Section 6 LANDSCAPE and VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Section 6 LANDSCAPE and VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Contents Sanquhar II Community Wind Farm - Additional Information Report Section 6 – Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Section 6 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Table 6.11: Other wind farms considered within CLVIA Table 6.12: Summary of Combined Cumulative Visual Effects by Viewpoint Location Contents 6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 6.2 Assessment methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Appendices 6.3 Landscape planning policies and designations ...................................................................................................... 7 Appendix 6.1: LVIA Methodology Assessment Criteria 6.4 Baseline landscape conditions ............................................................................................................................... 9 Appendix 6.2: Information to be read in conjunction with visualisations 6.5 Baseline visual conditions .................................................................................................................................... 12 Table 6.5b – Additional Wireframe and Photomontage Visualisations also now provided with the LVIA ..................... 16 Appendix 6.3: Preliminary Analysis of Landscape Character Areas within 35km 6.6 Project description .............................................................................................................................................. 16 Appendix 6.4: Viewpoint Assessment 6.7 Assessment of Landscape Effects ........................................................................................................................ 16 Appendix 6.5: Night-time Lighting Assessment 6.8 Assessment of Visual Effects ............................................................................................................................... 31 Appendix 6.6: Residential Visual Amenity Study 6.9 Cumulative Landscape and Visual Effects ........................................................................................................... 43 6.10 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................................................... 51 Appendix 6.7: Effects upon Landscape Designations 6.11 Residual Effects.................................................................................................................................................... 52 Appendix 6.8: Additional Supporting Wireframe Visualisations 6.12 Summary of Landscape and Visual Effects .......................................................................................................... 52 Appendix 6.9: Enlarged Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) Plans - Scaur Water Valley and Shinnel Water Valley 6.13 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................... 53 Appendix 6.10: Wireframe Route Analysis – ‘Southern Upland Way - between Benbrack and Conrig shoulder’ and ‘Scaur Water Valley - minor road between Carlistane Bridge and Polskeoch’ Tables Appendix 6.11: Letter from Pegasus to the Energy Consents Unit, dated 31.03.20, concerning the consultation response of Dumfries and Galloway Council, dated 18.02.20 Table 6.1: Production of Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) Maps Appendix 6.12 Additional Photomontage Visualisations from Scaur Water Valley and Shinnel Water Valley Table 6.2: Wireframe Visualisations (prepared using photography collected during pre-Covid restrictions) Table 6.3: Generation of Photomontages Appendix 6.13 360-degree Wireframe Visualisations from the summit of Blackcraig Hill Table 6.4: Character Types and Areas/Units Assessed Table 6.5a: Assessment Viewpoints Supporting Volumes Table 6.5b: Additional Wireframe and Photomontage Visualisations also now provided with the LVIA Additional Information, June 2020 - LVIA Volume 2: Figures Table 6.6 Summary of Landscape Sensitivity Ratings attributed to each Character Type/Unit in this LVIA Additional Information, June 2020 - LVIA Volume 3: Viewpoint visualisations Table 6.7: Summary of Effects on above assessed Landscape Character Units/Types (Operational Phase) Table 6.8: Landscape Character Assessment of other relevant Landscape Character Units/Types (Operational Phase) Table 6.9: Summary of Viewpoint Sensitivity, Magnitude of Change and Level of Effect during Operational Phase Table 6.10: Other Wind Farms within 35km of the Site Section 6 – Page 1 Section 6 – Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Sanquhar II Community Wind Farm – Additional Information Report Section 6: Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment • to identify, evaluate and describe the baseline visual context of the site and its surroundings with a focus on both specific views and the more general visual amenity experienced by people who have views of the site; 6.1 Introduction • to determine the nature of the visual receptor (i.e. the sensitivity of the viewpoint or person whose visual amenity is affected) through a consideration of the susceptibility of the viewpoint/person to the 6.1.1 This chapter presents a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) of the revised proposals for the type of development proposed and any values associated with either the viewpoint or visual amenity proposed Sanquhar II Community Wind Farm development. A full description of the revision to the proposals experienced; is provided in Chapter 2, however in summary this comprises the removal from the scheme of T11, T12, T13, • to identify and describe any impacts of the development in so far as they affect a viewpoint or views T14, T47 and T48 and an adjustment to the location of T10 (163m to the east). The chapter has been prepared experienced; by Landscape Architects from Pegasus Group who are Chartered Members of the Landscape Institute and who • to evaluate the nature of the visual effects (i.e. the magnitude, duration and reversibility of the effect); are experienced in the EIA of wind energy developments, including production of the original LVIA for the • to identify and describe mitigation measures that have been adopted to avoid, reduce and compensate proposals. The chapter replaces in full the previous Section 6 of the EIA Report and its accompanying, Figures, for visual effects; Visualisations and Appendices. This chapter includes the additional and updated figures and visualisations that • to evaluate the relative significance of residual visual effects; and have been requested by the local authorities following review of the original submission. This additional • information supplements the original information, which is also included in this chapter. to determine which visual effects, if any, are significant. 6.1.7 The LVIA also considers any cumulative landscape and visual effects which may arise as a result of constructing 6.1.2 The purpose of an LVIA when undertaken in the context of an EIA is to identify any likely significant landscape and visual effects arising as a result of the proposals. An LVIA must consider both: the Sanquhar II Community Wind Farm in conjunction with other developments. 6.1.8 It is acknowledged that wind turbines give rise to a wide spectrum of opinions, ranging from strongly adverse • effects on the landscape as a resource in its own right (the landscape effects); and to strongly positive, with a wide range of opinions lying somewhere between these two positions. Some people • effects on specific views and visual amenity more generally (the visual effects). view wind turbines as incongruous or industrial structures whilst others view them as aesthetically pleasing, 6.1.3 Therefore, this LVIA considers the potential effects of the Sanquhar II Community Wind Farm upon: elegant structures and a positive response to climate change. • individual landscape features and elements; 6.1.9 In considering the landscape and visual effects of the proposed Sanquhar II Community Wind Farm, a • landscape character; precautionary approach to the assessment has been adopted whereby it is assumed that the effects of the • specific views; and proposal would be adverse in nature even though it is acknowledged that, for some people, the impacts could • the visual amenity of people who view the landscape. be considered to be positive. 6.1.4 In this chapter, landscape and visual effects are assessed separately although the procedure for assessing each 6.1.10 All LVIA figures referenced in this chapter are bound within Volume 2 of this EIAR Additional Information, June of these is closely linked. 2020. The visualisations which accompany this report are presented in Volume 3 Additional Information, June 2020. Relevant appendices can be found at the end of this section. 6.1.5 The main objectives of the landscape assessment can be summarised as follows: Summary of Landscape and Visual Consultation Responses to Original Application scheme and Requests for • to identify, evaluate and describe the baseline landscape character of the site and its surroundings and Additional Information any notable individual landscape features within the site; • to determine the nature of the landscape receptor (i.e. the sensitivity of the landscape) through a LPA Response consideration of its susceptibility to the type of development proposed and any values associated with East Ayrshire Council
Recommended publications
  • Backhill O' Bush Land Management Plan 2016-26
    Backhill o’ Bush Land Management Plan 2016-26 Galloway Forest District BACKHILL O’ BUSH Land Management Plan Approval date: Plan Reference No: FDP Plan Approval Date: 01 January 2017 Plan Expiry Date: 31 December 2026 1 Galloway FD S Stables January 2017 Backhill o’ Bush Land Management Plan 2016-26 2 Galloway FD S Stables January 2017 Backhill o’ Bush Land Management Plan 2016-26 CSM 6 Appendix 1 FOREST ENTERPRISE – Application for Forest Design Plan Approvals Forest Enterprise – Property Forest District: GALLOWAY FD Woodland or property name: BACKHILL O’ BUSH Nearest town, village or locality: CARSPHAIRN OS Grid reference: NX490800 Local Authority district/unitary Authority DUMFRIES & GALLOWAY 1. I apply for Forest Design Plan approval*/amendment approval* for the property described above and in the enclosed Forest Design Plan. 2. I confirm that the scoping, carried out and documented in the Consultation Record attached, incorporated those stakeholders which the FC agreed must be included. Where it has not been possible to resolve specific issues associated with the plan to the satisfaction of consultees, this is highlighted in the Consultation Record. 3. I confirm that the proposals contained in this plan comply with the UK Forestry Standard. 4. I undertake to obtain any permissions necessary for the implementation of the approved Plan. Signed …………….................................. Signed .............................................. Forest District Manager Conservator District GALLOWAY FD................ Conservancy ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • TA 7.3 SNH Baseline Landscape Character
    EUCHANHEAD RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT Technical Appendix 7.3: SNH Baseline Landscape Character 10/2020 www.stephenson-halliday.com A. Technical Appendix 7.3: Baseline Landscape Caracter A.1 SNH Landscape Character Assessment (2019) A.1.1 SNH recently republished their National Programme of Landscape Character Assessments as a digital map based LCA in 2019. This data was reviewed to take account of intervening technical improvements in website mapping to produce a revised national suite of landscape character type at 1:50,000 scale. This information was created in collaboration and consultation with FLS and HES as well as all local authorities. This also included a more consistent baseline description across Scotland. As this is an online document, the following is an extract of the landscape character citations for each character area assessed. A.1.2 Compiled within this document are the following SNH Landscape Chatacter Type Baseline documents: • LCT 073 - Upland Glen - Ayrshire (2019) • LCT 081 - Southern Uplands - Ayrshire (2019) • LCT 160 - Narrow Wooded Valley - Dumfries & Galloway (2019) • LCT 165 - Upper Dale - Dumfries & Galloway (2019) • LCT 166 - Upland Glens - Dumfries & Galloway (2019) • LCT 175 - Foothills - Dumfries & Galloway (2019) • LCT 177 - Southern Uplands - Dumfries & Galloway (2019) • LCT 178 - Southern Uplands with Forest - Dumfries and Galloway (2019) Technical Appendix 7.3: Baseline Landscape Caracter 1 SNH National Landscape Character Assessment Landscape Character Type 73 UPLAND GLEN - AYRSHIRE Location and Context The Upland Glen- Ayrshire Landscape Character Type occurs in three places in Ayrshire, focused to the far south and east; the valley of the Afton Water, immediately to the south of New Cumnock, and Glen Tig and Glen App, draining to the Ayrshire coast, close to the boundary with Dumfries and Galloway.
    [Show full text]
  • Bennan Land Management Plan 2018-28
    Bennan Land Management Plan 2018-28 Galloway Forest District BENNAN Land Management Plan Approval date: Plan Reference No: FDP Plan Approval Date: 01 February 2018 Plan Expiry Date: 31 January 2028 1 Galloway FD S Stables 05/11/2018 Bennan Land Management Plan 2018-28 2 Galloway FD S Stables 05/11/2018 Bennan Land Management Plan 2018-28 CSM 6 Appendix 1 FOREST ENTERPRISE – Application for Forest Design Plan Approvals Forest Enterprise – Property Forest District: GALLOWAY FD Woodland or property name: BENNAN Nearest town, village or locality: NEW GALLOWAY OS Grid reference: NX598744 Local Authority district/unitary Authority DUMFRIES & GALLOWAY 1. I apply for Forest Design Plan approval*/amendment approval* for the property described above and in the enclosed Forest Design Plan. 2. I confirm that the scoping, carried out and documented in the Consultation Record attached, incorporated those stakeholders which the FC agreed must be included. Where it has not been possible to resolve specific issues associated with the plan to the satisfaction of consultees, this is highlighted in the Consultation Record. 3. I confirm that the proposals contained in this plan comply with the UK Forestry Standard. 4. I undertake to obtain any permissions necessary for the implementation of the approved Plan. Signed …………….................................. Signed .............................................. Forest District Manager Conservator District GALLOWAY FD................ Conservancy ......................................... Date ……..................
    [Show full text]
  • Galloway-Glens-All-Combined.Pdf
    000 600 000 590 000 580 000 570 000 560 000 550 KEY GGLP boundary Mesolithic sites 000 240000 250000 260000 270000 280000 540 Figure 4: Mesolithic elements of the historic environment Drawn by: O Lelong, 10.8.2017 ± Map scale @ A3: 1:175,000 000 600 000 590 000 580 000 570 000 560 KEY GGLP boundary Burnt mound 000 Cairn 550 Cup and ring marks Hut circle Standing stone Stone circle 000 240000 250000 260000 270000 280000 540 Figure 5: Neolithic to early BA elements of the historic environment Drawn by: O Lelong, 10.8.2017 ± Map scale @ A3: 1:175,000 000 600 000 590 000 580 000 570 000 560 000 550 KEY GGLP boundary Axehead, axe hammer (stone) Axehead, palstave, dirks etc (bronze) 000 240000 250000 260000 270000 280000 540 Figure 6: Find-spots of Bronze Age metalwork and battle axes Drawn by: O Lelong, 10.8.2017 ± Map scale @ A3: 1:175,000 000 600 000 590 000 580 000 570 000 560 KEY 000 GGLP boundary 550 Dun Fort Possible fort Settlement 000 240000 250000 260000 270000 280000 540 Figure 7: Late Bronze Age to Iron Age elements of the historic environment Drawn by: O Lelong, 10.8.2017 ± Map scale @ A3: 1:175,000 000 600 000 590 000 580 000 570 000 560 KEY 000 GGLP boundary 550 Enclosure Find-spot Fort annexe Temporary camp 000 240000 250000 260000 270000 280000 540 Figure 8: Roman elements of the historic environment Drawn by: O Lelong, 10.8.2017 ± Map scale @ A3: 1:175,000 000 600 000 590 000 580 000 570 000 560 KEY GGLP boundary Abbey 000 Castle or tower house 550 Church, chapel or cemetery Motte Settlement Well 000 240000 250000 260000 270000
    [Show full text]
  • Dumfriesshire
    Dumfriesshire Rare Plant Register 2020 Christopher Miles An account of the known distribution of the rare or scarce native plants in Dumfriesshire up to the end of 2019 Rare Plant Register Dumfriesshire 2020 Holy Grass, Hierochloe odorata Black Esk July 2019 2 Rare Plant Register Dumfriesshire 2020 Acknowledgements My thanks go to all those who have contributed plant records in Dumfriesshire over the years. Many people have between them provided hundreds or thousands of records and this publication would not have been possible without them. More particularly, before my recording from 1996 onwards, plant records have been collected and collated in three distinct periods since the nineteenth century by previous botanists working in Dumfriesshire. The first of these was George F. Scott- Elliot. He was an eminent explorer and botanist who edited the first and only Flora so far published for Dumfriesshire in 1896. His work was greatly aided by other contributing botanists probably most notably Mr J.T. Johnstone and Mr W. Stevens. The second was Humphrey Milne-Redhead who was a GP in Mainsriddle in Kircudbrightshire from 1947. He was both the vice county recorder for Bryophytes and for Higher Plants for all three Dumfries and Galloway vice counties! During his time the first systematic recording was stimulated by work for the first Atlas of the British Flora (1962). He published a checklist in 1971/72. The third period of recording was between 1975 and 1993 led by Stuart Martin and particularly Mary Martin after Stuart’s death. Mary in particular continued systematic recording and recorded for the monitoring scheme in 1987/88.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management Strategy Solway Local Plan District Section 3
    Flood Risk Management Strategy Solway Local Plan District This section provides supplementary information on the characteristics and impacts of river, coastal and surface water flooding. Future impacts due to climate change, the potential for natural flood management and links to river basin management are also described within these chapters. Detailed information about the objectives and actions to manage flooding are provided in Section 2. Section 3: Supporting information 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 31 1 3.2 River flooding ......................................................................................... 31 2 • Esk (Dumfriesshire) catchment group .............................................. 31 3 • Annan catchment group ................................................................... 32 1 • Nith catchment group ....................................................................... 32 7 • Dee (Galloway) catchment group ..................................................... 33 5 • Cree catchment group ...................................................................... 34 2 3.3 Coastal flooding ...................................................................................... 349 3.4 Surface water flooding ............................................................................ 359 Solway Local Plan District Section 3 310 3.1 Introduction In the Solway Local Plan District, river flooding is reported across five distinct river catchments.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Scenic Areas Technical Paper;
    DUMFRIES AND GALLOWAY COUNCIL Local Development \ Plan Technical Paper Regional Scenic SEPTEMBER 2014 Areas www.dumgal.gov.uk Dumfries and Galloway Regional Scenic Areas Technical Paper; Errata: Regional Scenic Areas were drawn as part of the 1999 Dumfries and Galloway Structure Plan. The adopted boundaries were shown on plans within Technical Paper 6 (1999) and subsequently in the four Local Plans, adopted in 2006. The boundaries were not amended during the production of the 2014 RSA Technical Paper; however the mapping included several errors: 1. Galloway Hills RSA The boundary to the east of Cairnsmore of Fleet (NX 501670) should have included Craigronald and Craigherron but not High Craigeazle, Low Craigeazle or Little Cullendoch Moss (Maps on pages 12 and 19 should be revised as below): Area not in RSA Area should be in RSA Area not in RSA 2. Solway Coast RSA (two areas); St Mary’s Isle, Kirkcudbright (NX 673491) should have been included within the RSA boundary (Maps on pages 12 and 24 should be revised as below): Area should be in RSA The area to the west of Powfoot (NY 148657) should have been included within the RSA (Maps on pages 12 and 24 should be revised as below): Area not within RSA Area should be in RSA 3. Terregles Ridge RSA The area around the A711 at Beeswing (NX 897694) should not have been included within the RSA (Maps on pages 12 and 27 should be revised as below): Area not within RSA Technical Paper: Regional Scenic Areas Contents Page Part 1: Introduction 2 Regional Scenic Designations 2 Dumfries and Galloway Landscape Assessment 3 Relationship between the Landscape Assessment and Scenic Designations 3 Part 2: 1999 Review Process 5 Aims and Objectives 5 Methodology 5 Part 3: Regional Scenic Area Descriptions 8 Appendices 42 Appendix 1: References 42 Appendix 2: Landscape Character Types and Units 43 1 Part 1: INTRODUCTION The quality of the landscape is one of Dumfries and Galloway's major assets, providing an attractive environment for both residents and visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirkcudbright and Wigtown M R C Eet , the Iver Ree , with Its Estuary Broadening Into M Wigtown Bay , for S the Eastern Boundary of Wigtown
    CA M B R I D G E UNIVE RSITY P RES S onhon FE ER LA NE E. C . Zfli : TT , 4 R C. CLA Y , M A NA G E m N ND L D o ba Qlalwtm an b M MI L LA A CO . T ‘ fi p, , fi ahm s : A C . < tific t : . M NT S N LT D . ran o J . D E O S , filokyo : M A R UZ E N - K A BUS H I KI - KA I S H A k qa ek KIRKC UD BRIG HT SHI RE A ND WIG T OWN SHIRE by WILLIA M kBA RM ONTH , G i - - r th o n P ub lic S ch o o l, G a teh o use o f Fleet With Ma s D a ams an d Illust atio n s p , i gr , r CA MBRID G E A T TH E UNI VE RSI T Y P RES S 1 9 2 0 CONTENTS P A G E S hi re O l Coun t a n d . y The rigin of Gal oway , k c d Wi town Kir u bright , g Gen eral Chara cteristics Si z e B d . Shape . oun aries Su rface a n d General Featu res R ivers a n d Lak es Geo logy Natural History Al on g th e Co ast h G a in s a n d o e B ea c es a . R aised . Coast l L ss s Lightho uses Clim ate e—R c c Peopl a e , Diale t , Population Agriculture M ct M e a n d M anufa ures , in s inerals Fish eries a n d d , Shipping Tra e Hi sto ry A n tiquities vi C ONTENTS — Architec ture (a ) Ecc lesiasti cal — Archi tecture (b) Milita ry — Archite cture (c) Dom esti c a n d Municipal Co m m uni catio n s Administration a n d Divisions Roll of Ho nour The Chi ef To wns a n d Vl lla ges ILLUST RAT IONS P A GE Glenlu ce Abbey o r ck o k o P tpatri , l o ing S uth R o ck s near Lo ch Enoch Lo ch Enoch a n d Merric k Head of Loch Troo l The Cree at Ma ch erm o re Ca rlin wa r k o c o g L h , Castle D uglas M d o o c Neldri ck en The ur er H le , L h On e o f B Tro o l the uchan Falls .
    [Show full text]
  • DUMFRIESSHIRE and GALLOWAY NATURAL HISTORY and ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY
    TRANSACTIONS of the DUMFRIESSHIRE AND GALLOWAY NATURAL HISTORY and ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY LXXXVII VOLUME 87 2013 TRANSACTIONS of the DUMFRIESSHIRE AND GALLOWAY NATURAL HISTORY and ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY FOUNDED 20 NOVEMBER 1862 THIRD SERIES VOLUME 87 LXXXVII Editors: ELAINE KENNEDY FRANCIS TOOLIS JAMES FOSTER ISSN 0141-1292 2013 DUMFRIES Published by the Council of the Society Office-Bearers 2012-2013 and Fellows of the Society President Dr F. Toolis FSA Scot Vice Presidents Mrs C. Iglehart, Mr A. Pallister, Mr D. Rose and Mr L. Murray Fellows of the Society Mr A.D. Anderson, Mr J.H.D. Gair, Dr J.B. Wilson, Mr K.H. Dobie, Mrs E. Toolis, Dr D.F. Devereux and Mrs M. Williams Mr L.J. Masters and Mr R.H. McEwen — appointed under Rule 10 Hon. Secretary Mr J.L. Williams, Merkland, Kirkmahoe, Dumfries DG1 1SY Hon. Membership Secretary Miss H. Barrington, 30 Noblehill Avenue, Dumfries DG1 3HR Hon. Treasurer Mr M. Cook, Gowanfoot, Robertland, Amisfield, Dumfries DG1 3PB Hon. Librarian Mr R. Coleman, 2 Loreburn Park, Dumfries DG1 1LS Hon. Editors Mrs E. Kennedy, Nether Carruchan, Troqueer, Dumfries DG2 8LY Dr F. Toolis, 25 Dalbeattie Road, Dumfries DG2 7PF Dr J. Foster (Webmaster), 21 Maxwell Street, Dumfries DG2 7AP Hon. Syllabus Conveners Mrs J. Brann, Troston, New Abbey, Dumfries DG2 8EF Miss S. Ratchford, Tadorna, Hollands Farm Road, Caerlaverock, Dumfries DG1 4RS Hon. Curators Mrs J. Turner and Miss S. Ratchford Hon. Outings Organiser Mrs S. Honey Ordinary Members Mrs P.G. Williams, Mrs A. Weighill, Dr Jeanette Brock, Dr Jeremy Brock, Mr D. Scott, Mr J.
    [Show full text]
  • Routeing and Consultation Document
    Proposed 132kV Overhead Line Connection from Sandy Knowe Wind Farm to Glenglass Substation May 2017 Routeing and Consultation Document Routeing and Consultation Document May 2017 PREFACE This Routeing and Consultation Document has been prepared on behalf of SP Transmission plc and relates to the proposal for a 132kV overhead line connection from Sandy Knowe Wind Farm to a connection point close to Glenglass substation. This proposal is referred as the “Proposed Development”. This Routeing and Consultation Document presents the methodology and findings of the routeing study which has been undertaken to inform consultation on the Proposed Development. This Routeing and Consultation Document is available to download for free from the Sandy Knowe Wind Farm Connection Project page on the SP Energy Networks website at the link below... https://www.spenergynetworks.co.uk/pages/community_consultation.aspx (this is the generic link to the Community Consultation page and the project will appear in a drop down box.) Hard copies of the Routeing Consultation Document are available to purchase upon request from: Land and Planning, ScottishPower Energy Networks, Ochil House, 10 Technology Avenue, Hamilton International Technology Park, Blantyre, G72 0HT This Routeing Consultation Document is also available for viewing at: Sanquhar Library, 106 High Street, Sanquhar, DG4 6DZ Kirkconnel Library, Greystone Avenue, Sanquhar, DG4 6RA Dumfries &Galloway Planning Dept, English Street, Dumfries, DG1 2DD Proposed 132kV Overhead Line Connection from Sandy Knowe Wind Farm to Glenglass Substation Take care of the environment. Printed in black and white and only if necessary. 1 Routeing and Consultation Document May 2017 Organisations contacted formally by SP Energy Networks (see Appendix 2) and local communities have been asked to respond by the 28th of July 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Lorg and Longburn Grid Connection Routeing Consultation Report
    Proposed 132kV Grid Connection to Lorg and Longburn Wind Farms Routeing Consultation Report REPORT NO 70016687-001 LORG AND LONGBURN GRID CONNECTION ROUTEING CONSULTATION REPORT APRIL 2017 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY .................................................................................................1 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................3 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT ................................................................. 3 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE ROUTEING REPORT ........................................................ 3 1.3 STRUCTURE OF THE ROUTEING REPORT ................................................... 3 2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................4 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................5 3.1 THE NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 5 3.2 DESIGN .............................................................................................................. 5 3.3 CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................................... 7 4 APPROACH TO ROUTEING ........................................................8 4.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 8 4.2 SPEN ROUTEING APPROACH ........................................................................ 8 5 TECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ROUTEING CONSIDERATIONS ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • R01 HSUK Scottish Rail Strategy
    HSUK SCOTTISH RAIL STRATEGY With Edinburgh and Glasgow comprising two of the UK’s principal conurbations, it is natural that both cities will be primary stakeholders in any future UK high speed rail network. Projections for HS2 show high speed lines extending northwards to both Edinburgh and Glasgow, and the scheme’s proponents claim major economic benefits accruing from accelerated North-South links, and environmental benefits accruing from short-haul air flows converted to rail. It is important to appreciate that the core rationale of any high speed rail system is to connect primary conurbations (of 500,000+ population), and this is likely to deter the opening of new lines north of the Forth-Clyde Line. Hence a major proportion of the Scottish population away from the Central Belt seems likely to see no direct benefits from the UK high speed rail project. These areas have been poorly served by rail since the ‘Beeching’ cuts of the 1960’s, and the economic impacts are continuing. The Scottish Government has taken significant steps to redress these connectivity deficiencies, with several rail routes reopened in recent years. But whilst the pace of Scottish reopenings far outstrips performance elsewhere in the UK, progress is still slow. It seems vital that the UK high speed rail initiative is developed in such a way as to extend operation of high speed services north of the Forth-Clyde Line, and in doing so to spur further reopenings. This will bring benefit to the widest practicable spread of Scottish communities. The following diagrams chart the development of the Scottish rail network, and illustrate the likely impacts of both HS2 and the alternative High Speed UK scheme.
    [Show full text]