Demonstration of Two Operator Elements in Gal: in Vitro Repressor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Demonstration of Two Operator Elements in Gal: in Vitro Repressor Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 81, pp. 6100-6104, October 1984 Genetics Demonstration of two operator elements in gal: In vitro repressor binding studies (operon/gaLR gene/electrophoretic mobility/DNA-protcin complex) ALOKES MAJUMDAR AND SANKAR ADHYA Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20205 Communicated by Allan Campbell, June 18, 1984 ABSTRACT Genetic and DNA base sequence analyses of F-hsdS20 recA13 aral4 proA2 lacY1 gal2 rpoL20 xyl5 su'II, cis-dominant mutations that derepress the gal operon ofEsch- used for large-scale preparation of gal plasmids (a gift of G. erichia coli suggested the existence of two operator loci needed Gaitanaris); SA1984 = F-strR galRA XcIts857 (Xint- for gal repression. One (OE) is located immediately upstream XcIII)AXN' (Xcro-chlA)A, made during this study and used to the two overlapping gal promoters and the other (01) is in- to maintain a PL-galR fusion plasmid. side the first structural gene. We have investigated the ability Fig. 1 Upper shows the genetic structure of the E. coli gal of wild-type and mutant OE and 01 DNA sequences to bind to operon and its restriction endonuclease sites relevant to the gal repressor. The repressor has been purified from cells con- construction of the following plasmids (i-v), which were the taining a multicopy plasmid in which the repressor gene is source ofgal DNA fragments used in protein binding assays. brought under the control of phage A PL promoter. The DNA- (i) pMI3 was generated by cloning the 260-bp gal DNA repressor interactions are detected by the change in electro- spanning sites b-e between the EcoRI and HindIII sites of phoretic mobility of labeled DNA that accompanies its com- pBR322 (7). The gal DNA (fragment A) contains a wild-type plex formation with repressor protein. The purified repressor OE (O) allele. shows concentration-dependent binding to both O and Ot (il) pAM230 was generated by restriction of gal DNA at but not to cEand 0( sequences. These results authenticate the site b, digestion with DNase exoIII and nuclease S1 to the proposed operator role of the two homologous gal DNA control position marked c, and addition of an EcoRI linker. The gal elements and thereby establish that the negative control of the DNA between sites c and f (fragment B) was subsequently gal operon requires repressor binding at both OE and 0, cloned between EcoRI and HindIII sites in pBR322. which are separated by >90 base pairs. pAM230 contains a wild-type 01 allele (Ot). Fragment B is 500 bp long. Three structural genes, E, T, and K, constitute the gal oper- (iii) p291 contains the wild-type alleles of both OE and 01 on of Escherichia coli (1). They are transcribed from either gal DNA (O Ot). p291 was generated by cloning the 664-bp of two partially overlapping promoters PG1 and PG2, which segment between sites b and f in gal (fragment C) between are modulated by cAMP and its receptor protein (CRP) in the EcoRI and HindIll sites of pBR322 (6). The distance be- opposite ways (2, 3). cAMP'CRP complex activates PG1 and tween OE and 0° is 97 bp. inhibits PG2 by binding to a single site, cat (refs. 4 and 5; see (iv) pBdC6 contains a 1100-bp gal DNA piece (fragment Fig. 1 Upper). The gal promoters are also regulated nega- D) spanning the segment a-f, between the EcoRI and Hin- tively by a gal repressor protein, the product of an unlinked dIII sites of PBR322 (11). Fragment D carries a mutation in galR gene (8-10). We have isolated and characterized cis- the OE allele (OE81 O'). dominant constitutive mutations in the gal operon and locat- (v) pAM401 was generated by cloning the gal DNA of an ed them by DNA base sequence analysis (3, 6, 11). These 01 mutant between sites d and f into the BstEII and HindIII studies have revealed the existence of two homologous 17- sites of pMI3. The resulting 664-bp-long gal DNA (fragment base-pair (bp) sequences in gal DNA, mutation in either one E) in pAM401 contains a mutant 01 allele (O 0i'6). of which causes derepression of PG, and PG2 in the presence (vi) pBR322 was obtained from Bethesda Research Labo- of gal repressor (Fig. 1). One of the sites (OE) is located im- ratories and digested with HindIII and BamHI to generate mediately upstream to the promoter region-i.e., around the 346-bp fragment F. -60 bp from the start site of PGl-promoted transcription. (vii) pAM2 and pAM3. pAM2 contains a complete gal re- The other (0r) is located downstream to the promoter and pressor gene (galR') within a HincII and EcoRI DNA frag- inside the first structural gene, galE. Because of the cis-act- ment (12) fused to the PL promoter of bacteriophage X in the ing nature of the two sites and of the sequence homology plasmid pKC30 of R. N. Rao (26). The HincII-EcoRI gaiR between them, we have proposed that the gal operon is neg- DNA fragment was generated by restriction digestion of a atively regulated by two operators, OE and 0° (6). Both of XgalR-transducing phage (13). The HincII site is upstream of them are required for repression ofthe two gal promoters. In the NH2 terminus and the EcoRI site is downstream of the this paper, we report on the binding of purified gal repressor COOH terminus of the gaIR gene. The PL-galR fusion was to DNA fragments that contain either wild-type or mutant made by the gaiR HincII site and the X Hpa I site located OE and 01 base sequences. downstream to PL. pAM3 contains the COOH-terminal seg- ment of the gaIR gene cloned in a similar fashion but by fus- MATERIALS AND METHODS ing a different HincII site, located within the gaiR structural The E. coli strains used in this paper are SA1796 = F-strR gene (12) to the X Hpa I site in pKC30. These two plasmids galRs8, used to test the presence of a gal operator allele (7); are maintained in the host strain SA1984 lysogenic for X. The RW1401 = C600 galA, used for cloning wild-type and mutant details of construction of pAM2 and pAM3 will be published gal DNA fragments (a gift of R. Weisberg); HB101 = elsewhere. Microbiological Technics. Standard microbiological media, agar plates, and methods, including transformation of cells The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. Abbreviations: CRP, cAMP receptor protein; bp, base pair(s). 6100 Downloaded by guest on October 2, 2021 Genetics: Majumdar and Adhya Proc. NatL Acad Sci. USA 81 (1984) 6101 PG1 PG2 OE cat EN I-60 t -35 + 1 +27 det f 0+ A 260 I I B 500 c OI C I- 664 b C D t 1100 a 0c E I 664 t f F 346 I I FIG. 1. (Upper) Genetic map of the initial part of the gal operon. O' and O. are the two control elements (6) shown to be operators in this paper; PG1 is the cAMP-dependent promoter and PG2 is the cAMP-independent promoter; cat is the cAMP CRP complex binding site; EN is the start site of translation of the first structural gal gene. The lettered arrows pointing upward indicate the following natural or engineered restriction nuclease sites in gal DNA: a, a natural EcoRI site present in bacterial DNA brought closer to gal by a deletion (A320); b, an engineered EcoRI site (7); c, an engineered EcoRI site (see text); d, a natural BstEII site; e, a natural Hpa II site engineered into a HindIII site (7); f, a natural HindIII site. The numbers indicate the corresponding distance in base pairs from the start site of transcription initiation from PG1. (Lower) DNA fragments A-F generated by restriction nucleases from their corresponding plasmids and used in repressor binding assays of Fig. 3. The following lettered arrows indicate restriction sites of pBR322: g, a natural HindIII site; h, a natural BamHI site. The size of each fragment is indicated in base pairs at its right. with plasmid DNA, were used (14, 15). sponding plasmids and labeled at their 5' ends with [y- 32P Labeling of DNA. DNA fragments generated by restric- 32P]ATP by polynucleotide kinase. The size and the relevant tion nucleases was labeled at the 5' end with [y32P]ATP as genetic makeup of the fragments are diagramed in Fig. 1 described by Maxam and Gilbert (16). The labeled fragments (Lower). These fragments were tested for their ability to bind were then purified by elution from gels (16). to gal repressor, as shown later. DNA-Protein Binding Assays. DNA complexed with pro- Purified gal Repressor. The gaiR gene encodes the repres- tein characteristically shows slower electrophoretic mobility sor of gal operon and maps between lysA and thyA genes at on acrylamide gels than free DNA. This property of DNA 60 min on E. coli chromosome (8, 9). We have fused the has been utilized successfully by Garner and Revzin (17) and wild-type gaiR gene to a strong promoter of bacteriophage X by Fried and Crothers (18) to demonstrate specific binding of in a hybrid plasmid vector pKC30, creating the plasmid proteins to DNA. We used the same principle to study the pAM2 (Materials and Methods). Because high-level tran- binding of gal repressor to 5'-end-labeled [32P]DNA frag- scription of the PL promoter in pAM2 is deleterious to its ments.
Recommended publications
  • Transcriptional Units
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 76, No. 7, pp. 3194-3197, July 1979 Biochemistry Cyclic AMP as a modulator of polarity in polycistronic transcriptional units (positive regulation/rho factor/lactose and galactose operons/catabolite repression) AGNES ULLMANNt, EVELYNE JOSEPHt, AND ANTOINE DANCHINt tUnite de Biochimie Cellulaire, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France; and tInstitut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, 75005 Paris, France Communicated by Frangois Jacob, April 16, 1979 ABSTRACT The degree of natural polarity in the lactose scribed by Watekam et al. (7, 8) in sonicated bacterial extracts. and galactose operons of Escherichia coli is affected by aden- One unit is the amount of enzyme that converts 1 nmol of osine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP). This effect, mediated substrate per min at 280C (except for UDPGal epimerase, for by the cAMP receptor protein, is exerted at sites distinct from the promoter. Experiments performed with a mutant bearing which the assay temperature was 220C). a thermosensitive rho factor activity indicate that cAMP relieves Reagents and Enzymes. They were obtained from the fol- polarity by interfering with transcription termination. Con- lowing companies: trimethoprim from Calbiochem; all radio- flicting results in the literature concerning the role of cAMP active products from Amersham; isopropyl-f3-D-thiogalactoside receptor protein and cAMP in galactose operon expression can (IPTG), D-fucose, cAMP, UDPglucose dehydrogenase, and all be reconciled by the finding that cAMP stimulates the expres- substrates from Sigma; and all other chemicals from Merck. sion of operator distal genes without significantly affecting the proximal genes. Therefore, it appears necessary to reevaluate the classification o(the galactose operon as exhibiting cAMP- RESULTS mediated catabolite repression at the level of transcription Natural Polarity in Lactose Operon.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudips Revised Thesis
    Investigation Of The Behavior Of The Gal4 Inhibitor Gal80 Of The GAL Genetic Switch In The Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sudip Goswami, M.S. Graduate Program in Molecular Genetics The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee Dr. James Hopper, Advisor Dr. Stephen Osmani Dr. Hay-Oak Park Dr. Jian-Qiu Wu ii Copyright by Sudip Goswami 2014 iii ABSTRACT The DNA-binding transcriptional activator Gal4 and its regulators Gal80 and Gal3 constitute a galactose-responsive switch for the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gal4 binds to upstream activation sequences or UASGAL sites on GAL gene promoters as a dimer both in the absence and presence of galactose. In the absence of galactose, a Gal80 dimer binds to and masKs the Gal4 activation domain, inhibiting its activity. In the presence of galactose, Gal3 interacts with Gal80 and relieves Gal80’s inhibition of Gal4 activity allowing rapid induction of expression of GAL genes. In the first part of this work (Chapter 2) in-vitro chemical crosslinking coupled with SDS PAGE and native PAGE analysis were employed to show that the presence of Gal3 that can interact with Gal80 impairs Gal80 self association. In addition, live cell spinning disK confocal imaging showed that dissipation of newly discovered Gal80-2mYFP/2GFP clusters in galactose is dependent on Gal3’s ability to interact with Gal80. In the second part (Chapter 3), extensive analysis of Gal80 clusters was carried out which showed that these clusters associate strongly with the GAL1-10-7 locus and this association is dependent on the presence of the UASGAL sites at this locus.
    [Show full text]
  • NADP, Corepressor for the Bacillus Catabolite Control Protein Ccpa
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 95, pp. 9590–9595, August 1998 Microbiology NADP, corepressor for the Bacillus catabolite control protein CcpA JEONG-HO KIM,MARTIN I. VOSKUIL, AND GLENN H. CHAMBLISS* Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, E. B. Fred Hall, Madison, WI 53706 Communicated by T. Kent Kirk, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, June 10, 1998 (received for review February 12, 1998) ABSTRACT Expression of the a-amylase gene (amyE)of (18), and the presence of a conserved effector-binding domain Bacillus subtilis is subject to CcpA (catabolite control protein in CcpA (3) together strongly suggest the necessity of an A)-mediated catabolite repression, a global regulatory mech- effector(s) such as a corepressor to activate CcpA. To date, anism in Bacillus and other Gram-positive bacteria. To deter- HPr, a phosphocarrier protein in the phosphoenolpyruvate- mine effectors of CcpA, we tested the ability of glycolytic :sugar phosphotransferase system, and two glycolytic metab- metabolites, nucleotides, and cofactors to affect CcpA binding olites, fructose-1,6-diphosphate (FDP) and glucose-6- to the amyE operator, amyO. Those that stimulated the phosphate, have been proposed as effectors of CcpA (19–22). DNA-binding affinity of CcpA were tested for their effect on HPr is phosphorylated in two different fashions: ATP- transcription. HPr-P (Ser-46), proposed as an effector of dependent phosphorylation at Ser-46 and phosphoenolpyru- CcpA, also was tested. In DNase I footprint assays, the affinity vate-dependent phosphorylation at His-15 (23). In the ptsH1 of CcpA for amyO was stimulated 2-fold by fructose-1,6- mutant strain, the serine residue at position 46 of HPr is diphosphate (FDP), 1.5-fold by oxidized or reduced forms of replaced with an alanine, which eliminates phosphorylation of NADP, and 10-fold by HPr-P (Ser-46).
    [Show full text]
  • Studies with the Escherichia Coli Galactose Operon Regulatory Region Carrying a Point Mutation That Simultaneously Inactivates T
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Volume 219, number 1, 189-196 FEB 04899 July 1987 Studies with the Escherichia coli galactose operon regulatory region carrying a point mutation that simultaneously inactivates the two overlapping promoters Interactions with RNA polymerase and the cyclic AMP receptor protein Sreenivasan Ponnambalarn, Annick Spassky* and Stephen Busby Department of Biochemistry, University of Birmingham, PO Box 363, Birmingham B15 2TT, England and *D~partement de Biologie Molbculaire, lnstitut Pasteur, 25 Rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France Received 22 April 1987 We report in vitro studies of the interactions between purified E. coli RNA polymerase and DNA from the regulatory region of the E. coli galactose operon which carries a point mutation that simultaneously stops transcription initiation at the two normal start points, $1 and $2. In the presence of this point muta- tion, transcription initiates at a third start point 14/15 bp downstream of $1, showing that inactivation of the two normally active promoters, P1 and P2, unmasks a third weaker promoter, P3. Transcription initia- tion in the gal operon is normally regulated by the cyclic AMP receptor protein, CRP, that binds to the gal regulatory region and switches transcription from P2 to PI. With the point mutation, CRP binding swit- ches transcription from P3 to P1, although the formation of transcriptionally competent complexes at P1 is very slow. The results are discussed with respect to the mechanism of transcription activation by the CRP factor and the similarities between the regulatory regions of the galactose and lactose operons.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 21 Operons: Fine Control of Bacterial Transcription
    Chapter 21 Operons: Fine Control of Bacterial Transcription The E. coli genome contains over 3000 genes. Some of these are active all the time because their products are in constant demand. But some of them are turned off most of the time because their products are rarely needed. For example, the enzymes required for the metabolism of the sugar arabinose would be useful only when arabinose is present and when the organism’s favorite energy source, glucose, is absent. Such conditions are not common, so the genes encoding these enzymes are usually turned off. Why doesn’t the cell just leave all its genes on all the time, so the right enzymes are always there to take care of any eventuality? The reason is that gene expression is an expensive process. It takes a lot of energy to produce RNA and protein. In fact, if all of an E. coli cell’s genes were turned on all the time, production of RNAs and proteins would drain the cell of so much energy that it could not compete with more effi cient organisms. Thus, control of gene expression is essential to life. Gene regulation is the device to insure that proteins are synthesized in exactly the amounts they are needed and only when they are needed. Transcriptional regulation: gene expression is controlled by regulatory proteins Negative regulation: - A repressor protein inhibits transcription of a specific gene. - In this case, inducer (antagonist of the repressor) is needed to allow transcription. Positive regulation: - Activator works to increase the frequency of transcription of an gene (operon) Transcriptional regulation: gene expression is controlled by regulatory proteins Operons Operons and the resulting transcriptional regulation of gene expression permit prokaryotes to rapidly adapt to changes in the environment: new carbon sources, lack of an amino acid, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regulation of Transcription Initiation in Bacteria
    Annual Reviews www.annualreviews.org/aronline Ann.Rev. Genet. 1985. 19:35547 Copyright© 1985 by AnnualReviews Inc. All rights reserved THE REGULATION OF TRANSCRIPTIONINITIATION IN BACTERIA William S. Reznikoff I, Deborah A. Siegele 2, Deborah W. Cowingz, and2 Carol A. Gross Departmentsof Biochemistry~ andBacteriology 2, Collegeof Agriculturaland Life Sciences, Universityof Wisconsin,Madison, Wisconsin 53706 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..................................................................................... 355 PROMOTERSTRUCTURE ......................................................................... 356 THEREGULATION OF E~TM TRANSCRIPTIONINITIATION ............................ 360 NegativeRegulation of TranscriptionInitiation ............................................. 361 Positive Regulationof TranscriptionInitiation .............................................. 363 DNATopology Regulation of TranscriptionInitiation ...................................... 365 DNAModification and the Regulationof GeneExpression ............................... 366 MODIFICATION OF HOLOENZYMESTRUCTURE AND THE REGULATION OF GENEEXPRESSION ................................................................... 366 E. coil ~r7° .......................................................................................... 367 ~2 by University of Wisconsin - Madison on 03/29/07. For personal use only. The HeatShock Response and ~r ............................................................. 368 The E. coli ntrA (glnF) Protein: AnotherSigma Factor ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Transcription Initiation at Gal Promoters and Their Multi-Level Regulation by Galr, CRP and DNA Loop
    Biomolecules 2015, 5, 2782-2807; doi:10.3390/biom5042782 OPEN ACCESS biomolecules ISSN 2218-273X www.mdpi.com/journal/biomolecules/ Review Molecular Mechanisms of Transcription Initiation at gal Promoters and their Multi-Level Regulation by GalR, CRP and DNA Loop Dale E.A. Lewis * and Sankar Adhya Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-301-496-9129; Fax: +1-301-496-2212. Academic Editors: Sivaramesh Wigneshweraraj and Deborah M. Hinton Received: 11 May 2015 / Accepted: 25 September 2015 / Published: 16 October 2015 Abstract: Studying the regulation of transcription of the gal operon that encodes the amphibolic pathway of D-galactose metabolism in Escherichia coli discerned a plethora of principles that operate in prokaryotic gene regulatory processes. In this chapter, we have reviewed some of the more recent findings in gal that continues to reveal unexpected but important mechanistic details. Since the operon is transcribed from two overlapping promoters, P1 and P2, regulated by common regulatory factors, each genetic or biochemical experiment allowed simultaneous discernment of two promoters. Recent studies range from genetic, biochemical through biophysical experiments providing explanations at physiological, mechanistic and single molecule levels. The salient observations highlighted here are: the axiom of determining transcription start points, discovery of a new promoter element different from the known ones that influences promoter strength, occurrence of an intrinsic DNA sequence element that overrides the transcription elongation pause created by a DNA-bound protein roadblock, first observation of a DNA loop and determination its trajectory, and piggybacking proteins and delivering to their DNA target.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation of the Gal Repressor (E
    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 68, No. 8, pp. 1891-1895, August 1971 Isolation of the gal Repressor (E. coli/lac repressor/fucose/galactose/affinity chromatography) J. S. PARKS*, M. GOTTESMAN*, K. SHIMADAt, R. A. WEISBERGt, R. L. PERLMAN$, AND I. PASTAN* * Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health;t Laboratory of Biomedical Sciences, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health; and $ Clinical Endocrinology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20014 Communicated by E. R. Stadtman, June 11, 1971 ABSTRACT The repressor of the galactose operon of I867Sam7) (6); Xh8Odlacp8 from PP70, F-,strRA(lac-proA),- Escherichia coli has been partially purified and identified Su- (Xh8OdlacpscJ857St68,Xh8Ocl857St68) (9); and X from as a protein. Induction of a lysogen in which X was linked N1383, Su-,galK-, Cultures were grown in to the bacterial gaiR and lysine genes resulted in a large (XcI857Sam7). increase in the production of the gal repressor. Single-step IL broth (10 g Bacto-tryptone-5 g yeast extract-5 g NaCl purification by affinity chromatography, using the ligand per liter) and induced by heating log-phase cultures at 40'C p-aminophenyl-B3-D-thiogalactoside linked to beaded agar- for 3-4 hr. Isolation and purification of bacteriophage and ex- ose, provided a convenient method of separating the gal traction of bacteriophage DNA have been described (10). To repressor from other DNA-binding proteins. Binding of gal repressor to Xpgal [32PJDNA was studied by assay of binding label phage DNA, 5 mCi Of 32p was added to 100 ml of cul- to a nitrocellulose filter.
    [Show full text]
  • Spot 42 RNA Mediates Discoordinate Expression of the E. Coli Galactose Operon
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 3, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Spot 42 RNA mediates discoordinate expression of the E. coli galactose operon Thorleif Møller, Thomas Franch, Christina Udesen, Kenn Gerdes, and Poul Valentin-Hansen1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark The physiological role of Escherichia coli Spot 42 RNA has remained obscure, even though the 109-nucleotide RNA was discovered almost three decades ago. Structural features of Spot 42 RNA and previous work suggested to us that the RNA might be a regulator of discoordinate gene expression of the galactose operon, a control that is only understood at the phenomenological level. The effects of controlled expression of Spot 42 RNA or deleting the gene (spf) encoding the RNA supported this hypothesis. Down-regulation of galK expression, the third gene in the gal operon, was only observed in the presence of Spot 42 RNA and required growth conditions that caused derepression of the spf gene. Subsequent biochemical studies showed that Spot 42 RNA specifically bound at the galK Shine-Dalgarno region of the galETKM mRNA, thereby blocking ribosome binding. We conclude that Spot 42 RNA is an antisense RNA that acts to differentially regulate genes that are expressed from the same transcription unit. Our results reveal an interesting mechanism by which the expression of a promoter distal gene in an operon can be modulated and underline the importance of antisense control in bacterial gene regulation. [Key Words: Antisense RNA; galactose operon; riboregulation; small RNAs; Spot 42RN A; translational regulation] Received March 22, 2002; revised version accepted May 13, 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Region Immediately Adjacent to the L-Arabinose Operator in Escherichia Coli B/R' MARIANNE ELEUTERIO, BARBARA GRIFFIN, and DAVID E
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, Aug. 1972. p. 383-391 Vol. 111, No. 2 Copyright 0 1972 American Society for Microbiology Printed in U.S.A. Characterization of Strong Polar Mutations in a Region Immediately Adjacent to the L-Arabinose Operator in Escherichia coli B/r' MARIANNE ELEUTERIO, BARBARA GRIFFIN, AND DAVID E. SHEPPARD Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19711 Received for publication 12 April 1972 Seven L-arabinose-negative mutations are described that map in three genet- ically distinct regions immediately adjacent to the araO (operator) region of the L-arabinose operon. All seven mutants revert spontaneously, exhibit a cis-dom- inant, trans-recessive polarity effect upon the expression of L-arabinose isom- erase (gene araA), and fail to respond to amber, ochre, or UGA suppressors. Three of these mutants exhibit absolute polarity and are not reverted by the mutangens 2-aminopurine, diethyl sulfate, and ICR-191. These may have arisen as a consequence of an insertion mutation in gene araB or in the initi- ator region of the L-arabinose operon. The four remaining mutants exhibit strong but not absolute polarity on gene araA and respond to the mutagens di- ethyl sulfate and ICR-191. Three of these mutants are suppressible by two in- dependently isolated suppressors that fail to suppress known nonsense codons. Partially polar Ara+ revertants with lesions linked to ara are obtained from three of the same four mutants. These polar mutants, their external suppres- sors, and their partially polar revertants are discussed in terms of the mecha- nism of initiation of expression of the L-arabinose operon.
    [Show full text]
  • Local and Global Regulation of Transcription Initiation in Bacteria Browning, Douglas F; Busby, Stephen J W
    University of Birmingham Local and global regulation of transcription initiation in bacteria Browning, Douglas F; Busby, Stephen J W DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.103 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Browning, DF & Busby, SJW 2016, 'Local and global regulation of transcription initiation in bacteria', Nature Reviews Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.103 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked 11/08/2016 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Escherichia Coli LUCIA B
    JOURNAL oF BAcTERIOLoGY, June 1973, p. 1040-1044 Vol. 114, No. 3 Copyright 0 1973 American Society for Microbiology Printed in U.SA. Role of Cyclic Adenosine 3', 5'-Monophosphate in the In Vivo Expression of the Galactose Operon of Escherichia coli LUCIA B. ROTHMAN-DENES, JOANNE E. HESSE, AND WOLFGANG EPSTEIN Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 Received for publication 22 December 1972 Studies of levels of galactokinase in Escherichia coli with mutations affecting synthesis of, or response to, cyclic adenosine 3', 5'-monophosphate show that this nucleotide does not play a major role in expression of the galactose operon, causing at most a twofold stimulation. The discrepancy between our in vivo results and the marked stimulation by cyclic adenosine 3', 5'-monophosphate in in vitro systems indicates that current cell-free systems lack a factor which allows efficient expression of the galactose operon even in the absence of cyclic adenosine 3', 5'-monophosphate or of the binding protein for this nucleotide. Genetic (7, 19, 20) and biochemical (2, 4, 6, 7) except for the presence of the araC+ and araCc67 evidence has accumulated in recent years, mutations, respectively. L104 is a strain constitutive showing that the catabolite repression of in- for the fl-methylgalactosidase transport system (13). ducible enzymes is mediated by cyclic adeno- Chemicals. [1-_4C]galactose was obtained from Calbiochem, and [U-_4C]glycerol was obtained from sine 3', 5'-monophosphate (c-AMP) and a pro- International Chemical and Nuclear Corp. tein factor (CRP) that specifically binds c-AMP. Bacterial growth and preparation of extracts.
    [Show full text]