Susan R. Wolf Curriculum Vitae
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Stephan Padel +49 681 302 4745 (Fax) Building C5.2, Office 213 CURRICULUM VITAE 66123 Saarbrücken (Germany) Website (Link)
Saarland University [email protected] Department of Philosophy +49 681 302 3688 (Office) Campus Saarbrücken Stephan Padel +49 681 302 4745 (Fax) Building C5.2, Office 213 CURRICULUM VITAE 66123 Saarbrücken (Germany) Website (Link) Education 08/2012 M.A. (with distinction), Philosophy and Sociology, RWTH Aachen University, Thesis Ti- tle: Metaethical Aspects of David Hume’s Moral Philosophy, Supervisor: Markus Stepani- ans 07/2010 B.A., Philosophy and Sociology, RWTH Aachen University, Thesis Title: Die moralische Bedeutung des Konzepts der positionalen Objektivität, Supervisor: Wilfried Hinsch 06/2006 Abitur, Geschwister-Scholl-Gymnasium in Aachen (Germany) Employment 10/2013–present Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter (Graduate Assistant), Saarland University, Chair for Analytic Philosophy (Holger Sturm) 11/2012–present Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter (Graduate Assistant), Saarland University, Chair for Practical Philosophy (Ulla Wessels and Christoph Fehige) 01/2009–09/2012 Studentische Hilfskraft (Student Research Assistant), RWTH Aachen University, Department of Philosophy 09/2006–01/2009 Freelancing Journalist for the Aachener Zeitung Scholarships and Grants 10/2012–11/2012 Full Ph.D.-Scholarship (RWTH Scholarship for Doctoral Students), RWTH Aachen University (Resigned for Assistantship at Saarland University) 03/2012–08/2012 Full Master Student Scholarship, Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes e.V. (German National Merit Foundation) Research Interests My current research mainly focusses on metaethics, action theory and related topics. In my Ph.D.- Thesis (supervised by Ulla Wessels and Christoph Fehige), I investigate the phenomenon of moral disagreement from a metaethical point of view. Assuming that a clear understanding of the phe- nomenon itself is prerequisite for assessing a metaethical theory’s resources to explain moral dis- agreements, the first step is finding resp. -
Balázs M. Mezei and Barry Smith the FOUR PHASES of PHILOSOPHY
Balázs M. Mezei and Barry Smith THE FOUR PHASES OF PHILOSOPHY With an Appendix: The Four Phases of Philosophy and Its Current State by Franz Brentano CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................ 1 PART ONE: BRENTANO’S THEORY ........................... 3 1. Brentano on Philosophy and Its History ...................... 3 Philosophy and Its Subject-Matter ................................. 5 Stages in the History of Sciences ................................... 7 Philosophy and the Decline of Cultures ........................... 8 The Four Phases of Philosophy ..................................... 10 2. The Emergence of Brentano’s Theory ........................ 12 The Influence of Comte .............................................. 12 Brentano’s Schema ................................................... 15 3. Factors Influencing Brentano’s Theory ....................... 16 The Periodization of the History of Philosophy: Kant and his Followers ......................................... 17 The ‘Catholic Principle’ ............................................. 21 4. Problems in the Brentanian Theory ............................ 23 5. How to Read Brentano ............................................ 26 6. Ideal Types: The Theory Behind the Schema ................ 29 ‘Decline’ in the History of Philosophy ............................ 30 Brentano’s Empiricism and the Method of Philosophy ......... 33 PART TWO: BRENTANO’S THEORY APPLIED ............ 37 1. The Four Phases of Post-Brentanian Philosophy .......... -
Personal Data Full Name: Peter Albert David Singer Date of Birth: July 6
Personal data Full Name: Peter Albert David Singer Date of Birth: July 6, 1946 Place of Birth: Melbourne, Australia Nationality: Australian Education B.A. (Hons), University of Melbourne, 1967 M.A., University of Melbourne, 1969 B. Phil., University of Oxford, 1971 Employment Appointments Radcliffe Lecturer, University College, Oxford, 1971‐3 Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, New York University, 1973‐4 Senior Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, La Trobe University, 1975‐6 Professor, Department of Philosophy, Monash University, 1977‐99; on secondment to the Centre for Human Bioethics, part‐time 1983‐87, full‐time 1987‐1997, part time 1997‐99 Chair, Department of Philosophy, Monash University, January 1, 1977‐June 30, 1978; January 1, 1980‐December 31, 1981 Associate Dean, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, 1982 (including 6 weeks as Acting Dean) Director, Centre for Human Bioethics, Monash University, part‐time, 1983‐7, full‐time, 1987‐ 91; Deputy Director, 1992‐7 Co‐Director, Institute for Ethics and Public Policy, Monash University, 1992‐5 Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics, University Center for Human Values, Princeton University, 1999‐2004, part‐time, 2005‐ Laureate Professor, University of Melbourne, Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, part‐time, 2005‐2012, School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, part‐time, 2013‐ Visiting positions Guest Scholar, Institute for Society, Ethics & the Life Sciences, Hastings‐on‐Hudson, New York, March‐April 1979 Fellow, Woodrow Wilson International Center -
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology July 22-28, 2018
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology July 22-28, 2018 ISUS Utility, Progress, and Technology 15th Conference of the International Society for Utilitarian Studies Table of Contents 4 About the Hosts 5 General Information 6 Summer School: July 22, 23 7 Conference Day 1: Tuesday July 24 8 Conference Day 2: Wednesday July 25 9 Conference Day 3: Thursday July 26 10 Panels 14 Satellite Workshops: July 27, 28 16 All Accepted Section Talks in Alphabetical Order 21 Conference Map 22 The Panopticon Dinner ISUS 2018 gratefully acknowledges support from: KIT Fördergesellschaft e.V. International Society for Utilitarian Studies Gesellschaft für Utilitarismusstudien e.V. Welcome to ISUS 2018! Organising the 15th conference of the Interna- Our conference theme, ‘Utility, Progress, and tional Society for Utilitarian Studies has been a Technology‘ is intended to emphasise that any great pleasure for us. We are honored the ISUS reflection on technology necessarily requires committee trusted us with this project and sin- normative dimensions that even the best sci- cerely thank you all for joining us in Karlsruhe entific education or training cannot provide. from all over the world. Does some innovation, useful as it may seem, actually constitute progress? Does it increase Legend has it that the founder of Karlsruhe, human happiness? We hope ISUS 2018 will Margrave of Baden-Durlach Karl Wilhelm, fell help all of us in improving our thinking on asleep in the forest and dreamt of a palace. these (and other) philosophical problems. He had the palace of Karlsruhe built in 1715, in that very forest, as the epicentre of a new Michael Schefczyk and Christoph Schmidt-Petri city. -
Edited by Christopher Cowley
Edited by Christopher Cowley Supererogation ROYAL INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY SUPPLEMENT: 77 EDITED BY Christopher Cowley CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA:VIBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1 RP, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UKIVERSITY PRESS UPH,Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom 32 Avenue of the Americas, New York,NY 10013-2473, USA 477 Williamstown Road,Port Melbourne, VIC 3207,Australia C/ Orense, 4, planta 13,28020 Madrid,Spain Lower Ground Floor,Nautica Building,The Water Club,Beach Road, Granger Bay, 8005 Cape Town,South Africa © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2015 Printed in the United Kingdom at Bell and Bain Ltd. Typeset by Techset Composition Ltd, Salisbury, UK A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 9781107545731 ISSN 1358-2461 Contents List of Contributors v Introduction: The agents, acts and attitudes of supererogation CHRISTOPHER COWLEY Can Virtue Ethics Account for Supererogation? 25 DAVID HEYD Beyond Obligation: Reasons and Supererogation 49 MICHAEL FERRY Disjunctive duties and supererogatory sets of actions 67 MATTHIAS BRINKMANN Beyond the Call of Duty: The Structure of a Moral Region 87 ULLA WESSELS Saints, Heroes and Moral Necessity 105 ALFRED ARCHER Is supererogation more than just costly sacrifice? 125 ELIZABETH DRUlVIlvlOND YOUNG Adopting Roles: Generosity and Presumptuousness 141 ROWLAND STOUT Supererogation and the relationship between religious and secular ethics: some perspectives drawn from Thomas Aquinas and John of the Cross 163 :VIARK WYNN Religion, Forgiveness and Humanity 185 CHRISTOPHER HAMILTON Beyond obligation? Jean-Marie Guyau on Life and Ethics 207 KEITH ANSELL-PEARSON Assimilating Supererogation 227 D.K. -
Rethinking Cost-Benefit Analysis
University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1999 Rethinking Cost-Benefit Analysis Eric A. Posner Matthew D. Adler Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Eric Posner & Matthew D. Adler, "Rethinking Cost-Benefit Analysis," 109 Yale Law Journal 165 (1999). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles Rethinking Cost-Benefit Analysis Matthew D. Adlert and Eric A. Posner"t CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 167 II. BACKGROUND .................................................................................. 169 III. THE CONVENTIONAL VIEW OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS ............... 176 A . What Is CBA ? .......................................................................... 177 1. Measuring Individual Utility Changes............................ 177 2. A ggregation..................................................................... 181 B. The Conventional Defenses of CBA ......................................... 187 1. The Pareto Defense ......................................................... 188 2. The Kaldor-Hicks Defense .............................................. 190 3. The (Unrestricted) UtilitarianDefense