DOCSLIB.ORG

Study on Appointment Procedures in the EU Institutions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study on Appointment Procedures in the EU Institutions STUDY requested by the CONT Committee Appointment procedures in the EU institutions Budgetary Affairs Policy Department D for Budgetary Affairs Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union PE 621.803 - February 2019 EN DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT D: BUDGETARY AFFAIRS Appointment procedures in the EU institutions STUDY Abstract This analytical study focuses on the legal and practical/ethical dimensions of the appointment of senior-level officials in the European Union (EU) institutions, and a selection of Member States and different European/international organisations. Focusing on the four instances of maladministration identified by the European Ombudsman with regard to the appointment of the new Secretary-General (SG) of the European Commission (EC), this study recommends inter alia that a special appointment procedure should be adopted for the appointment of the SG of the EC; amending Articles 7 and Article 29 of the Staff Regulations to improve their clarity and limit chances of misapplication/maladministration; for the Ombudsman to be capable of bringing a judicial review procedure; looking into the possible ways in which EU citizens and organisations may be involved in shaping the institutional policies on appointments; promoting the professionalisation of selection committees; addressing inefficiencies in appointment procedures and clarifying criteria (on exceptions, publication of vacancies etc.); enhancing the transparency of appointment procedures and strengthening independent monitoring of appointment procedures; broadening the choice of candidates; considering the introduction of external independent expertise in appointment procedures; a role for the European Parliament, e.g. pre-appointment hearings of SG; and clarifying existing conflict of interest requirements. IP/D/ALL/FWC/2015-001/LOT3/C1 28/2/2019 PE621.803 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control. It designated Mr Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy to follow the study. AUTHOR(S) Blomeyer & Sanz Ltd., Guadalajara (Spain): Dr Christoph Demmke, Dr Magdalena Tulibacka, Ms Margarita Sanz, Mr Roland Blomeyer, Dr Mike Beke RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Mr Jean-Jacques Gay Policy Department on Budgetary Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail:[email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Executive Summary: DE, FR, NL ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy Departments provide in-house and external expertise to support European Parliament's committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU policies. To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: Mr Niels FISCHER E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in February 2019. Brussels, © European Union, 2019. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. Appointment procedures in the EU institutions ____________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................. 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 6 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ....................................................................................................................... 10 NOTE DE SYNTHÈSE .......................................................................................................................... 15 SAMENVATTING ................................................................................................................................ 19 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 23 1.1 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE ...................................................................................................................................... 23 1.2 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................................... 25 1.3 REPORT STRUCTURE .............................................................................................................................................. 25 2 INTRODUCTION TO THE ‘SELMAYR CASE’ ............................................................................... 26 3 LEGAL DIMENSION .................................................................................................................... 31 3.1 INTRODUCING THE LEGAL DIMENSION .......................................................................................................... 32 3.2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF SLO ............................................................................. 35 3.3 Revoking administrative acts ............................................................................................................................. 55 4 PRACTICAL AND ETHICAL DIMENSION .................................................................................... 60 4.1 Appointing SLOs between political interests and merit based requirements ................................. 62 4.2 The role of the political level in the appointment process ...................................................................... 65 4.3 Determinants of selection by the political level - what do they want, and why ............................. 69 4.4 Finding the right level of political involvement .......................................................................................... 72 4.5 Criteria for internal or external recruitment .................................................................................................. 74 4.6 Composition of the structures in charge of selection/assessment ...................................................... 80 4.7 Conflicts of interest ................................................................................................................................................ 90 5 CONCLUDING CONSIDERATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................. 102 5.1 Legal dimension .................................................................................................................................................... 102 5.2 Practical and ethical dimension ...................................................................................................................... 104 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 109 ANNEX A – DATA COLLECTION FORMAT ....................................................................................... 115 3 DG IPOL | Policy Department D: Budgetary Affairs ____________________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CCA European Commission Consultative Committee on Appointments CFREU Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union CoE Council of Europe CJEU Court of Justice of the European Union CONT European Parliament Committee on Budgetary Control DDG Deputy Director General DG Directorate General / Director General DSG Deputy Secretary-General of the European Commission EC European Commission EFTA European Free Trade Area Secretariat EP European Parliament EU European Union GSC General Secretariat of the Council OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development ReNEUAL Research Network on EU Administrative Law SG Secretary-General of the European Commission SLO Senior-level officials TEU Treaty on European Union TFEU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ToR Terms of Reference UN United Nations WB World Bank 4 Appointment procedures in the EU institutions ____________________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 Chronology 26 TABLE 2 EP survey responses 29 TABLE 3 SLO appointment models: Who appoints SLOs at each level? 66 TABLE 4 SLO selection committees or bodies in the EU Member States 81 TABLE 5 Self-regulation or independent forms of appointment committees? – main differences 86 TABLE 6 Conflicting political and administrative interests and logics 95 TABLE 7 Contents for ‘case study’ institutions / interview guide 115 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 Perceived direct politicisation 63 FIGURE 2 Scale of political influence during selection & appointment of Top Public Managers 67 FIGURE 3 A scale of open and closed recruitment systems for Top-Officials positions 75 FIGURE 4 Departmental permanent secretary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Power of Initiative of the European Commission: a Progressive Erosion?
    The Power of Initiative of the European Commission: A Progressive Erosion? Paolo PONZANO, Costanza HERMANIN and Daniela CORONA Preface by António Vitorino Studies & 89 Research Study & The Power of Initiative 89 of the European Commission: Research A Progressive Erosion? PAOLO PONZANO, COSTANZA HERMANIN AND DANIELA CORONA Preface by António Vitorino Paolo PONZANO is a senior fellow at the European University Institute and a special adviser of the European Commission. Former collaborator of Altiero Spinelli at the Institute for International Affairs in Rome, he has worked for the European Commission from 1971 to 2009. He was formerly Director for Relations with the Council of ministers, subsequently for Institutional Matters and Better Regulation. He was also Alternate Member of the European Convention in 2002/2003. He published several articles and chapters on the EU institutions. He teaches European Governance and Decision-Making at the University of Florence and at the European College of Parma as well as European Law at the University of Rome. Costanza HERMANIN is a researcher in the department of social and political science of the European University Institute, where she is about to complete her PhD. Her research interests comprise EU social and immigration policy, EU institutional affairs, and human rights and immigration policy in Italy. She has been visiting fellow at several places (WZB, CERI, Columbia, Berkeley). She is the co-editor of a forthcoming book on “Fighting Race Discrimination in Europe” (Routledge, 2012). She has been publishing on Italian and English speaking journals. Daniela CORONA is currently research collaborator at the Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies at the European University Institute in Florence where she completed her PhD.
    [Show full text]
  • Litigious Paranoia: Sense of Justice, Bureaucracy, and Media
    ADMINISTORY ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR VERWALTUNGSGESCHICHTE BAND 3, 2018 SEITE 201–217 D O I : 10.2478/ADHI-2018-0037 Litigious Paranoia: Sense of Justice, Bureaucracy, and Media RUPERT GADERER Sense of Justice ›Quarrelers‹, according to the president of the German justice in connection with the Anglo-American law-and- Federal Administrative Court between 1958 and 1969, emotion debate,3 which in German-speaking countries should not be judged with the same standards as a has been discussed for the most part under the concept common citizen.1 People who take excessive legal action ›Rechtsgefühl‹ (sense of justice). In Germany, most of the and fle countless complaints are – in his opinion – contributions have come from the feld ›legal sociology‹ usually sick. Still today forensic psychiatry assumes that and in recent years research has been carried out in such querulous behavior is the result of a pathological the cultural and literary sciences.4 The present media- increase in an emotion, or more specifcally a pathological historical investigation of litigious paranoia takes these increase in a person’s ›sense of justice‹.2 Litigious results into consideration and emphasizes three aspects paranoia is said to be an obsessive endeavor to realize in particular. First, the question of the historicity of justice and a concept of justice – the origin of which can emotions is pursued, the temporally and spatially be found in the human psyche. It is precisely the legal dependent power derived from emotions to take action system and psychiatry that, in the history of litigious and the social contextualization of emotions.5 Second, paranoia or paranoia querulans, have dealt extensively those media are shifted from the periphery to the center with this behavior, after all they, as the observers of of cognitive interest which are brought into play to society and the authorities for pronouncing judgments, transfer the fury, the hate, but also the desperation and were and are most afected by it.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Teil Einwohnerverzeichnis Nach Strassen Geordnet A
    kinwolmerverzeiclmig von Linz B flach Straßen geordnet Mehr auch A alphabetifch geordnet] Gegründei 1880 Fett-ruf 3301 OBEtHAUS ANTON GATTERBAUER Link, nur-Graben Kompleiie Braufauzsiattungen in allen Frei-lagen. Ersfltlassige Polsiermöbel IIIII II AKTlENGEsELLSCHAFT Zenkralbiiko : I.I N Z - U R FA IsI R Lucien-fresse Nr. 20 Tel. Nr. 70-O9, 72-79 Hocn- UND Hinz-w Neuzsinuchn musswa schossemtzrk und Zemcnfwarenekzeugung Speziåliaehx Ausführung von gas- uns bombenslchetåp luttschuhtäumen GRABDENKMÄLER und » sämtliche BAUFfElNMEIZARBEUEN zot.Linler Wähne am drum-Friedhof J Fernruksosö -.J Erklärungen .zum-Sinwol1nerverzeichnis B, das nach straßem beziehungs- « weisesiedlungggruppen geordnet ausscheint o Jn diesem Verzeichnis-erfolgte die Reihung der Namen nach ganz anderen Gesicht3puntten, ale beim CinwohnerverzeichnissA Die Namen Maier und Schmied, einschließlich der Zufannnensetzungen (wie Maierhofer, Schmiedbauer usw.),- scheinen hier-mach ihrer verschiedenen wirklichen-Schreibweise aus. Die den Namen links vorgestellte Ziffer bedeutet die jeweilige hausnummer der betreffenden Straße; ist dieser Ziffer ein »V« darübergestellt,·besagt dies, daß die Zifferngebung zum Zwecke der Boltgzäljlung vorläufig erfolgt, eine amtliche Numerierung aber noch nicht vorhanden ift. Die Reihung der Vornamen der Mitglieder der einzelnen haughalte ist nicht alphabetifchz hier ist meist der haushaltsvorftand vorangestellt. Der Vorteil dieser Beihung liegt darin,«daß auch bei Kenntnis der deiläufigen Schreibweise des Namen-S und der Straße der zu suchenden Person sich das Auffinden derselben leicht ermöglichen läßt. (Veispiel: Mayer sName der'Straßef. Da es Mayer mit ai, ay,«aier, ayr, ey, ei, eier, eyer gibt, ist der einzige Anhalts- puntt die Straße, die der Suchen-de kennt. Nun ist es an hand dieser Reihung leicht-möglich, den Betreffenden zu sinden.) IW .
    [Show full text]
  • Governance by Committee: the Role of Committees in European Policy Making and Policy
    Governance by Committee: The Role of Committees in European Policy Making and Policy Research Paper 00/GHA Return to Introduction STATE OF THE ART REPORT CONTRACT NUMBER: HPSE-CT-1999-00019 PROJECT NUMBER: SERD-1999-00128 TITLE: GOVERNANCE BY COMMITTEE, THE ROLE OF COMMITTEES IN EUROPEAN POLICY-MAKING AND POLICY IMPLEMENTATION MAASTRICHT, MAY 2000 Table of Contents 1. General Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4 Subproject 1: The Standing Committees in the European Parliament 2.1..................Introduction ............................................................................................................... 6 2.2..................The Evolution of the European Parliament: From Consultative ............................... 6 Assembly to Co-legislator 2.2.1...............The EP as a Legislative Actor after Maastricht......................................................... 7 2.2.2...............EP and Council on an Even Footing after Amsterdam.............................................. 8 2.2.2.1. ..........The Streamlining of the Co-decision Procedure........................................................ 9 2.3..................The Role of EP Committees in the Legislative Process ............................................ 10 2.3.1...............Membership in EP Committees.................................................................................12 2.3.2...............Powers and Competences of EP Committees...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimacy, Accountability and Democracy in the European Union 3
    LEGITIMACY,LEGITIMACY, ACCOUNTABILITYACCOUNTABILITY ANDAND DEMOCRACYDEMOCRACY Determining a viable economic and political framework ININ THETHE for the Eurozone EUROPEANEUROPEAN UNIONUNION A FEDERAL TRUST REPORT JANUARY 2007 PROFESSOR VERNON BOGDANOR 2 A Federal Trust Report Author Vernon Bogdanor - Professor of Government, Brasenose College, Oxford University The Federal Trust is grateful for the help in the preparation of this report to the following members of the working group which met throughout 2006 under the chairmanship of Professor Bogdanor. Mary Dejevsky Lord Dykes Maurice Fraser Guy Lodge Christopher Lord Kalypso Nicolaidis John Peet Julie Smith Anthony Teasdale Professor Takis Tridimas Professor Stephen Weatherill Professor Richard Whitman All the above commend this report as an important contribution to debate, but only Professor Bogdanor and the Federal Trust are responsible for the report’s conclusions and the details of its analysis. Editorial Assistance (Federal Trust) Brendan Donnelly Joana Cruz Markus Wagner Legitimacy, Accountability and Democracy in the European Union 3 LEGITIMACY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND DEMOCRACY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A Federal Trust Report January 2007 enlightening the debate on good governance 4 A Federal Trust Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The European Union was founded to promote democracy in Europe. Yet its institutions and procedures leave much to be desired by democratic standards. The Union’s powers should be exercised in accordance with modern principles of democratic and accountable government. The purpose of this report is to show how this can be achieved. Legitimacy, accountability and democracy in the European Union Although there are more opportunities to hold the institutions of the European Union to account than is generally recognised, it is, nevertheless, widely seen as remote and unpredictable.
    [Show full text]
  • Bundesministerium Für Landesverteidigung 1
    w-M—F“—_h—In—q—H—mmu—Hm_—h——q—_ _—_—_——_———_-—.cfl———_—_—n_flu—l—_Ing-In“. Ausmusterung 17.8.1918 (die letzte). Rang 1.8.1918 Alberti Karl9 geb. 22.9.1898 in Szentlöringz, Sohn eines Tafel» richters9 Lt I.R.52‚ lebte in Budapest .Apitsch Robert, geb. 26.8.1899 in Neutitschein, Schn eines Regierungsrates,.Lt 1.3.49, 5.7.1919 a.D.‚ lebte als DiSpcnent (Später Prokurist) in Dornbirn, dann in einer FeinmechanikA.G. in’Wien Attems Frh.v. Heiligenkreuz Anton Graf Dr.jur.9 geb. 11.2.1899 in Baden bei Wien, Sohn eines Großgrundbesitzers‚ Lt D.R.7‚ später Rechtsanwalt in _ 50.6.1920 a.D.9 lebte in Baden b. Wien9 Wien, in der Deutschen Wehrmacht Hauptmann Sohn 'Balla von Irregh Valentin, geb. 25.10.1899 in Neusatz, eines Obergespans, Lt H.R.16‚ lebte in Budapest, nach 1945 geflüchtet, lebte in Schlcß Flammhof bei St. Nicolai (Stmk). Bardiö Alexander, geb. 28.9.1899 in Sümeg, Sohn eines Notars. Lt H.R.15‚ in die ungarische Armee übernommen, wurde Rittmeister in Szombathely Bartalis von Lengyelfalva Kolcman, geb. 16.5.1899 in Szamcsa Ujvär, Sohn eines Oberkontrollors9 Lt H.B.15‚ in die ungarische Armee übernommen, Später Rittmeister in Budapest BUNDESMINISTERIUM FÜR LANDESVERTEIDIGUNG 1. 2 _ Bedini Kajetan, geb. 8.11.1898 in Eszeg, Sohn eines Honved— Majors,-Lt I.R.78, soll in Jugoslawien leben, Weiteres unben kannt Begic Zdenko, geb. 20.2.1898 in Karlstadt, Sohn eines Gendarmeriew Oberstleutnants, Lt I.R.96, lebte in Novska (Jugoslawien) Beill Rudolf, geb.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics, Legitimacy and Institutional Balance: What Is the EU and Why Is the Commission?
    A Politics, Legitimacy and Institutional Balance: What is the EU and Why is the Commission? Dr Edward Best*, Head of Unit ‘European Decision-Making’, EIPA Maastricht 7 The 2014 European elections were intended to boost the legitimacy of both the European Parliament and the European Commission. The person nominated by the European Council as the next Commission President was the candidate of the European political party which won most seats, and was thus ‘elected’ by Parliament. This process may prove to have contributed to multi-level political participation in the long run. However, it has not (yet) halted the trend of an ever lower turnout in European elections, while the results produced a further weakening of the core centrist, and pro-integration groups in Parliament. Jean-Claude Juncker, the incoming President, stressed that his Commission would be political, not technocratic. He has also suggested that the democratic legitimacy of the Commission comes from the European Parliament. The Commission has always been institutionally accountable to the Parliament, but its role in promoting the general interest of the Union also depends upon its being seen as independent and impartial, and not directly linked to short-term party politics. The legitimacy of this role lies largely in the treaty which created the Commission. On the other hand, greater sensitivity to organised political opinion at EU level is a counterweight to politicisation by national influences, and the supranational appointment of the President is a balance to the composition of one member from each Member State, now including several former Prime Ministers. This may prove to be a new institutional hybrid which is actually rather well suited for the uncertain political times ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicle of an Election Foretold: the Longer-Term Trends Leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ Procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker As European
    LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series Chronicle of an Election Foretold: The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission President Martin Westlake LEQS Paper No. 102/2016 January 2016 LEQS is generously supported by the LSE Annual Fund Editorial Board Dr Joan Costa-i-Font Dr Vassilis Monastiriotis Dr Jonathan White Dr Katjana Gattermann Dr Sonja Avlijas All views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or the LSE. © Martin Westlake Chronicle of an Election Foretold: The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission President Martin Westlake* Abstract By focusing on the near-term campaign in the 2014 European elections analysts have tended to over-look a series of longer-term trends that were jointly and inexorably leading to the Spitzenkandidaten (lead candidate) process and to some at least of the subsequent structural reforms to the Commission. The paper argues that those longer-term trends continue and that the (s)election of Jean-Claude Juncker as President of the European Commission and the structural reforms he subsequently introduced are better understood as steps in ongoing processes rather than fresh departures. Thus, what will happen in 2019 will have been conditioned not only by 2014, but also by previous elections and previous developments, as considered in this paper. Keywords: European Commission Presidency, Jean-Claude Juncker, Spitzenkandidaten, European Parliament, Longer-Term Trends * Visiting Professor, College of Europe, Bruges Senior Visiting Fellow, European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE Email: [email protected] The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention: Public
    THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION Brussels, 7 July 2003 THE SECRETARIAT CONV 844/03 CONTRIB 380 COVER NOTE from Secretariat to The Convention Subject : Contribution of Mr David Heathcoat-Amory, member of the Convention: - “ Systems of Mismanagement ” The Secretary-General of the Convention has received the contribution annexed hereto from Mr David Heathcoat-Amory, member of the Convention. CONV 844/03 1 EN ANNEX Systems of Mismanagement "Mine is not a comfortable position" Whistleblower As the Convention turns to "The Policies and Functioning of the Union" (Part III), it may be worth a moment’s review of how elements of the Communities are presently being mismanaged; how attempts to correct these failings are being stonewalled; and what the Heads of Government could do to achieve reform and restore public confidence. Certainly, the system needs to be fundamentally repaired before we contemplate adding even more powers and responsibilities to those who manage it. I am referring to the issue of fraud, which is close to being institutionalised in key sectors of the Union. After the scandals which led to the unprecedented resignation of the Santer Commission in 1999, there followed promise of major reform. A Commission Vice-President was charged with overseeing the task. However, the promised reform has failed to materialise. The European Court of Auditors continues its annual tradition of refusing discharge for the budget (a practice now in its eighth year). The last independent audit of the Commission Treasury took place ten years ago. No change to the Commission accounting system has yet taken place, despite three years of promises.
    [Show full text]
  • Poetik Und Dramaturgie Der Komischen Operette
    9 Romanische Literaturen und Kulturen Albert Gier ‚ Wär es auch nichts als ein Augenblick Poetik und Dramaturgie der komischen Operette ‘ 9 Romanische Literaturen und Kulturen Romanische Literaturen und Kulturen hrsg. von Dina De Rentiies, Albert Gier und Enrique Rodrigues-Moura Band 9 2014 ‚ Wär es auch nichts als ein Augenblick Poetik und Dramaturgie der komischen Operette Albert Gier 2014 Bibliographische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deut- schen Nationalbibliographie; detaillierte bibliographische Informationen sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddb.de/ abrufbar. Dieses Werk ist als freie Onlineversion über den Hochschulschriften-Server (OPUS; http://www.opus-bayern.de/uni-bamberg/) der Universitätsbibliothek Bamberg erreichbar. Kopien und Ausdrucke dürfen nur zum privaten und sons- tigen eigenen Gebrauch angefertigt werden. Herstellung und Druck: Digital Print Group, Nürnberg Umschlaggestaltung: University of Bamberg Press Titelbild: Johann Strauß, Die Fledermaus, Regie Christof Loy, Bühnenbild und Kostüme Herbert Murauer, Oper Frankfurt (2011). Bild Monika Rittershaus. Abdruck mit freundlicher Genehmigung von Monika Rittershaus (Berlin). © University of Bamberg Press Bamberg 2014 http://www.uni-bamberg.de/ubp/ ISSN: 1867-5042 ISBN: 978-3-86309-258-0 (Druckausgabe) eISBN: 978-3-86309-259-7 (Online-Ausgabe) URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:473-opus4-106760 Inhalt Einleitung 7 Kapitel I: Eine Gattung wird besichtigt 17 Eigentlichkeit 18; Uneigentliche Eigentlichkeit
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Title Page
    The Politics of Change: Reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union A thesis submitted to the Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors with Distinction by Justin Anthony Nigro May 2006 Miami University Oxford, Ohio ii ABSTRACT The Politics of Change: Reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union by Justin Anthony Nigro Beginning with the MacSharry reforms of 1992 and continuing under the Agenda 2000 reform package and the Fischler mid-term review reforms of 2003, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union has experienced a fundamental restructuring in recent years. This was impossible only twenty years before, as proven by the quiet death of the Mansholt Plan in the early 1970s. From where did this impetus to reform originate? I begin by tracing the history of the CAP, dividing it into two stages—1) the evolution of the CAP, ranging from its inception in the 1950s to the end of the 1970s, and 2) the modification of the CAP, from the 1980s onward. After studying the history of the types of reform proposed and pursued, I focus on the major reform period of the last two decades. In this part of the analysis, I investigate the pressures behind CAP reform in the past fifteen years, seeking to explain how internal and external forces compelled policymakers in Brussels either to take or to refrain from action. I identify explanatory variables to characterize the politics of inertia and change within CAP policymaking and decision-making. Lastly, I classify these variables as endogenous or exogenous in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enlarged European Commission European Commission
    Policy Paper n°11 The Enlarged European Commission.Commission. John Peterson John Peterson John Peterson is Professor of International Politics at the University of Edinburgh. He has previously held posts at the Universities of Glasgow, York, Essex, Oxford, and the University of California. He has been a visiting researcher or professor at the Universities of Vienna, Paris, California (Berkeley), University College Dublin, the Centre for European Policy Studies (Brussels), and the College of Europe (Bruges). Current or recent works include: Europe and America: Partners and Rivals in International Relations (Rowman and Littlefield, 2006, forthcoming, 3rd edition) ; The Institutions of the European Union (co-edited with Michael Shackleton, Oxford University Press, 2005, forthcoming, 2nd edition) ; Europe, America, Bush: Transatlantic Relations in the 21st Century (co-edited with Mark Pollack, Routledge, 2003) ; Integration in an Expanding European Union: Reassessing the Fundamentals (co-edited with J H H Weiler and Iain Begg, Blackwell, 2003) Professor Peterson edits the 'New European Union' series (together with Helen Wallace) for Oxford University Press, and was editor of the Journal of Common Market Studies from 1998- 2003. He was educated at Ithaca College, the University of California (Santa Barbara), and the London School of Economics and Political Science. Notre Europe Notre Europe is an independent research and policy unit whose objective is the study of Europe – its history and civilisations, integration process and future prospects. The association was founded by Jacques Delors in the autumn of 1996. It has a small team of six in-house researchers from various countries. Notre Europe participates in public debate in two ways.
    [Show full text]