measures should be ensured by the project proponent towards the mitigation of all environmental hazards and various points raised by the public present in the hearing. In general, the public present in the hearing welcome the project incorporating with all the pollution control measures proposed by the Project Proponent.

Public Consultation at Sikkim State Pollution Control Board, Sikkim on, organized the Public Hearing of M/s. NTPC Limited on 04.05.2007 at Zero Point, Salangdang, West Sikkim, Sikkim.

The Public Hearing (PH) was presided by Shri D.G. , Addl. District Collector, West District, Govt. of Sikkim. About 131 people attended the public hearing. Dr. Gopal

7 - 4

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-5 of 63

Pradhan, Senior Scientist, SPCB, Sikkim explained about the provisions of the MoEF notification. Mr. R. Khetarpal, General Manager explained about the project. This was followed by brief note on environmental aspects by Dr. V. Prakash, Senior Manager, Environmental Engineering, NTPC Ltd., the likely environmental impacts arising out of the same as well as the proposed pollution abatement/ environmental management/ socio- economic issued considered by them.

The issues raised during the public hearing conducted at West Sikkim, Sikkim given below:

Issues raised and Response given during Public Hearing at West Sikkim, Sikkim

S.No. Name of Question/comments by Remarks / Clarification by Participant & participant Company Address Representative/Concerned person 1. Mr. D.R. Subba, Tunneling process may He replied that the technique DFO, Land Use lead to drying up of the used in the process of tunneling (West) drinking water resources. is of latest technology and we Is there any provision to will use minimum amount of protect it explosives so that water does not sink down. On top of this, there will be no tunneling towards Sikkim. 2. Mr. D.R. Subba, There are various types of He replied that there is no DFO, Land Use fishes found here and if necessity to worry as we will be (West) the dam comes up then the releasing 15% of water whether river may dry up leading we can reach our target or not to the extinction of entire aquatic life. What are the provisions made by the Developers to protect this aquatic life? 3. Mr. D.R. Subba, Though a very little He replied that we have not DFO, Land Use portion of the land will be acquired any land till date. As (West) acquired by the the process gets initiated we will

7 - 5

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-6 of 63

Developers in Sikkim, try to give the best value as per what will be the valuation the norms of the Government of of the land? Sikkim 4. Mr. D.R. Subba, What will be the future of He replied that our project site is DFO, Land Use National Park (WB) and much below the National Park (West) the wildlife sanctuary of West Bengal and wildlife (Sikkim) which are sanctuary of Sikkim. As such the situated at either side of project will not have any effect the river Rammam? on these two protected areas. 5. Mr. D.R. Subba, What are the major benefit He replied that the direct DFO, Land Use of the project to the benefits to the common people (West) common people of the as the project comes up are: area? i. All the materials required by the Developers can be supplied through local registered suppliers ii. We will invest 0.5% of the total profit of the Corporation for the Development of the project area iii. Registered contractors will get chance in the construction of the non- technical work. On top of this, we will be supplying 12% of the power to the State of Sikkim free. 6. Mr. N.R. Chettri, Is there any provision to Sorry, as our organization is a Rammam, employ the local skilled Government of India Salangdang and unskilled people of undertaking so we do not have the affected area in your such provision to employ any project? one directly. If anyone is interested to join us, they have to come through proper channel.

7 - 6

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-7 of 63

7. Mr. D.R. Subba, Is there any provision in No, we do not have provision DFO, Land Use the project to develop the for this. But we shall definitely (West) area into a Tourist spot? put up the green belt around the project area, which will surely add much better looks to the present area. 8. Mr. D.R. Subba, The valuation of our land He replied that we will not DFO, Land Use that is to be acquired by negotiate for the land directly. It (West) the Developers should be will be through the Department good of Land & Revenue, . Whatever the Government fixes we will pay the same. 9. Mr. D.R. Subba, There is a possibility of He replied that why do you DFO, Land Use increase in crime as the underestimate your police force. (West) project comes up. What We will surely cooperate in are the provisions made every aspects of the local by the Developers to have administration to overcome this a control over this? problem. 10. Mr. D.R. Subba, Is it possible to have Yes, if any one wants to have DFO, Land Use today’s proceeding in today’s proceeding in written (West) written? they can contact the office of the Member Secretary, State Pollution Control Board, Deorali 11. Dr. Pushpa Tamang, What will be the height of We will not be constructing any Jt. Director, Fishery the dam? dam as it will have great effect Department on the environment as such we will have a barrage only. 12. Dr. Pushpa Tamang, It is a well-known fact that It is true. As such, we will be Jt. Director, Fishery this type of project will releasing minimum required Department have maximum affect on water (1 cumec) to maintain the the aquatic life. What are aquatic eco system of Rammam the provisions made by River. the developers to minimize this affect?

7 - 7

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-8 of 63

13. Dr. Pushpa Tamang, Will the diversion of We will not generate the power Jt. Director, Fishery water towards the tunnel for 24 hrs. We will release Department not affect the life of fish sufficient amount of water to present there? sustain the aquatic life there in the river. As such it will not have adverse effect on migration of the fishes. 14. Dr. Pushpa Tamang, Why the project The survey was carried out by Jt. Director, Fishery developers failed to WAPCOS if necessary we do Department consult the Fishery not have any problem to hand Institutes for the survey of over the task of survey to any fishes of Rammam River? one of the Indian Fishery Institute if it is necessary to do so. 15. Dr. Pushpa Tamang, There has been no For this we will discuss with the Jt. Director, Fishery provision made in the Government and bring out the Department report of the project for necessary solution. the compensation for the people whose life depends on fishing 16. Mr. B.L. Chettri, What will be the impact of As I have already told you that Rammam project on drinking water there will be no negative impact supply on the supply of drinking water, instead the supply will increase as we have enough fund for the afforestation and plantation of trees. I request you all to guide us at the time of implementing this programme. 17. Mr. B.L. Chettri, How will the developers There is enough provision for Rammam help the Government to the plantation and its achieve the goal in maintenance. For the making Sikkim Clean and development of green belt at the Green? muck disposal sites, compensatory afforestation and the catchment area treatment plan, we have sufficient fund for 7 - 8

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-9 of 63

these programmes. 18. Mr. R.N. Sapkota, How will the developers Once the project comes up there Teacher, Salangdang help to improve the socio- will be various opportunities for economy of the common the common mass to improve masss? their life style as there will be big demand for the daily requirement of food, dairy products, vegetables and other construction materials. 19. Mr. R.N. Sapkota, Is there any provision for Mr. Sapkota, thanks for your Teacher, Salangdang the scholarship to the local concern to the society. We have students, community such provisions in the project. library etc.? We well work as per the genuineness of the local NGOs or the Project Welfare Committee 20. Mr. R.N. Sapkota, Our environment is very We have kept enough funds to Teacher, Salangdang clean, as such I request maintain the environment. On you to maintain the same top of this, we will have an as the project comes up Environmental Laboratory and an Environmental Management Cell. 21. Mr. M.C. Gautam What will be the length of I am sorry to say that we cannot ACF/Soreng the project? predict the length of the project but would like to inform you that in India the project does not die out so soon. 22. Mr. M.C. Gautam What will be the status of Rehabilitation Programme of ACF/Soreng rehabilitation programme? NTPC Ltd. is one of the best in India and we started this programme much before the Government of India did. 23. Mr. Bharat Chettri, Rammam River is the We shall discuss the matter with Salangdang only source for the the area MLA and the irrigation and we are Government and do the needful.

7 - 9

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-10 of 63

afraid that if the project comes up we will have much problem for the same. As such we would like to request you to kindly release little more water 24. Mr. Bharat Chettri, Is there any provision for Yes, we have the provision in Salangdang the compensation of the Resettlement and Rehabilitation damage that the developer Action Plan. causes? 25. Mr. Bharat Chettri, Is there any provision for No, sorry we do not have such Salangdang the boating facility in the provision, as we are not dam area as one of the constructing a big reservoir. It tourist points? will be a simple barrage where the depth of the water will be very small. 26. Mr. Bharat Chettri, Will the developer provide Yes, we will help you in every Salangdang us the facility in the field possible was as it is clearly of Education, Health and stated in Resettlement and other social activities? Rehabilitation Action Plan 27. Mr. Bharat Chettri, What is the process for the We will deal as per the Salangdang compensation of the land? guidelines of the State Government 28. Mr. Rajiv Roka Drying up of the We will discuss the matter with BDO/Daramdin Rammam River may lead the Government and the area to economic problem as MLA for the same. Thanks for the river is the only source the information. for the irrigation. So can the developer release some more water? 29. Mr. Rajiv Roka As the project are coming Sorry sir, we do not employ any BDO/Daramdin up in our area, I would one directly. Anyone interested like to request you for the should come up through proper long-term employment channel. But we will be opportunity for the local providing enough opportunity educated youths through contract, allotment of 7 - 10

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-11 of 63

shops/ PCOs, Vehicle hiring etc. 30. Mr. Robin Rai, NGO As per the local protection Sorry Mr. Rai, it is not possible Member/Salangdang act we too should be given but we will be providing you the employment opportunities opportunities in various fields indirectly 31. Mr. Suk Bir Subba, The time that we got is We had published the public Salangdang very little to discuss all the notice in one daily National subjects I request you to newspaper (Hindustan Times), hold the public hearing Nepali local paper (Samay again Dainik) and one English daily local paper (Sikkim Express). On top of this, we had put up a number of banners at different places of project-affected areas for your information. We regret to know that this could not attract your attention.

The whole proceeding came to the conclusion with wrap up speech by Shri S.Z. Lucksom, Member Secretary, SPCB. He concluded his speech by declaring that, as per today’s proceedings all the people present wanted project to come up with a reservation that maximum water is to be released and every effort to be made to protect the environment of the area.

7.2 CATCHMENT AREA TREATMENT PLAN A Catchment area Treatment Plan for the catchment area intercepted at the diversion structure of the barrage site has been prepared as a part of the Comprehensive EIA study. Catchment characteristics in terms of physiography, geomorphology, climate, land use, soil, denudation processes and conservational activities gained much importance to find out stress areas yielding higher sediments on micro-watershed basis. This entire process is called as Prioritization of Micro-watersheds into very high, high, medium, low, etc. sediment yielding categories for presenting a watershed development plan. For this purpose, Sediment Yield Index Model developed by Soil and Land Use, Survey of India,

7 - 11

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-12 of 63

Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India was utilized in the preparation of CAT plan for the Rammam HEPP, Stage-III.

The CAT plan is being implemented through State Forest Department as a deposit work of respective states of West Bengal & Sikkim. NTPC has deposited Rs. 7.23 Crores in favor of Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, West Bengal as part of proposal for implementation of CAT Plan for Rammam Stage-III project. NTPC has deposited Rs. 1.459 Crores in favor of PCCF cum Principal Secretary, Govt. of Sikkim as part of proposal for implementation of CAT Plan for Rammam Stage-III project. Fund utilization for Sikkim portion during 2009 & 2010 furnished by DFO, LU & E (West), Forest, Envi. & WL Management Department, Govt. of Sikkim has already been forwarded to MoEF&CC, Shillong vide NHL/RammamIII/11-12/01 dated 9th May 2011. Fund utilization report for WB part is still awaited.

7.2.1 Need for Catchment Area Treatment It is a well-established fact that reservoirs formed by dams on rivers are subjected to sedimentation. The process of sedimentation embodies the sequential processes of erosion, entrainment, transportation, deposition and compaction of sediment. The study of erosion and sediment yield from catchments is of utmost importance as the deposition of sediment in reservoir reduces its capacity, and thus affecting the water availability for the designated use. The eroded sediment from catchment when deposited on streambeds and banks causes braiding of river reach. The removal of top fertile soil from catchment adversely affects the agricultural production. Thus, a well-designed Catchment Area Treatment (CAT) Plan is essential to ameliorate the above-mentioned adverse process of soil erosion.

Soil erosion may be defined as the detachment and transportation of soil. Water is the major agent responsible for this erosion. In many locations, winds, glaciers, etc. also cause soil erosion. In a hilly catchment area, as in the present case, erosion due to water is a common phenomenon and the same has been studied as a part of the CAT Plan.

7 - 12

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-13 of 63

The CAT plan highlights the management techniques to control erosion in the catchment area of a water resource project. The life span of a reservoir is greatly reduced due to erosion in the catchment area. Adequate preventive measures are thus needed for the treatment of catchment for its stabilization against future erosion. The directly draining catchment area of 5273 ha, has been considered in the present study. The sub-watershed in the catchment area considered for the present study is given in Fig-7.1.

Fig 7.1 Directly Draining Catchment Area

7 - 13

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-14 of 63

The catchment area treatment involves . Understanding of the erosion characteristics of the terrain and . Suggesting remedial measures to reduce the erosion rate

In the present study `Silt Yield Index’ (SYI), method has been used. In this method, the terrain is subdivided into various watersheds and the erodibility is determined on relative basis. SYI provides a comparative erodibility criteria of catchment (low, moderate, high, etc.) and do not provide the absolute silt yield. SYI method is widely used mainly because of the fact that it is easy to use and has lesser data requirement. Moreover, it can be applied to larger areas like sub-watersheds, etc.

7.2.2 Objectives of Catchment Area Treatment Plan The broad objectives for preparation of Catchment Area Treatment Plan are outlined as under: i. Checking soil erosion and land degradation by taking up adequate and effective soil conservation measures, both engineering as well as biological, in erosion prone areas. ii. Rehabilitation of degraded forest areas through afforestation and facilitating natural regeneration. iii. Rehabilitation of degraded slopes and landslide prone area.

7.2.3 Approach for the Study A detailed database on natural resources, terrain conditions, soil type of the catchment area, socio-economic status, etc. is a pre-requisite to prepare treatment plan keeping in view the concept of sustainable development. Various thematic maps have been used in preparation of the CAT plan. Due to the spatial variability of site parameters such as soils, topography, land use and rainfall, not all areas contribute equally to the erosion problem. Several techniques like manual overlay of spatially index-mapped data have been used to estimate soil erosion in complex landscapes.

7 - 14

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-15 of 63

Geographic Information System (GIS) is a computerized resource data base system, which is referenced to some geographic coordinate system. In the present study, real coordinate system has been used. The GIS is a tool to store, analyze and display various spatial data. In addition, GIS, because of its special hardware and software characteristics, has a capacity to perform numerous functions and operations on the various spatial data layers residing in the database. GIS provides the capability to analyze large amounts of data in relation to a set of established criteria. In order to ensure that latest and accurate data is used for the analysis, satellite data has been used for deriving land use data. Ground truth studies, too, have been conducted.

The various steps, covered in the study, are as follows: . Data acquisition . Data preparation . Output presentation The above mentioned steps are briefly described in the following paragraphs:

7.2.3.1 Data Acquisition The requirement of the study was first defined and the outputs expected were noted. The various data layers of the catchment area used for the study are as follows: . Slope map . Soil map . Land use classification map . Current Management Practices . Catchment Area map

7.2.3.2 Data Preparation The data available from various sources was collected. The ground maps, contour information, etc. were scanned, digitized and registered as per the requirement. Data was prepared depending on the level of accuracy required and any corrections required were made. All the layers were geo-referenced and brought to a common scale (real co-

7 - 15

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-16 of 63 ordinates), so that overlay could be performed. A computer program was used to estimate the soil loss. The formats of outputs from each layer were firmed up to match the formats of inputs in the program. The grid size to be used was also decided to match the level of accuracy required, the data availability and the software and time limitations. The format of output was finalized. Ground truthing and data collection was also included in the procedure.

For the present study, IRS 1C-LISS III digital satellite data was used for interpretation & classification. The classified land use map of the catchment area, considered for the study, is shown as Fig 7.2.

7 - 16

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-17 of 63

Fig-7.2 Land use classification of the catchment area

Digitized contours from topo-sheets were used for preparation of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of the catchment area and to prepare a slope map. The first step in generation of slope map is to create surface using the elevation values stored in the form of contours or points. After marking the catchment area, all the contours on the topo-sheet were digitized (100 m interval). The output of the digitization procedure was the contours as

7 - 17

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-18 of 63

well as points contours in form of x, y & z points. (x, y - location and z - their elevation). All this information was in real world co-ordinates (latitude, longitude and height in meters above sea level).

A DTM of the area was then prepared, which was used to derive a slope map. The slope was divided in classes of slope percentages. The slope map is enclosed as Figure 7.3. Various layers, thus prepared, were used for modeling. Software was prepared to calculate the soil loss using input from all the layers.

7.2.3.3 Output Presentation The result of the modeling was interpreted in pictorial form to identify the areas with high soil erosion rates. The primary and secondary data collected as a part of the field studies were used as an input for the model. The land use pattern of the directly draining catchment is summarized in Table 7.1.

Table-7.1 Land use pattern of the catchment area S.No. Category Area (ha) Percentage 1. Dense vegetation 1911.46 36.25 2. Open vegetation 2419.25 45.88 3. Agriculture 515.17 9.77 4. Barren land 311.11 5.90 5. Water bodies 49.57 0.94 6. Settlement 66.44 1.27 Total 5273 100.0

7 - 18

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-19 of 63

Fig 7.3 Slope map of directly draining catchment area

7 - 19

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-20 of 63

7.2.4 Estimation of soil loss using Silt Yield Index (SYI) method The Silt Yield Index Model (SYI), considering sedimentation as product of erosivity, erodibility and aerial extent was conceptualized in the All India Soil and Land Use Survey (AISLUS) as early as 1969 and has been in operational use since then to meet the requirements of prioritization of smaller hydrologic units.

The erosivity determinants are the climatic factors and soil and land attributes that have direct or reciprocal bearing on the unit of the detached soil material. The relationship can be expressed as: Soil erosivity = f (Climate, physiography, slope, soil parameters, land use/land cover, soil management)

Silt Yield Index The Silt Yield Index (SYI) is defined as the Yield per unit area and SYI value for hydrologic unit is obtained by taking the weighted arithmetic mean over the entire area of the hydrologic unit by using suitable empirical equation.

Prioritization of Watersheds/Sub-watersheds The prioritization of smaller hydrologic units within the vast catchments is based on the Silt Yield Indices (SYI) of the smaller units. The boundary values or range of SYI values for different priority categories are arrived at by studying the frequency distribution of SYI values and locating the suitable breaking points. The watersheds/ sub-watersheds are subsequently rated into various categories corresponding to their respective SYI values.

The application of SYI model for prioritization of sub-watersheds in the catchment areas involves the evaluation of: a) Climatic factors comprising total precipitation, its frequency and intensity, b) Geo-morphic factors comprising land forms, physiography, slope and drainage characteristics, c) Surface cover factors governing the flow hydraulics and d) Management factors

7 - 20

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-21 of 63

The data on climatic factors can be obtained for different locations in the catchment area from the meteorological stations whereas the field investigations are required for estimating the other attributes. The various steps involved in the application of model are: . Preparation of a framework of sub-watersheds through systematic delineation . Rapid reconnaissance surveys on 1:50,000 scale leading to the generation of a map indicating erosion-intensity mapping units. . Assignment of weightage values to various mapping units based on relative silt- yield potential. . Computing Silt Yield Index for individual watersheds/sub-watersheds. . Grading of watersheds/sub-watersheds into very high, high, medium, low and very low priority categories. The area of each of the mapping units is computed and silt yield indices of individual sub-watersheds are calculated using the following equations: a. Silt Yield Index

SYI =  (Ai x Wi ) x 100 ; where i = 1 to n Aw where, Ai = Area of ith unit (EIMU) Wi = Weightage value of ith mapping unit n = No. of mapping units Aw = Total area of sub-watershed.

The SYI values for classification of various categories of erosion intensity rates are given in Table-7.2. Table-7.2 Criteria for erosion intensity rate Priority categories SYI Values Very high > 1300 High 1200-1299 Medium 1100-1199 Low 1000-1099 Very Low <1000

7 - 21

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-22 of 63

7.2.5 Watershed Management – Available Techniques Watershed management is the optimal use of soil and water resources within a given geographical area so as to enable sustainable production. It implies changes in land use, vegetative cover, and other structural and non-structural action that are taken in a watershed to achieve specific watershed management objectives. The overall objectives of watershed management programme are to: - Increase infiltration into soil; - Control excessive runoff; - Manage & utilize runoff for useful purpose. Following Engineering and Biological measures have been suggested for the catchment area treatment:

1. Engineering measures - Step drain - Angle iron barbed wire fencing - Stone masonry - Check dams 2. Biological measures - Development of nurseries - Plantation/afforestation - Pasture development - Social forestry The basis of site selection for different biological and engineering treatment measures under CAT are given in Table-7.3. Table-7.3 Basis for selection of catchment area treatment measures Treatment measure Basis for selection Social forestry, fuel wood and Near settlements to control tree felling fodder grass development Contour Bunding Control of soil erosion from agricultural fields. Pasture Development Open canopy, barren land, degraded surface 7 - 22

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-23 of 63

Treatment measure Basis for selection Afforestation Open canopy, degraded surface, high soil erosion, gentle to moderate slope Barbed wire fencing In the vicinity of afforestation work to protect it from grazing etc. Step drain To check soil erosion in small streams, steps with concrete base are prepared in sloppy area where silt erosion in the stream and bank erosion is high due to turbidity of current. Nursery Centrally located points for better supervision of proposed afforestation, minimize cost of transportation of seedling and ensure better survival.

7.2.6 Catchment Area Treatment Measures The catchment area considered for CAT Plan is 5273 ha. The erosion category of various watershed in the catchment area as per a SYI index are given in Tables-7.4 and 7.5 respectively and details are shown in Figure 7.4. Table-7.4 Erosion intensity categorization as per SYI classification Watershed number Area (ha) SYI values Category W1 638 1143 Medium W2 715 1151 Medium W3 926 1230 High W4 834 1256 High W5 695 1159 Medium W6 1009 1249 High W7 456 1276 High Total 5273

Table-7.5 Area under various erosion categories Sl. No. Category Area (ha) Percentage 1. Very Low - - 2. Low - - 3. Medium 2048 38.84 4. High 3225 61.16 5. Very High - Total 5273 100 7 - 23

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-24 of 63

Fig 7.4 Prioritization of directly draining catchment area

7 - 24

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-25 of 63

The objective of the SYI method is to prioritize sub-watershed in a catchment area for treatment. The area under very high and high erosion categories is to be treated at the project proponent cost. In the directly draining catchment of the project, there is no area under very high erosion category. Hence, CAT plan has been suggested for high erosion category, as a part of the present EIA study, the expenses of which have to be borne by project proponents. The area under high erosion category is 3225 ha, which is about 61.16% of the catchment area considered for treatment.

7.2.7 COST ESTIMATE The cost required for Catchment Area Treatment is Rs.32.08 million. The details of area to be treated given in Figure 7.5 and costing provided in Tables 7.6 and 7.7. The year wise physical and financial targets are given in Table-7.8.

Table-7.6 Cost for Catchment Area Treatment - Biological Measures S.No. Item Rate Target (Rs.) Physical Financial (Rs. million) 1. Afforestation 61,000 41.5 ha 2.53 1600 trees/ha 2. Plantation (800 trees/ha) 31,000/ha 286 ha 8.87 3. Pasture Development 15,000/ha 70 ha 1.05 4. Social forestry 30,000/ha 50 ha 1.50 5. Fuel wood and fodder 20,000/ha 50 ha 1.00 grass 6. Nursery development 300,000/no. 4 1.20 7. Maintenance of nursery 1,00,000/no 4 0.40 8. Barbed wire fencing 100,000/km 5 km 0.50 9. Watch and ward for 3 5000/man-month 240 1.20 years for 8 persons man months Total 18.20

7 - 25

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-26 of 63

Fig 7.5 Catchment area treatment measures

7 - 26

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-27 of 63

Table-7.7 Cost for Catchment Area Treatment - Engineering Measures Sl. Item Rate (Rs.) Unit Qty Target No. (No.) Physical Financial (Rs. million) 1. Step drain 2500 RMT 25 RMT 10 250 RMT 0.63 2. Check dams 200,000 - 22 22 4.40 3. Contour 25,000/ha ha 177 177 4.43 bunding Total 9.46

Total cost for Catchment Area Treatment Rs. (Million) Total cost for Biological and Engineering 27.66 (A) measures Administrative expenditure Government Expenditure 3% of A 0.83 (including O&M) Establishment cost 8% of A 2.21 Contingency 5% of A 1.38 Total 32.08

Table-7.8 Year wise target (physical and financial) for Catchment Area Treatment Plan Treatment Year-I Year-II Year-III Total measure Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Afforestation (80 41.5 ha 2.53 - - - - 41.5 2.53 trees/ha) Gap plantation 100 ha 3.10 100 ha 3.10 86 ha 2.67 286 ha 8.87 (800 trees/ha) Pasture 70 ha 1.05 - - - - 70 ha 1.05 Development Social Forestry 30 ha 0.90 20 ha 0.60 - - 50 ha 1.50 Fuel wood and 30 ha 0.60 20 ha 0.40 - - 50 ha 1.00 fodder grass Nursery 4 No. 1.20 - - - - 4 No. 1.20 development Maintenance of - - - 0.20 - 0.20 - 0.40 Nursery Barbed wire 3 km 0.30 2 km 0.20 - - 5 km 0.50 fencing Watch and ward 80 man 0.40 80 man 0.40 80 man 0.40 120 man 1.20

7 - 27

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-28 of 63

Treatment Year-I Year-II Year-III Total measure Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. months months months months Step Drain 150 m 0.38 100 m 0.25 - - 250 m 0.63 Check dam 12 No. 2.40 10 No. 2.00 - - 22 No. 4.40 Contour bunding 100 ha 2.50 77 ha 1.93 - 177 ha 4.43 Total 15.36 9.03 3.27 27.66 Note: Financial targets are in Rs. million

Till date, NTPC has deposited Rs. 7.23 Crores in favor of Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, West Bengal and Rs. 1.459 Crores in favor of PCCF cum Principal Secretary, Govt. of Sikkim as part of proposal for implementation of CAT Plan for Rammam Stage- III project.

7.3 DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN This plan has been prepared as an emergency preparedness measure to protect the life of the employees and others present on-site, that of the public in the vicinity of the project, company property and environment. The plan defines roles & responsibilities of persons at different levels in the event of emergency in the sites of the company.

7.3.1 Purpose of the Plan i. Basic purpose of this plan is to develop, implement and maintain an integrated emergency management system for protection of people, property and the environment in the event of on-site emergency as well as off-site emergency caused. ii. Ultimate goal is to reduce vulnerability of the project area due to emergency situation to save lives and protect property by developing capabilities that mitigate effects of, prepare for, respond to and recover from emergency situation that could affect the project area.

7.3.2 Scope of the Plan This Disaster Management Plan/Emergency Action Plan covers technological emergencies arising out of construction accidents and covers the following:

7 - 28

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-29 of 63

i. Geographical Coverage: The scope of the Plan is targeted to existing construction project activities at the sites/facilities at following locations a. Barrage across River Rammam (tributary of River Rangit), Intake structure, De- silting basin b. Head-Race Tunnel (HRT) with Surge shaft and the adit c. Pressure shaft/Penstock d. Power House e. Surface Switchyard covering location f. Tail-Race Tunnel (TRT) with outlet structure g. Access tunnels and approach adits

The general layout of the project showing location of above activities is shown in Fig 7.6 and Barrage Complex and Power House complex layout shown in Fig 7.7 & 7.8 respectively.

ii. Emergency Scenarios: Emergency scenarios arising out of existing project status and that anticipated in the immediate future expressed by the company management personnel and those of the concerned agencies and the project risks as envisaged with mutual thinking of the company and agency managements.

7.3.3 Hazardous Chemicals On-site & their Normal Inventories The plant handles some hazardous chemicals as daily requirements and bulk storages. Their normal inventory at different sites is given in Table 7.9

Table-7.9 Hazardous Chemicals and their normal inventory at different sites S.No. Location Chemical Normal Inventory 1 Magazine house 1 near Nitrate mixture Class 2, division 0 2450 kg Barrage Site 2 Magazine house 2 near Nitrate mixture Class 2, division 0 2500 kg Barrage Site 3 Magazine house near TRC Nitrate mixture Class 2, division 0 1100 kg 4 Store at fabrication yard at Light Diesel Oil 1200 L Barrage site

7 - 29

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-30 of 63

Fig 7.6 Layout of Project Site

7 - 30

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-31 of 63

Fig 7.7 Barrage Complex – Layout Plan

Fig 7.8 Power House – Layout Plan

7 - 31

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-32 of 63

7.3.4 Emergencies Scenarios The emergency scenarios are classified into 3 categories: A. Natural calamities i. Flood ii. Landslide iii. Earthquake B. Man-made disaster i. Fire ii. Explosion iii. Fire and Explosion C. Security related disasters i. Terrorist / Bomb threat attack ii. Sabotage

Flood Flood can occur due to . Heavy rain fall . Cloud burst to the upstream of the barrage area . More and sudden water released from TRC of the stage-II power project . Heavy debris falling into the river channel and form a water reservoir and due to heavy rain the reservoir can break & emergency can occur along the river

Landslide Compounded by the heavy rainfall and Geo-morphologic habits the landslides of major and minor scale keep occurring every year during monsoon. Following areas are susceptible to landslides a) Water conductor systems b) Surface Power House site

CIMFR (Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research) has been engaged by both the Major Civil Contractors for design of blast pattern and monitoring of tunneling works. Geological Survey of India (GSI), is also associated with NTPC, Rammam, vide MoU

7 - 32

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-33 of 63 dated 8th Feb’ 2015, for supervision and advice on tunneling/ road construction and/or any other vulnerable area of construction.

Earthquake Darjeeling District, comprising of vast mountain terrain is vulnerable to landslide and earthquake being situated at the fault line of Eurasian and Gondwana plates. The project falls in Zone IV (Severe intensity zone) of Earthquake vulnerability map. Seismologists have predicted the earthquake of major magnitude may occur at any moment and therefore all precautions are required to be taken prior to earthquake.

Seismic study has been conducted by IIT Roorkee. The suggested Earth Quake (EQ) design parameters have been cleared from National Committee of Seismic Design Parameters (NCSDP) of CWC and are being adopted for design of the project components.

Apart from some of the counter measures to be taken in foreseeable cases, emergency recovery plans shall be considered by the emergency management team as per the situation and site conditions a) Structural failure b) Collapse of structures inside the tunnels/adits c) General alignment

Fire and Explosion Following are areas where fire or explosion may take place due to improper maintenance or mishandling a) Switchyard area b) Transformer and switchgear room area c) Storages of explosives

7 - 33

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-34 of 63

Terrorist / Bomb threat attack Terrorism is the deadliest from of emergency/disaster in terms of loss of life and damage to property. Project sites could not be ruled out of the possibility of terrorism as these sites are vital nation assets. The terrorist-related aspects could be dealt with by making use of advancement of the technology in the areas of surveillance and proper intelligence network. Following are the vulnerable areas where the terrorists can strike a) Explosives Storages b) Barrage c) Power House d) Tunnels e) Offices

7.3.5 Factors to control Emergency i. Reporting of Incident ii. Key Persons iii. Emergency Management Teams iv. Responsibilities v. Emergency Communication Organization vi. Emergency Control Center (ECC) vii. Declaration of Emergency viii. Termination of Emergency ix. Siren System x. Communication System xi. Role of Employees after declaration of Emergency xii. Resources on-site xiii. Assembly Points

7 - 34

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-35 of 63

Reporting of Incident Any person (employee of NTPC or contracting agency or Security) who sees the incident shall inform/report to the ECC through the nearest office (NTPC, contracting agency/any security point) through telephone/mobile or by shouting.

Key Persons Following positions & names of key persons are included 1. Chief Incident Controller (CIC) 2. Works Incident Controller (WIC) 3. Site Incident Controller (SIC) Project Manager of the site contracting agency assumes the role of IC in case of any emergency. For silent hours (night time or on holidays) the senior security person will handle the emergency with the help of other security personnel till arrival of the seniors.

Emergency Management Teams and Responsibilities The list of emergency management teams-manning and responsibilities of various emergency teams viz. Chief Incident Controller (CIC), Works Incident Controller (WIC), Site Incident Controller (SIC), Resource Manager, Fire Team etc. enclosed as Annexure - XXI

7 - 35

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-36 of 63

Emergency Communication Organization

Fig 7.9 Emergency Communication Organization

Emergency Control Center (ECC) The Emergency Control Center is the focal point in case of an emergency from where the operations to handle the emergency are directed / co-ordinated by the Works Incident Controller (WIC) under the guidance of Chief Incident Controller (CIC). The entire project site is divided into 2 major sites 7 - 36

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-37 of 63

i. Barrage and HRT ii. Power House and its parts Hence, from the viewpoint of convenience and to effectively handle the emergency each of the two major sites should function from either of 2 separate ECCs – Main and alternate

Locations Barrage and HRT Main ECC: NTPC, Sajbote Alternate ECC: NTPC Porta cabin at Adit 1 Power House and Part HRT Main ECC: NTPC, Sajbote Alternate ECC: NTPC Porta cabin near SEW Work Shop

Contents of the ECC Main ECC is a place normally manned 24x7 basis e.g. Security Office. A board displaying “Emergency Control Center” / “Emergency Control Center - Alternate” . Display of Telephone/Mobile numbers of key persons working on-site . Display of Telephone/Mobile numbers of selected key government officials . A copy of Emergency Action Plan . Land-line telephone instrument for receiving calls only . A booklet of blank ‘Incident Information Summary’ sheets . Site Map showing: o Storage area of hazardous materials o Storage of safety equipment’s o Firefighting system and additional source of water o Site entrance, roadway and emergency exits o Assembly points o Truck parking area o Surrounding location

7 - 37

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-38 of 63

. Area map showing sensitive areas such as hospitals & nursing homes, laboratories, offices of key government officials, schools . Black / white board . Intercom . Mobile Phone / walky-talky . Selected PPE storage . Meeting Room with chairs only . TV and Radio sets . Record Book . Desktop computer containing required data and printer . Note Book, Pad and Pencil/pen

Manning At least one person should man ECC round the clock during peace time who can receive and record information. During an emergency, it should be manned by the emergency management staff, including the highest-ranking personnel in-charge of the whole operation.

Declaration and Termination of Emergency The WIC is authorized to declare and terminate the emergency. The sequence is given below: . After receiving information about an incident, SIC would rush to incident site immediately . SIC, if found beyond his control, informs the ECC attendant, who in turn informs all concerned key persons . CIC & WIC would then rush to ECC . CIC then contacts other key persons on-site, establishes communication set up with WIC & SIC to know more about the situation . After communication with WIC/SIC if it is beyond the control, CIC would give clearance to Security to declare Emergency

7 - 38

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-39 of 63

. The CIC contacts WIC & WIC then contacts SIC to know more about the incident . The Engineering Services Team approaches the incident site to attend emergency . Other plant In-charges occupy their offices to receive instructions from CIC . Other teams carry out their respective functions . CIC is in continuous interaction with the WIC & SIC and other senior persons in each site . SIC in consultation with the other team leaders updates CIC & WIC . After handling emergency situation successfully i.e. after cessation of emergency, WIC would declare termination of emergency in consultation with the CIC

Siren System . Declaration of emergency: Wailing sound for 30 seconds, break for 30 seconds repeated 3 times . Termination of Emergency: All Clear Signal will be a continuous siren for 2 minutes repeated twice. . Apart from sounding siren, emergency message shall be communicated to all the workers over Public Address system in and around the emergency site in Hindi, English & Local language.

Communication Systems Landline telephones All key personnel are provided with land-line telephones at office as well as at their residences. Landline telephones are also provided at selected locations in the project areas . Wireless communication . CUG Mobile Phones – Close User Group (CUG) mobile phones are also provided to all key personnel and site personnel . Walky-Talky – Legalized Walky-Talky connections are provided to key personnel at sites

7 - 39

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-40 of 63

Role of Contracting Agencies & Employees after declaration of Emergency Role of Contracting Agencies after declaration of Emergency The contracting agencies have their own on-site Emergency Management Plan. The Contracting agencies implement their plan after declaration of emergency. General guidelines they should follow as given below: On getting the information of declaration of emergency on the site, the Project Managers of Associates shall immediately report at site and shall act as per their emergency plan . Ensure that the immediate response is provided to protect health and safety of persons in the immediate area . Appoint responsible persons to account for their agency’s personnel and report to the Work Incident Controller of the site . Appoint emergency rescue team to locate the missing persons . Ensure that their personnel are housed in a secure place, till further instructions from WIC . Provide to their trained personnel and equipment for respective emergency actions . Any other responsibility as assigned by CIC/WIC/SIC

Role of Employees after declaration of Emergency After hearing the emergency siren / message, all the employees including workers of associates shall stay on their worksites. Those employees who are required to help in handling the emergency either for responding to emergency directly or support the emergency actions as per this emergency action plan or that of the agency should act accordingly.

Those employees who are not required to handle the emergency either directly or as support, should wait for instructions from their superiors to gather at designated Assembly Points.

7 - 40

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-41 of 63

Resources on-site (Own and those of Contracting Agencies) i. Fire Equipment The following fire equipment are available with NTPC at Rammam site: — Fire Tender: 1 no — Water mist and CAF high pressure backpack fire extinguishers: 2 nos. ii. Portable Fire Extinguishers The location wise list of portable fire extinguishers given in Table 7.10 Table 7.10 Location-wise list of Portable Fire Extinguishers

S.No. Location DCP Type (ABC CO2 Type Fire Type 6 kg) (4.5 kg) bucket A Power House Site 1 SEW Store 2 2 2 2 Fabrication Yard 1 3 DG Panel (Camp) 1 4 TRC DG Panel 2 1 1 5 Workshop 1 1 6 Batching Plant 1 7 Crusher Plant 1 8 Main Store 1 1 4 9 Magazine House 2 2 10 NTPC Porta Cabin 2 2 B Adit III portal 2 C Adit III DG set 1 D Surge Shaft 1 E Barrage Site 1 DG set 2 2 Batching Plant 1 3 Fabrication Yard 2 4 Magazine House 1 2 1 2 5 Magazine House 2 2 1 2 6 NTPC Porta Cabin 1 F Adit 1 Site 1 Store 1 1 2 Transformer Yard 2 3 Workshop 1 4 Tunnel DC 1 1 1 5 Tunnel DC 2 1 1 6 Tunnel GOC 1

7 - 41

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-42 of 63

7 NTPC Porta cabin 1 1 G Adit 2 Site 2 H NTPC Administrative Office 12 2

iii. The No. of Trained Emergency responders, emergency equipment, vehicles transporting people and ambulance facilities enclosed as Annexure-XXI

Assembly Points A. At Barrage Site Assembly Point No. 1 – Adjacent to NTPC Porta Cabin B. At HRT/Adit 1 Site Assembly Point No. 2 – Opposite to FQA Lab C. Adit-2 Site Assembly Point No. 3 – Adjacent to Adit-2 entrance D. At Surge Shaft Site Assembly Point No. 4 – At the entrance of surge shaft E. At Pressure Shaft Site Assembly Point No. 5 – at entrance to pressure shaft site F. At Power House Site Assembly Point No. 6 – Adjacent to Power House near TRC G. Adit-3 Site Assembly Point No. 7 – Adjacent to Adit-3 entrance

7 - 42

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-43 of 63

7.3.6 Emergency Organization

Fig 7.10 Emergency Organization Chart

7.3.7 Response Functions i. Emergency in Tunnels ii. Fire-fighting iii. Rescue iv. First-aid & Medical Response v. Security & Traffic Control vi. Communication vii. Evacuation

Emergencies in the tunnels can arise from a) Fire inside the Tunnel (Ignition of inflammable gases & explosives) b) Tunnel Collapse or Failure of Works resulting in persons been trapped c) Sudden release of toxic and inflammable gases d) Sudden flooding (Inrush from above/from underground water source)

7 - 43

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-44 of 63

Fire at other construction sites Fire would be extinguished with the help of own resources of trained firemen, available portable fire extinguishers, Fire equipment. However, if it is beyond own capabilities, help from nearby city fire brigade/mutual aid partners would be taken.

Treatment and Evacuation of injured person 1. A minor injury is one that causes no immediate danger to the life of the person who has suffered the injury; the injury party is conscious and is capable of walking unaided or with the support of a fellow worker. In general, cuts, bruises and minor burns are classified as minor injuries. Injured shall be escorted to First Aid Room, treatment be given worker should rest and returns to work when feeling better. 2. After treatment at the First Aid Room, if the First Aider thinks more treatment is required e.g. stitches to a deep cut or a check-up after any head injury, or worker complains of feeling ill or dizzy, then the First Aider arranges transport for the injured party to be taken to the Company Doctor.

7.4 R&R ACTION PLAN The most important deleterious impact during construction phase is, pertaining to land acquisition. Socio-economic survey for the Project Affected Families (PAFs) was conducted. Numbers of families lost their land were compensated as per NTPC R&R Policy. One time settlement for R&R package to affected PAPs has been agreed during VDAC meeting as per R&R policy. Total of Rs. 3.58 Crores disbursed as per R&R policy till 31.03.2021.

VDAC (Village Development Advisory committee) for monitoring R&R activities have been constituted by DM of concerned districts which include representatives of Project Affected Persons.

7 - 44 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-45 of 63

7.4.1 Details of Land acquired For Rammam Stage-III HEP, a total of approximately 178.286 acres of land has been acquired from Karmi, Kankebong and Rimbik Mouza under Bijanbari Block of Darjeeling District and Siktam, Salandong and Zhum Mouza under West Sikkim District. The analysis of state/district wise land acquired for Rammam Stage-III HEP indicates that majority of land i.e. 90.67% acquired is from West Bengal/Darjeeling District and remaining 9.33% of the land is acquired from Sikkim/West Sikkim District. The area under Bijanbari Block is approx. 165 acres (66.777 ha), which is insignificant as compared to total geographical area of the Block. Similarly, the area under Daramdin Block is approx. 18 acres (7.3 Ha), which is insignificant as compared to total geographical area of the Block. The mouza wise area of land acquired for Rammam Stage-III HEP is presented in Table 7.11. It is evident from the table that the maximum area i.e. 116.504 acres was acquired from Karmimouza followed by Kankibong (46.054 acres) in Darjeeling District. It may be pertinent to mention here that from Rimbik Mouza only 2.442 acre of Government land, which is presently under the possession of West Bengal State Electricity Board, is acquired. Whereas in Geyzing/West Sikkim District, the maximum land acquired from Salangdong followed by Zhum is 12.07 acres and 5.57 acres respectively. Table-7.11 Detail of Type of Land Acquired For Rammam Stage-III HEPP Sl No Mouza Government Land Forest Land Private Land Total (in acre) (in acre) (in acre) (in acre) Darjeeling District, West Bengal 1 Karmi 17.795 - 98.709 116.504 2 Kankibong 11.46 - 34.594 46.054 3 Rimbik 2.442 - - 2.442 Sub-Total 31.697 - 133.303 165 Geyzing/West Sikkim District, Sikkim 4 Salangdong 0.523 - 12.364 12.07 5 Siktam - - 0.39 0.39 6 Zhum - 4.761 - 5.5775 Sub-Total 0.523 4.761 12.754 18.038 Grand Total 32.22 4.761 146.057 183.047 7 - 45

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-46 of 63

The analysis of type of land acquired for Rammam Stage-III HEP reveals that out of total land for Rammam Stage-III HEP nearly 80% is private land and remaining 17.6% is Government land. Whereas, forest land is less than 3% only.

The component wise requirement of the land for Rammam Stage-III HEP is presented in Table 7.12. The analysis reveals that the maximum area required for approach road to barrage, power house, pen stock/surge shaft and township i.e. more than 30% of total land is acquired. The land requirement for power house and barrage accounts for nearly 10% each of total land. The muck disposal area requiring significant amount of land i.e. nearly 15% of total land was also acquired. Table-7.12 Component Wise Detail of Land acquired for Rammam Stage-III HEPP S. No. Components Area (ha) % 1 Barrage 8.50 11.47 2 Approach Roads 36.10 48.73 3 Tail Race Channel 8.130 10.97 4 Pen Stock and Surge Shaft 3.815 5.15 5 Power House 1.971 2.66 6 Township 8.903 12.0 7 Muck Disposal 6.661 8.99 Grand Total 74.076 100.00

7.4.2 Resettlement & Rehabilitation The NTPC Limited has acquired approximately 66.777 Ha of land at Darjeeling District and approximately 7.3 Ha at West Sikkim for Rammam Stage-III Hydro Electric Project (HEP), out of which nearly 80% is private land and remaining only 20% is Government land including the forestland. Acquiring these stretches of hilly agricultural as well as homestead land for its project is likely to affect/displace number of people. Accordingly, as per the R&R Policy of NTPC as well as Government of West Bengal and Sikkim, NTPC initiated measures to resettle and rehabilitate Project Affected Persons (PAPs) with the objective that the PAPs will improve or at least regain their previous standard of living.

7 - 46

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-47 of 63

The Rehabilitation Action Plan (RAP) is formulated so that after a reasonable transition period, the displaced/affected persons improve, or at least regain their previous standard of living, earning capacity and production levels. The transition gap also is to be reduced to a minimum.

7.4.3 Basis of R&R Action Plan The R&R strategies have been worked out keeping in view the socio-economic status of the PAPs and Impoverishment Risk Assessment of the PAPs. The existing infrastructure of Pulbazar Bijanbari and Darmadin Blocks were given due consideration while formulating the community development programme for Project Affected Villages. The formulation of income restoration schemes for potential PAPs were in line with the various on-going rural development and poverty alleviation programmes of the Government.

The Resettlement & Rehabilitation Action Plan for the Project Affected Persons has been prepared on the basis of the following criteria:

a) Concentration of PAPs in the village/Gram Panchayat for the location of target area; b) Socio-economic status of the PAPs i.e. vulnerable groups, occupation, educational status, income, etc. for the identification of the target group; c) The Impoverishment Risk Assessment (IRA) and Quality of Life (QoL) of PAPs have been used to prioritize the target group and area; d) Existing infrastructure of the area, developmental plans of the district, specially the affected Blocks. Based on the above, R&R strategies (resettlement measures, rehabilitation measures viz., jobs, self-employment, skill development, etc. and development of infrastructure) have been evolved for the various target groups of the PAPs of Rammam Stage-III HEP.

7.4.4 Process of Formulation of R&R Action Plan The entire process of formulation of the Resettlement & Rehabilitation Action Plan (RAP) was in consultation with the PAPs. For this purpose, qualitative research 7 - 47

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-48 of 63

techniques were employed which included focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and participatory planning. The core team members with the help of Research Assistants having relevant experience carried out most of these tasks. For successful employment of qualitative research techniques, the following standard forms were used as recording tools:

i. Village profile ii. Discussion guidelines with a. Knowledgeable persons and community leaders b. Field level officials c. NGOs Participatory mapping and group discussions were carried out with the potential PAPs along with Officials of Government of West Bengal & Government of Sikkim to identify suitable rehabilitation measures, recording their options, preferences and suggestions for formulation of effective RAP for PAPs of Rammam Stage-III HEP. The discussions in the field were documented and analyzed.

7.4.5 Social Assessment & Project Design Major efforts have been made to reduce the potential direct negative impacts of the project on both social and biophysical environment. Social and environmental concerns were considered carefully in project preparation and along with more conventional, technical and economic considerations were influential factors in the design process. These efforts have ranged from slight shifts of the plant boundary to avoid houses, religious structures and other common property resources. They include attention to social, environmental and safety measures to protect villagers. Environmental concerns such as avoiding cutting down trees were also coordinated with this process.

The specific measures taken to minimize displacement during the design of the layout plan for the Rammam Stage-III HEP included:

7 - 48

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-49 of 63

 As it is a Run of River (RoR) Project, thus the reservoir have been designed for storage of water only for two hours at the full load, keeping in view to minimize the submergence area as well as displacement.  Only optimum quantity of land is being acquired for barrage, surge shaft, penstock, powerhouse, township and other utility services.  As far as possible the land area required for the project were identified excluding the houses falling within the proposed area for the project.  After completion of the initial layout of the project, the number of structures likely to be affected was calculated by physical verification with the help of mouza maps. Where large numbers of people were likely to be displaced, the project boundary and road alignments were redefined to minimize the displacement.  A detailed study was carried out to determine/assess the prominent locations of tribal groups within the study area. The plant layout in these areas was undertaken to ensure that the proposed works do not affect the tribal communities.

Besides minimizing the amount of R&R required, these measures also minimized the loss of public utilities and cultural properties such as schools, roads, grazing land, gumpha/church, burial ground etc.

The sections that follow briefly present:  Key features of the design context and the social factors that were considered for minimization of resettlement;  The social development approach and objectives;  The process by which the social features have been incorporated into design;  Results of collaboration between social assessment and project design and outcome of efforts to reduce impacts and minimize displacement.

Project Design Context Project design occurs in multileveled context in which focus and emphasis shift over the project preparation period. Design inputs include economic, technical/engineering, environmental and social, particularly R&R, displacement and land acquisition

7 - 49

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-50 of 63 considerations. At the macro level, the project is based on the feasibility studies prepared on the basis of economic, social and environmental factors and conditions. This includes preliminary design inputs. At the next level, preliminary engineering designs relating to the plant layout, location of reservoir, township, alignment of Head Race Tunnel (HRT), surge shaft/penstock, etc. were addressed. At the micro level, area-specific issues were taken into considerations, e.g. a shift in layout to avoid demolishing of houses, commercial structures, religious and other common property resources.

Social factors and assessment findings, including insights gained from consultations, played an important role within the design context at each of these levels. Efforts to minimize displacement and to avoid, reduce or mitigate rehabilitation requiring, other social impacts were concentrated at the meso-and micro-level of project design, and detailed engineering aspects of this design context and the associated opportunities for minimizing adverse project impacts they presented are outlined below.

Project Layout Using the available records with the Revenue Department, the R&R team of Rammam Stage-III HEP verified the boundaries of project area. This information, entered in mouza maps, was jointly verified and certified by the project investigators, NTPC and the Revenue Department.

The objective of R&R contributions to project design was to ensure that the area of impact was modulated, within acceptable design principles and standards, to minimize displacement and other project impacts.

Design Pen Stock/Surge Shaft and Road Corridor of Impact The Surge Shaft/Pen Stock and Road corridor of impact in rural area mainly restricted to acquisition of agricultural land, vested land and other government lands. The effort has been made to minimize the impact of land acquisition for access roads.

Mitigation Measures While finalizing the plant layout including the corridor pen stock, surge shaft and roads, etc., minimization of adverse environmental and social impacts including displacement 7 - 50

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-51 of 63

were major criteria. This practice will continue throughout the project preparation period. The prime mitigation efforts and principles applied in project designs are described in the subsequent sections.

Principles of Mitigation Mitigation measures largely focused on settlement areas within the project area. The basic social impact mitigation principles that guided designs were:

 Minimal impact on residential and commercial structures thus minimizing resettlement and loss of livelihood;  Religious structures to be maintained as far as possible;  Minimum loss of other common property resources viz., roads, graveyards, orchards, grazing lands, etc.  The preservation of old and ethnic trees.

Mitigation Efforts Mitigation efforts included the following:  Avoiding unnecessary displacement by modifying project layout of the plant and reducing the width of the corridor of impact for pen stock, surge shaft, road, etc.  Reducing impacts on existing common property resources viz., roads, educational institutions, religious structures etc.;  Providing access to businesses and residential units that would be otherwise impacted by construction; and  Minimizing losses of public property, such as natural water sources, resting places, orchards etc. within the project area.

7.4.6 R&R Basic Approach NTPC Limited revised Resettlement & Rehabilitation Policy (June, 2005) on the basis its experiences as well as in view of National Resettlement & Rehabilitation Policy of Government of India (February, 2004). This R&R Policy describes the principles and approach to be followed in minimizing and mitigating negative social and economic impacts caused by the Thermal Power Project. This policy has been implemented within

7 - 51

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-52 of 63

the framework of Government of West Bengal & Sikkim R&R policy and other local applicable laws. The salient features of the NTPC’s R&R policy are discussed in subsequent sections.

 Improper resettlement and rehabilitation is the root of discontentment and alienation of the PAPs. It may be difficult to operate a project efficiently without the cooperation of the local people.  The land acquisition and consequent displacement disrupts the traditional social system. The changes in the land use pattern alter the agro-based rural economy and affect the life style of the people. This calls for a concentrated effort to provide means to ensure sustainable livelihood of these PAPs, considering them as stakeholders.  The Rehabilitation Action Plan (RAP) is formulated so that after a reasonable transition period, the affected families improve, or at least regain their previous standard of living, earning capacity and production levels.  NTPC has taken all actions in accordance with the RAP, preparation of Implementation Completion Report (ICR) and evaluation of activities post completion.

7.4.7 R&R Entitlement Matrix The compensation and rehabilitation assistance has been provided as per the following matrix:

7 - 52

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-53 of 63

Categories of PAPs Resettlement & Rehabilitation Entitlements a) PAPs whose entire land has been acquired LFL or RG equivalent of MAW of 1000 days or compensation to cover replacement value of land + Subsistence Grant. b) PAPs losing partial land and becoming marginal farmer (Left with unirrigated LFL or RG equivalent of MAW of 750 days or compensation to cover replacement value land holding upto 1 ha or irrigated holding of land + Subsistence Grant. upto half ha) c) PAPs losing partial land and becoming LFL or RG equivalent of MAW of 750 days marginal farmer (Left with unirrigated or compensation to cover replacement value land holding upto 2 ha or irrigated holding of land + Subsistence Grant. upto 1 ha) LFL or RG equivalent of MAW of 750 days d) PAPs losing partial land but not covered or compensation to cover replacement value with either category ‘B’ or ‘C’ of land + Subsistence Grant. e) Agricultural laborer PAPs RG equivalent of MAW of 750 days + SG. f) Non-agricultural laborer PAPs RG equivalent of MAW of 750 days + SG. g) PAPs losing partial lands in case of LFL or RG equivalent of MAW of 500 days narrow stretch of land being acquired + SG. h) PAPs of STs in possession of forest land As per category ‘A’ to ‘F’ + additional benefits. i) PAPs who are homestead oustees Self resettlement grant or plot of 200 sq m at

RC + SFG + RG.

PAP – Project Affected Persons LFL – Land for Land RG – Rehabilitation Grant SG – Subsistence Grant MAW – Minimum Agricultural Wage

7 - 53

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-54 of 63

7.4.8 Rehabilitation Measures To rehabilitate the PAPs losing their land following measures were adopted:

Land for Land (LFL) The “Land for Land” option is applicable to only land losers (i.e. category ‘A’ to ‘D’). Quantum of land for rehabilitation is as per the actual land acquired, subject to the ceiling of maximum of 1 ha of irrigated land or 2 ha of unirrigated/cultivable wasteland subject to availability of Government land in the districts. If Government land is not available, PAPs has been facilitated for purchase of land on a “willing buyer-willing seller” basis. For this purpose, the following process has been adopted:  Land price for the purpose of purchase of land was fixed after consultation with the State Government and the VDAC on the basis of market price of the good agricultural land in the vicinity generally within 25 km radius but normally not exceeding the 1.3 times of the rate paid for the acquisition of good agricultural land as per the LA Act.  The basic land compensation amount paid (i.e. excluding solatium and interest) has been adjusted against land price fixed as above.  In addition, land development amount @ Rs. 10,000/- per acre as per entitlement (based on process CPI as on 01.06.2004 and subject to revision from time to time) and actual land registration and stamp duty charges as per entitlement has been paid to those, who actually purchase the land and submit the required papers.  The PAPs losing less than 1 acre of land, purchase land upto 1 acre out of the grants and compensation money they have been reimbursed the actual stamp duty and registration charges of upto 1 acre.  In case of PAPs who are landless but are dependent only on the acquired land for livelihood (Category ‘E’ & ‘F’), also buy land through the grants provided to them, NTPC considered incentivizing their purchase by reimbursing actual stamp duty and registration charges for upto 1 acre of purchase of land.

7 - 54

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-55 of 63

In situation, where the LFL option is not feasible because of scarcity of land, they were eligible for Rehabilitation Grant (RG).

Rehabilitation Grant (RG) One time RG was paid to eligible categories (i.e. A to G). If a category ‘A’ PAP does not wish to go for LFL option, he/she had paid one time RG equivalent to 1000 days Minimum Agricultural Wage (MAW) in the concerned State/UT at the time of Section 4 notification under LA Act. For the categories B to F, the RG is equivalent to 750 days MAW. For the category ‘G’, a one-time RG equivalent to 500 MAW is payable with no other additional rehabilitation benefit. For the Category ‘H’, the RG is vary depending upon the type PAP as per Category ‘A’ to ‘G’. An illustrative amount will be as follows:

S No Category Amount (Rs.) 1 ‘A’ 70,000/- 2 ‘B’ to ‘F’ 52,500/- 3 ‘G’ 35,000/-

In case of non-feasibility of land for land option due to local constraints, the RG however, could be suitably fixed on per acre of land loss basis for Category ‘A’ to ‘D’ subject to a maximum of 5 acres in consultation with the stakeholders, to cover replacement value of land not normally exceeding 1.3 times the basic compensation of good agricultural land or the values in terms of MAW for these categories whichever is higher.

In case of rehabilitation of any rural artisan/small trader and a self employed person (Category ‘F’) who is having a shop in the affected area, a one time financial assistance of Rs. 15,000/- (based on CPI index as on 01.06.2004 subject to upward revision) was provided in addition to RG for construction of working shed/shop, in case he continues with his earlier vocation.

7 - 55

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-56 of 63

Subsistence Grant (SG) Each PAP was provided with a monthly SG equivalent to 20 days of MAW per month for a period of 1 year up to 250 days of MAW, starting from the date of relocation/displacement and physically handing over of the acquired land.

If a PAP falls in more than one category of ‘A’ to ‘G’, he/she was entitled for only of the rehabilitation package. For the category ‘H’, the package will vary depending upon the type of PAP as per Category ‘A’ to ‘G’.

Additional Rehabilitation Benefits  Economic Opportunities: The economic opportunities include preference to PAPs in following area:  Employment with contracting agencies  Allotment of shops/kiosks  Award of petty contracts  Vehicle hiring  PCO/Internet Kiosk  Newspaper vending  Vendor permit  Courier service, etc. The PAPs would be entitled for only one additional economic opportunity subjected to availability.

 Capacity Building: Capacity building efforts was made for PAPs or their family member. In order to make them self-reliant, skill up gradation through various training schemes at training institute of NTPC/State Government would be undertaken. Depending upon the need, as discussed in VDAC scholarship and/or reimbursement of tuition fees, to not more than one member of each PAP family to promote education and technical training.

 Incentive for Adopting Small Family: Onetime incentive was granted to the PAPs (who are between the age 35 and 50 year and have at least one child) if they undergo for family

7 - 56

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-57 of 63

planning operation within six to twenty four months period of acceptance of R&R package.  Other Welfare Activities: In addition to above, activities was undertaken for socio- economic upliftment of affected population. This may include special efforts for education of girl child, rural sports, medical camps, subsidized treatment at NTPC project hospital, cultural programmes, rural insurance scheme etc. These activities were finalized in consultation of VDAC.

 Special Efforts for Vulnerable PAPs: Special efforts for welfare measures was made for SC/ST, Physically Challenged, Women Headed Household, Aged, etc. These also include special vocational training programmes, priority in engagement for suitable jobs and facilities, free/enhanced subsidized medical treatment, etc.

7.4.9 Resettlement Measures Self-resettlement: PAPs of Category ‘I’ willing to resettle on their own or shift to some alternate location was encouraged for self-resettlement. Financial assistance for self- resettlement has provided generally at the rate of 5 times of the basic compensation payable for the house, excluding solatium and interest, under the Land Acquisition Act subject to a minimum of Rs. 50,000/- and a maximum of Rs. 1,00,000/- in each case (based on CPI index as on 01.06.2004 subject to upward revision). No other benefit like allotment of plot in RC, infrastructure at place of resettlement etc. was extended in case of individual self-resettlement.

7.4.10 Additional Resettlement Benefits: Shifting Grant: NTPC has bear the actual cost of transportation of the building materials and other moveable properties including self, family members, cattle etc. belonging to the PAPs from the place of displacement to resettlement colony or in the place of resettlement generally within 25 km of accessible roads in any transport arranged by NTPC. Alternatively, a lumpsum grant of Rs. 20,000/- (based on CPI index as on 01.06.2004 subject to upward revision) has been paid to each HSO for self-

7 - 57

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-58 of 63

transporting/shifting. This is inclusive of transportation of man, material, reusable goods, wood, cattle etc. if any.

Resettlement Grant: A fixed resettlement grant of Rs. 30,000/- (based on CPI index as on 01.06.2004 subject to upward revision) was provided to each HSO. This is inclusive of Rs. 5,000/- towards assistance for construction of cattle shed, if any.

7.4.11 Socio-economic Profile of PAPs The Socio-economic Impact Assessment Study was conducted by Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management, Kolkata in 2007. Project Affected Persons The category wise detail of PAPs as per NTPC R&R policy (June, 2005) is presented in Table-7.13. The analysis reveals that out of total 220 PAPs, nearly 72% PAPs lost only part of their agricultural land and approximately 15% lost their dwelling units as well as agricultural lands. Whereas only around 13% PAPs lost their homestead. Table-7.13 Category Wise Detail of PAPs as Per NTPC R&R Policy S No Category Description No of PAPs 1 A PAPs whose entire land has been acquired 20 2 B PAPs losing partial land and becoming marginal farmer (left with unirrigated land holding upto one Ha or irrigated 13 holding upto half Ha) 3 C PAPs losing partial land and becoming small farmer (left with unirrigated land holding upto two Ha or irrigated holding 35 upto 1 Ha) 4 D PAPs losing partial land but not covered in either category 268 B or C 5 E Agricultural labourer PAP - 6 F Non-agricultural labourer PAP - 7 G PAPs losing partial lands in case of projects/schemes wherein only a narrow stretch of land extending several kilometers is - being acquired. 8 H Occupiers i.e. PAPs of STs in possession of forest land since -

7 - 58

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-59 of 63

25th Oct 1980 9 I PAPs who are Homestead Oustees (HSO): Number of PAPs losing land & house* – 61

Number of PAPs losing only house – 11 Total Number of Homestead Oustees – 72 Total 336 * HSO which are losing agricultural land as well as house have been already included in the category A to D depending on their area of land acquired.

The analysis of village/hamlet wise concentration of PAPs reveals that out of total PAPs of Rammam III HEP i.e. 220, the maximum PAPs are from Karmi village (Sajbotey and Nezi Hamlet) i.e. 63.63% followed by Kankebang (Upper & Lower Sumbuck, Muzum, Majhigaon, Gurdum), which account for 29.09% of total PAPs respectively. Whereas, village Salandong accounts for minimium number of PAPs i.e. 7.27%.

The analysis of sex wise distribution of PAPs reveals that nearly 92% are male PAPs and remaining 8% are female PAPs.

7.4.12 Community Development Measures The community development work has been undertaken in the project affected villages. These facilities are available to the host population and the neighboring community besides the PAPs and facilitate socio-economic development of the area. The facilities/amenities include following:  Internal and approach WBM road with proper drainage  Drinking water facilities  Community Hall/Panchayat Ghar  Primary School Infrastructure  Medical Clinic  Plantation  Rural Electrification  Irrigation facilities, etc.

The infrastructural facilities is set up by NTPC on the basis of assurance from the State Government that it will take over the infrastructural facilities and maintain it properly.

7 - 59

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-60 of 63

The following community development work has been completed by Rammam HEPP Stage-III.

1. Construction of 2 nos school buildings(NEZI,SUMBUK) completed. 2. Construction of school building in progress(Sajbotey) 3. Drinking water scheme under construction(1.NEZI,SAJBOTEY 2.Sumbuk) 4. Road construction from Khoprai to Nezi(1.5 km)completed 5. Road construction from Power house to Khoprai(5.8km)under construction,in final stage. 6. 2 nos Ambulance handed over to District Administration,Darjeeling 7. Medical equipments of Rs2.5 lacs handed over to Jorethang Health Centre. 8. Footpath in Nezi 800m completed.

7.4.13 Implementation Mechanism for One Time Rehabilitation Package After receiving the land compensation from District Authority the PAP have got the certification of land compensation payment stating no dues are pending with land revenue department of concerned District and same had submitting to Rammam Stage-III HEP R&R Cell for calculation of one time rehabilitation package due to him/her. On receipt of clearance certificate from PAPs, R&R Cell of Rammam Stage-III HEP calculate the one time rehabilitation package payable to him/her and get his/her acceptance for the calculated amount to be paid to him/her. Mean while the PAP had open a joint account in the bank. The account was in the name of PAP & his/her spouse. In case of unmarried or widow/widower, the PAP open the account in his/her own name. The opening of bank accounts had facilitated by NTPC.

One time settlement for R&R package to affected PAPs has been agreed during VDAC meeting as per R&R policy. Total of Rs. 3.58 Crores disbursed as per R&R policy till 31.03.2021.

7.4.14 Cost Incurred The estimated budget for the RAP comprises the following prime area of compensation:

7 - 60 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-61 of 63

a) Acquisition of land for various components of Rammam Stage-III HEP including area under barrage, power house, surge-shaft and other approach roads; b) Rehabilitation & Resettlement Packages for PAPs/HSOs; c) Relocation/Replacement of CPR viz. primary schools, construction of road, graveyards, resting places, water reservoir, etc.; d) Plantation of trees; e) Training programme for self-employment and skill development for income generating activities; f) Community Development Programmes and other welfare activities; g) Implementation Measures.

The R&R Policy (June, 2005) of NTPC provide the guidelines for R&R measures to be taken for restoring the socio-economic status of PAPs/HSOs and undertaking community development work in project affected village/hamlets for improving quality of life. On the basis of SIA study conducted by IISWBM and interactions with PAPs as well as other stakeholders through VDAC, PIC, and Village level focus group discussions, the R&R measures to be taken for Rammam Stage-III HEP have been identified and presented in Table 7.14. The budget for the same has been worked out keeping in view the guidelines of NTPC R&R Policy.

The actual expenditure incurred by NTPC Ltd. on R&R is provided in Table 7.15. It supplies and justifies a cost-wise, item-wise, budget estimate for implementation of resettlement and rehabilitation schemes, including assistance, administrative expenses, monitoring & evaluation and contingencies.

Table-7.14 R&R Measures Identified to be undertaken for Rammam Stage-III HEP S No Description of R&R Activities REHABILITATION MEASURES: 1 One time Rehabilitation Package (this includes rehabilitation and subsistence grant, etc.) 2 Skill Development & Training and Scholarships for PAPs or their nominated family member.

7 - 61

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-62 of 63

S No Description of R&R Activities RESETTLEMENT MEASURES: 3 One time Self-Resettlement Package (this includes self resettlement, shifting grant and resettlement grant, etc ) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & OTHER MEASURES: 4 Education Facilities: a. Infrastructure Development for Schools b. Educational Cost (Furniture, Lab Equipment, Books, Stationery, etc.) 5 Health Facilities: a. Health Clinics b. General Health/Surgical/Eye Camps c. Family Planning d. Medicine &Equipments, etc. e. Mobile Clinic/Ambulance f. Veterinary Clinics 6 Village Sports & Cultural Programme: a. Sport kits/training & coaching/ rural sport events, etc. b. Cultural Programme 7 Welfare Measures for Physically Challenged & Other Vulnerable People: a. Movement Aid/Hearing Aid, etc. b. Self-employment Assistance viz. cattle for income generation, sewing machine, training/educational aid, etc. 8 Infrastructure Development Work: a. Community Centers b. Village Road & Culverts c. Drainage d. Sewerage & Toilets e. Drinking Water system f. Public Library g. Plantation under social forestry g. Infrastructure Development for Rural Electrification and Solar Systems h. Need Based Miscellaneous Rural Community Development Work (Smokeless Chulhas, Low Cost Toilets & Soak Pits, Water Harvesting System, etc) IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES: 9 PAPs Verification & Issue of ID Card and Signing of Agreement with each PAPs/HSOs 10 Engagement of Institute/NGOs for Supervision of Implementation of RAP 11 Monitoring & Evaluation of Implementation of RAP

The cost of resettlement has been included in the overall costs of the project. Values for compensation amounts and other support mechanisms will be adjusted, if required,

7 - 62

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 2 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C7-63 of 63

annually based on inflation factors. The budget incorporates provisions for this, and mechanisms for budgetary adjustments and updates are included.

Table-7.15 Summary of Actual Expenditure incurred on RAP for Rammam Stage-III HEP S. Actual Expenditure No. Descriptions (Rs. Lakh) incurred 31.03.2021 REHABILITATION MEASURES:

1 One time Rehabilitation Package 357.49

2 Skill Development & Training and Scholarships 1.46

Sub-total 358.59

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & OTHER MEASURES:

3 Educational Facilities 59.1

4 Health Facilities 287.29

5 Village Sports & Cultural Programme 15.44

6 Infrastructure Development Work 367.66

Sub-total 729.49

IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES:

7 Miscellaneous Expenses 68.71

Grand Total 798.20

7.5 POWER POTENTIAL STUDY The power potential studies have been carried out for Rammam-III Hydroelectric Scheme, situated on the river Rammam in West Bengal State of India. This is a run-of- the-river type development and would operate on variable head of water. A copy of Power Potential Study is enclosed as Annexure-XXII.

7 - 63

CHAPTER –VIII PROJECT BENEFITS

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C8-1 of 6

CHAPTER-8 PROJECT BENEFITS 8.0 GENERAL The implementation of the Rammam Hydro Electric Power Project (HEPP) Stage-III will provide impetus to the development of the area and also provide green energy i.e. hydro-electric power. The project will also throw opportunities to local people for both direct and indirect employment. The other indirect benefits of a hydropower project over thermal one are reduction in air pollution, water pollution, noise pollution, thermal, fly-ash and health effects in and around the area.

The advantage of not having a large amount of water storage is that less land has to be flooded and therefore the potential environmental footprint impacts are reduced. . Construction of Barrage will also bridge both banks with road connectivity . The project will bring social development and prosperity in area . The project provides indirect employment to the local population in construction phase and will provide the same in operation phase as well . The CD/CSR has helped and will help in the development of the required facilities for the general public of the area . The availability of the electricity will be highly beneficial for the cost effective industrial activities which will bring further prosperity in the area

8.1 BENEFITS TO ECONOMY Development of infrastructure and availability of reliable power supply as a result of the project realization would contribute to the stimulation of economic activities like small scale industries in the area. Additional power generation will mitigate the power shortage in the West Bengal and Sikkim state. Some of the local people may get permanent job during the operational phase of the project depending on their skill and performance. The project will act as stimulant to improve the economy both at the local and National levels.

8.2 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE The area possesses moderate level of infrastructural facilities. The township being constructed near Barbatia village shall be permanent residence for the project. About

8 - 1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C8-2 of 6

100 number of employees, support staff and CIEF Staff will be residing at site during operation phase of the project. NTPC has developed bachelor and office accommodation and other non-residential buildings for staff of NTPC, CISF, Support Staff, etc. are under different stages of construction.

In addition to the rightful compensation and R & R package for the project affected families, the project authorities will undertake a plan of infrastructural development in the area for enhancing the quality of life for the entire human population of the project affected area. Several such facilities would be created for the benefit and use of general public. The project authorities have already initiated the social infrastructure development activities in the project area under Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).

8.2.1 R&R Benefits Socio-Economic survey for the Project Affected Families (PAFs) was conducted. Number of families lost their land were compensated as per NTPC R&R Policy.

Details of PAFs of Rammam Project: West Bengal: 6 villages (Darjeeling District)  Mouza Karmi: 3 villages (Sajbotay, Nezi and Kolbong)  Mouza Kankebong: 3 villages (Sumbuk, Lower Jhepi and Majhigaon) Sikkim: 3 villages namely Chumbong, Salangdong & Siktam

Total provision for Land including R&R and CD activities is Rs. 59.20 Crore, out of which total expenditure/ commitment for expenditure (as on date) is Rs. 45.20 Crore. The cost provision for R&R and CD activities is Rs. 19.03 Crore.

8.2.2 CSR/CER Activities As per MOEF&CC Office memorandum dated 30.09.2020, the project proponent to commit to carryout proposed activites under Corporate Environmental Responsibility (CER). In NTPC community development activites are carried out at nearby villages before operation of project under capital expenditure of project. The similar welfare and development activites has been proposed under CER by MOEF&CC. Various

8 - 2

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C8-3 of 6

CER/CSR-CD activities undertaken in and around the project area are as given in Table No. 8.1.

Table No. 8.1 CER/CSR-CD Activities undertaken in and around the Project Area Health Upgradation of local PHC with equipments and infrastructure Partnership with Govt. for National Health Programmes like Polio, TB, Malaria etc. Health Camps for family planning and communicable diseases Subsidized treatment in company hospitals/Dispensory Specific programmes to improve health indicators e.g. fertility rates, mortality rate, nutrition levels of children and vulnerable Specific Programmes for hygiene and sanitation Education Targeted programmes for primary education specially for girl child Augmentation of infrastructure and equipments, furniture, blackboard, toilets etc. in village schools Scholarship to meritorious students Adult education Partnerships in state sponsored education programmes Physically Helping aids to each category of physically challenged as per requirement Challenged Health Camps Water Supply Provision of potable drinking water supply in nearby villages through wells, hand pumps, tankers etc. Awareness campaigns for water borne diseases, sanitation and hygiene Capacity Setting up new ITI with necessary infrastructure and machinery Building Sponsorship of old PAPs/wards Short term courses for skill up gradation Vocational training (dairy, poultry, bee keeping, sericulture) Specific Programmes for Ladies (stitching, embroidery, tailoring etc.) Infrastructure Construction of roads, drainage, community halls, school buildings, health Development centers, street lighting, equipments to educational institutions, public utilities, sanitation facilities, Health centers etc. in nearby and affected area Sports and Regular Rural Sports Culture Facilitation/ Sponsorship to local talent Promotion of local festivals

8 - 3

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C8-4 of 6

Table: 8.2 Details of Expenses of CSR-CD/CER Activities S.No. Head Approved Booked Balance Expenditure Incurred (in Lacs) A. CD Works Budget till date (in Lac) FY FY FY FY FY FY Total (in Lac) (in 15- 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 Lac) 16 1 Educational Facility 110.00 110.00 0.00 0.54 2.21 1.87 21.25 11.70 21.53 59.10 2 Health and medical 450.00 422.00 28.00 5.93 2.94 0.00 91.35 67.85 119.22 287.29 services 3 Providing other 90.00 31.00 73.00 0.00 2.09 0.17 3.28 3.86 2.76 12.16 infrastructure facility 4 Training/Self 15.00 0.36 14.64 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 1.13 1.46 Employment/Skill Development 5 Construction of 450.00 426.00 24.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 72.88 206.63 0.00 280.66 Roads and Drains 6 Sponsoring Local 30.00 10.80 19.20 1.19 2.19 1.81 1.76 3.67 4.82 15.44 Sports/Cultural Programme 7 Providing Drinking 110.00 94.00 16.00 0.00 30.38 0.00 22.68 0.00 21.78 74.84 Water Facility 8 Future Misc CD 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.23 17.23 Works Provision 9 Disaster Mitigation 70.00 69.10 0.90 0.00 11.16 9.50 0.00 26.56 21.49 68.71 1400.00 1149.26 250.74 7.66 50.97 14.83 213.20 320.27 209.96 816.89

The proposed CER/CD activities budget for 2021-2024 is given in Table 8.3. Table 8.3 Proposed CER/CD Activities for 2021-2024 S.No. Acitivity Proposed Budget (Rs. In Lakhs) 1. Education Facility 200 2. Health and medical services 200 3. Providing other infrastructure facility 120 4. Training/Self employment/Skill development 180 5. Providing Drinking water facility 100 6. Sponsirong local sports/Cultural programme 150 Total 950

8 - 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C8-5 of 6

8.3 EMPLOYMENT POTENTIAL The project is already benefitting the people living in the neighboring villages by giving preference to them in relation to indirect employment associated with the various project activities. The first preference is given to people whose land is acquired and to their relatives. The estimated no. of employees during operation phase of the project is estimated to be about 50. Considering the staff of CISF and support services, it is estimated that about 100 families will reside in the project township during operation stage. However, during construction stage, the number of workers are about 1000.

Besides generating local employment for skilled and non-skilled labourer, the project authorities is also providing an opportunity for the local people to compete for various project work related contracts depending on their economic status. In addition to above, capacity building and skill development programmes are being organised for local youth to encourge for self employment.

Vocational Training Programme for Skill Development for Women Beautician

Distribution of Sewing Machines for self Vocational Trainig Programme for employement Electrician

8 - 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C8-6 of 6

Providing Two ambulance to Rural Hospital Health Check-up Camp

Contruction of Primary School Building Distribution of School Baga and water bottles to children

8.4 CO2 EMISSIONS Hydropower is a clean, renewable, and environmentally friendly source of energy. As an important renewable energy resource, hydropower contributes significantly to the avoidance of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and to the mitigation of global warming. The largest sources of GHG emissions for hydropower are the construction of the facilities, and biomass decomposition from reservoir flooding. In addition, there are ongoing net differences between the carbon uptake and respiration of the pre- flooding and post-flooding biomes and water columns. However, as Rammam HEPP is a run of the river project with very small submerence area, the emissions due to biomass decomposition and other factors shall be negligible.

8 - 6

CHAPTER – IX ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C9-1 of 9

CHAPTER-9 ENVIRONMENT COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS

9.0 GENERAL The development of any hydroelectric scheme involves inevitable impacts. Some of these are negative and some positive. However, the deciding factor for any scheme is usually the cost derived from securing a steady and predictable source of electricity. Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) simply compares all the expected present and future benefits of a project with its present and future costs. It is a tool used either to rank projects or to choose the most appropriate option. The ranking or decision is based on expected economic costs and benefits.

This chapter discusses about the technique used for testing the financial viability of the project i.e. whether the investment to be made is worth and whether the project is financially rewarding. Costs here are described as the intended or unintended negative effects of project investment, whereas, benefits is described as the intended or unintended positive effects of the project. CBA aims to maximize economic efficiency at a point where marginal benefits and marginal costs are equal.

9.1 NEED FOR THE HYDROPOWER PROJECT In order to meet the ever-increasing power demand, it is imperative to commission power projects in the State of West Bengal. The proposed Rammam Stage-III Hydro Electric Project (HEP) would not only meet the power requirements, but would also improve the ratio of hydro, thermal mix as well. Rammam Stage-III H.E Project is a Run of the River (ROR) scheme utilizing power potential of Rammam River from elevation 900 m to 385 m, in the District of Darjeeling in the West Bengal with an installed capacity of 120 MW (3x 40 MW). The Proposed project is Run of River hydro project, is a readily available source of renewable electricity in a sustainable manner, and helps to meet greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets as a part of worldwide efforts to reduce the impacts of climate change. 9-1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C9-2 of 9

9.1.1 Power Evacuation As per National Electricity Plan (NEP), 2018, Capacity addition in between 2017-22 in Hydro Power Sector in ER is limited to only one project, i.e. Rammam HEP, Stage-III (3x40 MW) by NTPC. Ministry of Power has given following allocation: S.No. State Share in installed Equivalent quantum in Capacity (%) installed Capacity (MW) 1 West Bengal 73 87.6 2 Sikkim 12 14.4 3 Unallocated 15 18 100 120

As per the interstate agreement between Sikkim & West Bengal, the share of Power of the Sikkim Government (12%) will be made available to the Sikkim Government at free of cost. The issue of power generation of the project shall be taken up through 4 nos. of 132 kV outgoing Feeders from Rammam Stage-III Switchyard.

One 132 KV Double Circuit line from Rammam Stage-III to NJP 220/132/33 KV substation & Looped in and Looped out (LILO) of one existing 132 KV single circuit line from Rammam Stage-II to NBU 132 KV substation need to be constructed. This is in the stage of finalization with West Bengal Electricity Development Corporation Limited (WBSEDCL).

9.2 ENVIRONMENT COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS The main intention if this section is to determine the impacts and benefits from the proposed Run of River (ROR) project using cost - benefits analysis to verify significance of the proposed project to the area. Hydroelectric project generally involves intervention in river thereby changing river flow regime in the submergence area and causes changes in existing land use in relation to the land forest, agriculture and barren land beside waterbodies. Preferences for or against an impact may change through time and the relative price effect has to be accounted for. Costs and benefits are rarely known with certainty so that risk (probabilistic outcomes) and uncertainty (when no probabilities are known) also

9-2

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C9-3 of 9

have to be taken into account. Finally, identifying the distributional incidence of costs and benefits is also important.

The MoEF&CC vide OM No. 7-69/2011-FC(Pt.), dated 1st August, 2017 (Copy enclosed at Annexure-XXIII), issued Guidelines for conducting Cost Benefit Analysis for projects involving diversion of forest land under the provisions of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The guidelines provide a broad and self-explanatory methodology for assessing ecological and environmental losses and eco-economic distress caused to the people who are displaced and weighted against economic and social gains. As per above mentioned OM, Cost Benefit Analysis for forest diversion is not required for proposals involving forest land up to 20 Ha. in plains and up to 5 Ha. in hills.

9.3 ENVIRONMENT COST The major impacts due to the project would be direct, e.g. diversion of forest land, change in topography, impact to aquatic life and reduction in diversity and population density of migratory fishes, Rehabilitation and Resettlement of Project Affected Families (PAFs). In addition there are host of indirect impacts like loss of animal husbandry productivity, loss of fodder, etc.

9.3.1 Cost of Forest Land diverted Forests are a stabilizing force for the climate. They regulate ecosystems, protect biodiversity, play an integral part in the carbon cycle, support livelihoods, and supply goods and services that can drive sustainable growth. The diversion of forestland for non- forestry purpose certainly destabilize the existing eco-system balance. As per “Polluter Pays” principle, the agency demanding the diversion of forest land has to pay for the loss of benefits from ecological services from such land. Increasing and maintaining forests is therefore an essential solution to climate change. As per MoEF&CC guidelines dated 01.08.2017, the economic value of loss of eco-system services due to diversion of forests shall be the Net Present Value (NPV) of forest land being diverted as prescribed by the Central Government (MoEF& CC).

9-3

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C9-4 of 9

The project implementation is likely to envisage impacts on the land use pattern due to diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes i.e., for construction and widening of roads, installation of surface components both upstream and downstream stretch of the river. The total land requirement for this project has been finalized to be 74.077 ha out of which 1.927 ha is forest land, 10.334 Ha is Government land and 61.806 ha is private land. As a part of the EIA study, detailed Ecological survey was conducted for one season. Based on the findings of the survey, it can be concluded that the density and diversity of vegetation in the project area acquired is quite low.

9.3.2 Compensatory Afforestation Compensatory afforestation (CA) is one of the most important requirement/condition for prior approval of the Central Government for diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes and the purpose of compensatory afforestation (CA) is to compensate the loss of 'land by land' and loss of 'trees by trees'. It can be treated as a replacement cost of diverted forestland by way of either afforestation in equivalent new non-forest area or double of area diverted in a degraded forest area. Forest land diverted for project such as irrigation, hydropower, railways, roads and transmission lines are unlikely to be returned and remain in possession of the user agencies. As per MoEF&CC guidelines dated 01.08.2017, 30% of environmental costs (NPV) due to loss of forests or circle rate of adjoining area in the district should be added as a cost component of possession value of forestland, whichever is maximum.

9.3.3 Cost incurred in Rehabilitation & Resettlement The most important deleterious impact during construction phase is, pertaining to land acquisition. As per the Socio-Economic survey for the Project Affected Families (PAFs) 275 families have lost land, 61 families have lost land as well as homesteads and 11 families have lost homesteads. Approved Budget for R&R plan is 59.20 Crore, Total

9-4

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C9-5 of 9

approved budget is Rs. 45.20 Crore for land & House shifting. Total of Rs. 3.58 Crores disbursed as per R&R policy till 31.03.2021.

9.4 ENVIRONMENT BENEFITS The benefits from the project are mainly from provision of green-fuel (hydropower), social development and prosperity in area, direct and indirect employment due to the project, development of infrastructure and facilities in the area.

9.4.1 Increase in Electricity Production Although, the proportion of Hydro Electric Power (13.84%) in terms of installed Capacity (MW) at Eastern Region (ER) is close to the national average of 12.33%, but the proportion of Hydro + Renewable Energy source (RES) at ER is only 17.42% in comparison to the national average of 35.92% (Country wide installed capacity dated 31.05.20 has been considered). As per National Electricity Plan (NEP), 2018, Capacity addition in between 2017-22 in Hydro Power Sector in ER is limited to only one project, i.e. Rammam HPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW) by NTPC. As per the interstate agreement between Sikkim & West Bengal, the share of power of the Sikkim Government (12%) will be made available to the Sikkim Government at free of cost. The Rammam Stage-III Hydro Electric Power Project would not only meet the power requirements, but would also improve the ratio of hydro, thermal mix as well.

9.4.2 Economic Benefits Development of infrastructure and availability of reliable power supply as a result of the project realization would contribute to the stimulation of economic activities like small scale industries in the area. Additional power generation will mitigate the power shortage in the country. Some of the local people may get temporary jobs during the operational phase of the project depending on their skill and performance. The project will act as stimulant to improve the economy both at the local and National levels. There would be increase in government tax collection due to implementation of this project.

9-5

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C9-6 of 9

9.4.3 Employment Generation The estimated no. of employees during operation phase of the project is estimated to be about 50. Considering the staff of CISF and support services, it is estimated that about 100 families will reside in the project township during operation stage. However, during construction stage, the number of workers are much higher (about 1000).

9.4.4 Economic Benefits due to Catchment Area Treatment Plan A Catchment area Treatment Plan for the catchment area intercepted at the diversion structure of the proposed barrage site has been prepared as a part of the Comprehensive EIA study. NTPC has deposited Rs. 7.28 Crores in favor of Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, West Bengal as part of proposal for implementation of CAT Plan for Rammam Stage-III project. NTPC has deposited Rs. 1.46 Crores in favor of PCCF cum Principal Secretary, Govt. of Sikkim as part of proposal for implementation of CAT Plan for Rammam Stage-III project.

9.4.5 Positive Social Impact Assessment of Project For economic development, infrastructure building is utmost important viz. power, road, railways, dam, irrigation projects, mining, plantation, etc. For infrastructure development, land is the most primary resource. The land may be free from any occupancy or occupied by habitation, agricultural activity, plantation, forest, water, hills, barren, . The ownership of land can be private or government or public bodies. In any infrastructural projects, land acquisition is the key job. This results in two types of impacts on the population who are owing or using this land for their habitation and/or livelihood. The impacts are: a) Negative, b) Positive. The gravity of impact can be direct or indirect or cumulative.

Negative impacts of any infrastructural project are highlighted for necessary resettlement and rehabilitation work. In the projects, the negative impacts are always short-term and applicable to limited number of population who are directly or indirectly involved. Positive impacts are hardly highlighted. The positive impacts of any infrastructural project are long- term and applicable to both affected and non-affected population. Positive impacts are the 9-6

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C9-7 of 9

visible indicators of economic development. The positive impacts are visible from the infrastructural development itself and different income generating activities during the project construction period and after the completion of the project.

The Rammam Stage-III HEP will have both positive and negative social impacts. The prime positive impacts of Rammam Stage-III HEP are as follows:  Development of road, transport and communication facilities.  Development of ancillary industries to meet the requirement of the project.  Development of educational institutions such as schools, colleges, vocational institutions, etc.  Opening of banks, post offices, hospitals, religious places, community welfare centers, etc.  Generation of direct and indirect employment  Market activities will be increased and thereby purchasing power of the population will also be increased.  The overall impact will be to provide better quality of life to population than mere Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Project Affected Population.

The negative social impacts could be due to loss of land and homesteads and displacement of population. A total expenditure under CSR/CD activities undertaken by project is about Rs. 8.00 Crores (until March 2021) and local people have benefited from these activities.

9.5 ENVIRONMENT COST AND BENEFITS The environment cost and benefits of the project has been carried out based on the methodology and discussion made in foregoing section/sub-sections and elucidated in the following sections.

9.5.1 Expenditure on R&R and Community Development The expenditure on R&R and Community Development as on 31.03.2021 is shown in Table 9.1.

9-7

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C9-8 of 9

Table 9.1 Expenditure on R&R and Community Development S. Descriptions Actual Expenditure (Rs. No. Lakh) incurred 31.03.2021 REHABILITATION MEASURES: 1 One time Rehabilitation Package 357.49 2 Skill Development & Training and 1.46 Scholarships Sub-total 358.95 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & OTHER MEASURES: 3 Educational Facilities 59.1 4 Health Facilities 287.29 5 Village Sports & Cultural Programme 15.44 6 Infrastructure Development Work 367.66 Sub-total 729.49 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES: 7 Miscellaneous Expenses 68.71 Grand Total 798.20

9.5.2 Cost for Implementing Environmental Management Plan The total amount spent for implementation of Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is Rs. 2948.9 lakh (excluding cost required for cost of trees and NPV of forest land acquired). The details are given in Table-9.2.

Table-9.2 Cost for Implementing Environmental Management Plan (EMP) S. No. Item Cost* (Rs. lakh) 1. Sanitary facilities in labour camps 41.0 2. Solid waste management 53.5 3. Provision for free fuel distribution 78.6 4. Environmental Management in road construction 99.0 5. Management of muck disposal sites 103.1 6. Landscaping and restoration of construction sites 20.0 7. Greenbelt development 15.0 8. Compensatory afforestation 15.9 9. Public Health Delivery System 250.0 10. Construction of settling tanks 20.0

9-8

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C9-9 of 9

11. Sustenance of riverine fisheries 65.0 12. Wildlife Conservation 83.7 13. Setting up Environmental Laboratory 30.0 14. Catchment Area Treatment Plan 320.8 15. Resettlement & Rehabilitation Plan including CD 1903.0 16. Cost of noise meter 0.5 17. Environmental Monitoring Programme during 70.0 construction phase (refer Table-9.2) 18. Contingencies 100.0 Total 3269.1

Note: * The above cost is exclusive of the cost required for cost of trees and NPV of the forest land to be acquired.

Overall, the developmental activities in the proposed Rammam Stage-III HEP project will increase economy of country and state through power generation, taxes, supporting economy for nation’s growth.

However, as the project is already under advance stage of construction, after accord of Techno-economic clearance, the cost benefit is already establsished and the completion of the project is essential.

9-9

CHAPTER – X ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-1 of 32

CHAPTER-10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

10.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter provides a description of the administrative aspects of ensuring that mitigative measures are implemented and their effectiveness monitored, after approval of the EIA. Based on the evaluation of impacts and baseline conditions, an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) has been delineated to mitigate the adverse impacts. The EMP includes formulation, implementation and monitoring of environmental protection measures. The EMP features guidelines and methodologies to be adopted at different stages of the project for mitigating the impacts of various activities. The EMP is herein outlined after taking into account the various Acts, Rules and Regulations/Standards concerned with the environmental management. Thus, it is a planned and integrated programme aimed at ensuring that both identified and unidentified impacts that may arise during the various phases of the project are brought to an acceptable level.

10.1 EMP DURING VARIOUS PROJECT PHASES Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is the key to ensure a safe and clean environment. The desired results from the environmental mitigation measures proposed in the project may not be obtained without a management plan to assure its proper implementation and function. The EMP envisages the plans for the proper implementation of mitigation measures to reduce the adverse impacts arising out of the project activities. EMP has been prepared addressing the issues like:  Pollution control/mitigation measures for abatement of the undesirable impacts caused during the construction and operation phase of the project.  Details of management plans (air pollution control devices/measures, utilization of treated sewage, solid waste management plan etc.)  Institutional set up identified/recommended for implementation of the EMP.  Post project environmental monitoring programme to be undertaken

10 -1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-2 of 32

 Expenditures for environmental protection measures and budget for EMP.

10.2 CONTROL OF POLLUTION FROM LABOUR CAMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE As the project is in advanced stage of construction in its all three units (Unit 1, 2, & 3) various types of construction equipment are already made available within the site and the construction is likely to last till December, 2026. The aggregation of large labour population of about 1000 nos. during construction phase has significant stress on various facets of environment. Around 200 labours are local residents. The various issues covered in environmental management during construction phase are: - Facilities in labour camps - Sanitation and sewage treatment facilities - Solid waste management - Provision of community kitchen

10.2.1 Facilities in labour camps The labour population resides in 2 to 3 colonies near to the construction site. These structures are tin sheds. These sheds have internal compartments allotted to each worker family. The labour camp sites have electricity and ventilation system, water supply and community sanitation facilities.

The water for meeting domestic requirements being collected from the rivers or streams flowing upstream of the labour camps. The water is transferred to the labour camps, stored in tanks and utilized.

10.2.2 Sanitation facilities The total water requirements work out to be 70.0 KLD @ 70 lpcd. It is assumed that about 80% of the water supplied will be generated as sewage. Thus, total quantum of sewage generated is 56.0 KLD. This is being sent to Biodigestor septic tank and treated water is being reused/recycled for landscaping.

10 -2

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1

RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-3 of 32

10.2.3 Solid waste management from labour camps The labour colony located at diversion site, power house site and at adit sites. During construction phase, about 1000 labours are congregated. The average per capita solid waste generated is of the order of 450 gm/day/person. The solid waste generated from labour camps is of the order of 0.45 tonnes/day. Adequate facilities for collection, conveyance and disposal of solid waste are developed. The solid wastes being disposed regularly through Nayabazar Jorethang Municipal Corporation (NJMC).

10.2.4 Provision of free fuel At present LPG gas is being used for officers & staff engaged in the construction work. Adequate fuel for labour camp (about 100 LPG cylinders, Kerosene & fire wood) is provided by the contractors. Also, fuel depot at Jorethang (South Sikkim) is available within accessible reach from site. The cost provision for free fuel distribution has been made.

10.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN ROAD CONSTRUCTION The approach roads of 29 km was proposed to be constructed out of which 11.7 km has been completed and reaming are under construction, as a part of providing appropriate infrastructure for transporting staff and equipment to the construction site. In a hilly environment, construction of roads sometime disturbs the scenic beauty of the area. In addition, landslides are often triggered due to road construction because of the loosening of rocks by water trickling from various streams. Steeply sloping banks are liable to landslides, which can largely be controlled by provision of suitable drainage. The basic principle is to intercept and divert as much water as possible, before it arrives at a point, where it becomes a nuisance. The other erosion hazard is that of surface erosion of the bank, which is best controlled by vegetation. However, in a steeply sloping terrain, difficulty lies in growing vegetation on steeply sloping banks. Engineering solutions such as surface drainage, sub-surface drainage, toe protection and rock bolting were used. The cost required for implementation of various measures has already been incorporated in the overall budget earmarked for construction of roads.

10 -3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-4 of 32

In hilly terrain, road construction often generates significant quantity of wastes (muck) due to the stripping of the rocks to make way for the roads. The stripped material is collected and dumped in the designated muck disposal area with toe wall to prevent the muck to flow down into the river. After disposal operation is complete at the dump site, the dump yard shall be contoured and vegetated.

The various aspects considered while making the project roads are briefly described as following. Construction  Area for clearing and grubbing kept minimum subject to the technical requirements of the road. The clearing area properly demarcated to save desirable trees and shrubs and to keep tree cutting to the minimum.  Where erosion is likely to be a problem, clearing and grubbing operations is done in such a way that scheduled and performed that grading operations and permanent erosion control of features can follow immediately thereafter, if the project conditions permit; otherwise temporary erosion control measures is being provided between successive construction stages. Under no circumstances, very large surface area of erodible earth material are exposed at any time by clearing and grubbing.  The method of balanced cut and fills formation adopted to avoid large difference in cut and fill quantities.  The cut slopes suitably protected by breast walls, provision of flat stable slopes, construction of catch water and intercepting drains, treatment of slopes and unstable areas above and underneath the road, etc.  Where rock blasting is involved, controlled blasting techniques adopted to avoid over- shattering of hill faces.  Excavated material dumped duly dressed up in a suitable form at appropriate places where it cannot get easily washed away by rain, and such spoil deposits provided with some vegetative cover.

10 -4

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-5 of 32

Drainage  All artificial drains linked with the existing natural drainage system.  Surface drains have gentle slopes. Where falls in levels are to be negotiated, check dams with silting basins are constructed and that soil is not eroded and carried away by high velocity flows.  Location and alignment of culverts so chosen as to avoid severe erosion at outlets and siltation at inlets.

Grassing and Planting  Tree felling for road construction/works was bare minimum and strict control exercised in consultation with the Forest Department.  Depending on the availability of land and other resources, afforestation of roadside land shall be carried out to a sufficient distance on either side of the road.

About 29 km of roads were proposed to be constructed out of which 11.7 km has been completed as a part of Rammam Stage-III hydroelectric project.

10.4 MANAGEMENT OF MUCK DISPOSAL SITES For hydro-power projects, the quantity of muck generated is quite high for setting up of various structures. Muck generated from excavation of any project component is required to be disposed in a planned manner so that it takes a least possible space and is not hazardous to the environment. In the hilly area, dumping is done after creating terraces. The overall idea is to enhance/maintain aesthetic view in the surrounding area of the project in post-construction period and avoid contamination of any land or water resource due to muck disposal.

Muck of 0.99 Mm3 is expected to be generated from construction of project. Out of which 0.40 Mm3 is being utilized as construction material. At the present the dumping sites are already identified for muck disposal. The balance 0.59 Mm3 muck shall be disposed at designated/identified site in a planned manner so that it takes a least possible space and is not hazardous to the environment. An area of 6.66 Ha has been earmarked 10 -5

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-6 of 32

which can cater the entire quantity of muck to be disposed. About 0.132 Mm3 of aggregate is utilized for filling and construction works from muck generated during excavation of underground works like HRT and desilting chamber. A toe wall has been created around the muck disposal site and more landscaping to be done in the muck site.

10.5 RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPING OF PROJECT SITES The construction of the project, including its various appurtenances e.g. barrage, power house, approach roads, labour camps, project colony, etc. would disturb the existing topography and physiography. It is proposed to landscape the area, so that it integrates with the natural surroundings and the beauty of the area is restored. Accordingly, it is proposed to develop small gardens at 2 locations and few view points along the periphery of the water spread area and power house site. The landscaping plan is detailed as below: - Garden complex - View points - Landscaping The above referred measures are described briefly in the following paragraphs: Garden Complex: A garden with local ornamentation plants and trees shall be created at two locations, i.e. one each near the barrage/dam and project colony sites. All plants will be properly labelled with scientific and/or common names. Creation of viewpoints: Two viewpoints shall be created one near the powerhouse and other at suitable place along the periphery of the water spread area. These view points will be slab type extension above the ground, which will be properly reinforced and fenced to avoid any undesirable incidence. It will be given a shed and plantation of ornamental plants will be done near it. Landscaping: Various sites in the area will be stabilized by constructing a series of benches. The walls that will be constructed for containing the slope will be embedded with local stone to integrate with the aesthetics of the area. A total provision of Rs. 20 lakh is earmarked for restoration and landscaping of project sites. 10 -6

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-7 of 32

10.6 GREENBELT DEVELOPMENT The total land acquired for the project is about 74.007 ha, of which only 1.927 ha is the forest land. Although the forest loss due to various project appurtenances will be compensated as a part of compensatory afforestation, in addition to above, it is proposed to develop greenbelt. Till date 11000 saplings has been planted in project area as well as in nearby villages.

The general consideration involved while developing the greenbelt are: - Local plant species trees growing upto 10 m or above in height with perennial foliage have planted around various appurtenances of the proposed project. - Planting of trees has been undertaken in appropriate encircling rows around the project site. - Fast growing trees have selected for plantation - Since, the tree trunk area is normally devoid of foliage upto a height of 3 m, it may be useful to have shrubbery in front of the trees so as to give coverage to this portion. The plantation at a spacing of 2.5 * 2.5 m. The plantation and maintenance of the plantation area is being done by the project proponents in association with the State Government. The selection of species for greenbelt development and afforestation for further plantation shall be done in consultation with State Forest Department.

The following native species are being planted and suggested to plant under green belt development.

Table 10.1 List of Plant Species for Greenbelt

Sr. No. Name of Species Form of Species 1. Albizia chinensis Tree 2. Bischofia javanica Tree 3. Duabanga grandiflora Tree 4. Engelhardtia spicata, Tree 5. Erythrina arborescens Tree 6. Ficus reticulata, Tree 7. Gynocardia odorata Tree 10 -7

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-8 of 32

8. Boehmeria platyphylla Tree 9. Caesalpinia decapetala, Tree 10 Euonymus pendulus, Tree 11. Chromolaena odorata, Tree 12 Holmskioldia anguinea, Tree 13. Holmskioldia anguinea, Tree 14 Hedychium spicatum Sm. Medicinal Plants 15. Acrocarpus fraxinifolius Arnott. Tree 16. Centella asiatica (L.) Urban Medicinal Plants 17. Costus speciosus Smith Medicinal Plants 18. Acacia catechu (L. f.) Willd. Tree 19. Agapetes serpens(Wight) Sleumer Shrub 20. Albizia procera (Roxb.) Benth. Tree 21. Antidesma acidum Retzium. Shrub

10.7 COMPENSATORY AFFORESTATION The total land acquired for the project is about 74.007 ha, of which 1.927 ha is the forest land. During field study, it was found that the forest land acquired for the project do not contain any unique or rare or endangered species. The loss of vegetal cover can be compensated by compensatory afforestation. The Forest Conservation Act (1980) stipulates: - if non-forest land is not available, compensatory forest plantations are to be established on degraded forest lands, which must be twice the forest area affected or lost, and - if non-forest land is available, compensatory forest are to be raised over an area equivalent to the forest area affected or lost.

Compensatory afforestation and identification of suitable native tree species are done by State Forest Department. NTPC has paid the amount estimated by the Forest Department as Net Present Value (NPV) of forest land acquired. NTPC has deposited Rs. 7.28 Crores in favor of Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, West Bengal as part of proposal for implementation of CAT Plan for Rammam Stage-III project. NTPC has deposited Rs. 1.46 Crores in favour of PCCF cum Principal Secretary, Govt. of Sikkim as part of proposal for implementation of CAT Plan for Rammam Stage-III project. Compensatory 10 -8

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-9 of 32

afforestation has been done by the Sikkim State Forest Department as per the stipulating outlined as a part of Forestry Clearance. However, utilization certificate from West Bengal Forest department is awaited.

10.8 BIODIVERSITY AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN 10.8.1 Introduction Biodiversity plays a major role as it provides the fundamental building blocks for the many goods and services which provide a healthy environment to lead our life. It includes fundamental things to our health like fresh water, clean air and food products, as well as the many other products and also serves as cultural, recreational, and spiritual nourishment that play an important role in maintaining our personal life as well as social life.

The implementation of Biodiversity conservation strategy is a challenging job especially in North-Eastern States of India likes Sikkim state and Darjeeling hills of West Bengal as the area is predominant with various tribal populations, which consider themselves as an integral part of the forest ecosystem.

The formulation of a biodiversity management plan for a developmental project is one of the steps towards the environment conservation. Human activities like agricultural expansion, road construction, Dam construction, urbanization, and other developmental activities are supposed to be major threats to biodiversity and wildlife, therefore, the most effective and efficient mechanisms for conserving biodiversity is to prevent destruction of habitats. Four strategies required for the biodiversity management are in situ strategy, ex situ strategy, reduction of anthropogenic pressure and rehabilitation of endangered species. A copy of Wildlife Conservation plan is enclosed at Annexure-XVIII.

10.8.2 Biodiversity Policy of NTPC NTPC has become the first PSU to publish a Biodiversity Policy 2018 and become a member of IBBI (India Business and Biodiversity Initiative). This is also in line with 10 -9

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-10 of 32

National Biodiversity Action Plan (NBAP) 2008, which recommends set of actions towards biodiversity management. A copy of Biodiversity Policy is enclosed at Annexure-XXIV.

The purpose of the Biodiversity Policy to mainstream the concept of biodiversity across NTPC’s value chain and adopt a precautionary approach for sustainable management of biodiversity in all decision making processes so that the earth's variety of life is maintained ensured in and around NTPC’s the business units of NTPC.

Policy Statement

To mainstream the concept of biodiversity across NTPC’s value chain and adopt a precautionary approach for sustainable management of biodiversity in all decision- making processes so that the earth's variety of life is ensured in and around the business units of NTPC

The policy is applicable to all existing and upcoming business units of NTPC and each employee is a partner in implementing the policy.

The Biodiversity policy is guided by following five principles: a) Consideration of biodiversity in all business decision right from planning to operations and closure of sites; b) Minimization of adverse impacts on biodiversity through right combination of best industry practices and state of art technologies; c) Biodiversity goals are not limited to statutory and regulatory compliances but are aimed at the continual improvement of the biodiversity; d) Provision of accountability for all locations and creating systems to respond to any aberration; e) Capacity building through inclusiveness and regular knowledge sharing on biodiversity with concerned stakeholders;

10 -10

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-11 of 32

10.8.3 Objectives The main objective of Biodiversity Conservation and Management plan is sustainable use of natural resources, which involves scientific management of natural wealth vis-à-vis developmental activities, is likely to affect these resources. The threats to natural terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem generally arise due to by anthropogenic activities that may arise because of construction and associated activities of project. A detailed biodiversity conservation and management plan has been proposed and the main objectives of said plan are as follows:  Maintenance of ecological balance through preservation and restoration of wherever it has been disturbed due to project developmental activities  Conservation and preservation of natural habitats in catchment area  Rehabilitation of IUCN threatened category, if any provisions for in-situ or ex-situ conservation of IUCN threatened and Schedule –I species  Mitigation and control of project catchment area by taking up afforestation and soil conservation measures  Creating all round awareness regarding conservation and ensuring people’s participation in the conservation efforts and minimizing man animal conflict.

10.8.4 Study area The submergence area is 3.852 Ha, which is located in upstream of confluence of Rammam River near Lodhama Village in the Darjeeling district. The area in the vicinity of project comprised of degraded Mixed broad-leaf tropical deciduous forest with few Semi-evergreen riverine tree species.

On right bank of Rammam river, the tree canopy is comprised of Albizia chinensis, Bischofia javanica, Duabanga grandiflora, Engelhardtia spicata, Erythrina arborescens, Ficus reticulata, Gynocardia odorata, Schima wallichiiand Tetradium fraxinifolium. Second storey is also very thin and composed of some small trees and tall spreading weeds. Boehmeria platyphylla, Caesalpinia decapetala, Euonymus pendulus, Chromolaena odorata, Holmskioldia anguinea, Lantana camara, Rhamnus nepalensis,

10 -11

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-12 of 32

etc. are found in the under storey. Climbers and epiphytes are often seen on the forest floor. Cissus discolor, Cuscuta reflexa, Jasminum humile, Lygodium japonicum, Piper sylvaticum, Stephania glabra, Todalia asiatica, etc. are important trailing species. Herbaceous flora was represented by some pteridophytic plants, grasses and weeds. The pteridophytes are represented by species of Adiantum, Coniograme, Lygodium, Selaginella, etc. on this bank. Among the herbs and grasses are Ageratum conyzoides, Artemisia nilagirica, Arundinella nepalensis, Arthraxon hispidus, Capillipedium assimile, Commelina benghalensis, Eupatorium adenophorum, Imperata cylindrica, Lespedeza gerardiana, Oxalis corniculata, Pilea scripta, Pogonatherum paniceum, Saccharum spontaneum and Thysanolaena latifolia.

Species composition of left bank is more or less similar to the right bank but Dendrocalmus hamiltonii clumps is the dominant and Alnus nepalensis was found as a dominant tree species with other tree associates. Important tree associates were Albizia chinensis, Bischofia javanica, Bombax ceiba, Duabanga grandiflora, Erythrina arborescens, Oroxylum indicum, Pandanus nepalensis, Schima wallichii, etc. Second storey was very open and occupied by few trailing and spreading shrubby species. Dendrocalmus hamiltonii, Chromolaena odorata, Mimosa himalayana, etc. were in the under storey. Climbers and epiphytes were rare. Herbs were represented by few non vascular pteridophytic plants, weeds and few grasses.

10.8.5 Protected areas There are two protected areas which are Singalila National Park and Barsey Rododendron Sanctuary located within the Buffer zone area. Singalila National Park ESZ is located on the west side of project area at a distance of about 7.1 km from the barrage site. The Barsey Rhododendron Wildlife Sanctuary ESZ is at a distance of 4.2 km from the barrage site on NW side.

10 -12

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-13 of 32

10.8.6 Conservation plan for IUCN Threatened Category plants According to Nayar and Sastry (1987, 1988, and 1990) and Ministry of Environment and Forests, 13 species of plants are under the endangered category, two of them viz. Zeuxine pulchra (Orchidaceae) and Dennstaedtia elwesii (Dennstaedtiaceae) in all probability have already disappeared from Sikkim Himalaya. Around 10 species of plants are in vulnerable category and 18 species have become rare. Six species of plants have indeterminate status such as Acer hookeri var. majus (Endangered), Aconitum ferox (Vulnerable), Acronema pseudotenera (Indeterminate), Angelica nubigena (Indeterminate), Aphyllorchis parviflora (Rare), Arenaria thangoensis (Vulnerable), Athyrium duthei (Vulnerable), Begonia rubella (Rare), Begonia satrapis (Rare), Begonia scutata (Rare), Calamus inermis (Endangered), Calanthe alpina (Rare), Calanthe mannii (Rare), Carex kingiana (Indeterminate), Ceropegia hookeri (Endangered), Ceropegia lucida (Endangered or possibly extinct), Christella clarkei (Vulnerable), Christopteris tricuspis (Indeterminate), Cissus spectabilis (Endangered), Codonopsis affinis (Rare), Coelogyne truetleri (Possibly extent), Cotoneaster simonsii ((Indeterminate), Cyclogramma squamaestipes (Rare), Cymbidium eburneum (Vulnerable), Cymbidium hookerianum (Vulnerable), Cymbidium whiteae (Endangered), Cypripedium elegans (Rare), Cypripedium himalaicum (Rare), Dennstaedtia elwesii (possibly extent), Didiciea cunninghamii (Endangered), Juncus sikkimensis (Rare), Lactuca cooperi (Endangered), Lagerstroemia minuticarpa (Rare), Livistona jenkinsiana (Endangered), Lloydia himalensis (Rare), Mecodium levingei (Rare), Nardostachys grandiflora (Vulnerable), Ophiorrhiza lurida (Rare), Oreopteris elwesii (Rare), Panax pseudoginseng (Vulnerable), Paphiopedilumfairrieanum (Endangered), Paphiopedilum venustum (Vulnerable), Phoenix rupicola (Rare), Picrorhiza kurrooa (Vulnerable), Pimpinella tongloensis (Endangered), Pimpinella wallichii (Endangered), Pternopetalum radiatum (Indeterminate), Rhopalocnemis phalloides (Rare), and Zeuxine pulchra (Endangered or Extinct), these plant species included in the “Carrying capacity study of Teesta basin in Sikkim” published by Ministry of Environment and Forests. Among these plant species, only one species which is Phoenix rupicola (Near Threatened as per IUCN Redlist

10 -13

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-14 of 32

Category) available in the Barrage influence area. There is no vegetation in the Township and Power house areas where the vegetation was cleared.

The peculiar topography, the area and the location of the barrage on a comparatively narrow gorge, perhaps makes the creation of a comparatively 3.852 Ha submerging, small forest area obligatory in this case. However, there deeming feature is that the type of forest affected is, by no means unique to this area alone but occurs in other areas of the vast catchment. Moreover, the percentage of forest-covered land in this catchment is quite low which is 1.927 Ha reserved forest and the provision of compensatory afforestation should adequately take care of the possibility of upsetting the ecological balance. However, it is suggested that while clearing the forest area to be submerged, the Forest Department should take adequate care to translocation the rare species of plants particularly orchids, tree ferns and medicinal herbs and shrubs to other adjoining forest areas as far as feasible and the Project Authority should fully co-operate in this job. These should also ensure that their men and machineries create the least disturbance in the neighboring forest areas. Some of the techniques for ex-situ conservation are listed in Table 10.2. Table 10.2 Techniques of ex-situ conservation Techniques Definition Seed storage Collection of seed samples at one location and their transfer to a gene bank for storage. The samples are usually dried to suitable low moisture content and then kept at sub-zero temperatures. Field gene bank The collecting of seed or living material from one location and its transfer and planting at a second site. Large numbers of accessions of a few species are usually conserved. Botanic garden/ The collecting of seed or living material from one location and its transfer and arboretum maintenance at a second location as living plant collections of species in a garden or for tree species in an arboretum. Small numbers of accessions of a large number of species are usually conserved. In vitro storage The collection and maintenance of explants (tissue samples) in a sterile, pathogen- free environment DNA/pollen The collecting of DNA or pollen and storage in appropriate, usually storage refrigerated conditions.

10 -14

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-15 of 32

From the techniques mentioned in Table 10.2, creation of Botanic garden is proposed for conservation of endangered plants found in Rammam river catchment area. It is proposed to afforest rare and endangered species over an area of 2.5 ha (as a part of compensatory afforestation) as a measure for ex-situ conservation and propagation in consultation with Forest Departments of both states of West Bengal and Sikkim.

Many of the threatened plants and the superior germplasm that are going to be affected can be transplanted to safer locations. There are useful technologies that are available for this purpose. Appropriate technologies suiting to the species concerned could be adopted. Some of the vegetative propagation methods like air layering, grafting, stump planting, cuttings, suckers, stolon’s, bulbil propagation etc. may find application here.

There are many important trees and superior germplasm in the area particularly of timber species and bamboos. We need to create germplasm banks with the materials obtained from it. Though the same species could be found elsewhere, the germplasm may not be available. The propagation and cultivation of these species may be done in co-ordination with the Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Almora, Uttarakhand ENVIS Center at Gangtok, Regional Botanical Survey of India, Gangtok and Forest departments of the both the states.

10.8.7 Establishment of gardens for voucher specimens (Threatened category plants) The proposed repositories would be of special interest to biodiversity conservation, scientific research, education and environmental awareness. An Orchidarium and a fern house are proposed to be developed near project area in association with national Research Centre for Orchids, Pakyong, Sikkim, in which important species of orchids and ferns collected from the catchment area will be conserved.

10.8.8 Conservation and cultivation of medicinal plants It is proposed to develop herbal nursery at appropriate location preferably in the Gram Panchayat. Self-help groups formed by women should be involved for the promotion of

10 -15

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-16 of 32 herbal drugs from the kitchen stock and rare medicinal plants. Species of medicinal plants proposed for plantation in the project area is given as below: i. Aconitum ferox Wall. Ex Ser. ii. Aconitum heterophyllum Wall. Ex Royle iii. Acorus calamus L. iv. Adhatoda vasica L. v. Allium wallichii Kunth. vi. Aloe barbadensis Mill. vii. Artemisia vulgaris L. viii. Astilbe rivularis Ham. ix. Berginia ciliata (How.) Sternb. x. Centella asiatica (L.) Urban xi. Costus speciosus Smith xii. Curcuma aromatica Salisb. xiii. Curcuma caesia Roxb. xiv. Hedychium spicatum Sm. xv. Kaempferia rotunda L. xvi. Kalanchoe pinnata (Lam) Pers. xvii. Nardostachys jatamansi DC. xviii. Ocimum basilicum L. xix. Orchis latifolia L. xx. Panax pseudoginseng Wall. xxi. Picrorrhiza kurroa Royle ex Benth. xxii. Podophyllum hexandrum Royle xxiii. Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn. xxiv. Swertia chirata Ham. xxv. Taxus baccata L. xxvi. Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) Miers xxvii. Tupistra nutans Wall. xxviii. Zingiber cassumunar Roxb.

Farmers shall be trained to make them aware of the use of herbal plants and in animal health care also. West Sikkim Forest Division is rich in a variety of medicinal plants. However, in past uninhibited exploitation of medicinal plants has led to depletion of this valuable resource. Therefore, in order to augment natural stock of medicinal plants in the

10 -16

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-17 of 32

forests, it is proposed to take up planting of medicinal plants and establishing medicinal plants nurseries.

In order to ensure effective forest conservation, strong central legislation like Forest Conservation Act and Wildlife Protection Act has been enacted. The CAMPA (Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority) fund can be utilized to regenerate degraded forest area by way of planting and protecting natural regeneration. Networks of base camps and strike forces can be set up to improve forest protection involving the local people.  Enhance the long-term survival of a species;  Re-establish a keystone species;  Maintain and/or restore natural biodiversity;  Provide long-term economic benefits to the local and/or national economy; to promote conservation awareness; or a combination of these.  Improve vigilance by procurement of field vehicles and motorbikes.  Conduct public awareness programmes, training camps, distribution of pamphlets, brochures, hoardings, etc.  Provision of fire lines within critical areas to protect the forest from accidental fires. 10.8.9 Forest Protection Plan The submergence area is 3.852 Ha which is located in upstream of confluence of Rammam River near Lodhama Village in the Darjeeling district. The following measures are proposed as a part of Forest Protection Plan:  PBR’s shall be prepared, maintained and to validate in consultation with the local people so that the Register gives information about the details of access to biological resources and traditional knowledge pertaining to the area.  In order to ensure effective forest conservation, strong central legislation like Forest Conservation Act and Wildlife Protection Act has been enacted. The CAMPA (Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority) fund can be utilized to regenerate degraded forest area by way of planting and protecting 10 -17

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-18 of 32

natural regeneration. Networks of base camps and strike forces can be set up to improve forest protection involving the local people.  Enhance the long-term survival of a species;  Re-establish a keystone species;  Maintain and/or restore natural biodiversity;  Provide long-term economic benefits to the local and/or national economy; to promote conservation awareness; or a combination of these.  Improve vigilance by procurement of field vehicles and motorbikes.  Conduct public awareness programmes, training camps, distribution of pamphlets, brochures, hoardings, etc.  Provision of fire lines within critical areas to protect the forest from accidental fires.

10.8.10 Biodiversity Management Committee (BMC) The proposed Biodiversity Management Committee (BMC) will follow the guidelines of National Biodiversity Authority and State Biodiversity Conservation Strategy Action Plans (SBCSAP) to implement, monitor and evaluate the Biodiversity Management Plan of the existing Rammam Hydro Power project The Biodiversity Champion shall be designated among the executives from the NTPC Rammam HEPP and he will carry out the Biodiversity Conservation related activities with the help of others who keeps interest on biodiversity.

The budget for implementation of Biodiversity and Wildlife Management Plan shall be utilized from the CAT plan budget already deposited to the Forest Departments of Govt. of West Bengal and Sikkim. An amount of Rs. 3.2562 crores &Rs. 1.189 crores have been deposited to the forest department of West Bengal & Sikkim in 2008 & 2010, respectively. Fund utilisation for Sikkim portion during 2009 & 2010 furnished by DFO, LU & E (West), Forest, Envi. & WL Management Department, Govt. Of Sikkim has already been forwarded to MoEF&CC, Shillong, vide NHL/RammamIII/11-12/01 dated 9th May 2011. Fund utilisation report for WB part is still awaited.

10 -18

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-19 of 32

10.9 PUBLIC HEALTH DELIVERY PLAN The increase in water fringe area provides suitable habitats for the growth of vectors of various diseases and they are likely to increase the incidence of water-related diseases. Malaria could be the major water related vector-borne disease. The main breeding seasons of the anopheline mosquito (malaria vector) are the months of September and March. The preferred habitat is stagnant or slow-moving fresh water open to sunshine or moderate shade. Malaria can be controlled by mosquito control and mosquito proofing measures.

Mosquito control measures aim at destroying the habitat and interrupting the life cycle by mechanical or biological or chemical means. The anti-malarial operations are coordinated by various Primary Health Centres in the nearby villages and Hospital at District Head Quarters in association with the project authorities.

Development of medical facilities The labour population resides in 2 to 3 colonies near to the construction site. In addition they may invariably come up with injuries caused by accidents at work site. Under all circumstances, workers need immediate medical care. Medical/ First Aid facilities along with Ambulance are available at all the working sites for 24x7 for providing medical assistance in case any accident at site during construction. Regular health check-up of all labour is done before issuing the work permit. In addition to this, Doctor is available on permanent/ weekly basis at Power House/ Barrage site respectively.

The sanitation facilities and community toilets has been provided in labour camps to prevent unhygienic conditions in project area. Regular medical check-up of construction worker is done by various contracting agencies of NTPC. Regular fogging and sanitation work is done in project township and labour camps. Regular water sprinkling is being done at excavation area to minimize fugitive emissions causing health problems to locals.

10 -19

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-20 of 32

NTPC is always forefront in development of health facilities and its related programs under community development activities. Periodically medical camps have been organized in nearby villages and free medicines are provided to villagers during camps. NTPC Rammam also have a Medical Dispensary for treatment of worker, employees and PAPs. Approved budget for Health and medical services is 450 lakhs. In last 5 years 2015-2021 about 287.29 lakhs has been incurred on this head. Two ambulances have been donated to Govt. Rural Hospital.

10.10 CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION Construction Phase The air pollution is basically generated due to primary crushing and fugitive dust from the heap of crushed material. The various crushers provided with cyclones to control the dust generated while crushing the stone aggregates. The fine aggregates stacked after crushing are regularly sprayed with water to prevent fugitive emissions. In addition, fugitive emissions are generated as a result of movement of earth movers, vehicular traffic on unpaved roads, etc. Regular spray water over such areas to prevent entrainment of fugitive emissions being followed.

Operation Phase The emissions from DG sets shall be periodically monitored and preventive maintenance will be done regularly to achieve emission norms. All heavy vehicles and equipment’s for clearing of road and landslides will have “Pollution Under Control” certificates. The labour engaged in operation of plant will be given LPG Cylinders by contractors to avoid

the burning of fuel wood and avoid the CO2 emission.

10.11 CONTROL OF WATER POLLUTION Construction Phase During project construction phase, sufficient measures are implemented to ameliorate the problem of water pollution from various sources. The sewage generated from various

10 -20

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-21 of 32

labour camps is treated in Biodigestor septic tank. The disposal sites of treated sewage are located in such a way that the drinking water sources are not polluted.

The construction activities require a crusher to crush large lumps of rocks to the requisite size for coarse as well as fine aggregates. The effluent generated from these crushers has high suspended solids. The crusher plant effluent is being passed through settling tank to remove the suspended solids and only the sediment free water is allowed to enter the natural stream. The sludge from the various settling tanks collected once in 15 days and disposed in environmentally friendly manner.

Operation phase In the project operation phase, about 30 persons are likely to be involved for which a project colony has already been commissioned. The colony have Biodigestor septic tank to treat the sewage generated from the colony.

10.12 FISH MANAGEMENT The implementation of fish management plan including construction of a hatchery has been taken up with fisheries department, Govt. of West Bengal as well as with the Fisheries Department of Sikkim. Comprehensive Fish Management Plan is awaited from Govt. of W.B.

10.12.1 Release of minimum flow The construction of the project will lead to reduction in flow, especially during dry months, in the intervening stretch between the barrage/dam site and the tail race disposal point. Such a situation may adversely affect the benthic communities and fish. Snow trout (Schizothorax sp.) are likely to be affected as a result of obstruction in their migration created by the barrage

The segment of river between barrage site and tail race disposal at certain places may retain some water in shallow pools subjecting the fish to prey by birds and other animals.

10 -21

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-22 of 32

Such a condition will also enable the locals to catch fish indiscriminately. It is therefore, very essential for the project authorities to maintain the minimum flow for the survival and propagation of invertebrates and fish. In order to avoid the possible loss of aquatic life, a minimum flow of 1 cumec shall always be released from the barrage/dam. The minimum flow to be released is about 18% of the minimum flow of 5.35 cumec recorded in river.

10.12.2 Fish Migration Among the Himalayan fish, Tor putitora (Mahseer) is the most important species. The fish traverses a long distance from the Himalayan foothills or even from the plains to the upper reaches in smaller tributaries for spawning. Generally, the fish ascends during the months of April-June and uses the main river channel as the migratory route and finally enters tributaries to spawn. Water temperature, turbidity and food availability are the main factors which led Mahseer to the tributaries. After spawning, the fish descends to the main river during September and October.

10.12.3 Sustenance of Endemic Fisheries Snow trout (Schizothoraxrichardsonii) is the endemic species. The barrage on river Rammam developed as a part of the project will act as a barrier to the free movement of fish species. There are no satisfactory fish passes available for snow trout. Due to its dorso-lateral compressed body, the snow trout is not an active swimmer as compared to Indian Mahaseer and exotic brown trout.

Since, Schizothorax richardsonii is categorized as vulnerable species amongst the threatened fishes of India, scientific management of the existing stock needs be adopted. The water spread area in the project is quite small and the project is envisaged as Run off the River (ROR) scheme, with significant diurnal variations. Hence, reservoir stocking is not recommended in the project.

It is proposed to implement supplementary stocking programmes for the project area. It is proposed to stock River Rammam upstream and the downstream sides. On upstream side,

10 -22

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-23 of 32

stocking will be done upto diversion structure of Rammam-II HEP. On the downstream, stocking will be done upto confluence of River Rangit with river Rammam. The rate of stocking is proposed as 100 fingerlings of about 30 mm size per km. The stocking can be done annually by the Fisheries Department, State Government of West Bengal. To achieve this objective, facilities to produce seed of trout need to be developed at suitable sites. The total cost required for developing of hatcheries shall be Rs. 65 lakhs. The dimension of the hatching nurseries and rearing unit and their approximate cost is given in Table- 10.3. Table-10.3 Farm components in snowtrout facilities proposed for Rammam Stage-III HEP Farm Component Area (m) Num Type Rate of flow Cost (Rs. ber (lpm) million) Hatchery building 20x15x8.0 1 - - 0.5 Hatching trough each 2.0x0.5x 0.4 20 Flow through 3.0-5.0 1.0 with 4 trays each system Nursery ponds (Cement 5.0 x 1.0 x 15 Flow through 25-50 1.0 lined) 0.5 system

Rearing tanks (cement 10.0 x 2.0 x 10 Flow through 75-100 1.0 lined) 1.0 system Stock raceways 25.0x3.0x 5 Flow through 150-200 2.0 (cement lined) 1.5 system Storage – cum – silting 100x50x50 1 - - 1.0 tank Total 6.5

The above facility will be developed and implemented by Fisheries Department, State Government of West Bengal at an appropriate site. The estimated amount for this facility is Rs. 65 Lakhs. Seeds can be transported from this hatchery. The supply of seeds can be augmented by collecting them from natural sources. Production, transportation and stocking of fish material are a highly technical subject for which project proponent may

10 -23

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-24 of 32

not have the required expertise. Thus, implementation of this proposal may be done by the Fisheries Department.

10.13 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION As per the available data the project and its surrounding areas do not have much of wildlife. Around the main construction areas i.e. the barrage site, powerhouse site, etc. where construction workers congregate, no significant disturbance in the wildlife population was observed. In view of the low wildlife concentration in the area, the impacts due to various construction activities are marginal.

The project area is located at a distance of about 9 km from nearest boundary of Singalila National Park and about 4.4 km from the Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary, West Sikkim. None of the components of the project are situated within the National Park/ Wildlife Sanctuary or their Eco sensitive Zones. Thus, no impact is expected on the National Park. However, Wildlife Conservation Plan as proposed for implementation. The conservation plan shall be submitted to wildlife department for approval and after approval, same shall be implemented in consultation with state wildlife department.

10.14 SEISMICITY CONSIDERATIONS The Rammam basin has experienced quite a few earthquakes of moderate to severe intensities in the last 100-120 years. The project area forms a part of the seismic zone-IV (as per seismic zoning map of BIS). As per Bureau of Indian Standard (BIS) recommendation 0.1 g horizontal and 0.05 g vertical acceleration is to be considered for design of structures on consolidated foundations.

The seismic study has been conducted by IIT Roorkee. The suggested Earth Quake (EQ) design parameters have been cleared from National Committee of Seismic Design Parameters (NCSDP) of CWC and are being adopted for design of the project components. (Report already submitted to MOEF, Shillong in May 2011)

10 -24

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-25 of 32

10.15 NOISE CONTROL MEASURES Noise pollution can be mitigated at the source itself. As discussed in Chapter-4, the ambient noise levels would have marginal increase up to about 1 km from the major construction sites. The increased level of noise will, however, not have any significant adverse impact. The effect of high noise levels on the construction labour is to be considered. It is known that continuous exposure to high noise levels above 90 dB(A) affects the hearing acuity of the workers/operators and hence has to be avoided. Other physiological and psychological effects have also been reported in literature, but the effect on hearing acuity has been specially stressed. To prevent these effects, it has been recommended by international specialist organizations that the exposure period of affected persons is limited as specified in Table 4.12. Further, they are provided with effective personal protective measures such as ear muffs or ear plugs to be worn during periods of exposure. The other measures to control noise are as follows: - Equipment and machineries maintained regularly to keep the noise generation at the design level; - Silencers and mufflers of the individual machineries regularly checked.

10.16 ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GROUP An Environmental Management Group (EMG) consisting of competent workforce headed by AGM level and assisted by Sr. Manager has been established by the Rammam HEPP. This department deals with various environmental aspects including follow-up with SPCB, Regional office MOEF&CC and CPCB and interacts with inter- disciplinary groups responsible for maintenance and operation of pollution control equipment and environmental protection measures. The Environmental Management Group (EMG) is reporting to the Head of Project, for effective implementation of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP).

As per the present set-up, the environmental groups in NTPC have a three-tier organization structure, as shown in Table 10.4.

10 -25

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-26 of 32

Table-10.4 Organization Structure of NTPC for Overall Environmental Management Engineering Environmental Engineering Group Environmental Management Group Operations Ash Management Group Safety Corporate Centre Rehabilitation & Resettlement, CSR-CD Groups Human Resources Horticulture Group Medical & Public Health Regional Environmental Management As Coordinator Headquarters Coordinator Environmental Management Group Hydro Engg & Maintenance group Operation & Maintenance Safety Projects R&R, CSR-CD Group Human Resources Horticulture Medical & Public Health 10.17 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND EMP A summary of impacts and proposed measures along with the implementing agencies is given in Table-10.5.

Table-10.5 Summary of Impacts, suggested management measures and implementing agency S. Parameters Impact Management Implementing Actual No. Measures Agency Implementation 1. Land Environment Construction  Increase in  Proper collection  NTPC/  Disposal of phase turbidity in the and disposal of Contractor spoils at Muck river construction spoils. disposal site downstream of barrage/dam and power house sites

 Development of  NTPC &  NTPC  Increased PHC’s, first aid District Public dispensary is incidence of centre, anti- Health established and water related mosquito spray Department regular diseases and sanitization other health activities being 10 -26

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-27 of 32

S. Parameters Impact Management Implementing Actual No. Measures Agency Implementation problems done

 Generation of  Disposal at  NTPC/.  Disposal solid wastes designated landfill through NJMC from labour sites. camps/colonies. 2. WATER RESOURCES Operation  River stretch  Minimum flow  NTPC  Plant is under phase from will be released to construction barrage/dam site maintain the Phase to tailrace riverine ecology outfall will have reduced flow during lean

season.

 Siltation and  No major impact as sedimentation  Forest project is Run off Department/ problems River project. NTPC Plantation and check dams will be constructed 3. WATER QUALITY Construction  Water pollution  Community toilets,  NTPC  Measures phase due to disposal Biodigestor septic already taken of sewage from tank by NTPC labour colonies.

 Disposal of effluents with  Settling tanks high turbidity provided.  Project  Done from crushers Contractor commissioned at

various sites and

effluents from

adits at tunnel.

 Deterioration of water quality in Operation the dry stretch phase of river due to  Minimum flow of  Plant is under reduced flow 1 cumec will be  NTPC construction during the lean released Phase

10 -27

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-28 of 32

S. Parameters Impact Management Implementing Actual No. Measures Agency Implementation season.

 Disposal of  Biodigestor sewage from  Commission-ing of  NTPC commissioned project colony. Biodigestor septic tank

4. TERRESTRIAL FLORA Construction  Cutting of trees  Providing LPG to  Project  LPG phase for meeting fuel construction labour Contractor/ Cylinders/Keros wood and technical staff. NTPC ene provided to requirements by labour labour.

 Acquisition of  Compensatory  Forest &  Fund released to forest land. afforestation. Revenue Forest Dept. for Department/ Compensatory NTPC afforestation. 5. TERRESTRIAL FAUNA Construction  Disturbance to  No major wildlife is  NTPC/Forest  Wild Life phase wildlife due to found, hence impact Dept. Conservation operation of is not expected to be plan prepared. various significant. construction equipment.  No major wildlife is Operation  Impacts on recorded at project  NTPC/Forest  Wild Life phase Singalila site hence impact is Dept. Conservation National Park not expected to be plan will be due to increased significant. implemented. accessibility in However, the area as a surveillance through result of check posts is congregation of recommended to labour mitigate on the population. Sangalila National Park and Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary

10 -28

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-29 of 32

S. Parameters Impact Management Implementing Actual No. Measures Agency Implementation 6. AQUATIC ECOLOGY Construction  Marginal  Treatment of  NTPC/  Settling ponds phase decrease in effluent with high Project already installed aquatic suspended solids Contractor productivity due through settling to increased tanks turbidity and lesser light penetration.

 Impacts on Operation  Stocking of river  NTPC  Consultation migration of phase Rammam upstream with fisheries snow trout. and downstream of dept will be

barrage/dam site. done.

 Drying of river  Release of stretch minimum flow of 1  NTPC downstream of cumec barrage/dam up  Will be done to tail race during operation outfall

7. NOISE ENVIRONMENT Construction  Marginal  Maintenance of  Project  Noise phase increase in noise construction contractor monitoring at levels due to equipment site has been operation of done at site various  Provision of ear  PPE to labour construction plug /ear muff to provided. equipment. labour operating in high noise areas

8. AIR ENVIRONMENT Construction  Fugitive  Cyclone in each  Project  Water sprinkling phase emissions due to crusher. contractor is being done crusher operation at various sites.

9. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

10 -29

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-30 of 32

S. Parameters Impact Management Implementing Actual No. Measures Agency Implementation Construction  Acquisition of  Compensation as  NTPC and  Land already phase land and other per R&R package. State acquired and properties. Government R&R plan of West implemented. Bengal and Sikkim

10. Increased incidence of water-related diseases Construction  Increased water-  Provision of  Project  Community phase borne diseases community toilets contractor/ toilets and bio- and bio-digestor NTPC digestor septic septic tanks. tanks installed

Operation  Increase in  Medical check-up  NTPC &  Plant is under phase water-related of labour and Public Health construction diseases due to development of Department phase creation of medical facilities. suitable habitats for growth of  Spray of chemicals vectors. to avoid growth of vectors

10.18 NTPC’S ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY NTPC has a well laid Environment Policy and Environment Management System in 2021. A copy of NTPC Environment Policy (2021) document is enclosed as Annexure- XXV. The intent of this policy is to meet environmental expectations and provide actionable guidance, as NTPC strives to foster a culture of excellence and challenges itself for continual improvement.

The NTPC Environment Policy statement is as follows. “To provide cleaner energy by committing to highest possible levels of performance in environmental compliance, practices and stewardship.” A Risk Management Committee comprises of members from senior functionaries of management as per provisions of Companies Act, 2016 has been constituted to establish system for reporting environment related parameters, deviations and constraints to management. Environmental risks perceived are reviewed through risk management mechanism for appropriate action. 10 -30

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1

RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-31 of 32

Concerned group oversee compliance assurance of operating stations through reviews and appraisals.

NTPC continue to identify all stakeholders and engage with them at appropriate levels, to exchange views on environmental concerns and mitigation measures thereof.

10.19 COST FOR IMPLEMENTING ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN The total amount cost for implementation of Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is Rs. 3269.1 lakh (excluding cost required for cost of trees and NPV of forest land acquired). The details are given in Table-10.5. Table-10.5 Cost for implementing Environmental Management Plan (EMP)

S. No. Item Cost* (Rs. lakh) 1. Sanitary facilities in labour camps 41.0 2. Solid waste management 53.5 3. Provision for free fuel distribution 78.6 4. Environmental Management in road construction 99.0 5. Management of muck disposal sites 103.1 6. Landscaping and restoration of construction sites 20.0 7. Greenbelt development 15.0 8. Compensatory afforestation 15.9 9. Public Health Delivery System 250.0 10. Construction of settling tanks 20.0 11. Sustenance of riverine fisheries 65.0 12. Wildlife Conservation 83.7 13. Setting up Environmental Laboratory 30.0 14. Catchment Area Treatment Plan 320.8 15. Resettlement & Rehabilitation Plan including CD 1903.0 16. Cost of noise meter 0.5 17. Environmental Monitoring Programme during 70.0 construction phase (refer Table-9.2) 18. Contingencies 100.0 Total 3269.1

10 -31 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1

RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C10-32 of 32

The recurring cost for implementation of EMP included Environmental Monitoring cost, Plantation, ETP/Sewage treatment, and salary of EMG Staff etc. The estimated budget for recurring cost for EMP would be about 2 crores/year.

10.20 RESERVOIR RIM TREATMENT PLAN As the Rammam HEPP stage-III is Run of River project and the storage capacity is limited to 0.27 MCM, no large reservoir is envisaged. The submergence area is very small (3.852 Ha) and it will not cause any land slide. However, the surrounding loose rocks in water storage area of barrage will be dressed to prevent land slide, in future. Plantation will be done in surrounding area of barrage to mitigate land slide and land slip.

10 -32

CHAPTER – XI SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-1 of 22

CHAPTER-11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

11.0 INTRODUCTION NTPC Limited is constructing Rammam Hydro Electric Power Project (HEPP), Stage III (3x40 MW) in Darjeeling District of West Bengal. The project is located on Rammam River, which flows along the border of West Bengal and Sikkim at about 50 km from Ghoom and 130 km from Siliguri on Siliguri-Darjeeling Road in District Darjeeling of West Bengal.

The site for diversion structure is located downstream at the confluence of Rammam with Lodhama khola near Lodhama village just downstream of the powerhouse of Rammam Stage-II hydroelectric project (51 MW under operation by West Bengal State Electricity Board). The site for powerhouse is located near village Barbatia on the right bank of River Rammam. All the major project components are located in the State of West Bengal except the right abutments of the Barrage structure and a portion of submergence area in Siktam Block of West Sikkim.

Earlier Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change (MOEF&CC) accorded the Environmental Clearance (EC) for project vide letter No. J-12011/42/2007-IA.I dated 17.08.2007 with a validity period of 10 years. Further, MOEF&CC vide its letter dated 13.07.2017, extended the validity of EC for a further period of 3 years i.e. up to 16.08.2020. MOEF&CC vide Notification dated 18.01.2021 (Copy enclosed at Annexure-I) has amended the EIA Notification, 2006 and made a provision that period from 01.04.2020 to the 31.03.2021 shall not be considered for the purpose of calculation of the period of validity of prior Environmental Clearance in view of outbreak of Corona Virus (COVID-19) and subsequent lockdowns. Hence, the Environment Clearance for Rammam HEPP is valid till 16.08.2021.

M/S SV Enviro Labs & Consultants a NABET-QCI Accredited firm has been entrusted to conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in and around of the project site. The MoEF&CC approved the standard ToR for the proposed project vide F.No. J-

11 -1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-2 of 22

12011/11/2020-IA-I (R) dated 12th February 2021. Environmental baseline monitoring was carried out during July’ 2020 to September’ 2020 representing monsoon season and used to identify potential significant impacts. Since the project is in advanced stage of construction and more than 50% has been completed, it is exempted from requirement of public hearing as per MoEF&CC Notification S.O. 1247(E) dated 18.03.2021.

11.1 LOCATION & ACCESSIBILITY Rammam Hydro Power Project, Stage-III (3X40 MW) is located in District Darjeeling (West Bengal) & West Sikkim (Sikkim). It is a Run of the River (ROR) scheme utilizing power potential of Rammam River from elevation EL. 900.0 m to EL. 397.0 m. All the major project components are located in the State of West Bengal except the right abutments of the Barrage structure and a portion of submergence area in Siktam Block of West Sikkim. The Latitude and Longitude of the Diversion Structure and Barrage are given in Table-11.1.

The vicinity map and topographical map of the project is shown in Fig 11.1 and 11.2 respectively. Table-11.1 Coordinates of Project Components Project Component Latitude Longitude Diversion Structure 27°06'47" N 88°08'39" E Township 27°07'47" N 88°12'55" E Power House 27°07'25" N 88°13'20" E

The project is about 50 km from Ghoom (Siliguri-Darjeeling Road) and about 130 km from Siliguri in Darjeeling District of West Bengal. The nearest rail head is New Jalpaiguri (at about 115 km) and the nearest airport is Bagdogra (at about 110 km).

11 -2

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-3 of 22

Fig 11.1: Vicinity Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW)

11 -3

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-4 of 22

Fig 11.2: Topo Map of Rammam HEPP, Stage-III (3x40 MW)

11 -4

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-5 of 22

11.2 NEED OF THE PROJECT As per the interstate agreement between Sikkim & West Bengal, the share of power of the Sikkim Government (12%) will be made available to the Sikkim Government at free of cost. The Rammam Stage-III Hydro Electric Power Project would not only meet the power requirements, but would also improve the ratio of hydro, thermal mix as well.

11.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is envisaged to harness the hydropower potential of River Rammam. The project comprises of diversion arrangement, desilting chamber, water conveyance system, powerhouse and tailrace. Installed capacity of the project will be 120 MW and will utilize a design discharge of 28.31 cumecs.

The project comprises of the following components:  Barrage/dam as a diversion structure  Intake tunnel  Underground desilting chamber  HRT (Head Race Tunnel)  Surge Shaft  Surface Penstock  Vertical Pressure Shaft  Power House  Tail Race Channel (TRC) The project consists of 23 m high Barrage (above u/s apron level) 122.5m long Barrage near Lodhama Village and approximately 10.75km of water conductor system (8.2 km long 3.5m dia horse shoe shape head race tunnel, 1.6 km long Penstock and 0.74 km long tailrace channel etc.). It has also a 14.5 m dia 53.75m high surge shaft and a deep seated surface power house near Barbatia village on right bank of the Rammam River. The project is envisaged to use water from catchment area of 247sq. km.

11 -5

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-6 of 22

Techno Economic Clearance (TEC) for the project has been obtained from Central Electricity Authority (CEA), Govt. of India vide letter dated 12.09.2006 and revalidated on 01.08.2013 and the construction of the project started in September 2014.

11.3.1 Project Cost The project is in advance stage of construction and anticipated completion of its all three units (i.e. I, II & III) is by December 2026.

Total Cost of the Project is:

As per EC: Rs. 633.92 Crores

As per Inv. Approval: Rs. 1,381.84 Crores (2nd Qtr, 2014)

11.3.2 Minimum water flow in the River Environmental clearance for the projects was been accorded with a condition that iv) A minimum flow of 1 cumec shall always be released from the barrage. The minimum flow to be released is about 22% of the minimum flow of 4.47 cumec recorded in the river

The change in minimum flow as per Standard TOR at this stage shall drastically reduce the power generation from the project and render the project commercially unviable.

The issue of minimum flow in the rivers downstream of the hydro power projects has been a subject of study and deliberations at different levels.

(a) National Green Tribunal in its Order dated 09/08/2017 in the matter of Pushp Saini Vs. Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change & Others regarding environmental flow of the rivers directed that all the rivers in the country shall maintain minimum 15 % to 20% of the average lean season flow of that river. During the same case, counsel appearing for Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change submitted that the Ministry has already completed river basin

11 -6

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-7 of 22

study of 6 river basins i.e. Siang River Basin, Twang River Basin, Bichom River Basin, Subansiri River Basin, Dibang River Basin and Lohit River Basin and upon study the Ministry has recommended the minimum flow of the river to be 18% of the average of lean season flow of the river. However, in some of the cases, it has stated to be even 20%.

(b) Further, MOEF&CC has also undertaken a Cumulative Impact Assessment and Carrying Capacity Study (CIA & CCS) of Teesta River Basin. The minutes of EAC (Hydro) meeting held on 23.04.2019, during which a presentation was made on the CIA and CCS Study, it was noted that Rammam-II & Rammam-III are under operation and construction stage respectively. The change in Environmental Flow has been recommended for Rammam-I and Rammam Intermediate HEPs only, which are under planning.

In view of the above, NTPC Rammam HEPP will maintain the minimum Environmental flow of 1 cumecs as stipulated in the original environmental clearance.

11.4 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS The study of the baseline environmental status helps in assessing the existing environmental conditions and identifying the critical environmental attributes. The study of the physical, biological and socio-economic environment of the project area within a radius of 10 km (study area) comprises of the baseline environment. Primary and secondary data were collected for the EIA study.

11.4.1 Physical Environment Climate and Meteorology The study area falls under Humid Subtropical zone according to Koppen’s classification of climate zones. Winter and early summer are long and dry; summer is exceedingly hot leading to heat waves. The rainy season lasts from June to September. As per IMD data, wind speed is high and found mostly between 1.5-3.3 m/sec for all the months. The wind

11 -7

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-8 of 22 speed during summer recorded is high, and during rainy season, and winter recorded low. The predominant wind direction is from Southwest.

Air Quality

The ambient air quality representing PM10, PM2.5 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Oxides

(NOx), Carbon Monoxide (CO) was monitored at seven different locations for 24 hours twice a week from July’ 2020 to September’ 2020. Volatile Organic Carbons (VOCs),

Methane (CH4), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs), Ozone, Ammonia, Lead (Pb),

Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), Arsenic (As), Nickel (Ni) were monitored for the same period. All the parameters were found to be below the National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS), 2009. The average 24 hourly PM10 at monitoring locations 3 3 ranged between 29.0-66.9 µg/m (NAAQS-100 µg/m ). The average 24 hourly PM2.5 at monitoring locations ranged between 8.1-33.0 µg/m3 (NAAQS-60 µg/m3). The average 3 24 hourly SO2 at monitoring locations ranged between 6.8-13.1 µg/m (NAAQS-80 3 µg/m ). The average 24 hourly NOx at monitoring locations ranged between 7.2-14.6 µg/m3 (NAAQS-80 µg/m3). The average 24 hourly CO at monitoring locations ranged 3 3 between 0.10-0.30 µg/m (NAAQS-4.0 mg/m ). The average 24 hourly O3 at monitoring 3 3 locations ranged between 9.2-44.2 µg/m (NAAQS-180 µg/m ). Ammonia (NH3, Lead

(Pb), Benzene (C6H6), Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), Arsenic (As), Nickel (Ni), HC (methane and non methane Hydro Carbon), Volatile Organic Carbon (VOC) - are remained below detection limit (BDL) in the study area.

Noise Quality The noise quality was monitored for 24 hours at seven locations in and around the project site. The ambient noise quality at day and night was in compliance to the Noise Limits set for the residential area as per Noise Pollution (Control and Regulations), 2000. The daytime noise level was found in the range between 50.8-62.5 dB (A) whereas the night time noise level was found in the range between 42.6-55.6 dB(A).

11 -8

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-9 of 22

Geology Geologically, three important groups of rocks observed in the vicinity of the project area. They are older Daling group, younger Gondwana group and older Daling/Buxa group. No major occurrence of economic deposit has been found in the study area, except materials like boulder, pebbles, sand that bears no economic mineral importance, being utilized as construction material.

Hydrogeology The major water bearing formations are Darjeeling, Daling and Gondwana groups where ground water occurs in weathered zones, joints and fractures. The project area is characterized by hilly terrain - it acts as a recharge area where surface runoff is very high, has limited infiltration in the intermountain valleys. Ground water is harnessed using perennial springs and jhoras. The discharge of most of the springs ranges from 1 to 50 lpm during lean period and a few jhorasi kholas give discharge in the range of 50 to 500 lpm. Piedmont zone with high permeability, sloping topography and sub-surface runoff is characterised by poor to moderate yield ranging from 5 to 50 cum per hour. Aquifers in alluvial plain are highly potential with yield prospects ranging from 50 to 150 cum per hour. Aquifers at 200m below ground level with expected yield of 27 litres per second are reported. Water level fluctuation is in the order of 2 to 6 m in the northern foot hill part and less than 2m in the central and southern parts.

Groundwater Quality Groundwater was collected and analyzed as per IS: 10500:2012 from six locations in the study area. All the parameters analyzed were under the acceptable and permissible limit of IS: 10500:2012. Heavy metals were found to be below detection limit.

Surface Water Quality Surface water was sampled from six representative locations. The water samples were analyzed and compared as per IS 2296. The pH of the surface water samples varied from 6.8-7.2. The DO levels at all the locations exhibited values ranging from 5.1-6.1 mg/l.

11 -9

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-10 of 22

Nitrate content of all collected surface water sample ranges from 0.14-0.31 mg/l. TDS and Total hardness was found to be 71 mg/l to 86 mg/l and 24 mg/l to 36 mg/l respectively. The total coliform count of the surface water samples varied between 440MPN/100 ml to 480MPN/100 ml. All the heavy metals were found to be within below detectable limits. However, the water quality is not coming under any class designated by CPCB Water Use Criteria, but during the field visit, it has been observed that the water is being used for irrigation, bathing, cleaning and for catching fishes.

Land Use The study area is covered with Dense Vegetation around 57.83% respectively of the total area. Other class is Grass/Agricultural Fields occupies around 11.4%. The Contour Farming & Fallow Lands is 5.60% in the total study area. The scrub area covers 20.83% of the total area. The Barren land & Fallow lands cover about 3.61% of total area. Water body and Built-up area is covered with 0.69% and 0.1% respectively.

Soil Quality The pH of the soils is acidic in nature. The electrical conductivity in the study area is varying from 52.3 to 62.9 micro-mhos/ cm (µmhos/cm). This is average for germination. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and organic Carbon are very less sufficient level for crops. Residual soils are well developed on level summits of lesser Himalayas, sub-soils are deep and heavily textured. High contents of organic matter are found in its `A’ horizon and are acidic in nature. The soils in the region are average fertile enough for cultivation of crops.

Natural Hazards Natural calamities like Flood, Landslide and Earthquake are expected. Heavy rainfall and could burst can lead to flood resulting in heavy debris falling into the river channel. The project falls in Zone IV (Severe intensity zone) of Earthquake vulnerability map. Landslides are envisaged for supervision and advice on tunneling/ road construction and/or any other vulnerable area of construction Geological Survey of India (GSI), is also

11 -10

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-11 of 22

associated with NTPC, Rammam, vide MoU dated 8th Feb’ 2015. Disaster management plan has been prepared as an emergency preparedness measure to protect the life of the employees and others present on-site, that of the public in the vicinity of the project, company property and environment

11.4.2 Biological Environment Baseline Survey (Primary data through site visit) and Secondary data received from Forest Department’s Website and other published and unpublished document regarding sensitive ecological habitat and sensitive flora and fauna in the study area. The study area has an undulating topography characterized by hills, hillocks (Locally known as tillah), wide plains, and low-lying waterlogged areas (locally known as beels). The vegetation is mixed evergreen and deciduous forest and in this region, forests are degraded due to development of Tea Estates and Rubber plantations.

11.4.3 Traffic Survey During monsoon collection, mainly four wheelers/cars/jeeps were observed to be more than the trucks or heavy vehicles. It is because tourists from all over India transport in the region. Highest traffic volume was recorded on Jorthang-Soreng road. The road widths in the region vary from 6-10m as it is a hilly terrain. Most of the roads are blacktop; there would not be much of dust emission. Considering the design service volume of 5200 PCU/day for hilly terrain road, the existing traffic volume at the point of traffic count is found to be level of service (LOS) is “A”.

11.4.4 Socioeconomic Environment The Social Impact Assessment study was conducted within the study area of Rammam HEPP Stage-III Run of River (ROR) in Darjeeling and Sikkim districts of West Bengal and Sikkim. Both, secondary and primary details within the study area discussed. It is traditionally involved the use of technical and participatory analytical methods to anticipate change but also encouraging the life cycle of projects to minimize negative outcomes and maximize benefits. The early consideration of social impacts, the alignment of activities with regional and community planning objectives, and meaningful 11 -11

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-12 of 22

participation of community in decision making are key features. Apart from the SIA process and findings it can be concluded that most the respondents have positive perception towards implementation of the project.

11.5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION MEASURES The potential impacts of the project on different components of the environment was systematically identified and evaluated for significance. The principal concerns that emerged are:

11.5.1 Impact on land environment Construction phase The major impacts anticipated on land environment are as follows:  Movement and operation of construction equipment  Soil erosion  Muck disposal  Impacts due to construction of roads  Acquisition of land

Mitigation measures  Turbidity return to its original level after cessation of sandy materials excavation.  Construction equipment is selected in such a way that causes minimum adverse impacts on environmental parameters.  The running velocity of river is enough to dilute effluents/runoff carrying suspended solids.  Water sprinkling during construction of roads.

Operation Phase The operation phase is likely to envisage impacts on the land use pattern due to diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes i.e., for construction and widening of roads,

11 -12

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-13 of 22

installation of surface components both upstream and downstream stretch of the river. Necessary management measures are considered.

11.5.2 Impact on Air Quality Construction Phase The air pollution is basically generated due to primary crushing and fugitive dust from the heap of crushed material. The various crushers provided with cyclones to control the dust generated while crushing the stone aggregates. The fine aggregates stacked after crushing are regularly sprayed with water to prevent fugitive emissions.

In addition, fugitive emissions are generated as a result of movement of earth movers, vehicular traffic on unpaved roads, etc. The activities will generate large quantity of dust

and other gaseous pollutants like Oxides of Sulphur (SOx) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx). Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM) is the main pollutant during construction phase, released in the form of fugitive dust from various operations and activities. Regular spray water over such areas to prevent entrainment of fugitive emissions being followed.

Mitigation measures  Activities are being planned in such a way that dust emissions and other gaseous pollutants will be minimized.  Regular water sprinkling on haul roads and other places  Construction materials and muck for disposal are transported in covered trucks to prevent fugitive emissions like dust etc. in the atmosphere.  Regular maintenance of machines, vehicles and equipments  Developing greenbelt around the project components

Operation Phase Since the project is a Run of River (ROR) scheme and does not involve major air emissions during operation phase, therefore, it will have minimum negative impact on the air quality of the region.

11 -13

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-14 of 22

11.5.3 Impact on Noise Quality Potential impact on noise quality is anticipated from operation of construction/site preparation machineries/equipments and vehicular movement during site preparatory activities. Operation of heavy machinery/equipments and vehicular movement during site preparatory and road strengthening/construction activities may result in the generation of increased noise levels. Operational phase noise impacts are anticipated from operation of pump house.

Mitigation measures  Storage, handling, transportation and operation of explosives required for blasting and tunneling activities  Underground construction work including tunneling, excavation and other related activities  Movement of vehicles on construction site  Storage, handling, detection and safety measures for gases, chemicals and flammable liquids 11.5.4 Impact on Topography and drainage In general, drainage pattern of the area is in conformity with the topography, which area structurally controlled. Potential impact on drainage and topography viz. alteration of drainage pattern, water logging etc. are anticipated during site preparation, widening/strengthening of access roads and surface runoff from construction sites. Mitigation measures  Leveling and grading operations are undertaken with minimal disturbance to the existing contour, thereby maintaining the general slope of site;  Loss of micro-watershed drainage, if any, is to be compensated through provision of alternate drainage.  Disruption/alteration of micro-watershed drainage pattern will be minimized to the extent possible.

11 -14

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-15 of 22

 Proper engineering control has been employed as mitigation measures so that the flow and the course of the stream will not be altered. 11.5.5 Impact on Water Quality Construction Phase The major sources of surface and ground water contamination during project construction phase are as follows:  Sewage from labour camps/colonies.  Effluent from crushers.  Impacts due to extraction of fine sand from riverbed  Impact on Ground water

Mitigation measures  Drainage and sediment control systems at the well site will be efficiently designed.  The sewage generated from various labour camps is being treated in Biodigestor septic tank.  The crusher plant effluent is being passed through settling tank to remove the suspended solids.  The sludge from the various settling tanks collected once in 15 days and disposed at the site designed for disposal of municipal solid wastes from the labour camps.  The sludge after drying used as cover material for landfill disposal site Operation phase In the project operation phase, about 50 persons are likely to be involved for which township has already been developed. Township with amenities like water supply and sanitation facilities including biodigester of total capacity 98 KL.

11.5.6 Impact on Biological Environment Impact on the ecology will be mainly confined to study area.  Cutting of trees for meeting fuel wood requirements by labour.  Acquisition of forest land.  Disturbance to wildlife due to operation of various construction equipment. 11 -15

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-16 of 22

 Marginal decrease in aquatic productivity due to increased turbidity and lesser light penetration.  Impacts on migration of snow trout.  Drying of river stretch downstream of barrage/dam up to tail race outfall.  Marginal decrease in aquatic productivity due to increased turbidity and lesser light penetration.  Impacts on migration of snow trout.  Drying of river stretch downstream of barrage/dam up to tail race outfall

Mitigation measures  Providing LPG to construction labour and technical staff.  Compensatory afforestation.  Minimum clearance of vegetation during site preparation  Fencing would be done on the camp site to avoid any unfortunate encounter with faunal species.  No major wildlife is found, hence impact is not expected to be significant.  Treatment of effluent with high suspended solids through settling tanks  Stocking of river Rammam upstream and downstream of barrage/dam site.  Release of minimum flow of 1 Cumec

11.5.7 Impact on Socio economic Environment From The socio-economic profiles It is observed that a subsistence economy prevails amongst most of the people. Most of them are primarily dependent upon agriculture. However, a few of families to augment their income through / are dependent on jobs and business. There is some migration of labor force from outside the project area during construction phase, which may put some pressure on local settlements and resources. The project envisages all round development and growth in the region as a whole. However, few local people were affected in the form of acquisition of their land. Members of families were provided with R&R package as per NPRR-2003.

11 -16

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-17 of 22

The project will benefit the people living in the neighboring villages through direct & indirect employment opportunities associated with the various project activities and boosts the local economy.

Mitigation measures  Construction/ site preparation phase could lead to creation of indirect employment and procurement opportunities.  Compensation as per R&R package.  There would be influx of workers during construction phase/site preparation which could lead to pressure on key local infrastructure such as water, healthcare, electricity.

11.6 PUBLIC CONSULTATION The Public Hearing of M/s. NTPC Limited was organized by West Bengal Pollution Control Board (WBPCB) on 27.04.2007 at 11:30 AM at Community Hall/Recreation Hall at Lodhama Hat, West Bengal State Electricity Board Township, Dist. - Darjeeling, West Bengal. v State Pollution Control Board, Sikkim on, organized the Public Hearing of M/s. NTPC Limited on 04.05.2007 at Zero Point, Salangdang, West Sikkim, Sikkim.

As per MOEF&CC Notification S.O. 1247(E) dated 18.03.2021, Public Hearing is not essential for the projects, in which construction have been undertaken more than 50%. About 55% expenditure has been made on Rammam HEPP Stage-III till date and project is in advance stage of construction, therefore, the project is exempted from conducting Public Hearing again.

11.7 RISK ASSESSMENT PLAN and DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN This plan has been prepared to assess risk and emergencies scenario associated with project and as an emergency preparedness measure to protect the life of the employees and others present on-site, that of the public in the vicinity of the project, company property and environment. The major risks are two category- Natural Calamities (Flood

11 -17

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-18 of 22

Landslide and Earthquake), Manmade Risk (Fire and Explosion) The plan defines roles & responsibilities of persons at different levels in the event of emergency in the sites of the company.

11.8 CATCHMENT AREA TREATMENT PLAN A Catchment area Treatment Plan for the catchment area intercepted at the diversion structure of the barrage site has been prepared as a part of the Comprehensive EIA study. Catchment characteristics in terms of physiography, geomorphology, climate, land use, soil, denudation processes and conservational activities gained much importance to find out stress areas yielding higher sediments on micro-watershed basis. The CAT plan is being implemented through State Forest Department as a deposit work of respective states of West Bengal & Sikkim. NTPC has deposited Rs. 7.23 Crores in favor of Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, West Bengal as part of proposal for implementation of CAT Plan for Rammam Stage-III project. NTPC has deposited Rs. 1.459 Crores in favor of PCCF cum Principal Secretary, Govt. of Sikkim as part of proposal for implementation of CAT Plan for Rammam Stage-III project.

11.9 PROJECT BENEFITS The implementation of the Rammam Hydro Electric Power Project (HEPP) Stage-III will provide impetus to the development of the area and also provide green energy i.e. hydro- electric power. The project will also throw opportunities to local people for both direct and indirect employment. Various infrastructure like roads, bridges, schools buildings, community center has been developed by project. Various welfare and development activities shall be implemented as per CD/CER/CSR plan.

11.10 ENVIRONMENT COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) simply compares all the expected present and future benefits of a project with its present and future costs. It is a tool used either to rank projects or to choose the most appropriate option. The ranking or decision is based on

11 -18

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-19 of 22

expected economic costs and benefits. However, as the project is already under advance stage of construction, after accord of Techno-economic clearance, the cost benefit is already establsished and the completion of the project is essential.

11.11 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND MONITORING PLAN M/s NTPC Ltd has formulated an Environment Policy and Safety Policy for its operations. Through these Policy, M/s NTPC Ltd. is committed to protect the Environment, health and safety of everyone involved in its operations, and the sustainability of the environment in which it operates. The company strives for continual improvement and the adoption of national/international codes and standards and also aims at ensuring that all its operations comply with applicable health, safety and environmental laws, regulations and other requirements.

A comprehensive environmental monitoring plan has been developed for the project. Monitoring of ambient air quality, noise levels, soil and groundwater quality to be carried out by MoEF&CC/NABL/SPCB recognized laboratories during construction and operation phases.

11.11.1 Greenbelt Development

It is proposed to develop greenbelt/Plantation at all available spaces of project components, roads and nearby area. Till date 11000 saplings has been planted in project area as well as in nearby villages. About Rs. 15 lakhs have been kept in EMP budget for green belt development and plantation.

11.11.2 Compensatory Afforestation

About 1.927 Ha forest land has been diverted for project. The loss of vegetal cover can be compensated by compensatory afforestation. NTPC has paid the amount estimated by the Forest Department as Net Present Value (NPV) of forest land acquired. NTPC has deposited Rs. 7.28 Crores in favor of Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, West 11 -19

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-20 of 22

Bengal as part of proposal for implementation of CAT Plan for Rammam Stage-III project. NTPC has deposited Rs. 1.46 Crores in favour of PCCF cum Principal Secretary, Govt. of Sikkim as part of proposal for implementation of CAT Plan for Rammam Stage- III project.

11.11.3 Biodiversity and Wildlife Conservation Plan and Management

NTPC has become the first PSU to publish a Biodiversity Policy 2018 and become a member of IBBI (India Business and Biodiversity Initiative). A detailed biodiversity conservation and management plan has been proposed as per said policy. NTPC will make efforts to conserve IUCN Threatened category plants species. A Wildlife Conservation Plan has been prepared for Schedule-I species recorded in Study area and same will be submitted to State Forest department for approval.

11.11.4 Fish Management Plan

A minimum environmental flow will be maintained for sustaining the life of fishes. The implementation of fish management plan including construction of a hatchery has been taken up with fisheries department, Govt. of West Bengal as well as with the Fisheries Department of Sikkim. Comprehensive Fish Management Plan is awaited from Govt. of W.B.

11.11.5 Implementation of Environmental Management Plan

An Environmental Management Group (EMG) consisting of competent workforce headed by AGM level and assisted by Sr. Manager has been established by the Rammam HEPP. The total amount cost for implementation of Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is Rs. 3269.1 lakh (excluding cost required for cost of trees and NPV of forest land acquired). The estimated budget for recurring cost for EMP is about 2 crores/year. In addition, the CER/ CD activities planned for the year 2021-2024 are as follows:

11 -20

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-21 of 22

Proposed CER/CD Activities for 2021-2024 S.No. Activity Proposed Budget (Rs. In Lakhs) 1. Education Facility 200 2. Health and medical services 200 3. Providing other infrastructure facility 120 4. Training/Self employment/Skill development 180 5. Providing Drinking water facility 100 6. Sponsoring local sports/Cultural programme 150 Total 950

11.12 DISCLOSURES OF CONSULTANTS NTPC Ltd. has appointed M/s. SV Enviro Labs & Consultants, Visakhapatnam for carrying out this Environmental Impact Assessment study as per the EIA Notification, 2006 as amended till date. This EIA consultant is accriditated with QCI/NABET for carrying out EIA Study for Category ‘A’ Hydropower project and other sectors.

11.13 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed project has certain level of marginal impacts on the local environment. However, the proposed project has significant beneficial impact/effects in terms of local economy, increase availability of power, providing the employment opportunities and various CER practices. Project Proponant has taken various measures to mitigate environmental impact during construction phase. For operation phase, measures suggested in EMP shall be implemented.

The conclusions of EIA are:

• The proposed project meets the compliance requirements of various environmental regulations.

• Adoption of environmental friendly Best Management Practices results in minimising the impacts on environment.

11 -21

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C11-22 of 22

• Due to land acquisition, PAPs has impacted which has been compensated satisfactorily with approved R&R Plan. Overall Community impacts of the project will be beneficial, as the project will generate significant economic benefits for the region.

• As the project is under advance stage of construction, NTPC has demonstrate its commitment towards local community and Environmental protection.

• With the effective implementation of the Environment Management Plan (EMP) during the planning, design, construction and operation phases, the development and construction of project can proceed without significant negative impact on the environment.

11 -22

CHAPTER –XII DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C12-1 of 6

CHAPTER-12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS

12.0 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT ENGAGED NTPC Ltd. has appointed M/s. SV Enviro Labs & Consultants, Visakhapatnam for carrying out this Environmental Impact Assessment study as per the EIA Notification, 2006 as amended till date. SV Enviro Labs & Consultants has approved EIA coordinators and Functional Area Experts for undertaking Environmental and related studies in Eleven (11) approved sectors including Hydropower by NABET, Quality Council of India, New Delhi.

12.1 About SV Enviro Labs & Consultants (SVELC): SV ENVIRO LABS & CONSULTANTS pioneered its way in the mid 90’s in Yanam, the evergreen Union Territory, to provide the quality services in the area of environmental pollution. The laboratory serves have been set up in an extent of 7500 sq.ft in the city of destiny Visakhapatnam to provide analytical expertise in the field of Environmental Engineering. Our technical expertise is one among the best in the country, providing economical & sound environmental and safety solutions. SVELC is an ISO 9001:2015 company and is accredited by:  ISO 9001:2015  ISO 14001: 2004  Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change (MOEF&CC), Govt. of India, New Delhi  National Accreditation Board for Education & Training (NABET) registered Environmental consultants by Quality Council of India (QCI).  National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL) in the field of testing  OSHAS 18001: 2007

12 - 1

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C12-2 of 6

12.2 SERVICES OFFERED BY SV ENVIRO Environmental:  Environmental Impact Assessments  Environmental Management Plan  Environmental Audits preparation  Solid and hazardous waste management  Risk assessment and disaster management plans  Occupational health and safety studies  Socio-economic studies  Marine impact assessment  Rehabilitation and resettlement studies

Analysis:  Environmental monitoring for air, water, soil, noise, ecology, hazardous waste, etc.  Industrial emission source monitoring  Offshore sampling and analysis of marine water and sediments  Analysis of water, wastewater, soil, solid waste, hazardous waste, lube oils, etc.  Noise quality monitoring  Work zone source emission analysis

The firm has been engaged in the work of Environmental Impact Assessment studies for category – A & B projects, preparation of Environmental management plans (EMP) for the past 20 years for obtaining clearance from Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change.

12 - 2

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C12-3 of 6

List of Experts involved in the study: S.No Name of the Expert Expertise Signature 1. Dr. G.V.A Ramakrishna EIA Coordinator  Geology (GEO)  Hydrology, ground water and water conservation (HG)  Land use (LU) 2. M. Murali Krishna  Air pollution monitoring, prevention and control (AP)  Meteorology, air quality modelling and prediction (AQ)  Noise and Vibration (NV) 3. V. Hema Latha  Water pollution monitoring, prevention and control (WP)

4. K. Anitha  Solid and hazardous waste management (SHW) 5. Dr. B. Vijay Bhaskara Rao  Socio-economics (SE)

6. Dr. M. Tarakeswara Naidu  Ecology and biodiversity (EB)

7. D. Sunder Rao  Soil Conservation (SC)

8. Shaik Kasim  Risk Assessment and Hazards Management (RH)

12 - 3

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C12-4 of 6

Fig: 12.1 – NABET Certificate

12 - 4

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C12-5 of 6

Fig: 12.2 – NABET Validity Extension Certificate

12 - 5

Doc. No.:9548/999/GEG/S/01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Rev. No.: 1 RAMMAM HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT Date: 30/06/2021 STAGE-III (3 x 40 MW) Page No.: C12-6 of 6

Fig 12.3 NABL Certificate

12 - 6