DOCSLIB.ORG

Mapping and Modelling the Population and Habitat of the Roan Antelope (Hippotragus Equinus Langheldi) in Ruma National Park, Kenya

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Mapping and Modelling the Population and Habitat of the Roan Antelope (Hippotragus equinus langheldi) in Ruma National Park, Kenya Johnstone Kithiki Kimanzi A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Newcastle University School of Biology Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU January 2011 i Declaration No portion of the work presented in this thesis has been submitted in support of an application for another degree or qualification of this or any other university or other institute of learning i Acknowledgements This thesis could not have been completed without the help and support of many People and institutions. First of all, I would like to thank my supervisors, Roy Sanderson and Stephen Rushton, for their invaluable advice, guidance, and statistical and computer support throughout the research period. Without your precise supervision and prompt feedback, completion of this thesis would have taken longer than three years. I am grateful to Peter Lurz for introducing me to RANGES package and Mark Shirley for induction in applying R package. I thank Louis Goffe for support in GIS techniques. I thank my colleague, Andrew Close, for being an older brother to show me the way when I got stuck. I acknowledge the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission for funding this research fully. I thank my employer, Moi University, for granting me adequate study leave. Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) granted permission for carrying out this research in Ruma National Park. The Regional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD) and Kenya Soil Survey provided data for this study. Fieldwork was made possible by the cooperation and hosting of the Ruma National Park management. Special thanks go to the Acting Park Warden, David Kones, for providing secure accommodation within the park and ensuring comfortable settling down. Thanks also go to park research assistant, George Ouma, for induction in the park and its environs. Special thanks go to my research assistant, Alex Kyalo, who worked tirelessly during data collection. I thank the team of park rangers who provided adequate security during data collection. I express my heartfelt thanks to my wife, Jennifer, my son, Gabriel, and my daughter, Favour for your tremendous love, patience and encouragement. Jennifer, I sincerely thank you for being a true helper, your competence in taking charge of the family during my long periods of absence and for working tirelessly to supplement the ii family finances. Gabriel, your superb progress in your studies without my adequate attention kept me going. Favour, your gorgeous smile gave me inner strength especially when things were tough. My profound thanks goes to my mum, Emmah, for her unfathomable quest for knowledge and strict upbringing, that has brought me this far. Thanks to members of the Newcastle Apostolic Church for your encouragement, love and prayers. I thank Pastor John for the inspiring biblical teachings. Your teaching on discerning divine helpers greatly boosted my success. Above all, I thank the Lord God Almighty who is my source of strength and for providing everything. iii Abstract Wildlife-based tourism, which is Kenya’s second largest economic sector, is threatened by the risk of extinction of many wildlife species in the country. The endemic roan antelope (Hippotragus equinus langheldi) now only survives in Ruma National Park (RNP) where its population has been declining continuously since 1976. This thesis investigates the roan’s habitat use and selection, causes of population decline and population viability in RNP with the aim of recommending scientifically-based management interventions for population recovery and sustainable conservation. Roan movement patterns and habitat use were investigated using 4 home range estimation techniques. Habitat selection was studied at multi-spatial scales using compositional analysis, logistic regression, and information-theoretic (IT) and multi-model inference (MMI) techniques. Data for this study consisted of population estimates for roans and other grazers, Landsat images, soil maps, digital terrain data, rainfall records, snare distribution records, and roan ground tracking data. Identification of causes of population decline was carried out using both multivariate and univariate techniques. A generic population viability analysis (PVA) package was used to (i) estimate the likelihood of roan extinction under various management options; and (2) rank the management alternatives for roan population recovery. All 4 home range estimators are useful in characterizing different aspects of the roan home range, but overall the local convex hull method produced the most realistic home ranges. The three habitat selection methods yielded similar results but the IT techniques demonstrated superior qualities as they identified important habitat variables and produced the most accurate model predictions. MMI averaged models coupled with GIS data developed very informative habitat suitability and poaching risk maps. Analysis of habitat selection indicated different usage in iv seasons and spatial scales depending on water availability, habitat composition and burned status, and distribution of eco-geographical features. High adult mortality due to poaching with snares was identified as the main cause of roan population decline. Other important factors included habitat change and rainfall variability with its associated droughts and floods. PVA showed that under the current conditions, the roan population cannot persist more than 3 decades. Several anti-poaching and prioritized management interventions to curb poaching and promote population recovery are described. v Table of Contents Declaration ........................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. ii Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iv Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... vi CHAPTER 1: General Introduction .................................................................................... 2 1.1 The roan antelope: Description, biology, population status and distribution .......... 2 1.1.1 Physical description.............................................................................................. 2 1.1.2 The roan biology .................................................................................................. 2 1.1.3 Population status and distribution in Africa ......................................................... 4 1.2 The rationale of the research .................................................................................... 7 1.3 Research objectives ................................................................................................ 12 1.4 Outline of thesis ..................................................................................................... 13 1.5 Description of the study area ................................................................................. 16 CHAPTER 2: Vegetation mapping and herbivore population dynamics in Ruma National park (RNP) ........................................................................................................................ 21 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 21 2.1.1 Research objectives ............................................................................................ 27 2.1.2 Hypotheses and predictions ............................................................................... 27 2.2 Methods.................................................................................................................. 28 2.2.1 Data collection.................................................................................................... 28 2.2.1.1 Herbivore population census .......................................................................... 28 2.2.1.2 Vegetation mapping ........................................................................................ 30 2.2.1.2.1 Image pre-processing ...................................................................................... 31 2.2.1.2.2 Vegetation ground truthing ............................................................................. 34 2.2.1.2.3 Vegetation changes ............................................................................................ 38 2.2.1.3 Rainfall measurements ................................................................................... 38 vi 2.2.2 Statistical data analysis and modelling .............................................................. 39 2.2.2.1 Vegetation map accuracy assessment ............................................................. 40 2.2.2.2 Multivariate techniques .................................................................................. 41 2.2.2.3 Generalized linear models (GLM) .................................................................. 42 2.2.2.4 Model assessment ........................................................................................... 43 2.3 Results .................................................................................................................... 44 2.3.1
Recommended publications
  • Pending World Record Waterbuck Wins Top Honor SC Life Member Susan Stout Has in THIS ISSUE Dbeen Awarded the President’S Cup Letter from the President

    Pending World Record Waterbuck Wins Top Honor SC Life Member Susan Stout Has in THIS ISSUE Dbeen Awarded the President’S Cup Letter from the President

    DSC NEWSLETTER VOLUME 32,Camp ISSUE 5 TalkJUNE 2019 Pending World Record Waterbuck Wins Top Honor SC Life Member Susan Stout has IN THIS ISSUE Dbeen awarded the President’s Cup Letter from the President .....................1 for her pending world record East African DSC Foundation .....................................2 Defassa Waterbuck. Awards Night Results ...........................4 DSC’s April Monthly Meeting brings Industry News ........................................8 members together to celebrate the annual Chapter News .........................................9 Trophy and Photo Award presentation. Capstick Award ....................................10 This year, there were over 150 entries for Dove Hunt ..............................................12 the Trophy Awards, spanning 22 countries Obituary ..................................................14 and almost 100 different species. Membership Drive ...............................14 As photos of all the entries played Kid Fish ....................................................16 during cocktail hour, the room was Wine Pairing Dinner ............................16 abuzz with stories of all the incredible Traveler’s Advisory ..............................17 adventures experienced – ibex in Spain, Hotel Block for Heritage ....................19 scenic helicopter rides over the Northwest Big Bore Shoot .....................................20 Territories, puku in Zambia. CIC International Conference ..........22 In determining the winners, the judges DSC Publications Update
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda

    Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda

    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
  • Damaliscus Pygargus Phillipsi – Blesbok

    Damaliscus Pygargus Phillipsi – Blesbok

    Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi – Blesbok colour pattern (Fabricius et al. 1989). Hybridisation between these taxa threatens the genetic integrity of both subspecies (Skinner & Chimimba 2005). Assessment Rationale Listed as Least Concern, as Blesbok are abundant on both formally and privately protected land. We estimate a minimum mature population size of 54,426 individuals (using a 70% mature population structure) across 678 protected areas and wildlife ranches (counts between 2010 and 2016). There are at least an estimated 17,235 animals (counts between 2013 and 2016) on formally Emmanuel Do Linh San protected areas across the country, with the largest subpopulation occurring on Golden Gate Highlands National Park. The population has increased significantly Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern over three generations (1990–2015) in formally protected National Red List status (2004) Least Concern areas across its range and is similarly suspected to have increased on private lands. Apart from hybridisation with Reasons for change No change Bontebok, there are currently no major threats to its long- Global Red List status (2008) Least Concern term survival. Approximately 69% of Blesbok can be considered genetically pure (A. van Wyk & D. Dalton TOPS listing (NEMBA) None unpubl. data), and stricter translocation policies should be CITES listing None established to prevent the mixing of subspecies. Overall, this subspecies could become a keystone in the Endemic Yes sustainable wildlife economy. The common name, Blesbok, originates from ‘Bles’, the Afrikaans word for a ‘blaze’, which Distribution symbolises the white facial marking running down Historically, the Blesbok ranged across the Highveld from the animal’s horns to its nose, broken only grasslands of the Free State and Gauteng provinces, by the brown band above the eyes (Skinner & extending into northwestern KwaZulu-Natal, and through Chimimba 2005).
  • Fitzhenry Yields 2016.Pdf

    Fitzhenry Yields 2016.Pdf

    Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ii DECLARATION By submitting this dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: March 2016 Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za iii GENERAL ABSTRACT Fallow deer (Dama dama), although not native to South Africa, are abundant in the country and could contribute to domestic food security and economic stability. Nonetheless, this wild ungulate remains overlooked as a protein source and no information exists on their production potential and meat quality in South Africa. The aim of this study was thus to determine the carcass characteristics, meat- and offal-yields, and the physical- and chemical-meat quality attributes of wild fallow deer harvested in South Africa. Gender was considered as a main effect when determining carcass characteristics and yields, while both gender and muscle were considered as main effects in the determination of physical and chemical meat quality attributes. Live weights, warm carcass weights and cold carcass weights were higher (p < 0.05) in male fallow deer (47.4 kg, 29.6 kg, 29.2 kg, respectively) compared with females (41.9 kg, 25.2 kg, 24.7 kg, respectively), as well as in pregnant females (47.5 kg, 28.7 kg, 28.2 kg, respectively) compared with non- pregnant females (32.5 kg, 19.7 kg, 19.3 kg, respectively).
  • Ruma National Park Management Plan, 2012-2017

    Ruma National Park Management Plan, 2012-2017

    Ruma National Park Management Plan, 2012-2017 The dramatic valley of the roan antelope, oribi and so much more..... Ruma National Park Management Plan, 2011-2016 Planning carried out by Ruma National Park Managers and KWS Biodiversity Planning and Environmental Compliance Department In accordance with the KWS Planning Standard Oper- ating Procedures Acknowledgements This General Management Plan has been developed by a Planning Team comprising Park Wardens, Area Scientists and KWS Headquarters Resource Planners. The Planning Team Name Designation Station/Organisation Apollo Kariuki Senior Resource Pla nner KWS Headquarters John Wambua Park Warden -Ruma NP Ruma National Park Fredrick Lala SRS -WCA Western Conserv ation Area Shadrack Ngene SRS -Elephant programme KWS Headquarters Timothy Ikime ARS -Kisumu Impala Kisumu Station Israel Makau RS -WCA Western Conservation Area Kanyi L. Rukaria ARS -Ruma NP Ruma National Park The planning team would like to thank the following staff from Western Conservation Area who contributed to the development of this plan by providing relevant planning information: Stephen Chonga, George Tokro, George Anyona, and Maurice Koduk. II Approval Page The management of the Kenya Wildlife Service has approved the implementation of this management plan for Ruma National Park III Executive Summary The Plan This 5-year (2012-2017) management plan for Ruma National Park has been developed in accordance with the standard operating procedure (SOP) for developing management plans for protected areas. The plan is one of four management planning initiatives piloting the revised standard operating procedure, the others being Kisumu Impala, Ndere and Hell’s gate National Parks. In line with this SOP, this plan aims to balance conservation and development in the target protected areas.
  • Beatragus Hunteri) in Arawale National Reserve, Northeastern, Kenya

    Beatragus Hunteri) in Arawale National Reserve, Northeastern, Kenya

    The population size, abundance and distribution of the Critically Endangered Hirola Antelope (Beatragus hunteri) in Arawale National Reserve, Northeastern, Kenya. Francis Kamau Muthoni Terra Nuova, Transboundary Environmental Project, P.O. Box 74916, Nairobi, Kenya Email: [email protected] 1.0. Abstract. This paper outlines the spatial distribution, population size, habitat preferences and factors causing the decline of Hirola antelope in Arawale National Reserve (ANR) in Garissa and Ijara districts, north eastern Kenya. The reserve covers an area of 540Km2. The objectives of the study were to gather baseline information on hirola distribution, population size habitat preferences and human activities impacting on its existence. A sampling method using line transect count was used to collect data used to estimate the distribution of biological populations (Norton-Griffiths, 1978). Community scouts collected data using Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and recorded on standard datasheets for 12 months. Transect walks were done from 6.00Am to 10.00Am every 5th day of the month. The data was entered into a geo-database and analysed using Arcmap, Ms Excel and Access. The results indicate that the population of hirola in Arawale National Reserve were 69 individuals comprising only 6% of the total population in the natural geographic range of hirola estimated to be 1,167 individuals. It also revealed that hirola prefer open bushes and grasslands. The decline of the Hirola on its natural range is due to a combination of factors, including, habitat loss and degradation, competition with livestock, poaching and drought. Key words: Hirola Antelope Beatragus hunteri, GIS, Endangered Species 2.0. Introduction. The Hirola antelope (Beatragus hunteri) is a “Critically Endangered” species endemic to a small area in Southeast Kenya and Southwest Somalia.
  • Oribi Conservation

    Oribi Conservation

    www.forestryexplained.co.za SAVING SPECIES: ORIBI CONSERVATION Forestry Explained: Our Conservation Legacy Introducing the Oribi: South Africa’s most endangered antelope All photos courtesy of the Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT) Slender, graceful and timid, the Oribi fact file: Oribi (Ourebia ourebi) is one of - Height: 50 – 67 cm South Africa’s most captivating antelope. Sadly, the Oribi’s - Weight: 12 – 22 kg future in South Africa is - Length: 92 -110 cm uncertain. Already recognised - Colour: Yellowish to orange-brown back as endangered in South Africa, its numbers are still declining. and upper chest, white rump, belly, chin and throat. Males have slender Oribi are designed to blend upright horns. into their surroundings and are - Habitat: Grassland region of South Africa, able to put on a turn of speed when required, making them KwaZulu-Natal, Eastern Cape, Free State perfectly adapted for life on and Mpumalanga. open grassland plains. - Diet: Selective grazers. GRASSLANDS: LINKING FORESTRY TO WETLANDS r ecosystems rive are Why is wetland conservation so ’s fo ica un r d important to the forestry industry? Af in h g t r u a o s of S s % Sou l 8 th f a 6 A o n is fr d o ic s .s a . 28% ' . s 2 . 497,100 ha t i 4 SAVANNAH m b e r p l Why they are South Africa’s most endangereda n t a 4% t i 65,000 ha o n FYNBOS s The once expansive Grassland Biome has halved in. size over the last few decades, with around 50% being irreversibly transformed as a result of 68% habitat destruction.
  • Western Zambian Sable: Are They a Geographic Extension of the Giant Sable Antelope?

    Western Zambian Sable: Are They a Geographic Extension of the Giant Sable Antelope?

    View metadata, citation and similarWestern papers at core.ac.uk Zambian sable: Are they a brought to you by CORE geographic extension of theprovided by Stellenbosch University SUNScholar Repository giant sable antelope? Bettine Jansen van Vuuren1,2*, Terence J. Robinson1, Pedro VazPinto3, Richard Estes4 & Conrad A. Matthee1 1Evolutionary Genomics Group, Department Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa 2Centre for Invasion Biology, Department Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa 3Universidade Catolica de Angola, Rua Nossa Senhora da Muxima, 29 Luanda, Angola 45 Granite Street, Peterborough, NH 03458, U.S.A. Received 5 September 2008. Accepted 21 January 2010 The giant sable (Hippotragus niger variani ) is one of Africa’s most spectacular large antelope. Years of civil unrest in Angola, a highly localized distribution and interbreeding with its congener the roan antelope (H. equinus) has led to this subspecies being considered as critically endangered. Sable antelope occurring ~600 km to the east in western Zambia superficially resemble giant sable in phenotype, prompting speculation in the popular media that the distribution of giant sable may be larger than currently documented. Our aim here was to investigate the evolutionary placement of western Zambian sable using mitochon- drial DNA control region data. Phylogenetic analyses (maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses) supported the monophyly of H. n. variani (Bayesian posterior probability of >0.95, bootstrap support >80%) and nested the western Zambian sable within H. n. niger. This find- ing was supported by an analysis of molecular variance that discretely grouped western F Zambian sable from giant sable ( ST = 0.645, P = 0.001).
  • Hippotragus Equinus – Roan Antelope

    Hippotragus Equinus – Roan Antelope

    Hippotragus equinus – Roan Antelope authorities as there may be no significant genetic differences between the two. Many of the Roan Antelope in South Africa are H. e. cottoni or equinus x cottoni (especially on private properties). Assessment Rationale This charismatic antelope exists at low density within the assessment region, occurring in savannah woodlands and grasslands. Currently (2013–2014), there are an observed 333 individuals (210–233 mature) existing on nine formally protected areas within the natural distribution range. Adding privately protected subpopulations and an Cliff & Suretha Dorse estimated 0.8–5% of individuals on wildlife ranches that may be considered wild and free-roaming, yields a total mature population of 218–294 individuals. Most private Regional Red List status (2016) Endangered subpopulations are intensively bred and/or kept in camps C2a(i)+D*†‡ to exclude predators and to facilitate healthcare. Field National Red List status (2004) Vulnerable D1 surveys are required to identify potentially eligible subpopulations that can be included in this assessment. Reasons for change Non-genuine: While there was an historical crash in Kruger National Park New information (KNP) of 90% between 1986 and 1993, the subpopulation Global Red List status (2008) Least Concern has since stabilised at c. 50 individuals. Overall, over the past three generations (1990–2015), based on available TOPS listing (NEMBA) Vulnerable data for nine formally protected areas, there has been a CITES listing None net population reduction of c. 23%, which indicates an ongoing decline but not as severe as the historical Endemic Edge of Range reduction. Further long-term data are needed to more *Watch-list Data †Watch-list Threat ‡Conservation Dependent accurately estimate the national population trend.
  • Ecology of Red Deer a Research Review Relevant to Their Management in Scotland

    Ecology of Red Deer a Research Review Relevant to Their Management in Scotland

    Ecologyof RedDeer A researchreview relevant to theirmanagement in Scotland Instituteof TerrestrialEcology Natural EnvironmentResearch Council á á á á á Natural Environment Research Council Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Ecology of Red Deer A research review relevant to their management in Scotland Brian Mitchell, Brian W. Staines and David Welch Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Banchory iv Printed in England by Graphic Art (Cambridge) Ltd. ©Copyright 1977 Published in 1977 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecology 68 Hills Road Cambridge CB2 11LA ISBN 0 904282 090 Authors' address: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Hill of Brathens Glassel, Banchory Kincardineshire AB3 4BY Telephone 033 02 3434. The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE) was established in 1973, from the former Nature Conservancy's research stations and staff, joined later by the Institute of Tree Biology and the Culture Centre of Algae and Protozoa. ITE contributes to and draws upon the collective knowledge of the fourteen sister institutes which make up the Natural Environment Research Council, spanning all the environmental sciences. The Institute studies the factors determining the structure, composition and processes of land and freshwater systems, and of individual plant and animal species. It is developing a Sounder scientific basis for predicting and modelling environmental trends arising from natural or man-made change. The results of this research are available to those responsible for the protection, management and wise use of our natural resources. Nearly half of ITE'Swork is research commissioned by customers, such as the Nature Conservancy Council who require information for wildlife conservation, the Forestry Commission and the Department of the Environment. The remainder is fundamental research supported by NERC.
  • Le Plan Du Loup

    Le Plan Du Loup

    Le Plan du Loup (The Wolf Plan) PAGE 4 These Montana Ranchers Are Helping Grizzlies, Wolves and Cattle Coexist PAGE 8 Diane Boyd— Patient Pursuit of Understanding PAGE 12 Pictured: the painted “wolves” of Africa—actually, wild dogs that share many behaviors with wolves and are similarly endangered. PAGE 27 PERSONAL ENCOUNTER 1994. There were 17 seven- or eight- Acts Like a Wolf, Misunderstood Like a week-old pups inside! It was puppy Wolf—and Barely Surviving, a World Apart chaos when the adults returned with leftovers in their bellies. The begging for food by mobbing, licking, tum- Text by Nancy Gibson • Photos by Nicholas Dyer bling pups was short but intense. The yearlings pampered and played with the watch the silhouettes dashing across behaviors with Canis lupus—wolves. pups while older “wolves” surrounded the tall grasses and think: This could There is one obvious exception, and the site like sentries to alert members of I be a pack of wolves chasing elk in the “painted wolves” provides a hint. They any imminent attack by lions, leopards Lamar Valley of Yellowstone National Park. are costumed in patches of white, black, or hyenas—all of which are a constant, Instead, I am bouncing along in a jeep at brown, gray and everything in between. deadly threat to helpless pups. The pack dusk in Botswana, Africa. The animals Their large, round ears are reminiscent of was incredibly tolerant of our clicking weaving and darting in pursuit of an Disney’s famed Mickey Mouse character. cameras and whispering voices as we impala are wild canines, creatures with (Many African animals have large ears to tried to contain our excitement.
  • EAZA Antelope & Giraffe

    EAZA Antelope & Giraffe

    EAZA Antelope & Giraffe TAG Introduction & report on some activities Joint TAG chairs meeting 2016, Omaha Dr. Jens-Ove Heckel Zoo Landau in der Pfalz, Germany EAZA Antelope & Giraffe TAG chair [email protected] EAZA Antelope & Giraffe TAG • Antelope & Giraffe TAG continues as one of the largest and most complex TAGs representing 50 species (and approximately 90 taxa) in EAZA zoos • our remit: try to retain as many species as possible in healthy populations in EAZA collections • currently the TAG holds 11 EEPs and 11 ESBs; 4 species are part of ISBs; the remaining species are monitored (Mon-P, Mon-TAG). Chair Jens-Ove Heckel Landau Vice chair Sander Hofman Antwerp Vice chair (till 11.2015) Tania Gilbert Marwell Vice chair (since 12.2015) Kim Skalborg Simonsen Givskud Sub-group Okapi & Giraffe SG Sander Hofman Antwerp Sub-group Woodland antelope SG Kim Skalborg Simonsen Givskud Sub-group Savannah antelope SG Catrin Hammer Goerlitz Sub-group Aridlands antelope SG Ian Goodwin Marwell (Sub-group) (Mini antelope SG) (Klaus Müller-Schilling) (Hanover) Studbook keepers/Program managers EAZA Antelope & Giraffe TAG meeting 2015, Wroclaw Coordinator Conservation Tania Gilbert Marwell Coordinator Research Eulalia Moreno Almeria Advisor Veterinary Sven Hammer Goerlitz Advisor Genetics Rob Ogden Edinburgh Advisor Population management Laurie Bingaman Lackey USA Advisor Nutrition Marcus Clauss Zuerich Advisor Husbandry n.n. Advisor Education n.n. Regular support and advice also provided by: Exec. Coordinator - Collect. Coordin. & Conserv. Merel Zimmermann EPMAG / Population Management Kristin Leus Population Biologist - Collect. Coordin. & Conserv. Kristine Schad Good links to: IUCN SSC Antelope SG, IUCN Giraffe & Okapi SG/Giraffe Conservation Fdn., other EAZA Ungulate TAGs, BIAZA Hoof stock focus group, AZA Antelope & Giraffe TAG, Sahara Conservation Fund/SSIG etc.