DOCSLIB.ORG

5915 Tuesday, 3 November 1992 THE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

5915 Tuesday, 3 November 1992 THE DEPUTY PRESIDENT (Hon Garry Kelly) took the Chair at 3.30 pm, and mead prayers. STANDING COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATION - REPORT ON PORT KENNEDY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BILL Tabling THE DEPUTY PRESIDENT: I table the report of the Legislation Committee on the Port Kennedy Development Agreement Bill and draw the attention of the House to the attached schedule. The report was released last Wednesday pursuant to a resolution adopted by the Council on 22 October that in lieu of presenting the report on that day the chairman be authorised to present it to the President on or before 28 October and on receipt of that report the President be authorised to publish it and the report be deemed to be tabled and ordered to be printed. The chairman of the committee handed the report to the Deputy President on Wednesday, 28 October 1992 at 3.37 pm at which time the report was released. [See paper No 480.] MOTION - STANDING ORDERS SUSPENSION Attorney General's Resignation - Royal Commission into Commercial Activities of Government and Other Matters Report Recommendations HON GEORGE CASH (North Metropolitan - Leader of the Opposition) [3.39 pm]: I move without notice - That so much of Standing Orders be suspended as would enable a motion to be moved and debated to its conclusion at today's sitting. The motion I wish to move relates to a number of matters of public importance. If the House grants the suspension of Standing Orders the Legislative Council will be given the opportunity to discuss aspects of the Royal Commission's findings which were tabled in this House approximately two weeks ago. The House must be given the opportunity to raise the matters contained in the motion, not just because the Opposition sees it as an opportunity to debate matters connected with the Royal Commission but because the matters in the proposed motion touch on issues of high public importance. Debate will not only afford the Opposition the opportunity to put its view but will also allow the Leader of the House to respond. The motion calls on the Leader of the House to resign his ministerial portfolios. Members will be aware that as Attorney General he is the first officer of the State and that this is not the type of motion that can be left hanging around on the Notice Paper. It must be debated today. It is a matter of considerable public interest and should be debated with the utmost urgency. For those reasons, and for such other reasons as members think appropriate, I ask them to support the suspension of Standing Orders. HON J.M. BERINSON (North Metropolitan - Leader of the House) [3.48 pm]: I support the motion to suspend Standing Orders. More than that, I am happy to acknowledge that the motion is a welcome change from the quite disgraceful manipulation of Standing Orders in which Hon George Cash has engaged himself on earlier similar occasions. I have in mind in particular his conduct on a motion of censure against me which he moved on 8 May 1990. He started speaking at 9.59 pm and spoke for almost an hour. That brought him right up to our normal adjournment time, and when I moved an extension of time so that I could speak and have my rebuttal reported in the media at the same time as his unfounded allegations, he ensured that the extension of time was rejected. flat was not really clever-, it was merely tricky, in the distinctive way that has been all too typical of Mr Cash's approach on many occasions. Hon George Cash: You have been a very good teacher! Hon J.M. BERINSON: To the extent at least that the Leader of the Opposition in this 5916 [COUNCIL] procedural respect has withstood the temptation to be himself, it is only fair to acknowledge the improvement. If he can only bring himself also to present the facts rather than misrepresent them when we come to the substantive motion, he really wili show himself to be a very changed man, though his speech in that case will also be very short. I support the motion. Question put and passed with an absolute majority. MOTION - ATTORNEY GENERAL'S RESIGNATION Royal Commission into CommercialActivities of Government and Other Matters Report Recommendations HON GEORGE CASH (North Metropolitan - Leader of die Opposition) [3.50 pm]: I move - That this House - A. Having considered the report of the Royal Commission into Commercial Activities of Government and Other Matters and mindful that - (i) The Royal Commission was prohibited by the Bill of Rights article 9 from examining the conduct of Ministers in Parliament and accordingly, given that special privilege Parliament has an absolute obligation to make that examination itself; and (ii) the accountability of Ministers is to the Parliament, and in particular to the House of which the Minister is a member, and that the findings of the commission in themselves give rise to questions as to the sufficiency or probity of the actions of Ministers, or taken with matters that occurred in the House give rise to those questions; B. condemns the Leader of the House in his conduct as a Minister, as Attorney General and former Minister for Budget Management in that he has - (1) methodically misled the House as to the extent of his involvement in the acquisition by the State Government Insurance Commission (SGIC) of the Bell Group shares and convertible notes; (2) participated in a course of deception of the public and the undermining of public confidence in appointments to senior Public Service positions in the appointment of Len Brush as Chairman of the State Superannuation Board; (3) was grossly negligent in - (i) introducing and recommending to Cabinet the Bell convertible note purchase without making or causing to be made any inquiry as to the value of the notes; (ii) putting forward the Bell deal knowing that it was concerned with a rescue of Rothwells Limited and having learnt of the substantial deposits that had been made in Rothwells by the State Government Insurance Commission, the State Superannuation Board, the Bell Group and die Bond Corporation; (iii) failing to read the legal advice obtained regarding the SGIC's obligation to comply with the takeovers code with regard to the Bell share acquisition and in having dissuaded other members of Cabinet from doing so, where had he read the opinion he would have ascertained that the legality of the transaction depended upon Crown privilege and that he and the Government had participated in a breach of the spirit of die takeovers code; (iv) failing to ensure that Laurence Robert Connell executed an appropriate enforceable guarantee in accordance with the oral [Tuesday, 3 November 1992]191 5917 undertaking by Mr Connell to put the whole of his assets at the disposal of Rothwells especially in view of the fact that Hon J.M. Berinson with Brian Burke and David Parker were the three Ministers who agreed with Connell the terms of the Rothweils rescue; (v) failing to take an active interest in the legal and financial implications of the Western Australian Government Holdings and Petrochemical Industries Co Ltd transaction and especially those matters raised by the letter of advice to him dated 16 August 1988 from the Solicitor General; (4) participated in the deception of the public regarding the giving of the Government guarantees in connection with the Petrochemical Industries Co Ltd; (5) was deceptive and involved himself in a conflict of interest on the Ministerial Council by failing to give evidence to the National Companies and Securities Commission inquiry into the acquisition of Bell shares as to his involvement in the meeting with Bond Corporation over the acquisition; and that this House concludes that the whole WA Inc saga demonstrated - (i) a total disregard of the law and failure to enforce the law, and a participation in improper practices by Government; and (ii) a massive waste and loss of public funds through deals designed to hide the truth of the Government's involvement in Rothwells and to secure the Australian Labor Party's re-election; and that in his role as Attorney General he must bear direct responsibility for the former, and in his previous capacity as Minister for Budget Management he must accept responsibility for the latter, and has shown himself completely lacking in integrity and competence to act as a Minister of the Crown by elevating the party's advantage over his constitutional obligation to act in the community's interests; C. Requires him to resign forthwith as a Minister of the Crown. The opening paragraph of the motion refers to article 9 of the Bill of Rights. The preamble in the motion touches on mailers that could be considered by the Royal Commission and that have been the subject of debate in this House. Members will be aware that sonic time ago the Royal Commissioners made application to both the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly and the President of the Legislative Council for permission to waive the parliamentary privilege as it applied to article 9 of the Bill of Rights to enable the Royal Commissioners to give consideration to those matters which had been raised in the Parliament. Given the very special privilege that exists with respect to what members of Parliament say in a House of Parliament, the Presiding Officers of both Houses denied the Royal Commission the waiver of that privilege. Members will be aware that only two weeks ago the President of this Legislative Council, after reading various media reports which distorted the situation with respect to article 9 of the Bill of Rights and the special privilege that attaches to what is said in this Parliament, made a statement to this House which clearly outlined the reasons that both Mr President and Mr Speaker had declined to grant the waiver.
Recommended publications
  • JOSEPH MAX BERINSON B1932

    JOSEPH MAX BERINSON B1932

    THE LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SERVICE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA J S BATTYE LIBRARY OF WEST AUSTRALIAN HISTORY Oral History Collection & THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT PARLIAMENTARY ORAL HISTORY PROJECT Transcript of an interview with JOSEPH MAX BERINSON b1932 Access Research: Restricted until 1 January 2005 Publication: Restricted until 1 January 2005 Reference number 0H3102 Date of Interview 14 July 1993-7 July 1994 Interviewer Erica Harvey Duration 12 x 60 minute tapes Copyright Library Board of Western Australia The Library Board of WA 3 1111 02235314 6 INTRODUCTION This is an interview with Joseph (Joe) Berinson for the Battye Library and the Parliamentary Oral History Project. Joe Berinson was born to Sam Berinson and Rebecca Finklestein on 7 January 1932 in Highgate, Western Australia. He was educated at Highgate Primary School and Perth Modern School before gaining a Diploma of Pharmacy from the University of Western Australia in 1953. Later in life Mr Berinson undertook legal studies and was admitted to the WA Bar. He married Jeanette Bekhor in September 1958 and the couple have one son and three daughters Joining the ALP in 1953, Mr Berinson was an MHR in the Commonwealth Parliament from October 1969 to December 1975, where his service included Minister for the Environment from July to November 1975. In May 1980 he became an MLC in the Western Australian Parliament, where he remained until May 1989. Mr Berinson undertook many roles during his time in State Parliament, including serving as Attorney General from September 1981 to April 1983. The interview covers Mr Berinson's early family life and schooling, the migration of family members to Western Australia, and the influence and assistance of the Jewish community.
  • The Burke Labor Government

    The Burke Labor Government

    THE BURKE LABOR GOVERNMENT Dr Geoffrey Gallop, Murdoch University Paper delivered at 1984 APSA Conference, 27-29 August, Melbourne University I would like to thank the many people who helped in the preparation of this paper. ·. INTRODUCTION Labor came to power in Western Australia in February 1983 on the 1 basis of 54.4 per cent of the two-party-preferred vote. This amounted toa swing of 6.5 per cent. The largest swings were recorded in the north west (10.8 per cent) and in the outer metropolitan region (7 per cent). Nine Assembly seats fell to Labor: three in the metropolitan zone, five in the agricultural, mining and pastoral zone and one in the north. The Liberals gained one seat at the expense of the National Country Party. This left Labor with a clear majority in the Legislative Assembly and only three seats with a two-party-preferred vote of below 53 per cent. The Liberal Party has four seats in such a position, including Subiaco whose member, Dr Tom Dadour, has resigned from the party and now sits as an independent. Dadour has indicated that he intends to contest the seat as an independent at the next election. The Liberal Party preserved its clear majority in the Legislative Council - and its belief in the legitimacy of the currently constituted second chamber. On the basis of 52 per cent of the two-party-preferred vote Labor won 7 out of the 17 provinces. The Liberals lost North Metropolitan to Labor but won Lower Central and Central from the National Country Party.
  • Legislative Council

    Legislative Council

    Legislative Council Thursday, 23 November 2000 THE PRESIDENT (Hon George Cash) took the Chair at 10.00 am, and read prayers. FREMANTLE EASTERN BYPASS Petition Hon J.A. Scott presented the following petition bearing the signatures of 456 persons - To the Honourable the President and members of the Legislative Council in Parliament assembled. We the undersigned residents of Western Australia are concerned that the proposed Fremantle Eastern Bypass will:- • fragment and dislocate the communities of Whitegum Valley, Hamilton Hill and Beaconsfield; • increase vehicle emissions, affecting air quality and pollution levels; • remove the school oval and green areas of Whitegum Valley Primary School; • threaten safety of school children and all pedestrians and road users due to increased traffic levels in the surrounds; • create increased traffic in the feeder roads, adversely affecting residents; and • destroy remnant urban bushland at Clontarf Hill. Your petitioners therefore humbly pray that the Legislative Council examine the promises made by the Minister for Transport in relation to a study being undertaken to compare the alternative Stock Road option with the proposed Fremantle Eastern Bypass and why those undertakings have not been fulfilled. Your petitioners therefore humbly pray that you will give this matter earnest consideration and your petitioners, as in duty bound, will ever pray. [See paper No 592.] STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Overview for 2000 - Eighteenth Report Hon Kim Chance presented the eighteenth report of the Standing Committee on Public Administration, in relation to an overview report for the year 2000, and on his motion it was resolved - That the report do lie upon the Table and be printed.
  • 19 October 1995

    19 October 1995

    9435 Thursday, 19 October 1995 THE PRESIDENT (Hon Clive Griffiths) took the Chair at 2.30 pm, and read prayers. BILLS (3) - ASSENT Messages from the Governor received and read notifying assent to the following Bills - I. Hire-Purchase Amendment Bill 2. Land Tax Assessment Amendment Bill 3. Land Tax Amendment Bill MOTION - URGENCY Workplace Agreements Act THE PRESIDENT (Hon Clive Griffiths): I am pleased to advise that I have received the following letter - Dear Mr President At today's sitting, it is my intention to move under SO 72 that the House, at its rising adjourn until 9.00 am on December 25 1995 for the purpose of discussing the inadequacy of the Workplace Agreements Act 1993 in preventing prospective and current employees from being intimidated with respect to the entering into of workplace agreements, noting the answer to question on notice 3857 and other initiatives of the Government to have their employees enter into workplace agreements. Yours sincerely Nick Griffiths MLC. In order for this matter to be discussed it is necessary for at least four members to indicate their support by standing in their places. [At least four members rose in their places.] HON N.D. GRIFFITHS (East Metropolitan) [2.38 pm]: I move - That the House at its rising adjourn until 9.00 am on 25 December. In doing so I note that there is no choice in signing or resigning and no choice in taking it or leaving it. Only intimidation remains for current or prospective employees entering into workplace agreements. Unfortunately, the industrial relations policies of the Liberal Party, state, and I regret, federal, are not about choice but are about intimidation.
  • 02 TABLE 2007 Pages

    02 TABLE 2007 Pages

    THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CLERKS-AT-THE-TABLE IN COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON VOLUME 75 2007 THE SOCIETY OF CLERKS-AT-THE-TABLE IN COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTS HOUSE OF LORDS LONDON SW1A 0PW © The Society of Clerks-at-the-Table in Commonwealth Parliaments 2007 ISBN 978-0-904979-32-6 ISSN 0264-7133 CONTENTS Editorial 1 Parliamentary Control of Finance: Bringing Back the Revolution HARRY EVANS 9 Shield or Sword? Parliamentary Privilege, Charter Rights and the Rule of Law 17 CHARLES ROBERT AND VINCE MACNEIL Multiple Choice Voting 39 ANDREW MAKOWER, PAUL BRISTOW AND NICOLAS BESLY When is Ministerial Briefing Material Protected by Parliamentary Privilege and what are the Implications? 49 NEIL LAURIE Parliamentary Privilege and Modern Communications: a Postscript 62 NEIL LAURIE The Australian Parliamentary Studies Centre: Strengthening Parliamentary Institutions Project 69 IAN HARRIS Westminster, Past and Present 73 Miscellaneous Notes 89 Comparative Study: Developments in Support Services 123 Privilege 169 Standing Orders 189 Sitting Times 215 Unparliamentary Expressions 218 Books and Videos on Parliament 222 Index 226 iii THE TABLE The Journal of The Society of Clerks-at-the-Table in Commonwealth Parliaments EDITORIAL In the House of Lords 2006 saw the election of Baroness Hayman as the first Lord Speaker, bringing to an end a centuries-long sequence of Lord Chancellors who have held the post of Speaker ex officio. Having been elected in a secret ballot by the Members of the House of Lords, Baroness Hayman replaced the Lord Chancellor on the Woolsack with little ceremony, on 4 July 2006. The election of a Speaker was undoubtedly among the most significant events in the House of Lords in recent years.
  • PARLIAMENT of WESTERN AUSTRALIA Legislative Council

    PARLIAMENT of WESTERN AUSTRALIA Legislative Council

    PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA HON JOE BERINSON, MLC Condolence Motion Legislative Council Tuesday, 26 June 2018 Reprinted from Hansard Legislative Council Tuesday, 26 June 2018 ____________ HON JOE BERINSON Condolence Motion HON SUE ELLERY (South Metropolitan — Leader of the House) [2.02 pm] — without notice: I move — That this house expresses its deep regret at the death of Hon Joe Berinson, a former member of the Legislative Council for the North-East Metropolitan Province, later reconstituted as the North Central Metropolitan Province, and the North Metropolitan Region; and places on record its appreciation for his long public service, and tenders its profound sympathy to his wife and members of his family in their bereavement. Can I begin by paying my respects to Joe’s family and friends, leaders from the Western Australian Jewish community, and the many former members of Parliament who are with us in the gallery today as we pay our respects to Hon Joe Berinson. Joseph Max Berinson, or Joe as everybody knew him, was born at the family home near Hyde Park on 7 January 1932. Joe attended Highgate Primary School, which, to use his own words, was a real melting pot. When asked about whether he faced much bigotry while growing up due to his Jewish heritage, Joe remarked that he doubted very much whether as many as half of the pupils at Highgate primary came from other than immigrant families. In his own words, he said, “It was a great mixture there, so if you weren’t Jewish, you were Greek or Italian or something—Polish.” Joe did well at school and won a scholarship to attend Perth Modern School.
  • Feminism, Politics and Women's Policy in Western Australia, 1972

    Feminism, Politics and Women's Policy in Western Australia, 1972

    Burning Down the House?: Feminism, Politics and Women’s Policy in Western Australia, 1972-1998 Jasmina Brankovich, BA (Hons) UWA This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Western Australia School of Humanities, Discipline of History 2007 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the constraints and options inherent in placing feminist demands on the state, the limits of such interventions, and the subjective, intimate understandings of feminism among agents who have aimed to change the state from within. First, I describe the central element of a „femocratic‟ policy machinery as a three-tiered network of politicians, public servants, and women in community organisations and political lobbies, who were agents of a particular brand of feminism. I focus on the formation of a women‟s information service, passage of equal opportunity legislation, and a legislative decriminalisation of early abortion, as case studies where these networks were most effective in engendering change. Second, the politics of the 1970s Perth women‟s movement shared a heritage of peculiarly Australian tradition of social liberalism, where the state intervened to equalise the unequal social order. The „feminism‟ articulated within the state was influenced by social liberalism, but was also configured and reconfigured according to the specific Western Australian political context. Third, the material obtained in interviews with women politicians and senior bureaucrats constituted the most important source of the women‟s understandings of the politically volatile arenas of public life in which they worked. In particular, insights gathered in this material underscored and reinforced the complexities of feminist involvement with the state and the fragile, contraditory nature of feminist gains.

  • Gumtntent Aette

    [5731 Gumtntent aette OF WESTERN AUSTRAUA Published by Authority at 3.30 p.m. No. 15] PERTH: FRIDAY, 15 FEBRUARY [1985 Land Act 1933. Land Act 1933. PROCLAMATION PROCLAMATION WESTERN AUSTRALIA 1 By His Excellency Professor Gordon Reid, Governor WESTERN AUSTRALIA 1 By His Excellency Professor Gordon Reid, Governor GORDON REID, fin and over the State of Western Australia and GORDON REID, fin and over the State of Western Australia and Governor, its Dependencies in the Commonsvealth of Australia. Governor, its Depondencies in the Commonwealth of Australia. [L.SJ [L.S.] File No. 2300/58. File No. 2423/897v2. WHEREAS by section 31 2 of the Land Act 1933, WHEREAS by section 31 2 of the Land Act 1933, the Governor may by Proclamation cancel the reserva the Governor may by Proclamation cancel the reserva tion of any land classified as of Class "B"; and whereas tion of any land classified as of Class "B"; and whereas it is deemed expedient that Class "B" Reserve No. 24476 it is deemed expedient that Class "B" Reserve No. 24870 for "Hospital Purposes" as described in the Schedule for "Purposes of the Royal Perth Hospital" as described hereunder should be cancelled: Now therefore, I, the in the Schedule hereunder should be cancelled: Now Governor, with the advice and consent of Executive therefore, I, the Governor, with the advice and consent Council do by this my Proclamation cancel the reserva of Executive Council do by this my Proclamation cancel tion as of Class "B" the land described in the Schedule the reservation as of Class "B" the land described in the hereunder.
  • Electoral Law in the State of Western Australia: an Overview

    Electoral Law in the State of Western Australia: an Overview

    Electoral Law in the State of Western Australia: An Overview Third edition Electoral Law in the State of Western Australia: An Overview Harry C.J. Phillips This book celebrates 100 years of the Electoral Act 1907 Western Australian Electoral Commission Perth 2008 (Third edition 2013) First published in 2008 by the Western Australian Electoral Commission. Third edition 2013. © Western Australian Electoral Commission This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be made to the publisher. Bibliography ISBN 978 0 9804173 4 0 This book celebrates 100 years of the Electoral Act 1907. Printed by State Law Publisher HARRY C.J. PHILLIPS Contents Foreword................................................................................................... xi Acknowledgments ...................................................................................... xii Abbreviations............................................................................................. xii Chapter One: The Colonial Legacy........................................................... 1 The Colonial Franchise ..................................................................... 1 The Colonial Voting System............................................................. 5 Constituency Boundaries................................................................... 6 Administration of the
  • Proportional Representation in Western Australia Its Principles

    Proportional Representation in Western Australia Its Principles

    Proportional Representation in Western Australia Its Principles, History, Outcomes and Education Harry C.J. Phillips WESTERN AUSTRALIAN Electoral Commission Table of Contents FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................................................... v CHAPTER 1 VOTING SYSTEMS, ELECTORAL LAW AND REPRESENTATION ............... 1 1.1 Representation.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Electoral law (Its components)..................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Types of Proportional Representation.......................................................................................... 3 (a) The list system...................................................................................................................... 4 (b) The Single Transferable Vote (STV) Form of PR................................................................ 4 CHAPTER 2 THE BEGINNINGS OF THE PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION QUEST IN AUSTRALIA............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Letter to the Inquirer (1870) ........................................................................................................ 7 2.2 The idealists in the Colonies
  • Hon George Cash, MLC (Member for North Metropolitan)

    Hon George Cash, MLC (Member for North Metropolitan)

    PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA VALEDICTORY SPEECH Hon George Cash, MLC (Member for North Metropolitan) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL — RETIRING MEMBERS Thursday, 21 May 2009 Reprinted from Hansard Legislative Council Thursday, 21 May 2009 ____________ LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL — RETIRING MEMBERS Valedictory Remarks — Motion Resumed from 20 May on the following motion moved by Hon Norman Moore (Leader of the House) — That this house expresses its appreciation to retiring members for their significant contribution to the Legislative Council and the state of Western Australia. HON GEORGE CASH (North Metropolitan) [11.56 am]: Firstly, as this is going to be my final speech to the Legislative Council, I say to members that it has been my honour to have been a member of both the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council for the past 24 and a half years. The good news is that I have enjoyed every minute of my membership of both houses of this Parliament. The other point that I should make is I would do it all again, starting tomorrow. That is how much I have enjoyed it, and I think that if anyone can leave a job with those sentiments, he or she has had a reasonable spin during that time, so to speak. The problem is of course that life is finite. The time has come for me to now move on to the next, I hope, exciting and productive phase of my life. I also hasten to add that during the period that I have been in Parliament—as I say, it has been a fantastic honour and opportunity—I have also made a lot of friends on both sides of the house.
  • 8 May 1990 1

    8 May 1990 1

    247 {Cvgilati (Tuuncit Tuesday, 8 May 1990 1 THE DEPUTY PRESIDENT (Hon J.M. Brown) took the Chair at 3.30 pm, and read prayers. MINISTERIAL STATEMENT - BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Companies and Securities Law Meeting HON J.M. BERINSON (North Metropolitan - Attorney General) [3.33 pm] - by leave: Last Thursday, I made a detailed statement about the current status of the Commonwealth's proposals to assume control of companies and securities law. I indicated at that time that the Comnmonwealth had proposed negotiations with a view to resolving its current impasse with the States, and had proposed 4 May 1990 as a meeting date. I also indicated that I would represent the State Government at the meeting, and would report back to the Parliament thereafter. In the event, Ministers of all States and the Northern Territory were able to meet as planned with the Commonwealth Attorney General, Hon Michael Duffy. It is fair to say that significant progress was made at the meeting on the broad framework of a possible compromise. Due to the short notice for the meeting, few Ministers were able to give a firm commidtment to proposals developed at that time. However, there was broad. in-principle acceptance of the New South Wales-Victorian joint proposal as a basis for negotiations. A further meeting of Ministers has been tentatively scheduled for 18 May 1990 to further consider important unresolved issues. In summary, the negotiations now appear to be proceeding on the basis that the Commonwealth will no longer seek to legislate unilaterally in the companies and securities area and will continue to utilise State law to overcome its identified and potential constitutional difficulties.