FISSURE FORMATION and SUBSURFACE SUBSIDENCE in a COALBED FIRE Taku S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FISSURE FORMATION and SUBSURFACE SUBSIDENCE in a COALBED FIRE Taku S FISSURE FORMATION AND SUBSURFACE SUBSIDENCE IN A COALBED FIRE Taku S. Ide 1, David Pollard 2, and Franklin M. Orr, Jr. 3 1,3 Dept. of Energy Resources and Engineering, 2 Dept. of Geological and Environmental Sciences Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 e-mail: [email protected] was started in May of 1962 when the local government Abstract decided to burn an unregulated trash dump in an abandoned strip mine to reduce trash volume and Coalbed fires are uncontrolled subsurface fires control rodents. The fire ignited an anthracite outcrop, that occur around the world. These fires are believed to eventually connected to and spread through be significant contributors to annual CO emissions. 2 underground tunnels, and has been burning since. Although many of these fires have been burning for Fissures created by the coal fire emit assorted hot gases, decades, researchers have only recently begun to some of which are toxic. A combination of subsidence investigate physical mechanisms that control fire and emissions from fissures has caused the town of behavior. One aspect of fire behavior that is poorly Centralia to be abandoned (DeKok, 1986, GAI characterized is the relationship between subsurface Consultants, 1983). combustion and surface fissures. At the surface above The particular fire examined in this study, called many fires, long, wide fissures are observed. At a the North Coalbed Fire, to distinguish it from other coalbed fire near Durango, CO., these fissures form active fires in the region, was discovered in 1998 on the systematic orthogonal patterns that align with regional Southern Ute Indian Reservation when sets of fissures joints in the Upper Cretaceous Fruitland Formation. that are orthogonal to each other—similar to those at Understanding the mechanisms that form these fissures other coal fires around the world—appeared at the is important, as the fissures are believed to play vital surface (Williamson, 1999). Anecdotal evidences roles in sustaining the combustion in the subsurface. In provided by local Southern Ute Tribe members (Ide, some of the coalbed fire simulation models available 2007) suggest that the fire may have been smoldering today, these fissures are treated as fixed boundary for decades prior to the reported date of discovery. The conditions. We argue, using data collected, field fire continues to burn today. The research effort observations and simulation result, that there exists a described here is an attempt to understand whether coal relationship between the location and magnitude of combustion followed by subsurface subsidence can subsidence caused by the fire and the opening of produce fissures with systematic patterns at the surface. fissures. The results presented suggest that fissures are Subsidence can occur when a burned coalseam loses its believed to open when subsurface subsidence gives rise structural integrity and collapses under the weight of to tensile stresses around pre-existing joints. the overburden. Understanding the formation of fissures is important, as they appear to foreshadow the direction Keywords: of the combustion front propagation and may play a key coalbed fire, coal fire, subsidence , pre-existing role in sustaining the underground fire. joints, fissures, numerical modeling, CO 2 First, we summarize the San Juan Basin geology, highlighting key features in the NW section of the Introduction basin, where the coalbed fire is located. Second, we characterize the geological features and the surface Uncontrolled subsurface fires in coalbeds account anomalies in the vicinity of North Coalbed Fire. for significant releases of CO to the atmosphere. One 2 Surface topography, images of fissures overlying the of the world’s largest active coalbed fires has been coalbed fire, and measurements of fissure orientations documented in Wuda, China (Dai et al., 2002), where are presented. We also outline the process of digitizing the estimated annual loss of coal is around 200,000 features over the North Coalbed Fire and describe how tons, equivalent to a yearly emission of ~1.5Mt of CO 2 they were combined with the subsurface information (Kuenzer et al., 2005). Coalbed fires are burning in obtained from the wells drilled in the area. In the third many locations in China, Indonesia, India, and the section, the field data and previous geological surveys United States (Stracher and Taylor, 2004). They can be of the area are used to suggest how subsidence can open started naturally by forest fires that burn near an pre-existing joints in the area, leading to the formation outcrop, by lightning strikes, by human activities, or by of surface fissures over the combustion region. Finally, spontaneous exothermic reactions of pyrites (DeKok, we model this phenomenon using a simple boundary 1986). Forest fires in Indonesia in 1997 and 1998 element numerical code, and explore relationships ignited hundreds of coal fires at outcrops (Brown, among key variables that contrast subsidence activities 2003). A subsurface fire near Centralia, Pennsylvania, Stanford Rock Fracture Project Vol. 20, 2009 C-1 and surface deformation. The results and the limitations the coalbed fire, formations above the dotted line—the of applicability of this simulation model are discussed. Kirtland Shale and most of the Fruitland Formation— have been removed by weathering and erosion. The San Juan Basin Geology Kirtland Shale and the Fruitland Formation lie atop of the Pictured Cliffs Sandstone (PC), which was The San Juan Basin is an asymmetric, coal bearing deposited as regressive marine sands (Condon, 1988) basin that covers approximately 16,800 – 19,400 square parallel to the shoreline stretching northwest-southeast kilometers, stretching approximately 145km west-east (Fassett, 2000). The Fruitland Formation is a mixture of and 160km north-south (Fassett, 2000, Kelso et al., mudstones, siltsones, carbonaceous shales and coals 1988). It is located near the Four Corners, and spans deposited landward and parallel to this shoreline across northwest New Mexico and southwest Colorado (Fassett, 2000). Coalseams in the Fruitland Formation as shown in Figure 1. The basin is well characterized are often referred to as Lower Coal, Middle Coal and due to the abundance of both coal and coal-bed Upper Coal, and the thickest, most continuous coalbeds methane resources in the Upper Cretaceous Fruitland are found in the Lower Coal Zone in the northeastern Formation (Figure 2). One study has estimated that a region of the San Juan Basin (Sandberg, 1988). The coal-bed methane reserve of nearly 1.4 x 10 12 m 3 (50 x Lower Coal is burning at the North Coalbed Fire. 10 12 ft 3) adsorbed onto 219 x 10 9 metric tons of coal that underlies the San Juan Basin (Kelso et al., 1988). The flat, Central Basin is bounded by several key geologic features, which are described in detail in previous geologic surveys of the area (Fassett, 2000, Kelso et al., 1988, Lorenz and Cooper, 2000). The western and northwestern regions of the basin are circumscribed by the Defiance and the Hogback monoclines, respectively, and the Nacimiento uplift borders the basin on the east side (Lorenz and Cooper, 2000). As Figure 1 shows, the North Coalbed Fire is located along the Hogback Monocline in the northwestern portion of the basin. The Hogback monocline is believed to have formed either due to the shortening of the Cretaceous strata that induced a right- lateral strike-slip motion along the western and eastern margins during the Laramide orogeny (Lorenz and Cooper, 2000), or through reactivation of western dipping thrust faults underlying the Hogback monocline that resulted in the uplift (Taylor and Huffman, 1988). In the former view, the shortening can be attributed to the Zuni uplift thrusting northward and north northeastward into the San Juan Basin from the south, and the San Juan uplift indenting southward into the Figure 1: San Juan Basin and its characteristic basin (Lorenz and Cooper, 2000). Today, only the geologic features. The North Coalbed Fire location forelimb of the Hogback Monocline is exposed and is highlighted in the box in the northwestern corner some of the formation members of the Upper of the basin along the Hogback Monocline. The Cretaceous are exposed on the western side of the green area denotes outcrops of Pictured Cliffs basin. Along the northern perimeter of the Basin, sandstone. Figure reproduced from Lorenz and Cooper, 2003. including areas affected by the North Coalbed Fire, thick coalseams crop out along the Hogback monocline At the North Coalbed Fire, 14 boreholes were (Kaiser et al., 1991). drilled in 2007 over an area of 600m x 200m. The high Formations that make up the Upper Cretaceous density of boreholes allowed reliable subsurface rocks in the San Juan Basin are described by Molenaar correlations to be made at the site. Both the PC and the (Molenaar and Baird, 1992). The Fruitland Formation, Fruitland Formation rise in a step-like fashion from the which includes the coalbed fire, and adjacent geologic southwest to the northeast with respect to the units are depicted in the stratigraphic column in Figure isochronously deposited Huerfanito Bed in the Lewis 2. The left column is representative of the entire San shale, representing a migrating regression-transgression Juan Basin. The right column shows the top 25m of cycle over 1.2 million years (Fassett, 1971, Sandberg, rock found directly over the North Coalbed Fire. Above 1988). The deposition pattern suggests that the Stanford Rock Fracture Project Vol. 20, 2009 C-2 subsurface correlation along the shoreline in the approximately 600 m x 200m. There are signs of northwest-southeast direction is warranted, as this is the coalbed fires underlying the bare patch of land south trend of the long axis of most coal deposits (Fassett, southwest of the North Coalbed Fire, but only minor 1988). The echelon geometry of coal deposits can make surface deformation is observed; thus this area is not subsurface correlations difficult in the transverse included in the surveys.
Recommended publications
  • Forgotten Crocodile from the Kirtland Formation, San Juan Basin, New
    posed that the narial cavities of Para- Wima1l- saurolophuswere vocal resonating chambers' Goniopholiskirtlandicus Apparently included with this material shippedto Wiman was a partial skull that lromthe Wiman describedas a new speciesof croc- forgottencrocodile odile, Goniopholis kirtlandicus. Wiman publisheda descriptionof G. kirtlandicusin Basin, 1932in the Bulletin of the GeologicalInstitute KirtlandFormation, San Juan of IJppsala. Notice of this specieshas not appearedin any Americanpublication. Klilin NewMexico (1955)presented a descriptionand illustration of the speciesin French, but essentially repeatedWiman (1932). byDonald L. Wolberg, Vertebrate Paleontologist, NewMexico Bureau of lVlinesand Mineral Resources, Socorro, NIM Localityinformation for Crocodilian bone, armor, and teeth are Goni o p holi s kir t landicus common in Late Cretaceous and Early Ter- The skeletalmaterial referred to Gonio- tiary deposits of the San Juan Basin and pholis kirtlandicus includesmost of the right elsewhere.In the Fruitland and Kirtland For- side of a skull, a squamosalfragment, and a mations of the San Juan Basin, Late Creta- portion of dorsal plate. The referral of the ceous crocodiles were important carnivores of dorsalplate probably represents an interpreta- the reconstructed stream and stream-bank tion of the proximity of the material when community (Wolberg, 1980). In the Kirtland found. Figs. I and 2, taken from Wiman Formation, a mesosuchian crocodile, Gonio- (1932),illustrate this material. pholis kirtlandicus, discovered by Charles H. Wiman(1932, p. 181)recorded the follow- Sternbergin the early 1920'sand not described ing locality data, provided by Sternberg: until 1932 by Carl Wiman, has been all but of Crocodile.Kirtland shalesa 100feet ignored since its description and referral. "Skull below the Ojo Alamo Sandstonein the blue Specimensreferred to other crocodilian genera cley.
    [Show full text]
  • Central San Juan Basin
    Acta - ---- - - ---Palaeontologic- -- ---' ~ Polonica Vol. 28, No. 1-2 pp. 195-204 Warszawa, 1983 Second Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestiol. Ecosystems, Jadwisin 1981 SPENCER G. LUCAS and NIALL J. MATEER VERTEBRATE PALEOECOLOGY OF THE LATE CAMPANIAN (CRETACEOUS):FRUITLAND FORMATION, SAN JUAN BASIN, ~EW MEXICO (USA) LUCAS, s. G. and MATEER, N. J .: Vertebrate paleoecology of the late Campanian (Cretaceous) Fruitland Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico (USA). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 28, 1-2, 195-204, 1983. Sediments of the Fruitland Formation in northwestern New Mexico represent a delta plain that prograded northeastward over the retrating strandline of the. North American epeiric seaway during the late Campanian. Fruitland fossil · vertebrates are fishes, amphibians, lizards, a snake, turtles, crocodilians, dinosaurs (mostly h adrosaurs and ceratopsians) and mammals. Autochthonous fossils in the Fruitland ' Form ation represent organisms of the trophically-complex Para­ saurolophus community. Differences in diversity, physical stress and life-history strategies within the ParasaurolopllUS community . fit well the stablllty-time hypothesis. Thus, dinosaurs experienced relatively low physical stress whereas fishes, amphibians, small reptiles and mammals experienced greater physical stress. Because of this, dinosaurs were less likely to recover from an environment­ al catastrophe than were smaller contemporaneous vertebrates. The terminal Cretaceous extinctions selectively eliminated animals that lived in less physlcally­ -stressed situations, indicating that the extinctions resulted from an environmental catastrophe. Key w 0 r d s: Fruitland Formation, New Mexico, delta plain, stablllty-time hypothesis, Cretaceous extinctions. Spencer G. Lucas, Department ot Geology and Geophysics and Peabody Museum ot Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 6666, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 USA ; NlaU J .
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Coal Resources of the Upper Cretaceous Fruitland Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico and Colorado
    Chapter Q National Coal Resource Geology and Coal Resources of the Assessment Upper Cretaceous Fruitland Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico and Colorado Click here to return to Disc 1 By James E. Fassett1 Volume Table of Contents Chapter Q of Geologic Assessment of Coal in the Colorado Plateau: Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah Edited by M.A. Kirschbaum, L.N.R. Roberts, and L.R.H. Biewick U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1625–B* 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225 * This report, although in the USGS Professional Paper series, is available only on CD-ROM and is not available separately U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract........................................................................................................................................................Q1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Scope ............................................................................................................................. 2 Location and Extent of Area............................................................................................................... 2 Earlier Investigations .......................................................................................................................... 2 Geography............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Stratigraphy at Durango, Colorado
    160 New Mexico Geological Society, 56th Field Conference Guidebook, Geology of the Chama Basin, 2005, p. 160-169. LUCAS AND HECKERT MESOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY AT DURANGO, COLORADO SPENCER G. LUCAS AND ANDREW B. HECKERT New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Rd. NW, Albuquerque, NM 87104 ABSTRACT.—A nearly 3-km-thick section of Mesozoic sedimentary rocks is exposed at Durango, Colorado. This section con- sists of Upper Triassic, Middle-Upper Jurassic and Cretaceous strata that well record the geological history of southwestern Colorado during much of the Mesozoic. At Durango, Upper Triassic strata of the Chinle Group are ~ 300 m of red beds deposited in mostly fluvial paleoenvironments. Overlying Middle-Upper Jurassic strata of the San Rafael Group are ~ 300 m thick and consist of eolian sandstone, salina limestone and siltstone/sandstone deposited on an arid coastal plain. The Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation is ~ 187 m thick and consists of sandstone and mudstone deposited in fluvial environments. The only Lower Cretaceous strata at Durango are fluvial sandstone and conglomerate of the Burro Canyon Formation. Most of the overlying Upper Cretaceous section (Dakota, Mancos, Mesaverde, Lewis, Fruitland and Kirtland units) represents deposition in and along the western margin of the Western Interior seaway during Cenomanian-Campanian time. Volcaniclastic strata of the overlying McDermott Formation are the youngest Mesozoic strata at Durango. INTRODUCTION Durango, Colorado, sits in the Animas River Valley on the northern flank of the San Juan Basin and in the southern foothills of the San Juan and La Plata Mountains. Beginning at the northern end of the city, and extending to the southern end of town (from north of Animas City Mountain to just south of Smelter Moun- tain), the Animas River cuts in an essentially downdip direction through a homoclinal Mesozoic section of sedimentary rocks about 3 km thick (Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Evaluation of the Fruitland Formation with Implications on Leakage Potential of Injected
    Seismic Evaluation of the Fruitland Formation with Implications on Leakage Potential of Injected CO2 Thomas H. Wilson1,2 e-mail: [email protected]; Art Wells1, George Koperna3: 1) National Energy Technology Center; 2) West Virginia University; 3) Advanced Resources International, Inc. 1) Abstract (see proceedings for full text) 2) Introduction Subsurface characterization activities undertaken in collaboration Seismic analysis undertaken in this study consists primarily of post stack attribute with the Southwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership on analysis. Attribute analysis refers to an extensive collection of processes designed to their San Juan Basin pilot test include acquisition of geophysical enhance features of interest in subsurface interpretation. Attributes calculated and logs, time lapse VSP and analysis of 3D seismic data from the site. evaluated in this study included a variety of edge and discontinuity enhancement The project is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy and is algorithms. The motivation for this analysis is to identify potential fracture zones and managed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory. CO2 faults that may breach the injection zone and lead to migration of injected CO2 into injection began in late July of 2008 and continued through July of overlying strata. The project is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy and is 2009. Total CO2 injection volume was approximately 300MMcf. managed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory. Subsurface characterization activities are critical to the evaluation In the following discussion, an example of the 3D post-stack seismic processing of reservoir integrity and the potential that leakage of injected CO efforts is illustrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentation, Pedogenesis, and Paleoclimate Conditions in the Paleocene San Juan Basin, New Mexico, U.S.A
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Earth and Planetary Sciences ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2016 Sedimentation, pedogenesis, and paleoclimate conditions in the Paleocene San Juan Basin, New Mexico, U.S.A. Kevin Hobbs Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/eps_etds Recommended Citation Hobbs, Kevin. "Sedimentation, pedogenesis, and paleoclimate conditions in the Paleocene San Juan Basin, New Mexico, U.S.A.." (2016). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/eps_etds/104 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Earth and Planetary Sciences ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kevin Michael Hobbs Candidate Earth and Planetary Sciences Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Dr. Peter Fawcett, Chairperson Dr. Leslie McFadden Dr. Gary Weissmann Dr. Thomas Williamson i SEDIMENTATION, PEDOGENESIS, AND PALEOCLIMATE CONDITIONS IN THE PALEOCENE SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO, U.S.A. by KEVIN MICHAEL HOBBS B.S., Geology, The University of the South, 2006 M.S., Geological Sciences, The University of Idaho, 2010 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Earth and Planetary Sciences The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico July 2016 ii ACKNOWLEDMENTS I thank the following persons for professional help in the form of discussions, critique of ideas, or suggestions during the research and writing of this dissertation: From the Earth and Planetary Sciences Department: Viorel Atudorei, Adrian Brearley, Ben Burnett, Jeff Carritt, Laura Crossey, Magdalena Donahue, Maya Elrick, John Geissmann, Nick George, Karl Karlstrom, Bekah Levine, Grant Meyer, Corrinne Myers, Lyman Persico, Jane Selverstone, Zach Sharp, Mike Spilde.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Geology and Resources of Uranium in the San Juan Basin and Adjacent Region
    u~c..~ OFR :J8- 'JtgLJ all''1 I. i \ "' ! .SUHMARY OF THE GEOLOGY .ANp RESOURCES OF ,URANIUM IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN AND ADJACENT 'REGION, NEW MEXICO, ARIZONA, UTAH & COLORADO I , J.L. Ridgley, et. al. 1978 US. 6EOL~ SURVEY ~RD, US'RARY 505 MARQU51"1"5 NW, RM 72e I .1\LB'U·QuERQ~, N.M. 87'102 i I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUMMARY OF THE GEOLOGY AND RESOURCES OF URANIUM IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN AND ADJACENT REGION, NEW MEXICO, A~IZONA, UTAH, AND COLORADO 'V'R.0 t ~.-4~ . GICAL SURVEY p.· ..... P• 0 . .:.;J .. _. ·5 ALBU~U~~QUE, N. By Jennie L. Ridgley, Morris W. Green, Charles T. Pierson, • Warren I. Finch, and Robert D. Lupe Open-file Report 78-964 1978 Contents • Page Abstract Introduction 3 General geologic setting 3 Stratigraphy and depositional environments 4 Rocks of Precambrian age 5 .. Rocks of Cambrian age 5 < 'I Ignacio Quartzite 6 Rocks of Devonian age 6... i Aneth Formation 6 Elbert Formation 7 Ouray Limestone 7 Rocks of Mississippian age 8 Redwall Limestone 8 Leadville Limestone 8 Kelly Limestone 9 Arroyo Penasco Group 10 Log Springs Formation 10 Rocks of Pennsylvanian age 11 Molas Formation 11 ~ermosa Formation 12 .' . Ric9 Formation'· 13 .. •;,. Sandia Fotfuatto~ 13 Madera Limestone 14 Unnamed Pennsylvanian rocks 15 • ii • Rocks of Permian age 15 Bursum Formation 16 Abo Formation 16 Cutler Formation 17. Yeso Formation 18 Glorieta Sandstone 19 San Andres Limestone 19 Rocks of Triassic age 20 Moenkopi(?) Formation 21 Chinle Formation 21 Shinarump Member 21 Monitor Butte Member 22 Petrified Forest
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Coal Conference Paper
    Wilson et al. (2009) Seismic Evaluation of the Fruitland Formation with Implications on Leakage Potential of Injected CO2 Tom Wilson1,2, Art Wells1 and George Koperna3 Abstract the presence of local fold-like structures with Subsurface characterization activities undertaken in wavelengths of 1 km to 3.5km accompanied by relief of collaboration with the Southwest Regional Carbon 6 feet to 60 feet. The origin of these structures is Sequestration Partnership on their San Juan Basin pilot uncertain. Some of the structures observed in the test include acquisition of geophysical logs, time lapse Fruitland are present in overlying Paleocene and Late VSP and analysis of 3D seismic data from the site. The Cretaceous intervals. project is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy and is managed by the National Energy Technology Post-stack processing of the 3D seismic is undertaken Laboratory.CO2 injection began in late July of 2008 and to enhance subtle discontinuity in the data that might be appears it will continue at least into early August of indicative of small faults or fracture zones that could 2009. Total CO2 injection volume to date (mid July, jeopardize reservoir integrity. 3D seismic from the area 2009) is approximately 300MMcf. Subsurface is processed using edge enhancement, event similarity characterization activities are critical to the evaluation and spectral decomposition algorithms. Additional of reservoir integrity and the potential that leakage of seismic attributes are also evaluated for evidence of injected CO2 might occur. faults or fracture zones. The analysis raises questions concerning local variations in Fruitland coal Work discussed in this presentation focuses primarily depositional systems, the influence of differential on the analysis of 3D seismic from the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Assessment of Oil and Gas Resource Development of the Mancos Shale in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico
    HYDROLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF OIL AND GAS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MANCOS SHALE IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO Open-file Report 566 By Shari Kelley, Thomas Engler, Martha Cather, Cathryn Pokorny, Cheng-Heng Yang, Ethan Mamer, Gretchen Hoffman, Joe Wilch, Peggy Johnson, and Kate Zeigler New Mexico Bureau Geology & Mineral Resources New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology Socorro, New Mexico 87801 November 2014 HYDROLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF OIL AND GAS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MANCOS SHALE IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO Prepared for the Farmington Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management Shari A. Kelley, New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, [email protected] Thomas W. Engler, Petroleum and Chemical Engineering Department, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Martha Cather, Petroleum Recovery Research Center, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Cathryn Pokorny, Cheng-Heng Yang, Ethan Mamer, Gretchen Hoffman, Joe Wilch, and Peggy Johnson, New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Kate Zeigler, Zeigler Geologic Consulting, Albuquerque, NM 87123 1 Table of Contents ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Coal
    Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Coal Resource and Development Potential Report (2004, revised 2006) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope .......................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments........................................................................................................... 1 II. Geologic Units............................................................................................................... 1 Description.................................................................................................................. 5 III. Coal Fields .................................................................................................................... 5 Carbondale Coal Field .................................................................................................... 6 Crested Butte Coal Field................................................................................................. 6 Grand Mesa Coal Field ................................................................................................... 8 Somerset Coal Field........................................................................................................ 8 Tongue Mesa Coal Field................................................................................................. 9 IV. Coal Characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • Coalbed Methane Stream Depletion Assessment Study – Northern San Juan Basin, Colorado
    Coalbed Methane Stream Depletion Assessment Study – Northern San Juan Basin, Colorado S.S. PAPADOPULOS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Boulder, Colorado In Conjunction with: Colorado Geological Survey Denver, Colorado February 2006 1877 Broadway, Suite 703, Boulder, Colorado 80302-5245 · (303) 939-8880 Coalbed Methane Stream Depletion Assessment Study – Northern San Juan Basin, Colorado Prepared for: State of Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources and the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Prepared by: S.S. PAPADOPULOS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Boulder, Colorado In Conjunction with: Colorado Geological Survey Denver, Colorado February 2006 1877 Broadway, Suite 703, Boulder, Colorado 80302-5245 · (303) 939-8880 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The San Juan Basin is the most productive source of coalbed methane (CBM) in North America. Typically, in conjunction with the production of CBM is the production of water. In the San Juan Basin in Colorado there are concerns with the amount, quality, uses, and effects of CBM produced water and with how the production of water may be affecting CBM gas seepage at the surface. Specific to this study, there are concerns that the removal of water from aquifers that may be tributary to the surface stream system could be resulting in stream depletions or reductions in spring flows that could potentially impact water rights holders, the State of Colorado, and downstream water users not in Colorado. For these reasons it was considered important both to evaluate the extent and impacts of CBM water production in the San Juan Basin and to assess the regulatory framework associated with the production of CBM water, the potential for beneficial uses of such water, and the interstate ramifications of the consumptive uses of such water.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Ute Reservation Upper Menefee UT CO AZ NM Lower Menefee
    Southern Ute Indian Reservation occurs throughout the coal seams underlying the Reservation. The coal, estimated to be in excess of 200 million tons of strippable coal, General Setting is high quality (10,000 BTUs per lb.) and with low sulfur content. U T A H C O L O R A D O The Southern Ute Indian Reservation is in southwestern Colorado Leasing of minerals and development agreements on the UTE MOUNTAIN UTE adjacent to the New Mexico border (Figs. SU-1 and -2). The reser- Southern Ute Indian Reservation are designed in accordance with the vation encompasses an area about 15 miles (24 km) wide by 72 miles Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982, and the rules and (116 km) long; total area is approximately 818,000 acres (331,000 regulations contained in 25 CFR, Part 225 (published in the Federal SOUTHERN UTE ha). Of the Indian land, 301,867 acres (122,256 ha) are tribally Register, March 30, 1994). The Tribe no longer performs lease owned and 4,966 acres (2,011 ha) are allotted lands; 277 acres (112 agreements under the old 1938 Act (since 1977). NAVAJO ha) are federally owned (U.S. Department of Commerce, 1974). The The 1982 Act provides increased flexibility to the Tribe and TAOS JICARILLA rest is either privately owned or National Forest Service Lands. The developer to tailor their agreements to the specific needs of each APACHE TAO Tribal land is fairly concentrated in two blocks; one in T 32-33 N, R party. It also allows the parties to draft agreements based on state-of- PICURIS 1-6 W, and the other in T 32 N, R 8-13 W and T 33 N, R 11 W.
    [Show full text]