Sulfur Species Transformations and Sulfate Reduction During Pyrolysis Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Viboon Sricharoenchaikul for the degree of Master of Science in Chemical Engineering presented on February 24, 1995. Title: Sulfur Species Transformations and Sulfate Reduction During Pyrolysis of Kraft Black Liquor. Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: William J. Frederick Sulfur species in the char/ash residue and the product gases were measured during rapid pyrolysis of black liquor solids. The experiments were carried out in a laminar entrained-flow reactor (LEFR) in which particle heating rates in excess of 10,000 °C/s were obtained. The experimental conditions were 700 - 1100 °C and 0.3 - 1.7 s residence time, in a nitrogen atmosphere. The solid residue produced was collected in a nominal 3 pm cutoff cyclone. The water-soluble species were analyzed for hydrosulfide, sulfate, sulfite, and thiosulfate ions with a CES. The product gases were analyzed for COS, CS2, SO2, and organosulfur compounds with a FT-IR. H2S was analyzed by adsorption in a cadmium acetate solution and titration. Thiosulfate decomposed rapidly and completely at a reactor temperature of 900 °C and above within the shortest residence time (0.3 s) that can be achieved with this LEFR setting. Sulfite was present at short residence times and then decomposed after that. Sulfate was not reduced at 700 °C and an induction period was observed for the reduction at 900 and 1000 °C. No sulfide was detected at 700 °C while it formed rapidly after an induction period at 900 and 1000 °C. Sulfur is apparently converted from gaseous species to sulfide. In gaseous sulfur products, large amounts of mercaptans and H2S were formed rapidly. Much smaller amounts of CS2, COS, and SO2 were also detected. All of those species were formed at short residence times and then disappeared afterward. It was proposed that the mechanism of sulfur species transformations in black liquor involves rapid decomposition of thiosulfate to mostly elemental sulfur. The elemental sulfur produced then reacts with hydrocarbons to produce organic sulfur compounds, mostly mercaptans. A number of subsequent reactions produce H2, H2S, (CH3)SH, (CH3)2S, CS2, and other R-CH2SxH. For the sulfate reduction mechanism, it is likely that sulfate exchanges oxygen atoms with fully reduced catalytic sites and forms sulfite as an intermediate. The sulfite produced is further reduced to sulfide. The rate of sulfate reduction obtained was similar to the rate calculated using a sulfate reduction model developed by Cameron and Grace. Sulfur Species Transformations and Sulfate Reduction During Pyrolysis of Kraft Black Liquor by Viboon Sricharoenchaikul A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science Completed February 24, 1995 Commencement June 1995 Master of Science thesis of Viboon Sricharoenchaikul presented on February 24, 1995 APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Major Pro sor, representing Chemical Engineering Redacted for Privacy hair of ent of Chemical Engineering Redacted for Privacy Dean of Graduat6 chool I understand that my thesis will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my thesis to any reader upon request. Redacted for Privacy Viboon Sricharoenchaikul, Author ACKNOWLEDGMENT I would like to take this opportunity to express my appreciation to the following people and organization, this work would never be accomplished without their support. Dr. Frederick, for his valuable time and superb guidance throughout the project. Narongsak Jivakanun, who encouraged me to start on this work and helped me on FT-IR measurement. Scott Sinquefield and Kaj Wag, for helping me with the experiments. My parents, brothers, sister and Natty for always being there for me. Finally, this work is funded by US Department of Energy. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. THESIS OBJECTIVES 6 3. LITERATURE REVIEW 7 3.1 CHARACTERISTIC AND COMPOSITION OF BLACK LIQUOR SOLIDS 7 3.2 BLACK LIQUOR DROPLET COMBUSTION 8 3.3 THE CHEMISTRY OF SULFUR DURING PYROLYSIS OF BLACK LIQUOR 9 3.3.1 Sulfur Volatilization During Pyrolysis of Black Liquor 10 3.3.2 Reactions of Sodium Sulfide 13 3.3.3 Reactions of Sodium Thiosulfate 14 3.3.4 Reactions of Sodium Sulfate 16 3.3.5 Reactions of Sodium Sulfite 17 3.3.6 Reaction of Organic Sulfur 18 3.4 REDUCTION OF SULFATE 19 4. ANALYTICAL METHODS 22 4.1 CHAR COLLECTION AND SULFUR EXTRACTION 22 4.2 CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS ANALYSIS OF SULFUR SPECIES 23 4.3 TESTING FOR LINEARITY OF THE CALIBRATION CURVE OF SULFUR ION SPECIES 27 4.4 COMPARING BETWEEN ANTIOXIDANT AND DEOXYGENATED WATER 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 4.5 FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROMETER FOR ANALYSIS OF SULFUR GASEOUS SPECIES 33 5. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE FOR PYROLYSIS EXPERIMENTS 41 5.1 EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP 41 5.2 EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS 44 5.3 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE 45 5.3.1 Pre-run Preparation 46 5.3.2 Pyrolysis Runs 47 5.3.3 Collecting Data, Char, and Gas Sample 48 6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 50 6.1 CHAR SAMPLE ANALYSIS 50 6.2 GAS SAMPLE ANALYSIS 51 6.3 SULFUR MASS BALANCE CLOSURE ANALYSIS 57 6.4 DETAILED DISCUSSION ON CHAR AND GASEOUS SULFUR SPECIES 59 6.4.1 Thiosulfate 59 6.4.2 Sulfate 61 6.4.3 Sulfite 62 6.4.4 Sulfide 63 6.4.5 Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) 65 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 6.4.6 Mercaptans and their derivatives 67 6.4.7 Carbon disulfide (CS2) 69 6.4.8 Carbonyl sulfide (COS) 71 6.4.9 Sulfur dioxide (SO2) 72 6.5 SULFATE REDUCTION 72 6.6 PROPOSED SULFUR SPECIES TRANSFORMATION MECHANISM (PATHWAY) 75 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 78 8. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE WORK 81 BIBLIOGRAPHY 82 APPENDICES 86 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1.1 Fuel production world-wide per year 2 1.2 Simplified schematic diagram of pulping and kraft recovery process 2 1.3 Recovery boiler based on conventional Tomlinson design 3 1.4 Major components of black liquor solids 4 3.1 Stages of black liquor droplet combustion 12 3.2 The sulfate-sulfide cycle 20 4.1 Basic schematic diagram of capillary electrophoresis 23 4.2 Test for sulfate peak with different voltage between poles 24 4.3 Comparison between using 50 vs 60 cm capillary length 26 4.4 Comparison among 190, 210, and 250 nm wavelengths 28 4.5 Calibration curve for thiosulfate ion 29 4.6 Calibration curve for sulfate ion 29 4.7 Calibration curve for sulfite ion 30 4.8 Calibration curve for hydrosulfide ion 30 4.9 Schematic diagram of FT-IR spectrometer 35 4.10 Typical spectrogram acquired from scanning pyrolysis gas product 36 LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) Figure Page 4.11 C2H4 spectrum overlaps with CH3OH spectrum 38 4.12 C2H4 standard spectrum 38 4.13 Spectrum after subtraction of C2H4 spectrum 38 4.14 Spectrogram prior to subtraction of the water vapor spectrum 39 4.15 Water vapor standard spectrum 39 4.16 Final spectrogram, revealing others hidden peaks 39 4.17 Methyl mercaptan standard spectrum 40 4.18 Dimethyl sulfide standard spectrum 40 5.1 A simplified schematic diagram of the experimental set-up 42 5.2 Laminar entrained flow reactor 43 5.3 Black liquors solids temperature history 45 6.1 Sulfur ion species transformation at 700 °C 53 6.2 Sulfur ion species transformation at 900 °C 53 6.3 Sulfur ion species transformation at 1000 °C 54 6.4 Sulfur ion species transformation at 1100 °C 54 6.5 Sulfur gas species formed at 700 °C 55 LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) Figure Page 6.6 Sulfur gas species formed at 900 °C 55 6.7 Sulfur gas species formed at 1000 °C 56 6.8 Sulfur gas species formed at 1100 °C 56 6.9 Sulfur mass balance closure 57 6.10 Thiosulfate vs. residence time 59 6.11 Sulfate vs. residence time 61 6.12 Sulfite vs. residence time 63 6.13 Sulfide vs. residence time 64 6.14 H2S formed vs. residence time 66 6.15 Mercaptans formed vs. residence time 67 6.16 CS2 formed vs. residence time 69 6.17 COS formed vs. residence time 70 6.18 SO2 formed vs. residence time 71 6.19 Comparison between Cameron and Grace's model and experimental results 73 6.20 Reaction diagram for sulfate reduction involving carbonate decomposition 74 6.21 The proposed mechanism of sulfur species transformation 76 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 3.1 Elemental analysis of a typical southern pine black liquor 7 3.2 Analysis of sulfur species from southern pine black liquor 8 3.3 Rate constants and empirical values for equation 3.33 21 4.1 Analysis condition for CES operation 27 4.2 Typical sulfur ion species used in the experiments 29 4.3 Comparing between antioxidant and deoxygenated water 32 4.4 Analysis results from replicate runs for sulfur species in char for runs at 900 °C and 0.7 s particle residence time 33 4.5 Operating specification for FT-IR 34 4.6 Gas products detected from pyrolysis of black liquor solids 36 5.1 Experimental conditions 44 LIST OF APPENDICES Page APPENDICES 86 APPENDIX A MEASUREMENT OF H2S IN THE PRODUCT GAS BY ABSORPTION IN AQUEOUS CADMIUM ACETATE 87 APPENDIX B PREPARING CALIBRATION CURVE FOR FTIR ANALYSIS OF SULFUR GASEOUS SPECIES 90 APPENDIX C FTIR CALIBRATIONS 92 FTIR COS Calibration (carbonyl sulfide) 92 FTIR (CH3)2S Calibration (dimethyl sulfide) 94 FTIR CH3SH Calibration (methyl mercaptan) 96 APPENDIX D GAS ANALYSIS DATA 98 APPENDIX E CHAR ANALYSIS DATA 118 1. INTRODUCTION The kraft pulping recovery process is the most important chemical recovery process world-wide.
Recommended publications
  • Enhanced Conversion Oflactose to Glycerol by Kluyveromyces Fragilis

    Enhanced Conversion Oflactose to Glycerol by Kluyveromyces Fragilis

    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, Mar. 1989, p. 573-578 Vol. 55, No. 3 0099-2240/89/030573-06$02.00/0 Copyright C) 1989, American Society for Microbiology Enhanced Conversion of Lactose to Glycerol by Kluyveromyces fragilis Utilizing Whey Permeate as a Substrate WHEAMEI JENQ,1 RAY A. SPECKMAN,' RICHARD E. CRANG,2* AND MARVIN P. STEINBERG1 Department of Food Science, 1304 West Pennsylvania Avenue,' and School of Life Sciences, 505 South Goodwin Avenue,2 University ofIllinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 Received 6 June 1988/Accepted 12 December 1988 Kluyveromycesfragilis (CBS 397) is a nonhalophilic yeast which is capable of lactose utilization from whey permeate and high glycerol production under anaerobic growth conditions. However, the optimum yields of glycerol (11.6 mg/ml of whey permeate medium) obtained in this study occurred only in the presence of 1% Na2SO3 as a steering agent. The use of other concentrations of Na2SO3, as well as 5% NaCl and 1% ascorbic acid, had no or detrimental effects on cell growth, lactose utilization, and glycerol production. Glycerol yields were greater in cultures grown from a light inoculum of K. fragilis than in cultures in which a resuspended mass of cells was introduced into the medium. The results of this study suggest that this strain of K. fragilis may be useful commercially in the utilization of cheese whey lactose and the concomitant production of glycerol. Cheese whey represents a commercial by-product gener- troleum derivatives, which is less expensive than processing ated in such massive quantities that its safe disposal is a by sugar fermentation. major problem for many municipal sewage treatment plants.
  • So2 and Wine: a Review

    So2 and Wine: a Review

    OIV COLLECTIVE EXPERTISE DOCUMENT SO2 AND WINE: A REVIEW SO2 AND WINE: A REVIEW 1 MARCH 2021 OIV COLLECTIVE EXPERTISE DOCUMENT SO2 AND WINE: A REVIEW WARNING This document has not been submitted to the step procedure for examining resolutions and cannot in any way be treated as an OIV resolution. Only resolutions adopted by the Member States of the OIV have an official character. This document has been drafted in the framework of Expert Group “Food safety” and revised by other OIV Commissions. This document, drafted and developed on the initiative of the OIV, is a collective expert report. © OIV publications, 1st Edition: March 2021 (Paris, France) ISBN 978-2-85038-022-8 OIV - International Organisation of Vine and Wine 35, rue de Monceau F-75008 Paris - France www.oiv.int 2 MARCH 2021 OIV COLLECTIVE EXPERTISE DOCUMENT SO2 AND WINE: A REVIEW SCOPE The group of experts « Food safety » of the OIV has worked extensively on the safety assessment of different compounds found in vitivinicultural products. This document aims to gather more specific information on SO2. This document has been prepared taking into consideration the information provided during the different sessions of the group of experts “Food safety” and information provided by Member States. Finally, this document, drafted and developed on the initiative of the OIV, is a collective expert report. This review is based on the help of scientific literature and technical works available until date of publishing. COORDINATOR OIV - International Organisation of Vine and Wine AUTHORS Dr. Creina Stockley (AU) Dr. Angelika Paschke-Kratzin (DE) Pr.
  • Sulfite: Here, There, Everywhere

    Sulfite: Here, There, Everywhere

    Sulfite: Here, There, Everywhere Max T. Baker, PhD Associate Professor Department of Anesthesia University of Iowa Inadvertent Exposures Combustion of fossil fuels, Air pollutant Large quantities as sulfur dioxide are expelled from volcanos Kilauea on the Big Island Small quantities endogenously formed in mammals from sulfur-containing amino acid metabolism Deliberate Exposures As Preservative- Wine, Beer (dates to Roman times From burning sulfur candles) Fruits and Vegetables (reduce browning, extend shelf-life) Pharmaceuticals1 Reductant - Antioxidant - Antimicrobial What are Sulfites? Oxidized Forms of the Sulfur Atom Sulfur Dioxide, MW = 64, bp = - 10oC (gaseous) Sulfur (IV) - Oxidation state of 4 S = Atomic number 16 – electrons/shell, 2,8,6 Sodium Dioxide Readily Hydrates2 Sulfur Carbon Dioxide Dioxide (irritant) H O H2O 2 Sulfurous Unstable Carbonic low acid species acid pH high pH Bisulfite Bicarbonate anion anion Sulfite Carbonate dianion dianion Forms radical Doesn’t form radical Bisulfite Can Combine with SO2 to form Metabisulfite + excess Bisulfite Metabisulfite (disulfite, pyrosulfite) “Sulfite” usually added to drugs as sodium or potassium salts of: Sulfite, Bisulfite, or Metabisulfite Endogenous to Mammals Small quantities formed from sulfur-containing amino acid metabolism - cysteine, methionine3 + - + H2O + 2H + 2 e Sulfite Sulfate Rapidly detoxified by sulfite oxidase (SOX) to form sulfate – a two electron oxidation, molybdenum dependent Two Confirmed Sulfite Toxicities Neurological abnormalities from genetic sulfite oxidase deficiency3 Allergic reactions from exogenous exposure4 Oral, parenteral, inhalational exposure: dermatitis, urticaria, flushing, hypotension, abdominal pain and diarrhea to life- threatening anaphylactic and asthmatic reactions “The overall prevalence of sulfite sensitivity in the general population is unknown and probably low. Sulfite sensitivity is seen more frequently in asthmatic than in nonasthmatic people." - FDA Prevalence – 3-10% are sulfite sensitive among asthmatic subjects.
  • Anaerobic Degradation of Methanethiol in a Process for Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Biodesulfurization

    Anaerobic Degradation of Methanethiol in a Process for Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Biodesulfurization

    Anaerobic degradation of methanethiol in a process for Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) biodesulfurization Promotoren Prof. dr. ir. A.J.H. Janssen Hoogleraar in de Biologische Gas- en waterreiniging Prof. dr. ir. A.J.M. Stams Persoonlijk hoogleraar bij het laboratorium voor Microbiologie Copromotor Prof. dr. ir. P.N.L. Lens Hoogleraar in de Milieubiotechnologie UNESCO-IHE, Delft Samenstelling promotiecommissie Prof. dr. ir. R.H. Wijffels Wageningen Universiteit, Nederland Dr. ir. G. Muyzer TU Delft, Nederland Dr. H.J.M. op den Camp Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, Nederland Prof. dr. ir. H. van Langenhove Universiteit Gent, België Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoeksschool SENSE (Socio-Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment) Anaerobic degradation of methanethiol in a process for Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) biodesulfurization R.C. van Leerdam Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 19 november 2007 des namiddags te vier uur in de Aula Van Leerdam, R.C., 2007. Anaerobic degradation of methanethiol in a process for Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) biodesulfurization. PhD-thesis Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands – with references – with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN: 978-90-8504-787-2 Abstract Due to increasingly stringent environmental legislation car fuels have to be desulfurized to levels below 10 ppm in order to minimize negative effects on the environment as sulfur-containing emissions contribute to acid deposition (‘acid rain’) and to reduce the amount of particulates formed during the burning of the fuel. Moreover, low sulfur specifications are also needed to lengthen the lifetime of car exhaust catalysts.
  • Sodium Chlorite Neutralization

    Sodium Chlorite Neutralization

    ® Basic Chemicals Sodium Chlorite Neutralization Introduction that this reaction is exothermic and liberates a If sodium chlorite is spilled or becomes a waste, significant amount of heat (H). it must be disposed of in accordance with local, state, and Federal regulations by a NPDES NaClO2 + 2Na2SO3 2Na2SO4 + NaCl permitted out-fall or in a permitted hazardous 90.45g + 2(126.04g) 2(142.04g) + 58.44g waste treatment, storage, and disposal facility. H = -168 kcal/mole NaClO2 Due to the reactivity of sodium chlorite, neutralization for disposal purposes should be For example, when starting with a 5% NaClO2 avoided whenever possible. Where permitted, solution, the heat generated from this reaction the preferred method for handling sodium could theoretically raise the temperature of the chlorite spills and waste is by dilution, as solution by 81C (146F). Adequate dilution, discussed in the OxyChem Safety Data Sheet thorough mixing and a slow rate of reaction are (SDS) for sodium chlorite in Section 6, important factors in controlling the temperature (Accidental Release Measures). Sodium chlorite increase (T). neutralization procedures must be carried out only by properly trained personnel wearing Procedure appropriate protective equipment. The complete neutralization procedure involves three sequential steps: dilution, chlorite Reaction Considerations reduction, and alkali neutralization. The dilution If a specific situation requires sodium chlorite to step lowers the strength of the sodium chlorite be neutralized, the chlorite must first be reduced solution to 5% or less; the reduction step reacts by a reaction with sodium sulfite. The use of the diluted chlorite solution with sodium sulfite to sodium sulfite is recommended over other produce a sulfate solution, and the neutralization reducing agents such as sodium thiosulfate step reduces the pH of the alkaline sulfate (Na2S2O3), sodium bisulfite (NaHSO3), and solution from approximately 12 to 4-5.
  • Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Landfill Gas Using a Solar Regenerable Adsorbent

    Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Landfill Gas Using a Solar Regenerable Adsorbent

    Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Landfill Gas Using a Solar Regenerable Adsorbent by Sreevani Kalapala Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Chemistry Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY May, 2014 Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Landfill Gas Using A Solar Regenerable Adsorbent Sreevani Kalapala I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: Sreevani Kalapala, Student Date Approvals: Dr. Clovis A. Linkous, Thesis Advisor Date Dr. Daryl Mincey, Committee Member Date Dr. Sherri Lovelace-Cameron, Committee Member Date Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Associate Dean of Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT: Landfill gas is a complex mix of gases, containing methane, carbon dioxide, nitrogen and hydrogen sulfide (H2S), created by the action of microorganisms within the landfill. The gas can be collected and flared off or used to produce electricity. However, the H2S content, which may vary from 10’s to 1000’s of ppm, can cause irreversible damage to equipment, and when combusted creates SO2, a precursor of acid rain. It is also a toxic eye and lung irritant, so that prolonged exposure must be kept below a few ppm. Therefore, H2S must be removed before landfill gas can be utilized. Our approach is to scrub H2S into aqueous media and then use an adsorbent to sequester it. The adsorbent is then regenerated in a photocatalytic reaction potentially using sunlight.
  • Method 9215: Potentiometric Determination of Sulfide in Aqueous Samples and Distillates with Ion-Selective Electrode, Part of Te

    Method 9215: Potentiometric Determination of Sulfide in Aqueous Samples and Distillates with Ion-Selective Electrode, Part of Te

    METHOD 9215 POTENTIOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF SULFIDE IN AQUEOUS SAMPLES AND DISTILLATES WITH ION-SELECTIVE ELECTRODE 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1 This method can be used for measuring total sulfide in a distilled sample. The method is meant to be used as an alternate determinative step following the distillation in either SW- 846 Methods 9030 or 9031. 1.2 This method must not be used for undistilled samples because of possible mercury and silver ion interferences. Also, the ISE only responds to free sulfide dianion and will not detect sulfide in complexes. Therefore, this method would provide low recoveries for undistilled samples. 1.3 The method detection limit is 1.0 mg/L. Sulfide concentrations from 0.1 to 12,000 mg/L may be measured. However, when a linear calibration is used, results less than 1 mg/L may be biased up to approximately 90 percent low. 2.0 SUMMARY OF METHOD 2.1 The distillations in Methods 9030 and/or 9031 are performed, except that the scrubber solution is sulfide anti-oxidant buffer (SAOB), with ascorbic and salicylic acids added as oxygen scavengers. The distillates are then analyzed potentiometrically using a sulfide ion-selective electrode (ISE) in conjunction with a double-junction reference electrode and a pH meter with an expanded millivolt scale or an ISE meter capable of being calibrated directly in terms of sulfide concentration. 2.2 This method is an alternative to the iodometric titration procedure, where a solution of thiosulfate is standardized against the thiosulfate solution, and the sulfide standard is standardized against the iodine solution/thiosulfate solution (which requires daily calibration itself).
  • Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Inorganic Sulfites

    Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Inorganic Sulfites

    Reregistration Eligibility Decision – Inorganic Sulfites May 2007 Reregistration Eligibility Decision Inorganic Sulfites Special Review and Reregistration Division Office of Pesticide Programs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1801 South Bell Street Arlington, VA 22202 Introduction The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has completed its Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for the inorganic sulfites case, which includes the chemicals sulfur dioxide and sodium metabisulfite. This assessment provides information to support the issuance of a Reregistration Eligibility Decision for inorganic sulfites. EPA’s pesticide reregistration process provides for the review of older pesticides (those initially registered prior to November 1984) under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) to ensure that they meet current scientific and regulatory standards. In this document, EPA presents the results of its review of the potential human health effects of dietary, drinking water and occupational/bystander exposure to inorganic sulfites, as well as its ecological risk findings. Evaluations performed by the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) were relied upon for this assessment, in addition to peer-reviewed evaluations performed by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development-Screening Information Data Set (OECD-SIDS) and from other open literature sources. Based on this assessment, the Agency has determined that products containing sulfur dioxide or sodium metabisulfite are eligible for reregistration provided the necessary label changes are made. As a result of this assessment, one tolerance has been reassessed. I. Use Information The inorganic sulfites reregistration case includes the chemicals sulfur dioxide (CAS No.
  • Sodium Sulfide, Flake

    Sodium Sulfide, Flake

    CHEMICAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION SDS No. 49A SAFETY DATA SHEET February 8, 2019 Page 1 of 9 Pages __________________________________ _________________________ 1. PRODUCT IDENTIFIER Product Name: Sodium Sulfide Flake Trade Name: Sodium Sulfide Flakes - 60-62% Sodium Sulfide, Hydrated with not less than 30% water SYNONYMS: Sodium Sulfide Hydrated; Disodium Sulfide hydrate. RECOMMENDED USES: - For industrial use to precipitate metals from solution - Waste and wastewater treatment - De-hairing agent in leather processing - Pulp and paper manufacture - Chemical and textile industrial processes Industrial uses advised against: None. 1.3 SUPPLIER OF THIS SDS: Chemical Products Corporation 102 Old Mill Road P.O. Box 2470 Cartersville, Georgia 30120-1688 Telephone: 1-770-382-2144 1.4 EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBER: CHEMTREC, 800-424-9300 (24 hours every day) 2. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION 2.1 Classification in accordance with paragraph (d) of §1910.1200 Corrosive to Metals, Category 1 H290: May be corrosive to metals. Acute toxicity, Category 3 H301: Toxic if swallowed. Skin corrosion, Category 1B H314: Causes severe skin burns and eye damage. Serious eye damage, Category 1 H318: Causes serious eye damage. 2.2 Signal word, hazard statement(s), symbol(s) and precautionary statement(s) Signal Word DANGER CAUSES SEVERE SKIN BURNS AND EYE DAMAGE Hazard Statements - H290: May be corrosive to metals. - H301: Toxic if swallowed. - H314: Causes severe skin burns and eye damage - H318: Causes serious eye damage Precautionary Statements Prevention - P234 Keep only in original container. - P260 Do not breathe dusts or mists. - P264 Wash skin thoroughly after handling. - P270 Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product. - P280 Wear protective gloves/ protective clothing/ eye protection/ face protection.
  • Use of SO2 in High-Ph Wines Sulfur Dioxide Dosage

    Use of SO2 in High-Ph Wines Sulfur Dioxide Dosage

    Purdue extension FS-52-W Commercial Winemaking Production Series Use of SO2 in High-pH Wines Sulfur dioxide dosage By Christian Butzke Wine pH and alcohol destroy the vitamin thiamin, which is essential for the growth of Enology Professor How much free sulfur dioxide (SO2) must a winemaker add or measure to prevent Brettanomyces yeast and certain wine Department of Food Science malolactic fermentation or Brettanomyces bacteria. Only proper concentrations of Purdue University growth if a wine’s pH is 3.95? The answer free SO2 provide additional capacity to bind more products of oxidative aging, [email protected] is between 79 and 112 mg/L, depending on the alcohol content of the wine. The to cleave thiamin, or to kill unwanted SO -sensitive microbes. Brettanomyces requirements for free SO2 concentrations 2 in wine increase exponentially with pH, thrives at higher pH, at temperatures so at pH 4.0 they are 10 times higher greater than 55˚F, in larger ullages, and than at pH 3.0. This does not leave room at residual yeast nutrient levels. Luckily for rule-of-thumb or routine sulfite the thiamin break-up — given proper additions/adjustments. Sulfites added amounts of free bisulfite — occurs faster at a higher pH. Ethanol acts synergistically to wine in the form of either SO2 gas or potassium metabisulfite salt exist and enhances the bacteria-killing effect essentially in two forms: ionized bisulfite of molecular SO2, so high-alcohol wines require less SO protection (see dosage (free SO2) and sulfur dioxide gas 2 charts based on wine alcohol content (molecular SO2).
  • Safety Assessment of Sulfites As Used in Cosmetics

    Safety Assessment of Sulfites As Used in Cosmetics

    Safety Assessment of Sulfites as Used in Cosmetics Status: Re-Review for Panel Consideration Release Date: August 22, 2019 Panel Meeting Date: September 16-17, 2019 The 2019 Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel members are: Chair, Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D., F.A.C.P.; Donald V. Belsito, M.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel C. Liebler, Ph.D.; James G. Marks, Jr., M.D., Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M., Ph.D. The CIR Executive Director is Bart Heldreth, Ph.D. This safety assessment was prepared by Wilbur Johnson, Jr., Senior Scientific Analyst © Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1620 L Street, NW, Suite 1200 ♢ Washington, DC 20036-4702 ♢ ph 202.331.0651 ♢ fax 202.331.0088 ♢ [email protected] Distributed for Comment Only -- Do Not Cite or Quote Commitment & Credibility since 1976 Memorandum To: CIR Expert Panel Members and Liaisons From: Wilbur Johnson, Jr. Senior Scientific Analyst Date: August 22, 2019 Subject: Re-Review of the Safety Assessment of Sulfites The CIR Expert Panel first reviewed the safety of Sulfites in 2003. The Panel concluded that Ammonium Bisulfite, Ammonium Sulfite, Potassium Metabisulfite, Potassium Sulfite, Sodium Bisulfite, Sodium Metabisulfite, and Sodium Sulfite are safe as used in cosmetic formulations. The original report is included for your use (identified as sulfit092019orig in the pdf). Minutes from the deliberations of the original review are also included (sulfit092019min_orig). Because it has been at least 15 years since the safety assessment was published, in accordance with CIR Procedures, the Panel should consider whether the safety assessment of Sulfites should be reopened.
  • Ammonium Hydrogen Sulfite Water As an Authorized Food Additive and Establish Compositional Specifications and Use Standards for This Additive

    Ammonium Hydrogen Sulfite Water As an Authorized Food Additive and Establish Compositional Specifications and Use Standards for This Additive

    Amendment to the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Food Sanitation Act and the Specifications and Standards for Foods, Food Additives, Etc. The government of Japan will designate ammonium hydrogen sulfite water as an authorized food additive and establish compositional specifications and use standards for this additive. Background Japan prohibits the sale of food additives that are not designated by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (hereinafter referred to as “the Minister”) under Article 12 of the Food Sanitation Act (Act No. 233 of 1947; hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). In addition, when specifications or standards for food additives are stipulated in the Specifications and Standards for Foods, Food Additives, Etc. (Public Notice of the Ministry of Health and Welfare No. 370, 1959), Japan prohibits the sale of those additives unless they meet the specifications or the standards pursuant to Article 13 of the Act. In response to a request from the Minister, the Committee on Food Additives of the Food Sanitation Council under the Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council (hereinafter referred to as “the Committee”) has discussed the adequacy of the designation of ammonium hydrogen sulfite water as a food additive. The conclusion of the Committee is outlined below. Outline of conclusion The Minister should designate ammonium hydrogen sulfite water as a food additive unlikely to cause harm to human health pursuant to Article 12 of the Act and should establish compositional specifications and use standards for this additive pursuant to Article 13 of the Act (see Attachment for the details). Attachment Ammonium Hydrogen Sulfite Water 亜硫酸水素アンモニウム水 Standards for Use (draft) Permitted for use in grape juice used for wine production and grape wine only.