DOCSLIB.ORG

Deterrence in the Age of Thinking Machines for More Information on This Publication, Visit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deterrence in the Age of Thinking Machines for More Information on This Publication, Visit C O R P O R A T I O N YUNA HUH WONG, JOHN M. YURCHAK, ROBERT W. BUTTON, AARON FRANK, BURGESS LAIRD, OSONDE A. OSOBA, RANDALL STEEB, BENJAMIN N. HARRIS, SEBASTIAN JOON BAE Deterrence in the Age of Thinking Machines For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2797 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0406-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Getty Images Plus. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface We expect artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous systems to sig- nificantly change the future battlefield. Militaries around the world are incorporating AI and autonomy into their organizational processes, command and control systems, logistics systems, and, of course, weapon systems themselves—with an aim toward leveraging current develop- ments from the commercial world. As AI and autonomy proliferate on the battlefield, an important question arises: How might deterrence be affected by the proliferation of AI and autonomous systems? Up to this point, deterrence has primarily involved humans attempting to affect the decision calculus and perceptions of other humans. But what hap- pens when decisionmaking processes are no longer fully under the con- trol of humans? In this report, we lay out some initial considerations and present ideas for how deterrence could change in the age of AI and autonomy. RAND Ventures The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solu- tions to public policy challenges to help make communities through- out the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND Ventures is a vehicle for investing in policy solutions. Philanthropic contributions support our ability to take the long view, tackle tough and often-controversial topics, and share our findings in innovative and compelling ways. RAND’s research findings and iii iv Deterrence in the Age of Thinking Machines recommendations are based on data and evidence, and therefore do not necessarily reflect the policy preferences or interests of its clients, donors, or supporters. Funding for this venture was made possible by the independent research and development provisions of RAND’s contracts for the operation of its U.S. Department of Defense federally funded research and development centers. International Security and Defense Policy Center This research was conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Insti- tute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the defense agencies, and the defense Intel- ligence Community. For more information on the International Security and Defense Policy Center, see www.rand.org/nsrd/ndri/centers/isdp or contact the director (contact information is provided on the webpage). Contents Preface ............................................................................. iii Figures and Tables ...............................................................vii Summary .......................................................................... ix Acknowledgments ...............................................................xv Abbreviations ................................................................... xvii CHAPTER ONE Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Background ......................................................................... 2 Why Is This Topic Important? .................................................. 5 Approach ............................................................................ 7 How to Read This Report ........................................................ 8 CHAPTER TWO Key Deterrence Concepts ......................................................11 Deterrence .........................................................................11 Escalation ..........................................................................13 Stability and Instability ...........................................................15 Security Dilemma .................................................................15 CHAPTER THREE Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems ..........................17 Artificial Intelligence .............................................................17 Autonomy ......................................................................... 22 CHAPTER FOUR Potential Futures in a World of Proliferated Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems ................................................ 27 Key Factors Affecting Deterrence in the Age of Thinking Machines .... 27 Creating One Future World .................................................... 36 v vi Deterrence in the Age of Thinking Machines CHAPTER FIVE A Wargame of Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems .......39 Wargame Overview ...............................................................39 Wargame Events .................................................................. 43 Wargame Limitations ............................................................ 48 CHAPTER SIX Wargame Insights and Debates ...............................................51 Wargame Insights .................................................................51 Debates During the Game ......................................................53 CHAPTER SEVEN Implications for Deterrence....................................................59 Deterrence Concepts Revisited ..................................................59 Comparisons with Nuclear Weapon Proliferation ............................61 How Escalatory Dynamics May Change ......................................63 CHAPTER EIGHT Implications for Decisionmaking ............................................69 Inadvertent Engagement .........................................................69 Trust and Autonomy ..............................................................74 Time Scale and Decisionmaking ................................................75 Considerations When Building Autonomous Forces ........................ 80 CHAPTER NINE Conclusion and Areas for Further Research ................................83 Conclusion .........................................................................83 Areas for Further Research .......................................................83 APPENDIX General Morphological Analysis ............................................. 87 References ........................................................................93 Figures and Tables Figures 7.1. Understanding Required in Traditional Deterrence .............67 7.2. Understanding Required in Deterrence with AI and Autonomous Systems ................................................67 8.1. Boyd’s Observe, Orient, Decide, Act (OODA) Loop ...........76 8.2. Reaction Speeds and Type of Autonomy ..........................78 Tables 4.1. One Future World ...................................................37 5.1. Relative Distribution of Military Assets ......................... 42 7.1. Nuclear Weapon Proliferation Versus Autonomous System Proliferation ..........................................................62 7.2. Human and Machine Configurations and Potential Escalatory Dynamics ............................................... 64 7.3. Potential Machine Misinterpretation of Human Signaling .... 66 8.1. Inadvertent Engagements by Autonomous Systems .............72 8.2. Potential Advantages and Disadvantages of Military Autonomous Systems ................................................73 A.1. Morphological Field .................................................89 A.2. Cross-Consistency Analysis ........................................ 90 A.3. One Future World .................................................. 92 vii Summary Artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous systems have the potential to change the future of warfare. The increased use of unmanned sys- tems on the battlefield, breakthroughs in commercial AI, and interest that many countries now have in AI and autonomous systems for mili- tary applications make it likely that such systems will be widely used in future conflicts. Yet what happens to deterrence and escalation when decisions can be made at machine speeds and when states can
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Competitive Strategy Insights from Wargames
    Competitive Strategy Insights from Wargames Competitive Strategy Insights from Wargames BENJAMIN JENSEN JOHN T. WATTS CHRISTIAN TROTTI MARK J. MASSA ATLANTIC COUNCIL 1 Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strategies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of nonpartisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. Forward Defense Forward Defense helps the United States and its allies and partners contend with great-power competitors and maintain favorable balances of power. This new practice area in the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security produces Forward-looking analyses of the trends, technologies, and concepts that will define the future of warfare, and the alliances needed for the 21st century. Through the futures we forecast, the scenarios we wargame, and the analyses we produce, Forward Defense develops actionable strategies and policies for deterrence and defense, while shaping US and allied operational concepts and the role of defense industry in addressing the most significant military challenges at the heart of great-power competition. This publication was produced in support of Army Futures Command as part of a project that used competitive strat- egy wargames to evaluate alternative long-term military investment strategies for great-power competition. Competitive Strategy Insights from Wargames BENJAMIN JENSEN · JOHN T. WATTS · CHRISTIAN TROTTI · MARK J. MASSA ISBN-13: 978-1-61977-121-5 Cover image: Army AH-64 Apache aircrews conduct formation practice at Camp Williams, Utah, June 5, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • AI, Robots, and Swarms: Issues, Questions, and Recommended Studies
    AI, Robots, and Swarms Issues, Questions, and Recommended Studies Andrew Ilachinski January 2017 Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Distribution Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Specific authority: N00014-11-D-0323. Copies of this document can be obtained through the Defense Technical Information Center at www.dtic.mil or contact CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Photography Credits: http://www.darpa.mil/DDM_Gallery/Small_Gremlins_Web.jpg; http://4810-presscdn-0-38.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/ Robotics.jpg; http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-edia/image/upload/18kxb5jw3e01ujpg.jpg Approved by: January 2017 Dr. David A. Broyles Special Activities and Innovation Operations Evaluation Group Copyright © 2017 CNA Abstract The military is on the cusp of a major technological revolution, in which warfare is conducted by unmanned and increasingly autonomous weapon systems. However, unlike the last “sea change,” during the Cold War, when advanced technologies were developed primarily by the Department of Defense (DoD), the key technology enablers today are being developed mostly in the commercial world. This study looks at the state-of-the-art of AI, machine-learning, and robot technologies, and their potential future military implications for autonomous (and semi-autonomous) weapon systems. While no one can predict how AI will evolve or predict its impact on the development of military autonomous systems, it is possible to anticipate many of the conceptual, technical, and operational challenges that DoD will face as it increasingly turns to AI-based technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • The AGA Song Book up to Date
    3rd Edition Songs, Poems, Stories and More! Edited by Bob Felice Published by The American Go Association P.O. Box 397, Old Chelsea Station New York, N.Y., 10113-0397 Copyright 1998, 2002, 2006 in the U.S.A. by the American Go Association, except where noted. Cover illustration by Jim Rodgers. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without prior written permission of the copyright holder, except for brief quotations used as part of a critical review. Introductions Introduction to the 1st Edition When I attended my first Go Congress three years ago I was astounded by the sheer number of silly Go songs everyone knew. At the next Congress, I wondered if all these musical treasures had ever been printed. Some research revealed that the late Bob High had put together three collections of Go songs, but the last of these appeared in 1990. Very few people had these song books, and some, like me, weren’t even aware that they existed. While new songs had been printed in the American Go Journal, there was clearly a need for a new collection of Go songs. Last year I decided to do whatever I could to bring the AGA Song Book up to date. I wanted to collect as many of the old songs as I could find, as well as the new songs that had been written since Bob High’s last song book. You are holding in your hands the book I was looking for two years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting US Security by Minimizing the Role of Nuclear Weapons
    Blechman and Rumbaugh Protecting US Security by Minimizing the Role of Nuclear Weapons: A NEW US NUCLEAR POLICY Barry Blechman and Russell Rumbaugh MAY 2015 STIMSON | 1 Protecting US Security by Minimizing the Role of Nuclear Weapons: a New US Nuclear Policy This paper was prepared in September 2014 and commissioned by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). It will be published in “Project Atom: A Competitive Strategies Approach to Defining U.S. Nuclear Strategy and Posture for 2025- 2050” (Washington, DC: CSIS, 2015.) 2 | APRIL 2015 CONTENTS Introduction . 5 US Conventional Military Dominance . 5 The Limited Role of Nuclear Weapons . 8 Minimizing the Roles of Nuclear Weapons in US Policies and Those of Other Nations . 12 Contingencies . 19 Conclusion . 23 “After seventy years of indulging fantasies of what nuclear weapons can do, it is high time to acknowledge that they do very little and adapt US nuclear policy, strategy, and forces to those facts.” Blechman and Rumbaugh INTRODUCTION Nuclear weapons remain the most potent destructive force known to humanity . Yet, US nuclear policies and doctrines remain encumbered by Cold War beliefs in the potential utility of nuclear weapons, even though the United States enjoys a dominant geopolitical position in the world, un- derpinned by a conventional military superiority greater than any ever known before . These false hopes that nuclear weapons can play a range of political and military roles in US security policy cause the United States to mistakenly pursue a nuclear strategy that is costly — not only in material terms, but also in geopolitical terms . In the worst case scenarios, this strategy could be catastroph- ic in terms of human lives and the nation’s future .
    [Show full text]
  • STRIKING FIRST – Preemptive and Preventive Attack in U.S. National
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. STRIKINGFIRST Preemptive and Preventive Attack in U.S. National Security Policy KARL P. MUELLER JASEN J. CASTILLO FORREST E. MORGAN NEGEEN PEGAHI BRIAN ROSEN Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Transparency, Submarine Opacity, and Strategic Nuclear Stability
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 19, ISSUE 1 Studies Fluid Foundations: Ocean Transparency, Submarine Opacity, and Strategic Nuclear Stability Elizabeth Mendenhall The development and detonation of atomic weaponry at the end of World War Two so shocked established political and military thought that it can be accurately described as a “Nuclear Revolution.”1 The expectation that nuclear weapons would continue to be used in conflict, and the emerging bipolar tension, stoked premonitions of eminent international disaster. Aversion to their continued use, combined with fear of giving them up, produced a period of contradiction and adjustment in the missions and strategies of the armed forces. A nuclear strategy was needed to reconcile the extreme strength and extreme vulnerability attendant to the Nuclear Revolution, and to find a use for apparently un-useable weapons. “Deterrence theory” was meant to provide a practicable stopgap while more radical political solutions were formulated, but it was eventually fully incorporated into military doctrine, 1 Bernard Brodie, Some Strategic Implications of the Nuclear Revolution (University of Utah Press, 1959); Michael Mandelbaum, The Nuclear Revolution: International Politics Before and After Hiroshima (Cambridge University Press, 1981); Robert Jervis, The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989).; Avery Goldstein, Deterrence and Security in the 21st Century: China, Britain, France, and the Enduring Legacy of the Nuclear Revolution (Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2000). ©Centre of Military and Strategic Studies, 2018 ISSN : 1488-559X JOURNAL OF MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES strategy, and force structure.2 Deterrence theory relies on the idea that the threat of nuclear retaliation will prevent an enemy from starting a nuclear conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Deterrence As a Complex System
    NUCLEAR DETERRENCE AS A COMPLEX SYSTEM National Security Report Edward Toton | James Scouras NSP_19-0090_Scouras_v6.indd 1 4/22/19 9:05 AM Image from the Mandelbrot set, often used to represent complexity. Created by Wolfgang Beyer with the program Ultra Fractal 3. [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/)]. Retrieved from Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mandel_zoom_00_mandelbrot_set.jpg. NSP_19-0090_Scouras_v5.indd 2 3/4/2019 9:29:06 AM NUCLEAR DETERRENCE AS A COMPLEX SYSTEM Edward T. Toton James Scouras Copyright © 2019 The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC. All Rights Reserved. NSAD-R-19-003 NUCLEAR DeteRRENCE AS A COMPLEX SYSTEM iii Contents Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................... v The Cuban Missile Crisis ..........................................................................................................................................3 The Lost Bomber Incident .................................................................................................................................................... 4 The Vandenberg Missile Launch ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Observations ............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdsourced Production of AI Training Data” by Florian Alexander Schmidt Is Licensed Under
    Author: Dr. Florian Alexander Schmidt is professor for conceptual design and media theory at the University of Applied Sciences HTW Dresden. Since 2006 he has been studying the structure and mechanics of digital plat- forms. His latest book, “Crowd Design”, was published by Birkhäuser in 2017. This paper is condensed version of a 70-page-long report in German, published in February 2019: Schmidt, Florian A. (2019): Crowdproduktion von Trainingsdaten. Zur Rolle von Online-Arbeit beim Trainieren autonomer Fahrzeuge. Study Nr. 415, Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. Online: https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_study_hbs_417.pdf. © 2019 by Hans-Böckler-Stiftung Hans-Böckler-Straße 39, 40476 Düsseldorf, Germany www.boeckler.de “Crowdsourced Production of AI Training Data” by Florian Alexander Schmidt is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (BY). Provided that the author's name is acknowledged, this license permits the editing, reproduction and distribution of the material in any format or medium for any purpose, including commercial use. The complete li- cense text can be found here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode The terms of the Creative Commons License apply to original material only. The use of material from other sources, such as graphs, tables, photographs and texts, may require further permission from the rights holder. ISSN 2509-2359 SCHMIDT: CROWDSOURCED PRODUCTION OF AI TRAINING DATA | 3 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................... 4 Methodology and Research Questions ................................................... 6 The Crowdsourced Production of AI Training Data ................................. 8 Established Generalists and New Specialists ....................................... 10 Tailor-Made Tools and Handpicked Crowds ......................................... 13 Quality Management and Misclassification ........................................... 15 Migrant Crowds and German Platforms ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tian Zhuangzhuang: an Author Haunted by the Images*
    Szkice filmoznawcze Alicja Helman https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8266-6038 Wydział Zarządzania i Komunikacji Społecznej Uniwersytet Jagielloński Tian Zhuangzhuang: An Author Haunted by the Images* Key words: biopic, minority genre, ethnographic cinema, religion, ritual Słowa kluczowe: biografia filmowa, gatunek „minority”, kino etnograficzne, religia, rytuał Introduction The last film Tian Zhuangzhuang made was 2009’s The Warrior and the Wolf (Láng Zāi Jì). Not until 2015 has he participated, as one of three directors, in a blockbuster Lady of The Dynasty (Wángcháo de Nǚrén Yáng Guìfēi), where his contribution is difficult, if not impossible to isolate. As the aficionados of his talent had accurately predicted, the director never managed to put himself on the map again, amidst the transformations of China’s Film Industry that took a turn towards commercialization, conquest of foreign markets, and competition with Western production at home. Unable to find funds or producers, let alone audiences for his “cinematic project,” Tian did not only refuse to make films as forced upon him, but did not need to; most probably, he could not. His output proper – counting out student films – can be narrowed down to the period between the years 1985 (On the Hunting Ground [Lièchǎng zhā sā]) and 2006 (The Go Master [Wú Qīngyuán]), encompassing projects consistent with his views, temperament, and an idiosyncratic language of film art. However, even within this timeframe, we will find features from which Tian evidently distances himself. We ought to distinguish four feature films from the period 1987–1991, which Tian was attached to as director, rather than perceiving them as works of his own choosing.
    [Show full text]
  • Deterrence, Second Strike and Credibility Revisiting India’S Nuclear Strategy Debate
    Issue Brief # 255 July 2014 Innovative Research | Independent Analysis | Informed Opinion Deterrence, Second Strike and Credibility Revisiting India’s Nuclear Strategy Debate Rajesh Basrur Professor, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Singapore The past few years have produced for deterrence; that they are sufficient to meet considerable debate over India’s nuclear the requirements of minimum deterrence; and strategy and posture. Much of it has revolved that weapons development is reaching for around the credibility of India’s nuclear excessive capabilities. But to resolve such a arsenal (Chari, 2014; Global Security debate, it is first necessary to know: how does Newswire, 2009; Joshi, 2014; Koithara, 2012; deterrence work? For all the differences aired, Menon, 2014; O’Donnell and Pant, 2014; there is remarkably little or no disagreement Prakash, 2012; Prakash, 2014; Rajaraman, on the meaning and fundamental 2014; Saran, 2013; Saran and Sharma, 2013). requirements of minimum deterrence. This is an important question because it goes Everyone seems to agree that the central to the heart of India’s capacity to deter its principle of deterrence is “assured/secure adversaries. Is the Indian deterrent properly second strike capability.” From this flow the organized? Are its capabilities enough? What criteria for assessing the effectiveness of an makes a deterrent credible? The on-going arsenal: the survivability, reliability and debate has produced three broad positions: accuracy of weapons, plus an efficient system that India’s nuclear weapons are inadequate of command control. The needs of the arsenal – its hardware (weapons systems) and software (organization) are determined by these canons of deterrence.
    [Show full text]
  • Valley Girls
    VALLEY GIRLS They’re storming Silicon Valley with their sharp ideas. Meet six American Indian women who are paving their way to technological superstardom with their ambition and aptitude. By AARTI VIRANI and PARIZAAD KHAN SETHI Photographed by THAYER ALLYSON GOWDY Styled by KIERSTEN ANN 281 SHRADDHA CHAPLOT, 30, GREENGINEER, CISCO Shraddha Chaplot was that kid. The one who asked for more math homework, the one who worked out of a ninth-grade math book when her fourth grade class was struggling with theirs. In fact, at 30, she’s still that kid. “I’m really looking forward to my 10 pi birthday (31.4 years) and my 5-bit birthday (32). For the latter, microprocessors will be the party favours!” she says. After growing up in Walnut, a small town outside Los Angeles, Udaipur-born Chaplot studied electrical engineering and machine intelligence at the University of California, San Diego. “I had six different internships in college, and the last one was at Cisco, which turned into my first job. I always wanted to do things that made a real impact, changed a person’s perspective and dreams.” At Cisco, she’s a ‘Greengineer’, where her tasks have included building the Energy Star Compliance Test Lab for ensuring energy efficiency of products. She is also a board member of the Foundation Board of Directors for the National Technical Institute for the Deaf (at Rochester Institute of Technology in New York) and she brought on the first two hearing-impaired interns to Cisco. “For me, technology is the enabler for us to be our true selves.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Outsourcing Is Changing the World Through Impact Sourcing and CSR
    A movement has been underway. It started quietly nearly a decade ago in small villages in India. Now it has taken hold and is expanding to rural locales in places like Africa, Kenya, Ghana, Rwanda and Uganda. Job by job, lives are being changed for the better. The numbers are multiplying and the impact is being seen on entire communities and nations. corporate social responsibility Outsourcing is changing the world through impact sourcing and CSR. 30 PULSE May/June 2014 PULSE May/June 2014 31 corporate social responsibility Impact sourcing 101 With increased focus on shared value, inclusive business This business impact alone should entice businesses to and corporate social responsibility, businesses are looking start Impact Sourcing as an obvious choice. However, for both positive financial and social impact in their own Impact Sourcing provides the added benefit of social How socially responsible outsourcing is cHanging tHe world practices, and in those of their supply chain. impact. It enables employees to earn a higher income, The services outsourcing industry is well-placed to in some cases up to 200 percent more than they would By Sarah Troup, rockefeller foundaTion advance inclusive business practices. Impact Sourcing – expect otherwise, according to Monitor Group’s Job services employment for high potential but disadvantaged Creation through Building the Field of Impact Sourcing. people - can help businesses meet and exceed their cost Employees also learn valuable workplace and technical and quality objectives. It also provides an innovative new skills that prepare them to excel in their jobs now and in offering to clients in an industry looking for innovation.
    [Show full text]