DOCSLIB.ORG

FOIA Logs for Various Offices Within the Department of Justice, 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FOIA Logs for Various Offices Within the Department of Justice, 2005 Description of document: FOIA logs for various offices within the Department of Justice (DOJ), 2005 - 2007 Requested date: 13-August-2007 Released date: 14-September-2009 Posted date: 14-December-2009 Titles of documents Sep. 11, 2007 - OIP Initial Requests – Closed (71 pages) 11 September 2007 - OIP Initial Requests – Open (12 pages) Sep. 11, 2007 - OIP Initial Requests – Closed (32 pages) 11 September 2007 - OIP Initial Requests – Open (8 pages) Sep. 11, 2007 - OIP Initial Requests – Closed (12 pages) 11 September 2007 - OIP Initial Requests – Open (2 pages) Sep. 11, 2007 - OIP Initial Requests – Closed (3 pages) 11 September 2007 - OIP Initial Requests – Open (2 pages) Sep. 11, 2007 – OIP Initial Requests – Closed (69 pages) 11 September 2007 - OIP Initial Requests – Open (2 pages) Sep. 11, 2007 – OIP Initial Requests – Closed (9 pages) 11 September 2007 - OIP Initial Requests – Open (1 page) Source of document: Chief of Staff Office of Information Policy Department of Justice Suite 11050 1425 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20530-0001 Phone: (202) 514-FOIA Note: Entries in the last column on some pages indicate DOJ component. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Infonnation Policy Telephone: (202) 514-3642 Washington, D.C 20530 SEP 2 4 2009 Re: OIP/07-R0946 CLM:JES:VAV This responds to your Freedom ofInfonnation Act (FOIA) request dated August 13, 2007, and received in this Office on August 30, 2007, for copies ofFOIA Case Logs for fiscal years 2005, 2006, and 2007 for the Offices ofthe Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, Associate Attorney General, Intergovernmental and Public Liaison, Legal Policy, Legislative Affairs, Public Affairs, and Infonnation Policy. This response is made on behalf of the Office of Infonnation Policy. By letter dated October 2, 2007, we advised you that our search for responsive records was complete and that we would respond again after reviewing those records. We also advised you that we were not processing the FOIA Case Log from October 1,2004 to February 21,2006 for the Offices of Legal Policy, Legislative Affairs, Public Affairs, and Infonnation Policy because we had already provided you with those records in a prior request. Therefore, for those Offices, we processed the FOIA Case Log from February 22,2006 to August 30,2007. We also processed the FOIA Case Log from October 1,2004 to August 30,2007 for the Offices of the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, Associate Attorney General, and Intergovernmental and Public Liaison. Our Office located 256 pages ofrecords and our review of those records is now complete. I have detennined 175 pages are appropriate for release without excisions and copies are enclosed. Also appropriate for release are 81 pages with excisions made pursuant to Exemption 6 of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6), which pertains to infonnation the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of third parties. For your infonnation, the excised infonnation consists of the names of certain third party individuals cited in FOIA requests. Additionally, portions of the documents that pertain to Privacy Act requests were not processed inasmuch as they are outside the scope of your request. Those portions are marked accordingly. An electronic copy ofthe records is unavailable; therefore, a paper copy is enclosed, which you advised in your request letter was acceptable if an electronic version was not available. Department of Justice regulations pennit us to provide you, who we have detennined to be a non-media, non-commercial requester pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(ii)(III), with one hundred pages of records without incurring duplication fees. See C.F.R. § 16.11(d)(2009). Duplication fees beyond one hundred pages will be assessed at ten cents per page. See id. Accordingly, duplication fees for the processing of this request total $15.60 for the 256 -2- responsive pages. Please forward your check or money order for $15.60, made payable to the United States Treasury, to the Office of Information Policy, Suite 11050, 1425 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001. Please note "OIP/07-R0946" on your check or money order and your envelope. Please send your payment so that this Office receives it within fourteen days from the date of this letter. Interest charges will begin to accrue after thirty days. 28 C.F.R. § 16.11(g)(2009). If you are not satisfied with my response to this request, you may administratively appeal by writing to the Director, Office of Information Policy, United States Department of Justice, Suite 11050, 1425 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001, and your appeal must be received within sixty days from the date of this letter. Both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked "Freedom of Information Act Appeal." ~~ Carmen L. Mallon Chief of Staff Enclosures Page 1 Sep. 11, 2007 OIP INITIAL REQUESTS - CLOSED YEAR-NUMBER REQUESTER CLOSED HOW CLOSED AMEND ACT CITED SIGNED COMPONENT SUBJECT EXEMPTIONS DAYS UNIT 1997-R0933 DOYLE, KATE 14 AUG 2006 PD F AG MEXICAN PRESIDENT MIGUEL DE LA MADRID AND b5 b6 b7C b7E 2209 CIR MEXICAN AG SERGIO GARCIA RAMIREZ MEETING IN THE UNITED STATES AND OPERATION ALLIANCE 1998-RI004 BATTLE, JOYCE 23 DEC 20011 D F AG EXPORT CONTROL LAWS (POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS) 1574 CIR 2000-ROO1l3 DOYLE, KATE 23 DEC 2004 D F CLM AG PRESIDENT REAGAN'S MEETING WITH MEXICAN 1293 CIR PRESIDENT DE LA MADRID REGARDING DRUG TRAFFICKING 2000-R0203 EVANS, ROB 211 JAN 2005 PD F MAP AG AG RENO & CHARLES CLARKE MTG bl b5 b6 b7C 1259 CIR 2000-R0210 FARRELL, CHRISTOPHER J. 30 MAR 2006 WD F CLM AG GLOBALSTAR USA AND TELECOM. 1555 IRU 2000-R0257 ASCHOFF, SUSAN 08 MAY 2006 PD F MAP AG MAZEN AL-NAJJAR bl b2 b5 b6 b7C 1554 IRU 2000-R0320 GLASSER, JEFF 04 MAY 2005 REF F AG IRAN TRANSACTIONS (IRAN CONTRA) 1302 CIR 2000-R0738 NARA 18 OCT 2005 PD F CLM AG JFK RECORDS 1316 CIR Page 2 Sep. 11, 2007 OIP INITIAL REQUESTS - CLOSED YEAR-NUMBER REQUESTER CLOSED HOW CLOSED AMEND ACT CITED SIGNED COMPONENT SUBJECT EXEMPTIONS DAYS UNIT 2000-R0834 DOYLE, KATE 07 JAN 2005 TG F MAP AG VISIT TO MEXICO BY SECRETARY OF STATE JAMES 1096 CIR BAKER AND 5 U.S. CABINET OFFICIALS ON 9-8-91 2000-R0894 DOYLE, KATE 04 JAN 2005 D F CLM AG ANDEAN INITIATIVE COUNTER NARCOTICS STRATEGY b5 1100 CIR 2000-R0922 SCHAAP, WILLIAM H. 14 SEP 2006 D F MAP AG ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT bl b5 1499 IRU 2001-R0292 TYSON, LAURA A. 28 JAN 2005 D F MAP AG PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA bl 1014 CIR 2001-R0567 GIRARD, PHILIPPE 09 NOV 2006 PD F MAP AG MIREILLE DUROCHER BERTIN AND EUGENE BAILLERGEAU b2 b3 b5 b6 b7C 1367 IRU MURDER IN PORT-AU-PRINCE ON MARCH 28, 1995 2001-R0860 LAMBIDAKIS, STEPHANIE E. 05 MAY 2006 PD F MAP AG CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE NRA, JAMES BAKER, b6 1203 IRU JOHN ASHCROFT ADAM CIONGOLI ROBERT MUELLER, ALEX ACOSTA, SHELDON BRADSHAW, R. TED CRUZ, PAUL MCNULTY, PHIL PERRY, JOHNNY SUTTON AND CARL THORSEN 2001-R0919 SUGARMANN, JOSH 14 JAN 2005 NR/AM F MAP AG THE SECOND AMENDMENT EMERSON NRA 863 IRU 2001-R0984 HOFFMAN, MATTHEW M. 27 DEC 2006 PD F MAP AG REPORTS ON FISA - OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL bl 1321 CIR Page 3 Sep. 11, 2007 OIP INITIAL REQUESTS - CLOSED YEAR-NUMBER REQUESTER CLOSED HOW CLOSED AMEND ACT CITED SIGNED COMPONENT SUBJECT EXEMPTIONS DAYS UNIT 2002-R0036 NOJEIM, GREGORY T. 07 DEC 2006 PD F MAP AG AG GUIDELINES FOR FBI FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE b5 1293 IRU COLLECTION AND FOREIGN COUNTERINTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATIONS; AG GUIDELINES ON GENERAL CRIMES, RACKETEERING ENTERPRISE AND DOMESTIC SECURITY/TERRORISM INVESTIGATIONS: DOCUMENTS RELATING TO 2002-R0145 FARRELL, CHRISTOPHER J. 08 OCT 2004 PD F MAP AG TERRORISM: IMPLEMENT MILITARY TRIBUNALS AND b1 b2 b5 b7C b7E 718 IRU MONITOR PHONE CONVERSATIONS BETWEEN COUNSEL AND CLIENTS SUSPECTED TERRORISTS 2002-R0203 SUGARMANN, JOSH 14 JAN 2005 NR/AM F MAP AG LETTER TO NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION DATED MAY 757 IRU 17, 2001 2002-R0280 MEEK, JAMES 23 MAY 2006 PD F MAP AG SCHECULES OF ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN ASHCROFT AND b2 b5 b6 1078 IRU THE DECISION TO PURCHASE THE DRAPES IN GREAT HALL AND COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN ASHCROFT STAFF AND GARRETT LOTT 2002-R0574 BARNETT, JIM 05 SEP 2006 PD F MAP AG CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT TO PYSICIANS b5 1091 IRU CORRESPONDENCE FROM 1/20/02 TO THE PRESENT 2002-R0592 MCCARTNEY, PATRICK 05 SEP 2006 PD F MAP AG DOJ POLICY RE CALIFORNIA'S PROPOSITION 215 b2 b5 b7C 1082 IRU (MEDICAL MARIJUANA), COMPASSIONATE USE ACT 2002-R0607 BERNSTEIN, BARTON J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record—Senate S11915
    October 5, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð SENATE S11915 of the unanimous consent request, an This is not a time for partisan dec- objectivity, courtesy, and patience opportunity to speak? larations of victory, but I am pleased [are] without blemish.'' Mr. HARKIN. If I can follow the Sen- that my colleagues revisited their deci- Utah State Senator, Mike Dmitrich, ator from Utah for 10 minutes, yes, I sion to hold up the nomination. We are one of many Democrats supporting this request to speak. proceeding with a vote on the merits nomination, wrote, ``[Mr. Stewart] has The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without on Ted Stewart's nomination, and we always been fair and deliberate and objection, it is so ordered. will then proceed upon an arranged shown the moderation and thoughtful- Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I thank schedule to vote on other nominees in ness that the judiciary requires.'' my colleague, and I apologize. I did not precisely the way that was proposed I understand that the American Bar realize he had been standing here all prior to the filibuster vote. Association has concluded that Ted this time. Ultimately, it is my hope for us, as Stewart meets the qualifications for f an institution, that instead of sig- appointment to the federal district court. This sentiment is strongly NOMINATION OF TED STEWART TO naling a trend, the last 2 weeks will in- stead look more like an aberration shared by many in Utah, including the BE DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE recent president of the Utah State Bar. DISTRICT OF UTAH that was quickly corrected.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar No. 192
    Calendar No. 192 111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 1st Session SENATE 111–93 THE TRIBAL LAW AND ORDER ACT OF 2009 OCTOBER 29, 2009.—Ordered to be printed Mr. DORGAN, from the Committee on Indian Affairs, submitted the following R E P O R T [To accompany S. 797] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on Indian Affairs, to which was referred the bill (S. 797), to amend the Indian Law Enforcement Reform Act, the In- dian Tribal Justice Act, the Indian Tribal Justice Technical and Legal Assistance Act of 2000, and the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to improve the prosecution of, and re- sponse to, crimes in Indian country, and for other purposes, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and recommends that the bill (as amended) do pass. I. PURPOSE The criminal justice system on Indian lands consists of a complex and often overlapping matrix of federal, tribal, and in certain cir- cumstances, state jurisdiction. The complexity of this system has contributed to a crisis of violent crime on many Indian reserva- tions 1 that has persisted for decades. Federal reports have consist- ently found that the divided system of justice in place on Indian reservations lacks coordination, accountability, and adequate and consistent funding. These shortfalls, the reports find, serve to fos- 1 The terms ‘‘Indian reservations’’, ‘‘Indian country’’, ‘‘Indian communities’’, and ‘‘tribal commu- nities’’ are used interchangeably throughout this Report to refer to the lands on which federally recognized Indian tribes reside.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Value of Judicial Diversity Through the Native American Lens Paige E
    American Indian Law Review Volume 36 | Number 2 1-1-2012 Understanding the Value of Judicial Diversity Through the Native American Lens Paige E. Hoster Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr Part of the Courts Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, and the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Paige E. Hoster, Understanding the Value of Judicial Diversity Through the Native American Lens, 36 Am. Indian L. Rev. 457 (2012), https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr/vol36/iss2/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNDERSTANDING THE VALUE OF JUDICIAL DIVERSITY THROUGH THE NATIVE AMERICAN LENS Paige E. Hoster* Although Indians constitute less than 1% of the national population, the lives of Indians are impacted by law more pervasively than are the lives of most other Americans.' I. Introduction Diversity is the United States' defining characteristic. As the "melting pot,"2 this country continues to pursue diversity through policies like affirmative action.3 Universities seek a diverse student body to attain a "robust exchange of ideas."4 Corporations hire and retain a diverse workforce to increase their client bases and to stimulate innovation through diversity of thought.5 But America's preoccupation with diversity does not * Second-year student, University of Oklahoma College of Law. I would like to thank my family (Kirk, Daria, and Erin) for their constant, loving support of my academic endeavors.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Federal Courts of Oklahoma: 1975-2017
    History of the Federal Courts of Oklahoma: 1975-2017 William C. Kellough* “The judiciary has no influence over either the sword or the purse…neither Force nor Will, but merely judgment” A. Hamilton, Federalist No. 497 Introduction. The federal courts in Oklahoma were created and grew in influence over a long span of time as white settlers displaced or assimilated the Indians who had been granted the land by treaty in the first third of the nineteenth century. As the courts of the Indian Nations declined, federal courts replaced them. Before the white invasion, the Native American autonomous jurisdictions were inhabited either by wholly indigenous native people or the so-called “civilized tribes,” inhabitants of the southeastern states who were forced to emigrate. As the Indian Nations were absorbed and all but abolished in the late nineteenth century, the territorial judicial system, devised by the U.S. Congress, survived. For better or worse, these early federal courts and judges became the institutions left to deal with the explosive wave of white settlers and the uncontrolled economic expansion of pioneer Oklahoma. After statehood in 1907, federal court activity settled into the more predictable pattern of judicial appointments, docket management and jurisdictional and administrative growth as experienced by all new states. The first part of this history told this story starting with the earliest days of settlement of the land that would become Oklahoma up to latter years of the twentieth century.1 From Native American national sovereignty through Indian Territory and Oklahoma Territorial jurisdiction and finally statehood, Part I showed the evolution of the courts from the dispensers of raw, improvised frontier justice to a modern and professionally robust judicial institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Published Semi-Annually by the Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, Campus Box 401, Boulder, CO 80309-040
    JOURNAL ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS & HIGH TECHNOLOGY LAW is published semi-annually by the Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, Campus Box 401, Boulder, CO 80309-0401 ISSN: 1543-8899 Copyright © 2009 by the Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law an association of students sponsored by the University of Colorado School of Law and the Silicon Flatirons Telecommunications Program. POSTMASTER: Please send address changes to JTHTL, Campus Box 401, Boulder, CO 80309-0401 Subscriptions Domestic volume subscriptions are available for $45.00. City of Boulder subscribers please add $3.74 sales tax. Boulder County subscribers outside the City of Boulder please add $2.14 sales tax. Metro Denver subscribers outside of Boulder County please add $1.85 sales tax. Colorado subscribers outside of Metro Denver please add $1.31 sales tax. International volume subscriptions are available for $50.00. Inquiries concerning ongoing subscriptions or obtaining an individual issue should be directed to the attention of JTHTL Managing Editor at [email protected] or by writing JTHTL Managing Editor, Campus Box 401, Boulder, CO 80309-0401. Back issues in complete sets, volumes, or single issues may be obtained from: William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 1285 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14209. Back issues may also be found in electronic format for all your research needs on HeinOnline http://heinonline.org/. Manuscripts JTHTL invites the submission of unsolicited manuscripts. Please send softcopy manuscripts to the attention of JTHTL Articles Editors at [email protected] in Word or PDF formats or through ExpressO at http://law.bepress.com/expresso. Hardcopy submissions may be sent to JTHTL Articles Editors, Campus Box 401, Boulder, CO 80309-0401.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The
    Case 2:17-cv-01826-TSZ Document 153 Filed 06/11/20 Page 1 of 171 1 THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 10 KEVIN PINE, individually and on behalf Case No. 17-cv-1826 11 of all others similarly situated, DECLARATION OF DANIEL M. 12 Plaintiff, HUTCHINSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 13 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARDS TO THE 14 A PLACE FOR MOM, INC., a Delaware PLAINTIFFS corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DECLARATION OF DANIEL M. HUTCHINSON LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Case No. 17-cv-1826 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 1836300.2 San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Tel. 415.956.1000 • Fax 415.956.1008 Case 2:17-cv-01826-TSZ Document 153 Filed 06/11/20 Page 2 of 171 1 I, Daniel M. Hutchinson, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner in of the law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP 3 (“LCHB”), co-counsel of record for Plaintiff in this matter. 4 2. I am admitted to practice pro hac vice before this Court and am a member in good 5 standing of the bar of the State of California; the United States District Court for the Central, 6 Northern, and Southern Districts of California; the United States District Court for the Eastern 7 District of Wisconsin; and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and 8 Eleventh Circuits.
    [Show full text]
  • N E W S L E T T E R
    N E W S L E T T E R Volume 55, Nos. 1 & 2 Spring/Summer 2018 The Society’s new exterior sign was fabricated and installed by Swenson Granite Works. Pictured from left to right, Society President Bill Dunlap, Society Board Chair Kurt Swenson, and Vice Chair Jim Garvin worked together to make the long-planned sign a reality. Society’s Name Set in Stone Many today would agree with the late architect piqued, the new-to-the-area explorer would then need Julia Morgan—of California’s historic Hearst Castle to climb the wide granite steps toward the building’s renown—when she said that “architecture is a visual front door to see what exactly this formidable structure art, and the buildings speak for themselves,” but most claimed to be. Either from the letters engraved in the would also likely agree that it is helpful for buildings seal at the center of the monumental granite sculpture welcoming visitors to be clearly marked with an above the door or from the neatly arranged, white- identifying name. painted block letters on the door’s glass pane, our hypothetical adventurer would learn that this is the As recently as April of this year, anyone new to very place in which much of New Hampshire’s history Concord and eager to explore the State House area is preserved. Yet no permanent designation easily of downtown on foot might have been drawn to the visible from the street or sidewalk existed—until now. New Hampshire Historical Society’s impressive Park Street building, erected of mighty Concord granite and Since early May, a large exterior sign, made from none constructed in an architectural style so visibly Greek other than Concord granite, stands boldly on the lawn that it would surely elicit a smile from even the likes outside the Society’s “temple of history,” making its of tragedian Sophocles were he alive today.
    [Show full text]
  • Members by Circuit (As of January 3, 2017)
    Federal Judges Association - Members by Circuit (as of January 3, 2017) 1st Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Bruce M. Selya Jeffrey R. Howard Kermit Victor Lipez Ojetta Rogeriee Thompson Sandra L. Lynch United States District Court District of Maine D. Brock Hornby George Z. Singal John A. Woodcock, Jr. Jon David LeVy Nancy Torresen United States District Court District of Massachusetts Allison Dale Burroughs Denise Jefferson Casper Douglas P. Woodlock F. Dennis Saylor George A. O'Toole, Jr. Indira Talwani Leo T. Sorokin Mark G. Mastroianni Mark L. Wolf Michael A. Ponsor Patti B. Saris Richard G. Stearns Timothy S. Hillman William G. Young United States District Court District of New Hampshire Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. Joseph N. LaPlante Landya B. McCafferty Paul J. Barbadoro SteVen J. McAuliffe United States District Court District of Puerto Rico Daniel R. Dominguez Francisco Augusto Besosa Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr. Jay A. Garcia-Gregory Juan M. Perez-Gimenez Pedro A. Delgado Hernandez United States District Court District of Rhode Island Ernest C. Torres John J. McConnell, Jr. Mary M. Lisi William E. Smith 2nd Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Barrington D. Parker, Jr. Christopher F. Droney Dennis Jacobs Denny Chin Gerard E. Lynch Guido Calabresi John Walker, Jr. Jon O. Newman Jose A. Cabranes Peter W. Hall Pierre N. LeVal Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. Reena Raggi Robert A. Katzmann Robert D. Sack United States District Court District of Connecticut Alan H. NeVas, Sr. Alfred V. Covello Alvin W. Thompson Dominic J. Squatrito Ellen B.
    [Show full text]
  • Boyce Seminar 2010
    Federal Bar Association Utah Chapter Ronald N. FederalB CourOYCEt Litigation Practice Seminar Friday, November 5th, 2010 9:00 a.m. - 3:15 p.m. Little America Hotel 500 South Main Street Salt Lake City, Utah 6 Hours of CLE Credit (Approval Pending) AGENDA 9:00 a.m. Judge Ted Stewart The Courts and the Lawyers - Listening to 2:00 p.m. Each Other to Improve the Administration of Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells Using Foreign Language Interpreters Justice Effectively 9:30 a.m. 2:30 p.m. Magistrate Judge Samuel Alba Rule 502 Judge Dee Benson and Senior Judge Dale A. Kimball Everything You Wanted to Know About the 10:00 a.m. Federal Courts That You Are Not Afraid To Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner Ask Everything You Wanted to Know About the Magistrate System But Were Afraid To Ask 3:15 p.m. Program Concludes 10:30 a.m. Chief Bankruptcy Judge William T. Thurman Bankruptcy Judge Joel T. Marker Bankruptcy Update We hope you’ll also join us for the FBA Annual Awards Dinner 11:00 a.m. – 11:15 a.m. Morning Break November 16, 2010 Little America Hotel 6:30 - 8:30 p.m. 11:15 a.m. $35.00 per person Chief Judge Tena Campbell The State of the Federal Court 11:45 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. Luncheon Speaker: TBA 1:00 p.m. Senior Judge Bruce S. Jenkins The Legal Mind in the Digital Age 1:30 p.m. Judge Clark Waddoups Rule 702 Under Federal and State Law 2 REGISTRATION Cost (Lunch Included) Registration received by 10/29 FBA Members $175 Non-members $225 Registration after 10/29 FBA Members $205 Non-members $255 To register, send your name, Utah bar number and a check for the appropriate registration fee payable to "FBA, Utah Chapter" to: Tricia Pannier Unishippers 746 East Winchester, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, UT 84107 (801) 708-5872 [email protected] For those signing up for an FBA Membership, please fill out the attached form and include it with your check.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Legal History
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL ISSUE: FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VOLUME 28, NUMBER 2 201 Western Legal History is published semiannually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (626) 795-0266/fax (626) 229-7476. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts- particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawai'i, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the NJCHS as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all. Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100-$249; Advocate, $50499; Subscribing (nonmembers of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49. Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of endnotes. Copyright @2015, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • September, 2004
    REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES September 21, 2004 The Judicial Conference of the United States convened in Washington, D.C., on September 21, 2004, pursuant to the call of the Chief Justice of the United States issued under 28 U.S.C. § 331. The Chief Justice presided, and the following members of the Conference were present: First Circuit: Chief Judge Michael Boudin Chief Judge Hector M. Laffitte, District of Puerto Rico Second Circuit: Chief Judge John M. Walker, Jr. Chief Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr., Northern District of New York Third Circuit: Chief Judge Anthony J. Scirica Chief Judge Thomas I. Vanaskie, Middle District of Pennsylvania Fourth Circuit: Chief Judge William W. Wilkins Judge David C. Norton, District of South Carolina Fifth Circuit: Chief Judge Carolyn Dineen King Judge Martin L. C. Feldman, Eastern District of Louisiana Judicial Conference of the United States Sixth Circuit: Chief Judge Danny J. Boggs Chief Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff, Eastern District of Michigan Seventh Circuit: Chief Judge Joel M. Flaum Judge J. P. Stadtmueller, Eastern District of Wisconsin Eighth Circuit: Chief Judge James B. Loken Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum, District of Minnesota Ninth Circuit: Chief Judge Mary M. Schroeder Chief Judge David Alan Ezra, District of Hawaii Tenth Circuit: Chief Judge Deanell R. Tacha Judge David L. Russell, Western District of Oklahoma Eleventh Circuit: Chief Judge J. L. Edmondson Judge J. Owen Forrester, Northern District of Georgia District of Columbia Circuit: Chief Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg Chief Judge Thomas F. Hogan, District of Columbia 2 September 21, 2004 Federal Circuit: Chief Judge Haldane Robert Mayer Court of International Trade: Chief Judge Jane A.
    [Show full text]
  • September 21, 2004
    REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES September 21, 2004 The Judicial Conference of the United States convened in Washington, D.C., on September 21, 2004, pursuant to the call of the Chief Justice of the United States issued under 28 U.S.C. § 331. The Chief Justice presided, and the following members of the Conference were present: First Circuit: Chief Judge Michael Boudin Chief Judge Hector M. Laffitte, District of Puerto Rico Second Circuit: Chief Judge John M. Walker, Jr. Chief Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr., Northern District of New York Third Circuit: Chief Judge Anthony J. Scirica Chief Judge Thomas I. Vanaskie, Middle District of Pennsylvania Fourth Circuit: Chief Judge William W. Wilkins Judge David C. Norton, District of South Carolina Fifth Circuit: Chief Judge Carolyn Dineen King Judge Martin L. C. Feldman, Eastern District of Louisiana Judicial Conference of the United States Sixth Circuit: Chief Judge Danny J. Boggs Chief Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff, Eastern District of Michigan Seventh Circuit: Chief Judge Joel M. Flaum Judge J. P. Stadtmueller, Eastern District of Wisconsin Eighth Circuit: Chief Judge James B. Loken Chief Judge James M. Rosenbaum, District of Minnesota Ninth Circuit: Chief Judge Mary M. Schroeder Chief Judge David Alan Ezra, District of Hawaii Tenth Circuit: Chief Judge Deanell R. Tacha Judge David L. Russell, Western District of Oklahoma Eleventh Circuit: Chief Judge J. L. Edmondson Judge J. Owen Forrester, Northern District of Georgia District of Columbia Circuit: Chief Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg Chief Judge Thomas F. Hogan, District of Columbia 2 September 21, 2004 Federal Circuit: Chief Judge Haldane Robert Mayer Court of International Trade: Chief Judge Jane A.
    [Show full text]