DOCSLIB.ORG

Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Plan R E S O U C Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Plan .............................................. March 2015 N A T U R A L N A This publication is available from: Washington State Department of Natural Resources Recreation Program PO Box 47014 1111 Washington St. SE Olympia, WA 98504-7000 360-902-1600 [email protected] www.dnr.wa.gov Persons needing this information in an alternative format may contact DNR at the listing above. Acknowledgments The Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Plan was created through a public planning process that brought together users, neighbors, interest groups, citizens, and staff from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to develop a comprehensive plan to direct future recreation use and public access within the area. The following individuals and organizations contributed to the development of this document. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Peter Goldmark, Commissioner of Public Lands PLANNING COMMITTEE MEMBERS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SNOQUALMIE CORRIDOR PROJECT TEAM The committee provided valuable and diverse input throughout the planning process. The final concept map being recommended Doug McClelland, South Puget Sound by DNR is based on considerable input from the committee, the Assistant Region Manager public, and information learned during the planning process. Lisa Anderson, Statewide Recreation Committee members include: Planning and Policy Manager Brock Milliern, Assistant Division Manager- Jim Berry Statewide Recreation Program Manager Mark Boyar Kelly Heintz, South Puget Sound Region, Amy Brockhaus Natural Areas Manager Jenni Creveling Sam Jarrett, South Puget Sound Region, Harold Erland Snoqualmie Unit, Recreation Manager Robert Eversole Pene Speaks, Assistant Division Manager- Glenn Glover Natural Heritage Conservation Section Ted Jackson Curt Pavola, Natural Areas Program Manager David Kappler Cynthia Comfort, Environmental Planner- Conservation, Recreation & Transactions Sarah Krueger Tyler Traweek, South Puget Sound Region, Mire Levy Snoqualmie Forest Manager Rick McGuire Rebecca Needham Thomas O’Keefe UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON - PROJECT TEAM Robert Pattie Gordon Bradley, Professor, School of Ann Shilling Environmental and Forest Sciences Mike Town Laura Cooper, Research Assistant, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences and DNR DNR COMMUNICATIONS AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Recreation Planner Jason Goldstein, Geographic Information Systems Analyst DNR STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) CENTER Jessica Payne, Recreation Communications & Karen Arnold, SEPA Environmental Review Outreach Coordinator Program Lead Cover photo credits to Washington State DNR Fred Greef, SEPA Consultant Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Plan .............................................. March 2015 Table of Contents Letter from Commissioner of Public Lands Peter Goldmark 15 Introduction 17 The Washington State Department of Natural Resources 18 Agency Mission 18 Agency Vision 18 Our Guiding Principles 19 State Trust Lands 19 DNR Natural Areas Program 20 DNR Statewide Recreation Program PART I 21 Project Overview 23 Recreation Planning Area Description 26 Recreation Planning Area Context 29 Current Recreation Opportunities in the Recreation Planning Area 29 Summary of Current Recreation Opportunities PART II 33 The Plan 35 Recreation Plan Purpose and Use 35 Other Planning Efforts 36 Concept Maps 39 Objectives and Strategies 39 Recreation Planning Units 40 Recreational Facilities 43 Recreational Trails 46 Dispersed Recreation Management 47 Managed Access & Group Events 47 Restoration 49 Partnerships and Volunteer Coordination 50 Education and Enforcement 52 Adaptive Management 52 Sustainable Funding 53 Implementation PART III 55 Planning Area Background 57 South Puget Sound Region and Recreation 59 Ecological Description of the Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Planning Area 62 The Mountains to Sound Greenway 62 Snoqualmie Unit Advisory Committee PART IV 63 The Planning Process 65 Developing the Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Plan 67 Recreation Land Suitability 71 Public Involvement 71 The Project “Kick-Off” Public Meeting 72 User Survey 72 Recreation Planning Committee 73 Field Data Collection and Mapping 74 In Closing PART V 75 Regulations and Policy Information REFERENCES 79 References APPENDICES 83 Appendices 85p A pendix A: Glossary of Terms 90 Appendix B: Recreation Planning Committee Meetings 91 Appendix C: Recreation Planning Committee Field Trips 92 Appendix D: Public Kick-off Meeting Summary of Comments 98 Appendix E: State Route 18 – Issaquah Hobart Road to I-90 Improvement Project 99 Appendix F: Existing Recreation Trails in the Recreation Planning Area 100 Appendix G: Certificate of Adoption LIST OF FIGURES Figures AND TABLES 17 Figure 1. DNR Regions and Project Location 24 Figure 2. Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Planning Units 25 Figure 3. Recreation Planning Unit Landtype Designations 27 Figure 4. Recreation Planning Area Context 31 Figure 5. Current Recreation Opportunities: Recreation Planning Area – West 32 Figure 6. Current Recreation Opportunities: Recreation Planning Area – East 37 Figure 7. Concept Map of Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Planning Area - West 38 Figure 8. Concept Map of Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Planning Area - East 58 Figure 9. Service Area and Proximity to Urban Growth Areas 60 Figure 10. Recreation Planning Area Elevation Bands 68 Figure 11. Recreation Land Suitability: Hiking Trails 69 Figure 12. Recreation Land Suitability: Non-Motorized Trails 70 Figure 13. Recreation Land Suitability: Recreation Facilities Tables 28 Table 1. Nearby and Adjacent Public Lands 30 Table 2. Existing DNR-managed Facilities in the Recreation Planning Area 39 Table 3. Recreation Planning Unit Management Objectives 53 Table 4. Implementation Priorities and Phases 54 Table 5. Implementation Priorities and Phases Continued 67 Table 6. Suitability Criteria 90 Table 7. Recreation Planning Committee Meetings and Main Agenda Items 91 Table 8. Recreation Planning Committee Field Trips 99 Table 9. Existing Designated Trails in Recreation Planning Area Introduction 15 Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Plan | March 2015 16 Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Plan | March 2015 Introduction The Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) uses a recreation planning process that actively engages the public in developing recreation plans for DNR-managed landscapes. The Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Plan provides guidance for recreation development and management on DNR- managed lands in the Snoqualmie Corridor for the next 10-15 years. It builds on previous planning efforts for the area, provides goals and objectives for recreational opportunities, and identifies strategies for achieving the objectives and implementing projects. Washington State Department of Natural Resources The Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Planning Area is part of Washington’s heritage of public lands. DNR manages 5.6 million acres of forest, range, aquatic, agricultural, conservation, and commercial lands for the people of Washington State. Approximately 3 million acres are state trust lands that generate more than $200 million each year in non-tax revenue; much of which supports public schools, state institutions, and county services. The lands are also managed to provide fish and wildlife habitat, clean and abundant water, and public access to outdoor recreational opportunities. FIGURE 1. DNR Regions and Project Location 17 Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Plan | March 2015 DNR also fights wildfires on public and private lands, helps communities with fire prevention and urban forestry resources, manages a Natural Areas program that protects native species and ecosystems, administers state forest practices rules, provides geological services, regulates surface mine reclamation, and supplies knowledge about forestry, mining, rare native plant species, ecosystems, and geologic hazards. DNR-managed lands are organized into six geographic regions. Each region manages the day-to-day operations involved in protecting and managing the public lands. The Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Planning Area is located in the South Puget Sound Region (see Figure 1). Agency Mission In partnership with citizens and governments, DNR provides innovative leadership and expertise to ensure environmental protection, public safety, perpetual funding for schools and communities, and a rich quality of life. Agency Vision Our decisions and hard work on the ground leave a legacy of healthy forests, clean water, thriving ecosystems, and a vibrant natural resource-based economy. Our Guiding Principles MANAGE THE STATE’S RESOURCES SUSTAINABLY Through our sustainable management of resources entrusted to our care, future generations will have ample opportunities to enjoy and benefit from Washington’s rich natural heritage. We will also ensure that revenues for our trusts will be stable or growing and that associated industries will thrive for generations to come. MAKE DECISIONS BASED ON SOUND SCIENCE Using sound science, data, and information to guide our decisions will result in the best possible outcomes for the State of Washington. MAKE DECISIONS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND WITH THE PUBLIC’S KNOWLEDGE Transparency and accountability are vital to earn the public’s trust and appropriately manage shared resources. Decisions should be made for the benefit of current and future generations. 18 Snoqualmie Corridor Recreation Plan | March 2015 State Trust Lands By law, state trust lands are to be held in trust and managed to sustainably
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geology and Structural Evolution of the Foss River-Deception Creek Area, Cascade Mountains, Washington
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF James William McDougall for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on Lune, icnct Title: GEOLOGY AND STRUCTURALEVOLUTION OF THE FOSS RIVER-DECEPTION CREEK AREA,CASCADE MOUNTAINS, WASHINGTOV, Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: Robert S. Yekis Southwest of Stevens Pass, Washington,immediately west of the crest of the Cascade Range, pre-Tertiaryrocks include the Chiwaukum Schist, dominantly biotite-quartzschist characterized by a polyphase metamorphic history,that correlates with schistose basement east of the area of study.Pre-Tertiary Easton Schist, dominated by graphitic phyllite, is principallyexposed in a horst on Tonga Ridge, however, it also occurs eastof the horst.Altered peridotite correlated to Late Jurassic IngallsComplex crops out on the western margin of the Mount Stuart uplift nearDeception Pass. The Mount Stuart batholith of Late Cretaceous age,dominantly granodiorite to tonalite, and its satellite, the Beck lerPeak stock, intrude Chiwaukum Schist, Easton Schist, andIngalls Complex. Tertiary rocks include early Eocene Swauk Formation, a thick sequence of fluviatile polymictic conglomerateand arkosic sandstone that contains clasts resembling metamorphic and plutonic basement rocks in the northwestern part of the thesis area.The Swauk Formation lacks clasts of Chiwaukum Schist that would be ex- pected from source areas to the east and northeast.The Oligocene (?) Mount Daniel volcanics, dominated by altered pyroclastic rocks, in- trude and unconformably overlie the Swauk Formation.The
    [Show full text]
  • Sahalie Historical Note #7: the Snoqualmie Pass Ski Lodges
    Sahalie Historical Note #7: The Snoqualmie Pass Ski Lodges The history of club lodges at Snoqualmie Pass begins in 1914 and expands through the 1920s and 1930s, when enthusiasm for winter recreation first began to take off in the Northwest. The earliest general news article that describes the various accommodations at the Pass dates from 1933.1 It describes the Kendall Peak Lodge “built by a group of Seattleites” and the College Club’s lodge above Lake Keechelus, called either Mountain Goat Lodge or Roaring Creek Lodge; the article also notes a lodge run by the Helen Bush School for Girls. All have since disappeared, to my knowledge. (If you know differently, or can provide background, speak up.) Newspapers around 1940 also mention a Sno‐Owl Ski Club with a cabin at the Pass, but I can’t find anything more about it. Another good summary article of ski clubs in the area was published in late 1944.2 Enos Bradner noted that, “ Skiers who reside in the vicinity of Seattle have spread out before them as varied and as exciting a ski terrain in the Cascades and the Olympics as will be found anywhere in the United States….” The main anchors over the years at Snoqualmie Pass include the Mountaineers, Seattle Ski Club, Sahalie, Washington Alpine and, more recently, Berghaus. Here is a quick snapshot with some history for each. The Mountaineers. This venerable organization (founded in 1906) is the oldest club to have had a lodge in the Snoqualmie Pass area. The Mountaineers built its first lodge just west of the summit above Rockdale in 1914.
    [Show full text]
  • Requested Action — Expedited
    WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Date: March 16, 2006 Place: Centennial Conference Center 719 East 3rd Street Cle Elum, WA 98922 (509) 674-7530 Time: 9 a.m. Flag Salute: Jason Both, Park Ranger 2, Lake Easton State Park Call of the Roll Introduction of Staff Recognition of State and Local Officials Recognition of Local Volunteers Service Pins A. Agenda Approval B. Minutes of Previous Meeting C. Public Comments – New and ongoing issues not on the agenda D. Area and Region Reports Area Report: Maurya Broadsword, Senior Park Aide, Lake Easton State Park Region Report: Don Hoch, Puget Sound Region Manager E. Business Agenda Items Requested Action — Expedited E-1: Restructuring the Lake Sammamish Advisory Committee This item asks the Commission to amend the Lake Sammamish Advisory Committee charter to add an additional “at large” position to the committee. This complies with the Centennial 2013 Plan elements, “Our Commitment – Stewardship.” Author: Peter Herzog, Parks Planner (360) 902-8562 [email protected] Park(s) Affected: Lake Sammamish State Park Action taken: Passed as requested E-2: 2006 Inholdings – Trust land transfer and other acquisitions This item requests the Commission to determine that certain properties are suitable for state park purposes at Bogachiel, Burrows Island, Dosewallips, Fields Spring, Fort Casey, Klickitat Trail, Lake Easton, Ocean City and Riverside state parks and at Hartstine Island. This request complies with the Centennial 2013 Plan element, "Our Commitment – Stewardship." Author:
    [Show full text]
  • RCFB April 2021 Page 1 Agenda TUESDAY, April 27 OPENING and MANAGEMENT REPORTS 9:00 A.M
    REVISED 4/8/21 Proposed Agenda Recreation and Conservation Funding Board April 27, 2021 Online Meeting ATTENTION: Protecting the public, our partners, and our staff are of the utmost importance. Due to health concerns with the novel coronavirus this meeting will be held online. The public is encouraged to participate online and will be given opportunities to comment, as noted below. If you wish to participate online, please click the link below to register and follow the instructions in advance of the meeting. Technical support for the meeting will be provided by RCO’s board liaison who can be reached at [email protected]. Registration Link: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_JqkQAGCrRSOwbHLmg3a6oA Phone Option: (669)900-6833 - Webinar ID: 967 5491 2108 Location: RCO will also have a public meeting location for members of the public to listen via phone as required by the Open Public Meeting Act, unless this requirement is waived by gubernatorial executive order. In order to enter the building, the public must not exhibit symptoms of the COVID-19 and will be required to comply with current state law around personal protective equipment. RCO staff will meet the public in front of the main entrance to the natural resources building and escort them in. *Additionally, RCO will record this meeting and would be happy to assist you after the meeting to gain access to the information. Order of Presentation: In general, each agenda item will include a short staff presentation and followed by board discussion. The board only makes decisions following the public comment portion of the agenda decision item.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations Governing the Public Use of Washington State Parks
    PARK RULES Regulations Governing the Public Use of Washington State Parks Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission NOTE: Regulations are subject to change. Contact park staff if you have questions. P&R 45-30100-54 (10/13) Table of Contents Page Chapter 352-32 WAC Public Use of State Park Areas (08/13/2013) .......................................................................................... 1 Chapter 352-12 WAC Moorage and Use of Marine and Inland Water Facilities (11/20/2008) ........................................................................................ 25 Chapter 352-20 WAC Use of Motor Driven Vehicles in State Parks–Parking Restrictions–Violations (11/30/2005) ........................................................................................ 27 Commission Policy/Procedure 65-13-1 Use of Other Power-Driven Mobility Devices by Persons with Disabilities at State Park Facilities (10/22/2013) ........................................................................................ 29 Chapter 352-37 WAC Ocean Beaches (08/13/2013) ........................................................................................ 39 i Chapter 352-32 Chapter 352-32 WAC PUBLIC USE OF STATE PARK AREAS WAC DISPOSITION OF SECTIONS FORMERLY 352-32-010 Definitions. CODIFIED IN THIS CHAPTER 352-32-01001 Feeding wildlife. 352-32-011 Dress standards. 352-32-020 Police powers granted to certain employees. [Order 35, § 352-32-020, filed 7/29/77; Order 9, § 352-32-020, 352-32-030 Camping. filed 11/24/70.] Repealed by WSR 82-07-076 (Order 352-32-037 Environmental learning centers (ELCs). 56), filed 3/23/82. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.51.040. 352-32-040 Picnicking. 352-32-035 Campsite reservation. [Statutory Authority: RCW 352-32-045 Reservations for use of designated group facilities. 43.51.040(2). WSR 95-14-004, § 352-32-035, filed 352-32-047 Special recreation event permit.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Summits
    EVERETT MOUNTAINEERS Recommended Winter Summits Snow and weather conditions greatly influence the difficulty of winter scrambles. Because conditions change very quickly, things like road access, avalanche hazard, strenuousness, and summit success can vary a tremendous amount. So these ratings are only a rough comparison of the peaks. Winter scrambling can be a dangerous activity. Be a smart scrambler -- be willing to turn back if conditions are unsafe. Even a slight deviation from the surveyed routes may affect exposure and avalanche hazard considerably. The fact that a peak is listed here does not represent that it will be safe. Exposure Rating Avalanche Rating A: Falling will only get snow on your face. B: Falling may require self arrest, but usually good A: Usually safe in high, considerable, moderate, and low run-out. avalanche conditions. C: Falling requires self arrest, unchecked falls could B: Often safe in moderate and low conditions. be serious. C: Only recommended in low conditions. Note that B-rated slopes could become C-rated when icy. Table of contents by region (peaks within each region listed from West to East): Highway 542 (Mt Baker Highway): Church, Excelsior, Barometer, Herman, Table Highway 20 (North Cascades Highway): Goat, Welker, Sauk, Lookout, Hidden Lake, Oakes, Damnation, Trappers, Sourdough, Ruby Highway 530 (Darrington area): Higgins, Round, Prairie Mountain Loop Highway: Pilchuck, Gordon (Anaconda), Long, Marble, Dickerman Highway 2 (west & east of Stevens Pass): Stickney, Persis, Philadelphia, Frog, Mineral Butte, Iron, Conglomerate Point, Baring, Palmer, Cleveland, Eagle Rock, Evergreen, Captain Point, Windy, Tunnel Vision, Big Chief, Cowboy, McCausland, Union, Jove, Lichtenberg, Jim Hill, Rock, Arrowhead, Natapoc, Tumwater I-90 (west & east of Snoqualmie Pass): Teneriffe, Green, Mailbox, Washington, Web, Kent, Bandera, Defiance, Pratt, Granite, Humpback, Silver, Snoqualmie, Kendall, Guye, Catherine, Margaret, Baldy, Thomas, Amabalis, Hex, Jolly, Yellow Hill, Teanaway Butte Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Issaquahaips Trails Clu Alpinek July • August• September 2005
    Newsletter of the IssaquahAips Trails Clu ALPINEk July • August• September 2005 EAST LAKE SAMMAMISH TRAIL COMING By Doug Simpson The old railroad bed along the east side of Lake Besides crediting Sims and the county council, Sammamish hqs been battled over for years by Kappler also cited the council of the City of adjacent property owners and public use advo- Sammamish. "All the councilmen elected last cates. At last, those seeking public access have fall supported the project—and that was a big prevailed. The eleven-mile route, previously help." open in small sections on either end, will be Qpen in its entirety probably early next year. The interim trail will be gravel, most suitable for hiking, though some bikers will certainly use King County announced recently that it has I it too. Eventually it will probably paved, thus received the nine necessary permits to make the expanding its possible use. - full trail from Redmond to Issaquah a reality; The railroad property was acquired through a Opposition was heavy from local landowners national program called "Rails to Trails" which above the railroad bed who worry for the safely exists to convert old railroad beds to private of their property. "A high level of responsible organizations or local governments for use as use will be critical," Kappler pointed out. "It recreational trails. will take a real volunteer effort, probably from IATC, to monitor the trail." "It's been a long time coming," said Issaquah city councilman David Kappler. "We've talked The trail will be the last link in a continuous about it since the early years of IATC (Kappler trail system from Ballard to Issaquah (40 miles) is a former president of the club).
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Fork of the Snoqualmie River Valley Interpretive Plan
    Middle Fork of the Snoqualmie River Valley Interpretive Plan University of Washington Department of Landscape Architecture March 2004 F O R E W O R D An interpretive plan is a map for future action. It is a framework for making decisions about which and how stories about a place are best told, to achieve desired goals. It serves as a basis for creating materials, facilities and programs that deliver messages aimed at revealing relationships, provoking investigation, and inspiring action. A good interpretive plan answers the standard interrogative questions: who will it serve, what are the themes and stories important to convey, and why—for which goals—should it be created? Drawing upon the strength of real places to stimulate imagination and congeal memories, where should the stories be told? Finally, how—through which methods—are the messages about a particular place most effectively revealed, related to the individual’s experience, and used to enlarge one’s relationship with that place? This Interpretive Plan for the Middle Fork of the Snoqualmie River Valley was developed as part of an undergraduate landscape architecture studio working on two park sites along the river. The purpose of the plan was to create a preliminary document to guide development of interpretive facilities in the valley, while also informing the park conceptual design work. It was accomplished primarily through student research, and in a workshop at the University of Washington where individuals most familiar with the valley’s stories shared their expertises. This plan is only a beginning, providing a framework that requires substantial fleshing out, further development and creative application.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State's Scenic Byways & Road Trips
    waShington State’S Scenic BywayS & Road tRipS inSide: Road Maps & Scenic drives planning tips points of interest 2 taBLe of contentS waShington State’S Scenic BywayS & Road tRipS introduction 3 Washington State’s Scenic Byways & Road Trips guide has been made possible State Map overview of Scenic Byways 4 through funding from the Federal Highway Administration’s National Scenic Byways Program, Washington State Department of Transportation and aLL aMeRican RoadS Washington State Tourism. waShington State depaRtMent of coMMeRce Chinook Pass Scenic Byway 9 director, Rogers Weed International Selkirk Loop 15 waShington State touRiSM executive director, Marsha Massey nationaL Scenic BywayS Marketing Manager, Betsy Gabel product development Manager, Michelle Campbell Coulee Corridor 21 waShington State depaRtMent of tRanSpoRtation Mountains to Sound Greenway 25 Secretary of transportation, Paula Hammond director, highways and Local programs, Kathleen Davis Stevens Pass Greenway 29 Scenic Byways coordinator, Ed Spilker Strait of Juan de Fuca - Highway 112 33 Byway leaders and an interagency advisory group with representatives from the White Pass Scenic Byway 37 Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington State Department of Agriculture, Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife, Washington State Tourism, Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission and State Scenic BywayS Audubon Washington were also instrumental in the creation of this guide. Cape Flattery Tribal Scenic Byway 40 puBLiShing SeRviceS pRovided By deStination
    [Show full text]
  • A Model for Measuring the Benefits of State Parks for the Washington State Parks And
    6 A Model for Measuring the Benefits of State Parks for the Washington State Parks and january 201 january Recreation Commission Prepared By: Prepared For: Earth Economics Washington State Parks and Tacoma, Washington Recreation Commission Olympia, Washington Primary Authors: Tania Briceno, PhD, Ecological Economist, Earth Economics Johnny Mojica, Research Analyst, Earth Economics Suggested Citation: Briceno, T., Mojica, J. 2016. Statewide Land Acquisition and New Park Development Strategy. Earth Economics, Tacoma, WA. Acknowledgements: Thanks to all who supported this project including the Earth Economics team: Greg Schundler (GIS analysis), Corrine Armistead (Research, Analysis, and GIS), Jessica Hanson (editor), Josh Reyneveld (managing director), Sage McElroy (design); the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission: Tom Oliva, Katie Manning, Steve Hahn, Steve Brand, Nikki Fields, Peter Herzog and others. We would also like to thank our Board of Directors for their continued guidance and support: Ingrid Rasch, David Cosman, Sherry Richardson, David Batker, and Joshua Farley. The authors are responsible for the content of this report. Cover image: Washington State Department of Transportation ©2016 by Earth Economics. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Executive Summary Washington’s state parks provide a myriad of benefits to both urban and rural environments and nearby residents. Green spaces within state parks provide direct benefits to the populations living in close proximity. For example, the forests within state parks provide outdoor recreational opportunities, and they also help to store water and control flooding during heavy rainfalls, improve air quality, and regulate the local climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Report Cover Sheet
    CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT COVER SHEET Author: Noah Oliver and Corrine Camuso Title of Report: Cultural Resources Evaluations of Howard Carlin Trailhead Park, City of Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington Date of Report: May 2017 County: Kittitas Section: 27 Township: 20N Range: 15E Quad: Cle Elum Acres: 0.30 PDF of report submitted (REQUIRED) Yes Historic Property Export Files submitted? Yes No Archaeological Site(s)/Isolate(s) Found or Amended? Yes No TCP(s) found? Yes None Identified Replace a draft? Yes No Satisfy a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit requirement? Yes # No DAHP Archaeological Site #: Temp. HC-1 Submission of paper copy is required. Temp. HC-2 Please submit paper copies of reports unbound. Submission of PDFs is required. Please be sure that any PDF submitted to DAHP has its cover sheet, figures, graphics, appendices, attachments, correspondence, etc., compiled into one single PDF file. Please check that the PDF displays correctly when opened. Legal Description: T20N, R15E, Sec. 27 County: Kittitas USGS Quadrangle: Kittitas Total Project Acers: 0.30 Survey Coverage: 100% Sites and Isolates Identified: 1 Cultural Resources Evaluations of Howard Carlin Trailhead Park, City of Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington A report prepared for the City of Cle Elum By The Yakama Nation Cultural Resource Program Report prepared by: Noah Oliver and Corrine Camuso March 2017 Yakama Nation Cultural Resource Program Na-Mi-Ta-Man-Wit Nak-Nu-Wit Owt-Nee At-Tow Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation Post Office Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 ititamatpama´ Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Prehistoric Context ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Historic Context ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The “Recreation Boom” on Public Lands in Western Washington: Impacts to Wildlife and Implications for Treaty Tribes
    The “Recreation Boom” on Public Lands in Western Washington: Impacts to Wildlife and Implications for Treaty Tribes A Summary of Current Literature The Tulalip Tribes Natural Resources Department Treaty Rights Office 6406 Marine Drive Tulalip, WA 98271 February 28, 2021 “ It’s important that we never lose our right to access our traditional foods and our materials that we gather, our fish and our game, and all those things from the land and the water that our people remain spiritually connected to which defines us and our living culture.” Ray Fryberg, Sr., Tribal Research Historian, Tulalip Tribes Natural and Cultural Resources Department 2 | Recreational Impacts to Wildlife, Treaty Rights Acknowledgements We wish to acknowledge those who both inspired and contributed directly to this work: Tulalip’s ancestors who fought hard to protect the resources that would enable generations that follow to be able to continue tribal lifeways, and who ensured these resources were protected in the treaty; Tulalip Board leadership and staff Ray Fryberg, Jason Gobin, Mike Sevigny, Molly Alves, Ryan Miller, Patti Gobin, Amanda Shelton, Kurt Nelson, and Tim Brewer. We also wish to thank Chris Madsen and Cecilia Gobin of the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission for their review and contributions to this paper, and Frank Bob, Lummi and Tino Villaluz, Swinomish for their insights on recreation that helped us in our approach to this report. We want to acknowledge and thank Richard Knight and Courtney Larson for steering us toward available research as well as sharing their detailed knowledge on this topic with us at the early stages of our search.
    [Show full text]