DOCSLIB.ORG

Communityworkplan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Communityworkplan COMMUNITY WORKPLAN Tunkhannock Heritage Communities Program 2011 Pennsylvania Route 6 Alliance TUNKHANNOCK HERITAGE COMMUNITY WORKPLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER/Subsection Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii COMMUNITY WORKPLAN SUMMARY 1 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 3 Tunkhannock Heritage Communities Program 3 COMMUNITY INVENTORIES 4 Community and Area Overview 4 Location Map 5 Demographics 6 Economics 8 Historical and Architecturally Significant Buildings, Sites and Themes 15 Cultural History 20 Museum 22 Inventory of Community Events/Activities 23 Regional Attractions and Resources 25 Local Recreation Related Resources 30 Inventory and Survey of Businesses 34 Business Survey 36 Physical and Non-Physical Conditions 46 Transportation System 49 Community Visual Conditions and Design Analysis 56 SYNTHESIS OF INFORMATION 70 Public Input First Workshop – The Wish List 70 Second Workshop – Planning Charrette 72 Third Workshop – Draft Presentation and Comments 78 Issues and Opportunities Statement Overview 79 IMPLEMENTATION 81 Heritage Route 6 Economic Impacts 81 Tourism and Economics 82 Implementation Matrix 86 Summary of Recommendations 99 Interpretive Planning Statement 105 Marketing and Hospitality Planning Statement 107 Wayfinding Planning Statement 109 Heritage Resource Development/Physical Enhancement Planning Statement 115 Context – The Main Street Approach 119 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This planning effort represents a relatively new approach to heritage planning being implemented by the Pennsylvania Route 6 Alliance. The concept was locally developed during early Route 6 heritage planning and refined with the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) who insisted that the Heritage Communities Program be premised on the engagement of the community. In short, DCNR wanted this to be “grass roots” and not “top down” planning requiring the establishment of the Heritage Community Stakeholders Groups in each Heritage Community. This was envisioned to be a group of area residents who met throughout this process and even spearheaded several early action implementation actions. Members of the Tunkhannock Stakeholders Group represented a cross-section of the community and met on numerous occasions between February 2010 and May 2011, and also helped during this period in conducting Community Workshops and a Planning Charrette. In addition, many other residents participated in various public forums such as during the focus group meetings during the Planning Charrette and at the various Community Workshops. The coordination provided by the staff of the Northern Tier Regional Planning and Development Commission was invaluable as the local liaison and point of contact on behalf of the Pennsylvania Route 6 Alliance planning team. Major project funding for the Heritage Communities Program is provided through the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation through the Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, through the Heritage Areas Program under the PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources and a local contribution from Tunkhannock. Last but not least, a special thanks to the residents and business community of Tunkhannock who not only embraced this program and participated, but more importantly showed a genuine love for their community. ii TUNKHANNOCK HERITAGE COMMUNITIES PROGRAM Pennsylvania Route 6 Heritage Corridor COMMUNITY WORKPLAN Background A Community WorkPlan is a requirement of the Pennsylvania Route 6 Heritage Communities Program. It is intended to establish an action-oriented framework for local heritage and community planning and implementation in Heritage Communities along Route 6. This is a WorkPlan for the Tunkhannock area that is focused on the Borough, Tunkhannock Township, Eaton Township and the immediate surrounding region. While the document is important in itself the process gone through to prepare it is probably more important. In this regard local engagement is not only important but is required. The process involved the engagement and discussion with a local Stakeholders Group that was involved throughout the planning period. The document attempts to aggregate and synthesize the input and recommendations of this Group, also taking into account public input received at Community Workshops and a planning charrette. The document and process also involves original and secondary research gathered by the Route 6 planning team. The WorkPlan is organized as follows: BACKGROUND ACTIVITIES – DESCRIPTION Tunkhannock Heritage Communities Program Community Inventories - Themes and Sites, Heritage, Community Events, Businesses, Physical and Non-Physical Needs and Visual Conditions and design Analysis SYNTHESIS OF INFORMATION Public Input review and Issues and Opportunities Statement Overview Issues and Opportunities Statement IMPLEMENTATION - Planning Statements and Implementation Strategy Overview The Pennsylvania Route 6 Heritage Communities Program recognizes that the action-oriented framework requires attention to both physical and non-physical needs that address the Visitor’s Experience and the Community Context. Each has an impact on the other, and the latter frames and directly affects the former. Thus the Community WorkPlan must enhance the Tunkhannock area as a destination and a stopover, without negatively affecting the quality of life and community characteristics that make it a great place reside. In essence then, this entire process is an attempt to address tourism in a context-sensitive manner. In this regard, we recommend a number of enhancements: 1 Visitor Experience Enhancement – ―things to see and do‖ A decentralized visitor interpretation and guidance approach primarily using existing groups, agencies and websites Local promotional effort – brochures, itineraries and web-based Individualized Hospitality Training/Education in a format that is business- friendly and adaptable to changing employees A series of Loop Tours that link the rich tourism resources of the region while reinforcing Tunkhannock as a hospitality center Wayfinding Signage – at critical attractions and along the Loops and within the Historic District Greater utilization of the Historic District as an economic resource The Community Context – addressing local needs Gateway Enhancements at strategic points identified locally An interrelated revitalization effort with the dual focus of enhancing the community as a place to visit – shopping, arts, dining and entertainment – and as a ―Rivertown‖ on the Susquehanna o Safe and more direct pedestrian connection with river o Riverside Park enhancements o Façade enhancements o Recruitment Revisions – Land use and signage regulations 2 BACKGROUND ACTIVITIES – DESCRIPTION The Heritage Communities Program is an initiative of the Pennsylvania Route 6 Heritage Corporation, focused on strengthening the many vibrant communities along the Route 6 Corridor in Pennsylvania. The Program was developed by local stakeholders involved in the development of the Pennsylvania Route 6: Our Heritage and a Destination for the Future – Framework for Action during 2001- 03. These stakeholders have developed the Pennsylvania Route 6 Heritage Communities Program that requires communities – their leaders, business community and residents – to buy into the heritage tourism concept and process. The program provides assistance to Route 6 communities in first identifying and localizing heritage tourism sites, resources and themes; then developing ways to enhance and refine these resources; and finally a way to sustain local heritage tourism. This assumes a very inclusive grass-roots process involving local residents, which will have an important side-benefit of making the community a better place in which to live as well as visit. The key to the Program is to identify and capitalize on the unique qualities of select communities on the Corridor that reflect the themes of Route 6. These themes are as follows: Warrior’s Road honoring the epic stories of the warriors of many races, genders and times fought or lived along the Corridor; The many Natural Opportunities utilized and enjoyed by hunters, fishermen, oilmen, tanners and miners of the region, and the changes in the view of natural resources; The rough terrain required Engineer’s Challenge to be met by spectacular feats of civil engineering that made Northern Pennsylvania and its resources more accessible; The region has provided New Beginnings and Safe Havens for a diverse group including Connecticut Yankees, French Aristocrats and escaping slaves; Visionaries, Achievers and Social Entrepreneurs of the region whose ideas and achievements inspired and transformed the region and the country; and The region’s recognized position as an Outdoor Enthusiast’s Paradise offering active and passive recreational opportunities year-round. The Program is premised on providing technical assistance to the communities in interpreting and localizing these themes. Tunkhannock Heritage Communities Program The unique qualities of the Pennsylvania US Route 6 Corridor are created and affected by the communities along its length. Descriptions of the Corridor often tout the unhurried, small-town ambiance that has not been traded for a ―brand 3 name drive-through identity‖. The Route 6 Community identity is authentic and individual and is not contrived. Route 6 heritage planning recognizes that this ―community identity‖ must be maintained and strengthened if heritage tourism is to prosper along the Corridor. A request
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guide to the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Records
    Guide to the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Records NMAH.AC.1074 Alison Oswald 2018 Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 3 Historical........................................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 5 Series 1: Business Records, 1903-1966.................................................................. 5 Series 2: Drawings, 1878-1971................................................................................ 6 Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Records NMAH.AC.1074 Collection Overview Repository: Archives Center, National Museum of American History Title:
    [Show full text]
  • A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types
    A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types TRANSPORATION RESEARCH BOARD NAS-NRC PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This report, not released for publication, is furnished for review to members or participants in the work of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the NCHRP. Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research team. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research reported herein was performed under NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15, by Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage. Margaret Slater, AICP, of Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) was principal investigator for this project and led the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD, SOUTH BERGEN TUNNEL Jersey City Hudson County New Jersey PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTOR
    DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD, SOUTH HAER NJ-137 BERGEN TUNNEL NJ-137 Jersey City Hudson County New Jersey PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD PHILADELPHIA SUPPORT OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Custom House, 3rd Floor 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTH BERGEN TUNNEL HAER No. NJ-137 Location: Through Bergen Hill from Prospect Street at Ogden Avenue to J.P. Kennedy Boulevard at Beacon Avenue, Milepost 1.46 of NJ Transit Morristown Line, Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey UTM: 18.579780.4509950 Quad: Jersey City, New Jersey Date of Construction: 1908-1911 Engineer: Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad (D.L.&W.) Present Owner: New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ Transit), One Penn Plaza East, Newark, New Jersey 07105 Present Use: Railroad Tunnel Significance: The South Bergen Tunnel is technologically significant for its innovative concrete technology and is historically significant because it reflected the dramatic increase in railroad freight operations on the D.L.&W. Railroad by the opening of the twentieth century. Project Information: This documentation was initially undertaken, after consultation with the NJ SHPO in 1991, as a mitigative measure in anticipation of alteration or demolition of the South and North Bergen Tunnels. Documentation on the tunnels was begun in April 1991 by Frances Alexander, Chief, Architectural History; Christopher Martin, Senior Architectural Historian; and Jesse Daugherty ofEngineering-Science, Inc., Washington, D.C .. Additional research and documentation on the ventilator shafts and open cuts was undertaken in late 1994 by Stacy E. Spies for NJ Transit.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Department of Transportation New Jersey
    NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NEW JERSEY HISTORIC BRIDGE DATA STRUCTURE # 1900A10 CO SUSSEX OWNER COUNTY MILEPOINT 0.0 NAME & FEATURE CR 616 OVER CONRAIL (ABANDONED) FACILITY CR 616 INTERSECTED TOWNSHIP ANDOVER TOWNSHIP TYPE STRINGER DESIGN ENCASED MATERIAL Steel # SPANS 1 LENGTH 47 ft WIDTH 30.6 ft CONSTRUCTION DT 1937 ALTERATION DT 1988ca SOURCE INSCRIPTION DESIGNER/PATENT UNKNOWN BUILDER UNKNOWN SETTING / The bridge carries a 2-lane county road over abandoned Conrail r-o-w in a wooded undeveloped area adjacent to a golf course. The CONTEXT railroad r-o-w was originally part of the New York Susquehanna & Western line, then part of the Lehigh and Hudson River Railroad before transferred to Conrail. 1995 SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Not Eligible HISTORIC BRIDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN ( EVALUATED ) No CONSULT STATUS Not Individually Eligible. CONSULT DOCUMENTS SHPO Letter 6/30/95 SUMMARY The encased stringer bridges supported on scored concrete abutments was constructed on a slight skew. The encasement of the fascia stringers is panelled. The span is flanked by ca. 1988 guide rails affixed to the concrete curbs. One of over 25 pre-WW II stringer bridges in the county, the span is an altered example of a common type in the state, and it is neither technologically innovative nor historically distinguished. INFOR MATION PHOTO: 1907:40,41 (07/92) REVISED BY (DATE): QUAD: Newton East Page 1 A. G. Lichtenstein & Associates, Inc. performed initial survery. Correction Updates Etc should be sent to November 12 , 2002 NJDOT updated data 03-01-2001. [email protected] NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NEW JERSEY HISTORIC BRIDGE DATA STRUCTURE # 1900A92 CO SUSSEX OWNER COUNTY MILEPOINT 0.0 NAME & FEATURE CR 669 OVER PEQUEST RIVER FACILITY CR 669 INTERSECTED TOWNSHIP ANDOVER BOROUGH TYPE SLAB DESIGN MATERIAL Reinforced # SPANS 1 LENGTH 23 ft WIDTH 24 ft Concrete CONSTRUCTION DT 1933 ALTERATION DT 1980ca SOURCE PLANS DESIGNER/PATENT HARVEY SNOOK, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Steamtown NHS: Special History Study
    Steamtown NHS: Special History Study Steamtown Special History Study STEAM OVER SCRANTON: THE LOCOMOTIVES OF STEAMTOWN SPECIAL HISTORY STUDY Steamtown National Historic Site, Pennsylvania Gordon Chappell National Park Service United States Department of the Interior 1991 Table of Contents stea/shs/shs.htm Last Updated: 14-Feb-2002 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/steamtown/shs.htm[8/16/2012 12:31:20 PM] Steamtown NHS: Special History Study Steamtown Special History Study TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS INTRODUCTION THE LOCOMOTIVES OF STEAMTOWN AMERICAN STEAM LOCOMOTIVES a. Baldwin Locomotive Works No. 26 b. Berlin Mills Railway No. 7 c. Boston and Maine Railroad No. 3713 d. Brooks-Scanlon Corporation No. 146 e. Bullard Company No. 2 f. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad No. 565 g. E.J. Lavino and Company No. 3 h. Grand Trunk Western Railroad No. 6039 i. Illinois Central Railroad No. 790 j. Lowville and Beaver River Railroad No. 1923 k. Maine Central Railroad No. 519 l. Meadow River Lumber Company No. 1 m. New Haven Trap Rock Company No. 43 n. Nickel Plate Road (New York, Chicago and St. Louis) No.44 o. Nickel Plate Road (New York, Chicago and St. Louis) No. 759 p. Norwood and St. Lawrence Railroad No. 210 q. Public Service Electric and Gas Company No. 6816 r. Rahway Valley Railroad No. 15 s. Reading Company No. 2124 t. Union Pacific Railway No. 737 u. Union Pacific Railroad No. 4012 CANADIAN STEAM LOCOMOTIVES a. Canadian National Railways No. 47 b. Canadian National Railways No. 3254 c. Canadian National Railways No. 3377 d.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Department of Transportation New Jersey
    NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NEW JERSEY HISTORIC BRIDGE DATA STRUCTURE # 2100112 CO WARREN OWNER COUNTY MILEPOINT 0.0 NAME & FEATURE LONG BRIDGE ROAD (CR 613) OVER PEQUEST FACILITY LONG BRIDGE ROAD (CR 613) INTERSECTED RIVER TOWNSHIP ALLAMUCHY TOWNSHIP TYPE STRINGER DESIGN ENCASED MATERIAL Steel # SPANS 1 LENGTH 39 ft WIDTH 26 ft CONSTRUCTION DT 1938 ALTERATION DT SOURCE INSCRIPTION DESIGNER/PATENT H. W. VETTER, COUNTY ENGINEER BUILDER COUNTY FORCES SETTING / The bridge is located in a rural wooded area with scattered houses and farms. It carries a two-lane county route over a stream. CONTEXT 1995 SURVEY RECOMMENDATION Not Eligible HISTORIC BRIDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN ( EVALUATED ) No CONSULT STATUS Not Individually Eligible. CONSULT DOCUMENTS SHPO Letter 6/30/95 SUMMARY The one-span stringer bridge bears on concrete abutments with flared wingwalls. The encased stringers support a concrete deck that is flanked by well-detailed concrete balustrades. The posts have Moderne detailing. The span is one of over 65 extant pre-World War II stringer bridges in Warren County, and it is not technologically or historically distinguished. INFOR MATION PHOTO: 184:16-18 (08/92) REVISED BY (DATE): QUAD: Tranquility Page 1 A. G. Lichtenstein & Associates, Inc. performed initial survery. Correction Updates Etc should be sent to November 12 , 2002 NJDOT updated data 03-01-2001. [email protected] NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NEW JERSEY HISTORIC BRIDGE DATA STRUCTURE # 2100113 CO WARREN OWNER COUNTY MILEPOINT 0.0 NAME & FEATURE LONG BRIDGE ROAD (CR 613) OVER PEQUEST FACILITY LONG BRIDGE ROAD (CR 613) INTERSECTED RIVER TOWNSHIP ALLAMUCHY TOWNSHIP TYPE STRINGER DESIGN ENCASED MATERIAL Steel # SPANS 1 LENGTH 39 ft WIDTH 26.2 ft CONSTRUCTION DT 1939 ALTERATION DT SOURCE INSCRIPT, CO.RECORDS DESIGNER/PATENT H.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad, Boxcar No. 43651
    -~- ---------------------------------- p-Ill (i/e: Sf-t'llmhwl) DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA and WESTERN RAILROAD BOXCAR No. 43651 HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT Part I Prepared by Mark L. Morgan and Thomas H.E. Campion July 1996 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Steamtown National Historic Site PLEASE RETURN TO: TECHNICAL INFORMATION C£NTER DENVER SERVICE CENTER ON MICROFIL~A NATIONAL PARK SERVICE f J.- j 1 aj.2oo1- TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. i i Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION. ..... 1 2. ADMINISTRATIVE DATA . 3 Management Data. ............. 5 Proposed Use . ............. 5 Planning Background. ............. 5 Proposed Treatment and Justification ..... 5 Recommended Treatment for Materials Collected in Preparing This Report ....... 5 Source Materials . 6 3. DOCUMENTARY HISTORY AND ANALYSIS .. 9 The Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad. 11 American Car & Foundry . 21 Car Type . 36 Car HistoryjPeriod of Construction ... 39 Physical Specifications/Modifications. 41 Maintenance and Repairs ............. 57 4. ARCHITECTURAL & RESTORATION DATA. .... 59 Physical Studies . 61 Paint Schemes. 62 Paint Analysis . 67 Evaluation of the Proposed Use On the Integrity of the Car ... 69 Restoration Recommendations .. 69 5. PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION .... 73 Appendix 1. Legal Documentation .. 81 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 87 i LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS e Figure Page 1. DL&W locomotive No. 57 ............... 15 2 . DL&W freight on the Tunkhannock Viaduct .... 17 3 . Gondola built by the Missouri car and Foundry Company ...............•.. 23 4 . Pennsylvania Railroad MP-54 powered coach . 26 5. Location of AC&F plants . 28 6. Motor Train "The Rebel'' ...........••. 29 7 . DL&W No. 43651 in storage • . • • • . 41 8 . Gould coupler, "A" end. 44 9. Cardwell draft gear . 45 10. Bettendorf truck, "A" end .
    [Show full text]
  • THE COMPASS Volume 50
    VALLEY FORGE CHAPTER PENNSYLVANIA SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 585 WORCESTER, PA 19490-0585 THE COMPASS Volume 50. Number 3. February/March 2016 (Read the COMPASS online at www.pspe.org/valleyforge) President’s Message By: Randy Cleaver, P.E. The 2016 Valley Forge Chapter activities are well underway. In January, VFC State Director, Tony Dougherty, organized a very successful tour of the CHOP Specialty Care Center & Surgery facility in King of Prussia. This state of the art medical center includes over 60 exam rooms, sport medicine gyms, Pediatric Imaging Center, Sleep Center, Urgent Care Center, Ambulatory Surgery Center, and more. Each day an average of 400 children visit this CHOP facility for medical service. Our tour took us to view the technical areas, HVAC, water handling, electrical distribution, data storage and more. After the tour, the 20 attendees convened at Ralph’s of South Philly for awesome appetizers and beverages. Moving onto February, the 4th Annual Joint VFC and NSPE Villanova Chapter Meeting took place on Thursday, February 4th, at Villanova University’s Dougherty Hall. Conversation at the buffet dinner was stimulated by both students and PEs. “What do you do? Which engineering discipline are you studying? Why do you want to be an engineer?” And the questions and answers went on and on until it was time for the evening speaker, Zeyn Uzman, a Villanova University professor and a professional engineer licensed in 49 states. Zeyn spoke on PE license thievery. He highlighted two personal experiences which made it very evident that all professional engineers should be aware of the ease to reproduce one’s license stamp.
    [Show full text]
  • Iaai^$Ti6n\ Plant Sextriton; ;4Aekawanna
    S&ratifcdn~r&i^'^iaai^$ti6n\ plant HAER Wp, PA-76 SexTriton; ;4aekawanna Gpunfcy ..a" ■ .. :'■' j -5S - sc^KH o WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20013-7127 ^5 - <baftN HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD Scranton Army Ammunition Plant PA-7 6 Location: In downtown Scranton, Pennsylvania, within three blocks of the Lackawanna County Courthouse. Date of Construction: Established in 1907-1909. Owne r: Department of the Army Significance: The four major buildings at Scranton Army Ammunition Plant were constructed in 1907-1909 as the Scranton Locomotive Shops of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad. At the time of construction they were considered part of that period's most advanced concepts regarding planning and design of such facilities. Historical Report Prepared by; Robert Ferguson and Stuart E. MacDonald, 1984. Prepared for Transmittal by: Robie S. Lange, HABS/HAER, 1985. Scranton Army Ammunition Plant HAER No. PA-76 Page £- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Scranton Army Ammunition Plant (Scranton AAP), a part of the Army's Armament, Munitions and Chemical Command (AMCCOM), is a government-owned, contractor-operated shell-production facility located near the center of downtown Scranton, Pennsylvania. Its four major buildings were built in 1907-1909 as locomotive shops for the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad (D.L. & W), and were minimally modified for shell production when they were transferred to the Army in 1951. There are no Category I historic properties at Scranton AAP, since none of the buildings can be considered to be unique or to have national significance. However, the complex as an ensemble is a remarkably intact early twentieth-century locomotive shop facility, and the D.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Runte
    llies A of the Earth railroads and the soul of preservation Alfred Runte TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS Copyright © 2006 Alfred Runte Published by Truman State University Press, Kirksville, Missouri All rights reserved tsup.truman.edu Cover painting, Spirit of the Water Gap © 2005 by J. Craig Thorpe. Oil on canvas, 24 x 16 inches. Commissioned by Charles and Mary Jo Mott specifically for the cover of Allies of the Earth: Railroads and the Soul of Preservation. Used by permission of the artist. Historical photography by Nancy Hines, University of Washington. Cover design: Teresa Wheeler Type: Text is LegacySerITC—copyright URW; display is Optima—copyright Linotype Library GmbH or its affiliated Linotype–Hell companies. Printed by: Thomson-Shore, Dexter, Michigan USA Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Runte, Alfred, 1947–. Allies of the earth : railroads and the soul of preservation / by Alfred Runte. p. cm. Includes bibliographical and index references. ISBN–13: 978-1-931112-52-9 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN–10: 1-931112-52-5 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Railroads—United States—History. 2. Railroads—United States—Passenger traffic. I. Title. TF23.R85 2006 385'.0973—dc22 2005016920 No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any format by any means without writ- ten permission from the publisher. ∞ The paper in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992. Contents Illustrations - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming Wb&A Events
    April 10, 2015 Dear All: Tick Tock time is running out to sign up for a table for the Joint VTC/WB&A Train Show, I hope you will be one of the vendors participating and/or patron. There are still some tables available, but they’re going fast, so hurry up and reserve yours (form attached). If you missed it, check out Clem’s Primer updates at: http://tcaetrain.org/ As a reminder, the eblasts and attachments will be placed on the WB&A website under the “About” tab for your viewing/sharing pleasure http://www.wbachapter.org/2015%20eblasts.htm along with the WB&A Facebook page. The attachments are contained in the one PDF attached to this email in an effort to streamline the sending of this email and to ensure the attachments are able to be received. Click on the Ribbon on the Left and you will see an “index” of the documents and you can click on them to go to them. If you need a PDF viewer to read the document which can be downloaded free at http://www.adobe.com/products/acrviewer/acrvdnld.html. To retain a copy you may want to save the file to a folder different from your temporary files (downloading and use is in your discretion). UPCOMING WB&A EVENTS May 9, 2015 – Joint VTC & WB&A (aka NORTH MEETS SOUTH) Great Train Show and Sale at the Eagles Lodge at 21 Cool Spring Road, Fredericksburg, VA 22405 contact Colleen Hall [email protected] for more information, it’s never too early to start planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Tier Region State of the Region Report
    NORTHERN TIER REGION STATE OF THE REGION REPORT DEMOGRAPHIC DATA FOR: BRADFORD, SULLIVAN, SUSQUEHANNA, TIOGA, AND WYOMING COUNTIES. 2004 NTRPDC Bradford County Bradford County Northern Tier State of the Region 3 Bradford County NTRPDC Location Municipal Population Nearby Distance 2000 1990 Metropolitan Cities in Miles* Bradford County 62, 761 60,967 Binghamton, New York 54 Alba Borough 186 170 Elmira, New York 40 Albany Township 927 927 Scranton, Pennsylvania 67 Armenia Township 166 134 Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania 66 Asylum Township 1,097 981 Williamsport, Pennsylvania 63 Athens Borough 3,415 3,468 Athens Township 5,058 4,755 *All distances are driving miles taken from Towanda Burlington Borough 182 255 Burlington Township 799 705 Elevation Range: 660' to 2,380' Canton Borough 1,807 1,966 Canton Township 2,084 2,099 Area of Bradford County: 1,150.7 sq. miles Columbia Township 1,162 1,077 Franklin Township 698 557 Granville Township 873 837 Population Herrick Township 676 647 2000 1990 1980 1970 1960 Le Raysville Borough 318 336 County 62,761 60,967 62,919 57,962 54,925 Leroy Township 627 610 Litchfield Township 1,307 1,296 Estimated Present Population Monroe Borough 514 540 within a 75-mile Radius: 1,449,642 Monroe Township 1,271 1,235 New Albany Borough 306 306 Climate North Towanda Township 927 909 Mean Temperatures: Orwell Township 1,097 1,107 Annual 48.7°F Overton Township 187 157 January 25.4°F Pike Township 657 684 July 70.6°F Ridgebury Township 1,982 2,026 Rome Borough 382 475 Annual Precipitation Normal: 37.7 inches Rome Township 1,221 1,043 Sayre Borough 5,813 5,791 Sheshequin Township 1,300 1,211 Smithfield Township 1,538 1,520 South Creek Township 1,261 1,229 A Half-Shire Town South Waverly Borough 987 1,049 Springfield Township 1,167 1,118 The Township of Troy, established in 1815, was one of the Standing Stone Township 596 436 first townships in Bradford County established by the Com- Stevens Township 414 401 monwealth of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]