DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecología Y Conservación De Cephalota (Taenidia) Deserticoloides (Codina, 1931) (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecología Y Conservación De Cephalota (Taenidia) Deserticoloides (Codina, 1931) (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae) UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA ESCUELA INTERNACIONAL DE DOCTORADO Ecology and Conservation of Cephalota (Taenidia) Deserticoloides (Codina, 1931) (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae) Ecología y Conservación de Cephalota (Taenidia) Deserticoloides (Codina, 1931) (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae) D. José Herrera Russert 2018 Ecología y conservación de Cephalota (Taenidia) deserticoloides (Codina, 1931) (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae) Ecology and conservation of Cephalota (Taenidia) deserticoloides (Codina, 1931) (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae) José Herrera Russert 2018 Escuela Internacional de Doctorado Universidad de Murcia Directores: José Galián Albaladejo José Serrano Marino 2 Este trabajo se ha realizado en el Área de Biología Animal del Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física de la Universidad de Murcia, bajo la financiación obtenida en la convocatoria de Grupos de Excelencia Regional otorgada por la Fundación Séneca de la Región de Murcia al grupo de investigación “Filogenia y Evolución Animal” (19908/GERM/15), cuyo I.P. es el Dr. José Galián Albaladejo, director de esta tesis. 3 4 5 6 Table of Contents List of figures ......................................................................................................................... 11 List of tables ........................................................................................................................... 13 Abstract................................................................................................................................... 15 Resumen ................................................................................................................................. 17 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 21 Tiger beetles as an object of study .................................................................................. 23 The genus Cephalota ...................................................................................................... 28 Cephalota deserticoloides ................................................................................................. 30 Conceptual and methodological aspects ....................................................................... 34 Phylogenetic analysis ................................................................................................... 34 Phylogeography: haplotype networks ....................................................................... 37 Mitochondrial markers ................................................................................................. 39 DNA barcoding ............................................................................................................. 41 Environmental DNA .................................................................................................... 42 Geometric morphometrics ........................................................................................... 42 Population ecology: mark-recapture .......................................................................... 44 Aims and hypotheses ........................................................................................................... 47 Chapter 1: Molecular phylogeny and origin of the halophile tiger beetle genus Cephalota (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) .................................................................................. 51 Abstract............................................................................................................................... 53 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 53 Material and methods ...................................................................................................... 55 7 Specimens ....................................................................................................................... 55 Sequence obtention ....................................................................................................... 56 Phylogenetic analysis ................................................................................................... 56 Results ................................................................................................................................. 57 DNA extraction, sequences and models .................................................................... 57 Phylogenetic results ...................................................................................................... 58 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 60 Chapter 2: Geometric morphometrics and molecular characterization of the endangered endemism Cephalota (Taenidia) deserticoloides .............................................. 65 Abstract............................................................................................................................... 66 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 66 Material and methods ...................................................................................................... 68 Specimens ....................................................................................................................... 68 Sequence obtention ....................................................................................................... 69 Phylogeographic analysis ............................................................................................ 69 Geometric morphometrics analysis ............................................................................ 70 Results ................................................................................................................................. 70 DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing ....................................................... 70 Phylogeographic results ............................................................................................... 71 Geometric morphometric results ................................................................................ 72 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 73 History of C. deserticoloides ........................................................................................... 73 Genetic diversity of C. deserticoloides .......................................................................... 74 Future expectations ....................................................................................................... 75 8 Chapter 3: Non-invasive identification of endangered tiger beetle species (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) from soil samples ................................................................... 77 Abstract............................................................................................................................... 79 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 79 Material and methods ...................................................................................................... 82 Results and discussion ..................................................................................................... 84 Chapter 4: Mark-recapture population estimates of Cephalota deserticoloides ............... 87 Abstract............................................................................................................................... 89 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 89 Material and methods ...................................................................................................... 92 Mark-recapture study ................................................................................................... 92 Data analysis .................................................................................................................. 93 Results ................................................................................................................................. 94 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 95 Final remarks and conclusions ............................................................................................ 99 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 103 9 10 List of figures INTRODUCTION Figure 1. Cephalota (Cephalota) hispanica pair feeding on a mealworm (Tenebrio molitor). 25 Figure 2. Cephalota (Taenidia) deserticoloides exhibiting thermoregulatory behaviour. 25 Figure 3. Life cycle of a tiger beetle. 26 Figure 4. Captive Cicindela larva lunging at prey. 26 Figure 5. Pseudotetracha sp. running form a sudden water flood. 27 Figure 6. Robber fly feeding on Cephalota (Taenidia) circumdata. 28 Figure 7. Cephalota (Taenidia) littorea. 29 Figure 8. Cephalota (Cassolaia) maura. 30 Figure 9: Cephalota (Taenidia) deserticoloides from Rambla Salada. 31 Figure 10. Rambla Salada (Murcia, Spain). 33 Figure 11. The tiger beetle Cicindela hybrida hunting an ant (Formica sp.). 34 Figure 12. Bayesian topology
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ants As Prey for the Endemic and Endangered Spanish Tiger Beetle Cephalota Dulcinea (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Carlo Polidori A*, Paula C
    Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.), 2020 https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2020.1791252 Ants as prey for the endemic and endangered Spanish tiger beetle Cephalota dulcinea (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Carlo Polidori a*, Paula C. Rodríguez-Flores b,c & Mario García-París b aInstituto de Ciencias Ambientales (ICAM), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Avenida Carlos III, S/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain; bDepartamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, 28006, Spain; cCentre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), C. d’Accés Cala Sant Francesc, 14, 17300, Blanes, Spain (Accepté le 29 juin 2020) Summary. Among the insects inhabiting endorheic, temporary and highly saline small lakes of central Spain during dry periods, tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelinae) form particularly rich assemblages including unique endemic species. Cephalota dulcinea López, De la Rosa & Baena, 2006 is an endemic, regionally protected species that occurs only in saline marshes in Castilla-La Mancha (Central Spain). Here, we report that C. dulcinea suffers potential risks associated with counter-attacks by ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), while using them as prey at one of these marshes. Through mark–recapture methods, we estimated the population size of C. dulcinea at the study marsh as of 1352 individuals, with a sex ratio slightly biased towards males. Evident signs of ant defensive attack by the seed-harvesting ant Messor barbarus (Forel, 1905) were detected in 14% of marked individuals, sometimes with cut ant heads still grasped with their mandibles to the beetle body parts. Ant injuries have been more frequently recorded at the end of adult C.
    [Show full text]
  • Relazione Finale Della Ricerca Sui Coleotteri Carabidi Del Parco Nazionale Delle Foreste Casentinesi, Monte Falterona E Campigna
    Associazione di Ricerca e Studio nelle Scienze Naturali c/o Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara RELAZIONE FINALE DELLA RICERCA SUI COLEOTTERI CARABIDI DEL PARCO NAZIONALE DELLE FORESTE CASENTINESI, MONTE FALTERONA E CAMPIGNA Calosoma sycophanta (L.) Lestes – 2004 – Relazione della ricerca sui Coleotteri Carabidi del PNFC Indice Introduzione p. 3 Metodologia dell’indagine p. 4 Localizzazione dell’indagine p. 7 Metodi di elaborazione dati p. 12 Risultati e considerazioni generali p. 13 Carabidi del suolo p. 16 Altri Coleotteri delle trappole a caduta al suolo p. 21 Carabidi e altri Coleotteri arboricoli p. 21 Considerazioni sulle specie di interesse p. 24 Conclusioni e indicazioni gestionali p. 45 Ringraziamenti p. 47 Bibliografia p. 48 Allegato 1 - Elenco sistematico delle specie 12 pp. Allegato 2 - Elenco dati di raccolta per specie 48 pp. Allegato 3 - Cartine di distribuzione delle specie di particolare interesse 11 pp. 2 Lestes – 2004 – Relazione della ricerca sui Coleotteri Carabidi del PNFC INTRODUZIONE I Coleotteri Carabidi sono diffusi in tutto il mondo con oltre 40.000 specie, sono tra gli invertebrati terrestri meglio studiati e sono utilizzati come organismi indicatori del livello di inquinamento, per la classificazione degli habitat per la protezione della la natura, per la caratterizzazione dello stato dei nutrienti dei suoli forestali ed anche come indicatori della biodiversità (BRANDMAYR, 1975; THIELE, 1977; LÖVEI & SUNDERLAND, 1996; BRANDMAYR et al., 2002; RAINIO & NIEMELÄ, 2003). Un ridotto numero di specie svolge in Europa il ciclo vitale all’interno degli alberi morti a terra o in piedi e questi sono perciò considerate a tutti gli effetti come invertebrati saproxilici, al contrario molte altre entità geofile passano solo parte della loro esistenza nel legno morto e vengono definiti come subxaproxilici, o xaproxilici temporanei, ma tutti svolgono come predatori un ruolo importante nella regolazione dei processi di decomposizione del legno (BELL, 1994; SPEIGHT, 1989; SCHLAGHAMERSKÝ, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • The Tiger Beetles (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae) of the Southern Levant and Adjacent Territories: from Cybertaxonomy to Conservation Biology
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 734: 43–103 The(2018) tiger beetles( Coleoptera, Cicindelidae) of the southern Levant... 43 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.734.21989 MONOGRAPH http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The tiger beetles (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae) of the southern Levant and adjacent territories: from cybertaxonomy to conservation biology Thorsten Assmann1, Estève Boutaud1, Jörn Buse2, Jörg Gebert3, Claudia Drees4,5, Ariel-Leib-Leonid Friedman4, Fares Khoury6, Tamar Marcus1, Eylon Orbach7, Ittai Renan4, Constantin Schmidt8, Pascale Zumstein1 1 Institute of Ecology, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Universitätsallee 1, D-21335 Lüneburg, Germany 2 Ecosystem Monitoring, Research and Wildlife Conservation (SB 23 Invertebrates and Biodiversity), Black Forest National Park, Kniebisstraße 67, D-72250 Freudenstadt, Germany 3 Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 73, D-01109 Dresden. Germany 4 Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Tel Aviv, IL-69978, Israel 5 Biocentre Grindel, Universität Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany 6 Department of Biology and Biotechnology, American University of Madaba, P.O.Box 2882, Amman, JO-11821, Jordan 7 Remez St. 49, IL-36044 Qiryat Tiv’on, Israel 8 Deichstr. 13, D-21354 Bleckede, Germany Corresponding author: Thorsten Assmann ([email protected]) Academic editor: B. Guéorguiev | Received 1 November 2017 | Accepted 15 January 2018 | Published 5 February 2018 http://zoobank.org/7C3C687B-64BB-42A5-B9E4-EC588BCD52D5 Citation: Assmann T, Boutaud E, Buse J, Gebert J, Drees C, Friedman A-L-L, Khoury F, Marcus T, Orbach E, Renan I, Schmidt C, Zumstein P (2018) The tiger beetles (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae) of the southern Levant and adjacent territories: from cybertaxonomy to conservation biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Genomes Resolve the Phylogeny of Adephaga
    1 Mitochondrial genomes resolve the phylogeny 2 of Adephaga (Coleoptera) and confirm tiger 3 beetles (Cicindelidae) as an independent family 4 Alejandro López-López1,2,3 and Alfried P. Vogler1,2 5 1: Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK 6 2: Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK 7 3: Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Campus 8 Mare Nostrum, 30100, Murcia, Spain 9 10 Corresponding author: Alejandro López-López ([email protected]) 11 12 Abstract 13 The beetle suborder Adephaga consists of several aquatic (‘Hydradephaga’) and terrestrial 14 (‘Geadephaga’) families whose relationships remain poorly known. In particular, the position 15 of Cicindelidae (tiger beetles) appears problematic, as recent studies have found them either 16 within the Hydradephaga based on mitogenomes, or together with several unlikely relatives 17 in Geadeadephaga based on 18S rRNA genes. We newly sequenced nine mitogenomes of 18 representatives of Cicindelidae and three ground beetles (Carabidae), and conducted 19 phylogenetic analyses together with 29 existing mitogenomes of Adephaga. Our results 20 support a basal split of Geadephaga and Hydradephaga, and reveal Cicindelidae, together 21 with Trachypachidae, as sister to all other Geadephaga, supporting their status as Family. We 22 show that alternative arrangements of basal adephagan relationships coincide with increased 23 rates of evolutionary change and with nucleotide compositional bias, but these confounding 24 factors were overcome by the CAT-Poisson model of PhyloBayes. The mitogenome + 18S 25 rRNA combined matrix supports the same topology only after removal of the hypervariable 26 expansion segments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Occurrence of the Endemic Tiger Beetle Cicindela (Ifasina) Waterhousei in Bopath Ella, Ratnapura
    J.Natn.Sci.Foundation Sri Lanka 2011 39 (2): 163-168 SHORT COMMUNICATION The occurrence of the endemic tiger beetle Cicindela (Ifasina) waterhousei in Bopath Ella, Ratnapura Chandima Dangalle 1* , Nirmalie Pallewatta 1 and Alfried Vogler 2 1 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Colombo, Colombo 03. 2 Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. Revised: 04 January 2011 ; Accepted: 21 January 2011 Abstract: The occurrence of the endemic tiger beetle Cicindela species are found in the Oriental region of the world in (Ifasina) waterhousei from Bopath Ella, Ratnapura is recorded countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan and China for the first time. The study reveals a population of 276 beetles (Pearson, 1988). Fifty-six species have been recorded from the sandy bank habitat of Bopath Ella. A site description from Sri Lanka of which thirty-five species are said to be is given stating the abiotic environmental factors of climate and endemic to the island (Cassola & Pearson, 2000). soil. Morphology of the species is described using diagnostic features of the genus, and in comparison with reference specimens at the Department of National Museums, Colombo Cicindela (Ifasina) waterhousei Horn is endemic and the type specimen at the British Natural History Museum, to Sri Lanka and has been recorded along watercourses London. According to the findings of the study, at present, within dark, moist forests of Labugama (Colombo the species is recorded only from Bopath Ella and is absent District, Western Province), Avissawella (Colombo from its previously recorded locations at Labugama, Kitulgala, District, Western Province), Kitulgala (Kegalle District, Karawanella and Avissawella.
    [Show full text]
  • Omoglymmius (S. Str.) Wukong Sp. N., a New Species from Xizang, China (Coleoptera, Rhysodidae, Omoglymmiini)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 706: 95–107Omoglymmius (2017) (s. str.) wukong sp. n., a new species from Xizang, China... 95 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.706.14655 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Omoglymmius (s. str.) wukong sp. n., a new species from Xizang, China (Coleoptera, Rhysodidae, Omoglymmiini) Cheng-Bin Wang1,2, Jan Růžička1, Bin Liu2 1 Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21 Praha 6, Czech Republic 2 Bin Insect Taxonomy Studio, No.16, Xizhaosi Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100061, P. R. China Corresponding author: Bin Liu ([email protected]) Academic editor: B. Guéorguiev | Received 2 June 2017 | Accepted 4 September 2017 | Published 4 October 2017 http://zoobank.org/98A60715-D2AB-4ACB-8AA6-07A2889D6567 Citation: Wang C-B, Růžička J, Liu B (2017) Omoglymmius (s. str.) wukong sp. n., a new species from Xizang, China (Coleoptera, Rhysodidae, Omoglymmiini). ZooKeys 706: 95–107. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.706.14655 Abstract Omoglymmius (s. str.) wukong sp. n. (Coleoptera: Rhysodidae: Omoglymmiini) is described from Xizang, China. Relevant morphological characters of the new species are illustrated with colour plates, and known distribution of the subgenus Omoglymmius in the Himalayan region is mapped. Keywords China, new species, Omoglymmiini, Omoglymmius, Rhysodidae, taxonomy Introduction Omoglymmius Ganglbauer, 1891 is the most speciose genus of Rhysodidae (Coleop- tera), almost cosmopolitan, but absent from Madagascar, New Zealand, and South America. Bell and Bell (1982) excellently revised Omoglymmius and established eleven subgenera to classify the congeneric species. The nominotypical subgenus is the largest with 97 species (Lorenz 2005, Bell and Bell 2009, Hovorka 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Rdna Chromosomal Localization in Palearctic Cephalota and Cylindera (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelini) with Different Numbers of X-Chromosomes
    COMPARATIVE A peer-reviewed open-access journal CompCytoGen 5(1): 47–59 Patterns(2011) of rDNA chromosomal localization in Cicindelini 47 doi: 10.3897/compcytogen.v5i1.962 RESEARCH ARTICLE Cytogenetics www.pensoft.net/journals/compcytogen International Journal of Plant & Animal Cytogenetic, Karyosystematics, and Molecular Systematics Patterns of rDNA chromosomal localization in Palearctic Cephalota and Cylindera (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelini) with different numbers of X-chromosomes Sonia J. R. Proença1, Artur R. M. Serrano1, José Serrano2, José Galián2 1 Centro de Biologia Ambiental /Departamento de Biologia Animal/, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Bloco C2 - 3º Piso, 1700 Lisboa, Portugal 2 Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física, Campus de Espinardo, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia , Spain Corresponding author: José Galián ([email protected]) Academic editor: Robert Angus | Received 27 January 2011 | Accepted 15 March 2011 | Published 5 May 2011 Citation: Proença SJR, Serrano ARM, Serrano J, Galián J (2011) Patterns of rDNA chromosomal localization in Palearctic Cephalota and Cylindera (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelini) with different numbers of X-chromosomes. Comparative Cytogenetics 5(1): 47–59. doi: 10.3897/compcytogen.v5i1.962 Abstract The ribosomal clusters of six Paleartic taxa belonging to the tiger beetle genera Cephalota Dokhtourow, 1883 and Cylindera Westwood, 1831, with multiple sex chromosomes (XXY, XXXY and XXXXY) have been localised on mitotic and meiotic cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), using a PCR- amplified 18S rDNA fragment as a probe. Four patterns of rDNA localization in these tiger beetles were found: 1. Two clusters located in one autosomal pair; 2. Two clusters located in one autosomal pair and one in an X chromosome; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Programa De Doutoramento Em Biologia ”Dinâmica Das
    Universidade de Evora´ - Instituto de Investiga¸c~aoe Forma¸c~aoAvan¸cada Programa de Doutoramento em Biologia Tese de Doutoramento "Din^amicadas comunidades de grupos selecionados de artr´opodes terrestres nas ´areasemergentes da Barragem de Alqueva (Alentejo: Portugal) Rui Jorge Cegonho Raimundo Orientador(es) j Diogo Francisco Caeiro Figueiredo Paulo Alexandre Vieira Borges Evora´ 2020 Universidade de Evora´ - Instituto de Investiga¸c~aoe Forma¸c~aoAvan¸cada Programa de Doutoramento em Biologia Tese de Doutoramento "Din^amicadas comunidades de grupos selecionados de artr´opodes terrestres nas ´areasemergentes da Barragem de Alqueva (Alentejo: Portugal) Rui Jorge Cegonho Raimundo Orientador(es) j Diogo Francisco Caeiro Figueiredo Paulo Alexandre Vieira Borges Evora´ 2020 A tese de doutoramento foi objeto de aprecia¸c~aoe discuss~aop´ublicapelo seguinte j´urinomeado pelo Diretor do Instituto de Investiga¸c~aoe Forma¸c~ao Avan¸cada: Presidente j Luiz Carlos Gazarini (Universidade de Evora)´ Vogais j Am´aliaMaria Marques Espirid~aode Oliveira (Universidade de Evora)´ Artur Raposo Moniz Serrano (Universidade de Lisboa - Faculdade de Ci^encias) Fernando Manuel de Campos Trindade Rei (Universidade de Evora)´ M´arioRui Canelas Boieiro (Universidade dos A¸cores) Paulo Alexandre Vieira Borges (Universidade dos A¸cores) (Orientador) Pedro Segurado (Universidade T´ecnicade Lisboa - Instituto Superior de Agronomia) Evora´ 2020 IV Ilhas. Trago uma comigo in visível, um pedaço de matéria isolado e denso, que se deslocou numa catástrofe da idade média. Enquanto ilha, não carece de mar. Nem de nuvens passageiras. Enquanto fragmento, só outra catástrofe a devolveria ao corpo primitivo. Dora Neto V VI AGRADECIMENTOS Os momentos e decisões ao longo da vida tornaram-se pontos de inflexão que surgiram de um simples fascínio pelos invertebrados, reminiscência de infância passada na quinta dos avós maternos, para se tornar numa opção científica consubstanciada neste documento.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    _____________ Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 2, No. 1, January 2007___________ I MUNIS ENTOMOLOGY & ZOOLOGY Ankara / Turkey II _____________ Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 2, No. 1, January 2007___________ Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology publishes a wide variety of papers on all aspects of Entomology and Zoology from all of the world, including mainly studies on systematics, taxonomy, nomenclature, fauna, biogeography, biodiversity, ecology, morphology, behavior, conservation, pa!eobiology and other aspects are appropriate topics for papers submitted to Munis Entomology & Zoology. Submission of Manuscripts: Works published or under consideration elsewhere (including on the internet) will not be accepted. At first submission, one double spaced hard copy (text and tables) with figures (may not be original) must be sent to the Editors, Dr. Hüseyin Özdikmen for publication in MEZ. All manuscripts should be submitted as Word file or PDF file in an e-mail attachment. If electronic submission is not possible due to limitations of electronic space at the sending or receiving ends, unavailability of e-mail, etc., we will accept ―hard‖ versions, in triplicate, accompanied by an electronic version stored in a floppy disk, a CD-ROM. Review Process: When submitting manuscripts, all authors provides the name, of at least three qualified experts (they also provide their address, subject fields and e-mails). Then, the editors send to experts to review the papers. The review process should normally be completed within 45-60 days. After reviewing papers by reviwers: Rejected papers are discarded. For accepted papers, authors are asked to modify their papers according to suggestions of the reviewers and editors. Final versions of manuscripts and figures are needed in a digital format.
    [Show full text]
  • The Morphological Evolution of the Adephaga (Coleoptera)
    Systematic Entomology (2019), DOI: 10.1111/syen.12403 The morphological evolution of the Adephaga (Coleoptera) ROLF GEORG BEUTEL1, IGNACIO RIBERA2 ,MARTIN FIKÁCEˇ K 3, ALEXANDROS VASILIKOPOULOS4, BERNHARD MISOF4 andMICHAEL BALKE5 1Institut für Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung, FSU Jena, Jena, Germany, 2Institut de Biología Evolutiva, CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain, 3Department of Zoology, National Museum, Praha 9, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Praha 2, Czech Republic, 4Center for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany and 5Zoologische Staatssammlung, Munich, Germany Abstract. The evolution of the coleopteran suborder Adephaga is discussed based on a robust phylogenetic background. Analyses of morphological characters yield results nearly identical to recent molecular phylogenies, with the highly specialized Gyrinidae placed as sister to the remaining families, which form two large, reciprocally monophyletic subunits, the aquatic Haliplidae + Dytiscoidea (Meruidae, Noteridae, Aspidytidae, Amphizoidae, Hygrobiidae, Dytiscidae) on one hand, and the terrestrial Geadephaga (Trachypachidae + Carabidae) on the other. The ancestral habitat of Adephaga, either terrestrial or aquatic, remains ambiguous. The former option would imply two or three independent invasions of aquatic habitats, with very different structural adaptations in larvae of Gyrinidae, Haliplidae and Dytiscoidea. Introduction dedicated to their taxonomy (examples for comprehensive studies are Sharp, 1882; Guignot, 1931–1933; Balfour-Browne Adephaga, the second largest suborder of the megadiverse & Balfour-Browne, 1940; Jeannel, 1941–1942; Brinck, 1955, > Coleoptera, presently comprises 45 000 described species. Lindroth, 1961–1969; Franciscolo, 1979) and morphology. The terrestrial Carabidae are one of the largest beetle families, An outstanding contribution is the monograph on Dytiscus comprising almost 90% of the extant adephagan diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W
    30 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 42, Nos. 1 & 2 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W. Messer1 Abstract A survey of Carabidae in the state of Wisconsin, U.S.A. yielded 87 species new to the state and incorporated 34 species previously reported from the state but that were not included in an earlier catalogue, bringing the total number of species to 489 in an annotated checklist. Collection data are provided in full for the 87 species new to Wisconsin but are limited to county occurrences for 187 rare species previously known in the state. Recent changes in nomenclature pertinent to the Wisconsin fauna are cited. ____________________ The Carabidae, commonly known as ‘ground beetles’, with 34, 275 described species worldwide is one of the three most species-rich families of extant beetles (Lorenz 2005). Ground beetles are often chosen for study because they are abun- dant in most terrestrial habitats, diverse, taxonomically well known, serve as sensitive bioindicators of habitat change, easy to capture, and morphologically pleasing to the collector. North America north of Mexico accounts for 2635 species which were listed with their geographic distributions (states and provinces) in the catalogue by Bousquet and Larochelle (1993). In Table 4 of the latter refer- ence, the state of Wisconsin was associated with 374 ground beetle species. That is more than the surrounding states of Iowa (327) and Minnesota (323), but less than states of Illinois (452) and Michigan (466). The total count for Minnesota was subsequently increased to 433 species (Gandhi et al. 2005). Wisconsin county distributions are known for 15 species of tiger beetles (subfamily Cicindelinae) (Brust 2003) with collection records documented for Tetracha virginica (Grimek 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Utilization of Non-Native Wood by Saproxylic Insects
    Chapter 23 Utilization of Non-native Wood by Saproxylic Insects Michael D. Ulyshen, Stephen M. Pawson, Manuela Branco, Scott Horn, E. Richard Hoebeke, and Martin M. Gossner Abstract Whether intentionally or accidentally introduced, non-native woody plants now feature prominently in many ecosystems throughout the world. The dying and deadwood produced by these plants represent novel resources for saproxylic insects, but their suitability to these organisms remains poorly under- stood. We herein review existing knowledge about the utilization of non-native wood species by saproxylic insect communities and also provide several previously unpublished case studies from the USA, Germany, Portugal/Spain, and New Zealand. The first case study suggests that the relative number of beetle species utilizing non-native vs. native wood varies greatly among wood species, with some non-native species (e.g., Albizia julibrissin) supporting a high beetle diversity. A decomposition experiment found that termites did not readily attack three non-native wood species and did not contribute significantly to their decomposition in contrast to what has been shown for a native pine species. The second case study found two species of non-native wood to support a lower richness of beetles compared to two native wood species in Germany, with Pseudotsuga menziesii supporting particu- larly few species which formed just a small subset of the community collected from native Picea abies. The third case study, from Iberia, found Eucalyptus to support a relatively small number of insect species with generalist host preferences. The fourth M. D. Ulyshen (*) · S. Horn USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Athens, GA, USA e-mail: [email protected] S.
    [Show full text]