DOCSLIB.ORG

Quantifying Twentieth Century Glacier Change in the Sierra Nevada, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quantifying Twentieth Century Glacier Change in the Sierra Nevada, California Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2008 Quantifying Twentieth Century Glacier Change in the Sierra Nevada, California Hassan J. Basagic Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Geology Commons, Glaciology Commons, and the Physical and Environmental Geography Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Basagic, Hassan J., "Quantifying Twentieth Century Glacier Change in the Sierra Nevada, California" (2008). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2239. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.2236 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. THESIS APPROVAL The abstract and thesis of Hassan Jules Basagic IV for the Master of Science in Geography were presented May 5, 2008, and accepted by the thesis committee and the department. COMMITI'EE APPROVALS: /'.,drew G. Fountain, Chair DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: Martha A. Works, Chair Department of Geography ABSTRACT An abstract of the thesis of Hassan Jules Basagic IV for the Master of Science in Geography presented May 5, 2008. Title: Quantifying Twentieth Century Glacier Change in the Sierra Nevada, California Numerous small alpine glaciers occupy the high elevation regions of the central and southern Siena Nevada, California. These glaciers change size in response to variations in climate and are therefore important indicators of climate change. An inventmy based on USGS topographic maps (l :24,000) revealed 1719 glaciers and 2 perennial snow and ice features for a total area of39.l5 ±7.52 km • The number of 'true' glaciers, versus non-moving ice, is estimated to be 118, covering 15.87 ± 1.69 2 km • All glaciers were located on north to nmtheast aspects, at elevations >3000 m. Historical photographs, geologic evidence, and field mapping were used to detetmine the magnih1de of area loss over the past cenh1ry at 14 glaciers. These glaciers decreased in area by 31% to 78%, averaging 55%. The rate of area change was detetmined for multiple time periods for a subset of seven glaciers. Rapid retreat occmred over the first half of the twentieth cenh1ry beginning in the 1920s in response to warm/dry conditions and continued through the mid-1970s. Recession ceased during the early 1980s, when some glaciers advanced. Since the 1980s each of the seven study glaciers resumed retreat. The uniform timing of changes in area amongst study glaciers suggests a response to regional climate, while the magnitude of change is influenced by local topographic effects. Glacier area changes correlate with changes in spring and summer air temperatures. Winter precipitation is statistically urn-elated to changes in glacier area. Headwall cliffs above the glaciers alter the glacier responses by reducing incoming shortwave radiation and enhancing snow accumulation via avalanching. 2 QUANTIFYING TWENTIETH CENTURY GLACIER CHANGE IN THE SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA by HASSAN JULES BASAGIC IV A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE m GEOGRAPHY Portland State University 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Andrew G. Fountain, for his support and guidance during this research, and my committee members, Keith S. Hadley and Martin D. Lafrenz, for their valuable insights. I would like to acknowledge staff at Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI) for their help, including Pat Lineback, Sylvia Haultain, Tony Caprio, Nate Stephenson (USGS BRD), and Hal Pranger at the Geologic Resources Division. I am especially grateful to Danny Boiano and Annie Esperanza for their help in developing this project and for their support and encouragement. I appreciate the hard work provided in the field by Danny Boiano, Shane Ftyer, Alysha Wilson, Ryan Branciforte, Jeff Kane, Jennifer Hook, and Rhonda Robb. Thanks for helping to carry heavy loads in difficult terrain. I would also like to thank archive staff who helped me locate photographs including Ward Eldredge (SEKI), Linda Eade (Yosemite NP), William Ketwin and Linda Reynolds (USFS Bishop). I thank Douglas Hardy for use of his Yosemite glacier photos. I benefited greatly from conversations with Keith Jackson, Matt Hoffman, and Peter Sniffen. Most importantly I thank my family for their support and encouragement throughout this process. Support for this research came from the National Park Service, including Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks and the Geologic Resource Division, the National Science Foundation (BCS-0351004), and NASA (NNG04GJ41 G). I thank SEKI for their support through the Student Career Employee Program. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................... i LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................ iv LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ v 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... ! 2. STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................... 6 Previous Glacier Studies .......................................................................................... 10 3. GLACIER POPULATION INVENTORY .............................................................. 13 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 13 Methods .................................................................................................................... 13 Results ...................................................................................................................... 15 4. GLACIER CHARACTERISTICS AND TEMPORAL CHANGE ......................... 25 Study Glaciers .......................................................................................................... 25 Temporal change database ....................................................................................... 35 Results ...................................................................................................................... 39 5. CLIMATE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 48 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 48 Methods .................................................................................................................... 48 Results ...................................................................................................................... 49 6. TOPOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS ................................................................................. 60 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 60 Topographic characteristics ...................................................................................... 62 Change in mean glacier conditions .......................................................................... 65 Case study at Lyell Glacier ...................................................................................... 69 7. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION ...................................................................... 74 8. REFERENCES CITED ............................................................................................ 79 Appendix A. USGS Maps with Glaciers ...................................................................... 87 Appendix B. Repeat Photography ................................................................................ 89 Appendix C. Glacier Change Metadata ........................................................................ 96 11 Appendix D. Rates of Glacier Area Change for Seven Glaciers .................................. 99 Appendix E. Glacier Area Change Maps and Area-Altitude Distributions for Seven Study Glaciers ............................................................................................................ 100 SUPPLEMENTAL CD Glacier inventory table lll LIST OF TABLES 2 Table 1. Comparison of ~lacier area (km ) statistics for the glacier population, glaciers with area >0.01 km , and glaciers with calculated shear stress> 105 Pa .............. 21 Table 2. Comparison of glacier inventories ................................................................. 22 Table 3. Locations of the study glaciers. Names in bold are those selected for in depth study over time. Names in italics are informal glacier names. Area and topographic characteristics are based on the population inventory. Elv = elevation 0 (meters), Sip= slope CO), Asp= aspect ( ) ••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 26 Table 4. Size comparison of glaciers >0.01 km2 and selected study glaciers .............. 33 Table 5. Study glaciers with the number of extents and time range of available data. Names in bold are those selected for in depth study over time. Asterisk indicates extent based solely on moraine position............................................................... 40 2 Table 6. Comparison of three
Load more

Recommended publications
  • YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK O C Y Lu H M Tioga Pass Entrance 9945Ft C Glen Aulin K T Ne Ee 3031M E R Hetc C Gaylor Lakes R H H Tioga Road Closed
    123456789 il 395 ra T Dorothy Lake t s A Bond C re A Pass S KE LA c i f i c IN a TW P Tower Peak Barney STANISLAUS NATIONAL FOREST Mary Lake Lake Buckeye Pass Twin Lakes 9572ft EMIGRANT WILDERNESS 2917m k H e O e O r N V C O E Y R TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST N Peeler B A Lake Crown B C Lake Haystack k Peak e e S Tilden r AW W Schofield C TO Rock Island OTH IL Peak Lake RI Pass DG D Styx E ER s Matterhorn Pass l l Peak N a Slide E Otter F a Mountain S Lake ri e S h Burro c D n Pass Many Island Richardson Peak a L Lake 9877ft R (summer only) IE 3010m F LE Whorl Wilma Lake k B Mountain e B e r U N Virginia Pass C T O Virginia S Y N Peak O N Y A Summit s N e k C k Lake k c A e a C i C e L C r N r Kibbie d YO N C n N CA Lake e ACK AI RRICK K J M KE ia in g IN ir A r V T e l N k l U e e pi N O r C S O M Y Lundy Lake L Piute Mountain N L te I 10541ft iu A T P L C I 3213m T Smedberg k (summer only) Lake e k re e C re Benson Benson C ek re Lake Lake Pass C Vernon Creek Mount k r e o Gibson e abe Upper an r Volunteer McC le Laurel C McCabe E Peak rn Lake u Lake N t M e cCa R R be D R A Lak D NO k Rodgers O I es e PLEASANT EA H N EL e Lake I r l Frog VALLEY R i E k G K C E LA e R a e T I r r Table Lake V North Peak T T C N Pettit Peak A INYO NATIONAL FOREST O 10788ft s Y 3288m M t ll N Fa s Roosevelt ia A e Mount Conness TILT r r Lake Saddlebag ILL VALLEY e C 12590ft (summer only) h C Lake ill c 3837m Lake Eleanor ilt n Wapama Falls T a (summer only) N S R I Virginia c A R i T Lake f N E i MIGUEL U G c HETCHY Rancheria Falls O N Highway 120 D a MEADOW
    [Show full text]
  • Marion Peak Quadrangle, Fresno County, California­ Analytic Data AVAILABILITY of BOOKS and MAPS of the U.S
    Marion Peak Quadrangle, Fresno County, California­ Analytic Data AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability LisL" Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mall or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL Books OVER THE COUNTER Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general in­ Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the terest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single copies of Earthquakes counter at the following Geological Survey Public Inquiries Offices, all & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from • WASHINGTON, D.C.--Main Interior Bldg., 2600 corridor, 18th and C Sts., NW.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontispiece the 1864 Field Party of the California Geological Survey
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC ROAD GUIDE TO KINGS CANYON AND SEQUOIA NATIONAL PARKS, CENTRAL SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA By James G. Moore, Warren J. Nokleberg, and Thomas W. Sisson* Open-File Report 94-650 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. * Menlo Park, CA 94025 Frontispiece The 1864 field party of the California Geological Survey. From left to right: James T. Gardiner, Richard D. Cotter, William H. Brewer, and Clarence King. INTRODUCTION This field trip guide includes road logs for the three principal roadways on the west slope of the Sierra Nevada that are adjacent to, or pass through, parts of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (Figs. 1,2, 3). The roads include State Route 180 from Fresno to Cedar Grove in Kings Canyon Park (the Kings Canyon Highway), State Route 198 from Visalia to Sequoia Park ending near Grant Grove (the Generals Highway) and the Mineral King road (county route 375) from State Route 198 near Three Rivers to Mineral King. These roads provide a good overview of this part of the Sierra Nevada which lies in the middle of a 250 km span over which no roads completely cross the range. The Kings Canyon highway penetrates about three-quarters of the distance across the range and the State Route 198~Mineral King road traverses about one-half the distance (Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • THE YOSEMITE by John Muir CHAPTER I The
    THE YOSEMITE By John Muir CHAPTER I The Approach to the Valley When I set out on the long excursion that finally led to California I wandered afoot and alone, from Indiana to the Gulf of Mexico, with a plant-press on my back, holding a generally southward course, like the birds when they are going from summer to winter. From the west coast of Florida I crossed the gulf to Cuba, enjoyed the rich tropical flora there for a few months, intending to go thence to the north end of South America, make my way through the woods to the headwaters of the Amazon, and float down that grand river to the ocean. But I was unable to find a ship bound for South America--fortunately perhaps, for I had incredibly little money for so long a trip and had not yet fully recovered from a fever caught in the Florida swamps. Therefore I decided to visit California for a year or two to see its wonderful flora and the famous Yosemite Valley. All the world was before me and every day was a holiday, so it did not seem important to which one of the world's wildernesses I first should wander. Arriving by the Panama steamer, I stopped one day in San Francisco and then inquired for the nearest way out of town. "But where do you want to go?" asked the man to whom I had applied for this important information. "To any place that is wild," I said. This reply startled him. He seemed to fear I might be crazy and therefore the sooner I was out of town the better, so he directed me to the Oakland ferry.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTI8 SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 296 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS OF CALIFORNIA PART II. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP JOHN C. HOYT BY B. D. WOOD In cooperation with the State Water Commission and the Conservation Commission of the State of California WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 NOTE. A complete list of the gaging stations maintained in the San Joaquin River basin from 1888 to July 1, 1912, is presented on pages 100-102. 2 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS IN SAN JOAQUIN RIYER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. By B. D. WOOD. INTRODUCTION. This gazetteer is the second of a series of reports on the* surf ace waters of California prepared by the United States Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the State of California as repre­ sented by the State Conservation Commission, George C. Pardee, chairman; Francis Cuttle; and J. P. Baumgartner, and by the State Water Commission, Hiram W. Johnson, governor; Charles D. Marx, chairman; S. C. Graham; Harold T. Powers; and W. F. McClure. Louis R. Glavis is secretary of both commissions. The reports are to be published as Water-Supply Papers 295 to 300 and will bear the fol­ lowing titles: 295. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part I, Sacramento River basin. 296. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part II, San Joaquin River basin. 297. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part III, Great Basin and Pacific coast streams. 298. Water resources of California, Part I, Stream measurements in the Sacramento River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • BEDROCK GEOLOGY of the YOSEMITE VALLEY AREA YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Prepared by N
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I-1639 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF THE YOSEMITE VALLEY AREA YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Prepared by N. King Huber and Julie A. Roller From the writings of Frank C. Calkins and other sources PREFACE INTRODUCTION Frank Calkins' work in Yosemite was preceded by Yosemite Valley, one of the world's great natural works Henry W. Turner, also of the U.S. Geological Survey, of rock sculpture, is carved into the west slope of the who began mapping the Yosemite and Mount Lyell 30- Sierra Nevada. Immense cliffs, domes, and waterfalls minute quadrangles in 1897 and laid the foundation that tower over forest, meadows, and a meandering river, Calkins' work was built on. Although Turner never creating one of the most scenic natural landscapes in completed this sizable assignment, he recognized the North America (fig. 1). In Yosemite Valley and the differing types of plutonic rocks and, for example, named adjoining uplands, the forces of erosion have exposed, the El Capitan Granite. with exceptional clarity, a highly complex assemblage of Calkins mapped the valley and adjacent areas of granitic rocks. The accompanying geologic map shows the Yosemite National Park during the period 1913 through distribution of some of the different rocks that make up 1916, at the same time that Francois Matthes was this assemblage. This pamphlet briefly describes those studying the glacial geology of Yosemite. Calkins rocks and discusses how they differ, both in composition summarized the bedrock geology of part of Yosemite in and structure, and the role they played in the evolution the appendix of Matthes' classic volume "Geologic History of the valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Potential of the John Muir Wilderness, Fresno, Inyo, Madera, and Mono Counties, California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP MF-1185-C UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE JOHN MUIR WILDERNESS, FRESNO, INYO, MADERA, AND MONO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA SUMMARY REPORT By 2 E. A. du Bray1, D. ~ Dellinger1, H. W. ~ver 1 , M. F. Diggl~l, Fredrick L. J~ , Horace K. 'lburber , Richard W. Morris , Thomas J. Peters , and David s. Lindsey STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and the Joint Conference Report on Senate Bill 4, 88th Congress, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the John Muir Wilderness, Inyo and Sierra Na tional Forests, Fresno, lnyo, Madera, and Mono Counties, California. The area was established as a wilderness by Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964. SUMMARY The U.S. Bureau of Mines arj the U.S. Geological Survey identified many areas of the John Muir Wilderness as having marginal and subeconomic resources of tungsten, molybdenum, copper, gold, and silver.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite: Warming Takes a Toll
    Bay Area Style Tuolumne County Gives Celebrating Wealthy renowned A guide to donors’ S.F. retailer autumn’s legacies Wilkes best live on Bashford’s hiking, through Island Style ever-so- climbing their good Unforgettable Hawaiian adventures. K1 stylish and works. N1 career. J1 biking. M1 SFChronicle.com | Sunday, October 18,2015 | Printed on recycled paper | $3.00 xxxxx• Airbnb measure divides neighbors Prop. F’s backers, opponents split come in the middle of the night, CAMPAIGN 2015 source of his income in addition bumping their luggage down to work as a real estate agent over impact on tight housing market the alley. This is not an occa- and renewable-energy consul- sional use when a kid goes to ing and liability issues. tant, Li said. college or someone is away for a But Li, 38, said he urges “I depend on Airbnb to make By Carolyn Said Phil Li, who rents out three week. Along with all the house guests to be respectful, while sure I can meet each month’s suites to travelers via Airbnb. cleaners, it’s an array of com- two other neighbors said that expenses,” he said. “I screen A narrow alley separates “He’s running a hotel next mercial traffic in a residential they are not affected. Vacation guests carefully and educate Libby Noronha’sWest Portal door,” said Noronha, 67,a re- neighborhood,” she said of the rentals helped him after he lost them to come and go quietly.” house from that of her neighbor tired federal employee. “People noise, smoking, garbage, park- his job and remain a major Prop.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite National Park National Park Service
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Yosemite National Park Tuolumne Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement Tuolumne River Values and Baseline Conditions After five years of study and stakeholder involvement, the Tuolumne Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Tuolumne River Plan/DEIS) will be released in summer of 2011. In advance of the plan’s release, the NPS is providing the Tuolumne River Values and Baseline Conditions chapter as a preview into one of the plan’s most foundational elements. Sharing the baseline information in advance of the plan will give members of the public an understanding of river conditions today and specific issues that will be explored in the Tuolumne River Plan. Public comments on all elements of the Tuolumne River Plan, including the baseline conditions chapter, will be accepted when it is released for review this summer. What follows is a description of the unique values that make the Tuolumne stand apart from all other rivers in the nation. This chapter also provides a snapshot in time, documenting overall conditions and implications for future management. In particular the baseline chapter examines, • What are the outstandingly remarkable values that make the Tuolumne River worthy of special protection under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA)? • What do we know about the condition of these values (in addition to water quality and free-flow), both at time of designation in 1984 and
    [Show full text]
  • Kings Canyon and Sequoia National Parks
    S o k u To Bishop ee t Piute Pass Cr h F 11423ft p o o 3482m r h k s S i o B u B i th G s h L o A p Pavilion Dome Mount C F 11846ft IE Goethe C or r R e k S 3611m I 13264ft a D VID e n 4024m k E J Lake oa q Sabrina u McClure Meadow k r i n 9600ft o F 2926m e l d R d Mount Henry i i Mount v 12196ft e Darwin M 3717m r The Hermit 13830ft South L 12360ft 4215m E 3767m Lake Big Pine C G 3985ft DINKEY O O 1215m O P D Hell for Sure Pass E w o N D Mount V s 11297ft A O e t T R McGee n L LAKES 3443m D U s E 12969ft T 3953m I O C C o A N r N Mount Powell WILDERNESS r D B a Y A JOHN l 13361ft I O S V I R N N 4072m Bi Bishop Pass g P k i ine Cree v I D e 11972ft r E 3649m C Mount Goddard L r E MUIR e 13568ft Muir Pass e C DUSY North Palisade k 4136m 11955ft O BASIN 3644m N 14242ft Black Giant T E 4341m 13330ft COURTRIGHT JOHN MUIR P Le Conte A WILDERNESS 4063m RESERVOIR L I Canyon S B Charybdis A 395 8720ft i D rc 13091ft E Middle Palisade h 2658m Mount Reinstein 14040ft 3990m C r WILDERNESS CR Cre e 12604ft A ek v ES 4279m i Blackcap 3842m N T R Mountain Y O an INYO d s E 11559ft P N N a g c r i 3523m C ui T f n M rail i i H c John K A e isad Creek C N Pal r W T e E s H G D t o D I T d E T E d V r WISHON G a a IL O r O S i d l RESERVOIR R C Mather Pass Split Mountain G R W Finger Pe ak A Amphitheater 14058ft E 12100ft G 12404ft S Lake 4285m 3688m E 3781m D N U IV P S I C P D E r E e R e k B C A SIERRA NATIONAL FOREST E art Taboose r S id G g k e I N Pass r k Tunemah Peak V D o e I 11894ft 11400ft F e A R r C 3625m ree 3475m C k L W n L k O Striped
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Repeat Photographs of Darwin and Dana Glaciers, Sierra Nevada, California
    2008 Repeat Photographs of Darwin and Dana Glaciers, Sierra Nevada, California Hassan Basagic October 2008 I collected repeat photographs of two Sierra Nevada glaciers in September, 2008 to maintain the photographic record of glacier change. This brief report contains the repeat photographs and observations of Darwin and Dana glaciers. Darwin Glacier is located on the north side of Mount Darwin in Kings Canyon National Park. I photographed Darwin Glacier on September 5, 2008. The location of the image was the same location as G.K. Gilbert’s 1908 photograph. Darwin Glacier lost area and mass when compared to 2004 photographs. The glacier had very little snow remaining from the past winter. A bergshrund was present on both lobes of the glacier. A large amount of rock debris was observed on the base of the glacier. One pile of debris, located at the middle of the glacier terminus was several meters high. Several measurements were made along the glacier perimeter with a GPS unit. These points confirmed that the glacier is smaller along the western boundary compared to 2004. Dana Glacier is located on the north side of Mount Dana in the Inyo National Forest. I photographed the Dana Glacier on September 11, 2008. The location of the image was same as I.C. Russell photo in 1883. Dana Glacier lost area when compared to 2004. The glacier boundary had receded along the western boundary. Ice and snow did not reach the top of the couloir. A bergshrund was observed in the upper portion of the glacier and where the couloir joins the glacier.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuolumne Meadows Historic District Yosemite National Park
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2007 Tuolumne Meadows Historic District Yosemite National Park Tuolumne Meadows Historic District Yosemite National Park Table of Contents Descriptive Information Part 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 Park Information .............................................................................................................................. 5 Property Level and CLI Number ..................................................................................................... 5 Inventory Summary ......................................................................................................................... 5 Landscape Description .................................................................................................................... 6 CLI Hierarchy Description .............................................................................................................. 7 Location Map .................................................................................................................................. 7 Boundary Description ...................................................................................................................... 8 Regional Context ........................................................................................................................... 10 Site Plans ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]