Mathematical Origami

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mathematical Origami Mathematical Origami Geo Hagopian College of the Desert [email protected] October 25, 2016 Fall 2016 : Math & Science Lecture Series The College of the Desert School of Math and Science Presents: The Mathematics and Algorithms of Origami On Tuesday, October 25th in MSTC 250, College of the Desert Math and Com- puter Science Professor Geo Hagopian will give an introduction to the exciting new science of computational origami. Figure 1: Robert Lang's Fiddler Crab. From simple folds on 1-dimensional pa- per to squash folds in hyperspace, learn 13 how new computer algorithms are de- 12 signed to create crease patterns to fold 11 lizards and lions; elk, shrimp, praying 10 mantises and the dollar velociraptor. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 This is a potent new area of research and 012345678910111213 development with applications ranging Figure 2: The crease pattern of the ddler crab. from biology (folding proteins) to astro- physics (deploying NASA's gliders in the Martian atmosphere!) I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 7. Single vertex Folding. 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. I Kawasaki's Theorem 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. I Maekawa's Theorem 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 8. Tesselation Folds 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. Overview 1. Mathematical denitions for origami. 2. Universality. 3. Turn Gadget 4. Example (dodecahedron) 5. One Dimensional Flat Folding. 6. Two Dimensional Flat Folding 7. Single vertex Folding. I Maekawa's Theorem I Kawasaki's Theorem 8. Tesselation Folds 9. Straight Cuts 10. Treemaker. 11. Origamizer. 12. Hyperbolic Paraboloid • Crease: line segment or curve on the paper. • Crease pattern: a set of creases; that is, a planar graph drawn on the paper. • Folded state: nished origamiunfolding! crease pattern • Flat folding: folded state lying in a planeif all creases are folded, the crease pattern is called at foldable Valley crease: top sides touch • Mountain crease: bottom sides touch Origami Denitions • Piece of paper: A 2-D polygon with distinguished top and bottom faces. • Crease pattern: a set of creases; that is, a planar graph drawn on the paper. • Folded state: nished origamiunfolding! crease pattern • Flat folding: folded state lying in a planeif all creases are folded, the crease pattern is called at foldable Valley crease: top sides touch • Mountain crease: bottom sides touch Origami Denitions • Piece of paper: A 2-D polygon with distinguished top and bottom faces. • Crease: line segment or curve on the paper. • Folded state: nished origamiunfolding! crease pattern • Flat folding: folded state lying in a planeif all creases are folded, the crease pattern is called at foldable Valley crease: top sides touch • Mountain crease: bottom sides touch Origami Denitions • Piece of paper: A 2-D polygon with distinguished top and bottom faces. • Crease: line segment or curve on the paper. • Crease pattern: a set of creases; that is, a planar graph drawn on the paper. • Flat folding: folded state lying in a planeif all creases are folded, the crease pattern is called at foldable Valley crease: top sides touch • Mountain crease: bottom sides touch Origami Denitions • Piece of paper: A 2-D polygon with distinguished top and bottom faces. • Crease: line segment or curve on the paper. • Crease pattern: a set of creases; that is, a planar graph drawn on the paper. • Folded state: nished origamiunfolding! crease pattern Valley crease: top sides touch • Mountain crease: bottom sides touch Origami Denitions • Piece of paper: A 2-D polygon with distinguished top and bottom faces. • Crease: line segment or curve on the paper. • Crease pattern: a set of creases; that is, a planar graph drawn on the paper. • Folded state: nished origamiunfolding! crease pattern • Flat folding: folded state lying in a planeif all creases are folded, the crease pattern is called at foldable Origami Denitions • Piece of paper: A 2-D polygon with distinguished top and bottom faces. • Crease: line segment or curve on the paper. • Crease pattern: a set of creases; that is, a planar graph drawn on the paper. • Folded state: nished origamiunfolding! crease pattern • Flat folding: folded state lying in a planeif all creases are folded, the crease pattern is called at foldable Valley crease: top sides touch • Mountain crease: bottom sides touch • Mountain-Valley pattern: crease pattern + mountain-valley assignment. • Simple fold: fold along a single mountain/valley line by ±180◦ This presents the choice of how many layers to fold. • One-layer simple fold: just top or bottom layer All-layers simple fold: fold all the layers • Strip: a long, narrow rectangle • Non-simple strip folding: a strip knot More Origami Terminology • Mountain-Valley assignment: specify which creases are mountains and which are valleys. • Simple fold: fold along a single mountain/valley line by ±180◦ This presents the choice of how many layers to fold. • One-layer simple fold: just top or bottom layer All-layers simple fold: fold all the layers • Strip: a long, narrow rectangle • Non-simple strip folding: a strip knot More Origami Terminology • Mountain-Valley assignment: specify which creases are mountains and which are valleys. • Mountain-Valley pattern: crease pattern + mountain-valley assignment. • One-layer simple fold: just top or bottom layer All-layers simple fold: fold all the layers • Strip: a long, narrow rectangle • Non-simple strip folding: a strip knot More Origami Terminology • Mountain-Valley assignment: specify which creases are mountains and
Recommended publications
  • Mathematics of Origami
    Mathematics of Origami Angela Kohlhaas Loras College February 17, 2012 Introduction Origami ori + kami, “folding paper” Tools: one uncut square of paper, mountain and valley folds Goal: create art with elegance, balance, detail Outline History Applications Foldability Design History of Origami 105 A.D.: Invention of paper in China Paper-folding begins shortly after in China, Korea, Japan 800s: Japanese develop basic models for ceremonial folding 1200s: Origami globalized throughout Japan 1682: Earliest book to describe origami 1797: How to fold 1,000 cranes published 1954: Yoshizawa’s book formalizes a notational system 1940s-1960s: Origami popularized in the U.S. and throughout the world History of Origami Mathematics 1893: Geometric exercises in paper folding by Row 1936: Origami first analyzed according to axioms by Beloch 1989-present: Huzita-Hatori axioms Flat-folding theorems: Maekawa, Kawasaki, Justin, Hull TreeMaker designed by Lang Origami sekkei – “technical origami” Rigid origami Applications from the large to very small Miura-Ori Japanese solar sail “Eyeglass” space telescope Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Science of the small Heart stents Titanium hydride printing DNA origami Protein-folding Two broad categories Foldability (discrete, computational complexity) Given a pattern of creases, when does the folded model lie flat? Design (geometry, optimization) How much detail can added to an origami model, and how efficiently can this be done? Flat-Foldability of Crease Patterns 훗 Three criteria for 훗: Continuity, Piecewise isometry, Noncrossing 2-Colorable Under the mapping 훗, some faces are flipped while others are only translated and rotated. Maekawa-Justin Theorem At any interior vertex, the number of mountain and valley folds differ by two.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Folding and Unfolding in Computational Geometry
    Combinatorial and Computational Geometry MSRI Publications Volume 52, 2005 A Survey of Folding and Unfolding in Computational Geometry ERIK D. DEMAINE AND JOSEPH O’ROURKE Abstract. We survey results in a recent branch of computational geome- try: folding and unfolding of linkages, paper, and polyhedra. Contents 1. Introduction 168 2. Linkages 168 2.1. Definitions and fundamental questions 168 2.2. Fundamental questions in 2D 171 2.3. Fundamental questions in 3D 175 2.4. Fundamental questions in 4D and higher dimensions 181 2.5. Protein folding 181 3. Paper 183 3.1. Categorization 184 3.2. Origami design 185 3.3. Origami foldability 189 3.4. Flattening polyhedra 191 4. Polyhedra 193 4.1. Unfolding polyhedra 193 4.2. Folding polygons into convex polyhedra 196 4.3. Folding nets into nonconvex polyhedra 199 4.4. Continuously folding polyhedra 200 5. Conclusion and Higher Dimensions 201 Acknowledgements 202 References 202 Demaine was supported by NSF CAREER award CCF-0347776. O’Rourke was supported by NSF Distinguished Teaching Scholars award DUE-0123154. 167 168 ERIKD.DEMAINEANDJOSEPHO’ROURKE 1. Introduction Folding and unfolding problems have been implicit since Albrecht D¨urer [1525], but have not been studied extensively in the mathematical literature until re- cently. Over the past few years, there has been a surge of interest in these problems in discrete and computational geometry. This paper gives a brief sur- vey of most of the work in this area. Related, shorter surveys are [Connelly and Demaine 2004; Demaine 2001; Demaine and Demaine 2002; O’Rourke 2000]. We are currently preparing a monograph on the topic [Demaine and O’Rourke ≥ 2005].
    [Show full text]
  • GEOMETRIC FOLDING ALGORITHMS I
    P1: FYX/FYX P2: FYX 0521857570pre CUNY758/Demaine 0 521 81095 7 February 25, 2007 7:5 GEOMETRIC FOLDING ALGORITHMS Folding and unfolding problems have been implicit since Albrecht Dürer in the early 1500s but have only recently been studied in the mathemat- ical literature. Over the past decade, there has been a surge of interest in these problems, with applications ranging from robotics to protein folding. With an emphasis on algorithmic or computational aspects, this comprehensive treatment of the geometry of folding and unfolding presents hundreds of results and more than 60 unsolved “open prob- lems” to spur further research. The authors cover one-dimensional (1D) objects (linkages), 2D objects (paper), and 3D objects (polyhedra). Among the results in Part I is that there is a planar linkage that can trace out any algebraic curve, even “sign your name.” Part II features the “fold-and-cut” algorithm, establishing that any straight-line drawing on paper can be folded so that the com- plete drawing can be cut out with one straight scissors cut. In Part III, readers will see that the “Latin cross” unfolding of a cube can be refolded to 23 different convex polyhedra. Aimed primarily at advanced undergraduate and graduate students in mathematics or computer science, this lavishly illustrated book will fascinate a broad audience, from high school students to researchers. Erik D. Demaine is the Esther and Harold E. Edgerton Professor of Elec- trical Engineering and Computer Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he joined the faculty in 2001. He is the recipient of several awards, including a MacArthur Fellowship, a Sloan Fellowship, the Harold E.
    [Show full text]
  • © Cambridge University Press Cambridge
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85757-4 - Geometric Folding Algorithms: Linkages, Origami, Polyhedra Erik D. Demaine and Joseph O’Rourke Index More information Index 1-skeleton, 311, 339 bar, 9 3-Satisfiability, 217, 221 base, see origami, base, 2 α-cone canonical configuration, 151, 152 Bauhaus, 294 α-producible chain, 150, 151 Bellows theorem, 279, 348 δ-perturbation, 115 bending λ order function, 176, 177, 186 machine, xi, 13, 306 antisymmetry condition, 177, 186 pipe, 13, 14 consistency condition, 178, 186 sheet metal, 306 noncrossing condition, 179, 186 beta sheet, 158 time continuity, 174, 183, 187 Bezdek, Daniel, 331 transitivity condition, 178, 186 blooming, continuous, 333, 435 bond angle, 14, 131, 148, 151 Abe’s angle trisection, 286, 287 bond length, 148 accordion, 85, 193, 200, 261 active path, 244, 245, 247–249 cable, 53–55 acyclicity, 108 CAD, see cylindrical algebraic decomposition, 19 additor (Kempe), 32, 34, 35 cage, 21, 92, 93 Alexandrov, Aleksandr D., 348 canonical form, 74, 86, 87, 141, 151 Alexandrov’s theorem, 339, 348, 349, 352, 354, Cauchy’s arm lemma, 72, 133, 143, 145, 342, 343, 368, 381, 393, 419 377 existence, 351 Cauchy’s rigidity theorem, 43, 143, 213, 279, 339, uniqueness, 350 341, 342, 345, 348–350, 354, 403 algebraic motion, 107, 111 Cauchy—Steinitz lemma, 72, 342 algebraic set, 39, 44 chain algebraic variety, 27 4D, 92, 93, 437 alpha helix, 151, 157, 158 abstract, 65, 149, 153, 158 Amato, Nancy, 157 convex, 143, 145 amino acid, 158 cutting, xi, 91, 123 amino acid residue, 14, 148, 151 equilateral, see
    [Show full text]
  • The Mathematics of Origami Thomas H
    The Mathematics of Origami Thomas H. Bertschinger, Joseph Slote, Olivia Claire Spencer, Samuel Vinitsky Contents 1 Origami Constructions 2 1.1 Axioms of Origami . .3 1.2 Lill's method . 12 2 General Foldability 14 2.1 Foldings and Knot Theory . 17 3 Flat Foldability 20 3.1 Single Vertex Conditions . 20 3.2 Multiple Vertex Crease Patterns . 23 4 Computational Folding Questions: An Overview 24 4.1 Basics of Algorithmic Analysis . 24 4.2 Introduction to Computational Complexity Theory . 26 4.3 Computational Complexity of Flat Foldability . 27 5 Map Folding: A Computational Problem 28 5.1 Introduction to Maps . 28 5.2 Testing the Validity of a Linear Ordering . 30 5.3 Complexity of Map Folding . 35 6 The Combinatorics of Flat Folding 38 6.1 Definition . 39 6.2 Winding Sequences . 41 6.3 Enumerating Simple Meanders . 48 6.4 Further Study . 58 The Mathematics of Origami Introduction Mention of the word \origami" might conjure up images of paper cranes and other representational folded paper forms, a child's pasttime, or an art form. At first thought it would appear there is little to be said about the mathematics of what is by some approximation merely crumpled paper. Yet there is a surprising amount of conceptual richness to be teased out from between the folds of these paper models. Even though researchers are just at the cusp of understanding the theoretical underpinnings of this an- cient art form, many intriguing applications have arisen|in areas as diverse as satellite deployment and internal medicine. Parallel to the development of these applications, mathematicians have begun to seek descriptions of the capabilities and limitations of origami in a more abstract sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Simulation for Foldable Tsunami Pod
    明治大学大学院先端数理科学研究科 2015 年 度 博士学位請求論文 Modeling and Simulation for Foldable Tsunami Pod 折り畳み可能な津波ポッドのためのモデリングとシミュレーション 学位請求者 現象数理学専攻 中山 江利 Modeling and Simulation for Foldable Tsunami Pod 折り畳み可能な津波ポッドのためのモデリングとシミュレーション A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of Advanced Mathematical Sciences of Meiji University by Department of Advanced Mathematical Sciences, Meiji University Eri NAKAYAMA 中山 江利 Supervisor: Professor Dr. Ichiro Hagiwara January 2016 Abstract Origami has been attracting attention from the world, however it is not long since applying it into industry is intended. For the realization, not only mathematical understanding origami mathematically but also high level computational science is necessary to apply origami into industry. Since Tohoku earthquake on March 11, 2011, how to ensure oneself against danger of tsunami is a major concern around the world, especially in Japan. And, there have been several kinds of commercial products for a tsunami shelter developed and sold. However, they are very large and take space during normal period, therefore I develop an ellipsoid formed tsunami pod which is smaller and folded flat which is stored ordinarily and deployed in case of tsunami arrival. It is named as “tsunami pod”, because its form looks like a shell wrapping beans. Firstly, I verify the stiffness of the tsunami pod and the injury degree of an occupant. By using von Mises equivalent stress to examine the former and Head injury criterion for the latter, it is found that in case of the initial model where an occupant is not fastened, he or she would suffer from serious injuries. Thus, an occupant restraint system imitating the safety bars for a roller coaster is developed and implemented into the tsunami pod.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Folding by Rahnuma Islam Nishat B.Sc.Engg., Bangladesh
    Map Folding by Rahnuma Islam Nishat B.Sc.Engg., Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, 2009 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in the Department of Computer Science c Rahnuma Islam Nishat, 2013 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Map Folding by Rahnuma Islam Nishat B.Sc.Engg., Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, 2009 Supervisory Committee Dr. Sue Whitesides, Supervisor (Department of Computer Science) Dr. Frank Ruskey, Departmental Member (Department of Computer Science) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Sue Whitesides, Supervisor (Department of Computer Science) Dr. Frank Ruskey, Departmental Member (Department of Computer Science) ABSTRACT A crease pattern is an embedded planar graph on a piece of paper. An m×n map is a rectangular piece of paper with a crease pattern that partitions the paper into an m×n regular grid of unit squares. If a map has a configuration such that all the faces of the map are stacked on a unit square and the paper does not self-intersect, then it is flat foldable, and the linear ordering of the faces is called a valid linear ordering. Otherwise, the map is unfoldable. In this thesis, we show that, given a linear ordering of the faces of an m × n map, we can decide in linear time whether it is a valid linear ordering or not. We also define a class of unfoldable 2 × n crease patterns for every n ≥ 5.
    [Show full text]
  • When Can You Fold a Map?
    When Can You Fold a Map? Esther M. Arkin¤ Michael A. Bendery Erik D. Demainez Martin L. Demainez Joseph S. B. Mitchell¤ Saurabh Sethiay Steven S. Skienax Abstract We explore the following problem: given a collection of creases on a piece of paper, each assigned a folding direction of mountain or valley, is there a flat folding by a sequence of simple folds? There are several models of simple folds; the simplest one-layer simple fold rotates a portion of paper about a crease in the paper by §180±. We ¯rst consider the analogous questions in one dimension lower|bending a segment into a flat object|which lead to interesting problems on strings. We develop e±cient algorithms for the recognition of simply foldable 1D crease patterns, and reconstruction of a sequence of simple folds. Indeed, we prove that a 1D crease pattern is flat-foldable by any means precisely if it is by a sequence of one-layer simple folds. Next we explore simple foldability in two dimensions, and ¯nd a surprising contrast: \map" folding and variants are polynomial, but slight generalizations are NP-complete. Speci¯cally, we develop a linear-time algorithm for deciding foldability of an orthogonal crease pattern on a rectangular piece of paper, and prove that it is (weakly) NP-complete to decide foldability of (1) an orthogonal crease pattern on a orthogonal piece of paper, (2) a crease pattern of axis-parallel and diagonal (45-degree) creases on a square piece of paper, and (3) crease patterns without a mountain/valley assignment. 1 Introduction The easiest way to refold a road map is di®erently.
    [Show full text]
  • Mortality Statistics and Paper Folding
    Welcome to Issue 79 of the Secondary Magazine. Contents From the editor In order to focus clearly on our mathematical thinking, it is helpful sometimes to address questions and problems that require a minimum of mathematical background. It’s in the News! Mortality Statistics Each year the Office for National Statistics publishes a set of data showing the causes of death for the previous year. In January 2011 the data for 2009 was released, showing some interesting statistics which might challenge our intuitive understanding of, and the way that the media presents, the dangers facing us. This is used as a context for students to explore the way that data is presented and interpreted. The Interview – James Grime Dr James Grime is the Enigma Project Officer of the Millennium Mathematics Project in the Department of Mathematics and Theoretical Physics at the University of Cambridge. He travels the UK, and the world, talking to schools and adult audiences about mathematical ideas and their histories. Focus on…paper folding Paper folding explorations include the generation of mathematical objects, the doing of mathematical actions and the proving of relationships. 5 things to do Will you be arranging to be at a STEM careers conference, or at a meeting about algebra without equations, or at a workshop on using origami in the classroom? There is still time to apply for a Media Fellowship, and respond to the Call for Evidence relating to the National Curriculum Review. Or you could just relax by watching Tung Ken Lam fold a cuboctahedron! Subject Leadership Diary Sometimes a subject leader may seize an opportunity to convey messages to the whole school, for example by taking a school assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GRAMMAR of DEVELOPABLE DOUBLE CORRUGATIONS (For FORMAL ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATIONS)
    THE GRAMMAR of DEVELOPABLE DOUBLE CORRUGATIONS (for FORMAL ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATIONS) DISSERTATION REPORT Tutors Sean Hanna Alasdair Turner Ankon Mitra MSc. Adaptive Architecture & Computation 2008-09 UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON (figure 01 : Cover Piece : A ‘Fire-Works’ Origami object is juxtaposed against a ‘Hill-Trough’ Origami folded artifact. Source : Author) Declaration I, Ankon Mitra, submit this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Science (Adaptive Architecture & Computation). I also confirm that the work presented in this dissertation is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, this has been indicated and clearly referenced in the dissertation. The work strictly adheres to the University College London guidelines for dissertations and theses of this nature. The word count for this paper is 10, 137 (excluding - title content, abstract, page of contents, list of figures and tables and references). 2 Abstract This paper investigates the geometrical basis of regular corrugations, with specific emphasis on Developable Double Corrugations (DDCs), which form a unique sub-branch of Origami Folding and Creasing Algorithms. The aim of the exercise is three fold – (1) To define and isolate a ‘single smallest starting block’ for a given set of distinct and divergent DDC patterns, such that this starting block becomes the generator of all DDCs when different generative rules are applied to it. (2) To delineate those generic parameters and generative rules which would apply to the starting block, such that different DDCs are created as a result (3) To use the knowledge from points (1) and (2) to create a complete family of architectural forms and shapes using DDCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Computational Origami
    Introduction to Computational Origami Ryuhei Uehara Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST) School of Information Science [email protected] http://www.jaist.ac.jp/~uehara 2020/01/10 At UIT, Myanmar 1/33 Origami? • In Japanese, “Ori”=folding and “kami/gami”=paper. • It was born in 1500? with inventing paper, in some Asia, maybe. Of course, we have no record on paper! • Now, “ORIGAMI” is an English word, and there are some shelves in bookstores in North America and Europe. • Origami‐like things… There are some “Origami”s which are not folded, and not paper any more now a day!! Maybe by an NSF big fund? 2020/01/10 At UIT, Myanmar 2/33 Origami as paper folding • Normal Origami • Difficult Origami • Impossible Origami (for most human!) Kawasaki Rose Maekawa Devil By Tetsushi Kamiya (Origami Champion) 2020/01/10 At UIT, Myanmar 3/33 Science Application of Origami based on the basic operations of “folding” • There are many applications of “Folding”→ Computational Origami There are many applications and open Foldable Solar Panels problems of “folding” (Miura Map Folding) Packing Airbag Self-foldable robot Protein folding problem 2020/01/10 At UIT, Myanmar 4/33 International Conference on Origami Science 1. 1989@Italy • International meeting of Origami Science and Technology 2. 1994@Japan • International meeting of Origami Science and Art Proceedings is 3. 2001@USA on market • 3OSME(International meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education) 4. 2006@USA • 4OSME 5. 2010@Singapore Proceedings • 5OSME become 2 6. 2014@Japan
    [Show full text]
  • BIOINSPIRED ORIGAMI: INFORMATION RETRIEVAL TECHNIQUES for DESIGN of FOLDABLE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS a Dissertation by ELISSA M
    BIOINSPIRED ORIGAMI: INFORMATION RETRIEVAL TECHNIQUES FOR DESIGN OF FOLDABLE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS A Dissertation by ELISSA MORRIS Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Daniel A. McAdams Committee Members, Richard Malak Douglas Allaire Michael Moreno Head of Department, Andres Polycarpou August 2019 Major Subject: Mechanical Engineering Copyright 2019 Elissa Morris ABSTRACT The science of folding has inspired and challenged scholars for decades. Origami, the art of folding paper, has led to the development of many foldable engineering solutions with applications in manufacturing, materials, and product design. Interestingly, three fundamental origami crease patterns are analogous to folding observed in nature. Numerous folding patterns, structures, and behaviors exist in nature that have not been considered for engineering solutions simply because they are not well-known or studied by designers. While research has shown applying biological solutions to engineering problems is significantly valuable, various challenges prevent the transfer of knowledge from biology to the engineering domain. One of those challenges is the retrieval of useful design inspiration. In this dissertation work, information retrieval techniques are employed to retrieve useful biological design solutions and a text-based search algorithm is developed to return passages where folding in nature is observed. The search
    [Show full text]