Woolly Apple Aphid: Interactions Within an Orchard System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Woolly Apple Aphid: Interactions Within an Orchard System (,)Ì lGl'1 US WOOLLY APPLE APHID: INTERACTIONS WITHIN AN ORCHARD SYSTEM BY FRANCES FITZGIBBON B. Sc. University of Victoria (Canada) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of.PhilosoPhY ln The University of Adelaide Faculty of Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Department of Crop Protection Waite Agricultural Research Institute The University of Adelaide August 1996 TO HAROLD F. MADSEN l92L - L987 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures vii List of Tables X Summary xiv Declaration xvi Acknowledgments xvii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER T\ryO A SURVEY OF APPLE GROWERS OF THE ADELAIDE HILLS REGION OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA 2,1, Abstract 6 2.2. Introduction l 2.3. Materials and Methods 8 2.4. Results 10 2.5. Discussion I7 CHAPTER THREE BIOLOGY OF WOOLLY APPLE APHID, Eriosoma lanigerum AND ITS PARASITE' Aphelinus mali 3.1. Abstract 22 3.2. Introduction 23 3.2.1. \ù/oolly apple aphid 23 3.2.2. Aphelinus mali 25 3.3. Materials and Methods 26 3.3.1. Woolly apple aphid 27 3.3.2. Aphelinus mali 27 3.3.2.I. Developmental times 27 3.3.2.2. Sex ratio 28 3.3.2.3. Adult life span 28 3.3.3. Statistical analysis 28 3.4. Results 29 3.4.1. Woolly apple aphid 29 3.4.2. Aphelinus mali 31 3.5. Discussion 33 CHAPTER FOUR INSECTICIDE TOXICITY TO WOOLLY APPLE APHID AND ITS PARASITOID, Aphelinus mali, UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS 4.I. Abstract 36 4.2. Introduction 37 4.3. Materials and Methods 40 4.3.1. Aphid colonies 40 4.3.2. Aphelinus mali 42 4.3.2.1. Pre-mummy (larval) stage 42 4.3.2.2. Mummies 42 4.3.2.3. Adult parasitoids 43 4.3.3. Statistical analysis 45 4.4. Results 46 4.4.1. Aphid colonies 46 4.4,2. Aphelinus mali 48 4.4.2:1. Pre-mummY (larval) stage 48 4.4.2.2. Mummies 49 4.4.2.3. Adult parasitoids 55 4.5. Discussion 5l CHAPTER FIVE EFFECTS OF WOOLLY APPLE APHID INFESTATION ON THE GROWTH OF YOUNG APPLE TREES UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS AND IN THE FIELD 5.1. Abstract 66 5.2. Introduction 61 5.3. Materials and Methods - Laboratory Experiment 70 5.3.1. Experimental design 70 5.3.2. Plant conditioning and initiation of the experiment 70 5.3.3. Statistical analysis 72 5.4. Results - Laboratory Experiment 13 5.4.I. Experiment 1 14 5.4.2. Experiment 2 76 5.4.3. Experiment 3 19 5.5. Materials and Methods - Field Experiment 83 5.5.1. Experimental design 83 5.5.2. Year One 83 5.5.3. Year Two 86 5.5.4. Statistical analysis 88 5.6. Results - Field Experiment 88 5.6.1. Year One 88 5.6.1.1. Biological overview 88 5.6.1.2. Tree growth 90 5.6.1.3. Leaf growth 9l 5.6.I.4. Aphid numbers 96 5.6.2. Year Two 98 5.6.2.1. Biological overview 98 5.6.2.2. Tree growth 100 5.6.2.3. Leaf and shoot growth 101 5.7. Discussion 103 CHAPTER SIX SEASONAL ACTIVITY OF WOOLLY APPLE APHID ON MATURE TREES 6.1. Abstract rt4 6.2. Introduction 115 6.3. Materials and Methods 118 6.3.I. Colony distribution and number 118 6.3.2. Seasonal movements of aphids r22 6.4. Results r23 6.4.1. Colony distribution and number t23 6.4.2. Seasonal movements t29 6.5. Discussion r33 CHAPTER SEVEN SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS T.L SummarY t4r 7.2. Conclusions 148 APPENDIX ONE A SURVEY OF APPLE GROWERS IN THE ADELAIDE HILLS REGION OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA t49 APPBNDIX TWO METHODS FOR GROWING APPLE SEEDLINGS UNDER SEMI.CONTROLLED CONDITIONS 160 APPENDIX THREE METHODS FOR REARING \ryOOLLY APPLE APHID AND Aphelinus malí IN THE LABORATORY A3.1 Introduction r62 A3.2 Materials and Methods 163 A3.3 Discussion r66 APPENDIX FOUR LEAF AREA DETERMINATION OF APPLE LEAVES A4.I. Abstract r67 A4..2. Introduction t67 A4.3. Materials and Methods 168 A4.4. Results and Discussion r69 APPENDIX FIVE ESTIMATION OF THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS \ryITHIN WOOLLY APPLE APHID COLONIES 45.1. Abstract n0 A5.2. Introduction no 45.3. Materials and Methods r7r 45.4. Results and Discussion r72 APPENDIXSIX RELATIONSHIPSBETWEEN WOOLLY APPLE APHID INFESTATION AND TREE GROWTH UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS 114 APPENDIXSEVEN RELATIONSHIPSBET\ryEEN WOOLLY APPLE APHID INFESTATION AND TREE GROWTH IN THE FIELD 180 REFERENCES 195 vil LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER TWO Figure 2.L. Per cent of growers' affirmative response to survey questions. 13 Figure 2.2. Per cent of growers' affirmative response to survey questions. 15 Figure 2.3. Per cent of growers' affirmative response to survey questions' 16 CHAPTER THREE Figure 3.1. Relationship between temperature and developmental rate (l/days to complete development) of WAA. 30 Figure 3.2. Relationship between temperature and developmental rate (l/days to complete development) of A. mali. 32 CHAPTER FOUR Figure 4.L. Aluminium spray cages for adult A. mali' 44 Figure 4.2. Mean per cent reduction (t standard error)of live WAA colonies 24 hours post spray. 41 Figure 4.3. Life span (mean * standard eror) (days) of adult A- mali adúlts emerging aftèr treatment at the pre-munìmy stage (four days after oviposition). 50 Figure 4.4. Life span (mean * standard error) (days) of adult A. mali adults emerging aftèr treatment at the late post-mummy stage (10 days after egg lay). 54 Figure 4.5. Time to death (mean * standard error) (days) of adult A. mali after 24 hours exposure to pesticides in 'sandwich' cages. 56 CHAPTER FIVE Figure 5.1. Relationship between tree parameters (mean t standard error) and woolly apple aphid densities over time in Experiment 1. 75 Figure 5.2. Relationship between tree parameters (mean * standard error) and woolly apple aphid densities over time in Experiment2' 78 Figure 5.3. Relationship between tree parameters (mean t standard error) and woolly apple aphid densities over time in Experiment 3' 80 vlll Figure 5.4. Number (mean * standard error) of aphids on trees infested with difierent densities of woolly apple aphid in three experiments. 81 Figure 5.5. Relationships between tree parameters_(mean t standard error) anã woolly apple aphid diensities during Year 1 (1989-1990) and Year 2 (1990-1991) in Block A. 92 Figure 5.6. Relationships between tree p¿ìrameters (mean * standard error) and woolly apple aphid densities during Year 1 (1989-1990) and Year 2 (1990-1991) in Block B. 93 Figure 5.7. Relationships between tree parameters (mean * standard error) and woolly apple aphid densities during Year 1 (1989-1990) and Year 2 (1990-1991) in Block C. 94 Figure 5.8. Number (mean t standard error) of colonies and aphids_ on treés infested with different densities of woolly apple aphid in Year 1 (1e89-19e0). 97 Figure 5.9. Percentage of trees that were dormant or dead in three blocks (combined) during Year 2 (1990-1991). 99 CHAPTER SIX Figure 6.1. Tree divided into (A) height strata and (B) directional quadrants. t20 Figure 6.2. Total number (mean t standard error) of WAA colonies on trees through the season. 124 Figure 6.3. Percentage (mean * standard error) of total V/AA colonies counted in the first season (1989). t26 Figure 6.4. Percentage (mean t standard error) of total WAA colonies counted in the second season (1989-1990). r28 Figure 6.5. mean (+ standard error) number of WAA/mm tape caught on sticky tape traps 131 Figure 6.6. Aphids caught on the lower trunk traps expressed as a percentage of the total aphids caught on both the lower and upper traps. t32 APPENDIX ONE Figure 4L.1. Per cent of growers' affirmative response to survey questions r57 Figure A1.2. Per cent of growers' affîrmative response to survey questions 158 Figure 4L.3. Per cent of growers' affirmative response to survey questions 159 lx APPENDIX THREE Figure 43.1. Lantern globe cage used in rearing woolly apple aphid and A. mali under laboratory conditions. 164 APPENDIX SEVEN Figure A7.1. Relationships between tree parameters_ (me^an + standard error) anã woolly apple aphid infèstation during Year 2 (1990-1991) t94 X LIST OF TABLES CHAPTER THREE Table 3.1. The durations (mean * standard error) of the life stages of WAA reared on small apple seedlings at three constant temperatures. 30 Table 3.2. The durations (mean * standard error) of development from egg lay to mummification and from mummification to emergence of A. mali. 31 Table 3.3. Mean (+ standard error) life span (days) of male and female A. mali at three constant temperatures. 32 CHAPTER FOUR Table 4.1. Trade names, common name, class and field rates of 10 pesticides tested against WAA colonies andAphelinus mali. 4I Table 4.2. Per cent emergence, mean time to emergence, sex ratio and mean life span of A. mali ãfter being treated with pesticides at the pre- mummy (larval) stage. 49 Table 4.3. Per cent emergence, mean time to emergence, sex ratio and mean life span of A. mali áfter being treated with pesticides at the post- mummy stage. 51 Table 4.4. Per cent emergence, mean time to emergence, sex ratio and mean life span of A. mali after being treated with pesticides at the post- munìmy stage, Potter's Tower. 53 CHAPTER FIVE Table 5.L. P values of the F statistic comparing the regression lines for tree height, total leaf number, total leaf area of trees infested with different densities of woolly apple aphid in Experiment 1.
Recommended publications
  • MF3546 Woolly Apple Aphid
    Woolly Apple Aphid Insect Pest of Apple Trees The woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum, is native to waxy, filaments (Figure 3) that protect them from preda- the United States and a major insect pest of young (2- to tors and insecticide spray applications. Adults are red- 3-year-old) apple, Malus domestica, trees (Figure 1). This brown to purple. Woolly apple aphid colonies appear as publication provides information on pest biology and cottony masses clustered near wounds or pruning cuts damage and addresses management strategies that can be (Figure 4) or on the trunks or branches of apple trees used to mitigate plant damage caused by the woolly apple (Figure 5). Woolly apple aphids can be found on water aphid. sprouts emerging from the base of apple trees. Biology First-instar nymphs emerge from the soil in the spring and move up and down the trunk of apple trees. From summer There are four nymphal instars (stages between each molt) through fall, woolly apple aphid nymphs feed on the roots and an adult female ranging in size from 1/40 to 1/14 or on the trunk, branches, and twigs. Woolly apple aphid inches (0.64 to 1.84 mm) in length. Females produce live overwinters as a nymph on the roots or as a nymph located nymphs that are dark red-brown to salmon in color. As on the trunk, main branches, pruning wounds, or cracks woolly apple aphid nymphs feed, they become purple in and crevices in the bark of apple trees. color (Figure 2) and covered by white, cottony, thread-like, Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Rearing and Release of Aphelinus Mali (Hald) (Hymenoptera
    Academic Journal of Entomology 4 (3): 108-113, 2011 ISSN 1995-8994 © IDOSI Publications, 2011 Rearing and Release of Aphelinus mali (Hald) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), the Sole Parasitoid of Woolly Apple Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann) (Homoptera: Eriosomatidae) on Apple orchards in Ash-Shoubak 12Mazen Ateyyat, Marwan Al-Awamleh and2 Hassan El-Osofi 1Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Al-Balqa’ Applied University, 19117 Al-Salt, Jordan 2National Center of Agricultural Research and Extension, Al Baqa', Jordan Abstract: Aphelinus mali (Hald) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) is the sole parasitoid of woolly apple aphid (WAA), Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann) (Homoptera: Eriosomatidae). Five ratios of parasitoid to aphid colonies were tested to determine the suitable amount of the parasitoid that gives the highest percentage of parasitism under greenhouse conditions. Curve fitting using Table Curve program showed that releasing 6 pairs of unsexed A. mali adults to 100 colonies of WAA results in 98.7 % of parasitism of WAA after 10 days of releasing adults of parasitoids. A valuable suppression of WAA in 2010 was recorded in two apple orchards where the parasitoid was released compared with the orchard in which no release of the parasitoid was done. However, the continuous use of pesticides by apple orchardists in the apple orchards near the experimental orchards resulted in decreasing parasitism rates in 2011 in the apple orchards where release was done due to the movement of WAA from pesticide-controlled orchards to parasitoid-controlled orchards. The government represented by ministry of agriculture is requested to apply a legislation that prevent apple orchardists use insecticides in order to give good opportunity of the parasitoid to build itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological and Logistical Considerations Toward Introducing Heringia Calcarata to New Zealand
    Ecological and logistical considerations toward introducing Heringia calcarata to New Zealand Sean D. M. Gresham Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Science in Life Science In Entomology J. Christopher Bergh (Committee Chair) Loke T. Kok Scott M. Salom 28 January 2013 Blacksburg, VA Keywords: Eriosoma lanigerum, Heringia calcarata, Aphelinus mali, Intraguild predation, biological control, ovary development, captive rearing Ecological and logistical considerations toward introducing Heringia calcarata to New Zealand Sean D. M. Gresham Abstract This thesis outlines research conducted as part of a collaborative project between Virginia Tech and Plant and Food Research New Zealand (PFRNZ) to introduce Heringia calcarata (Loew) (Diptera: Syrphidae) to New Zealand (NZ) for biological control of woolly apple aphid (WAA), Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Ultimately, the introduction of H. calcarata to New Zealand will be contingent upon satisfying regulatory requirements and concerns, including documentation that it will not have an adverse effect on the existing biological control of WAA by Aphelinus mali (Haldeman) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). As well, it will be critical to develop methods for sustained rearing of H. calcarata in captivity. Basic and applied studies were conducted toward providing essential information for advancing this project. Apple shoot sections with a WAA colony that did or did not contain mummified aphids parasitized by A. mali were deployed in pairs at the base of apple trees. There was no significant difference in the mean number of H. calcarata eggs deposited between shoots with parasitized (1.5 ± 0.34 SE) and non-parasitized colonies (1.75 ± 0.42 SE), although female H.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Ecology of Aphelinus Certus, an Adventive Parasitoid of Soybean Aphid in North America, with Implications for Biological Control
    Population ecology of Aphelinus certus, an adventive parasitoid of soybean aphid in North America, with implications for biological control A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY James Rudolph Miksanek IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY George E. Heimpel, Adviser May 2020 © 2020 James Rudolph Miksanek All rights reserved. Chapter 1 has been published in PLoS One. Permission for use is granted by the primary author, James Rudolph Miksanek. Chapter 3 has been published in Biological Control. Permission for use is granted by the primary author, James Rudolph Miksanek. Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, George Heimpel, for his unwavering support throughout my graduate career. He has provided me with an in-depth introduction into the world of parasitoids, challenged me with a variety of research projects, and has encouraged my participation in an array of academic and professional meetings. I have also been extremely fortunate to share with George my personal interests in birding and jazz guitar. I thank my committee members—Dave Andow, Robert Koch, and Robert Venette—for their invaluable advice along the way. I would also like to thank Anthony Ives and Mary Marek-Spartz for fruitful discussions on mathematical modeling, as well as Kelton Welch, who has shared with me fascinating insights into ecological theory. Jonathan Dregni, too, has been helpful in contributing his knowledge of Aphelinus and the soybean aphid system, as well as in his hard work maintaining laboratory colonies of the study system. I also thank Henry Davis, who was not only a great help in conducting field research, but whose work ethic and positive attitude is something that I will always aspire towards.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficial Insects of Utah Guide
    BENEFICIAL INSECTS OF UTAH beneficial insects & other natural enemies identification guide PUBLICATION COORDINATORS AND EDITORS Cami Cannon (Vegetable IPM Associate and Graphic Design) Marion Murray (IPM Project Leader) AUTHORS Cami Cannon Marion Murray Ron Patterson (insects: ambush bug, collops beetle, red velvet mite) Katie Wagner (insects: Trichogramma wasp) IMAGE CREDITS All images are provided by Utah State University Extension unless otherwise noted within the image caption. CONTACT INFORMATION Utah State University IPM Program Dept. of Biology 5305 Old Main Hill Logan, UT 84322 (435) 797-0776 utahpests.usu.edu/IPM FUNDING FOR THIS PUBLICATION WAS PROVIDED BY: USU Extension Grants Program CONTENTS PREFACE Purpose of this Guide ................................................................6 Importance of Natural Enemies ..................................................6 General Practices to Enhance Natural Enemies ...........................7 Plants that will Enhance Natural Enemy Populations ..................7 PREDATORS Beetles .....................................................................................10 Flies .........................................................................................24 Lacewings/Dustywings .............................................................32 Mites ........................................................................................36 Spiders .....................................................................................42 Thrips ......................................................................................44
    [Show full text]
  • For Biological Control of the Soybean Aphid, Aphis Glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae), in the Continental United States
    United States Department of Agriculture Field Release of Aphelinus Marketing and Regulatory glycinis (Hymenoptera: Programs Animal and Aphelinidae) for Biological Plant Health Inspection Service Control of the Soybean Aphid, Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae), in the Continental United States Environmental Assessment, September 2012 Field Release of Aphelinus glycinis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) for Biological Control of the Soybean Aphid, Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae), in the Continental United States Environmental Assessment, September 2012 Agency Contact: Shirley Wager-Page, Branch Chief Pest Permitting Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Road, Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737–1236 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention of companies or commercial products in this report does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees or warrants the standard of any product mentioned. Product names are mentioned solely to report factually on available data and to provide specific information.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Synthesis for the State of the World’S Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture
    REGIONAL SYNTHESIS REPORTS LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN REGIONAL SYNTHESIS FOR THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN REGIONAL SYNTHESIS FOR THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ROME, 2019 Required citation: FAO. 2019. Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Synthesis for The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca7125en. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-131991-8 © FAO, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/ legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • And How Ecological Solutions Can Bloom the Bitter Taste of Europe's
    The Bitter Taste of Europe’s Apple Production and how Ecological Solutions can Bloom June 2015 The Bitter Taste and how Ecological of Europe’s Apple Solutions can Bloom Introduction:Production The Bitter Taste of Europe’s Apple Production and how Ecological Solutions can Bloom Apple and fruit production is one of the most chemical intensive sectors Seven of the pesticides found are currently not approved for use in the in Europe’s agriculture. Considering that the EU-27 is one of the world’s EU and can only be used with exceptional member state authorisations. leading producersPreface: and consumers of Food apples, and thatfor apples Life are EU- These residues may be present as a result of historical use of these 27’s most popular fruit1, the importance of this sector becomes clear. pesticides, although in the case of carbendazim could result from Producing our food within an agricultural system highly dependent on degradation of other active ingredients. synthetic-chemical pesticides doesn’t come without consequences. Five samples exceed the average Environmental Quality Standards for High The impacts of industrial agriculture are widespread, ranging from Priority Water Contaminants of the EU Water Framework Directive, and two contaminated soil and water, to impacts on bees and other beneficial of them even exceed the maximum standard (chlorpyrifos-ethyl from Italy). insects, as well as on farmers, their families and consumers. The growing concern about Europe’s massive pesticide use goes hand in hand with an Given the cocktails of pesticides detected in the water and soil of apple increasing need to search for ecological solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Knowledge-Based Decision Support System for Integrated Control of Woolly Apple Aphid, Eriosoma Lanigerum, with Maximal
    insects Article Towards a Knowledge-Based Decision Support System for Integrated Control of Woolly Apple Aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum, with Maximal Biological Suppression by the Parasitoid Aphelinus mali Eva Bangels 1,† , Ammar Alhmedi 1, Wannes Akkermans 1, Dany Bylemans 1,2 and Tim Belien 1,*,† 1 Zoology Department, Research Centre for Fruit Cultivation (Pcfruit Npo), Fruittuinweg 1, B-3800 Sint-Truiden, Belgium; [email protected] (E.B.); [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (W.A.); [email protected] (D.B.) 2 Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Decroylaan 42, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-(0)11-69-71-30 † Both authors contributed equally to this work. Simple Summary: The woolly apple aphid Eriosoma lanigerum is an important pest in apple orchards worldwide. At present, effective limitation of woolly aphid populations relies on a good synergy between chemical control treatments and biological suppression by beneficial insects, especially by its main specific natural enemy, the parasitic wasp (parasitoid) Aphelinus mali. In order to reach maximum control levels on woolly apple aphids and avoid negative side effects on A. mali, Citation: Bangels, E.; Alhmedi, A.; decision support for the optimal timing and positioning of control treatments is needed. In this Akkermans, W.; Bylemans, D.; Belien, study, we developed prediction models that based on the weather conditions (temperature data) can T. Towards a Knowledge-Based reasonably accurately predict crucial development/activity phases of both insects in the orchard. Decision Support System for Integrated Control of Woolly Apple These prediction models can be utilized to target insecticide sprayings at the most sensitive stage of Aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum, with the pest (woolly apple aphids) and/or to avoid insecticide sprayings with detrimental side effects at Maximal Biological Suppression by the vulnerable stage of the beneficial insect (parasitoid A.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicity of Pymetrozine and Thiamethoxam to Aphelinus Gossypii 459
    Toxicity of pymetrozine and thiamethoxam to Aphelinus gossypii 459 Toxicity of pymetrozine and thiamethoxam to Aphelinus gossypii and Delphastus pusillus(1) Jorge Braz Torres(2), Christian Sherley Araujo Silva-Torres(2) and José Vargas de Oliveira(2) Abstract – The objective of this work was to study the toxicity of pymetrozine and thiamethoxam to the cotton aphid parasitoid Aphelinus gossypii Timberlake and to the whitefly predator Delphastus pusillus (LeConte). Cotton leaves containing mummies of the parasitoid A. gossypii were collected and treated with seven concentrations of both insecticides. Parasitoid emergence was not affected by pymetrozine and ranged from 59.9% to 75.0%, but decreased with the increase of thiamethoxam concentrations ranging from 30.2% to 69.6%. Cotton leaves infested by whitefly and treated with recommended rates of both insecticides were collected three hours, three days and six days after spraying and colonized with larvae and adults of D. pusillus. Predators released on thiamethoxam- treated leaves experienced mortality from 70% to 100%, while those released on pymetrozine-treated leaves showed mortality from 0% to 20%. Topical toxicity from both insecticides was studied on larvae, pupae and adults of D. pusillus. The survival of predator after six days of exposure to 400, 600 and 800 mg/L of pymetrozine a.i. was higher than 69.6%, and to 25, 100 and 200 mg/L of thiamethoxam a.i. was lower than 8.7%. The toxicity data for A. gossypii and D. pusillus characterize the pymetrozine as harmless for both species, and thiamethoxam of low to moderate toxicity for A. gossypii treated mummies, and high toxicity for D.
    [Show full text]
  • Eriosoma Lanigerum [Hausmann]) in Organic Apple Growing M
    Reviewed Papers 77 Efficacy evaluation of different methods for the control of woolly apple aphid (Eriosoma lanigerum [Hausmann]) in organic apple growing M. Kelderer1, E. Lardschneider1 and R. Schütz2 Abstract Since the woolly apple aphid (Eriosoma lanigerum) is still one of the major problems in organic apple orchards, at the Research Centre Laimburg several methods for the control of this pest were tested over the last years. The effect of applications of plant protection products at different timings, of various pruning methods (used in combination with and without hail netting), and of conventional and novel rootstocks on woolly apple aphid infestations was evaluated. Adequate timing of applications of plant protection products enabled to improve pest control, and promising results were achieved with novel rootstocks. Key words: woolly apple aphid, apple, organic farming, late autumn- and early spring- applications, rootstocks Introduction Due to the not synchronized development of the parasite Aphelinus mali (Haldeman) with its host E. lanigerum under Central European climatic conditions, this natural enemy is rarely effective enough to prevent infestations (Hetebrügge et al., 2006). The second most important natural antagonist of woolly apple aphid, the European earwig Forficula auricularia (Linnaeus), usually starts to move into trees and to feed on woolly apple aphids from the third nymphal stage (approx. mid July) onwards. At this point, however, the summer populations of E. lanigerum are already present, and extensive damage to trees may already have occurred (Gobin et al., 2008). In addition, population levels of F. auricularia generally vary considerably among fruit orchards, and the impact of other predators, belonging to the Chrysopidae (Schneider) and Coccinellidae (Latreille) families, on the pest populations is considered negligible.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Stakeholders' Perceptions of Using Natural Enemies
    Co-innovating in agroecology: integrating stakeholders’ perceptions of using natural enemies and landscape complexity for biological control into the research and innovation process KeyWords : Landscape, Biological pest control, Uncertainty, Collective action, Action-research Salliou Nicolas1, Barnaud Cécile1, Monteil Claude2 1 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) 2 Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse - Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Agronomie de Toulouse (INP-ENSAT) Abstract : Scientific findings in landscape ecology suggest that a patchy landscape including hedgerows, meadows and woods favours insect pest biological control by conservation of habitats for natural enemies. Some scientists foresee the possibility for farmers to act together in order to generate such conditions in their landscape. For such grass-root collective action to be possible, local stakeholders must first perceive landscape elements and/or natural enemies as resources; and the same stakeholders must be willing to co-operate through a collective management approach. Our objective was to investigate stakeholders’ perceptions of landscape elements and natural enemies in relation to the potential for innovation in the form of coordinated management of the landscape. To do this, we used a participatory research approach in an area specialized in fruit tree production in south-west France, known for its high pest pressure and use of insecticides in orchards, and consequently high risk associated with any alternative approach in this domain. We conducted thirty comprehensive interviews with stakeholders about their pest control strategy to explore their perceptions of landscape elements and natural enemies in particular. The results indicated that natural predators were regularly perceived as resources. Stakeholders mostly perceived them as public goods requiring public institution interventions for their conservation, acclimation and management.
    [Show full text]