DOCSLIB.ORG

32Nd Global GS1 Healthcare Conference Chicago, 17-19 October 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
32Nd Global GS1 Healthcare Conference Chicago, 17-19 October 2017 32nd Global GS1 Healthcare Conference Chicago, 17-19 October 2017 Participants list The Global GS1 Healthcare Conference provides a neutral forum for all healthcare supply chain stakeholders to physically meet, exchange ideas, and advance development and adoption of global standards. Participants include representatives from governmental bodies and regulators, manufacturers, distributors, healthcare providers, group purchasing organisations, logistics providers, associations, solution providers and educational institutes. Participants also include GS1 Member Organisations from around the world representing their local healthcare communities. Company Name Last name Country 121nexus Brent Carney United States 121nexus Charles Kim United States 121nexus Kass Poryzees United States 121nexus Heather Ryan United States 121nexus Joseph Triska United States 1WorldSync Jeffrey Holzman United States 1WorldSync Nick Manzo United States 1WorldSync Todd Simons United States 1WorldSync Lionel Tussau Belgium 3M Health Care Charity Hovey United States A.D. Mitchell Surgery Inc Alexander Mitchell Canada Abbott Marcel De Grutter Netherlands Abbott Cyndi Poetker United States Abbott Ulf Suerig Germany Abbott Laboratories Kiryl Grechuha United States Abbott Laboratories Christopher Street United States Abbott Laboratories John Terwilliger United States AbbVie Douglas Brandt United States AbbVie Gregory Goger United States AbbVie Lloyd Mager United States AbbVie Laura Weekley United States AbbVie, Inc. Kylee Raby United States ACRES Greg Koski United States ACT Health Ryan Mavin Australia ACT Health Peter O'Halloran Australia Adents Mike Angiolelli United States Adents Jim Cummings United States Adept Packaging (Adept Group LLC) Andre Schultz United States Adept Packaging Engineers & Consultants Reggie Morris United States Advocate Health Care Kathy Sullivan United States AHRMM Robert Perry United States AHRMM of the American Hospital Assoc Mike Schiller United States AHRMM of the American Hospital Assoc Debbie Sprindzunas United States Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Susan Basiti United States Page 1 of 9 Status 02.11.2017 32nd Global GS1 Healthcare Conference Chicago, 17-19 October 2017 Participants list Company Name Last name Country Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Trey Davis United States Amazon Ryan Kelly United States Amazon Business Jennifer Stockman United States Amazon.com Ryan Milburn United States Amerisourcebergen Dave Kuehl United States AmerisourceBergen Michael Miller United States Amerisourcebergen Corporation Jeffery Denton United States Amgen Brian Finley United States Astellas Ashley Albert United States B. Braun Medcial Inc. Joseph Costagliola United States B.Braun/Aesculap Georg Keller Germany Baxter Joseph Culotta United States Baxter Healthcare Kat Crowder United States Baxter Healthcare Ramana Rao United States Baxter Healthcare Miranda Wilson United States Baxter Healthcare Barbara Zenner United States Baxter Healthcare Corporation John Langanke United States Baxter Healthcare Inc Dana Smith United States Bayer Stefan Artlich Germany BD Dennis Black United States Bernhoven hospital Justin Bitter Netherlands Bernhoven hospital Anouska Brekelmans Netherlands Bernhoven hospital René Bults Netherlands Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Nathan Alley United States Bio-Rad Laboratories Christophe Belbeoch United States Bio-Rad Laboratories Sining Wang United States BJC Health Care Kraig Butts United States BJC Healthcare Robert Viviano United States Boston Scientific Corporation Robert Mennow United States Bracket Kelly Knowles United States BrandSure, LLC Gary Lerner United States Cambridge Health Alliance Cindy Peaslee United States Capgemini Hemant Bonde United States Center for Supply Chain Studies Robert Celeste United States Central Denmark Region Henrik Stilling Denmark Centro Médico Imbanaco Jose Sabogal Colombia Centro Médico Imbanaco de Cali Juan C Rincon B Colombia Childrens Hospital Group David Vaughan Ireland CHRISTUS Health Anthony Scanio United States Page 2 of 9 Status 02.11.2017 32nd Global GS1 Healthcare Conference Chicago, 17-19 October 2017 Participants list Company Name Last name Country Chrono-log Corp. Janice DeLoatch United States Clarkston Consulting Seth Andrews United States Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi Essa Al Hertani United Arab Emirates Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi Hashid Kalappurathakath United Arab Emirates Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi (CCAD) Ashraf Urothiyil United Arab Emirates Committee for Healthcare eStandards Curtis Miller United States Commport Communications International, inc. Brian Miles Canada Cook Medical Bill Bobbie Canada Cook Medical Dheepa Lekshmanan United States Cook Medical Patrick Main United States CVS Health Susan DelMonico United States CVS Health Tom McHugh United States Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Sylvia Bartel United States Deloitte Brad Pedrow United States Deloitte Consulting LLP Rajesh Singh United States Department of Veterans Affairs/VHA Procurement and Logistics Office Roberto Carmona United States Department of Veterans Affairs/VHA Procurement and Logistics Office Elizabeth Kiley United States Dept of Veterans Affairs Jeffrey Pearson United States Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS foundation Trust Kevin Downs United Kingdom Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS foundation Trust Keith Jones United Kingdom DHL Mike Meakin United Kingdom Drummond Group Aaron Gomez United States Drummond Group LLC Dave Dolan United States Drummond Group LLC Ray Greer United States Dutch Hospital Pharmacist Association (NVZA) Tjalling Van der Schors Netherlands E2open Ameya Kamat United States EFMHACA Elisa Zwaneveld Ethiopia EFMHACA Yeshialem Abebe Ethiopia EFMHACA Yehulu Alamneh Ethiopia EFMHACA Heran Borta Ethiopia EHS Paul O'Hara United States Eli Lilly Senthil Rajaratnam United States Eli Lilly & Co. Tagore Somers United States Eli Lilly/CES Rebecca Debalski United States Excellis Health Solutions Greg Wozniak United States F. Hoffmann La Roche Ltd Tatjana Pathare Switzerland F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Sébastien Langlois-Berthelot Switzerland Federal Ministry of Health Jennifer Enekebe Nigeria Former Pfizer Employee Peggy Staver United States Page 3 of 9 Status 02.11.2017 32nd Global GS1 Healthcare Conference Chicago, 17-19 October 2017 Participants list Company Name Last name Country Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System, US James Philips United States FSEnet+ Matthew Muldoon United States FSEnet+ Tasha Wiehe United States Fundacion Cardioinfantil Oscar Cordoba Colombia Geisinger Kevin Capatch United States General Medical Council Terence Stephenson United Kingdom GHX Neil Farquharson United States GlaxoSmithKline Neil Lawrence United Kingdom GlaxoSmithKline Barbara Watson Canada Global Healthcare Exchange Karen Conway United States GMDN Agency Chinaniso Tembo United States GPO Resah Jean-Michel Descoutures France GS1 Robert Beideman United States GS1 Andrew Hearn United States GS1 Alain Jonis Belgium GS1 Miguel Lopera Belgium GS1 Timothy Marsh United States GS1 Algeria Halim Recham Algeria GS1 Australia Catherine Koetz Australia GS1 Austria GmbH Poppy Abeto Kiesse Austria GS1 Brasil Marcelo Oliveira Sa Brazil GS1 Brazil Ana Paula Maniero Brazil GS1 Canada Alicia Duval Canada GS1 Canada John King Canada GS1 Canada Arthur Smith Canada GS1 China Han Du China GS1 China Zixiao Guo China GS1 China Zhitao Jia China GS1 China Yuan Zhang China GS1 Colombia Sebastian Leon Colombia GS1 Colombia Leonel Pava Colombia GS1 Czech Republic Pavla Cihlarova Czech Republic GS1 Denmark Jesper Kervin Franke Denmark GS1 Denmark Lars Kyed Denmark GS1 Denmark Anne Schmidt Denmark GS1 France Valérie Marchand France GS1 France Alexandre Rieucau France GS1 Germany GmbH Sylvia Reingardt Germany GS1 Global Office Pete Alvarez United States Page 4 of 9 Status 02.11.2017 32nd Global GS1 Healthcare Conference Chicago, 17-19 October 2017 Participants list Company Name Last name Country GS1 Global Office Chuck Biss United States GS1 Global Office Ulrike Kreysa Belgium GS1 Global Office Kelly Lerch United States GS1 Global Office Geraldine Lissalde-Bonnet Belgium GS1 Global Office Sophie Molle Belgium GS1 Global Office Craig Alan Repec Belgium GS1 Global Office Tania Snioch Belgium GS1 Global Office Marianne Timmons United States GS1 Global Office Els Van der Wilden Belgium GS1 Global Office Mike Wehrs United States GS1 Guest Rosalie Clemens United States GS1 Ireland Siobhain Duggan Ireland GS1 Japan Fumi Maekawa Japan GS1 Japan Hiromitsu Takai Japan GS1 Japan Koichi Uemura Japan GS1 Netherlands Amanda DeLaroque Netherlands GS1 Netherlands Remco Krol Netherlands GS1 Netherlands Hans Lunenborg Netherlands GS1 Netherlands Pieter Maarleveld Netherlands GS1 Netherlands Esther Peelen Netherlands GS1 Netherlands Dyonne Van Heest Netherlands GS1 Netherlands Edgar Van Ravenzwaaij Netherlands GS1 Russia Georgy Nasonov Russian Federation GS1 Senegal Oumy Coly Senegal GS1 Slovakia Ladislav Janco Slovakia GS1 Slovakia Marianna Revallova Slovakia GS1 Turkey Cihan Korucu Turkey GS1 UK Claire Clarke United Kingdom GS1 UK Glen Hodgson United Kingdom GS1 US Adrian Bailey United States GS1 US Greg Bylo United States GS1 US Bob Carpenter United States GS1 US Jennifer Cohee United States GS1 US Beth Gibson United States GS1 US Salil Joshi United States GS1 US Siobhan O'Bara United States GS1 US Annette Pomponio United States GS1 US Olivia Ritchie United States GS1 US Jessica Slotman United States Page 5 of 9 Status 02.11.2017 32nd Global GS1 Healthcare Conference Chicago, 17-19 October 2017 Participants list Company Name Last name Country GS1 US Peter
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lg Electronics Inc. Audit Report 2002
    LG ELECTRONICS INC. AUDIT REPORT 2002 As of December 31, 2002 and for the nine-month period from April 1, 2002 (date of spin-off) to December 31, 2002 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of LG Electronics Inc. We have audited the accompanying non-consolidated balance sheet of LG Electronics Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2002, and the related non-consolidated statements of income, appropriations of retained earnings (draft) and cash flows for the nine-month period from April 1, 2002 (date of spin-off) to December 31, 2002, expressed in Korean Won. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the Republic of Korea. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the non-consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of LG Electronics Inc. as of December 31, 2002, and the results of its operations, the changes in its retained earnings and its cash flows for the nine-month period from April 1, 2002 (date of spin-off) to December 31, 2002, in conformity with financial accounting standards generally accepted in the Republic of Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • LG Electronics Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2004 and 2003
    LG Electronics Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2004 and 2003 LG Electronics Inc. And Subsidiaries Index December 31, 2004 and 2003 Page(s) Report of Independent Auditors ........................................................................................ 1 - 2 Consolidated Financial Statements Balance Sheets ....................................................................................................................... 3 - 4 Statements of Income ............................................................................................................ 5 - 6 Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity ....................................................................... 7 Statements of Cash Flows ..................................................................................................... 8 - 9 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ......................................................................... 10 - 51 Samil PricewaterhouseCoopers Kukje Center Building 191 Hankangro 2ga, Yongsanku Seoul 140-702, KOREA (Yongsan P.O. Box 266, 140-600) Report of Independent Auditors To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of LG Electronics Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LG Electronics Inc. (“LGE”) and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, expressed in Korean won.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2020 Supply Chain Management
    2020 WINTER CUSTOMER SUCCESS REPORT SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT CATEGORY SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW Supply chain management software is built to control complete business workflows across the supply chain, execute demand forecasting and planning, and handle supplier relationships. Common features of this solution include purchase order fulfillment, supplier sourcing, inventory management, shipping, and execution-focused programs (e.g., transportation and warehouse management). Leading supply chain management platforms include forecasting, which assists organizations to manage the variations in supply and demand by utilizing consumption analysis and advanced algorithms to analyze purchaser histories. Supply chain improvement solutions can thus help to boost production efficiency and plan for the future. 2 Customer Success Report Ranking Methodology The FeaturedCustomers Customer Success ranking is based on data from our customer reference Customer Success Report platform, market presence, web presence, & social Award Levels presence as well as additional data aggregated from online sources and media properties. Our ranking engine applies an algorithm to all data collected to calculate the final Customer Success Report rankings. The overall Customer Success ranking is a weighted average based on 3 parts: Market Leader Content Score is affected by: Vendor on FeaturedCustomers.com with 1. Total # of vendor generated customer substantial customer base & market share. references (case studies, success stories, Leaders have the highest ratio of customer testimonials, and customer videos) success content, content quality score, and social media presence relative to company size. 2. Customer reference rating score 3. Year-over-year change in amount of customer references on FeaturedCustomers platform 4. Total # of profile views on FeaturedCustomers platform Top Performer 5.
    [Show full text]
  • S&Op Execution
    White Paper S&OP EXECUTION: MAKING SUPPLY CHAIN PLANS WORK An E2open White Paper Contents 2 Executive Summary 3 Making the Plans Work with 2 The Best Laid Plans Collaborative Execution 3 Rapid Re-Planning, Not-So- 4 Executing a Plan: A Week in Rapid Execution the Life 9 Summary and Conclusion e2open.com White Paper: S&OP Execution Executive Summary Manufacturing business models have changed. Static, linear supply chains serving vertically integrated manufacturers have been replaced by dynamic trading networks supporting increasingly outsourced, global businesses. With this change has come increased volatility—in supplies, in customer demand, and even in product lines, as life cycles shorten and margin windows narrow. How can you plan in this chaotic environment? And, once plans are made, how can you most effectively implement them—plus respond intelligently when the playing field shifts? While the original sales and operations planning (S&OP) process is beyond the scope of this paper, this white paper will examine two different approaches to implementing those plans once they are formulated: the first is based on rapid re-planning in response to exceptions; and the second is grounded in collaborative execution by the extended network, including brand owners, contract manufacturers, suppliers, and other trading partners. While the traditional re-planning approach has a certain intellectual appeal, this paper will demonstrate that it is also a common source of additional cost, noise, and latency. Moreover, it may underutilize one of your most important assets: the knowledge and creativity of your supply chain team. Finally, re-planning approaches assume a stability of process that often does not exist in the real world.
    [Show full text]
  • LG Electronics Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2005 and 2004 LG Electronics Inc
    LG Electronics Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2005 and 2004 LG Electronics Inc. And Subsidiaries Index December 31, 2005 and 2004 Page(s) Report of Independent Auditors .................................................................................... 1 - 2 Consolidated Financial Statements Balance Sheets .................................................................................................................. 3 - 4 Statements of Income ........................................................................................................ 5 - 6 Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity.................................................................... 7 Statements of Cash Flows ................................................................................................. 8 - 9 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ...................................................................... 10 - 66 Samil PricewaterhouseCoopers Kukje Center Building 191 Hankangro 2ga, Yongsanku Seoul 140-702, KOREA (Yongsan P.O. Box 266, 140-600) Report of Independent Auditors To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of LG Electronics Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LG Electronics Inc. (“LGE”) and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, expressed in Korean won. These financial statements
    [Show full text]
  • E2open Parent Holdings, Inc. Form PRE 14A Filed 2021-07-20
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM PRE 14A Preliminary proxy statement not related to a contested matter or merger/acquisition Filing Date: 2021-07-20 | Period of Report: 2021-07-19 SEC Accession No. 0001193125-21-218837 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER E2open Parent Holdings, Inc. Mailing Address Business Address 9600 GREAT HILLS TRAIL, 9600 GREAT HILLS TRAIL, CIK:1800347| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 0228 SUITE 300E SUITE 300E Type: PRE 14A | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-39272 | Film No.: 211099008 AUSTIN TX 78759 AUSTIN TX 78759 SIC: 7374 Computer processing & data preparation 8664326736 Copyright © 2021 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ Check the appropriate box: ☒ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☐ Definitive Proxy Statement ☐ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 E2OPEN PARENT HOLDINGS, INC. (Name of registrant as specified in its charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ☒ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it is determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Sessions for Friday, April 20
    Sessions for Friday, April 20 Friday, 09:15 AM - 10:45 AM Friday, 09:15 AM - 10:45 AM, Scottsdale (Floor 5) Track: Behavioral Operations 1 Session: Bounded Rationality and System Dynamics in OM Chair(s): Maximiliano Udenio 025-0918 Managing the Dynamics of Process Improvement: Production, Improvement, and Learning Brad Morrison, Assistant Professor, Brandeis International Business School, United States Using a system dynamics model of process improvement under constrained resources that must do both production and process improvement, simulation analysis highlights the tradeoff between production and improvement and demonstrates a tipping point that demarcates enduring high production levels. Results show that policies that favor learning lead to superior performance. 025-1320 Regulatory Systems and Loss Aversion in Newsvendor Model Xiang Zhang, Associate Professor, Beijing Institute Of Technology, China We propose a behavioral model to predict judgmental and decision making behavior by incorporating loss aversion and regulatory orientations in newsvendor framework. The proposed model shows that both the optimal order quantity and profit are substantially influenced by the bounded rationality and regulatory orientations. 025-1291 Cultural dimensions of agile supply chain management Diego Fogaça, Student, Universidade De Sao Paulo, Brazil Fernando Almada Santos, Assistant Professor, Universidade De Sao Paulo, Brazil Rafael Souza, Student, Universidade De Sao Paulo, Brazil Raul Toledo, Student, Universidade De Sao Paulo, Brazil Marcos Gandra, Student, Universidade De Sao Paulo, Brazil This paper investigates the relationships between Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and agile supply chain management. These concepts have their main characteristics presented. The conclusions are that the agile supply chain management is related to the following cultural dimensions: low power distance, collectivism, low uncertainty avoidance, femininity and long term orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • L'oréal Talks Supply Chain Transformation with Collaborative Execution
    L’Oréal Talks Supply Chain Transformation with Collaborative Execution Richard Markoff, L’Oréal Kevin O’Marah, Stanford Global SCM Forum E2open Interactive Case Study The Vision and the Voyage CHALLENGE: Leveraging existing investments in ERP systems 1. SOLUTION: L’Oréal talks about extending the value of ERP CHALLENGE: Accelerating supply chain processes to fuel corporate growth 2. SOLUTION: L’Oréal talks about moving to the cloud. CHALLENGE: Making better decisions faster 3. SOLUTION: L’Oréal talks about collaboration as a strategy CHALLENGE: Managing demand you can’t predict and supply you don’t control 4. SOLUTION: L’Oréal talks about execution as a strategy Kevin O’Marah Richard Markoff Sr. Research Fellow, Stanford Global Supply Chain Corporate Supply Chain Standards & Management Forum Audits Director, L’Oréal This interactive eBook features video footage captured during an E2open-sponsored interview between Kevin O’Marah, original creator of AMR’s Supply Chain Top 25, and Richard Markoff, Corporate Supply Chain Standards & Audits Director at L’Oréal. The discussion focuses on L’Oréal’s innovative supply chain transformation initiative, which leverages the latest cloud technologies to enable collaborative execution across the company’s diverse and fast-growing business network. Challenge Solution Leveraging Existing Investments 1 L’Oréal Talks: Extending the in ERP Systems Value of ERP It has been nearly a quarter century since the term ‘ERP’ was first coined, and in the intervening years the development of dramatically extended enter- prises has ratcheted up the importance of trading partners in delivering value to customers from manufacturing organizations. As such, the importance of collaboration and information exchange across the value chain has increased, and the idea of ERP as a comprehensive enterprise application has lost currency.
    [Show full text]
  • Ways Made by Others Are Not the Only Roads to Travel
    Contents 002 Financial Highlights Part 1 004 The LG Way 006 Holding Structure 007 Gains (or Losses) from Equity Method 008 CEO's Letter 010 Board of Directors 012 Executive Officers Part 2 014 What is The LG Way 016 New Way 018 Wide Way 020 Right Way Part 3 022 We're going The LG Way 024 Electronics 032 Chemicals 040 Telecommunications & Services Part 4 048 Management Discussion 056 Non-Consolidated Financial Statements 060 Consolidated Financial Statements 003 Financial Highlights 002 005 004 Part 1 The LG Way Part 1 The LG Way Ways made by others are not the only roads to travel. Charting a new course is LG's way of achieving greatness A way to build a No. 1 company through the practice of “Jeong-Do” Management(1) A way that no other company has traveled before A way to become a leading company that puts customer value ahead of everything, we are now paving the LG Way (1) “Jeong-Do” Management is LG's unique code of conduct that governs our management activities. English translation of “Jeong-Do” is “Right Way”. “Jeong-Do” Management is the way we display our uncompromising integrity in pursuing LG's management principle of creating value for customers. 006 007 Part 1 Holding Structure Gains (or Losses) from Equity Method As of December 31, 2005 (Unit : KRW one million) Company Shares Stake Book BV Portion Owned Ratio(*2) Value (%) Gains from Equity Method (%) Before Portion After Portion Negative Goodwill (*3) (%) Negative Goodwill (*3) (%) LG Electronics Inc. 50,341,430 31.45 2,288,347 49.36% 223,499 36.20% 20,109 6.57% Siltron Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Suez Canal: Looking Beyond the Surface to Access the Full
    IN THE NEWS “The disaster of the moment The Suez Canal: Looking Beyond the Surface becomes a global phenomenon because we realized the to Access the Full Economic Impact interconnectedness that comes with globalization and A Dun & Bradstreet and E2open Perspective on the Ripple Effect of our reliance of each other Ever Given Blocking the Suez Canal and Best Practices for Building as contributors to the global Supply Chain Resilience supply chain. Companies have developed a higher level of dependency on suppliers On March 23, 2021, the Ever Given, a 193 feet wide vessel, ran aground and third parties from other in the Suez Canal. While the vessel was freed on March 29, the ripple countries, and that dependency effect of its lodging in the Canal will have continued ramifications for is highlighted when a link in the supply chain is impacted. global supply chains in the weeks to come as global trade resumes, goods start to be unloaded at destination ports and suppliers look to The Suez Canal incident gives us replenish shortfalls in essential materials that threatened downstream yet another reason for businesses production and manufacturing of consumer goods. to invest in data and technology to create an agile, geographically dispersed supply chain that can Impact on Global Supply Chains – By the Numbers: quickly pivot during unexpected According to industry data, it is estimated that 12 percent of the world’s events.” Brian Alster seaborn trade and 30 percent of global container traffic passes through General Manager, the Suez Canal annually, with approximately 50 container ships passing Third-Party Risk & Compliance through every day, accounting for an estimated $400M in cargo flowing Dun & Bradstreet through each hour.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION E2open
    TABLE OF CONTENTS As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 2021 Registration No. 333-253969​ UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ​ AMENDMENT NO. 1 FORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ​ E2open Parent Holdings, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)​ ​ Delaware 7372 86-1874570 ​ (State or Other Jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization)​ Classification Code Number)​ Identification Number) ​ 9600 Great Hills Trail, Suite 300E Austin, Texas 78759 (866) 432-6736 (Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)​ ​ Laura Fese Executive Vice President and General Counsel E2open Parent Holdings, Inc. 9600 Great Hills Trail, Suite 300E Austin, Texas 78759 (866) 432-6736 (Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent For Service)​ ​ Copy to: Morgan D. Elwyn Claire E. James Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 787 Seventh Avenue New York, New York 10019 (212) 728-8000 ​ Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time after this Registration Statement becomes effective. If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. ☒ If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Steps to Service Supply Chain Excellence
    Newsletter of the Stanford Global Supply Chain Management Forum Vol. 10 Issue 4 • Fall 2004 Five Steps to Service FORUM PARTNER MEMBERS Supply Chain Excellence Accenture ADX By Dirk de Waart and Steve Kemper AT Kearney Agile Software Applied Materials For decades, companies have struggled with the seemingly competing forces Cisco Systems of excellent customer service and best-in-class operational cost. The pre- Deloitte Research vailing view dictated that customer satisfaction required a high price and Dow Chemical aftermarket service was a necessary evil. Only recently have companies E2Open realized that they can run their service business as a profit center, making Hewlett-Packard IBM Corporation both their customers and their shareholders happy. The advantages of Ingram Micro Logistics achieving excellence in service supply chain management include increased Intel Corporation customer satisfaction and retention, product sales, and service contract rev- Intuit enue as well as higher margins. Given the higher emphasis of customers on Motorola after-sale support, the importance of excellence in service supply chain Nike Nokia Mobile Phones management—and the risks of not taking proper steps to improve perfor- Nomura Research Inst. mance in this area, are expected to further increase in the future. Oracle This article describes a five-step process to help companies swiftly get on palmOne that road to service supply chain excellence: PeopleSoft Samsung Electronics Step 1: Understand Your Service Supply Chain. The service supply SAP Labs LCC chain is defined as all processes and activities involved in the planning, SeeCommerce movement, and repair of materials to enable after-sales support of the Solectron company’s products.
    [Show full text]