Darwinism Versus Intelligent Design David Berlinski & Critics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Darwinism Versus Intelligent Design David Berlinski & Critics CONTROVERSY Darwinism Versus Intelligent Design David Berlinski & Critics PAUL R. GROSS: theory have all been given before- again in evolutionary biology and Congratulations are in order. In in the professional literature, in the mathematical physics. This, if true, his latest COMMENTARY essay on introductory biology courses of all would give it some scientific serious- "Darwinism"-as it is often called by decent colleges, in half a dozen very ness. But it is not true. There is not those who do not know much evolu- recent specialist books, on fifty one publication in recent biological tionary biology-David Berlinski flourishing scientific websites. How- journals, out of the tens of thousands seems to have reversed himself ["Has ever well intelligent-design apolo- of articles published annually-a Darwin Met His Match?," Decem- getics is doing as politics, there is huge subset of them devoted specifi- ber 2002]. He is now critical of the nothing new about its abject failure cally to evolution-that undertakes to effort to rehabilitate the ancient "ar- as science. rehabilitate the argument from de- gument from design," these days On the other hand, none of the sign. None of the intelligent- holiday-wrapped as "intelligent-de- reasons Mr. Berlinski hints at for re- design "theorists" mentioned in his sign theory." This change of mind is jecting "Darwinism" stand up. They essay has ever published the claim in all the more praiseworthy because are the familiar creationist pabulum, an original article in a regular, refer- Mr. Berlinski is not only the author supposedly demonstrating the grand eed biological journal. Nor, of course, of "The Deniable Darwin" (COM- flaws and gaps in evolutionary biol- has Mr. Berlinski himself done so. MENTARY, June 1996) but, according ogy. But these arguments, too, have As for William Dembski's lu- to his current author's note, closely been addressed in the professional cubrations on chance and probabili- associated with the Discovery Insti- literature, in tens of thousands of pa- ty-which even Mr. Berlinski now tute, the conservative Christian think pers, and in dozens of excellent, best- finds flawed-I know of no profes- tank that serves as the primary pro- selling popular science books-and sional publications (other than Dem- moter of "intelligent design." they have been soundly refuted. Un- bski's own books and his frenetic re- The manner of Mr. Berlinski's dis- fortunately, a non-biologist reader of sponses to critics) that treat them as missal is less creditable, however. His "Has Darwin Met His Match?," in- of interest for mathematical physics. argument might be paraphrased as nocent of this vast body of knowl- There are, however, a dozen point- follows: intelligent design has failed, edge, will have no notion of its con- by-point refutations of those claims, evolutionary biology has failed, and tent or even, perhaps, of its existence, many of them available on the Inter- therefore nobody has a plausible sci- and may therefore take Mr. Berlin- net, by well-known physicists, philo- entific explanation for the diversity ski's assertions as true as well as deep, sophers, mathematicians, and biolo- of life on earth. This is absurd. which they are not. gists. The reasons Mr. Berlinski gives Mr. Berlinski says that the argu- University of Virginia for the failure of intelligent-design ment from design has been taken up Charlottesville, Virginia [9] COMMENTARY MARCH 2003 MARK PERAKH: that would be troubling if Darwin- still myriad open questions today. What is perhaps most amusing ism were a theory about the origins Mr. Berlinski does not mention about David Berlinski's article is his of life. Since it is not, Mr. Berlins- Fisher or Hamilton or any of the apparent change of mind on the sub- ki's hand-wringing on the subject is other thousands of biologists ex- ject of intelligent design. Having inappropriate. ploring these open questions be- supplied rave blurbs to the books of The fruits of evolutionary theo- cause he is anxious to present evolu- such prominent advocates of this ry are disseminated in thousands of tionary theory as a fixed philosophy "theory" as William Dembski and research articles in dozens of jour- rather than a dynamic science. In- Michael Behe, he now casts doubt on nals every year. Obviously, the peo- deed, the only publishing biologist the concepts they promote. What ple charged with the responsibility he mentions is Jonathan Wells, the explains this new view? The advo- of entering their labs and solving Unification minister whose prayers cates of intelligent design are anxious problems find it useful. Numerous and conversations with the Rev. Sun to be taken seriously as scientists. complex systems have been studied Myung Moon convinced him, in From their standpoint, it may seem and the major steps of their evolu- Wells's own words, "that I should to be a step forward that Mr. Berlin- tion revealed. Where data are copi- devote my life to destroying Dar- ski gives their ideas a status equal to ous, they are all in accord with winism," which he reports as his that of Darwinism, even if only by Darwinian expectations; where mys- spur for studying biology. casting doubts on both equally. teries remain, the problem is a lack But no matter how vivid his the- The list of unsubstantiated asser- of data, not a lack of theoretical ro- ological motivations may be, Wells tions in Mr. Berlinski's paper is long. bustness. (or indeed anyone in the intelligent- Though enviably eloquent, it adds In response to all this, intelligent- design camp) will eventually have to nothing to the debate other than to design theorists fold their arms and offer an alternative explanation of try to put the failed hypothesis of shake their heads. That is their the variety we see among living intelligent design on a par with gen- right. But for all their bloated things that does not rely on the key uine science. claims and hyperbolic rhetoric, they evolutionary idea of descent with Bonsall, California have made no contribution toward modification. Furthermore, that ex- solving an actual biological prob- planation will have to be tested, and JASON ROSENHOUSE: lem. For that matter, neither has those tests will have to be scientif- David Berlinski's arguments David Berlinski. ic, not religious. against intelligent-design theory Kansas State University Here even Mr. Berlinski gets off suffer only from a lack of originali- Manhattan, Kansas the intelligent-design bus, because ty; critics have been making the he can see where it is heading. If the same points for years. Still, he gives CLAY SHIRKY: only way to defeat a scientific hy- a good picture of why most scien- David Berlinski expends a lot of pothesis is with another scientific tists find this field unpromising. energy trying to make evolutionary hypothesis, then we will never get Mr. Berlinski's ongoing antipathy theory look like religion. He men- to what he seemingly wants: a world to mainstream biology, by contrast, tions Darwin often and gestures to- where science stops trying to ex- is based on a caricature. Blubber- ward a set of beliefs called "Dar- plain things. He likes intelligent de- ing about gaps in the fossil record winism," as if Darwin were some sign for criticizing evolutionary cannot change the fact that, with sort of high priest and Darwinism a theory, but he dislikes it because it millions of fossils collected and clas- sect. But biologists do not practice is itself too much like science, and sified, not one is out of place from "Darwinism" any more than physi- may end up having to make testable a Darwinian standpoint. Also, Dar- cists practice "Einsteinism." For bi- assertions in the domain of what he winism requires continuity at the ologists, The Origin of Species is a his- calls "the ineffable inimitable." level of the genotype, not the phe- torical work, not a how-to manual. Because he cannot get his hands notype. And while it is true that in- Unlike Berlinski's "Darwinism," on the steering wheel, Mr. Berlin- formation is independent of the evolutionary theory is a field of vig- ski reaches for the brakes, asserting medium containing it, there is noth- orous and current debate. Darwin that a large domain of interest is or ing mysterious about the idea that had no idea how heredity worked- should be permanently exempt from changing the medium can alter the it took fifty years for R.A. Fisher scientific inquiry. This has been a information. Genes do mutate, and his colleagues to relate Darwin's standard plea of the religious for the thereby coding for different pro- work to Mendel's. Darwin likewise last several centuries, and Mr. teins from before, and new func- had no explanation for altruism-it Berlinski's formulation-that the tions are sometimes observed to took a hundred years and the work search for "the ineffable inimitable" arise as a result. The source of the of William Hamilton to develop a is fruitless-is a classic of the genre. code is indeed mysterious, a fact plausible hypothesis. And there are History has not been kind to those [10] DIVERSITY 'AN IMPORTANT BOOK... Convincingly and with erudition, Wood addresses what is likely to be the domestic policy issue of the first half of 2003-racial preferences. Wood's book earns a place near the top of the pile of literature debunking affirmative action." -The Weekly Standard "This is simply the best and most thorough critique of the diversity phenomenon yet written. Yet this book is not a rant;it is an even-handed account of an empty concept entrench- ing itself in a free society.
Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals
    UNDERSTANDING THE INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONIST MOVEMENT: ITS TRUE NATURE AND GOALS A POSITION PAPER FROM THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY OFFICE OF PUBLIC POLICY AUTHOR: BARBARA FORREST, Ph.D. Reviewing Committee: Paul Kurtz, Ph.D.; Austin Dacey, Ph.D.; Stuart D. Jordan, Ph.D.; Ronald A. Lindsay, J. D., Ph.D.; John Shook, Ph.D.; Toni Van Pelt DATED: MAY 2007 ( AMENDED JULY 2007) Copyright © 2007 Center for Inquiry, Inc. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for noncommercial, educational purposes, provided that this notice appears on the reproduced materials, the full authoritative version is retained, and copies are not altered. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the Center for Inquiry, Inc. Table of Contents Section I. Introduction: What is at stake in the dispute over intelligent design?.................. 1 Section II. What is the intelligent design creationist movement? ........................................ 2 Section III. The historical and legal background of intelligent design creationism ................ 6 Epperson v. Arkansas (1968) ............................................................................ 6 McLean v. Arkansas (1982) .............................................................................. 6 Edwards v. Aguillard (1987) ............................................................................. 7 Section IV. The ID movement’s aims and strategy .............................................................. 9 The “Wedge Strategy” .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Look at Mathematics and Theology Philip J
    Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal Issue 27 Article 14 Winter 1-1-2004 A Brief Look at Mathematics and Theology Philip J. Davis Brown University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/hmnj Part of the Logic and Foundations of Mathematics Commons, Mathematics Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Philip J. (2004) "A Brief Look at Mathematics and Theology," Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal: Iss. 27, Article 14. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/hmnj/vol1/iss27/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 A Brief Look at Mathematics and Theology Philip J. Davis "Such a really remarkable discovery. I wanted your opinion on it. You know the formula m over naught equals infinity, m being any positive number? [m/0 = ]. Well, why not reduce the equation to a simpler form by multiplying both sides by naught? In which case you have m equals infinity times naught [m = x 0]. That is to say, a positive number is the product of zero and infinity. Doesn't that demonstrate the creation of the Universe by an infinite power out of nothing? Doesn't it?" Aldous Huxley, Point Counter Point, (1928), Chapter XI. I Introduction We are living in a mathematical age. Our lives, from the personal to the communal, from the communal to the international, from the biological and physical to the economic and even to the ethical, are increasingly mathematicized.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Washington University St. Louis: Open Scholarship Washington University Law Review Volume 83 Issue 1 2005 Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution Matthew J. Brauer Princeton University Barbara Forrest Southeastern Louisiana University Steven G. Gey Florida State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Education Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Religion Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Matthew J. Brauer, Barbara Forrest, and Steven G. Gey, Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution, 83 WASH. U. L. Q. 1 (2005). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol83/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington University Law Quarterly VOLUME 83 NUMBER 1 2005 IS IT SCIENCE YET?: INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONISM AND THE CONSTITUTION MATTHEW J. BRAUER BARBARA FORREST STEVEN G. GEY* TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions David Berlinski
    pdf The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions David Berlinski - free pdf download The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions PDF, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions PDF Download, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions Download PDF, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions by David Berlinski Download, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions Full Collection, PDF The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions Free Download, online free The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions, pdf download The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions, Download Free The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions Book, pdf free download The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions David Berlinski pdf, David Berlinski epub The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions, pdf David Berlinski The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions, Download The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions E-Books, Read Online The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions E-Books, Read Best Book The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions Online, Read The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions Books Online Free, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions PDF read online, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions Read Download, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism And Its Scientific Pretensions Books Online, CLICK FOR DOWNLOAD Wow. Dot much. And if i were or someone who is not a fan of history i 'm not sure ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwins-Corrosive-Idea.Pdf
    This report was prepared and published by Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture, a non-profit, non-partisan educational and research organization. The Center’s mission is to advance the understanding that human beings and nature are the result of intelligent design rather than a blind and undirected process. We seek long-term scientific and cultural change through cutting-edge scientific research and scholarship; education and training of young leaders; communication to the general public; and advocacy of academic freedom and free speech for scientists, teachers, and students. For more information about the Center, visit www.discovery.org/id. FOR FREE RESOURCES ABOUT SCIENCE AND FAITH, VISIT WWW.SCIENCEANDGOD.ORG/RESOURCES. PUBLISHED NOVEMBER, 2016. © 2016 BY DISCOVERY INSTITUTE. DARWIN’S CORROSIVE IDEA The Impact of Evolution on Attitudes about Faith, Ethics, and Human Uniqueness John G. West, PhD* EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In his influential book Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, have asked about the impact of science on a person’s philosopher Daniel Dennett praised Darwinian religious faith typically have not explored the evolution for being a “universal acid” that dissolves impact of specific scientific ideas such as Darwinian traditional religious and moral beliefs.1 Evolution- evolution.5 ary biologist Richard Dawkins has similarly praised In order to gain insights into the impact of Darwin for making “it possible to be an intellect- specific scientific ideas on popular beliefs about ually fulfilled atheist.”2 Although numerous studies God and ethics, Discovery Institute conducted a have documented the influence of Darwinian nationwide survey of a representative sample of theory and other scientific ideas on the views of 3,664 American adults.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Los Angeles, California 90064
    1 PARTIES 2 1. Plaintiff, AMERICAN FREEDOM ALLIANCE, (hereinafter “Plaintiff ”) is and 3 at all relevant times was a nonprofit corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of 4 California with its principal place of business in Los Angeles, California. 5 2. Defendant, CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER, (hereinafter “CENTER”) is a 6 department of the State of California, located and doing business at 700 Exposition Park Drive, 7 8 Los Angeles, CA 90037. 9 3. Defendant, CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION, (hereinafter 10 “FOUNDATION”) is and at all relevant times was a nonprofit corporation duly organized and 11 existing under the laws of California with its principal place of business in Los Angeles, Califor- 12 nia. 13 4. Defendant, JEFFREY RUDOLPH, (hereinafter “RUDOLPH”) is an individual 14 and at all relevant times is and was the President and CEO of Defendant CENTER and the Presi- 15 16 dent of Defendant FOUNDATION (see http://www.californiasciencecenter.org/GenInfo/ 17 AboutUs/Governance/Bio/Bio.php, accessed on November 16, 2009). 18 5. The true names and capacities of Defendants sued herein as DOES 1 through 50, 19 inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff, who therefore sues such Defendants by such fictitious names 20 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure §474. Plaintiff alleges that each fictitiously named Defen- 21 dant acted or failed to act in such a manner that each has contributed in proximately causing the 22 23 damages to Plaintiff as herein alleged. Plaintiff will seek leave of Court to amend this Complaint 24 to set forth their true names and capacities when ascertained.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering ID.Indd
    DISCOVERING INTELLIGENT DESIGN A JOURNEY INTO THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE Gary Kemper Hallie Kemper Casey Luskin DISCOVERY INSTITUTE PRESS, SEATTLE, WA Description The Discovering Intelligent Design textbook is part of a comprehensive curriculum that presents both the biological and cosmological evidence in support of the scientific theory of intelligent design. Developed for middle-school-age students to adults, the curriculum also includes a workbook with learning activities and a DVD with video clips keyed to the content of the textbook. Produced by Discovery Institute in conjunction with Illustra Media, the curriculum is intended for use by homeschools and private schools. The curriculum is divided into six modules that explore topics such as the origin and development of the universe, the origin of biological complexity, the fossil record’s evidence (or lack thereof) for universal common descent, and the broader cultural debate over intelligent design. More information can be obtained by visiting the curriculum’s website, http://discoveringid.org. Copyright Notice Copyright © 2013 by Gary Kemper, Hallie Kemper, and Casey Luskin. All Rights Reserved. Library Cataloging Data Discovering Intelligent Design: A Journey into the Scientific Evidence by Gary Kemper, Hallie Kemper, and Casey Luskin 286 pages, 8.5 x 11x 0.6 inches or 280 x 216 x 15 mm, 1.5 lbs or 680 g. Library of Congress Control Number: 2013934288 BISAC: SCI015000 SCIENCE/Cosmology BISAC: SCI027000 SCIENCE/Life Sciences/Evolution BISAC: SCI034000 SCIENCE/History BISAC: SCI075000 SCIENCE/Philosophy & Social Aspects ISBN-13: 978-1-936599-08-0 ISBN-10: 1936599082 Publisher Information Discovery Institute Press, 208 Columbia Street, Seattle, WA 98104 http://www.discoveryinstitutepress.com Published in the United States of America on acid-free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the BEGINNING and Other Essays on Intelligent Design (2Nd Edition)
    IN THE BEGINNING and Other Essays on Intelligent Design (2nd Edition) IN THE BEGINNING and Other Essays on Intelligent Design (2nd Edition) GRANVILLE SEWELL Mathematics Department University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, Texas 79968 Discovery Institute Press Seattle, WA Description In this revised and expanded collection of essays on origins, mathemati- cian Granville Sewell looks at the big bang, the fine-tuning of the laws of physics, and (especially) the evolution of life. Sewell explains why evolution is a fundamentally different and much more difficult problem than others solved by science, and why increasing numbers of scientists are now recognizing what has long been obvious to the layman, that there is no explanation possible without design. This book summarizes many of the traditional arguments for intelligent design, but presents some powerful new arguments as well. Granville Sewell is Professor of Mathematics at the University of Texas at El Paso. He has written four books on numerical analysis, and is the author of a widely-used finite element computer program. Copyright Notice Copyright c 2015 by Granville Sewell. All Rights Reserved. Publisher’s Note This book is part of a series published by the Center for Science & Culture at Discovery Institute in Seattle. Previous books include Why Is a Fly Not a Horse? by Guiseppe Sermonti, The Deniable Darwin and Other Essays by David Berlinski, Darwin’s Conservatives: The Misguided Quest, by John G. West, and Traipsing into Evolution: Intelligent Design and the Kitzmiller vs. Dover Decision,
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION JEFFREY MICHAEL SELMAN, et al., ) No. 1:02-CV-2325-CC ) Plaintiffs, ) BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE ) OF COLORADO CITIZENS v. ) FOR SCIENCE, KANSAS ) CITIZENS FOR SCIENCE, COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., ) MICHIGAN CITIZENS FOR ) SCIENCE, NEBRASKA Defendants. ) RELIGIOUS COALITION ) FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION, NEW MEXICO ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, NEW MEXICANS FOR SCIENCE AND REASON, NEW MEXICO COALITION FOR EXCELLENCE IN SCIENCE AND MATH EDUCATION, AND TEXAS CITIZENS FOR SCIENCE, IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS LYNN FANT 254963 Counsel of Record P.O. Box 668 Marietta, GA 30061-0668 Tel: (770) 590-7294 Attorney for Amici Curiae Colorado Citizens for Science, et al. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................ii INTRODUCTION ...............................................1 IDENTITY AND INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ....................1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ......................................2 ARGUMENT ...................................................2 I. INTELLIGENT DESIGN ADVOCATES MISREPRESENT EVOLUTIONARY SCIENCE ..................................2 II. THERE IS NO GENUINE SCIENTIFIC CONTROVERSY OVER THE VALIDITY OF EVOLUTION ..............................6 CONCLUSION .................................................10 - i - TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Cases Freiler v. Tangipahoa Parish Bd. of Educ., 185 F.3d 337 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1251 (2000)) ....................................6 Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) .........6 Everson v. Board of Ed. of Ewing Tp., 330 U.S. 1 (1947). .................9 Other Texts Gary L Bennett, A Review of Of Pandas and People as a Textbook Supplement, NCSE Reports, Nov. 2000 .......................................7 Marshall Berman, Intelligent Design Creationism: A Threat to Society--Not Just Biology, The American Biology Teacher, Nov. 2003 ......................5 Wesley R. Elsberry, et al., The “Meyer 2004" Medley, Panda’s Thumb .......9 Douglas J.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin's Doubt
    Debating Darwin’s Doubt A Scientific Controversy that Can No Longer Be Denied DAVID KLINGHOFFER, EDITOR DISCOVERY INSTITUTE PRESS SEATTLE 2015 Description This book contains essays responding to criticism of Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design by Stephen Meyer. The book explores topics such as orphan genes, cladistics, small shelly fossils, protein evolution, the length of the Cambrian explosion, the God-of-the-Gaps objection to intelligent design, and criticisms raised by proponents of theistic evolution. Contributors include Stephen Meyer, Douglas Axe, David Berlinski, William Dembski, Ann Gauger, Casey Luskin, and Paul Nelson. Edited by David Klinghoffer. Copyright Notice Copyright © 2015 by Discovery Institute. All Rights Reserved. Publisher’s Note This book is part of a series published by the Center for Science & Culture at Discovery Institute in Seattle. Previous books include Signature of Controversy: Responses to CritiCs of Signature in the Cell, edited by David Klinghoffer; The Myth of Junk DNA by Jonathan Wells; The Deniable Darwin & Other Essays by David Berlinski; and DisCovering Intelligent Design: A Journey into the SCientifiC EvidenCe by Gary Kemper, Hallie Kemper, and Casey Luskin. Library Cataloging Data Debating Darwin’s Doubt: A SCientifiC Controversy that Can No Longer Be Denied Edited by David Klinghoffer. BISAC Subject: SCI027000 SCIENCE / Life Sciences / Evolution BISAC Subject: SCI080000 SCIENCE / Essays BISAC Subject: SCI034000 SCIENCE / History ISBN-13: 978-1-936599-30-1 (Kindle) 978-1-936599-31-8 (EPUB) 978-1-936599-28-8 (paperback) Publisher Information Discovery Institute Press, 208 Columbia Street, Seattle, WA 98101 Internet: http://www.discoveryinstitutepress.com/ First Edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Beyond Religion As Science: "Unstifling" Worldview Formation in American Public Education
    Getting Beyond Religion as Science: "Unstifling" Worldview Formation in American Public Education Barry P. McDonald* Abstract Since ancient times, Western civilization has witnessed a great debate over a simple but profound question: From whence did we come? Two major worldviews have dominated that debate: a theistic worldview holding that we, and the world in which we live, are the purposeful product of a supernatural creator; and a materialistic worldview holding that we are the product of unintelligent and random natural forces. This debate rose to the fore with Darwin’s publication of his theory of evolution and the development of the modern scientific establishment. In America, it initially took its most conspicuous form in efforts by creationists to ban the teaching of evolution in American public schools, and then to have creationism taught as science. After legal setbacks based on the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, that effort morphed into the intelligent design movement of the past couple of decades. That movement’s aim to gain a place in the science curriculum recently stalled with a court ruling that it was, like the creationists before it, attempting to teach religious concepts as science. Most recently, a notable group of scientists and atheists have reversed the trend of defending science against religious attacks and launched a very public and aggressive campaign against religion itself. Prominent scientists and other believers have responded with works attempting to reconcile science and faith. * Associate Professor of Law, Pepperdine University School of Law. J.D., Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (1988). I would like to extend my grateful thanks and appreciation to Kent Greenawalt, Kurt Lash, and Steve Smith for some very helpful comments on this Article.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download Deniable Darwin & Other Essays Ebook, Epub
    DENIABLE DARWIN & OTHER ESSAYS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK David Berlinski, David Klinghoffer | 558 pages | 01 Feb 2010 | Discovery Institute | 9780979014123 | English | United States Deniable Darwin & Other Essays PDF Book Alongside an up-to-date introduction to a core philosophical stance, each contributor provides a critical response to their opponent and clear explanation of their view. Although Berlinski is neither despondent nor faithful, just amusingly amused The full text of this article in PDF format can be obtained by clicking here. And 6 percent is better than 5, 7 percent better than 6, and so on up the gradual, continuous series. Something that is unsatisfying when reading David Berlinski is that he always seems to reach the conclusion that nothing has been concluded. No evidence in the vast literature of heredity changes shows unambiguous evidence that random mutation itself, even with geographical isolation of populations, leads to speciation. His critics, who are given many pages in this work to refute his theories, mainly drop to name calling and constantly refer to him as a "fundamentalist Christian" and "creationist". Lists with This Book. Berlinski comes across as the brilliant teacher that is unable to connect to his students and it shows with how he chooses to write and get his point across. Antony Flew — was a celebrated atheist who defended atheism against C. This process is iterated and iterated again. And for obvious reasons: complex objects are useful islands, isolated amid an archipelago of useless possibilities. Organized as a writhing ball, the sequences resemble a planet-sized object, one as large as pale Pluto.
    [Show full text]