DOCSLIB.ORG

Whatmore on Norman, 'Edmund Burke: the First Conservative'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Whatmore on Norman, 'Edmund Burke: the First Conservative' H-Albion Whatmore on Norman, 'Edmund Burke: The First Conservative' Review published on Monday, June 13, 2016 Jesse Norman. Edmund Burke: The First Conservative. New York: Basic Books, 2013. vii + 325 pp. $27.99 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-465-05897-6; $16.99 (paper), ISBN 978-0-465-06293-5. Reviewed by Richard Whatmore (University of St Andrews) Published on H-Albion (June, 2016) Commissioned by Jeffrey R. Wigelsworth The Curse of Edmund Burke Jesse Norman’s elegantly written and highly accessible summary of Edmund Burke’s life, thought, and times is an excellent guide to eighteenth-century British intellectual history, especially for those who normally turn away from academic tomes. Norman guides the reader through Burke’s complicated speeches and published works, and sets each in their contemporary setting. As is to be expected, he is especially good in describing Burke the politician, Burke’s defense of parties and of civil liberties, and Burke’s assault on corruption. The sense of a man concerned by enthusiasts and projectors is nicely conveyed; Burke felt that those who wanted to recreate the greatness of Rome in the present were mad, that those who wanted to set the people free by making them political agents were crazed, and that anyone who imagined that a better society could easily be created by legislative fiat was an idiot. Like Montesquieu, Burke believed that change had to be adapted to circumstance: a law that worked in one society would never work the same way in another place with a different history and distinctive mores. Like Adam Smith, Burke was an adept of the science of the statesman or legislator, the complicated natural jurisprudence that taught that the passions had to be manipulated, that men had to be presumed to be knaves, and that the production of the balanced personality characterized by prudence and moderation was the ideal goal of any statesman. Above all, and again following Smith, politics was always to be conducted in accordance with the wisdom of Solon: the second-best world of imperfection and unintended consequences, where perfection was never to be found. Norman’s book might be assumed to be Whiggish from the subtitle, anachronistically reading back into the past ideas from subsequent times. The argument is not that Burke was the first true conservative and that politicians, if they are to truly be “conservative,” ought to follow Burke’s policies and ideas to the letter. Rather, Norman’s claim is that Burke’s attitude to Britain and how to maintain it led him to a mind-set that can usefully be described as conservative, and that this mind- set is still worth following. There are ad hoc statements in the text that do not make sense because they go further than this, making assertions about Burke’s originality and his being the first to do this or to think that, but these can easily be set aside. The fact is that Burke was not original and that his approach to the political world was akin to that of David Hume or Smith or Montesquieu, being founded on the natural jurisprudence described above. What is not fully covered in Norman’s book is what might be termed Burke’s curse. This was that he lived longer than fellow philosophical writers like Smith and that he was forced in consequence to Citation: H-Net Reviews. Whatmore on Norman, 'Edmund Burke: The First Conservative'. H-Albion. 06-13-2016. https://networks.h-net.org/node/16749/reviews/129846/whatmore-norman-edmund-burke-first-conservative Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Albion adapt fully his ideas to the French Revolution. The French Revolution changed Burke. The argument can be made that he ceased to be a conservative, largely because he came to believe that across much of Europe there was nothing left to conserve. Let me explain. Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France, first published in November 1790, was positive about the future. Events at Paris were altogether intolerable, releasing in modern times historic forms of barbarism. At the same time, the Revolution, Burke believed, was about to burn itself out. The revolutionaries had assaulted the aristocracy, monarchy, and church. In so doing, they had ineradicably weakened the French state. The violence in increasing evidence across France was a sign of the collapse of normal politics, and of a shuddering state barely able to survive. In consequence, when the Duke of Brunswick invaded France with a combined force on August 19, 1792, and quickly took Longwy and Verdun, Burke anticipated a speedy victory. When Brunswick was defeated at the Battle of Valmy on September 20, and then turned his forces around and departed French soil, Burke was astonished. He could not believe that professional soldiers had been vanquished by “a troop of strolling players with a buffoon [Charles-François du Périer Dumouriez] at their head.” Remarkably, and against all expectation, “vigour and decision, though joined with crime, folly and madness, have triumphed.”[1] The French then successfully took Nice and Savoy. Invasion of the Austrian Netherlands followed, which fell before the middle of November. Burke now felt that all of Europe was under threat. Even the mountains of the Swiss, he wrote to his son, would not protect them from the revolutionaries. With the proclamation of the First French Republic in September 1792, Burke abandoned the surety and confidence that had marked the Reflections on the Revolution in France. Revolutionary France was violating all of the inherited rules of political behavior. The French economy had collapsed, and yet the state was employing resources to fight wars on every front. Invaders, rather than being assaulted by the peoples whose lands they were taking, were being welcomed, and indeed were being acclaimed as liberators. Anarchy at Paris might continue, but it did not seem to matter because the Republic was impregnable. In a brilliant summation of 1796, Burke explained his fear and incomprehension. He also warned contemporaries in Britain that they could not afford to lie down with the leopard and make peace with the French Republic: “The Republic of Regicide with an annihilated revenue, with defaced manufactures, with a ruined commerce, with an uncultivated and half depopulated country, with a discontented, distressed, enslaved, and famished people, passing with a rapid, eccentric, incalculable course, from the wildest anarchy to the sternest despotism, has actually conquered the finest parts of Europe, has distressed, disunited, deranged, and broke to pieces all the rest; and so subdued the minds of the rulers in every nation, that hardly any resource presents itself to them, except that of entitling themselves to a contemptuous mercy by a display of their imbecility and meanness.”[2] Burke was increasingly sure that the French Revolution could easily be followed by a similar revolution across Britain. This was one of the lessons of the naval mutinies of 1797. Many politicians were embracing revolutionary ideals. Ireland, always dear to Burke, was likely to be the place where violent revolution commenced. Burke’s solution to the problem was to abandon any sense of conserving what had gone before. The world had changed because a contagion of mistaken ideas was spreading everywhere. A false god had been erected and had quickly destroyed much that was glorious about Europe. In his Letters on a Regicide Peace, Burke advised war to the death with the French Republic. Liberties and traditional tolerances in Britain had to be put to one side until the Citation: H-Net Reviews. Whatmore on Norman, 'Edmund Burke: The First Conservative'. H-Albion. 06-13-2016. https://networks.h-net.org/node/16749/reviews/129846/whatmore-norman-edmund-burke-first-conservative Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Albion cancer of French republicanism had been routed out. Burke died convinced that his world had been eroded to the point of death; a new politics had to be formulated to combat the kinds of enthusiasm that promised perfectibility and ceaseless improvement. What such a politics would look like, Burke could not imagine, so great was his sense of desperation about the future. As Burke wrote to French Laurence, his friend and member of Parliament, less than two months before his death, “the times are so deplorable, that I do not know how to write about them.”[3] Burke was sure that what he had learned about politics was found wanting when faced with the French Revolution. Whatever can be said about Burke the conservative, he died convinced that the political doctrines he had espoused had failed. We still live in a world where projectors and enthusiasts promise a perfected world, where we do not have to worry about manipulating or balancing the passions in the manner of the natural jurists, because the free market does it all for us. In many respects, free market conservatives, in abandoning both history and the wisdom of Solon, are the true inheritors of the French Revolution. Norman’s book explains why we should return to Burke’s perspective on politics and history. The broader story, how a doctrine rejecting all forms of government intervention, and promising improvement for all, came to be associated with Smith, remains to be told. Notes [1]. Edmund Burke to Richard Burke, October 17, 1792, The Correspondence of Edmund Burke, vol. 7, January 1792-August 1794, ed. P. J. Marshall and John A. Woods (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968), 271-272. [2]. Edmund Burke, Two Letters Addressed to a Member of the Present Parliament on the Proposals for Peace with the Regicide Directory of France (London: F.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unjust Law As a Justification for Civil Disobedience
    Mgbakoigba: Journal of African Studies, Volume 4, 2015. UNJUST LAW AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE Arinze Agbanusi Department of Philosophy Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka. Introduction Laws are bodies of rules for human conduct. They are meant to guide human actions, indicating those that are permitted or accepted and those that are prohibited, which performance attracts one form of punishment or the other. Laws are supposed to guide the behavior of citizens of a nation. A nation without laws is like a vehicle without wheels. Without laws people cannot live peacefully together as there will be the problem of reconciling conflicting human rights. As Thomas Hobbes pointed out in his theory of the state, when man was alone, there was no need for laws. The need for laws was necessitated by the increase in human population, to help reconcile naturally conflicting rights of different individuals. It is therefore expected that citizens should obey laws, to avoid an anarchical state where jungle justice (the principle of survival of the fittest) operates. According to Hobbes, the commonwealth was formed because men had a foresight of their own preservation, and thus had to find a way of averting that miserable condition of war and strife which are natural consequences of ever conflicting human rights. For John Locke, the main aim of forming the commonwealth (government) is the preservation of the „Property‟ of Citizens. Since the commonwealth and laws were created for the noble sake of the preservation of life and property, through the avoidance of war and uncertainties; it behooves on all citizens to obey the laws of the state or nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Montesquieu, Methodological Pluralism and Comparative Constitutional Law 481
    Montesquieu, Methodological Pluralism and Comparative Constitutional Law 481 Montesquieu, Methodological Pluralism and Comparative Constitutional Law Lorenzo Zucca* Montesquieu’s lessons for modern comparative constitutional law – The Spirit of the Laws – The textual bias of normative constitutionalism – The utility of other disci- plines to comparative constitutional law – Constitutions as more than mere texts Introduction Modern comparative constitutional law begins in Esfahan, the old capital of Iran, in a majestic seraglio, where some of the most beautiful women are held captive. Uzbek, an Iranian prince, set out for a trip to Europe. He travels to Qom, the holy city, then to Tabriz. He stops for a while in Turkey and embarks in Smyrna on the way to Livorno. Then he quickly arrives in Paris, the centre of modern Europe. From there, Uzbek and Rica, a close friend, report back on European laws, habits and culture from the perspective of two Persian observers. There are two impor- tant, albeit conflicting, insights in Montesquieu’s Persian Letters. First, we can im- prove the understanding of our society by adopting an external viewpoint. In this case, Montesquieu wears the clothes of two Persian visitors, Uzbek and Rica. Through this fiction, he can critically report on a number of interesting aspects of contemporary France. Montesquieu stresses a second point: self-understanding through comparison is limited, as we always tend to excuse our own habits more than we criticise them. Uzbek, for example, sees many weaknesses in the French political and cultural system, but tends to justify his position of slave owner and incarcerator of women back home.
    [Show full text]
  • Voltaire's Wit and Wisdom: Freethought, Enlightenment, Satire
    While the public loved his plays, often summarized these values the French elites6 could not with the common saying, “I François-Marie Arouet1 was born tolerate a laugh at their expense. disapprove of what you say, but I in 1694’s Paris at the dawn of the Without trials7 or legal defense, will defend to the death your Age of Enlightenment. His father Voltaire was imprisoned multiple right to say it.”16 sent him off to become a lawyer, times and later exiled to Britain. yet he quickly found fame as a socialite, philanderer2, and poet Once outside his home country, 8 who strived to surround himself he soon realized how corrupt “Doubt is not a pleasant with the great minds of his time. and tyrannical the absolute 9 condition, but certainty is He studied John Locke and monarchy in France really was. absurd.” Edmund Burke, admired Isaac Civil liberties were ignored, 3 religious minorities were brutally Newton, criticized Leibniz, and Voltaire could see how evidence- tortured, and execution came to became close friends with based17 reasoning18, scientific anyone who failed to flatter Jonathan Swift, Alexander Pope, literacy, and general education19 those in power.10 and Benjamin Franklin. could improve a society; so he worked to popularize and Fueled by coffee, inspired by his Despite the risks, Voltaire 11 explain Newton’s controversial muse (the mathematician and continued to riddicule state 12 discoveries to the public. He physicist, Madame du Châtelet), churches, organized religion, even helped to create the and driven to speak out against monarchies, injustice, hypocrisy, 13 world’s first encyclopedia! the political and religious prejudice , and corruption for atrocities around him, he wrote the rest of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly  Approve Laws/Declarations of War  Must Pay Considerable Taxes to Hold Office
    Nat’l Assembly’s early reforms center on the Church (in accordance with Enlightenment philosophy) › Take over Church lands › Church officials & priests now elected & paid as state officials › WHY??? --- proceeds from sale of Church lands help pay off France’s debts This offends many peasants (ie, devout Catholics) 1789 – 1791 › Many nobles feel unsafe & free France › Louis panders his fate as monarch as National Assembly passes reforms…. begins to fear for his life June 1791 – Louis & family try to escape to Austrian Netherlands › They are caught and returned to France National Assembly does it…. after 2 years! Limited Constitutional Monarchy: › King can’t proclaim laws or block laws of Assembly New Constitution establishes a new government › Known as the Legislative Assembly Approve laws/declarations of war must pay considerable taxes to hold office. Must be male tax payer to vote. Problems persist: food, debt, etc. Old problems still exist: food shortages & gov’t debt Legislative Assembly can’t agree how to fix › Radicals (oppose monarchy & want sweeping changes in gov’t) sit on LEFT › Moderates (want limited changes) sit in MIDDLE › Conservatives (uphold limited monarchy & want few gov’t changes) sit on RIGHT Emigres (nobles who fled France) plot to undo the Revolution & restore Old Regime Some Parisian workers & shopkeepers push for GREATER changes. They are called Sans-Culottes – “Without knee britches” due to their wearing of trousers Monarchs & nobles across Europe fear the revolutionary ideas might spread to their countries Austria & Prussia urge France to restore Louis to power So the Legislative Assembly ………. [April 1792] Legislative Assembly declares war against Prussia and Austria › Initiates the French Revolutionary Wars French Revolutionary Wars: series of wars, from 1792-1802.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Life of Edmund Burke
    INTRODUCTION 1 Empire and Revolution Th is is a book about the vicissitudes of empire and revolution as confronted by one of the leading political intellects of the eighteenth century. Th e confrontation was complicated in a number of distinct ways. In the fi rst place the term “revolution” had a range of meanings. At its simplest it could denominate a change in the system of government. Yet it could also cover resistance to an established political order lead- ing to the creation of a new regime. Finally it could refer to the subversion of govern- ment along with the various liberties it was supposed to protect. Over the course of his life, Edmund Burke defended revolution in the fi rst two senses although he ardently set himself against the third. But while he supported the rights of legitimate rebellion, he also consistently upheld the authority of empire. However, the picture here was again a complex one. Burke cherished the rights of British imperial sover- eignty, yet he vehemently opposed the standing policies of the Empire. Underlying this apparent ambivalence was a commitment to the rights of conquest accompanied by a repudiation of the “spirit of conquest.” Th is referred to the attitude of usur- pation that Burke believed had characterised European governments in the gothic past. Although governments of the kind had their origins in expropriation, they had gradually accommodated the “spirit of liberty.” Nonetheless, modern liberty for Burke was a precarious achievement. It was capable of relapsing into the spirit of domination, not least in its interactions with the extra- European world.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution in the French-Algerian War (1954-1962): Historical Analogy and the Limits of French Historical Reason
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2016 The French Revolution in the French-Algerian War (1954-1962): Historical Analogy and the Limits of French Historical Reason Timothy Scott Johnson The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1424 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE FRENCH REVOLUTION IN THE FRENCH-ALGERIAN WAR (1954-1962): HISTORICAL ANALOGY AND THE LIMITS OF FRENCH HISTORICAL REASON By Timothy Scott Johnson A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 TIMOTHY SCOTT JOHNSON All Rights Reserved ii The French Revolution in the French-Algerian War (1954-1962): Historical Analogy and the Limits of French Historical Reason by Timothy Scott Johnson This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Richard Wolin, Distinguished Professor of History, The Graduate Center, CUNY _______________________ _______________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee _______________________
    [Show full text]
  • Wars and Battles of Modern Europe Battle Summaries Are from Harbottle's Dictionary of Battles, Published by Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1904
    WARS AND BATTLES OF MODERN EUROPE BATTLE SUMMARIES ARE FROM HARBOTTLE'S DICTIONARY OF BATTLES, PUBLISHED BY SWAN SONNENSCHEIN & CO., 1904. War of Austrian Succession (1740-48) Seven Year's War (1752-62) French Revolutionary Wars (1785-99) Napoleonic Wars (1801-15) Peninsular War (1808-14) Italian Unification (1848-67) Hungarian Rising (1849) Franco-Mexican War (1862-67) Schleswig-Holstein War (1864) Austro Prussian War (1866) Franco Prussian War (1870-71) Servo-Bulgarian Wars (1885) Balkan Wars (1912-13) Great War (1914-18) WAR OF THE AUSTRIAN SUCCESSION —1740 TO 1748 Frederick the Great annexes Silesia to his domains in opposition to the claims of Austria 1741 Battle of Molwitz (Austria vs. Prussia) Prussians victory Fought April 8, 1741, between the Prussians, 30,000 strong, under Frederick the Great, and the Austrians, under Marshal Neuperg. Frederick surprised the Austrian general, and, after severe fighting, drove him from his entrenchments, with a loss of about 5,000 killed, wounded and prisoners. The Prussians lost 2,500. 1742 Battle of Czaslau (Austria vs. Prussia) Prussians victory Fought 1742, between the Prussians under Frederic the Great, and the Austrians under Prince Charles of Lorraine. The Prussians were driven from the field, but the Austrians abandoned the pursuit to plunder, and the king, rallying his troops, broke the Austrian main body, and defeated them with a loss of 4,000 men. 1742 Battle of Chotusitz (Austria vs. Prussia) Prussians victory Fought May 17, 1742, between the Austrians under Prince Charles of Lorraine, and the Prussians under Frederick the Great. The numbers were about equal, but the steadiness of the Prussian infantry eventually wore down the Austrians, and they were forced to retreat, though in good order, leaving behind them 18 guns and 12,000 prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Protections Guidance
    CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES PROTECTION GUIDANCE Requirement The Information Sharing Environment (ISE) Privacy Guidelines, at Section 1(b), state that they ―apply to information about United States citizens and lawful permanent residents that is subject to information privacy or other legal protections under the Constitution and Federal laws of the United States (‗protected information‘).‖ (Emphasis added.) Section 2 of the ISE Privacy Guidelines, entitled ―Compliance with Laws,‖ states as follows: a. General. In the development and use of the ISE, all agencies shall, without exception, comply with the Constitution and all applicable laws and Executive Orders relating to protected information. b. Rules Assessment. Each agency shall implement an ongoing process for identifying and assessing the laws, Executive Orders, policies, and procedures that apply to the protected information that it will make available or access through the ISE. Each agency shall identify, document, and comply with any legal restrictions applicable to such information. Each agency shall adopt internal policies and procedures requiring it to: (i) Only seek or retain protected information that it is legally permissible for the agency to seek or retain under the laws, regulations, policies, and executive orders applicable to the agency; and (ii) Ensure that the protected information that the agency makes available through the ISE has been lawfully obtained by the agency and may be lawfully made available through the ISE. Purpose This document does not create new or modify existing policy but, rather, provides guidance interpreting the above ISE Privacy Guidelines requirements and outlines possible methods or ―best practices‖ to assist agencies in implementing this requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • First Amendment Protection of Homosexual (Expressive) Conduct
    FROM HAND-HOLDING TO SODOMY: FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF HOMOSEXUAL (EXPRESSIVE) CONDUCT David Cole William N. Eskridge, Jr.* Navy Lieutenant Richard Dirk Selland found himself "in a situation resembling that of a sparrow caught in a badminton game."' As a closeted gay man in 1992, Selland was disturbed by shipmate kidding that he was probably a "homosexual." The taunts escalated when the Democrats' presidential nominee, Bill Clinton, promised to end the military's exclu- sion of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. Selland's internal turmoil im- pelled him to seek counseling from the ship's chaplain. On the day after Clinton's inauguration as President, the chaplain and Selland met with the ship's commanding officer, and Selland admitted that he was "homosex- ual" in orientation. Under the military policy then in effect, Selland was unfit to serve: the policy held that homosexuality was incompatible with military service, and flatly forbade homosexuals from serving in the mili- tary. Selland's commander immediately removed him from his position.2 Soon thereafter, however, President Clinton announced his intention to end the policy justifying such separations. The President's announcement triggered a political firestorm. What emerged from the firestorm was a policy of "don't ask, don't tell "' 3 Under this policy, military recruits and personnel will not be asked about their sexual orientation. In theory, gay men, lesbians, and bisexuals may serve in the military so long as they do not engage in homosexual conduct.4 The change came on the heels of several judicial decisions questioning the constitutionality of the previous *Both professors are at Georgetown University Law Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline (PDF)
    Timeline of the French Revolution 1789 1793 May 5 Estates General convened in Versailles Jan. 21 Execution of Louis XVI (and later, Marie Jun. 17 National Assembly Antoinette on Oct. 16) Jun. 20 Tennis Court Oath Feb. 1 France declares war on British and Dutch (and Jul. 11 Necker dismissed on Spain on Mar. 7) Jul. 13 Bourgeois militias in Paris Mar. 11 Counterrevolution starts in Vendée Jul. 14 Storming of the Bastille in Paris (official start of Apr. 6 Committee of Public Safety formed the French Revolution) Jun. 1-2 Mountain purges Girondins Jul. 16 Necker recalled Jul. 13 Marat assassinated Jul. 20 Great Fear begins in the countryside Jul. 27 Maximilien Robespierre joins CPS Aug. 4 Abolition of feudalism Aug. 10 Festival of Unity and Indivisibility Aug. 26 Declaration of Rights of Man and the Citizen Sept. 5 Terror the order of the day Oct. 5 Adoption of Revolutionary calendar 1791 1794 Jun. 20-21 Flight to Varennes Aug. 27 Declaration of Pillnitz Jun. 8 Festival of the Supreme Being Jul. 27 9 Thermidor: fall of Robespierre 1792 1795 Apr. 20 France declares war on Austria (and provokes Prussian declaration on Jun. 13) Apr. 5/Jul. 22 Treaties of Basel (Prussia and Spain resp.) Sept. 2-6 September massacres in Paris Oct. 5 Vendémiare uprising: “whiff of grapeshot” Sept. 20 Battle of Valmy Oct. 26 Directory established Sept. 21 Convention formally abolishes monarchy Sept. 22 Beginning of Year I (First Republic) 1797 Oct. 17 Treaty of Campoformio Nov. 21 Berlin Decree 1798 1807 Jul. 21 Battle of the Pyramids Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Select Works of Edmund Burke, Vol. 1 [1770]
    The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. Edmund Burke, Select Works of Edmund Burke, vol. 1 [1770] The Online Library Of Liberty This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, educational foundation established in 1960 to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. 2010 was the 50th anniversary year of the founding of Liberty Fund. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), or to make use of the hundreds of essays, educational aids, and study guides, please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 1,000 books and quotes about liberty and power, and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash, in present day Iraq. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • How to Report a Civil Liberties Or Privacy Violation
    How to Report a Civil Liberties or Privacy Violation PLEASE NOTE: Due to the current COVID-19 pandemic, the submission and response procedures for all Privacy and Civil Liberties complaints will be temporarily modified. See below for details. Civil liberties are fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Constitution of the United States. Most civil liberties (including freedom of speech, assembly, press and religion) are concentrated primarily in the Bill of Rights. Click here for additional information about civil liberties. The Department of Defense (DoD) is committed to the protection of the civil liberties and privacy of DoD employees, members of the military, and the public, to the greatest extent possible, consistent with its operational requirements. The Defense Privacy, Civil Liberties, and Transparency Division (DPCLTD) is charged with implementing the DoD's Privacy and Civil Liberties programs through advice, monitoring, official reporting, and training. The information contained on this page serves to assist individuals who allege that the DoD violated their civil liberties or privacy rights. Steps for Submitting Your Complaint Letter: At this time DPCLTD cannot accept complaints by mail, fax, or telephone. To report a civil liberties or privacy violation to the DPCLTD, please email your complaint letter as an attachment to the DPCLTD Civil Liberties Correspondence Box at: [email protected] Your letter will help DPCLTD determine if your complaint raises a civil liberties or privacy concern. Your letter also will help DPCLTD decide whether your complaint can be referred to a DoD component office for investigation. If your letter does not include all of the information below, DPCLTD may be unable to process your complaint.
    [Show full text]