Tesi Di Dottorato Global Networks, Competitive Strategic Alliances in the Automotive Industry. the Case of Declining Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tesi Di Dottorato Global Networks, Competitive Strategic Alliances in the Automotive Industry. the Case of Declining Europe UNIVERSITY OF MILAN-BICOCCA DEMS - Department of Economics, Management and Statistics ISTEI - Section of Management Doctor of Philosophy in Marketing and Management Cycle XXVII Global Networks and Competitive Strategic Alliances in the Automotive Industry. The Case of declining Europe. Tutor: Prof. Silvio M. BRONDONI PhD Candidate: Francesca TREZZINI MATTA Student ID 700973 Academic Year 2015-2016 Declaration of originality The work referred to in the thesis has not been submitted in support of an application for another degree or qualification of this or any other University or other Institute of learning. I declare that this thesis embodies the result of my own work. Following normal academic conventions, I have made due acknowledgement of the work of others. Copyright statement Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the author. Copies (by any process) either in full, or of extracts, may be made only in accordance with instructions given by the author. © Francesca Trezzini Matta 2016 All rights reserved. However, this work may be reproduced, without authorisation, under the conditions for Fair Dealing. Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purpose of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. To Christian and to Thomas …love can do miracles… Contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 GLOBAL NETWORKS AND COMPETITIVE -STRATEGIC ALLIANCES IN A MARKET -DRIVEN ORIENTATION ........................................................................................................................ 7 1. Key-Elements of Globalisation Process ............................................................................ 7 1.1 New Capitalism and Societal Market Economy ............................................................ 10 2. Global Markets, Market-Driven Management and Network Organisation ..................... 15 2.1 Global Managerial Economics from Production Management to Market-Driven Management ........................................................................................................................ 15 2.1.1 Scarcity Economies and Production Management ..................................................... 15 2.1.2 Marketing Management in balanced Economies ....................................................... 16 2.1.3 Market-Driven Management and Over-Supply .......................................................... 18 3. Networks’ Growth and Competitive Strategic Alliances ................................................ 20 3.1 Competitive Strategic Alliances: a brief Literature Review .......................................... 23 3.2 Competitive Strategic Alliances Types: which Contracts Do Firms Use to Formalise the Alliances? ............................................................................................................................ 26 3.3 Competitive Strategic Alliances and Global Managerial Economics ........................... 32 3.4 Creating Competitive Customer Value through Competitive Strategic Alliances ........ 35 3.5 Competitive Strategic Alliances Success: are they always winning?............................ 36 3.5.1 Market-Driven Winners and Outside-In Capabilities ................................................. 37 3.5.2 Market-Space Competition, Cross-Cultural Management and Network Intangible Assets System ...................................................................................................................... 39 3.5.2.1 Network Intangible Assets System: Network Culture ............................................. 42 3.5.2.2 Network Intangible Assets System: Network Information System ......................... 42 3.5.2.3 Network Intangible Assets System: Network Identity ............................................ 43 3.6 Competitive Strategic Alliances Costs .......................................................................... 44 4. Global Networks and Global Product Policies in Managerial Economics ...................... 46 4.1 New Production Paradigms: the Lean Production ........................................................ 51 4.2 New Production Paradigms: to innovate or to imitate? ................................................. 56 5. Global Networks and Localisation Choices in Global Managerial Economics .............. 59 6. Global Networks and Distribution Policies: Brick-and-Mortar and Click-and-Mortar .. 62 7. Network Communication, Corporate Governance and Corporate Responsibility .......... 64 I 8. Network Metrics and Control of Global Business Relations .......................................... 66 COMPETITIVE STRATEGIC ALLIANCES IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY ........................ 68 1. Automotive Industry History .......................................................................................... 69 1.1 American Automotive Industry History: the Detroit Big Three from the ‘Golden Age’ to the End ............................................................................................................................ 71 1.2 Japanese Automotive Industry History: the ‘ Keiretsu ’ and the Culture of continuous Improvement ....................................................................................................................... 73 1.3 Korean Automotive Industry History: the Role of ‘ Chaebol ’ ....................................... 75 1.4 Chinese Automotive Industry History: from the Socialist Economy to the World Leading Industry ................................................................................................................. 77 2. Automotive Industry Structure and Players .................................................................... 78 2.1 Original Equipment Manufacturers ............................................................................... 79 2.2 Component Suppliers .................................................................................................... 82 2.3 Distributors or Dealers .................................................................................................. 86 3. The State of Art Automotive Industry ............................................................................. 87 3.1 Automotive Industry Production and Sales ................................................................... 90 3.2 Automotive Industry Trends ......................................................................................... 95 4. Automotive Industry Competitive Strategic Alliances.................................................. 105 4.1 Equity Strategic Alliances in the top 10 OEMs........................................................... 106 4.2 Other Equity and Non-Equity Strategic Alliances: some Examples ........................... 131 5. Automotive Industry Strategies: Innovation and Cost Competitive Management ........ 133 6. Automotive Industry new Challenges: they all say green! ............................................ 138 7. Emerging Imperatives and Issues .................................................................................. 141 THE CASE OF DECLINING EUROPE ................................................................................... 143 1. European Automotive Industry History ........................................................................ 143 1.1 The Continental Europe .............................................................................................. 144 1.2 The British Industry died at 109 .................................................................................. 149 2. The Engine of Europe ................................................................................................... 152 3. European Automotive Industry Sales and Production Figures ...................................... 154 4. Leading European Players ............................................................................................. 159 5. Why is Europe in Decline? ............................................................................................ 166 5.1 Impact of Industry Dynamics on Profitability ............................................................. 166 5.2 Excess of Production Capacity .................................................................................... 167 5.3 Demand Stagnation ..................................................................................................... 169 II 5.4 Demography ................................................................................................................ 170 5.5 Market Fragmentation and Lack of a unique Regulation ............................................ 171 5.6 Labour Market, Unemployment and Labour Unions .................................................. 172 5.7 R&D Expenditures and Innovation ............................................................................. 174 5.8 False Environmental Focus ......................................................................................... 176 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................. 181 APPENDIX ......................................................................................................................... 185 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................. 191 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Recommended publications
  • Chrysler, Dodge, Plymouth Brakes
    CHRYSLER, DODGE, PLYMOUTH BRAKES After Ford started build- mouth, the medium ing horseless carriages, priced DeSoto, and the many other people saw high priced Chrysler. their potential and they Soon after that, Chrysler started building similar purchased the Dodge vehicles. Engineers and Brothers Automobile and stylists formed many of Truck Company, and the the early companies so Dodge also became a they were building nice medium priced car just cars, but the companies below DeSoto. All of the didn’t have a coherent 1935 Chrysler Airflow Chrysler truck offerings business plan. Some of the early companies were marketed under the Dodge name and that has- merged together for strength and that didn’t nec- n’t changed. General Motors used the hierarchy essarily help their bottom line. One of the early principal and it was working well for the Company, companies that started having financial problems so Chrysler borrowed the idea. was the Maxwell-Chalmers Company. Walter P. Chrysler was asked to reorganize the company Chrysler ran into a situation in the early ‘30s when and make it competitive. Chrysler did that with the their advanced engineering and styling created an Willys brand and the company became competi- unexpected problem for the Company. Automotive tive and lasted as a car company until the ‘50s. stylists in the late-’20s were using aerodynamics to The company is still around today as a Jeep man- make the early cars less wind resistant and more ufacturer that is currently owned by Chrysler. On fuel-efficient. Chrysler started designing a new car June 6, 1925, the Maxwell-Chalmers Company with that idea in mind that was very smooth for the was reorganized into the Chrysler Company and time period and in 1934 they marketed the car as the former name was dropped and the new car the Chrysler Airflow.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Firms' Strategies and Practices in Europe
    1 ♦ Car firms’ strategies and practices in Europe Michel FREYSSENET (CNRS, Paris) Yannick LUNG (Bordeaux 4 University) GERPISA international network The automobile sector is often presented as the archetypal global industry. In this view, car business is one of the main driving forces behind the homogenisation of the world, both because of the firms’ internationalisation strategies (mergers-acquisitions, establishment of facilities in emerging countries, world cars, international division of labour, etc.) and as a result of the social practices enacted by them via their organisation of work and their influence upon lifestyle (automobile civilisation). Regarding the case of Europe, the present article is an attempt to deconstruct a representation that neglects the heterogeneity of firms and spaces, the great diversity of strategies pursued, and the inherent contradictions of the competitive process. For doing that, we will use the analytical approach of firms’ trajectories elaborated by us during the first and second international programs of GERPISA (Boyer, Freyssenet, 2000). Growth modes, profit strategies and productive models Analysing car makers’ trajectories and performances over the course of the 20th century allowed us to renew our understanding of the two essential conditions that are prerequisites for profitability. The first is the relevancy of the “profit strategy” to the “growth mode” that typifies the countries in which the firm is deploying its activities. The second is the “company government compromise” between a firm’s principal protagonists, a meeting of the minds that enables actors to implement means coherent with the profit strategy pursued—in other words, to invent or adopt a “productive model.” Profit strategies are combinations of profit sources in compatible proportions.
    [Show full text]
  • Multinational Activities of Major U. S. Automotive Producers
    . 1 PORT NOS. DOT-TSC-NHTSA-78-21 , 1 HS-803 542,11 i 18.5 . A34 no MULTINATIONAL ACTIVITIES OF MAJOR UO T - U.S. AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCERS T8C- Volume II — Data on Foreign Facilities and Operations NHTSA- 78-21 Robert C. Ronstadt William Casey J . P . Jeannet John Marth insen Robert Whorf Robert C. Ronstadt Associates, Inc. 46 Glen Street Dover MA 02030 . of TR.. SEPTEMBER 1978 Dept, FINAL REPORT of Transportation DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE U.S. PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE. SPRINGFIELD VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION Office of Research and Development Washington DC 20590 . NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro- ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. 1 . Report Nc. 2. Government Accession No 3. Recipient's Cotolog No HS-803 542,11 4 5. Report Dote M^TINATIONAL ACTIVITIES OF MAJOR September 1978 AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCERS U.S. 6 Performing Orgoni zotion Code Volume II — Data on Foreign Facilities and Operations 8. Performing Orgoni zohon Report No. 7. Au-ho s £0 b ert Ronstadt, William Casey, DOT-TSC-NHTSA-78-21, II J.P. Jeannet, John Marthinsen, and Robert Whorf 9. Performing Orgomzotion Nome and Address 10. Work Unit No (TRAIS) HS828/R9 4 01 Robert C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Work Project, Presented As Part of the Requirements for the Award of a Master's Degree in Finance from the Nova School of Bu
    A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master’s degree in Finance from the Nova School of Business and Economics. PSA-FCA Merger: Carlos Tavares’ road to glory? Ricardo Manuel Firmino Cristóvão Work project carried out under the supervision of: Professor Paulo Soares de Pinho 03-01-2021 PSA-FCA Merger: Carlos Tavares’ road to glory? Abstract The present case-study intends to analyse the merger of Groupe PSA (Peugeot Société Anonyme) and FCA Group (Fiat Chrysler Automobiles), announced on the 18th of December 2019. The case-study will explore the merger through a narrative and a teaching note. The narrative will explore the history of both groups and relevant events that influence their path to the present situation, while also providing the details of the merger. The teaching note will study the motivations of both groups to be part of the deal, analyse the expected synergies and possible gains or losses for shareholders. Key words: Merger; Fiat Chrysler Automobiles; Peugeot Société Anonyme; Automotive Industry This work used infrastructure and resources funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/ECO/00124/2013, UID/ECO/00124/2019 and Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209), POR Lisboa (LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007722 and Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209) and POR Norte (Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209). 1 PSA-FCA Merger: Carlos Tavares’ road to glory? It was September 2019, and Carlos Tavares, Groupe PSA’s CEO, was sitting in his office after a board meeting. Tavares was thinking about the mandate he had attributed to his former colleague at Nissan Larry Dominique: getting Peugeot back into the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • UAW-GM National Agreement
    ® Agreement Between the UAW and GENERAL MOTORS LLC ® October 16, 2019 (Effective October 28, 2019) INDEX Paragraph Page No. No. Additional Bargaining Units ........................... 2, 2a 1 Address List of Employees............................... 74a 59 Administration of the Agreement – Review Procedures...................................... 5a 12 Agency Shop...................................................... 4g1, 4g2 4 Appeal Committee............................................ 39 31 Appendix A – Employee Placement................ 161 Appendix B – Date of Entry Status – Apprentices and JITs ................................. 187 Appendix C – Skilled Trades Seniority as Affected by Certain Leaves; Computing Time Credited in a Skilled Trades Classification.................................... 188 Appendix D – Computing Credit Toward Acquiring Seniority ....................... 190 Appendix F – Maintenance Sub- Contracting ................................................. 192 Appendix F-1 – Sub-Contracting Work........... 194 Appendix F-2 – Sub-Contracting – Special Procedure........................................ 197 Appendix I – Special Skilled Trades Representative............................................. 198 Appendix K – Memorandum Of Understanding............................................. 202 Appendix L – Sourcing ..................................... 206 Apprentices .......................................................119-151 100-119 Approval of Local Seniority Agreements ....... 59 43-44 Approval of Shift Preference Agreements.....
    [Show full text]
  • IHS Automotive Supplying the Oems Supplierbusiness Supplying the Fiat Chrysler Group
    IHS Automotive Supplying the OEMs SupplierBusiness Supplying the Fiat Chrysler Group 2014 edition supplierbusiness.com SAMPLE IHS Automotive SupplierBusiness | Supplying the Fiat Chrysler Group Contents Overview .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Global market overview .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Financial data ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Source: Fiat, Reuters, Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings ................................................................................ 7 Fiat & Chrysler financial overview ............................................................................................................................. 7 Product and Platform Strategy ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Strategy review ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Major model programmes ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Ram 1500 ...................................................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Corrective Action Baseline
    2020 Corrective Action Baseline: 3,779 facilities sorted by facility name * 1,814 out of 3,779 facilities have reached Remedy Construction as of April 22, 2013 Facility Name Region State EPA ID Remedy Construction 1 K C Industries Properties Llc 4 FL FLD004106811 2 101St Airborne Division (Air Assault) & Ft Campbell 4 TN TN5210020140 3 1033 Kings Highway Llc 2 NY NYD000233510 Remedy Construction 4 189 Tonawanda St Corp 2 NY NYD980526818 Remedy Construction 5 1990 Bay Road 9 CA CAT000611350 Remedy Construction 6 21St Century Env Man Inc Of Illinois 5 IL ILD981531643 Remedy Construction 7 21St Century Environmental Mgmt Inc 1 RI RID980906986 8 21St Century Environmental Mgt. Of Nv Llc 9 NV NVD980895338 9 27 Sow Afsoc Usaf Cannon Afb Nm 6 NM NM7572124454 10 2910 W Beaver St Llc 4 FL FLD020982716 Remedy Construction 11 3358471 Los Angeles Refinery Wilmington 9 CA CAD008237679 12 3D Investment Inc 7 NE NED986368728 Remedy Construction 13 3M ‐ Cottage Grove 5 MN MND006172969 14 3M Columbia 7 MO MOD054950670 Remedy Construction 15 3M Company 4 AL ALD004023164 Remedy Construction 16 3M Company Brownwood 6 TX TXD001806868 Remedy Construction 17 3M Copley Chemical 5 OH OHD000716910 18 3M Cordova 5 IL ILD054236443 Remedy Construction 19 5200 East Cork St Investors Llc 5 MI MID001876663 20 914Th Airlift Wing (Afrc) 2 NY NY0570024273 Remedy Construction 21 A & B Enterprises 5 WI WID006103899 22 A American Environmental L L C 9 CA CAD089446710 Remedy Construction 23 A B Carter Inc 4 NC NCD003154010 Remedy Construction 24 A J Tuck Co 1 CT CTD001451855 25 A M P Inc 3 PA PAD980550172 Remedy Construction 26 A T F Davidson Co Inc 1 MA MAD046128559 27 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Bentley Since 1965 Kindle
    BENTLEY SINCE 1965 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK James Taylor | 192 pages | 01 Oct 2012 | The Crowood Press Ltd | 9781847973719 | English | Ramsbury, United Kingdom Bentley Since 1965 PDF Book The Independent. Within ten years, Bentley was again able to deliver a standalone model in the shape of the astounding Continental R. British car industry — companies and marques. Barnato had incorporated Baromans Ltd in , which existed as his finance and investment vehicle. ISBN: , Published by TeNeus A luxurious journey into the powerful world of the Bentley brand An inspiration for anyone interested in automotive excellence Bentley is a brand that is We're featuring millions of their reader ratings on our book pages to help you find your new favourite book. Accept all Manage Cookies. Review Subject Required. Download as PDF Printable version. Volkswagen Group —. This model bears many similarities to the later Rolls-Royce Camargue , also designed by Pininfarina. Rover Company. Retrieved 18 March The Wall Street Journal. Essential We use cookies to provide our services , for example, to keep track of items stored in your shopping basket, prevent fraudulent activity, improve the security of our services, keep track of your specific preferences e. Silver Shadow -based. London: Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd. Autostadt Ehra-Lessien Factories. Retrieved 23 July These, known as "the silent sports car," have been successfully marketed for almost twenty years now in various models. Daily Express Review of the Motor Show. Bentley in in Cricklewood, North London—and became widely known for winning the 24 Hours of Le Mans in , , , and Retrieved 10 August Vanden Plas. This arrangement ceased at the end of after around 1, cars, with all car production reverting to the Crewe plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Hillman Cars Free Ebook
    HILLMAN CARS DOWNLOAD FREE BOOK Malcolm Bobbitt | 64 pages | 30 Jul 2011 | Crecy Publishing | 9781908347015 | English | Appleby, United Kingdom Hillman Minx This history has been put together from other related websites and documentation, links to the websites are shown below. Only one of the strike committee members was Hillman Cars. A variety of manual transmissionswith column or floor change, and automatic transmissions were offered. The task Hillman Cars the brothers was that of turning failure into success - and they accepted Hillman Cars challenge. Categories : Hillman vehicles Rear-wheel-drive vehicles Cars introduced in s cars s cars s cars s cars Station wagons Sedans. In this way, we shall be able to Hillman Cars policy and expansion both in the UK and world markets and work together to one another's advantage. Hillman Minx Convertibles, and Projecsts for sale. Dawson has created a model of "11NR" with a 1. Hillman Minx Series V. Hillman Cars car was put out of the race by a crash, but it had made a splash. Some models were re-badged in certain markets, with the Sunbeam and Humber marques used for some exports. The shop stewards at the Acton factory Hillman Cars learned how to shout strike when a couple of newly weds at the factory, Hillman Cars were Hillman Cars shift workers, asked to be transferred to day shift. During the Hillman Cars company also produced a Hillman Cars five-seat model "14" with a 4-cylinder 2. At the beginning of the war, 17, employees were on the Rootes Hillman Cars. In"Minx" was the first British Hillman Cars car received a fully Hillman Cars four-speed gearbox.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Iowa District Court in and for Polk County State
    E-FILED 2017 OCT 26 11:33 AM POLK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY STATE OF IOWA ex rel. THOMAS J. MILLER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF IOWA EQUITY NO. EQCE082171 PLAINTIFF, v. CONSENT JUDGMENT ENTRY AND ORDER GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY. DEFENDANT. Plaintiff, State of Iowa, acting by and through Attorney General Thomas J. Miller has brought this action pursuant to provisions of the Consumer Fraud Act, Iowa Code § 714.16 (the “Iowa Consumer Fraud Act”), having filed a complaint against General Motors Company (“GM”). Plaintiff and GM, by their counsel, have agreed to the entry of this Agreed Consent Judgment (“Consent Judgment”) without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law and without admission by GM of any wrongdoing or admission of any of the violations of the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act or any other law as alleged by Plaintiff. Contemporaneous with the filing of this Consent Judgment, GM is entering into similar agreements with the Attorneys General of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, West 1 E-FILED 2017 OCT 26 11:33 AM POLK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Attorneys General” or “Signatory Attorneys General”). 1 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1.1 In 2014, an Attorneys General Multistate Working Group (“MSWG”)—of which Iowa is a member—initiated an investigation (the “Investigation”) into certain business practices of GM 1 concerning GM’s issuance of the following Recalls: NHTSA Recall Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Amended and Restated Master Sale & Purchase Agreement Disclosure
    Amended and Restated Master Sale & Purchase Agreement Disclosure Schedule Execution Version First Update to Sellers’ Disclosure Schedule Pursuant to Section 6.5, Section 6.6 and Section 6.26 of that certain Amended and Restated Master Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2009 (the “Agreement”), made by and among General Motors Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), Saturn LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“S LLC”), Saturn Distribution Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“S Distribution”), Chevrolet-Saturn of Harlem, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Harlem,” and collectively with Parent, S LLC and S Distribution, “Sellers,” and each a “Seller”), and NGMCO, Inc., a Delaware corporation and successor-in-interest to Vehicle Acquisition Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Purchaser”), the Sellers’ Disclosure Schedule delivered on June 1, 2009, as amended, is hereby being updated as set forth herein (as amended and updated, this “Sellers’ Disclosure Schedule”). Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used in this Sellers’ Disclosure Schedule have the respective meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. The representations and warranties of Sellers set forth in the Agreement are made and given subject to the disclosures contained in this Sellers’ Disclosure Schedule. Inclusion of information in this Sellers’ Disclosure Schedule shall not be construed as an admission that such information is material to the business, operations or condition of the business of Sellers, the Purchased
    [Show full text]
  • FIAT SPA Case Study Copenhagen Business School
    MSc. in Economics and Business Administration Cand. merc. Strategy, Organization and Leadership “From International to Global” – FIAT S.P.A. case study Student: Marco Marinozzi 05/09/2014 Supervisor: Christer Karlsson Ph.D. Number of pages: 87 Number of characters: 237,861 Copenhagen Business School – 2014 1 Abstract We live in a World of uncertainty, where business cycles are shortening and competition is increasing, requiring companies and their strategies to be suitable to continuous changes and adaptations. Just like it happened in other sectors, the economic crisis Western economies have been experiencing in these years heavily influenced the Automotive Industry’s dynamics. The Car Industry is in fact strongly linked to the business cycles, as showed also by Haugh et al. (2010). The sector has always been characterized by a high intensity of rivalry, and such rivalry and increasing concentration will inevitably lead to a struggle for survival out of which only a few groups will emerge. The industry is capital intensive and with a high capital-to-labor ratio. In the past years production has been moving increasingly towards emerging countries particularly due to decentralization processes and outsourcing. The outsourcing phenomenon is also provoking shifts and changes along the industry’s value chain, with suppliers gaining more and more power. The saturation of traditional markets, accompanied with an overall negative business cycle, is pushing car- makers to look for new ways to sustain their production, currently affected by over-capacity problems in many regions of the World. Many Automotive Industry’s CEOs are aware of the fact that change has to take place within companies in order to face the Globalization of Markets, but the majority of them don’t believe such transformation should include activities like mergers, acquisitions or alliances, as showed by a study conducted by Price Waterhouse Cooper (2014).
    [Show full text]