DOCSLIB.ORG

Indo-Burma Ecosystem Profile, 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indo-Burma Ecosystem Profile, 2007 Ecosystem Profile Indo-Burma Biodiversity Hotspot Indochina Region FINAL VERSION MAY 2007 Prepared by: BirdLife International in collaboration with: Bird Conservation Society of Thailand Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden WWF Cambodia Program and with the technical support of: Conservation International-Center for Applied Biodiversity Science Drafted by the ecosystem profiling team: Andrew W. Tordoff Michael C. Baltzer Peter Davidson John Fellowes Ha Quy Quynh Tran Thanh Tung Assisted by the following experts and contributors: CAMBODIA Mead, David An Dara Men Soriyun CHINA Meoun Sam Ang Austin, Sean Bleisch, William A Bradley, Amanda Meynell, Peter-John Busstra Bram Chan Sophal Nong Divan Chan, Bosco Chheang Dany Ouch Kim Nary Chen, Kelin Chin Vibol Oum Saven Chen Ronggui Ching Uy Paley, Richard Dudgeon, David Delattre, Etienne Pel Piseth Fan, Bo Emmett, David Poole, Colin Gao Yu-ren Gauntlett, Suwanna Prum Sovanna Han, Lianxian Hak Song Sam Han Hau, Billy Heffernan, Joe Seng Kim Hout He, Zhaorong Heng Sovannara Seng Teak Hu, Jian Hogan, Zeb Shambhu Dangal Hu Zhihao Hong Chamnan Simms, Anthony Huang, Chengming Kong Kim Sreng Shore Robert Jiang, Hong Kry Masphal Sona Sok Jiang, Xuelong La Peng Ly Soun Phalla Kirkpatrick, Craig Lic Vuthy Tan Setha Kou, Zhitong Ly Saveth Tek Vannara Lau, Michael Mam Kosal Walston, Joe Leven, Mike Marris, Guy Weiler, Hunter Li, Yuyuan McLellan, Liz Withington, Dale Li, Zhaoyuan McLellan, Richard Yok Lin Liang, Wei ii Long, Yongcheng Parr, John Vu Thi Quyen Ng, Sai Chit Pattanwibul Anak Weil, Martin Pan Wenshi Pimathai, Rungratchanee Wind, Jan Shi, Haitao Prayoonsith, Theerapat Wang, Yingxiang Redford, Tim JAPAN Xie, Yan Round, Philip Chan, Simba Yang, Fan Santisuk, Thawatchai Grimmett, Richard Yang, Wenzhong Srikosamart, Sompoch Yang, Xiaojun Theerakup, Kamtorn Young, Lew Vidthayanon, Chavalit KENYA Zhang, Qun Webb, Edward Hunter, Nigel Zhang, Xiaohong Zhou, Fang VIETNAM MALAYSIA Compton, James Zhou, Wei Becker, Aaron Mundkur, Taej Zhu, Jianguo Coull, Eric Zou, Fasheng Cox, Nick Dinh The Hung THE NETHERLANDS LAO P.D.R. Eames, Jonathan van Dijk, Peter Paul Baird, Ian Hendrie ,Douglas van Rijsoort, Jeannette Cobey, Sarah Hoang Hoe Eve, Roland Infield, Mark UK Hansel, Troy Koeman, Annelisa Crosby, Mike Hedemark, Michael Le Van Lanh Darwall, Will Johnson, Arlyne Long, Barney McGowan, Phil Reece, Rick Martin, Bettina Sylavong, Latsamay Momberg, Frank USA Nadler, Tilo Brooks, Thomas THAILAND Nguyen Duc Tu Brunner, Jake Elkin, Chantal Boonsai, Kunakron Nguyen Luong Duyen Langhammer, Penny Brockelman, Warren Nguyen Phuc Bao Hoa Peters, James Chan-ard, Tanya Nguyen Thi Thanh Thuy Sterling, Eleanor Chayamarit, Kongkanda Nguyen Thi Thu Huong Vynne, Carly Chutima, Gawin Oda, Kensei Duangkhae, Surapon Pham Thi Phuong Hoa Eawpanich, Piyathip Pham Tuan Anh Gale, George Rambaran, Girish Roberton, Scott Galster, Steven Grindley, Mark Stenke, Rosi Hankaew, Charoenwitt Swan, Steven Kanchanasaka, Budsabong Thomson, Julie Lynam, Anthony Tran Minh Dung Manopawitr, Petch Tran Triet Nabhitabhat, Jarujin Trinh Le Nguyen Nadee, Nivesh Vu Thi Minh Phuong iii CONTENTS Executive Summary............................................................................................................ iv Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 The Ecosystem Profile ........................................................................................................ 3 Biological Importance of Indochina ................................................................................... 4 Conservation Outcomes.................................................................................................... 15 Socioeconomic Features ................................................................................................... 29 Legislation and Protected Area Networks ........................................................................ 41 Synopsis of Current Threats.............................................................................................. 48 Synopsis of Current Investment........................................................................................ 57 CEPF Niche for Investment.............................................................................................. 72 CEPF Investment Strategy and Program Focus................................................................ 74 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 93 Logical Framework........................................................................................................... 94 Abbreviations Used in the Text ........................................................................................ 98 References....................................................................................................................... 100 Appendices...................................................................................................................... 112 iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is designed to safeguard Earth’s biologically richest and most threatened regions known as biodiversity hotspots. CEPF is a joint initiative of Conservation International, l'Agence Française de Développement, the Global Environment Facility, the government of Japan, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the World Bank. The program focuses on biological areas rather than political boundaries and examines conservation threats on a hotspot-level basis. CEPF targets transboundary cooperation in areas of high importance for biodiversity conservation that straddle national borders, or in areas where a regional approach will be more effective than a national approach. CEPF provides civil society with an agile and flexible funding mechanism complementing funding available to government institutions. The Indo-Burma Hotspot, with its unique assemblages of plant and animal communities and threatened and endemic species, and high levels of threat, is a global priority for conservation. The ecosystem profile focuses on the Indochina Region, which covers 1,496,000 km2 of land within the hotspot and comprises all non-marine parts of Cambodia, Lao P.D.R., Thailand, and Vietnam, as well as Hainan Island and southern parts of Yunnan, Guangxi, and Guangdong provinces in southern China. The ecosystem profile for Indochina was developed through a process of consultation and desk study coordinated by BirdLife International in collaboration with the Bird Conservation Society of Thailand, Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden, and the WWF Cambodia Program with the technical support of the Center for Applied Biodiversity Science (CABS) at Conservation International. More than 170 stakeholders from civil society, government, and donor institutions were consulted during the preparation of the ecosystem profile. Myanmar is not covered by this ecosystem profile. The ecosystem profile presents an overview of Indochina in terms of its biodiversity conservation importance, major threats to and root causes of biodiversity loss, socioeconomic context, and current conservation investments. It provides a suite of measurable conservation outcomes, identifies funding gaps, and opportunities for investment, and thus identifies the niche where CEPF investment can provide the greatest incremental value. The ecosystem profile contains a 5-year investment strategy for CEPF in the region. This investment strategy comprises a series of strategic funding opportunities, termed strategic directions, broken down into a number of investment priorities outlining the types of activities that will be eligible for CEPF funding. Civil society organizations or individuals may propose projects that will help implement the strategy by fitting into at least one of the strategic directions. The ecosystem profile does not include specific project concepts, as civil society groups will develop these as part of their applications for CEPF grant funding. v Conservation Outcomes The biological basis for CEPF investment in Indochina will be conservation outcomes: the quantifiable set of species, sites, and biodiversity conservation corridors that must be conserved to curb biodiversity loss globally. The species, site, and corridor outcomes for Indochina were identified during the preparation of the ecosystem profile and then prioritized as part of developing the CEPF niche and investment strategy. Selecting priority sites and corridors enables CEPF investment in site-based and landscape-scale conservation actions to focus on geographic areas (particularly sites) of the highest priority, while selecting priority species enables CEPF investment in species-focused conservation actions to be directed at those globally threatened species with conservation needs that cannot be adequately addressed by site- based and landscape-scale conservation actions alone. In all cases, the most important selection criteria were urgency for conservation action and opportunity for additional investment. Priority species, sites, and corridors were only selected where current threats, if not mitigated, were predicted to cause extinction of species or the loss of key elements of biodiversity in the case of sites and corridors within the next 20 years. During the preparation process, 492 species outcomes, 362 site outcomes, and 53 corridor outcomes were defined for Indochina. Other Important
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species List
    Dec. 11, 2013 – Jan. 01, 2014 Thailand (Central and Northern) Species Trip List Compiled by Carlos Sanchez (HO)= Distinctive enough to be counted as heard only Summary: After having traveled through much of the tropical Americas, I really wanted to begin exploring a new region of the world. Thailand instantly came to mind as a great entry point into the vast and diverse continent of Asia, home to some of the world’s most spectacular birds from giant hornbills to ornate pheasants to garrulous laughingthrushes and dazzling pittas. I took a little over three weeks to explore the central and northern parts of this spectacular country: the tropical rainforests of Kaeng Krachen, the saltpans of Pak Thale and the montane Himalayan foothill forests near Chiang Mai. I left absolutely dazzled by what I saw. Few words can describe the joy of having your first Great Hornbill, the size of a swan, plane overhead; the thousands of shorebirds in the saltpans of Pak Thale, where I saw critically endangered Spoon-billed Sandpiper; the tear-jerking surprise of having an Eared Pitta come to bathe at a forest pool in the late afternoon, surrounded by tail- quivering Siberian Blue Robins; or the fun of spending my birthday at Doi Lang, seeing Ultramarine Flycatcher, Spot-breasted Parrotbill, Fire-tailed Sunbird and more among a 100 or so species. Overall, I recorded over 430 species over the course of three weeks which is conservative relative to what is possible. Thailand was more than a birding experience for me. It was the Buddhist gong that would resonate through the villages in the early morning, the fresh and delightful cuisine produced out of a simple wok, the farmers faithfully tending to their rice paddies and the amusing frost chasers at the top of Doi Inthanon at dawn.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Wild Animals in Market -Tuensang, Nagaland
    Mongabay.com Open Access Journal - Tropical Conservation Science Vol.6 (2):241-253, 2013 Research Article Wildlife exploitation: a market survey in Nagaland, North-eastern India Subramanian Bhupathy1*, Selvaraj Ramesh Kumar1, Palanisamy Thirumalainathan1, Joothi Paramanandham1, and Chang Lemba2 1Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History Anaikatti (Post), Coimbatore- 641 108, Tamil Nadu, India 2C/o Moa Chang, Youth Secretary, Near Chang Baptist, Lashong, Thangnyen, Mission Compound, Tuensang, Nagaland, India *Corresponding Author ([email protected]) Abstract With growing human population, increased accessibility to remote forests and adoption of modern tools, hunting has become a severe global problem, particularly in Nagaland, a Northeast Indian state. While Indian wildlife laws prohibit hunting of virtually all large wild animals, in several parts of North-eastern parts of India that are dominated by indigenous tribal communities, these laws have largely been ineffective due to cultural traditions of hunting for meat, perceived medicinal and ritual value, and the community ownership of the forests. We report the quantity of wild animals sold at Tuensang town of Nagaland, based on weekly samples drawn from May 2009 to April 2010. Interviews were held with vendors on the availability of wild animals in forests belonging to them and methods used for hunting. The tribes of Chang, Yimchunger, Khiemungan, and Sangtam are involved in collection/ hunting and selling of animals in Tuensang. In addition to molluscs and amphibians, 1,870 birds (35 species) and 512 mammals (8 species) were found in the samples. We estimated that annually 13,067 birds and 3,567 mammals were sold in Tuensang market alone, which fetched about Indian Rupees ( ) 18.5 lakhs/ year.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterocarpaceae)
    DNA Sequence-Based Identification and Molecular Phylogeny Within Subfamily Dipterocarpoideae (Dipterocarpaceae) Dissertation Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) at Forest Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding, Büsgen Institute Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology Georg-August-Universität Göttingen By Essy Harnelly (Born in Banda Aceh, Indonesia) Göttingen, 2013 Supervisor : Prof. Dr. Reiner Finkeldey Referee : Prof. Dr. Reiner Finkeldey Co-referee : Prof. Dr. Holger Kreft Date of Disputation : 09.01.2013 2 To My Family 3 Acknowledgments First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Prof. Dr. Reiner Finkeldey for accepting me as his PhD student, for his support, helpful advice and guidance throughout my study. I am very grateful that he gave me this valuable chance to join his highly motivated international working group. I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Holger Kreft and Prof. Dr. Raphl Mitlöhner, who agreed to be my co-referee and member of examination team. I am grateful to Dr. Kathleen Prinz for her guidance, advice and support throughout my research as well as during the writing process. My deepest thankfulness goes to Dr. Sarah Seifert (in memoriam) for valuable discussion of my topic, summary translation and proof reading. I would also acknowledge Dr. Barbara Vornam for her guidance and numerous valuable discussions about my research topic. I would present my deep appreciation to Dr. Amarylis Vidalis, for her brilliant ideas to improve my understanding of my project. My sincere thanks are to Prof. Dr. Elizabeth Gillet for various enlightening discussions not only about the statistical matter, but also my health issues.
    [Show full text]
  • ONEP V09.Pdf
    Compiled by Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan-ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern OEPP BIODIVERSITY SERIES volume nine OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND PLANNING MINISTRY OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT 60/1 SOI PIBULWATTANA VII, RAMA VI RD., BANGKOK 10400 THAILAND TEL. (662) 2797180, 2714232, 2797186-9 FAX. (662) 2713226 Office of Environmental Policy and Planning 2000 NOT FOR SALE NOT FOR SALE NOT FOR SALE Compiled by Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan-ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern Office of Environmental Policy and Planning 2000 First published : September 2000 by Office of Environmental Policy and Planning (OEPP), Thailand. ISBN : 974–87704–3–5 This publication is financially supported by OEPP and may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non–profit purposes without special permission from OEPP, providing that acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purposes. Citation : Nabhitabhata J., Chan ard T., Chuaynkern Y. 2000. Checklist of Amphibians and Reptiles in Thailand. Office of Environmental Policy and Planning, Bangkok, Thailand. Authors : Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan–ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern National Science Museum Available from : Biological Resources Section Natural Resources and Environmental Management Division Office of Environmental Policy and Planning Ministry of Science Technology and Environment 60/1 Rama VI Rd. Bangkok 10400 THAILAND Tel. (662) 271–3251, 279–7180, 271–4232–8 279–7186–9 ext 226, 227 Facsimile (662) 279–8088, 271–3251 Designed & Printed :Integrated Promotion Technology Co., Ltd. Tel. (662) 585–2076, 586–0837, 913–7761–2 Facsimile (662) 913–7763 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Species of the Genus Limnonectes from Myanmar (Amphibia, Anura, Dicroglossidae)
    diversity Article Bioacoustics Reveal Hidden Diversity in Frogs: Two New Species of the Genus Limnonectes from Myanmar (Amphibia, Anura, Dicroglossidae) Gunther Köhler 1 , Britta Zwitzers 1, Ni Lar Than 2, Deepak Kumar Gupta 3, Axel Janke 3,4, Steffen U. Pauls 1,3,5 and Panupong Thammachoti 6,* 1 Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt a.M., Germany; [email protected] (G.K.); [email protected] (B.Z.); [email protected] (S.U.P.) 2 Zoology Department, East Yangon University, Thanlyin 11291, Yangon, Myanmar; [email protected] 3 LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt a.M., Germany; [email protected] (D.K.G.); [email protected] (A.J.) 4 Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Georg-Voigt-Straße 14-16, 60325 Frankfurt a.M., Germany 5 Institute of Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392 Gießen, Germany 6 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand * Correspondence: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4C463126-CD59-4935-96E3-11AF4131144C urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:5EA582A8-39DB-4259-A8D9-4C8FADAC5E9A urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:412732A4-47E3-4032-8FF0-7518BA232F9F Citation: Köhler, G.; Zwitzers, B.; Than, N.L.; Gupta, D.K.; Janke, A.; Abstract: Striking geographic variation in male advertisement calls was observed in frogs formerly Pauls, S.U.; Thammachoti, P. referred to as Limnonectes doriae and L. limborgi, respectively. Subsequent analyses of mtDNA and Bioacoustics Reveal Hidden Diversity external morphological data brought supporting evidence for the recognition of these populations as in Frogs: Two New Species of the distinct species.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • BHUTAN - Birding, Mammals and Monasteries for Golden Gate Audubon Society
    Page 1 BHUTAN - Birding, Mammals and Monasteries For Golden Gate Audubon Society Trip Date: 02 - 20 May 2021 www. goldengateaudubon.org Email: [email protected] Page 2 Tour at a glance Tour Date: 02 – 20 May 2021 Tour Duration: 19 Days Expected Birds Species: 350-400 Expected Mammal Species: 10-15 Altitude: 150m/492ft – 3,822m/12,539ft Photographic Opportunity: Excellent Local Guides: Sonam Tshering or Chubzang Tangbi Other staff: For 3 or more guests catering staff will be provided for picnic breakfasts and lunches in prime birding locations Synopsis Bhutan has been protected by both its isolation within the Himalayas and the topography of its moun- tainous land, resulting in over 70% of the land remaining forested with approximately 25% protected by 10 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. The diverse range of environments varies from sub-tropical at 150m to alpine at over 4,500m, supporting a wide range of eco-systems with rich and varied bird-life, flora and fauna. Our Bhutanese tour leader is a birding expert and an accredited naturalist who will ensure that your trip through this varied and beautiful landscape is full of birding and wildlife excellence. Prices 1. Land Price: 8 guests: US$ 3,980 per person, based on standard twin occupancy 2. Flights: International: Druk Air/Bhutan Airlines – PBH - DEL = US$ 385 per person Druk Air/Bhutan Airlines - PBH - KTM = US$ 265 per person Druk Air/Bhutan Airlines – PBH - BKK = US$ 440 per person Please note: Flights from Delhi/Calcutta – Guwahati are not included in the costs and are arranged by yourselves www.
    [Show full text]
  • Norntates PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y
    AMERICAN MUSEUM Norntates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 3052, 19 pp., 9 figures, 1 table December 14, 1992 Sucking Lice (Insecta, Anoplura) from Indigenous Sulawesi Rodents: a New Species of Polyplax from a Montane Shrew Rat, and New Information About Polyplax wallacei and P. eropepli LANCE A. DURDEN' AND GUY G. MUSSER2 ABSTRACT Polyplax melasmothrixi, a new species of po- from Eropeplus canus from tropical upper mon- lyplacid sucking louse, is described from Melas- tane rain forest also in Central Sulawesi. Host and mothrix naso, a small-bodied shrew rat known habitat associations for these three species ofsuck- only from tropical upper montane rain forest in ing lice are discussed. Polyplax melasmothrixi and Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. The male ofPolyplax P. eropepli are both known only from montane wallacei is described from specimens collected from habitats in Central Sulawesi and both appear to Bunomys chrysocomus trapped in tropical lowland be host specific (to M. naso and E. canus, respec- evergreen rain forest in Central Sulawesi. A further tively). Contrastingly, P. wallacei parasitizes two specimen ofPolyplax eropepli, a taxon previously species ofBunomys in lowland forests and is known known only from the type series, is documented from North and Central Sulawesi. INTRODUCTION Melasmothrix naso, Bunomys chrysoco- Musser and Holden, 1991). The shrew rat, mus, and Eropeplus canus are three murine M. naso, and the large-bodied E. canus have rodents found only in forests on the Indo- been recorded only from montane rainforest nesian island of Sulawesi (Musser, 1987; formations in the mountainous central part I Assistant Professor and Assistant Curator, Institute of Arthropodology and Parasitology, Georgia Southern Uni- versity, Landrum Box 8056, Statesboro, Georgia 30460.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia
    Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia Submitted in accordance with Foreign Assistance Act Sections 118/119 February 20, 2004 Prepared for USAID/Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 3-5 Jakarta 10110 Indonesia Prepared by Steve Rhee, M.E.Sc. Darrell Kitchener, Ph.D. Tim Brown, Ph.D. Reed Merrill, M.Sc. Russ Dilts, Ph.D. Stacey Tighe, Ph.D. Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures............................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms....................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary.................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................1- 1 2. Legislative and Institutional Structure Affecting Biological Resources...............................2 - 1 2.1 Government of Indonesia................................................................................................2 - 2 2.1.1 Legislative Basis for Protection and Management of Biodiversity and
    [Show full text]
  • Is Dicroglossidae Anderson, 1871 (Amphibia, Anura) an Available Nomen?
    Zootaxa 3838 (5): 590–594 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3838.5.8 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:87DD8AF3-CB72-4EBD-9AA9-5B1E2439ABFE Is Dicroglossidae Anderson, 1871 (Amphibia, Anura) an available nomen? ANNEMARIE OHLER1 & ALAIN DUBOIS Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Département Systématique et Evolution, UMR7205 ISYEB, CP 30, 25 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris 1Corresponding autho. E-mail: [email protected] Abbreviations used: BMNH, Natural History Museum, London; SVL, snout–vent length; ZMB, Zoologisch Museum, Berlin. Anderson (1871a: 38) mentioned the family nomen DICROGLOSSIDAE, without any comment, in a list of specimens of the collections of the Indian Museum of Calcutta (now the Zoological Survey of India). He referred to this family a single species, Xenophrys monticola, a nomen given by Günther (1864) to a species of MEGOPHRYIDAE from Darjeeling and Khasi Hills (India) which has a complex nomenclatural history (Dubois 1989, 1992; Deuti et al. submitted). Dubois (1987: 57), considering that the nomen DICROGLOSSIDAE had been based on the generic nomen Dicroglossus Günther, 1860, applied it to a family group taxon, the tribe DICROGLOSSINI, for which he proposed a diagnosis. The genus Dicroglossus had been erected by Günther (1860), 11 years before Anderson’s (1871a) paper, for the unique species Dicroglossus adolfi. Boulenger (1882: 17) stated that this specific nomen was a subjective junior synonym of Rana cyanophlyctis Schneider, 1799, and therefore Dicroglossus a subjective junior synonym of Rana Linnaeus, 1758 (Boulenger, 1882: 7).
    [Show full text]
  • A Bird's View of New Conservation Hotspots in China
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316950300 A bird's view of new conservation hotspots in China Article in Biological Conservation · July 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.033 CITATIONS READS 3 699 10 authors, including: Ruocheng Hu Hao Wang Shan Shui Conservation Center Peking University 7 PUBLICATIONS 8 CITATIONS 27 PUBLICATIONS 400 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Xiangying Shi Zhi Lu Peking University Peking University 6 PUBLICATIONS 13 CITATIONS 73 PUBLICATIONS 821 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Restoring Habitat Connectivity for Giant Panda and Sympatric Species View project China's Nature Watch View project All content following this page was uploaded by Ruocheng Hu on 13 March 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Biological Conservation 211 (2017) 47–55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon A bird's view of new conservation hotspots in China ⁎ MARK Ruocheng Hua,b,1, Cheng Wena,b, ,1, Yiyun Gub, Hao Wanga, Lei Gub,c, Xiangying Shib, Jia Zhongd, Ming Weid, Fenqi Hee, Zhi Lua a Center for Nature and Society, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China b Shan Shui Conservation Center, Beijing 100871, China c School of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100871, China d Chinese Bird Watching Societies Network, Kunming, Yunnan 650224, China e Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Blooming citizen science in China creates opportunities to update distribution maps of threatened birds and Citizen science contributes to decision making for conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazrin Full Phd Thesis (150246576
    Maintenance and conservation of Dipterocarp diversity in tropical forests _______________________________________________ Mohammad Nazrin B Abdul Malik A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Science Department of Animal and Plant Sciences November 2019 1 i Thesis abstract Many theories and hypotheses have been developed to explain the maintenance of diversity in plant communities, particularly in hyperdiverse tropical forests. Maintenance of the composition and diversity of tropical forests is vital, especially species of high commercial value. I focus on the high value dipterocarp timber species of Malaysia and Borneo as these have been extensive logged owing to increased demands from global timber trade. In this thesis, I explore the drivers of diversity of this group, as well as the determinants of global abundance, conservation and timber value. The most widely supported hypothesis for explaining tropical diversity is the Janzen Connell hypothesis. I experimentally tested the key elements of this, namely density and distance dependence, in two dipterocarp species. The results showed that different species exhibited different density and distance dependence effects. To further test the strength of this hypothesis, I conducted a meta-analysis combining multiple studies across tropical and temperate study sites, and with many species tested. It revealed significant support for the Janzen- Connell predictions in terms of distance and density dependence. Using a phylogenetic comparative approach, I highlight how environmental adaptation affects dipterocarp distribution, and the relationships of plant traits with ecological factors and conservation status. This analysis showed that environmental and ecological factors are related to plant traits and highlights the need for dipterocarp conservation priorities.
    [Show full text]