DOCSLIB.ORG

The Beacon Target Detector (BTD) Algorithms Deployed in the ASR-9 5 September 2000 Processor Augmentation Card (9-PAC) 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Beacon Target Detector (BTD) Algorithms Deployed in the ASR-9 5 September 2000 Processor Augmentation Card (9-PAC) 6 Project Report ATC-288 The Beacon Target Detector (BTD) Algorithms Deployed in the ASR-9 Processor Augmentation Card (9-PAC) G. R. Elkin J. L. Gertz 5 September 2000 Lincoln Laboratory MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for the Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. 20591 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. TECHNICALREPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. GovernmentAccession No. 3. Recipients Catalog No. ATC-288 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The Beacon Target Detector (BTD) Algorithms Deployed in the ASR-9 5 September 2000 Processor Augmentation Card (9-PAC) 6. Performing OrganizationCode 7. Author(s) 8. Performing OrganizationReport No. G.R. EIkin and J.L. Gertz ATC-288 9. Performing OrganizationName and Address IO. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) MIT Lincoln Laboratory 244 Wood Street 11. Contractor Grant No. Lexiugton, MA 02420-9108 2. SponsoringAgency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Department of Transportation ATClAugust 2000 Federal Aviation Administration Systems Research and Development Service 14. SponsoringAgency Code Washington, DC 20591 5. SupplementaryNotes This report is based on studies performed at Lincoln Laboratory, a center for research operated by Massachusetts Institute of Technology, under Air Force Contract F19628-00-C-0002. 6. Abstract This project report describes the Beacon Target Detector (BTD) algorithms implemented in the ASR-9 Processor Augmentation Card (9-PAC). The BTD function combines replies that arise from the same aircraft to form beacon targets, and sends these beacon targets to the 9-PAC merge process where they are combined with primary radar targets. The 9-PAC BTD algorithm was designed to solve two problems with the ASR-9 Array Signal Processor (ASP) BTD: identifying and removing false beacon targets due to reflections, and preventing merging or splitting of targets due to reply overlap and garble. The BTD reflection processing algorithm marks each beacon target as either real or false, and provides this information to the 9-PAC merge process. Discrete Mode 3/A reflection false targets are identified when duplicate code reports satisfying stringent conditions are located. In order to find non- discrete Mode 3/A code reflection false targets, the BTD builds an automated, dynamic reflector databasebased on the geography of real and false targets with discrete Mode 3/A codes. This report supersedesan earlier report (ATC-220) which described the 9-PAC BTD algorithms prior to the operational field testing effort conducted by the FAA in 1995 and 1996. Nationwide deployment of 9-PAC on production hardware was approved in April 1999. To date, more than 60 installations have been performed, and hardware has been procured to update all 134 ASR-9s in the National Airspace System. 7. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springileld, VA 22161. 9. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 2% FORM DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction. of completed page authorized EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Since 1990, the Airport Surveillance Radar-9 (ASR-9) has been installed and commissioned at more than 130 airports in the United States. The ASR-9 provides aircraft detection and false alarm performance that is superior to that of earlier generations of airport surveillance radars. The ASR-9 uses two types of surveillance to monitor aircraft activity. In primary or skin surveillance, the radar transmits a pulse of electromagnetic energy that is reflected by the metal components of an aircraft. Secondary, or beacon, surveillance uses a second antenna mounted on top of the ASR-9 primary antenna to interrogate a transponder device located on board all commercial and most general aviation aircraft. The transponder E reply is contains identification code or altitude. The ASR-9 is designedto operate as a standaloneradar or in conjunction with the Mode S secondary radar system. The Mode S system provides more advanced beacon surveillance. The standalonebeacon surveillance is the subject of this report and is referred to as the interim beacon interrogator (IBI) mode. After the first several ASR-9 systems were placed on-line, operational problems were cited by air traffic controllers, both with the primary and the beacon radar surveillance functions. The beaconproblems, which are the focus -of this report, were as follows: . false beacon target reports resulting from signal reflections caused by buildings and other reflective surfacesnear airports; and . missing or extra beacon target reports, or reports with inaccurate azimuth measurements (particularly on approach to parallel runways), resulting from interference between overlapping reply pulses from multiple aircraft in the main beam of the antenna. In 1992, Lincoln Laboratory proposed a replacement of the surveillance data processing elements in the ASR-9, the so-called Array Signal Processor (ASP), with a Processor Augmentation Card (9-PAC). The increased processing and memory capacity of the 9-PAC made it possible to solve the surveillance problems listed above by implementing sophisticated algorithms in software. This report describesthe 9-PAC Beacon Target Detector (BTD) algorithms, which were developed to solve the beacon reflection and interference problems cited above. The BTD receives beacon reply data from ASR-9 beacon reply processing hardware, combines replies that arise from the same aircraft to form beacon target reports, and outputs these target reports to the 9-PAC Merge process,where they are combined with primary radar reports. While the ASP BTD makes no attempt to remove false target reports caused by reflections, the 9-PAC BTD has a Dynamic Reflector False Target Algorithm (DRFTA). DRFTA determines the location and geometric characteristics of reflecting surfaces through analysis of target report data, and stores this information in a dynamic reflector database. The reflector databaseis then used to identify false targets. The dynamic databasehandles reflections caused by moving reflectors, such as ships and airplanes, and requires no hand entered inputs when new buildings are constructednear an airport. ..- 111 The 9-PAC BTD reduces the reply interference problems by using knowledge of track history to correct corrupted reply code and altitude data. The ASP BTD had to assign each beacon reply to a target at its time of reception, but the 9-PAC BTD postponestarget formation decisions until all replies in an area have been received, and then processesthe group in batch mode when all information is available. This results in a reduction in missed target reports, merging replies from two aircraft into one target report, or splitting the replies from one aircraft into two target reports. Data analysis during field testing of the algorithms described in this report has demonstratedmore than an order of magnitude improvement in the beacon false target rate of the ASR-9. False target rates of 4 reports per antenna scan have been reduced to less than 1 false target in 5 antenna scans. Nationwide deployment of these algorithms on production 9-PAC hardware was approved by the FAA in April, 1999. To date, more than 60 installations have been performed, and hardware has been procured to update all 134 ASR-9’s in the National Airspace System (NAS). iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of several people without whom the algorithms described in this paper would never have found their way into the ASR-9. Ed Hall and Jim Pieronek designed and built the 9-PAC prototype boards, and Robert Callahan supervised the repair of boards that broke during field testing. Oliver Newell provided the considerable benefits of his experiencein real-time software techniques,and he also wrote the 9- PAC operating system software and much more. Jenifer Evans developed the 9-PAC Radar/Beacon Target Merge algorithm. Walter Heath wrote the flash card file system software used to store reflector maps and monitor the system tests, and offered advice about debugging real-time embedded software on numerous occasions. Tammy Parsons and Paul Harrell of Northrop Grumman performed an independent validation and verification effort prior to field testing. Bill Goodchild of the FAA directed the field acceptancetesting effort at Philadelphia, Los Angeles, Dallas/Fort Worth, and Oakland airports, and worked in the trenches with the authors in analyzing recorded data. Marc Edwards and Edward Paule at the FAA Technical Center (AOS-270) modified the ASR-9 software to work with 9-PAC. Wesley Johnson supported the Albuquerque field site testing effort. Robert Grappel patiently reviewed this report. c TABLEOFCONTENTS ... Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................................................111 Ackn owledgments............................................................................................................................................................... List of Illustrations .............................................................................................................................................................xi
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radio Spectrum Resource Assessment of the Band 450 Mhz to 5 Ghz
    Radio Spectrum Resource Assessment of the band 450 MHz to 5 GHz SRMC & GSMA 2014.07 1 / 44 450MHz-5GHz 关注频段频谱资源评估报告 国家无线电监测中心 全球移动通信系统协会 2014.07 2 / 44 Contents 0. Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 5 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 6 2. Frequency allocation and station information ........................................................ 9 2.1. Frequency bands .............................................................................................. 9 2.2. Frequency allocation in each band .................................................................. 9 2.3. Registered radio station information ............................................................. 10 3. Frequency occupation measurement scheme ....................................................... 11 3.1. Test sites ........................................................................................................ 11 3.2. Duration of monitoring.................................................................................. 13 3.3. Measurement equipment ............................................................................... 13 3.4. Parameters setting ......................................................................................... 14 4. Measurement results ............................................................................................. 16 4.1. 470-566 MHz ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Award of 2.3 and 3.4 Ghz Spectrum Bands Information Memorandum
    The award of 2.3 and 3.4 GHz spectrum bands Information Memorandum Publication date: 11 July 2017 Award of the 2.3 and 3.4 GHz spectrum bands – Information Memorandum Important Notice This Information Memorandum (Memorandum) has been prepared by Ofcom in connection with the proposed award of licences in the 2.3 and 3.4 GHz spectrum bands by auction. Terms and expressions used in this Memorandum are as defined in annex 10 of this Memorandum, or in the text of the Memorandum itself. The Award Process will be conducted in accordance with regulations to be made by Ofcom pursuant to powers under Section 14 of the Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006, pursuant to which the grant of the licences may be made following a procedure set out in regulations issued by Ofcom. The regulations to be made in respect of this award are referred to in this Memorandum as the Regulations. A copy of the draft Regulations and a Notice of Ofcom’s proposals to make regulations have been published alongside this Memorandum and can be found on Ofcom’s website at www.ofcom.org.uk . Recipients of this Memorandum should note that only the Regulations will have statutory effect. Accordingly, in the event of any difference between this Memorandum and the provisions of the Regulations, the Regulations are definitive and will prevail. This Memorandum has been prepared solely in connection with the proposed award of licences in the 2.3 and 3.4 GHz spectrum bands, and has been made available for information purposes only. This Memorandum does not constitute an offer or invitation to participate in the Award Process, nor does it constitute the basis for any part of any contract which may be concluded in relation to the Award Process or in respect of any award of licences.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiodetermination, Air Traffic and Maritime Services Licence Guidelines
    Guidelines Radiodetermination, Air Traffic and Maritime Services Licence Guidelines Document No: ComReg 11/07R1 Date: May 2017 This document does not constitute legal, commercial, financial, technical or other advice and the Commission for Communications Regulation shall not, at any time, be bound by the contents of this document which do not necessarily set out the Commission’s final or definitive position in any particular matter. The Commission reserves its right to act at all times in accordance with its statutory functions and objectives and this may include reaching a decision or taking an action which is at variance with all or any part of these guidelines. An Coimisiún um Rialáil Cumarsáide Commission for Communications Regulation One Dockland Central, Guild Street, Dublin 1, D01 E4X0, Ireland Telephone +353 1 804 9600 Fax +353 1 804 9680 Email [email protected] Web www.comreg.ie Radiodetermination, Air Traffic & Maritime Services Guidelines Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................... 3 2 Radiodetermination, Air Traffic and Maritime Services – An Overview ..... 4 3 Air Traffic Services Licence ............................................................... 7 3.1 AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS .......................................... 8 4 Maritime Services Licence ................................................................ 9 4.1 LAND BASED MARITIME MOBILE ................................................................ 10 4.2 LAND BASED PRIVATE MARITIME
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 80.110
    SUBCHAPTER D—SAFETY AND SPECIAL RADIO SERVICES PART 80—STATIONS IN THE 80.71 Operating controls for stations on land. MARITIME SERVICES 80.72 Antenna requirements for coast sta- tions. Subpart A—General Information 80.74 Public coast station facilities for a te- lephony busy signal. GENERAL 80.76 Requirements for land station control Sec. points. 80.1 Basis and purpose. 80.2 Other regulations that apply. STATION REQUIREMENTS—SHIP STATIONS 80.3 Other applicable rule parts of this chap- 80.79 Inspection of ship station by a foreign ter. Government. 80.5 Definitions. 80.80 Operating controls for ship stations. 80.7 Incorporation by reference. 80.81 Antenna requirements for ship sta- tions. Subpart B—Applications and Licenses 80.83 Protection from potentially hazardous RF radiation. 80.11 Scope. 80.13 Station license required. OPERATING PROCEDURES—GENERAL 80.15 Eligibility for station license. 80.17 Administrative classes of stations. 80.86 International regulations applicable. 80.21 Supplemental information required. 80.87 Cooperative use of frequency assign- 80.25 License term. ments. 80.31 Cancellation of license. 80.88 Secrecy of communication. 80.37 One authorization for a plurality of 80.89 Unauthorized transmissions. stations. 80.90 Suspension of transmission. 80.39 Authorized station location. 80.91 Order of priority of communications. 80.41 Control points and dispatch points. 80.92 Prevention of interference. 80.43 Equipment acceptable for licensing. 80.93 Hours of service. 80.45 Frequencies. 80.94 Control by coast or Government sta- 80.47 Operation during emergency. tion. 80.49 Construction and regional service re- 80.95 Message charges.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Order 7110.10Y, Flight Services
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JO 7110.10Y CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CHG 2 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: November 10, 2016 SUBJ: Flight Services 1. Purpose of This Change. This change transmits revised pages to Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7110.10Y, Flight Services, and the Briefing Guide. 2. Audience. This change applies to select offices in Washington headquarters, service area offices, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, and to all air traffic field facilities, international aviation field offices, and the interested aviation public. 3. Where Can I Find This Change? This change is available on the FAA Web site at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and http://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_ notices/. 4. Explanation of Policy Change. See the Explanation of Changes attachment which has editorial corrections and changes submitted through normal procedures. The Briefing Guide lists only new or modified material, along with background. 5. Distribution. This change is distributed to select offices in Washington headquarters, service area offices, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, and to all air traffic field facilities, international aviation field offices, and the interested aviation public. 6. Disposition of Transmittal. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 7. Page Control Chart. See the page control chart attachment. Distribution: ZAT-793; ZAT-464; Initiated By: AJR-0 ZAT-423 (External) Vice President, System Operations Services 11/10/16 JO 7110.10Y CHG 2 Flight Services Explanation of Changes Change 2 Direct questions through appropriate facility/service center office staff to the Office of Primary Interest (OPI) a.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecc Report 157 the Impact of Spurious Emissions Of
    ECC REPORT 157 Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT) ECC REPORT 157 THE IMPACT OF SPURIOUS EMISSIONS OF RADARS AT 2.8, 5.6 AND 9.0 GHz ON OTHER RADIOCOMMUNICATION SERVICES/SYSTEMS Cardiff, January 2011 ECC REPORT 157 Page 2 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This ECC Report presents detailed analysis of the impact of fixed radiodetermination systems on other services/systems (i.e. Fixed service (P-P application), Mobile service (RLAN in 5 GHz band) and Radioastronomy service) operating in adjacent or different bands. This analysis was done on a theoretical approach, but results of some measurements of existing filtering solutions were also considered. A number of cases have been considered of major importance for defining levels of unwanted emissions in the spurious domain giving confidence of reasonably low occurrence probability of interference. Particular attention has been given to meteorological radars, which represent the majority of fixed installations presently subject to the 100 dBPEP attenuation required in ERC/REC 74-01. Further consideration was given to the levels in ERC/REC 74-01. In relation to FS, the Report considered: the impact of spurious emission, the very high power of the primary radars under consideration confirm the common assumption that, whichever would be the spurious limit in dBc, main-beam to main-beam coupling between radars and FS stations is not possible because in all cases the protection distance is in the order of several tens of km (in most cases lies beyond the horizon). Therefore, it is assumed that information about the FS and radar locations are known to administrations licensing their use; the impact of typical C band meteo radars on the variation of the potentially blocked azimuth angles for FS stations in the 6-8 GHz band was considered as more representative case.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Characteristics and Performance Criteria for Systems in the Meteorological Aids Service in the 403 Mhz and 1 680 Mhz Bands
    Recommendation ITU-R RS.1165-3 (12/2018) Technical characteristics and performance criteria for systems in the meteorological aids service in the 403 MHz and 1 680 MHz bands RS Series Remote sensing systems ii Rec. ITU-R RS.1165-3 Foreword The role of the Radiocommunication Sector is to ensure the rational, equitable, efficient and economical use of the radio-frequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, including satellite services, and carry out studies without limit of frequency range on the basis of which Recommendations are adopted. The regulatory and policy functions of the Radiocommunication Sector are performed by World and Regional Radiocommunication Conferences and Radiocommunication Assemblies supported by Study Groups. Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR) ITU-R policy on IPR is described in the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC referenced in Annex 1 of Resolution ITU-R 1. Forms to be used for the submission of patent statements and licensing declarations by patent holders are available from http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/go/patents/en where the Guidelines for Implementation of the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC and the ITU-R patent information database can also be found. Series of ITU-R Recommendations (Also available online at http://www.itu.int/publ/R-REC/en) Series Title BO Satellite delivery BR Recording for production, archival and play-out; film for television BS Broadcasting service (sound) BT Broadcasting service (television) F Fixed service M Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services P Radiowave propagation RA Radio astronomy RS Remote sensing systems S Fixed-satellite service SA Space applications and meteorology SF Frequency sharing and coordination between fixed-satellite and fixed service systems SM Spectrum management SNG Satellite news gathering TF Time signals and frequency standards emissions V Vocabulary and related subjects Note: This ITU-R Recommendation was approved in English under the procedure detailed in Resolution ITU-R 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tdma Broadcast Satellite / Ground Architecture for the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network
    A TDMA BROADCAST SATELLITE / GROUND ARCHITECTURE FOR THE AERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK Mohammed A. Shamma, Rajesh S. Raghavan Analex Corporation, Cleveland, OH 44142 Contract NAS3-00145, NASA Glenn Research Center Abstract: An initial evaluation of a TDMA research stage [ 11. Several communication satellite broadcast architecture with an links, technologies, and architectures were integrated ground network is proposed in considered which differ in complexity, cost, this study as one option for the Aeronautical and the time frame for its implementation. Telecommunications Network (ATN). The Here we are proposing an architecture based architecture proposed consists of a ground on the following objectives: based network that is dedicated to the - Cost: A system that takes into reception and transmissions of Automatic account the initial cost of Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) implementation. Considering the messages from Mode-S or UAT type fact that such architectures are not systems, along with tracks from primary and mass produced, the initial cost secondary surveillance radars. Additionally, will likely determine the expected the ground network could contain VHF final costs. Digital Link Mode 2, 3 or 4 transceivers for - New but tested technologies: In this the reception and transmissions of we mean a system that relies on Controller-Pilot Data Link Communications technologies that are new but (CPDLC) messages and for voice. The already tested as oppose to being second part of the ATN network consists of in the initial research stage. Also a broadcast satellite based system that is minimum use of what is defined mainly dedicated for the transmission of as older technologies is assumed. surveillance data as well as En-route Flight - Enough Room for Technology Information Service Broadcast (FIS-B) to all growth: while the cost and the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Beacon Transponder (RBX) Functional Description
    FAA-RD-80-135 Project Report ATC-104 Radar Beacon Transponder (RBX) Functional Description R.G. Sandholm 18 February 1981 Lincoln Laboratory MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for the Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. 20591 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. CONTENTS 1.0 OVERVIEW AND SHRY 1.1 Introduction 1 RBX Concept 1 ) 1.2 1.3 Interaction of RBX with BCAS and ATC 2 2.0 THE RBX OATA LINR 6 ./ 2.1 Signal Waveforms 6 2.2 Signal Content 6 2.3 Message Formts 7 3.0 RBX GROUND EQUIPMENT 10 3.1 Transmission Control 10 3.2 System Clock 10 3.3 Modulator/Transmitter 12 3.4 htenna System 12 3.5 Receiver 12 3.6 Interrogation Signal Processing 14 3.7 RBX Processor 14 3.7.1 Sensitivity Level Selection 14 3.7.2 ATC Communication Data Link Interface 16 3.7.3 ATC Remote Control Interface 17 3.8 Performance Monitoring 17 4.0 RBX PERFOMCE 18 4.1 Link Reliability 18 4.1.1 Link Power Budget 18 4.1.2 RBX Antenna Lobing 18 4.1.3 Aircraft Antenna Fading 18 4.1.4 Interference Effects 22 4.1.5 Net Link Reliability 25 .> REFERENCES 26 . iii —. ILLUSTRATIONS 1 Relationship of RBX to Elements of BCAS and ARTS 2 Sequence of Events and Information Transfer between RBX and BCAS 3 RBX Link Formats a 4 RBX Functional Block Diagram 11 5 Example of an RBX Front End 13 6 Side View of RBX Coverage Volume 15 7 Vertical Lobing..” .,:- 20 a Aircraft Antenna Summry Statistics 21 9 Probability of RBX 3-pulse Detection of a 24 Single BCAS Interrogation in the Presence of Noise Alone and Noise Plus Interference.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 80.108
    Federal Communications Commission § 80.108 once every 15 minutes during radio- § 80.104 Identification of radar trans- telephone communications. missions not authorized. (f) VHF public coast stations licensed This section applies to all maritime to serve a predetermined geographic radar transmitters except radar beacon service area are not required to provide stations. station identification under this sec- (a) Radar transmitters must not tion. A site-based VHF public coast transmit station identification. station may identify by means of the (b) [Reserved] approximate geographic location of the OPERATING PROCEDURES—LAND station or the area it serves when it is STATIONS the only VHF public coast station serv- ing the location or there will be no § 80.105 General obligations of coast conflict with the identification of any stations. other station. Each coast station or marine-utility [51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 52 station must acknowledge and receive FR 35244, Sept. 18, 1987; 68 FR 46961, Aug. 7, all calls directed to it by ship or air- 2003; 69 FR 64671, Nov. 8, 2004] craft stations. Such stations are per- mitted to transmit safety communica- § 80.103 Digital selective calling (DSC) tion to any ship or aircraft station. operating procedures. VHF (156–162 MHz) and AMTS (216–220 (a) Operating procedures for the use MHz) public coast stations may provide fixed or hybrid services on a co-pri- of DSC equipment in the maritime mo- mary basis with mobile operations. bile service are as contained in ITU–R M.541–9 (incorporated by reference, see [65 FR 77824, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 80.108
    Federal Communications Commission § 80.108 once every 15 minutes during radio- § 80.104 Identification of radar trans- telephone communications. missions not authorized. (f) VHF public coast stations licensed This section applies to all maritime to serve a predetermined geographic radar transmitters except radar beacon service area are not required to provide stations. station identification under this sec- (a) Radar transmitters must not tion. A site-based VHF public coast transmit station identification. station may identify by means of the (b) [Reserved] approximate geographic location of the OPERATING PROCEDURES—LAND station or the area it serves when it is STATIONS the only VHF public coast station serv- ing the location or there will be no § 80.105 General obligations of coast conflict with the identification of any stations. other station. Each coast station or marine-utility [51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 52 station must acknowledge and receive FR 35244, Sept. 18, 1987; 68 FR 46961, Aug. 7, all calls directed to it by ship or air- 2003; 69 FR 64671, Nov. 8, 2004] craft stations. Such stations are per- mitted to transmit safety communica- § 80.103 Digital selective calling (DSC) tion to any ship or aircraft station. operating procedures. VHF (156–162 MHz) and AMTS (216–220 (a) Operating procedures for the use MHz) public coast stations may provide fixed or hybrid services on a co-pri- of DSC equipment in the maritime mo- mary basis with mobile operations. bile service are as contained in ITU–R M.541–9 (incorporated by reference, see [65 FR 77824, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Surveillance Phased Array Radar (SSPAR): Initial Feasibility Study
    Project Report ATC-416 Secondary Surveillance Phased Array Radar (SSPAR): Initial Feasibility Study M.E. Weber M.L. Wood J.R. Franz D. Conway J.Y.N. Cho 6 February 2014 Lincoln Laboratory MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for the Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. 20591 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. ATC-416 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date 6 February 2014 Secondary Surveillance Phased Array Radar (SSPAR): Initial Feasbility Study 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. M.E. Weber, M.L. Wood, J.R. Franz, D. Conway, and J.Y. N. Cho, ATC-416 MIT Lincoln Laboratory 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) MIT Lincoln Laboratory 244 Wood Street 11. Contract or Grant No. Lexington, MA 02420-9108 FA8721-05-C-0002 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Department of Transportation Project Report Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave., S.W. 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20591 15. Supplementary Notes This report is based on studies performed at Lincoln Laboratory, a federally funded research and development center operated by Massachusetts Institute of Technology, under Air Force Contract FA8721-05-C-0002.
    [Show full text]